
Major League Baseball has set specific rules for allowing a position player to pitch in a blowout game.
The player’s team has to be trailing by eight or more runs at any point, or be ahead by 10 or more runs in the ninth inning. Position players can also pitch at any point in extra innings.
This has turned from “ha, ha, this is entertaining” to something farcical. We’ve seen this a couple of times with the Cubs this year, when Dansby Swanson hit his third home run of the game off San Diego’s backup catcher Rodolfo Durán in the 23-3 blowout of the Padres July 1, and Alex Bregman doing the same off Andrew Vaughn of the Brewers when the Cubs blasted Milwaukee 17-3 on Aug. 31. In that game, Bregman’s third homer gave the Cubs nine for the game, breaking the franchise record set last year.
Is that all fun? Sure, if you’re the team that’s ahead. Is it baseball? Not really. I’ve suggested in the past that MLB could establish a mercy rule where teams could agree to just stop playing after the seventh inning if there’s a certain deficit, most recently last February.
Position player pitching used to be fairly rare. But check this out:
That’s batting practice, not competitive baseball. Those 11 are among 110 (!) different position players who have pitched this year. That’s more than doubled the 48 position players who pitched last year. You can see all such players in MLB history here.
Last week at Fangraphs, Jay Jaffe wrote a long article on this topic in which he suggested this change to position players pitching (PPP):
Raising the PPP threshold to a nine-run deficit for the losing team would cut into the number of those appearances, as would prohibiting them from happening before the eighth inning. Either or both steps might serve to concentrate more PPP within a smaller footprint, which appears to be the case since 2023, but from a competitive standpoint, so what?
Rule-wise, another thing to do is to cap the length of an individual PPP stint, whether by innings, pitches, or batters faced.
That could work, but I have a different idea.
What if teams all had “emergency pitchers” who could pitch in situations like this, similar to the emergency goalie who is with NHL teams? Those guys don’t get into games often, though you likely remember Scott Foster, the Blackhawks emergency goalie who once played college hockey and then settled into a life as an accountant. He wound up playing in a 2019 game for the Blackhawks and made several saves.
So what if MLB teams signed deals with guys like that with baseball experience? Say, a college pitcher who didn’t make it to a pro career, or a guy who had some minor league seasons but was let go, maybe some guy who played a bit of indy ball.
Here’s how I’d do it. Each team would have one pitcher like that around for every game. He’d work out with the team and be ready to pitch in a blowout situation. That pitcher would be attached to the home team, though he could also pitch for the visitors if needed. Teams might have to have multiple guys available like this because those folks, like Foster, might have other jobs, and unlike the NHL, baseball is an everyday sport. If such a pitcher had to pitch, at least he could do a credible job and not throw 43 mile per hour floaters termed “knuckleball” on video boards. (Hint: They’re not knuckleballs.) Although, the database does have one correct slow pitch, noted here from Vaughn to Matt Shaw twice in that Aug. 31 rout:

This is where that “eephus” pitch wound up [VIDEO].
Here’s how hard and how far that ball was hit [VIDEO].
Remember this pitch that was thrown by Frank Schwindel for the Cubs in 2022? At the time it was said to be the slowest MLB pitch ever hit for a home run:
I wouldn’t count the emergency pitcher against any roster limit because, well, most of the time he’s not going to pitch. But at least if and when he did pitch, he could probably throw a decent enough selection of major league pitches so that even in a blowout, his team could play, you know, a game resembling real baseball instead of batting practice. The team would pay these players a modest sum. NHL emergency goalies get $500 per game (plus a jersey!); MLB teams could certainly afford even more than that (and wouldn’t have to count it against any payroll limits or luxury tax).
What do you think?












