Category: Sports News

When the Cleveland Cavaliers signed Sam Merrill to a contract extension and let Ty Jerome walk, it raised a lot of eyebrows. It created unnecessary discourse around who they should have let walk in free agency when they could have retained both at the expense of going further over the second apron. Merrill’s 2025-26 season showed why the Cavaliers invested in one of the league’s purest three-point shooters.

All grades are based on our usual expectations for each player.

Regular Season Stats

• 12.8 points
• 2.6 rebounds
• 2.4 assists
• 46.1% FG
• 42.1% 3PT FG
• 85.5% FT

Merrill is arguably one of, if not the most straightforward, grades on this Cavaliers roster. The question boils down to “how well did Merrill shoot the ball in 2025—2026?” The answer to that question is very well.

It was not only that Merrill had his highest three-point percentage since his rookie season, but also that he accomplished this feat while shooting the highest number of attempts from the perimeter in his career.

If one word could describe Merrill’s past season, it is confidence. It takes a certain mindset to blindly fire from the perimeter as Merrill did. There is a sureness with his approach, combined with the ability makes him a one-man wrecking crew to opposing defenses. I’m not saying Merrill was the Cavaliers’ version of Steph Curry, however, the way that his presence can bend a defense is a difference maker alone.

Merrill is an active shooter; he does not sit idle in the corner and wait for the primary ball-handler to generate his looks for him. When Merrill is on the floor, he is arguably the most active player, constantly forcing opposing defenses to keep their eyes on him as much as any star the Cavs have in lineups with him.

What separated Merrill’s 2025-26 season from others is that it felt like the Cavs optimized Merrill as a player. They featured him in a way that previous versions of the team didn’t. This was best shown once the Cavaliers acquired James Harden at the trade deadline.

Harden passed the ball most to Merrill of anyone on the Cavs, averaging nearly 10 passes a game. James Harden and Merrill are an intriguing example of how Merrill’s game is far from just a floor spacer. Their partnership evolved into these convoluted pick-and-roll or pop actions where their basketball IQ would stand out almost instantly.

When players like Harden immediately take note of how dynamic a player Merrill can be, it validates the investment made into Merrill at the beginning of the season. The Cavaliers made the correct choice of extending Merrill and keeping his elite skills in house. As the Cavaliers look forward, it’s safe to say that Merrill will continue to play an integral part of the offense and motion of it.

Grade: A

To get a sense of how universally beloved Victor Wembanyama was before playing a single second of NBA basketball, look at the way the best players in the world described him ahead of his first professional minutes. 

“An alien,” said LeBron James.

“I think he’s going to be one of the best to play this game,” added Giannis Antetokounmpo.

Wembanyama had a higher approval rating than pizza and puppies when the San Antonio Spurs selected him first overall in the 2023 NBA Draft out of Le Chesnay, France. The 7-foot-4 center with an 8-foot wingspan walked into the league looking like a wacky waving inflatable tube man and became the first unanimous Rookie of the Year since 2016, averaging 21.4 points and 10.6 rebounds. Despite being a 20-year-old rookie, he led the league in blocks with 3.6 per game, finishing second in Defensive Player of the Year voting behind fellow French big man Rudy Gobert. “Let [him] win it now,” Wembanyama said. “Because after that, it’s no longer his turn.”

Confident quips like that one — along with various philosophical ruminations — only worked to further endear Wembanyama to the basketball world and beyond. Legions of new fans from all over fell in love with his rare combination of brash competitiveness, raw vulnerability, confidence, calculation, and, of course, his one-of-a-kind style of play. One couldn’t help but stare in wonder at the way he dominated the game on the defensive end, where the biggest, fastest athletes in the world veered away from him at all costs. 

Off the court, Wembanyama was unafraid to stand out in historically unmasculine ways. “Personally, I refuse to carry the burden of having to hide my emotion,” he said after crying on the court following a big Spurs win. In a league full of guarded superstars who would rather act tough than stand out, Wembanyama’s vulnerability was a breath of fresh air. “He has a spine, guts, and heart,” NBA journalist Michael Pina wrote. “To soberly possess such authenticity at that age, in front of the world, is special. It makes him such an easy player to bet on. He cares deeply.” The recognition only continued to build as Wembanyama won the 2026 Defensive Player of the Year award and finished third in MVP voting after leading the upstart Spurs to 62 wins and a spot in the NBA Finals this June. 

However, over the past few weeks, people have started to turn on Wembanyama. Though it started with Oklahoma City Thunder and New York Knicks fans, it wasn’t just egg-gate — basketball fans everywhere are suddenly turning on the NBA’s golden child. “I cannot stand this guy,” basketball podcaster David Jacoby said on “The Zach Lowe Show.” “I hate his outfits. I hate his face. I hate his hair. I hate everything about him.” 

The question is, why? 

Is it because Wembanyama is a frontrunner — a rare exception in being considered the world’s best basketball player before winning a title? Is it because he’s a bully, throwing elbows and jabs at opposing players without facing repercussions from the NBA? Or because he’s too full of himself? Too corny? Too calculated? Or is it simply because he has the conviction to parade around with his dogs out in the Garden? 

Wembanyama the frontrunner

On May 18, despite coming into Game 1 of the Western Conference finals as significant underdogs to the reigning NBA Champion Thunder, Wembanyama became just the fifth player in NBA history to drop 41-points and 24-rebounds in a playoff game. The Spurs won the double-overtime classic, 122-115, with Wembanyama looking like the best player on the floor over two-time NBA MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander.

Typically, an athlete isn’t crowned as the best player alive until they win the big one, especially in basketball, where one player can affect the game in so many different ways. But Wembanyama is different. “The best player in the (expletive) world,” Spurs guard Stephon Castle announced for all the world to hear in a postgame interview on NBC. And it wasn’t just him: basketball analysts and former players were equally loud about Wembanyama now having the claim to basketball’s throne.

It was clear to anyone watching that he was on his way there. But now? At age 22? For some, he was being punctually recognized. For others, it was too much praise too fast, resulting in him becoming overrated. “Wemby ain’t the one, yo. Y’all crowning Wemby too fast,” radio host and culture critic Charlamagne tha God said on “Breakfast Club Power 105.1.” “I don’t see the dominance yet.”

Wembanyama the bully 

Wembanyama’s frustration had been mounting throughout the postseason, where he was subjected to more contact than anyone since prime Shaquille O’Neal. And it boiled over during the opening minutes of Game 3 of the NBA Finals, when Wembanyama shoved Knicks star Jalen Brunson to the floor despite the ball not being anywhere in their vicinity. 

“I hate him. He’s a bully,” Knicks fan and head of content at The Ringer, Sean Fennessey, said on the “Bill Simmons Podcast.” “He’s dirty, like it’s very obvious; you can watch clips from the game, he plays like a bully, and he’s not being officiated like a bully, and it’s annoying. So, it’s hard to watch the series.”

Knicks fans like Fennessey had a legitimate gripe: Wembanyama already accumulated two flagrant fouls earlier in the postseason, most notably for losing his temper and elbowing Minnesota Timberwolves forward Naz Reid in the head during their second-round series, which resulted in an ejection but not a suspension. A third flagrant would have put him one short of a one-game suspension in the NBA Finals — a death knell as far as the NBA’s surging ratings were concerned. And while the league had an opportunity to retroactively upgrade the clear violation to a flagrant foul, they chose not to. “It’s just better for the league if there’s six games or seven games instead of four games, and so it’s hard not to think that when you’re watching the game,” Fennessey added.

The tinfoil hats came out, and anyone rooting against the Spurs was quick to point out that the NBA was protecting their golden child, who brought so many new, global eyeballs to the game that he could do no wrong. The animosity only grew from there. 

Wembanyama the tryhard  

After missing a buzzer-beating jump shot that would have won Game 2 of the NBA Finals for the Spurs, Wembanyama needed to decompress. “The Playoffs, it’s like… a whirlwind. It’s hard to put your head out of the water,” he said. “I need some time off, let my brain cool down, recover. Recover as much for the body as for the mind.”

Last Sunday, in between Games 2 and 3, he went to Gramercy Park in lower Manhattan with his sister, Éve, to sketch. All of a sudden, his park rendezvous became the main storyline, with hilariously inaccurate hypotheses flying about regarding the calculated, pretentious superstar. “He’s corny as fuck,” one Knicks fan said to the Channel 5 YouTube channel. “And he’s just trying way too hard to make a storyline for himself.”  

Finally, after the Knicks won Game 5 of the NBA Finals and put an end to their 53-year championship drought on Saturday, Wembanyama returned to the Spurs locker room without shaking hands with his opponents. It drew the ire of fans and players alike, with four-time NBA Champion Draymond Green saying, “Look your killer in the face. You got to look them in they face… and so to see them walk off the court, it was disheartening.” 

But isn’t Wembanyama supposed to be different? Isn’t that what people liked about him in the first place? 

Wembanyama the product of the internet age

It’s clear that people are turning on Wembanyama for the same reasons they originally fell in love with him, from his awe-inspiring feats of athleticism to his brash competitiveness to his quirky hobbies. These characteristics endeared him to people until they didn’t. It begs the question: Is it possible that Wembanyama changed during the postseason, behaving in a more distasteful way? Or is there something about the postseason spotlight that changed the way we think about him?

One could argue that he brought the villain narrative onto himself, going out of his way to provoke Knicks players and fans. There’s no doubt that Wembanyama enjoys being an agitator at the center of the basketball universe, growing increasingly disdainful of the media as the postseason went along before saying “see y’all… never” at his final press conference of the season. But it’s not so simple as to say Wembanyama chose villainy for himself. 

Wembanyama isn’t the modern NBA’s first villain, and he won’t be the last. Just a few weeks ago, Gilgeous-Alexander had a similar fall from grace. After ethically working his way up the basketball ranks from an undersized underdog in Hamilton, Ontario to the best player on earth, he was framed as an unskilled flop-artist who was ruining basketball (and the future of the sport). What do Wembanyama and Gilgeous-Alexander have in common, other than the fact that they are both foreigners? 

They are both products of the internet. 

An unfortunate truth of the modern world is that people increasingly encounter reality through “algorithmic feeds built to warp reality, on platforms with every commercial incentive to keep users scrolling,” culture and technology writer Lane Brown writes in a Vulture story titled “The Feed is Fake.” Now that everything an athlete says or does can be recorded, cut up, aggregated, and misrepresented online through bad-faith actors who understand that extreme content gets rewarded, celebrity athletes like Gilgeous-Alexander and Wemby are subjected to the internet and its hot-take machinery finding something they don’t like about them and drumming it up until it becomes a story.

“On social media, popular opinion is being formed, measured, and manipulated all at once,” Brown continues. “And every signal the platforms produce — a trending song, a backlash, a talking point, the feeling that ‘everybody’ is suddenly talking about the same thing — can now be fabricated by unseen actors with hidden agendas.” As hateful content gets drummed up by the algorithm, trust in journalism declines and good reporting disappears behind paywalls, the average fan and media member are forced to look towards the comment sections for a sense of what’s being said. Talking heads pick up on that and bam! You got a snowball of negativity becoming too big to stop because on the internet, hate rises to the top. 

It happened to Gilgeous-Alexander. And now it is happening to Wembanyama — and it will only get worse. Next season, the French Freak will be back in San Antonio with more tricks in his bag and more haters magnifying and criticizing his every move.  Because in the modern NBA, the true sign of superstardom isn’t rings or MVP trophies: it’s hate and villainy. Get used to it.

Depending on how the board falls, North Carolina big man Henri Veesaar could be available when New York is on the clock on draft night next week. Should the Knicks consider him with their 24th or 31st selection?

The Basics

• School: North Carolina (transferred from Arizona)
• Position: Center
• Height: 7’0″
• Weight: 227 lbs
• Age: 22
• 2025-26 Stats: 17.0 PPG, 8.7 RPG, 2.1 APG, 60.8% FG, 42.6% 3PT, 61.5% FT
• Projected Draft Range: Late first to early second round

The Numbers

Veesaar turned himself into a legitimate NBA Draft prospect after transferring from Arizona to North Carolina. He started all 31 games for the Tar Heels, averaged 17 points and 8.7 rebounds, and earned second-team All-ACC honors.

The most interesting numbers in Veesaar’s sheet are linked to his shooting. Veesaar made 42.6% of his 94 three-point attempts, showing real catch-and-shoot touch for a 7-footer. He hit spot-up threes, trailer threes, and pick-and-pop looks, giving scouts the stuff of their dreams heading into the NBA in what looks like a smooth transition to the pro game.

Veesaar was also extremely efficient near the rim, converting more than 75% of his half-court attempts at the basket. He added 2.1 assists per game against 1.7 turnovers, showing enough passing feel to operate as more than a standstill stretch big.

That mix of shooting, touch, passing, and size explains why ESPN’s mock draft has Veesaar going to New York with the No. 24 overall pick as a late first-round selection.

What Does He Do Well?

• Floor Spacing: Veesaar’s jumper is his cleanest NBA skill. He shot 42.6% from three at North Carolina and looked comfortable on catch-and-shoot attempts, especially above the break and in pick-and-pop situations. For a 7-footer, that kind of shooting would do wonders for spacing his team’s offense.
• Pick-And-Roll Versatility: He can roll, pop, slip screens, and make quick reads after catching the ball. Veesaar already understands timing and angles, which helps him find soft spots in the defense instead of relying only on power.
• Touch Around the Rim: Veesaar is not an explosive athlete, but he has soft hands and comes with reliable finishing. He can do it all in the paint from hooks, layups, floaters, and quick catches around the basket, but not so much flashy dunking.
• Passing Feel: Veesaar showed strong high-low chemistry with phenom Caleb Wilson at UNC and made smart reads from the short roll, post, and perimeter. He is not a hub-style creator, but he can move the ball quickly and punish rotations.
• Rebounding: At 227 pounds, he is not built like a traditional bruiser, but he averaged 8.7 rebounds and showed solid fundamentals on the defensive glass. He reads the ball well and uses his reach effectively.

What Are the Concerns?

• Strength and Physicality: This is the biggest negative factor to considering using a pick, let alone if the Knicks move one of their selections, on Veesaar. He needs to add 15 to 20 pounds without losing mobility, which is never guaranteed to happen smoothly. Right now, stronger NBA centers could move him off spots, seal him deep, or knock him off balance on rolls and post touches.
• Defensive Translation: Veesaar is not an elite rim protector. He blocked 1.2 shots per game, but his impact comes more from length and positioning than verticality in the paint. NBA teams may question whether he can anchor a defense.
• Ball-Screen Defense: He struggled at times when switching onto guards and was not always active enough in drop coverage. He can play too upright, which creates problems against quicker ball-handlers.
• Free Throw Shooting: His three-point shooting was excellent, but the 61.5% free-throw mark is a small concern. It does not erase the jumper, but it does make the shooting projection slightly less automatic. And it’s not that the Knicks haven’t already had their fair share of Mitch’s issues there…

The Knicks Fit

The Knicks enter the 2026 NBA Draft with picks No. 24, No. 31, and No. 55. Veesaar makes sense if New York wants a frontcourt piece who can give the second unit a different offensive look than the one built around Mitchell Robinson.

In fact, Veesaar is the total opposite to Mitch: not a vertical lob threat or solid defensive anchor. Veesaar is closer to the other side of the Robinson archetype: a skilled stretch big who can space the floor, pass from the middle, finish with touch, and keep offensive possessions moving.

That matters for a team built around Jalen Brunson and Karl-Anthony Towns, however, as Veesaar could function as a backup center who keeps the floor open, gives guards room to attack, and allows the Knicks to run more five-out or pick-and-pop actions with the bench.

The concern is whether New York can live with the defensive questions. Would Mike Brown trust a young big who cannot hold up physically, communicate in coverage, or survive playoff matchups? Veesaar would need strength development and probably would not be a finished product as a rookie.

Still, if the Knicks believe their strength staff can add functional weight to his frame, the offensive upside is obvious. Skilled 7-footers who shoot, pass, and finish efficiently are not easy to find late in the first round.

NBA Comparison

• Best-Case Comparison: Kelly Olynyk (Skilled stretch big who shoots, passes, plays from the elbows, and survives despite his subpar defense)
• Median Outcome: Mike Musical (Foor-spacing backup big whose shooting and offensive feel keep him useful, but whose defense limits his role)
• Low-End Outcome: Frank Kaminsky (A skilled college big whose shooting, touch, and passing flashes at times, but whose defense and strength cap his NBA career and end up cutting it short)

The Verdict

Think about it at 24. If a higher-upside wing or guard is still available, the Knicks may be better off prioritizing athleticism, defense, or shot creation. Veesaar’s defensive questions are real, and the Knicks should not ignore them if they want a plug-and-play prospect to bolster next year’s rotation.

Draft him at 31. Veesaar is worth serious consideration if he reaches the Knicks’ second selection, especially if New York wants a cost-controlled stretch big with real offensive skill. The value here is obvious, and the Knicks should pounce, as Veesaar is the next-bext 7-footer in the whole draft after lottery-bound Aday Mara. Veesaar has the size, shooting, passing and touch to appeal a pro franchise, and is coming off a productive high-major season. He may never become a defensive anchor, but he could develop into a useful rotation center who gives New York a different kind of frontcourt option.

For our other Draft Profiles, go here.

Go Knicks!