Listen, I know many of you reading this read the title and think you already know the answer.

“No!” is the most likely refrain were I to post somewhere else, looking to spark discussion or creating some kind of snap poll that looked for a majority vote. Based on his performance this year where it matters, I’m not sure that I would blame you. A 6.82 ERA thanks to his allowing 26 runs in 33 innings are not numbers one wants to see from one of it’s supposed high leverage relievers.

Yet I am here to tell you, dear reader…..Jose Alvarado has indeed stunk up the ballpark in 2026. He’s allowing a ton of runs, walking too many hitters and falling behind in too many counts as to make at bats uncompetitive for him before they’ve really even begun. There really is no way to dance around these facts. It leads to the question of, can he and his season be salvaged to let him be something important down the line in the season?

There was a question that was asked of Justin Verlander this All-Star weekend where his answer really interested me.

Justin Verlander on the biggest change in pitching since 2005:

Analytics changed everything.

Some of it's great.

But JV says the danger now is analysts deciding whether a pitch is good based on the data, instead of how hitters actually react to it in games. pic.twitter.com/LMfQW87acX

— Rob Friedman (@PitchingNinja) July 14, 2026

What Verlander is saying is something we should be thinking more about as the game moves forward. Stuff models are very useful in the modern game as they are the ways pitchers learn new pitches, refine what they have already, basically all the ways they can get better at their craft. His point about hitters being able to tell a pitcher information about his pitches is getting a little lose along the way makes sense and is further broadening the divide between baseball purists and “the nerds”.

Alvarado is a great case here as his under the hood stuff, according to Baseball Savant, his season hasn’t been too bad. Take a quick peek at it and there is a lot of red going on, a good thing for a pitcher to have as it means a lot of what we are looking for in pitcher effectiveness is in the top percentiles.

He’s doing a lot of things the team wants him to do well, he’s just not seeing the results in the counting stats we see on a scoreboard. Looking at if from a subjective point of view, it’s something that everyone can see plain as day, that he is giving up a ton of runs in a few innings. Whatever trust there was to bring him into high leverage situations seems to be evaporating quickly. Which begs the question: why does the team continue to put him into high leverage situations? Is his stuff that good that he continues to warrant looks in those situations?

It really does depend on what you think of how people evaluate “stuff”. Fangraphs takes Stuff+ for each pitcher and ranks them for each pitch they throw. If we narrow the leaderboards to 20 innings pitched to make sure that Alvarado is included, he has some of the best pitches in the game:

• sinker: 120 Stuff+ (t-15th among 339 pitchers that have thrown the pitch)
• curveball: 147 Stuff+ (2nd among 208 pitchers that have thrown the pitch)
• cutter: 115 Stuff+ (6th among 203 pitchers that have thrown the pitch)

From this model, Alvarado has some of the best stuff in the majors as a reliever and is a great choice to be brought into a game when it is tight. Yet, how can he be so bad when his stuff is this good? This is where the hitters telling a pitcher if his pitch is any good comes into play. Hitters this season have a .481 slugging percentage against his sinker and a . 444 slugging against the cutter. They are simply hammering the good stuff he is pitching with. This is backed up by his Location+ number, especially for the sinker.

• sinker: 93 Location+ (t-244th among 339 pitchers that have thrown the pitch)
• curveball: 66 Location+ (200th among 208 pitchers that have thrown the pitch)
• cutter: 101 Location+ (108th among 203 pitchers that have thrown the pitch)

The location he has with his pitches is simply horrendous, which leads to hitters being able to hit the ball better, which leads to worse results no matter how good your stuff is according to the pitch models. Until Alvarado can start to locate his stuff better, he’s going to continue getting hit hard. So there’s no hope in his being able to turn it around, right?

Not necessarily.

There is also the argument for Alvarado being unlucky, an argument that can be made by looking at his BABIP. That number right now is an unsightly .440, twenty-three points higher than the next closest pitcher according to Fangraphs. When I first looked at that, it seemed abnormally high, even for a team with the defense the Phillies currently has. If you wanted to know if that was unprecedented or not, using Stathead, I looked up how many pitchers have had a BABIP of .425 or higher and thrown at least thirty innings as a reliever only in a season over the past forty years.

There are four.

And Alvarado has the highest BABIP of them quartet.

It doesn’t help that he has that pretty terrible defense behind him, which has to be taken into account a bit when considering that number, but there is an amount of unlucky-ness that occurring when he is on the mound that is leading to the results he has. You can see it in the quality of contact he has running with.

Listen, Alvarado has not been very good this season. Using “bad” might be a little strong in arguing about it, but I wouldn’t argue too much were you to go that route. However, I’d also ask that we pause before writing him totally off for the season. Alvarado is working with some good stuff as we can see based on different pitch models. That’s a great foundation from which to be a reliever. Where he’s throwing it needs work, an issue that has dogged Alvarado his whole career. If he’s able to reign in the command even a bit the rest of the way, there is the chance that either he starts getting a little luckier with balls put in play, or he’s able to strike hitters out a little more often and not have to involve his defense as much.

Can he be salvaged? Sure.

It’ll all depend on him.

Welcome to the second half. The Red Sox are 46-48 after a nine-game winning streak to close out the first part of the season. Now the team races towards the trade deadline with eyes on being buyers rather than sellers.

Willson Contreras doesn’t’ want to leave.

So it’ll be up to him, Sonny Gray, Aroldis Chapman and the rest of the team to really force Craig Breslow’s hand. This was, after all, the original plan entering the season. To compete. To win. To reach October.

After running wild in April and May, the Rays fell back to earth with a .500 June – including a 3-game sweep of the Sox – but are 7-5 so far in July.

Griffin Jax started one of those games in June and went 4.0 innings while allowing 3 runs (2 earned). That was his season high at the time but he’s since made nine starts of at least 5.0 innings including one 6.0 inning appearance. He’s not going deep in terms of pitch counts. just innings. Over 6.0 he just 71 pitches. In recent 5.0 inning starts he’s used as many at 88 but as few as 69. They’re clearly working him along in s specific way. Jake Bennett is coming off an excellent start against the Chicago White Sox. 7.0 shutout innings with 4 strikeouts and 1 walk? Can’t ask for more.

Game two doesn’t have announced starters yet, which leans towards the Sox pushing Payton Tolle into the next series to give him some extra rest. Eduardo Rivera and Brayan Bello are both available though…that just worked well against the Mets. Not that the Rays up the LOLMets.

The Ian Seymour experiment hasn’t gone as well as Jax. He was a pure reliever, then did some opening, and now has made three straight starts. The last was against the Seattle Mariners where he allowed 6 wins in 3.1 innings. His start against Boston was 4.0 innings and he allowed a single run: a homer by Marcelo Mayer. Patrick Sandoval is making his second start for the Red Sox. His first in two years was solid enough: 4.1 innings, 1 run, 5 Ks. With Ranger Suarez on the IL a few more days at least, Sandoval arrived at the right time.

Shane McClanahan is also back from a long absence for 2026. But he’s 17 starts into his return. The Sox missed him the last time. He held the Yankees scoreless over 6.1 last time out. And didn’t allow a run to KC the previous start. Sonny Gray is coming off a restful All-Star Break as he didn’t get selected for the game itself. He’s taking all comers ans shutting down their offenses. He’s been every bit the number two Breslow promised.

Junior Caminero was hit in the hand during the All-Star Game and could be out? He’s having a terrific year: 28 homers so far.

Chandler Simpson has 22 steals and has been caught 11 times, which leads the league.

Jonathan Aranda is posting a .394 OBP.

Yandy Diaz leads baseball with 11 hits.

Probable Pitching Matchups

Friday, July 17: Griffin Jax (2.61 ERA / 4.42 FIP) vs. Jake Bennett (2.64 ERA /3.02 FIP)

Friday, July 17: TBD (—ERA / — FIP) vs. TBD (— ERA /— FIP)

Saturday, July 18: Ian Seymour (4.59 ERA / 4.09 FIP) vs. Patrick Sandoval (2.08 ERA / 1.49 FIP)

Sunday, July 19: Shane McClanahan (2.83 ERA / 3.15 FIP) vs. Sonny Gray (2.54 ERA / 3.53 FIP)

When/Where to Watch

Friday, July 17: 1:35 PM ET on NESN

Friday, July 17: 7:10 PM ET on NESN

Saturday, July 18: 4:10 PM ET on NESN

Sunday, July 19: 1:35 PM ET on NESN

Adam Lind turns 43 today.

Adam Lind was on our prospect list when I first joined BBB. I remember the debate about whether he’d become a “40 home run” player. That didn’t happen, but very few players ever reach that mark.

Lind made his MLB debut as a September call-up in 2006 and performed admirably. Still, he didn’t secure a roster spot out of spring training in 2007. He was recalled in April to cover left field after Reed Johnson was injured, but when Johnson returned, Lind was sent back to the minors—his .230/.274/.383 line didn’t help his case. He received another call-up that September.

In 2008, Lind again began the season in the minors but was called up when the team abruptly parted ways with Frank Thomas. He struggled initially, starting 1-for-19, and an impatient John Gibbons—understandably concerned about his job—sent Lind back to the minors. The Jays then turned to the infamous Mencherson platoon (Brad Wilkerson and Kevin Mench), which, with Lind available, seemed like managerial malpractice.

After Gibbons was fired and Cito Gaston was hired, Gaston’s first and best move was insisting Lind be recalled. Cito made Adam his project, putting him in left field and letting him play regularly. Lind was often seen sitting beside the manager on the bench.

With Cito’s guidance, Lind had his best MLB season in 2009, playing 151 games and hitting .305/.370/.562 with 35 home runs and 114 RBI. Unfortunately, that success created unrealistic expectations, and the following seasons made it clear he wouldn’t become the perennial All-Star fans had hoped for.

2010 was a disappointment; Lind hit just .237/.287/.425, and for the next few years, he seemed like a lost cause.

In 2013, when John Gibbons returned as manager, he recognized—as many fans had—that Lind needed to be platooned. This decision restored Lind’s value to the team.

I’ve always liked Lind. He spoke his mind in interviews, never settling for the usual clichés. When he visited Calgary for a promotional tour, he genuinely enjoyed playing with kids at team events—a quality I truly admire.

Happy birthday, Adam.

---

Steve Delabar turns 43 today.

The Blue Jays acquired Delabar from the Mariners for Eric Thames at the end of July 2012. Since then, Thames has taken an interesting path—playing three years in Korea, signing with the Brewers, spending 2020 with the Nationals, and appearing briefly in the A’s system in 2022, though he hasn’t returned to the majors.

Delabar’s journey is unique. Drafted by the Angels in 2003, he spent several years in the Padres system before being released in 2008. He played independent ball in 2009 until a fractured elbow derailed his career.

After stepping away from playing, Steve became a high school baseball coach. It was there that he discovered the ‘weighted ball’ program, which briefly became a sensation. The program rejuvenated his arm strength, leading to a minor league deal with the Mariners and, ultimately, his major league debut in 2011. He featured a mid-90s fastball, a slider, and a split-finger fastball.

With the Jays, Delabar emerged as the team’s top setup man and earned an AL All-Star selection in 2014. After that, however, his command faltered, and he bounced between Toronto and Buffalo for a couple of seasons before being released in spring training 2016.

Over four seasons with Toronto, he appeared in 143 games, posted a 3.97 ERA, and struck out 179 batters in 143 innings.

He even recorded an immaculate inning in Oakland on July 30, 2013—a game I attended.

Delabar pitched for the Reds in 2016, spending most of the year in Triple-A but logging eight major league innings. In 2018, he was in the Rangers’ system.

In 2017, Delabar tested positive for PEDs and received an 80-game suspension from MLB.

He retired from pitching in 2018 and returned to coaching.

Happy birthday, Steve. Hope it’s a great one.

Following back-to-back winning seasons, the Royals had designs on contending this year. Much of the season hinged on the development of young hitters Carter Jensen and Jac Caglianone, and those two seem to be coming around as key parts of the lineup. Bobby Witt Jr. continues to play at an MVP level, and Michael Wacha was an All-Star. With those developments, you would think the Royals would be right in the mix.

Instead, it has been a disaster of a season. The Royals enter the second half tied for the worst record in baseball. Injuries have taken their toll this summer, but the losing began well before the roster was decimated. The organization’s lack of depth has been exposed, and the team will have a lot of work to do before next spring to get back on track.

Failing students have to show their report cards to their parents, so let’s hand out Royals first-half report cards for fans to see.

Position players

The offense has actually improved from last year, with the team averaging 4.23 runs per game, a 5 percent increase over 2025. The development of young hitters like Caglianone and Jensen has fueled the improvement, although the team still ranks 21st in baseball in runs scored. The team lost the disappointing Jonathan India to injury early on, but the struggles of Salvador Perez and Vinnie Pasquantino have had the biggest impact.

Bobby Witt Jr. – A+

Bobby is on track to test whether a player on a last place team can win MVP. He leads the league in fWAR (4.8) and steals (30), ranks fourth in hits (103), third in doubles (22), and leads all of baseball defensively in Outs Above Average (+18). He has increased his walk rate and cut down on his strikeout rate. He is everything you want in a ballplayer, and the Royals are absolutely wasting one of his prime seasons.

Jac Caglianone – B+

A hot June propelled Cags into the Home Run Derby and gave Royals fans some hope for the future. He has cut down on his groundball rate, and his Baseball Savant page is covered in red, particularly in hard-hit rate and exit velocity. He still chases a bit, and his defense is a work in progress (although better than I think some expected), but Jac is starting to look like the 30+ home run threat the Royals saw when they drafted him.

Isaac Collins – B+

Collins was brought in to get on base, and he is second behind only Witt on the team in on-base percentage at .345. He’s been a bit rough defensively in left field, but he has pretty much done what the Royals asked him to do, although he may be a bit stretched too thin in such a prominent role.

Maikel Garcia – B

His numbers are down from last year’s breakout performance, and his baserunning leaves something to be desired at times. But his OPS is still around league average and his defense has been outstanding at third. You’d like his numbers to be better after he signed a long-term deal last offseason, but his numbers have been pretty good this year.

Kyle Isbel – B

Isbel’s offensive numbers are substantially similar to his stats the last two seasons. He is what he is – a terrific defender with little power who should hit ninth in your lineup. He’s out the last month with plantar fasciitis, something that could hamper him the rest of the season.

Carter Jensen – B

Jensen was a bit of a dark horse Rookie of the Year pick before the year, and while he hasn’t lived up to that, he has been solid enough to consider him a fixture for the next few years. The power has been as-advertised, and he shows a patient approach the plate. His immaturity showed earlier this year when he overslept for a game, and his defense has been a mixed bag, but Jensen has put together a solid rookie performance.

Nick Loftin – B

The former first-round pick may be escaping his status as a AAA player by posting strong walk and strikeout rates at the big league level and becoming an offensive asset. His defense at third has been brutal, but perhaps he could improve with more playing time at second.

Michael Massey – B

Massey struggled last year, but has rebounded this year to put up very similar numbers to what he did in 2024. He’s got some pop for a second baseman and plays good defense, but struggles to get on base at a consistent clip. His salary will go up under arbitration next year, so this is a big year for him to prove he is worth keeping.

Lane Thomas – B-

Thomas was a bit of a whipping boy for Royals fans to begin the year, but overall his numbers are…fine? His power is down a bit, but he’s on pace to post his best on-base percentage since 2021, and he’s been most effective against left-handers. He has stayed healthy and has done what was expected of him, the question is whether the Royals needed more from an acquisition.

Tyler Tolbert – B–

What a weird season for Tolbert. He was hitting .200/.275/.200 through 41 plate appearances, then went 12-for-13 with two home runs over three games, and suddenly he has the highest OPS on the team. He’s a speedy bench player, but with this being a lost season, perhaps the Royals should explore whether he’s worth having an expanded role.

Starling Marte – C

Marte seems like a good clubhouse guy, and you could do worse with your bench options, but it is clear the 37-year-old veteran is at the end of the line.

Vinnie Pasquantino – D

Vinnie hit a career-high 32 home runs last year, and with the fences moving in this year, there were thoughts of a huge power season. He has hit two home runs at the K this year. He battled lower back tightness, then missed nearly a month with a hamate bone injury. His saving grace is that his walk rate has spiked to a career-high 11 percent, but otherwise he has been a dud at the plate.

Salvador Perez – F

Salvy has held off Father Time for years, but age seems to have caught up with him this season. Nearly every Baseball Savant metric is trending in the wrong direction. He ranks as the second-worst qualified hitter in baseball with a 58 wRC+, and his -1.5 fWAR is the lowest among all position players. He’s hitting better in July, but he’ll need a strong second half to avoid entering the final year of his contract in 2027 as an albatross.

Pitchers

Pitching was expected to be the strength of this club entering the season, but it has largely been a disaster. The Royals have allowed the fourth-most runs per game in baseball. They have surrendered double-digit runs in ten games, including a 22-1 beatdown at the hands of the White Sox. They entered the season with a lot of supposed pitching depth, but injuries to Carlos Estévez, Kris Bubic, and Cole Ragans have exposed them.

Michael Wacha – A

Wacha may be one of the best free agent signings in Royals history. He has been a workhorse, leading the league in innings pitched, and he gives the Royals a chance to win each time out with 12 Quality Starts. He has some of the worst run support in baseball, which is the only reason why he has a losing record.

Daniel Lynch IV – A-

Lynch has been used in more high-leverage roles this year and has met the challenge, improving his strikeout and walk rates. He has become the most trusted arm in the bullpen.

Stephen Kolek – B

Kolek was a model of consistency until one awful nine-run start against the Cardinals. He throws strikes and gets ground balls and is a perfectly acceptable back-of-the-rotation starter.

John Schreiber – B

Schreiber has been getting outs despite a drop in strikeout rate, but a 4.94 FIP suggests a second-half regression. The Royals should probably be aggressive looking to move him at the deadline for anyone that needs bullpen help.

Kris Bubic – B–

Bubic was looking pretty solid until he gave up five runs in his last start, then hit the Injured List with a shoulder injury. He suffered a setback in his rehab and it is looking increasingly unlikely he will be healthy enough to be moved at the trade deadline.

Noah Cameron – B-

It has been a bit of an up-and-down season for Cameron. The knock on Cameron last year was that he didn’t miss enough bats. He has significantly improved his strikeout numbers this year, and while his 4.89 ERA ain’t great, his 4.03 FIP will play.

Seth Lugo – C+

Lugo hit a wall last year that resulted in a terrible second half and he may be hitting a similar wall this year. He had a 3.69 ERA through his first 15 starts, but has given up 21 runs in 19.1 innings over his last four outings.

Beck Way – C+

Way was called up out of desperation and has been fine, although it has come in low-leverage situations and his FIP is 5.39.

Luinder Avila – C

I like Avila’s stuff and I think he has a bright future, most likely in the bullpen. The Royals were not counting on him being fourth on the team in innings pitched, but here we are. He needs to throw more strikes to have success in the big leagues, but he has shown some glimpses of promise.

Alex Lange – C

Lange was looking like a decent reclamation project until he gave up ten runs over his last four appearances. His walk rate is still awfully high, and he has struggled to strike hitters out the last few weeks.

Mason Black – C-

Before the season, Black was put in a “break glass in case of emergency” box, and it turns out the Royals have needed him 12 times. He has done fine pitching mostly in losses, but he probably shouldn’t be someone the Royals count on in the second half.

Nick Mears – C-

Mears seemed like a shrewd pickup for the bullpen when the Royals got him from Milwaukee, but he struggled with walks and has been out over a month with a shoulder injury.

Steven Cruz – C-

Cruz is a hard thrower who has trouble throwing strikes at times. His cutter has been a lot better than his straight fastball, and I still feel like he could be a really good reliever with some tweaks.

Eli Morgan – C-

The very definition of “replacement level player.”

Lucas Erceg – D

Erceg’s drop in strikeout rate was a red flag last year, and the chickens have come home to roost this season. He has the third-worst strikeout-to-walk rate among relievers. The Royals really needed him to step up after the injury to Estévez but his six blown saves are the most in baseball.

Cole Ragans – D

It has been a frustrating two seasons for Ragans, who was an All-Star in 2024. He made eight starts, showed some flashes of brilliance with high whiff rates, but went down in early May with an elbow injury that required surgery. We probably won’t see him again until mid-2027.

Matt Strahm – F

Strahm was one of the best relievers in baseball last year, and it seemed like a coup when the Royals acquired him last winter. Instead he has been a disaster for the Royals with the second-worst home run rate in baseball. Worse yet, Jonathan Bowlan, who the Royals traded away to acquire Strahm, has been very good for the Phillies.

The 2026 MLB Draft is over. The Texas Rangers have made their selections and started signing players. Deals for their top few picks should be announced in the next few days, with the deadline for signing most drafted players being ten days from now, at 4 p.m. on Monday, July 27, 2026.

Its a far cry from the days of old, when first round picks didn’t sign until weeks — sometimes months — after they were drafted, when there were staring matches, games of chickens, where the deadline was when classes started for the school a drafting player would be attending in the fall if he didn’t sign (assuming that the player in question opted to set foot on campus, rather than not going to school and continuing negotiations into the fall and winter). The assumption is that, barring something extraordinary, a team is going to sign the players it picks in the first ten rounds, with the only real question being which players in rounds 11-20 will be inked to deals before the window for negotiations close.

The Rangers’ 2026 draft class is an unusual one, noted by many of the commentariat as being a boom-or-bust type draft, being top heavy, with their first three picks — who will likely consume the vast majority of the team’s draft bonus pool — being of the high-risk, high-reward variety. After years of swinging for the fences in the draft, the Rangers, in 2019, began orienting more towards lower-risk, safer college picks, with a particular focus on landing batters with a track record of success and good contact skills.

In 2025, the Rangers went in a somewhat different direction in the draft, using their first round pick on prep infielder Gavin Fien — the first high schooler they had picked in the first round since Cole Winn in 2018 — and splitting their first six picks, and the bulk of their draft pool, between three prep infielders* and three injured college pitchers. They didn’t take a college hitter until the seventh round, when they popped Penn State outfielder Paxton Kling — and Kling fit more in the toolsy, athletic category than the polished, advanced skills category.

* Or, if you prefer, two prep infielders and Josh Owens, a prep infielder who also pitches, and who was announced, and being used this season, as a two way player.

This past weekend, the Rangers seemingly came full circle, using their first three selections on high school players for the first time since 2018, including high-velocity lefty pitchers with two of their first three picks. As the industry as a whole has shifted more and more towards college players — nine of the first 11 picks in 2026 were from four year schools — and with a particular focus on college hitters with strong contact ability, the Rangers have put their eggs in a three player basket of guys who were attending high school two months ago.

I don’t know, though, if this is inherently a philosophical shift so much as the team seeing opportunities in regards to players that were on the board when they picked that didn’t necessarily fit their usual mode. The reports heading into draft day had the Rangers’ connected with a number of players prior to the draft, with various mock drafts having the Rangers going both position player and pitcher, both prep and college, with their top pick.

Gio Rojas, taken by the Rangers at #16, was the first high school pitcher selected in the draft, and one of only two high school pitchers taken in the “true” first round, versus the competitive balance pick round after the first round. He’s someone who was seen at one point as likely being off the board before the Rangers picked, a tall, athletic lefty who touches 98 and is expected to be able to hit triple digits when he fills out, a high spin guy who also has a quality slider and feel for a changeup. That profile even a few years ago would have him a lock to go in the top 10.

The flameout rate for high school pitchers has resulted in them dropping on draft boards in recent years, and with good reason. One can go back and look at the failure rate for high school pitchers taken high in the draft and see how often they don’t make it.

But while you are going to adjust where you put high school pitchers on your draft board as a result of that, you aren’t going to remove them from your board altogether. You aren’t going to want to take a high school pitcher first overall, sure…and a high school pitcher hasn’t gone first since Brady Aiken infamously was picked #1 in 2014 by the Houston Astros, who then didn’t sign him due to medical concerns. The only other high school pitchers taken first overall in the history of the draft are Brien Taylor, who went first overall in 1991 to the Yankees and never made the majors, and David Clyde, whose story you are all familiar with.

At some point, though, you’re going to reach a point in the draft where the risk of a high school pitcher is outweighed by the potential value that a particular high school pitcher offers at that point. For the Texas Rangers, this year, that point was the 16th pick the draft, with Gio Rojas.

Rojas, though, wasn’t necessarily the only prep pitcher the Rangers viewed as worthy of snagging with the 16th overall pick. They also were linked with Brody Bumila, a huge lefty out of Massachusetts who throws 100 with great extension, but who has a lot of work to do with his secondaries. The notion of taking Bumila at #16 went out the window when the pre-draft medicals showed that Bumila — who underwent internal brace surgery on his elbow 14 months ago — had a damaged UCL, likely necessitating another surgery.

The injury knocked Bumila out of the first round, and saw him drop all the way to the third round…where the Rangers grabbed him, reportedly with an agreement to pay him first round money. Going way over slot to get a first round talent in the later rounds isn’t unusual. Doing it for a high schooler who may not be ready to step on a mound until the end of 2027 because of a second elbow surgery is, however. Its the organization betting, not just on Bumila’s upside, but on his, and the team’s medical staff, being able to get him back to full strength.

If Bumila does, he’s a steal in the third round. If he doesn’t, well, you’ll be hearing comparisons to Michael Matuella.

In between Rojas and Bumila, the Rangers went prep hitter with Connor Comeau. Like last year’s first rounder, Gavin Fien, Comeau is a high school shortstop with an advanced hit tool who will almost certainly have to move off of shortstop. Unlike Fien, Comeau is one of the youngest players in his draft class, not turning 18 until August, and is a tall, gangly fellow who lacks speed and athleticism, but whose swing, approach and build allows him to be projected as a potential impact hitter as he fills out.

None of the Rangers’ top three picks are cheap signs. Texas isn’t going underslot with them to sign guys who slid to the later rounds. The team said after the draft that Bumila unexpectedly reaching them in the third round scrambled their draft board, as signing him would necessitate them devoting most of their excess bonus pool money to him.

And so in the fourth round, took a junior reliever out of Ole Miss in Hudson Calhoun, who may be below slot, and almost certainly won’t be above slot. In the fifth, they took Michael Anderson out of Penn State, who has already signed for $172,500, significantly below slot. The team’s sixth, seventh, ninth and tenth rounders have all signed for nominal $2500 bonuses, providing savings that will go to Bumila. Their eighth rounder, Georgia shortstop Kolby Branch, is a senior, and a good enough prospect he will likely not sign for $2500, but who will not cost a lot to lock up.

We don’t know yet how much the guys taken in the top 10 rounds will cost to sign, how much pool money will be left over to apply to potential above-$150,000 bonuses for players taken after round 10. There are interesting players the Rangers picked in that range, guys who have the potential to be legitimate prospects as they develop. We will have a fuller picture of the entire draft class in ten days.

But the big bets were in the first three rounds, when the Rangers were opportunistic in grabbing high risk, high reward guys who fell in their laps.

The Guardians welcome one of the few teams they will see post-All-Star break who enter the schedule with a record better than .500 in the Pittsburgh Pirates.

The Pirates are 50-47 with a +44 run differential, second in team wRC+ at 111, second in baserunning runs above average at 6.3, 26th in Defense at -27.5, 11th in starting pitcher ERA at 4.20 (3.72 FIP),

The Guardians are 51-46 with a -2 run differential, 23rd in team wRC+ at 92, seventh in baserunning runs above average at 5.2, ninth in Defense at -2.6, seventh in starting pitcher ERA at 3.69 (4.04 FIP), and eighth in bullpen ERA at 3.74 (3.85 FIP).

The Pirates are good at everything… except defense. They are horrific at defense. So, please, Guardians, put the ball in play.

Matchups:

Game One, Friday 7:10PM ET, Gavin Williams, RHP 3.81 ERA (3.74 FIP) vs. Jared Jones, RHP 4.37 ERA (3.67 FIP)

Game Two, Saturday, 4:10PM ET, Joey Cantillo, LHP 3.56 ERA (4.08 FIP) vs. Braxton Ashcraft, RHP 3.49 ERA (3.32 FIP)

Game Three, Sunday, 1:40PM ET, Tanner Bibee, RHP 3.90 (4.82 FIP) vs. Paul Skenes, RHP 3.57 ERA (2.88 FIP)

The Pirates are led by Esmeryn Valdez 186 wRC+, Bryan Reynolds 143 wRC+, Endy Rodriguez 138 wRC+, Ryan O’Hearn 128 wRC+, Brandon Lowe 115 wRC+, Nick Gonzalez 113 wRC+, Tyler Callihan 110 wRC+, and Jake Mangum 109 wRC+. Spencer Horwitz, Oneil Cruz and Konnor Griffin are on the IL.

The Guardians are led by Chase DeLauter 123 wRC+, Austin Hedges 116 wRC+, Brayan Rocchio 113 wRC+, and Travis Bazzana 103 wRC+.

Let’s get the second half started off with a series win!

“Gentleman. American. Sportsman. Through whose vision and courage this imposing edifice, destined to become the home of champions, was erected and dedicated to the American game of baseball.”

So reads the second plaque erected at the old Yankee Stadium to recognize a figure of organizational significance. The plaque predates Monument Park itself, having been installed upon the center field bleacher fence in 1940, the year after the death of the man it honors.

While the ballpark was informally christened “The House that Ruth Built,” of course the Yankees’ ownership was directly responsible for its construction. The plaque in question honors Jacob Ruppert, the renaissance man who owned the Yankees for 24 years. He’s received the lion’s share of the credit for shepherding the Yankees’ franchise from afterthought to behemoth, with Yankee Stadium serving as the physical embodiment of this ascent.

But it was not Ruppert who oversaw construction at East 161st Street and River Avenue. It was his co-owner, a civil engineer by trade whose attention to detail led him to spend two weeks deciding on the perfect seats for the grandstand and whose legacy as one of the most pivotal figures in Yankees history has been largely papered over.

Tillinghast L’Hommedieu Huston
Born: July 17, 1867 (Buffalo, NY)
Died: March 29, 1938 (Darien, GA)
Yankees Tenure: 1914-23 (co-owner)

Tillinghast L’Hommedieu Huston grew up in Cincinnati, Ohio as a diehard Reds fan. He followed in the footsteps of his father, a civil engineer from Ireland, with the two working together on the Louisville and Nashville railroads. The younger Huston joined the Army during the Spanish American War, serving as a captain in the 16th Regiment of Engineers in Cuba. He stuck around for 15 years after hostilities ended, building his fortune developing infrastructure for the fledgling nation.

Despite his physical distance from his homeland, Huston remained connected to the game he loved as a child, getting American newspapers so he could follow box scores. “Neither tropic heat nor tropic rain could drive thoughts of the old game from my head,” he’d say years later of this period.

Upon his return, he hatched a plan to purchase the Chicago Cubs in 1914 and install his good friend John McGraw as manager. While McGraw was keen on the idea, he had to back out after being unable to withdraw from his contract with the Giants. A few months later, Huston linked up with Ruppert to purchase a moribund Yankees franchise. The two split the roughly $460,000 cost evenly, with Ruppert serving as team president and Huston as secretary and treasurer.

Turning the Yankees around would be no small task. The new co-owners employed a strategy familiar to more recent owners of the club: spend early and often. Ruppert and Huston reportedly told their staff to “go to the limit” in procuring talent, later relaying to manager Bill Donovan that “no sum of money would stand in the way” of whatever acquisitions he requested. Their resulting bounty, which included Hall of Famer Home Run Baker and Bob Shawkey, who’d win 168 games in 13 years in New York, served notice to the rest of the league and helped the Yankees start climbing up in the standings.

The crowning achievement of this talent influx came in December 1919. Fresh off their best finish since they were known as the Highlanders in 1910, the Yankees purchased Babe Ruth’s contract from the Red Sox. By 1921, they’d be playing in their first World Series.

Throughout this period, there was one snag in the Yankees’ rise. Since 1913, they had had played second fiddle at the Giants’ Polo Grounds in Manhattan. As the Yankees’ fortunes improved, they began to wear out their welcome. The Giants first attempted to evict them, then settled on vastly increasing their rent. Huston, leveraging his civil engineering background, led the search for a new site, surveying plots of land across Manhattan, Queens, and the Bronx. He and Ruppert settled on a 10-acre plot of land just across the Macombs Dam Bridge from the Polo Grounds in the Bronx.

Work began in 1922, with Huston a regular presence at the site. As construction drew to a close, he expressed his desire to sell his half of the club to Ruppert. “I’m old and tired,” he said of the decision. “The Yankees are a good team and the stadium is nearly finished. It looks as if my work is about done.” In reality, the move to sell was also sparked by years of tension between the two co-owners, chiefly over the hiring of eventual Hall of Famer Miller Huggins as manager.

Huston sold his stake in the team in May 1923, weeks after his beloved stadium first opened its doors. He left the team he helped purchase less than 10 years earlier with a new ballpark of its own and on the doorstep of its first of 27 world championships and counting. Huston moved to Georgia after his retirement from baseball before making one last attempt to buy back in. In the mid-1930s, he made an offer to purchase the Brooklyn Dodgers with a plan to install Ruth as manager, though his bid was not accepted.

Huston died of natural causes in Darien, GA at the age of 70. Unlike Ruppert, he has yet to receive enshrinement in the National Baseball Hall of Fame or much of a formal acknowledgement at the stadium he helped built. But through the conviviality, connections, expertise, and purse he brought to the New York Yankees, he deserves no less credit for the team’s historic turnaround.

---

See more of the “Yankees Birthday of the Day” series here.

Major League Baseball introduced a new innovation for the 2026 season by implementing the ABS Challenge System. The All-Star break provided an opportunity to reflect on how the Automatic ball-strike system has changed the game and overall, the reception has been positive. 

It is impossible to discuss the ABS system without talking about the technology behind it. T-Mobile has played a huge role in the system. Go to a baseball game or watch one from home and you will instantly see all of the T-Mobile branding throughout the ballpark. However, it is important to point out that T-Mobile’s partnership with Major League Baseball simply isn’t branding. They are powering the technology behind the ABS system. 

“We have been a partner with Major League Baseball for over a decade now and I think one of the things and the reasons it’s worked so well is we’ve kept innovating together,” T-Mobile Vice President of Sponsorships Amy Azzi said during All-Star festivities at Citizens Bank Park. 

Major League Baseball began testing the ABS system back in 2022 in the minor leagues. A priority was of course that it needed to be accurate but it also had to be fast so that it wouldn’t take away from the game experience. The system is powered by Hawkeye Cameras that have been installed in every Major League park. The data is transferred over a private 5G network that is provided by T-Mobile. That leads to an almost instantaneous result.  

“All of that data is transmitted into a software system that we’ve developed via the T-Mobile network,” said Morgan Sword who is the Executive Vice President of Baseball Operations at MLB. “That software system determines whether the trajectory of the ball matches with the strike zone we’ve loaded in. Then if it’s challenged, that produces a call.” 

“That’s the call you see on the big board and then also on the broadcast. It’s a lot of technology that has to happen very quickly to keep that pace and rhythm going in the game.” 

So far there have been over 6,000 challenges during the first half of the regular season. Teams start with two challenges each and lose one for every unsuccessful attempt. Sword said that the number of challenges was something that the league had tested in the minors and listened to feedback from fans. Two felt like the sweet spot. 

“We decided on two challenges per team because that was the overwhelming fan feedback in the minor leagues that we started out at three. Fans told us that, you know, ABS challenges are great and exciting to a point. If you have games where there’s 12, 15 challenges, then it starts to feel a little like it’s disrupting the game a little bit. So we dialed it back to two and that’s produced about four challenges per game, which we think is kind of right on the money and fans have responded well to that.”

The overwhelming reaction to ABS from fans has been positive, but what about the players? Brewers’ Cy Young candidate Jacob Misiorowski talked about the ABS system at T-Mobile’s Club Magenta. Misiorowski said that he thinks that the system gives an advantage to the hitters. 

“I mean, sure, yes, there’s an advantage for pitchers to get a corner call, but I think you have a bigger advantage to get a call reversed to a ball over a strike.” 

While he thinks that ABS is tipped slightly in hitters favor, he is a fan of all of the technology that has made its way into baseball. 

“All the technology that you’re getting, all the information that they throw up on the scoreboard, all that stuff is really cool. The tech comes back to us and we get that information and stuff like that to tweak pitches, tweak everything around it. There’s Hawkeye, stuff like that is huge.”

Phillies legends Ryan Howard and Chase Utley both agreed that they would have benefitted from having the ABS system.  

“I think we both had a pretty good knowledge of the strike zone and I think that guys now, pitchers, catchers, and hitters are starting to get a better understanding of what that strike zone is,” Howard said. “We’ve seen pitches that are this far off, that are a ball, and then just a hair on, that are strikes.”

“Yeah, I think it would have helped. I think, right now, what we’re seeing is, calls are getting right,” said Utley. “At the end of the day, it’s about getting the calls correct. 

While the ABS system looks like a success, Major League Baseball is currently looking for other ways that they can use technology to improve the game. They are testing a check swing system in the minors. 

“It is the same Hawkeye tracking system. It actually tracks the bat, when a hitter swings. So you can finally, for the first time in the history of baseball, decide what a swing is,” Sword said. “We actually don’t really define that for anybody. So, we’ve made up a definition for the purpose of Triple-A  just to see how it goes. But, we may tweak that.”

A lot of thought has gone into developing these systems and how they would impact the fan experience. 

“It’s been really fun to watch it in the stadium, and I think I was telling Morgan before this, that some of the loudest moments in the stadium, you’d think someone hit a home run,” Azzi said of the ABS system. 

“It’s really fun to see the impact it’s had on getting people to engage in even more. It supports the great momentum that the sport has right now.”