Worldwide Sports News

Last year, when Tekoah Roby was voted as the 10th best prospect, he had not yet proven that his stuff would return. Had fans known that he would have the 2025 season he did, he would have been voted higher. So weirdly, these rankings do not reflect his rise and fall, so to speak, as you would maybe assume. In fact, he is arguably considered a better prospect this year with a stronger system and more high upside players in front of him, despite dropping one spot. Here is your list:

1. JJ Wetherholt
2. Liam Doyle
3. Rainiel Rodriguez
4. (or 5) Quinn Mathews
5. ( or 4) Jurrangelo Cjintje
6. Joshua Baez
7. Leonardo Bernal
8. Jimmy Crooks
9. Brandon Clarke
10. Tink Hence
11. Tekoah Roby

Jurrangelo Cjintje
I’m going to make this introduction every time because this may be the first prospect vote you’ve seen. When the Cardinals traded Brendan Donovan, we had already ranked the first 7 prospects. Cjintje was by most measures going to be somewhere in that top 7. So instead of starting over, Cjintje is facing off against the prospects, one-by-one, head-to-head, until he loses. He has already defeated Jimmy Crooks, Leonardo Bernal, and now Joshua Baez. If he defeats Quinn Mathews, he would get a crack at Rainiel Rodriguez. If he loses the vote, consider him the #5 prospect in the system. Scouting report below:

Cjintje is technically a switch pitcher, but it is very clear from the scouting and the numbers that he is a far better pitcher right-handed. From the right side, Cjintje throws mid-90s and has topped at 99 mph. He has both a cutter and a sweeper, though the sweeper is the better pitch. He also throws an upper-80s change. From his left side, he is effectively a two-pitch pitcher, throwing low 90s with a solid sweeper. Statistically, it wasn’t close. He walked more than he struck out and allowed 7 homers in 21 innings from the left side, but from the right side he had a 5.0 K/BB ratio and only allowed 3 homers in 34.1 IP.

VOTE HERE

Comparable Player Poll

Today is not really a clean comparison, in my opinion. I don’t think these pitchers are alike and I would ordinarily try to find two pitchers who were more similar. But in a weird way, sometimes when players are total opposites, it makes for a fun poll too. Today, we have a player who is relatively close to the major leagues against a player who made last year’s top 20. Pete Hansen appears in another player poll and I would like to see exactly how high you guys are on him after he won last week’s poll. In the other corner, I’m not real sure where you guys are on Chen Wei-Lin after a bit of a down year.

Pete Hansen has methodically made his way to AAA after being drafted in the 3rd round of the 2022 draft. He spent the following year in Low A, he spent 2024 in High A, and he spent 2025 in AA. He will be spending his age 25 season in AAA after posting a 3.93 ERA/3.65 FIP/3.71 xFIP with a 21.1 K% and a low walk rate. I don’t know that he has a standout pitch, but his main strength is his command.

On the flip side, hard to argue command was Chen-Wei Lin’s strength with a 17.2 BB%. Command was less of an issue in 2024 and it may have been injury-related, as he was limited to 50.1 IP last season. Pitch-wise, he may have an MLB quality fastball right now and Fangraphs think its potential is a 70 grade fastball. Even with his command issues, he still had a 3.69 FIP and 4.17 xFIP (with a 4.89 ERA) in High A, so if healthy, along with the fact that he’ll be 24, he may very well be in AA for the majority of 2026.

VOTE HERE

New Add

Folks, the day has arrived. The day I finally add newly acquired Tai Peete. In case you have the memory of a goldfish or just don’t keep that up-to-date on things, Peete was part of the return for Brendan Donovan. I have been trying to add him to the voting for a few votes, but I think this is a strong system and other players just made more sense. But finally, I think he makes the most sense to add at this point.

Jesus Baez, IF – 21

Stats (High A): 416 PAs, .244/.327/.397, 10.3 BB%, 18.5 K%, .153 ISO, .270 BABIP, 116 wRC+, 121 DRC+

Scouting (FG): 30/45 Hit, 35/50 Game Power, 50/55 Raw Power, 40/40 Speed, 40/45 Fielding

Just as a quick reminder, because I don’t know if I’ve pointed this out. The age I list is the age they are considered for this upcoming season. Baez is being listed at 21 despite currently being 20 because his birthday is in 10 days. I think Baez is a good player to point this out for because it essentially means he will be 21 and in AA for the 2026 season. That’s probably the thing he has going in his favor the most honestly. He is younger than everyone in the top 10 except for Rainiel Rodriguez.

Nathan Church, OF – 25

Stats (AA): 129 PAs, .336/.380/.563, 6.2 BB%, 7.8 K%, .227 ISO, .327 BABIP, 157 wRC+, 136 DRC+

AAA: 242 PAs, .335/.400/.521, 9.9 BB%, 10.3 K%, .186 ISO, .338 BABIP 144 wRC+, 132 DRC+

MLB: 65 PAs, .179/.254/.250, 4.6 BB%, 27.7 K%, .071 ISO, .237 BABIP, 46 wRC+, 78 DRC+

Scouting: 55/55 Hit, 35/35 Game Power, 40/40 Raw Power, 55/55 Speed, 45/45 Field

The other reason I felt the need to point this out – and I would argue this point needs to be applied to Church as well as Baez – is that when you see the age and you see the stats, you might mistakenly think they compiled those stats at their listed age. Church had his ascension last year at 24-years-old and not 25-years-old and I think that’s an important thing to know. Some of you probably already know this, I just feel like sometimes our brain can unconsciously associate their stats with the age I have listed and they are actually a year younger when they compiled those stats.

Also, while I doubt I’m as high on his defense as some of you commenters, a 45 is an absurd grade for his defense honestly.

Yhoiker Fajardo, RHP – 19

Stats (CPX): 6 G, 20.2 IP, 31.6 K%, 9.2 BB%, 51.2 GB%, .205 BABIP, 0.44 ERA/2.41 FIP/3.29 xFIP

Low A: 13 GS, 51.1 IP, 27.8 K%, 9.4 BB%, 50 GB%, .326 BABIP, 2.98 ERA/2.50 FIP/3.14 xFIP

Scouting: 40/45 Fastball, 55/60 Slider, 30/50 Change, 35/50 Command

I probably could have waited to add Fajardo. Last week, I took out Ryan Mitchell so that I could add Fajardo and Church. And while all the voting basically went to just two people, Church certainly justified his early inclusion with the results of the poll. Fajardo performed less well, but again, it’s difficult to say when two players got 67% of the vote and nobody else got 10%. To keep on the age theme, Fajardo pitched in both the complex league and Low A ball at 18-years-old, so he will presumably be pitching in High A at 19-years-old.

Tanner Franklin, 22 – RHP

Stats: 3 GS, 6 IP, 32.1 K%, 17.9 BB%, 66.7 GB%, .333 BABIP, 1.50 ERA/3.95 FIP/4.28 xFIP

Scouting: 60/70 Fastball, 40/55 Slider, 30/40 Change, 40/45 Cutter, 30/40 Command

Franklin pitched at both Low A and High A after he got drafted mainly a way of building up his innings just a little more and perhaps also to get him more used to pitching into August. I’m not sure we should really pay attention to his stats last year even slightly, because he was effectively still in the bullpen given the 2 inning stints. He’ll throw more than 2 innings per start, but I would be surprised if it’s 5 innings per start. But yeah as far as his legitimacy as a starting pitching prospect, his first step will be remaining effective over 3-4 inning stints first.

Ixan Henderson, 24 – LHP

Stats (AA): 25 GS, 132 IP, 25.2 K%, 9.6 BB%, 37.1 GB%, .278 BABIP, 2.59 ERA/3.16 FIP/4.00 xFIP/4.51 DRA

Scouting: 50/60 Fastball, 45/50 Slider, 30/40 Change, 40/45 Cutter, 40/50 Command

Its times like these that I really, really wish we could have finished the top 20 earlier. I feel the recent news is totally going to affect how many votes he gets and I’m not convinced it should. I just found out Brandon Clarke is out until June and I might be breaking this news to some of you and if this was more widely known when Clarke made the #9 prospect, would he be the #9 prospect? Honestly, the timing couldn’t be worse, because we don’t actually know anything. And fans are absolutely going to assume – most of them I think – it’s the worst case scenario. Should we ignore the news because the first 11 prospects have the benefit of not having had reported to spring training yet? This is a tough one honestly.

Cooper Hjerpe, 25 – LHP

Didn’t pitch

Scouting: 55/55 Fastball, 55/60 Slider, 50/50 Change, 45/50 Cutter, 45/50 Command

Good news about Hjerpe: he had Tommy John surgery in April of last season. That is not a statement that is usually said, but basically it means Hjerpe’s Tommy John recovery should put him in line to throw half a season or so of innings. A very reasonable timeframe of returning in fact would have him in line to throw his career high in professional innings. That’s the bad news about Hjerpe: he hasn’t given us a lot of faith in staying healthy.

Brycen Mautz, 24 – LHP

Stats (AA): 25 GS, 114.2 IP, 28.6 K%, 7.1 BB%. 41.2 GB%, .286 BABIP, 2.98 ERA/3.58 FIP/3.20 xFIP/4.54 DRA

Scouting: 45/45 Fastball, 55/55 Slider, 45/50 Curve, 30/35 Change, 50/55 Command

Fangraphs released the Cardinals list recently and with that came some updated scouting. If you were wondering, the pitches did not collectively change a lot. The fastball and slider were the exact same, his actual and potential both improved by 5, but his change went down 5 in both actual and potential. His command current took a bump but his potential remained at 55. Basically, they think he’s a slightly better pitcher than when he was graded on last year’s list, but his potential hasn’t moved.

Deniel Ortiz, 21 – 1B/3B

Stats (Low A): 320 PAs, .285/.406/.446, 15.3 BB%, 27.5 K%, .162 ISO, .386 BABIP, 145 wRC+, 119 DRC+

High A: 130 PAs, .336/.438/.500, 13.8 BB%, 22.3 K%, .164 ISO, .436 BABIP, 168 wRC+, 97 DRC+

Somewhat unbelievably, Fangraphs gave an updated list and yet I still have no scouting numbers for Deniel Ortiz. Whether or not you think Ortiz should be a top 20 prospect, is is objectively insane that he is not among the top 53 by Fangraphs. I have been very open that I’m more of a scouting the stat line guy than probably wise, but I feel like certainly stats alone should get you on the top 53. It’s not like he did this in the Dominican Summer League. Or when he was old for his level. Age-appropriate (young if anything), elite performance across two levels – I mean he should be above most relievers at minimum, no?

Yairo Padilla, 19 – SS

Stats (CPX): 38 G, 148 PAs, .283/.396/.367, 12.2 BB%, 14.2 K%, .083 ISO, .340 BABIP, 119 wRC+

Scouting: 25/55 Hit, 20/55 Game Power, 40/60 Raw Power, 50/40 Speed, 30/40 Field

The interesting thing about Padilla has a prospect is I did not realize that his prospect ranking was quite so tied to a belief in his bat. I honestly thought it was because of a belief that he would be an above average shortstop and that his bat would be good enough – a Masyn Winn type essentially. And while that may be what other publications think, this is very clearly a bat first profile. I actually think Fangraphs is lower on his defense than other publications to be fair, nonetheless, I found that surprising when I saw the scouting.

Tai Peete, OF – 20

Stats (High A): 529 PAs, .217/.288/.404, 8.7 BB%, 30.6 K%, .187 ISO, .282 BABIP, 79 wRC+

Another trick I like to use with age: you look at the age for the upcoming season and then you look at how they performed at the most recent level. Then you decide whether or not they will be promoted from that level in the upcoming season – in some cases, even if you expect them to start at the level they were at, you can see them getting promoted quickly. In Peete’s case, it seems pretty clear, he’ll be spending his age 20 season back at High A. And he’ll probably be there all season, barring a Joshua Baez like crushing of the baseballs. Good news: you see that .187 ISO from a 19-year-old in High A.

VOTE HERE

Happy Monday, everyone. It has been a very interesting week for an old friend, as Nick Castellanos was released by the Phillies—for some potentially interesting reasons—and will move on to the Padres and a brand new position on the field.

We’ve got other Phillies news, as well, with Bryce Harper being as candid as even when talking about Dave Dombrowski. Harper was also joined by Manny Machado in sharing his positive feelings about the Dodgers’ bold spending strategy. Go figure that players have no qualms about teams spending big bucks on massive contracts.

Plenty of other little tidbits as we get into the first week of Spring Training, so let’s just jump right into i.

• Michael Baumann looks at the top college teams to be aware of this year.
• Jared Greenspan looks at the 15 hitters to keep an eye during Spring Training.
• Todd Zolecki brings us Bryce Harper’s unfiltered response to Dave Dombrowski’s comments about him.
• AJ Cassavell reports that old friend Nick Castellanos will be trying out a new position this season: first base.
• Tim Capurso looks at how things managed to go south between the Phillies and Castellanos.
• It might have had something to do with a certain beer incident… Story by Ryan Phillips.
• Gosh, I love a vintage baseball story.

• Tarik Skubal isn’t satisfied just being one of the greatest pitchers of a generation. He wants to add “barista” to his skillset, too. Story by Jason Beck.
• Speaking of the Tigers, Riley Greene had an incredible 2025 season, but he’s hoping to make it even better this year, by cutting back on his strikeouts. Story by Jason Beck.
• Brent Maguire assesses some players who could help get their teams back into the postseason.
• Jesse Rogers reports that Manny Machado thinks the Dodgers’ spending is good for baseball.
• The 2026 Spring Training survey. Story by Jayson Stark. (The Athletic subscription required.)
• A look at some players trying out a new position the first time.

• Anthony Castrovince shares the most stacked positions in baseball currently.
• Bryan McTaggart reports that the Astros have signed the son of a team legend to a minor league deal.
• Anthony DiComo brings us peace between Juan Soto and Francisco Lindor who are said to have put their clubhouse issues in the past.
• Reports indicate that Emmanuel Clase rigged a pitch in the postseason. Story by Mike Vorkunov and Zack Meisel. (The Athletic subscription required.)
• This is a pretty rad baseball tattoo.

And tomorrow will be a better day than today, Buster. Make it so.

After they traded away their third base depth chart last week, it was widely expected that the Brewers would add someone to the mix in their infield. Without doing so, the Brewers would enter the season relying on a whole bunch of promising prospects who have never played a meaningful number of games above Double-A. Remember, last season when the Brewers had questions at third, they started the season with a Vinny Capra/Oliver Dunn platoon at the hot corner. It wasn’t until that ran its course that Caleb Durbin entered the picture, about three weeks into the season.

Of course, the Capra/Dunn combo failed quite miserably. But the Brewers, by signing Luis Rengifo on Friday, have signaled that this year they’re going to start with veteran options at third — some combination of Rengifo and David Hamilton, who was also acquired in the Durbin trade. Milwaukee had very little money tied up in Capra and Dunn last year, so when that project went south, they gave up on it almost immediately. The Brewers are paying Rengifo at least $3.5 million in 2026, which suggests they have a little more faith that he’ll produce at an acceptable level. Meanwhile, the Jett Williams-Brock Wilken-Cooper Pratt-Eddys Leonard group will wait for an opportunity while getting reps in the minor leagues (where their service clocks will not run, which the team is certainly conscious of).

Is the Brewers’ faith in Rengifo misplaced? He had a rough year in 2025, but was a solid player in the three years prior to that. Let’s dig in and see if we can’t see what caused his problems last season, and whether or not we should expect a rebound.

Recent season results

In 2022, Rengifo had a breakout year. He’d played in parts of three seasons with the Angels going back to 2019, but had never really hit at all, and the results were, to be generous, mixed. (The Angels, never shy about promoting prospects, called him up to the big leagues just after his 22nd birthday, after a solid year in 2018, which he split between Anaheim’s High-A, Double-A, and Triple-A levels.) But after bouncing back and forth between the minors and the big leagues in 2021 (which he could not do in 2020, when the minor league season was cancelled), Rengifo earned a steady role with the Angels in 2022, in which he played most often as the second baseman but appeared also at shortstop, third base, and briefly at both corner outfield positions.

In 127 total games that year, Rengifo hit .264/.294/.429 (a 102 OPS+) with 17 homers and 22 doubles. While his defensive metrics took a step back in 2023, Rengifo’s offensive numbers jumped up in 2023, mainly due to a more patient approach at the plate, and he posted a 112 OPS+ with a .264/.339/.444 batting line, 16 homers, and 15 doubles in 126 games. In 2024, Rengifo was having arguably his best season when he injured his wrist in July; he played only nine more games after the injury and finished the season batting .300/.347/.417 in 78 games.

Rengifo had season-ending wrist surgery in August of 2024, but supposedly was fully healthy when he reported to camp in 2025. But the results at the plate told a different story. He hit just .238, had an OBP of just .287, and slugged only .335 — he hit just nine homers despite a career-high 541 plate appearances.

Here’s what we can learn by glancing back at the surface-level stats on Rengifo:

• He isn’t an especially patient hitter, but in 2023, he posted a perfectly acceptable 9.2% walk rate. That was back down to 5.3% in 2024 and 6.1% in the next two seasons; expect the Brewers to ask him to lean into the more patient approach he showed in 2023.
• Rengifo has flashed power, but it was down in 2024, even before the wrist injury. From 2022-2025, his ISO was as follows: .166, .180, .117, and .098. (For a reference point, Brice Turang over the past three seasons has posted ISO numbers of .082, .095, and .147.)
• Rengifo also stole some bases in 2024 — 24 of them in just 78 games, but he was caught seven times. Rengifo is not especially fast, according to Statcast, so I wouldn’t expect him to be a prolific base stealer with the Brewers. (He has shown solid baserunning instincts at times, but that data is kind of all over the place.)

Looking under the hood

Let’s examine some “advanced” numbers from Rengifo’s last four seasons:

• 2022: 86.9 EV, 109.3 max EV, 9.9 LA, 33.6% hard-hit, .254 xBA, .403 xSLG, .285 BABIP
• 2023: 89.1 EV, 109.1 max EV, 11.0 LA, 36.4% hard-hit, .243 xBA, .406 xSLG, .293 BABIP
• 2024: 87 EV, 110.2 max EV, 6.7 LA, 32.5% hard-hit, .263 xBA, .359 xSLG, .339 BABIP
• 2025: 87.1 EV, 109.2 max EV, 6.7 LA, 32.7% hard-hit, .260 xBA, .375 xSLG, .281 BABIP

The first thing to look for are the outliers. There are a couple that stand out. First: Rengifo’s .339 BABIP in 2024, which is significantly higher than the other three seasons, and explains why his batting average that year was .300, 36 points higher than the previous two seasons. Given the decrease in expected slugging, this leads me to mostly disregard Rengifo’s 2024 season; not only do we have the outlier BABIP number, but it happened in far fewer plate appearances because of the injury.

Another “outlier,” or at least a change in trend: launch angle. In 2022 and 2023, when Rengifo was hitting homers, he was elevating the ball. In 2024 and 2025, when the homers dried up, he was not. That seems to be the only major difference; while he was making a little more good contact in 2023, he didn’t have a meaningfully better hard-hit percentage in 2022 than in ’24 or ’25.

Other than those things, there are a lot of fairly similar numbers here. The launch angle explains why Rengifo’s 2025 xSLG is lower than in 2022 and 2023, and the BABIP seems to show us that his 2024 season — in which he looked like a borderline All-Star through 70 games — was fluky, and probably should’ve been more like his 2025 season.

The question here is whether Rengifo can get his launch angle back up. Otherwise, I don’t see a whole lot to tell me that he can’t be the same hitter he was in 2022 and 2023. His 2024 wrist injury does not seem to be the culprit for why his power decreased in 2024 and 2025 — that change happened prior to the injury and is explainable by the launch angle. Rengifo’s plate discipline numbers, which you can dig into on Statcast, don’t show any alarm bells — he did a slightly better job at swinging at good pitches to hit in 2022-24 than in 2025, but for the most part, there are no major changes.

What should we expect?

The Brewers value patience, so expect them to tell Rengifo to lean into that. He has shown the ability to take a walk; in 126 games in 2023, his 9.2% walk rate was 59^th percentile in the league. That’s plenty good — and way better than 2022 (first percentile) and 2025 (24^th percentile).

While Rengifo’s BABIP in 2025 was the worst of the previous four years, I’m not sure we should expect a meaningful bounce back here. His sprint speed, via Statcast, has been decreasing: from 2021 to 2025, he went from 77^th percentile to 67^th, 51^st, 37^th, and 38^th, respectively. Speed plays a big part in BABIP, so if he’s just slower now than he used to be, that might explain the small decrease in BABIP between ’22-’23 and ’25.

The good news is that there’s nothing here that suggests that Rengifo cannot be the hitter he was when he was a solidly above-average hitter. Exit velocities and hard-hit percentage are largely the same. The big difference is just that launch angle, so expect the Brewer hitting coaches to tinker with Rengifo’s approach to try to get the ball back in the air a bit.

Rengifo’s 2022 and 2023 seasons, in which he had a 107 OPS+ over 956 plate appearances, were probably a little better than the underlying numbers say they should’ve been. His 2025 season, when he had a 73 OPS+ in 541 PA, was probably worse than the underlying numbers suggest.

He probably falls somewhere in between, and whether he’s good in 2026 will depend largely on launch angle. The projection systems listed on FanGraphs are not optimistic: none project him for more than 10 homers. The other big factor that will weigh on his success in 2026 is whether he’s more like the batter who walked 9% of the time in 2023 or the one who walked 3.3% of the time in 2022 (or 6.1% of the time in 2025).

It seems reasonable to expect that Rengifo will hit somewhere around .250-.260. But the next two numbers in his slash line could be pretty much anywhere. The tools seem to be intact, and it will be interesting to see how things play out.

Jalon Thompson talks to Kris Bubic as he ramps back up after an injury ended his season last year.

Bubic faced several hitters during the live batting practice. He showcased his pitching arsenal and had a few minor self-critiques. Overall, he felt his fastball command was there and that his changeup could’ve been a little sharper. Yet, the gravity of his performance was noticeable. He didn’t miss a beat, and that bodes well for the Royals as they enter Cactus League play on Friday.

“Getting back out there is step No. 1,” Bubic said. “Just hearing the feedback, too, right away has been great. You know, just seeing a hitter in the box is great as well. It’s great to always have the support of my teammates. They saw me quite a bit last year and was with me too when I was doing the rehab towards the end of the year. But I’m excited and I know they are excited. Obviously, we just want to keep it going.”

He also talks to Salvador Perez about getting in some action in the Venezuelan Winter League.

“It was amazing,” Perez said. “I don’t remember the last time I played. Last December, I played 22 games and Jose Alguacil was the manager. I played for Caracas, my mom’s team, so she was super excited. You know, I think it’s going to help me. It’s kind of different to face some pitchers and not wait for a month to face pitchers here in live BP (batting practice) in spring training.”

Ben Kudrna could get an extended look this spring.

Now, Kudrna is ready to seize his opportunity this spring.

“It’s a dream come true,” he said. “You know, now being here, I look at it as a big opportunity to learn. You’ve got guys that have been there and done that. They have illustrious careers, and you don’t stay in this game that long unless you’re doing the right things.”

Pitching coach Brian Sweeney discusses how the team is planning to adjust to the new ABS challenge system.

“I don’t think pitchers should challenge any call,” Sweeney said. “Let the guy behind the plate … who has the feel for it. I’m sure we are going to see it over there right away. …

“It’s a process that we are trying to understand. And talking with R&D (research and development) and the guys in the minor leagues that have used it before, it’s, OK, when do we use our challenges and who calls them?”

Anne Rogers writes about the bullpen competition.

The two to really watch are Avila and Falter. The Royals still believe in Avila as a starter, but there are enough voices on the Major League side saying he could make an impact as a reliever right now. The stuff ticked up when he got a chance in the ‘pen last year, and his curveball was devastating. Falter is out of options, so the Royals need to decide how and where he fits. He had a rough time last year when he was moved to the ‘pen, ultimately ending the season on the IL, but Falter could be another lefty out there.

She also talks to Jac Caglianone about improvements he made over the offseason.

The most important thing Caglianone worked on this offseason was swing decisions. He felt he got himself out “a lot more than the pitchers did,” he said. Whether that was because he was seeing the best stuff he’s ever seen in his life at the Major League level or because of the subconscious pressure he put on himself — or very likely both — Caglianone wanted to be more prepared for what he was going to face in 2026.

“One of the biggest things I took away from last year was these guys are really good at throwing strike-to-ball pitches,” Caglianone said. “Out of the hand, it looks really good, and it ends up being a 58-foot curveball.”

Former Royals coach Gary Blaylock died this week at age 94.

The Rangers sign former Royals outfielder Mark Canha to a minor league deal.

The Orioles acquire former Royals pitcher Jackson Kowar.

The Astros sign former Royals infielder Cavan Biggio to a minor league deal.

Arizona re-signs pitcher Zac Gallen on a one-year deal.

The Brewers sign catcher Gary Sánchez to a one-year contract.

The Orioles may be looking to trade Coby Mayo or Ryan Mountcastle.

Bryce Harper is irked by Phillies management over comments that he’s not an elite player.

The Padres sign Nick Castellanos and Germán Márquez.

The Reds sign first baseman Nathaniel Lowe to a minor league deal.

Is Jasson Domínguez the odd man out in New York?

What are the college baseball teams to keep an eye on this season?

Kansas State fires men’s basketball coach Jerome Tang “for cause.”

Who is the most shameless tanking team in the NBA?

Gaming’s biggest publishers are leaning on indie studios to freshen up their most valuable games.

Humans really don’t need chins.

Your song of the day is Blondie with Sunday Girl.

Scottsdale, Ariz. – Chase Dollander was drafted ninth overall in the 2023 MLB Draft and skyrocketed through the Colorado Rockies’ minor league system, finally making his MLB debut on April 6 last year against the Athletics.

Dollander had an up-and-down season, but he ended on a strong note when he went head-to-head against Tyler Glasnow in September before ultimately straining his patellar tendon during the game and finishing the year on the IL.

But Dollander is ready to take on 2026 with a new approach and a coaching staff.

“I’ve got to throw strikes,” Dollander said of his biggest 2025 takeaway. 

“I’ve got to get in the zone early, which is something we’ve really honed in on. Especially with this new staff, they’ve been really big about just throwing strike one. You put a hitter in a defensive mode, and it’s not good for them. So that’s been a huge focus of mine this offseason – command, making sure I’m getting strike one, and going from there.”

That was something that Warren Schaeffer echoed, as well.

“I think the main thing is getting in the strike zone early in the count,” Schaeffer said. “That’s something he did not do very well last year with any of his pitches, specifically at Coors Field.”

Dollander spent his offseason making adjustments to ensure he could command the ball, both physically and philosophically. 

“[I’ve made] a couple of mechanical adjustments,” he said, “being more direct to the plate, making sure my energy and everything like that goes towards the plate rather than away from it, which I think just in its own right has helped a lot of other things as well. So it’s been cool to kind of see the changes and stuff like that.”

And now that he’s gotten to work with the new coaching staff, he’s impressed.

“I like a lot of them so far,” he said, grinning.

“It’s a big change from what we had last year, and I think all of us are very excited. Some are more outspoken than others, but it’s definitely a change. It’s just exciting!”

In addition to a new coaching staff, the Rockies rotation is also shaping up to be dramatically different from 2025. Just in the last week, they added veterans José Quintana and Tomoyuki Sugano after bringing on Michael Lorenzen in January. 

And Dollander is taking full advantage of the new brainpower. 

“I’ve been talking to Lorenzen a lot, picking his brain and getting to know him as a person rather than the player, as well,” he said. 

“I haven’t gotten to talk to Sugano all that much, and Quintana the same thing, but I’m looking forward to getting to know those guys and really talking to them and picking their brains. Obviously, all three of them have a lot of experience – along with [Kyle] Freeland – so I feel like there’s a lot to learn, and I have the right guys around me to do it, so I’m going to do it.”

Dollander said his head is hurting a little bit from all of the information being thrown at him, but “in a great way!”

“I’d rather have too much information than not enough,” he said. “I think they’re really good at just making sure that we’re all understanding and making sure we’re all on the same page. I think it’s going to be great.”

Schaeffer also praised the new veterans and what they can bring to a young pitcher like Dollander.

“I think just that attitude and being around new people and being around a lot more veterans – not just Kyle Freeland and [Antonio] Senzatela, but now it’s Michael Lorenzen and Sugano and Quintana. These are all guys that can help him with getting in the zone. His stuff is nasty – if he gets the ball over the plate, he’s going to be really good for a long time.”

And, of course, Dollander is working on a new pitch.

“The other day, we were playing around with a sweeper,” he said. “Obviously, the sinker got added last year. That has taken off in its own right. And then it’s just refining everything else, making sure that the slider stays hard with more of a downward action rather than side-to-side.

“I feel like my stuff is good enough,” he continued. “If I throw strikes, it’ll be a tough time for hitters. So that’s been my focus: Just command the zone.”

Looking ahead to 2026, Dollander is looking the most forward to working with the staff and veteran pitchers. 

“[I’m most looking forward to] picking their brains more, especially as games go on, like, ‘Hey man, what did you see here? What would you throw in this situation?’ That kind of stuff,” he said. 

“I think that’s when I’ll start to really learn a lot. It’s hard now just because we’re all doing different things – we’re all throwing live (batting practices) at these different times and stuff like that – but once games start, I’m in learning mode.”

After difficult ’25 on and off field, Doyle eyes bounce-back ’26 | MLB.com

To say Brenton Doyle had a difficult 2025 is underscoring things. Between personal tragedy and professional challenges, it was a rough one. But Doyle is looking to bounce back in 2026, hopefully to reclaim himself at the plate and in the field (and perhaps at the MLB Honors once again).

The Rockies try something new: Signing pitchers who want to come to Coors Field | The Athletic ($)

The Rockies have always struggled to attract free agent pitchers, but something changed this year and they’ve had an influx of pitchers eager to sign with them. Sam Blum spoke with them, as well as the new pitching coaches and PBO Paul DePodesta, to see what the difference is in 2026 compared to years past.

Please keep in mind our Purple Row Community Guidelines when you’re commenting. Thanks!

Yesterday was the first official full practice for MLB teams, and for non-roster invitees (NRIs), it’s the official start of their fight for a position on 40-man rosters. Although 10 of the 26 White Sox NRIs have already inked contracts with the club, roster shifts are expected before Opening Day on March 27.

With invitations extended to new faces, a few veterans and even some familiar faces, who has the best chance of breaking camp with the White Sox?

Ben Peoples
The Sox tapped into Tampa Bay’s pitching factory last year in the Adrian Houser trade, and it’ll pay off this season. Peoples spent his first three years in the Rays minor league system putting up solid numbers as a starter before he transitioned into a long reliever role in 2025. His 2.65 ERA and 39 strikeouts in 37 1/3 innings with the Durham Bulls showed much promise despite his performance slippage once he was traded to Chicago. While seven earned runs and nine hits in 10 relief appearances doesn’t look great on paper, consistency (especially in Charlotte) is hard to expect from a reliever. With nearly five-and-a-half seasons of sub-4.00 ERA ball under his belt, don’t reach too much into Peoples’ second-half 2025 stats.

Peoples is in a strong position to break camp with the team. He could easily steal a bullpen spot from incumbents Wikelman González or Prelander Berroa (who is on the Tommy John mend and could struggle in his initial return). After one of the worst bullpen years in recent memory (and that’s saying something), the Sox will be experimenting with their bullpen to find a crew that clicks, and Peoples could become a go-to guy in the fifth and sixth innings.

Dru Baker
The Sox are in dire need of defense, and Chicago’s outfield could end up a mess. That leaves the door open for Baker to sneak onto the 40-man roster in March. Baker hasn’t produced jaw-dropping numbers, but he’s done enough to be given a chance. Coming off a strong 2024 campaign, Baker’s .245/.321/.343 slash line and 30 walks in 100 games in 2025 was serviceable. His real strength is defense: Baker has spent most of his time in center, but is no stranger to the outfield corners. He showcased excellent fielding several times last year. and was recognized as Tampa’s minor league player of the month last April.

There isn’t much separating a Triple-A outfielder from a major-leaguer in the Sox organization, leaving Baker a narrow window of opportunity. Injuries and Spring Training performance will play a huge role in whether Baker makes his MLB debut before June.

Jarred Kelenic
The former 2018 first-round pick hasn’t lived up to his hype. Kelenic’s performance quickly dropped off following his career-high .253/.327/.419 slash in 2023 with the Mariners. He struggled to stay in the majors in his last two seasons with the Braves, batting .222/.279/.381 with 17 home runs in 155 games. His poor swing decisions (41.5% WHIFF in 2025) are hard to fix and don’t bode well for a fruitful career in the majors. However, it’s possible that Chicago’s hitting coaches can make enough tweaks to get him back to being a viable defensive sub option, as his strong arm beats Andrew Benintendi’s any day. At this rate, put me in left field, Venable!

Kelenic has a slim chance of making the Opening Day roster, but his big league experience and raw power could be enough to beat out the rest of the competition.

While Brandon Sproat is my pick to be the next Brewers “pitching lab” success story, I started writing that article before the Brewers traded for left-hander Kyle Harrison (4.09 ERA in 2025). Harrison — the main piece acquired in the trade that sent Caleb Durbin to Boston— might have an even more intriguing profile. He’s a former top 25 overall prospect who the Red Sox liked enough to make him the centerpiece in the trade that sent slugger Rafael Devers to San Francisco. He seems like a perfect candidate for the Brewers “lab” to work some of its magic.

I don’t put very much stock in the fact that Harrison hasn’t exactly impressed in the majors, nor that he lost his spot in the Giants’ rotation to Landen Roupp (who, by the way, has a very respectable 3.73 career ERA). Harrison has a ton of potential but is in need of some more development. That might be worrying, maybe, if he wasn’t already ahead of schedule. When Harrison made his debut as a Giant, at 22 years old, he was the youngest pitcher to pitch in a Giants uniform since Madison Bumgarner. He’s already spent a full season in a major league starting rotation. It’s not like San Francisco desperately wanted to unload Harrison either; most general managers would have traded Harrison for Rafael freakin’ Devers.

Harrison was originally drafted in the third round by the Giants back in 2020. While he was drafted over five years ago, he was drafted out of high school, so at 24 years old, he’s still younger than a few notable Brewers prospects — Sproat (25), Craig Yoho (26), Robert Gasser (26), and Coleman Crow (25) are all older than Harrison. He’s not much older than Logan Henderson, Jeferson Quero, and Brock Wilken, who are all 23. Harrison is the same age as Tyson Hardin, and the same age that Quinn Priester was when Milwaukee traded for him.

To me, there are some Priester parallels with Harrison. Harrison, like Priester, was picked high in the draft and was a top prospect for a couple of years. Harrison didn’t exactly light the world on fire in his first full season in the Giants rotation, pitching to the tune of a 4.56 ERA with 118 strikeouts in 124 1/3 innings pitched. Neither did Priester, who lost his rotation spot to Richard Fitts (5.00 ERA in 10 starts in 2025). Fitts is now in St. Louis, and Priester just put up a 3.32 ERA in Milwaukee.

MLB statistics definitely matter when evaluating Harrison, but when you look at the big picture, the acquisition starts to look more promising. Numbers in this small of a sample size can also be somewhat misleading. If Harrison had simply not made his last start of the season (3 ER in 3 IP against the Tigers), he would have finished the season with a 3.58 ERA.

Think of Harrison like a prospect. He’s still as young as some prospects and is uber-talented, but comes with the added bonus of big-league experience. He’s already shown flashes of what he could be, but he hasn’t been consistent enough to justify a featured role thus far in his career. Now, Harrison is in an organization known for “unlocking” pitchers, of getting the most out of new acquisitions. With some tweaks, he could justify his former ranking as a top prospect in baseball as soon as this season. Here’s everything you need to know about Harrison’s current arsenal and how it might look different in Milwaukee.

Harrison’s Fastball

Harrison’s fastball is a “problematic pitch,” as put by Steven Kennedy from McCovey Chronicles. The “problem” is actually paradoxical — his fastball is really, really good, but in his only full season as a starter (2024), he threw it more frequently than any other starting pitcher in baseball. No pitcher is going to win a Cy Young throwing his fastball nearly 60% of the time, but part of the reason that Harrison’s heavy fastball usage became “problematic” is that his average fastball velocity declined from what it was in 2023. In 2023, Harrison averaged 93.6 mph on his fastball. In 2024, that number dipped down to 92.5 mph.

Harrison has never thrown super hard, but his fastball (characterized by a late-rising movement) has always been effective as a result of its shape. The decline in velocity led to a decline in movement. Together, both led to a decline in overall effectiveness.

Here’s what The Athletic baseball writer Grant Brisbee said about Harrison prior to the 2025 season:

“If Harrison levels up with his offspeed stuff or with his command, or ideally both, his ceiling is where you might expect a former top-20 prospect’s ceiling to be. If it’s just a mid-90s fastball that carries him, he’ll still help the Giants toward the postseason. If the fastball is what we saw toward the end of last year and the offspeed stuff and command don’t improve, the 4.56 ERA (85 ERA+) doesn’t have to be a blip or something that can be written off because of inexperience.” Brisbee and Kennedy both characterized Harrison as someone who “can be, and has been, a serviceable starter at the back-end of a rotation purely on the merits of his four-seam. What prevents him from filling a more elevated rotation role is his secondary pitches.” From reading other scouting reports, most people seemed to view Harrison similarly — a back-end starter at worst, a high-end starter if he can develop his secondary offerings.

One good sign for Harrison’s development is that he got his velocity back — and then some — in 2025. Harrison’s average fastball velocity in 2025 was 94.6 mph (over 2 mph faster than in 2024). Unsurprisingly, his fastball also played better. Opponents hit .249 against it in 2024 and .195 in 2025. Simply put, I wouldn’t worry about the fastball.

Harrison’s secondary stuff, however?

Harrison’s Secondary Offerings

Harrison’s secondary offerings, for most of his career, have left something to be desired. The narrative on Harrison was exactly how Brisbee and Kennedy described him — great fastball, less-than-great secondary stuff. When he was traded to Boston last summer, however, the Red Sox reportedly “started to modify his arsenal, adding a cutter and sinker and tweaking his breaking ball.”

Harrison didn’t throw either pitch all that often in 2025 (22 and 12 times, respectively). Getting either pitch to miss bats consistently would change the equation entirely. The sinker averages a similar velocity (93 mph) to his fastball, but with an entirely different shape. Harrison’s fastball features arm-side movement (away from a right-handed hitter) and significant rising action, while his sinker has arm-side movement but… well, it sinks. Pitching is all about deception, so having two pitches that look very similar until the last 30-ish feet would go a long way towards missing bats. The cutter also shows a lot of potential playing off his fastball, as detailed in this September article from Over The Monster.

While the sinker and the cutter are both new additions, Harrison has also featured a slurve (thrown 27% of the time last year) and a changeup (8%). The slurve has been inconsistent, although it’s been consistently more effective against righties than it has against lefties. Before joining the Red Sox, Harrison’s slurve tended not to “finish its’ shape,” straightening out inside of continuing to break down and towards the glove side. With the Red Sox, however, Harrison was throwing the pitch slightly harder (82.2 mph as opposed to 80.6 mph) and getting an extra 1.6” of vertical break on average. In the Over the Monster article, author Jacob Roy wondered if a “harder breaking ball is the answer” — it seems the Red Sox were already making that adjustment. That may be something the Brewers have also pinpointed.

As for the changeup? Well, who better to hear from than Harrison himself?

“(The changeup) used to be similar to Logan Webb’s changeup — the way he throws his with a one-seam orientation — but I’ve switched to a kick,” Harrison explained. “That’s what I’m trying to harness. It is a little harder to get a feel for. Throwing a kick kind of takes away that being perfect, of trying to pronate a pitch and get to a spot. Now it’s, ‘Throw the pitch and let the kick take care of it.’”

It’s admittedly a very small sample size, and opponents did hit .300 against Harrison’s changeup last year, but they also only slugged .400 — lower than any pitch other than his fastball and his cutter (22 total pitches thrown). Fastball pitchers usually rely on changeups to keep hitters off balance and unable to sit on the fastball, since both pitches are generally thrown with a similar arm angle, arm speed, and release trajectory. A quality changeup would aid Harrison in the same way that a quality sinker would; batters can’t sit on Harrison’s rising fastball when he has a pitch that looks similar out of his hand, but reaches the plate significantly slower and drops inside of rising.

So, what does Harrison need to live up to his potential? Simply put, he needs better shape on his secondary pitches and a go-to secondary offering. As detailed in the Sproat article, Milwaukee has a (literal) pitching lab dedicated to, in the words of former Brewer Josh Hader, learning “how pitches should spin to get optimal drop or movement.” Using that data, they’ve gotten great seasons out of pitchers much less talented than Harrison.

I don’t know whether Milwaukee thinks they can make the slurve the (harder, faster) swing-and-miss pitch it should be, or whether they think the cutter, sinker, or changeup can become plus pitches with some tweaks. I do know that trading a valuable part of last year’s team (Caleb Durbin) and versatile infield depth speaks to their confidence in their ability to get the best out of Harrison. The Brewers think he can live up to his billing as a former top prospect leaguewide, and I’m excited to see how they get him there.

While Brandon Sproat is my pick to be the next Brewers “pitching lab” success story, I started writing that article before the Brewers traded for left-hander Kyle Harrison (4.09 ERA in 2025). Harrison — the main piece acquired in the trade that sent Caleb Durbin to Boston— might have an even more intriguing profile. He’s a former top 25 overall prospect who the Red Sox liked enough to make him the centerpiece in the trade that sent slugger Rafael Devers to San Francisco. He seems like a perfect candidate for the Brewers “lab” to work some of its magic.

I don’t put very much stock in the fact that Harrison hasn’t exactly impressed in the majors, nor that he lost his spot in the Giants’ rotation to Landen Roupp (who, by the way, has a very respectable 3.73 career ERA). Harrison has a ton of potential but is in need of some more development. That might be worrying, maybe, if he wasn’t already ahead of schedule. When Harrison made his debut as a Giant, at 22 years old, he was the youngest pitcher to pitch in a Giants uniform since Madison Bumgarner. He’s already spent a full season in a major league starting rotation. It’s not like San Francisco desperately wanted to unload Harrison either; most general managers would have traded Harrison for Rafael freakin’ Devers.

Harrison was originally drafted in the third round by the Giants back in 2020. While he was drafted over five years ago, he was drafted out of high school, so at 24 years old, he’s still younger than a few notable Brewers prospects — Sproat (25), Craig Yoho (26), Robert Gasser (26), and Coleman Crow (25) are all older than Harrison. He’s not much older than Logan Henderson, Jeferson Quero, and Brock Wilken, who are all 23. Harrison is the same age as Tyson Hardin, and the same age that Quinn Priester was when Milwaukee traded for him.

To me, there are some Priester parallels with Harrison. Harrison, like Priester, was picked high in the draft and was a top prospect for a couple of years. Harrison didn’t exactly light the world on fire in his first full season in the Giants rotation, pitching to the tune of a 4.56 ERA with 118 strikeouts in 124 1/3 innings pitched. Neither did Priester, who lost his rotation spot to Richard Fitts (5.00 ERA in 10 starts in 2025). Fitts is now in St. Louis, and Priester just put up a 3.32 ERA in Milwaukee.

MLB statistics definitely matter when evaluating Harrison, but when you look at the big picture, the acquisition starts to look more promising. Numbers in this small of a sample size can also be somewhat misleading. If Harrison had simply not made his last start of the season (3 ER in 3 IP against the Tigers), he would have finished the season with a 3.58 ERA.

Think of Harrison like a prospect. He’s still as young as some prospects and is uber-talented, but comes with the added bonus of big-league experience. He’s already shown flashes of what he could be, but he hasn’t been consistent enough to justify a featured role thus far in his career. Now, Harrison is in an organization known for “unlocking” pitchers, of getting the most out of new acquisitions. With some tweaks, he could justify his former ranking as a top prospect in baseball as soon as this season. Here’s everything you need to know about Harrison’s current arsenal and how it might look different in Milwaukee.

Harrison’s Fastball

Harrison’s fastball is a “problematic pitch,” as put by Steven Kennedy from McCovey Chronicles. The “problem” is actually paradoxical — his fastball is really, really good, but in his only full season as a starter (2024), he threw it more frequently than any other starting pitcher in baseball. No pitcher is going to win a Cy Young throwing his fastball nearly 60% of the time, but part of the reason that Harrison’s heavy fastball usage became “problematic” is that his average fastball velocity declined from what it was in 2023. In 2023, Harrison averaged 93.6 mph on his fastball. In 2024, that number dipped down to 92.5 mph.

Harrison has never thrown super hard, but his fastball (characterized by a late-rising movement) has always been effective as a result of its shape. The decline in velocity led to a decline in movement. Together, both led to a decline in overall effectiveness.

Here’s what The Athletic baseball writer Grant Brisbee said about Harrison prior to the 2025 season:

“If Harrison levels up with his offspeed stuff or with his command, or ideally both, his ceiling is where you might expect a former top-20 prospect’s ceiling to be. If it’s just a mid-90s fastball that carries him, he’ll still help the Giants toward the postseason. If the fastball is what we saw toward the end of last year and the offspeed stuff and command don’t improve, the 4.56 ERA (85 ERA+) doesn’t have to be a blip or something that can be written off because of inexperience.” Brisbee and Kennedy both characterized Harrison as someone who “can be, and has been, a serviceable starter at the back-end of a rotation purely on the merits of his four-seam. What prevents him from filling a more elevated rotation role is his secondary pitches.” From reading other scouting reports, most people seemed to view Harrison similarly — a back-end starter at worst, a high-end starter if he can develop his secondary offerings.

One good sign for Harrison’s development is that he got his velocity back — and then some — in 2025. Harrison’s average fastball velocity in 2025 was 94.6 mph (over 2 mph faster than in 2024). Unsurprisingly, his fastball also played better. Opponents hit .249 against it in 2024 and .195 in 2025. Simply put, I wouldn’t worry about the fastball.

Harrison’s secondary stuff, however?

Harrison’s Secondary Offerings

Harrison’s secondary offerings, for most of his career, have left something to be desired. The narrative on Harrison was exactly how Brisbee and Kennedy described him — great fastball, less-than-great secondary stuff. When he was traded to Boston last summer, however, the Red Sox reportedly “started to modify his arsenal, adding a cutter and sinker and tweaking his breaking ball.”

Harrison didn’t throw either pitch all that often in 2025 (22 and 12 times, respectively). Getting either pitch to miss bats consistently would change the equation entirely. The sinker averages a similar velocity (93 mph) to his fastball, but with an entirely different shape. Harrison’s fastball features arm-side movement (away from a right-handed hitter) and significant rising action, while his sinker has arm-side movement but… well, it sinks. Pitching is all about deception, so having two pitches that look very similar until the last 30-ish feet would go a long way towards missing bats. The cutter also shows a lot of potential playing off his fastball, as detailed in this September article from Over The Monster.

While the sinker and the cutter are both new additions, Harrison has also featured a slurve (thrown 27% of the time last year) and a changeup (8%). The slurve has been inconsistent, although it’s been consistently more effective against righties than it has against lefties. Before joining the Red Sox, Harrison’s slurve tended not to “finish its’ shape,” straightening out inside of continuing to break down and towards the glove side. With the Red Sox, however, Harrison was throwing the pitch slightly harder (82.2 mph as opposed to 80.6 mph) and getting an extra 1.6” of vertical break on average. In the Over the Monster article, author Jacob Roy wondered if a “harder breaking ball is the answer” — it seems the Red Sox were already making that adjustment. That may be something the Brewers have also pinpointed.

As for the changeup? Well, who better to hear from than Harrison himself?

“(The changeup) used to be similar to Logan Webb’s changeup — the way he throws his with a one-seam orientation — but I’ve switched to a kick,” Harrison explained. “That’s what I’m trying to harness. It is a little harder to get a feel for. Throwing a kick kind of takes away that being perfect, of trying to pronate a pitch and get to a spot. Now it’s, ‘Throw the pitch and let the kick take care of it.’”

It’s admittedly a very small sample size, and opponents did hit .300 against Harrison’s changeup last year, but they also only slugged .400 — lower than any pitch other than his fastball and his cutter (22 total pitches thrown). Fastball pitchers usually rely on changeups to keep hitters off balance and unable to sit on the fastball, since both pitches are generally thrown with a similar arm angle, arm speed, and release trajectory. A quality changeup would aid Harrison in the same way that a quality sinker would; batters can’t sit on Harrison’s rising fastball when he has a pitch that looks similar out of his hand, but reaches the plate significantly slower and drops inside of rising.

So, what does Harrison need to live up to his potential? Simply put, he needs better shape on his secondary pitches and a go-to secondary offering. As detailed in the Sproat article, Milwaukee has a (literal) pitching lab dedicated to, in the words of former Brewer Josh Hader, learning “how pitches should spin to get optimal drop or movement.” Using that data, they’ve gotten great seasons out of pitchers much less talented than Harrison.

I don’t know whether Milwaukee thinks they can make the slurve the (harder, faster) swing-and-miss pitch it should be, or whether they think the cutter, sinker, or changeup can become plus pitches with some tweaks. I do know that trading a valuable part of last year’s team (Caleb Durbin) and versatile infield depth speaks to their confidence in their ability to get the best out of Harrison. The Brewers think he can live up to his billing as a former top prospect leaguewide, and I’m excited to see how they get him there.