Real Madrid beats Paris FC to set up women’s Champions League quarterfinal against Barcelona

LONDON (AP) — Real Madrid set up a Clasico against three-time champion Barcelona in the women's Champions League quarterfinals by beating Paris FC 2-0 on Wednesday.

Striker Naomie Feller opened the scoring and Melween N’Dongala put through her own net as Madrid advanced 5-2 on aggregate, having won the first leg in Paris 3-2.

Later Wednesday, defending champion Arsenal protects a 4-0 lead when it hosts Belgian side OH Leuven. Qualification for the London club would set up a quarterfinal with rival Chelsea.

Early red card

Paris' cause was made harder when defender Théa Greboval was sent off in the fifth minute for pulling back Feller as she ran through on goal.

Still, the visitors came close to taking a 19th-minute lead at Estadio Alfredo Di Stéfano when Océane Picard’s low shot from 20 meters was well saved by goalkeeper Misa Rodríguez.

Attacking midfielder Caroline Weir missed a chance to put Madrid ahead from the penalty spot in the 36th after Picard handled a cross. Goalkeeper Mylène Chavas, playing against her former club, pushed away the spot kick with both hands.

Feller broke Paris' resistance in the 54th when she volleyed in from close range following a fine cross from right back Eva Navarro, who also set up the second goal midway through the second half when her cross led to N’Dongala's own goal from near the penalty spot.

The revamped women’s Champions League format has followed the men’s competition, with an opening league phase of six rounds instead of eight.

The top four in the 18-team league phase — Barcelona, Lyon, Chelsea and Bayern Munich — advanced directly to the quarters and teams placed fifth to 12th went into the playoffs.

To come

In Thursday's second legs, Juventus hosts two-time champion Wolfsburg with the score 2-2 while Manchester United defends a 3-0 lead at home to Atletico Madrid.

___

AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccer

What happened to the Bucks’ once-prolific three-guard lineup? Part 2

MILWAUKEE, WI - OCTOBER 30: Ryan Rollins #13, AJ Green #20, Myles Turner #3 and Kyle Kuzma #18 of the Milwaukee Bucks celebrates during the game against the Golden State Warriors on October 30, 2025 at Fiserv Forum Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2025 NBAE (Photo by Gary Dineen/NBAE via Getty Images). | NBAE via Getty Images

Late in the 2024–25 campaign, the Bucks featured a three-guard look that was quite effective, even in the playoffs: Kevin Porter Jr., AJ Green, Gary Trent Jr., Giannis, and Bobby Portis. It was so intriguing that many fans thought the answer this year would be to replace Portis with newcomer Myles Turner and run with it. But while that lineup has been good, we’ve barely seen it thanks to injuries and ineffectiveness. Still, we’ll attempt to figure out how playing three guards is going this year.

Yesterday, we found that when the best lineups stayed together over the 2024 offseason, they remained pretty good, even with a drop-off from increased playing time. That generally held when these teams swapped or added significant talent to their rotations too, improving their holdover lineups on paper. It also held when said talent came in the form of a big man.

But that was only entering last season. To get a handle on how it’s gone in recent years, we’re going to increase the scope here. I looked at teams that made a significant frontcourt acquisition the previous offseason, particularly additions who regularly played the five, then I compared how they integrated with smaller or less-talented groups from one year to the next. This dates back to offseason big man additions since 2018:

LineupTeamMPYear 1 NetMPYear 2 NetDiff.
Horford/G. Williams/Brown/White/TatumBOS11713.1
Horford/Porzingis/Brown/White/TatumBOS11816.2+3.1
Horford/Smart/Brown/White/TatumBOS43212.2
Horford/Porzingis/Brown/White/TatumBOS11816.2+4.0
Horford/R. Williams/Brown/White/TatumBOS6944.9
Horford/Porzingis/Brown/White/TatumBOS11816.2-28.7
Horford/Brogdon/Brown/White/TatumBOS482.0
Horford/Porzingis/Brown/White/TatumBOS11816.2+14.2
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/VanderbiltUTA13315.7
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/CollinsUTA2564.3-11.4
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/KesslerUTA79-0.1
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/CollinsUTA2564.3+4.4
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/BeasleyUTA37-3.8
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/CollinsUTA2564.3+8.1
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/ConleyUTA3030.4
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Sexton/CollinsUTA2564.3-26.1
Olynyk/Clarkson/Markkanen/Horton-Tucker/KesslerUTA4118.4
Collins/Clarkson/Markkanen/Horton-Tucker/KesslerUTA84-22.1-40.5
Russell/Towns/Vanderbilt/Edwards/McDanielsMIN155-4.6
Russell/Towns/Gobert/Edwards/McDanielsMIN2604.0+8.6
Russell/Towns/Beasley/Edwards/McDanielsMIN10411.9
Russell/Towns/Gobert/Edwards/McDanielsMIN2604.0-7.9
Russell/Towns/Beverley/Edwards/McDanielsMIN7610.7
Russell/Towns/Gobert/Edwards/McDanielsMIN2604.0-6.7
Russell/Towns/Okogie/Edwards/McDanielsMIN45-0.9
Russell/Towns/Gobert/Edwards/McDanielsMIN2604.0+4.9
Thompson/Smart/Brown/Tatum/TheisBOS95-4.3
Horford/Smart/Brown/Tatum/TheisBOS5933.9+38.2
Thompson/Smart/Brown/Tatum/G. WilliamsBOS3230.1
Horford/Smart/Brown/Tatum/G. WilliamsBOS61-13.7-43.8
Valaciunas/Anderson/Melton/Morant/BaneMEM5014.0
Adams/Anderson/Melton/Morant/BaneMEM60-25.2-39.2
Redick/Favors/Ingram/Ball/HartNO94-10.7
Redick/Adams/Ingram/Ball/HartNO4620.0+30.7
Bledsoe/Henson/Middleton/Giannis/BrownMIL3220.7
Bledsoe/Lopez/Middleton/Giannis/BrownMIL130-10.4-31.1
Bledsoe/Henson/Middleton/Giannis/SnellMIL6065.8
Bledsoe/Lopez/Middleton/Giannis/SnellMIL673.5-2.3
Bledsoe/Henson/Middleton/Giannis/BrogdonMIL22413.0
Bledsoe/Lopez/Middleton/Giannis/BrogdonMIL5975.7-7.3
Bledsoe/Henson/Snell/Giannis/BrogdonMIL40-23.4
Bledsoe/Lopez/Snell/Giannis/BrogdonMIL3561.7+85.1
Livingston/West/Iguodala/Thompson/GreenGS1399.4
Livingston/Cousins/Iguodala/Thompson/GreenGS6713.2+3.8
Durant/Pachulia/Curry/Thompson/GreenGS4148.5
Durant/Cousins/Curry/Thompson/GreenGS26813.1+4.6

These aren’t all elite teams by any means, but does the pattern above—the best lineups fell off but were still generally very good, and increased exposure lowered net ratings overall—hold? Well, lineups that shifted their biggest guy down the positional spectrum, then installed their shiny new big man in place of a guard or wing, sometimes saw a nice jump. Look at the Celtics replacing Malcom Brogdon with Kristaps Porzingis in 2023, then further down the list, Tristan Thompson with Al Horford in 2021. A post-ACL tear DeMarcus Cousins elevated some Warriors holdovers too.

On the other hand, newcomer Rudy Gobert plus lesser defender Karl-Anthony Towns lineups in Minnesota were a mixed bag, as were groups that added John Collins alongside one of Utah’s returning bigs, Kelly Olynyk or Walker Kessler. Even Lopez couldn’t elevate two of the Bucks’ better quintets in 2017–18, though they were still solid (the 20.7 net with Sterling Brown looks quite fluky).

Generally, though, new big men lineups did fit the pattern I mentioned: the four-returnees-plus-one-new-guy groups averaged a 1.5 points per 100 possessions decrease in their net rating. And when previous-year lineups saw an uptick in minutes, their net decreased 73% of the time. But the truly elite groups didn’t usually maintain a standard of excellence. Of all the fivesomes with net ratings above 12 (usually around 80th percentile), nearly all sank to league average or below in net, except for the Porzingis crews.

We now finally arrive to this year’s Bucks. Unfortunately, only two Milwaukee lineups with Turner replacing Lopez and the other four not changing have carried over from 2024–25 to 2025–26 thus far. The sample size is far too small to glean anything from:

LineupMP24–25 NetMP25–26 NetDiff.
Porter/Green/Trent/Giannis/Lopez1775.8
Porter/Green/Trent/Giannis/Turner1748.9-26.9
Porter/Green/Trent/Kuzma/Lopez43-9.8
Porter/Green/Trent/Kuzma/Turner418.3+28.1

Though Giannis may be returning soon, we may not get more data on last year’s three-guard trio since Trent seems to have been replaced by Cam Thomas in the rotation. But it’s really Rollins who has replaced him in the Bucks’ three-guard groups, which they have used a lot this year: they’ve played 373 minutes together, which CTG defines as 754 non-garbage time possessions. They have a very solid 119.9 offensive rating and 111.0 defensive rating; a +8.9 net rating, good for the 90th percentile. Their most successful and most used groups slot Giannis alongside Portis, Turner, or Kuzma, though using Portis and Turner together has also worked in small doses (only seen in four games):

LineupPossessionsNet Rtg%tileORtg%tileDRtg%tile
Rollins/Porter/Green/Giannis/Turner35613.681st123.074th109.474th
Rollins/Porter/Green/Kuzma/Turner99-17.612th104.011th121.626th
Rollins/Porter/Green/Giannis/Portis9430.296th120.262nd90.099th
Rollins/Porter/Green/Sims/Turner874.154th114.938th110.968th
Rollins/Porter/Green/Portis/Sims36-2.037th133.396th135.53rd
Rollins/Porter/Green/Kuzma/Portis28-59.10th96.42nd155.60th
Rollins/Porter/Green/Portis/Turner2632.698th115.442nd82.8100th
Rollins/Porter/Green/Kuzma/Giannis1931.697th142.1100th110.570th

Of the four lineups that are made up of returning players from 2024–25, only one saw any action last year: the one at the very bottom, with just five possessions. But the third lineup down, with its +30.2 net, is probably the best analogue for Porter/Green/Trent/Giannis/Portis, and the top lineup is the closest we’ll get to Porter/Green/Trent/Giannis/Lopez. If we use Rollins as our Trent equivalence (not too far off, given Trent’s excellent shooting last year and scratch defense), here’s how they compare across seasons:

LineupPoss.24–25 NetPoss.25–26 NetDiff.
Porter/Green/Trent/Giannis/Lopez3488.2
Porter/Green/Rollins/Giannis/Turner35613.6-74.6
Porter/Green/Trent/Kuzma/Lopez84-7.4
Porter/Green/Rollins/Kuzma/Turner99-17.6-10.2
Porter/Green/Trent/Giannis/Portis8854.6
Porter/Green/Rollins/Giannis/Portis9430.2-24.4
Porter/Green/Trent/Kuzma/Portis3361.5
Porter/Green/Rollins/Kuzma/Portis28-59.1-120.6
Porter/Green/Trent/Portis/Lopez22-58.2
Porter/Green/Rollins/Portis/Turner2632.6+90.8
Porter/Green/Trent/Kuzma/Giannis58-6.3
Porter/Green/Rollins/Kuzma/Giannis1931.6+37.9
Porter/Green/Trent/Kuzma/Sims964.2
Porter/Green/Rollins/Kuzma/Sims3133.3+129.1

In a sense, the Bucks’ small-ball “death lineup” didn’t go anywhere, if you just replace Rollins with Trent, and the three-guard “triumverate” still exists with him alongside Porter and Green. The sample sizes of Porter/Green/Trent/Giannis/Portis and Porter/Rollins/Green/Giannis/Portis are now about the same, and though it’s seen a net falloff of 24.4, it’s still 96th percentile. That’s in line with findings from other teams dating back several years: the best lineups fell off but remained generally very good, and increased exposure lowered net ratings overall.

And as much as we’ve bemoaned the Bucks’ lack of size on the wing, playing AJG as an undersized three has actually worked pretty well as long as he has the right frontcourt: CTG gives lineups with Green playing alongside two smaller guards (not just Rollins and KPJ, but also small doses of Cole Anthony and Cam Thomas) a +7.8 net. What you don’t want, though, is him plus another non-ballhandling guard (-28.6 in 35 possessions). Or worse yet, one of Trent or Gary Harris moving up a spot to the three (-9.4 in 1228 possessions).

Rollins’ emergence has been so critical to the Bucks this year, as roster construction and an injury to Taurean Prince have dictated that they play three guards very often. Though they can now play bigger on the wing when necessary, thanks to Ousmane Dieng, it’s still a good weapon. One question moving forward is how it will work with Thomas: playing next to any of Rollins, KPJ, or Porter, will he bring enough offense to keep three-guard lineups above water? If so, how high above even, and who do they need in the frontcourt? We’ll check on this down the road, provided Doc doesn’t abandon the three-guard look, which he shouldn’t, even if playing that small is usually a necessity.

2026 Chicago Cubs player profiles: Javier Assad

Today we look at the Cubs’ younger right-handed swingman.

The Cubs have restocked the bullpen and added a starter. So far, we’ve covered the starting five and the entire batting/fielding group (as it stands). We’ll look at the additional starter candidates and the bullpen in alphabetical order, which means that the roster will consist of Assad, Brown, Harvey, Hodge, Hollowell, Little, Martin, Maton, Milner, Neely, Palencia, Ray, Roberts, Rolison, Thielbar, Webb, Wicks. We’ll skip Miller and Steele until they are activated.

Javier Eduardo Assad was born July 30, 1997 in Tijuana, Mexico. He’s 18-12 lifetime, 3.43 ERA in 78 games, 54 of which were starts, over a four-year period. When he isn’t starting, he’s a long reliever. He’s fine in either role — I don’t think he gets enough respect, honestly. He started 29 games in 2024, his best overall and most complete season, and then got hurt, suffering a Grade 2 left oblique strain in Spring Training which bit him twice, aborting a first comeback attempt.

He seems fine now, is playing for Mexico in the World Baseball Classic, and is said to be focused on his health.

His health willing, Assad will probably make the cut in the spring and travel north. He’s more or less on a plain with Colin Rea as a swingman, and there’s no reason not to keep both unless they lay eggs in Mesa.

He’s amassed a career 5.1 bWAR (2.7 fWAR), and is an injury away from the rotation.

We’ll see you tomorrow with a few words about Ben Brown.

Green Bay's Doug Gottlieb gets 1-game suspension from Horizon League after criticizing officiating

GREEN BAY, Wis. (AP) — Green Bay coach Doug Gottlieb was suspended one game by the Horizon League on Wednesday for comments he made while criticizing officials after a 75-72 loss to Milwaukee last Sunday.

Gottlieb slammed his hands on the table at one point and used an expletive in his postgame news conference while complaining about what he perceived as inconsistency in the officiating. Video of his news conference garnered attention on social media.

“Gottlieb’s postgame comments do not reflect the League’s values or sportsmanship expectations,” the Horizon League said in a statement announcing the suspension. “The Horizon League considers this matter closed and will have no further comment.”

The suspension will take effect for Friday when Green Bay (15-13, 10-7) visits Oakland (14-13, 10-6).

“I’d like to apologize to the Horizon League and the officials for my disparaging comments following Sunday’s game,” Gottlieb said Wednesday in a statement. “I understand and appreciate how difficult their job is, and respect what they do for the sport of basketball. I will be better moving forward.”

Kerry Rupp, an assistant on Gottlieb's staff, will be Green Bay's acting head coach on Friday.

“We have talked to Coach Gottlieb about the comments he made following Sunday’s game," Green Bay chancellor Michael Alexander athletic director Josh Moon said in a statement. “We appreciate his apology and respect the commissioner’s decision, however, we do not believe his actions warrant a suspension. We feel a reprimand or public censure would have been appropriate.”

Green Bay was trailing 73-72 in the closing seconds when Milwaukee’s Stevie Elam stole the ball from Preston Ruedinger, who was driving to the basket. Elam then made two free throws with 1 second left.

On Milwaukee’s previous possession, Amar Augillard had driven to the basket, got a foul call and made two free throws to put the Panthers ahead. Green Bay believed a foul should have been called on Ruedinger’s drive as well.

“It’s the exact same play as the other end — could not be more similar,” Gottlieb said after the game. “And yet, every time they drove, it was a foul. And every time we did, it was mixed.”

Milwaukee went 30 of 37 on free-throw attempts, while Green Bay was 14 of 18. There were 23 fouls called on Green Bay and 18 on Milwaukee.

Gottlieb also wondered why he received a technical foul at one point in the game. Gottlieb said he didn’t curse, wasn’t demonstrative and hadn’t left his box before the technical was called.

“There was nothing, nothing that should have been called a technical foul,” Gottlieb said. “I know when I’ve earned one. I did not earn one.”

___

Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here. AP college basketball: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-basketball-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-basketball

Mick Cronin is a bully, can't help it. 'John Wooden would be beside himself'

UCLA basketball coach Mick Cronin did it again Tuesday night — he keeps doing this — and someone needs to get him under control. I’d suggest Cronin needs to control himself, stop bullying his players and others, but these aren’t isolated incidents. This keeps happening. It’s who he is:

A bully. A vicious one.

Yeah, I hear some of you: Wah, wah, you’re so soft…

Maybe so. But maybe being soft, being vulnerable, is more of what this world needs. Everywhere you look, on the streets and on social media and even in our seats of government, we’re being hard, being invulnerable, being downright mean. Look around. You like what you see? Not me.

And what we’re seeing from Bruins coach Mick Cronin is appalling. Here’s what we saw Tuesday night, and please, see the whole picture. Don’t focus on one thing — the foul by one of his players — and decide: Welp, that’s what the kid deserved.

Nah. UCLA senior forward Steve Jamerson II didn’t deserve this.

Neither did the reporter who asked Cronin, afterward, about the atmosphere in East Lansing, Michigan.

Here’s how it started:

Michigan State’s Carson Cooper is running down the court, ahead of the pack, going up for a dunk. The No. 15 Spartans lead UCLA by 27 with 4½ minutes left, well on their way to victory, when Cooper rises for a dunk. Behind him, Jamerson arrives a split-second late. He goes for the block, nothing dirty — watch the play yourself — but Cooper’s momentum, combined with the contact Jamerson makes on his arm, sends Cooper to the floor.

Cooper rises, angry. Hey, that’s his right. Jamerson stands his ground. His right, too.

And then Mick Cronin did one of the single cruelest things I’ve ever seen.

First, UCLA's Mike Cronin ejects his own player

You’re picturing the scene, right? The Breslin Center is furious, turning all its rage on Jamerson. That was the crowd’s right. So far, nobody has done anything wrong. Jamerson was hustling, competing. Didn’t look frustrated, just a split-second late as he contested the shot. Cooper was angry. The crowd was furious.

It happens.

But then Cronin does something that can’t happen. Cronin grabs Jamerson by the shirt, by the arm, and tells him to get out. Points angrily to a staffer, then to Jamerson, and gives the “get him out of here” signal.

Watch the video. See that look on Jamerson’s face? He’s bewildered, dejected. The entire building has just turned on him, and now his coach is sending him off the court, into the locker room, to face all that fury by himself? The video shows students giving Jamerson the middle finger, and shouting at him. You can see the finger(s). Can’t hear the shouting, thank goodness.

You hope Jamerson didn’t hear it, either, but that’s naïve.

This was the worst example, but just the latest example, of Cronin humiliating his players. His postgame news conferences tend to go viral after losses, because he questions his players’ toughness or effort in the most straightforward terms, and has even suggested — rather blatantly — that his players aren’t smart enough.

“The most important thing for a teacher is for his students to have aptitude or they can’t learn,” he said in 2024 after a loss to Stanford. “If a team makes adjustments, we struggle to adjust to instruction on the fly.”

"It’s really hard to coach people that are delusional," Cronin said in 2025 after a loss to Michigan. "We got guys who think they’re way better than they are. They’re nice kids. They’re completely delusional about who they are.”

“You can't call your mommy; she can't help you,” he said in 2024. “You've got an opportunity of a lifetime and it may not last forever depending on your performance.”

Cronin thinks he’s old-school tough, and that players are soft. He’s not the problem — they are.

“If you’re hard on Little Johnny in this era,” he said earlier this month, after a win at Rutgers, “you might get investigated.”

At first, forgive me, I found it almost refreshing. Maybe that’s because I was inclined to like Cronin — because I’d always liked Cronin — since meeting him 20 years ago when he was coaching Cincinnati and I was living there, covering college basketball for CBSSports.com. In 2011, when players from Xavier and Cincinnati brawled, Cronin’s postgame disgust was so real, so deserved, I texted him that night to thank him for standing up for decency.

Now this is me, standing up for decency, and telling Mick — or telling UCLA — this has to stop. What happened to Steven Jamerson was the breaking point, for me.

What happened afterward, to a reporter? Another brutal, bully move.

Then Mick Cronin bullies a reporter

This story hinges on Xavier Booker, who spent the past two seasons at Michigan State before transferring to UCLA this season. The Breslin Center student section, the 5,000-strong Izzone, taunted Booker by chanting his name.

Afterward, a reporter asked Cronin what he thought about that.

“I could give a rat’s ass about the other team’s student section,” Cronin said. “I would like to give you kudos for the worst question I’ve ever been asked.”

A second reporter starts to ask a question on another topic, but Cronin ignores him to turn on the first reporter. His team has just been embarrassed. Cronin’s about to take it out on someone else.

“You really think I care about the other team’s student section?” he asks.

The second reporter tries to defend himself, and if his voice went up ever so slightly — and that’s all it was — could you blame him? He was being humiliated by the coach of UCLA, with cameras running. He was standing up for himself, and you know bullies:

They don’t like that.

“Are you raising your voice at me?” Cronin demanded.

The reporter, trying to calm the situation, backed down and said he wasn’t.

“Yeah, you are, yeah, you are,” Cronin said. “Come on, dude … everybody’s standing here listening to you. Everybody. This is on camera. They can hear you. I answered the question. I could give a rat’s ass about the other team’s student section. I coach UCLA. I don’t care about Michigan State students. Who cares?”

This was the biggest kid in the schoolyard, pushing down a smaller one and then mocking him. It’s what Cronin had done to Jamerson, using the assembled crowd to reinforce his own cruelty.

This is who Cronin is with cameras rolling, and NBA scouts tell me he’s even worse behind closed doors, at practice. A Western Conference scout, a longtime friend of mine, was discussing Cronin’s recent odd behavior with me before tipoff at a recent Big Ten game. This was before the incident Tuesday night at Michigan State — that’s how bizarre Cronin has been behaving — when the scout told me:

“He mother(bleeps) them in practice like you wouldn’t believe,” the scout said. “Oh, he (bleeps) them. Mick is the only coach I know who doesn’t film his practice. You know why? He doesn’t want evidence.”

An Eastern Conference scout, another longtime friend who has attended UCLA practices, said he’s heard the same — that Cronin doesn’t film practice — and added: “John Wooden would be beside himself” at the way Cronin treats his players on a daily basis.

“Not sure why he’s so combative,” the scout continued. “He’s an excellent coach, and actually a great guy off the court.”

As I said, I’ve found Cronin to be charming away from the court as well, and was such a fan of his — past tense, was — that I suggested the Indiana basketball program hire Cronin last season after firing Mike Woodson. It’s OK to admit when we’re wrong.

What is Cronin waiting on? How about you, UCLA? Contrast UCLA’s silence, its unspoken approval of Cronin, with what Kansas State did Sunday, firing basketball coach Jerome Tang for a postgame rant that included: “These dudes do not deserve to wear this uniform, and there will be very few of them in it next year.”

You ask me, Kansas State wasn’t standing up for its players but being cheap and opportunistic, using Tang’s rant to try to fire its losing coach for cause — and get out of his $18 million buyout. That might stick in court, but probably not.

Contrast Cronin’s postgame behavior Tuesday with Purdue coach Matt Painter the same night, when Michigan trounced his team at Mackey Arena and Painter stuck up for his players, said he “liked” them and even “loved” them, and then joked with reporters afterward.

“That was way too much talking,” he said as he rose to head back to the locker room.

“That’s on you,” a reporter teased.

“You have to own your part,” said Painter, teasing back, maybe the nicest great coach ever.

Mick Cronin? If he’s not the meanest coach in the country, God help the players of any coach who deserves the title more.

Find IndyStar columnist Gregg Doyel on Threads, or on BlueSky and Twitter at @GreggDoyelStar, or at www.facebook.com/greggdoyelstar. Subscribe to the free weekly Doyel on Demand newsletter.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Mick Cronin ejects UCLA players, rips into reporter. Can't stop bullying

If you could sign one Washington National to an extension, who would it be?

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 26: Daylen Lile #51 of the Washington Nationals tosses his bat after hitting a home run against the Chicago White Sox at Nationals Park on September 26, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by G Fiume/Getty Images) | Getty Images

This time of year, there are always a few young players across the league that get contract extensions. Teams try to buy out a few free agent years at what they think will be cheaper costs, while players get long term security. Bobby Witt Jr., Jackson Merrill, Kristian Campbell and Keibert Ruiz are all young players who have signed lucrative extensions right before a season over the last few years.

From that list, you can see this is a high risk, high reward approach. If you sign the right player, you will be getting these guys on huge bargains for most of their primes. However, extending the wrong guy could be an anchor on the franchise. Not only financially, but also from an opportunity cost standpoint.

Paul Toboni comes from a Red Sox organization that has extended several young players in the last few years. Garrett Crochet, Roman Anthony, Kristian Campbell, Ceddanne Rafaela, Garrett Whitlock and Brayan Bello have all signed extensions in Boston, with most taking place before those guys hit arbitrations. Could Toboni replicate this process with the Nats, and if he does, who should he extend?

In my opinion, Daylen Lile is the best and most obvious extension candidate on the roster. Unlike a few of the Nats other young players, he is not represented by Scott Boras, so that makes talks easier. He is not projected to hit free agency until 2032, which also means an extension will not be that pricey. As players accrue more service time, the price of their extension goes up.

Lile showed a phenomenal feel to hit in his first taste of MLB action in 2025. He hit .299 with an .845 OPS. The speedy outfielder also compiled an insane 11 triples in just 91 games. His speed and gap to gap power make him a constant threat for triples. He hit a ton in the minor leagues as well, so this is no fluke.

I also think Lile has room to grow, especially on the defensive side of the ball. Right now, he is not a good defensive outfielder. However, I think he has the athletic ability to be at least an average defender in a corner. His reads need sharpening, but he has been making a point of improving that. Lile’s reads could also improve when it comes to stealing bases. Despite 92nd percentile sprint speed, he was inefficient as a base stealer.

Lile’s combination of current production and upside make him the guy Toboni should approach. He is already a good player, but he has clear areas of improvement. Lile also has the athleticism to improve in those areas, which makes development possible.

Honestly, the Nats should try offering him an 8-year $65 million contract with a couple team options attached as well. It is a bit more than the 8-years $50 million that Keibert Ruiz got, but Lile has produced more than Ruiz ever has.

He is not the only guy the Nats should approach though. Dylan Crews and James Wood are Boras clients, which complicates things, but it is still worth asking. That is especially true in the case of Wood, who has shown super star upside when he is at his best. 

Given how Wood has performed at his best and his agent, this extension will be pricey. If Scott Boras were even willing to listen, he would probably use the Julio Rodriguez contract as a point of comparison. That is a 12-year $209 million deal, but it has incentives that could take it up to $470 million. Boras would want more guaranteed money, but there would not be as much incentive based money.

A Wood extension is not very likely, but you never know. He is a local kid whose family has a lot of roots in DC. However, I do not see that happening unless the Nats absolutely blow him away. Given how they have been spending lately, I find that hard to envision.

One player who I certainly do not see the Nats extending is CJ Abrams. Despite not being a Boras client, it really seems like the extension window has closed with Abrams. He is much more likely to be traded in the next year than extended, at least in my opinion.

It is not just my opinion though. Those around the game see an Abrams trade as a matter of when not if. There was an Athletic article about potential Spring Training trade candidates, and Abrams was at the top of the list.

I do not think Abrams will be traded before the season, but a deadline deal seems like a real possibility. The piece on Abrams was actually quite interesting. They talked about how those Giants rumors had legs, even if the move did not come to be. It was also mentioned that the Nats goal right now is making the best farm system in baseball, and that they will do whatever it takes to achieve that goal.

Abrams only has three years of team control remaining and is on the trade block. Combine that with some of the maturity questions, I do not see an extension coming. If it does happen, I would be pleasantly surprised because I still think Abrams can be a long term piece for this group.

Now I am going to flip the question to you guys. Who would you want to extend and are there any guys you would stay away from? An extension this spring would be a good PR move from the Nats as well. With all the losing, there is apathy setting in. There is also a sense that ownership is checked out. An extension would not quell all of those concerns, but it would be a positive step. For me, I would be on the phone with Daylen Lile’s agent non-stop.

Community Prospect List: Juan Sánchez ranked No. 41

Juan Sánchez throwing a pitch.
PEORIA, ARIZONA - MARCH 10: Juan Sanchez #93 of the San Francisco Giants pitches during the spring training game against the Seattle Mariners at Peoria Sports Complex on March 10, 2024 in Peoria, Arizona. (Photo by John E. Moore III/Getty Images) | Getty Images

For the final time this year, it’s nomination day! Head to the comment section to nominate some prospects for Friday’s CPL.


Baseball is in the air. The San Francisco Giants, like all teams, are fully in the spring swing, as they’ve been playing real baseball activities in Scottsdale for over a week now. On Saturday, they’ll play their first Cactus League game of the year. Meanwhile, over here at McCovey Chronicles, we’ve nearly finished our Willie McCovey Memorial Community Prospect List, in which we’ll work together to rank the top 44 prospects in the Giants organization.

Our next name is a player we just might see in that aforementioned Saturday game, as he’s in camp as a non-roster invitee: it’s left-handed reliever Juan Sánchez, who earns the vote as the No. 41 prospect in the system. That’s a drop of eight spots for Sánchez, who came in at No. 33 last year.

It’s been a long and winding road for Sánchez, who is one of the longest tenured players in the organization. Despite having only recently turned 25, Sánchez is entering his 10th year with the Giants, after signing in international free agency in 2017 out of Venezuela. That said, it’s only his seventh year actually pitching: he didn’t pitch in 2017 due to the timing of the DSL schedule and the international signing period back then; he didn’t throw in 2020 as Minor League Baseball was cancelled due to Covid; and he lost all of 2025 while recovering from Tommy John surgery.

But when he has pitched, the crafty southpaw has been quite successful. After a brief stint as a starter, Sánchez started to rise the ranks as a reliever starting in 2021. He really took off in 2023, when he posted a 2.39 ERA and a 3.17 FIP with AA Richmond, despite being nearly two-and-a-half years younger than the average pitcher in the Eastern League. He ended the year by holding his own in AAA Sacramento as a 22-year old, where he was more than five years younger than his peers.

Questions persisted about Sánchez’s ability to get outs at the Major League level, as he didn’t possess too much heat with his fastball. But he showed up to his first Spring Training in 2024 looking like a new man, with a notable uptick in velocity, and results that opened eyes. Sánchez was the talk of camp at times and, were it not for roster logistics — he wasn’t on the 40-man roster, and Rule 5 protection Erik Miller was — he might have made the Opening Day roster.

Instead, he returned to Sacramento for some more seasoning, and the red flags immediately started to wave. While he had a 3.93 ERA (very respectable for the Pacific Coast League), Sánchez struggled with control in a way we’d never seen before, issuing 28 walks in 34.1 innings. Soon, a scary explanation for the lack of control was given, as the southpaw hit the Injured List with elbow soreness. Not long after, it was announced that he needed Tommy John surgery, which ended his 2024 and his 2025 at the same time.

But now he’s healthy. While Sánchez didn’t get on the field for the 2025 season, he did end the year with a stint in the Arizona Fall League, where he posted a 2.70 ERA in seven appearances. Most importantly, Sánchez walked just four batters in 10 innings, while striking out 11.

He’s back in camp for a second time, and once again hoping to beat out the competition and earn a spot on the Opening Day roster. Whether or not that happens, odds are good that Sánchez — if he stays healthy — will see his nearly decade-long journey in professional baseball finally result in the ultimate prize sometime this year: a Major League debut.

Now let’s add to the list, and a reminder that today is nomination day. Both nominations and voting take place in the comment section, using the “rec” feature.

The list so far

  1. Bryce Eldridge — 1B
  2. Josuar González — SS
  3. Jhonny Level — SS
  4. Bo Davidson — CF
  5. Dakota Jordan — CF
  6. Luis Hernández — SS
  7. Gavin Kilen — SS
  8. Carson Whisenhunt — LHP
  9. Blade Tidwell — RHP
  10. Keyner Martinez — RHP
  11. Jacob Bresnahan — LHP
  12. Trevor McDonald — RHP
  13. Argenis Cayama — RHP
  14. Luis De La Torre — LHP
  15. Trevor Cohen — OF
  16. Jesús Rodríguez — C
  17. Parks Harber — OF/3B
  18. Carlos Gutierrez — OF
  19. Drew Cavanaugh — C
  20. Daniel Susac — C
  21. Gerelmi Maldonado — RHP
  22. Josh Bostick — RHP
  23. Lorenzo Meola — SS/2B
  24. Will Bednar — RHP
  25. Yunior Marte — RHP
  26. Joe Whitman — LHP
  27. Joel Peguero — RHP
  28. Alberto Laroche — RHP
  29. Trent Harris — RHP
  30. Carlos De La Rosa — LHP
  31. Diego Velasquez — 2B
  32. Lisbel Diaz — OF
  33. Maui Ahuna — SS
  34. Cam Maldonado — OF
  35. Victor Bericoto — OF/1B
  36. Reid Worley — RHP
  37. Jack Choate — LHP
  38. Rayner Arias — OF
  39. Nate Furman — 2B
  40. Jakob Christian — OF
  41. Juan Sánchez — LHP

Note: Clicking on the above names will link to the CPL where they were voted onto the list.

No. 42 prospect nominees

Sabin Ceballos — 23.5-year old 3B — .670 OPS/102 wRC+ in AA (420 PA)

Reggie Crawford — 25.2-year old LHP — did not pitch in 2025; 1.04 ERA/4.07 FIP in AAA in 2024 (8.2 IP); 4.66 ERA/4.93 FIP in AA in 2024 (9.2 IP)

Charlie Szykowny — 25.7-year old 3B/1B — .816 OPS/122 wRC+ in High-A (549 PA)

Jancel Villarroel — 21.0-year old C — .699 OPS/91 wRC+ in High-A (61 PA); .746 OPS/123 wRC+ in Low-A (372 PA)

Note: Each player’s first name links to their Baseball-Reference page, and their last name links to their Fangraphs page. All stats are from the 2025 season.

Wolverhampton Wanderers 2-2 Arsenal: Premier League – as it happened

Bottom-of-the-table Wolves came from two down to end a nine-game losing streak against leaders Arsenal, and throw the title race wide open

2 min: It’s not a pleasant evening weather-wise. It’s raining in the West Midlands, and that rain could turn to sleet or snow later. Slapstick entertainment not yet off the menu.

Wolves get the ball rolling. “A quiet night is wanted, I think, from all parties, at least in the sense of avoiding the ghastly shenanigans on view in the notorious match last night,” begins Charles Antaki, who speaks for us all. “Raucous is good, animated is fine, full bloodedness welcome, but none of the other stuff, please. British football has been pretty free of it these last years, for which we should all be grateful.”

Continue reading...

Luka Dončić reportedly supported Lakers trade deadline approach

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA - JANUARY 06: Luka Doncic #77 of the Los Angeles Lakers drives the ball around Karlo Matkovic #17 of the New Orleans Pelicans at Smoothie King Center on January 06, 2026 in New Orleans, Louisiana. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Chris Graythen/Getty Images) | Getty Images

A franchise and its biggest star need to be aligned, and it appears the Lakers have that with Luka Dončić.

The Lakers traded for him last February, and he showed that he wanted to stay here by signing an extension in the summer.

Since then, every move has been about building around Luka and maintaining flexibility so that they can have optionality this summer with as much cap space as possible.

This is why they had a rather quiet trade deadline and why Lakers President of Basketball Operations Rob Pelinka described the team as being aggressive by saying no to bad deals.

While fans might’ve been unsatisfied with the activity at the trade deadline, according to a recent piece by Dave McMenamin of ESPN, Luka supports how LA approached it.

A source familiar with Doncic’s thinking told ESPN that L.A.’s deadline approach with “adherence to discipline” and focus on the “long-term picture” was supported by the 26-year-old star. He has not pushed the team to add a superstar-level co-star for when James is no longer on the roster.

The relationship between Luka and the Lakers is still fairly new, but they’ve shown that they’ll work hard to do what he approves of.

When he joined the team in the middle of the season and asked for a center, they got him one. This summer, he was part of the recruiting pitch for Marcus Smart, and they landed him as well.

So, if he understands the inner workings of the organization and believes in the plan, then that’s what matters most.

Still, the pressure will be on the Lakers’ front office to prove they didn’t waste a deadline and can actually capitalize on the opportunity they created in the summer.

Because if they don’t upgrade the roster in significant ways this summer, then it won’t be long before even Luka will be wondering what’s being done to foster winning.

And while things are good now, as we’ve seen around the NBA with other franchises and their stars, it doesn’t take much for a situation to turn sour.

For now, though, Luka is happy and aligned with the vision.

You can follow Edwin on Twitter at @ECreates88 or on Bluesky at @ecreates88.bsky.social.

Weekly Pebble Report: Introducing the 2026 Prospect Non-Roster Invitees: Pitchers

SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA - FEBRUARY 13: Sean Sullivan #85 of the Colorado Rockies stretches prior to a bullpen session at Salt River Fields at Talking Stick on February 13, 2025 in Scottsdale, Arizona. (Photo by Kyle Cooper/Colorado Rockies/Getty Images) | Original photo by Kyle Cooper/Colorado Rockies/Getty Images, 2/13/2025

Although it may be hard to tell with the unseasonably warm weather this winter in the Mile High City, spring is in the air and on the horizon. Pitchers and catchers reported to the Rockies’ complex in Scottsdale, Arizona last week, with position players reporting yesterday. The first game of spring training is this coming Friday, and the 2026 season of Major League Baseball will be here before we know it.

The new-look Colorado Rockies front office and coaching staff have emphasized competition and the earning of positions over the off-season. They’ve brought in plenty of players who could complete for virtually every position—save for center field, catcher, and shortstop—and the prospects and youngest Rockies will have to earn their way into starting roles.

However, that doesn’t mean prospects won’t be given a chance to show their stuff.

A sizeable handful of prospects—many of them listed in our PuRPs rankings—received non-roster invites to camp this year to showcase how they might be part of this organization’s future. We’ll start by looking at the young pitchers.

Left-Handed Pitchers

Konnor Eaton (No. 28 PuRP, Pre-Season 2026) and Sean SullivanNo. 8 PuRP, Pre-Season 2026) are the two southpaw prospects with non-roster invites this spring.

Eaton, 23, was the Rockies’ sixth round pick out of George Mason University in the 2024 draft. In his professional debut season, he pitched just 11 innings, all of which were out of the bullpen. However, his workload both in college and in 2025 are that of a starter.

Eaton made 23 starts with the High-A Spokane Indians last season with a solid 3.56 ERA over 121 1/3 innings and struck out 125 batters before a late season promotion to Double-A Hartford. With the Yard Goats he made another four starts over 18 2/3 innings and posted a 5.30 ERA with 24 strikeouts. While with Spokane, he earned Northwest League Pitcher of the Week in late June after pitching back-to-back Quality Starts with 11 strikeouts in each game.

The 6’3” lefty is most likely to return to Hartford to start the 2026 season, but his ability to strike out batters and limit walks throughout his minor league career so far show promise. He misses bats with a low-to-mid 90s fastball and a high-spin sweeping slider with late horizontal break. He also has a changeup in development.

Sullivan, 23, had his 2025 season delayed after having off-season hip surgery. When he made it to Double-A Hartford in mid-May, he hit the ground running with a stupendous season.

The 2023 second round pick out of Wake Forest made 18 starts for the Yard Goats, posting a 3.14 ERA over 97 1/3 innings of work and 95 strikeouts to 24 walks. Sullivan did seem to run out of gas at the end of the season. In his final four starts, he pitched more than four innings just once and had a combined ten strikeouts over 16 2/3 innings. He had previously been on a streak of tallying five or more strikeouts in 11 of his last 12 starts.

With no experience over Double-A, Sullivan will likely start his 2026 campaign with the Triple-A Albuquerque Isotopes. However, he is virtually a lock to make his Major League debut at some point this year.

Right-Handed Pitchers

With Gabriel Hughes (No. 12 PuRP, Pre-Season 2026) now on the 40-man roster to protect him from this off-season’s Rule 5 draft, the right-handed pitching prospects left with non-roster invites fly a bit under the radar.

25-year-old reliever Brayan Castillo started his 2025 season with Double-A Hartford and was a reliable strikeout machine out of the Yard Goats’ bullpen. In 26 appearances, he struck out 40 batters, walked 17, and gave up only one home run on his way to a 2.12 ERA over 34 innings.

Castillo was promoted to Triple-A Albuquerque, where his debut was less than stellar. In his first Pacific Coast League game against the Reno Aces, he yielded five earned runs on four hits—including a home run—with a walk and a strikeout over 2/3 of an inning. However, he was lights out for the rest of the season. Castillo gave up earned runs in just two of his final 14 appearances and struck out 23 batters over 17 1/3 innings.

Also headed to Rockies camp is Eiberson Castellano, a 24-year-old from Venezuela who originally hails from the Philadelphia Phillies system. Castellano was selected by the Minnesota Twins in last year’s Rule 5 draft, but was returned to the Phillies after failing to make the Opening Day roster in spring training. He was allowed to become a minor league free agent at the end of the season.

What makes Castellano intriguing is his young age and the fact that he’s not far removed from a strong 2024 campaign. In 22 appearances—including 20 starts—across the High-A Jersey Shore BlueClaws and Double-A Reading Fightin’ Phils, Castellano posted a 3.99 ERA with 136 strikeouts and 29 walks over 103 2/3 innings. He was named the Phillies organization’s best minor league pitcher for his efforts.

Castellano struggled in 2025 pitching mostly for Double-A Reading. Battling both injuries and his own command, he carried a 5.14 ERA in 20 appearances and only made one start. While he did strike out 39 batters in 36 1/3 innings, he also walked 17 and carried a bloated 9.5 hits per nine innings.

A healthy Castellano then attended the Arizona Fall League with the Surprise Saguaros and made a solid four starts, striking out 18 batters with a 3.86 ERA over 14 innings.

Castellano can work both as a starter or from the bullpen and has done both extensively in his young professional career. His lively four-seam fastball rises late and can hit up to 98 MPH, and his excellent low-80s curveball featured a whopping 49% whiff rate in 2024. He also has a promising changeup.

With a full 40-man roster, multiple veteran signings in Jose Quintana, Tomoyuki Sugano, and Michael Lorenzen brought in over the off-season, and Rule 5 protections like Gabriel Hughes and Welinton Herrera on the inside track, it’s difficult to see a path where any of the non-roster invite pitchers make the Opening Day roster.

However, with a long season ahead and the Rockies looking to evaluate talent and establish a new floor, strong performances this spring could indicate who goes where for minor league assignments and who might be on the short list for an eventual call-up.


Please keep in mind our Purple Row Community Guidelines when you’re commenting. Thanks!

If you could pick one role player to have a big 2026 season, who would you pick?

KANSAS CITY, MO - SEPTEMBER 16: Carter Jensen #22 of the Kansas City Royals celebrates with Jonathan India #6 after hitting a home run during the game between the Seattle Mariners and the Kansas City Royals at Kauffman Stadium on Tuesday, September 16, 2025 in Kansas City, Missouri. (Photo by Tanner Gatlin/MLB Photos via Getty Images) | MLB Photos via Getty Images

The Kansas City Royals were on the brink of making the playoffs last season, they were in it until the final week of the season, despite the myriad of starting pitching injuries and hitters underperforming.

Things like that happen in baseball, everything doesn’t work out the way you want or plan for them to go. Last season, the usual suspects, Bobby Witt Jr., Salvy, Vinnie were all great. The bullpen for the most part was exceptional.

It was leaps by players like Maikel Garcia and Kyle Isbel. Taylor Clarke had a surprisingly good year, considering his expectations at the beginning of the season. Steven Cruz was a revelation out of the bullpen before suffering an injury. It was “role” players or “secondary” guys like this that helped the Royals get to another winning season of baseball.

There are plenty of candidates for the 2026 squad that could fill this role of surprise hero or big part of the team. Names like Jac Caglianone, Carter Jensen, Jonathan India come to mind immediately for me. Jac and Jensen are obviously still really young, so I don’t like calling them “role” players or “secondary” players, but the Royals are relying on those two to be huge parts of the team this season, so I feel like they fit into the category still.

The point being, outside the main cast of superstars that the Royals have, who would you pick to have a big 2026 season?

Michael Kay confused by Aaron Judge’s ‘passive aggressive’ Yankees comments

An image collage containing 2 images, Image 1 shows Aaron Judge speaks to reporters at Yankees spring training on Feb. 16, 2026, Image 2 shows Michael Kay during his ESPN Radio show on Feb. 17, 2026

Aaron Judge’s frustrations about the pace of the Yankees’ offseason left Michael Kay scratching his head.

The voice of the Yankees on YES Network said during his eponymous ESPN NY radio show Tuesday he wasn’t sure where Judge was coming from by expressing that the beginning of the offseason was “tough to watch,” while also stating he wanted the team to bring back Cody Bellinger and ultimately being pleased with Brian Cashman’s moves.

“Didn’t it seem somewhat to you passive aggressive?” Kay asked a caller. “Like, he was frustrated but then he loves the team that they have. So, what was he frustrated about? Just the pace, that they didn’t do things right away? If you’re gonna lock in to getting Bellinger, then you’re a victim to Scott Boras’ whim. So, to me, it sounded almost passive aggressive.”

Aaron Judge speaks to reporters at Yankees spring training on Feb. 16, 2026. Charles Wenzelberg / New York Post

Kay argued that once Bellinger became the priority, the Yankees couldn’t do anything else and had to wait out the sweepstakes Boras was trying to drum up for the versatile outfielder/first baseman.

“He sounded frustrated but then sounded satisfied. Little passive aggressive, but in the end, I love this team, and this is the team he wanted,” Kay said.

“I don’t understand what Aaron’s saying. Where would you have made the changes?”

For any Yankees fans who hoped the team would pursue Alex Bregman, Kay says the third baseman — who signed with the Cubs — was never an option for them and they’ve “never been engaged on Bregman” because they don’t think the righty’s swing would play at Yankee Stadium.

And regarding Kyle Tucker, Kay made the point that there’d be no spot for Tucker with Bellinger and Trent Grisham back in the fold.

Michael Kay during his ESPN Radio show on Feb. 17, 2026. YouTube/ESPN New York

Judge said at spring training on Monday he expressed his feelings to the front office.

“Early on, it was pretty tough to watch,” Judge said. “I’m like, ‘Man, we’re the New York Yankees, let’s go out there and get the right people, get the right pieces to go out there and finish this thing off.’ We got a special group of players here, we got a good core, good young core. So it was frustrating, but I think we’re right where we need to be.”

2026 Fantasy Baseball Reliever Rankings: Mason Miller climbs to the top, Edwin Díaz joins powerhouse Dodgers

Determining where to take your relievers, particularly in category leagues, is an annual draft-season dilemma.

On one hand, you’ve got the elite closers that come with a hefty price but help across the board with ratios and strikeouts, on top of having the job security to bank on saves. Jhoan Duran and Andrés Muñoz join this class, with each setting career-highs in saves while producing stellar ratios and accumulating strikeouts. However, not all at the top are safe, as the position is perhaps the most volatile in baseball. Mason Miller finished as one of the game’s top relievers. Yet, he was relegated to a setup role behind Robert Suarez, who had a spectacular year in San Diego, leading the National League with 40 saves. Devin Williams had high expectations in New York but fell flat as he struggled in a new environment. Despite the down seasons, you’ll see in our rankings that the Rotoworld staff believes the two are in for bounce-backs.

You’ve also got your veterans who are accustomed to pitching the ninth and have earned the trust of managers across baseball, your Raisel Iglesias and Kenley Jansen. Then the late-round darlings. These come in the form of breakouts or bounce backs in ambiguous situations. Last season, it was Aroldis Chapman returning to form and having his most dominant year on the mound in his 16th season.

Whether you subscribe to the early closer strategy or prefer to shoot your shots at saves in the late rounds, the Rotoworld staff is here to help with consensus rankings, projections, and outlooks for the top options.

Other position previews:

⚾️ Coming soon: MLB returns to NBC and Peacock in 2026! In addition to becoming the exclusive home of Sunday Night Baseball, NBC Sports will broadcast MLB Sunday Leadoff, “Opening Day” and Labor Day primetime games, the first round of the MLB Draft, the entire Wild Card round of the postseason, and much more.

⚾ 2026 Fantasy Baseball Reliever Rankings

** Rotoworld staff consensus rankings **

RankPlayerPouliotSamulskiSchianoShortMontanezBissellShoveinCrawfordConsensus Avg
1 Mason Miller 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 3 1.625
2 Edwin Diaz 2 3 3 1 2 2 1 2 2
3 Jhoan Duran 5 2 2 3 7 6 4 4 4.125
4 Cade Smith 3 4 4 5 3 5 5 5 4.25
4 Andres Munoz 8 5 5 4 5 4 2 1 4.25
6 Devin Williams 6 6 6 6 4 8 10 6 6.5
7 Aroldis Chapman 4 8 7 7 8 7 7 9 7.125
8 David Bednar 9 7 8 8 6 9 6 8 7.625
9 Josh Hader 7 10 14 9 12 3 8 10 9.125
10 Ryan Helsley 13 9 12 10 9 12 11 7 10.375
11 Jeff Hoffman 12 11 13 12 13 11 14 12 12.25
12 Raisel Iglesias 14 12 15 14 11 10 9 15 12.5
13 Daniel Palencia 10 14 11 11 10 16 18 19 13.625
14 Trevor Megill 15 13 9 19 16 15 16 14 14.625
15 Pete Fairbanks 18 15 17 13 14 18 15 11 15.125
16 Emilio Pagan 16 17 18 16 17 14 13 17 16
17 Carlos Estevez 19 22 19 15 15 13 12 16 16.375
18 Kenley Jansen 17 19 16 17 18 17 17 20 17.625
19 Griffin Jax 11 16 10 21 19 25 23 18 17.875
20 Abner Uribe 22 21 21 23 21 22 22 13 20.625
20 Dennis Santana 23 20 22 20 20 20 19 21 20.625
22 Ryan Walker 20 18 20 18 23 24 20 23 20.75
23 Riley O’Brien 25 35 25 22 22 21 25 25 25
24 Seranthony Dominguez 21 24 35 27 24 19 35 30 26.875
25 Bryan Abreu 24 23 23 35 27 35 26 24 27.125
26 Robert Garcia 35 35 24 25 28 25 28 26 28.25
27 Robert Suarez 26 28 35 29 29 35 21 27 28.75
28 Kirby Yates 27 35 28 24 26 35 35 22 29

Editor’s Note: Projections and dollar values courtesy of Matthew Pouliotplayer rankings are based on consensus.

⚾ 2026 Reliever Projections and Previews

1) Mason Miller - San Diego Padres

2026 Outlook: Some struggles in May resulted in a 4.04 ERA for Miller in the first half. He settled in and proceeded to give up just six more runs all season from June on, ending the year with an outstanding 2.63 ERA and 0.91 WHIP while striking out 104 batters over 61 2/3 innings for an MLB-best 44.4% strikeout rate among relievers. The 27-year-old right-hander converted 20 saves with the Athletics before he was traded to the Padres, where he slotted into a setup role behind Robert Suarez for the final two months of the season. With Suarez departing in free agency, Miller is poised to function as the primary closer in San Diego, which should present an excellent situation to generate save chances and make him one of the top selections among relievers in fantasy drafts.

2026 projection: (Mixed $25): 61.7 IP, 3 W, 38 SV, 0 H, 2.48 ERA, 0.96 WHIP, 100 K

2) Edwin Díaz - Los Angeles Dodgers

2026 Outlook: After a down year by Díaz’s standards in 2024, the 31-year-old right-hander bounced back with a stellar season, posting a 1.63 ERA, 0.87 WHIP, and a 98/21 K/BB ratio across 66 1/3 innings while converting 28 saves for the Mets. As the top reliever on the free agent market, he signed a three-year, $69 million deal to close out games for the Dodgers. Díaz posted nearly a carbon-copy season under the hood from a skills perspective, including an elite 38% strikeout rate. While the ratios could see some regression as he acclimates to a new home park, Díaz projects as one of the top closers in baseball on one of the best teams, making him well worth a pick as one of the first relievers off the board.

2026 projection: (Mixed $22): 62.3 IP, 5 W, 38 SV, 1 H, 3.18 ERA, 1.09 WHIP, 89 K

3) Jhoan Duran - Philadelphia Phillies

2026 Outlook: Duran recovered from a down year in which he posted a 3.64 ERA in 2024, posting a 2.06 ERA across 70 innings with the Twins and Phillies while converting a career-high 32 saves. Half of those saves came over the final two months with the Phillies following his trade deadline move to Philadelphia. The team found their established closer in Duran as he converted 16 of their 20 save chances after three different relievers recorded at least five saves before his arrival. While the 28-year-old right-hander has proven himself among the league’s best at suppressing runs to close out games, his strikeout rate has plateaued a bit, and the ground ball tendencies have led to higher WHIP output than other closers in the top tier. Still, Duran’s profile comes with minimal risk with considerable upside as a top-five closer selection.

2026 projection: (Mixed $15): 65.3 IP, 4 W, 36 SV, 1 H, 3.03 ERA, 1.12 WHIP, 78 K

4 - tied) Cade Smith - Cleveland Guardians

2026 Outlook: Smith followed his breakout rookie campaign with a stellar sophomore performance, starting his career with back-to-back 100-plus strikeout seasons. He was one of only five relievers to surpass 100 strikeouts in 2025. The 26-year-old right-hander appears to have the total package when it comes to elite skill sets out of the bullpen, as he keeps walks to a minimum and generates high whiff rates with his fastball, splitter, and slider. Smith had settled in as the primary setup option, recording 19 holds before stepping into the closer role following Emmanuel Clase’s suspension. He finished the season with 16 saves, a 2.93 ERA, and a 1.00 WHIP. No team has generated more saves than the Guardians over the last three seasons, leading baseball with 147. With Smith locked into the ninth-inning role, there’s RP1 overall upside with the saves and strikeout totals he can produce.

2026 projection: (Mixed $20): 64.3 IP, 4 W, 34 SV, 3 H, 2.66 ERA, 1.03 WHIP, 82 K

4 - tied) Andrés Muñoz - Seattle Mariners

2026 Outlook: Muñoz put together his best season in the majors, posting a 1.73 ERA across 62 1/3 innings while converting 38 of Seattle’s 43 saves. Though a 3.05 xFIP suggests Muñoz was fortunate to produce the numbers he did on the surface, mostly due to an elevated 11% walk rate he’s now displayed over the last three seasons. He’s been able to overcome the high walk rate with excellent swing-and-miss ability. While his swinging-strike rate remains elite at 16.1%, it’s steadily decreased over the last four years due to missing fewer bats with the fastball. Any further decline could lead to more volatility. Still, his slider remains one of the best, generating the second-most whiffs on the pitch behind just Mason Miller. Despite the minor flaws, there aren’t many relievers that possess the talent and upside to match Muñoz, who’s now added the title of “established closer” to his impeccable skillset.

2026 projection: (Mixed $14): 57.0 IP, 3 W, 35 SV, 1 H, 2.84 ERA, 1.14 WHIP, 73 K

6) Devin Williams - New York Mets

2026 Outlook: Williams had a tumultuous season with the Yankees, to say the least. Before moving from Milwaukee to New York in an offseason trade, he was one of the most dominant relievers in baseball with a career 1.83 ERA over 235 2/3 innings with the Brewers. In 2025, he struggled to a 4.79 ERA and finished with 18 saves as he was relegated from the ninth-inning role more than once, with David Bednar ending the season as the team’s closer. Still, there was plenty that Williams did on the mound that suggests a bounce-back could be on the horizon as he finds himself set to operate as the Mets’ closer after signing a three-year, $51 million contract. Underlying ERA indicators, including a 2.95 xFIP and 2.67 SIERA, imply he’s closer to the dominating pitcher he’s been throughout his career than the 2025 stats show on the surface.

2026 projection: (Mixed $15): 59.0 IP, 4 W, 36 SV, 1 H, 2.90 ERA, 1.15 WHIP, 81 K

7) Aroldis Chapman - Boston Red Sox

2026 Outlook: Chapman relayed an excellent second half of 2024 into a dominant 2025 campaign. It was perhaps the best season in the 37-year-old veteran left-hander’s career. Chapman posted a 1.17 ERA, 0.70 WHIP, and 85 strikeouts over 61 1/3 innings while converting 32 saves. Even at his age, he’s shown little sign of wearing down, with an average fastball velocity that still sits at 98mph and a swinging-strike rate of 18.7%. He even managed a career-best 6.6% walk rate, resulting in a 30.7% K-BB rate, his best mark since 2016. The only red flag we can point to in his profile is the number 38, his age on Opening Day. But there’s little reason to believe he can’t finish as a top-ten closer in 2026 once again.

2026 projection: (Mixed $16): 59.7 IP, 4 W, 31 SV, 3 H, 2.56 ERA, 1.04 WHIP, 82 K

8) David Bednar - New York Yankees

2026 Outlook: You couldn't have predicted it after Bednar was demoted to Triple-A by the Pirates on April 1 for two weeks following three rough outings to start the season, but the 31-year-old right-hander ended up having one of his best seasons. Bednar returned on April 19 and posted a 1.90 ERA over 61 2/3 innings the rest of the way while collecting 27 saves and a career-high 86 strikeouts. Ten of those saves came with the Yankees after he stepped in to establish himself as the primary closer following his acquisition from Pittsburgh at the trade deadline. With Devin Williams departing in free agency, Bednar enters the season as the unquestioned closer for the Yankees. After displaying the best underlying skills of his career, Bednar’s 2024 ERA of 5.77 looks more and more like an extreme outlier.

2026 projection: (Mixed $13): 62.3 IP, 4 W, 33 SV, 1 H, 3.47 ERA, 1.12 WHIP, 79 K

9) Josh Hader - Houston Astros

2026 Outlook: If not for a capsule sprain in his throwing shoulder that ended Hader’s season two months early, he’d be no worse than top-three. He was having an outstanding season, posting a 2.05 ERA, 0.85 WHIP, and 76 strikeouts over 52 2/3 innings while converting 28 saves. Leaning on his slider more than ever, he generated a whopping 21.1% swinging-strike rate. Hader declined to address the shoulder injury with surgery and expected to be fully healthy going into the season. However, he reportedly experienced left bicep inflammation as he began his throwing program in early February, an issue he’s downplayed. While there’s no doubting he still possesses some of the top skills at the position, it’s hard to ignore the significant risk of injury recurrence. And don’t expect Hader to have regular multi-inning outings as he did in 2025. A gamble in drafts, Hader remains one of the game’s top closers if he can avoid the injured list.

2026 projection: (Mixed $18): 61.3 IP, 4 W, 34 SV, 0 H, 3.08 ERA, 0.99 WHIP, 91 K

10) Ryan Helsley - Baltimore Orioles

2026 Outlook: Coming off his best season, Helsley failed to meet expectations, posting a 4.50 ERA, 1.54 WHIP, and 63 strikeouts over 56 innings while converting just 21 saves. All 21 saves came with St. Louis before the Cardinals sent the soon-to-be free agent to the Mets, where he struggled mightily down the stretch with a 7.20 ERA over 20 frames. More walks, a dip in his strikeout rate, and an inflated hit rate appear to be behind his down year. But Helsley has a track record of success, posting a 1.83 ERA over 167 2/3 innings across his previous three seasons. The Orioles are betting on a bounce-back, signing him to a two-year, $28 million contract, with manager Craig Albernaz confirming Helsley will operate as the primary closer on an improved Orioles team. Helsley is being drafted as a backend RP1 with upside.

2026 projection: (Mixed $10): 61.7 IP, 4 W, 32 SV, 3 H, 3.65 ERA, 1.22 WHIP, 74 K

11) Jeff Hoffman - Toronto Blue Jays

2026 Outlook: Hoffman finally got the chance to operate as a full-time closer for the Blue Jays after a pair of dominant seasons as a setup man in Philadelphia. While he managed to convert 33 saves on the year, good for fourth in baseball, it came with a disappointing 4.37 ERA and 1.19 WHIP across 68 innings. A particularly rough stretch in May, with 15 runs allowed in the month, ballooned his ERA before he rebounded in the second half. But despite an improved 3.45 ERA after the All-Star break, it came with worse underlying numbers, including an underwhelming 12% K-BB rate. While general manager Ross Atkins stated that the team isn’t committed to using Hoffman as the closer in 2026, there were no offseason additions that appear ready to threaten Hoffman for the role, signaling the team’s confidence that he can return to form.

2026 projection: (Mixed $11): 64.3 IP, 4 W, 32 SV, 1 H, 3.50 ERA, 1.15 WHIP, 77 K

12) Raisel Iglesias - Atlanta Braves

2026 Outlook: Iglesias struggled out of the gate in 2025, recording a 5.91 ERA over the first two months, and was removed from the closer role for a short stint before turning things around. He went on to post a 1.96 ERA while converting 21 saves from June onward, finishing with 29 of the team’s 34. He was terrific down the stretch, allowing one run over his final 28 outings and leading the league in saves over the final two months. There’s been a gradual decline in his fastball velocity, resulting in fewer whiffs and knocking Iglesias from elite closer status to simply very good. And despite the team’s addition of Robert Suarez, Iglesias will remain the team’s go-to option in the ninth inning. Unless we see the velocity rebound, unlikely at this stage, the saves may come with a few more bumps than we’re accustomed to for the now mid-tier closer.

2026 projection: (Mixed $9): 64.0 IP, 3 W, 31 SV, 3 H, 3.66 ERA, 1.12 WHIP, 67 K

13) Daniel Palencia - Chicago Cubs

2026 Outlook: Palencia enjoyed a breakout season with the Cubs, posting a 2.91 ERA, 1.14 WHIP, and 61 strikeouts over 52 2/3 innings. He quickly ascended the late-inning hierarchy, taking over the closer role in late May and finishing with 22 saves. Palencia’s season hit a snag when he was placed on the injured list in September for a right shoulder strain following a five-run outing. He returned to make eight more appearances, including eight in the postseason, but did not record another save. The fact that he saw no decline in his velocity, sitting at 99 mph, was a good sign upon his return from the injury. Palencia is expected to enter the 2026 season fully healthy and in line to assume closing duties for the Cubs with no apparent threats to challenge for the role. While not without risk, he’s an ideal RP2 with terrific upside in fantasy drafts.

2026 projection: (Mixed $12): 60.7 IP, 4 W, 33 SV, 3 H, 3.26 ERA, 1.15 WHIP, 67 K

14) Trevor Megill - Milwaukee Brewers

2026 Outlook: Megill was having an outstanding season, converting 30 saves with a 2.49 ERA, 1.13 WHIP, and 60 strikeouts over 47 innings before landing on the injured list in late August with a right elbow flexor strain. He returned for the postseason, but the team opted to keep Abner Uribe in the closer role as he filled in for Megill over the final month and picked up the team’s only postseason save. Megill maintains the skills to close, with a solid 22.4% K-BB rate and supporting ERA indicators. He goes into 2026 as the favorite to assume the role, having converted 30 last season and 51 for the team over the last two years. But the late-season injury and playoff usage cast far too much doubt to call this a safe pick in drafts until there’s more clarity this spring.

2026 projection: (Mixed $8): 55.0 IP, 3 W, 23 SV, 5 H, 3.27 ERA, 1.16 WHIP, 66 K

15) Pete Fairbanks - Miami Marlins

2026 Outlook: Fairbanks had an excellent year with the Rays as he was able to avoid the injured list for the first time in a full season. He converted a career-high 27 saves with a 2.83 ERA, 1.04 WHIP, and 59 strikeouts over 60 1/3 innings. For the second straight season, his strikeout rate has hovered around 24%, likely a result of his fastball dropping from 99 mph in 2022-2023 to 97 mph since 2024. When he sat at 99 mph, his strikeout rate approached 40%. It’s likely the trade-off for him staying healthy. Fairbanks is set to close for the Marlins after inking a one-year, $13 million contract with Miami. A safe bet for saves, he still comes with an elevated injury risk and the possibility he’s on the trade market if the Marlins find themselves out of contention at the deadline.

2026 projection: (Mixed $7): 55.3 IP, 3 W, 28 SV, 2 H, 3.90 ERA, 1.28 WHIP, 55 K

16) Emilio Pagan - Cincinnati Reds

2026 Outlook: Five years removed from his best season and coming off a 4.50 ERA in 2024, Pagán's resurgence came as a bit of a surprise. He emerged early on as the go-to option in the ninth, securing a hold of the closer role and ending the season with 32 saves, good for fifth in baseball, to go with an excellent 2.88 ERA, 0.92 WHIP, and 81 strikeouts over 68 2/3 innings. He’s maintained a solid 14% swinging-strike rate over the last two seasons and continues to limit free passes, but home runs remain an issue as he’s prone to the longball. Pagán is set to return as the Reds’ closer after re-signing with Cincinnati on a two-year, $20 million deal. Some regression to his .200 BABIP will make it difficult to repeat the sub-3.00 ERA given his home run rate, but he’s a solid option as a second closer for saves.

2026 projection: (Mixed $8): 64.3 IP, 4 W, 26 SV, 8 H, 3.92 ERA, 1.15 WHIP, 65 K

17) Carlos Estevez - Kansas City Royals

2026 Outlook: Estévez was able to avoid regression despite diminishing underlying skills, recording a 2.45 ERA and a 1.06 WHIP while leading MLB in saves with 42 over 66 innings. Those numbers were already going to be hard to repeat given his gradual decline in fastball velocity, bloated ERA indicators, and an 11.9% K-BB rate that was one of the worst among closers. They’re going to be even harder to replicate after the Royals adjusted the dimensions to Kauffman Stadium, bringing the fences in roughly 10 feet across the board and making the walls slightly shorter. Estévez will need to see a rebound in his velocity and bat-missing ability after his swinging-strike rate dropped from 12.5% to 8.2% if he’s to fend off serious regression. Still, he enters the season as the unquestioned closer. Draft for saves, but don’t expect the prettiest ratios.

2026 projection: (Mixed $5): 62.0 IP, 3 W, 28 SV, 3 H, 4.06 ERA, 1.26 WHIP, 56 K

18) Kenley Jansen - Detroit Tigers

2026 Outlook: Jansen continues to get the job done as he converted 29 saves for the Angels last season to go with a stellar 2.59 ERA and 0.95 WHIP with 57 strikeouts over 59 innings. However, the 38-year-old right-hander did show some chinks in the armor, as he saw a decline in some underlying skills, including a career-low 24.4% strikeout rate. And he was incredibly fortunate on balls put in play, with a .195 BABIP. But while his ERA indicators scream regression, including a 4.60 xFIP and 3.94 SIERA, Jansen has significantly outperformed those metrics nearly every season since 2020. The savvy 16-year veteran joins a Tigers team that has employed a committee approach over the last several seasons. And while he may not get every save opportunity, manager A.J. Hinch has confirmed that Jansen will open the season as the favorite to close out games as he approaches the 500-save milestone.

2026 projection: (Mixed $7): 55.7 IP, 3 W, 25 SV, 6 H, 3.72 ERA, 1.17 WHIP, 58 K

19) Griffin Jax - Tampa Bay Rays

2026 Outlook: Jax emerged as one of baseball’s top relievers in 2024 but, at least on the surface, wasn’t able to replicate his success. He recorded a 4.23 ERA and a 1.29 WHIP with 28 holds across 66 innings with the Twins and Rays. Despite the uninspiring ratios, Jax sustained outstanding underlying skills. With a swinging-strike rate of 18% over the last two seasons, he’s established himself as one of the top bat-missers among relievers, ending the season with a career-high 99 strikeouts. The struggles with run prevention can mostly be attributed to a bloated hit rate, with a .368 BABIP. It was on his fastball in particular that hitters did their damage. With a 28.1% K-BB rate that was top-ten in baseball among qualified relievers, there’s a good chance we see Jax bounce back. Just don’t expect a full share of saves as he’s set to work in a committee in Tampa Bay.

2026 projection: (Mixed $12): 66.3 IP, 4 W, 28 SV, 5 H, 3.12 ERA, 1.06 WHIP, 82 K

20 - tied) Abner Uribe - Milwaukee Brewers

2026 Outlook: Uribe burst onto the scene after a tumultuous 2024 campaign in which he saw a suspension and demotion before a knee injury ended his season. He posted an incredible 1.67 ERA, 1.04 WHIP, and 90 strikeouts over 75 1/3 innings while recording 37 holds and stepping in for seven saves, including the team’s only save in the postseason. He displayed a vastly improved walk rate, generated more whiffs, and kept the ball on the ground, exhibiting an excellent all-around skillset. Despite ending the season as the team’s closer, Trevor Megill remains the favorite to assume ninth-inning duties going into the 2026 season. Yet, there’s been speculation surrounding Megill as a potential trade candidate. It’ll be a situation worth monitoring closely this spring. Should Uribe be given the chance to run with the closer role, he has the potential to establish himself as one of the best.

2026 projection: (Mixed $6): 64.3 IP, 4 W, 16 SV, 18 H, 2.94 ERA, 1.18 WHIP, 80 K

20 - tied ) Dennis Santana - Pittsburgh Pirates

2026 Outlook: Santana is set to enter the season as Pittsburgh’s primary closer after recording a 2.18 ERA, 0.87 WHIP, and 60 strikeouts over 70 1/3 innings. He converted 16 saves, taking over the ninth-inning role after the Pirates traded David Bednar at the deadline. He has limited closing experience, with 20 career saves, and doesn’t possess prototypical closer stuff, posting just a 22.2% strikeout rate. But the team hasn’t brought anyone in who poses as an immediate threat to challenge him for the closer role. Leaning more on his slider, Santana induced a career-high 13.1% swinging-strike rate, which could potentially translate to more strikeouts. He also displayed improved control, with a career-low 6.3% walk rate. He’ll have to generate more strikeouts and continue to limit walks to limit regression, but Santana makes for a solid fallback option for saves in fantasy drafts.

2026 projection: (Mixed $4): 63.0 IP, 3 W, 23 SV, 6 H, 3.86 ERA, 1.22 WHIP, 61 K

22) Ryan Walker - San Francisco Giants

2026 Outlook: Walker followed an outstanding 2024 breakout campaign with a turbulent season, posting a 4.11 ERA, 1.27 WHIP, and 60 strikeouts over 61 1/3 innings. He entered the season as the closer but was relegated to middle relief by May after a poor start. Walker got another opportunity down the stretch after the team traded Camilo Doval and Randy Rodríguez was lost to injury, finishing with 17 saves. He was much more hittable, not inducing the same amount of swing-and-miss on his slider, resulting in a sharp reduction in his strikeout rate from 32.1% in 2024 to 22.6%. Ideally, the Giants would like Walker to make the necessary adjustments to return to form and settle back into the team’s closer role, but the team has indicated that there could be competition for the job this spring.

2026 projection: (Mixed $3): 65.0 IP, 4 W, 13 SV, 13 H, 3.60 ERA, 1.20 WHIP, 68 K

23) Riley O’Brien - St. Louis Cardinals

2026 Outlook: O’Brien started the season in Triple-A after missing most of 2024 with a forearm flexor strain. He flashed some strikeout upside in the minors with a 37.2% strikeout rate over 19 1/3 innings. He was recalled by the Cardinals and spent most of the year in St. Louis for a career-high 48 innings. O’Brien didn’t generate nearly as many strikeouts, with a 22.6% strikeout rate, but he still recorded an excellent 2.06 ERA and 1.15 WHIP while working his way into late-season ninth-inning work with six saves. A high ground ball rate helped him suppress runs, but he’s going to have to do more than that to fend off regression as an 11.6% K-BB rate likely won’t cut it if he’s to remain in the mix for saves all season. O’Brien is a late dart throw for saves with limited upside in deeper leagues.

2026 projection: (Mixed $2): 61.0 IP, 3 W, 21 SV, 6 H, 3.84 ERA, 1.33 WHIP, 63 K

24) Seranthony Dominguez - Chicago White Sox

2026 Outlook: Domínguez had a solid campaign across 62 2/3 innings, starting the season with the Orioles and finishing out with the Blue Jays after the trade deadline. He posted a 3.16 ERA and 1.28 WHIP with 79 strikeouts for an excellent 30.3% strikeout rate, his best since his debut season in 2018. While he impressed with improved strikeout ability, the tradeoff was a career-high 13.8% walk rate, one of the worst across all qualified relievers. Combined, a 16.5% K-BB rate is more middling than you’d like to see for a closer. Still, the White Sox showed their confidence in Domínguez, giving him a two-year, $20 million contract. Bringing 40 career saves, he’s expected to enter the season as the team’s closer. And he’s likely one of the last relievers in fantasy drafts that you can say that about, making him a fallback option for saves.

2026 projection: (Mixed $5): 61.7 IP, 3 W, 23 SV, 7 H, 3.79 ERA, 1.25 WHIP, 69 K

25) Bryan Abreu - Houston Astros

2026 Outlook: Abreu was one of baseball’s best relievers and top setup men once again, recording at least 24 holds and 100-plus strikeouts for the third straight season. He posted a 2.28 ERA, 1.15 WHIP, and 105 strikeouts over 71 innings, even stepping in for seven saves in Josh Hader’s absence late in the year. Despite leaning more on his fastball, Abreu generated a career-high 17.8% swinging-strike rate. And he’s the only reliever in baseball with at least 70 innings pitched in each of the last three seasons. Already one of the top closer handcuffs in baseball, Abreu appears poised to step into the ninth-inning role in the event Hader is sidelined once again. Should he find himself closing games, he can be a top-five option for saves while being one of the top strikeout leaders at the position.

2026 projection: (Mixed $1): 67.7 IP, 5 W, 4 SV, 31 H, 2.93 ERA, 1.15 WHIP, 92 K

28) Kirby Yates - Los Angeles Angels

2026 Outlook: Yates had a disappointing season with the Dodgers after an impressive career revival with the Rangers in 2024. He started the season just fine, posting a 2.95 ERA with 31 strikeouts over his first 18 1/3 innings for an outstanding 41.3% strikeout rate and 34.7% K-BB rate. Hampered by multiple hamstring and back injuries, he went on to record an inflated 5.96 ERA with just a 21.4% strikeout rate over the following 22 2/3 innings. On the bright side, his swinging-strike rate never really deteriorated as he generated a strong 16.5% mark on the year. But back and soft-tissue problems could be a common occurrence at age 39. Still, the Angels are taking a chance on the veteran right-hander, giving him a one-year, $5 million deal where he’s expected to compete for save chances, making Yates a volatile option worth a dart throw late in drafts.

2026 projection: (Mixed $4): 52.3 IP, 3 W, 22 SV, 5 H, 3.96 ERA, 1.24 WHIP, 66 K

Rangers Reacts Survey: NRI Pitchers

SURPRISE, ARIZONA - FEBRUARY 19: Josh Sborz #66 of the Texas Rangers poses for a portrait during photo day at Surprise Stadium on February 19, 2025 in Surprise, Arizona. (Photo by Emilee Chinn/Getty Images) | Getty Images

Welcome to SB Nation Reacts, a survey of fans across the MLB. Throughout the year we ask questions of the most plugged-in Rangers fans and fans across the country. Sign up here to participate in the weekly emailed surveys.

In these early days of spring training, there are a gaggle of pitchers who are in camp. Some are on the 40 man roster, some are guys in the minor league system who aren’t on the 40 man roster but who got invites, and some are veterans who are brought in on minor league deals to provide depth or to compete for a spot on the major league staff.

Today’s question…who of the veteran NRIs that the Texas Rangers have brought to camp is most likely to end up on the Opening Day pitching staff?

Cast your vote below…

Olympics hockey overtime, shootout rules explained

Olympics hockey, just like the NHL, doesn't allow for ties.

Canada and Czechia are the latest two nations to embody that, as their quarter-final matchup in the 2026 Winter Olympic games headed to overtime after a back-and-forth affair during regulation.

A late goal from Team Canada's Nick Suzuki tied the matchup at three goals apiece with time ticking down in the third. Now, both squads head to overtime looking to keep their medal hopes alive.

There are differences between NHL rules and Olympic rules on how overtimes and shootouts are conducted. The maximum length of a sudden death overtime depends on the round in which the game is being played. And the shootout format is totally different from the one used by the NHL.

Here's an explainer on how overtimes and shootouts work in Olympic hockey:

Olympic overtime rules

If the teams are tied after 60 minutes in the preliminary round, a five-minute sudden-death overtime will be played at 3-on-3. Unlike the NHL, teams don't change ends for overtime.

Overtime in a playoff game, along with the bronze medal game, lasts a maximum of 10 minutes. It's also 3-on-3, as opposed to 5-on-5 in NHL playoff games.

In the gold medal game, teams play 20-minute 3-on-3 overtime periods, separated by 15-minute intermissions, until someone scores. Teams don't change sides for the first overtime but do for subsequent overtimes.

Olympic shootout rules

If overtime doesn't settle a game outside of the gold medal game, there will be a shootout. The winner of a coin toss gets to choose whether their team shoots first or second.

The format differs from the NHL, with five shooters per team instead of three. If nothing is settled after five rounds, then each round is sudden death as in the NHL. But there's another difference. Olympic teams can use the same shooters multiple times during the sudden death rounds (think back to TJ Oshie in the 2014 Olympics). They also can change goaltenders.

In the sudden death round, the team that shot second in the first five rounds will shoot first. The rounds continue until one team finishes with one more goal than the other. That team is declared the winner.

Overtime games at the 2026 Winter Olympics

Feb. 15 - Switzerland 4, Czechia 3: Switzerland's Dean Kukan scored at 1:49 of overtime.

USA TODAY's Joe Rivera contributed to this article.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Overtime, shootout rules in Olympics hockey: How it differs from NHL