The Guardians lost another series yesterday, dropping the finale to the Blue Jays 6-3. Yet, in a weak American League and American League Central, there is still room to hope.
The Tigers come to town today, starting with a doubleheader at 2:10PM and 7:10PM ET today.
Jeff McNerny and I commiserated about this mediocre Guardians team on the Disgusting Baseball Podcast last night.
Around MLB:
The White Sox, Orioles and Mariners lost, and Astros and Rangers won.
Draymond shares intriguing proposal after Clippers lose five first-round picks originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area
The Los Angeles Clippers got handed arguably the worst punishment in NBA history for salary cap circumvention, fined millions of dollars as well as losing consecutive first round draft picks. Beginning in 2029, the Clippers will forfeit their top draft picks until 2033, leaving the NBA draft with less draft selections than normal. And Warriors star Draymond Green does not agree with how the draft pick forfeiture is being handled.
Green offered a proposal for what the league should do with the lost draft picks on his podcast, “The Draymond Green Show.” And he is all for making sure that the picks go to different teams so that the number of draft selections stays the same, giving incoming prospects the same opportunity to hear their names called.
“Here’s one thing I will say,” Green said. “Usually in these situations where draft picks get snatched, you look up and it’s just 29 first round picks. I think the NBA needs to do something about that. And I think the NBA needs to do something about that for a few reasons. Number one, it’s not fair to guys who have the opportunity to be one of 60 and then all of a sudden teams lose three picks somewhere in the 30 team system and you get three picks snatched and then there’s 57 draft picks this year.
“That’s not fair to three guys who can possibly get their name called, who’ve worked their whole lives for an opportunity at being one of 60. I think that sucks for guys who have worked their ass off. I think it sucks for the NBA as a whole. I think at some point the NBA has to figure out a system where when a pick gets snatched, maybe it goes into a lottery to certain teams. Maybe you can do something to where those picks didn’t go somewhere else. But just getting rid of the picks as a whole, I don’t think that’s fair, I don’t think that’s great for the NBA. You want 60 draft picks… I think those picks should go elsewhere… .”
The investigation into the Clippers began in September 2025 after a journalist reported that Kawhi Leonard and a company called Aspiration Fund Adviser LLC. — a company that went bankrupt the same year– were involved in an endorsement deal that could have broken NBA rules.
The Clippers maintained they did nothing wrong, but after the league investigation wrapped up, they found the team guilty and handed down a harsh punishment that included a one-year suspension for owner Steve Ballmer from all league and team activities, a $30 million fine and the stripped draft picks. As for Leonard, a trade back to the Toronto Raptors was halted during the investigation.
Green’s proposal hasn’t been discussed in any capacity but is interesting because it would allow the league to continue normally while still punishing the Clippers for their wrongdoings. And while there is no indication yet that Green’s thought will be taken seriously, it is an interesting one that could benefit the NBA.
Green is entering his 14th season, both in the NBA and with Golden State, and while his podcasting career is going strong, he is eager to continue playing at a high level and lead the Warriors back to the postseason. A four-time NBA champion, Green hopes he can win at least one more ring before riding off into the sunset.
The Toronto Maple Leafs announced that they have signed Brendan Brisson to a one-year contract on Friday. His salary cap hit is $850,00, according to PuckPedia. In the minors, he'll earn $300,000.
Brisson, 24, is coming off a one-year contract. He was a pending RFA at the beginning of this off-season, but the New York Rangers decided not to qualify him, which made him a UFA.
The left winger still has a lot to prove at the NHL level. In his career, he's played 27 games across parts of three seasons, registering two goals and nine points.
Brisson spent this past season with the Rangers, but played just three games in the NHL. Most of his time was in the AHL with the Hartford Wolf Pack. In the minors, he produced 19 goals and 37 points and a minus-32 rating on a team that finished last in the league.
In terms of his role in the Maple Leafs organization, he'll be a depth player who spends most of his time in the minors with the Toronto Marlies, coming off a Calder Cup championship.
This move could fill the gap that was left when right winger Alex Nylander signed a professional tryout with the Calgary Flames.
Nylander Brothers Apart Again As Alex Reportedly Set To Join Flames On Professional TryoutAlex and his brother, William, spent the last couple of years living together in Toronto as the former tried to get his game back to an NHL level.Brisson is still a relatively young player. If he shows some promise in the minors this coming season, perhaps the Leafs would be inclined to keep him around a bit longer. And in a perfect world, Brisson should have many years of professional hockey in his locker.
The Vegas Golden Knights were the team that drafted Brisson. He was selected in the first round of the 2020 draft with the 20th overall pick. Before being traded to New York, he made nine NHL appearances for Vegas and didn't mark a single point while averaging 9:52 per game. With the AHL's Henderson Silver Knights, he scored five goals and 19 points in 45 games.
His best stint in the NHL was in 2023-24 when he played 15 NHL games that year. Brisson went on to score two goals and eight points for the Golden Knights.
The 2022-23 season marked his best AHL season, scoring 18 goals and 37 points in 58 contests.
Report: Chris Tanev Waiting To Be Cleared By Doctors, Plans To Be On Ice First Day Of Maple Leafs CampWhile Tanev aims to be ready for the opening day of camp, Tanev described his rehab from surgery in March as "slow". The veteran defender has to show that the injury issues of last year are fully in the rearview mirror.Brisson had a rather impressive stretch before entering the professional leagues. In 2019-20, he was a member of the Chicago Steel in the USHL. In what was his rookie season, he scored 24 goals and 59 points in 45 appearances. That was good enough to get him named the USHL rookie of the year.
The 6-foot forward also has a World Junior Championship gold medal under his belt from the 2021 tournament. Brisson notched two goals in seven games for Team USA.
He also competed in the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics for the Americans, recording two goals in four games.
Brisson was also successful in the NCAA, playing two seasons for the University of Michigan in 2020-21 and 2021-22. In his rookie season at the college level, he scored 10 goals and 21 points in 24 games. He followed that up with a 21-goal and 42-point campaign in 38 games the next year.
See more of The Hockey News on Google — Save us as Preferred Source
For action-packed issues, access to the entire magazine archive and a free issue, subscribe to The Hockey News at THN.com/free. Get the latest news and trending stories by subscribing to our newsletter here. And share your thoughts by commenting below the article on THN.com or creating your own post in our community forum.
Good morning! Roman Anthony has been on fire since finally finishing his rehab assignment. In his five games since returning he has slashed .455/.500/.909 with 2 homers, 2 doubles, and a triple. He is so good that he is somehow 5th on the team in position player bWAR despite being 16th in games played.
But there is one stat he’s lagging behind on this week: he has just 2 RBI, both of which came on his two solo shots.
This raises the question: should the Sox consider batting him somewhere other than leadoff?
On one hand, you don’t want to mess with what’s working. And it goes without saying that a hitter who gets on base as much as he does is exactly what you want at the top of the order. But it is worth considering the obvious fact that production with the bases empty doesn’t help the team as much as production with someone on.
Moreover, the Sox do have a pretty good candidate to take that leadoff spot: Nick Sogard has posted a .368 OBP since returning to the big leagues in late July, with 21 walks and 9 doubles in 34 games. It’s hard not to salivate at the thought of Anthony hitting with Sogard already on second ahead of him.
Talk about the batting order and whatever else you want in this space and, as always, be good to one another.
Barring a catastrophe, the Houston Rockets will make the playoffs in 2026-27.
Making the playoffs is no longer enough.
If they don’t win a series this year, they’ll need major systemic changes. It isn’t even up for debate. It might start with firing Ime Udoka, but that’s actually my next article.
(In the industry, that’s called a plug).
For now, let’s drink a half-full glass of optimism juice. The Rockets certainly have the talent to advance to (at least) the second round. After the San Antonio Spurs and Oklahoma City Thunder, they should be able to beat anybody in a playoff series (although the newly formed Timberwolves would like a word, and Jokic is still a Nugget…anyway, optimism).
Here are three keys to a successful 2026-27 season
As was the parlance in the 1990s, no duh.
It’s less about accuracy and more about volume. The Rockets were 10th in three-point percentage in 2025-26 (36.4%), but 28th in threes attempted per game (31.5). If they’d taken one three all year and hit it, they’d have shot a historic 100.0% from three-point range.
Fred VanVleet, who shot 7.7 threes per game in 2024-25, will help. More would be nice. Expanding Reed Sheppard’s role could suffice, but that’s at odds with VanVleet getting his shots up, and with Marcus Smart in the fold…well, we’ll see what happens.
Could Alperen Sengun get one more up per game, and ideally start hitting more? Amen Thompson is too far from a “credible shooter” to even wishcast.
It would be optimal if Kevin Durant would slightly adjust his shooting profile, but that’s unlikely. He’s been the perfect shot creator, in a vacuum, for his entire, illustrious career. He now finds himself on a team that needs fewer mid-range shots and more threes, but he’s a pretty old dog to expect a new trick from.
Wherever the Rockets find more threes, they need more threes.
This one is also obvious.
They’re all obvious, OK? There’s no hidden blade. The Rockets are arguably the best rebounding team ever. They’re a top-end defensive team. They need better shooting; they need luck, and they need one more equally obvious thing that’s going to be the third key.
(In the literary world, that’s what we call poor foreshadowing because everyone knew it was coming anyway).
Last year, Durant was available for a remarkable 78 games. Then, he was largely unavailable in the playoffs when it mattered. That sure was annoying.
VanVleet infamously suited up for 0 contests. Can he play back-to-backs? Can Steven Adams?
Does any of it matter if the young guys can’t step up?
Sengun still has not put together a season where he maximized his impact on both ends of the floor. As I recently covered, neither has Amen Thompson.
With Thompson’s fresh extension, those two now account for roughly 40% of the team’s cap space. So, they’re the obvious breakout candidates:
But they’re not the only ones.
Some of us have long suspected that Jabari Smith Jr. could be a late bloomer. This would be a good year to bloom. A Reed Sheppard who isn’t wearing a “right this way, gentleman” T-shirt on defense could change the team.
Even Tari Eason has demonstrated more of an ability to get to his midrange jumper than some fans have given him credit for (although, if he could just return to his previous defensive impact, that would be good enough).
Generally speaking, the obvious route would be for one of Thompson or Sengun to step up from “fringe All-Star” to “fringe All-NBA”. If Smith Jr. could make a leap from “fringe starter” to “fringe All-Star”, that would also be impactful, and so forth. The Rockets need their veterans to stay healthy, but they’ll only go as far as the young guys can carry them:
And it had better be past the first round.
The San Diego Padres dropped two of three games to the Pittsburgh Pirates before going on the road to face the Tampa Bay Rays and the Cleveland Guardians. They return to Petco Park battered and bruised after a 1-5 road trip to host the New York Yankees and the Washington Nationals.
Despite the struggles the Padres will still play meaningful games over the final 22 games of the regular season thanks in large part to the Philadelphia Phillies who took two of three from the Arizona Diamondbacks over the weekend. San Diego is a half game out of the final Wild Card position and holds their postseason fate in its hands. The most glaring area of need after their trip to Cincinnati was hitting with runners in scoring position. Over the final two games against the Reds, both losses, the Padres went 1-for-17 in that category. Between the lack of timely hits and the untimely inability to play fundamental baseball the current potential playoff berth picture could and probably should look much worse.
San Diego will have to improve in all three phases of the game if it is going to put an end to its current streak of poor play. At times, the offense has looked unstoppable, but then it just disappears. The same could be said for the starting pitching, which had back-to-back poor outings from Randy Vasquez and Casey Mize. The bullpen, which has been the strength of the team throughout the season, has been hittable and no one outside of Yuki Matsui has been immune.
Hopefully the hometown crowd and the friendly confines of Petco are just what the Padres need to get right, but if for some reason they are not, it could be a slow and agonizing end to the season. We should have a feeling one way or the other when San Diego opens its series against New York tonight at 6:40 p.m.
Padres News:
Baseball News:
Roob Stats: The 10 craziest Ben Simmons stats and numbers known to mankind originally appeared on NBC Sports Philadelphia
As soon as we saw that Ben Simmons was returning to the NBA, one thought came to mind:
FREAKING STATS!!!
Simmons, who just turned 30 in July, has had one of the strangest careers in NBA history, with an unprecedented first four seasons followed by injuries, mediocrity and inconsistency. He’s always been either really, really good or really, really bad. The good part of his career was so good that despite the last few years, his overall numbers are still remarkable.
Which is why we’re here!
So here we go with 10 Ben Simmons stats you won’t find anywhere else!
1. Ben Simmons had 32 triple doubles in his first 300 career games, and only three players have had more in their first 300 games, and all three are legends: Oscar Robertson (109), Luka Dončić (54) and Magic Johnson (52). Charles Barkley had the next-most among 76ers in their first 300 games with six. Overall, Simmons’ 33 career triple doubles are 14th-most in NBA history.
2. With career averages of 13.1 points, 7.4 rebounds and 7.2 assists per game, Simmons is one of only six players in NBA history to average 13 points, 7.0 points and 7.0 assists per game. The others: Dončić, LeBron James, Magic Johnson, Robertson and Nikola Jokić.
3. Only Simmons, Jokić and James also averaged 13, 7 and 7 and more than half a block per game. Only Johnson, James and Simmons averaged 13, 7, 7 and at least 1.5 steals. So in NBA history only Simmons and James have averaged 13 points, 7.0 assists, 7.0 rebounds, 1.5 steals and 0.7 blocks per game
4. Simmons is the 2nd-youngest player in NBA history to score 4,000 points with 2,000 rebounds and 2,000 assists. He reached the last of those milestones – assists – on March 25, 2001, in a win over the Lakers at Staples Center at the age of 24 years, 240 days. Dončić reached all three milestones before turning 23.
5. Simmons is one of only four players in NBA history to shoot over 55 percent in his career but below 14 percent from 3-point range (minimum 30 3-point attempts). Simmons is a career 55.8 percent shooter but 13.9 percent from 3. The others are former 76er Montrezl Harrell, Mason Plumlee and Bo Outlaw.
6. In 2018, Simmons became only the second rookie in NBA history to average at least 8.0 assists, 8.0 rebounds and the first since Hall of Famer Oscar Robertson with the Cincinnati Royals in 1961. Simmons averaged 15.8 points, 8.2 assists and 8.0 rebounds, and 57 years earlier Robertson averaged 30.5 points, 9.7 assists and 10.1 rebounds per game. But Simmons shot 55 percent from the field and Robertson just 47 percent, so Simmons to this day is the only rookie ever to average 15 points, 8.0 rebounds and 8.0 assists per game and shoot over 50 percent from the field. The only other 76er to do that at any point in his career is Wilt Chamberlain in 1968, with 24.3 points, 23.8 rebounds (!) and 8.6 assists per game and 60 percent from the field.
7. In Simmons’ first four seasons with the 76ers, he averaged at least 14 points, 6 rebounds and 6 assists and shot at least 54 percent from the field. Every other 76er in franchise history combined has had two such seasons – Wilt Chamberlain in 1967 and in 1968. The only other NBA player with four consecutive seasons reaching those plateaus is Jokić, who has done it six straight years since 2021.
8. With career posteason averages of 12.2 points, 6.6 assists and 7.2 rebounds per game and 57 percent from the field, Simmons is the only player in history over 12, 6 and 6 and 55 percent in the playoffs. The only other player to average 12 points, 6 assists, 6 rebounds and shoot over 50 percent in the postseason is Jokić (27.4, 7.7, 12.4, 52 percent).
9. Since leaving the 76ers after the 2022 season, Simmons has averaged just 5.9 points in 108 games with the Celtics and Clippers but 5.8 rebounds and 5.8 assists per game. He’s the only player in NBA history to average over 5 ½ rebounds and assists in any 108-game span while still averaging below 6.0 points per game.
10. When Simmons plays his first game with Sacramento after playing for the 76ers, Nets and Clippers, he’ll be the first overall No. 1 pick to play for four teams since former teammate Markelle Fultz, who the 76ers selected No. 1 in 2017, a year after Simmons. Fultz has played for the 76ers, Magic, Kings and Raptors.
In case you missed it (or were sitting under a rock for the last couple of days) the Clippers got hammered by the league with penalties stemming from their circumvention dance with Kawhi Leonard and his uncle.
I’m sure that most of you also realized that the Celtics have a Clippers pick in 2028. But there are complicated provisions related to where the pick lands, swaps with other teams, and it just makes my head hurt to think through the different variations.
With all that said, the clearest explanation I saw on this comes from BRobb at MassLive.
Celtics get a 2028 first-round lottery pick via swap from PHI/LAC if:
The Clippers’ pick lands between 1 and 16 and/or Sixers’ pick lands between 1 and 8. Celtics would get the higher of these picks in this scenario via a swap with their own pick.
Celtics get a 2028 first-round pick outright from Clippers if:
The Clippers pick falls between 17 and 30 and Sixers pick falls between 9 and 30. In that scenario, Celtics get the Clippers pick outright without having to swap their own.
There are flow charts and percentage tables out there if you are interested. But I’ll find it hard to follow all the math until we at least get into next offseason and see what the Clippers end up doing.
So the bottom line is that we should be doing something that we would do normally: Rooting against the Sixers and Clippers. I guess I don’t have any specific dislike of the Clippers, more of a sad pity for their fans. But in this case the team dug the hole with their own aspirational shovels.
It will be interesting to see how the Clippers navigate the next couple of years. I’ve seen some suggest that they should lean into taking on bad contracts (for the cost of other people’s draft picks). Balmer is banned from the team for a year, but his money is still limitless, so they could just pay their way through this. But it will still be very hard without all those draft picks.
Anyway, the Celtics have an asset in that 2028 pick and it seems to have gotten a bit better because of all this. Now we wait and see what Brad Stevens intends to do with that asset.
According to Sportsnet:
Pittsburgh Penguins: Arturs Silovs
It’s something of a similar story in Pittsburgh. After finishing second in the Metro last season, after a string of campaigns in the division’s basement before that, the Penguins enter 2026-27 looking to prove their resurgence was more than a one-year fluke.
They’ll do so with a lineup that’s seen plenty of turnover this summer. New offensive talents Andrei Kuzmenko and Nick Robertson are dotted among the forward corps’ bottom six, and new blue-liners Trevor van Riemsdyk and Kaedan Korczak will slot in to replace key depth pieces. The most important change, though, might be the fact that the net will be turned over to young Arturs Silovs.
The 25-year-old split netminding duties with a veteran partner for the entirety of last season — first with Tristan Jarry and then Stuart Skinner following the trade that brought the two-time Cup finalist to Pittsburgh. It was Skinner who got the start for the first few games of the post-season, before Silovs took over and nearly pulled Pittsburgh back from an 0-3 series deficit. With Skinner headed to Winnipeg, it’ll be up to Silovs and young Sergei Murashov to keep Sidney Crosby’s club in the post-season picture once again.
It’s an interesting choice by them. The low-hanging fruit would be to pick Sidney Crosby or Erik Karlsson and call it a day. Neither of which would be an incorrect answer. Without excellent seasons from the team’s best forward and/or its best defenseman, Pittsburgh’s season is bound to have a very low ceiling.
The choice of Silovs isn’t a bad one. It highlights what we mentioned over the summer – the veteran goalie role filled by Tristan Jarry and then Stuart Skinner last year is out the door. Both players have been maligned at times, not for unfounded reasons, but both were solid last year for the Pens. Between their combined stints, the ‘veteran goalie’ provided a +13.92 goals saved above expected last season (7.59 for Jarry, 6.33 for Skinner). Jamming that together like some Frankenstein creation and the Jarry/Skinner combo would have been the 13th best GSAE goalie in the NHL last season.
Silovs was way down the list at -5.69, 75th among 89 NHL goalies. Sergei Murashov was at -1.66 in his limited NHL action.
If those trends were to continue, the Pens would be just as doomed as any variable. Though you wouldn’t see the perspective strictly from stats like save percentage or goals against average, the Pens got a big boost from their vet goalies doing more than their share to step up and make a clutch stop when needed. They didn’t get that as much from the younger goalies, and now the younger group is all that remains moving forward.
As always, there is more to the story. News came out after the year that Silovs was battling through a knee injury late in the season. That didn’t prevent him from playing three tremendous playoff games to keep Pittsburgh’s year alive. The Pens will be counting on that version of Silovs – seen before in the playoffs in Vancouver and in glimpses with Latvia internationally, to step up his level of play. More importantly, he’ll have to maintain it, or keep the valleys as low and brief as possible. That’s been a challenge for him in the past, it grows in significance now that there isn’t an established NHL starter to fall back upon.
In the end, with the way the Pens are built, they will both help a goalie with tremendous support offensively to make up for their shortcomings defensively. This isn’t a team built to try and win 2-1 or even 3-2 type of games. The Pens are going to go out there and try to score four or five goals on any given night and hope that’s enough to stand up for the win. Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn’t their night. As seen last year, they don’t need a Vezina caliber goalie in net, they just need an anchor that can buckle down and pick them up or hold them in games until the offense can kick in and out-score their issues.
That will be Silovs’ big task moving forward as the 1A goalie entering the year. He played 39 games last season and likely won’t be asked for a large increase in that department. In the games he plays, however, the Pens are definitely going to need Silovs to step up and deliver a better GSAE than he was able to provide last season. It’s a big ask and can’t be expected that Silovs alone can rank 13th like the Jarry/Skinner combo did. It’s just going to have to be a lot better than 75th this time around.
The Dallas Mavericks now have five Europeans on their roster, and the NBA is getting increasingly more international and influenced by the European style of play.
After primarily focusing on the European perspective in part I and part II, it’s time to take a look at this topic from the other side in part III: the American perspective, and one European NBA coach.
Toni Canyameras, a reporter for the Spanish sports media Mundo Deportivo, covers the NBA from Toronto and has the unique perspective of a European reporter on the ground.
In collaboration with Toni Canyameras, who has been asking multiple current and former NBA coaches about their view on this exact topic through the last few seasons, we dive into how the coaches on the floor view this.
It seems fitting to start with the first European head coach in the NBA who led a team an entire season and who is the first European coach to lead an NBA team to the playoffs. That’s of course Toronto Raptors head coach – and Serbian – Darko Rajakovic, who took over in Toronto in 2023.
Last season, Toni Canyameras asked him why Serbia produces so many great players – like Nikola Jokic. His answer can be used to help explain European success on a bigger scale, as well. This is what he said:
“Serbia has a huge basketball tradition. It’s a country that has had a lot of success over the last decades and the last half century. Basketball is the number one sport in the country, there is a lot of pride, a lot of pressure when you play for the Serbian national team.”
“Serbia is a small country with only 6 million people. So many great players come from there, because basketball is so special, means so much to people – and all the kids grow up watching the stars back in the day: Djordjevic, Divac, Bodiroga… and now watching Nikola Jokic, Bogdanovic and all the young players in the league,” Rajakovic said.
In Serbia, they can’t afford to waste talent, he points out, making the development of every single player a focus.
“Player development there is very important because it is a small country. We don’t have talent to waste, so every kid shows up to play basketball being short or tall, being skinny or not skinny. We are trying to maximize every single kid that wants to play basketball and I think that helps coaches to maximize potential.”
This insight gives a great perspective into what seems to be the more effective developmental system of Europe. The smaller talent pool in general may not be a downside all the time at all, but could serve as a way to help find the unique strengths of every talented player rather than try to make everyone fit into a box.
If nothing else, the European boom, the European NBA revolution – or if you will, the increasing dominance of European players in the National Basketball Association (of America), does not stem from having the most athletic or explosive players – and focusing on developing that type and skillset.
Because in order to compete, Europeans had to stand out in other ways. Ahmet Melik Subaşı, Turkish basketball executive and author of part II of this series, touched on that in his piece.
“In tactical terms, they either had to develop superior systems that would allow them to play the game more efficiently with less effort and despite having lower physical standards, or they had to develop players whose fundamental skills were so exceptional that they could compensate for the physical gap – players capable of creating magic with the ball,” he pointed out in part II.
Former Blazers coach Chauncey Billups agrees. Back in 2024, he said that the gap between Europe and the US had closed – exactly because Europe has a better player development system, teaching players how to play modern basketball:
“I do think that the gap has closed. I can tell you the difference. In the United States, when we grow up learning the game, we grow up learning skills, dribbling moves, we love highlight reels, shooting.”
“I think that in international basketball, they learn how to play modern basketball from a very young age, when to drop back, how to get off screens, how to handle the pick and roll, how to read the game properly. We aren’t taught that, so international players have an advantage over us because they are taught the game the right way.”
The advantage the other way around, mostly focused on individual skills and athleticism, is not enough by itself anymore, according to Billups:
“We have an advantage because individually, we are very gifted. You see players like the Joker (Nikola Jokic) or Luka (Doncic). These guys can’t beat me in a one-legged race or jump higher than me, but nobody in the NBA can defend them because they play mentally, with their heads, and their skill level evens things out. It’s a dynamic combination.”
This dynamic combination of European skill and IQ has led to the international players winning the NBA MVP since 2019, and Europeans receiving all but the last two (which went to another international: Canadian Shai Gilgeous-Alexander). On top of that, the top three finalists for MVP have consistently been Europeans, as well, with players like Slovenian Luka Doncic, Serbian Nikola Jokic, and Greek Giannis Antetokounmpo being repeat offenders, with Frenchman Victor Wembanyama entering the race last year.
But how are these players, along with a long list of European NBA players able to continue this dominance in the best league in the world without some of the athletic and individual gifts – which Billups mentions?
Basketball IQ is one thing that keeps recurring in the NBA coaches’ answers. Boston Celtics coach Joe Mazzulla tends to agree:
“You study some trends, things they do there, and it shows they have really smart players and coaches. I like the development system they have from kids to adults. They play with the same shot clock, they understand how to read the game, they do things faster at a younger age, which develops decision-making and basketball IQ,” Mazzulla said in 2024.
But things have also changed in the way Americans develop young players, longtime NBA coach Steve Clifford told Toni Canyameras. Clifford says he doesn’t think the American players’ basketball IQ is being developed in the same way as it used to be:
“My conclusion about basketball in my country is this: kids come into the league right after college games. Their shot creation, dribbling skills, and shooting accuracy are better than ever; they’re better with the ball, but their basketball IQ isn’t even close to what it used to be. Their understanding of how to work as a team offensively and defensively isn’t even close to what it used to be, because they don’t use the best coaches,” he said.
He makes the point that American players generally aren’t spending enough time playing college basketball, which is where you find some of the best US coaches.
“There aren’t high school coaches like there used to be. We have phenomenal college coaches, but the players aren’t even there for a year, just seven months. They don’t get the benefit of playing four years for Coach K (Mike Krzyzewski, longtime Duke head coach). We’re getting kids who don’t know about basketball, how to play. Their shot creation and accuracy are phenomenal, but their basketball IQ is nonexistent.”
Their basketball IQ is nonexistent. A powerful – albeit painful – sentence that may encapsulate a lot of the reasons why Europeans have taken the lead on how to develop players and dominate the game.
But Clifford isn’t done:
“Europeans, in most countries, learn when they are 13 or 14 years old. They go to these academies and are taught to play 3×3, 4×4, they are taught how to help each other, so there is a clear difference.”
He doesn’t have a lot of faith in American development catching up any time soon, however:
“Frankly, I don’t think it’s going to change. The United States is a money-making machine and there’s no way the teaching will go back.”
Doc Rivers, in 2025 when he was still the head coach of the Milwaukee Bucks, talked about the shortage of American centers and why European centers are playing bigger roles on NBA teams, generally:
“I just think they don’t have an AAU. And I hate to say that, I think AAU can serve a better purpose for us. But the European kids practice a lot, they practice on fundamentals. They spend hours in the gym practicing, where the US kids play games and they don’t practice on fundamentals and skills,” he told Toni Canyameras, which echoes the point multiple Europeans made in Part I of this series.
“I think right now we’re in the middle of having to change that and if we don’t change that, we’re going to continue to be outplayed,” Doc Rivers said.
It is worth noting that the narrative of Europeans being “soft” and not as physical as the Americans, which was prevalent a decade or two ago, seems to have disappeared.
It turns out that in the most physical position – the five center position – Europeans are outplaying the Americans, as Doc Rivers touches on. Almost all of the big men, who play significant roles on NBA teams at this point in time, are Europeans.
Dallas Mavericks center Dereck Lively could be an exception, if he can manage to stay healthy. We saw him play up against Wembanyama in his rookie season, and he has a lot of what it takes to make a real impact. In 2024, I wrote a piece touching on exactly that, where I called Lively’s skillset a great sign for the future of the American big man.
But not all NBA coaches buy into the viewpoint that the Europeans are ahead of the Americans.
Toni Canyameras asked Atlanta Hawks head coach Quin Snyder back in 2024, what he saw as the differences between the American player development system and the European system:
“I don’t think there’s a huge difference between what we have here and in Europe, but there are certainly some differences. I think here, when we think about development, we always think about 1-on-1 and 2-on-2. The fact that in Europe they’re trained in a 5-on-5 system means you could say they’re taught how to play with other people through passing. There are some things that carry over to the United States and things we can learn from,” Snyder said.
And when you ask Europeans what the difference is between the two styles, that’s exactly what they respond. Playing through passing, sharing the ball, team basketball versus individualism.
Could that mean that Europe has closed the gap by playing their own style, as other coaches have implied?
Former NBA coach Monty Williams was not so sure. Toni Canyameras asked him this question based on the results in the last World Cup tournaments.
“That question has come up a lot, and I truly believe the world has improved, but I’m not going to say the gap is closed because we’ve never seen our best talent in these particular World Cup tournaments. It’s a difficult question, and I don’t want to sound disrespectful. I’ve seen the spirit of those teams. I’ve been in the corridor with our guys, listening to their music, and other teams singing their anthems, preparing for the matches. I understand how important it is for every country we face there.”
National team success is one way to gauge dominance. Here, Germany and Spain won the last two World Cup tournaments. Another is the nationality of the players topping the MVP ladder and other awards.
Basketball is a competition where the best team wins. Not the best player, or the one with the best highlight reel. There’s no way around the fact that individualism doesn’t serve anyone in a team sport – and it doesn’t create a winning mentality or team success.
And it looks like we’re seeing the brunt of that mindset right now. If and when the American developmental system and players change the focus to become more team-oriented again, Europeans will lose some of their edge. If they manage to get back to teaching players how to develop their basketball IQ early on, Europeans will have to level up again.
And for all of us, who love the competition of team sports, this is a great race to witness. The race to greatness will sharpen both sides and result in the very best basketball possible. And that should be the aim above all else – to get to witness the very best by the very best.
Thank you to Toni Canyameras for quotes, links and collaboration.
For the first eight innings of Thursday’s contest against the St. Louis Cardinals, the absence of Shohei Ohtani in the starting lineup was emphatically felt.
Ohtani had went 0-4 with four strikeouts during Wednesday’s 8-6 extra-inning loss to St. Louis, and the Dodgers decided to give him the night off. Although the offense floundered throughout most of Thursday, they were able to string together a ninth inning rally to walk off St. Louis 3-2.
As the Dodgers prepare to host the Washington Nationals for three games, the question of whether Ohtani will be back in the lineup or not remains undecided. Sonja Chen of MLB.com notes that a move to the injured list for the two-way superstar is unlikely, but the team will monitor his health over the final 22 games of the regular season.
“Right now, I would consider it unlikely,” Roberts said. “Unlikely, but not impossible.”
“I think it’s up to us to kind of figure out how we navigate these next three and a half, four weeks,” Roberts said. “But I’m very confident that we’ll see the guy we all expect to see.”
Teoscar Hernández was the one to send the Dodgers to a walk-off victory, with his two-run double helping the Dodgers avoid a sweep at the hands (or wings) of the Cardinals. Hernández capped off the series going 6-13 with two doubles and two RBI, and he spoke with Kirsten Watson of SportsNet LA about what he was looking for from All-Star closer Riley O’Brien.
“First, I was just trying to be more patient. He was a little wild in that inning. Just trying to get focused on the middle of the plate and get a good pitch to hit… We know we’re not playing the best baseball that we know we can play. We know we’re not hitting we know we can hit. One thing they should know is that we’re going to go out, we’re going to battle, fight every at-bat and just try to win every game.”
Tarik Skubal helped the Cardinals collect a season-high 10 hits against him, but he held them in check for just two runs allowed over 5 2/3 innings, walking one and striking out six in another no-decision. Skubal spoke with Watson following the walk-off win about not having to adjust as much while fending off traffic and dealing with calls going against him.
“I think, early, the changeup was a little bit elevated. They put some good hits on it. At the end of the day, they were all singles, so it’s not like I needed to change my approach. It’s not like they were slugging anything. Just gotta stay true to myself. I bet there was 10-15 throws that were less than two inches off the plate both ways. If those were over the plate, then that’s 10-15 more strikes.”
The Vancouver Canucks are just a few weeks away from kicking off the 2026–27 season. In honour of the upcoming campaign, The Hockey News’ Canucks team will be previewing Vancouver’s Pacific Division opponents. Today’s team is the Vegas Golden Knights.
Record: 39-26-17
Division Ranking: 1st
Playoffs: Stanley Cup Final Loss
Goals For: 264
Goals Against: 242
Power Play: 24.6%
Penalty Kill: 81.4%
Despite making it to the Stanley Cup Final, the Golden Knights decided to part ways with Head Coach John Tortorella. The former Canucks bench boss was hired just before the playoffs after the team decided to fire Bruce Cassidy. As for Vegas' new bench boss, that will be Ryan Craig, who spent the last three years in the AHL with the Henderson Silver Knights.
Overall, the Golden Knights did not make any waves this past off-season. They are bringing back an almost identical roster, with the only major change being a new head coach. As the saying goes, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
The biggest storyline heading into next year is whether Vegas will have a Stanley Cup Final visit hangover. On top of a long run, multiple key members of the team also went to the Olympics, which could cause some fatigue. While there is a chance the Golden Knights could start slow out of the gate, they will most likely find their footing before the end of 2026.
One player to keep an eye on this season is center William Karlsson. The 33-year-old played just 14 games in the regular season while also missing the first round of the post-season with an injury. If Karlsson can stay healthy, Vegas will have one of the strongest center groups not just in the Western Conference, but across the NHL.
Make sure you bookmark THN's Vancouver Canucks site and add us to your favourites on Google News for the latest news, exclusive interviews, breakdowns, and so much more. Also, don't forget to leave a comment at the bottom of the page and engage with other passionate fans through our forum. This article originally appeared on The Hockey News.
Latest From THN’s Vancouver Canucks Site:
Canucks Jamie Oleksiak Heads Into The 2026-27 Season Focused On Leading By Example
Canucks Co-President Henrik Sedin Speaks On Rebuild Timeline & Elias Pettersson Trade Rumours
2026–27 Vancouver Canucks Divisional Opponent Previews: Los Angeles Kings
For action-packed issues, access to the entire magazine archive and a free issue, subscribe to The Hockey News at THN.com/free. Get the latest news and trending stories by subscribing to our newsletter here. And share your thoughts by commenting below the article on THN.com or creating your own post in our community forum.
As the 2026-27 NHL season nears, many different hockey media outlets have done different variations of player rankings. The Athletic released an NHL player tier ranking, listing some of the most notable names in the league.
From the Toronto Maple Leafs, five players made the cut. Those ranked were Auston Matthews, William Nylander, Matthew Knies, Darren Raddysh and John Tavares.
Every player on the list had an explanation attached to their profile, and most of the Leafs players included had quotes from anonymous NHL executives and coaches.
Matthews was ranked the highest among Maple Leafs representatives. He's slotted in the second tier, called "franchise," in group 'A,' down a full tier from his first-tier rank in the previous three years.
"Based off just last year, I think Auston is a little bit high," a coach said of where Matthews is listed in this ranking.
Toronto's captain scored 27 goals and 53 points in 60 regular-season games last season. That follows 33 goals and 78 points the season before.
"You can't argue anything other than he's an elite player," an executive said. "There's been a slight downward tick (to his game), not having Marner certainly hurt him. ... Matthews is in the right spot."
Maple Leafs' Auston Matthews’ Last Couple Of Seasons Takes A Toll On His EA Sports NHL 27 RatingAuston Matthews hasn't been himself the past two years, either because of injuries or usage by his former head coach. Ultimately, his EA Sports NHL rating has dropped for the second straight year and is outside the top 10 centers.Nylander is next on the list. He's ranked in tier three, "all-star," in group A. The right winger was the Maple Leafs' leading scorer last season, with 30 goals and 79 points in 65 appearances.
"He's in the top five or so players in the league when he really plays his best," an executive said of Nylander. "His skating, edge work and ability to hold onto the puck is so freaking good. He's so good, and that's why you get so mad at him sometimes when you watch him."
Maple Leafs Projected To Be In Playoff Hunt, Matthews Nets 40 Goals Again In MagazineThe latest issue of THN reveals the Toronto Maple Leafs' predicted finish in the Atlantic Division standings and individual stat projections for the team's top players.Knies, Raddysh and Tavares all ranked in tier five, "support," in group B.
Knies, 23, continues to grow as a power forward and looks to turn into a star from a strong supporting cast member. He scored 23 goals and recorded a career-high 66 points in 79 games.
Raddysh was certainly a star for the Tampa Bay Lightning on the back end last season, with his 22 goals and 70 points. But from a league-wide perspective and an overview of his entire career, he'll still need to prove that 2025-26 wasn't a one-off.
Six Maple Leafs Who Have The Most To Prove Going Into The 2026-27 NHL SeasonGoing into the 2026-27 NHL season, here are six members of the Toronto Maple Leafs who have the most to prove."If you look at some of these other guys, it's not like they've done it very long either," an executive said of Raddysh. "I think Raddysh is in this blue tier (one tier above) all day."
Tavares is well into the back-nine of his NHL career. Turning 36 before the beginning of the regular season, it's tough to consider the veteran center a star on the grand scale of the NHL. He's still been solid for Toronto, registering a team-high 31 goals last year, totalling 71 points in 82 contests.
See more of The Hockey News on Google — Save us as Preferred Source
For action-packed issues, access to the entire magazine archive and a free issue, subscribe to The Hockey News at THN.com/free. Get the latest news and trending stories by subscribing to our newsletter here. And share your thoughts by commenting below the article on THN.com or creating your own post in our community forum.
Back for the first time this season: our Questions & Antlers series! For those who might’ve forgotten, this is our version of a mailbag—you ask the questions and we do our best to answer them. This year, the series will run on a quarterly basis to give you even more opportunity to have your voice heard.
It’s been an offseason, hasn’t it? The Bucks have transformed; the lights turned off on an era none of us will ever forget. And as the dust continues to settle, the ramp-up to the season proper begins.
While the roster losses have been huge—it’s impossible to replace the franchise’s mayor and GOAT at any point, let alone at the same time—“new” is refreshing. And I know I’m not the only one around here who feels at least somewhat revitalised by the makeover. Almost overnight, the Bucks have metamorphosed from an ageing roster desperately trying to hang on to one full of youth and promise. Yes, there will be growing pains, but let’s not pretend the last few years have been all that fun either—there’s a reason I compared last season to Cormac McCarthy’s The Road. So, like with the boy in The Road, the Bucks’ immediate and long-term future is unknown (unless you believe in prophecies).
Speaking of “here,” Brew Hoop too has undergone change, and we appreciate your perspective and continued support. Sincerely. We’ve analysed the Bucks’ new arrivals and we’ve gotten goosebumps thinking about the starters—and soon we’ll rank the roster too (with your help, of course). We’ll also introduce you to some terrific new writers who are joining our community (you’ve already “met” one)! Truthfully, there’s even more than that to come, but that’s fodder for another time.
In the meantime, what have we missed? What questions remain unanswered? Let your voice roam free in the comments and we’ll spin you a yarn in return.
The Los Angeles Clippers cheated, lied about it, and got banished to the NBA shadow realm for their misdeeds. Adam Silver had no choice but to give the Clippers perhaps the most significant punishment in the history of American professional sports for their cap circumvention scandal with Kawhi Leonard. Top-rated law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen, & Katz simply found too much evidence that the Clippers dangled business partnerships in exchange for endorsement deals for Leonard, and now they’re out five future first-round picks, among other things.
This is essentially an NBA death sentence. First-round picks aren’t just an opportunity to add top young talent on a cost-controlled contract, they’re also the currency that drives trades. Even if the Clippers create max cap space in free agency, what star is signing up to go to a team that has limited avenues for improvement?
The Clippers are screwed, to put it plainly. It’s not a stretch to say this team has no hope of winning a championship within the next 10 years after this penalty. Still, the basketball will continue, and the Clippers must trudge on. They have a potential rookie star on the roster in No. 5 overall pick Keaton Wagler, and they’ll have some salary cap flexibility over the next couple of years. Even if a title is off the table, it’s still possible for the Clippers to build a scrappy team that can make a few playoff appearances and entertain the fanbase. Here are a few free suggestions for how the Clippers can continue to build out the team even after these devastating sanctions.
Teams are finally starting to realize their power in restricted free agency lately, and they’re using it to drive down salaries for some of their best young players. The Detroit Pistons’ ongoing clash with Jalen Duren is a premium example: Detroit is offering him about $35 million per year, Duren wants $40 or $41 million, but there’s not much he can do other than take a massive risk (and one-year paycut) by playing on the lowly qualifying offer to become an unrestricted free agent a year from now. It’s rare that a team will go after another team’s restricted free agents, in part because they don’t want their cap space on hold for a few days while they wait to hear if their offer was matched. The Clippers don’t really have a choice. Next year’s free agent class could feature the following restricted free agents if they don’t reach an early extension: Brandon Miller, Ausar Thompson, Scoot Henderson, Cason Wallace, Anthony Black, Brandin Podziemski, and more. The following year’s restricted free agent class could feature Stephon Castle, Donovan Clingan, Matas Buzelis, Ron Holland, Kyshawn George, Zach Edey, and more. It would behoove the Clippers to throw a super rich deal at one of these guys in hopes of stealing a top young talent.
One benefit of being a bad team is the ability to churn spots at the bottom of the roster to keep giving new players a chance in hopes of finding a diamond in the rough. The Process era Sixers were known for their shameless tanking, but they also uncovered some really nice future contributors like Robert Covington, TJ McConnell, Jerami Grant, Richaun Holmes, and Christian Wood who may not have ever gotten an opportunity on a more competitive team. The key for the Sixers will be finding some good young role players like these guys, then locking them up on cheap extensions before they hit free agency.
The conventional wisdom right now is that the NIL killed the second round of the draft. The Rockets traded up to the first pick of the second round (No. 31 overall) this year to take Ohio State guard Bruce Thornton by giving up only picks No. 39, No. 53, and a 2029 second-rounder. Arkansas guard Meleek Thomas also fell to the Cleveland Cavaliers in the second round and then had an awesome summer league. The Chicago Bulls straight up sold the No. 38 overall pick this year (the second-round swaps they got in return still result in a net loss of a draft pick). I reject the notion that the second-round of the draft is completely worthless. There’s always good players available, and you could build a pretty solid team just with the best second-round picks of the 2020s so far. The Clippers should get in the mix and be aggressive in second-round trade ups to try to land some of the best players who fall out of the first-round. Even if you hit on one or two guys, it could make a big difference in building out the overall talent of the roster around Wagler.
We haven’t seen teams give up first-round picks just to shed salary this offseason, but that doesn’t mean it’s never going to happen again. There are more than a few examples of teams trading conditional first round picks just to dump some bad money in trades, and the Clippers need to be all over those types of deals.
The Clippers are going to need pure upside swings going forward, and going after stars who are suddenly on the outs with their teams is a great way to do this. If the Pelicans eventually want to get rid of Zion Williamson, the Clippers are in a unique position to go after him and give him a starring role. If the Spurs eventually want to dump De’AAron Fox because he makes too much money, but the Clippers could pick him up for cheap. If Ja Morant is looking for a new home shortly after joining the Blazers, the Clippers might as well have interest. Hell, even Karl-Anthony Towns was kind of in this situation a few years ago with Minnesota, and I think the Knicks like how that one turned out. The Clippers might as well throw caution to the wind to try to find a veteran co-star next to Wagler over the next few years.
Professional sports have become one big game of looking for the next market inefficiency. Just over 10 years ago, teams were still catching up to the idea that it’s good to take a lot of threes. These days, everyone is obsessed with the possession game, valuing low-turnover players who rebound well for their position and get to the foul line. The war on analytics is over within front offices, and analytics won, but the hunt for the next edge will still continue. There’s no salary cap for staff, so the Clippers should invest heavily in their front office by hiring people from different backgrounds. Maybe that means people who are doing cutting edge data science or mathematics. Maybe that means taking a chance on a few young scouts from Draft Twitter. Maybe it’s trying out a strategy from someone coming from another sport. The Clippers have nothing but time on their hands as they wait to get some first-round picks back, and in the meantime they can afford to make some nontraditional hires in search of their next edge.
Clippers fans have to feel completely defeated right now. Like, more so than their typical level of defeat. The organization needs to get the fans back on its side, and the best way to do it is to slash the prices of everything it takes to support the team. Want to pay through the nose for tickets and a t-shirt? Go to a Lakers game. The Clippers should be the team of the people with cheap seats, drinks, and merch. This is a non-negotiable.