Who is Braves Baseball to you?

KRT SPORTS STORY SLUGGED: BBO-ASTROS-BRAVES KRT PHOTOGRAPH BY TOM PRIDDY/KRT (March 6) KISSIMEE, FL -- Atlanta Braves pitching coach Leo Mazzone, left, and manager Bobby Cox talk in the dugout during a spring training game against the Houston Astros at the Osceola County Stadium in Kissimmee, Florida, on Saturday, March 5, 2005. The Braves won 4-3 in 10 innings. (Photo by Tom Priddy/MCT/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

This week, we lost two key figures on Atlanta Braves history. Ted Turner accumulated discounted media, bought the Atlanta Braves, and built and rode the cable television wave to a fortune and brought the America’s Team to millions across the country. Bobby Cox served forty plus years in baseball and helped build, nurture, and inspire the Atlanta Braves to fourteen straight division titles, one World Series Championship, gaining undying loyalty and a record-setting number of ejections. If you’re in a younger generation, you barely know them or just caught the tail end of the story. But we’re learning again about their greatness and some of the lost lore is starting to emerge.

They’re as Atlanta Brave as it gets. It makes me wonder how everybody thinks about when they think about the Braves. I remember this conversation with my mother from a few years during probably the last time we watched together.

Mother: Why are the Braves wearing orange?
Me: Mother, that’s the Mets. They’re the home team.
No it isn’t. The team wearing black is the Mets.
That’s not black. It’s a really dark navy that looks black.
It’s ugly.
Yeah I don’t like it either, but they’re short-sleeved and some pitchers like it.
Where’s Bobby Cox?
They have a new manager now.
Is his brother managing?
His brother?
Yeah, him and his brother used to set next to each other and his brother would just rock back and forth just nervous about everything. He looks just like him.

So to my mother, Bobby Cox and Leo Mazzone plus red, blue, and mostly white uniforms equaled Atlanta Braves. Which is fair, I think, if you folded laundry and talked on the phone while I had the Braves on. So who is Braves Baseball to you? If I picked three, it’s probably Bobby Cox, Andruw Jones, and John Smoltz.

Probably my favorite Bobby Cox memory was a game in 2003. The umpire told Kevin Grybowski to take off a gray bandage on his pitching hand. Not on the fingers, on the wrist because it could deceive the batter. This was after he had already thrown 15 pitches. Bobby Cox blew a gasket, pulled Grybowski off the mound, and got tossed. Lots of times his anger was theatrical, but it wasn’t that night. He tells the media afterward that “these hitters can come up to the plate with all this body armor on and the pitcher can’t even wear a bandaid.” He protected his player, got tossed, and Barry Bonds took a stray. That’s a Bobby Cox trifecta there.

I don’t have my three in any order and they’re not necessarily the most important to the 15-year run. But those are the ones I think when I think Braves. There are no wrong answers here or decade limitations. If Ronnie and Ozzie are the Atlanta Braves to you, then they are.

Knicks vs 76ers – Game 4 Round 2 NBA Playoffs – predictions: Odds, recent stats, trends, best bets for May 10

The Knicks won Game 3, 108-94, and the series is 3-0 in favor of New York. Game 4 is set in Philadelphia and the 76ers once again have their backs against the wall.

New York was without OG Anunoby in Game 3 as he is dealing with a hamstring strain. Miles McBride started and finished with three points in 21 minutes. Jalen Brunson led the game with 33 points and the Knicks finished from 38-of-76 (50%) from the field. With a win in Game 4, New York will await the winner of Cleveland versus Detroit (2-1 Detroit).

Joel Embiid made a return in Game 3 after missing Game 2's six-point loss. Embiid finished with 18 points, six rebounds, and five assists over 35 minutes. Paul George was the hot hand for the 76ers early as he scored 15 points in the first quarter, but went scoreless the rest of the game. The 76ers shot 28% from deep (9/32) and lost the rebounding battle 49-33 in Game 3.

Lets take a closer look at tonight’s matchup and take into consideration lineups, injuries, and other factors affecting the line and total.

We’ve got all the info and analysis you need to know ahead of the game, including the latest info on how to catch tipoff, odds courtesy of DraftKings recent team performance, player stats, and of course, our predictions, picks best bets for the game from our modeling tools and staff of experts.

After 24 years, the NBA is back on NBC and Peacock, combining the nostalgia of an iconic era with the innovative future of basketball coverage. The NBA on NBC YouTube channel delivers fans must-see highlights, analysis, and exclusive and unique content. 

Game Details and How to Watch Live: 76ers vs. Knicks

  • Date: Sunday, May 10, 2026
  • Time: 3:40 PM EST
  • Site: Xfinity Mobile Arena
  • City: Philadelphia, PA
  • Network/Streaming: ABC

Rotoworld has you covered with all the latest NBA Player News for all 30 teams. Check out the feed page right here on NBC Sports for headlines, injuries and transactions where you can filter by league, team, positions and news type!

Game Odds: 76ers vs. Knicks

The latest odds as of Sunday courtesy of DraftKings:

  • Moneyline: Philadelphia 76ers (+102), New York Knicks (-122)
  • Spread: Knicks -1.5
  • Total: 212.5 points

This game opened 76ers -1.5 with the Total set at 213.5.

Be sure to check out DraftKings for all the latest game odds & player props for every matchup this week on the NBA schedule!

Expected Starting Lineups: Knicks vs. 76ers

Philadelphia 76ers

  • PG Tyrese Maxey
  • SG VJ Edgecombe
  • SF Kelly Oubre Jr
  • PF Paul George
  • Joel Embiid (probable)

New York Knicks

  • PG Jalen Brunson
  • SG Josh Hart
  • SF Mikal Bridges
  • PF OG Anunoby (questionable)
  • Karl-Anthony Towns

Injury Report: Knicks vs. 76ers

New York Knicks

  • OG Anunoby (hamstring strain) is listed as QUESTIONABLE for Game 4. Anunoby missed Game 3.

Philadelphia 76ers

  • Joel Embiid (ankle) is listed as PROBABLE for Game 4. Embiid played in Game 3.

Important stats, trends and insights: 76ers vs. Knicks

  • New York is 50-42 ATS and 50-42 to the Under this season
  • New York is 26-19 to the Under as the road team
  • New York is 11-4 to the Under as the road underdog
  • New York is 18-27 ATS as the road team, ranking third-worst
  • New York is 11-19 ATS as the road favorite, ranking seventh-worst
  • Philadelphia is 50-43 ATS
  • Philadelphia is 50-43 to the Under 
  • Philadelphia is 25-21 to the Under at home
  • Philadelphia is 15-14 to the Over as a home favorite
  • Philadelphia is 22-24 ATS at home
  • Philadelphia is 8-9 ATS as a home underdog and 5-12 on the ML

Rotoworld Best Bet

Please bet responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline at 1-800-522-4700.

Our model calculates projections around each moneyline, spread and over/under bet for every game on the NBA calendar based on data points like recent performance, head-to-head player matchups, trends information and projected game totals.

Once the model is finished running, we put its projections next to the latest betting lines for the game to arrive at a relative confidence level for each wager.

Here are the best bets our model is projecting for Sunday’s Knicks and 76ers’ game:

  • Moneyline: Rotoworld Bet is leaning towards a play on the Knicks’ Moneyline
  • Spread: Rotoworld Bet is leaning towards a play on the Knicks -1.5 ATS
  • Total: Rotoworld Bet is leaning towards a play on the Game Total UNDER 212.5

Want even more NBA best bets and predictions from our expert staff & tools? Check out the Expert NBA Predictions page from NBC Sports for money line, spread and over/under picks for every game on today’s calendar!

If you’re looking for more key trends and stats around the spread, moneyline and total for every single game on the schedule today, check out our NBA Top Trends tool on NBC Sports!

Follow our experts on socials to keep up with all the latest content from the staff:

  • Jay Croucher (@croucherJD)
  • Drew Dinsick (@whale_capper) 
  • Vaughn Dalzell (@VmoneySports) 
  • Trysta Krick (@Trysta_Krick)

Sabres vs Canadiens Props & NHL Playoffs Game 3 Best Bets

Want to get more Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account here.

Juraj Slafkovsky exploded for a hat trick in his playoff opener, but the Montreal winger has been held quiet since as the Canadiens prepare for a pivotal Game 3 against the Buffalo Sabres.

Despite the recent scoring drought, the opportunities are still there, and my Sabres vs. Canadiens props expect Slafkovsky to bounce back in a big way tonight.

Let’s break down my favorite Sabres vs. Canadiens predictions, along with today’s top NHL picks and the full game preview for this Eastern Conference showdown.

Best Sabres vs Canadiens props for Game 3

PlayerPickBET99
Canadiens Juraj SlafkovskyOver 0.5 points-155
Sabres Rasmus DahlinOver 2.5 shots-125
Canadiens Ivan DemidovOver 0.5 points-120

Game 3 Prop #1: Juraj Slafkovsky Over 0.5 points

-155 at BET99

Juraj Slafkovsky opened the playoffs with a hat trick, but he has picked up just one point over his last seven games despite piling up 22 scoring chances. That leads all Montreal Canadiens players and ranks ahead of names like Matt Boldy and Jack Eichel league-wide.

The Canadiens are consistently generating chances during his minutes, creating 9.1 expected goals but scoring only three times. Montreal also scored 123 goals on 117 expected goals with Slafkovsky on the ice during the regular season, so this kind of cold finishing is not the norm.

The puck should start going in sooner rather than later, and Slafkovsky is well-positioned to benefit when it does.

Game 3 Prop #2: Rasmus Dahlin Over 2.5 shots

-125 at BET99

Rasmus Dahlin leads all defensemen in shot attempts, shots on goal, and scoring chances during the playoffs.

He has been extremely aggressive in the offensive zone, and he should have plenty of room to operate against a Montreal Canadiens team more focused on clogging the middle of the ice than pressuring the points. The Wild are the only active playoff team allowing more shots per game to defensemen during their postseason run.

Dahlin has already generated nine shots on goal through two games in this series and has cleared 2.5 shots in seven of his last nine meetings with Montreal.

Game 3 Prop #3: Ivan Demidov Over 0.5 points

-120 at BET99

Martin St. Louis can give Ivan Demidov easier matchups and more favorable usage at home, and that has shown up clearly in his numbers. When isolating Montreal’s home games this postseason, Demidov leads the Canadiens in shots on goal and scoring chances.

Only Lane Hutson has attempted more shots, and he has logged 33 more minutes across just three games.

With plenty of offensive-zone starts against weaker lines and pairings at 5-on-5, plus consistent work on the top power-play unit, Demidov has a strong path to getting back on the scoresheet.

img alt="Get a first bet encore up to $800 with the BET99 promo code COVERSNHL" width="100%" loading="lazy" src="https://img.covers.com/promo-articles/bet99nhlcreative2526.jpeg"Get a first bet encore up to $800 with BET99 bonus code COVERSNHL.
(not available in Ontario)

Odds are correct at the time of publishing and are subject to change.
Not intended for use in MA.
Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.

This article originally appeared on Covers.com, read the full article here and view our best betting sites or check out our top sportsbook promos.

Knicks Bulletin: ‘He runs like a deer. His gait is beautiful’

Here…

Come…

The Brooms!

Mike Brown

On OG Anunoby’s status heading into Game 4:

“He’s still day-to-day. I had not followed up to ask any specifics. I just wanna let them know, ‘OK, when’s he gonna be ready to play?’ It’s all medical-related and it starts with [the training and medical staff]. All I want them to do is tell me when he can play.”

On the 76ers’ ability to rally:

“They’re a really good team, man, and they’ve already done it once before. We addressed it, but the biggest thing is just trying to stay present, not getting ahead of yourself and however you can do that, try to do it. And the simplest way for me is just keep reminding myself, reminding people around me it’s one game at a time — but it’s also one quarter, one possession at a time and trying to lock in on each possession like it’s your last.”

On balancing playoff adjustments:

“What we’re doing now, I think, can have great carryover next year and down the line because we’d be able to expand on it the right way through a training camp and all that other stuff. Right now it’s a little limited, but there’s still enough options within what we kind of stumbled upon to make it effective, but hopefully as time goes on, we’ll be able to expand on it, and if we can get to it during this playoff run, great. If not, we feel pretty good about where we’re at, going forward even afterwards.”

On Mikal Bridges’ athleticism:

“He runs like a deer. His gait is beautiful, which makes him fast and it doesn’t even look like it.”

On the current Knicks culture:

“When guys are engaged like that 24/7 throughout the course of the year, it bodes well for the environment, for the culture and guys are actively trying to keep their mind present because when they get an opportunity, they want to perform well.”

On his trust on the full Knicks rotation and his players’ professionalism:

“As a coach, you love to see it. That’s why you give different guys opportunities at different times. Sometimes, you start Landry. Sometimes, you start Mo. Sometimes, you start this guy. And what hopefully it shows at the end of the day coming from me is that I have confidence in them, and not only that, your number can be called any time, so be ready. And our guys have taken that to heart. We’ve got a lot of good guys that are resilient. They’re fighters. And they’ve done a good job of keeping their mind on staying present in whatever we’re doing, and it’s showing when they go out there and get the opportunity.”

On deploying an “equal opportunity” offense:

“Anybody can be in any position. Anybody can set screens. Anybody can initiate it, but it’s going to take some time to expand on it.”

On offensive growth potential:

“What we’re doing now, I think, can have great carryover next year and down the line because we’d be able to expand on it the right way through a training camp.”

Karl-Anthony Towns

On the need to stay focused for Game 4:

“I just look at us as a team that’s trying every single day to stay in the present and find a way to win. Every single time we step on the court. We just got to stay in the present. The next game is the most important game. There’s a lot of things we need to clean up and we want to clean up and we have another game to do that. It’s about just staying about us.”

On offering condolences to Nick Nurse:

“I got to say one thing, I missed saying this. I told Derek the other day, I was so tired after Game 2. I feel like we’ve played five games already. Game 2, Game 3, but I didn’t get to say, my family, at least, wanted to give love and condolences to Nick Nurse’s brother and his family. I never got to say that after Game 2. I was exhausted, as you can see on the court. So it kind of skipped my mind in Game 3 yesterday. It skipped my mind, the mad house, media coming in and everyone trying to get out. I don’t care if you don’t write it or anything, but I wanted y’all to know that. I could’ve told y’all in the locker room but y’all was trying to get to every player, so just wanted to make sure that was known. Wanted to say that on TV, on the podium after Game 2, but I was just so tired. I was so tired I couldn’t even get to the Gatorade. I couldn’t even make another Gatorade joke. Really wanted to give my condolences to him. I haven’t been able to talk to him personally, but I know it’s real tough. I don’t know what he’s going through, but in a similar fashion I know how it is to have to show up to work and to have a lot of pressure on you to do something special when you’re kind of not fully there.”

On whether or not he had anything to do with the Knicks’ offensive adjustments this playoffs:

“I feel like we all had an opinion, and we were able to figure out what was best for our team, especially in a spot like that — down 2-1. I had my opinion, I feel like we’ve done a great job adjusting to have all of us be our best.”

On Mikal Bridges’ growth:

“I think that he’s always been athletic, he’s always been talented. I think what’s better is just to see the experience kicking in for him. He’s using that experience to help us and help himself. It’s great to see that his career has helped make him the best version of himself right now, today.”

On the timing of the Knicks’ offensive shift:

“I feel like the real change for us came before Game 4 in Atlanta. I think that’s when we really changed our offense. It’s been great. It’s been something I’ve talked about for a lot of the season, to feel like we can help our guys more. We made the right moves. [Brown] set the table for us to have this kind of run.”

On the alignment between the Knicks players and Coach Brown:

“It was the perfect time for all of us to really get on the same accord. There’s no better time to be playing your best basketball than right now. So shout out to Mike and really the whole coaching staff for putting us in the best position to succeed.”

On playing on Mother’s Day:

“It’s work. Just work to me. I’m glad we got a game on Mother’s Day. It gets me doing what I love and what gets me off of everything off the court.”

On trusting his passing chops:

“I feel like I’ve always had this my whole career. It’s just I never had the opportunity to utilize that skill set. It’s being utilized. My teammates have been in great positions for me to find them when they’re open.”

On making collaborative adjustments:

“I feel like we all had an opinion and we were able to figure out what was best for our team, especially in a spot like that – down 2-1. I had my opinion. I feel like we’ve done a great job adjusting to have all of us be our best.”

Jalen Brunson

On internal growth and outside perceptions:

“These guys understand that you guys only see the finished product. You guys see what’s on the court. You guys see what’s what when the cameras are on, when there’s media access. You guys don’t see the ups and downs of us talking things out. You guys don’t see us in practice trying to figure things out. And we all want to win. Obviously, there’s ups and downs to it. And we have times where we look disconnected and we look connected. That’s just team sports. That’s basketball. That’s sports. That’s life. There’s going to be ups and downs. It’s all about how you move on, how you get positive, how you move in a positive direction regardless of whether things are negative or positive. You got to block out the noise. You got to focus on inside those lines. You got to focus on just us as a team. There’s going to be times where things aren’t going your way. It’s how you respond. How you respond as a team is going to define who we are. And I think it took time. I think we still have a lot of room where we can grow. But it’s really key for us. I think our mental approach is a positive for us.”

On Mikal Bridges’ durability:

“Obviously, he’s played an unlimited amount of games in a row. And that’s just a testament to who he is.”

Mitchell Robinson

On his dunk over Joel Embiid:

“It’s just a basketball play. You’re trying to bait me. That’s a good one. But no, just playing ball, just happy. It’s part of this league.”

On not planning on using his poster on Embiid as a screensaver:

“Not mine, no. It don’t got no truck in it.”

Landry Shamet

On Mikal Bridges’ impact:

“I would take it a step further. There’s a ton of stuff that I would argue people don’t see that he does throughout the course of the game that’s far more important than just a couple of the big plays and coming up with a loose ball down the stretch. He does that for 48 minutes. So does his level go up and does he show up in big moments? Absolutely, but I would argue that he’s the type of guy that does that for all 48 and finds a way to do it every night.”

Josh Hart

On playing through thumb injury:

“It’s something I’ll revisit in the offseason. There’s people that played through this. They got (Kyle Lowry) on their team, who played through it and won a championship. So it’s something that’s doable.”

On Mikal Bridges’ defense:

“He’s going to take each matchup personal. When he gets into that mindset and that mode he’s a heck of a player. He’s doing an amazing job. [Tyrese Maxey] is a tough task, a tall order. The way [Mikal] is able to maneuver and navigate screens, do all those things, and on top of that, give us good shots, good minutes and a good quality of executing on the offensive end is great.”

Jordan Clarkson

On staying ready despite a swinging role:

“Never. I was just going with the flow, staying locked in. I don’t really think too far ahead. Whatever is in the moment is what’s going on. I got out the mud, bro. I was a second-round pick, damn near undrafted. I just stick with the grind and stick with the process, try to find ways to impact the game. I only care about winning. I came here for the opportunity to play winning basketball.”

Nick Nurse

On missed open shots steadily against the Knicks:

“There’s certainly an element of that for sure that has got us in the last two games. I don’t expect to make them all. But you make one of those, it’s a one-point game. Make two of them, you’re up two. I don’t know what else you can do other than create wide-open shots. Certainly, in Game 2, down the stretch there, all we did was have really good offensive creation. We just didn’t make enough. I can’t fault the guys’ effort and trying to do the right thing. We just need them to go in.”

VJ Edgecombe

On missed shots dooming Philly:

“We’re not making shots, we’re getting a lot of looks. We just watched the film. We’re generating a lot of good looks. Nothing is going in for us.”

On fatigue impacting the Sixers play:

“Obviously, fatigue is a factor. But fatigue’s a factor for every team this late in the season. If you want to win, that shouldn’t matter. We’ve just been missing wide-open shots.”

Good Morning San Diego: Padres do just enough to beat Cardinals 4-2; Mason Miller strikes out four… in one inning

SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA - MAY 09: Mason Miller #22 of the San Diego Padres reacts after striking out JJ Wetherholt #26 of the St. Louis Cardinals to defeat the St. Louis Cardinals 4-2 in a game at Petco Park on May 09, 2026 in San Diego, California. (Photo by Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images) | Getty Images

The San Diego Padres entered the top of the eighth inning with a 3-1 lead over the St. Louis Cardinals at Petco Park. Padres reliever Adrian Morejon was on the mound and manager Craig Stammen was following the blueprint to a San Diego win. Randy Vasquez started the game and pitched five innings of one-run ball scattering six hits without allowing a walk and striking out six. Jeremiah Estrada worked a scoreless sixth and Jason Adam followed with a scoreless seventh. Morejon was supposed to pitch a scoreless eighth before handing the ball to Mason Miller to close out the win. It did not happen that way.

Instead, Morejon hit JJ Weatherholt to put a runner on with one out. He then allowed a double to Ivan Herrera, which scored Weatherholt and cut the Padres lead to one run. Morejon faced lefty Alec Burleson and got him to ground out for the second out of the inning, but then Stammen called on Miller for a four-out save. The right-hander did his job in the top of the eighth and got one of the Cardinals’ hottest hitters in Jordan Walker to ground out to end the inning, stranding the tying run at second base.

Manny Machado launched a one-out solo home run to left-center field in the bottom of the eighth inning to push the lead to 4-2, but San Diego did not score any additional insurance runs. Miller returned to the mound in the top of the ninth inning and looked less than dominant… kind of. Miller allowed a leadoff walk, recorded a strikeout and then allowed the second walk of the inning to put runners at first and second base. Miller then recorded his second strikeout of the inning and followed that with his third strikeout, but Freddy Fermin was unable to keep the ball in front of him and Yohel Pozo was able to reach first base safely to load the bases. Miller then faced Weatherholt and froze him with a fastball down the middle for the fourth strikeout of the inning, earning the save and the win.

Ty France opened the scoring for San Diego with a one-out solo home run in the bottom of the fifth inning to tie the game at 1-1. Fernando Tatis Jr. came up with two out and runners at second and third and dumped a shallow fly ball in right field, which allowed two runs to score to put the Padres ahead, 3-1.

The Padres will play for the split when they host the Cardinals in the fourth game of the series at 1:10 p.m.

Padres News:

  • Yuki Matsui was being stretched out during his minor league rehab assignment and he wants to continue to work toward helping the Padres cover multiple innings out of the ’pen.
  • Tony Gwynn would have turned 66 on Saturday, but he died far too young. The man they called Mr. Padre was a legend in San Diego and beyond. Kirk Kenney of the San Diego Union-Tribuneshared his thoughts on Gwynn.

Baseball News:

Burnt pizza.

May 9, 2026; San Francisco, California, USA; Pittsburgh Pirates outfielder Oneil Cruz (15) swings a sledgehammer in the on deck circle before batting against the San Francisco Giants during the sixth inning at Oracle Park. Mandatory Credit: Robert Edwards-Imagn Images | Robert Edwards-Imagn Images

The boos started to boil over from the stands in the 6th inning. A walk, a wild pitch, and two consecutive RBI singles allowed by Ryan Walker set off audible mutterings of a mutiny. The fan uprising grew louder after Heliot Ramos couldn’t pick a line drive out of the lights, turning what should’ve been a flyout into a RBI double that ultimately beget a six-run 7th for Pittsburgh.

The boos became physical, dark winged omens that crow-hopped around the infield, shrieking expletives and crawing curses as more baseballs collided with Giants defenders. A routine grounder that should’ve ended the inning jumped out of Willy Adames’s glove, leading to a 2-run triple off the bat of Brandon Lowe. A comebacker to Gregory Santos off the bat of Ryan O’Hearn hit the palm of his glove and ejected itself without the reliever knowing it. Another run scored. 

What was an exchange of scoreless frames for four innings between starters Landen Roupp and Braxton Ashcraft devolved into an ugly exposé for the Giants once the bullpen took over.

Rampant and pervasive ills were on full display: their impatience at the plate, their inability to build rallies, hit for power, stress-out opposing arms, as well as their unstructured, unproven, and unreliable relief corps. 

This bunch in a nutshell:    

The Pirates plated 10 runs over the 5th, 6th, and 7th frames.

On a day that the Giants off-loaded an offensively-challenged catcher, another discarded backstop in Joey Bart collected four hits and two RBIs while scoring thrice. His infield knock to start the 5th chased Roupp from the mound, kickstarting Pittsburgh’s offensive takeover. They go on to collect 13 runs and 17 more hits off six different relievers. The hits weren’t blasts either. The Pirates picked and pecked on the Giants. They singled them out — in a sense, beating them at their own game (if it’s even fair to say this team has “a game”). 

15 of Pittsburgh’s 20 hits on the night were singles (and two of their extra base hits came with Christian Koss on the mound in the 9th). Why were those measly one-baggers so meaningful. Quantity helps, but the main difference was clearly in the quality of the at-bats. A single on the second pitch of the at-bat versus the seventh or eighth? That wears on an arm. The Pirates took to the plate with a mortar-and-pestle, grinding the baseball down into a fine powder with foul balls and disciplined takes. They managed just a pair of hits off Roupp but forced him to throw 90+ pitches over 4 innings. 8 strikeouts, while cool, didn’t help his efficiency. Nor did his 44% first pitch strike rate. Pittsburgh’s starter Ashcraft’s rate: 65%. He ended up throwing 80 pitches over 7 complete. Pirates eventually worked five walks to go along with their 20 knocks, they took advantage of over-enthusiastic relays home, capitalized on errors, and went 10-for-22 with runners in scoring position. 

Meanwhile, as the top half of innings labored on, the bottom half of innings went by in a blink of an eye, and there seemed to be no willingness by Giants hitters to change  their approach until the 9th inning, when, down by a dozen runs, Ramos earned San Francisco’s first walk in 130 batters. They had gone nearly four games, 34 straight innings, without managing a base-on-balls. 

Of course, Ramos bat-flipped it. The irony of the gesture had never been more apparent. It actually led to the Giants most productive rally of the game: an RBI single from Eric Haase, and three walks and a hit batter. Go figure.  

In Mike Krukow’s words, the loss was a “burnt pizza,” a phrase taken from his time playing for the Cub affiliate Key West Conchs in the early 70s. The wisdom here is you don’t over-analyze a “burnt pizza.” Sometimes you make a dumb mistake, the oven temp is too high, or you forget to set a timer, and the pizza becomes a charred saucer in an instant. There’s wisdom in that story. But burning a pizza could reveal some obvious executive functioning problems that need to be addressed. Sometimes you can’t just throw a mistake out like that and move on — an autopsy might be necessary; a good and long, soul-searching look in the mirror in which you ask yourself, through gritted teeth, how did you burn the pizza?   

Or we could just bin it, and distract ourselves. Oh, look over there! Bryce Eldridge’s first career homer! 

MLB Home Run Predictions Today: Best HR Prop Bets, Picks, Parlay & Odds for Sunday, May 10

Want to get more Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account here.

The sluggers are out in full force today with 15 games on the MLB docket.

Yordan Alvarez went yard already this weekend, and he’ll headline my home run picks and MLB player props for Sunday, May 10, alongside Kazuma Okamoto and Kyle Schwarber.

  • UPDATE: Added another HR pick + parlay.

Best MLB home run props today

Player to hit a HROdds
Reds Kyle Schwarber+239
Reds Kazuma Okamoto+430
Reds Yordan Alvarez+256
💲Today's HR parlay+6296

Home run pick: Kyle Schwarber (+239)

Kyle Schwarber is coming off a career year where he hit 56 home runs, and the Philadelphia Phillies slugger is looking to top that number in 2026.

Schwarber is already up to 14 dingers in 40 games and has gone yard in three consecutive contests.

Rockies starter Tomoyuki Sugano has surrendered six dingers in seven starts, while the Colorado bullpen has allowed 24 homers — third most in the MLB.

Schwarber has hit 11 of his 14 home runs vs. right-handed pitching, so he’s got a perfect matchup today.

  • Time: 1:35 p.m. ET
  • Where to watch: NBCS-Philadelphia, Rockies.TV

Home run pick: Kazuma Okamoto (+430)

Kazuma Okamoto has stepped up for the injury-riddled Toronto Blue Jays with a team-leading 10 homers in 38 games.

The Japanese import has been on fire in May with five dingers in his last eight contests to go along with a .355 batting average and .871 slugging percentage.

L.A. Angels starter Jose Soriano has impressive numbers, but he’s fallen off heavily over his last two outings. 

The southpaw has allowed two homers in each of those starts, while the Angels' pen has the MLB’s third-worst ERA (5.42) and the fourth-most home runs surrendered (22). 

  • Time: 1:37 p.m. ET
  • Where to watch: Sportsnet One, Angels Broadcast Television

Home run pick: Yordan Alvarez (+256)

Yordan Alvarez snapped a six-game home run drought on Friday, and the Houston Astros star has a good opportunity to add to his lofty totals on Sunday.

Cincinnati Reds starter Andrew Abbott has given up at least one homer in four of his last seven appearances, while Alvarez has launched six of his 13 dingers against southpaws in just 56 at-bats vs. lefties.

Alvarez has the fifth-best rate of barrels per plate appearance in the MLB at 13.4%, so chances are he squares up a few balls this afternoon.

  • Time: 1:40 p.m. ET
  • Where to watch: Space City Home Network, Reds.TV
Josh Inglis' 2026 Transparency Record
  • HR picks: 5-10, +8.75 units

Today’s HR parlay

Reds Kyle SchwarberBet Now
+6296
Reds Kazuma Okamoto
Reds Yordan Alvarez

Odds are correct at the time of publishing and are subject to change.
Not intended for use in MA.
Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.

This article originally appeared on Covers.com, read the full article here and view our best betting sites or check out our top sportsbook promos.

The Mavericks 2025-26 season review: January

DALLAS, TEXAS - APRIL 03: Klay Thompson #31 of the Dallas Mavericks gestures after sinking a three-pointer against the Orlando Magic in the first half of an NBA game at American Airlines Center on April 03, 2026 in Dallas, Texas. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Richard Rodriguez/Getty Images) | Getty Images

Coming out of a December that started off well but ended poorly, the Mavs were looking to build on the momentum of an ever-growing Cooper Flagg, all the while hoping Anthony Davis would finally string together a run that could help propel Dallas to a PlayIn berth or better. For the most part, Flagg was playing his more natural position and while still shaky, the team was beginning to show they were going to hang in almost any game.

January Record: 7-8 (19-30 overall)

January began with the Mavs splitting their first six games. Another loss was followed by what proved to be a season-long winning streak of four games. Two of the victories came against the Utah Jazz, with the other two against the New York Knicks and Golden State Warriors. All of that momentum was immediately lost however, as they closed out the month with an equally long losing streak.

Anthony Davis goes down with season-ending injury

Although we didn’t know it at the time, January 8, 2026 was the last time Anthony Davis would play as a Dallas Maverick. Any remaining holdouts hoping that Davis was finally going to put a run together most likely knew that was now not to be the case. Those hoping he would stay healthy long enough to be traded were also holding their breath. The injury looked so mundane yet elicited such a visceral reaction from Davis, that you almost knew it was going to shelve him for a while, despite a variety of conflicting reports in the following days. When it was all said and done, Davis only played in 29 regular season games and two PlayIn games for the Mavericks.

Naji Marshall finally sits one out

In yet another injury-plagued season, though not nearly as bad as the prior year, Marshall proved to be the Mavericks’ ironman in the early going. On January 28, Marshall had played in all 47 games of the season to that point, before sitting out the following night. He came on strong to start the new year, scoring in double figures in all but a single game in January leading up to his first absence. His best outing of the month was a 30 point, 7 rebound, 9 assist game in a win over the Warriors on January 22. By season’s end, Marshall logged 74 games played, second on the team to only Max Christie.

Klay Thompson drains his 2,800th three-pointer

Thompson will go down as one of the very best shooters in the history of the NBA. Despite missing more than two full seasons straight, he joined elite company as only the fifth player to ever to hit 2,800 three-pointers. In the January 12 matchup against the Brooklyn Nets, Thompson connected on 3-for-7 from downtown. By the end of the season, he drained 99 more three-pointers for a solid hold on fourth all-time in three-point makes.

After the calendar turned on January, things got very rocky for the Mavericks, but more changes with an eye on the future were soon to come as well.

I invite you to follow me @_80MPH on X, and check back often at Mavs Moneyball for all the latest on the Dallas Mavericks.

NBA Draft Lottery winners and losers: Wizards earn top pick, trade dooms Pacers

NBA Draft Lottery winners and losers: Wizards earn top pick, trade dooms Pacers originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

The Washington Wizards are officially on the clock.

The NBA’s worst team this season was rewarded with some lottery luck on Sunday, winning the top pick in a loaded draft.

The Utah Jazz, Memphis Grizzlies and Chicago Bulls filled out the top-four picks, in that order. Now, it’s time to start scouring mock drafts and studying some of the top players in this potentially historic class.

Here are some winners and losers from the lottery:

Winner: Wizards

Starting with the obvious, winning the lottery is monumental for the Wizards.

The team has won fewer than 20 games in three straight seasons, but lottery luck hasn’t given them the first overall pick since 2010. John Wall, who was their representative at Sunday’s drawing, was the pick that year. Washington, in 2025, fell from second to sixth, where it selected Tre Johnson.

There isn’t an obvious No. 1 player in this class, but that’s only due to the glut of talent at the top. BYU forward AJ Dybantsa projects as a potential pick, but you could make the argument for Kansas guard Darryn Peterson, Duke forward Cameron Boozer or North Carolina forward Caleb Wilson. For a roster that just added Trae Young and Anthony Davis in mid-season trades, perhaps a wing talent like Dybantsa is the pick.

Loser: Nets

Lottery luck hasn’t been on Brooklyn’s side recently.

Last year, the Nets dropped from sixth to eighth. This year, they fell from third to sixth. These results come after years of surrendering their own first-round picks to teams like the Celtics and Rockets — where they picked players like Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown and Reed Sheppard.

The Nets can still add talent at No. 6, but they will miss out on the top-four talent that seems to be on another tier. Arkansas guard Darius Acuff, Houston guard Kingston Flemings, Illinois guard Keaton Wagler and Arizona guard Brayden Burries could be options for Brooklyn.

Winner: Trades shake up the order

Four trades were revisited during this lottery, with the results impacting the Pacers, Clippers, Pelicans, Hawks, Bucks and Thunder.

The Pacers-Clippers trade this season involving Ivica Zubac meant that Indiana kept its pick if it was top-four, or else it went to LA. Well, it was fifth — so the Clippers now have a premium pick after losing in the Play-In Tournament. The reigning Eastern Conference champions, meanwhile, have nothing to show for their 19-win campaign — although they will get Tyrese Haliburton back from injury next season.

The Pelicans gave up their unprotected first-rounder to the Hawks last year during the draft, but the Hawks could also swap picks with the Bucks if Milwaukee’s pick jumped over New Orleans’. Neither pick moved into the top four, so the Hawks will take the Pelicans’ No. 8 pick and the Bucks will keep their No. 10 pick.

The Thunder, who are rolling through the playoffs and seem poised to win consecutive titles, own the Clippers’ unprotected first from the trade that also gave them reigning (and potentially repeat) MVP winner Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. For the rest of the NBA, it was a sigh of relief that their pick stayed put at No. 12.

Winner AND loser: Tanking

It was tough to watch for most of the season, but fans of many bad teams were rewarded Sunday. Others, not so much.

The Wizards had the worst record in the NBA, blatantly resting Young and Davis and letting their young talent play extended minutes. The Jazz and Grizzlies had a similar strategy, with Lauri Markkanen, Jaren Jackson Jr. and Ja Morant missing time and both teams opting for development over victories in 2025-26.

Other teams that tanked weren’t as lucky. The aforementioned Pacers and Nets fell just outside of the top-four despite their year-long losing effort. The Kings dropped from fifth to seventh despite going 22-60, which was their worst record since 2008-09.

The good and the bad of tanking were on full display Sunday, and it’s unclear how these results will impact the NBA’s potential plans to revamp the lottery odds moving forward.

Game 4 Preview: Timberwolves vs. Spurs

MINNEAPOLIS, MN - MAY 8: Stephon Castle #5 of the San Antonio Spurs looks to pass the ball as Jaden McDaniels #3 of the Minnesota Timberwolves plays defense during the game during Round Two Game Three of the 2026 NBA Playoffs on May 8, 2026 at Target Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2026 NBAE (Photo by Joe Murphy/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images

Minnesota Timberwolves vs. San Antonio Spurs
Date: May 10th, 2026
Time: 6:30 PM CDT
Location: Target Center
Television Coverage: NBC, Peacock

On Friday night, the Minnesota Timberwolves entered Target Center entrenched in a tug-of-war with the San Antonio Spurs. With a victory, they could seize control of the Western Conference Semifinals, wash away the stench of that Game 2 disaster, defend home court, remind the young Spurs that playoff experience actually matters, and turn Game 4 into a chance to put San Antonio on the brink.

Instead, they spent the first seven minutes of Game 3 acting like someone had unplugged the offense.

For over half of the first quarter, the Wolves managed one point. One. A single Anthony Edwards free throw. That was it. No rhythm, no flow, no composure, no ability to finish, no ability to breathe offensively. It was the basketball equivalent of trying to start a lawn mower in March after leaving it in the garage all winter. Pull the cord. Nothing. Pull again. Nothing. Everyone starts looking around awkwardly. Maybe this thing is broken.

By the time Minnesota finally woke up, San Antonio had already built a 15-point hole. And yes, to their credit, the Wolves clawed back. They showed fight. They turned what could have been a first-quarter burial into a real game. But that opening stretch mattered. In a playoff game that came down to the wire, you cannot give away seven minutes and expect the basketball gods to refund them later.

The cruel part is that once the Wolves stopped hitting the snooze button, they were right there. They competed and held leads. They had moments where it felt like the veteran team was about to take control. But every time Minnesota seemed ready to tilt the game, San Antonio had an answer: a better look, a cleaner possession, or Victor Wembanyama acting like a cheat code with a jump shot.

Ultimately that was the difference. The Spurs got easier offense. The Wolves had to work for almost everything. San Antonio attacked the rim with purpose. Minnesota too often ran into Wemby’s shadow and started negotiating with itself. San Antonio generated better looks closer to the basket. Minnesota had too many possessions that felt forced.

So now the series sits in the exact place Minnesota absolutely did not want it to be.

Spurs 2, Wolves 1.

Game 4 at Target Center.

Win, and this becomes a 2-2 series where both teams have shown they can hurt the other, where the Wolves still have every reason to believe their experience and toughness can carry them forward. Lose, and suddenly they are down 3-1, needing three straight wins against Wembanyama, including two in San Antonio, while still nursing injuries and searching for answers.

That is not a hill. That is Everest with a Spurs logo painted on it.

So let’s call this what it is: Game 4 is a must-win in everything but the mathematical sense. The Wolves do not technically go home if they lose. But if they drop this one, the series starts feeling like a funeral procession with a Game 5 tipoff time.

This is the desperation game. This is the bite-back game. This is where Minnesota either reasserts itself as the battle-tested, bruising, playoff-hardened team that just knocked out Denver, or it lets a young Spurs team start believing this whole thing belongs to them.

With that, here are the keys to the game….

1. Body Victor Wembanyama

Game 3 was too easy for Wembanyama. He got to his spots. He impacted the rim. He punished Minnesota from multiple levels. The Wolves talked a lot about physicality after Game 1, but in Game 3, they didn’t deliver enough of it. That has to change immediately.

This is where Julius Randle becomes one of the most important players in the series. We have seen him body Wemby before. We have seen him put a shoulder into that narrow frame, move him off his spot, and make him look like a baby giraffe fighting a lion. That version of Randle has to show up.

Every Wembanyama catch needs contact. Every drive needs bodies. Every rebound needs someone putting a forearm into his chest. The Wolves cannot let him float through this game like he is playing in open space. They need to make him feel the weight of the series.

Rudy Gobert has to do his part. Naz Reid has to do his part. Randle has to do a lot of it. This has to be a collective effort built around one simple idea: no comfort.

If Wemby gets comfortable, San Antonio becomes incredibly difficult to beat. If he gets battered, pushed, forced to work, forced to play through bodies for 48 minutes? Then the Wolves have a chance to tilt the game back toward their strengths.

2. Lock Down Everyone Else

Wembanyama is going to get his. That’s the starting point. You do not beat San Antonio by pretending you can make him disappear. But the Wolves absolutely cannot let the rest of the Spurs get comfortable around him.

This is where Minnesota has to borrow from the Denver series, even if the matchup is completely different. Against Denver, the Wolves made life miserable for Jamal Murray. Jaden McDaniels snatched his soul. Rudy battled Jokic, but the perimeter pressure was what allowed the whole defense to breathe.

Against San Antonio, the assignment is less obvious but just as important. De’Aaron Fox cannot be allowed to bend the defense at will. Stephon Castle cannot be handed easy lanes and confidence. Devin Vassell cannot be allowed to get into rhythm. Champagnie cannot be gifted clean catch-and-shoot looks.

The Wolves need connected perimeter defense. McDaniels, Edwards, Dosunmu, Shannon, Clark, whoever is on the floor, has to hound the ball, fight over screens, cut off penetration, and close out with purpose. They cannot allow the Spurs guards to waltz into the paint, force Gobert into impossible decisions, and then spray the ball out to shooters.

And yes, this might be a Jaylen Clark game. If the Wolves need chaos, put in the rabid wolverine. Let him pick up full court. Let him make someone uncomfortable. Let him blow up a possession or two. Sometimes in a playoff game, you don’t need elegance. You need disruption. You need someone who makes the other team say, “Why is this guy guarding me like I owe him money?”

3. Dominate the Glass

The Wolves technically outrebounded San Antonio in Game 3, but that number does not tell the whole story. Some of that came from Minnesota missing so many first looks and cleaning up its own mess. The bigger issue came on the defensive end, where the Wolves had multiple chances to finish possessions and simply didn’t. Three different times, balls that should have been secured by Minnesota ended up back in San Antonio’s hands, eventually turning into Spurs threes. In a seven-point game, that is basically the whole thing.

This is where playoff basketball becomes cruel. You can defend for 20 seconds, force a miss, and do almost everything right. But if you don’t finish the possession, none of it matters. Against a team with Wembanyama, Fox, Castle, Vassell, and shooters waiting around the arc, you cannot hand out second and third chances.

Everybody has to rebound like the ball is the series, because once Minnesota secures those boards, it can run. And that is the second half of the equation. Defensive rebounds are not just about preventing Spurs points; they are Minnesota’s best pathway to easier offense. Get the ball, push, attack before Wemby gets set, make San Antonio defend in transition. None of that happens if the ball keeps bouncing back to silver and black jerseys.

Finish possessions. Or get finished.

4. Make Shots, But Stop Letting Wemby Scare You Out of Good Ones

Minnesota’s offense in Game 3 started as a horror show and eventually became merely inconsistent. That’s not good enough. The Wolves shot 35% from three, which is around the target range they probably need in this series. But it still felt like too many important shots rattled out, too many possessions died late, too many looks near the rim got rushed, altered, or outright abandoned because Wembanyama was nearby.

That is the Wemby effect. He doesn’t have to block every shot. Sometimes he wins just by existing. The Wolves have to fight that.

This does not mean driving blindly into him and getting the ball slapped into the 15th row. It means attacking with a plan and not making the defensive play for him. If you have a lane, take it. If he commits, make the pass. If he stays home, finish strong. If the defense collapses, kick out. But the Wolves cannot allow his presence to turn good offensive opportunities into awkward, off-balance, self-defeating attempts.

There has to be a balance between respect and fear. Respect Wemby’s length. Do not fear it so much that you stop playing basketball.

From deep, the Wolves need to be more than adequate. They need to be timely. They need to hit the shots that stop runs, the shots that punish help, the shots that make San Antonio think twice about collapsing. This team has lived and died by the three all season.

Find a way to live.

5. Treat This Like the Season Is on the Line

The Wolves have spent the entire season playing with the switch. On, off, on, off… In Game 2, it was off. In the first seven minutes of Game 3, it nearly fell off the wall. That cannot happen again.

Not for a quarter. Not for five minutes. Not for two careless possessions. Game 4 demands full desperation from the opening tip.

The Wolves need to come out like the more urgent team, because they are the more urgent team. They need to defend 94 feet. They need to run back. They need to hit people legally, preferably. They need to box out. They need to attack. They need to play with the kind of edge that tells San Antonio immediately, “You are not walking into our building and taking this series from us.”

Target Center will be ready. The crowd will bring it. But the crowd cannot make the first shot, keep Wembanyama off the glass, or stop the Spurs in transition. The players have to bring the force.

This is where experience matters. This is where two straight Western Conference Finals runs are supposed to matter. This is where the Wolves are supposed to look like the team that has been through playoff wars and knows exactly how much a Game 4 can swing a series.

If they treat this like just another game, they will lose. If they treat it like a fight for survival, they can even the series and make this a best-of-three.

Bite Back

The Wolves were bitten in Game 3. They cornered the Spurs with Game 1, got mauled in Game 2, and then let Game 3 slip because they started too slowly, defended too inconsistently, and failed to make San Antonio feel the full weight of a desperate veteran team protecting its home floor.

Now it is time to bite back.

This series is not over. The Wolves have enough talent, enough toughness, enough playoff scar tissue, and enough defensive weaponry to beat San Antonio. But they cannot keep waiting until the game starts slipping away before they decide to fight. They cannot keep giving away stretches and asking themselves to climb back uphill. They cannot let Wembanyama and the Spurs grow more confident by the quarter.

Game 4 is the response game. Win, and the series is tied 2-2. Home court is technically gone, but momentum is alive. The Wolves head back to San Antonio having restored order and reminded the Spurs that this is going to be a long, painful, physical fight.

Lose, and everything changes. Down 3-1. Two games left in San Antonio if it gets that far. Wembanyama and this young team smelling blood and gaining belief. A battered Wolves team staring at the edge.

That cannot be the outcome.

The Wolves need to land their shot. They need to play with force. They need to turn Target Center into a place San Antonio wants no part of. They need to show, from the opening tip, that this series still runs through their defense, their physicality, and their refusal to go quietly.

This is the hunt.

The prey bit back.

Now the Wolves need to answer.

What’s your favorite NBA Playoffs moment from a Tar Heel?

SAL LAKE CITY - JUNE 14: Michael Jordan #23 of the Chicago Bulls shoots the game winner against the Utah Jazz in the 1998 NBA FINALS of Game 6. The shot gave the Bulls their sixth NBA title, 87-86 at the Delta Center, Salt Lake City, Utah. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory copyright notice: Copyright NBAE 2002 (Photo by Scott Cunningham/ NBAE/ Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images

We’re fully into the month of May on the calendar, which means a few things in the sporting world. Several of the college sports are getting down to the nitty gritty, with lacrosse soon crowning champions and the baseball and softball NCAA Tournaments soon to start. Meanwhile, in the pros, the MLB season is in full swing, the WNBA season is just getting underway, while two other leagues are only partway through their playoff journeys.

The spring and summer months feature the multi-week long battles that are the NBA and NHL playoffs. Around here at Tar Heel Blog, we have several Carolina Hurricanes fans on staff and probably as readers, there aren’t really any obvious UNC connections other than them being another local team. (It would be very cool if UNC sponsored an NCAA hockey team at some point, though).

However, there are plenty of connections to the NBA playoffs, as many Tar Heels have gone on to NBA careers following their time in Chapel Hill. Many of those names have also had notable moments and careers in the playoffs. It’s with that in mind that I ask today’s Question of the Day. What’s your most favorite or most memorable moment from a Tar Heel in the NBA Playoffs?

Several Carolina alumns had their moments in the NBA Playoffs, but of course, Michael Jordan has an abnormally large amount of them. Whether it be his shot over Craig Ehlo, his “flu game” in the 1997 NBA Finals, or winning the 1998 Finals with the shot over Bryon Russell, there are plenty to choose from. There are plenty I didn’t even get to in those examples.

However, I’m going to go a little off the board for my answer. One of my favorite ever Tar Heels whose time in Chapel Hill I can actually remember is Danny Green. It was especially fun watching him go from a second round pick and somewhat of an afterthought in the pros to a legitimate option for the Spurs, including in 2013.

While his San Antonio team didn’t end up winning that particular championship over the Heat — they did get revenge the following year — Green was incredible in the 2013 Finals. Including a 27-point, 6-10 from three effort in Game 3, Green led San Antonio in scoring in two games in the series and may very well have won Series MVP had the Spurs held on to finish off the series in Game 6. He ended up shooting an incredible 55.5% from three over the course of the seven games.

That’s my answer, but we want to hear from you! What is your favorite game or memory from a Tar Heel in the NBA Playoffs?

Rangers 6, Cubs 0: Sometimes it’s just not your day. The winning streak ends at 10

Seriously, the headline tells pretty much the story of the Cubs’ 6-0 loss to the Rangers, a defeat that ended their 10-game winning streak, the second such Cubs streak this season.

Well, not the entire story. Here’s most of the reason for the loss:

I’m not going to complain too much about this, because the team has done so well and this game was an aberration compared to many of the games during the winning streak. Yes, they have had RISP issues at times this year, but not during the streak. Nevertheless, the Cubs did have plenty of baserunners in this game, four hits, six walks and one runner reaching on an error, but they simply could not capitalize. At all. This despite again forcing the Rangers starter, this time Jack Leiter, to throw 28 pitches in the first inning, and got him out of the game before the fifth inning had ended.

These kinds of things happen, all the time, even to very good teams. I don’t think this is going to start some sort of trend.

Edward Cabrera had an easy first inning, then didn’t really have much the rest of the way. He served up a pair of solo homers and five runs overall in five innings. It wasn’t a terrible outing, but it wasn’t really a good one, either. Jacob Webb and Ethan Roberts finished up, throwing three innings combined and allowing one run. That saved the higher-leverage arms for the series finale Sunday.

Usually, even in a loss like this, I sometimes have good defensive highlights to show you. Not from this one, there was nothing out of the ordinary. So here, let me break up this wall of text with a summary of Cabrera’s start [VIDEO].

Ian Happ’s on-base streak remained alive when he drew a walk in the first inning. That puts his streak at 30 games, if you’re keeping track of such things. The Cubs’ only hits were singles by Seiya Suzuki and Michael Busch, and doubles by Michael Conforto and Dansby Swanson. Moisés Ballesteros got a couple of innings behind the plate, so I suppose that’s useful.

A couple of notes from BCB’s JohnW53 on the end of the streak:

This was the 11th winning streak by the Cubs since 1901 that ended after 10 games. The loss to the Rangers was the fifth in which the Cubs were beaten by at least six runs.

The previous two were by eight: 8-0 at Minnesota in 1998 and 12-4 at Los Angeles vs. the Dodgers on April 25.

They fell to the Giants at home by seven runs, 7-0, in 1906 and by nine runs, 18-9, in 1910.

The Cubs also were shut out, 3-0, at home vs. the Superbas, today’s Dodgers, in 1909, so four of the 11 streaks ended in a shutout defeat.

Two of the losses were by one run and two more by two. A 1938 streak was halted by a 7-7 tie at St. Louis.

And more from John regarding interleague competition:

Last night’s loss was the 42nd in which the Cubs were shut out by an American League team. It was their 586th interleague game. They have won 304 and lost 282, for a winning percentage of .519.

None of the earlier shutouts had been against the Rangers. In the 28 previous games between the teams, the Cubs had averaged 5.18 runs, while winning 15 and losing 13.

They had scored one run in two of the losses, at Texas in 2010 and at home in 2016.

The only AL team that has not shut out the Cubs at least once is the Orioles, whom the Cubs have played 25 times.

Oddly enough, during the three-game losing streak that came in between the 10-game winning streaks for the Cubs, one of the losses was by this same score, 6-0, to the Dodgers on April 26.

So, as the saying goes: Flush this one and move on, and hopefully start another winning streak Sunday afternoon.

It will not be an easy task, as the Cubs will be facing Jacob deGrom. Jameson Taillon gets the start for the Cubs. Game time is 1:35 p.m. CT and TV coverage will be via Marquee Sports Network.

Angels vs Blue Jays Prediction, Odds & Home Run Pick for Today's MLB Game

Want to get more Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account here.

The Toronto Blue Jays' bats erupted last night, and I expect the party to keep on rolling into today’s matchup against Jose Soriano.

Read on to see why with my Blue Jays vs. Angels predictions and MLB Picks on Sunday, May 10. 

Angels vs Blue Jays predictions

Angels vs Blue Jays best bet: Jose Soriano Over 5.5 hits (+120)

Jose Soriano was looking like a Cy-Young favourite a couple of weeks ago, but he’s been roughed up in back-to-back outings as reality is setting in for the veteran right-hander.

This regression was expected as his 1.74 ERA didn’t match up with his 3.58 xERA, while ranking in the 62nd percentile in xBA.

Soriano has now allowed six or more hits in three straight outings, which includes a start against the Toronto Blue Jays on April 22, where he surrendered seven hits to Toronto. 

I expect the Jays' bats to roll again this afternoon after waking up yesterday with a 20-hit performance.

It’s a good matchup for Toronto’s offense, too, which ranks 6th against the sinker, Soriano’s most utilized pitch, with a .304 team batting average.

Covers COVERS INTEL: Jose Soriano has allowed an average of seven hits over his last three starts

Angels vs Blue Jays same-game parlay (SGP)

Death, taxes, and Vladimir Guerrero Jr. hitting singles. It’s just what he does now. He ranks 3rd in singles hit this season and is 2-for-4 lifetime against Soriano, with both hits being for one base. I’ll add O 0.5 singles for Vlad to my SGP.

For the final leg of the SGP, I’m taking Daulton Varsho to go Over 0.5 hits tonight. He’s 3-for-6 against Soriano in his career and has recorded at least one hit in seven of his last nine games.

Angels vs Blue Jays SGP

  • Soriano Over 5.5 hits
  • Guerrero Jr. Over 0.5 singles
  • Varsho Over 0.5 hits
img loading="lazy" width="100%" height="null" src="https://img.covers.com/editorial/2026/jaysmlcbp.jpg" alt="Canada’s best price for Jays"
Get the best Jays ML odds at BET99 — every game.

Angels vs Blue Jays home run pick: Daulton Varsho (+700)

After giving up just one home run through his first five starts of the season, it’s starting to unravel for Soriano, who’s given up four dingers in his last two starts. 

Soriano has a three-pitch arsenal, but utilizes the sinker the most. 

Varsho has handled the sinker pretty well this season with a .391 average and a .565 slug rate with a home run against the pitch.

Additionally, Varsho is 3-for-6 against Soriano with a 1.166 OPS against him. 

2026 Transparency record
  • Best bets: 17-21, -0.15 units
  • SGPs: 8-30, +3.70 units
  • HR picks: 8-30, +8.65 units

Angels vs Blue Jays odds

  • Moneyline: Los Angeles -110 | Toronto -110
  • Run line: Los Angeles -1.5 (+150) | Toronto +1.5  (-175)
  • Over/Under: Over 8.5 | Under 8.5

Angels vs Blue Jays trend

The Toronto Blue Jays have hit the Run Line in 5 of their last 6 games at home (+5.20 Units / 74% ROI). Find more MLB betting trends for Angels vs. Blue Jays.

How to watch Angels vs Blue Jays and game info

LocationRogers Centre, Toronto, ON
DateSunday, May 10, 2026
First pitch1:37 p.m. ET
TVSN1, ABTV
Angels starting pitcherJose Soriano
(5-2, 1.74 ERA)
Blue Jays starting pitcherEric Lauer
(1-4, 6.03 ERA)

Angels vs Blue Jays latest injuries

Angels vs Blue Jays weather

Odds are correct at the time of publishing and are subject to change.
Not intended for use in MA.
Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.

This article originally appeared on Covers.com, read the full article here and view our best betting sites or check out our top sportsbook promos.

Who is the Next Man Up for the St. Louis Cardinals’ Lineup?

JUPITER, FL - MARCH 19: Joshua Baez #27 of the St. Louis Cardinals walks to the dugout prior to the game between the Washington Nationals and the St. Louis Cardinals at Roger Dean Chevrolet Stadium on Thursday, March 19, 2026 in Jupiter, Florida. (Photo by Jared Blais/MLB Photos via Getty Images) | MLB Photos via Getty Images

HAPPY MOTHER’S DAY to those in your lives!


By almost all accounts, the 2026 St. Louis Cardinals have surpassed expectations so far this year and are well on pace to blow past preseason win projections, which has made my wallet happy. It has been a full team effort so far, with the lineup coming with plenty of surprises and great performances, and the pitching staff chipping in with solid games here and there, although less consistent than we would like to see. Regardless of those frustrations, the Cardinals are still above .500 and in playoff contention as we approach the 1/4 mark of the season. If the offense slumps, though, is there anyone in the organization that can jolt the lineup back into what we have come to expect from an electric top of the lineup?

To answer that question, though, that means someone is going to have to be removed from the overachieving lineup, an offense that currently measures as 4% above league-average and top-10 in the league in power stats. As with every team’s lineup, there are holes in the Cardinals’ normal alignment. Outside of the top half of the order, the bottom 4-5 players have had runs of good, followed by longer, more painful runs of bad. By measure of wRC+, spots 1-3 in the order all fall in the top 10 of baseball, while only the seven-spot in the lineup ranks among those top teams. In the other five lineup spots, none are greater than 14th-best in baseball.

Who will be the first Cardinals player to lose their regular playing time?

The starting lineup is a point of conversation literally every game, with fans wondering how Oli Marmol could bat someone in a certain spot or why another player is getting an off day despite “getting paid millions to play a game for three hours a day”. I do my best to stay out of those unintelligent conversations, having been in a clubhouse and see the day to day for how a baseball team works, of course nowhere near the level these guys grind everyday. And yes, it is a grind. Okay, stepping off the soapbox and moving along.

To avoid talking more about the spots in the order, let me shift to talking about the actual players and their production at the plate. I think we are all in agreement that JJ Wetherholt, Ivan Herrera, Alec Burleson, Jordan Walker and Masyn Winn are written in pen, barring injury, of getting the starter at bats for the entire season and beyond as they look to cement themselves as the core of the next great Cardinals team. That makes sense as each of those five players has rated as above-average offensive contributors and could be fixtures in figuring out what the next step is in this rebuild.

Of the remaining four spots, the players with the most at-bats so far this year are catcher Pedro Pages, center fielder Victor Scott II, outfielder Nathan Church, and third baseman Nolan Gorman. Now, as I figure out which of these players will be the first to lose out on their playing time, I will try to keep my personal emotions and expectations for them aside and attempt to be realistic in who is out first. In my preseason expectations, I had Victor Scott II nowhere near the starting lineup for this season or beyond, but the word around the organization was that he had changed his swing and the staff was excited for what he was going to bring this year. Nathan Church was truly just an afterthought for me, a placeholder until the next bus from Memphis came up or Lars Nootbaar became healthy. There was never a doubt that Pages was going to remain the starting catcher, even as they kept Yohel Pozo on the roster and had Herrera working his way back behind the plate. And Nolan Gorman, the one I was highest on coming into the year, was supposed to finally get his runway (no his 1500 PAs coming into the year was not enough, in my opinion) and get his at-bats against righties and lefties while slotting in the middle of the order.

So, where are we now?

Victor Scott II has turned it on the last couple of weeks, finally tallying his first barrel of the year with his first homer, but his current “hot streak” still has him hitting below .200 with an OPS that starts with a four. The whole idea was that VSII was going to find ways on base, with a punch and Judy single, bunt, or a walk, but he is currently reaching base just 25% of the time, severely limiting his premier speed tool. Because of his inconsistent on-base skills, Scott has six stolen bases (off pace from his preseason goal of 70) but caught thrice after being thrown out just four times in 38 attempts last year. His defense has also fallen below his normal Gold Glove levels, settling in as simply above-average, but there are plenty of solid defensive center fielders who can provide more at the dish. Because of this, he is my first man out in terms of the lineup. The issue with this whole exercise, though, is that there has to be someone ready to take that spot. For me, that moves Nathan Church over to center, leaving left field open for the next man up.

The fun answer would be that Joshua Baez gets his shot to play left field in the bigs, at least until Lars Nootbaar is healthy and ready to return. That would give Baez a low-risk opportunity, albeit with a timeline, assuming that Noot returns at the end of May as has been reported. It would also give him consistent at-bats, which is the biggest reason I am against top prospect promotions unless there is an everyday spot open. Baez was off to a slow start with Memphis, but has found another level in recent weeks, raising his overall season line to .250/.336/.500 with seven homers and six stolen bases, but has seen his strikeout rate back at pre-2025 levels. For me, I am saying lets wait on a Baez promotion for another couple of weeks.

With Chaim Bloom stating at the beginning of the year that he wants to keep guys around without having to jump through the 40-man hoops, that means it would likely be Jose Fermin as the next man up for the daily left field reps. It is not attractive, fun, or really even exciting, but he is already on the roster and has performed better than VSII in his limited opportunities. The team obviously is high on Fermin, keeping him around rather than Thomas Saggese (before calling Saggese back up) as Fermin is out of options and done well so far. Whether they are worried about another team claiming him, or they truly think he’s a viable major league player remains to be seen, but for now, he is the next man up in the outfield for the Cardinals. I was hoping Saggese could flash something with the bat like he did as a Texas League MVP, but that has not come to pass just yet.

Nolan Gorman has unfortunately been much of the same with the bat so far this year despite the lower strikeout rate. That improved discipline has not resulted in more power, as his OPS is in line with his past three seasons. What has been impressive, though, is his above-average defense at third, which I expected after bouncing between third, second, and the bench with irregularity while Nolan Arenado was in town. I have constantly called him a “more athletic Kyle Schwarber”, hoping that he could hit 30+ homers while actually contributing on the defensive end, but I may be willing to admit those hopes were too high, even though Gorman is still just 25-years-old. I am not ready to pull the plug on him since he still has the chance to do some damage with the bat and has at least shown some improvements in his approach. There is also the fact that nobody is ready to take over for him at third just yet.

My preseason pick to click was Blaze Jordan and I am still feeling good about that with his scorching start to the Triple-A season after ending last year with a whimper. Currently, Blaze is hitting .322 with a 148 wRC+ with eight homers and stellar strikeout rate. His has spent more time at third base then first so far and has yet to make an error at the hot corner, so he could be getting closer to that major league debut. Like I just mentioned, if Blaze were to be called up, I want it to be for everyday opportunity, otherwise I could see his career going the same way as Luken Baker. A Gorman injury or complete incompetence would open up that shot, but beyond that, we may have to continue waiting on the Jordan promotion to St. Louis.

Onto Pages. The Ivan Herrera move back to catcher has been as expected, solid receiver with an inability to throw runners out but a spectacular knowledge of the strike zone and ABS challenges. Because of Herrera’s arm, the organization’s infatuation with Pages’ game calling, and Pages’ knack for the random clutch hit, the split behind the plate should be expected to continue, even with Jimmy Crooks playing well in Memphis. Despite the mid-.600s OPS for the entirety of his career, Pages continues to see time as the starting catcher, a role best suited for any of the other top catching prospects in the organization, but Pages profiles as a just fine backup catcher on a contending team. As a placeholder while Herrera hopes his arm bounces back and the next level of catchers approach the bigs, Pages is doing his job with the Cardinals.

The whole idea of the 2026 season was for the Cardinals to get answers on the vast majority of their roster. As we approach the quarter mark of the year, it looks like they are on their way of doing just that. However, even if the team continues to outperform those preseason expectations, we should not expect major turnover with the big league roster as the fact-finding mission continues. A worst-case scenario for Chaim Bloom would be if he were to give up on one of these youngsters too early and Cardinal Nation would get unfair flashbacks of Randy Arozarena. The next man up will likely have to continue waiting for their next opportunity.

Other than Jhoan Duran, who is the Phillies’ best reliever?

May 4, 2026; Miami, Florida, USA; Philadelphia Phillies pitcher Brad Keller (40) and catcher Garrett Stubbs (21) celebrate after the game against the Miami Marlins at loanDepot Park. Mandatory Credit: Sam Navarro-Imagn Images | Sam Navarro-Imagn Images

Last night, the Phillies’ bullpen held the Rockies without a baserunner over 4 1/3 innings. Colorado isn’t exactly a titan of offensive production, but this season, they’ve also been no slouch. Holding them down like that is still rather impressive.

It got me thinking: other Jhoan Duran, who is this team’s best reliever this season? Naturally my mind went to Brad Keller, but he’s been merely good instead of his otherworldly self he was in 2025. Chase Shugart has opened some eyes so far, but would we really put him second behind Duran? There are other options to choose from, but I still think it might be Keller.