New York and Seattle are both low-scoring teams that play at slow paces and rely greatly on their goaltenders.
Neither team found the back of the net in regulation — or overtime — when they met earlier this season.
While that’s unlikely to be the case again, my Islanders vs. Kraken predictions are banking on another low-scoring affair.
Let’s take a closer look at my NHL picks for Wednesday, January 21.
Puck-drop is set for 9:30 p.m. ET at Climate Pledge Arena in Seattle, with the game airing on TNT.
Islanders vs Kraken prediction
Islanders vs Kraken best bet: Under 5.5 (+100)
Both of these teams have been kind to Under backers this season. The New York Islanders own an O/U record of 22-26-1, while the Seattle Kraken come in at 19-27-2.
The Islanders rank 22nd in goals per game and don’t score a lot in the best of times. Finding the net is even more challenging without Bo Horvat, who comfortably leads the team in goals despite already missing 13 games, and veteran winger Kyle Palmieri.
They have relied on Ilya Sorokin to do the heavy lifting and he has answered the bell, sporting a .915 SV% through 29 appearances.
He is likely to improve those numbers against a Kraken team sitting 25th in goals per game. Sorokin has made seven appearances vs. Bottom-10 scoring offenses this season, allowing an average of 1.86 goals while posting two shutouts.
He should be able to greatly limit the damage. So, too, should Philipp Grubauer. He owns a .917 SV% on the season and recently held low-scoring teams like the Flames, Predators, and Flyers to one goal each.
With a pair of lower-end offenses set to square off against quality goaltenders, goals will likely be difficult to come by.
Islanders vs Kraken same-game parlay
One would think shooters like Jared McCann and Brandon Montour getting healthy would take volume away from Matty Beniers. Not the case. He has averaged 2.1 shots and 4.9 attempts with those two healthy compared to 1.7 shots and 3.1 attempts without both.
The Kraken have given up the fourth-most shots to defensemen this season, setting up nicely for the offensive-minded Tony DeAngelo to get a couple of pucks on net.
New York has hit the Under in 14 of its last 20 away games (+9.75 Units / 44% ROI). Find more NHL betting trends for Islanders vs. Kraken.
How to watch Islanders vs Kraken
Location
Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle, WA
Date
Wednesday, January 21, 2026
Puck drop
9:30 p.m. ET
TV
TNT
Islanders vs Kraken latest injuries
Odds are correct at the time of publishing and are subject to change. Not intended for use in MA. Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.
This article originally appeared on Covers.com, read the full article here
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Mystery spinner Mujeeb Ur Rahman grabbed a hat trick as Afghanistan warmed up for next month’s T20 World Cup with a series-clinching 39-run win over the West Indies on Wednesday.
West Indies, which lost the first game by 38 runs, got bowled out for 150 in 18.5 overs. Mujeeb claimed 4-21 and became only the third Afghan bowler after Rashid Khan and Karim Janat to accomplish a hat trick in T20s.
Earlier, Darwish Rasooli followed his half-century in the first game with 68 off 39 balls and Sediqullah Atal made 53 in Afghanistan’s total of 189-4 after the West Indies won the toss and elected to field.
Mujeeb had Evin Lewis trapped leg before wicket of a quicker ball before he clean bowled Johnson Charles with a perfect delivery that drifted into the right-handed batter and the West Indies slumped to 38-3 in eight overs.
Mujeeb waited for his hat trick until he returned for his final over in the death overs when top-scorer captain Brandon King (50) holed out at long-on and then finished with a four-wicket haul by clean bowling Quentin Sampson.
“The plan was to keep it simple and hit the stumps,” Mujeeb said. “Didn’t know I was on a hat trick and I was just looking to hit the right areas. Good preparation for us before the World Cup. This win will give us more energy.”
The three-match series concludes on Thursday.
Shimron Hetmyer briefly challenged the tall target with his 46 off 17 balls that featured six sixes before he holed out to sweeper cover while attempting a big shot against Fazalhaq Farooqi (2-28).
Fast bowler Azmatullah Omarzai claimed 2-20 before Farooqi dismissed No. 11 batter Ramon Simmonds to seal the series for Afghanistan with seven balls to spare.
Afghanistan opening pair of Rahmanullah Gurbaz (1) and Ibrahim Zadran (22) exited inside the power play, but Rasooli and Atal combined in a 115-run stand as they dominated both pace and spin.
Atal smacked three sixes and two fours before he holed out to deep square leg in Matthew Forde’s (2-25) return spell and Rasooli fell in the 18th over when he couldn’t clear Alick Athanaze at mid-off.
Omarzai smashed an unbeaten 26 off 13 balls with spinner Gudakesh Motie returning with expensive figures of 0-54 that included 19 runs of the final over.
“Hetty (Hetmyer) played a fantastic innings, but after he got out, I had to be the person finishing it,” King said. “The fielding has been a disappointment but that’s something we keep working on.”
We've reached the midpoint of an NBA season that has been filled with surprises — Detroit and Boston lead the East, San Antonio is second in the West — and also far too many injuries to stars. It's also given us jaw-dropping moments, and not just the ones Victor Wembanyama seems to deliver us on a nightly basis.
The midpoint also means it's time to take stock of the NBA postseason awards. All week long, I will make my picks for some of the NBA's top awards at this point in the season, plus get betting angles from NBC Sports experts. Today: Rookie of the Year.
NBA Rookie of the Year: Kon Knueppel
2. Cooper Flagg 3. VJ Edgecombe
Analysis of Rookie of the Year race
Any analysis has to start here: This is a deep, talented and very entertaining rookie class.
At the top of it are two former Duke teammates who, to me, are a coin flip for Rookie of the Year at this point in Knueppel and Flagg. Neither is playing like a rookie. Their counting stats are relatively even — Knueppel is averaging 19 points per game, Flagg 18.8; Flagg is grabbing one more rebound and dishing out 0.6 assists more a game. Both are playing heavy minutes, and both have been impressive playmakers for rookies asked to carry a lot of their team's offense. Flagg has been the better defender, but Knueppel has held his own.
What separated them for me was that Knueppel has just been more efficient to this point — he's shooting better (particularly from 3) and putting up those numbers on fewer touches and lower usage. By the end of the season, I may well flip these two with my vote, but if the season ended today, I would vote Knueppel.
It's also very close in my mind for the No. 3 spot in this ranking, with the 76ers' VJ Edgecombe getting the nod but Memphis' Cedric Coward (maybe the most overlooked player in this class) right on his heels. If I were voting for the All-Rookie first team this week, those two would be in it with Derik Queen from New Orleans getting the other spot (and he could crack the top three for this award by the end of the season.
Betting ROY Race
We reached out to the NBC Sports betting experts for their thoughts on the Rookie of the Year race and how they might bet it.
Jay Coucher, NBC Sports Lead Betting Analyst
Cooper Flagg is the rightful clear favorite, but Kon Knueppel's historic efficiency for a rookie, combined with the Hornets being a surprisingly frisky top 10 offense, should make the odds slightly tighter than they are currently.
Drew Dinsick, NBC Sports Betting Analyst
The clear favorite is Flagg but his case is far from secure as the Mavs face the 3rd toughest remaining schedule and the Anthony Davis injury makes their likelihood of tanking for draft position much higher. If the Mavs shut down Flagg with meaningful time remaining this season to preserve him for future years, it would not be entirely surprising. The second choice, Kon Knueppel (+600), has the opposite paradigm with the potential of getting wind in his sails. The Hornets have been playing very well of late and are likely in the mix for a play-in spot, if not a seat at the table in the postseason. Kon is effectively tied with Cooper right now in terms of raw production and it would again be unsurprising to see the voters reward his efforts if the Hornets continue to win games and threaten to qualify 8th in the weak East making it a solid bet at price.
Send in your questions now for this week’s episode of The Pindown: A Detroit Pistons Podcast to discuss everything Pistons. Submit your question to the comments section here or on X/Twitter to @TheRealWesD3 and/or @blakesilverman.
Join us live on Saturday morning for the show where we’ll discuss the Pistons’ week of games. Just how impressive was the win over the Celtics? Is Jalen Duren a lock to become an All-Star and join Cade Cunningham? With relatively little chatter surrounding the upcoming trade deadline, will the Pistons make any move?
Plus, The Pindown has a phone line where you can leave a message and hear your voice on the show. Call (313) 355-2717 and leave us a voicemail with your question. Please try to keep the message around 45 seconds or less so we can fit everyone into the show.
The podcast will be uploaded to all audio platforms the following morning.
Venezuelan catcher Fernando Graterol puts pen to paper as the White Sox welcome one of the top international prospects of the class.
The Chicago White Sox officially kicked off the 2026 international signing period last week by announcing a deep class of 18 prospects, spending a significant portion of the $6,679,200 international bonus pool that was allocated to the club this year.
Spread across position players and pitching prospects, Chicago’s international class tilts slightly toward the mound while investing well on both sides of the ball. Leading the way are a pair of dynamic prospects who each project to play key roles in the organization moving forward.
Top of the class: Catcher Fernando Graterol
The crown jewel of Chicago’s class is Venezuelan backstop Fernando Graterol. The 17-year-old bats from the right side and is regarded as one of the top catching prospects in the cohort.
Among his projected plus-tools, Graterol features:
6´2´´ frame with room to continue filling out
Plus bat speed and power with the ability to tap it over the fence as he gets older
6.8-second 60-yard dash time showcasing elite speed and athleticism that’s rare to see from a catcher
Ranked as Baseball America’s No. 27 international prospect and slots in as the top catching prospect in MLB Pipeline’s 2026 class.
Given MLB’s premium on quality catchers along with his offensive tools, Graterol is definitely the cornerstone piece of this White Sox class.
Also anchoring the group is Sebastián Romero, a left-handed hitting outfielder from Los Teques, Venezuela.
Romero features:
Projectable 6´2´´ frame that should continue to fill out naturally with age and strength
A smooth left-handed swing that includes quality contact skills and developing power
Defensive versatility with a chance to stick in center field, though a move to a corner outfield spot could enhance his run-production profile as he progresses
A spot in Baseball America’s Top 50 international prospects at No. 31
Romero has an intriguing combination of tools that should allow him to find success offensively while remaining versatile defensively. If those traits translate, Chicago just added another piece that could help bolster the system’s outfield corps, an area that certainly lacks organizational strength.
Class overview: Depth and balance
Beyond the headliners, this White Sox class features a mix of tools and positional balance:
Nine right-handed pitchers who add to their prospect capital on the mound
Three catchers, including Graterol and two others, as the organization continues to make the backstop position a priority
Three shortstops and three outfielders, diversifying the position talent
Players hail from the Dominican Republic (9), Venezuela (7), Colombia (1), and Mexico (1), underscoring the club’s broad scouting reach
This is the second international class under David Keller, special assistant to the executive vice president and general manager of international scouting. Keller appears to be laying the groundwork for a long-term influx of young talent.
Looking ahead
It’s always difficult to project how teenage signees will translate to big-league talent, but Chicago’s early returns are promising. They now have two top-50 international prospects and have shown a concentrated effort in several premium areas on the path to development. Here’s hoping that many from this specific group can factor significantly on the mound, behind the plate, and on the basepaths moving forward.
Carlos Beltran, Jerry Snyder and Gary Pettis are among the players with incorrect photos on their baseball cards.
They say a picture is worth 1,000 words ... but sometimes those words come from a different book.
When Carlos Beltran was elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame on Tuesday night, collectors might have started searching for his key rookie cards.
Here's the problem: One of those cards, Beltran's 1995 Topps Traded rookie features a photo that is not the eventual Hall of Fame outfielder, but instead is a picture of a teammate who never climbed higher than Class AA.
But Beltran isn't alone with this photo error — in fact, he's not even the first Hall of Famer to have an image of someone else pictured on his card.
Here are seven baseball cards featuring an unfortunate case of mistaken identity.
1995 Topps Traded Carlos Beltran
Beltran was elected to Cooperstown with 84% of the vote, but anyone hunting for his flagship rookie card will likely be disappointed.
Included in 1995 Topps Traded, the front of Beltran’s rookie with the Kansas City Royals actually shows teammate Juan LeBron, an outfielder who would play 12 seasons of professional baseball, but never reached higher than AA in the United States.
According to GemRate, Beltran’s mistaken rookie is by far his most graded card with more than 2,400 authenticated by PSA. PSA adds a designation reading “UER: Juan LeBron Pictured” to each.
The public record for the card, according to data tool Card Ladder, is the $1,138 paid for a BGS 10 Pristine example on eBay in 2005.
Though Leiter would eventually become a two-time All-Star and three-time World Series champion, he wasn’t exactly a recognizable face during rookie camp.
According to Leiter, he was confused for teammate Steve George by photographers when they mistakenly read the “SG” written on George’s glove as Leiter’s No. 56 jersey.
The error was eventually discovered when Leiter was asked to sign a copy for a kid at a Little League banquet in New Jersey.
“Kid came up and said ‘Mr. Leiter, Topps just came out with the ‘88 set, and I have your card, would you sign it?’” Leiter told MLB Network in 2021.
“Yeah, of course, kid. He runs over to his table, he comes back, and he plops this in front of me. Immediately I look, and I’m like, ‘This isn’t me.’”
PSA differentiates the error and the corrected card with “No ‘NY’ On Shirt” (George) and “‘NY’ On Shirt” (Leiter) variations after an updated photograph of Leiter was added with a team logo on his jersey.
To date, PSA has graded 184 copies of the card featuring George and 175 corrected examples with Leiter.
In 2023, a 1988 Topps Tiffany PSA 10 variation of the error card sold for $449 on eBay.
1987 Donruss Opening Day Barry Bonds
One of Barry Bonds’ earliest cards is an unfortunate example that just simply isn’t him.
Bonds would finish his career with 762 home runs, 14 All-Star appearances and a staggering seven MVPs, but back in 1987 he was mistaken for teammate Johnny Ray, an infielder who finished his career with 53 homers and zero All-Star selections.
To date, PSA has graded 177 examples of the Ray error and more than 3,100 copies of the corrected card, which features Bonds in a white jersey with a bat over his shoulder.
According to Card Ladder, the public record for the error card is the $33,000 paid for a BGS 10 Pristine example at PWCC in 2021.
The record for the corrected card featuring Bonds appears to be the $2,000 paid for signed copy on eBay in August 2025.
2021 Bowman Draft Jackson Merrill
A hobby darling at one point, Merrill discovered his first error card when attempting to sign autographs for an upcoming Topps product.
According to The Athletic, Merrill received 3,000 cards from Topps to sign for 2021 Bowman Draft, a prospect product that features players photoshopped into MLB jerseys.
The prospect shown on the card ended up being Isaac Frye, a player mistakenly photographed at a travel ball tournament when Merrill was announced as the hitter and listed in the box score.
That mistake led to Frye being misidentified in photographs and eventually used instead of Merrill in 2021 Bowman Draft.
“All the stats were right, name right, everything right. And then the picture wasn’t me,” Merrill told The Athletic.
Despite the error, PSA has graded more than 4,000 examples of Merrill’s 2021 Bowman Draft card, including parallels and variations.
According to Card Ladder, the record for any variation of the card is the $12,999 paid for the Padparadscha 1/1 on eBay in 2024.
2006 Topps Heritage Jerry Snyder Real One Autograph
Collectors have long coveted Topps’ on-card “Real One” autographs, and few are better than Jerry Snyder’s from 2006 Topps Heritage.
Snyder played just seven seasons for the Washington Nationals from 1952 to 1958, but the inscriptions he delivered nearly roughly 20 years ago punch well above his lifetime .230 batting average.
When signing cards for the set, Snyder added “This isn’t me” inscriptions alongside his signature.
Snyder’s ink from the set has sold for as much as $175 on the secondary market, according to Card Ladder, but has fetched $75 or less in recent sales.
1985 Topps Gary Pettis
Collectors hunting for the next breakout Angels outfielder in 1985 Topps got a Pettis card — it just wasn’t the right Pettis.
Gary Pettis was supposed to appear on the card, but it ended up being his younger brother, Lynn, in the photograph.
According to Gary, Lynn would sometimes dress up in a uniform at the ballpark and shag fly balls. Normally harmless, Lynn ended up in front of the camera and didn’t do much to correct the situation.
"He posed for the picture. I'm sure he had no idea it was going to end up on a baseball card,” Gary told MLB.com in 2018. “And then I think sometime during that offseason, a friend of mine said, 'Hey, you look really young on your baseball card.' I didn't think anything of it. ... Lo and behold, when I finally saw the baseball card later that year I couldn't help but laugh and go, 'Yeah, I do look pretty young because it's not me. It's my brother.'"
Though Pettis told MLB.com he believes it’s a cool story, he refuses to sign autographs on the card.
PSA has graded 49 copies of the card to date.
1988 Donruss Rookies Edgar Martinez
Inducted into the Hall of Fame in 2019, Martinez had a great career after an inauspicious introduction to the hobby.
Seattle signed Martinez in 1982, but he didn’t land on a trading card until 1988 — and it wasn’t even him.
Instead of placing Martinez on the front of the card, Donruss used a photograph of teammate Edwin Nuñez, a pitcher entering his seventh season with the team.
For many trading card mixups, you can see how mistakes can be made with a quick glance. For this card, Nunez and Martinez look nothing alike, resulting in a brutal error from Donruss.
PSA has graded more than 600 copies of the card to date.
Ben Burrows is a reporter and editor for cllct, the premier company for collectible culture. He was previously the collectibles editor at Sports Illustrated. You can follow him on X and Instagram @benmburrows.
The Mets have signed right-handed reliever Luis Garcia to a one-year contract.
The club announced the deal, adding that infielder Tsung-Che Cheng has been designated for assignment.
The 38-year-old Garcia split last season between the Dodgers, Nationals, and Angels, posting a 3.42 ERA (3.28 FIP) and 1.46 WHIP while striking out 48 batters over 55.1 innings (58 appearances).
During his 13-year career, which has also included stints with the Phillies, Rangers, Cardinals, Padres, and Red Sox, Garcia has a 4.07 ERA (3.92 FIP) and 1.42 WHIP in 583.1 innings spanning 603 games.
Garcia has been very good when it comes to keeping the ball in the park, with a career HR/9 rate of 0.8. That rate was a microscopic 0.3 in 2025 as he allowed just two home runs.
With Garcia in tow, he figures to be part of a relief corps that features Devin Williams and Luke Weaver in the back end. The bullpen is also expected to include A.J. Minter and Brooks Raley -- though the start of Minter's season could be a bit delayed following lat surgery this past May.
Huascar Brazoban will also be in the bullpen mix, along with hard-throwing prospects Dylan Ross and Ryan Lambert.
Other relievers who could compete for roles include Jonathan Pintaro (who made his big league debut last season and recently transitioned to relief), Adbert Alzolay (who is on a two-year minor league deal and missed the 2025 season), Richard Lovelady, Alex Carrillo, and Joey Gerber.
At Citi Field this afternoon, the Mets formally introduced their new third baseman, Bo Bichette, to the media. Donning a #19 jersey, Bichette addressed the media alongside Mets President of Baseball Operations David Stearns and two of Bichette’s representatives.
Stearns, in his introductory remarks, called Bichette “one of the most complete right-handed batters in our sport,” as well as praising his baseball aptitude, and his intense desire to win. Stearns said that Bichette made it clear that his focus was “about winning, and our objectives [are] very well aligned there.”
When Bichette took the microphone, he thanked Stearns, Steve and Alex Cohen, and the entire Mets organization for making this happen. “It was very obvious that I wanted to be a Met,” said Bichette. “The organization is looking to win every year and has the opportunity to win every year.” Bichette also praised the roster and their abilities and desire to win.
Bichette didn’t miss the opportunity to get some cheap pop saying that New York was “maybe the best city in the world” and that Mets fans are “some of the best fans in the world,” and that playing in front of these fans is a “pretty cool opportunity.” A number of times Bichette stated that he is “excited to be here and excited to be a Met.”
When asked about the transition to third base and his openness to a position change, Bichette said that he was open to “doing anything if I felt like it was the place I needed to be, and it became very clear that I wanted to be a Met.” Bichette was asked about his relationship with new Met Marcus Semien, and he said that while it was not the reason he signed with the Mets, he looked forward to playing with Semien again.
Jon Heyman asked Bichette about the opt-outs in his contract and whether or not this could be looked at as a one-year deal. Bichette’s agent Greg Genske answered the question for him, “Bo had his choice of long term deals, short term deals, and deals with opt-outs. The important thing is to know that he’s committed to being here and committing to the team…Certainly it was important that we reserve optionality, but his commitment is to the Mets, his desire is to be here and compete for championships here.”
Bichette expressed his desire to be ‘the absolute toughest at bat every time I come to the plate” and talked about how his father, former MLB All-Star Dante Bichette, has drilled in him the importance of driving in runs from a young age.
In a conversation on SNY with Steve Gelbs after the general presser, Bichette mentioned how conversations between the Mets and his camp started at the beginning of the offseason and, again, praised the Mets, their stadium, and their fans. “This is one of my favorite stadiums [to play in]…[I’m excited to play in front of] unbelievable fans that hold you to a high standard.”
After the press conference, Steve Gelbs caught up with David Stearns, who did not have any public questions addressed to him during the conference. Gelbs asked about his approach to bringing in players that make more contact and Stearns pushed back against that slightly, saying that “contact wasn’t the priority per se,” but that they wanted a lineup that top to bottom took competitive at-bats. Stearns pointed to the players that were already on board with the Mets, the new additions, and the young players coming up as all giving the Mets those types of at-bats.
When asked about Bichette’s ability to hit with runners in scoring position, Stearns cited that while there’s not a lot of data to back up the underlying skills that allow for that success, there is a ‘skill in regulating yourself” in order to be more calm and patient in those spots, and that Bichette clearly excels at that part of the game.
In terms of Bichette and Jorge Polanco both being asked to switch positions, Stearns was honest but bullish on the proposition of having “four shortstops on the dirt some days.” He said that there will be “learning moments as they learn the intricacies” of their new positions, but that he believes that the players in question know the game well and have both the aptitude and the work ethic to make the transitions happen.
When asked about the newest Met, Luis Robert Jr., Stearns said that when you look under the hood at Robert’s skills, he still possesses everything that made him an elite player a few years ago. He said that when you see those skills “you want that guy in your organization” and that the team will do all it can to get the best out of Robert and cited the change of scenery may be very good for him.
Stearns then said that while he won’t stop looking, he feels good about the offensive side of the team at this point in the offseason, but that ‘unexpected things’ tend to happen at this point in the season, so he would not rule out additional offensive additions while reiterating how happy he is with that part of the team.
The starting rotation is another story, as Stearns stated that it is ‘[his] preference’ to add a starting pitcher. The team remains ‘engaged on a number of different fronts in that market’ and stated how there’s still plenty of time to make a move on that front.
The Baseball Writers’ Association of America announced the induction of two new members into the National Baseball Hall of Fame on Tuesday night: Carlos Beltrán and Andrew Jones. For the former, it was the fourth ballot he had appeared on before getting the nod, while the latter took nine tries to reach baseball immortality.
Funny enough, the two players were born one day apart, with Jones coming into the world on April 23 and Beltrán bursting on the scene on April 24 back in 1977.
A total of 425 ballots were cast, making it necessary to earn at least 319 votes to get in. The 11 blank ballots received this year were the most since 2011, and the average ballot had 5.8 names checked.
Next in line was Chase Utley, who was the only other former player to crack the 50% mark at 59.1% on his third ballot. Former Detroit Tiger Rick Porcello was among the first-balloters who fell short of the threshold to appear a second time, earning just two votes — both unknown.
It is worth mentioning that this year’s inductees do not come without controversy. Many remember Beltrán for his significant role in the Houston Astros’ cheating scandal, and a large share of folks feel like he does not deserve to be in the Hall because of it.
Between the past and present issues of PEDs, and a myriad of other wild inconsistencies, the drama continues in Cooperstown.
So, fellow Tigers fans, what are your thoughts on this year’s ballot? Is Beltrán undeserving? Did King Felix get snubbed? Will any of the legendary dopers like Alex Rodriguez ever get in? LOL Porcello?
Let us know what you are thinking in the comments below.
It’s an exciting day for fans of San Francisco Giants prospecting. Over at Baseball America, the best top-100 list around has dropped, and for the first time in a long time, it features four Giants: Bryce Eldridge (No. 18), Josuar González (No. 30), Bo Davidson (No. 87), and Jhonny Level (No. 98). Over at There R Giants, 80-grade Giants prospect writer Roger Munter has kicked off his top-50 list, a must-read for anyone with an interest in Giants prospects. And here at McCovey Chronicles, we officially have a top 30, as we continue our community ranking of the 44 best prospects in the Giants system.
Getting us to that point — and winning in a landslide election — is left-handed pitcher Carlos De La Rosa, who makes his CPL debut as the No. 30 prospect in the system.
De La Rosa continues an exciting trend for the Giants: recent additions that strengthen the farm. He closes out the top 30, and he does so by becoming the whopping 10th player in that top 30 who has been acquired in the last six months (for those keeping count, that’s five trade acquisitions, three draft picks, one international signing, and one Rule 5 Draft selection). And that doesn’t even include Drew Gilbert, who is ineligible for the CPL after graduating late last season.
The southpaw, who turned 18 less than two months ago, came to the Giants in the Camilo Doval trade, and is already the third player from that trade to appear on the CPL. He was a late signing by the New York Yankees in the 2025 international signing period out of the Dominican Republic, and spent his debut season in the Dominican Summer League. He wasn’t a particularly heralded signing, but what he did in the DSL opened eyes.
Across 10 games (nine starts) with the Yankees and Giants DSL affiliates, De La Rosa posted just a 4.73 ERA, but his FIP was 2.30, thanks to an utterly absurd strikeout-to-walk ratio. In 32.1 innings, he punched out a staggering 51 batters, while only walking 10.
The DSL is, it goes without saying, a low-level league, but even so, the numbers jump off the page. There were 562 different pitchers who tossed at least 20 innings in the league last year, and De La Rosa was sixth in strikeouts per nine innings (14.20), 65th in walks per nine innings (2.78), and sixth in strikeout rate minus walk rate (27.9%).
De La Rosa’s fastball is his best pitch, and it sits mid-high 90s with 20 inches of induced vertical break, per Baseball America. He also has a decent slider and changeup.
As with all players in the DSL, we’ll learn a lot about where De La Rosa sits in the organization by whether or not he’s repeating the level in 2026, or pitching stateside. Hopefully it’s the latter … he’d look good fronting the Complex League rotation.
Now let’s add to the list, and we have some new names to vote on in the comment section.
Note: Each player’s first name links to their Baseball-Reference page, and their last name links to their Fangraphs page.All stats are from the 2025 season.
The Toronto Blue Jays suffered a heartbreaking defeat last season, blowing a 4-3 lead with one out in the ninth inning as the Los Angeles Dodgers claimed their second consecutive World Series title.
Adding insult to injury for the Blue Jays, the Dodgers have stolen the spotlight from them yet again, signing superstar outfielder Kyle Tucker to a four-year, $240 million deal after Toronto had been considered a frontrunner for him throughout free agency.
MLB odds unsurprisingly have the Dodgers pegged as betting favorites to win a third straight Fall Classic at +350, with the New York Yankees (+750) and Philadelphia Phillies (+1100) among the closest competitors.
Here's a look at the early 2026 World Series odds following LA's splash move.
2026 World Series winner odds
2026 World Series odds over time
Here, we'll track how the World Series odds shift throughout the offseason, free agency, spring training, and 2026 regular season.
Will revisit betting splits as more data is available for the 2026 World Series.
Past World Series winners
The Los Angeles Dodgers won the 2025 World Series by toppling the Toronto Blue Jays in an epic seven-game series.
Here are the last 10 World Series winners, along with their opening odds.
Season
Winner
Opening odds
Runner up
2025
Los Angeles Dodgers
+240
Toronto Blue Jays
2024
Los Angeles Dodgers
+350
New York Yankees
2023
Texas Rangers
+5000
Arizona Diamondbacks
2022
Houston Astros
+800
Philadelphia Phillies
2021
Atlanta Braves
+1000
Houston Astros
2020
Los Angeles Dodgers
+600
Tampa Bay Rays
2019
Washington Nationals
+1800
Houston Astros
2018
Boston Red Sox
+1200
Los Angeles Dodgers
2017
Houston Astros
+1600
Los Angeles Dodgers
2016
Chicago Cubs
+1050
Cleveland Guardians
The biggest World Series underdogs
Below are the 10 World Series-winning teams since 1985 with the longest opening odds.
Season
Winner
Opening odds
1991
Minnesota Twins
+8000
2003
Florida Marlins
+7500
2023
Texas Rangers
+5000
1987
Minnesota Twins
+5000
2013
Boston Red Sox
+4000
2002
Anaheim Angels
+4000
2010
San Francisco Giants
+2500
2005
Chicago White Sox
+2200
2008
Philadelphia Phillies
+2000
2014
San Francisco Giants
+2000
Teams with most World Series titles
Team
World Series titles
Most recent championship
New York Yankees
27
2009
St. Louis Cardinals
11
2011
Oakland A's
9
1989
Boston Red Sox
9
2018
Los Angeles Dodgers
9
2025
San Francisco Giants
8
2014
Cincinnati Reds
5
1990
Pittsburgh Pirates
5
1979
Detroit Tigers
4
1984
Atlanta Braves
4
2021
Chicago Cubs
3
2016
Baltimore Orioles
3
1983
Minnesota Twins
3
1991
Chicago White Sox
3
2005
The New York Yankees are the most decorated team in MLB history, and it isn't close. In addition to winning a whopping 27 titles, they've played in 41 World Series. The Los Angeles Dodgers are second all-time with 23 World Series appearances, while the St. Louis Cardinals have won the second-most championships at 11.
Oh boy, welcome back to our annual Socratic seminar about “should the Celtics make a trade this year?” A tradition unlike any other, it’s one of the most important questions for each Celtics season — answering it can reflect the state of the team, the direction and goals for the coming playoff run or tanking extravaganza. In some ways, it’s the defining concept of each season. To trade or not to trade, that is the question.
Yeah… except it’s actually a stupid question.
Presenting this discussion as a binary between “the Celtics should stand pat with their roster” or “the Celtics should go out and try to improve their roster” is the easiest answer since you asked your 4-year-old niece if she wanted ice cream or not. Of course the Celtics should try to improve their roster! What is the point of paying front office executives and scouts millions of cumulative dollars if you’re not always trying to improve your roster? That would be like asking that same 4-year-old niece about ice cream and you literally own an ice cream shop.
The Celtics are always going to try to get better. The real question is “is it possible to improve this team without needlessly hamstringing its future flexibility?” which is, of course, not a stupid question and one we can actually try to answer. Trading Anfernee Simons to get under the first apron of the luxury tax seemed like a mortal lock until he went sicko mode in the last month and is now very reasonably a Sixth Man of the Year candidate.*
*side note: what the heck is up with the Celtics printing 6MOYs? Brogdon, Pritchard, and now maybe Simons? It seems like there’s a real infrastructure here that we need to dissect. Maybe I’ll get to that in the offseason.
I’m still in favor of trading Simons due to the simple fact that he is capital G Gone at the end of this season. He’s on the final year of a reasonably sized expiring contract, and unless Jayson Tatum can come back, be actually, literally, unequivocally, 100% and the Celtics can compete for a title this year, it seems silly to lose him for nothing. They definitely won’t be able to pay him after this year, so forget about that.
The issue is that the above Tatum situation is still an open question. Tatum launched the mother of all press balloons by staging a full workout in front of reporters, quite intentionally getting the conversation going about whether he’ll be back sooner rather than later. And while it makes me uncomfortable, I’ve long resigned to not judging Tatum and the team’s decision on when he returns. Oh, what, do I have better medical info than Tatum and the team doctors? No, I don’t, so I’ll stay out of it.
We don’t, unfortunately, have any indication of when/if Tatum will return, which also, unfortunately, means we have a classic Schrödinger’s Simons situation. If Tatum returns, I don’t want to trade Simons. If he doesn’t, I do.
For Simons, this is kind of a great situation. He’s playing great and making the case that he should get a decent-sized contract this offseason, and he’s probably okay if that doesn’t come from the Celtics. If Boston trades him somewhere, he might be able to work on an extension with them or start planning his future (which he’s probably already doing).
For the Celtics, this is awkward, because I am unable to responsibly answer the Simons question without more Tatum info. Maybe we’ll get some soon, but for now I’ll punt on that one. Dealing Simons would remove an offensive creator, yes, but that should be made up for by Derrick White figuring out whatever slump he’s in. Couple that with how much future flexibility it will give Boston financially, and it’s probably worth it. But the larger question of “is it possible to improve this team without needlessly hamstringing its future flexibility?” remains unanswered. I’ll speculate anyway.
Save for a Simons deal, I think it probably is not possible to do better than this without doing something irresponsible.
Because of the misfortune that befell Tatum and the rest of last year’s roster, we can imagine this Celtics season as life giving us limes and making limeade (which clears lemonade btw). Now, the limeade we made is insanely good, and each individual lime has managed to produce more lime juice than the top Lime-ologists previously thought possible. As I’ve discussed at length, this team is playing way over its head on so many levels.
Transactions, then, are pretty likely to reduce the quality of the limeade. Say the Celtics packaged Garza and Hauser and a pick for some “better” player. What are the chances that player will immediately assimilate and produce what those two have managed for the Celtics this year on aggregate? Pretty low. Sure, in theory the Celtics are a porous team with lots of growth areas, but that simply hasn’t borne out in reality.
I’m ready to start taking this team seriously as a collection of serious basketball players that work well together, rather than treating it like a fantasy football team that will regress to the mean and thus we need to “sell high.” The sample size is too big for that kind of argument; this works, so I say let it work.
Logan Evans’ future depends on two numbers from his rookie season:
.529 OPS allowed on the first turn through a lineup in a game (fifth best in MLB)
1.022 OPS allowed on the second turn through a lineup in a game (worst in MLB)
That .493 difference was the largest such split in 2025 and one of the 20 largest splits in MLB history. Which number better reflects his true talent?
OPS allowed isn’t the ideal measure for pitchers. I use it here as it’s the parlance of Baseball Reference, which facilitates the comparison. The next plot shows performance against this split using FIP (courtesy of Fangraphs). Here we see a less extreme split, with Evans performing closer to average on the first time through the order, while still the worst in MLB on the second.
Evans’ (relative) success on the first time through the order was thanks to an outstanding ability to limit quality of contact. He didn’t get a lot of whiffs or strikeouts, and his command was just OK. But batters simply could not square up the ball in their first look, either rolling over or getting jammed or popping up or otherwise juuuuuust missing. His .289 xwOBAcon allowed on the first time through the order was sixth in MLB.
On the second time through the order, he was awful by every metric.
The most likely explanation for this phenomenon is that sometimes bizarre splits show up in small samples; Evans accomplished this feat across just 15 starts. The safe analyst would evaluate him by his overall line: 5.05 FIP, 8% K-BB, 1.44 HR/9, -0.1 fWAR. That’s a bottom 20% starting pitcher line posted by a seventh-string, 12th rounder with poor stuff. That’s, frankly, what we should expect from Evans.
Still, it’s hard to ignore that for nine batters a night, Evans was a good or even great pitcher. We care about this split because it’s a possible clue towards something less measurable, something fundamental. We know a lot of pitching is Stuff, but we’re increasingly aware a lot of pitching is other stuff. Batters gain an advantage the more they see a pitcher in a game, so for a pitcher to perform notably in the early or late parts of an outing, that could say something about those less measurable abilities. And for a pitcher at the extremes — Evans certainly is — perhaps it says something about the nature of those abilities themselves. What might we learn about pitching by studying Logan Evans? What might we learn about humanity?
God I love small samples.
Evans in his rookie season showcased a deep, six-pitch repertoire. What he lacked in speed and spin, he made up for in sheer quantity. He could make the ball go in every conceivable direction at release, and batters had a tough time guessing where and when to swing.
We can see that, especially to lefties, Evans mixed his repertoire evenly and unpredictably. Batters had to respect that any one of six pitches might show up, preventing them from teeing off on something specific.
That approach worked on the first time through the order, and most of his pitches were effective against either handedness. But all his pitches got measurably worse across the board once the lineup turned over.
I’m not sure why this was the case. I appreciate that certain skills might be more or less resistant to the times through the order penalty, but to go from so good to so bad is hard to wrap my head around. Perhaps this says something about the impact of movement spread, as coined by Stephen Sutton-Brown for Baseball Prospectus, or the idea that having lots of pitches moving in all directions can keep hitters off balance. Maybe that alone is enough to get through a lineup once, and then raw stuff is necessary from there? Or maybe Evans struggled to disguise (or tunnel) his pitches, as Timothy Jackson recently pointed out for Baseball Prospectus; once they could identify each of his pitches, the jig was up.
Evans enters Spring Training 2026 as depth. His exact proximity to the starting rotation is unclear, whether he’ll continue to serve as second alternate or if he’ll leapfrog Emerson Hancock’s fourth attempt. We only know that opportunity relies on something going wrong, and that something will eventually go wrong. The Mariners are coming off a season where four starting pitchers missed time with some type of injury; one of them still has bone spurs. Evans will pitch in MLB at some point this year.
I’m fascinated to see what if any changes he makes. The Mariners know all that I’ve written here. They’ve seen his splits, they’ve measured his arsenal, and they’ve surely set forth a Plan. Maybe we’ll see him add a pitch, or remove a pitch, or overhaul a pitch, or shift his aim, or adjust his sequencing — something in an attempt to stump batters just a bit longer. It’s worth following for the sake of Evans’ career and the Mariners’ success, but it could also provide a glimpse into the minds of one of the sharper collections of pitching thinkers out there. This is a challenge that justifies our modern Pitching Bureaucracy. This is where organization reputations are earned.
I don’t think anyone really expected another outcome for Cody Bellinger. Did you?
Here’s the deal that returns Bellinger to the Bronx:
Cody Bellinger's deal with the Yankees is for five years and $162.5 million, sources tell ESPN. There are opt-outs after the second and third season, a $20M signing bonus and a full no-trade clause.
Bellinger’s swing seems well-suited for Yankee Stadium, and that shows in his splits from 2025.
Home: .302/.365/.544 with 18 home runs in 298 at-bats Away: .241/.301/.414 with 11 home runs in 290 at-bats
So yeah. Outside of Yankee Stadium, that’s not a hitter who would rate such a contract.
You likely recall that Bellinger had a three-homer game against the Cubs last year, and would have had a fourth if not for this great catch by Kyle Tucker [VIDEO].
(NOTE: This does not suggest I wish the Cubs had re-signed Tucker. It’s just a great play worth noting.)
Anyway, while Bellinger has some opt-outs in this deal, my feeling is that he’ll stay with the Yankees for the five-year term. As noted, he’s a good fit there and the Yankees do, generally, contend every year.
If you’re interested in seeing him play at Wrigley, the Yankees will visit the Cubs for a three-game series July 31-Aug. 1-2. Should be a hot ticket — and not just to see Bellinger.
After a protracted staring contest, the New York Yankees and Cody Bellinger have finally reunited.
Bellinger and the Yankees agreed to terms on a five-year, $162.5 million deal, according to a person with direct knowledge of the negotiations. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the deal is not yet finalized.
The agreement comes after an impasse on the length of contract: Bellinger was aiming for a seven-year commitment, but the Yankees hoped to stick to a five-year deal for the 30-year-old outfielder/first baseman. After potential landing spots were largely short-circuited by the signings of Kyle Tucker and Bo Bichette last week, Bellinger met the Yankees' ask for length of contract, while ensuring a $32.5 million annual salary - highest in Bellinger's career.
Bellinger has experienced a career resurgence after injury-plagued 2021 and 2022 seasons with the Los Angeles Dodgers. Since then, Bellinger thrived with both the Chicago Cubs and New York Yankees, smacking 73 homers and posting a cumulative 12.1 WAR over the last three campaigns.
Here's everything to know about Bellinger's new deal.
Cody Bellinger contract details
Bellinger agreed to a five-year, $162.5 million deal. The contract contains opt-out clauses after the second and third years, but they move back a year if the 2027 season is canceled due to a lockout. Bellinger receives a $20 million signing bonus and $32.5 million each of the first two seasons, guaranteeing him $85 million before his first opt-out.
Cody Bellinger 2025 stats
Bellinger experienced one of his best seasons in 2025, finishing 14th in AL MVP voting in his lone season with the New York Yankees. His 29 home runs mark the third-most he's hit in a season, and his best mark since belting 47 in his MVP season in 2019.
Bellinger slashed .272/.334/.480 across 152 games with New York, accumulating 5.1 WAR in 2025, a stellar mark and his most since 2019. Bellinger also played a tremendous right field in pinstripes, racking up eight Defensive Runs Saved at the position in just 416 innings.
Bellinger has played in at least 130 games in each of the last four seasons, showing a durability after his stint with the Dodgers ended after both shoulder surgery and a lower-leg injury dampened his final two seasons.