The Celtics should (basically) not make a trade this year

Oh boy, welcome back to our annual Socratic seminar about “should the Celtics make a trade this year?” A tradition unlike any other, it’s one of the most important questions for each Celtics season — answering it can reflect the state of the team, the direction and goals for the coming playoff run or tanking extravaganza. In some ways, it’s the defining concept of each season. To trade or not to trade, that is the question.

Yeah… except it’s actually a stupid question. 

Presenting this discussion as a binary between “the Celtics should stand pat with their roster” or “the Celtics should go out and try to improve their roster” is the easiest answer since you asked your 4-year-old niece if she wanted ice cream or not. Of course the Celtics should try to improve their roster! What is the point of paying front office executives and scouts millions of cumulative dollars if you’re not always trying to improve your roster? That would be like asking that same 4-year-old niece about ice cream and you literally own an ice cream shop. 

The Celtics are always going to try to get better. The real question is “is it possible to improve this team without needlessly hamstringing its future flexibility?” which is, of course, not a stupid question and one we can actually try to answer. Trading Anfernee Simons to get under the first apron of the luxury tax seemed like a mortal lock until he went sicko mode in the last month and is now very reasonably a Sixth Man of the Year candidate.*

*side note: what the heck is up with the Celtics printing 6MOYs? Brogdon, Pritchard, and now maybe Simons? It seems like there’s a real infrastructure here that we need to dissect. Maybe I’ll get to that in the offseason.

I’m still in favor of trading Simons due to the simple fact that he is capital G Gone at the end of this season. He’s on the final year of a reasonably sized expiring contract, and unless Jayson Tatum can come back, be actually, literally, unequivocally, 100% and the Celtics can compete for a title this year, it seems silly to lose him for nothing. They definitely won’t be able to pay him after this year, so forget about that.

The issue is that the above Tatum situation is still an open question. Tatum launched the mother of all press balloons by staging a full workout in front of reporters, quite intentionally getting the conversation going about whether he’ll be back sooner rather than later. And while it makes me uncomfortable, I’ve long resigned to not judging Tatum and the team’s decision on when he returns. Oh, what, do I have better medical info than Tatum and the team doctors? No, I don’t, so I’ll stay out of it.

We don’t, unfortunately, have any indication of when/if Tatum will return, which also, unfortunately, means we have a classic Schrödinger’s Simons situation. If Tatum returns, I don’t want to trade Simons. If he doesn’t, I do. 

For Simons, this is kind of a great situation. He’s playing great and making the case that he should get a decent-sized contract this offseason, and he’s probably okay if that doesn’t come from the Celtics. If Boston trades him somewhere, he might be able to work on an extension with them or start planning his future (which he’s probably already doing). 

For the Celtics, this is awkward, because I am unable to responsibly answer the Simons question without more Tatum info. Maybe we’ll get some soon, but for now I’ll punt on that one. Dealing Simons would remove an offensive creator, yes, but that should be made up for by Derrick White figuring out whatever slump he’s in. Couple that with how much future flexibility it will give Boston financially, and it’s probably worth it. But the larger question of “is it possible to improve this team without needlessly hamstringing its future flexibility?” remains unanswered. I’ll speculate anyway.

Save for a Simons deal, I think it probably is not possible to do better than this without doing something irresponsible. 

Because of the misfortune that befell Tatum and the rest of last year’s roster, we can imagine this Celtics season as life giving us limes and making limeade (which clears lemonade btw). Now, the limeade we made is insanely good, and each individual lime has managed to produce more lime juice than the top Lime-ologists previously thought possible. As I’ve discussed at length, this team is playing way over its head on so many levels. 

Transactions, then, are pretty likely to reduce the quality of the limeade. Say the Celtics packaged Garza and Hauser and a pick for some “better” player. What are the chances that player will immediately assimilate and produce what those two have managed for the Celtics this year on aggregate? Pretty low. Sure, in theory the Celtics are a porous team with lots of growth areas, but that simply hasn’t borne out in reality.

I’m ready to start taking this team seriously as a collection of serious basketball players that work well together, rather than treating it like a fantasy football team that will regress to the mean and thus we need to “sell high.” The sample size is too big for that kind of argument; this works, so I say let it work.

40 in 40: Logan Evans turns two

Logan Evans’ future depends on two numbers from his rookie season: 

  • .529 OPS allowed on the first turn through a lineup in a game (fifth best in MLB)
  • 1.022 OPS allowed on the second turn through a lineup in a game (worst in MLB)

That .493 difference was the largest such split in 2025 and one of the 20 largest splits in MLB history. Which number better reflects his true talent? 

OPS allowed isn’t the ideal measure for pitchers. I use it here as it’s the parlance of Baseball Reference, which facilitates the comparison. The next plot shows performance against this split using FIP (courtesy of Fangraphs). Here we see a less extreme split, with Evans performing closer to average on the first time through the order, while still the worst in MLB on the second.

Evans’ (relative) success on the first time through the order was thanks to an outstanding ability to limit quality of contact. He didn’t get a lot of whiffs or strikeouts, and his command was just OK. But batters simply could not square up the ball in their first look, either rolling over or getting jammed or popping up or otherwise juuuuuust missing. His .289 xwOBAcon allowed on the first time through the order was sixth in MLB.

On the second time through the order, he was awful by every metric.

The most likely explanation for this phenomenon is that sometimes bizarre splits show up in small samples; Evans accomplished this feat across just 15 starts. The safe analyst would evaluate him by his overall line: 5.05 FIP, 8% K-BB, 1.44 HR/9, -0.1 fWAR. That’s a bottom 20% starting pitcher line posted by a seventh-string, 12th rounder with poor stuff. That’s, frankly, what we should expect from Evans.

Still, it’s hard to ignore that for nine batters a night, Evans was a good or even great pitcher. We care about this split because it’s a possible clue towards something less measurable, something fundamental. We know a lot of pitching is Stuff, but we’re increasingly aware a lot of pitching is other stuff. Batters gain an advantage the more they see a pitcher in a game, so for a pitcher to perform notably in the early or late parts of an outing, that could say something about those less measurable abilities. And for a pitcher at the extremes — Evans certainly is — perhaps it says something about the nature of those abilities themselves. What might we learn about pitching by studying Logan Evans? What might we learn about humanity?

God I love small samples.

Evans in his rookie season showcased a deep, six-pitch repertoire. What he lacked in speed and spin, he made up for in sheer quantity. He could make the ball go in every conceivable direction at release, and batters had a tough time guessing where and when to swing.

We can see that, especially to lefties, Evans mixed his repertoire evenly and unpredictably. Batters had to respect that any one of six pitches might show up, preventing them from teeing off on something specific.

That approach worked on the first time through the order, and most of his pitches were effective against either handedness. But all his pitches got measurably worse across the board once the lineup turned over.

I’m not sure why this was the case. I appreciate that certain skills might be more or less resistant to the times through the order penalty, but to go from so good to so bad is hard to wrap my head around. Perhaps this says something about the impact of movement spread, as coined by Stephen Sutton-Brown for Baseball Prospectus, or the idea that having lots of pitches moving in all directions can keep hitters off balance. Maybe that alone is enough to get through a lineup once, and then raw stuff is necessary from there? Or maybe Evans struggled to disguise (or tunnel) his pitches, as Timothy Jackson recently pointed out for Baseball Prospectus; once they could identify each of his pitches, the jig was up.

Evans enters Spring Training 2026 as depth. His exact proximity to the starting rotation is unclear, whether he’ll continue to serve as second alternate or if he’ll leapfrog Emerson Hancock’s fourth attempt. We only know that opportunity relies on something going wrong, and that something will eventually go wrong. The Mariners are coming off a season where four starting pitchers missed time with some type of injury; one of them still has bone spurs. Evans will pitch in MLB at some point this year.

I’m fascinated to see what if any changes he makes. The Mariners know all that I’ve written here. They’ve seen his splits, they’ve measured his arsenal, and they’ve surely set forth a Plan. Maybe we’ll see him add a pitch, or remove a pitch, or overhaul a pitch, or shift his aim, or adjust his sequencing — something in an attempt to stump batters just a bit longer. It’s worth following for the sake of Evans’ career and the Mariners’ success, but it could also provide a glimpse into the minds of one of the sharper collections of pitching thinkers out there. This is a challenge that justifies our modern Pitching Bureaucracy. This is where organization reputations are earned.

Cody Bellinger re-ups with the Yankees

I don’t think anyone really expected another outcome for Cody Bellinger. Did you?

Here’s the deal that returns Bellinger to the Bronx:

Bellinger’s swing seems well-suited for Yankee Stadium, and that shows in his splits from 2025.

Home: .302/.365/.544 with 18 home runs in 298 at-bats
Away: .241/.301/.414 with 11 home runs in 290 at-bats

So yeah. Outside of Yankee Stadium, that’s not a hitter who would rate such a contract.

You likely recall that Bellinger had a three-homer game against the Cubs last year, and would have had a fourth if not for this great catch by Kyle Tucker [VIDEO].

(NOTE: This does not suggest I wish the Cubs had re-signed Tucker. It’s just a great play worth noting.)

Anyway, while Bellinger has some opt-outs in this deal, my feeling is that he’ll stay with the Yankees for the five-year term. As noted, he’s a good fit there and the Yankees do, generally, contend every year.

If you’re interested in seeing him play at Wrigley, the Yankees will visit the Cubs for a three-game series July 31-Aug. 1-2. Should be a hot ticket — and not just to see Bellinger.

Cody Bellinger signs five-year, $162.5 million deal with Yankees

After a protracted staring contest, the New York Yankees and Cody Bellinger have finally reunited.

Bellinger and the Yankees agreed to terms on a five-year, $162.5 million deal, according to a person with direct knowledge of the negotiations. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the deal is not yet finalized.

The agreement comes after an impasse on the length of contract: Bellinger was aiming for a seven-year commitment, but the Yankees hoped to stick to a five-year deal for the 30-year-old outfielder/first baseman. After potential landing spots were largely short-circuited by the signings of Kyle Tucker and Bo Bichette last week, Bellinger met the Yankees' ask for length of contract, while ensuring a $32.5 million annual salary - highest in Bellinger's career.

Bellinger has experienced a career resurgence after injury-plagued 2021 and 2022 seasons with the Los Angeles Dodgers. Since then, Bellinger thrived with both the Chicago Cubs and New York Yankees, smacking 73 homers and posting a cumulative 12.1 WAR over the last three campaigns.

Here's everything to know about Bellinger's new deal.

Cody Bellinger contract details

Bellinger agreed to a five-year, $162.5 million deal. The contract contains opt-out clauses after the second and third years, but they move back a year if the 2027 season is canceled due to a lockout. Bellinger receives a $20 million signing bonus and $32.5 million each of the first two seasons, guaranteeing him $85 million before his first opt-out.

Cody Bellinger 2025 stats

Bellinger experienced one of his best seasons in 2025, finishing 14th in AL MVP voting in his lone season with the New York Yankees. His 29 home runs mark the third-most he's hit in a season, and his best mark since belting 47 in his MVP season in 2019.

Bellinger slashed .272/.334/.480 across 152 games with New York, accumulating 5.1 WAR in 2025, a stellar mark and his most since 2019. Bellinger also played a tremendous right field in pinstripes, racking up eight Defensive Runs Saved at the position in just 416 innings.

Bellinger has played in at least 130 games in each of the last four seasons, showing a durability after his stint with the Dodgers ended after both shoulder surgery and a lower-leg injury dampened his final two seasons.

Contributing: Bob Nightengale

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Cody Bellinger contract with Yankees: What we know

An expected major winter storm already has some leagues reshuffling games this week

One year after a winter storm forced postponements across U.S. sports, another major weather system is prompting a reshuffling of games this week and threatened to wreak havoc on the weekend schedule.

A storm that meteorologists say could rival the damage of a major hurricane is expected to bring snow, ice and frigid temperatures from New Mexico to New England starting Friday.

Major League Baseball’s Texas Rangers canceled their annual Fan Fest event scheduled for Saturday due to the weather forecast for frozen precipitation in North Texas and “in the interest of safety for players, fans, and employees.”

The Sun Belt Conference preemptively shook up its women’s basketball schedule, moving around the start times on several games from Thursday through Saturday. The American Athletic Conference also adjusted its weekend men’s and women’s basketball schedules, moving some games up to Friday.

Tennessee’s swim meet at Georgia and the USC Upstate women’s basketball game at Longwood were moved up to Friday from Saturday due to the forecast.

___

AP sports: https://apnews.com/sports

Yankees re-sign Cody Bellinger to five-year, $162.5 million contract

As soon as outfielder Cody Bellinger decided to exercise his opt-out in early November and hit free agency again this offseason, it seemed like he and the Yankees would find their way back to each other. Both sides were extremely complimentary about each other and New York in particular was active in talking to the media about their desire to retain him, even when seemingly superior outfield options like Kyle Tucker were also available on the market. Because Bellinger’s agent is Scott Boras, however, negotiations took a very long time as Boras tried to find the best possible deal for his player, and there were talks of him negotiating with the Mets and Blue Jays as well.

Two and a half months later, the sides have finally come together, not long after Tucker signed with the Dodgers and the Mets picked up Luis Robert Jr. via trade. The official terms are below, per ESPN’s Jeff Passan, who broke the signing. It’s a five-year contract with some particular details:

If he wants, Bellinger, will be able to test the market again after the 2027 and 2027 campaigns. There are no deferrals. Boras and Bellinger had been angling for six or seven years, but the Yankees stuck to their guns on the five-year offer with opt-outs.

Is this a lot of money for someone who wasn’t even an All-Star in 2025? Sure, but the Yankees bleed money, they absolutely needed to keep Bellinger in this offense given the alternatives, and they were able to avoid a longer-term commitment that has burned them in the past with similar players like DJ LeMahieu. Bellinger was quite productive in 2025 regardless of his specific honors (he did make the All-MLB Second Team), hitting .272/.334/.480 with 29 homers—his most since his MVP year in 2019—and a 125 wRC+. This is a win-now move for a team that still has Aaron Judge in his scalding-hot prime and needs to win now, though they could still use another starting pitcher. Bellinger’s lefty swing was well-suited for Yankee Stadium, he covered the tricky left field with aplomb, he could shift back to center next year if Trent Grisham departs, he can man first as well in a pinch, and he’ll be able to keep calling the place where his father once played home for likely the rest of the decade.

We’ll have more to come soon at Pinstripe Alley. In the meantime, welcome back Cody!

Yankees re-signing OF/1B Cody Bellinger to five-year deal

Cody Bellinger is returning to the Bronx.

After opting out of his contract following the end of the 2025 season, the Yankees and Bellinger have agreed to a new five-year, $162.5 million contract, per multiple reports.

The deal reportedly has opt-outs after 2027 and 2028, along with a $20 million signing bonus and a full no-trade clause.

The Yankees acquired Bellinger in a trade with the Chicago Cubs — along with $5 million in cash considerations — in December 2024 for right-handed pitcher Cody Poteet and the former NL MVP became arguably the team's second-best hitter this past season. 

The 30-year-old slashed .272/.334/.480 with 29 home runs and 98 RBI in 152 regular season games this year. He was a Silver Slugger finalist and played phenomenal defense in the outfield. 

Bellinger's play helped the Yankees make it back to the postseason, although the playoffs ended in the ALDS for New York. 

Re-signing Bellinger was a major priority for the Yankees, who needed to fill out their outfield around Aaron Judge. Even with Trent Grisham returning on the qualifying offer, the Yankees still needed more help.

And now they keep a powerful left-handed bat in the middle of their lineup.

"I had an unbelievable time putting on this uniform. Yankee Stadium, the fans, the organization, the culture that these guys have created in this locker room," Bellinger said after last season. "It really is special. It's such a fun group, a fun group to be a part of. We came up short and that part stinks for sure because we had a really really good group here."

Frustrated Lakers governor Jeanie Buss reportedly floated trading LeBron James in wake of Westbrook trade

For anyone who loves drama, particularly family drama — think "Succession’ meets hoops — needs to take the time and read Baxter Holmes’ brilliant and meticulously reported story at ESPN on the Buss family infighting and the sale of a controlling interest of the team to Mark Walters.

One interesting part of that story: It wasn't just Lakers fans who were frustrated with LeBron James in the wake of the team trading for Russell Westbrook, it was team governor Jeanie Buss as well — and she even floated the idea of trading him.

Jeanie privately grumbled, people close to the team say, about what she felt was James' outsized ego and the overt control that he and Klutch Sports, which represents both James and Anthony Davis, exerted over the organization at times. She didn't like that James was considered a savior for a floundering franchise when he arrived in 2018 and that it was he who chose the Lakers rather than the team's leadership receiving praise for landing him....

The distance between Jeanie and James widened after the Lakers traded for Russell Westbrook in July 2021, people close to the team said. The team had made the trade in an effort to appease James, but the acquisition backfired in catastrophic fashion. L.A. went 33-49 and missed the playoffs, and James seemed to wash his hands of his role in the acquisition...

In 2022, in the aftermath of the Westbrook trade, multiple people said Jeanie privately mused about not giving James a contract extension and, later that year, even about trading James, with the LA Clippers floated as a possibility. (This was before James received a no-trade clause in July 2024 after signing a new two-year, $104 million contract.)

Just as a background refresher, the Lakers were very close to a trade that would have sent Kyle Kuzma and Montrezl Harrell to Sacramento for Buddy Hield, allowing them to keep Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, and put that shooting around LeBron and Anthony Davis. Instead, reportedly at LeBron's urging, the Lakers pivoted to a trade for Westbrook, a deal that proved a legendarily bad fit.

Buss also reportedly was frustrated that LeBron didn't seem grateful — or at least grateful enough — that the team drafted LeBron's son, Bronny James, in the second round in 2024.

Buss would be far from the first owner to be frustrated with a star player and float the idea of trading him, only to have calmer, wiser heads in the front office talk them out of that notion. It's a long and storied list.

It's also Buss chaffing against the reality of the modern NBA — truly elite players have the power. They drive winning on the court (LeBron did win a title with the Lakers), but more importantly they drive the business of basketball — they fill the buildings with fans who come to see them, they drive television ratings, team sponsors want to be associated with them, the stars sell jerseys, and more. As big as modern NBA max contracts get (16 players have $50+ million contracts this season) for a star who plays and contributes to winning, that is a good deal for the team in terms of revenue those stars generate.

Few players have flexed that power like LeBron (while trying to spin "I'm just an employee" and distance himself from deals), but Giannis Antetokounmpo and others have used that leverage as well. Those stars have the power. That is the reality of the NBA. And LeBron retains that power both because he has built his international brand and because, at 41, he is still producing on the court.

Buss, still the Lakers' governor (if not the owner calling the shots), likely gets her wish this summer when the Lakers and LeBron are expected to part ways, something league sources have told NBC Sports and is widely expected in league circles.

Bucks Trade Candidate: Andrew Wiggins

We are inching closer and closer to the NBA trade deadline, now just over two weeks away from February 5. The Bucks haven’t pulled the trigger on anything yet, but with all the rumors swirling, it’s definitely possible we see some action before then. In the meantime, we here at Brew Hoop have been presenting our candidates for the Bucks and GM Jon Horst to target. We’ve already identified five players for consideration, but now I’m throwing in a sixth, as we take a look at Andrew Wiggins.


The Player

Andrew Wiggins, 6’7”, 210 lbs. wing

Season averages: 15.8 PPG, 4.9 RPG, 2.8 APG, 1.2 SPG, 1.0 BPG, .465/.398/.775

This is now the third player from the 2014 NBA draft we’ve presented, as Wiggins was the no. 1 pick that year to the Timberwolves. The Bucks just missed on acquiring Wiggins’ services in that draft, instead selecting Jabari Parker at two. After five and a half seasons in Minnesota with just one playoff appearance, the T-Wolves traded Wiggins to the Warriors. There, he fit in perfectly next to Steph Curry, Draymond Green, and Klay Thompson as a do-it-all small forward. In his second full season with Golden State, he earned his first and only All-Star appearance and helped them win the 2022 title. After their time together in Minneapolis, Wiggins and Jimmy Butler crossed paths again, but this time they were traded for each other, with Wiggins heading to Miami and Butler to the Bay.

With Miami, Wiggins has firmly cemented himself as the same do-it-all player he became in Golden State: a good secondary scorer and perimeter defender. He’s shooting a career best 39.8% from beyond the arc on decent volume (4.8 attempts per game), and is capable of creating a shot in the midrange, shooting 36% from 10 feet to the three-point line. When asked to handle the rock this season, he’s been a decent playmaker, averaging the second-most assists per game of his career (2.8). Per Cleaning The Glass, the Heat’s offense is scoring 1.4 more points per 100 possessions when he’s on the floor.

Wiggins is a strong perimeter defender and could take on opponents’ best wing or bigger guards. He gets into the passing lane and affects shots, averaging 2.2 steals plus blocks per game, also a career high. His advanced numbers don’t look great, though: opposing teams score 4.6 more points per 100 with Wiggins on the court. That number could be inflated by the Heat’s lagging offense, which ranks 20th (113.5 offensive rating). Overall, they sit 10th in the league in defensive rating at 112.8.

Regardless, Wiggins would undoubtedly be a solid improvement for the Bucks, bringing more consistent offense and defense alongside Giannis. So it’s no surprise that the Bucks were linked to Wiggins last year before he was traded to Miami, and in several reports this season. This one was courtesy of ClutchPoints’ Brett Siegel:

“Wiggins, who was drawing interest from the Bucks over the summer, continues to be a name associated with Milwaukee’s trade deadline plans. From the Heat’s perspective, though, they seem to be working on their own plans to upgrade their roster, and it’s unknown whether Miami would surrender Wiggins in a trade that doesn’t land them an All-Star-level player like Giannis or someone else.“

The Trade

To even get this trade off the ground, the Bucks likely have to invite a third party. Outside of Giannis, the Bucks don’t have the type of player Miami wants. To facilitate the deal, the Nets are added to the equation. The Bucks’ part in this would actually be the second of two separate deals that essentially turn into one big deal, much like how Jericho Sims was attached to last year’s Kyle Kuzma-Khris Middleton swap.

In the first half of the trade, Miami snags the hottest commodity on the trade market in Michael Porter Jr. in exchange for Wiggins, Terry Rozier’s expiring contract, and their unprotected 2029 first-round pick, also getting Tyrese Martin as a salary filler. Then the Nets re-route Wiggins to the Bucks for Kyle Kuzma and Andre Jackson Jr. This puts the Nets over the 15-man roster limit, so they’d have to cut someone—likely the injured Haywood Highsmith—to stay in compliance.

Now, I know some will question why the Bucks are seemingly helping a team above them in the standings (Miami leads Milwaukee by 3.5 games for the 8th seed). But this isn’t the Bucks coming to Miami and Brooklyn with this trade offer. They swoop in after Miami acquires Porter, offer Kuzma and AJax to Brooklyn, and re-route Wiggins, who has a player option decision this summer, to Milwaukee. The Nets get an easier contract to move off of, and Wiggins gets to finish this season on a team that is gunning for the playoffs. Miami offers Brooklyn a future first and an expiring contract. Every team gets something they want.

But the Bucks themselves have been linked to Porter, so why wouldn’t they get the better player? They have only their 2031 or 2032 first-round picks to offer. The Nets, should they choose to trade Porter, appear to want a first-round pick (or more) in return. That’s the market for a 27-year-old wing who’s averaging 25+ points per game. As good as Porter is, the Bucks don’t have the right kind of pick to deal. If they owned any of their draft picks from 2027–2030, that would make more sense for Porter. Giannis will be 36 going on 37 in 2031; I see it as unlikely that the Bucks even trade that pick anyway, considering they’ve been unwilling to move it dating back to last season.

Wiggins, while a good player, wouldn’t command giving up 2031, even if the trade was strictly between Miami and Milwaukee. But the Bucks have to make some moves to improve this roster. If they’re eyeing the more distant future without Giannis and don’t want to give up that pick, then this is the type of deal to make. I’m not the only one who feels this way, as according to Jamal Collier of ESPN, that’s where much of the league sees how the Bucks are going to improve:

“It’s where rival executives see the biggest chance for opportunity in Milwaukee. The Bucks can accept a larger contract with multiple years beyond this season that an opposing team might be trying to get out from under, such as Miami‘s Andrew Wiggins, who owns a $30 million player option for next season, or Charlotte‘s Miles Bridges, who will make $22.8 million in the 2026-27 season, team and league sources told ESPN.“

This may not be the best offer the Nets get for Porter, but there are things to like about it. Adding a future first-round pick in 2029 would bring their total to four that season: the Nets would have their own first, the Knicks’, and the least favorable of the Rockets, Mavericks, and Suns. Provided that the Nets are a contending team around that time, they could use those picks as ammunition to trade for a star. As for the players, Rozier is an expiring deal that they can wash their hands of this summer. Kuzma can be a decent contributor in the short term, and he will be on an expiring contract next season, which the Nets could flip for more assets. AJax is a young defender that they could take a flyer on.

The Fit

Wiggins could realistically fit with every team in the league. With his experience and production, he would be a particularly welcome sight in Milwaukee. He’s an above-average three-point shooter and doesn’t need the ball in his hands all the time to create offense. In some ways, he reminds me of a lesser Khris Middleton: a good player who makes winning plays. I’m not trying to say Wiggins is as good on offense as Middleton was, but his qualities make him a good fit for a championship-contending roster.

Teams wouldn’t be able to sag off Wiggins in the half-court like they could with someone like Miles Bridges. As I mentioned earlier, Wiggins is having his most efficient season from distance in his career, and not just on-ball: 3.7 of Wiggins’ 4.8 three-point attempts per game are off the catch, and he’s converting those at 42%. Wiggins is also consistent, which would be a welcome change for the Bucks. Too many players are volatile from game to game to be relied on in big spots. Ryan Rollins and Kevin Porter Jr. have been scuffling in January, and you can’t rely on your backup center to be the second leading scorer.

Wiggins may also help the Bucks’ rebounding, averaging nearly five per game. Compared to some of the other wings we’ve discussed (LaVine, Bridges, Jerami Grant), Wiggins slots in much better as the starting small forward next to Giannis. Finally, he’s a pretty durable player who has played at least 73% of games every year of his career except for one. That was 2022–23, when he missed 22 straight games because his father, former NBA player Mitchell Wiggins, was going through a serious medical issue, and the younger Wiggins stepped away from the team.


Are you okay with jumping into a deal that makes the Heat better if it means the Bucks can still get Wiggins and keep the 2031 first-round pick? Or would you rather the Bucks go for it and outbid the Heat? Let me know in the comments below.

How The Rangers' "Breath Of Fresh Air" Turned Rancid In A Hurry

Gary A. Vasquez-Imagn Images
Gary A. Vasquez-Imagn Images

The Rangers visited Los Angeles supposedly "breathing easier" –  s a couple of MSG Networks analysts noted – following the now infamous Chris Drury retread letter of surrender and false hope.

But the "easy-breathing" has ended. The 4-3 loss to the occasionally competitive Kings last night in Tinseltown hurt more than any previous defeat.

In no uncertain terms, it doomed fans to a second straight non-playoff season. (Not that it matters, but at the highest ticket prices in the NHL.)

Now it's back to the normal, "Close But No Cigar" saga for the skating YO-YOs of Seventh Avenue.

You have to understand that when the Blueshirts embarked on their four-game road trip, life in Rangerville was far different than it is now. Faint as it was, at least there was some hope.

After that dastardly 8-4 home defeat at the hands of the feeble Ottawa Senators, one totally dismaying era ended.

We entered the new world of Letters From Lord Drury. This is the very same Drury who "earned" a new contract from MSG despite managerial mistake after mistake.

The pizza man, who doubles as not only Blueshirts' President" but Lord High Executioner, decided that his 2025-26 model Rangers, which looked good in the showroom, was obsolete.

Customer warranty is about as valuable as last night's performance.

Amazingly, the Blueshirt sedan broke down so far from the NHL Finish Line, Sir Drury drew up a proclamation for all to read (and if you didn't, you may fail the upcoming test.)

In this New Drury world, leading scorer Breadman Panarin will disappear and maybe even – perish the thought – Mika Zibanejad or Vin (The Bin) Trocheck being traded as well.

What the MSG Networks' analysts are now telling us is that Lord Drury is being a benevolent despot. Meaning that his proclamation has allowed the poor, overpaid players to "breathe easy."

J.T. Miller Paints Positive Picture After Rangers' Loss To KingsJ.T. Miller Paints Positive Picture After Rangers' Loss To KingsThe New York <a href="https://thehockeynews.com/nhl/new-york-rangers/">Rangers</a> have come out empty-handed on their west coast road trip thus far, dropping a 5-3 loss to the Anaheim Ducks on Monday night and a 4-3 loss to the Los Angeles Kings on Tuesday night.&nbsp;

Beating the sinking  Flyers in Philly supposedly provided that "breath of fresh air."

We have to believe it was only a one-game "easy breather"  because look what happened first in Anaheim and then L.A. last night. The "fresh air" was polluted by two more ersatz performances.

In Tinseltown, the Beloved Blueshirts coughed up a game to a team that was mired in a four-game skid.straight. As for any more "easy breaths,"  Mike Sullivan's troupe may find them in San Jose where the Sharks are inhaling some fresh NHL oxygen.

The Rangers should be so lucky!

Is Jasson Domínguez ready for an expanded role with the Yankees?

With the Toronto Blue Jays reportedly not that interested in pursuing free agent outfielder Cody Bellinger, it’s looking more and more likely that the only true threat to ‘steal’ the player away from the New York Yankees is, well, the Mets. With their trendy contract structure of short deals with a high average annual value, they remain candidates to get whoever they put their eyes on.

But late last night, the Mets swung a deal for Luis Robert Jr., perhaps leaving them less likely to pursue Bellinger aggressively. The Yankees are the favorites to land Bellinger, who put up a 125 wRC+ with 29 home runs and 4.9 fWAR in his lone campaign in the Bronx last year. Still, there is a world in which they lose him to the Mets or another team, with Jon Heyman noting yesterday that Bellinger was weighing offers from two non-New York teams.

If that’s the case, the Yanks will need to make a decision. Do they pursue a mid-level free agent, knowing that there are no players of Bellinger or Kyle Tucker’s level in the open market? Do they try to bring in someone via trade? Or do they trust Jasson Domínguez to be the man in left field?

Maybe the ‘Martian’ needs a platoon partner, since he had a 116 wRC+ vs. righties and a meager 63 mark vs. lefties in 2025. Perhaps he can do a much better job with a glove on his hand, as the -7 Defensive Runs Saved (DRS) and -10 Outs Above Average (OAA) he had in 793 innings in 2025 suggest. But there is a case to be made that, if Bellinger signs elsewhere, Domínguez is their best choice for left field at this point.

The young outfielder has had another offseason to work on his routes, reactions, and overall fluidity back there, and even though that doesn’t guarantee improvement, remember he is still just 22 and maturing as a player, and that includes defense.

He is athletic enough to think there could be at least modest improvement on that front with good coaching and a lot of work. Of course, he would need in-game reps. A lot of them. Will he get them on a regular basis? That will depend entirely on what the Yankees do in the rest of the offseason.

Offensively, Domínguez managed to hold his own even without getting regular playing time last year, with a .257/.331/.388 line in 429 plate appearances; 10 home runs, and 23 stolen bases. His 103 wRC+ suggests he is playable right now, but the minor league track record (.817 career OPS down in the farm with a .373 OBP) and set of tools lead us all to believe his ceiling is higher than that.

Domínguez was fine against righties, but he is capable of more. He was a liability facing lefties, though, but there is also potential for improvement there as he gets more at-bats against top competition. Even if he can post an 85-90 wRC+ as a righty, that would be seen as a major step forward, but it’s much easier said than done.

His performance hitting right-handed and how much he improves on defense will likely dictate his overall ceiling as a player. He’ll also need to walk a bit more (9.6 percent BB% last year) and cut down on his strikeouts some (26.8 percent K%), but Domínguez’s ceiling, even if not quite as high as we all thought it was when he was a minor leaguer, is still exciting under the right circumstances.

If Domínguez is anointed the everyday left fielder, which is possible but unlikely since the Yankees will probably want someone to play in his stead when there is a southpaw on the mound, the potential to hit 20 home runs and steal 30 bases with a 110 wRC+ is there. It might not be pretty at times, but we are talking about a soon-to-be 23-year-old player with top prospect pedigree who has held his own as a major leaguer.

Domínguez’s performance vs. lefties and how much progress he makes with the glove will likely dictate if he is a close to replacement-level or a legitimate three-win-type contributor. The pressure will be on, but the solace for him is that he honestly might well be accustomed to it at this point.

Phillies All-Star One and Dones: The 1930s

In honor of the Philadelphia Phillies playing host to the 2026 Major League Baseball All-Star Game at Citizens Bank Park, we here at The Good Phight are launching a yearlong series that focuses on the history of the Phillies and the All-Star Game.Check back regularly for posts about the Phillies participation in (or lack thereof) in the Midsummer Classic over its history.

Being named to the All-Star team is one of the highest honors in baseball. It means that you were good enough to be chosen to represent your team in a showcase of some of the best players in the sport. But for some, they were only good enough once to get that honor. The Phillies have 36 such one and dones in their history, meaning players who made one All-Star team in their career and did it with the Phillies, excluding active players. In order to make reading this close to palatable, we’re going to break them down by decades in a series of articles. First up, the 1930s.

Arthur “Pinky” Whitney, 1936

There wasn’t much good baseball in Philadelphia in 1936, as both the Phillies and the Athletics lost 100 games and finished in dead last in their respective leagues. But Arthur “Pinky” Whitney of the Phillies nevertheless was named the starting third baseman for the National League. Whitney’s numbers were pedestrian, as he was hitting .280 with 16 extra-base hits including five home runs in the 66 games before the All-Star game. The 31-year-old San Antonio native started his career with the Phillies in 1928 before being traded to the Boston Braves in the middle of 1933.

But Whitney found his way back to Philadelphia after ten games of the 1936 season, where he garnered the most votes of any Phillies player and was named to the All-Star team because the fan vote had failed to assure that every team had a representative. Whitney displaced Bill Brubaker of the Pirates despite the latter receiving the fifth most votes of any infielder. Ironically enough, the other Philadelphia 100 loss team also sent a third baseman nicknamed “Pinky” who had to be named to the team due to the representative rule, as Mike Higgins of the Athletics replaced the White Sox player/manager Jimmy Dykes on the roster.

The Phillies’ Pinky directly contributed to the NL’s 4-3 win over the AL, its first since the game began in 1933, with a sacrifice fly in the second off of future Hall of Famer Lefty Grove that put the NL up 2-0. However, Whitney would not finish the game, as he suffered an injury in the eighth inning when fielding a groundout from future Phillies manager and eternal source of shame Ben Chapman grounded out. Whitney finished the top of the eighth but was pinch hit for by the Reds Lew Riggs in the bottom half of the inning. His cross-town counterpart “Pinky” Higgins didn’t have the same impact as the Phillies Pinky did, as Higgins went 0-2 with two strikeouts and was subbed out after six innings. The Philadelphia Pinkys reunited on the train ride out of Boston back to Philadelphia after the game. Whitney went on to play three more seasons in his career with the Phillies before leaving baseball, while Higgins played nine more years in the Majors, interrupted in 1945 after being drafted into the Army, and made one more All-Star team in 1944.

Hersh Martin, 1938

Center fielder Hersh Martin was only in his second year in the Majors when he was named to the 1938 All-Star game to represent the Phillies. Martin was in the midst of a strong first half of the season, hitting .336 with 30 extra-base hits and two home runs in the season’s first 64 games. Unfortunately, his efforts were going to waste on the Phillies, as they were on their way to yet another 100+ loss season and last place finish.

Luckily for Martin, he was chosen to be the Phillies representative at the All-Star game that season to take place at Crosley Field in Cincinnati. Unluckily for the Birmingham, Alabama native, he was not chosen to start in the game and never even got to appear. His luck didn’t much improve after he went back to the Phillies, as Martin suffered an ankle injury before a game on September 10th. Martin was demonstrating the proper way to slide into a base for a movie recording arranged by his manager Jimmie Wilson when he caught his spikes in the dirt and suffered the injury, Martin was taken from the field to the hospital and did not appear in another game that season.

It wasn’t the first time Martin suffered a freak injury on the field and had to be hospitalized in 1938 either. In a May 10th game against the Reds, Martin was attempting to steal second after a single when the throw from Reds catcher Willard Hershberger hit him in the left temple, knocking Martin out immediately. However, his feet remained on second base while he was unconscious and being attended to by trainers. Martin was then carried off the field by four teammates and came to in the clubhouse where he complained of a headache and nausea. He then spent the night in the hospital where an x-ray confirmed he did not have a fracture and then returned to the Phillies lineup six days later.

Martin would go on to play two more years for the Phillies before heading to Double-A for three and a half seasons. He finally got the call to the Majors again in 1944 with the Yankees but only played in New York for two seasons before once again finding himself in the minors. Martin would continue to play professional ball consistently until 1953, but never again appeared in the Majors.

Morrie Arnovich, 1939

Five-foot-ten, 168-pound Morrie Arnovich may have not been much to look at, but he was once a promising centerfielder for the Phillies in the late thirties. The son of Orthodox Jewish parents, Arnovich went against his parents’ wishes to become a rabbi and instead pursued a baseball career, starting out playing for his hometown of Superior, Wisconsin in the Northern League. After two seasons where Arnovich hit a combined .354, the Phillies signed him to a deal in 1935 and sent him to Class-A Hazelton. His always-hustling nature caught eyes, and the 25-year-old Arnovich earned a call to the Majors in 1936.

The little centerfielder had a solid first two and a half seasons with the Phillies before breaking out in 1939. By the time of the All-Star game, Arnovich was hitting a staggering .383 with 21 extra-base hits including four home runs in 68 games. But of course, the Phillies as a team were terrible, sitting at 21-46 and in dead last in the National League so Arnovich was originally left off of the All-Star roster despite leading the Majors in hitting. He had to be added later to fulfill the requirement for every team to have one player. Arnovich was one of three Jewish players at the 1939 All-Star Game, joining Detroit’s Hank Greenburg and the Giants’ Harry Denning. Unfortunately for Arnovich and Denning, neither appeared in the actual game. Greenburg meanwhile started and went 1-3 with a walk to help his American League win 4-1 at Yankee Stadium.

Arnovich was beloved in his hometown of Superior, and the local media and fans joined the rest of the Phillies in demanding to know why NL manager Gabby Hartnett from the Chicago Cubs decided not to use Arnovich despite his leading the league in hitting. Hartnett’s given reason was that he wanted to use left-handed hitters against the AL’s pitchers Red Ruffing, Tommy Brudges, and Bob Feller, all of whom were right-handed. But that explanation wasn’t good enough for writer Bill Stewart in the local Evening Telegram in Superior, who noted that Hartnett still used right-hander Joe Medwick from the Cardinals in the outfield, with Hartnett’s reasoning being that Medwick is “more dangerous.” But as Stewart so eloquently put it, Hartnett “failed to denote what he meant by dangerous” and that “it must be that the St. Louis outfielder beats his grandmother to earn that ‘dangerous’ rating, because he didn’t cause American League pitching an iota of grief” in his 0-4 performance.

Superior’s favorite son returned to the Phillies and couldn’t keep up his torrid pace, as Arnovich hit .257 in the second half and ultimately finished with a .324 BA, good for 13th in the Majors and six places behind Medwick who finished hitting .332. It was a recurring theme in Arnovich’s career, as he usually started the season strong but faded as the summer wore on. He hit .308 for his career in the first half but only to hit .268 in the second half.

1939 turned out to be Arnovich’s last full season with the Phillies, as he was traded to the Reds in June of 1940. He was hitting just .199 at the time of the trade to Cincinnati and ended the year with a career-low .250 BA. However, Arnovich was a part of a Reds team that won the World Series in 1940, even if he only appeared in one game during the series. 1941 brought some controversy, as Arnovich’s draft status was a topic of debate after it was revealed that he obtained a deferment due to having dental plates after losing many teeth playing basketball. Nevertheless, he eventually enlisted in the Army in 1942 where he played and managed for the Fort Lewis team located in Tacoma, Washington as well as serving as a poster clerk in New Guinea. Arnovich’s military service cost him four years of his baseball career, and he would only play in one more MLB game in 1946 with the New York Giants despite playing in the minor leagues until 1948.

Sources

Baseball-Reference.com

James C. Isaminger, The Philadelphia Inquirer, July 9th, 1936

The Boston Globe, June 27th, 1936

The Philadelphia Inquirer, February 17th, 1945

The Philadelphia Inquirer, June 28th, 1938

The Philadelphia Inquirer, September 11th, 1938

The Philadelphia Inquirer, May 11th, 1938

Ralph Berger, Society for American Baseball Research (SABR) Biography of Morrie Arnovich

The Philadelphia Inquirer, July 1st, 1939

Cy Peterman, The Philadelphia Inquirer, July 11th, 1939

The Evening Telegram, July 11th, 1939

Bill Stewart, The Evening Telegram, July 12th, 1939

India wins T20 series opener against New Zealand by 48 runs

NAGPUR, India (AP) — Abhishek Sharma scored 84 off 35 balls as India beat New Zealand by 48 runs Wednesday in the opener of a five-match T20 series.

Sharma, the world’s number one T20 batter, hit eight sixes and five fours as India notched up 238-7 in 20 overs. It was the third highest T20 score against New Zealand.

Indian skipper Suryakumar Yadav scored 32 off 22 balls, while Rinku Singh provided a late flourish with 44 not out off 20 balls.

Singh hit three sixes and four fours as India reached only the second-ever 200-plus total in T20s at the VCA Stadium — a first since 2009.

New Zealand fell short despite Glenn Phillips’ 78 off 40 balls. Mark Chapman also scored 39 off 24 balls as the Black Caps finished with 190-7 in 20 overs.

The series is preparation by both teams for the T20 World Cup in India and Sri Lanka starting Feb. 7. New Zealand won its first ODI bilateral series in India on Sunday.

Raipur will host the second T20 on Friday.

Put into bat, India lost Sanju Samson (10) and Ishan Kishan (8).

Sharma powered his way to 50 off 22 balls and put on 99 off 47 balls with Yadav. India crossed 100 in the ninth over, and the skipper was out caught in the 11th over as Mitchell Santner (1-37) got the breakthrough.

Ish Sodhi struck in the next over too — removing Sharma — and India seemed to lose its way at 185-6 in 15.4 overs.

Hardik Pandya scored 25 off 16 balls, while Shivam Dube managed only 9 runs. Axar Patel was out for only 5.

Singh held one end together and used the time-penalty to good effect in the end to propel India to an improbable target.

Pacers Kyle Jamieson (2-54) and Jacob Duffy (2-27) picked up a brace each.

In reply, New Zealand started poorly. Devon Conway was caught behind for a two-ball duck. Rachin Ravindra fell for 1.

Opener Tim Robinson scored 21 runs and put on 51 off 30 balls with Phillips, before Varun Chakravarthy (2-37) dismissed the former in the seventh over.

From 52-3, Phillips and Chapman added 79 off 42 balls for the fourth wicket. It set up New Zealand’s chase.

Both batters survived owing to India’s lapses in the field, and Phillips powered his way to 50 off 29 balls.

The breakthrough finally came in the 14th over — Phillips was out caught off Axar Patel.

Thereafter, the Black Caps didn’t have enough time left in the game despite sufficient firepower.

Daryl Mitchell scored 28 off 18 balls, while Santner was unbeaten on 20 off 13 balls, but the target proved to be too tall.

___

AP cricket: https://apnews.com/hub/cricket

Olympic Snubs Caufield, Hutson Make Wild Pay In Final Seconds

The Minnesota Wild (28-14-9) dropped its last game of the road trip in a 4-3 loss to the Montreal Canadiens (28-15-7).

Montreal scored with 15 seconds left to take a 4-3 lead in the third period.

That lead held up.

Wild General Manager and President of Hockey Operations Bill Guerin is also Team USA's General Manager for the 2026 Olympics coming up next month.

The Canadiens have two players on their team that were left off the USA roster. Cole Caufield and Lane Hutson. Both are on the smaller side and aren't physical.

Caufield, 25, is tenth in the NHL in goals with 25 and has 49 points in 50 games. He is first in the NHL in game-winning goals with seven. All he does is score and it always is big goals at crucial times.

But he is 5-foot-8.

Hutson, 21, recorded 60 assists and 66 points during his rookie season last year and won the Calder Trophy. He has nine goals, 43 assists and 55 points in 50 games this season.

Not only does he lead all defensemen in the NHL in points, but Hutson ranks sixth in the NHL in assists. Only Connor McDavid, Macklin Celebrini, Mikko Ranatanen, Nathan McKinnon and Nikita Kucherov have more assists.

So in their first game against the Wild since being left off the Olympic roster, Hutson and Caufield came up huge.

Hutson scored the go-ahead goal in the second period to give the Canadiens a 3-2 lead. Vladimir Tarasenko scored his second of the night on the power play to tie the game in the third.

That was until the Canadians scored with 15 seconds left.

Who was it?

Caufield from Hutson.

That goal was Caufield's 21st game-winning goal in the third period or in overtime since making his debut in 2020-21.

The only players with more tallies over that span are Leon Draisaitl (28), Sebastian Aho (28), Sidney Crosby (23) and Steven Stamkos (23). 

The win for the Canadiens snapped a nine-game losing streak against Minnesota.

For action-packed issues, access to the entire magazine archive and a free issue, subscribe to The Hockey News at THN.com/free. Get the latest news and trending stories by subscribing to our newsletter here. And share your thoughts by commenting below the article on THN.com.

Recent Wild Stories

Newly Acquired Defenseman Quinn Hughes Breaks Franchise Record In 18th GameNewly Acquired Defenseman Quinn Hughes Breaks Franchise Record In 18th GameQuinn Hughes rewrites Wild history, shattering a scoring record in just 18 games. Discover how his immediate impact transforms the team's offensive attack.

- Wild Place Star Winger Matt Boldy On Injured Reserve.

- Immediate Impact: Quinn Hughes' Start With The Wild Has Been Historically Fast.

- 'You Want To Get Out Of Your Zone': Why Quinn Hughes Changes The Game For The Wild.

- Wild's Jonas Brodin, Joel Eriksson Ek Named To Sweden's Olympic Roster.

- 'We Want To Compete For The Stanley Cup': Why Bill Guerin Went All In.

Raptors head to Sacramento for second night of back-to-back

The Toronto Raptors are fresh off one of their best performances of the season, a 145-127 win against the Golden State Warriors – despite being down four rotation players – in which Immanuel Quickley dropped a career-high 40 points and 10 assists.

Now, they’ll be shorthanded and on short rest as they take on the Sacramento Kings, who are 14th in the Western Conference and, like the Raptors, on the second night of a back-to-back.

The Kings, led by a 2018 All-Star team of Zach LaVine, Russell Westbrook and DeMar DeRozan, had shown some signs of life earlier in January despite an injury to Domantas Sabonis, winning four consecutive games – the first three of which came against the Rockets, Lakers and Knicks. But the 12-32 Kings have come back down to earth with consecutive losses.

The game is scheduled for 10 p.m. ET on TSN.

Here are some storylines to follow.

A new start(ing lineup)

Thanks to a flurry of injuries, and aided by the team’s deep roster, head coach Darko Rajakovic has started a different five-man lineup in eight consecutive games. Last night’s new unit included Gradey Dick, who was making his first start of the season. Unlike the Warriors, Sacramento has a fair bit of size; All-Star center Sabonis is back, though he’s played on a minutes restriction off the bench since returning. 7-foot-1 rookie Maxime Raynaud has started in his place. The Raptors went super small against Golden State, starting Quickley, Jamal Shead and Dick together, alongside Brandon Ingram and Scottie Barnes. They may opt for a bigger lineup tonight – but with Jakob Poeltl still out, and Collin Murray-Boyles likely out with his thumb injury, it’s slim pickings.

Former Raptor report

The Sacramento Kings are bad in many respects. But there’s one advanced statistic according to which they are a top team in the NBA: Rate of Any Player That were Openly Raptors (RAPTOR). The main driver of their high RAPTOR rating is DeMar DeRozan, the 36-year-old who is Toronto’s all-time leading scorer and co-built the We the North era with Kyle Lowry. DeRozan’s numbers are down a bit this year, though his efficiency is up: He’s average 19 points, 3.3 rebounds and four assists on 50.8% shooting and a 35.9% clip from three. Meanwhile, former Raptor Precious Achiuwa has been starting for the Kings, and is averaging 7.6 points and 5.5 boards, while Dennis Schröder is averaging 12.7 points and 5.6 assists off the bench. The Raptors’ “Former Kings report” includes Garrett Temple, who played in Sacramento on a 10-day contract in 2010.

Worth a shot?

Thanks to some paltry shooting efforts, the Raptors have found themselves stymied by zone defenses as of late, leading to somewhat of a roster construction crisis (though things would certainly look a bit different with Walter and Barrett healthy). That crisis seemed like a distant memory last night, when the Raptors shot 21/34 from behind the arc. Will their shooting juice continue on the second night of a back-to-back? Will tired legs prevail? And, importantly, will Kings coach Doug Christie dare the Raptors to find out by running a zone defense?