Its Friday, April 18 and the White Sox (4-13) are in Boston to take on the Red Sox (10-10).
Martín Pérez is slated to take the mound for Chicago against Richard Fitts for Boston.
The White Sox have lost three in a row scoring a total of four runs in those three games. Yesterday they were held to four hits and blanked by the A’s 8-0. The Red Sox were off yesterday after taking two of three from the Tampa Bay Rays.
Lets dive into the matchup and find a sweat or two.
We’ve got all the info and analysis you need to know ahead of the game, including the latest info on the how to catch tipoff, odds, recent team performance, player stats, and of course, our predictions, picks & best bets for the game from our modeling tools and staff of experts.
Follow Rotoworld Player News for the latest fantasy and betting player news and analysis all season long.
Game details & how to watch White Sox at Red Sox
Date: Friday, April 18, 2025
Time: 7:10PM EST
Site: Fenway Park
City: Boston, MA
Network/Streaming: CHSN, NESN
Never miss a second of the action and stay up-to-date with all the latest team stats and player news. Check out our day-by-day MLB schedule page, along with detailed matchup pages that update live in-game with every out.
Odds for the White Sox at the Red Sox
The latest odds as of Friday:
Moneyline: White Sox ({odds.away}), Red Sox ({odds.home})
Spread: Red Sox 0
Total: {game.overunder} runs
Probable starting pitchers for White Sox at Red Sox
Pitching matchup for April 18, 2025: Martín Pérez vs. Richard Fitts
White Sox: Martín Pérez (1-0, 1.59 ERA) Last outing: 4/12 vs. Boston - 4.2IP, 2ER, 5H, 4BB, 5Ks
Red Sox: Richard Fitts (0-2, 3.18 ERA) Last outing: 4/12 at White Sox - 5IP, 0ER, 2H, 1BB, 5Ks
Rotoworld still has you covered with all the latest MLB player news for all 30 teams. Check out the feed page right here on NBC Sports for headlines, injuries and transactions where you can filter by league, team, positions and news type!
Top betting trends & insights to know ahead of White Sox at Red Sox
The White Sox have lost 4 games in a row
The Under is 7-3 in the White Sox's last 10 road games
The White Sox have failed to cover the Run Line in 4 straight games
If you’re looking for more key trends and stats around the spread, moneyline and total for every single game on the schedule today, check out our MLB Top Trends tool on NBC Sports!
Expert picks & predictions for tonight’s game between the White Sox and the Red Sox
Rotoworld Best Bet
Please bet responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline at 1-800-522-4700.
Our model calculates projections around each moneyline, spread and over/under bet for every game on the MLB calendar based on data points like past performance, player matchups, ballpark information and weather forecasts.
Once the model is finished running, we put its projection next to the latest betting lines for the game to arrive at a relative confidence level for each wager.
Here are the best bets our model is projecting for Friday's game between the White Sox and the Red Sox:
Moneyline: NBC Sports Bet is recommending a play on the Boston Red Sox on the Moneyline.
Spread: NBC Sports Bet is leaning towards a play ATS on the Chicago White Sox at +1.5.
Total: NBC Sports Bet is leaning towards a play on the under on the Game Total of 9.0.
Want even more MLB best bets and predictions from our expert staff & tools? Check out the Expert MLB Predictions page from NBC
Follow our experts on socials to keep up with all the latest content from the staff:
Expansion is coming to the NBA. Adam Silver is too smart a lawyer and too wise a commissioner to put it that bluntly — ultimately he needs the votes of two-thirds of a fickle group of owners — but that's the reality.
Silver opened up about that on ESPN's Pat McAfee show Wednesday.
"We're just beginning the process of exploring the opportunity to expand..
We're looking hard at it and there's no doubt that there's been interest in Seattle and Las Vegas..
"What I've been saying for the last several years, we knew we needed to get a new collective bargaining agreement done. We did. We needed a new media deal to get done… We did that. We've locked in our television rights for 11 years...
"I think as we get into the summer, we'll get into a more formal process of how we go about doing it. I don't want to say it's a foregone conclusion that we're going to expand, but I also think over time, organizations tend to grow. And I look at the success of those markets for other major league teams, and so it's easy to present a scenario where you can see it working successfully for the league.
"But I don't want to jump the gun here," said Silver. "We have the 30 existing teams who all need to weigh in on this process, and also at some point need to have direct conversations with the people who are who are interested in those teams."
Silver also addressed the rumor that the motive behind the Luka Doncic trade was some sort of plot ripped from the movie "Major League" to move the Mavericks to Las Vegas. The dots are not hard to connect, Mavericks governor Patrick Dumont is president and COO of the Las Vegas Sands Corp.
"The Dallas Mavericks aren't going anywhere and that team is staying in Dallas..
They're looking at building a new arena in Dallas"
It's not just Silver shooting the idea of a Mavericks move down, Dumont himself has said the plan is to build a new arena for the Mavericks in the Dallas area, part of a larger real estate investment, but that the team is not going anywhere.
Its Friday, April 18 and the Cardinals (9-10) are in Queens to take on the Mets (12-7).
Miles Mikolas is slated to take the mound for St. Louis against David Peterson for New York.
Game 1 of this weekend series saw the Mets win, 4-1. Francisco Lindor had three hits, MarkVientos went yard for his first home run of the season, and Griffin Canning allowed just one run on three hits over six innings to pick up the win.
Lets dive into the matchup and find a sweat or two.
We’ve got all the info and analysis you need to know ahead of the game, including the latest info on the how to catch tipoff, odds, recent team performance, player stats, and of course, our predictions, picks & best bets for the game from our modeling tools and staff of experts.
Follow Rotoworld Player News for the latest fantasy and betting player news and analysis all season long.
Game details & how to watch Cardinals at Mets
Date: Friday, April 18, 2025
Time: 7:10PM EST
Site: Citi Field
City: Queens, NY
Network/Streaming: FDSNMW, SNY
Never miss a second of the action and stay up-to-date with all the latest team stats and player news. Check out our day-by-day MLB schedule page, along with detailed matchup pages that update live in-game with every out.
Odds for the Cardinals at the Mets
The latest odds as of Friday:
Moneyline: Cardinals (+140), Mets (-166)
Spread: Mets -1.5
Total: 8.0 runs
Probable starting pitchers for Cardinals at Mets
Pitching matchup for April 18, 2025: Miles Mikolas vs. David Peterson
Cardinals: Miles Mikolas (0-2, 9.00 ERA) Last outing: 4/12 vs. Philadelphia - 5IP, 3ER, 3H, 2BB, 6Ks
Mets: David Peterson (1-1, 2.70 ERA) Last outing: 4/12 @ Athletics - 6IP, 2ER, 7H, 0BB, 5Ks
Rotoworld still has you covered with all the latest MLB player news for all 30 teams. Check out the feed page right here on NBC Sports for headlines, injuries and transactions where you can filter by league, team, positions and news type!
Top betting trends & insights to know ahead of Cardinals at Mets
The Mets are 10-9 on the Run Line this season
Wilson Contreras is hitless over his last 3 games (0-11)
Francisco Lindor has hit safely in 6 straight games (9-25)
If you’re looking for more key trends and stats around the spread, moneyline and total for every single game on the schedule today, check out our MLB Top Trends tool on NBC Sports!
Expert picks & predictions for tonight’s game between the Cardinals and the Mets
Rotoworld Best Bet
Please bet responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline at 1-800-522-4700.
Our model calculates projections around each moneyline, spread and over/under bet for every game on the MLB calendar based on data points like past performance, player matchups, ballpark information and weather forecasts.
Once the model is finished running, we put its projection next to the latest betting lines for the game to arrive at a relative confidence level for each wager.
Here are the best bets our model is projecting for Friday's game between the Cardinals and the Mets:
Moneyline: NBC Sports Bet is recommending a play on the New York Mets on the Moneyline.
Spread: NBC Sports Bet is leaning towards a play ATS on the St. Louis Cardinals at +1.5.
Total: NBC Sports Bet is leaning towards a play on the over on the Game Total of 8.0.
Want even more MLB best bets and predictions from our expert staff & tools? Check out the Expert MLB Predictions page from NBC
Follow our experts on socials to keep up with all the latest content from the staff:
Draymond Green is amazed at Steph Curry’s leadership development during their time with the Warriors.
Green recounted a moment during Golden State’s 121-116 NBA play-in tournament victory over the Memphis Grizzlies where Curry offered a critique and play suggestion.
“I said in my press conference, ‘Steph, in a very nice way, told me not to shoot,’ ” Green said on “The Draymond Green Show with Baron Davis.” “Steph would never say ‘don’t shoot,’ but that’s how I wanted to hear what he was saying.
“Pretty much what he was saying was, ‘I want you to get the ball in the same spot that you just got it.’ I don’t want you to take the shot, I want you to get me the ball so I can take the shot.’
“And we went right back to it, and he took the shot, and if you see when he made the shot, he turned to me and [screamed].”
The tandem has played together on the Warriors for 13 years, during which Green has noticed Curry become a much more vocal leader on the court.
“I was right here for that year where I felt like his career really started,” Green told Davis. “So to watch the growth from that point and for him to come to me and be like, ‘Yo all right so just boom boom,’ we need to like that’s the growth that I’m most impressed by.
“Obviously, the shot-making, like all of that stuff, is incredible, but for me, I’ve seen it from the inside the entire time. Because that growth right there encompasses so many different areas, it encompasses his voice. You know he didn’t always have that voice right there.”
The 37-year-old has become known for his incredible shooting prowess and his ability to weave through opposing defenses with ease, something that leaves Green in awe to this day.
“All these years, that’s something that he grew into and the ability to read the defenses and see the floor,” Green explained. “He’s always been able to see the floor, but he sees the floor at such an elite level now, it’s crazy and the timeliness.
“So those are the areas of growth where people will see we have a certain connection on the court, right? That’s one of the ones where I’ll be sitting back like, wow. I’m amazed because I can remember those situations even seven years ago, five years ago, and he wouldn’t have said that.”
Curry turned in a resurgent second half of the regular season, with the Jimmy Butler trade rejuvenating the 37-year-old. His ability to nail clutch shots was on full display against Memphis as his 15-point scoring barrage in the fourth quarter was enough to hold off the Grizzlies.
Now, Green and Curry will turn their attention to a first-round playoff series against the Houston Rockets. Expect more vocal leadership and unreal shooting from one of the NBA’s all-time greats.
The Razorbacks seemingly solidified their front court Tuesday when South Carolina transfer Nick Pringle announced his commitment to head coach John Calipari and Arkansas. Pringle brings with him three years of experience in Southeastern Conference play. The Seabrook, South Carolina, native talked to ESPN's Paul Biancardi on Thursday about his decision to transfer to Arkansas.
The die is now cast; the Montreal Canadiens will take on the Washington Capitals in the first round of the Stanley Cup playoffs after qualifying in their last game of the season. To those of us who have been around for a while, there’s a big déjà vu feeling there.
In 2009-2010, the Jacques Martin-led Canadiens qualified for the Spring dance with a 4-3 overtime loss to the Toronto Maple Leafs. That point was enough for the Canadiens to grab the 8th spot in the Eastern Conference standings, just one point ahead of the New York Rangers.
That year, the Washington Capitals had terrorized the league, finishing the season with 121 points, eight more than the second-place San Jose Sharks. Needless to say, the Canadiens were the underdogs. While the Canadiens were led by the likes of Mike Cammalleri, Brian Gionta, Scott Gomez, Thomas Plekanec, and Andrei Kostitsyn up front, the Caps already had superstar Alexander Ovechkin, playmaker Nicklas Backstrom, and skilled forward Alexander Semin, who were scoring machines.
On the backend, Andrei Markov had already earned his nickname as the General, but he had been battling injuries during the season, and the playoffs were no exception, since he only competed in eight games. Thankfully, they had a young and upcoming blueliner in P.K. Subban, who was called up for the last two games of the season and stuck around for the playoffs. As for the Caps, they had Mike Green, who had put up over 76 points in the regular season, and rookie John Carlson, who is still there today.
In net, Martin juggled with the future face of the franchise, Carey Price, and Jaroslav Halak until game four, before finally deciding that the latter was the man for the job. As for the Caps, former Hab Jose Theodore had been their number one goaltender that season, but he lost his job to Semyon Varlamov.
The Canadiens shocked the hockey world by winning the first game 3-2 in overtime before losing the next three games. Down 3-1, not many believed Montreal could survive, but they didn’t know just how good Jaroslav Halak would be that Spring.
In the next three games, facing elimination, the diminutive Slovak goaltender allowed three goals, one per game. In game six, he stopped 53 of the 54 shots he faced. Meanwhile, his teammates scored eight, and just like that, the series was flipped on its head, and David had beaten Goliath.
It was only the beginning of what would come to be known as the Halak Spring in the province of Quebec, with the “Jaroslav Halak you bring Stanley back” song on everyone’s lips and stop signs showing the goalie’s name making the rounds on social media.
Back then, I lived in London, England, and I won’t lie, I was staying up for every game, watching from midnight to three in the morning and then making my way to work at six with a huge grin on my face, singing Anakyn Slayd’s Feels Like 93. Little did I know, that was just the beginning…
Canadiens stories, analysis, breaking news, and more! Tap the star to add us to your favorites on Google News, never to miss a story.
After missing the 2025 NBA playoffs, both the Kings and New Orleans Pelicans made major front-office moves in hopes of turning the page on their respective underwhelming 2024-25 seasons.
New Orleans hired Joe Dumars as executive vice president of basketball operations after the Pelicans finished the season as the No. 14 seed in the Western Conference with just 21 wins.
Sacramento (40-42) finished as the No. 9 seed and missed the playoffs for the 18th time in 19 years following a rollercoaster season. A change in leadership was needed, and the urgency was evident with former general manager Monte McNair and the Kings mutually agreeing to part ways shortly after the team’s season-ending loss to the Dallas Mavericks on Wednesday night in the NBA play-in tournament. The following morning, it was widely reported that the Kings hired respected NBA executive Scott Perry as their next general manager.
“Joe Dumars to the New Orleans Pelicans. Scott Perry to the Sacramento Kings as the general manager. It excited me, because what that said to me is people are ready to get back to basketball,” Green said on “The Draymond Green Show with Baron Davis.” “Like, let’s bring back these real basketball minds. That’s what those two moves said to me.
“We ain’t even started the playoffs yet and those two moves being made [means] let’s get back to real basketball now. Congratulations to those two guys and those two franchises. I think those are some incredible hires.”
Dumars is a Naismith Hall of Famer and two-time NBA champion as a player and a title-winning executive with the Detroit Pistons. He replaces David Griffin as the head of basketball operations for the Pelicans.
Perry, who started his executive career in 2000 with the Pistons, spent three months with the Kings in 2017 before leaving for the New York Knicks. He also has worked in front-office roles with the Orlando Magic and the then-Seattle SuperSonics.
“To see the Joe Dumars and the Scott Perrys, you see people are qualified for the job,” Davis said. “I get excited because I’m like, ‘Damn, I’ll go work for Scott Perry. I’ll go work for Joe Dumars.’ I think it’s going to open up the door for a lot of other former athletes. You look at the Landry Fields and Kyle Corver, what they’re doing in Atlanta. There was a regime of James Jones. But now you’re looking at it and you’re like, oh there could be some new blood, some new intelligence.
“And to your point, the NBA is getting back to great basketball minds, finding great talent, and putting together great teams. The analytics will take you so far. … So I love the fact that Joe D and Scott Perry were the first hires, even before the season is over. I think that sets the tone for the summer, that sets the tone for free agency, and then we’ll see the Pelicans and the Sacramento Kings improve.”
Next on Sacramento’s offseason to-do list, which has plenty of items, is finding an assistant general manager to work alongside Perry since Wes Wilcox announced his midseason exit. Finding a head coach, or removing Doug Christie’s interim title, also is top of mind.
But Green believes Perry’s hire sets the tone the rest of the way.
“One thousand percent. There will also be coaching hires,” Green said. “I think this sets the tone for that as well. Time to get back to real basketball, guys.”
The estimated price for a family of four to see a game at Dodger Stadium this season — four of the cheapest tickets, parking, four hot dogs, two beers and two sodas — was a league-high $399.68, according to a study. (Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times)
Four days after the Dodgers won the World Series, and two days before he won the presidential election, Donald Trump was the guest on a sports podcast.
America’s major sports leagues, he said, were pricing out their most loyal customers.
“The leagues are not taking care of their fans,” Trump said on the “Let’s Go!” podcast. “They really aren’t. They’re making it impossible.”
If tickets to sporting events have gotten too expensive for the average fan — and 86% of sports fans say they have, according to an Ipsos poll released last month — then Dodger Stadium is a flash point in the debate over whether teams should pursue every dollar they can or sacrifice a few bucks so they can better nurture a new generation of fans.
Baseball, after all, is touted as America’s last great affordable sport.
Fans are more likely to develop a lifelong baseball habit if they attend a game as a kid, according to research cited by the commissioner's office. Can a family of four afford hundreds of dollars to enjoy a day at the ballpark?
“That inability to have that family experience is an incredible negative if you’re just going for the green,” said Andy Dolich, who has run marketing operations for teams in all the major North American sports leagues. “That’s where you are building your fan bases of the future.”
In an interview with The Times, Commissioner Rob Manfred challenged the notion that baseball tickets have become too expensive. The 30 major league teams sold a combined 71 million tickets last year, the most in seven years, and attendance has increased every year since the pandemic.
“If we had an affordability problem, I think you would see it in terms of those numbers,” Manfred said. “Those numbers tell you the opposite.”
According to the league, tickets for $20 or less were available for 70% of MLB games last season. No Dodgers game this season is currently on sale at that price.
Fans line up to buy food at a concession stand before a game earlier this month at Dodger Stadium. (Kevork Djansezian / For The Times)
“If you want to sit next to Mary Hart, it’s expensive,” Manfred said. “I think it’s really important to think about that from an access perspective.”
Many studies about fan costs use the average price of a resale ticket, but a study released this month used the cheapest ticket price on official sale sites, as sampled on a variety of dates this season.
The estimated price for a family of four to see a game at Dodger Stadium this season — four of those cheap tickets, parking, four hot dogs, two beers and two sodas — was a league-high $399.68. The league average, according to that study: $208.
Ticket prices can rise and fall daily, based on supply and demand. On the day before the Dodgers’ home opener, The Times checked the prices for every game on the Dodgers’ website.
The cheapest ticket all season, available only for a Wednesday afternoon game against the Miami Marlins, before school lets out: $38. For four seats that day, parking, four hot dogs, and four sodas, the price would be $249.96.
In Los Angeles County, the median family income is $101,800, according to Elly Schoen, assistant director of the Neighborhood Data for Social Change program at the USC Lusk Center. If both parents work, and if they subtract costs for housing, food, child care, health care and transportation, the amount left over each month would be $530.
“I don’t know if you can spend half your discretionary income on a baseball game,” Schoen said.
Dodgers team president Stan Kasten, right with Shohei Ohtani following the team's World Series win over the Yankees, said the team and its corporate sponsors work to provide free and discount tickets. Even so, the range of of cheapest available prices per game ranged from $38 to $156. (Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times)
Dodgers president Stan Kasten said the team and its corporate sponsors work to provide free and discount tickets. The Dodgers’ foundation said it distributed 64,000 tickets last year through the Commissioner’s Community Initiative, described by the league as a program that “provides $2.5 million in ticket distributions to deserving communities league-wide.”
Said Kasten: “We’ve had a lot of success maintaining and even starting to grow our youth fan base. We’re very proud of that, and we work hard at it.”
In 2015, the Dodgers’ average ticket price was $29, according to Team Marketing Report. A decade later — after winning the World Series twice and signing Shohei Ohtani as the crown jewel of a superstar-studded roster — the range of cheapest available prices per game ranged from $38 to $156.
“You can’t have it all ways, right?” Manfred said. “The Dodgers have made a massive financial commitment in terms of players, and they have to run a business that supports that massive financial commitment.”
Notwithstanding Manfred’s belief that MLB does not have an affordability problem, a popup survey on the league website last week asked fans whether they strongly agreed, somewhat agreed, somewhat disagreed, or strongly disagreed with this statement: “Attending a Major League Baseball game is affordable.”
If local fans consider the Dodgers’ prices too high, Manfred suggested where they could find a cost-effective alternative.
“One of the leaders in terms of thinking about affordability has been the other Los Angeles team,” Manfred said.
Soon after Arte Moreno bought the Angels in 2003 — and with the team coming off a World Series championship — the team introduced $3 tickets for kids and teenagers one night per week. The Angels now offer a $44 family pack — four tickets, four hot dogs and four drinks — at more than half their home games. They also feature a "Junior Angels" kids' club, with a $20 membership that includes four game tickets.
Arte Moreno, who has owned the Angels since 2003, on affordability in baseball: "We want everybody to have access to the stadium. We've worked really hard to keep tickets low and have families come in." (Ashley Landis / Associated Press)
Parking is $20 at Angel Stadium and $40 at Dodger Stadium.
“I just really believe there should be affordability,” Moreno said. “We want everybody to have access to the stadium. We’ve worked really hard to keep tickets low and have families come in.”
The Angels last appeared in the playoffs 11 years ago, the longest postseason drought in the majors. Moreno did not discount the notion that prices might rise if the team returns to contention, but he did not guarantee it either.
“If the demand exceeds the supply, prices go up,” he said. “But, for us, you have 45,000 seats.”
The New York Yankees sold more tickets than any team besides the Dodgers in each of the past three seasons. The Yankees sell $10 tickets for every game: sometimes a few dozen, sometimes a few hundred, sometimes a couple thousand, based on overall demand for each game. As part of a corporate promotion, they also sell tickets under $10 or at 50% off for a handful of games.
The league maintains a fan value page, where the vast majority of teams display a variety of ticket discounts, concession deals and family packs. The Dodgers’ entry on that page features its promotional schedule, highlighted by bobblehead dolls so coveted that they drive ticket prices ever higher.
On that November podcast, Trump said he knew how to address high ticket prices.
“I think there are things that have to be done,” Trump said.
Manfred declined to comment about whether he had heard from Trump or whether he would work with him on the issue.
The Times asked the White House press office what ideas Trump had to lower ticket prices and what timeline he might have for pursuing any such actions. White House spokeswoman Liz Huston packed six sports phrases into a 48-word statement — “stepping up to the plate” and “home run economy” included — that did not provide a response to the questions.
Trump did not say he would make the Dodgers affordable again. In Los Angeles, some fans have stuck with their team through the lean years — the Fox and McCourt years, as we call them — only to be priced out when the team returned to glory.
On the podcast, without reference to any particular team, Trump said middle-class fans are “your biggest sports fans.”
Said Trump: “They’re being shut out of seeing a team they grew up with and that they love.”
Fans wait in line to purchase food and beverages before a game at Dodger Stadium earlier this month. (Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times)
In the seventh inning, fans rise and sing about buying peanuts and Cracker Jack at the ballgame.
But what if the concession prices have risen so much that fans have to think twice about buying? At Dodger Stadium, a Dodger Dog costs $7.99.
As ticket prices have soared, a small but growing number of teams in all sports are offering a limited menu of basic concession items at fan-friendly prices. At Chase Field, the home of the Arizona Diamondbacks, a hot dog costs $2.99.
Diamondbacks president Derrick Hall said team executives discussed whether discounting a handful of concession items would cost the team some revenue. It turns out, he said, they make more money that way.
“People feel like they’re getting a bargain,” Hall said, “and they buy more.”
The Chase Field $2.99 menu includes hot dogs, sodas, peanuts and popcorn. The Baltimore Orioles offer seven food items at $4 or less, including hot dogs, nachos, popcorn, pretzel bites and desserts. Nine other teams have value menus or $1 hot dogs for selected games, based on the fan value page on the league website.
At the Delta Center, home of the NBA's Utah Jazz and the Utah Hockey Club, the $3 menu includes hot dogs, nachos, popcorn and ice cream.
The Atlanta Falcons, the NFL team credited with starting the trend, offer hot dogs, sodas, popcorn and pretzels at $2 each, with $3 items including sweet tea, peach shakes, nachos and vegan dogs.
The Dodgers have studied whether to introduce a value menu at Dodger Stadium, team president Stan Kasten said.
“We will increase the number of transactions if we have lower prices,” he said. “They say they make more money that way.”
That would be great, Kasten said, except for what he said was an insurmountable obstacle.
“I hate to say this,” he said. “It’s a terrible thing to say. I wish it wasn’t true.
“We can’t physically handle more transactions.”
The fan experience would be worsened that way, Kasten said. The notoriously long Dodger Stadium concessions lines would get even longer, and the notoriously crowded concourses would get even more crowded.
The Dodgers allow fans to bring in their own food and drink, provided the food is in a small clear bag and the drink is in a factory-sealed bottle, no larger than one liter, and non-alcoholic.
The matchup between centers Nikola Jokic, left, and Ivica Zubac will be pivotal in the Nuggets-Clippers playoff series that starts Saturday in Denver. (David Zalubowski / Associated Press)
The Clippers enter the playoffs on an eight-game winning streak that helped them secure fifth place in the highly competitive Western Conference and a matchup with the Denver Nuggets, who won the 2023 NBA title behind three-time MVP Nikola Jokic.
The Clippers do have size with 7-foot Ivica Zubac to combat Denver's all-world center as well as a healthy and once-again productive Kawhi Leonard, one of three players averaging 20-plus points along with James Harden and Norman Powell.
The Nuggets have recovered since a four-game losing streak cost Michael Malone, the franchise's most successful coach, his job. Denver has recovered under interim coach Dave Adelman, winning three in a row to close the season and secure the fourth seed.
The two clubs last met in the postseason during the 2020 bubble playoffs when the Nuggets rallied from a 3-1 series deficit to eliminate the Clippers.
Here's how two Western Conference scouts, speaking on condition of anonymity because they're not authorized to speak publicly about opponents, break down the series:
Scout 1
“I think it's probably gonna be one of the best series out there. Like, I don't know if a team is playing better than the Clippers are right now, and you're going against the best player in the world.
“I think it'll be it'll be a chess match, and I'm curious to see how Adelman does against arguably the best Xs and O's coach in the league [in Tyronn Lue]. I think they're gonna throw a lot a lot of different looks at Joker. But I think I think if I'm the Nuggets, the Clippers are one of the teams that I would not want to be playing because I think they can play you a lot of different ways. Like, they have size to go against Joker to keep them from just bullying. If they want to kind of speed up the game, they can go small at five and match up to him as a shooter.
"Yeah, the Clippers have got pretty good wing defenders in Kris Dunn and obviously Kawai and Derrick Jones that they can kind of stay with the movement of Denver off the ball. So, I think it's going to be a tough matchup for Denver. I think on paper Denver is the more talented team, but they've had so much turmoil this season. It's hard to pick against the team playing as well as the Clippers are with Kawhi playing like he is.”
“I think with something like the Clippers’ defense, especially in the playoffs, it's all about can you take away what they really want to do and what Joker wants to do is get everybody else involved because when Michael Porter is hitting open threes, and Jamal Murray is getting his scoring and Christian Braun is cutting back door and doing all that stuff, they just become really, really potent. If you can kind of take them out of that — I don't know if it's the stay home on everybody and make Jokic score 50 method. I don't know if it's still like play one on one with with Zu down there and if he beats you over the top out of the post you live with it. But to me, I think it's both the initial look and you take away what they want to do and then what's your adjustment and that's where I think Ty is so good at like you know whether it's bringing a double team or doing something different in like the Joker-Murray two-man game. Like, I think there's just a lot a lot optional there because that group's been together in that group kind of knows what to do. I think they've done some different things throughout the season to experiment with some different stuff. So I think it's been a really good series.”
Scout 2
“The whole game plan is going to start with the Clippers dealing with Nikola Jokic. The one advantage the Clippers have that a lot of teams don’t is that they got the size with Zubac to matchup with Jokic. Like, Jokic can’t push him around or bully him under the basket because Zubac is just as big. So, I don’t think the Clippers will need to double team. I think they’ll be content with just playing him straight-up with Zubac. Because with Jokic, if you start double-teaming him, he picks you apart. So it’s almost like you want to play him one-on-one and have him score in the paint rather than getting everybody else involved. So, what I see with the Clippers is playing him straight up with Zubac and not really wanting to double-team him.
“Now when he steps out and shoots those threes, I think you come up and contest those threes. You don’t back all the way off him. You got to put a little bit of a contest, get your hand up. But you live with him making a couple a game.
“Now the Clippers have weapons with Kawhi, James, Norman and Zu. The Clippers have much more firepower than Denver, much more. They got four guys that can at any time score 20. They got two guys at any time could score 30. The Clippers create much more problems than Denver does for the Clippers on offense. The biggest concern is James has got to keep playing. He can’t revert back to 19 dribbles, one-on-one, all that stuff. There’s going to be spots in the game where he’s going to have to isolation, but he’s got to keep playing the way he’s been playing this last two or three months.
“It hurts Denver a little bit that Mike Malone got fired so late in the season. But the one thing that helps them is that the assistants have been there for a couple of years. The others guys have been there so they are real familiar with the players, they are familiar with the Clippers. So, it’s not as bad as some people think. Now, does it affect them a little bit? Sure, because Malone is a championship coach, like Ty Lue, who has been through it. But at least they have some continuity there with their assistants.
“So, when you look at Denver’s team, really the key is is Jamal Murray healthy and does Michael Porter make jump shots. Because if Porter is making jumpers, they are a whole different team. He’ll shoot from anywhere, anytime. The best play in the NBA, when Murray is healthy, is the Murray and Jokic two-man pick-and-roll game. It’s that tough to defend. When both guys are healthy and got it going, that two-man game with them, it’s a nightmare.
“The Clippers have the depth advantage. Denver does not have a good bench. They don’t have the bench that the Clippers have, not even close. That’s going to be a factor.
“So, even though the Clippers don’t have home court, I still think they are going to win the series."
For a heaving mass of self-professed adrenaline junkies and thrill seekers, Americans tend to play it safe when it comes to their sports preferences. How else to explain our weird aversion for playoff hockey, a nerve-shredding two-month stretch that is almost farcically overlooked relative to the volume of thrills that are dished out every night?
While it’s a mug’s game to try and assign causality to any aspect of human behavior—let alone one as inherently irrational as fandom—the fact that the NHL doesn’t put up far bigger TV numbers during the spring arrhythmia fest is one of the most confounding aspects of our collective sports culture. At the risk of indulging in a sort of giddy hyperbole, pretty much every NHL playoff game feels like watching Uncut Gems after drinking a thermos of espresso. Only hockey is nowhere near as exasperating.
Sixteen of last season’s 81 playoff games (or 20%) were settled in overtime, and four of those bonus-cantos outings required a second OT. The margin of victory in 42 of those playoff battles: 1 goal. And yet, despite everything that hockey’s fetch-me-the-Ativan® interval has going for it, the audience is relatively undersized. Last year’s NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs averaged 1.54 million viewers across ABC, ESPN, ESPN2, TNT, TBS and truTV, and while that marked a 28-year high for the league, those deliveries were about one-third (32%) of what the NBA served up during its parallel postseason run.
If the regular-season TV turnout is any indication, the gap between the NHL and NBA playoffs may expand further still. Heading into the final days of the 82-game campaign, NHL deliveries were down 13% versus the year-ago period—this despite a massive turnout (9.25 million viewers) for February’s 4 Nations Face-Off finale and Alex Ovechkin’s epic pursuit of Wayne Gretzky’s all-time scoring record.
As much as the NHL keeps giving fans plenty of reasons to tune in, the league remains at the mercy of its cable-heavy schedule. ESPN, TNT and their streaming cousins this season carried 143 games, or around 88% of the national slate, an arrangement that inevitably limits the NHL’s overall reach. Per MoffettNathanson estimates, pay-TV operators closed out 2024 with 46.9 million bundled video subscribers, which marked a 12% drop from the year-ago 53.3 million.
Once a staple in 91% of all U.S. TV households, the legacy bundle’s penetration has plunged to 38%. Even when you toss the 20.8 million virtual MVPD subs into the mix, total penetration has been winnowed down to 54%. If recent churn figures hold up, the total count of stateside pay-TV homes will slip below the 60 million mark before the year is out. That’s nearly 23 million homes shy of broadcast’s current reach.
An ever-shrinking distribution scheme isn’t the NHL’s only challenge as it skates into the postseason. Five Canadian teams have punched their ticket to the playoffs, the most since 2017, and while the prospect of one of them hoisting Lord Stanley’s beer stein after a 32-year drought would be great for the game, the abundance of North-of-the-Border clubs translates to a not-insignificant diminution in stateside market representation. When the puck drops on the Blues-Jets opener Saturday, 31% of the home markets still in play won’t be measured by Nielsen, although a fair amount of top-tier DMAs on this side of the 49th Parallel will be in mix. (That said, at least one Canadian team is guaranteed an early exit, as the Maple Leafs and Senators are set to square off in the first round.)
If this year’s field is diminished by the unprecedented absence of any of the four U.S.-based Original Six clubs, the size of many of the measured markets may prove to be a boon for the NHL’s media partners. While the Devils practice their dark magic a good 40-minute drive from midtown Manhattan, Newark is part of the greater New York DMA, which includes 7.49 million TV homes. Also suiting up are No. 2 Los Angeles (5.84 million TV homes), No. 4 Dallas/Ft. Worth (32.6 million) and No. 8 Washington, D.C. (26.3 million). As a bonus, should the Capitals and Kings advance to the second round, that eliminates two more Canadian clubs—arguably a mixed blessing, as a Kings win would send the Oilers’ superstar Connor McDavid to the showers.
McDavid has already demonstrated that he can move the needle here in the U.S., as was made evident by ABC’s year-ago Stanley Cup Final deliveries. In a seven-game series, duration trumps market demographics, and the audience for Game 7 of the 2024 battle between Edmonton and Florida was more in line with the NHL’s overall entertainment value. Per Nielsen, the Panthers’ 2-1 victory averaged 7.66 million viewers, making it the most-watched Final broadcast since the Blues and Bruins took it to the limit in front of 8.72 million NBC viewers in 2019. (Florida’s win also marked the all-time biggest delivery for a game not featuring an Original Six club.)
Unfortunately, this year’s Final is an all-cable affair, as TNT/TBS/truTV will carry the series. Given all the erosion in the pay-TV space, even a Devils-Kings Final is likely to come up short of last year’s numbers. When TNT Sports hosted its first title tilt in 2023, the five-game Panthers-Golden Knights set averaged 2.63 million viewers, down from the 4.6 million ABC scared up with its six-frame Lightning-Avalanche series the previous year. (Even when you eliminate ABC’s bonus broadcast, the resulting average delivery of 4.36 million viewers per game still overshadowed the 2023 cable numbers.)
If hockey is forever doomed to play second fiddle to basketball here in the States—per EDO Ad EnGage estimates, the NHL this season generated $80.2 million in national TV ad revenue, versus $636.6 million for the NBA—the sport can put up big numbers given the right set of circumstances. And while the NHL’s ratings may never be commensurate with the sheer tonnage of heart-in-your-throat action it dishes out seemingly every night of the playoffs, at least some of the audience shortfalls are a function of the way hockey’s breaks are structured. As TV is rated on an average-minute basis, the twin 17-minute intermissions between periods tend to eat into the overall deliveries, as legions of fans use that downtime to grab a sandwich, drink a calmative beverage or simply pace around agitatedly away from the set.
Then again, it could be that hockey is simply too intense for the general sports-enjoying population. If the dizzying array of pharmaceutical ads are anything to go by—according to the CDC, every 40 seconds someone in the U.S. suffers a heart attack—then perhaps it’s for the best that so many people don’t make the NHL part of their daily diet. For the rest of us, however, there’s no excuse for missing out on the most fun you can have with your pants on.
Breaking their NBA play-in tournament curse, the Warriors used an extra game as a gift to get back into the playoffs, earning a trip to Houston to play the Rockets. These two teams have a long history in the playoffs, too. The coach is new, as is the roster, but the bad blood remains.
The Warriors won the season series 3-2, and their core has much more postseason experience. They’ll be leaning on that to take down the No. 2-seeded Rockets, starting Sunday night. Will that be enough?
Here are four keys to the Warriors getting four wins in the first round against the Rockets.
Protect The Ball
Jimmy Butler blew a kiss and thanked the basket nearest the Warriors’ bench at Chase Center in Tuesday’s win against the Memphis Grizzlies after making back-to-back free throws. Butler hates missing free throws and had gone 1 of 2 at the line his previous four trips. It was obvious how annoyed Butler was with missing a total of six shots at the free-throw line, but it’s even more clear what part of the game frustrates him most.
Turnovers. Nothing compares for the 14-year veteran.
“I hate turning the ball over,” Butler says. “Free throws; but turnovers really irk me.”
A lack of turnovers had to make Butler happy after surviving the Grizzlies. The Warriors committed half as many turnovers as the Grizzlies – 20 to 10 – and scored 27 points off turnovers, compared to giving up 12. Nearly every player, along with coach Steve Kerr, said turnovers will be the main factor in the Warriors’ either moving on to the second round, or having to answer a long list of questions from a first-round exit.
They turned the ball over 20 times in their most recent game with the Rockets, a 106-96 loss, and that turned into 18 points for Houston. The Rockets in that game had 14 more fastbreak points than them, 16 more points in the paint and two more second-chance points in a win where they shot 33.3 percent from 3-point range. The equation is simple: Don’t give the Rockets more chances.
Their half-court offense can keep them out of games, but they make up for it by hitting the offensive glass and sprinting past you. The Warriors, in their three wins against the Rockets, averaged 11.7 turnovers and 14 points conceded off them. But in their two losses, they averaged 21 turnovers and 24 points conceded off them.
Ball security will either make or break the Warriors against the Rockets.
Freeing Steph
Like a phantom haunting him all over the court, nobody made Steph Curry look more human this season than Amen Thompson. The 22-year-old made his Defensive Player of the Year case in the final regular-season game between the Warriors and the Rockets. Thompson had three steals and two blocks, badgering Curry all game.
Here’s what an off-night it was for Curry: His four turnovers were more than the three points he scored. Curry was 1 of 10 overall and 1 of 8 on threes, making a heave at the end of the first half. Thompson was the main defender guarding Curry’s nine missed shots just once. A combination of Dillon Brooks and Fred VanVleet made up for the rest.
But it was all the off-ball trouble that Thompson caused. Curry played three games against the Rockets this year and averaged 16.3 points on 36.4 percent shooting (16 of 44) and 30 percent on threes (9 of 30), all being incredibly low numbers for him. The Rockets will force the referees to adjust to them, particularly with the physicality of guarding Curry.
He has scored just five points with Thompson as his primary defender this season, going 2 of 8 overall and 1 of 6 from deep. Curry’s 0 of 5 with Brooks as his main defender, all being 3-pointers, but 4 of 8 with VanVleet on him. Can Curry exploit Jalen Green or Alperen Sengun in the pick-and-roll? Can Butler’s early scoring recently allow Curry to cook when it counts most?
In the simplest of terms, this series can be decided on Kerr finding ways to free up his 37-year-old star. Curry is the king of adjusting throughout a series, and the opposing coach called him out for crying about fouls last game. Every “Steph Stopper” has eventually failed. The mental and physical toll of a renewed rivalry should be a treat.
Big vs. Small
Houston houses a starting backcourt of a 6-foot VanVleet and a 6-foot-4 Green, who plays even smaller. Then, there’s just a long line of players who are big, long and want to impose their size over you.
An Ime Udoka-led team can throw Tari Eason and Jabari Smith Jr. at you off the bench, and they’re sure to go to the two-big lineup of Sengun and Steven Adams. Those two played 162 minutes together this season and had a 29.9 net rating with a 122 offensive rating and 92 defensive rating. As Sengun had a 19-point, 14-rebound double-double last game against the Warriors, including seven offensive rebounds, Adams was a plus-7 with eight rebounds in 17 minutes.
Curry went 3 of 10 – 1 of 7 from three – when Sengun guarded him this season. Adams defended him for 11 seconds and forced a turnover. Sengun offensively has not been good in the post with Green on him. In the Warriors’ three wins over the Rockets this season, Sengun was a minus-36. That two-big lineup cannot work when Curry’s on the floor.
The biggest flare-up less than two weeks ago was with Draymond Green and Sengun. Watch the 22-year-old try to make a statement on the 35-year-old. And watch how the four-time champion responds. Against the Grizzlies, Green kept so many possessions alive, and he knocked numerous balls out from the scrum. The Warriors need him to contain Sengun on the offensive glass and remain out of foul trouble.
Will Kerr show his faith in Kevon Looney? How much of a factor can Quinten Post be as a stretch-five to pull the Rockets’ big men away from the rim?
Both Gary Payton II and Moses Moody can have major roles in small-ball lineups. Moody should have open shots the Warriors need him to knock down, and Payton was the Warriors’ best player against the Rockets last game with 16 points, five rebounds, two assists and three steals. Then there’s the player who can match the Rockets’ youth, size and athleticism.
Kerr essentially declined to answer a pregame question about Kuminga on Tuesday before the Warriors’ play-in tournament game, saying that conversations to maintain a player’s mental strength can’t be necessary at this stage of the season. But Kerr and the Warriors will have to hope Kuminga has stayed ready, mentally and physically, for a series he very well could be needed in.
“He’ll contribute,” Green said later that night. “He’s great. He’s getting his work in. That’s all you can do in that situation is get your work in.
“And he’ll be meaningful for us in that series. I have zero doubt about that. I think the challenge for him is to stay mentally engaged, as it is for anyone in that situation. But I have zero doubt in my mind that he’s going to help us in this series. He will, 1,000 percent.”
Kuminga played in four of the Warriors’ five games against the Rockets this season, missing their 105-98 win on Feb. 13 while still dealing with a badly sprained right ankle. The four games (two starts) he did play were a sample of why it could be hard for Kerr to completely ignore him. Kuminga averaged 21.3 points and 6.8 rebounds in 28.8 minutes per game against the Rockets.
In their first meeting, Kuminga led the Warriors to an overtime win as a plus-18 off the bench with 23 points and six rebounds, scoring six of their eight points in OT. He was even better the next time the two teams played each other. The Warriors’ former top draft pick dropped a then-career-high 33 points on 13-of-23 shooting, made three of his six 3-point attempts and skied for seven rebounds. On a night the Warriors didn’t have Curry or Green, Kuminga showed all the promise the franchise has invested in.
The Warriors have lost their last two games against the Rockets that Kuminga has played, but not because of him. He had 20 points and another seven rebounds in his third game against them, and then played just 19 minutes off the bench in the Warriors’ loss to the Rockets earlier this month, despite being a team-high plus-9 with nine points and seven rebounds. Everything shows the Rockets were Kuminga’s best matchup, by far, and he’s Golden State’s only player who is as athletic and long as Houston’s young and hungry roster.
It’ll be extremely telling where Kuminga’s present and future as a Warrior stand in the case he’s reduced to his warmups on the sidelines for however long the first round goes.
The Boston Bruins were not expected to have a chance at a top-five pick in the 2025 NHL Draft this season.
But after plummeting to the bottom tier of the Eastern Conference standings with a 33-39-10 record, the focus has shifted to the top prospects in the 2025 class and next month’s NHL Draft Lottery. The B’s have the fifth-best odds (8.5 percent) to win the lottery. The worst they could finish is No. 7 overall.
The last time the Bruins’ own first-round pick was in the top seven came in 2006 when they selected Phil Kessel at No. 5 overall.
The Bruins’ No. 1 roster need entering the draft is at center. They still have not found a long-term replacement for Patrice Bergeron or David Krejci, both of whom retired after the 2022-23 season. Finding a top-six center in this draft would be a significant upgrade for the Bruins. And luckily for them, there are several centers in this class who could fill that role someday.
Let’s look at six prospects who would be a good fit for the Bruins early in the first round.
Michael Misa
Position: Center
Team: Saginaw Spirit (OHL)
2024-25 stats: 62 goals, 72 assists in 65 games
The Bruins might need to win the lottery or get the No. 2 pick for a chance to draft Misa, who is projected as the first forward selected in many 2025 mock drafts. It wouldn’t be shocking if he goes No. 1 overall.
Misa is an elite offensive player who led the OHL in scoring this past season. In fact, his 134 points were the most by an OHL player in a draft-eligible season since Patrick Kane tallied 145 in the 2006-07 campaign. Misa is the total package. He skates well, he has a hard and accurate shot, his playmaking ability is top-tier, he competes hard, and he’s not a liability defensively. He also has a high hockey IQ. There are very, very few weaknesses in his skill set.
A good NHL comparison for Misa would be John Tavares — a No. 1 center for many years. That’s exactly what the Bruins need.
Misa is the kind of prospect who could potentially play in the NHL as early as next season, which would be ideal for the Bruins if they plan on their retool being a quick one.
Caleb Desnoyers
Position: Center
Team: Moncton Wildcats (QMJHL)
2024-25 stats: 35 goals, 49 assists in 56 games
Desnoyers projects to be a top-six center at the NHL level who can make a strong impact in all three zones with a great two-way skill set. He plays in all situations, including special teams, and brings a high hockey IQ to the ice with each shift.
Desnoyers has high-end offensive skill, too. He’s a good skater and is crafty with the puck as a playmaker. He fights hard to win real estate in front of the net and score dirty goals.
Desnoyers is a complete player with not many weaknesses. He’s probably one of the safest picks the Bruins could make in the No. 4 to No. 6 range of the first round. The bust potential here is pretty low, although the ceiling is not as high as someone like Misa.
James Hagens
Position: Center
Team: Boston College (NCAA)
2024-25 stats: 11 goals, 26 assists in 37 games
Hagens is an elite playmaker and an excellent skater. He didn’t score as many goals for Boston College as some people expected, but he did come up clutch a few times, including the Eagles’ win over Bentley in the NCAA Tournament. Hagens also played a prominent role for Team USA as a first-line forward during its gold medal run at the World Junior Championships in January.
The FRESHMAN James Hagens with the game-winner for @BC_MHockey with only 77 seconds to play. Biggest goal of his season 🔥
Hagens is more than a high-end playmaker, though. He’s very good defensively, too. That kind of two-way skill set would be a nice fit in Boston.
The biggest concern with Hagens is probably his size. He’s about 5-foot-11 and 177 pounds, and he doesn’t play with a ton of physicality. But if the Bruins are looking for a potential top-six center who can consistently create scoring chances for himself and teammates, Hagens is definitely worth considering early in Round 1.
Porter Martone
Position: Right wing
Team: Brampton Steelheads (OHL)
2024-25 stats: 37 goals, 61 assists in 57 games
Martone is the lone right wing on this list, and the Bruins’ top needs are center and left wing. That said, the size (6-foot-3, 208 pounds) and offensive skill that Martone brings to the ice are hard to ignore.
His playmaking skill is fantastic. It’s an area that he’s improved quite a bit since joining the OHL. He tallied 38 assists last season and then increased that number to 61 this past season. He has a quick release on his shot, too.
Martone has the ability to be a tremendous power forward at the NHL level. The question is whether the Bruins value his skill set more than a traditional center.
Anton Frondell
Position: Center
Team: Djurgardens IF (Sweden)
2024-25 stats: 11 goals, 14 assists in 29 games
Bruins fans would love Frondell, who is considered the top European prospect in this year’s draft class.
He plays a power forward-type of game at 6-foot-2 and 200 pounds. He’s a physical player who fights hard for puck possession all over the ice. He can also score in a variety of different ways. His shot ranks among the best in this draft, highlighted by its quick release and accuracy. It could make him very dangerous on the power play. His skating and playmaking ability are tremendous for a player of his size, too.
Frondell projects to be a top-six forward at the NHL level. He could play center or on the wing.
Jake O’Brien
Position: Center
Team: Brantford Bulldogs (OHL)
2024-25 stats: 32 goals, 66 assists in 66 games
O’Brien is one of the best passers in this draft. He plays with poise, a high IQ and creativity as a playmaker that consistently creates high-danger scoring chances.
His two-way skill set (he’s very responsible defensively) is impressive, and he’s also shown good leadership qualities at Brantford.
O’Brien isn’t a super physical player, but his compete level ranks among the best at the center position in this draft. And at 6-foot-2, there’s plenty of room for him to add muscle and develop that part of his game. He has a very well-rounded skill set with a lot of offensive ability, and his draft stock has steadily risen over the last few months.
This postseason will be the fourth year in a row that LA will face the Edmonton Oilers in the first round of the playoffs.Photograph: Gina Ferazzi/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images
“It’s the stupidest thing ever.” This was Washington Capitals’ forward Daniel Winnik’s review in 2017 of the NHL’s still (somewhat) new playoff format. Three seasons earlier, along with realigning its divisions, the NHL had abandoned it’s previous, simple playoff arrangement. For 20 years, the top eight teams from each conference qualified for the playoffs, with the first-placed team playing the eighth-placed team, the second-placed team played the seventh, and so on. “I don’t know why it’s not one to eight,” Winnik said. “I don’t know why we got away from that.” A lot of people are still asking the same question.
On Sunday, as the NHL locked in its first Western conference playoff matchup, confirming that the Dallas Stars will face the Colorado Avalanche, some fans took to online forums to both celebrate and lament. “Anybody else hate the divisional format? I truly think both of these teams are legit contenders,” one user posted to the r/hockey subreddit under a link announcing the matchup. “Pretty sure literally everyone does,” another responded. Indeed, it seems unfair that one of the top teams in the West will be eliminated so soon into the postseason. Worse, is that, thanks in part to the playoff format, fans have seen this matchup coming for ages – a predictability that is supposed to build anticipation, but has instead become annoying.
Here’s how the NHL playoffs work now: Since 2014, the top three teams from each NHL division qualify for the postseason, plus the next two highest-placed teams by points, regardless of their division, as wildcard entrants. In the first round, each of the top divisional seeds plays a wildcard team, with the team with the most points playing the wildcard team with the least. Meanwhile, the second- and third-placed teams from each division face off.
When it was announced for the 2014 season, the revamped playoff rearrangement was just one piece of a broader league-wide realignment. The NHL redesigned its divisions and conferences to align more closely with time zone boundaries to both reduce travel and make TV schedules better for fans. “We played a majority of games outside the Eastern time zone, and our next generation of fans wanted to be able to watch and listen. But so many of our games started too late,” John Davidson, president of the Columbus Blue Jackets – who moved from the Eastern Conference to the Western Conference during the realignment – said when the changes were approved.
NHL commissioner Gary Bettman also felt the realignment would create more intense rivalries, because it meant that teams began to play inside their division and conference more frequently – three or four times each – with the remainder of the games against teams from the other conference. On the eve of the 2014 Stanley Cup final, Bettman declared the effort a mission accomplished. “I think the entire realignment this season has been received overwhelmingly in a positive way,” Bettman said at a 2014 press conference. “The rivalries have been great,” he said, speaking of that year’s postseason – the first under the new format.
Whether or not divisional or conference rivalries have intensified since the realignment is a point of debate. What’s clearer is that the playoff matchups in an ever-expanding league remain in some cases painfully predictable.
The LA Kings of recent years are a good example. This postseason will be the fourth year in a row that LA will face the Edmonton Oilers in the first round of the playoffs. The Oilers have won the past three meetings. Forget rivalry, this is more like a recurring nightmare for Kings fans – and one they could see coming for months. It’s a similar, though less pronounced, issue for the Toronto Maple Leafs, who’ve faced the Boston Bruins three times in the first round since 2018 and the Tampa Bay Lightning twice. “You see LA-Edmonton every year in the first round. Is that really good for the league?” Winnipeg forward Gabriel Vilardi asked reporters in March. “You can’t make rivalries. They just happen naturally. That’s my opinion.”
What to do? The solution to all this might not be a fresh overhaul of the playoff format itself, but of the regular-season points system. Some have suggested that the NHL should adopt the 3-2-1 points system it used in the Four Nations tournament earlier this year – that is, three points for a win, two for an overtime win or shootout win, and one for an overtime or shootout loss (zero for a loss in regulation). Currently, the NHL awards two points for any win and one point for a loss in overtime or a shootout. The theory is that the 3-2-1 system would incentivize teams to win more games in regulation, thereby shifting the overall standings, and rewarding teams that might have otherwise not made the postseason. One poll in 2024 showed 78.7% of NHL fans want the change. Yet, if the 3-2-1 points system had been applied this season, the Oilers and Kings still would have likely played one another in the first round. And the Leafs would not have played the Senators (as they will), but instead, uh, the Lightning.
For now, Bettman doesn’t think the format needs a rethink. “I’m pretty dug in on this,” he said in March. “I like exactly what we have and if you look at the races that we’re having for the regular season, playoffs have started already,” Bettman added, referring to the fact that some teams have been relatively certain of the team they’ll face in the first round for many weeks. Bettman referred to this inevitability as the NHL’s “play-in tournament”, referring to the NBA’s extra games that determine the final teams to make the postseason. But, even by his own account, Bettman should consider a change. When the current playoff format was introduced, Bettman said it would stand for at least three years “barring another relocation or expansion” – neither of which, he noted, were being considered. Since then, the NHL has seen one team relocate and two new join. It might be time.
Playoff predictions
Western Conference final Las Vegas v Winnipeg
Eastern Conference final Toronto v Washington
Stanley Cup final Winnipeg v Toronto
If this proves to be the matchup, it would be fitting for a year in which Canada has (re)defined itself so much via hockey that a Canadian team finally ends the nation’s 35-year Cup drought. Things have aligned well for the Leafs this season, but the hockey gods are also endlessly cruel, so if this unbelievable Cup Final should occur, the safe bet would be with the Jets.