The Montreal Canadiens will try to avenge a recent overtime loss to the New York Islanders when the two teams clash tonight.
Each side has leaned into low-scoring, defense-first hockey down the stretch as they prepare for the postseason, and I’m expecting a similar script to play out in my Islanders vs. Canadiens predictions.
Montreal has allowed just 2.71 goals per game over the past two weeks, while New York has been even stingier at 2.17 — the third-best mark in the league over that span.
The Under is 5-1 in each team’s last six games, with the Islanders hitting Under 5.5 in four straight and the Canadiens in two straight.
New York has also cashed the Under in 53.6% of its games this season, the seventh-highest rate in the NHL.
Islanders vs Canadiens same-game parlay
Goals will be hard to come by tonight, but if there’s anyone who can break through, it’s Cole Caufield.
The Habs winger has goals in three of his last four games and six of his last 10, including a tally vs. the Islanders in their last meeting on February 26.
The Under is 9-4 in New York’s last 13 road games. Find more NHL betting trends for Islanders vs. Canadiens.
How to watch Islanders vs Canadiens
Location
Bell Centre, Montreal, QC
Date
Saturday, March 21, 2026
Puck drop
7:00 p.m. ET
TV
MSGSN, SNE
Islanders vs Canadiens latest injuries
Odds are correct at the time of publishing and are subject to change. Not intended for use in MA. Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.
The Chicago Blackhawks have had the number one penalty kill in the NHL for quite some time. They aren’t a winning team, but that aspect of their overall game has been impressive for most of the 2025-26 season.
Part of the PK success was the play of Nick Foligno, Connor Murphy, and Jason Dickinson. All three of them were traded away ahead of the deadline, and the penalty kill units miss them.
On Friday night against the Colorado Avalanche, the Blackhawks gave up two power-play goals. Despite having so much firepower, the Avalanche came in with the 29th-ranked power play, but they found a way against the Blackhawks.
That makes it 7 power play goals against over the 8 games since the trade deadline. Chicago enters an idle Saturday with the second-ranked PK at 84.1 percent. To still be in second after giving up 7 power play goals in 8 games tells you how good the kill was ahead of the deadline.
Now, the Blackhawks must move forward with younger players taking over the kill. Special teams is an important aspect of the game, and they have a PK system that has worked well, but new faces need reps.
"I think it's something that you continue to gain experience with," Wyatt Kaiser said of the PK. "There are going to be some stumbles and falls, but we have to learn from those and continue to move forward and get better."
Kaiser mentioned that there are certain plays that you only see in the NHL, and that seeing them and learning from them is how to get better. With stars like Nathan MacKinnon, Cale Makar, and Marty Necas on the other side, it can take time for young players to process.
"Some new guys are on there, but our structure hasn't changed," Ryan Greene said. "We're still trying to accomplish the same thing within the same structure. Giving up two [against Colorado] wasn't good enough; it's on us to execute better."
Ryan Greene, as a rookie, has a deep understanding of the game. He isn't a flashy player who will have all of these incredible stats, but he knows how to play well in all situations. His words echo what Kaiser said: they just need to keep learning from their triumphs and mistakes. Blashill had a similar response.
"You need reps," Blashill said on the PK postgame. "Penalty kill is one of those things where there are so many different nuances that happen. We certainly have our structure, but I don't know any way to learn it without going through it. They're getting those reps."
Blashill also made a point that they have had multiple instances of killing off most of the penalty and then allowing one late after some great work. That will certainly impact the numbers, but he also understands that you need to kill the full two minutes to win more than you lose.
The head coach also pointed out that they have committed to trial by fire, so the young players are going to continue getting big PK minutes as the season winds down. In that sense, moving out the veterans to make room for them was a wise choice. It's better to develop the PK now than when they are trying to win down the line.
The commitment to being a winning player is there up and down the lineup, and they are not afraid to work on getting better.
The dip in penalty kill since the deadline is never easy to deal with, but it will be more valuable for the future of the team to see the youth take over, rather than guys succeeding who won't be there in the long term.
For action-packed issues, access to the entire magazine archive and a free issue, subscribe to The Hockey News at THN.com/free. Get the latest news and trending stories by subscribing to our newsletter here. And share your thoughts by commenting below the article on THN.com or creating your own post in our community forum.
TAMPA, FL - FEBRUARY 21: Oswaldo Cabrera #95 of the New York Yankees smiles before the game against the Detroit Tigers at George M. Steinbrenner Field on February 21, 2026 in Tampa, Florida. (Photo by New York Yankees/Getty Images) | Getty Images
The moment that news broke late Friday afternoon that the Yankees would be optioning Jasson Domínguez to Triple-A, it seemed like a cinch that big-league veteran Randal Grichuk would make their Opening Day roster. Although he arrived to camp as a late-signing non-roster invitee and manager Aaron Boone tried to make it sound like it wasn’t a sure thing that be with them at the start of 2026 (even saying so yesterday), Grichuk so clearly seemed to fit what the Yankees claimed they were looking for all winter: a righty-hitting bench outfielder.
As such, it has to come to pass: Grichuk will be on the 2026 Yankees, per Boone’s report on Saturday morning. Domínguez wasn’t the only player who had to make room for Grichuk given the crowded roster situation, and so came the related news that utilityman Oswaldo Cabrera would begin the year in Triple-A:
Randal Grichuk has made the team, Aaron Boone said.
Cabrera had an option and is coming back from a pretty brutal ankle injury, only making it into seven games thus far in spring training. So for as solid as a bench option as he is at full health, he’s not quite there yet, and he can keep getting regular reps at Scranton rather than rarely playing in the majors. More likely than not, he’ll be needed sooner rather than later given the overall age of the Yankees’ roster.
As for Grichuk, he’s not terribly exciting on the surface, but as Estevão noted earlier in March, there’s a reason why he had the Yankees were interested in him. Is it possible that he was just cooked in his 85 OPS+ age-33 season last year? Sure. However, he has an .819 career OPS against lefties and that figure was .913 as recently as 2024. So it’s worth the flyer to see if he still has that in him, especially when the roster flexibility is available at the moment with Cabrera and Domínguez’s options (and need for playing time).
Just to throw my hat in the ring on Opening Day roster projections, here’s what I think it could be as of now, acknowledging that Gerrit Cole, Carlos Rodón, Clarke Schmidt, and Anthony Volpe will all begin the year on the IL:
Catchers (2) Austin Wells J.C. Escarra
Infielders (6) Ben Rice Jazz Chisholm Jr. José Caballero Ryan McMahon Paul Goldschmidt Amed Rosario
Starting Pitchers (5) Max Fried Cam Schlittler Luis Gil Ryan Weathers Will Warren
Bullpen (8) David Bednar Camilo Doval Fernando Cruz Tim Hill Ryan Yarbrough Paul Blackburn Cade Winquest Jake Bird
That last spot in the bullpen could go to someone like Brent Headrick rather than Bird, but aside from that, this all seems to be in order. What do you think?
Two teams jockeying for playoff positioning in their respective conferences clash Saturday, when the Miami Heat visit the Houston Rockets.
Miami is in a logjam of five teams currently battling for the two playoff spots in the East, all separated by 1.5 games.
Houston, meanwhile, the slight betting favorite Saturday, is in a three-way battle for the 4-seed with Denver and Minnesota out West.
While Miami has dominated this head-to-head series, my Heat vs. Rockets prediction and NBA picks have this one in a more defensive battle, where I will target the total.
Heat vs Rockets prediction
Heat vs Rockets best bet: Under 229.5 points (-110)
The Miami Heat has dropped three straight and sits in eighth in the East, though just 1.5 games out of fifth.
They have ripped the Houston Rockets of late, going 9-1 in the last 10 and 8-2-0 against the spread, but they're currently hard to trust. They're also down Andrew Wiggins (toe) and Jaime Jaquez Jr (hip).
Houston just ended Atlanta's 11-game win streak in a 117-95 romp. They're fourth in scoring defense and have held five of the last eight opponents to 105 points or less.
The Under has cashed in three straight matchups, with all signs pointing to a fourth.
Heat vs Rockets same-game parlay
While he's shooting a blistering 55.9% from the field and 43.2% from three, Kevin Durant is only averaging 22.7 points in 10 March games. He's gone Under 26.5 points seven times.
Tyler Herro's 21.5 scoring line is gettable: he's topped that mark in four of seven games, missing the over by a bucket in two others.
Heat vs Rockets SGP
Under 229.5 points
Kevin Durant Under 26.5 points
Tyler Herro Over 21.5 points
Our "from downtown" SGP: Amen!
Bam Adebayo has rebounded well against Houston historically, grabbing at least 10 boards in seven of the last nine meetings, missing the Over by a single rebound in another.
Amen Thompson has hit the 6-assist mark once in his last five, while never hitting six dimes in four career games vs Miami.
Heat vs Rockets SGP
Under 229.5 points
Kevin Durant Under 26.5 points
Tyler Herro Over 21.5 points
Bam Adebayo Over 9.5 rebounds
Amen Thompson Under 5.5 assists
Heat vs Rockets odds
Spread: Heat +3 (-110) | Rockets -3 (-110)
Moneyline: Heat +125 | Rockets -150
Over/Under: Over 226.5 (-110) | Under 226.5 (-110)
Heat vs Rockets betting trend to know
Houston has lost eight straight against Miami teams with a winning record. Find more NBA betting trends for Heat vs. Rockets.
How to watch Heat vs Rockets
Location
Toyota Center, Houston, TX
Date
Saturday, March 21, 2026
Tip-off
8:00 p.m. ET
TV
FDSN-SU, SCHN
Heat vs Rockets latest injuries
Not intended for use in MA. Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.
GLENDALE, ARIZONA - MARCH 16: Tyler Glasnow #31 of the Los Angeles Dodgers walks to the dugout during a Spring Training game against the Milwaukee Brewers at Camelback Ranch on March 16, 2026 in Glendale, Arizona. (Photo by Brandon Sloter/Getty Images) | Getty Images
After six weeks in Arizona, the Dodgers return home to Southern California to finish up their exhibition season with the Freeway Series against the Angels. First up is a game in Anaheim on Sunday night at Angel Stadium.
Tyler Glasnow takes the hill in his final spring tuneup for the regular season, which for the right-hander likely begins next weekend against the Arizona Diamondbacks.
Non-roster right-hander George Klassen starts for the Halos.
There aren't many chances left to find Spring Training betting edges, with today being the final Saturday of exhibition play.
My MLB picks have scoured the board to find the best bets to make on March 21.
See why the White Sox top my trio of road team moneylines for today.
Spring Training predictions for March 21
Pick
Odds
COL moneyline
+135
SD moneyline
-110
CHW moneyline
+105
Pick #1: Rockies moneyline
This is a pitching mismatch based on Cactus League results.
Colorado Rockies SP Kyle Freeland has bounced back nicely from a dismal 2025, authoring a 1.80 ERA through five innings this spring. He was last seen blanking the Chicago Cubs over three frames.
Cole Ragans counters for the Kansas City Royals, and he enters play with a monstrous 8.44 ERA. He's surrendered 14 hits over 10 2/3 innings, and has allowed at least two ER in three straight appearances.
The Padres also have the better of the two starters going for them today in Randy Vasquez. He's pitched to a 4.15 ERA so far, fanning 11 batters over 8 2/3 innings.
Meanwhile, Robert Gasser totes a 9.95 ERA into this one. He's allowed three homers in just 5 1/3 innings of work.
Pick #3: White Sox moneyline
The Chicago White Sox are on the long end of what's arguably the biggest starting pitching mismatch of the day, yet they are underdogs. Sign me up.
Ryan Borucki rocks a 2-0 record with a spotless ERA. He's allowed only four hits and a walk while striking out five batters over four frames.
Cincinnati Reds SP Andrew Abbott looks ready for regression after an incredible 2025 campaign. He's 1-3 with a 13.85 ERA in Cactus League action, allowing 18 ER over 11 frames.
Odds are correct at the time of publishing and are subject to change. Not intended for use in MA. Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.
GLENDALE, ARIZONA - MARCH 16: Will Klein #61 of the Los Angeles Dodgers participates in a fielding drill prior to a Spring Training game against the Milwaukee Brewers at Camelback Ranch on March 16, 2026 in Glendale, Arizona. (Photo by Brandon Sloter/Getty Images) | Getty Images
The Dodgers finish up the Arizona portion of their spring training by hosting the A’s on getaway day Saturday at Camelback Ranch.
Lineup
Alex Call LF Santiago Espinal 1B Dalton Rushing C Alex Freeland 2B Nick Senzel 3B Hyeseong Kim SS Jack Suwinski RF Jaron Elkins CF Kellon Lindsey DH
Elkins (wearing uniform number 88) and Lindsey (89) are up from minor league camp. It’s the first game this spring for Lindsey, the Dodgers’ first-round draft pick in 2024.
Emmet Sheehan starts on the mound.
Other pitchers
Will Klein is also scheduled to pitch on Saturday.
Up from minor league camp are Jerming Rosario (81), Matt Lanzendorfer (87), Christian Suárez (90), Dilan Figueredo (91), Javier Bartolozzi (92), Jacob Frost (94), and Keynan Middleton (98).
Other position players
Non-roster catchers Eliézer Alfonzo and Seby Zavala are active.
Up from minor league camp are infielders Jake Gelof (93), Joe Vetrano (95), Jose Izarra (00), Sean McLain (01), and Austin Gauthier (03), plus outfielders Kole Myers (02), Damon Keith (05), and Samuel Muñoz (06).
The Phoenix Suns have dropped four straight games, but they’ll look to get back on track when they host the banged-up Milwaukee Bucks on Saturday.
Devin Booker has been scoring at an elite rate, and my Bucks vs. Suns predictions expect a strong performance from the franchise cornerstone in a comfortable win.
Here are my best free NBA picks for this late-night matchup on Saturday, March 21.
Bucks vs Suns prediction
Bucks vs Suns best bet: Devin Booker Over 27.5 points (-120)
Over his last 10 games, Devin Booker has averaged 30.3 points. In that span, he scored 28+ six times and finished with 27 twice more. He provided 27 points against the Milwaukee Bucks on March 10.
Milwaukee’s defense has been dreadful over the last 10 games, surrendering the fifth-most points (120.5), most three-pointers (16.9) and third-highest three-point percentage (39%), while sporting the 29th-ranked defensive rating (123.3).
Booker should be motivated to get his team back on track after four straight losses, and I expect him to take advantage of this highly-favorable matchup at home.
Bucks vs Suns same-game parlay
The Phoenix Suns are back home after a six-game road trip, and they'll be fired up after losing to the San Antonio Spurs on a Victor Wembanyama buzzer-beater in their last game out.
Phoenix won 129-114 against the Milwaukee Bucks at Fiserv Forum, and they can cover Saturday's big spread against an opponent missing its superstar forward and a number of key role players.
The Suns should have no problem finding their groove offensively. Even if the Bucks have trouble scoring, Phoenix should put up more than enough points to nudge this line to the Over.
Milwaukee's 29th-ranked defense will have no answers for Devin Booker, Jalen Green and Co.
Bucks vs Suns SGP
Devin Booker Over 27.5 points
Suns -11.5
Over 219.5
Our "from downtown" SGP: Suns shine bright
Jalen Green has averaged 23.9 points across his last eight games. After scoring 23+ in five straight, he’s gone Under that point total in each of his last three games. He scored 25 against the Bucks on March 10, and I look for him to get back on track in the scoring department.
Collin Gillespie has hit the Over on this combo line in two straight and five of his last eight. He posted 30 PRA in his first matchup with the Bucks.
Oso Ighodaro will get another starting nod with Mark Williams sidelined. He’s gone for at least 22 PRA in two straight and four of his last 10.
Bucks vs Suns SGP
Devin Booker Over 27.5 points
Jalen Green Over 22.5 points
Collin Gillespie Over 22.5 points + rebounds + assists
Oso Ighodaro Over 21.5 points + rebounds + assists
Over/Under: Over 219.5 (-110) | Under 219.5 (-110)
Bucks vs Suns betting trend to know
The Phoenix Suns have covered the 3Q Spread in 26 of their last 40 games (+9.55 Units / 20% ROI). Find more NBA betting trends for Bucks vs. Suns.
How to watch Bucks vs Suns
Location
Mortgage Matchup Center, Phoenix, AZ
Date
Saturday, March 21, 2026
Tip-off
10:00 p.m. ET
TV
FDSN-WI, KTVK, KPHE
Bucks vs Suns latest injuries
Not intended for use in MA. Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.
The Pittsburgh Pirates are at home today against the Toronto Blue Jays looking to grab a win in Spring Training.
Please remember our Game Day thread guidelines.
Don’t troll in your comments; create conversation rather than destroying it
Remember Bucs Dugout is basically a non-profanity site
Out of respect to broadcast partners who have paid to carry the game, no mentions of “alternative” (read: illegal) viewing methods are allowed in our threads
The commenting system was updated during the summer. They’re still working on optimizing it for Game Day Threads like ours. If you don’t like clicking “Load More Comments”, remember that the “Z” key can be your friend. It loads up the latest comments automatically.
BD community, this is your thread for today’s game. Enjoy!
NORTH PORT, FL - MARCH 14: Fans sit in the sun in the outfield during the spring training game between the Boston Red Sox and the Atlanta Braves on March 14, 2026 at CoolToday Park in North Port, FL. (Photo by Jeff Robinson/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images) | Icon Sportswire via Getty Images
The Braves have one of their final tune-ups of spring against the Red Sox and they are facing Garrett Crochet, who has had a fairly unimpressive spring. Still, the star pitcher who the Braves reportedly were interested in trading for should be a good test for the Braves’ bats.
First pitch is scheduled for 1:05 p.m. ET and the game will be available on Gray TV in-market and 680AM/93.7FM on the radio. Elsewhere, it will be available on MLBTV.
Feb 18, 2026; Port St. Lucie, FL, USA; New York Mets pitcher Jonah Tong (21) throws a pitch during spring training workouts at Clover Park. Mandatory Credit: Reinhold Matay-Imagn Images | Reinhold Matay-Imagn Images
Mets at Nationals
Mets lineup
Carson Benge – RF
Mark Vientos – 1B
Jared Young – DH
Luis Torrens – C
Tyrone Taylor – LF
Vidal Brujan – 2B
Jacob Reimer – 3B
Cristian Pache – CF
Yonny Hernandez – SS
SP: Joander Suarez – RHP
Nationals lineup
Nasim Nunez – 2B
Jose Tena – 3B
Keibert Ruiz – C
Luis Garcia – 1B
Andres Chaparro – DH
Joey Wiemer – CF
Christian Franklin – RF
Seaver King – SS
Sam Petersen – LF
SP: Cade Cavalli – RHP
Broadcast info
First pitch: 1:05 PM EDT TV: Nope Radio: Not this time
Mets vs Astros
Mets lineup
Francisco Lindor – SS
Juan Soto – LF
Bo Bichette – DH
Jorge Polanco – 1B
Luis Robert – CF
Brett Baty – 3B
Marcus Semien – 2B
Mike Tauchman – RF
Francisco Alvarez – C
SP: Jonah Tong – RHP
Astros lineup
Joey Loperfido – LF
Isaac Paredes – 2B
Cam Smith – RF
Zach Cole – CF
Christian Walker – 1B
Yainer Diaz – C
Cavan Biggio – DH
Riley Unroe – 3B
Nick Allen – SS
SP: Mike Burrows – RHP
Broadcast info
First pitch: 1:10 PM EDT TV: PIX 11 Radio: Audacy Mets Radio WHSQ 880AM, Audacy App 92.3 HD2
PORT CHARLOTTE, FLORIDA - MARCH 15, 2026: Manager Kevin Cash #16 of the Tampa Bay Rays makes a pitching change during the fourth inning of a spring training game against the Pittsburgh Pirates at Charlotte Sports Park on March 15, 2026 in Port Charlotte, Florida. (Photo by Nick Cammett/Diamond Images via Getty Images) | Diamond Images/Getty Images
First pitch against the Minnesota Twins is at 1:05 at Charlotte Sports Park and the Rays will be providing tv and radio coverage.
1986(1) vs 2010 (8) G1: 2-0, ’10 G2: 3-1, ’86 G3: 6-3, ’86 G4: 6-4, ’86 Series MVP: Ray Knight
Ray Knight’s MVP streak continues, as the veteran third baseman hit two more clutch homers and drove in five runs to propel the 1986 Mets to another series victory. For a second consecutive round, the heavily favored ’86 team unexpectedly dropped a game early. 2010’s sole win was a shutout, with Johan Santana tossing seven innings and Francisco Rodríguez throwing the final two while back-to-back solo homers from Jason Bay and Henry Blanco in the eighth accounted for all the scoring. From that point on, ’86 found their stride, getting a pair of incredible pitching performances from Ron Darling (8.0 IP, 1 ER) and Bob Ojeda (7.0 IP, 1 ER) in Games 2 and 3, respectively. Rookie Ike Davis hit an early homer to give ’10 a lead in Game 4, but a three-run homer from Knight helped ’86 snatch a lead they would not relinquish. Blanco nearly hit his second homer of the game (and third of the series) in the ninth inning, but Mookie Wilson made an incredible catch just in front of the left-field fence to prevent further trouble.
2009 (12) vs 1983 (13) G1: 5-4, ’09 G2: 17-6, ’83 G3: 10-6, ’83 G4: 6-5, ’09 G5: 7-0, ’09 Series MVP: Johan Santana
When the 1983 Mets won in this series, they won big. Their lineup exploded for 17 runs on 18 hits in Game 2, scoring 14 of those runs in the first three innings (it was not John Maine’s day). In Game 3, they put up another double-digit performance aided by homers from George Foster and rookie Darryl Strawberry (who finished the series with four homers and 11 RBI). But even if their margins were less impressive, the ’09 team won a pair of hard-fought battles. In Game 1, after a Strawberry homer off submariner Pedro Feliciano gave ’83 a 4-3 lead, the ’09 team capitalized on a Wally Backman error to rally, eventually winning on a Daniel Murphy walk-off single flared down the left-field line. In Game 4, a late Strawberry homer was once again overcome, this time with the help of a ninth-inning wild pitch that allowed José Reyes to score the go-ahead run before Francisco Rodríguez slammed the door in the bottom of the frame. When Game 5 arrived, ace Johan Santana was up to the task, tossing eight innings of shutout ball and propelling the inaugural Citi squad to the sweet sixteen. Even if this is likely their last hurrah in Mets Madness (the fearsome 1986 Mets loom in the next round), they’ve certainly had a tournament to be proud of thus far.
2024 (3) vs 1968 (11) G1: 6-0, ’24 G2: 7-0, ’68 G3: 14-5, ’24 G4: 5-3, ’68 (f/11) G5: 4-2, ’68 Series MVP: Ron Swoboda
I will admit…even I, the theoretically unbiased tournament simulator, couldn’t help but wish for a redo after seeing the beloved ’24 team get blindsided by the 1968 Mets — especially when the “OMG” magic appeared alive as ever. In Game 1, ’24 scored five runs off Tom Seaver (with a Jose Iglesias homer to boot) before Francisco Lindor took Nolan Ryan deep. What could be a sign of Grimace’s presence more than that? Though they were left flailing in Game 2 against Jerry Koosman, who tossed a complete-game shutout with 11 K’s, Game 3 was a joyous rout, with ’24 clubbing six homers (two from Mark Vientos, two from Iglesias, one from Francisco Alvarez, and one from Brandon Nimmo) before Edwin Díaz struck out five of six batters faced. Game 4 was the kind of tense marathon that ’24 thrived in, except this time it was the other dugout that came away celebrating. The score was knotted at 3-3 from the fifth inning until the eleventh, with each team’s bullpen proving impervious, until Ron Swoboda slapped a two-run homer off José Buttó to force a winner-take-all elimination game. Were anyone else on the mound, perhaps ’24’s offense would be able to rally…but there’s only one Seaver. An Ed Charles homer gave ’68 late insurance, and the team of destiny was eliminated. You could say that ’24 embarrassingly underperformed in this round, but that’s insulting to the ’68 Mets, who have a clear formula for success moving forward. Seaver and Koosman pitched two gems. They won both of them. And they do, after all, represent “The Year of the Pitcher.”
1973 (2) vs 2002(10) G1: 7-1, ’73 G2: 4-3, ’02 G3: 6-3, ’02 G4: 5-4, ’02 Series MVP: Mo Vaughn
Game 1 gave the “Ya Gotta Believe” Mets every reason to believe this series would go as planned. The 1973 N.L. Champs tallied seven runs and twelve hits, while Tom Seaver appeared destined for a vintage shutout until Jeromy Burnitz hit a relatively meaningless one-out homer to left field in the ninth (there’s just something about left-handed hitters batting with one out in the ninth that seem to put a crimp in Seaver’s plans). Game 2 was closer, with the 2002 squad getting a phenomenal outing from Steve Trachsel, but the ’73 Mets still held a 3-2 lead entering the top of the ninth. That’s when the pivotal momentum change occurred. With Tug McGraw on the mound, Mo Vaughn and Mike Piazza led off the top of the ninth with back-to-back homers, and Armando Benítez slammed the door to give ’02 a shocking win. ’73 never truly recovered, with Vaughn hitting another homer and Timo Pérez hitting a clutch go-ahead single in the eighth to give ’02 a Game 3 win. ’73 found themselves down 3-2 in the eighth in Game 5, when Ron Hodges was spared a borderline strikeout call on a check swing and promptly hit a two-run single on the next pitch. But before ’73 could blink, outfielder Brady Clark (who played just 17 games with the Mets spread strangely across 2002 and 2008) hit a two-run homer off McGraw. While the Mets’ iconic lefty closer stumbled, Benítez was unhittable, tossing 3 1/3 innings of scoreless ball and inducing a Rusty Staub flyout to secure an upset series win.
QUADRANT 2
1969(1) vs 2018 (9) G1: 7-3, ’69 G2: 6-4, ’69 G3: 5-4, ’18 G4: 3-1, ’69 Series MVP: Jerry Koosman
This Series MVP award could have been given to a number of deserving candidates. It could have gone to Cleon Jones, who hit a two-run homer off Cy Young Award winner Jacob deGrom in the seventh inning of Game 1…and then hit a two-run homer off him again the next inning. It could have gone to Don Cardwell, the veteran of the 1969 starting staff who may very well have turned in its best performance with eight innings of one-run ball in the clinching Game 4. But it ends up with Jerry Koosman, who in Game 2 battled to throw 7.1 innings while allowing just two runs without his best stuff (he allowed ten hits and walked five) and helped his cause by hitting a go-ahead, two-run home run off Noah Syndergaard in the seventh inning. Talk about miracles. Koosman only had two career home runs in real life, which came against Bill Hands and John Montefusco (who, according to baseball-reference.com, are nicknamed “Froggy” and “The Count,” respectively). With Thor added to the mix, I think it’s safe to say that Koosman has a penchant for homering off those with striking alter-egos. If this all feels like too light-hearted of a tangent for Mets Madness, I’d argue it matches the way the ’69 Mets have played thus far: they’re having fun, they’re feeling confident, and they’re letting the good times of the ’69 postseason roll on.
1997 (4) vs 2017 (12) G1: 7-1, ’17 G2: 7-2, ’17 G3: 7-5, ’17 Series MVP: Yoenis Céspedes
Forget about winning back-to-back series as the underdog — the 2017 Mets have won every single game they’ve played thus far. They aren’t just being carried by one facet of their roster either; this series was a full-team effort, with stellar starting pitching (a Syndergaard complete-game performance followed up by eight innings and no earned runs from Jacob deGrom) and a deep lineup powered by Yoenis Céspedes, Brandon Nimmo, and Juan Lagares. Losing to this apparent surprise juggernaut must have been quite frustrating for the 1997 Mets, who entered this series coming off a first-round sweep of their own. It was so frustrating, in fact, that something happened which I didn’t even know was possible in OOTP: a benches-clearing incident. After Zack Wheeler plunked Butch Huskey and Carl Everett in consecutive at-bats during the fifth inning of Game 3, Everett allowed the frustration to boil over by — according to the play-by-play info — charging the mound. It can’t possibly have been intentional, as both hit batsmen brought a run home in a tight game. Plus, I can’t quite see Zack Wheeler being the type to go Hunter Strickland-mode in a game with these kinds of stakes. But hey, why not? It’s “Mets Madness,” not “Mets Let Cooler Heads Prevail.” I have no idea whether warnings were issued by the umpires, but I do know that the ’17 Mets have issued a warning to the rest of the tournament with their six-game win streak. They were a team with lofty expectations, plagued by injury issues…were they secretly destined for greatness after all?
20-year-old Cy Young Award winner Dwight Gooden went on quite the hero’s journey in this series. He started it by facing off against Tom Seaver (a matchup which, up until now, hadn’t happened yet in Mets Madness), and being outlasted. Gooden was good, allowing just three runs on solo shots from John Milner and Joe Torre and an RBI single from Milner; but Seaver was spectacular, tossing eight innings of scoreless ball. When Gooden and Seaver matched up again in the winner-take-all Game 5, it was Gooden’s time to shine, throwing eight scoreless innings himself and securing a series win for the 1985 Mets. Still, it was Ron Darling who delivered ’85’s best individual start, throwing a complete-game shutout in Game 2. Offensively, ’85 took their cue from Gary Carter, who had a three-hit Game 3 and delivered a two-run double in the left-center-field gap to blow Game 5 open. This series also featured two critical outfield assists. In the eighth inning of Game 1, center fielder Pepe Mangual gunned down George Foster at the plate as ’85 tried desperately to break through against Seaver. In the ninth inning of Game 2, Mangual ambitiously tried to tag at second base on a flyout (despite being the lead runner while his team trailed by two) and was gunned down at third by Darryl Strawberry. If you can hear Keith Hernandez’s voice criticizing that decision in your mind, just know that Mangual probably heard it too from the other side of the diamond.
The 1988 Mets continue to cruise through their corner of the bracket, this time riding an eight-RBI display from MVP runner-up Darryl Strawberry, who homered in Games 2 and 4. Strawberry also got ’88’s most pivotal hit: a two-out, two-run triple while trailing 5-4 in the bottom of the eighth inning of Game 2. The hit energized the team enough that Keith Hernandez promptly followed it with a two-run homer, robbing the 1971 Mets of what they hoped would be a series-evening win. The ’71 Mets did muster a victory in Game 3, getting a quality start from Roy Sadecki and scoreless relief from Buzz Capra and Danny Frisella. But Sid Fernandez shut the door in Game 4, and the heavily-favored ’88 Mets waltz on to the sweet sixteen. Plus, for all the attention on aces like Seaver, Gooden, and deGrom, 1988 David Cone might be having the single best tournament of any pitcher so far; with eight innings of one-run ball in the previous round and 8.1 scoreless innings in this one, albeit both against rather soft-hitting lineups, he’s proving he can go toe-to-toe with the best in Mets history.
QUADRANT 3
2000 (1) vs 2011(8) G1: 7-2, ’11 G2: 5-1, ’00 G3: 6-5, ’11 G4: 9-6, ’11 Series MVP: Nick Evans
This felt like one of those postseason series where a wild card team goes up against a division winner, and the latter just looks flat-out flat. The 2000 team’s offense was scoring runs, but it wasn’t quite beating up on the 2011 rotation which — aside from R.A. Dickey, who threw a two-run complete game in Game 1 — ought to have been more vulnerable. Meanwhile, the ’00 pitching staff seemed to have no answers for David Wright and batting champ José Reyes. The only ’00 win came in Game 2, when Mike Piazza hit a go-ahead homer, Darryl Hamilton went 3-for-4, and Al Leiter tossed 7.2 innings of one-run ball. Game 3 got off to a thunderous start with a five-run inning for ’00 (Rick Reed hit a bases-clearing double), but a Lucas Duda three-run homer and epic Nick Evans two-run wallscraper off John Franco gave the ’11 Mets a stunning comeback victory while the ’00 lineup complacently went quiet. Game 4 was a slugfest. The 2000 team got a pair of homers (courtesy of Robin Ventura and Edgardo Alfonzo) and scored consistently throughout, but ’11 was putting on a Home Run Derby, with Josh Thole, Wright, Daniel Murphy, and Jason Bay each going deep. The 2000 Mets may have won two series in the postseason, but they are going home after just one in Mets Madness.
1990 (4) vs 1974(12) G1: 3-2, ’90 G2: 4-2, ’74 G3: 3-1, ’74 G4: 11-1, ’74 Series MVP: George Stone
You’d think that the 1990 Mets would have an advantage here given that their end-of-season manager, Bud Harrelson, played shortstop for the opposing team. You at least think he’d have the scouting report on himself, yet Harrelson still managed to hit .312 in the series. Meanwhile, 1974’s manager Yogi Berra blew Game 1 by inexplicably leaving a tired Jerry Koosman on the mound for the ninth, when he hit a batter, walked two in a row, and finally walked Mark Carreon to allow the winning run to carry on home. But from then on, ’74 was in complete control. David Cone and Tom Seaver were both working without their best stuff in Game 2, but the more experienced Seaver was able to evade trouble, allowing only two runs while surrendering ten hits. In Game 3, Jerry Koosman tossed a four-hit complete game. And in Game 4, any hope ’90 had was turned to stone by left-hander George Stone, who tossed 6.1 innings of one-run ball while also clobbering a two-run homer to make the game a proper rout.
1987 (3) vs 2019(6) G1: 7-6, ’87 G2: 3-1, ’87 G3: 6-5, ’19 G4: 3-2, ’19 G5: 7-1, ’19 Series MVP: Pete Alonso
Of all the upsets in this round, this one felt the least surprising. That’s partially because these two teams have a less significant gap in seeding, but it’s also because the 2019 Mets possess about as much fight as a non-playoff team can have. That showed in this series, with ’19 finding themselves on the brink of elimination before winning three straight against the 1987 Mets. Jacob deGrom and Dwight Gooden both faltered in Game 1, with deGrom getting chased out early and Gooden proving vulnerable as he tired late, but ’87 held on despite a 7-2 lead turning to 7-6. In Game 2, Sid Fernandez (8.0 IP, 1 ER) outdueled Zack Wheeler (8.0 IP, 3 ER), who was tagged with the loss despite making just a pair of bad pitches which Howard Johnson and Darryl Strawberry hit out of the park. With a sweep in their sights, ’87 went up 4-0 on shoddy defensive play in Game 3, but that’s when Pete Alonso and his “LFGM” resilience kicked in. Alonso hit a seventh-inning homer which ignited an electric rally as a Jeff McNeil two-run double and Brandon Nimmo homer helped secure the win. In Game 4, ’19 once again trailed in the bottom of the seventh when Alonso dunked a two-out, two-strike RBI single into left field (shoutout as well to Michael Conforto, who gunned down Lee Mazzilli at third base to end the top of the ninth inning). In Game 5, they didn’t wait to attempt another late comeback, instead seizing an early lead on a McNeil triple and Alonso two-run homer off Gooden. The ’87 Mets have nothing to regret, and they did their best to fend off a rally-happy opponent (especially Lenny Dykstra, who multiple times made stellar plays in center field only to soon see ’19 score anyway). As for the ’19 team, their next opponent will be the toughest yet…
2006 (2)vs 2021 (10) G1: 8-5, ’06 G2: 4-3, ’06 G3: 8-1, ’06 Series MVP: José Valentín
This series began with the baseball equivalent of an unstoppable force meeting an immovable object in the 2006 lineup facing 2021 Jacob deGrom (that was the year he had a 1.08 ERA in 15 starts). The ’06 offense did damage against deGrom, with José Valentín hitting a homer and Carlos Beltrán hitting two, but that alone wasn’t enough to win them the game. Billy Wagner came on for the save in the top of the ninth and was first greeted by Pete Alonso, who absolutely demolished a 455-foot, 114.4-mph homer to left-center field to tie the game. It was an epic moment for the Mets’ all-time home run king, though he was promptly one-upped by a Paul Lo Duca opposite-field, three-run homer off Edwin Díaz in the bottom of the frame to give the ’06 Mets a patented walk-off win. Alonso would hit another homer off Tom Glavine in the first inning of Game 2, but was once again thwarted by Shawn Green and Valentín’s back-to-back homers in the next inning. A Brandon Nimmo two-run homer in the top of the eighth tied the game at 3-3, but David Wright responded with a go-ahead RBI double, and Wagner redeemed himself with a clean 1-2-3 ninth inning. Game 3 showed just how much of a mismatch this series was, with the ’06 Mets scoring four runs before making two outs. ’21’s only hope was to win their opening deGrom game and steal momentum. It’s hard to imagine the ’06 powerhouse being taken down except by a rotation three or four aces deep — especially when a middle-of-the-order bat like José Valentín is slashing .455/.538/1.273 with three homers (five total now in the tournament).
QUADRANT 4
2015 (1) vs 2001(8) G1: 6-2, ’01 G2: 5-3, ’15 G3: 7-0, ’01 G4: 4-3, ’01 Series MVP: Robin Ventura
Much like in the 2015 World Series, the 2015 Mets led the majority of their losses in the late innings. In Game 1, Matt Harvey threw six scoreless while RBI singles from Wilmer Flores and Juan Lagares gave ’15 a 2-1 lead, but the bullpen imploded. Addison Reed surrendered a game-tying solo homer to Edgardo Alfonzo in the eighth, and the 2001 team tacked on four more off Jeurys Familia in the ninth. Game 2 was the N.L. Champs’ only win, with Jacob deGrom providing a dominant outing before a Curtis Granderson homer and RBI doubles from Daniel Murphy and Travis d’Arnaud helped ’15 take the lead in the eighth. In Game 3, Steve Trachsel rained on the parade with 7.2 scoreless innings while the ’01 lineup rained hit after hit upon the norse god Noah Syndergaard. In the deciding Game 4, homers from d’Arnaud and Muprhy gave ’15 a 3-0 lead by the sixth, but Steven Matz suffered a blowup inning — often his Achilles’ heel in New York — and ’01 was suddenly ahead 4-3. That was all they would need. Lucas Duda gave one a ride to the warning track in left off Armando Benítez with two outs in the ninth, but it settled into the glove of Benny Agbayani to eliminate another one-seed. Credit where credit is due: ’01’s big bats came through. Mike Piazza, Edgardo Alfonzo, and Robin Ventura (.538 average) put a hurt on ’15’s vulnerable bullpen, and they’re living to fight another day because of it.
1984 (4) vs 2004(12) G1: 2-1, ’04 G2: 7-3, ’04 G3: 8-5, ’84 G4: 5-2, ’04 Series MVP: Mike Cameron
2004’s starting pitching staff, take a bow. For a second consecutive series, ’04 managed to upset a more formidable 1980’s team on the back of their starting rotation, this time getting particularly notable outings from Tom Glavine (eight innings of one-run ball in Game 1) and Jae-Weong Seo (seven innings of three-run ball in Game 2). It’s also the second consecutive Series MVP award for Mike Cameron, a two-time Gold Glove Award winner who delivered perhaps the most highlight-worthy defensive play in Mets Madness thus far. In Game 4, the ’04 Mets clung to a three-run lead with the bases loaded and two outs in the bottom of the ninth. Wally Backman hit a bullet to center off rookie Heath Bell, which Cameron broke in and made a diving catch on to end the series. Offensively, ’04 received particularly strong showings from rookies David Wright (game-tying homer in Game 3) and Kaz Matsui (go-ahead single in Game 2), as well as Cliff Floyd, who hit a tone-setting two-run homer in the first inning of Game 4. If you’re wondering what the ’04 team has going for them as they continue to surprise in the tournament, consider this: perhaps no other team has the number of iconic Mets leaders (Wright, Mike Piazza, John Franco, Al Leiter, etc.) that they do. If there’s one team that can handle the pressure of future rounds against favored opponents, perhaps it’s them.
2013(11) vs 1977 (14) G1: 1-0, ’77 G2: 1-0, ’13 (f/10) G3: 3-2, ’13 (f/12) G4: 8-3, ’13 Series MVP: Ike Davis
In the first 31 innings of this series, seven total runs were scored. In Game 1, the 2013 team somewhat characteristically managed to lose despite getting eight spectacular innings from Matt Harvey, who was throwing a no-hitter until the seventh and allowed only an unearned run (kudos to Jerry Koosman as well for seven scoreless innings). In Game 2, Jon Matlack met the same fate for the 1977 squad, as the left-hander tossed 8.1 scoreless innings but was matched by ’13’s southpaw starter Jon Niese. The game mercilessly came to an end when David Wright dunked an RBI single just in front of Lee Mazzilli in center in the bottom of the tenth inning, allowing Eric Young Jr. to dash home. Game 3’s score was stuck at 1-1 until the eleventh, when Lucas Duda hit a solo homer and Bud Harrelson responded with an RBI single to send us to the twelfth. A Daniel Murphy RBI double finally did the trick, and 37-year-old Scott Atchison was able to nail down the save. Then, we got the eleven-run offensive explosion that was Game 4, thanks to this series’ MVP by default: Ike Davis, who hit two homers to help ’13 secure a comfortable final win. Relative to this series’ run environment, that basically makes him Barry Bonds.
I ended the entry for 1999’s win in the prior round by writing that their lineup “put the rest of the tournament on notice.” How do you make good on that warning? You immediately tag Tom Seaver for 7 runs and 12 hits in just 4 innings. That being said, this wasn’t a walk in the park for the ’99 team. Jerry Koosman gave them fits early in Game 2, but the lineup bore him down and crept back from down 4-1 with the help of a Robin Ventura homer and later go-ahead sac fly. Game 3 was one of the most enthralling back-and-forth battles of this round, with Tommie Agee and Mike Piazza trading homers early, ’70 taking advantage of sloppy defensive play by ’99, Edgardo Alfonzo hitting what at one point seemed a decisive homer off lefty Rich Folkers, and Cleon Jones slamming into the left-field fence to preserve the tie in the top of the eleventh. Minutes later, Joe Foy foiled ’99’s hopes of a sweep with a walk-off, seeing-eye single through the right side. But despite ’70 stealing another win in Game 4 by scrapping together a few runs off right-hander Dennis Cook, ’99 ended this series by reminding us who they really are with another absurd offensive display. 15 runs. 13 hits. Another homer from Ventura and…an 8-RBI game from Roger Cedeño? I’ll say it again: the rest of the tournament is on notice.
Italian tumbles over guardrail down Cipressa climb
Tadej Pogacar pips Tom Pidcock in men’s race
The Italian cyclist Debora Silvestri was taken to a hospital after a horrific-looking crash during the Milano-Sanremo one-day classic on Saturday. Several cyclists were caught up in the incident, with Silvestri tumbling over a guardrail as riders tried to avoid the pileup.
Silvestri’s team, Laboral Kutxa, said the 27-year-old was conscious as she was transported and that it would give an update on her condition later. The incident happened on the descent of the famous Cipressa climb, less than 20km (12 miles) from the end of the 156km route.
We’ve got 11 games on the NHL betting slate tonight, including a cross-conference clash between the Edmonton Oilers and the Tampa Bay Lightning.
Evan Bouchard’s offensive instincts are off the charts, and it’s resulted in a heavy shot volume lately. My Lightning vs. Oilers predictions expect that trend to continue tonight against Tampa.
Find out more with my free NHL picks for Saturday, March 21.
Lightning vs Oilers prediction
Lightning vs Oilers best bet: Evan Bouchard Over 2.5 shots on goal (-125)
The Edmonton Oilers are struggling to score, but are averaging 31.6 shots on goal per game over their last five games.
Evan Bouchard is the team leader in shots during this stretch, with 17 in his last five games, averaging 3.5 shots per game.
Bouchard's posted total tonight is set at 2.5, a number he’s eclipsed in five of his last six games.
Additionally, the Oilers blueliner has averaged 3.4 shots on net in his five career meetings against the Tampa Bay Lightning.
The Bolts are a plus matchup for defensemen, allowing 7.79 shots per game to the position.
Lightning vs Oilers same-game parlay
Bouchard leads all NHL defensemen with 78 points, 59 of them counting as assists. He’s also registered 1+ assists in 10 of his last 13 games.
Nikita Kucherov has 12 multi-point performances in his last 20 games, averaging 2.2 points per game in that stretch.
Lightning vs Oilers SGP
Evan Bouchard Over 2.5 shots on goal
Evan Bouchard Over 0.5 assists
Nikita Kucherov Over 1.5 points
Lightning vs Oilers odds
Moneyline: Lightning -140 | Oilers +120
Puck Line: Lightning -1.5 | Oilers +1.5
Over/Under: Over 6.5 | Under 6.5
Lightning vs Oilers trend
The Oilers have hit the 1P Over in 14 of their last 20 games (+7.35 Units / 24% ROI). Find more NHL betting trends for Lightning vs. Oilers.
How to watch Lightning vs Oilers
Location
Rogers Place, Edmonton, AB
Date
Saturday, March 21, 2026
Puck drop
10:00 p.m. ET
TV
CBC
Lightning vs Oilers latest injuries
Odds are correct at the time of publishing and are subject to change. Not intended for use in MA. Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.