Worldwide Sports News

This was a complicated season for Donovan Mitchell. The Cleveland Cavaliers aren’t in a position to make a deep playoff run if Mitchell doesn’t carry them through a turbulent regular season. Simultaneously, the disappointing four-game sweep in the Eastern Conference Finals can be laid more at the feet of Mitchell than anyone else on the roster.

Regular Season Stats

• 27.9 points
• 5.7 assists
• 4.5 rebounds
• 48.3% FG
• 36.4% 3PT FG
• 86.5% FT

Mitchell held the Cavs together when their roster was decimated by injuries during the regular season. His efficient scoring and energy were a godsend for a team that was in desperate need of both most nights.

This past season was Mitchell’s second-highest scoring output and his second-highest efficiency. Further implementation and perfection of the short mid-range floater — in addition to his usual scoring output — allowed him to increase production without sacrificing efficiency. Mitchell converted 55% of his looks in the short midrange (four to 14 feet from the basket), putting him in the 95th percentile for scoring guards from that zone.

The increased usage in the short midrange was part of a season-long plan to keep wear and tear off his body. In previous years, he was more of a downhill finisher who initiated contact at the rim to draw fouls and get to the line. This past season, he got the shot off before contact, allowing him to play 70 games (his second-highest since being traded to Cleveland) and the entire postseason.

This was important because the Cavs as a team went as Mitchell did throughout the regular season. Cleveland was 22-6 when Mitchell played and scored 31 or more points. That record got better the more he scored. When Mitchell put up 35 or more points, his team was an outstanding 14-1.

More importantly, it was Mitchell’s off-the-court leadership that kept the team afloat when they could’ve gone completely off the rails.

“He kept this thing together,” head coach Kenny Atkinson said after their Game 7 win over the Detroit Pistons. “When things weren’t going great, he was the beacon, the light, his leadership carried us on the court. … And when things weren’t going great, he was the person everyone looked to his positivity. I would have said this even if we lost.”

The postseason proved to be a different story.

Mitchell has long been an efficient and productive playoff scorer, even though his teams had never advanced out of the second round before this past season.

The 2025 series against the Indiana Pacers is a good example of this. Mitchell contributed 34.2 points per game, but that wasn’t enough to carry the team over the finish line, considering the injuries and struggles everyone else was going through. It’s difficult to point a finger at Mitchell when his teammates weren’t living up to expectations.

It was easier to blame Mitchell this past postseason run. Mitchell’s scoring was more inconsistent than normal during this playoff run against rangey wing-heavy defensive teams like the Toronto Raptors and Pistons. He failed to eclipse 25 points in nine of his 18 postseason appearances. For context, he achieved this in six out of nine appearances in 2025 and in seven out of 10 games in 2024.

This is important because the regular-season trend of the Cavs performing well if Mitchell did continued in the playoffs. Cleveland was 4-2 in postseason games when Mitchell scored 30 or more points, and were 4-8 when he scored less. This included going 1-3 when he registered 20 or fewer points.

The lack of consistent scoring highlighted the other shortcomings in Mitchell’s game, particularly with his playmaking for others. He wasn’t able to get teammates involved, and when he wasn’t scoring, the offense was mostly stuck in neutral. This is why Cleveland’s offense was 11 points worse with him on the floor in the postseason compared to when he was off.

Assists aren’t necessarily the most accurate way to determine whether someone is creating for others, but they can be instructive. Mitchell averaged 5.7 assists in the regular season. He only exceeded that average once in 18 playoff games.

This coincided with Mitchell’s passes made per game and potential assists dropping. He averaged 41.7 passes per game in the regular season, and just 34.6 in the playoffs. His potential assists went from 11.1 per game in the regular season to 7.6 in the postseason.

The frustrating part of this is that when Mitchell made a concerted effort to get others involved, it led to tremendous team and individual success.

Mitchell made it a point to get the bigs involved in Game 7 against the Pistons. He had a playoff-high eight assists in that game, with all but one of those helpers going to either Evan Mobley or Jarrett Allen. The willingness to make those passes opened up the offense for himself and his teammates, resulting in a lopsided 125-94 road elimination victory.

Mitchell’s team advanced to the conference finals for the first time in his career, but it felt like many of these wins were despite Mitchell’s efforts, not because of them. That was a first for his Cleveland tenure and was in stark contrast with Jalen Brunson’s postseason run with the New York Knicks.

The two undersized scoring guards often find themselves in similar places in the NBA player rankings and have similar archetypes. The difference between the two this past playoffs was Brunson’s willingness to move the ball and compete defensively.

Brunson consistently took what the defense gave him. This led to 14 assists in Game 2 against Cleveland because the Cavs consistently double-teamed him. This caused Cleveland to adjust away from that strategy in the final two games of the series, which allowed him to attack one-on-one mismatches.

At the risk of belaboring the point too much, this is also seen in Brunson’s passing numbers. Brunson made 63.6 passes per game in the regular season with 11.7 potential assists per game. Those numbers didn’t dip much in the playoffs as Brunson posted 63.1 passes per playoff game with an average of 10.3 potential assists.

It’s fair to point out that Brunson is the point guard of the Knicks, while Mitchell isn’t. However, if you’re in the 99th percentile for usage in the regular season and 100th percentile in the playoffs — as Mitchell is — the point guard designation doesn’t matter all that much. In the NBA, whoever has the ball in their hand needs to be able to act as a facilitator if they’re going to optimize the offense. And with Mitchell occupying that many possessions, he needs to do a better job of helping his teammates.

The shorcomings Mitchell’s games aren’t skill-related. He has the tools to be a great passer (and defender). The question is whether he wants to improve his game the way he needs to in order to help his team more in the playoffs next season, regardless of how different the roster might look.

The difference between the regular season and playoffs makes it difficult to grade Mitchell’s year. On one hand, the Cavs aren’t in a position to even make a playoff run if it weren’t for his consistent play on a nightly basis. On the other hand, his shortcomings directly led to Cleveland not being able to put away Toronto and Detroit as early as they should’ve, which contributed to the one-sided loss to New York.

I’m going to lean more negative than I’d like in this situation. The playoffs are all that matter for someone in Mitchell’s position. And that is where he fell short most.

Grade: C

When the Phoenix Suns acquired Miles Bridges, a plethora of questions entered my mind. And one of the first was whether or not they would extend him. He is entering the final year of his contract at $22.8 million, so the possibility existed that Phoenix moved off the $29 million owed to Grayson Allen and Royce O’Neale to save money in the short term while creating more financial flexibility moving forward. But when I saw that the Suns attached their unprotected 2033 first-round pick to make the transaction work, my thinking changed.

I don’t believe it would be responsible to attach an asset that valuable simply to move off money. That leads me to believe the Suns have a longer-term vision for Bridges, which got me thinking about two questions. What would an extension look like, and when should Phoenix offer it?

My opinion? This isn’t a decision that should be rushed. Bridges becomes eligible for an extension on July 14, but eligibility doesn’t mean the organization needs to immediately put a contract in front of him. The reasonable and responsible way to navigate this is to wait and see. How does Bridges fit within the system Phoenix is building? How does he respond to his teammates? More importantly, how does he look on the court alongside them?

For all the numbers and analytics you can gather, the one thing that remains difficult to quantify is chemistry. The Suns should give themselves time to determine whether that chemistry exists between Bridges and the team they’re building. If it does, give him the contract. If it doesn’t, start thinking about an exit strategy.

The Suns don’t have to be in a rush because there are two options relative to a Miles Bridges extension that currently exist. The first is if they opt to sign him within six months of the trade. Seeing as the trade becomes official tomorrow, July 6, that would put the six-month mark at January 6, 2027.

That gives Phoenix plenty of time to execute the strategy laid out above and evaluate how Bridges fits within the confines of this roster. They can see how he plays alongside Devin Booker and Jalen Green, how he responds to Jordan Ott’s system, and whether the chemistry exists to justify a long-term commitment.

If the Suns opt to extend Bridges within that six-month window, they would be limited by the extend-and-trade rules. Essentially, the maximum amount Phoenix could offer him would begin at 120% of his previous $22.8 million salary, with 5% raises in each additional season and no more than four total seasons, including the current year.

So what does that look like financially? The new deal would be three years, with a maximum of $86.3 million, structured as such:

Season	Salary
2026-27	$22,826,087
2027-28	$27,391,304
2028-29	$28,760,87
2029-30	$30,130,435
Extension Total	$86,282,609

Here is how it would look on the Suns’ five-year cap sheet:

If the Suns opt to wait, Miles Bridges could become eligible for a larger extension.

Once that six-month restriction passes, post-January 6, if you will, Phoenix could offer him a standard veteran extension. This is the deal that provides Bridges with more long-term security and comes with a potentially higher price tag. The standard extension can begin at up to 140% of the final year of his current contract with 8% annual raises.

How does that look on the cap sheet? Four years, $143.2 million.

Season	Salary
2026-27	$22,826,087
2027-28	$31,956,522
2028-29	$34,513,044
2029-30	$37,069,565
2030-31	$39,626,087
Extension Total	$143,165,218

And the cap sheet, where Bridges finds himself alone as the only player under contract in the 2023-31 season:

What is alarming about that number in both scenarios is the Suns’ total cap figure for the 2027-28 season. Yes, the salary cap will increase, along with the luxury tax and apron thresholds, but Phoenix would still be committing a significant amount of money to the roster. And all of this is without a Dillon Brooks extension, which could tack on another $25 million to the cap sheet.

Both of those contract structures represent the maximum amount Phoenix could offer. The Suns could offer Bridges less than 120% of his current salary in the three-year scenario or less than 140% once the six-month restriction passes. I’m providing the maximum values simply to illustrate the high-end possibilities and establish the ceiling of what a potential extension could look like.

It all depends on how the Suns believe Bridges aligns with their future. I wouldn’t be surprised if Phoenix ultimately takes the swing and signs him to one of those extensions. Why? Because the timelines align pretty well with the current path of the organization.

The Suns have young talent they’re in the process of developing, and those players can continue to grow alongside this current era of Suns basketball. Rasheer Fleming is the obvious player to watch as it pertains to a Bridges extension because he plays the same position at the four. We know injuries will occur, opportunities will arise for Fleming to earn playing time, and ultimately it comes down to how well he develops when those opportunities present themselves.

There is also a world in which the Suns opt not to extend Dillon Brooks, something they have yet to do, and Miles Bridges eventually moves to small forward while Fleming takes over as the starting power forward. Theoretical? Absolutely. But it’s a possibility nonetheless.

If the Suns were to extend Bridges for three years, Rasheer Fleming would be 25 years old when that contract expires. Fleming will also become eligible for a rookie extension next summer, even though he remains under contract through the summer of 2029 if the Suns exercise his team option in the summer of 2028. That gives Phoenix time to evaluate Fleming’s development while maintaining stability at the position with Bridges.

Then there is the money timeline. Devin Booker is under contract through 2030, the same timeframe in which the dead money finally comes off the Suns’ cap sheet. Extending Miles Bridges would align with that timeline.

Between now and 2030, the Suns have first-round draft picks. They might not be the most valuable first-round picks, but they do have ammunition in the proverbial draft gun to continue adding young players and prospects to the organization. That gives Phoenix multiple swings at development during the same timeframe in which they have NBA starting-caliber players attempting to remain competitive.

Why does that matter? Because there is no benefit to losing for the Suns over the next four years. They don’t control their own draft capital, so there is no reward for mediocrity. The best-case scenario for Phoenix is to continue fielding a competitive team that showcases the identity and culture the organization desires while winning basketball games. That environment also allows young players to earn minutes rather than having them gifted. For players who aren’t lottery picks, I believe that’s the best way to develop.

We should know in the coming weeks what the Phoenix Suns’ strategy is as it pertains to Miles Bridges’ contract. If July 14 arrives and they offer him the three-year extension, don’t be surprised.

While I believe the organization should be prudent and see how Bridges fits within everything the Suns have developed, they did give up that unprotected 2033 first-round pick. They most likely did so with a contract extension in mind. If they do extend him, the hope is that Phoenix doesn’t go all the way to the maximum 120% of his previous salary. The Suns have done an outstanding job this offseason bringing back their players while getting them on appropriate discounts. We’ll see if Brian Gregory can showcase those contract negotiation skills once again when it comes to Miles Bridges.

The other thing to remember, regardless of the length or value of the extension Bridges might receive, is that nothing is permanent. Giving him a contract now doesn’t mean the Suns couldn’t move off of it at some point down the road. If Rasheer Fleming pops as a player, Bridges naturally becomes more expendable.

Granted, we don’t know what the market for Bridges would look like at that exact time or what circumstances might lead to a trade. But if this offseason has taught us anything, it’s that almost any contract can be traded. I never thought Paul George would be moved given his production and the two years, $110 million remaining on his contract, but the NBA continues to find ways to surprise us.

So whenever that Bridges extension comes, it isn’t the end of the world or some permanent declaration about the future of the franchise. It’s simply where the Suns are now.

At this point in the offseason, it’s very clear the Lakers are focused on opening up cap space in order to sign a wing, a glaring hole on the team’s current roster.

What also appears to be clear is that, for now, the focus is not on re-signing one of their free agents, but bringing a new player in.

Rui Hachimura’s free agency hasn’t gone according to plan as he currently still sits without a contract and with few suitors lined up. It left some to wonder if he could return to the Lakers and fill their hole on the perimeter.

However, according to NBA beat writer Jake Fischer, that doesn’t appear to be in the plans for the purple and gold. In his latest piece on Substack on Saturday, Fishcer noted that the presumption around the league is the Lakers are focused on Jonathan Kuminga, not Rui Hachimura, as their wing signing.

There is a corresponding (and growing) expectation that free agent forward Rui Hachimura will join James in exiting Tinseltown.

The Lakers, league sources say, are focused on adding a wing and another big man after Friday’s agreement with Washington to trade Deandre Ayton for the slightly less expensive Jaden Hardy and two future second-round picks.

And a good bit of that focus, sources say, has involved Kuminga.

Considering the team’s needs and the skill sets of Kuminga and Hachimura, there is rationale for targeting the former. The Lakers have a hole at the small forward position and Rui is more of a four than a three. Kuminga is a better perimeter defender, a need for the Lakers, and is more athletic, fitting the profile of the players signed this offseason.

But the Lakers are not unopposed in their pursuit of Kuminga. In the same piece, Fischer notes the Cavs are interested in signing him while the Hawks are also open to bringing him back.

The Lakers’ need to create cap space means Kuminga could be off the market by the time they can sign him. It adds to the urgency of the situation. It also is further evidence of how fluid free agency remains.

For now, the Lakers don’t seem interested in bringing back Rui. But things can still change.

You can follow Jacob on Twitter at @JacobRude or on Bluesky at @jacobrude.bsky.social.

The Nets couldn’t close it out in their first Summer League game against the Kings, and depending on how much stock you want to put into the exhibition matchups, there were plenty of positives to take away. One being Egor Dëmin, who dropped 23 points and looked like a Summer League veteran. They also played stellar defense against Darius Acuff Jr., who scored 25 points in 24 minutes — on 29 shots.

Unfortunately, fans didn’t get a chance to see Mikel Brown Jr., who sat out yesterday and is out again today. He’ll play on Monday against the Warriors. The Nets will also sit Dëmin, Ben Saraf, Drake Powell, Danny Wolf, Tyler Bilodeau, and Chaney Johnson. Who’s left? Hunter Sallis, James Harden’s cousin!

Not playing for the Bucks: Nate Ament who the Nets may or may not have had interest in. Like Joshua Johnson, he’s involved in a trade that doesn’t get finalized till Monday.

---

🏀 Key Info

• Matchup: Milwaukee vs. Brooklyn
• Time (ET): 3:00 p.m. ET
• Broadcast / Streaming Platform: Gotham Sports App, Prime, NBA TV, NBA League Pass, ESPN+

---

💬 Discussion

Share your thoughts and react, but please be respectful. NetsDaily prides itself on being a safe space for Nets and basketball fans alike to have healthy conversation. Reach out to Anthony Puccio or Net Income with any issues.

With limited roster and cap space, the Knicks made a pretty big gamble about a year ago in free agency.

While using their mid-level exception on Guerschon Yabusele would prove to ultimately be riskier, it was pretty eye-opening to see the team sign Jordan Clarkson, a high-usage, low-shot-quality microwave scorer who had played on a destitute Utah Jazz team for the last three seasons.

But what the team wanted from him was objectively different than what he had been his entire career. They needed his scoring punch, sure, but they wanted him to be a team player on both ends as a contributing role player. Selfish play, low-quality shots, and poor defensive effort weren’t acceptable here.

It wasn’t all sunshine and rainbows for Clarkson in New York. He had stretches of brilliance, most notably a strong December, but was also kicked out of the rotation in late January due to his lack of effort.

It was an experiment. Would the grizzled veteran who isn’t used to winning basketball buy in?

When he got his next opportunity, he seized it by doing everything Mike Brown could’ve asked for. The consummate selfish role player bought in and became a champion.

Fast forward to this offseason, and while the Knicks certainly haven’t ruled out bringing him back next year, it seems like they could go another direction in bringing in one more guard or wing to the roster.

You look at the bench, which is very similar to last year’s, and it looks good, but it lacks the self-created scoring ability that Clarkson possessed. Could they look for a similar archetype?

Well, fortunately for the Knicks, they’ll have options. Outside of Clarkson, there are interesting names on the free agent and buyout market that could fit his role, but with the added risk of buy-in once again.

Bradley Beal and DeMar DeRozan were both once stars of the game. In the late 2010s, they were staples of the Wizards and Raptors, perennially gaining all-star and All-NBA consideration despite their teams always stagnating.

In both of their careers, they stagnated. Their teams grew frustrated with the lack of progress and sent them away. DeRozan was the sacrificial lamb so that Toronto could win a title with Kawhi Leonard. Beal was sent to Phoenix at a low point in his value so Washington could tank. Both of them have steadily declined since, but have still been in different situations entering this offseason.

Beal is coming off a major injury after planning to be a complementary starter on the Clippers in 2025-26, while DeRozan has gotten his numbers up on a truly horrible Kings team that’s going nowhere. While Beal is a free agent now entering his age-33 season, DeRozan is a buyout candidate nearing his 37th birthday. Despite their difference in age, both feel equally close to the end of their NBA careers without any playoff glory to speak of.

Could either be a candidate to join the Knicks’ bench on a vet min?

It all boils down to their willingness to become a team player.

Being unsigned nearly a week into free agency likely means Beal would have to latch on somewhere as a backup anyway, and for a guy who’s never even made the Conference Finals, you’d think he’d be enticed to get an opportunity on a contender.

“I need a ring.”

— Bradley Beal on signing with the Clippers.

(via @tamar_sher)

pic.twitter.com/BDmuXWpDgL

— Hoop Central (@TheHoopCentral) August 11, 2025

He’d likely be a better true role player than many think, despite his defensive weaknesses. He’s improved greatly as a shooter since leaving Washington, shooting 40.5% from downtown on 4.6 attempts per game since 2023-24 while becoming a steadier secondary playmaker. He’s also been fairly efficient for a high-usage guard, something that was a major wart on Clarkson’s resume.

BRADLEY BEAL. 🥶

pic.twitter.com/089YY9N0VX

— Hoop Central (@TheHoopCentral) January 12, 2024

The weaknesses are, of course, shoddy defense and his recent injury issues. He’s not terribly old but has played in just 59 total games over the last two seasons. He last played more than 60 games in 2018-19 and is coming off a broken hip. He might be a good fit as a true role player at this point in his career, but there are still major warts that likely give teams pause.

The other option would be DeRozan, contingent on the Kings buying him out. He’s the opposite of what Beal has become over the last few years, continuing to be a high-usage, mid-range maestro. Last year was the first time in 13 years he averaged under 20 points a game, but still averaged 18.4 on nearly 50% from the field.

Clarkson was never a DeRozan-esque offensive player, but he played like DeRozan in his sixth man role for a long time. Their shot diets aren’t conducive to modern basketball; both are shoddy three-point shooters, and neither has ever seen a shot they don’t like. DeRozan isn’t as reckless as Clarkson and has always been turnover-averse, but his style of basketball hasn’t correlated with winning much.

Aside from a long playoff run in 2016 with the Raptors, he’s never gone deeper than an uncompetitive second-round series. In the last seven years, he has one playoff series to his name. He’s also never been anything but a high-usage starter, coming off the bench just 12 times in his career (all as a rookie in 2009-10). His 13.1 FGA/g in 2025-26 were his lowest in 16 years.

The perk of DeRozan is that he would immediately become the second-best self-creating scorer on the team. A few other players can get their own shots, but none can do it quite like DeRozan, other than the captain. He’s also consistently been one of the best clutch scorers in basketball, finishing top three in Clutch Player of the Year voting in 2024 and 2025. This could give the Knicks a secondary option in closing offensive lineups to Brunson’s iso ball.

DEMAR DEROZAN GAME WINNER. 🔥🔥

pic.twitter.com/loJf6WAns0

— Hoop Central (@TheHoopCentral) February 11, 2025

The downside is self-explanatory. He’d be a 15-20-minute role player, something he’s never been in his career. He hasn’t been a reliable defender in a long time. He has the exact same worries you might have with Clarkson last season, except with the added distinction of him being a five-time All-Star with an ego he’d have to check at the door to join a championship-caliber operation.

All of this aside, they could also just bring back Clarkson, who reinvented himself to prolong what was looking like a fleeting career midway through last season. Their current cap situation will likely see two more players signed, with one being a third center.

Is this the archetype they should hunt? They should at least think about it.