Reading catcher Kehden Hettiger (7) signs an autograph for Jake Owens, of Medina, before the home opening-day game between the Akron RubberDucks and the Reading Fightin Phils, April 2, 2026, in Akron, Ohio. | Andrew Dolph / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
Another week of series comes to a close on the farm for the Phillies. Here’s a look at yesterday’s action.
Lehigh Valley 5, Rochester 3
Where it pertains to the Phillies, Brad Keller had another appearance with the IronPigs, throwing a scoreless innings, striking out one. The stuff looked better, which may mean he’s close to returning. With the kids, Robert Moore had two RBI to lead the offense, Payton Henry had two hits, all of which was backed up with a solid start from Drake Fellows (5 IP, 5 H, 3 R, 2 K) and good bullpen work.
New Hampshire 5, Reading 3
Raylin Heredia, have a day. The young outfielder went four for four with a walk and a run scored to lead an offense that couldn’t do much more. Heredia interests me since he seems to be putting up numbers each time we write these up and indeed, he has an .840 OPS with 16 home runs on the year. Alas, he also swings at virtually everything, evidenced by a walk rate that falls below 5%. In his latest prospect rankings, Matt Winkelman did not list him among his top thirty Phillies prospects. Hey, you never know, maybe he’ll discover some plate discipline and turn himself into something useful.
Rome 2, Jersey Shore 0
It’s a little concerning that the BlueClaws team is basically the desert of the Phillies’ farm system. There is barely a top prospect there and they are performing as such, Sunday’s game a microcosm. There was a decent start from Tanner Gresham (5 IP, 4 H, 2 R) that was wasted by nothing coming from the offense. I read an article this weekend about the owners’ proposal to continue outsourcing minor league development somewhere else and how it’s being felt on rosters around the minor leagues. Maybe this is the example in the Phillies’ own system, where Jersey Shore struggles to field decent rosters. At least they have Ramon Marquez (and Cody Bowker, to a smaller extent).
Clearwater 6, Ft. Myers 2
I think we need to start paying more attention to Juan Villavicencio. Having another good day where he’s 2 for 4 with an RBI double continues to raise his profile. Matthew Ferrera had a double and three RBI, Will Vierling had a two-run home run and the offense showed a pulse. There seems to be something bubbling down in Clearwater.
Jul 5, 2026; Houston, Texas, USA; Houston Astros starting pitcher Peter Lambert (38) delivers a pitch during the first inning against the Tampa Bay Rays at Daikin Park. Mandatory Credit: Troy Taormina-Imagn Images | Troy Taormina-Imagn Images
The Yankees have done an excellent job of sucking all the fun from baseball the past two weeks. It feels like an entire June Swoon’s worth of misery has been stuffed into the past 10 days. Unfortunately, I am extremely skeptical we are out of the woods.
The situation could be more dire, however. Thankfully, the Astros made themselves useful this weekend. A day after Yordan Alvarez burnished his MVP candidacy at the dish, outstanding pitching led Houston to another win, thereby handing the Rays a series loss and preventing Tampa from building a daunting AL East lead as the Yankees fester in their own bumbling ineptitude.
Tampa Bay Rays (52-35) 0, Houston Astros (45-47) 2
Today was far from an offensive outburst for either club. But Houston had just enough juice in their bats to eke out the win. First, Christian Walker launched a solo home run in the fourth, his 20th dinger of the season. What a difference a year makes: On this day in 2025, Walker’s season-long slump had him with a .673 OPS and a sub-.400 SLG while today, those numbers are .781 and .470, respectively.
Isaac Paredes followed with a solo shot of his own in the sixth, his 12th. That was enough offense, as the ‘Stros completely shut down Tampa. Peter Lambert continued his strong first half now that he has escaped Coors Field tossing 5.2 shutout innings before handing it over to the ‘pen. A pair of relievers got the game to the ninth, where Josh Hader loomed. Hader walked Junior Caminero (probably smart) to start the frame prior to retiring the next three Rays he saw to seal the game and series.
Toronto Blue Jays (42-48) 0, Seattle Mariners (47-44) 4: At least the Yankees scored a run Sunday. That’s more than Tampa and Toronto can claim. Emerson Hancock took the ball and completely stifled the Jays offense. Hancock tossed seven shutout before the M’s ‘pen took over and notched the final six outs. At the plate, a Seattle backstop hitting south of the Mendoza Line was the hero. No. Not “The Big Dumper.” Mitch Garver clubbed a two-run home run, though Cal Raleigh did manage an RBI on a sac fly. Man. Has anyone had a worse follow-up season after an historically good one?
Cleveland Guardians (47-44) 6, Chicago White Sox (47-42) 7: Early, this one looked like it might be a barn burner. Five combined runs in the first. Chicago scored in each of the opening innings. First team to 10 wins? After Cleveland tied it at six in the home fifth on a Gabriel Arias three-run bomb, that looked possible. But you can’t predict baseball. The White Sox reclaimed their lead in the sixth then both clubs’ bats went silent. The ChiSox bullpen got the final nine outs, allowing only two baserunners. This is a genuinely fun turnaround for a team that was historically awful in 2024. Hopefully they can keep it up.
Daily perspective: Four teams with more wins than the Cubs. The Cubs are on a perfect 90-win pace. 72 games remaining. The Cubs managed one win from the Cardinals. A disappointing weekend, but a good homestand winning four of six. Fangraphs has the Cubs at 71 percent for a postseason spot. The Cubs have an off day Monday before a six-game road trip to Baltimore and Cincinnati. The early Fangraphs projection of those matchups has the Cubs somewhere between a small and medium favorite for the first five of those six games and an underdog in the sixth. An off day, then six road games, then the All-Star break provides a somewhat unusual opportunity to be a little more aggressive with bullpen usage. Matthew Boyd is in line for the two start week. I’m not sure there is per se a better option right now. I haven’t followed injury notes, but Fangraphs thinks Jameson Taillon takes the Saturday start (and no starts for Javier Assad). Taillon threw 3.1 innings in a rehab start for South Bend Sunday, allowed one run, struck out two and threw 45 pitches. So he and Assad could possibly piggyback on Saturday.
Enough perspective for one day. That feels like it at least could be a decent trip. So it’s a good thing the Cubs didn’t spoil the homestand by getting swept. Four of six feels pretty good against two teams that Fangraphs thinks have 41.5 percent and 12.5 percent likelihood of being in the playoffs. Putting a nail in a in no way sealed coffin for the Padres was terrific. That team might be in some amount of disarray right now, but with their bullpen and some of the bats they have there, that’s a team that has a puncher’s chance in a series.
The Cardinals have a tough road ahead and appear to be the third (or fourth) best team in their own division. That’s a tough, though clearly not impossible, road to the playoffs. I think if I could flat out pick where the wins fell, I’d have chosen two in each series, but I really don’t mind the 3/1 split. This is not a year where I feel it totally needed to be 3/1 with the Cardinals being the three.
What went right on Sunday? Javier Assad had a decent start, though he didn’t finish five, using 80 pitches to get two outs into the fifth. He allowed two hits and two walks. The Cubs rode two Cardinals errors in the decisive sixth inning to put together a four run inning. A walk and two hit by pitches in the first inning by Cardinal pitchers also helped the Cub offense.
Long story short, the Cubs were better on Sunday, but they really won this one because the Cardinals were pretty sloppier. Drew Pomeranz returned to the team and appears to be a potential contributor. We’ll see how spotty that will be. But obviously this team had a lot of familiarity with him and a ton of need. The team continues to keep their eyes open. There are a couple of more veteran relievers throwing innings in Iowa for the organization, as the team looks to try to float their injuries until some of the plethora of injured Cub pitchers start working their way back.
I will hat tip that the Cubs led 6-3 after six and ultimately won a game. I’ve belabored a lot that the Cubs really haven’t been involved in games like this, games where the team leads after six and turns it over to the pen to nail it down. I’m not sure how often they can throw Jacob Webb for two innings to nail down a save like this, but he hadn’t thrown all weekend and won’t be needed Monday, so it was a spot where this was an option. Webb has looked better, but knowing they wanted him to get six outs while also knowing he had a three-run lead to work with, this was a fine performance.
Webb now has three saves, matching Daniel Palencia for the team lead. It was a rare three-save week for the Cubs. And true to form for this team, the saves were recorded by three different pitchers. An interesting question is what will the Cubs end up with more of: Different pitchers with saves or walk-off wins? With 10 different players already having saves, you’d knee jerk that it’s going to be hard to find too many other guys to get saves. Pomeranz comes to mind right away. Phil Maton is the only other semi-obvious candidate. But I’ll eat my hat if the Cubs don’t trade for at least one reliever later this month. Then there are also those two veteran arms working at Iowa. Walk-offs are not a thing that are guaranteed to happen. I would probably say walk-offs are at least a 60-40 favorite.
Three Positives:
Nico Hoerner had two plate appearances in scoring opportunities and had a sacrifice fly and an RBI-single, scoring two of six runners he batted with on base on the day.
He had all of those opportunities because Michael Busch (single, two hit by pitch) and Carson Kelly (single, two walks) kept getting on base. Each scored a run.
A hat tip to Jacob Webb for six outs even though he allowed a hit and a walk and an inherited run.
Obligatory PCA update: two singles, hit by pitch, two stolen bases and a run scored. Pete is now on pace for a 30/40 season with 74 walks, 88 RBI and 101 runs. His ascendency to Superstar has been so much fun to watch.
Game 90, July 5: Cubs 6, Cardinals 4 (50-40)
Reminder: Heroes and Goats are determined by WPA scores and are in no way subjective.
THREE HEROES:
Superhero: Javier Assad (.252). 4.2 IP, 17 BF, 2 H, 2 BB, 0 R, 2 K
Hero: Michael Busch (.204). 1-2, 2 HBP, R
Sidekick: Dansby Swanson (.158). 1-4, R
THREE GOATS:
Billy Goat: Tyler Ferguson (-.336). 0.2 IP, 3 BF, H, ER
Goat: Ian Happ (-.089). 0-3, HBP (Cards hit four Cubs).
Kid: Seiya Suzuki (-.072). 0-4
WPA Notes: Despite Ryan Rolison starting the sixth inning meltdown for the Cub pen, most of the WPA falls on Ferguson because they scored while he was pitching. Webb gets knocked for allowing the inherited runner to score. Absent that run, he slips past Dansby for third. Nico’s day doesn’t land higher because his RBI-single didn’t really massive move the needle on expected scoring. Run expectancy thought the Cubs would score 1.83 more runs in the inning before Hoerner’s single and after his RBI-single, total run expectancy for the inning was 2.48.
WPA Play of the Game: Jordan Walker’s three-run homer off of Tyler Ferguson with one out in the sixth turned a two run deficit into a one run lead. (.370)
Cubs Play of the Game: Dansby Swanson batted with runners on first and second with one out, scored tied in the sixth. He grounded to third, but Jose Fermin’s error led to a run and runners on second and third. (.198)
Cubs Player of the Game:
Game 89 Winner: Pete Crow-Armstrong received 83% of 36 votes.
Rizzo Award Standings: (Top 5/Bottom 5)
The award is named for Anthony Rizzo, who finished first in this category three of the first four years it was in existence and four times overall. He also recorded the highest season total ever at +65.5. The point scale is three points for a Superhero down to negative three points for a Billy Goat.
Pete Crow-Armstrong +21
Carson Kelly +14.5
Michael Busch +14
Ben Brown +13.5
Trent Thornton +12.5
Dansby Swanson -9
Edward Cabrera -9.5
Phil Maton -10
Caleb Thielbar -13
Seiya Suzuki -13.5
Up Next: That off day Monday. Matthew Boyd (3-1, 5.08) is scheduled for the first game of the trip. He’s 1-0 with three runs allowed in 9.2 innings since coming off of the IL. He threw 76 pitches in each of the two starts. I’d imagine at this point situation would dictate possibly going a little farther than that going forward.
The 42-49 Orioles have lost six of 10 and have a -28 run differential. They feel like the fifth best team in a division with two titans in it (though the Yankees are free falling right now). 27-year-old right Shane Baz (4-8, 4.19) will get the start. I know him best for his four years here in Tampa with the Rays, though he was the 12th overall pick of the Pirates back in 2017. He had a good start last time against the White Sox in Baltimore, allowing two runs over seven innings. He’s got a 3.30 ERA over his last seven starts (43.2 IP), so this is definitely no gimme.
The Orioles are 12th in runs scored in MLB. Their issue is the eighth most runs allowed. They are 13th in runs allowed by relievers, so the starters have been the problem. If you follow that set of stats around the circle, this is a decent chance for the Orioles to win a game.
The Tampa Bay Rays are short home favorites against the New York Yankees, but I’m taking the near-pick’em road side.
Griffin Jax’s contact profile gives New York a buy-low power matchup, while Cam Schlittler gives the Yankees an edge.
Here are my Yankees vs Rays predictions and MLB picks for July 6.
Who will win Yankees vs Rays today: Yankees Moneyline (-101)
I’m betting the New York Yankees for 2 units and would play them down to -135.
Cam Schlittler is coming off a rough start against the Detroit Tigers, and New York is in its worst stretch of the season, but this price has overcorrected.
My projection is well off the market (around -150), and Tampa Bay Rays starter Griffin Jax gives the Yankees the right rebound matchup. Jax has allowed a 10.7% barrel rate and .483 xSLG, while New York still owns a 9.9% team barrel rate.
With Schlittler’s starter edge, I’m buying the dip.
COVERS INTEL:Jax’s 5.37 expected ERA is the hidden concern. His 3.45 ERA looks playable, but it's a screaming signal for overdue regression.
Yankees vs Rays Over/Under pick: Over 7.5 (+105)
I’m playing the Over because this number is low enough to buy a Yankees offensive rebound against the right starter. Jax's barrel rate is a problem against an offense that still ranks in the top three of the sport in barrel rate and hard-hit rate.
This enables at least one crooked number inning, and that may be all you need.
Schlittler is the better arm, but asking the Rays to score around 3 runs isn't out of reach. I'd play this down to -130, with an 8.2-run projection.
Chris Hatfield's 2026 Transparency Record
ML/RL bets: 34-32, +3.77 units
Over/Under bets: 41-27, +18.40 units
Yankees vs Rays weather
Excessive heat with a chance of showers is expected in the Tampa Bay area tonight.
Yankees vs Rays odds
Moneyline: Yankees +100 | Rays -120
Run line: Yankees +1.5 | Rays -1.5
Over/Under: Over 7.5 | Under 7.5
Yankees vs Rays trend
The New York Yankees have hit the Moneyline in 12 of their last 19 away games (+3.70 Units / 15% ROI). Find more MLB betting trends for Yankees vs. Rays.
How to watch Yankees vs Rays and game info
Location
Tropicana Field, St. Petersburg, FL
Date
Monday, July 6, 2026
First pitch
6:40 p.m. ET
TV
YES, Rays.TV
Yankees starting pitcher
Cam Schlittler (8-5, 2.08 ERA)
Rays starting pitcher
Griffin Jax (4-5, 3.45 ERA)
Yankees vs Rays latest injuries
Odds are correct at the time of publishing and are subject to change. Not intended for use in MA. Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.
DALLAS, TEXAS - JUNE 29: A detail view of a Dallas Mavericks logo before the introduction of Dallas Mavericks head coach Dusty May before a press conference at American Airlines Center on June 29, 2026 in Dallas, Texas. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Ron Jenkins/Getty Images) | Getty Images
I know things start to break, so here’s a new one.
As I’m publishing this, the NBA Free Agency moratorium is ending shortly. That means a lot of reported deals get signed, but perhaps there will be surprises too. Then later this week we’ll have NBA Summer League to cover. Dallas plays Thursday, Saturday, and Monday. A significant cohort of Mavs Moneyball staff is going, so if you’re going, let me know.
The Mavericks actually have a pretty good team, so expect decent enough basketball.
As usual, have fun within this space. Let me know if there are issues.
The Philadelphia Phillies and Kansas City Royals wrap up a three-game set this afternoon, with Cristopher Sanchez taking the mound for the visitors.
My Phillies vs. Royals predictions and MLB picks lean toward Philly taking the finale, given their ace's recent dominance.
Who will win Phillies vs Royals today: Phillies -1.5 (-126)
Philadelphia Phillies lefty Cristopher Sanchez has been brilliant this season, compiling a 2.00 ERA overall. That success hasn't stopped lately, either. Sanchez sports a 2.69 FIP across his last two outings, allowing just 0.75 HR/9.
On the other side, the Kansas City Royals send Noah Cameron to the hill. He owns an alarming 9.38 xERA over the last two weeks. He's allowed 11 earned runs across his previous two outings.
Cameron's recent struggles are a recipe for disaster against a hot Phillies offense. They own a .211 ISO over the last six contests and a 44% hard-hit rate as a lineup during that span.
Phillies vs Royals Over/Under pick: Over 8.5 (+101)
I expect the Phillies to do the majority of the scoring off Cameron, but Sanchez doesn't need to have a poor outing for this game to reach the Over. Even a couple of runs from Kansas City before the bullpens take over would put this total in a favorable position
When it comes to the bullpens, Kansas City's relievers have posted a 4.50 FIP over the last week, allowing a 42.6% hard-hit rate. They've held their own, but the bullpen hasn't been unstoppable, either. As for the Phillies pen, they've compiled a 3.86 FIP over that same span, walking 4.85 hitters per nine.
With a relatively low total and the Phillies offense capable of putting up five or six runs of their own, a 7-2, 8-3 scoreline seems realistic here.
I'll play this pick up to -110.
Quinn Allen's 2026 Transparency Record
ML/RL bets: 33-29, +2.97 units
Over/Under bets: 34-27, +1.40 units
Phillies vs Royals weather
Conditions should be favorable for offense this afternoon, with temperatures climbing into the mid-80s under mostly clear skies. Winds are expected to remain light at around 5–6 mph. The warm weather could help well-hit balls carry a bit farther, giving hitters a slight boost, though the starting pitching matchup will likely remain the biggest factor in determining the outcome.
Phillies vs Royals odds
Moneyline: Phillies -194 | Royals +186
Run line: Phillies -1.5 (-122) | Royals +1.5 (+117)
Over/Under: Over 8.5 (+108) | Under 8.5 (-113)
Phillies vs Royals trend
The Phillies have cashed the team total Over in 10 of their last 14 games for +5.85 units and a 36% ROI. Find more MLB betting trends for Phillies vs. Royals.
How to watch Phillies vs Royals and game info
Location
Kauffman Stadium, Kansas City, MO
Date
Monday, July 6, 2026
First pitch
2:10 p.m. ET
TV
NBCS-Philadelphia, Royals.TV
Phillies starting pitcher
Cristopher Sanchez (10-3, 2.00 ERA)
Royals starting pitcher
Noah Cameron (4-6, 4.95 ERA)
Phillies vs Royals latest injuries
Odds are correct at the time of publishing and are subject to change. Not intended for use in MA. Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.
DENVER, COLORADO - APRIL 27: Kyle Anderson #12 of the Minnesota Timberwolves warms up before Game Five of the First Round of the NBA Western Conference Playoffs against the Denver Nuggets at Ball Arena on April 27, 2026 in Denver, Colorado. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Matthew Stockman/Getty Images) | Getty Images
There’s a specific kind of anxiety that lives in your phone now.
You’re at the grocery store or walking the dog or doing whatever normal people do in July when basketball isn’t happening, and a notification slides down from the top of the screen. Shams Charania, ESPN. You see a player’s name. Kyle Anderson. You see the years. You see the dollar figure. But you can’t see the team. Not until you tap it. Not until you open the app and let the full post load and your stomach does that little half-second gymnastics routine while your brain screams please don’t be Dallas, please don’t be Dallas, please don’t be…
Toronto Raptors.
Oh, thank the basketball gods.
This has happened to me at least five times in the last week. And every single time, the relief has been real, physical, almost spiritual. Because the Mavericks are having a quietly excellent offseason, and a huge part of what makes it excellent is what they haven’t done.
Masai Ujiri’s front office drafted Morez Johnson Jr. at nine. They grabbed Sergio de Larrea later in the first round via trade. They appear committed to holding onto Kyrie Irving as he returns to the floor this year. They traded a heavily protected first-round pick and two future seconds for Santi Aldama, a 25-year-old combo forward who averaged 14 points and nearly seven rebounds last year. They have a year-two Cooper Flagg who won’t turn 20 until December. Dereck Lively II is reportedly 7’3” now with a 7’9” wingspan. The positive ledger is long and it’s real.
But I want to talk about the negative space. The signings that didn’t happen. The alternate timeline.
The Darkest Timeline Has a Name
Because here’s the thing: as dark as the actual timeline got after the Dončić trade, we can imagine a darker one. A timeline where Nico Harrison and Jason Kidd are still running this franchise, scrolling through free agent lists with the same philosophical blinders that produced the worst trade in franchise history and perhaps in professional sports.
Harrison’s front office had a type. If you came up through the AAU circuit, if you were a sneaker-convention fixture, if you were a recognizable NBA name who could be acquired through a relationship rather than through rigorous evaluation, you were in the pipeline and on the dubious trade-target list, where Jrue was perilously close to the Joker. If you were a 20-year-old guard lighting up the ACB in Spain? Probably not on the radar.
The Harrison regime shed its European connective tissue and never replaced it with an overseas find of its own. There was no impactful effort to scout or recruit international talent from overseas that turned over a single gem during that era. The scouting lens was narrowed in its final analysis to who Nico knew or approved of in the abstract, and the results looked like it.
So let’s play a game. Let’s look at a few free agent moves from the last week, imagine how each one might have played out in the somehow-still-here Harrison timeline, and collectively exhale.
Kyle Anderson → Toronto Raptors (1 year, $3.9 million)
Anderson is 32, entering his 13th season, and has been traded to five different teams in the last two years. He’s a solid, unconventional player. In the Harrison timeline, Slow Mo might have been the starting small forward, with Nico calling it “veteran leadership.”
Have a nice season in Toronto, Kyle.
Mike Conley → Boston Celtics (1 year, minimum)
Conley is 38 years old and entering his 20th NBA season. He averaged a career-low 4.5 points in 18 minutes a game last year. He is, by all accounts, a wonderful human being and a respected locker room presence.
He is also the exact player Nico Harrison would have signed instead of trading for Marcus Sasser. I can see the press conference. I can hear the phrase “championship run.” I can feel my soul leaving my body.
Enjoy Boston, Mike.
Keon Ellis → Brooklyn Nets (2 years, $18 million)
Ellis is 26 and a perfectly useful 3-and-D wing who’s a little undersized at 6’4” and not much of a playmaker. He’s not a bad player. He may even be a helpful one in Brooklyn.
That’s the point. A disciplined front office can pass on a decent player because he doesn’t quite fit the build. The old Mavericks too often treated available and familiar as if they were synonyms for sensible. Sometimes the sign of a grown-up front office is not that it avoids obvious disasters. Sometimes it just declines the wrong perfectly fine player at the wrong perfectly fine price.
Good luck in Brooklyn, Keon.
Javonte Green → Detroit Pistons (1 year, $3.95 million)
Green re-signed with Detroit at 32, and this is the one that you can imagine easily in a post-Luka delusional Nico timeline. If he were still here, Harrison could easily be envisioned welcoming Javonte Green as the quintessential “win now charade” signing.
A 30-something journeyman role player who fills a roster spot and lets a GM gesture toward activity without actually building anything. In the Harrison timeline, Green is your sixth man and you’re being told to feel good about it.
Tobias Harris → San Antonio Spurs (2 years, $31 million)
Harris signed with a division rival for $31 million fully guaranteed, pushing his career earnings past $330 million. He’s turning 34 this month. He’s a fine player who will give San Antonio respectable minutes next to Wembanyama.
He’s also the kind of name and price tag that would have had Harrison feeling great about himself at the introductory press conference and Mavericks fans doing cap sheet math by December.
The Spurs can have him. Bon appétit.
Kyle Lowry → Retired
And then there’s Kyle Lowry, who announced his retirement this week. He’s 40 years old. He played 14 games last season as a locker room mentor in Philadelphia. The Raptors are signing him to a one-day contract on Monday so he can retire in Toronto, where he belongs.
In the Harrison timeline, Nico is on the phone before Kyle even gets the chance to schedule that ceremony. He’s pitching a championship run. He’s talking about those 40-year-old knees having one more season in them. He’s describing a veteran mentorship role that somehow also involves 22 minutes a game.
The Raptors are trying to set up a podium, and Nico Harrison would be trying to talk Kyle Lowry out of using it.
What the Negative Space Tells You
None of this is meant to disrespect any of those players. They’ve all had real careers and earned their money. The point is about organizational philosophy, and what it reveals when a front office consistently declines to do the thing that the previous regime would have done reflexively.
The Ujiri front office didn’t sign a single one of those players. They drafted a dynamic frontcourt player from Michigan, whose coach they just hired. They drafted a guard from the top Spanish league who’s drawing blatantly unfair early comparisons to another nifty passer with a Euro league past. They traded for a young combo forward on a team-friendly deal. Everything they’ve done has felt intentional. Even the things that haven’t worked out feel like they came from a plan rather than from panic.
The Mavericks are rebuilding. You don’t pass on Morez Johnson Jr. at nine because Daniel Gafford is still on the roster. You don’t decline to trade for a 25-year-old combo forward at Aldama’s price because PJ Washington is still here. Those are veteran contracts, and veteran contracts move. There are months between now and the start of the regular season, and there is at least another year before genuine playoff aspirations should extend beyond a first-round exit at best.
Ujiri has been in the job for five proverbial minutes. The roster has open surgery scheduled. Diagnosing the patient mid-procedure and calling it a failure is the kind of analysis that sounds smart in a column and evaporates the moment a single trade clears the logjam that everyone, including the front office, already knows is there.
I’d love to be proven wrong on the timeline and see meaningful basketball deep into the playoffs out of nowhere. But calling this offseason a loss because the rebuild isn’t finished in week one? Bleak and dour stuff from a guy who should know better.
The Mavericks aren’t done building. The offseason still has moves to make and questions to answer. But right now, every time a Shams notification slides down your screen and the team turns out to be someone else, you can exhale.
The adults are running this.
Have a nice season, gentlemen. Genuinely. Just not here.
The Dodgers (59-32) are pulling away from the NL West and have the Rockies (37-54) on deck for a three-game series. Los Angeles is 5-2 versus Colorado this season with four straight wins. The Dodgers swept the Rockies in three games over their past series.
Los Angeles had its three-game winning steak snapped in a 5-2 loss to San Diego on Sunday. The Dodgers are 14-6 in the past 20 games and only lost back-to-back games once since mid-May. Los Angeles' offense is cooking with top 10 ranks in BA, OPS, OBP, SLG, runs scored, and hits over the past week (seven games).
The Rockies have won four of the last five games and scored 46 runs in the process. Colorado's offense is hitting .304 over the last week (seven games), which ranks second, along with their OPS, OBP, and SLG. Colorado has won three straight starts by Kyle Freeland, but the 33-year-old lefty has his worst start of the season versus the Dodgers with eight earned runs on nine hits over four innings.
Let’s dive into the matchup and find a sweat or two.
We’ve got all the info and analysis you need to know ahead of the game, including the latest info on the how to catch first pitch, odds, recent team performance, player stats, and of course, our predictions, picks & best bets for the game from our modeling tools and staff of experts.
Follow Rotoworld Player News for the latest fantasy and betting player news and analysis all season long.
Game details & how to watch Rockies at Dodgers
Date: Monday, July 6, 2026
Time: 10:10 PM EST
Site: Dodger Stadium
City: Los Angeles, CA
Network/Streaming: MLB TV
Never miss a second of the action and stay up-to-date with all the latest team stats and player news. Check out our day-by-day MLB schedule page, along with detailed matchup pages that update live in-game with every out.
Odds for the Rockies at the Dodgers
The latest odds as of Monday:
Moneyline: Los Angeles Dodgers (-231), Colorado Rockies (+188)
Spread: Padres +1.5 (-105), Dodgers -1.5 (-114)
Total: 10.0
Probable starting pitchers for Rockies at Dodgers
Monday's pitching matchup (July 6): Eric Lauer vs. Kyle Freeland
The Dodgers’ Shohei Ohtani is hitting .288 with 90 hits, 18 home runs and 51 RBI over 312 at-bats
The Dodgers’ Alex Freeland is hitting .226 with 42 hits and 63 strikeouts over 186 at-bats
The Rockies’ Troy Johnston is hitting .313 with 83 hits, 3 home runs, and 39 RBI over 265 at-bats
The Rockies’ Ezequiel Tovar is hitting .208 with 61 hits and 84 strikeouts over 293 at-bats
Rotoworld still has you covered with all the latest MLB player news for all 30 teams. Check out the feed page right here on NBC Sports for headlines, injuries and transactions where you can filter by league, team, positions and news type!
Top betting trends & insights to know ahead of Rockies at Dodgers
The Dodgers are 44-47 ATS
The Rockies are 49-42 ATS
The Dodgers are 49-42 to the Under, ranking seventh-best
The Rockies are 45-43-3 to the Under
The Dodgers are 18-26 ATS at home, ranking sixth-worst
The Rockies are 23-18 ATS on the road, ranking sixth-best
Expert picks & predictions for tonight’s game between the Rockies and the Dodgers
Rotoworld Bet Best Bet
Please bet responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline at 1-800-522-4700.
Our model calculates projections around each moneyline, spread and over/under bet for every game on the MLB calendar based on data points like past performance, player matchups, ballpark information and weather forecasts.
Once the model is finished running, we put its projection next to the latest betting lines for the game to arrive at a relative confidence level for each wager.
Here are the best bets our model is projecting for Monday's game between the Rockies and the Dodgers:
Moneyline: NBC Sports Bet is recommending a play on the Dodgers on the Moneyline.
Spread: NBC Sports Bet is leaning towards a play ATS on the Dodgers at -1.5.
Total: NBC Sports Bet is recommending a play on the Under on the Game Total of 10.0
Follow our experts on socials to keep up with all the latest content from the staff:
It's a 6-pack of action in the NBA Summer League on Monday, with most eyes set on a dynamite matchup between No. 2 pick Darryn Peterson and No. 3 pick Cameron Boozer, as the Jazz take on the Grizzlies.
Other top 10 players that should be in action include Sacramento's Darius Acuff Jr, the debut of Brooklyn's Mikel Brown Jr (no. 6), and Atlanta's Kingston Flemings, the no. 9 pick.
Check out my NBA Summer League Predictions and free NBA picks for Monday, July 6.
NBA Summer League predictions for July 6
Pick
Memphis Grizzlies moneyline
-133
Sacramento Kings moneyline
+150
Atlanta Hawks moneyline
+100
Today's Summer League Picks
Grizzlies moneyline (-133 at Kalshi)
Utah Jazz rookie Darryn Peterson starred in his debut in an overtime win over Atlanta, pouring in 21 points on a cool 11-for-21 shooting.
Cameron Boozer looked great in his debut too, piling up 15 points on 7-for-11 shooting, four boards and four assists in a blowout win over OKC.
Different positions, but this is the first of many head-to-head matchups we will see at the pro level, and I think both want to shine.
Peterson wins the duel, but this Memphis Grizzlies roster is a little supercharged, with legit star Cedric Coward on the roster, and former 2023 Round 1 picks Olivier Maxence-Prosper and Taylor Hendricks battling for roster spots.
Kings moneyline (+150 at Kalshi)
Darius Acuff quite literally fit his pre-draft profile to a T in his debut: he led the Sacramento Kings in scoring with 25 points and wasn't bashful about hoisting them up, going 9-for-29 from the field while also adding three assists.
As I predicted, the hungry Milwaukee Bucks hammered the split Warriors squad, but then followed that up by getting beaten by 20 points by the Nets.
Acuff sat out the Kings' 91-85 win over Warriors Blue, and they may have unearthed a rotational big in Victor Lakhin.
The 6-foot-11 Russian, who went undrafted last year, led the Kings with 12 points, six rebounds and an assist.
The Bucks have yet to showcase their lottery picks, Braydon Burries and Nate Ament, in Summer League play, but the Kings should roll here.
Hawks moneyline (+100 at Kalshi)
The Oklahoma City Thunder Summer League roster consists of their three 2026 draft picks: Aday Mara, Bennett Stirtz, and Otega Oweh; 2025 2nd-Rounder Brooks Barnhizer; and 14 undrafted players, ranging from as far back as 2022 (Buddy Boeheim!) to eight from this last draft.
It's an experimental roster – as the Thunder are contender-ready, with even their top draft picks likely riding pine behind a slew of talent.
It's a different story for the Atlanta Hawks, who need their picks to fill legit roster spaces on a team that should be in the NBA Eastern Conference mix.
The three expected to make the most impact looked great in their debut.
No. 9 pick Kingston Flemings had 14 points, nine assists and four steals, while 13th pick Zuby Ejiofor had eight points and 11 boards (seven on the offensive end). Second-year man Asa Newell tied for the scoring lead with 15.
They should again be prominent over a Thunder side that's really just trying to catch some kind of lightning in a bottle.
Start trading with Kalshi today!
Sign up now using our exclusive Kalshi promo code 'COVERS20' and get a $20 trading bonus after you trade $20 on any other event contracts — including NBA Summer League!
Sign Up Now at img src="https://img.covers.com/betting/sportsbooks/336/kalshi.svg" alt="Kalshi" width="100" height="28" style="vertical-align: middle;"
*Eligible U.S. locations only
Monday’s NBA Summer League parlay
Grizzlies moneyline
Kings moneyline
Hawks moneyline
+776 at Kalshi
Odds are correct at the time of publishing and are subject to change. Not intended for use in MA. Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.
LOS ANGELES, CA - JULY 05: Mason Miller #22 and Fernando Tatis Jr. #23 of the San Diego Padres celebrate their win following an MLB game between the San Diego Padres and the Los Angeles Dodgers on July 5, 2026 at Dodger Stadium in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Greg Fiore/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images) | Icon Sportswire via Getty Images
After eight grueling games the San Diego Padres have ended their losing streak with a 5-2 win over the Los Angeles Dodgers in the final game of their four-game series at Dodger Stadium. Not only was it the end of the losing streak, but it was also the end of the San Diego road trip that saw them get swept by the Chicago Cubs in three games and drop the first three games to Los Angeles.
JP Sears was the unlikeliest of heroes for the Padres, making his third start since being called up from Triple-A El Paso. The left-hander completed five scoreless innings and allowed just one hit with two walks and five strikeouts. Sears actually had a no-hitter into the fifth inning but allowed a two-out single to Miguel Rojas before finishing the inning with a strikeout of Alex Freeland. Sears recorded three of his five strikeouts in his final inning of work.
San Diego gave Sears a 1-0 lead in the top of the fourth inning after a Manny Machado walk and a Gavin Sheets single. Jackson Marrill came to the plate with runners at first and second and two outs in the inning. He then hit a sharp ground ball through the right side of the infield which allowed Machado to score from second base to give the Padres the lead. San Diego added to its total in the seventh when Sung-Mun Song walked and stole second before Luis Campusano singled to open the inning. Fernando Tatis Jr. beat out an infield single and Song came into score to give the Padres a 2-0 lead. Miguel Andjuar followed Tatis with a flyball out, which brought Machado to the plate with two on and one out. The third baseman connected on a ball that went out over the center field wall to push the San Diego lead to 5-0.
Los Angeles responded in the bottom of the seventh inning after a leadoff walk to Teoscar Hernandez. Alex Call struck out for the first out of the inning and Kyle Tucker singled to right field off new reliever Adrian Morejon. Freeland followed with a single that allowed Hernandez to score to get the Dodgers on the board, 5-1. After a strikeout of Tommy Edman, Morejon allowed a single to Shohei Ohtani, and the Padres lead was cut to 5-2. Morejon ended the threat and the inning with a three-pitch strikeout of Andy Pages.
San Diego mounted another scoring threat in the top of the ninth with two on and one out but a groundout from Sheets and a flyout from Ty France left the runners at second and third and gave Mason Miller an opportunity to come in for the save in the bottom of the ninth. The right-hander made quick work of his inning and struck out Tucker before getting Freeland and Dalton Rushing to flyout.
Jake Peavy said it best on the NBC broadcast, for the Padres to get back into the playoff picture their stars have to star and that is what Tatis and Machado did in the final game against the Dodgers. Tatis finished 3-for-5 with an RBI and a run scored, while Machado finished 1-for-2 with three walks, three RBI and two runs scored. Of course, the biggest contribution was the three-run home run from Machado in the seventh which proved to be a game winning home run.
San Diego returns to Petco Park to take on the Arizona Diamondbacks today at 6:40 p.m.
The Padres damaged their playoff chances with their long losing streak, which means they now have to play catchup according to Tom Krasovic of the San Diego Union-Tribune.
I might be one of the few writers here that has no experience in radio, but I remember my old journalism classes and one of the things they taught us is that the average audience turns over every 15 to 20 minutes. That was literally in the last century and I’m sure that ballpark has changed some, but the concept is still very much the same. I try to take the same concept to the writing game. There will be new readers all the time, so it pays off to revisit concepts every now and then.
Offensive efficiency is a very simple stat. You simply take the total percentage of base runners that have crossed home plate. Obviously, it’s not absolutely perfect. You get hitters that reach on an error and baseball-reference.com doesn’t keep track of those. It is what we in the stats world would call noise where we assume it is fairly constant throughout the 30 teams and simply move on. So, you add up hits, walks, and hit by pitches and then divide runs into that.
The results are important, but the why is probably more important. The main reason we do it is to guard against what we might call regional bias. In other words, we watch the Astros and mainly the Astros. So, it often seems they are bad at leaving runners on base and on third with less than two outs in particular. Are they really bad in comparison with the rest of the league? That’s where offensive efficiency comes in.
Of course, tracking this data tells us many other things. Where do the Astros rank in total base runners? Where do they rank in walks? Is this a good offense overall? They were one of the worst offenses in the AL last season and that was particularly true in terms of offensive efficiency. They ranked 13th out of 15 AL teams in that department and it got both hitting coaches fired. So, are the new hitting coaches doing any better? The stats below are the team stats coming into the fourth of July.
Runs
Hits
Walks
HBP
TBR
EFF
Yankees
422
679
343
17
1039
.406
Twins
431
739
292
54
1085
.399
White Sox
418
702
298
52
1052
.397
Orioles
406
704
339
23
1066
.381
Astros
401
728
298
39
1065
.377
Angels
393
712
290
54
1056
.372
Athletics
406
747
326
32
1105
.367
Rays
388
738
306
36
1080
.359
Tigers
370
693
318
29
1040
.356
Blue Jays
356
730
244
35
1012
.353
Royals
363
714
285
32
1031
.352
Mariners
357
679
298
57
1034
.345
Guardians
355
669
333
29
1031
.344
Red Sox
342
701
249
44
994
.344
Rangers
364
723
293
44
1060
.343
Average
385
711
301
38
1050
.367
The average is pretty telling here and we can break this down with all kinds of regression analysis, but we should probably pair this down and keep it simple. The Astros have an above average offense in the American League. They are above average in runs scored, hits, total base runners, and offensive efficiency. They only really lag in one major category and that is walks. Of course, lagging needs to be put in air quotes. They are more or less league average in that category.
Numbers are always the easiest part of statistical analysis. The whys and what fors are the hardest. Are the gains primarily because of the hitting coaches or are they because Yordan Alvarez is healthy and playing the best baseball of his career? Most would probably point towards the latter. In fact, if you do nothing but look at Alvarez and Christian Walker then you probably have seen all of the gains the Astros have made between 2025 and 2026.
Do the hitting coaches deserve credit for that? That’s a harder question. Is Walker’s resurgence due to adjustments he has made or simple regression to the mean? It’s always some of both in these instances. In other words, Walker was probably not going to be as bad regardless of who the hitting coach was. Suffice it to say, this is the Walker the Astros thought they were signing. When you couple that with Alvarez and a healthy Isaac Paredes and you have the bulk of your offense right there.
Our default expectation is always a regression to the mean. In other words, teams will eventually tighten and get closer to the average. In the Astros case, the expectation is some form of slowing down. Of course, the components can change and if they do then the results can change. Adding Lamont Wade and Taylor Trammel to the starting lineup could change that some. A trade down the line could change that some as well. Getting Jeremy Pena back and hitting the way he was before he went on IR could change that calculus some.
The worry is that both the Texas Rangers and Seattle Mariners are due for positive regression. The Astros have worked very hard to get back into the race, but their finish depends not only on their ability to keep their head above water but on the other teams in the AL West continuing to struggle. A large part of that is going to be to see what the other teams in the division do at the trade deadline.
Next time around we will look at the pitching side of this equation. We know (or think we know) that the Astros are one of the worst pitching teams in baseball. Is that simply a function of allowing too many base runners or have they been inefficient in limiting those base runners from crossing home plate? Stay tuned for the next lab. In the meantime, what do you think is the best way to avoid falling back to the pack? What changes would you make?
A fresh week of Major League Baseball is loaded with plenty of opportunities to keep things green, is in front of us, with eight MLB contests to keep us busy on this fine Monday.
Here are my favorite MLB picks for tonight’s MLB slate.
MLB moneyline picks for July 6
Matchup
Pick
Phillies vs Royals
-199
Yankees vs Rays
-108
Astros vs Nationals
+108
Mets vs Braves
-120
Brewers vs Cardinals
-111
Diamondbacks vs Padres
-106
Blue Jays vs Giants
+102
Rockies vs Dodgers
+203
Prices courtesy of Polymarket as of 7-6.
Trade on the MLB at Polymarket!
Sign up now using our exclusive Polymarket promo code 'COVERS' (on your mobile app only) and get a $50 trading bonus after you deposit $50 to trade on any other event contracts — including MLB moneylines!
Sign Up Now at img src="https://img.covers.com/editorial/2026/polymarketlogo.png" alt="Polymarket" width="100" height="28" style="vertical-align: middle;"
*Eligible locations only
Expert MLB moneyline picks for July 6
Phillies vs Royals: Phillies (-199)
Phillies win probability: 66%
It is hard to justify laying nearly 2/1 odds, but aside from Bobby Witt Jr. and Jac Caglianone, the Kansas City Royals' lineup has been lifeless. Over their last 12 games, they own a 71 wRC+, .269 wOBA, and .608 OPS. Meanwhile, the Philadelphia Phillies send their ace to the mound and continue to swing the bats well. Lay the run line.
Yankees vs Rays: Rays (-108)
Rays win probability: 52%
I do not give a single hoot that Cam Schlittler is on the mound tonight for the New York Yankees. Their offense owns a 49 wRC+ over its last 12 games. Forty-nine.
There is no more lifeless offense in baseball right now than the Yankees'.
This could end up being one of my biggest misreads; it certainly would not be the first. But the Tampa Bay Rays are one of baseball's hottest offenses, and the -108 odds feel like an absolute steal.
Astros vs Nationals: Astros (+108)
Astros win probability: 48%
This sets up as a battle between two very mediocre starting pitchers in Mike Burrows and Miles Mikolas. Of the two, Mikolas has been the worse arm, both on the season and over his last three starts.
The Washington Nationals' offense has been humming lately, but the Houston Astros have been swinging it well too. When both starters are this shaky, I will gladly take the plus money with the better value.
Mets vs Braves: Braves (-120)
Braves win probability: 55%
They are finally awake. The Atlanta Braves are finally turning things around.
Now they draw a struggling Freddy Peralta, who owns a 10.95 ERA over his last three starts. Meanwhile, Atlanta's offense has posted a 111 wRC+, .329 wOBA, and .743 OPS over its last six games. Take the Braves to beat the New York Mets.
Brewers vs Cardinals: Brewers (-111)
Brewers win probability: 52%
Is there a world where Dustin May holds it down for 5-plus innings against the St. Louis Cardinals? Sure. But we do not live in that world.
May owns an 8.49 ERA over his last three starts and a 5.40 ERA across his last five.
Meanwhile, Milwaukee Brewers southpaw Shane Drohan has been nails over his last five outings, and Milwaukee's offense has been right there with him, posting a 132 wRC+, .362 wOBA, and .819 OPS.
Brew Crew!
Diamondbacks vs Padres: Padres (-106)
Padres win probability: 52%
The Arizona Diamondbacks' offense is still frozen solid, posting an 82 wRC+, .292 wOBA, and .652 OPS over its last 12 games. Meanwhile, the San Diego Padres have been humming, posting a 130 wRC+, .354 wOBA, and .806 OPS over their last six games.
With Brandon Pfaadt on the mound for Arizona, this is a great spot for the Padres to feast.
Blue Jays vs Giants: Giants (+102)
Giants win probability: 50%
Yet another frozen offense that needs to be faded. The Toronto Blue Jays have gone ice cold across the board, posting just a 48 wRC+, .237 wOBA, and .522 OPS over their last six games.
Kevin Gausman is on the mound, and he owns a 9.00 ERA over his last three outings. Meanwhile, the San Francisco Giants have been seeing the ball extremely well over the last week.
Give me the plus money.
Rockies vs Dodgers: Rockies (+203)
Rockies win probability: 33%
Chase the value!!!!
The Colorado Rockies' offense has caught fire over the last two weeks, so getting them at better than 2/1 feels like a fun sprinkle. The Los Angeles Dodgers send left-hander Eric Lauer to the mound, and he owns a 5.63 ERA at home this season.
Meanwhile, the Rockies counter with Kyle Freeland.
It will be sweaty, but I think chasing the value on the Rockies is worth the sprinkle.
Odds are correct at the time of publishing and are subject to change. Not intended for use in MA. Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.
With three wins in their last 15 games, the Mets have all but sealed their fate as sellers at this year’s trade deadline. At this point, they need a miracle to revive their postseason hopes, and the chance for a present-day miracle is not worth surrendering the chance at a more functional future. So the Mets will sell, which is not exactly news.
But what exactly selling looks like for this high-priced bunch is still unclear. Are they tearing this down? Will they start sooner than later? Who will be key to a brighter future and whose departure will clear the way for it?
SNY talked to multiple people familiar with the front office’s thinking to get some answers to these and other questions that will hover around the Mets between now and next month’s trade deadline. The answers, in most cases, appear to be both rational and evolving.
How far will this sell-off go? Are the Mets tearing this down completely?
The Mets plan to contend next year, so they are not approaching this deadline as the first domino to fall in a lengthy rebuild. They are not determined to trade everyone, but they will listen to offers on almost everyone. Players on expiring contracts -- Freddy Peralta, Clay Holmes, Brooks Raley, A.J. Minter, and Tyrone Taylor – will be available, unless something changes their long-term status with the club. Should the Mets pitch Holmes on an extension, for example, that could obviously change their plans.
As for those players under control beyond this season, the Mets will listen to any offers that might help them long-term without any pressure to accept them. Carson Benge, A.J. Ewing, Nolan McLean, Christian Scott, and other rookie-aged players are all but completely untouchable, given that those are precisely the type of assets a team intending to contend next year would be seeking in deadline deals. But outside of the true youngsters, everyone from Luke Weaver (under control through next season) to Francisco Alvarez (under control for three more seasons) could draw interest in a market that currently looks like it might have more buyers than sellers.
What will the Mets be prioritizing in return?
The Mets are going to chase the best talent available regardless of position, minor league level, or major league readiness, according to people familiar with their thinking. They will not be prioritizing major league needs (like, say, controllable starting pitching) or any specific position, which does not mean they might not find themselves acquiring it if that is the best talent offered them. A top prospect is as valuable to them long-term as it could be to a potential trade partner as the Mets try to improve their major league roster this offseason.
This approach is emblematic of the way the Mets seem to be thinking about this deadline and roster more broadly: they are not going to overreact to a bad season by giving up on pieces that contributed to it at a discount, and they are not trying to fix all their problems in August knowing how different things could be for them and others by the time the calendar hits November.
Jun 25, 2026; New York City, New York, USA; New York Mets designated hitter Juan Soto (22) talks to shortstop Francisco Lindor (12) in the dugout during the first inning against the Chicago Cubs at Citi Field. / Brad Penner - Imagn Images
Steve Cohen told the New York Post last week that he does not anticipate trading Soto or Lindor, and that he is happy to have two superstar players to build around. Toss in the money they’re making and the fact that they are two of the most productive players on an unproductive roster, and deals for either seem even more unlikely than a 2026 Mets turnaround – which is to say, highly unlikely, but it is always safest not to rule out anything completely.
People familiar with the Mets' thinking say they still do not have a sense of whether Bichette will opt out of his three-year, $142 million deal after this year. If he finishes strong, he will probably want to take advantage of a weak free agent hitters’ class. If he doesn’t, he will probably want to stay and prove he deserves a long-term deal. In either case, he is an asset on what might be an expiring contract, which means it is fair to ask whether the Mets will explore trading him.
The answer seems to be somewhere between probably and definitely not, though the Mets seem willing to listen on just about anyone in case the market yields unexpected value. But with the money Bichette is making and the fact that he is a former American League batting champ who could remain under control for two more seasons, he is not the kind of player the Mets will feel needs to be moved urgently – particularly when they have not yet seen him at his best for an extended period.
Will they tear down the bullpen?
The bullpen has been the Mets’ best unit by far, and it is loaded with pitchers contenders would love to have. Raley is having one of his best seasons. Weaver is, too. And before his blow-up Sunday, Huascar Brazoban was quietly establishing himself as the kind of versatile, swing-and-miss-capable type that all bullpens would love to have.
Since he has multiple years of team control remaining, Brazoban could be a coveted asset for contenders hoping to bolster their bullpen without making the financial investment in more expensive back-end types. Weaver, too, could be one of the better relievers available if the Mets are willing to part with him. Devin Williams would, too, though two years remaining at roughly $17 million each might scare some teams away.
But as of this week, it seems that while the Mets are open to moving controllable relievers like Brazoban or even Austin Warren, they are not necessarily comfortable starting from scratch in the bullpen in 2027. It seems more likely that one or two of those under team control beyond this season would go, rather than all of them.
May 4, 2026; Denver, Colorado, USA; The New York Mets celebrate defeating the Colorado Rockies at Coors Field. / Ron Chenoy - Imagn Images
Are there any potential trade candidates on the roster flying under the radar?
As much as Mets fans might wish they could offload struggling young players like Brett Baty, Mark Vientos, and Ronny Mauricio in exchange for future Mets saviors, none of those three is likely to yield a substantial return. That does not mean they are untradable, and in fact, multiple people with rival organizations said Mauricio’s name was brought up in trade discussions as recently as earlier this season.
Still, some within the Mets front office still believe Baty will emerge as a lineup staple, which means they will not part with him for nothing. Mauricio still hasn’t gotten enough major league playing time to render a final verdict. He could certainly entice another team to take a chance. Vientos has been the most confounding member of that trio. Maybe a change of scenery could help him if someone is willing to take the chance.
But the most likely member of that baby Mets generation to be traded might be Alvarez, who has demonstrated an ability to produce as a designated hitter even if his catching has not necessarily evolved into a defensive asset. Given how rare power-hitting catchers are these days, and particularly in this year’s market, Alvarez would represent a cost-controlled asset to a contending team that could pair him with a better defensive catcher and maximize his at-bats as a designated hitter.
Similarly, Luis Torrens is widely respected as one of the game’s most steady defensive catchers and is now under control through the 2028 season after the Mets signed him to a very reasonable $11.5 million extension earlier this season. Obviously, he would be an asset to a contending 2027 Mets team, too. But if a 2026 contender is willing to overpay, the Mets will listen.
When will the Mets start selling?
While the Mets are no longer within striking distance of a winning record by the trade deadline, they do not seem to be in a rush to start trading away players, either. They, like other teams, are inundated with draft preparation ahead of that event next weekend. Once the draft passes, they anticipate the trade market to solidify and the phone calls to pick up.
In other words, while it is not impossible that the Mets will start trading players prior to the All-Star Break, it would qualify as a surprise. But once the draft is behind them and their competitors, expect the move-making to begin.
Boston, MA - September 25: Bill Chisholm, the new lead owner and governor of the Boston Celtics, listens as Brad Stevens, president of basketball operations, speaks during an introductory press conference at the Auerbach Center on September 25, 2025 in Boston. (Photo by Danielle Parhizkaran/The Boston Globe via Getty Images) | Boston Globe via Getty Images
Five days ago, the Boston Celtics agreed to trade Jaylen Brown for Paul George and draft compensation. The trade could not be made official until today, so the team hasn’t been able to officially discuss the details or explain the thought process behind the trade. That airspace has invited rumors, inuendo, conspiracy theories, educated guesses (and some uneducated ones), and every opinion under the sun.
At 4PM today we’ll hear from Brad Stevens and Bill Chisholm directly. We’ll get their official statements on the trade and we’ll hear them respond to many questions. I’m just not entirely sure if we’ll hear the full truth of what transpired and what it means for the future of the franchise.
I don’t have a crystal ball, but here are some categories of subjects that are sure to be addressed.
Financial Flexibility
One reason they may have decided to move on from Brown was his contract. Several smart people have pointed out that he’s getting supermax money and probably wouldn’t be ranked by many as a top 5 player in the league (or pick your range). Which makes him a bit overpaid in a league where the 2nd apron is treated as a defacto hard cap. Sure, even the biggest Jaylen Brown fans might accept that, but that’s why you lean into cheaper, high value contracts (like the guys on rookie deals and Payton Pritchard who’s on one of the highest value deals in the league). It also doesn’t explain why you would take back Paul George, widely considered one of the worst contracts in basketball.
I have a feeling that Brad Stevens will talk about flexibility on some level, because flexibility is one of his favorite buzzwords. Chisholm will field questions about how much of this was an ownership mandate, but it doesn’t really come across as a cost cutting move because they didn’t actually cut much cost in the deal.
We probably won’t get the full picture of how much money influenced this deal.
Analytics
One of the most popular topics being discussed in the aftermath of this trade has been the role of analytics in the evaluation of Jaylen’s value. The “well actually” articles and data analysis deep dives have centered around his advanced analytics that can be looked at to paint a pretty negative picture of Jaylen’s value to a basketball team.
I’m not going to go into detail pro or con on those numbers. I think analytics are very much a critical part of the game today and need to be considered as part of the overall analysis. The limitations to Jaylen’s game are well documented and don’t always need numbers to back them up. But it has always seemed to me that his positive impact almost always outweighed his struggles.
This is going to be a very delicate thing to address at the press conference. How do they justify the deal with numbers without it looking like they are trashing their former pillar of the team going out?
If he is really a net negative on the court, why did the team invest so much into him in the first place? Why wouldn’t they have traded him earlier? What changed and when did it change? Again, I’m skeptical we’ll hear the full truth about how much the numbers influenced this decision.
The Human Element
There are a lot of other theories and rumors that I’m just going to lump together under the heading of “the Human Element.”
Did Jaylen want his own team? It has been reported that he never asked for a trade, so I’m guessing that won’t be a stated reason. We don’t know how much he indicated a desire to the team to move on or if he was planning on demanding a trade later.
Was the team frustrated with the way Jaylen spoke about the past season on his twitch streams? Honestly, this seems weak even writing it down. Many pearl clutching words have been written and spoken about his “favorite season” comments, which were addressed by him and easily explained away. I don’t buy that this was a big issue and I highly doubt that it will be named explicitly by the team as a reason for the trade.
Did Jayson Tatum want to move on? Personally, I doubt this has anything to do with it and even if it was, (for so many reasons) they would never admit it to be true or have anything to do with the trade.
Jaylen was an extremely popular player with the fanbase and in the community of Boston. The team will undoubtably be very careful with anything they say about him. If anything, they could and should lean into celebrating him as a person and beloved member of the franchise. So if there’s anything personal going on behind the scenes, we won’t hear about it today.
Style of Play
This might be the only thing that makes some sense to me, but on the other hand it doesn’t. Maybe Jaylen shoots too many contested two pointers for the analytics team to be comfortable with. Of course, those are sometimes the only shots that you can get in the playoffs when all the better shots are taken away. So it helps to have a guy that can make those shots.
Brad Stevens stressed the need to put more pressure on the rim. Well, Jaylen does a much better job of that than Paul George, who has evolved into more of a deep threat perimeter player than anything else.
Maybe the team wasn’t confident that Jaylen would be ok sliding back into the 1B role he had before (related to the above section on The Human Element) and George will be happy being a 2nd or 3rd option. That’s not a great reason to make this trade either, and most likely won’t be named as a primary reason.
BOSTON, MA – JUNE 6: Head Coach Joe Mazzulla, Jayson Tatum, and Jaylen Brown #7 of the Boston Celtics looks on during the game against the Dallas Mavericks during Game 1 of the 2024 NBA Finals on June 6, 2024 at the TD Garden in Boston, Massachusetts. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2024 NBAE (Photo by Jesse D. Garrabrant/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images
Timing
One big question that should absolutely be addressed is “why now?” The word that keeps coming to mind is “desperation.” By all accounts, it seemed like the team did not have good offers for Jaylen but were urgently motivated to complete a deal now. Why?
In any negotiation, you need to have a feel for what your walking away price is and be prepared to walk away if you don’t get it. Somehow, they either put a much lower value on Jaylen than most would have expected, or they were so desperate to get a deal done that they accepted under market value. Couldn’t they have gotten this same kind of deal later in the summer or even at the trade deadline?
Are there other deals coming? If so when? And why couldn’t this have waited to be combined with those additional moves?
Not sure if we’ll get satisfactory answers for this topic, but it will be interesting to hear their responses.
Must See TV
One thing I know, I will be watching and listening very carefully to what is said (and isn’t said). We need answers from the Celtics leadership. I’m just not sure if the answers will tell the full story or if they will be satisfactory to fans.
The cognitive dissonance of this still puzzles me. Brad Stevens has “won” so many deals over the years and has built up so much trust. It is just so jarring to see him “lose” one of this magnitude. What does that mean for the near and long term future? Is there anything that he can say in this press conference that is going to restore part of that trust? I guess we’ll see.
We will, of course, report on the presser. Feel free to use this post as an open thread for comments below.
Fans were denied thrilling finale as Charles Leclerc won behind safety car but there are no easy solutions
The British Grand Prix ending under the safety car and denying a potentially thrilling finale was a controversial, but also complicated incident. It raised issues from the sport’s past and questions over what it may yet address for the future.
The Silverstone victor, Charles Leclerc, of course said he would rather have done it in more style than with taking the flag behind the safety car. The scenario does not happen often, but whenever it does, almost no one finds it a satisfactory way to conclude a race.