The Cleveland Cavaliers are back in the hole, facing an 0-2 deficit for the second straight round. They host the New York Knicks on Saturday for Game 3.
Let’s go over today’s losers.
LOSER – Ignoring Josh Hart
The Cavs haven’t made it a secret that they’re ignoring Josh Hart on the perimeter. They’ve had Jarrett Allen guard (or not guard him), cheating way into the paint and allowing Hart to fire away as often as he wants.
This strategy worked for the Cavs in the previous rounds. They found success ignoring Detroit’s Ausaur Thompson in the same way. The only problem is, Hart is a far better shooter than anyone the Cavs have given this treatment to in the past.
Hart shot 41.3% from downtown this season. Granted, his attempts are some of the highest quality in the league as teams are content with daring him to shoot. Still, it’s hard to hit more than 40% of your three-pointers. For comparison, Thompson shot just 25% from deep this year.
Cleveland won their bet in Game 1. Hart shot 1-5 from the three-point line and wasn’t able to make them pay. But this is playing with fire. And Hart found his stride by hitting 5-of-11 three-pointers in Game 2. The Cavs continued to leave him open even after his third triple sank. It was maddening to watch Hart nail two more triples without facing any defensive pressure.
Kenny Atkinson is a process-oriented coach. He has a plan and stick to it, regardless of the results. That can lead him to sticking through some painful stretches of basketball, whereas other coaches migth be quicker to read the moment and adjust.
The Cavs could have used an adjustment tonight.
LOSER – Sam Merrill
I speak for everyone when I say I wondered how losing Game 1 would impact the Cavs tonight. What I didn’t expect, however, was for Sam Merrill to be the one seemingly most effected,
Merrill had a great opportunity to win the game at the end of regulation in Game 1. He took a shot he’s nailed hundreds of times before, watching it hit every part of the rim and bounce out. I can’t say for certain, but it looked like missing that shot messed with Merrill’s focus in Game 2.
The Cavs generated a ton of clean looks for Merrill tonight. Despite this, he ended the game 0-7 from downtown, missing some of the easiest shots he’s had all year. He even missed 2-4 free throws, something that comes as a surprise for 85% free throw shooter.
Merrill wasn’t the only one who struggled from deep. Max Strus, Jaylon Tyson and Dennis Schroder shot a combined 1-8. A few makes from anyone on the bench would have gone a long way to making this game feel more competetive in the second half.
Donovan Mitchell and James Harden weren’t great either. The backcourt shot 5-14 from deep.
Still, I have to focus on Merrill, who is held to a higher standard as the team’s best shooter. We know this type of game can happen to anybody, but I’ll be watching closely to see if he can shake this off and get back to being himself.
LOSER – James Harden
The Cavs are in an impossible position with Harden.
There is nowhere to hide him on defense. New York has too many creators and is too dynamic offensively for Harden to find any solace. He has to defend someone, and sometimes, that means he’ll have to defend Jalen Brunson.
We didn’t see Brunson erase a 22 point deficit by targeting Harden tonight. But we did watch him get whatever he wanted whenever the beard was in front of him. You might ask why the Cavs aren’t working harder to avoid those situations.
Let me explain why by going over their other options.
Option 1: Hedge and recover
Hedging a ball screen requires effort. A lot of it.
I’m not going to kick a man while he’s down, but I think it’s fair to say that defensive effort has never been Harden’s strength. I’m also not sure if he has the foot speed at 36 years old to push Brunson away from the screen and then rush to recover to the screener.
So, we can just take this option off the board. It’s not happening.
Option 2: Trap the ball
Okay, we can’t have Harden hedge to avoid the switch. Not without conceding a massive disadvantage, at least.
What if we trapped the ball?
Sending two to Brunson and forcing him to give it up will at least add some organization to the chaos. It’s easier to funnel the ball to certain spots on the floor when you’re prepared to send two to the ball.
But, that only works if the trap is aggressive. That means rushing the ball, being physical, and actively working to take away passing lanes.
Not… standing around in no-mans land.
Harden doesn’t play with enough urgency on defense to properly trap a ball-handler. And, he doesn’t hustle back into the play to keep the Knicks from taking full advantage of the numebrs game.
So, take this option away too.
Option 3: Just play defense!
You can scheme all you want. At the end of the day, there’s two sides to the floor, and you have to play them both to win a championship.
This wouldn’t be such a topic of discussion if Harden could meet the moment. Provide resistance, make it difficult for the Knicks to target him. Or, even just win a few individual battles by getting lucky.
None of that has happened.
This isn’t anything new for Harden, and that’s where the biggest concern comes from.
Can he change the narrative and get back into this fight? Or will the Cavs be bold enough to bench him? If they did that, I don’t know if they have a chance at running an efficient offense.
There’s really no winning here. The only path forward is taking the challenge and actually playing defense.