The Phoenix Suns All-Time Pyramid, The Final 2 Tiers

PHOENIX - MAY 18: Steve Nash #13 of the Phoenix Suns passes the ball back out for an assist against the Dallas Mavericks in Game five of the Western Conference Semifinals during the 2005 NBA Playoffs at America West Arena on May 18, 2005 in Phoenix, Arizona. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Stephen Dunn/Getty Images) | Getty Images

We have reached the final stop on this ride, the point where the road narrows and we finally reveal the last two tiers and the three players who sit above all else on the Phoenix Suns All-Time Pyramid. What started as a random idea, a Salad and Go cold brew in one hand as the calendar flipped, has slowly turned into something much bigger than I ever anticipated.

16,000+ words later, here we are.

This was always about more than rankings or arguments or filling space on the internet. The goal was simple, even if the execution was not. To build something that could live beyond the moment. Something we can reference years from now, something others might stumble upon long after we are gone. Through it, readers can understand who the best players in Suns history were. And why.

This pyramid is a snapshot of memory, effort, impact, and identity. It is imperfect by design, shaped by perspective, emotion, and lived experience. But it is honest. And now, with everything laid out and the foundation set, it is time to finish the thing and place the final names where they belong.

Somewhere along the way, a realization set in and stayed with me. This franchise may not have climbed all the way to the mountaintop and grabbed a championship banner, but that does not mean it lacks history, weight, or meaning. Far from it.

If your entire sports worldview begins and ends with championships, I genuinely feel bad for you. Not in a condescending way, but in a “missed out” way. Because you are skipping the best parts. You are ignoring the process, the moments, the nights that stayed with you long after the final buzzer. You are reducing something expansive into a single checkbox and calling it analysis.

Basketball is memory. It always has been. As you move through these names and the eras they lived in, nostalgia creeps in whether you invite it or not. That is the beauty of sports. In real time, you feel frustration, joy, anger, pride, and exhaustion. Only later do you really understand what you were watching, how it fit together, and why it mattered.

Those Seven Seconds or Less teams still carry disappointment because they never finished the job, and that reality does matter when you start stacking players and weighing legacies. Barkley and Booker have made the Finals, but like every season in the history of the organization, it ended with disappointment. But it does not erase the magic of what those seasons felt like, or how alive they made this fan base.

That is the spiritual side of sports, and that has been the most rewarding part of this whole exercise. Digging through player histories. Replaying moments in my head. Mining stats. Building graphics. Staring at old photos soaked in purple and orange. That shared color palette, those shared memories, that is the connective tissue. That is what binds us.

Reducing all of that to whether a championship happened is easy. Too easy. It lacks imagination. It lacks depth.

These final two tiers have depth. They invite debate. They demand context. And honestly, there is no wrong answer here. You could place any one of these final three players at the top of the pyramid and make a compelling case. I landed where I landed, and I am comfortable with it, but I also respect the arguments that go another direction.

So, before I explain why I made the final call the way I did, let’s talk about the last three players who occupy the top two tiers of the Phoenix Suns All-Time Pyramid.

I know the second that graphic hit your screen, you felt something. Maybe it was agreement. Maybe you nodded along. Maybe you muttered, “Voita, you’re an idiot, how could you possibly do that?” And honestly, that reaction is the whole point. That push and pull is what makes this such a good conversation in the first place.

So I am asking you for one thing before you sprint to the comment section with the keys smoking. Read the article. Give me the space to explain why I landed where I did, and why certain names went where they went. How I weighed what matters to me in a project like this. I am fully aware that I might not be right. But you know what? I might not be wrong either…

Tier 2: Organizational Royalty

Charles Barkley. The Round Mound of Rebound. If you are looking for the cleanest definition of a supernova in Phoenix Suns history, this is it. No player arrived in the Valley already in his prime with this level of gravity, personality, and immediate takeover energy the way Sir Charles did. This was not a slow burn. This was ignition.

He arrived after the 1992 Barcelona Olympics, riding global stardom into a brand new arena, a new uniform, and a new coach. The timing felt almost cinematic. Loud, eccentric, confrontational, brilliant, Barkley did not blend into Phoenix. He bent it around himself. That 1992–93 run remains one of the most electric seasons not only in Suns history, but in the storytelling fabric of the NBA itself, a moment where basketball felt bigger, louder, and impossibly alive.

I think it is fair to say that the 1992-93 season by Charles Barkley stands as the single greatest season by any player in Phoenix Suns history. Sure, Steve Nash came to Phoenix in his prime and won MVPs. Yes, that team went 62-20. Charles Barkley did that too, and then he carried the Suns all the way to the NBA Finals, doing it with a force of personality that rattled arenas and pulled the entire league into Phoenix’s orbit. Nash floated. Barkley detonated.

That first year, Barkley averaged 25.6 points per game and 12.2 rebounds, won the MVP, made the All-Star team, and earned First Team All-NBA honors. He checked every possible box a superstar season can check. In a moment when Michael Jordan was operating at the absolute peak of his powers, there was a real and serious conversation happening about whether Charles Barkley was the best player in the world.

That debate ultimately met reality in the NBA Finals, where Jordan averaged 41.0 points and 6.3 assists over six games and slammed the door shut, but for that stretch of time, it was not outrageous to ask the question. That alone tells you how high Barkley’s level was.

What followed was a meteoric rise for the Suns as a franchise. Phoenix was no longer a quiet basketball outpost or a historical footnote. After 24 years of existence and a lone Finals appearance in 1976, the city and the team finally commanded national attention. Charles Barkley did not only elevate the Suns on the court, he altered how the league viewed Phoenix altogether, and that impact is impossible to separate from the history of the organization.

Statistically, the Barkley run in Phoenix is as loud as it gets. Over 280 games across four seasons, he was an All-Star every year and made four All-NBA teams. While only one of those landed on the First Team in 1992-93, the consistency still matters.

When you scan the Suns’ record book, his name jumps off the page. He is number one all-time in player efficiency rating, number one in defensive rebounds per game at 8.4, and he owns the single-season mark as well, pulling down 9.1 defensive boards per night in that 1992-93 season. He sits second in rebounds per game at 11.5, trailing only Paul Silas, and despite spending only four seasons in Phoenix, he still ranks fourth in triple-doubles and seventh in total rebounds. That is how concentrated his impact was.

Meteoric is the right word.

When you talk about the greatest players to ever wear purple and orange, Charles Barkley is always part of the conversation. Personally, I think Shaquille O’Neal and Kevin Durant belong on that broader list too, which might be another pyramid project I just talked myself into. Still, if you place Barkley at the very top of your Suns pyramid, I am not here to tell you that you are wrong. The case is real, and it is powerful.

Where the discussion gets more layered is in the length and the ending of his time in Phoenix. The first two seasons live warmly in memory, full of energy, relevance, and belief. The final stretch was rockier, emotionally and structurally, and that tension is part of the story whether we like it or not. As Zach Bryan says in his song All Good Things Must Pass, “Nostalgia has a way of lookin’ better in your head.” (Did you honestly think I would write and this entire series without one Zach Bryan philosophical reference?! C’mon…you know me better than that…)

Even so, the weight of what he did here is undeniable. Four seasons. One MVP. One Finals run. A franchise lifted into the national spotlight. That is Tier 2 territory without question, a peak so high and so impactful that it still casts a shadow decades later

I’ve done a lot of soul searching over this thought exercise, and at some point, I had to be honest with myself and allow the list to breathe. Devin Booker was at the top when I started. That felt right in the moment. But the deeper I went, the more I realized his story is still being written, and as much as I believe in where it is headed, there are still rungs left on the ladder for him to climb.

That is not a knock. It is an acknowledgment of motion.

Booker is still adding chapters in real time. Every night reshapes the graphic. Every season stretches the ceiling. He has been here for 11 years now, drafted 13th overall out of Kentucky in 2015, and none of us truly saw this coming. We hoped for a Klay Thompson-type outcome. What we got was a franchise cornerstone, a player whose arc is still bending upward, and because of that, the top spot has to wait.

The numbers will keep shifting because he is still active, still stacking nights, still moving the goalposts. Even so, the shape of the résumé is already clear.

Devin Booker is the leading scorer in the history of the franchise. He sits third all-time in scoring average at 24.5 points per game. Five of the top ten scoring seasons in Suns history belong to him, and his 2023–24 season finished second all-time, ten points shy of Tom Chambers’ long-standing mark. In the postseason, he is second all-time in franchise history at 28.0 points per game across 47 games, which says plenty about how his game scales when the lights get brighter.

He is first all-time in three-point attempts and makes, second in free throw attempts and free throws made, third in minutes played, and third in overall free throw percentage. He owns a spot inside the top five single-season free-throw percentages at 91.9% in 2019–20, ranks fifth in defensive rebounds, and ninth in total rebounds in Suns history.

Taken together, it tells a very clean story. Devin Booker is the greatest scorer this franchise has ever had, not for a moment or a season, but across the full arc of a career. Efficient, repeatable, and relentless, with one of the purest jump shots the league has seen, and a nightly consistency that has defined an era of Suns basketball.

One of the real challenges Booker faces is the era he plays in. We have never had more access, more data, more angles, and more opportunities to dissect every possession a player has. You can go back and pick apart anyone on this pyramid if you want, but with Booker, it feels louder, sharper, more immediate.

We are all plugged in now, walking around with a tiny computer in our pocket, capable of amplifying every frustration, every missed rotation, every off-shooting night, and firing it straight into the void. I do it too. We all do. And through all of that noise, Devin Booker keeps showing up, night after night, carrying this organization with a level of consistency that is easy to overlook precisely because it has become normal.

There is also one detail that cannot be ignored when placing him in Suns history. He is 29 years old. There is still a massive portion of his story left to write in Phoenix. Steve Nash was 30 when he arrived in 2004 and reshaped the franchise. Booker is already deep into his Suns tenure, and while his game is not built the same way, not designed first to supercharge everyone around him, he has grown into a dangerous scorer and a capable playmaker who can bend games in multiple ways.

The fan in me wants him at the top of this pyramid right now. I feel that pull. But the honest version of this exercise says the moment has not arrived yet. He is building one of the greatest careers the franchise has ever seen, and that part is undeniable.

Where he ultimately lands will be decided by the chapters that are still coming, the ones that determine whether his story finishes as great, or transcendent, or something even heavier than that.

Tier 1: Face of the Franchise

Where do you even start with Steve Nash? I suppose the only honest place is the beginning.

Draft night, 1996, the 15th pick out of Santa Clara, a skinny kid from Canada who did not exactly scream future Hall of Fame point guard. At the time, he looked like someone who would survive in the league, maybe carve out a nice career, maybe bounce around a bit. What he eventually became was something far bigger than that.

Steve Nash did not grow into a star quietly. He grew into a force that reshaped the organization, the fan base, and eventually the way basketball itself was played. Trying to define him strictly through numbers almost misses the point, even though the numbers are good. His Suns averages line up closely with Jason Kidd in purple and orange. Both at 14.4 points per game. Kidd actually edges him in assists per game, 9.7 to Nash’s 9.4. On paper, that feels like a wash.

And that is exactly why statistics can lie to you.

Because what Steve Nash did was not about box scores. It was about movement, tempo, spacing, and belief. He turned Phoenix into a basketball laboratory, a place where the game moved faster, smarter, freer. He made shooters better. He made bigs richer. He made role players feel indispensable. Night after night, the ball popped, the floor stretched, and the Suns felt inevitable in a way that no spreadsheet can fully capture.

Steve Nash did not simply play basketball in the Valley. He changed how it was understood. He changed what fans expected. He changed what opponents feared. And in doing so, he left behind something that numbers alone will never be able to explain.

He could have been one of the great scorers of his generation if that had ever been the priority. The skill was there. The efficiency was there. His 43.5% shooting from three is the highest mark from beyond the arc in franchise history. He ranks second all-time in made threes at 1,051 and second in attempts at 2,417, which makes that percentage even louder. And yet, across ten seasons in Phoenix, he averaged only 3.2 attempts per night. The shots were available. He simply chose something else.

That choice tells you everything you need to know about Steve Nash.

He hit his share of unforgettable threes, the kind that live forever in highlight reels and late-night arguments, but scoring was never the point. His obsession was amplification. Make everyone else better. Pull defenders out of position. Turn good players into great ones and role players into weapons. That was the engine. That was the gift. That is why he won two MVPs.

Not because he poured in points, but because he unlocked entire rosters.

In his first MVP season, 2004-05, he averaged 15.5 points per game. That number still surprises people who did not live through it. What matters more is the 11.5 assists per night, the league-leading mark, and what happened around him. A team that had won 29 games the season before he arrived finished 62-20. That does not happen by accident. That happens when one player rewires how basketball is played.

It is difficult to fully articulate what Steve Nash meant to the Suns and to the league at large. People often point to 1992-93 as a turning point for the franchise, and it absolutely was. But what Nash did beginning in 2004 reshaped the entire sport. Pace changed. Spacing changed. Decision-making changed. The league we watch now traces a straight line back to what was happening nightly in Phoenix.

And then there are the numbers, which somehow still feel understated. He sits first all-time in franchise assists, finishing just shy of 7,000. He owns the second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and ninth best single-season assist totals in Suns history. He is first all-time in Suns free throw percentage at 90.7%, and he set the single-season franchise record in 2009-10 by hitting 93.8% from the line. He ranks third in win shares and third in total games played.

Steve Nash did not dominate the game by force. He bent it. He guided it. He made everyone around him sharper, faster, and more dangerous. And long after the numbers blur together, that feeling remains.

Nash gave the Suns legitimacy. He gave them relevance. He gave them gravity. He led the league in assists five times during his ten seasons in Phoenix, and the winning followed right along with him. From 2004 through 2012, the Suns went 405-235. That is not a hot stretch. That is sustained excellence. And he was the best guy on the court every night.

In the postseason, he was still Steve Nash, averaging 18.2 points and 9.7 assists on absurd 50/38/90 shooting splits. And yet, the one thing missing still hangs in the air. He never reached the NBA Finals in a Suns uniform. The Spurs and the Mavericks made sure of that.

But yes, he absolutely should sit at the top of the pyramid. Because what he did? It was Nashty.


There was one part of this project that ended up being trickier than I expected, even though by the time I reached the end it all settled into place, and that was naming the tiers themselves. The labels are mostly arbitrary, an attempt to give each level a little more personality than Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3, and so on, but the final tier carries real weight. “The Face of the Franchise”. That is the one where people tend to pause, reread, and start forming opinions immediately.

When you really think about it, the player at the top of any pyramid, for any team, is exactly that. The face. The name that comes to mind first when the organization is mentioned. The mental shortcut your brain takes before you even realize it is happening. That is why the final two tiers matter so much, because all three of those players qualify depending on who you ask.

If you are a newer fan, or someone who came of age watching this current era, Devin Booker is the answer without hesitation. If you are ten or fifteen years older, your brain probably goes straight to Steve Nash. And if you go back another generation, you are likely landing on Charles Barkley, because of what Suns basketball meant nationally at that moment, the visibility, the swagger, the feeling that Phoenix was suddenly on the map.

That is what makes the question so personal. The answer changes based on memory, age, and lived experience. There is no universal response, and that is part of what makes this exercise worth doing in the first place.

For me, when I step back and look at the totality of the franchise history, Steve Nash is the answer that holds up the longest. Fifty years from now, even if no one is playing basketball anymore and all that remains are stories, clips, and context, what Nash did and how he did it will still resonate.


The journey has ended. The pyramid is built. The conclusions, though, remain open, because there are still chapters waiting to be written, still performances left to deliver, still awards that have not found their owner.

I want to thank everyone who leaned into these conversations with me over the past few weeks. This was ambitious, something I had kicked around in my head more than once, and then finally decided to sit down and do. A free weekend turned into digging through data, combing through box scores, rewatching highlights, designing graphics, and slowly letting the history of this franchise breathe again. It became more than a project. It became an experience, one that sparked a handful of other thought exercises I might circle back to someday.

By the end of it all, I feel like I landed where I was supposed to land, even if it took longer than expected to get there. I still believe Devin Booker should be the face of the franchise because when his career reaches its conclusion, I believe that is exactly what he will be. That conviction never left me.

What changed came late in the process, during the final pass through the pyramid, while writing the closing pieces and assembling the Steve Nash graphic.

Seeing it all laid out again, the weight of what Nash accomplished in Phoenix hit differently. The longevity. The sustained success. The way he carried the organization year after year and reshaped how basketball was played, not only in the Valley but across the league. He matched the tenure Booker already has, and paired it with a level of consistent winning that is incredibly difficult to maintain.

Nash never reached the NBA Finals in Phoenix, but there are real reasons for that, reasons rooted in usage, roster depth, and the physical toll placed on guards asked to carry everything every night. Mike D’Antoni rode him hard. The margins were thin. The league was unforgiving.

It is a reminder of how difficult it is to win a championship as the best player on a team when you are a guard. You absorb contact. You take the hits. We saw it with Kevin Johnson. Paul Westphal never broke through either. Chris Paul and Devin Booker both reached the Finals, only to run into teams powered by dominant size and strength.

That context matters. It always has.

This pyramid is not a verdict carved in stone. It is a snapshot in time, shaped by history, memory, and perspective. And if there is one thing this exercise reinforced, it is how rich this franchise’s story really is, championship or not.

There are lessons tucked into this whole exercise. There are flowers that deserve to be handed out. There is appreciation to be felt and shared.

The Phoenix Suns have never climbed all the way to the top of the mountain, but that does not mean they have failed to give us something meaningful to hold onto. There is beauty in the process. There is beauty in the game itself. There is beauty in the history, in the conversations that history sparks, in the nights spent inside an arena or on a couch, living and dying with every possession.

Looking back through this pyramid forced me to sit with memories, some joyful, some frustrating, all of them personal. Players I grew up watching. Players I learned about later through numbers, stories, and grainy highlights. Friends and family who were part of my Suns’ experience. Some of them are still with us. Some of them are not.

That is part of the responsibility that comes with being a fan, and part of the responsibility I feel as a writer. To carry those stories forward. To keep them alive. To share them openly. To welcome new fans into the fold without acting like gatekeepers or arbiters of truth.

This was always a subjective process. Disagreement is baked into it. You might not see the pyramid the way I do, and that does not make either of us wrong. Sports history lives in memory as much as it lives in data, and memory is personal by nature. The arguments are part of the fun. The debate is the point.

Alright, maybe there is one exception. If you have Deandre Ayton on this pyramid, we might need to talk. That one probably came from a spreadsheet and not from watching the games. A joke. Mostly.

More than anything, I had fun doing this. I hope you had fun reading it. I hope you learned something you did not know before. I hope it led to a conversation, a text thread, a late-night argument, or a shared laugh. Because that is what makes sports matter. It is never only about the action on the floor. It is about the people watching, reacting, remembering, and connecting through it all.

That is what rooting for the purple and orange has always been about.


Open Thread: Remembering Doug Moe

UNSPECIFIED - CIRCA 1977: Head coach Doug Moe of the San Antonio Spurs looks on during an NBA basketball game circa 1977. Moe coached the Spurs from 1976-80. (Photo by Focus on Sport/Getty Images) | Getty Images

The first San Antonio Spurs game I ever attended was in 1985. The Spurs were hosting the Denver Nuggets at HemisFair Arena. My parents took my brother and I to the game and after we stuck around to get autographs. We both came home with pages signed by members of both teams. Among the dozen or so signatures we obtained, only two were legible – Spurs guard Johnny Moore and Nugget’s head coach Doug Moe.

I didn’t know who Doug Moe was, but my father did and dropped all kinds of knowledge into my ten-year-old mind. He’d been with the Spurs as they transitioned from the ABA to the NBA and helped define the culture of the team as they navigated the move into the big league.

Doug Moe passed away yesterday at the age of 87.

Moe was born in 1938 in Brooklyn, New York. He attended University of North Carolina before being drafted 22nd overall in 1961 by the Chicago Packers (these days known as the Washington Wizards). He eventually played for the ABA, picking up a championship trophy in 1969 and making three All-Star teams.

Moe began his coaching as an assistant coach to his former college teammate Larry Brown from 1972 to 1974 with ABA’s Carolina Cougars.

From 1974 to 1976 Moe continued on with Larry Brown as an assistant coach with the Denver Nuggets.

On June 30, 1976, Moe replaced Bob Bass as the head coach of the San Antonio Spurs, the year of the NBA-ABA merger, effectively making him him the Spurs first NBA coach. He served as head coach for four seasons amassing a regular-season coaching record of 177-135 (.567) only second to Gregg Popovich.

In a career that spanned four decades, Moe became one of the most celebrated coaches in NBA history. His overall NBA head coaching record, 628–529 (.543), is the 19th most in NBA history.

Doug Moe was the 2018 recipient of the Chuck Daly Lifetime Achievement Award.


Welcome to the Thread. Join in the conversation, start your own discussion, and share your thoughts. This is the Spurs community, your Spurs community. Thanks for being here.

Our community guidelines apply which should remind everyone to be cool, avoid personal attacks, not to troll and to watch the language.

College basketball hot seat: 13 coaches who may be in trouble

Jerome Tang called his Kansas State basketball team "embarrassing." No argument on that point. K-State fans wore paper bags over their heads. Embarrassed by all of it, the university fired Tang.

Tang won't be the last college basketball coach fired these next several weeks. The hot seat steams from Syracuse to LSU to Oklahoma and lands in between.

Adrian Autry, Syracuse

Why it’s hot: Syracuse is mired in a yearslong nosedive. Never mind the glory days, is it too much to ask the Orange to make the NCAA Tournament? No, it shouldn’t be too much to ask. It might be time for Syracuse to break with the Jim Boeheim coaching tree.

Jeff Capel, Pittsburgh

Why it’s hot: This is Capel’s eighth season. He’s been to the NCAA Tournament once. This season has been a disaster, including losses to Hofstra and Quinnipiac. If Pitt keeps Capel, take that as a sign it’s too poor to pay his buyout. There’s no other case for retention.

Jake Diebler, Ohio State

Ohio State coach Jake Diebler reacts during the first half of the 2025 Cleveland Hoops Showdown against West Virginia at Rocket Arena on December 13, 2025 in Cleveland.

Why it’s hot: On one hand, Diebler’s buyout would be a de minimis housekeeping cost for a revenue behemoth like Ohio State. On the other hand, the Buckeyes are on the bubble for the Big Dance. If they go dancing, there’s probably nothing to see here. If not, stay tuned.

Kim English, Providence

Why it’s hot: Providence became an NCAA Tournament regular under Ed Cooley, English’s predecessor. With English, the Friars are a Big East doormat. A recent loss to St. John’s included a brawl, the latest embarrassing moment in a bad season.

Steve Forbes, Wake Forest

Why it’s hot: Forbes won 25 games in his second season. An affable coach, he’s delivered some decent years and good soundbites. Eventually, though, every coach needs an NCAA bid. Forbes, now in Year 6, hasn’t gotten Wake Forest there.

Earl Grant, Boston College

Why it’s hot: Grant isn’t the sole problem at Boston College. This program lost its way almost 15 years ago and hasn’t found its way back. But Grant hasn’t been the solution, either. This bleak season includes a loss to Central Connecticut. That's the definition of a call to action.

Penny Hardaway, Memphis

Memphis' head coach Penny Hardaway reacts as a foul is called on Memphis during the game between Memphis and Tulane at FedExForum in Memphis, Tenn., on February 1, 2026.

Why it’s hot: Hardaway is following a good year (he won 29 games last season) with one of his worst. Memphis probably would hesitate before firing one of its own, but Hardaway knows as well as anyone this program has standards. He’s not meeting them.

Bobby Hurley, Arizona State

Why it’s hot: It’s never a good sign when a coach admits he’s “failing.” Hurley offered that brutal assessment after a loss in January. Well, you said it, coach. Prep the buyout cannon, but hold off on firing after ASU’s upset of Texas Tech.

Matt McMahon, LSU

Why it’s hot: McMahon was great at Murray State. He’s gone splat at LSU. If LSU wants to be an “everything school,” it must fix its basketball program. What better time than with a new athletic director, new president and new board of supervisors chairman? Would Will Wade listen to a "strong-ass offer"?

Wes Miller, Cincinnati

Why it’s hot: Bob Huggins and Mick Cronin set a high bar for Cincinnati. Miller isn’t meeting the standard through five seasons. Cincinnati isn’t the type of program that’s OK with going 0-for-5 in NCAA bids under the same coach.

Porter Moser, Oklahoma

Why it’s hot: Like his SEC counterpart McMahon, Moser thrived at a mid-major but fizzled in the Power Four ranks. A tale as old as peach baskets. Oklahoma endured a nine-game losing streak earlier this winter. That’s the foundation for a firing.

Lamont Paris, South Carolina

Why it’s hot: Paris has a meaty buyout, and South Carolina football coach Shane Beamer will enter this season on the hot seat. How many buyouts do the Gamecocks want to stomach this year? And yet, two straight disaster seasons leave Paris in trouble.

Damon Stoudamire, Georgia Tech

Why it’s hot: Within an ACC with a handful of bad teams, Georgia Tech might be the worst.The decision here will be a test of how badly (and how quickly) first-year Georgia Tech athletic director Ryan Alpert wants to address this program.

Blake Toppmeyer is a columnist for the USA TODAY Network. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: College basketball coach hot seat includes Penny Hardaway, Porter Moser

James Harden shouldn’t need your validation, but still does

Feb 11, 2026; Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Cleveland Cavaliers guard James Harden (1) stands on the court in the fourth quarter against the Washington Wizards at Rocket Arena. Mandatory Credit: David Richard-Imagn Images | David Richard-Imagn Images

James Harden is a walking paradox.

The newest Cleveland Cavaliers star is a man who’s inarguably changed how basketball is played — especially by those at the top of the game. He has birthed an entire generation of players who put their own spin on the heliocentric, perfectly spaced, three-outcome offense he pioneered. Jayson Tatum, Trae Young, Luka Doncic, and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander are all offshoots of this mold.

The main difference? Two of those players have won a championship. Harden hasn’t. And until he does, Harden won’t get as muchvalidation for changing the game as he deserves.

“At this point of his career, he’s still very, very talented, very, very good,” Donovan Mitchell said. “You look at the desperation of him. The first thing we talked about was, like, man, this could be his last chance to try and go ahead and get a ring. And we’re all in the locker room with the same mindset. So when you have that desperation from everybody up top, everybody else follows.”

On one hand, it’s fair to judge Harden for not being able to deliver a championship. Basketball is a team sport, but when your team’s entire philosophy is built around making sure one person can succeed, you can’t really divorce the team results from the individual.

At the same time, winning a championship is outside of just one person’s control, and it always will be.

“This whole ring culture thing is crazy,” Mitchell said. “It is what it is, right? I can’t fight it. It’s just what it is. That’s the way we value people.”

SACRAMENTO, CA – FEBRUARY 7: James Harden #1 and Donovan Mitchell #45 of the Cleveland Cavaliers talk during the game against the Sacramento Kings on February 7, 2026 at Golden 1 Center in Sacramento, California. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2026 NBAE (Photo by Rocky Widner/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images

Two weeks ago, if you told a Cavs fan that there would be a packed house for a weekday game against the shamelessly tanking Washington Wizards team, with nearly everyone in attendance there to see Harden’s debut with the team, they would’ve thought you were crazy. But reality is often stranger than fiction.

We live in a world where James Harden isn’t just on the Cavaliers, he’s why they’re the favorites to represent the Eastern Conference in the NBA Finals.

The Cavs are soaring up the standings and playing their best basketball of the season. Harden’s ability to unlock Jarrett Allen, provide elite three-level scoring, and, most importantly, not take away from what Mitchell does best is a large reason why the team is succeeding.

The on-court production that Harden provides is apparent. Fans are typically going to like the guys that makes their team good. But embracing Harden to this level and this quickly speaks to how Harden is one of the most entertaining players when you remove the outside noise about his playing style.

For many basketball fans, Harden represents what’s wrong with the current NBA.

Harden hops from team to team as the ultimate basketball mercenary. He is the basketball epitome of the three-outcome baseball player, but in this instance, it’s threes, rim attempts, or free throws. And, the lengths he goes to initiate and highlight defensive contact can be revolting if he’s doing so against your favorite team.

These criticisms are completely fair, but they shouldn’t overshadow the artistry and skill that Harden plays with.

In many ways, Harden is the Drake of basketball. He has the talent and mastery of the craft to be one of the most aesthetically pleasing players of all-time, but sacrificed it all at the altar of commercial success.

Instead of prioritizing the technical mastery of Kobe Bryant operating in the midrange, Harden bypasses that part of the floor altogether by seeing how many steps he can take without dribbling to get from the three-point line to the basket.

Instead of going to the basket with the combination of force and grace that Dwyane Wade did, he’s seeing if he can hook a defender’s arm and still get an off-balance floater to fall.

And instead of hunting for threes by tirelessly navigating off-ball screens like Ray Allen, he’s going to cut out the middle man and create that look himself by taking the largest possible step backward he can and hoist the shot up that way.

These changes have been looked at as deskilling the game, when in reality, it’s just a simplification.

Taking exaggerated step-back threes or contorting your body to highlight contact on drives while still keeping your balance requires incredible talent. Being able to do these things as an individual player, and not relying on others to run specific sets to get these shots off reduces variables and leads to more predictable positive outcomes. This is what has led to Harden consistently captaining elite offenses, regardless of the team context, for the last 17 years.

HOUSTON, TX – MAY 28: Stephen Curry #30 of the Golden State Warriors defends against James Harden #13 of the Houston Rockets in the first half of Game Seven of the Western Conference Finals of the 2018 NBA Playoffs at Toyota Center on May 28, 2018 in Houston, Texas. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Bob Levey/Getty Images) | Getty Images

Some changes to the game are embraced. The way Stephen Curry revolutionized how we thought about three-point shooting and how to create those looks was celebrated. Harden’s ruthless efficiency hasn’t been, even though he’s done more to change how the game is played at the highest level than Curry ever did.

At the height of his powers, Harden completely eliminated the midrange shot and focused only on taking threes, shots at the rim, or getting to the free-throw line. He also played in systems with perfect spacing and minimal off-ball movement. Harden needed to know where everyone was on the court. If the help came, he made the correct pass out to the assist.

During his MVP season, this style of play led to being in the 100th percentile in points per shot attempt, usage, and assist percentage. All the while, with just a slightly below-average turnover rate, which is exceptional considering how much he handled the ball. In short, there are very few offensive engines — especially those that are guards — who have put together as special a season.

This style of play should’ve been the NBA intelligentsia’s dream. Harden is the personification of basketball’s version of Moneyball, with his ruthless pursuit of figuring out how to apply his skills best to get the most success for himself and his team. Instead of being celebrated, he was derided for ruining the game.

Harden is unquestionably one of the best guards ever, and his influence on how the game is played is rivaled by only a few in history, regardless of team success. That, however, won’t be how history remembers him unless he plays a significant role on a championship team.

Fortunately for him, this Cavs team gives him another chance to change that narrative, and he knows it.

“I don’t know how many times I’ve really said that throughout my career,” Harden said about the championship possibilities. “Given the depth, the shooting, the athleticism, the versatility that we have, yes.” 

Maybe validation doesn’t truly matter for Harden. He doesn’t seem like someone who lies awake at night thinking about how the rest of the world perceives him, unlike one of his former teammates in Oklahoma City. At the same time, it would be a disservice to how we talk about the game if he isn’t remembered as one of the very best players of his generation years down the line. And that isn’t right.

Just because you don’t like how the artist applies their skills doesn’t make them less of one.

“But at the end of the day, I don’t think it’s fair,” Mitchell said. “I don’t think it’s right. But, whatever.”

Twitter Gold: The Greek Freak Likes What He Sees In Kon Knueppel

Nov 14, 2025; Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA; Milwaukee Bucks forward Giannis Antetokounmpo (34) shoots against Charlotte Hornets guard Kon Knueppel (7) during overtime at Fiserv Forum. Mandatory Credit: Jeff Hanisch-Imagn Images | Jeff Hanisch-Imagn Images

In last summer’s NBA Draft, Cooper Flagg went first to Dallas, Rutgers’ Dylan Harper second to San Antonio, Baylor’s V.J. Edgecombe third to Philly and Flagg’s Duke teammate Kon Knueppel fourth to Charlotte.

In retrospect, San Antonio might have made a mistake. He would have been a great fit with Victor Wembanyama and more importantly, he would have fit in philosophically with what the Spurs have always looked for: smart, team-oriented players.

Woulda, coulda, shoulda. Too late now. And anyway, Knueppel has been great with the Hornets.

After they picked him, a lot of people thought he had gone too soon, but someone with the team – we can’t remember who – said they thought they might have gotten the best player in the draft.

It’s still early, but they might be right, and at a minimum, almost everyone underestimated Knueppel’s impact. He’s been a revelation.

It’s been fun to watch people realize his impact. In this video from All-Star Weekend, Milwaukee’s Giannis Antetokounmpo spends a little time talking to Knueppel. He demonstrates a move and compliments Knueppel, a rookie, for understanding something that a lot of players have never figured out.

Antetokounmpo goes on to say that Knueppel is one of the smartest rookies he’s ever seen and that, in so many words, his future is bright.

At the end, Knueppel, a Milwaukee native, is clearly excited that the hometown hero is impressed. Who wouldn’t be?

Go to the DBR Boards to find Blue Healer Auctions | Drop us a line

March Madness bracket tracker: Who's in, out on NCAA Tournament bubble

It's mid-February, which means it's time for college basketball fans to get serious about NCAA Tournament brackets.

Conference championships just around the corner, meaning March Madness is nearly here. At this point of the 2025-26 season, we have a good idea of which teams are headed to the Big Dance — and which teams have work left to do.

Last year at this time, it was easy to predict an SEC team would win it all, as the conference was dominating the top 25. Eventually, it was Florida that won the national championship.

That conference has taken a step back this year, with the Big Ten emerging as the conference to watch. In USA TODAY Sports' latest look at the bracket, Georgia, UCLA, Ohio State, TCU are the last four teams in the tourney, through Tuesday, Feb. 17. Conversely, New Mexico, California, Missouri and Santa Clara are the first four teams out of the tournament.

Here's an updated look at the NCAA Tournament bubble, with which teams are locks and likely in the field as the conference tournaments begin this week:

March Madness bracket bubble watch tracker

Tracker based on games through Tuesday, Feb. 17

NCAA Tournament locks

  • Big Ten (7): Michigan, Purdue, Nebraska, Illinois, Michigan State, Wisconsin and Iowa
  • ACC (6): Duke, Virginia, Louisville, North Carolina, Clemson and North Carolina State
  • Big 12 (6): Arizona, Houston, Iowa State, Kansas, Texas Tech and Brigham Young
  • SEC (6): Florida, Vanderbilt, Alabama, Arkansas, Tennessee and Kentucky
  • Other (5): Gonzaga, Miami (Ohio), St. Louis, Saint Mary's and Utah State
  • Big East(3): UConn, St. John's and Villanova

The Big Ten currently leads all conferences with a projected seven teams that look like locks for the NCAA Tournament. Michigan has looked like the best team in the country all season.

Following a slow start, Florida looks like a real threat to win the SEC and get back to the Final Four to defend its national championship. The SEC ties the ACC and Big 12 with six teams looking like potential locks.

The Big East has three potential locks for the tournament, making it a real threat to the other conferences in 2025-26.

NCAA Tournament likely ins

  • ACC (2): Miami and Southern Methodist
  • Big Ten(2): Indiana and UCLA
  • Big 12 (1): Central Florida 
  • Big East: None
  • SEC (3): Auburn, Texas A&M and Texas 
  • Other (6): Howard, New Mexico, Santa Clara, San Diego State, VCU and Yale

Auburn reached the Final Four last season, but still has some work to do to even get back to the tournament in the first season with Steven Pearl leading the team, following the retirement of Bruce Pearl before the season.

Despite losing Richard Pitino to St. John's, New Mexico has held up strongly this year and is a team that could likely earn a berth in the NCAA Tournament if the Lobos have a strong ending to the season.

After winning it all in football, could Indiana make history and follow Florida in becoming schools to win football and basketball national titles in the same academic year?

NCAA Tournament bubble teams

  • ACC: None
  • Big Ten (2): Ohio State and Southern California
  • Big 12: None  
  • Big East (1): Seton Hall 
  • SEC (2): Georgia and Missouri 
  • Other (7): Belmont, High Point, Liberty, Navy, North Dakota State, Stephen F. Austin and Utah Valley

These bubble teams have just over a 50% chance of reaching the NCAA Tournament, according to JThom Analytics. These teams have a strong chance to make the Big Dance, but will need to have strong finishes to the season.

For these teams, winning their conference tournaments would remove doubts about the strength of the schedule, quality of wins, etc. Schools such as Georgia or Missouri in the SEC, or Ohio State and USC in the Big Ten, could use deep runs in their respective conference tournaments to lock in a spot.

At this point, none of the schools on this list should book tickets for the NCAA Tournament — but one good week could change the discourse and make Selection Sunday less stressful.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: March Madness bubble tracker: Latest look at who's in, out NCAA bracket

The Gold Plan Is the NBA’s Best Fix for Tanking

Utah's Lauri Markkanen dribbles against Indiana's Jay Huff. (Bobby Goddin / Getty Images)
NBA tanking has reached a breaking point, but a modified “Gold Plan” draft format could reward late-season wins, restore competitive integrity, and make every game in March and April matter again.

The first question at NBA Commissioner Adam Silver's annual All-Star Weekend press conference on Saturday was about the league's most pressing issue: tanking.

Just two days earlier, the league fined the Utah Jazz $500,000 and the Indiana Pacers $100,000 for "conduct detrimental to the league," due to roster management designed to lose games to improve their chances to land the top pick in a 2026 draft that's expected to be one of the most talented in recent memory. While teams have historically tried losing games in March and April, Utah was cited for games on Feb. 7 and 9, where it benched top stars Lauri Markkanen and Jaren Jackson Jr. for the fourth quarter in winnable games after playing in the first three. (Earlier Thursday, the Jazz announced that Jackson would undergo season-ending knee surgery.)

“Overt behavior like this that prioritizes draft position over winning undermines the foundation of NBA competition and we will respond accordingly to any further actions that compromise the integrity of our games,” Silver said in Thursday's press release. Silver doubled down Saturday, saying that we're seeing worse tanking behavior that we've seen in recent memory and "what we're doing, what we're seeing right now is not working; there's no question about it."

Luckily for the NBA, my solution for tanking is already successfully implemented in other sports leagues and would promote and incentivize winning and competitive basketball for the league's worst teams during the regular season's waning months.

At the 2012 MIT Sloan Sports & Analytics Conference, University of Missouri PhD student Adam Gold presented an anti-tanking plan for hockey. He proposed that once NHL teams were eliminated from playoff contention, every win and overtime loss would count as draft ranking points, with the draft order determined by the most successful bad team toward the end of the season rather than by the bad team that tanks to finish with the worst record. The PWHL adopted the "Gold Plan" in 2024, and the NBA can and should implement a modified model to prevent teams from intentionally losing games in February, March, and April.

Once an NBA team reaches 40 regular-season losses, it can start accumulating wins toward its draft position, which is determined by the teams that win the most games after it's essentially eliminated from playoff contention. At the All-Star break, Sacramento and Indiana are already past 40 losses, while Utah, Washington, and Brooklyn are at 38-39 defeats. This plan ensures that the worst teams will actually want to win games at the end of the season, making the final contests of the year impactful and meaningful for all 30 teams.

Would teams try to tank at the beginning of the season rather than reach 40 losses more quickly? Potentially, but intentionally losing games at the beginning of each season is harder to accomplish for both teams and players, and the NBA's antennae would be on high alert to punish teams over the first half of the season that try to manipulate rosters the way Utah did earlier this month.

Players don't want to tank because their play impacts their stats, which impact their future contracts, and players are competitors who want to win and want to be viewed as winners. Unless they have rock-solid job security, coaches don't particularly like tanking either.

"I don't think it would work with me. I don't think it's right," Hall of Fame former head coach George Karl told Boardroom last week at the premiere for Prime Video's ABA docuseries Soul Power. "There's a problem that I think the commissioner has got to address."

There's no foolproof way to completely eliminate tanking. Whether you eliminate certain draft pick protections in trades, take away draft lottery ping-pong balls, lock the lottery order at a certain date, or prevent teams from taking luxury tax payments, there isn't a perfect plan out there that would eliminate tanking for good. But the Gold Plan would eliminate late-season tanking for good, with increased penalties and scrutiny for early-season offenders that would be too obvious to ignore.

All 30 teams would be motivated to win in March and April, giving every game meaning, purpose, and high stakes heading into the playoffs. And what a breath of fresh air that would be.

Read More:

Film & TVFebruary 18, 2026

Glossy, Gothic, and Hollow: We Didn’t Need Emerald Fennell’s ‘Wuthering Heights’ Adaptation

SportsFebruary 17, 2026

Tony Clark’s Exit Comes at the Worst Time for Baseball

MusicFebruary 17, 2026

The Business of LaRussell: How Independence Became the Advantage

SportsFebruary 13, 2026

The Long Game: How the Super Bowl Halftime Show Signals NFL’s Global Future

EntertainmentFebruary 13, 2026

Why I Can’t Stop Thinking About Doctors on ‘The Pitt’ and Generational Heartthrobs

Film & TVFebruary 13, 2026

How ‘The Gallerist’ Turns Natalie Portman and Jenna Ortega Into Art-World Outlaws

Mea culpa: I severely underestimated these Boston Celtics

Oct 31, 2025; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Boston Celtics center Neemias Queta (88) jumps for a rebound with forward Jaylen Brown (7) and guard Derrick White (9) against Philadelphia 76ers forward Jabari Walker (33) in the first quarter at Xfinity Mobile Arena. Mandatory Credit: Kyle Ross-Imagn Images | Kyle Ross-Imagn Images

Back in October, before this NBA season began, did you perhaps open up a sports betting app on your phone and wager on how many wins the Boston Celtics would achieve? Did you say they would win at least 48? Maybe 50? More than 50?

If so, then the odds are good that you’re about to win some money. At the All-Star break, the Celtics rank fifth in the entire league at 35-19 – a winning percentage of .648 that equates to a 53-29 record over a full season. Barring any unfortunate developments, the Celtics should finish in a far better position than almost anyone expected.

If you saw all that coming, you’re smarter than I am. Last season, I correctly predicted the Celtics would win 61 games, and I’ve been pretty close to the right number in most other recent years. This season, however, I dropped my expectation to 44 wins. That’s because the narratives appeared reasonable: With so much talent lost in the off-season, and with the replacements being primarily young and unproven, there seemed to be no way for Boston to avoid the “gap year” that many NBA observers were forecasting.

There’s no denying it. I was guilty of underestimating the Celtics.

My mistakes didn’t end there. I said Derrick White would make the All-Star team (he didn’t); Jayson Tatum’s absence would be so harmful (it’s been manageable) that his haters would apologize (they haven’t); and the Cs would be more effective if they’d speed up their offense (at 95.7, they’re dead last in pace for the second straight year, yet are second in offensive rating at 120.2).

The Celtics have defied expectations, with Jaylen Brown having his best season. (Photo by Erin Clark/The Boston Globe via Getty Images) | Boston Globe via Getty Images

There’s more. I was sure they’d be pounded on the glass (but in fact, they’re eighth in the league with 45.4 rebounds per game, and seventh in rebound percentage at 51.4%); they’d struggle on defense (nope, their current defensive rating is ninth-best at 112.6); and they’d be especially vulnerable inside (they actually have allowed just 40.9 paint points per game, second best in the league).

My one consolation was I had plenty of company in being wrong. The most optimistic guess here at CelticsBlog was a 48-win season. Also, in hindsight, we now see numerous mainstream news outlets whose crystal ball apparently wasn’t crystal-clear. Here’s a sampling of wayward prognostications.

Yahoo! Sports, Oct. 7, 2025 – Boston Celtics 2025-26 season preview: Will this be a lottery team without Jayson Tatum?

Over/under win total: 40.5

Not only would it be fine and completely justified for Boston to dip under .500 this season, it would be advisable to do so! I’ll take the under, at the risk of making Mazzulla rage-weep tears of blood and swear an unrelenting vendetta against my family, friends and still-living former teachers.

ESPN.com, Oct. 20, 2025 – 2025-26 NBA season preview: Rankings, predictions, odds

Chances to make playoffs: 51.8%

Projected wins: 40.1

Biggest thing we’ll be talking about this season: What is the plan for what should be a gap season? The Celtics are a proud bunch, and coach Joe Mazzulla and Co. believe they can be a factor while Jayson Tatum recovers from a torn Achilles. But without Tatum and experienced bigs in the rotation, how competitive can this team be — and what happens if Derrick White and/or Jaylen Brown miss time?

SB Nation, Oct. 16, 2025 — NBA power rankings: 2026 championship chances from No. 30 to No. 1

16. Boston Celtics (and miss playoffs)

Is Jayson Tatum actually going to play this season after suffering a torn Achilles in the Eastern Conference semifinals? It seems insane to me, but Tatum is already running and dunking, and clearly wants to give it a go. This Boston team sure seems built for a gap year while Tatum rests and recovers if you ask me. This might be one of the worst front courts in the league after Al Horford, Kristaps Porzingis, and Luke Kornet departed in free agency, leaving Neemias Queta, Chris Boucher, Luka Garza, and a lot of question marks. I understand the logic that Jaylen Brown and Derrick White are just too good to fail, and it’s possible Payton Pritchard puts his name in All-Star consideration with a bigger role. Even if Tatum comes back, I don’t think the Celtics have any shot at winning the East, so to me it makes it all moot. Finishing in the lottery and with a crack at another potential young star should be in the Celtics’ best long-term interest, but it’s hard to do that with championship-caliber players like these.

CBSsports.com, Oct. 21, 2026 – NBA season predictions: Expert picks for full standings and 2026 NBA Finals

Note: This site listed picks in chart form with seven participants. The Celtics were ranked as high as sixth in the East and as low as 12th. Two of the writers predicted Boston would miss the playoffs.

* * * * *

On top of all that, the NBA itself indicated the Celtics would fall a notch or two. Boston didn’t play on the official opening night and was omitted from the Christmas Day schedule for the first time in several years.

When the Celtics began the season losing their first three games, it appeared that the narratives were coming true. Yet today, the Celtics are not scuffling to make the Play-In – they hold second place in the East by one-half game over their nemesis, the New York Knicks. Last May, shortly after the Celtics were eliminated and Tatum was hospitalized, a Knicks fans was talking trash to me on the BlueSky platform. His comment: “Enjoy the rebuild.”

Wonder if he’s looked at the standings lately?

Putting that fun aside, the Celtics and all Boston fans know too well that fortunes can change in an instant. There’s no guarantee that the Cs continue to win at the same pace. However, there are reasons they’ve overcome expectations.

Everyone on the roster has contributed to wins at some point, including young players who are just now getting their first opportunities to perform. And if a 10-year veteran can have a breakout season, Jaylen Brown is doing just that. Equally important, President of Basketball Operations Brad Stevens, Head Coach Joe Mazzulla, the assistant coaches, and the entire behind-the-scenes staff are brilliant at what they do.

As Jaylen put it recently:

The Celtics have made the playoffs for 11 consecutive years. That’s the longest active streak in the NBA, and it’s about to become 12 straight. Maybe the only mistake I made, that everyone made this season, was not trusting them.

For more analysis of how the Celtics remain successful, check these current CelticsBlog articles.

There’s No Salary Cap on Basketball IQ — The Week in Green

How does Boston’s competition stack up after the trade deadline?

The Celtics weren’t supposed to be this good. What should fans expect now?

Three statistical paradoxes that explain the Celtics’ overachieving season

Derrick White doesn’t need to make shots to be elite

Jaylen Brown loves these Celtics — and he’ll shout it from the rooftops

What lies ahead

There are 28 games remaining, divided equally between home and away. Here are some of the storylines that will be most prominent over the final weeks of the season. (I’ll keep predictions to a minimum.)

40-20 rule:
Conventional NBA wisdom says that a true title contender will win 40 games before losing 20. The Celtics need to win five straight to make that happen. It’s achievable, but unlikely, because their first four games after the All-Star break will be on a Western road trip versus four teams above .500: Golden State Warriors, Los Angeles Lakers, Phoenix Suns and Denver Nuggets. Then they’d have to beat the Brooklyn Nets in their first game back in Boston.

The Denver contest is set up to be a scheduled loss: second night of a back-to-back, last game of the week-long trip, being played in the altitude of the Mile-High City, versus the potent Nuggets (currently 35-20) led by MVP candidate Nikola Jokic. If the Celtics actually do win their next five in a row, we should all get very, very excited.

Schedule:
The Celtics will be tested again by a five-day road trip in March: at Cleveland, San Antonio, and Oklahoma City. After that, 10 of their last 16 will be at home, including four of the last five. Their final road game will be on April 9 at New York, possibly with second-place in the East at stake. The regular season concludes on April 12 with the Orlando Magic visiting Boston.

Incorporating Vucevic:
The acquisition of Nikola Vucevic gives the Celtics an experienced and talented big man who can rebound and stretch the floor. The task now is to get him comfortable with the system and to create an effective tandem with Neemias Queta. Luka Garza will get fewer minutes, but stuff happens. Vooch is the guy the Cs will count on in the postseason.

Jayson Tatum:
Will Tatum return or not? If he does play, how effective will he be? Those are the questions that will determine if the Celtics are just a feel-good regular-season story, or a real contender with a chance to return to the Finals. There are only five rotation players from the 2024 championship squad still on the roster today, Tatum being one. The Celtics have found ways to win in the regular season without him, but they won’t in the postseason. It’s just that simple.

Assuming Tatum does return, there are two dates that stand out as the best options. On February 27, the Nets visit the Garden, and during the following week there are three more home games. That period would be a solid opportunity for a test run that could incorporate some rest, avoid travel, and gradually build up Tatum’s minutes.

Similarly, March 14 has the Washington Wizards visiting Boston, followed by five of the next six games at home. At that point, 16 games would remain on the schedule, which might or might not be enough time for Tatum to get reacclimated. It’s difficult to imagine him being ready for the postseason if he attempts his comeback any later than that.

* * * * *

How did your predictions turn out so far? Let us know in the comments.

Former Cavs player says he was a ‘scapegoat’ for team’s early season struggles

CLEVELAND, OHIO - JANUARY 04: Lonzo Ball #2 and Darius Garland #10 of the Cleveland Cavaliers look on during the first half against the Detroit Pistons at Rocket Arena on January 04, 2026 in Cleveland, Ohio. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Nick Cammett/Getty Images) | Getty Images

No one likes to lose. Even worse, no one likes to be blamed for losing. Lonzo Ball says he feels he became a scapegoat for fans this season when the Cleveland Cavaliers were struggling.

“I don’t feel like I’m playing as badly as people are saying,” Ball said on his podcast. “I know I’m the scapegoat right now, but look, that comes with the name, though, and that comes with what they brought me in for, so it’s granted, I’m not going to say I was playing great.”

The full quote is more reasonable than what has gone viral on Twitter. Ball recognizes he fell short of the expectations he brought to Cleveland. His only disagreement is that he doesn’t believe he was as bad as the discourse suggested. Now, that’s something we can argue on the merits. But I think it’s worth being fair to what Ball was actually saying.

“Can I play better? Yes. Have I been playing terrible? I don’t think I have,” Ball said.

Ball was brought to Cleveland with the hopes of being their version of Jrue Holiday or Alex Caruso. A defensive-minded guard who can playmake and potentially space the floor. At his best, Ball flashed the potential to be that in the past

That never materialized in Cleveland. Ball shot just 30.1% from the floor and was a non-threat to score. That drastically limited his ability to create for others — and his defense wasn’t as good as advertised. His poor three-point shooting was the nail in the coffin.

“To me, I’m just missing shots.” “People say, ‘Oh well, he’s shooting 25 percent.’ Well, let’s actually take the percentages and talk about what that is, I’m taking four shots a gameand making one of them, that’s sh****, but I promise we’re not winning or losing off of four shots.”

It would be silly to suggest that Ball was the primary reason for Cleveland’s struggles. The early portion of the season saw injuries, poor effort, and bad shooting across the board. Ball was only one part of the equation. Though he certainly wasn’t helping them when he was on the floor.

“I don’t feel like I’m the worst in the NBA,” Ball said.

Ball finished in the 0th percentile for points per shot attempt and the 1st percentile in turnover percentage. The Cavs were 5.5 points worse with him on the floor, placing him in the 25th percentile for on/off rating. As a reminder, you want to be in the higher percentiles.

Kansas State said it fired Jerome Tang 'for cause.' Will that hold up in court?

The two parties are in agreement on this: Jerome Tang is no longer the men’s basketball coach at Kansas State.

Things get dramatically more complicated from there. Kansas State holds that Tang, who was fired on Sunday, can be dismissed “for cause,” which would invalidate the $18.7 million buyout associated with his contract.

“This was a decision that was made in the best interest of our university and men’s basketball program," athletics director Gene Taylor said in a statement.

“Recent public comments and conduct, in addition to the program’s overall direction, have not aligned with K-State’s standards for supporting student-athletes and representing the university. We wish Coach Tang and his family all the best moving forward.”

Taylor’s remarks refer to comments Tang made following a 91-62 loss to Cincinnati on Feb. 11, which dropped the Wildcats’ record to 10-15 overall and 1-11 in Big 12 play.

“This was embarrassing,” Tang had said. “These dudes do not deserve to wear this uniform, and there will be very few of them in it next year. I'm embarrassed for the university, I'm embarrassed for our fans, and our student section. It's just ridiculous.”

Tang’s attorneys, Tom Mars and Bennett Speyer, pushed back on the school’s characterization.

If Taylor and university president Richard Linton “really think the school was embarrassed by recent events,” they said in a statement shared with ESPN, “that’s nothing compared to the embarrassment that both of them are about to experience.”

What does it mean to be fired “for cause”?

Dozens of major-conference men’s basketball and football coaches will be fired in any given year, the wide majority for simply failing to win enough games.

That’s certainly the case with Tang, who led Kansas State to an unexpected Elite Eight appearance as the first-year coach in 2023 but was unable to capitalize on that early success. Since losing to Florida Atlantic in the regional final that March, the Wildcats have gone a combined 45-47 with one postseason appearance, a trip to the NIT in 2024 that ended in the first round.

Occasionally, however, schools are able to fire coaches for contractual violations that can minimize or even outright negate agreed-upon buyout figures.

“The most important part of a contract is not what is being paid, but how you get fired, how you get terminated,” said Martin Greenberg, a sports lawyer and professor of sports law at Marquette University. “That’s the most important part of a contract these days.”

In these scenarios, universities can dismiss a coach for missteps related to NCAA penalties, inappropriate behavior or, as stated in Tang’s contract, a “failure or refusal to perform his duties and responsibilities as head coach.”

“A university’s most realistic options often are to: (1) continue to employ the coach because of the coach’s success or because it is cost prohibitive to terminate the coach’s employment without cause; or (2) attempt to terminate the coach with cause and likely encounter litigation,” University of Iowa Professor Josh Lens wrote in a 2022 article for the Villanova Law Review.

One recent example is former Ohio football coach Brian Smith, who was placed on leave in early December and then fired later that month for "serious professional misconduct and activities that reflect unfavorably on the University,” the school said.

Another is former Michigan coach Sherrone Moore. The Wolverines’ second-year coach was terminated with cause in December after an investigation unearthed an inappropriate relationship with a staff member, saving the school from paying the roughly $14 million buyout he was owed in his contract.

Did Jerome Tang violate his contract?

According to a contract signed in 2023, Tang agreed he could be fired for cause without being “entitled to the payment of any compensation, benefits, or damages.”

In addition to “serious or multiple violations” of NCAA rules or “material fraud or dishonesty,” issues that could lead to a for-cause firing were “insubordination” or “objectional behavior” and “intentional, negligent or other failure or refusal in any material respect to perform the duties and responsibilities of Head Coach required under this Agreement.”

Kansas State’s efforts to obtain a for-cause firing seem to hinge on responsibilities outlined to Tang under the category of “Specific Duties and Responsibilities.”

In addition to requiring Tang to devoting his “full professional time” to serving as the Wildcats’ head coach, the list of responsibilities included two key requests:

One, “promoting and encouraging support of the Team’s student-athletes. And two, to avoid engaging in “any behaviors, actions, or activities” that could subject the university “to public disrepute, embarrassment, ridicule, or scandal.”

By absolving itself of the need to pay Tang’s buyout, Kansas State could save a significant sum of money at a time when many major-conference athletics departments are attempting to piece together revenue-sharing payments given directly to student-athletes under last year’s House v. NCAA settlement.

The crux of Kansas State’s argument comes down to this: By disparaging members of the team, did Tang fail to conduct himself in a manner consistent with being the Wildcats’ head coach?

“I am deeply disappointed with the university's decision and strongly disagree with the characterization of my termination," Tang said in a statement. “I have always acted with integrity and faithfully fulfilled my responsibilities as head coach.”

What happens next with Jerome Tang and Kansas State?

Tang and Kansas State should eventually come to an undisclosed financial agreement that ends any potential litigation and permanently severs the relationship between both parties.

This is what unfolded in the high-profile disagreement between LSU and former football coach Brian Kelly. Two weeks after relieving Kelly in late October, the school informed his representatives it would be attempting to fire him for cause. If successful, LSU would have been off the hook for Kelly’s full buyout of $54 million.

According to Kelly’s contract, he could have been fired for cause because of “substantial” rules violations, a felony conviction or conduct that damaged the university’s brand. By the end of November, LSU agreed to pay Kelly’s full buyout, which became the second-largest in NCAA history.

One factor that stands to complicate Kansas State’s argument is Taylor’s willingness to allow Tang to remain as coach through the end of the season with a renegotiated buyout number, Taylor said on Monday.

If open to retaining Tang for another month, Tang’s lawyers could contend, how could the school find his behavior to be inappropriate enough to warrant an immediate for-cause dismissal?

In the end, both Kansas State and Tang will likely find a sort of common ground, one that absolves the school of some financial commitment and avoids a very public and possibly embarrassing legal back-and-forth that could cause damage to both parties’ reputation.

“It’s better to settle these things in the boardroom rather than the courtroom,” Greenberg said. “To let out the dirty laundry in public doesn’t do any good for the school, doesn’t do any good for the students, doesn’t do any good for recruiting or for donations.”

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Does Kansas State have a case for 'for cause' firing of Jerome Tang?

Fantasy Basketball Waiver Wire: Young players on tanking teams present plenty of rest-of-season value

The All-Star break came and went, allowing fantasy basketball managers to take a well-earned rest. Now, attention shifts to the fantasy playoffs, which for some could be just around the corner. With certain NBA teams now focused on the lottery, we could be about to see certain players stepping into larger roles. As we approach the pointy end of the season, the waiver wire is the place to be, providing managers with bargain players who could be about to ascend the NBA fantasy rankings. And remember, never assume a player is rostered. It always pays to double-check, just in case they have been overlooked.

Identifying players who are benefiting from expanded roles — whether it's an offensive threat delivering points and 3s or a defensive-minded player boosting your blocks and steals — is vital as you navigate the season.

Let's dive into nine key NBA sleepers whose stats suggest they are poised for significant value and are currently rostered in fewer than 40% of Yahoo leagues.

Things in Sacramento have certainly not gone to plan this season. After months of chopping and changing, it appears as though the coaching staff could finally be about to lean into developing its young core. Enter: Nique Clifford. He has played at least 30 minutes in four straight games, providing ample production on both ends of the floor. During that span, he has averaged 36.7 fantasy points per game, including a 54-point performance in a loss to Cleveland. With Zach LaVine ruled out for the season, Clifford is likely to be the biggest beneficiary when it comes to playing time. Assuming he sticks in a 30-minute-per-night role, he could end up being a valuable addition for anyone hoping to sneak in the fantasy playoffs.

Unlike Clifford, Walker has been playing meaningful minutes for the past few weeks. He has scored double digits in 10 consecutive games while also chipping in across the board on most nights. He has totaled at least 40 fantasy points in four of those games, flashing some intriguing upside in the process. After Johnny Furphy suffered a knee injury that will cost him the remainder of the season, the path to minutes for Walker became even more enticing. While he doesn't have the defensive upside of Clifford, Walker's ability to score the basketball on a team looking for offense should hold him in good standing for the remainder of the season.

Another team looking to lose as much as possible, Washington could also provide fantasy managers with a few surprises down the stretch. While it has been a breakout season for Alex Sarr, he is currently dealing with a hamstring injury, having been ruled out for at least the next week. With Marvin Bagley III now in Dallas, the backup center role belongs to Vukčević, meaning he will likely be the starter for the next few games.

If Washington is to exercise caution when it comes to Sarr's injury, Vukčević could certainly find himself in the starting role for multiple weeks. In his past three games, Vukčević has scored 23, 23 and 32 fantasy points, averaging just 17.0 minutes per game during that time. If his playing time even sniffs 30 minutes, he could very well end up flirting with top-70 value, making him a risky, yet intriguing target.

Carter could be another player to consider, should Sacramento fully embrace the tank as expected. After barely playing thus far this season, Carter has logged at least 27 minutes in three straight games. He has recorded at least four assists in five consecutive appearances, while chipping in four steals during that time. At this point, we haven't seen enough of Carter to determine whether he is going to take the ball and run with it. However, given the situation in Sacramento, he certainly warrants consideration, particularly for those needing assists and steals down the stretch.

Cardwell has been on the fantasy radar for the past month, putting up top-70 value in 16 appearances during that time. With averages of 6.3 points, 8.9 rebounds and 2.6 combined steals and blocks in just 24.1 minutes per game, his appeal is obviously limited to managers requiring traditional big man numbers. Although Domantas Sabonis has recently returned from a knee injury, he now finds himself limited due to back issues. There is no indication that this is a long-term injury; however, Sacramento is likely to be cautious moving forward. Assuming what we have seen from Cardwell over the past month is his floor, managers can roster him with confidence, expecting him to play at least 24 minutes per game for the remainder of the season.

Brooklyn is another team towards the bottom of the standings, a place that is all too familiar for Nets fans. While Day'Ron Sharpe has been a popular late-season target, Wolf has quietly gone about his business, having played at least 20 minutes in four straight games. During that time, he has averaged 14.0 points, 6.7 rebounds, 2.5 assists and 1.7 3-pointers, good enough for top-70 value in standard leagues. Knowing what the rotation is going to look like from one night to the next is almost impossible, meaning Wolf does come with an element of risk. However, if you can afford to take a bit of a chance, Wolf could end up being a versatile addition to just about any fantasy roster, should his role continue to develop.

It feels as though the time to stash Filipowski has been coming since about the third week of the season. Have we finally reached that point? Shockingly, the answer is not clear, even though Utah was recently fined for its shenanigans when it comes to playing time. Filipowski's role continues to shift on a nightly basis. In his past six games, his playing time has ranged from eight minutes to 36 minutes. In eight appearances over the past two weeks, he has averaged almost 30 fantasy points per game, a great sign given that it included a five-point performance in a blowout win against the Kings. There is no certainty when it comes to what Filipowski's exact role might look like, but we are likely close enough to finding out, making him a borderline must-roster player.

Although Washington appears as though it is going to limit playing time rather than flat-out resting, Johnson could end up being somewhat immune. Having recently returned from an ankle injury that cost him six games, Johnson played just 18 minutes in his first game back. However, prior to the injury, he had logged at least 30 minutes in six straight games, providing the Wizards with a nice offensive punch. His overall skill set remains limited, which actually boosts his appeal in points leagues, as opposed to category leagues. Despite the limited ceiling, he is worth the gamble, especially if he ends up playing upwards of 30 minutes for the remainder of the season.

Traoré has seemingly established himself as a key piece for the Nets, having started in eight straight games. Despite a somewhat sluggish start to his new role, Traoré has now scored double digits in four consecutive appearances, while also adding 32 assists during that time. He has amassed at least 32 fantasy points in three of those four games, averaging 31.5 minutes per game. While Egor Dёmin has been the more talked-about player, it could be argued that Traoré has been the more impressive of the two, at least in recent times. Much like the situation in Washington, there are no guarantees when it comes to the rotation in Brooklyn. However, grabbing Traoré now makes a lot of sense.

Champions League playoffs: Bodø/Glimt targets another upset against Inter Milan

LONDON (AP) — Inter Milan faces a daunting trip to Bodø/Glimt in the Champions League playoffs on Wednesday.

The tiny Norwegian team has been the surprise story of this season's competition after shocking wins over Manchester City and Atletico Madrid to make the playoffs.

Located north of the Arctic Circle — farther north than any team in Champions League history -- its reward for its impressive run is a showdown with last year's runner-up Inter, which currently leads the Italian league.

Qarabag of Azerbaijan is another unlikely team in the playoffs and it hosts Newcastle.

Atletico travels to Club Brugge and Olympiacos hosts Bayer Leverkusen.

In Tuesday's playoffs Paris Saint-Germain rallied from two goals down to beat Monaco 3-2 and Real Madrid beat Benfica 1-0.

Galatasaray won 5-2 against Juventus and Borussia Dortmund beat Atalanta 2-0.

___

AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccer

Deandre Ayton detained in Bahamas for suspicion of marijuana possession

Los Angeles Lakers center Deandre Ayton was briefly detained Tuesday, Feb. 17 at an airport in the Bahamas before being released, according to Ayton's lawyer Devard Francis.

Francis said Ayton was detained on suspicion of being in possession of a "very small amount of marijuana" while at Lynden Pindling International Airport in Nassau, Bahamas.

Ayton, a native of the Bahamas, last played for the Bahamian national team in 2024.

Francis said the marijuana had been in someone else's bag, which led to a swift release of Ayton following a brief investigation.

"The investigators saw that the actual very small amount of marijuana wasn't in Deandre's bag, but they still went through their investigations and he was released expeditiously," Francis told Reuters in a statement.

Players are no longer tested for marijuana and it has been removed from the banned substance list, according to the CBA regulations.

However, marijuana is illegal in the Bahamas.

Ayton, 27, in his first season with the Lakers has averaged 13.2 points, 8.5 rebounds and a block per game.

The Lakers' next game is Friday, Feb. 20 at home against the Los Angeles Clippers following the All-Star break

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Deandre Ayton gets caught with weed at airport in Bahamas

Sacramento faces Orlando on 6-game home skid

Orlando Magic (28-25, seventh in the Eastern Conference) vs. Sacramento Kings (12-44, 15th in the Western Conference)

Sacramento, California; Thursday, 10 p.m. EST

BETMGM SPORTSBOOK LINE: Magic -11; over/under is 225.5

BOTTOM LINE: Sacramento is looking to break its six-game home slide with a win over Orlando.

The Kings are 9-19 in home games. Sacramento averages 13.9 turnovers per game and is 9-20 when it has fewer turnovers than its opponents.

The Magic are 10-15 on the road. Orlando is 8-2 in games decided by 3 points or fewer.

The Kings are shooting 46.2% from the field this season, 1.9 percentage points lower than the 48.1% the Magic allow to opponents. The Magic's 46.2% shooting percentage from the field this season is 3.2 percentage points lower than the Kings have allowed to their opponents (49.4%).

TOP PERFORMERS: DeMar DeRozan is averaging 18.7 points and 3.8 assists for the Kings. Nique Clifford is averaging 1.6 made 3-pointers over the last 10 games.

Desmond Bane is averaging 19.6 points and 4.2 assists for the Magic. Paolo Banchero is averaging 22.4 points over the last 10 games.

LAST 10 GAMES: Kings: 0-10, averaging 106.8 points, 42.9 rebounds, 23.5 assists, 7.5 steals and 4.7 blocks per game while shooting 44.1% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 119.9 points per game.

Magic: 5-5, averaging 112.5 points, 38.2 rebounds, 26.7 assists, 10.8 steals and 5.1 blocks per game while shooting 45.0% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 114.7 points.

INJURIES: Kings: Domantas Sabonis: day to day (back), Keegan Murray: out (ankle), Russell Westbrook: day to day (ankle), De'Andre Hunter: out (eye), Zach LaVine: out for season (finger), Malik Monk: day to day (illness).

Magic: Jett Howard: day to day (ankle), Colin Castleton: out (thumb).

___

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.

Detroit faces New York, seeks 4th straight road win

Detroit Pistons (40-13, first in the Eastern Conference) vs. New York Knicks (35-20, third in the Eastern Conference)

New York; Thursday, 7:30 p.m. EST

BETMGM SPORTSBOOK LINE: Knicks -4.5; over/under is 222.5

BOTTOM LINE: Detroit visits New York looking to extend its three-game road winning streak.

The Knicks are 24-13 in conference play. New York ranks third in the Eastern Conference in team defense, allowing only 111.9 points while holding opponents to 45.9% shooting.

The Pistons are 26-7 against Eastern Conference opponents. Detroit is fifth in the NBA scoring 18.4 fast break points per game led by Cade Cunningham averaging 3.7.

The Knicks make 47.2% of their shots from the field this season, which is 3.1 percentage points higher than the Pistons have allowed to their opponents (44.1%). The Pistons average 5.3 more points per game (117.2) than the Knicks allow (111.9).

The teams square off for the third time this season. The Pistons won the last meeting 118-80 on Feb. 7. Daniss Jenkins scored 18 points to help lead the Pistons to the win.

TOP PERFORMERS: Karl-Anthony Towns is averaging 19.8 points and 11.9 rebounds for the Knicks. Jalen Brunson is averaging 23.3 points and 6.1 assists over the last 10 games.

Cunningham is averaging 25.3 points, 5.6 rebounds, 9.6 assists and 1.5 steals for the Pistons. Duncan Robinson is averaging 2.9 made 3-pointers over the last 10 games.

LAST 10 GAMES: Knicks: 8-2, averaging 119.0 points, 46.3 rebounds, 29.6 assists, 7.7 steals and 3.2 blocks per game while shooting 48.3% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 103.7 points per game.

Pistons: 8-2, averaging 118.7 points, 43.9 rebounds, 26.9 assists, 11.5 steals and 4.5 blocks per game while shooting 48.7% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 106.4 points.

INJURIES: Knicks: OG Anunoby: day to day (toe), Miles McBride: out (ankle).

Pistons: Ronald Holland II: day to day (personal).

___

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.