The Mets have signed right-handed reliever Luis Garcia to a one-year contract.
The club announced the deal, adding that infielder Tsung-Che Cheng has been designated for assignment.
The 38-year-old Garcia split last season between the Dodgers, Nationals, and Angels, posting a 3.42 ERA (3.28 FIP) and 1.46 WHIP while striking out 48 batters over 55.1 innings (58 appearances).
During his 13-year career, which has also included stints with the Phillies, Rangers, Cardinals, Padres, and Red Sox, Garcia has a 4.07 ERA (3.92 FIP) and 1.42 WHIP in 583.1 innings spanning 603 games.
Garcia has been very good when it comes to keeping the ball in the park, with a career HR/9 rate of 0.8. That rate was a microscopic 0.3 in 2025 as he allowed just two home runs.
With Garcia in tow, he figures to be part of a relief corps that features Devin Williams and Luke Weaver in the back end. The bullpen is also expected to include A.J. Minter and Brooks Raley -- though the start of Minter's season could be a bit delayed following lat surgery this past May.
Huascar Brazoban will also be in the bullpen mix, along with hard-throwing prospects Dylan Ross and Ryan Lambert.
Other relievers who could compete for roles include Jonathan Pintaro (who made his big league debut last season and recently transitioned to relief), Adbert Alzolay (who is on a two-year minor league deal and missed the 2025 season), Richard Lovelady, Alex Carrillo, and Joey Gerber.
At Citi Field this afternoon, the Mets formally introduced their new third baseman, Bo Bichette, to the media. Donning a #19 jersey, Bichette addressed the media alongside Mets President of Baseball Operations David Stearns and two of Bichette’s representatives.
Stearns, in his introductory remarks, called Bichette “one of the most complete right-handed batters in our sport,” as well as praising his baseball aptitude, and his intense desire to win. Stearns said that Bichette made it clear that his focus was “about winning, and our objectives [are] very well aligned there.”
When Bichette took the microphone, he thanked Stearns, Steve and Alex Cohen, and the entire Mets organization for making this happen. “It was very obvious that I wanted to be a Met,” said Bichette. “The organization is looking to win every year and has the opportunity to win every year.” Bichette also praised the roster and their abilities and desire to win.
Bichette didn’t miss the opportunity to get some cheap pop saying that New York was “maybe the best city in the world” and that Mets fans are “some of the best fans in the world,” and that playing in front of these fans is a “pretty cool opportunity.” A number of times Bichette stated that he is “excited to be here and excited to be a Met.”
When asked about the transition to third base and his openness to a position change, Bichette said that he was open to “doing anything if I felt like it was the place I needed to be, and it became very clear that I wanted to be a Met.” Bichette was asked about his relationship with new Met Marcus Semien, and he said that while it was not the reason he signed with the Mets, he looked forward to playing with Semien again.
Jon Heyman asked Bichette about the opt-outs in his contract and whether or not this could be looked at as a one-year deal. Bichette’s agent Greg Genske answered the question for him, “Bo had his choice of long term deals, short term deals, and deals with opt-outs. The important thing is to know that he’s committed to being here and committing to the team…Certainly it was important that we reserve optionality, but his commitment is to the Mets, his desire is to be here and compete for championships here.”
Bichette expressed his desire to be ‘the absolute toughest at bat every time I come to the plate” and talked about how his father, former MLB All-Star Dante Bichette, has drilled in him the importance of driving in runs from a young age.
In a conversation on SNY with Steve Gelbs after the general presser, Bichette mentioned how conversations between the Mets and his camp started at the beginning of the offseason and, again, praised the Mets, their stadium, and their fans. “This is one of my favorite stadiums [to play in]…[I’m excited to play in front of] unbelievable fans that hold you to a high standard.”
After the press conference, Steve Gelbs caught up with David Stearns, who did not have any public questions addressed to him during the conference. Gelbs asked about his approach to bringing in players that make more contact and Stearns pushed back against that slightly, saying that “contact wasn’t the priority per se,” but that they wanted a lineup that top to bottom took competitive at-bats. Stearns pointed to the players that were already on board with the Mets, the new additions, and the young players coming up as all giving the Mets those types of at-bats.
When asked about Bichette’s ability to hit with runners in scoring position, Stearns cited that while there’s not a lot of data to back up the underlying skills that allow for that success, there is a ‘skill in regulating yourself” in order to be more calm and patient in those spots, and that Bichette clearly excels at that part of the game.
In terms of Bichette and Jorge Polanco both being asked to switch positions, Stearns was honest but bullish on the proposition of having “four shortstops on the dirt some days.” He said that there will be “learning moments as they learn the intricacies” of their new positions, but that he believes that the players in question know the game well and have both the aptitude and the work ethic to make the transitions happen.
When asked about the newest Met, Luis Robert Jr., Stearns said that when you look under the hood at Robert’s skills, he still possesses everything that made him an elite player a few years ago. He said that when you see those skills “you want that guy in your organization” and that the team will do all it can to get the best out of Robert and cited the change of scenery may be very good for him.
Stearns then said that while he won’t stop looking, he feels good about the offensive side of the team at this point in the offseason, but that ‘unexpected things’ tend to happen at this point in the season, so he would not rule out additional offensive additions while reiterating how happy he is with that part of the team.
The starting rotation is another story, as Stearns stated that it is ‘[his] preference’ to add a starting pitcher. The team remains ‘engaged on a number of different fronts in that market’ and stated how there’s still plenty of time to make a move on that front.
The Baseball Writers’ Association of America announced the induction of two new members into the National Baseball Hall of Fame on Tuesday night: Carlos Beltrán and Andrew Jones. For the former, it was the fourth ballot he had appeared on before getting the nod, while the latter took nine tries to reach baseball immortality.
Funny enough, the two players were born one day apart, with Jones coming into the world on April 23 and Beltrán bursting on the scene on April 24 back in 1977.
A total of 425 ballots were cast, making it necessary to earn at least 319 votes to get in. The 11 blank ballots received this year were the most since 2011, and the average ballot had 5.8 names checked.
Next in line was Chase Utley, who was the only other former player to crack the 50% mark at 59.1% on his third ballot. Former Detroit Tiger Rick Porcello was among the first-balloters who fell short of the threshold to appear a second time, earning just two votes — both unknown.
It is worth mentioning that this year’s inductees do not come without controversy. Many remember Beltrán for his significant role in the Houston Astros’ cheating scandal, and a large share of folks feel like he does not deserve to be in the Hall because of it.
Between the past and present issues of PEDs, and a myriad of other wild inconsistencies, the drama continues in Cooperstown.
So, fellow Tigers fans, what are your thoughts on this year’s ballot? Is Beltrán undeserving? Did King Felix get snubbed? Will any of the legendary dopers like Alex Rodriguez ever get in? LOL Porcello?
Let us know what you are thinking in the comments below.
It’s an exciting day for fans of San Francisco Giants prospecting. Over at Baseball America, the best top-100 list around has dropped, and for the first time in a long time, it features four Giants: Bryce Eldridge (No. 18), Josuar González (No. 30), Bo Davidson (No. 87), and Jhonny Level (No. 98). Over at There R Giants, 80-grade Giants prospect writer Roger Munter has kicked off his top-50 list, a must-read for anyone with an interest in Giants prospects. And here at McCovey Chronicles, we officially have a top 30, as we continue our community ranking of the 44 best prospects in the Giants system.
Getting us to that point — and winning in a landslide election — is left-handed pitcher Carlos De La Rosa, who makes his CPL debut as the No. 30 prospect in the system.
De La Rosa continues an exciting trend for the Giants: recent additions that strengthen the farm. He closes out the top 30, and he does so by becoming the whopping 10th player in that top 30 who has been acquired in the last six months (for those keeping count, that’s five trade acquisitions, three draft picks, one international signing, and one Rule 5 Draft selection). And that doesn’t even include Drew Gilbert, who is ineligible for the CPL after graduating late last season.
The southpaw, who turned 18 less than two months ago, came to the Giants in the Camilo Doval trade, and is already the third player from that trade to appear on the CPL. He was a late signing by the New York Yankees in the 2025 international signing period out of the Dominican Republic, and spent his debut season in the Dominican Summer League. He wasn’t a particularly heralded signing, but what he did in the DSL opened eyes.
Across 10 games (nine starts) with the Yankees and Giants DSL affiliates, De La Rosa posted just a 4.73 ERA, but his FIP was 2.30, thanks to an utterly absurd strikeout-to-walk ratio. In 32.1 innings, he punched out a staggering 51 batters, while only walking 10.
The DSL is, it goes without saying, a low-level league, but even so, the numbers jump off the page. There were 562 different pitchers who tossed at least 20 innings in the league last year, and De La Rosa was sixth in strikeouts per nine innings (14.20), 65th in walks per nine innings (2.78), and sixth in strikeout rate minus walk rate (27.9%).
De La Rosa’s fastball is his best pitch, and it sits mid-high 90s with 20 inches of induced vertical break, per Baseball America. He also has a decent slider and changeup.
As with all players in the DSL, we’ll learn a lot about where De La Rosa sits in the organization by whether or not he’s repeating the level in 2026, or pitching stateside. Hopefully it’s the latter … he’d look good fronting the Complex League rotation.
Now let’s add to the list, and we have some new names to vote on in the comment section.
Note: Each player’s first name links to their Baseball-Reference page, and their last name links to their Fangraphs page.All stats are from the 2025 season.
Spring training baseball is underway, and the regular season isn't far behind.
MLB odds unsurprisingly have the Los Angeles Dodgers pegged as betting favorites to win a third straight Fall Classic at +225 or +230 after adding outfielder Kyle Tucker to an already formidable lineup. But that doesn't mean it's all wrapped up.
Below, I examine the 2026 World Series odds and single out the Detroit Tigers as a potential dark horse to win the Fall Classic.
2026 World Series winner odds
2026 World Series odds over time
Here, we'll track how the World Series odds shift throughout the offseason, free agency, spring training, and 2026 regular season.
MLB World Series futures bets
The Los Angeles Dodgers are rightly favored to win the World Series, and you can certainly justify wagering on them at +230 or thereabouts, where they're listed.
However, a lot can happen in a few months. Granted, even their late-season swoon didn't hurt them too much, but the Dodgers were +500 as of the Wild Card Series.
If I'm betting this market now, I'm either going big on the Dodgers or going light on a bit of a longer shot. Below, I examine the latter.
Bet
Odds
Bet date
Units
Detroit Tigers
+2500
February 26
0.25
This might be the Detroit Tigers' best shot at winning the Fall Classic before the window closes a tad before re-opening. Two-time American League Cy Young winner Tarik Skubal is poised to enter free agency after the season, which would greatly diminish their chances going forward, even with fellow southpaw Framber Valdez anchoring the rotation.
But with Skubal and Valdez at the front of the rotation, Jack Flaherty and Casey Mize providing solid innings in the middle, and veteran Justin Verlander returning home for one last shot at glory with the team that drafted him 22 years ago, the pitching side of things is promising enough to inspire confidence.
The lineup is where risk and uncertainty come into play, which is why we can get them for +2500. Riley Greene, Kerry Carpenter, and Spencer Torkelson are more or less penciled in as the heart of the batting order, which is a bit wobbly. Colt Keith could take another step forward, and Gleyber Torres has a reasonably high floor, but the ceiling feels limited.
However, the Tigers have an abundance of prospects knocking on the door of the major leagues. Shortstop Kevin McGonigle and outfielder Max Clark are the two with the most promise, and they should make their debuts fairly early on. McGonigle is a candidate to crack the Opening Day roster, while Clark is likely to arrive closer to midseason.
Trey Sweeney has already had a taste, Max Anderson is probably the second baseman of Detroit's future, and Hao-Yu Lee and Jace Jung could be useful pieces from the jump.
The point is, the Tigers won't mess around with Skubal's final year. And with the AL Central still in flux, Detroit has a projected 72.6% chance of reaching the postseason — the second-best odds in the American League, behind only the Seattle Mariners at 79.1% — per FanGraphs.
Getting to the postseason is, obviously, the first big hurdle. And if the Tigers are in the mix at the All-Star break, management will likely add at the trade deadline, so the soft spots on the roster today won't be the same in a few months.
The Mariners are +1300 to win the World Series. I'll take the value play on the Tigers at +2500, instead.
Will revisit betting splits as more data is available for the 2026 World Series.
Past World Series winners
The Los Angeles Dodgers won the 2025 World Series by toppling the Toronto Blue Jays in an epic seven-game series.
Here are the last 10 World Series winners, along with their opening odds.
Season
Winner
Opening odds
Runner up
2025
Los Angeles Dodgers
+240
Toronto Blue Jays
2024
Los Angeles Dodgers
+350
New York Yankees
2023
Texas Rangers
+5000
Arizona Diamondbacks
2022
Houston Astros
+800
Philadelphia Phillies
2021
Atlanta Braves
+1000
Houston Astros
2020
Los Angeles Dodgers
+600
Tampa Bay Rays
2019
Washington Nationals
+1800
Houston Astros
2018
Boston Red Sox
+1200
Los Angeles Dodgers
2017
Houston Astros
+1600
Los Angeles Dodgers
2016
Chicago Cubs
+1050
Cleveland Guardians
The biggest World Series underdogs
Below are the 10 World Series-winning teams since 1985 with the longest opening odds.
Season
Winner
Opening odds
1991
Minnesota Twins
+8000
2003
Florida Marlins
+7500
2023
Texas Rangers
+5000
1987
Minnesota Twins
+5000
2013
Boston Red Sox
+4000
2002
Anaheim Angels
+4000
2010
San Francisco Giants
+2500
2005
Chicago White Sox
+2200
2008
Philadelphia Phillies
+2000
2014
San Francisco Giants
+2000
Teams with most World Series titles
Team
World Series titles
Most recent championship
New York Yankees
27
2009
St. Louis Cardinals
11
2011
Oakland A's
9
1989
Boston Red Sox
9
2018
Los Angeles Dodgers
9
2025
San Francisco Giants
8
2014
Cincinnati Reds
5
1990
Pittsburgh Pirates
5
1979
Detroit Tigers
4
1984
Atlanta Braves
4
2021
Chicago Cubs
3
2016
Baltimore Orioles
3
1983
Minnesota Twins
3
1991
Chicago White Sox
3
2005
The New York Yankees are the most decorated team in MLB history, and it isn't close. In addition to winning a whopping 27 titles, they've played in 41 World Series. The Los Angeles Dodgers are second all-time with 23 World Series appearances, while the St. Louis Cardinals have won the second-most championships at 11.
Oh boy, welcome back to our annual Socratic seminar about “should the Celtics make a trade this year?” A tradition unlike any other, it’s one of the most important questions for each Celtics season — answering it can reflect the state of the team, the direction and goals for the coming playoff run or tanking extravaganza. In some ways, it’s the defining concept of each season. To trade or not to trade, that is the question.
Yeah… except it’s actually a stupid question.
Presenting this discussion as a binary between “the Celtics should stand pat with their roster” or “the Celtics should go out and try to improve their roster” is the easiest answer since you asked your 4-year-old niece if she wanted ice cream or not. Of course the Celtics should try to improve their roster! What is the point of paying front office executives and scouts millions of cumulative dollars if you’re not always trying to improve your roster? That would be like asking that same 4-year-old niece about ice cream and you literally own an ice cream shop.
The Celtics are always going to try to get better. The real question is “is it possible to improve this team without needlessly hamstringing its future flexibility?” which is, of course, not a stupid question and one we can actually try to answer. Trading Anfernee Simons to get under the first apron of the luxury tax seemed like a mortal lock until he went sicko mode in the last month and is now very reasonably a Sixth Man of the Year candidate.*
*side note: what the heck is up with the Celtics printing 6MOYs? Brogdon, Pritchard, and now maybe Simons? It seems like there’s a real infrastructure here that we need to dissect. Maybe I’ll get to that in the offseason.
I’m still in favor of trading Simons due to the simple fact that he is capital G Gone at the end of this season. He’s on the final year of a reasonably sized expiring contract, and unless Jayson Tatum can come back, be actually, literally, unequivocally, 100% and the Celtics can compete for a title this year, it seems silly to lose him for nothing. They definitely won’t be able to pay him after this year, so forget about that.
The issue is that the above Tatum situation is still an open question. Tatum launched the mother of all press balloons by staging a full workout in front of reporters, quite intentionally getting the conversation going about whether he’ll be back sooner rather than later. And while it makes me uncomfortable, I’ve long resigned to not judging Tatum and the team’s decision on when he returns. Oh, what, do I have better medical info than Tatum and the team doctors? No, I don’t, so I’ll stay out of it.
We don’t, unfortunately, have any indication of when/if Tatum will return, which also, unfortunately, means we have a classic Schrödinger’s Simons situation. If Tatum returns, I don’t want to trade Simons. If he doesn’t, I do.
For Simons, this is kind of a great situation. He’s playing great and making the case that he should get a decent-sized contract this offseason, and he’s probably okay if that doesn’t come from the Celtics. If Boston trades him somewhere, he might be able to work on an extension with them or start planning his future (which he’s probably already doing).
For the Celtics, this is awkward, because I am unable to responsibly answer the Simons question without more Tatum info. Maybe we’ll get some soon, but for now I’ll punt on that one. Dealing Simons would remove an offensive creator, yes, but that should be made up for by Derrick White figuring out whatever slump he’s in. Couple that with how much future flexibility it will give Boston financially, and it’s probably worth it. But the larger question of “is it possible to improve this team without needlessly hamstringing its future flexibility?” remains unanswered. I’ll speculate anyway.
Save for a Simons deal, I think it probably is not possible to do better than this without doing something irresponsible.
Because of the misfortune that befell Tatum and the rest of last year’s roster, we can imagine this Celtics season as life giving us limes and making limeade (which clears lemonade btw). Now, the limeade we made is insanely good, and each individual lime has managed to produce more lime juice than the top Lime-ologists previously thought possible. As I’ve discussed at length, this team is playing way over its head on so many levels.
Transactions, then, are pretty likely to reduce the quality of the limeade. Say the Celtics packaged Garza and Hauser and a pick for some “better” player. What are the chances that player will immediately assimilate and produce what those two have managed for the Celtics this year on aggregate? Pretty low. Sure, in theory the Celtics are a porous team with lots of growth areas, but that simply hasn’t borne out in reality.
I’m ready to start taking this team seriously as a collection of serious basketball players that work well together, rather than treating it like a fantasy football team that will regress to the mean and thus we need to “sell high.” The sample size is too big for that kind of argument; this works, so I say let it work.
Logan Evans’ future depends on two numbers from his rookie season:
.529 OPS allowed on the first turn through a lineup in a game (fifth best in MLB)
1.022 OPS allowed on the second turn through a lineup in a game (worst in MLB)
That .493 difference was the largest such split in 2025 and one of the 20 largest splits in MLB history. Which number better reflects his true talent?
OPS allowed isn’t the ideal measure for pitchers. I use it here as it’s the parlance of Baseball Reference, which facilitates the comparison. The next plot shows performance against this split using FIP (courtesy of Fangraphs). Here we see a less extreme split, with Evans performing closer to average on the first time through the order, while still the worst in MLB on the second.
Evans’ (relative) success on the first time through the order was thanks to an outstanding ability to limit quality of contact. He didn’t get a lot of whiffs or strikeouts, and his command was just OK. But batters simply could not square up the ball in their first look, either rolling over or getting jammed or popping up or otherwise juuuuuust missing. His .289 xwOBAcon allowed on the first time through the order was sixth in MLB.
On the second time through the order, he was awful by every metric.
The most likely explanation for this phenomenon is that sometimes bizarre splits show up in small samples; Evans accomplished this feat across just 15 starts. The safe analyst would evaluate him by his overall line: 5.05 FIP, 8% K-BB, 1.44 HR/9, -0.1 fWAR. That’s a bottom 20% starting pitcher line posted by a seventh-string, 12th rounder with poor stuff. That’s, frankly, what we should expect from Evans.
Still, it’s hard to ignore that for nine batters a night, Evans was a good or even great pitcher. We care about this split because it’s a possible clue towards something less measurable, something fundamental. We know a lot of pitching is Stuff, but we’re increasingly aware a lot of pitching is other stuff. Batters gain an advantage the more they see a pitcher in a game, so for a pitcher to perform notably in the early or late parts of an outing, that could say something about those less measurable abilities. And for a pitcher at the extremes — Evans certainly is — perhaps it says something about the nature of those abilities themselves. What might we learn about pitching by studying Logan Evans? What might we learn about humanity?
God I love small samples.
Evans in his rookie season showcased a deep, six-pitch repertoire. What he lacked in speed and spin, he made up for in sheer quantity. He could make the ball go in every conceivable direction at release, and batters had a tough time guessing where and when to swing.
We can see that, especially to lefties, Evans mixed his repertoire evenly and unpredictably. Batters had to respect that any one of six pitches might show up, preventing them from teeing off on something specific.
That approach worked on the first time through the order, and most of his pitches were effective against either handedness. But all his pitches got measurably worse across the board once the lineup turned over.
I’m not sure why this was the case. I appreciate that certain skills might be more or less resistant to the times through the order penalty, but to go from so good to so bad is hard to wrap my head around. Perhaps this says something about the impact of movement spread, as coined by Stephen Sutton-Brown for Baseball Prospectus, or the idea that having lots of pitches moving in all directions can keep hitters off balance. Maybe that alone is enough to get through a lineup once, and then raw stuff is necessary from there? Or maybe Evans struggled to disguise (or tunnel) his pitches, as Timothy Jackson recently pointed out for Baseball Prospectus; once they could identify each of his pitches, the jig was up.
Evans enters Spring Training 2026 as depth. His exact proximity to the starting rotation is unclear, whether he’ll continue to serve as second alternate or if he’ll leapfrog Emerson Hancock’s fourth attempt. We only know that opportunity relies on something going wrong, and that something will eventually go wrong. The Mariners are coming off a season where four starting pitchers missed time with some type of injury; one of them still has bone spurs. Evans will pitch in MLB at some point this year.
I’m fascinated to see what if any changes he makes. The Mariners know all that I’ve written here. They’ve seen his splits, they’ve measured his arsenal, and they’ve surely set forth a Plan. Maybe we’ll see him add a pitch, or remove a pitch, or overhaul a pitch, or shift his aim, or adjust his sequencing — something in an attempt to stump batters just a bit longer. It’s worth following for the sake of Evans’ career and the Mariners’ success, but it could also provide a glimpse into the minds of one of the sharper collections of pitching thinkers out there. This is a challenge that justifies our modern Pitching Bureaucracy. This is where organization reputations are earned.
I don’t think anyone really expected another outcome for Cody Bellinger. Did you?
Here’s the deal that returns Bellinger to the Bronx:
Cody Bellinger's deal with the Yankees is for five years and $162.5 million, sources tell ESPN. There are opt-outs after the second and third season, a $20M signing bonus and a full no-trade clause.
Bellinger’s swing seems well-suited for Yankee Stadium, and that shows in his splits from 2025.
Home: .302/.365/.544 with 18 home runs in 298 at-bats Away: .241/.301/.414 with 11 home runs in 290 at-bats
So yeah. Outside of Yankee Stadium, that’s not a hitter who would rate such a contract.
You likely recall that Bellinger had a three-homer game against the Cubs last year, and would have had a fourth if not for this great catch by Kyle Tucker [VIDEO].
(NOTE: This does not suggest I wish the Cubs had re-signed Tucker. It’s just a great play worth noting.)
Anyway, while Bellinger has some opt-outs in this deal, my feeling is that he’ll stay with the Yankees for the five-year term. As noted, he’s a good fit there and the Yankees do, generally, contend every year.
If you’re interested in seeing him play at Wrigley, the Yankees will visit the Cubs for a three-game series July 31-Aug. 1-2. Should be a hot ticket — and not just to see Bellinger.
After a protracted staring contest, the New York Yankees and Cody Bellinger have finally reunited.
Bellinger and the Yankees agreed to terms on a five-year, $162.5 million deal, according to a person with direct knowledge of the negotiations. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the deal is not yet finalized.
The agreement comes after an impasse on the length of contract: Bellinger was aiming for a seven-year commitment, but the Yankees hoped to stick to a five-year deal for the 30-year-old outfielder/first baseman. After potential landing spots were largely short-circuited by the signings of Kyle Tucker and Bo Bichette last week, Bellinger met the Yankees' ask for length of contract, while ensuring a $32.5 million annual salary - highest in Bellinger's career.
Bellinger has experienced a career resurgence after injury-plagued 2021 and 2022 seasons with the Los Angeles Dodgers. Since then, Bellinger thrived with both the Chicago Cubs and New York Yankees, smacking 73 homers and posting a cumulative 12.1 WAR over the last three campaigns.
Here's everything to know about Bellinger's new deal.
Cody Bellinger contract details
Bellinger agreed to a five-year, $162.5 million deal. The contract contains opt-out clauses after the second and third years, but they move back a year if the 2027 season is canceled due to a lockout. Bellinger receives a $20 million signing bonus and $32.5 million each of the first two seasons, guaranteeing him $85 million before his first opt-out.
Cody Bellinger 2025 stats
Bellinger experienced one of his best seasons in 2025, finishing 14th in AL MVP voting in his lone season with the New York Yankees. His 29 home runs mark the third-most he's hit in a season, and his best mark since belting 47 in his MVP season in 2019.
Bellinger slashed .272/.334/.480 across 152 games with New York, accumulating 5.1 WAR in 2025, a stellar mark and his most since 2019. Bellinger also played a tremendous right field in pinstripes, racking up eight Defensive Runs Saved at the position in just 416 innings.
Bellinger has played in at least 130 games in each of the last four seasons, showing a durability after his stint with the Dodgers ended after both shoulder surgery and a lower-leg injury dampened his final two seasons.
One year after a winter storm forced postponements across U.S. sports, another major weather system is prompting a reshuffling of games this week and threatened to wreak havoc on the weekend schedule.
A storm that meteorologists say could rival the damage of a major hurricane is expected to bring snow, ice and frigid temperatures from New Mexico to New England starting Friday.
Major League Baseball’s Texas Rangers canceled their annual Fan Fest event scheduled for Saturday due to the weather forecast for frozen precipitation in North Texas and “in the interest of safety for players, fans, and employees.”
The Sun Belt Conference preemptively shook up its women’s basketball schedule, moving around the start times on several games from Thursday through Saturday. The American Athletic Conference also adjusted its weekend men’s and women’s basketball schedules, moving some games up to Friday.
Tennessee’s swim meet at Georgia and the USC Upstate women’s basketball game at Longwood were moved up to Friday from Saturday due to the forecast.
As soon as outfielder Cody Bellinger decided to exercise his opt-out in early November and hit free agency again this offseason, it seemed like he and the Yankees would find their way back to each other. Both sides were extremely complimentary about each other and New York in particular was active in talking to the media about their desire to retain him, even when seemingly superior outfield options like Kyle Tucker were also available on the market. Because Bellinger’s agent is Scott Boras, however, negotiations took a very long time as Boras tried to find the best possible deal for his player, and there were talks of him negotiating with the Mets and Blue Jays as well.
Two and a half months later, the sides have finally come together, not long after Tucker signed with the Dodgers and the Mets picked up Luis Robert Jr. via trade. The official terms are below, per ESPN’s Jeff Passan, who broke the signing. It’s a five-year contract with some particular details:
Cody Bellinger's deal with the Yankees is for five years and $162.5 million, sources tell ESPN. There are opt-outs after the second and third season, a $20M signing bonus and a full no-trade clause.
If he wants, Bellinger, will be able to test the market again after the 2027 and 2027 campaigns. There are no deferrals. Boras and Bellinger had been angling for six or seven years, but the Yankees stuck to their guns on the five-year offer with opt-outs.
Is this a lot of money for someone who wasn’t even an All-Star in 2025? Sure, but the Yankees bleed money, they absolutely needed to keep Bellinger in this offense given the alternatives, and they were able to avoid a longer-term commitment that has burned them in the past with similar players like DJ LeMahieu. Bellinger was quite productive in 2025 regardless of his specific honors (he did make the All-MLB Second Team), hitting .272/.334/.480 with 29 homers—his most since his MVP year in 2019—and a 125 wRC+. This is a win-now move for a team that still has Aaron Judge in his scalding-hot prime and needs to win now, though they could still use another starting pitcher. Bellinger’s lefty swing was well-suited for Yankee Stadium, he covered the tricky left field with aplomb, he could shift back to center next year if Trent Grisham departs, he can man first as well in a pinch, and he’ll be able to keep calling the place where his father once played home for likely the rest of the decade.
After opting out of his contract following the end of the 2025 season, the Yankees and Bellinger have agreed to a new five-year, $162.5 million contract, per multiple reports.
The deal reportedly has opt-outs after 2027 and 2028, along with a $20 million signing bonus and a full no-trade clause.
The Yankees acquired Bellinger in a trade with the Chicago Cubs — along with $5 million in cash considerations — in December 2024 for right-handed pitcher Cody Poteet and the former NL MVP became arguably the team's second-best hitter this past season.
The 30-year-old slashed .272/.334/.480 with 29 home runs and 98 RBI in 152 regular season games this year. He was a Silver Slugger finalist and played phenomenal defense in the outfield.
Bellinger's play helped the Yankees make it back to the postseason, although the playoffs ended in the ALDS for New York.
Re-signing Bellinger was a major priority for the Yankees, who needed to fill out their outfield around Aaron Judge. Even with Trent Grisham returning on the qualifying offer, the Yankees still needed more help.
And now they keep a powerful left-handed bat in the middle of their lineup.
"I had an unbelievable time putting on this uniform. Yankee Stadium, the fans, the organization, the culture that these guys have created in this locker room," Bellinger said after last season. "It really is special. It's such a fun group, a fun group to be a part of. We came up short and that part stinks for sure because we had a really really good group here."
One interesting part of that story: It wasn't just Lakers fans who were frustrated with LeBron James in the wake of the team trading for Russell Westbrook, it was team governor Jeanie Buss as well — and she even floated the idea of trading him.
Jeanie privately grumbled, people close to the team say, about what she felt was James' outsized ego and the overt control that he and Klutch Sports, which represents both James and Anthony Davis, exerted over the organization at times. She didn't like that James was considered a savior for a floundering franchise when he arrived in 2018 and that it was he who chose the Lakers rather than the team's leadership receiving praise for landing him....
The distance between Jeanie and James widened after the Lakers traded for Russell Westbrook in July 2021, people close to the team said. The team had made the trade in an effort to appease James, but the acquisition backfired in catastrophic fashion. L.A. went 33-49 and missed the playoffs, and James seemed to wash his hands of his role in the acquisition...
In 2022, in the aftermath of the Westbrook trade, multiple people said Jeanie privately mused about not giving James a contract extension and, later that year, even about trading James, with the LA Clippers floated as a possibility. (This was before James received a no-trade clause in July 2024 after signing a new two-year, $104 million contract.)
Just as a background refresher, the Lakers were very close to a trade that would have sent Kyle Kuzma and Montrezl Harrell to Sacramento for Buddy Hield, allowing them to keep Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, and put that shooting around LeBron and Anthony Davis. Instead, reportedly at LeBron's urging, the Lakers pivoted to a trade for Westbrook, a deal that proved a legendarily bad fit.
Buss also reportedly was frustrated that LeBron didn't seem grateful — or at least grateful enough — that the team drafted LeBron's son, Bronny James, in the second round in 2024.
Buss would be far from the first owner to be frustrated with a star player and float the idea of trading him, only to have calmer, wiser heads in the front office talk them out of that notion. It's a long and storied list.
It's also Buss chaffing against the reality of the modern NBA — truly elite players have the power. They drive winning on the court (LeBron did win a title with the Lakers), but more importantly they drive the business of basketball — they fill the buildings with fans who come to see them, they drive television ratings, team sponsors want to be associated with them, the stars sell jerseys, and more. As big as modern NBA max contracts get (16 players have $50+ million contracts this season) for a star who plays and contributes to winning, that is a good deal for the team in terms of revenue those stars generate.
Few players have flexed that power like LeBron (while trying to spin "I'm just an employee" and distance himself from deals), but Giannis Antetokounmpo and others have used that leverage as well. Those stars have the power. That is the reality of the NBA. And LeBron retains that power both because he has built his international brand and because, at 41, he is still producing on the court.
Buss, still the Lakers' governor (if not the owner calling the shots), likely gets her wish this summer when the Lakers and LeBron are expected to part ways, something league sources have told NBC Sports and is widely expected in league circles.
We are inching closer and closer to the NBA trade deadline, now just over two weeks away from February 5. The Bucks haven’t pulled the trigger on anything yet, but with all the rumors swirling, it’s definitely possible we see some action before then. In the meantime, we here at Brew Hoop have been presenting our candidates for the Bucks and GM Jon Horst to target. We’ve already identified five players for consideration, but now I’m throwing in a sixth, as we take a look at Andrew Wiggins.
This is now the third player from the 2014 NBA draft we’ve presented, as Wiggins was the no. 1 pick that year to the Timberwolves. The Bucks just missed on acquiring Wiggins’ services in that draft, instead selecting Jabari Parker at two. After five and a half seasons in Minnesota with just one playoff appearance, the T-Wolves traded Wiggins to the Warriors. There, he fit in perfectly next to Steph Curry, Draymond Green, and Klay Thompson as a do-it-all small forward. In his second full season with Golden State, he earned his first and only All-Star appearance and helped them win the 2022 title. After their time together in Minneapolis, Wiggins and Jimmy Butler crossed paths again, but this time they were traded for each other, with Wiggins heading to Miami and Butler to the Bay.
With Miami, Wiggins has firmly cemented himself as the same do-it-all player he became in Golden State: a good secondary scorer and perimeter defender. He’s shooting a career best 39.8% from beyond the arc on decent volume (4.8 attempts per game), and is capable of creating a shot in the midrange, shooting 36% from 10 feet to the three-point line. When asked to handle the rock this season, he’s been a decent playmaker, averaging the second-most assists per game of his career (2.8). Per Cleaning The Glass, the Heat’s offense is scoring 1.4 more points per 100 possessions when he’s on the floor.
Wiggins is a strong perimeter defender and could take on opponents’ best wing or bigger guards. He gets into the passing lane and affects shots, averaging 2.2 steals plus blocks per game, also a career high. His advanced numbers don’t look great, though: opposing teams score 4.6 more points per 100 with Wiggins on the court. That number could be inflated by the Heat’s lagging offense, which ranks 20th (113.5 offensive rating). Overall, they sit 10th in the league in defensive rating at 112.8.
Regardless, Wiggins would undoubtedly be a solid improvement for the Bucks, bringing more consistent offense and defense alongside Giannis. So it’s no surprise that the Bucks were linked to Wiggins last year before he was traded to Miami, and in several reports this season. This one was courtesy of ClutchPoints’ Brett Siegel:
“Wiggins, who was drawing interest from the Bucks over the summer, continues to be a name associated with Milwaukee’s trade deadline plans. From the Heat’s perspective, though, they seem to be working on their own plans to upgrade their roster, and it’s unknown whether Miami would surrender Wiggins in a trade that doesn’t land them an All-Star-level player like Giannis or someone else.“
The Trade
To even get this trade off the ground, the Bucks likely have to invite a third party. Outside of Giannis, the Bucks don’t have the type of player Miami wants. To facilitate the deal, the Nets are added to the equation. The Bucks’ part in this would actually be the second of two separate deals that essentially turn into one big deal, much like how Jericho Sims was attached to last year’s Kyle Kuzma-Khris Middleton swap.
In the first half of the trade, Miami snags the hottest commodity on the trade market in Michael Porter Jr. in exchange for Wiggins, Terry Rozier’s expiring contract, and their unprotected 2029 first-round pick, also getting Tyrese Martin as a salary filler. Then the Nets re-route Wiggins to the Bucks for Kyle Kuzma and Andre Jackson Jr. This puts the Nets over the 15-man roster limit, so they’d have to cut someone—likely the injured Haywood Highsmith—to stay in compliance.
Now, I know some will question why the Bucks are seemingly helping a team above them in the standings (Miami leads Milwaukee by 3.5 games for the 8th seed). But this isn’t the Bucks coming to Miami and Brooklyn with this trade offer. They swoop in after Miami acquires Porter, offer Kuzma and AJax to Brooklyn, and re-route Wiggins, who has a player option decision this summer, to Milwaukee. The Nets get an easier contract to move off of, and Wiggins gets to finish this season on a team that is gunning for the playoffs. Miami offers Brooklyn a future first and an expiring contract. Every team gets something they want.
But the Bucks themselves have been linked to Porter, so why wouldn’t they get the better player? They have only their 2031 or 2032 first-round picks to offer. The Nets, should they choose to trade Porter, appear to want a first-round pick (or more) in return. That’s the market for a 27-year-old wing who’s averaging 25+ points per game. As good as Porter is, the Bucks don’t have the right kind of pick to deal. If they owned any of their draft picks from 2027–2030, that would make more sense for Porter. Giannis will be 36 going on 37 in 2031; I see it as unlikely that the Bucks even trade that pick anyway, considering they’ve been unwilling to move it dating back to last season.
Wiggins, while a good player, wouldn’t command giving up 2031, even if the trade was strictly between Miami and Milwaukee. But the Bucks have to make some moves to improve this roster. If they’re eyeing the more distant future without Giannis and don’t want to give up that pick, then this is the type of deal to make. I’m not the only one who feels this way, as according to Jamal Collier of ESPN, that’s where much of the league sees how the Bucks are going to improve:
“It’s where rival executives see the biggest chance for opportunity in Milwaukee. The Bucks can accept a larger contract with multiple years beyond this season that an opposing team might be trying to get out from under, such as Miami‘s Andrew Wiggins, who owns a $30 million player option for next season, or Charlotte‘s Miles Bridges, who will make $22.8 million in the 2026-27 season, team and league sources told ESPN.“
This may not be the best offer the Nets get for Porter, but there are things to like about it. Adding a future first-round pick in 2029 would bring their total to four that season: the Nets would have their own first, the Knicks’, and the least favorable of the Rockets, Mavericks, and Suns. Provided that the Nets are a contending team around that time, they could use those picks as ammunition to trade for a star. As for the players, Rozier is an expiring deal that they can wash their hands of this summer. Kuzma can be a decent contributor in the short term, and he will be on an expiring contract next season, which the Nets could flip for more assets. AJax is a young defender that they could take a flyer on.
The Fit
Wiggins could realistically fit with every team in the league. With his experience and production, he would be a particularly welcome sight in Milwaukee. He’s an above-average three-point shooter and doesn’t need the ball in his hands all the time to create offense. In some ways, he reminds me of a lesser Khris Middleton: a good player who makes winning plays. I’m not trying to say Wiggins is as good on offense as Middleton was, but his qualities make him a good fit for a championship-contending roster.
Teams wouldn’t be able to sag off Wiggins in the half-court like they could with someone like Miles Bridges. As I mentioned earlier, Wiggins is having his most efficient season from distance in his career, and not just on-ball: 3.7 of Wiggins’ 4.8 three-point attempts per game are off the catch, and he’s converting those at 42%. Wiggins is also consistent, which would be a welcome change for the Bucks. Too many players are volatile from game to game to be relied on in big spots. Ryan Rollins and Kevin Porter Jr. have been scuffling in January, and you can’t rely on your backup center to be the second leading scorer.
Wiggins may also help the Bucks’ rebounding, averaging nearly five per game. Compared to some of the other wings we’ve discussed (LaVine, Bridges, Jerami Grant), Wiggins slots in much better as the starting small forward next to Giannis. Finally, he’s a pretty durable player who has played at least 73% of games every year of his career except for one. That was 2022–23, when he missed 22 straight games because his father, former NBA player Mitchell Wiggins, was going through a serious medical issue, and the younger Wiggins stepped away from the team.
Are you okay with jumping into a deal that makes the Heat better if it means the Bucks can still get Wiggins and keep the 2031 first-round pick? Or would you rather the Bucks go for it and outbid the Heat? Let me know in the comments below.
The Rangers visited Los Angeles supposedly "breathing easier" – s a couple of MSG Networks analysts noted – following the now infamous Chris Drury retread letter of surrender and false hope.
But the "easy-breathing" has ended. The 4-3 loss to the occasionally competitive Kings last night in Tinseltown hurt more than any previous defeat.
In no uncertain terms, it doomed fans to a second straight non-playoff season. (Not that it matters, but at the highest ticket prices in the NHL.)
Now it's back to the normal, "Close But No Cigar" saga for the skating YO-YOs of Seventh Avenue.
You have to understand that when the Blueshirts embarked on their four-game road trip, life in Rangerville was far different than it is now. Faint as it was, at least there was some hope.
After that dastardly 8-4 home defeat at the hands of the feeble Ottawa Senators, one totally dismaying era ended.
We entered the new world of Letters From Lord Drury. This is the very same Drury who "earned" a new contract from MSG despite managerial mistake after mistake.
The pizza man, who doubles as not only Blueshirts' President" but Lord High Executioner, decided that his 2025-26 model Rangers, which looked good in the showroom, was obsolete.
Customer warranty is about as valuable as last night's performance.
Amazingly, the Blueshirt sedan broke down so far from the NHL Finish Line, Sir Drury drew up a proclamation for all to read (and if you didn't, you may fail the upcoming test.)
In this New Drury world, leading scorer Breadman Panarin will disappear and maybe even – perish the thought – Mika Zibanejad or Vin (The Bin) Trocheck being traded as well.
What the MSG Networks' analysts are now telling us is that Lord Drury is being a benevolent despot. Meaning that his proclamation has allowed the poor, overpaid players to "breathe easy."
Beating the sinking Flyers in Philly supposedly provided that "breath of fresh air."
We have to believe it was only a one-game "easy breather" because look what happened first in Anaheim and then L.A. last night. The "fresh air" was polluted by two more ersatz performances.
In Tinseltown, the Beloved Blueshirts coughed up a game to a team that was mired in a four-game skid.straight. As for any more "easy breaths," Mike Sullivan's troupe may find them in San Jose where the Sharks are inhaling some fresh NHL oxygen.