Brusdar Graterol expected to miss Opening Day while recovering from shoulder surgery

Dodgers reliever Brusdar Graterol

PHOENIX — Brusdar Graterol’s return to the mound will have to wait a little longer.

After missing all of last season recovering from a shoulder surgery, the hard-throwing Dodgers reliever is not expected to be ready for Opening Day this year, manager Dave Roberts said Wednesday.

Though Graterol came into spring training hopeful of returning for the start of the new season, Roberts said the right-hander will be on a slower progression as he ramps up in the coming weeks, after he struggled to dial up his velocity in some early throwing session in camp.

Los Angeles Dodger Pitcher Nick Frasso (79) walks with pitcher Brusdar Graterol (48) during Los Angeles Dodger workouts at Camelback Ranch in Glendale, Arizona. Arianna Grainey-Imagn Images

“With Brusdar, he’s shown that we can count on him when he’s needed in the biggest of spots,” Roberts said. “We just got to get him back up to that velocity. It’s an intentionally slow build-up.”

Graterol — who has a 2.78 career ERA — becomes the Dodgers’ latest right-handed reliever expected to be sidelined at the beginning of the year.


Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters

California Post News: Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, YouTube, WhatsApp, LinkedIn
California Post SportsFacebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X
California Post Opinion
California Post Newsletters: Sign up here!
California Post App: Download here!
Home delivery: Sign up here!Page Six Hollywood: Sign up here!


Brock Stewart is still working his way back from a shoulder surgery he underwent in September. Evan Phillips isn’t expected back until midseason as he completes his recovery from last year’s Tommy John surgery.

Their absences could create opportunities for younger right-handers including Will Klein and Edgardo Henriquez, who are trying to parlay their success in last year’s playoffs into more permanent roles in the team’s big-league bullpen.

Five biggest things to watch as NBA resumes for sprint to finish

LeBron James said, "We've gotten past the marathon and the sprint is about to start."

We're not sprinting yet. To keep with LeBron's marathon analogy, there's about 8.5 miles left in the race of the NBA season — still a ways to go, right about when people start running into the wall, but the end (and that sprint) is in sight.

What are the five biggest things to watch, the five biggest story lines as we get ready for that sprint to the end of the season? Let's break it down.

Tanking

When Adam Silver was first asked about tanking during his All-Star Saturday press conference, he proceeded to give a four-and-a-half-minute, circular, almost rambling statement that boiled down to this: He doesn't think it is what fans want, he understands why the analytics tell teams to tank (and some fans root for their team to lose, "the worst place to be, for example, is to be a middle-of-the-road team"), and that the league is looking at things it can do to limit tanking in the future.

Then Silver got to the real issue: This year is a perfect storm that makes things worse. This year's draft is considered particularly deep, with at least three potential franchise cornerstone players at the top (and potential All-Stars through the top eight or nine), and the next couple of drafts are seen as down years. Teams are focused on tanking this season because the rewards are higher.

The reality is that there is only so much the league can do — in basketball, landing one elite player changes a franchise. Despite what seemingly every other Reddit NBA post says, there are no easy answers here, every "solution" creates a different problem. It comes down to this: Landing Cooper Flagg or Cade Cunningham or Anthony Edwards or Victor Wembanyama can turn a franchise around, so it is worth the risk (and some fines) to improve draft positioning.

Just ask Mark Cuban.

Nine teams are more focused on maximizing their draft odds and landing one of those top players than winning games the rest of this season (Milwaukee would have made 10, but Giannis Antetokounmpo is coming back and looking to win games). That's 30% of the league. To be clear, the players on the court will play hard and try to win, this is a front office call. Meaning the higher-level players who can help those teams win games will see limited court time. If any.

It's going to lead to some ugly games the rest of the season, either blowouts when a team that cares faces these squads, or fans will be paying NBA prices to witness essentially a G League game when these tanking teams meet. It's only going to get worse in the coming weeks.

Silver will fine more teams, the league will institute some new rules in the offseason, but it will ultimately change little. As Silver said, the "incentives are misaligned" because getting one elite player changes everything, and the risk is worth it.

James Harden in Cleveland

Cleveland got better at the trade deadline, bringing in James Harden. The question is how much better?

How about No. 2 seed in the East better? Maybe NBA Finals better.

Cleveland sits as the No. 4 seed in the East, just 1.5 games back of No. 2 Boston, and the Cavaliers have the fifth-easiest remaining schedule in the league (and noticeably easier than any team above them), according to the Elias Sports Bureau. Yahoo Sports' Tom Haberstroh did the math and said that 13 of the Cavaliers remaining 28 games are against tanking teams (only the Warriors and Magic have more).

Harden brings a lot of positives to Cleveland. He is a pick-and-roll master, and that has helped Jarrett Allen — a proven pick-and-roll big — thrive since the trade. Plus, late in games, it has opened up opportunities for Donovan Mitchell. Rather than Mitchell having to create against a set defense, Harden can initiate the offense, get the defense in rotation, then swing it to Mitchell to finish the play (not unlike what Darius Garland could do when healthy last season for Cleveland). Plus — and this is an odd thing to say — Harden could be better for the Cavaliers' defense. Opponents targeted the 6'1" Garland, forcing switches into mismatches; Harden is no elite defender, but he's 6'5", has great hands, and is stout and can't be backed down easily.

Will Harden on the Cavaliers work in the playoffs, especially the second round and beyond? That's the big question. Considering his track record of duds, not to mention Cleveland's history, there's still a lot to prove. That said, Harden running a lot of pick-and-roll against the Knicks defense seems like bad news for New York. One team the Cavs may not match up well against is in Boston, which brings us to…

Jayson Tatum’s return

Is Boston the best team in the East?

The Celtics already sit as the No. 2 seed in the conference, with a top-10 offense and defense, and now it looks like their best player — Jayson Tatum — will return before the playoffs.

Tatum's return from a torn Achilles suffered last playoffs is not set in stone, but Boston is acting as if they expect his return — it is not trading away the wing scoring of Anfernee Simons to add big man Nikola Vucevic if they don't expect Tatum on the wing for a playoff run.

There are questions in Boston. Can Tatum slot into the role Jaylen Brown played for this team? These Celtics don't need vintage, MVP-ballot Tatum because they have MVP-ballot play from Brown this season, plus Derrick White has stepped up. What Boston needs is Tatum to be the No. 2 option and threat that keeps the defense honest and opens up driving and passing lanes. Just 85% of Tatum is a huge help for this team.

Still, in an open Eastern Conference, this Celtics team with Tatum (and now Vucevic) may be the best of the group.

Denver’s health

One thing that has come out of the first 55 games of the season: Oklahoma City is not inevitable. They are the best team in the NBA, especially when healthy, but they are not unbeatable.

Denver is the team best positioned to knock OKC off… if healthy.

The Nuggets have the size, the scoring, the defense to challenge the Thunder — it was a seven-game series a year ago against OKC, and the Nuggets didn't have Johnson or this Peyton Watson, but they were playing Russell Westbrook in all seven games.

This year's Denver is improved and a legit title contender, but has been hit hard by injuries: Nikola Jokic has missed 14 games, Cameron Johnson 24, Aaron Gordon 32 (and counting, he remains out with a hamstring issue), and Christian Braun 36. The Denver core of Jokic/Murray/Gordon have played just 229 minutes together all season (with a +23.5 net rating in those minutes). The ideal starting five — Murray, Braun, Johnson, Gordon, Jokic — have played in 10 games together.

Through all that, the Nuggets are still the No. 3 seed in the West and have the best offense in the league. Get healthy, get their defense playing better, and this team is a legit title threat. It's just a question of getting right before the postseason.

Are we sleeping on the Pistons?

Already in this list, we have said to keep an eye on how much better James Harden makes the Cleveland Cavaliers, or how, with Jayson Tatum back in the fold, the Boston Celtics could be the best team in the East.

What about the team that is on top of the East in the standings, the Detroit Pistons? Are we sleeping on them?

Detroit has the elite star in Cade Cunningham, the team has an identity, and it meets the classic definition of a contender with a top-10 offense and defense in the league (and it is second in the league in net rating).

Yet ask around at the All-Star break, and it's almost likely the Pistons are in the second tier. The concerns are on the offensive end: This is a team that scores a lot of points in the paint (56.8 per game), and they are third in the league in offense started in transition (17.3% of their possessions), but those points are harder to come by in the playoffs as the games slow down. Teams will pack the paint against Detroit and dare it to shoot over the top — Detroit takes the third-lowest percentage of shots from 3 in the league, and it is in the bottom 10 in the league in shooting percentage from deep (34.9%). The Pistons could simply lose the math game some nights in the playoffs.

Also, when teams load up on Cade Cunningham in the playoffs, who is the secondary shot creator?

Still, Detroit has an elite defense and a clear identity. This is a very good team, and in this Eastern Conference, count them out at your own risk.

Green Bay coach Doug Gottlieb suspended by Horizon League after postgame rant

Green Bay men's basketball coach Doug Gottlieb has been suspended by the Horizon League for his postgame comments about referees.

The Horizon League announced it was suspending Gottlieb for one game for his comments following a 75-72 loss to in-state rival Wisconsin-Milwaukee on Sunday, Feb. 15. As a result, he will miss the Phoenix's matchup against Oakland on Friday, Feb. 20.

"The Horizon League is suspending Green Bay men's basketball head coach Doug Gottlieb for violating the League's Operating Regulations on Sunday, Feb. 15," the league wrote in a statement shared on X.

The post also added that it considers the matter closed and will have no further comment.

Shortly after the league announced the discipline, Gottlieb took to his own personal X (formerly Twitter) account to apologize for his actions.

"I'd like to apologize to the Horizon League and the officials for my disparaging comments following Sunday's game," Gottlieb wrote. "I understand and appreciate how difficult their job is, and respect what they do for the sport of basketball. I will be better moving forward."

Gottlieb was upset about a foul call against his best player, CJ O'Hara, which was his fourth and came with 4:25 left in the game. The Phoenix led by four at the time, but the foul changed the direction of the game.

Later on, Gottlieb was further angered by a no-call for a foul when his player drove to the hoop for a potential game-winning shot with just a few seconds remaining.

"You had the exact same play at both ends on the last play of the game," Gottlieb said to reporters, pausing momentarily to aggressively slam his fists onto the table.

"The exact same [expletive] play!" he yelled, "The exact same play!"

Gottlieb also took exception to a technical foul he was hit with, with just under seven minutes left in the game.

"I need the new commissioner of the Horizon League to explain to me what a technical foul is when I don't leave the box, I don't curse, I'm not demonstrative," Gottlieb said. "There was nothing, nothing that should have been called a technical foul. I know when I earn one. I did not earn one.

"The CJ play, we're up [four] points, that dramatically changed the [trajectory] of the game."

For the game, Milwaukee shot 37 free throws, while Green Bay shot 19, despite drawing only five more fouls. 

"All we ask is that there's a fair game. That's what we ask," Gottlieb said. "CJ O'Hara goes and gets an offensive rebound, their player dives at his legs and CJ gets called for a foul. I need [Jill Bodensteiner] at the league, our new commissioner, to explain to me the disparity in the officiating. That's what I need explained to me."

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Doug Gottlieb suspended by Horizon League after Green Bay coach's rant

Anthony Gordon grabs four as Newcastle hit Qarabag for six in playoff

When the Qarabag manager, Gurban Gurbanov, declared before kick-off that Newcastle possess “a style of play that does not suit us”, there were suggestions that he was playing mind games. Long before half-time it was fully apparent that he had rather understated things.

Had this been a boxing match it would surely have been stopped by the 20th minute. Qarabag were utterly overwhelmed by the pace of their guests, and that of Anthony Gordon in particular. Gordon scored four times, boosting his tally in the Champions League this season to 10 goals.

Continue reading...

Jurrangelo Cjintje is your #5 St. Louis Cardinals prospect

NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR - SEPTEMBER 03: Jurrangelo Cijntje #7 of the Arkansas Travelers pitches prior to the game between the Amarillo Sod Poodles and the Arkansas Travelers at Dickey-Stephens Park on Wednesday, September 3, 2025 in North Little Rock, Arkansas. (Photo by Braeden Botts/Minor League Baseball via Getty Images)

Instead of sharing that Jurrangelo Cjintje lost the head-to-head vote to Quinn Mathews for the #5 prospect during our regularly scheduled programming (tomorrow), I figured it was more appropriate to have its own official post. There was an interesting quandary posted in the comments that was not a quandary at all as it turns out. There was a belief that Cjintje could have plausibly lost to Joshua Baez but would have beat Mathews. But no, the prospect order was seemingly confirmed when Cjintje beat Baez and then lost to Mathews. The order as it stands now:

  1. JJ Wetherholt
  2. Liam Doyle
  3. Rainiel Rodriguez
  4. Quinn Mathews
  5. Jurrangelo Cjintje
  6. Joshua Baez
  7. Leonardo Bernal
  8. Jimmy Crooks
  9. Brandon Clarke
  10. Tink Hence
  11. Tekoah Roby

The 12th prospect gets revealed tomorrow, although it wouldn’t be terribly difficult to figure out who that is if you really wanted to know right this minute. And hey while you’re here, I might as well get some use out of this post and run another comparable player poll, which I technically lost when Cjintje was automatically placed in the top 7 without ever going on the vote.

Comparable Player Poll #1

One of the appeals of making this its own post, quite frankly, was being able to run a couple extra of these. When Cjintje got added to the top 7 without ever going into the main vote, I lost a comparable player poll. And since this is such an exceptionally short post and you’re already here, help me separate seemingly indistinguishable prospects who may or may not get added to the voting, but at least shortening my options from 3 to 1 would help a lot. The first of these will be simple: pick the best of the 2025 trade deadline pickups:

Nate Dohm, 23 – RHP

Low A: 7 GS, 28.1 IP, 27.9 K%, 8.2 BB%, 43.4 GB%, .351 BABIP, 3.18 ERA/2.66 FIP/3.14 xFIP

High A: 15 GS, 46.2 IP, 27.9 K%, 10.9 GB%, 39 GB%, .289 BABIP, 3.28 ERA/4.28 FIP/3.52 xFIP

Scouting (FG): 50/60 Fastball, 45/50 Slider, 30/50 Command

Frank Ellisalt, 24 – RHP

Low A: 18 G (7 GS), 50.2 IP, 28.4 K%, 10.4 BB%, 30.2 GB%, .222 BABIP, 3.02 ERA/3.69 FIP/3.64 xFIP

High A: 6 (3 GS), 15.1 IP, 22.2 K%, 12.7 BB%, 35 GB%, .282 BABIP, 4.70 ERA/4.18 FIP/4.26 xFIP

Scouting: 55/60 Fastball, 50/60 Slider, 30/40 Change, 30/40 Command

Mason Molina, 22 – LHP

Low A: 11 GS, 46.2 IP, 32.3 K%, 8.3 BB%, 43.6 GB%, .298 BABIP, 3.86 ERA/3.87 FIP/2.94 xFIP

High A: 11 GS, 49 IP, 28.1 K%, 13.3 BB%, 36.5 GB%, .270 BABIP, 2.39 ERA/3.38 FIP/4.03 xFIP

Scouting: 45/50 Fastball, 40/45 Slider, 35/40 Curve, 50/55 Change, 30/40 Command

No mini-profiles here, just the stats and the scouting.

VOTE HERE

Comparable Player Poll #2

Kind of weird comparison honestly, but today we are looking at two recently recovering from Tommy John pitchers with not much of a sample size and a recent draft pick with zero sample size. I wanted all of them in a poll at some point, and honestly, comparing three guys with very little sample to work with makes sense to me. As such I don’t think listing the stats is particularly useful. Here’s a spoiler: the Tommy John guys struck out a lot of guys but also walked a lot of guys.

Cade Crossland was the 2025 3rd round draft choice out of Oklahoma. He is left-handed and had in my opinion a bit of a confusing stat line last season. Playing in the SEC, he struck out a good number of batters, walked a bit too many but nothing too bad and…. allowed a lot of runners to score. He is an underlying metrics + scouting the stuff bet I would guess.

Andrew Dutkanych IV was the 7th rounder from the 2024 draft who was drafted after having already gotten Tommy John, with a gamble on grabbing a higher round talent who was available lower because of his injury. He threw 17 total innings and finished the year in Low A.

Jacob Odle was a 14th round pick from the 2023 draft who needed Tommy John after getting drafted and thus missed all of 2024. On the bright side, he threw 51 innings last season including 43 in Low A. He averaged a bit more than 3 innings per start.

All three are 22-years-old, so age is not a separator.

VOTE HERE

That’s all I have for you. The #12 prospect will be revealed tomorrow and so will the chance to vote on 13th best prospect.

Cavs Injury Updates: Multiple key players are ramping up for a return

CLEVELAND, OHIO - MAY 04: Max Strus #1 is helped up by Evan Mobley #4 of the Cleveland Cavaliers during the fourth quarter of game one of the Eastern Conference Semifinals against the Indiana Pacers at Rocket Arena on May 04, 2025 in Cleveland, Ohio. The Pacers defeated the Cavaliers 121-112. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Jason Miller/Getty Images) | Getty Images

It’s been a long season full of recurring injuries for the Cleveland Cavaliers. Soon, hopefully, they can put those concerns behind them and finish the final 27 games strong. That means getting multiple key players such as Evan Mobley, Dean Wade and Max Strus back on the court.

Head coach Kenny Atkinson says those guys are starting to ramp up towards a return.

“All are trending very positive,” said Atkinson. “Dean and Evan are trending toward playing tomorrow. They went through a full practice today and looked good.”

Support us and Let ‘Em Know with Homage!

Anything bought from the links helps support Fear the Sword. You can buy the Let ‘Em Know shirt HERE. You can also shop all of Homage’s Cavs gear HERE.

Getting back Mobley and Wade would give this surging team another boost. They both bring tremendous value defensively and should pair well offensively with newcomer James Harden. There’s an entire pick-and-roll game to develop between Harden and Mobley, while Wade should benefit from catch-and-shoot attempts in the corner off Harden’s drive-and-kicks.

As for Strus, the timeline is still murky.

“Max is progressing,” said Atkinson. “Did a pretty high-level workout today, no contact still, but he’s starting to ramp up. Don’t get too excited, but he’s doing a lot more, so that’s good news.”

Strus has not played yet this season after suffering a foot injury in August. It was announced in January that Strus would miss at least another month with the injury.

The Cavs have missed Strus for his ability to space the floor and get hot in a hurry. He’s one of the streakiest three-point shooters in the league, and that’s led to some of the most entertaining games of the last few years for Cleveland. They’d love to have him back, not only for his volume shooting, but for the connective tissue he brings to both ends of the floor. Strus is a competitor that raises the floor for everyone.

For now, Cavs fans can at least look forward to Mobley and Wade returning soon. Cleveland is back from the All-Star break tomorrow as they host the Brooklyn Nets.

Real Madrid beats Paris FC to set up women’s Champions League quarterfinal against Barcelona

LONDON (AP) — Real Madrid set up a Clasico against three-time champion Barcelona in the women's Champions League quarterfinals by beating Paris FC 2-0 on Wednesday.

Striker Naomie Feller opened the scoring and Melween N’Dongala put through her own net as Madrid advanced 5-2 on aggregate, having won the first leg in Paris 3-2.

Later Wednesday, defending champion Arsenal protects a 4-0 lead when it hosts Belgian side OH Leuven. Qualification for the London club would set up a quarterfinal with rival Chelsea.

Early red card

Paris' cause was made harder when defender Théa Greboval was sent off in the fifth minute for pulling back Feller as she ran through on goal.

Still, the visitors came close to taking a 19th-minute lead at Estadio Alfredo Di Stéfano when Océane Picard’s low shot from 20 meters was well saved by goalkeeper Misa Rodríguez.

Attacking midfielder Caroline Weir missed a chance to put Madrid ahead from the penalty spot in the 36th after Picard handled a cross. Goalkeeper Mylène Chavas, playing against her former club, pushed away the spot kick with both hands.

Feller broke Paris' resistance in the 54th when she volleyed in from close range following a fine cross from right back Eva Navarro, who also set up the second goal midway through the second half when her cross led to N’Dongala's own goal from near the penalty spot.

The revamped women’s Champions League format has followed the men’s competition, with an opening league phase of six rounds instead of eight.

The top four in the 18-team league phase — Barcelona, Lyon, Chelsea and Bayern Munich — advanced directly to the quarters and teams placed fifth to 12th went into the playoffs.

To come

In Thursday's second legs, Juventus hosts two-time champion Wolfsburg with the score 2-2 while Manchester United defends a 3-0 lead at home to Atletico Madrid.

___

AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccer

What happened to the Bucks’ once-prolific three-guard lineup? Part 2

MILWAUKEE, WI - OCTOBER 30: Ryan Rollins #13, AJ Green #20, Myles Turner #3 and Kyle Kuzma #18 of the Milwaukee Bucks celebrates during the game against the Golden State Warriors on October 30, 2025 at Fiserv Forum Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2025 NBAE (Photo by Gary Dineen/NBAE via Getty Images). | NBAE via Getty Images

Late in the 2024–25 campaign, the Bucks featured a three-guard look that was quite effective, even in the playoffs: Kevin Porter Jr., AJ Green, Gary Trent Jr., Giannis, and Bobby Portis. It was so intriguing that many fans thought the answer this year would be to replace Portis with newcomer Myles Turner and run with it. But while that lineup has been good, we’ve barely seen it thanks to injuries and ineffectiveness. Still, we’ll attempt to figure out how playing three guards is going this year.

Yesterday, we found that when the best lineups stayed together over the 2024 offseason, they remained pretty good, even with a drop-off from increased playing time. That generally held when these teams swapped or added significant talent to their rotations too, improving their holdover lineups on paper. It also held when said talent came in the form of a big man.

But that was only entering last season. To get a handle on how it’s gone in recent years, we’re going to increase the scope here. I looked at teams that made a significant frontcourt acquisition the previous offseason, particularly additions who regularly played the five, then I compared how they integrated with smaller or less-talented groups from one year to the next. This dates back to offseason big man additions since 2018:

LineupTeamMPYear 1 NetMPYear 2 NetDiff.
Horford/G. Williams/Brown/White/TatumBOS11713.1
Horford/Porzingis/Brown/White/TatumBOS11816.2+3.1
Horford/Smart/Brown/White/TatumBOS43212.2
Horford/Porzingis/Brown/White/TatumBOS11816.2+4.0
Horford/R. Williams/Brown/White/TatumBOS6944.9
Horford/Porzingis/Brown/White/TatumBOS11816.2-28.7
Horford/Brogdon/Brown/White/TatumBOS482.0
Horford/Porzingis/Brown/White/TatumBOS11816.2+14.2
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/VanderbiltUTA13315.7
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/CollinsUTA2564.3-11.4
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/KesslerUTA79-0.1
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/CollinsUTA2564.3+4.4
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/BeasleyUTA37-3.8
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/CollinsUTA2564.3+8.1
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/ConleyUTA3030.4
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/CollinsUTA2564.3-26.1
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Horton-Tucker/KesslerUTA4118.4
Collins/Clarkson/Markkanen/Horton-Tucker/KesslerUTA84-22.1-40.5
Russell/Towns/Vanderbilt/Edwards/McDanielsMIN155-4.6
Russell/Towns/Gobert/Edwards/McDanielsMIN2604.0+8.6
Russell/Towns/Beasley/Edwards/McDanielsMIN10411.9
Russell/Towns/Gobert/Edwards/McDanielsMIN2604.0-7.9
Russell/Towns/Beverley/Edwards/McDanielsMIN7610.7
Russell/Towns/Gobert/Edwards/McDanielsMIN2604.0-6.7
Russell/Towns/Okogie/Edwards/McDanielsMIN45-0.9
Russell/Towns/Gobert/Edwards/McDanielsMIN2604.0+4.9
Thompson/Smart/Brown/Tatum/TheisBOS95-4.3
Horford/Smart/Brown/Tatum/TheisBOS5933.9+38.2
Thompson/Smart/Brown/Tatum/G. WilliamsBOS3230.1
Horford/Smart/Brown/Tatum/G. WilliamsBOS61-13.7-43.8
Valaciunas/Anderson/Melton/Morant/BaneMEM5014.0
Adams/Anderson/Melton/Morant/BaneMEM60-25.2-39.2
Redick/Favors/Ingram/Ball/HartNO94-10.7
Redick/Adams/Ingram/Ball/HartNO4620.0+30.7
Bledsoe/Henson/Middleton/Giannis/BrownMIL3220.7
Bledsoe/Lopez/Middleton/Giannis/BrownMIL130-10.4-31.1
Bledsoe/Henson/Middleton/Giannis/SnellMIL6065.8
Bledsoe/Lopez/Middleton/Giannis/SnellMIL673.5-2.3
Bledsoe/Henson/Middleton/Giannis/BrogdonMIL22413.0
Bledsoe/Lopez/Middleton/Giannis/BrogdonMIL5975.7-7.3
Bledsoe/Henson/Snell/Giannis/BrogdonMIL40-23.4
Bledsoe/Lopez/Snell/Giannis/BrogdonMIL3561.7+85.1
Livingston/West/Iguodala/Thompson/GreenGS1399.4
Livingston/Cousins/Iguodala/Thompson/GreenGS6713.2+3.8
Durant/Pachulia/Curry/Thompson/GreenGS4148.5
Durant/Cousins/Curry/Thompson/GreenGS26813.1+4.6

These aren’t all elite teams by any means, but does the pattern above—the best lineups fell off but were still generally very good, and increased exposure lowered net ratings overall—hold? Well, lineups that shifted their biggest guy down the positional spectrum, then installed their shiny new big man in place of a guard or wing, sometimes saw a nice jump. Look at the Celtics replacing Malcom Brogdon with Kristaps Porzingis in 2023, then further down the list, Tristan Thompson with Al Horford in 2021. A post-ACL tear DeMarcus Cousins elevated some Warriors holdovers too.

On the other hand, newcomer Rudy Gobert plus lesser defender Karl-Anthony Towns lineups in Minnesota were a mixed bag, as were groups that added John Collins alongside one of Utah’s returning bigs, Kelly Olynyk or Walker Kessler. Even Lopez couldn’t elevate two of the Bucks’ better quintets in 2017–18, though they were still solid (the 20.7 net with Sterling Brown looks quite fluky).

Generally, though, new big men lineups did fit the pattern I mentioned: the four-returnees-plus-one-new-guy groups averaged a 1.5 points per 100 possessions decrease in their net rating. And when previous-year lineups saw an uptick in minutes, their net decreased 73% of the time. But the truly elite groups didn’t usually maintain a standard of excellence. Of all the fivesomes with net ratings above 12 (usually around 80th percentile), nearly all sank to league average or below in net, except for the Porzingis crews.

We now finally arrive to this year’s Bucks. Unfortunately, only two Milwaukee lineups with Turner replacing Lopez and the other four not changing have carried over from 2024–25 to 2025–26 thus far. The sample size is far too small to glean anything from:

LineupMP24–25 NetMP25–26 NetDiff.
Porter/Green/Trent/Giannis/Lopez1775.8
Porter/Green/Trent/Giannis/Turner1748.9-26.9
Porter/Green/Trent/Kuzma/Lopez43-9.8
Porter/Green/Trent/Kuzma/Turner418.3+28.1

Though Giannis may be returning soon, we may not get more data on last year’s three-guard trio since Trent seems to have been replaced by Cam Thomas in the rotation. But it’s really Rollins who has replaced him in the Bucks’ three-guard groups, which they have used a lot this year: they’ve played 373 minutes together, which CTG defines as 754 non-garbage time possessions. They have a very solid 119.9 offensive rating and 111.0 defensive rating; a +8.9 net rating, good for the 90th percentile. Their most successful and most used groups slot Giannis alongside Portis, Turner, or Kuzma, though using Portis and Turner together has also worked in small doses (only seen in four games):

LineupPossessionsNet Rtg%tileORtg%tileDRtg%tile
Rollins/Porter/Green/Giannis/Turner35613.681st123.074th109.474th
Rollins/Porter/Green/Kuzma/Turner99-17.612th104.011th121.626th
Rollins/Porter/Green/Giannis/Portis9430.296th120.262nd90.099th
Rollins/Porter/Green/Sims/Turner874.154th114.938th110.968th
Rollins/Porter/Green/Portis/Sims36-2.037th133.396th135.53rd
Rollins/Porter/Green/Kuzma/Portis28-59.10th96.42nd155.60th
Rollins/Porter/Green/Portis/Turner2632.698th115.442nd82.8100th
Rollins/Porter/Green/Kuzma/Giannis1931.697th142.1100th110.570th

Of the four lineups that are made up of returning players from 2024–25, only one saw any action last year: the one at the very bottom, with just five possessions. But the third lineup down, with its +30.2 net, is probably the best analogue for Porter/Green/Trent/Giannis/Portis, and the top lineup is the closest we’ll get to Porter/Green/Trent/Giannis/Lopez. If we use Rollins as our Trent equivalence (not too far off, given Trent’s excellent shooting last year and scratch defense), here’s how they compare across seasons:

LineupPoss.24–25 NetPoss.25–26 NetDiff.
Porter/Green/Trent/Giannis/Lopez3488.2
Porter/Green/Rollins/Giannis/Turner35613.6-74.6
Porter/Green/Trent/Kuzma/Lopez84-7.4
Porter/Green/Rollins/Kuzma/Turner99-17.6-10.2
Porter/Green/Trent/Giannis/Portis8854.6
Porter/Green/Rollins/Giannis/Portis9430.2-24.4
Porter/Green/Trent/Kuzma/Portis3361.5
Porter/Green/Rollins/Kuzma/Portis28-59.1-120.6
Porter/Green/Trent/Portis/Lopez22-58.2
Porter/Green/Rollins/Portis/Turner2632.6+90.8
Porter/Green/Trent/Kuzma/Giannis58-6.3
Porter/Green/Rollins/Kuzma/Giannis1931.6+37.9
Porter/Green/Trent/Kuzma/Sims964.2
Porter/Green/Rollins/Kuzma/Sims3133.3+129.1

In a sense, the Bucks’ small-ball “death lineup” didn’t go anywhere, if you just replace Rollins with Trent, and the three-guard “triumverate” still exists with him alongside Porter and Green. The sample sizes of Porter/Green/Trent/Giannis/Portis and Porter/Rollins/Green/Giannis/Portis are now about the same, and though it’s seen a net falloff of 24.4, it’s still 96th percentile. That’s in line with findings from other teams dating back several years: the best lineups fell off but remained generally very good, and increased exposure lowered net ratings overall.

And as much as we’ve bemoaned the Bucks’ lack of size on the wing, playing AJG as an undersized three has actually worked pretty well as long as he has the right frontcourt: CTG gives lineups with Green playing alongside two smaller guards (not just Rollins and KPJ, but also small doses of Cole Anthony and Cam Thomas) a +7.8 net. What you don’t want, though, is him plus another non-ballhandling guard (-28.6 in 35 possessions). Or worse yet, one of Trent or Gary Harris moving up a spot to the three (-9.4 in 1228 possessions).

Rollins’ emergence has been so critical to the Bucks this year, as roster construction and an injury to Taurean Prince have dictated that they play three guards very often. Though they can now play bigger on the wing when necessary, thanks to Ousmane Dieng, it’s still a good weapon. One question moving forward is how it will work with Thomas: playing next to any of Rollins, KPJ, or Porter, will he bring enough offense to keep three-guard lineups above water? If so, how high above even, and who do they need in the frontcourt? We’ll check on this down the road, provided Doc doesn’t abandon the three-guard look, which he shouldn’t, even if playing that small is usually a necessity.

2026 Chicago Cubs player profiles: Javier Assad

Today we look at the Cubs’ younger right-handed swingman.

The Cubs have restocked the bullpen and added a starter. So far, we’ve covered the starting five and the entire batting/fielding group (as it stands). We’ll look at the additional starter candidates and the bullpen in alphabetical order, which means that the roster will consist of Assad, Brown, Harvey, Hodge, Hollowell, Little, Martin, Maton, Milner, Neely, Palencia, Ray, Roberts, Rolison, Thielbar, Webb, Wicks. We’ll skip Miller and Steele until they are activated.

Javier Eduardo Assad was born July 30, 1997 in Tijuana, Mexico. He’s 18-12 lifetime, 3.43 ERA in 78 games, 54 of which were starts, over a four-year period. When he isn’t starting, he’s a long reliever. He’s fine in either role — I don’t think he gets enough respect, honestly. He started 29 games in 2024, his best overall and most complete season, and then got hurt, suffering a Grade 2 left oblique strain in Spring Training which bit him twice, aborting a first comeback attempt.

He seems fine now, is playing for Mexico in the World Baseball Classic, and is said to be focused on his health.

His health willing, Assad will probably make the cut in the spring and travel north. He’s more or less on a plain with Colin Rea as a swingman, and there’s no reason not to keep both unless they lay eggs in Mesa.

He’s amassed a career 5.1 bWAR (2.7 fWAR), and is an injury away from the rotation.

We’ll see you tomorrow with a few words about Ben Brown.

Green Bay's Doug Gottlieb gets 1-game suspension from Horizon League after criticizing officiating

GREEN BAY, Wis. (AP) — Green Bay coach Doug Gottlieb was suspended one game by the Horizon League on Wednesday for comments he made while criticizing officials after a 75-72 loss to Milwaukee last Sunday.

Gottlieb slammed his hands on the table at one point and used an expletive in his postgame news conference while complaining about what he perceived as inconsistency in the officiating. Video of his news conference garnered attention on social media.

“Gottlieb’s postgame comments do not reflect the League’s values or sportsmanship expectations,” the Horizon League said in a statement announcing the suspension. “The Horizon League considers this matter closed and will have no further comment.”

The suspension will take effect for Friday when Green Bay (15-13, 10-7) visits Oakland (14-13, 10-6).

“I’d like to apologize to the Horizon League and the officials for my disparaging comments following Sunday’s game,” Gottlieb said Wednesday in a statement. “I understand and appreciate how difficult their job is, and respect what they do for the sport of basketball. I will be better moving forward.”

Kerry Rupp, an assistant on Gottlieb's staff, will be Green Bay's acting head coach on Friday.

“We have talked to Coach Gottlieb about the comments he made following Sunday’s game," Green Bay chancellor Michael Alexander athletic director Josh Moon said in a statement. “We appreciate his apology and respect the commissioner’s decision, however, we do not believe his actions warrant a suspension. We feel a reprimand or public censure would have been appropriate.”

Green Bay was trailing 73-72 in the closing seconds when Milwaukee’s Stevie Elam stole the ball from Preston Ruedinger, who was driving to the basket. Elam then made two free throws with 1 second left.

On Milwaukee’s previous possession, Amar Augillard had driven to the basket, got a foul call and made two free throws to put the Panthers ahead. Green Bay believed a foul should have been called on Ruedinger’s drive as well.

“It’s the exact same play as the other end — could not be more similar,” Gottlieb said after the game. “And yet, every time they drove, it was a foul. And every time we did, it was mixed.”

Milwaukee went 30 of 37 on free-throw attempts, while Green Bay was 14 of 18. There were 23 fouls called on Green Bay and 18 on Milwaukee.

Gottlieb also wondered why he received a technical foul at one point in the game. Gottlieb said he didn’t curse, wasn’t demonstrative and hadn’t left his box before the technical was called.

“There was nothing, nothing that should have been called a technical foul,” Gottlieb said. “I know when I’ve earned one. I did not earn one.”

___

Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here. AP college basketball: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-basketball-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-basketball

Mick Cronin is a bully, can't help it. 'John Wooden would be beside himself'

UCLA basketball coach Mick Cronin did it again Tuesday night — he keeps doing this — and someone needs to get him under control. I’d suggest Cronin needs to control himself, stop bullying his players and others, but these aren’t isolated incidents. This keeps happening. It’s who he is:

A bully. A vicious one.

Yeah, I hear some of you: Wah, wah, you’re so soft…

Maybe so. But maybe being soft, being vulnerable, is more of what this world needs. Everywhere you look, on the streets and on social media and even in our seats of government, we’re being hard, being invulnerable, being downright mean. Look around. You like what you see? Not me.

And what we’re seeing from Bruins coach Mick Cronin is appalling. Here’s what we saw Tuesday night, and please, see the whole picture. Don’t focus on one thing — the foul by one of his players — and decide: Welp, that’s what the kid deserved.

Nah. UCLA senior forward Steve Jamerson II didn’t deserve this.

Neither did the reporter who asked Cronin, afterward, about the atmosphere in East Lansing, Michigan.

Here’s how it started:

Michigan State’s Carson Cooper is running down the court, ahead of the pack, going up for a dunk. The No. 15 Spartans lead UCLA by 27 with 4½ minutes left, well on their way to victory, when Cooper rises for a dunk. Behind him, Jamerson arrives a split-second late. He goes for the block, nothing dirty — watch the play yourself — but Cooper’s momentum, combined with the contact Jamerson makes on his arm, sends Cooper to the floor.

Cooper rises, angry. Hey, that’s his right. Jamerson stands his ground. His right, too.

And then Mick Cronin did one of the single cruelest things I’ve ever seen.

First, UCLA's Mike Cronin ejects his own player

You’re picturing the scene, right? The Breslin Center is furious, turning all its rage on Jamerson. That was the crowd’s right. So far, nobody has done anything wrong. Jamerson was hustling, competing. Didn’t look frustrated, just a split-second late as he contested the shot. Cooper was angry. The crowd was furious.

It happens.

But then Cronin does something that can’t happen. Cronin grabs Jamerson by the shirt, by the arm, and tells him to get out. Points angrily to a staffer, then to Jamerson, and gives the “get him out of here” signal.

Watch the video. See that look on Jamerson’s face? He’s bewildered, dejected. The entire building has just turned on him, and now his coach is sending him off the court, into the locker room, to face all that fury by himself? The video shows students giving Jamerson the middle finger, and shouting at him. You can see the finger(s). Can’t hear the shouting, thank goodness.

You hope Jamerson didn’t hear it, either, but that’s naïve.

This was the worst example, but just the latest example, of Cronin humiliating his players. His postgame news conferences tend to go viral after losses, because he questions his players’ toughness or effort in the most straightforward terms, and has even suggested — rather blatantly — that his players aren’t smart enough.

“The most important thing for a teacher is for his students to have aptitude or they can’t learn,” he said in 2024 after a loss to Stanford. “If a team makes adjustments, we struggle to adjust to instruction on the fly.”

"It’s really hard to coach people that are delusional," Cronin said in 2025 after a loss to Michigan. "We got guys who think they’re way better than they are. They’re nice kids. They’re completely delusional about who they are.”

“You can't call your mommy; she can't help you,” he said in 2024. “You've got an opportunity of a lifetime and it may not last forever depending on your performance.”

Cronin thinks he’s old-school tough, and that players are soft. He’s not the problem — they are.

“If you’re hard on Little Johnny in this era,” he said earlier this month, after a win at Rutgers, “you might get investigated.”

At first, forgive me, I found it almost refreshing. Maybe that’s because I was inclined to like Cronin — because I’d always liked Cronin — since meeting him 20 years ago when he was coaching Cincinnati and I was living there, covering college basketball for CBSSports.com. In 2011, when players from Xavier and Cincinnati brawled, Cronin’s postgame disgust was so real, so deserved, I texted him that night to thank him for standing up for decency.

Now this is me, standing up for decency, and telling Mick — or telling UCLA — this has to stop. What happened to Steven Jamerson was the breaking point, for me.

What happened afterward, to a reporter? Another brutal, bully move.

Then Mick Cronin bullies a reporter

This story hinges on Xavier Booker, who spent the past two seasons at Michigan State before transferring to UCLA this season. The Breslin Center student section, the 5,000-strong Izzone, taunted Booker by chanting his name.

Afterward, a reporter asked Cronin what he thought about that.

“I could give a rat’s ass about the other team’s student section,” Cronin said. “I would like to give you kudos for the worst question I’ve ever been asked.”

A second reporter starts to ask a question on another topic, but Cronin ignores him to turn on the first reporter. His team has just been embarrassed. Cronin’s about to take it out on someone else.

“You really think I care about the other team’s student section?” he asks.

The second reporter tries to defend himself, and if his voice went up ever so slightly — and that’s all it was — could you blame him? He was being humiliated by the coach of UCLA, with cameras running. He was standing up for himself, and you know bullies:

They don’t like that.

“Are you raising your voice at me?” Cronin demanded.

The reporter, trying to calm the situation, backed down and said he wasn’t.

“Yeah, you are, yeah, you are,” Cronin said. “Come on, dude … everybody’s standing here listening to you. Everybody. This is on camera. They can hear you. I answered the question. I could give a rat’s ass about the other team’s student section. I coach UCLA. I don’t care about Michigan State students. Who cares?”

This was the biggest kid in the schoolyard, pushing down a smaller one and then mocking him. It’s what Cronin had done to Jamerson, using the assembled crowd to reinforce his own cruelty.

This is who Cronin is with cameras rolling, and NBA scouts tell me he’s even worse behind closed doors, at practice. A Western Conference scout, a longtime friend of mine, was discussing Cronin’s recent odd behavior with me before tipoff at a recent Big Ten game. This was before the incident Tuesday night at Michigan State — that’s how bizarre Cronin has been behaving — when the scout told me:

“He mother(bleeps) them in practice like you wouldn’t believe,” the scout said. “Oh, he (bleeps) them. Mick is the only coach I know who doesn’t film his practice. You know why? He doesn’t want evidence.”

An Eastern Conference scout, another longtime friend who has attended UCLA practices, said he’s heard the same — that Cronin doesn’t film practice — and added: “John Wooden would be beside himself” at the way Cronin treats his players on a daily basis.

“Not sure why he’s so combative,” the scout continued. “He’s an excellent coach, and actually a great guy off the court.”

As I said, I’ve found Cronin to be charming away from the court as well, and was such a fan of his — past tense, was — that I suggested the Indiana basketball program hire Cronin last season after firing Mike Woodson. It’s OK to admit when we’re wrong.

What is Cronin waiting on? How about you, UCLA? Contrast UCLA’s silence, its unspoken approval of Cronin, with what Kansas State did Sunday, firing basketball coach Jerome Tang for a postgame rant that included: “These dudes do not deserve to wear this uniform, and there will be very few of them in it next year.”

You ask me, Kansas State wasn’t standing up for its players but being cheap and opportunistic, using Tang’s rant to try to fire its losing coach for cause — and get out of his $18 million buyout. That might stick in court, but probably not.

Contrast Cronin’s postgame behavior Tuesday with Purdue coach Matt Painter the same night, when Michigan trounced his team at Mackey Arena and Painter stuck up for his players, said he “liked” them and even “loved” them, and then joked with reporters afterward.

“That was way too much talking,” he said as he rose to head back to the locker room.

“That’s on you,” a reporter teased.

“You have to own your part,” said Painter, teasing back, maybe the nicest great coach ever.

Mick Cronin? If he’s not the meanest coach in the country, God help the players of any coach who deserves the title more.

Find IndyStar columnist Gregg Doyel on Threads, or on BlueSky and Twitter at @GreggDoyelStar, or at www.facebook.com/greggdoyelstar. Subscribe to the free weekly Doyel on Demand newsletter.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Mick Cronin ejects UCLA players, rips into reporter. Can't stop bullying

If you could sign one Washington National to an extension, who would it be?

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 26: Daylen Lile #51 of the Washington Nationals tosses his bat after hitting a home run against the Chicago White Sox at Nationals Park on September 26, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by G Fiume/Getty Images) | Getty Images

This time of year, there are always a few young players across the league that get contract extensions. Teams try to buy out a few free agent years at what they think will be cheaper costs, while players get long term security. Bobby Witt Jr., Jackson Merrill, Kristian Campbell and Keibert Ruiz are all young players who have signed lucrative extensions right before a season over the last few years.

From that list, you can see this is a high risk, high reward approach. If you sign the right player, you will be getting these guys on huge bargains for most of their primes. However, extending the wrong guy could be an anchor on the franchise. Not only financially, but also from an opportunity cost standpoint.

Paul Toboni comes from a Red Sox organization that has extended several young players in the last few years. Garrett Crochet, Roman Anthony, Kristian Campbell, Ceddanne Rafaela, Garrett Whitlock and Brayan Bello have all signed extensions in Boston, with most taking place before those guys hit arbitrations. Could Toboni replicate this process with the Nats, and if he does, who should he extend?

In my opinion, Daylen Lile is the best and most obvious extension candidate on the roster. Unlike a few of the Nats other young players, he is not represented by Scott Boras, so that makes talks easier. He is not projected to hit free agency until 2032, which also means an extension will not be that pricey. As players accrue more service time, the price of their extension goes up.

Lile showed a phenomenal feel to hit in his first taste of MLB action in 2025. He hit .299 with an .845 OPS. The speedy outfielder also compiled an insane 11 triples in just 91 games. His speed and gap to gap power make him a constant threat for triples. He hit a ton in the minor leagues as well, so this is no fluke.

I also think Lile has room to grow, especially on the defensive side of the ball. Right now, he is not a good defensive outfielder. However, I think he has the athletic ability to be at least an average defender in a corner. His reads need sharpening, but he has been making a point of improving that. Lile’s reads could also improve when it comes to stealing bases. Despite 92nd percentile sprint speed, he was inefficient as a base stealer.

Lile’s combination of current production and upside make him the guy Toboni should approach. He is already a good player, but he has clear areas of improvement. Lile also has the athleticism to improve in those areas, which makes development possible.

Honestly, the Nats should try offering him an 8-year $65 million contract with a couple team options attached as well. It is a bit more than the 8-years $50 million that Keibert Ruiz got, but Lile has produced more than Ruiz ever has.

He is not the only guy the Nats should approach though. Dylan Crews and James Wood are Boras clients, which complicates things, but it is still worth asking. That is especially true in the case of Wood, who has shown super star upside when he is at his best. 

Given how Wood has performed at his best and his agent, this extension will be pricey. If Scott Boras were even willing to listen, he would probably use the Julio Rodriguez contract as a point of comparison. That is a 12-year $209 million deal, but it has incentives that could take it up to $470 million. Boras would want more guaranteed money, but there would not be as much incentive based money.

A Wood extension is not very likely, but you never know. He is a local kid whose family has a lot of roots in DC. However, I do not see that happening unless the Nats absolutely blow him away. Given how they have been spending lately, I find that hard to envision.

One player who I certainly do not see the Nats extending is CJ Abrams. Despite not being a Boras client, it really seems like the extension window has closed with Abrams. He is much more likely to be traded in the next year than extended, at least in my opinion.

It is not just my opinion though. Those around the game see an Abrams trade as a matter of when not if. There was an Athletic article about potential Spring Training trade candidates, and Abrams was at the top of the list.

I do not think Abrams will be traded before the season, but a deadline deal seems like a real possibility. The piece on Abrams was actually quite interesting. They talked about how those Giants rumors had legs, even if the move did not come to be. It was also mentioned that the Nats goal right now is making the best farm system in baseball, and that they will do whatever it takes to achieve that goal.

Abrams only has three years of team control remaining and is on the trade block. Combine that with some of the maturity questions, I do not see an extension coming. If it does happen, I would be pleasantly surprised because I still think Abrams can be a long term piece for this group.

Now I am going to flip the question to you guys. Who would you want to extend and are there any guys you would stay away from? An extension this spring would be a good PR move from the Nats as well. With all the losing, there is apathy setting in. There is also a sense that ownership is checked out. An extension would not quell all of those concerns, but it would be a positive step. For me, I would be on the phone with Daylen Lile’s agent non-stop.

Community Prospect List: Juan Sánchez ranked No. 41

Juan Sánchez throwing a pitch.
PEORIA, ARIZONA - MARCH 10: Juan Sanchez #93 of the San Francisco Giants pitches during the spring training game against the Seattle Mariners at Peoria Sports Complex on March 10, 2024 in Peoria, Arizona. (Photo by John E. Moore III/Getty Images) | Getty Images

For the final time this year, it’s nomination day! Head to the comment section to nominate some prospects for Friday’s CPL.


Baseball is in the air. The San Francisco Giants, like all teams, are fully in the spring swing, as they’ve been playing real baseball activities in Scottsdale for over a week now. On Saturday, they’ll play their first Cactus League game of the year. Meanwhile, over here at McCovey Chronicles, we’ve nearly finished our Willie McCovey Memorial Community Prospect List, in which we’ll work together to rank the top 44 prospects in the Giants organization.

Our next name is a player we just might see in that aforementioned Saturday game, as he’s in camp as a non-roster invitee: it’s left-handed reliever Juan Sánchez, who earns the vote as the No. 41 prospect in the system. That’s a drop of eight spots for Sánchez, who came in at No. 33 last year.

It’s been a long and winding road for Sánchez, who is one of the longest tenured players in the organization. Despite having only recently turned 25, Sánchez is entering his 10th year with the Giants, after signing in international free agency in 2017 out of Venezuela. That said, it’s only his seventh year actually pitching: he didn’t pitch in 2017 due to the timing of the DSL schedule and the international signing period back then; he didn’t throw in 2020 as Minor League Baseball was cancelled due to Covid; and he lost all of 2025 while recovering from Tommy John surgery.

But when he has pitched, the crafty southpaw has been quite successful. After a brief stint as a starter, Sánchez started to rise the ranks as a reliever starting in 2021. He really took off in 2023, when he posted a 2.39 ERA and a 3.17 FIP with AA Richmond, despite being nearly two-and-a-half years younger than the average pitcher in the Eastern League. He ended the year by holding his own in AAA Sacramento as a 22-year old, where he was more than five years younger than his peers.

Questions persisted about Sánchez’s ability to get outs at the Major League level, as he didn’t possess too much heat with his fastball. But he showed up to his first Spring Training in 2024 looking like a new man, with a notable uptick in velocity, and results that opened eyes. Sánchez was the talk of camp at times and, were it not for roster logistics — he wasn’t on the 40-man roster, and Rule 5 protection Erik Miller was — he might have made the Opening Day roster.

Instead, he returned to Sacramento for some more seasoning, and the red flags immediately started to wave. While he had a 3.93 ERA (very respectable for the Pacific Coast League), Sánchez struggled with control in a way we’d never seen before, issuing 28 walks in 34.1 innings. Soon, a scary explanation for the lack of control was given, as the southpaw hit the Injured List with elbow soreness. Not long after, it was announced that he needed Tommy John surgery, which ended his 2024 and his 2025 at the same time.

But now he’s healthy. While Sánchez didn’t get on the field for the 2025 season, he did end the year with a stint in the Arizona Fall League, where he posted a 2.70 ERA in seven appearances. Most importantly, Sánchez walked just four batters in 10 innings, while striking out 11.

He’s back in camp for a second time, and once again hoping to beat out the competition and earn a spot on the Opening Day roster. Whether or not that happens, odds are good that Sánchez — if he stays healthy — will see his nearly decade-long journey in professional baseball finally result in the ultimate prize sometime this year: a Major League debut.

Now let’s add to the list, and a reminder that today is nomination day. Both nominations and voting take place in the comment section, using the “rec” feature.

The list so far

  1. Bryce Eldridge — 1B
  2. Josuar González — SS
  3. Jhonny Level — SS
  4. Bo Davidson — CF
  5. Dakota Jordan — CF
  6. Luis Hernández — SS
  7. Gavin Kilen — SS
  8. Carson Whisenhunt — LHP
  9. Blade Tidwell — RHP
  10. Keyner Martinez — RHP
  11. Jacob Bresnahan — LHP
  12. Trevor McDonald — RHP
  13. Argenis Cayama — RHP
  14. Luis De La Torre — LHP
  15. Trevor Cohen — OF
  16. Jesús Rodríguez — C
  17. Parks Harber — OF/3B
  18. Carlos Gutierrez — OF
  19. Drew Cavanaugh — C
  20. Daniel Susac — C
  21. Gerelmi Maldonado — RHP
  22. Josh Bostick — RHP
  23. Lorenzo Meola — SS/2B
  24. Will Bednar — RHP
  25. Yunior Marte — RHP
  26. Joe Whitman — LHP
  27. Joel Peguero — RHP
  28. Alberto Laroche — RHP
  29. Trent Harris — RHP
  30. Carlos De La Rosa — LHP
  31. Diego Velasquez — 2B
  32. Lisbel Diaz — OF
  33. Maui Ahuna — SS
  34. Cam Maldonado — OF
  35. Victor Bericoto — OF/1B
  36. Reid Worley — RHP
  37. Jack Choate — LHP
  38. Rayner Arias — OF
  39. Nate Furman — 2B
  40. Jakob Christian — OF
  41. Juan Sánchez — LHP

Note: Clicking on the above names will link to the CPL where they were voted onto the list.

No. 42 prospect nominees

Sabin Ceballos — 23.5-year old 3B — .670 OPS/102 wRC+ in AA (420 PA)

Reggie Crawford — 25.2-year old LHP — did not pitch in 2025; 1.04 ERA/4.07 FIP in AAA in 2024 (8.2 IP); 4.66 ERA/4.93 FIP in AA in 2024 (9.2 IP)

Charlie Szykowny — 25.7-year old 3B/1B — .816 OPS/122 wRC+ in High-A (549 PA)

Jancel Villarroel — 21.0-year old C — .699 OPS/91 wRC+ in High-A (61 PA); .746 OPS/123 wRC+ in Low-A (372 PA)

Note: Each player’s first name links to their Baseball-Reference page, and their last name links to their Fangraphs page. All stats are from the 2025 season.

Wolverhampton Wanderers 2-2 Arsenal: Premier League – as it happened

Bottom-of-the-table Wolves came from two down to end a nine-game losing streak against leaders Arsenal, and throw the title race wide open

2 min: It’s not a pleasant evening weather-wise. It’s raining in the West Midlands, and that rain could turn to sleet or snow later. Slapstick entertainment not yet off the menu.

Wolves get the ball rolling. “A quiet night is wanted, I think, from all parties, at least in the sense of avoiding the ghastly shenanigans on view in the notorious match last night,” begins Charles Antaki, who speaks for us all. “Raucous is good, animated is fine, full bloodedness welcome, but none of the other stuff, please. British football has been pretty free of it these last years, for which we should all be grateful.”

Continue reading...

Luka Dončić reportedly supported Lakers trade deadline approach

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA - JANUARY 06: Luka Doncic #77 of the Los Angeles Lakers drives the ball around Karlo Matkovic #17 of the New Orleans Pelicans at Smoothie King Center on January 06, 2026 in New Orleans, Louisiana. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Chris Graythen/Getty Images) | Getty Images

A franchise and its biggest star need to be aligned, and it appears the Lakers have that with Luka Dončić.

The Lakers traded for him last February, and he showed that he wanted to stay here by signing an extension in the summer.

Since then, every move has been about building around Luka and maintaining flexibility so that they can have optionality this summer with as much cap space as possible.

This is why they had a rather quiet trade deadline and why Lakers President of Basketball Operations Rob Pelinka described the team as being aggressive by saying no to bad deals.

While fans might’ve been unsatisfied with the activity at the trade deadline, according to a recent piece by Dave McMenamin of ESPN, Luka supports how LA approached it.

A source familiar with Doncic’s thinking told ESPN that L.A.’s deadline approach with “adherence to discipline” and focus on the “long-term picture” was supported by the 26-year-old star. He has not pushed the team to add a superstar-level co-star for when James is no longer on the roster.

The relationship between Luka and the Lakers is still fairly new, but they’ve shown that they’ll work hard to do what he approves of.

When he joined the team in the middle of the season and asked for a center, they got him one. This summer, he was part of the recruiting pitch for Marcus Smart, and they landed him as well.

So, if he understands the inner workings of the organization and believes in the plan, then that’s what matters most.

Still, the pressure will be on the Lakers’ front office to prove they didn’t waste a deadline and can actually capitalize on the opportunity they created in the summer.

Because if they don’t upgrade the roster in significant ways this summer, then it won’t be long before even Luka will be wondering what’s being done to foster winning.

And while things are good now, as we’ve seen around the NBA with other franchises and their stars, it doesn’t take much for a situation to turn sour.

For now, though, Luka is happy and aligned with the vision.

You can follow Edwin on Twitter at @ECreates88 or on Bluesky at @ecreates88.bsky.social.