Brazil's Corinthians defeats Gotham FC 1-0 in Women’s Champions Cup semifinal

LONDON (AP) — Corinthians captain Gabi Zanotti scored late as her team beat Gotham FC 1-0 in the semifinals of the inaugural Women’s Champions Cup intercontinental competition on Wednesday.

The 40-year-old Zanotti connected with a cross and shot with her left boot to the right of Gotham’s German international goalkeeper Ann-Katrin Berger, who got her hands to the ball but couldn’t stop it slipping through in the 82nd minute.

It had been a scrappy game of few clear-cut chances for either team.

Gotham, which qualified for the inaugural FIFA event by winning the first CONCACAF Champions Cup, had pushed hard for the opener in the second half. Jaelin Howell forced Leticia in the Corinthians goal into action, then fired another good chance high and wide.

Gotham made a desperate push for a late equalizer with Berger going up for a free kick deep in stoppage time. Jaedyn Shaw sent it to the right of the post.

Corinthians, the Copa Libertadores champion, awaits the winner between Arsenal and African champion ASFAR of Rabat, Morocco in the second semifinal later.

Both the final and third-place match are to be played Sunday at Arsenal’s stadium.

___

AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccer

Spurs vs Rockets Prediction, Picks & Odds for Tonight’s NBA Game

It’s a “Battle of Texas” as the San Antonio Spurs and Houston Rockets meet for the third time this season.

Both defenses have been particularly stingy as of late, and my Spurs vs. Rockets predictions call for a low-scoring matchup tonight.

Here are my top NBA picks for this Southwest Division showdown on Wednesday, January 28.

Tip-off is set for 9:30 p.m. ET at the Toyota Center in Houston, with the game airing on ESPN.

Spurs vs Rockets prediction

Spurs vs Rockets best bet: Under 220.5 (-110)

On the season, the Houston Rockets have allowed the fourth-fewest points (110.5), and the San Antonio Spurs have allowed the seventh-fewest (112.4).

Over the last 10 outings, both teams have been even better on the defensive end. The Spurs have surrendered the fifth-fewest points (106.7), and the Rockets have given up the 10th-fewest (109.8). They’ve combined to allow just 216.5 points, four fewer than tonight’s line.

The Spurs are 1-9 to the Under across their last 10 games, and the Houston Rockets are 2-8 in that span. The Spurs are 9-14 to the Under on the road and 4-8 to the Under as the road dog. San Antonio is 18-29 to the Under overall.

The Rockets are 7-11-1 to the Under at home and 7-10-1 as the home favorite. Houston is 21-23 O/U overall. 

The teams have hit the Under in seven of their last 10 head-to-head matchups, including six of seven in Houston. I’ll take the Under in this clash of top-tier defenses.

Spurs vs Rockets same-game parlay

Houston sports the best home record in the Association at 16-3, but the Rockets are just 8-11 ATS at Toyota Center. San Antonio is 14-9 straight up on the road and 11-11-1 ATS, including a 7-5 mark ATS as the road underdog. 

Amen Thompson has taken a step back in the scoring department, but he's been excellent as a rebounder and facilitator. Across his last five games, he's averaged 15.2 points, 8.2 rebounds, and 8.4 assists, hitting the Over on this combo line in each contest. He handed out a career-high 14 assists to go with eight rebounds in Monday's win over Memphis.

Spurs vs Rockets SGP

  • Under 220.5
  • Spurs +2.5
  • Amen Thompson Over 13.5 rebounds + assists

Our "from downtown" SGP: Sengun Stands Tall

Alperen Sengun has grabbed 9+ rebounds in 21 of 37 games overall, including 10 of 15 at home.

Sengun pulled down 13 and nine rebounds in two matchups with the Spurs, and he should be leaned on more in that department with Steven Adams out indefinitely.

Spurs vs Rockets SGP

  • Under 220.5
  • Spurs +2.5
  • Amen Thompson Over 13.5 rebounds + assists
  • Alperen Sengun Over 8.5 rebounds

Spurs vs Rockets odds

  • Spread: Spurs +2.5 (-105) | Rockets -2.5 (-115)
  • Moneyline: Spurs +125 | Rockets -150
  • Over/Under: Over 220.5 (-110) | Under 220.5 (-110)

Spurs vs Rockets betting trend to know

San Antonio has hit the moneyline in 17 of its last 30 road games (+19.95 Units / 37% ROI). Find more NBA betting trends for Spurs vs. Rockets.

How to watch Spurs vs Rockets

LocationToyota Center, Houston, TX
DateWednesday, January 28, 2026
Tip-off9:30 p.m. ET
TVESPN

Spurs vs Rockets latest injuries

Not intended for use in MA.
Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.

This article originally appeared on Covers.com, read the full article here

Red Wings Ink Three-Year, $11.55 Million Extension With Ben Chiarot

The Detroit Red Wings are bringing back veteran defenseman Ben Chiarot with a new three-year contract extension carrying an cap hit of $3.85 million per season, keeping him with the organization well into his late 30s. While the deal stretches beyond the typical comfort zone for players his age, the team is clearly betting on more than just what Chiarot brings on the ice.

At 34, Chiarot has been a steady presence in the top four this season, logging heavy minutes and continuing to handle some of the toughest matchups night after night. He’s averaging over 21 minutes of ice time per game and has quietly put together a productive campaign, recording four goals and seven assists for 11 points in 54 games, along with a plus-one rating.

Beyond the numbers, Chiarot’s value has shown up in his partnership with rookie defenseman Axel Sandin-Pellikka. The veteran has taken on a mentoring role, helping guide the young blueliner through the daily grind of being a regular NHL defenseman. Whether it’s positioning, decision-making under pressure, or simply knowing when to simplify the game, Chiarot has been there to steady things and, at times, clean up the inevitable rookie mistakes.

That leadership component appears to be a major factor behind the extension. With a wave of young defensemen pushing their way into the lineup, having a seasoned voice who can still play meaningful minutes is a luxury Detroit may not be taking lightly.

Bookmark The Hockey News Detroit Red Wings team site to stay connected to the latest newsgame-day coverage, and player features

Chiarot’s play suggests he still has plenty left to give after finishing last season with 13 points, he is on pace to surpass that total this year. He has remained a reliable contributor at both ends of the ice despite his veteran age and has helped the Red Wings maintain a 2.96 goals against per game average as a team, which is tied for 12th-best in the NHL. His physicality, reach, and willingness to block shots continue to anchor the defensive group.

The extension also puts a notable milestone within reach as Chiarot has appeared in 777 NHL games over his career, and if he can stay healthy through the duration of the new deal, the prestigious 1,000-game mark is firmly in sight and is a real possibility.

Never miss a story by adding us to your Google News favorites!

Image

For action-packed issues, access to the entire magazine archive and a free issue, subscribe to The Hockey News at THN.com/free. Get the latest news and trending stories by subscribing to our newsletter here. And share your thoughts by commenting below the article on THN.com or creating your own post in our community forum.

Wizards Snap Losing Streak Against Avdija and Trail Blazers

The Wizards ended a nine-game losing streak by beating the Portland Trail Blazers, 115-111, in a chippy and kinda entertaining game, despite being nearly devoid of offensive competence.

Some of the fun was delivered by the return of Deni Avdija, who’s much improved and might be an All-Star this season. He’s been limited a bit lately with a back injury but still flashed what’s made him special for Portland — rocket-propelled transition pushes, physical drives that draw fouls, crafty (yes, crafty!) moves inside to get buckets or trips to the free throw line, and some accurate three-point shooting.

Former Wizards forward Deni Avdija returned to DC with the Portland Trail Blazers.

One thing I’ve liked about Avdija this season was on display last night. Some players seem to drive with a singular purpose. They’re either looking to score, or to get fouled, or to pass. It seems like their end decision is made before they put ball on deck. Avdija seems not to have made up his mind until he gets into the paint and the defense reacts, at which point he’ll try to score or kick to an open teammate. This is a good thing, and it gave his teammates several open looks. They missed a lot of them, but Avdija made some good basketball plays.

The biggest weakness of his game was also on display — six turnovers. For the season, he’s over five turnovers per 100 team possessions, which is high. His overall offensive efficiency is still very good (+5.5 points per 100 possessions relative to league average) and on a career-high 29% usage rate. This is quite good considering the dearth of offensive talent on the Portland roster.

Shaedon Sharpe is probably the best hope for an offensive helper, and he had a good game against Washington. For the season, his offensive efficiency is also nearly nine points per 100 possessions below average. Jerami Grant and Jrue Holiday might help — Holiday is finally healthy and playing. Grant has been coming off the bench because of significant limitations in his overall game.

That’s more Trail Blazers stuff than I meant to write given that the Wizards won. They pulled off the victory despite giving up 29 offensive rebounds and an offensive rebounding percentage of 47.5%. Yes, Washington allowed Portland to get back nearly half their missed shots.

Big man Donovan Clingan sent a Trail Blazers franchise record with 13 offensive rebounds.

Washington won because they made threes (17-39, 43.6%) and free throws (18-21), and avoided turnovers (just 13 turnovers in 106 offensive possessions), and Portland didn’t (14-38 on threes, 13-23 from the free throw line, 20 turnovers). Portland shooting their “normal” free throw percentage would have given them 4-5 more points, which could have been interesting.

The Wizards starting group was bolstered by the returns of Khris Middleton and Bilal Coulibaly, and they won the minutes their starters played. Their bench was rough, and gave back most of the advantage the starters earned.

From the Notebook

  • Avdija on brand — drove on the game’s first possession.
  • Coulibaly maybe attempting to establish a brand, attempted a transition dunk on Avdija barely a minute into the game.
  • 10:41 of the first quarter — Coulibaly, Alex Sarr and Middleton did a nice job defending a pick and roll set. Coulibaly chased Avidja over a strong screen and stayed connected. Sarr switched onto Avdija and corralled the drive. Middleton rotated from the “low man” spot to pick up the roller and arrived in time to break up Avdija’s lob attempt. That’s good stuff.
  • Wizards ball and player movement was good in the early going. One example was on a Coulibaly drive. He touched the paint and kicked to Middleton in the corner. Portland closed out well, and Middleton passed it back to Coulibaly. He turned and hit Sarr, who was open at the weakside elbow. Sarr turned down the open midrange shot to drive. He got fouled and turned it into an and-one.
  • A theme throughout was Sarr turning down open threes. In the second half, I jotted, “If Sarr took all the threes Portland was conceding to him, the Wizards would never run halfcourt offense.”
  • 1:51 of the first quarter: Jamir Watkins stripped Avdija’s dribble and got a transition dunk out of it. I like the play, though in fairness, I thought Watkins fouled Avdija multiple times on the play. Wasn’t called though.
  • In the second quarter, Anthony Gill utterly wrecked an offensive possession by turning down a conceded three. Left undefended at the three-point line, he had two good choices — 1) take the shot, or 2) attack the space and force someone to defend him. He chose to stand there and wait for a teammate to come get the ball.
  • Sarr had a career-high 29 field goal attempts, making just 11. He struggled throughout the night against Clingan’s size. It was a marked contrast when Hansen Yang was in the game. Sarr seemed to do a little better shooting over Clingan in the second half.
  • One defensive possession I liked in the second quarter — Tre Johnson directed a Holiday drive to the baseline where Sarr loomed. Sarr’s presence prevented a Holiday layup and cut off easy passes. The result: a Holiday turnover.
  • 3:32 of the second quarter — Avdija hit the turbo button in transition while Kyshawn George jogged back. George was behind the play from that moment on. This should be a teachable moment about what it means to play hard in the NBA. There’s no reason for the guy with the ball to outrun an unencumbered defender.
  • Around 1:42 of the second quarter — this is the push-and-shove portion between Sarr and Clingan. The Portland broadcast showed replays that left Sarr’s umbrage taking inexplicable. The preceding second or two made it clear that Sarr was rightfully torqued at Clingan “boxing out” by throwing an elbow. The two got tangled up a few minutes later. I don’t think they like each other much.
  • Despite taking just two shots in 28 minutes, this was a pretty strong return to action for Coulibaly. He defended well, coming up with 2 blocks and 2 steals and forcing multiple turnovers. He also got some rebounds and produced 6 assists.
  • George shot just 5-16 but still had a very good game — 9 rebounds, 5 assists, 3 steals, 2 blocks, and just 1 turnover. He committed just two fouls — one of them a semi-intentional “one to give” foul in the game’s final minutes. He went hard for a steal and ended up fouling, which was perfectly fine.
  • Middlton had one of his better games, in part because Portland kept fumbling the ball in his direction (three steals).
  • Sarr had 6 blocks to go with 6 offensive rebounds. He’s gotta get stronger. At one point in the third quarter, he got overwhelmed by Clingan’s size and physicality and did the NBA equivalent of tapping out. To his credit, he came right back and battled the rest of the way. The Wizards will want to add a physical presence to play alongside him in future seasons, I think.
  • Tre Johnson has become a lethal shooter. The Wizards didn’t seem to run as many actions to shake him loose last night as they have in the previous few games. I’d like to see them show more patience in the halfcourt so they can run off-ball actions for him. Too many of the team’s possessions end in stepback threes early in the shot clock. They can get that same shot 5-7 seconds later — after working to get a better shot.
  • The 29-year-old Skal Labissiere — freshly signed to a 10-day contract — made his Wizards debut last night.

Four Factors

Below are the four factors that decide wins and losses in basketball — shooting (efg), rebounding (offensive rebounds), ball handling (turnovers), fouling (free throws made).

The four factors are measured by:

  • eFG% (effective field goal percentage, which accounts for the three-point shot)
  • OREB% (offensive rebound percentage)
  • TOV% (turnover percentage — turnovers divided by possessions)
  • FTM/FGA (free throws made divided by field goal attempts)
FOUR FACTORSTRAIL BLAZERSWIZARDSLGAVG
eFG%45.0%49.5%54.3%
OREB%47.5%25.9%26.1%
TOV%18.8%12.2%12.8%
FTM/FGA0.1190.1840.210
PACE10699.6
ORTG104108115.5

Stats & Metrics

PPA is my overall production metric, which credits players for things they do that help a team win (scoring, rebounding, playmaking, defending) and dings them for things that hurt (missed shots, turnovers, bad defense, fouls).

PPA is a per possession metric designed for larger data sets. In small sample sizes, the numbers can get weird. In PPA, 100 is average, higher is better and replacement level is 45. For a single game, replacement level isn’t much use, and I reiterate the caution about small samples sometimes producing weird results.

POSS is the number of possessions each player was on the floor in this game.

ORTG = offensive rating, which is points produced per individual possessions x 100. League average so far this season is 115.1. Points produced is not the same as points scored. It includes the value of assists and offensive rebounds, as well as sharing credit when receiving an assist.

USG = offensive usage rate. Average is 20%.

ORTG and USG are versions of stats created by former Wizards assistant coach Dean Oliver and modified by me. ORTG is an efficiency measure that accounts for the value of shooting, offensive rebounds, assists and turnovers. USG includes shooting from the floor and free throw line, offensive rebounds, assists and turnovers.

+PTS = “Plus Points” is a measure of the points gained or lost by each player based on their efficiency in this game compared to league average efficiency on the same number of possessions. A player with an offensive rating (points produced per possession x 100) of 100 who uses 20 possessions would produce 20 points. If the league average efficiency is 114, the league — on average — would produced 22.8 points in the same 20 possessions. So, the player in this hypothetical would have a +PTS score of -2.8.

Players are sorted by total production in the game.

WIZARDSMINPOSSORTGUSG+PTSPPA+/-
Khris Middleton275912724.9%1.724615
Alex Sarr36809935.2%-4.517616
Kyshawn George378111221.1%-0.716919
Bilal Coulibaly28612056.8%3.722019
Tre Johnson327114415.7%3.11674
Will Riley112415115.5%1.3195-10
Malaki Branham2529915.8%1.44404
Anthony Gill6148921.9%-0.864-8
Bub Carrington28627619.3%-4.82-6
Skal Labisseire4809.4%-0.9-70-8
Justin Champagnie18404512.2%-3.4-36-9
Jamir Watkins12274920.7%-3.7-61-16
TRAIL BLAZERSMINPOSSORTGUSG+PTSPPA+/-
Shaedon Sharpe357814122.3%4.4197-10
Rayan Rupert194313914.1%1.42911
Donovan Clingan306611624.9%0.2156-17
Toumani Camara337314813.3%3.21132
Deni Avdija31689426.3%-3.950-9
Hansen Yang122611323.9%-0.17511
Jerami Grant24536514.2%-3.8-36-1
Sidy Cissoko153405.6%-2.2-585
Caleb Love17377521.6%-3.2-71-5
Jrue Holiday25556527.0%-7.4-773

Good Morning San Diego: Jake Cronenworth could be key to success for Padres; Yu Darvish is an outlier who fans should appreciate

Jake Cronenworth has been a mainstay in the San Diego Padres organization since 2020 when he came to San Diego in a trade with the Tampa Bay Rays. Cronenworth has proven himself to be a versatile defender who can play multiple positions at a high level. His offense has been an area of inconsistency during his time with the Padres and he has been unable to recreate the success he had at the plate in 2021. Thomas Conroy of Gaslamp Ball looks at the value Cronenworth brings to the major league roster and how he can be a key to the team’s success in 2026.

Padres News:

  • Kevin Acee of the San Diego Union-Tribune wrote a story about Padres pitcher Yu Darvish walking away from baseball and his contract, but the report was deemed premature. Acee himself stated the wording used in the report could have been better. No matter when Darvish decides to call it a career, Cheri Bell of Gaslamp Ball says fans should appreciate Darvish for the player he has been with the Padres and the man he has shown himself to be.
  • The Padres announced their 2026 promotional schedule and some of the hottest items each year are the bobbleheads. There are nine bobblehead giveaways this year with six regular season ticket items and three theme game ticket items. Gaslamp Ball asked readers which bobblehead would get them to Petco Park.
  • Shaun O’Neill of Padres.com says that if Joe Musgrove can return to the pitcher he was from 2021 to 2024 following Tommy John surgery that kept him out all of 2025, he might be the most important player on the current Padres roster.
  • 2025 was a breakout year for reliever Adrian Morejon. He established himself not only as the top left-hander in the Padres’ bullpen, but he might well be the best left-handed reliever in MLB. Jeff Sanders of the San Diego Union-Tribune looks at how Morejon can be more dominant in 2026 in his latest Padres roster review.

Baseball News:

  • New Arizona Diamondbacks third baseman Nolan Arenado waived his no-trade clause to be shipped from the St. Louis Cardinals to Arizona this offseason. He had the opportunity to change teams in 2024 with a trade to the Houston Astros but blocked the deal with his no-trade clause. Arenado sheds light on what went into his decision making then and now.
  • Aaron Judge will return to the cover of MLB The Show 26 after being the cover athlete in 2018. Judge is just the second player in the game’s history to make the cover more than once.
  • Willi Castro was announced as the latest player to be added to the Puerto Rico World Baseball Classic Team.
  • The trade deadline for the 2026 MLB season has been set for Aug. 3 according to MLB Trade Rumors.

Evaluating the 2026 Red Sox starting pitching with projections

In the dead of winter, when I’m not refreshing MLB Trade Rumors or yelling at Siri to ask if my Jeff Passan Twitter alerts are broken, I like to look at player projections on Fangraphs. Despite the fact that they are a complete fantasy land, they provide a good baseline for our expectations for the upcoming season. Drawing from past performances of players, the various systems weigh more heavily towards the most recent seasons, while also using historical data of career trends of previous players with similar age, experience, and skill level.

Today, we’re kicking off a series that digs into 2026 projections by taking a look at what they say about the Red Sox starting staff. I looked at three systems:

  • Steamer: Created and maintained by Jared Cross, these are always the first projections released, usually not long after the World Series wraps up. They’ve been around for a long time and are widely considered to be among the best systems for projections. 
  • The BAT: Derek Carty’s projection system, which is very popular in fantasy baseball and DFS circles.
  • OOPSY: Created by Jordan Rosenblum over the last couple of years. While I cannot approve of the name of this system, Jordan and I wrote together at a fantasy baseball site called The Dynasty Guru for several years, and he was the first person to try to convince me to trust projection models, so I’m going to give him a pass on the name. 

This comes with the obvious caveat that it still feels likely that there is still a trade to come. Moreever, with so many starting candidates, it’s hard to predict innings totals, so looking at the rate stats is probably a more worthwhile task than playing time at this point. 

1. Garrett Crochet

These may not look like the dominant numbers that you’re expecting from Garrett Crochet in 2026, but it’s important to remember that projection systems rely on “regression,” and try to predict 50th percentile outcomes. If you sort any of these three projection models by ERA, the list goes: Tarik Skubal, Paul Skenes, Garrett Crochet, (big gap), everyone else. Skubal’s projection of 2.63 on OOPSY is the best on any list, even though it’s very likely that the eventual ERA league leader will beat that number. The only pitchers, including relievers, who best Crochet in K-BB% are Skubal, Mason Miller, and Edwin Diaz. Expectations are high and there’s no reason to think that Crochet can’t deliver again, if healthy. 

2. Ranger Suarez

The hope for Suarez is that he will keep his walk rate closer to the past two seasons (6.2%) than in his first six seasons (8.4%, which was still a solid number) as the projections split the difference on that walk percentage. OOPSY is most bearish on the Suarez projection, adding three more home runs allowed than the others. With a 3.38 career ERA, we would hope for an output close to that, but The BAT’s projection of 3.78 is actually 12th-best among AL starting pitchers, and Steamer’s projection of 3.73 is 16th in the AL. That would be the “number two starter” outcome that we were looking for. 

3. Sonny Gray

Slightly ahead of Suarez on Steamer’s list is Sonny Gray, whose 3.68 ERA projection would be 14th in the AL and would round out a strong top three in Boston’s rotation. Those top three pitchers can match up with any team in the American League in a short playoff series, although Seattle’s rotation one-through-five likely has an edge. Gray has a 1.20 WHIP over 13 career seasons, and much like Suarez, his walk rate over the past two seasons (5.4% combined) has been the best of his career.

4. Brayan Bello

Bello’s career K-BB rate of 11.5% is closer to Steamer and OOPSY, where The BAT seems to think that his paltry rate of 9.3% in 2025 is a sign of what’s to come. Bello has started 28+ games in all three of his full seasons in the big leagues, and there is something to be said for that. With a .234 batting average allowed, thanks to a .268 BABIP in 2025, Bello needs to have a strong infield defense behind him to repeat a 3.35 ERA output. Projections expect closer to a .260 BA allowed in 2026, which would bring his ERA back up into the mid-4’s, closer to his xFIP and xERA a year ago. 

The #5 (through #10) Candidates:

A little conditional formatting never hurt anybody. 

When Steamer was released back in November, one of the most eye-opening projections in all of baseball was Connelly Early’s. Perhaps it’s the five pitches that all had a 20% Whiff Rate or better in his four regular-season starts a year ago. There are very few rookies who pop in projections before they’ve had much of a chance to show it on the field. Moreover, The BAT is notoriously harsh on rookie projections, with the great Derek Carty needing to fight off the Twitter prospect trolls on a weekly basis. 

Early’s 16% K-BB, and near-3.50 ERA in both projections, is startling. Of course, thanks to the logjam of pitchers on this team, he’s projected for only 50-60 innings at the moment. That being said, there are only six starting pitchers on The BAT, and seven starting pitchers on Steamer who are projected to have a better ERA than Connelly Early in the American League. I don’t know what to make of this, but as Rick James once said, “Now, THAT is ABSURD.”

OOPSY is more partial to the other starting pitcher who made his debut in the final month of last season, Payton Tolle. Its projected 27.2 K% for Tolle is bested in the American League by only Skubal, Crochet, Cole Ragans, Trey Yesavage, Dylan Cease, and Joe Boyle (arguably a Quad-A guy) among starting pitchers. The BAT didn’t have time for Payton Tolle, apparently, nor Kutter Crawford. 

Johan Oviedo was enough of an attraction for Craig Breslow to move Jhostynxon Garcia, even though Oviedo has just two years of control left. For that reason, I wouldn’t be surprised if Oviedo made more starts for the Red Sox in 2026 than both Early and Tolle, and he does have a higher projected innings total than the rest of the bunch. However, the projections are fairly low on Oviedo, with the highest ERA and highest walk rate across all of the candidates. 

Both Kutter Crawford and Kyle Harrison have a decent output on Steamer. Crawford’s 17.6 K-BB% is very impressive, and not all that shocking for someone with a 16.6 career rate, which topped out at 18.8 in 2023. Harrison’s 3.91 ERA with a 16.6% K-BB projection would be more than serviceable. The other systems are not as kind to either of them. 

Lastly, there’s Patrick Sandoval. It should be mentioned daily that Sandoval was signed by the Red Sox to an $18.25 million contract over “two years”. You should mention it daily in your work meetings, if necessary, regardless of your line of work. Would the front office acknowledge that the team has nine better starting pitchers this season and take the L, selling Sandoval for half of his salary to help with payroll flexibility this year? Regardless, Sandoval has not pitched well since 2022 and hasn’t thrown a pitch in a game since early 2024, so it’s not surprising to see the projections be as low as they are on him, even though he is only 29 years old. The WHIP projections are ugly, but to be fair, OOPSY and Steamer both have Sandoval a shade under 4 in the ERA column. 

The last time that I did this exercise was heading into the 2024 season. After reviewing the hitters in Part One, my concluding sentence was, “Next week, we’ll take a look at the pitching projections and then all collectively vomit into a bucket.” Amazing what a difference two years makes. 

In Part Two we’ll examine the Red Sox lineup. And with the “ZIPS” projections coming out this week, there’s another robot we can be add to the mix!

Canadiens: St-Louis On Big Goaltending Issue

Much has been made of Ottawa Senators’ defenseman Jake Sanderson telling the media after their 6-5 defeat at the hands of the Montreal Canadiens that “Leevi made some good saves, but at the end of the day, you need more than 10 saves to win a game.” On Tuesday, after practice, Martin St-Louis was essentially asked if his job would be easier if the Habs had stability in net, and needless to say, the coach is not a Sanderson kind of guy:

If those things happened, it would be band aids. You know what I mean? And maybe we wouldn’t be paying attention to that, because if you’re focused on results, your process isn't always in the right place. And I’d say that in anything we do, we’re guided by a process rather than the result. So, if goalies are making big saves, it can sometimes hide things. So, when focusing on process, of course, you need saves, but we’re actually looking at what happens before the save is made or not. It doesn’t change what we coach in front of that. So, even if we had stability, as you say, it wouldn’t change the way we’re coaching.
- St-Louis on goaltending stability

That answer shouldn’t have surprised anybody. Just like St-Louis won’t throw his forwards or his defensemen under the bus, he won’t throw his goaltenders either. Any coach would like their goaltenders to make more saves; that goes without saying, but no goaltender would like their coach to say it out loud.

Dobes Wins One For The Canadiens
Canadiens’ Prospect Has Winning Attitude
Canadiens: Avoiding Self-Sabotage

Furthermore, St-Louis once again gave a well-thought-out answer, and he has a point. When coaching his players, a coach will speak to them about the mistakes made, whether or not the puck ended up in the back of their own net; if they don’t, they’re not doing a very thorough job. Whether the puck crosses the goal line or not, a mistake was made before the goaltender was tested, and if the netminder made the save that one time, it doesn’t mean he’ll do it the next time, so it’s the coach’s job to address the issue.

What’s much more worrying, however, is that Samuel Montembeault had to say after the defeat against the Boston Bruins. While he did admit that he could have made the save on Fraser Minten’s backhand, he added that on the goals against the Buffalo Sabres and the other ones against the Bruins, there wasn’t much he could do. That’s not the right attitude to have.

Back in October 2017, when the Canadiens had a bad start to the season, Carey Price had a 2-6-1 record, a 3.60 GAA, and a save percentage of .886, and after a 4-0 loss against the Los Angeles Kings, he said:

I just got to find ways to stop the puck and keep our guys in it until we bury the puck. It just seems that I’m not doing that right now. So, I just got to find a way to do it.
- Carey Price on his struggles in 2017

That’s the right attitude for a goalie to have. Whatever comes your way, you have to find a way to stop it. That’s why there’s a stat called goals saved above expected: a good goaltender will stop shots he’s not expected to save. A goalie who’s doing his job will be able to stop high-danger chances that should have been goals.

In Tuesday night’s 3-2 OT win over the Vegas Golden Knights, Jakub Dobes stopped 32 of the 34 shots he faced, and quite a few of those saves should have been goals. On the penalty kill, the Czech netminder frustrated Vegas with a few saves on one of their set play on the man advantage, the cross-crease pass to a player who’s alone on the doorstep. After the game, he explained:

I was kind of in my flow tracking, and I was feeling good.[…] Mark Stone is really good, around the net, and we had a pre-scout, we knew that they like to make those plays. So, it’s just something that you keep in mind, they probably won’t shoot it from that side of the net, and they’ll probably go back door. So, just a good pre-scout, and I was patient.
- Jakub Dobes on his game-saving stops against Vegas

He could have taken more of the merit, but he didn’t. Knowing a team favours a play is one thing; executing to stop it is quite another. The penalty killers also knew about that play, but Dobes was the only one who was able to neutralize it. None of the skaters was able to cut a pass they knew could be coming.

After the game, St-Louis agreed that Dobes had a great game, but it felt like he didn’t want to praise him too much. He didn’t want to say the Canadiens owed him one because he had made so many saves, it almost felt like he didn’t want to praise one goalie when the other is struggling.

The fact is, however, that Dobes is winning games. He hasn’t lost in regulation in his last seven games. Earlier in the season, when he was hot, the Canadiens kept going back to Montembeault instead of riding the hot hand, and that was a mistake, and one that led to Dobes starting to struggle as well. It’s time to face the elephant in the room; he’s playing better, and he should play more, period. The net should be his to lose by now; the Habs have been patient enough with Montmebeault, and it’s time to respect Dobes’ body of work.


Follow Karine on X @KarineHains Bluesky @karinehains.bsky.social and Threads @karinehains.  

Bookmark The Hockey News Canadiens' page for all the news and happenings around the Canadiens.

Join the discussion by signing up to the Canadiens' roundtable on The Hockey News.

Subscribe to The Hockey News at THN.com/free. Get the latest news and trending stories by subscribing to our newsletter here

Playing With Draisaitl Now Could Pay Off For Semanski In Italy

Josh Semanski is in an interesting spot right now. He made his NHL debut against the Ducks earlier this week, already has a roster spot locked in for Team Germany at the Olympics, and for the next few weeks, he's playing for the Edmonton Oilers alongside Leon Draisaitl, who happens to be the best player Germany's ever produced.

The timing works out pretty well.

Semanski's not fighting for an Olympic spot. He's already on the roster. But what he's getting right now is something most international players don't: daily exposure to one of the best players in the world, who'll also be his teammate in Italy. He's seeing how Draisaitl prepares, how he operates, what his expectations are. That's useful information heading into a tournament where chemistry and trust matter.

Former Oilers Forward Seeking New Team As Agent Scours Market For A FitFormer Oilers Forward Seeking New Team As Agent Scours Market For A FitEvander Kane's agent actively shops the veteran forward, sparking speculation about potential Western Conference contenders and a possible reunion with his former team.

Most guys heading to the Olympics come from at least different teams, but even different leagues. They show up at camp with a week or two to figure things out. Semanski's already spending time around Draisaitl, which means when they get to Italy, he'll have a better sense of what to expect from Germany's best player.

"Very, very happy for him. (He's) such a great kid. He's got a great energy about him," Draisaitl said. "I think he's a great hockey player. He understands the game. And the way he plays the game is the right way. If he can continue to chip away at the little things, I think he's got a chance at becoming an NHL player."

That's solid praise from someone who doesn't hand out compliments casually. More importantly, it means Draisaitl's paying attention and recognizes Semanski as someone who can contribute. When they're on the ice together in Italy, that familiarity will help.

When Did the Oilers' Defence Get This Good? A Look Into Ekholm's HattyWhen Did the Oilers' Defence Get This Good? A Look Into Ekholm's HattyIt feels like just yesterday we were all watching Evan Bouchard get his hat trick and listening to Mattias Ekholm sing his praises. Okay, so it was literally the last game. But it's the same difference.

The other benefit? Semanski's getting NHL game experience right before the Olympics. He's playing against some of the same players he'll see in Italy. He's adjusting to NHL speed and physicality in real time. Seven minutes of ice time against the Ducks isn't a ton, but it's more recent NHL experience than most of his German teammates will have heading into the tournament.

Now, let's be clear: Germany's not winning gold. They're not even favorites to medal. The Olympic field is loaded. Canada, the U.S., Sweden, Finland—these teams are stacked. Germany will compete, but expectations should be realistic.

What this is, though, is a useful opportunity for Semanski. He's getting a taste of the best hockey the world has to offer, sharing a locker room with some of the best players out there, and preparing for the biggest tournament of his life in about as ideal a setup as you could ask for. Most depth players heading to the Olympics don't get this kind of preparation.

Something Is Brewing Around Jack Roslovic and the OilersSomething Is Brewing Around Jack Roslovic and the OilersCould Jack Roslovic's unpredictable scoring bursts and speed justify a four-year deal? The Oilers weigh his high-risk, high-reward potential.

Semanski's been productive in Bakersfield—7 goals, 21 assists, 28 points, mostly 5-on-5. He's earned the call-up. But it's the timing that makes it so unique. It's the exact kind of preparation German fans love to see.

That's not going to win Germany a medal, but it's a better situation than showing up cold. When Semanski steps on the ice in Italy, he'll have recent NHL experience, he'll have spent weeks around Draisaitl, and he'll be more prepared than he would've been otherwise.

For a 24-year-old rookie, that's a pretty solid setup. 

Bookmark The Hockey News Edmonton Oilers team site to never miss the latest newsgame-day coverage, and moreAdd us to your Google News favourites, and never miss a story.

MMBets: Wolves at Mavs: Is Another Dallas Cover Coming?

As winter weather melts away in North Texas, the Mavericks return home to face a Timberwolves squad still figuring out its own identity. Despite injuries and inconsistency, Dallas has shown resilience — often finding ways to compete when it matters most. Tonight offers another chance to test that resolve against a top-tier Western opponent.

Let’s scan the lines in search of value.

🏀 Fixture:
Minnesota Timberwolves (28–19, 13–12 Away)
@ Dallas Mavericks (19–27, 11–12 Home)
📍 American Airlines Center — Dallas, TX
🕢 7:30 PM CST, Jan 28, 2026
📺 KFAA / MavsTV / NBA League Pass

💰 DraftKings Odds (as of 4:45 AM CST):
Spread: MIN -7.5 (-102) | DAL +7.5 (-118)
Total: O/U 231.5
Moneyline: MIN -285 | DAL +230

🎲 Game Side Pick: DAL +7.5 (-118)

There’s something stubborn in this Mavericks team. Even when outgunned or undermanned, they tend to keep games close. Whether it’s grit, pride, or the unpredictability of youth, Dallas hangs around — not always to win, but often enough to cover.

Minnesota has the edge on paper. Their defense is elite, the shooting’s cleaner, and Anthony Edwards — if cleared — changes the game’s math. But they’ve also coasted through stretches this month, dropping winnable games when intensity dips. If they allow Dallas to dictate tempo or get loose from three, this could be a closer contest than expected.

Flagg and Edwards are both questionable, and the line reflects that. But Dallas catching over a touchdown at home — with some momentum in the rotation and recent wins over playoff-caliber squads — is enough for a lean here. It’s not about belief in dominance. It’s about acknowledging that effort shows up, and sometimes that’s enough.

📈 Prop Play: Caleb Martin Over 5.5 Points (-131)

A quiet, high-floor option with volume trending the right direction. Martin has topped this number in 5 of his last 7 games, averaging 5.5 points in January on 54.2% shooting. With Davis out and Flagg potentially sidelined again, Martin’s midrange game and transition cuts have kept him involved. He’s seeing ~17 minutes per night and isn’t shy about pulling when open.

Against a Minnesota team focused on perimeter containment, there’s room for secondary options like Martin to slip through in the seams. It’s not a flashy bet — but it’s a solid one.

Tyson Fury set for heavyweight boxing comeback in April on Netflix

  • Former world champion to face Arslanbek Makhmudov

  • Briton has been training in Thailand

Tyson Fury is to make his comeback against Arslanbek Makhmudov on 11 April in a fight that will be screened on Netflix. Fury announced his retirement a year ago after successive defeats to Oleksandr Usyk, but has been training in Thailand for his return to the ring. A venue has yet to be announced for the fight, but it will take place in the UK, making it Fury’s first contest here since he overcame Derek Chisora in 2022.

“Well it’s official I’m back doing what I [heart emoji] to do,” Fury posted on Instagram. “I’ve brought the biggest network along with me. Netflix, this is going to be astronomical. Blessed by God.”

Continue reading...

MLB News: Tarik Skubal, Jose Ramirez, Kevin McGonigle, Lucas Giolito, Carlos Correa, World Baseball Classic

Happy Wednesday, everyone! It’s a day that ends in Y, which means we’ve got some Tarik Skubal trade speculation to talk about, though all signs seem to point to Skubal sticking around through at least the start of the year, if not right up to his free agency. Still, we love an offseason rumor, so we’re sharing it with you.

We also take a look at some World Baseball Classic drama (Carlos Correa will miss it, Bo Bichette has backed out of Team Brazil), and Aaron Judge is a repeat cover star.

Let’s just get right into the highlights of the day.

Detroit Tigers News

Detroit would still like to sign him to a long-term contract but it’s difficult to see that happening with how far apart both sides are on a deal. The Tigers have listened to trade offers and at least talked about the “ballpark” parameters it would take to trade him. According to club sources, the asking price is so significant that it is unlikely a trade happens unless Detroit lowers its sights significantly.

So, where do the Tigers go from here? They could continue to try to extend him, keeping in mind what this year’s free-agent class has done to the market. If Kyle Tucker is worth $60 million per year, what would Skubal get on a comparable four-year deal? $70 million per year?

I’ve also been told by some rival executives that they think it makes more sense to wait until Skubal is a free agent rather than emptying their farm system for just one year of his services. At this point, Detroit could trade him now, or wait until the trade deadline when the return would be less, or do what the Angels did with Shohei Ohtani and wait until he leaves in free agency and get just draft pick compensation for him.

  • It’s rumor mill season!!

AL Central News

MLB News

  • Well this isn’t ideal…
  • Aaron Judge can add “repeat cover star” to his growing resume. Funny, though, because just one day before this, they announced there would be no cover star.
  • Nolan Arenado is officially on Team Puerto Rico.

Do the Orioles need more help in the bullpen or the rotation?

With spring training only a few weeks away, it’s possible that the Orioles are done adding to the roster. Framber Valdez remains available, and the Birds could strike for a number of players at any point, but the team could also decide to stand pat.

The majority of free agents have already found new homes. The front office made significant additions by signing Pete Alonso, acquiring Shane Baz, inking Ryan Helsley, bringing back Zach Eflin, and trading for Taylor Ward.

On paper, this roster looks far more competitive than the team that finished at the bottom of the AL East in 2025. But the Orioles didn’t bring in a $155 million first baseman just to not finish last. This team wants a division crown and a real run at the World Series. Do they have the talent for that?

The lineup looks set aside from a potential hole in center field. On the other hand, you can never have enough pitching. Baz will immediately join Trevor Rogers and Kyle Bradish in the rotation. Eflin figures to join the bunch when healthy, and Dean Kremer remains a dependable—yet unspectacular—arm. Tyler Wells has the talent to make the rotation if healthy, while guys like Cade Povich and Brandon Young hope to receive another chance.

Helsley will anchor the bullpen with Félix Bautista set to miss at least the first half. The Birds brought back Andrew Kittredge, and Keegan Akin will return as a sold left-handed option. After that, the picture gets slightly less clear.

There’s room for improvement in both units, and the Orioles should leave no stone unturned when it comes to adding pitchers. With that being said, which group needs more help?

The case for the rotation

The Orioles went into the offseason with a clear need at the top of the rotation, and they have yet to address that need. The team views Baz as a player that could fill that role down the road, but nobody should expect the 26-year-old to pitch like an ace this season. Trevor Rogers looked like a Cy Young pitcher last year over 18 starts, but he missed out on the award because he only made 18 starts. Kyle Bradish finished fourth in Cy Young voting back in 2023, but he has only 14 starts over the least two seasons.

The Birds have a rotation that can get them to the playoffs, but can this staff help them advance? Baltimore watched Dylan Cease go off the board early, but a guy like Valdez can take the ball in Game 1. Zac Gallen isn’t a true ace, but his presence could prevent a guy like Kremer from starting the third or fourth game of a playoff series.

In the same vein, adding a top arm would allow a talented pitcher to fall to the bullpen. Wells would bring credibility to a bunch lacking in experience. Povich, Young, and Chayce McDermott all profile as guys that could thrive in shorter stints. If the Birds fail to add, they’ll only be a few injuries from depending on these guys every fifth day.

The case for the bullpen

The current rotation features a pretty clear pecking order. Bradish and Rogers stand a level above the rest. Eflin and Baz fit into the middle of the rotation with the potential to over perform. Kremer and Wells are known commodities, and the other guys have some potential.

The bullpen hierarchy is less clear. Helsley is the closer until Bautista comes back. Kittredge and Akin can be trusted in high-leverage situations. Then what?

Kade Strowd posted a 1.71 ERA over 25 games last season, but the 28-year-old still carries rookie status. Rico Garcia out performed his career 5.27 ERA last season, but the 32-year-old hardly qualifies as a sure thing. The same can be said for Colin Selby, Grant Wolfram, and Yaramil Hiraldo.

The Birds would love to see Yennier Cano get back on track after he posted a 5.12 ERA last season. Anthony Nunez will likely make his major league debut after arriving in the Cedric Mullins deal last July. Dietrich Enns and Albert Suárez are both talented swingmen that could turn into a pumpkin at any point.

The case against the rotation

The Orioles added two legitimate starters in Eflin and Baz. Eflin literally took the ball on Opening Day last season, and new skipper Craig Albernaz recently described Baz to the Baltimore Banner podcast as someone with “all the potential in the world to be an ace and to go out there and be in the conversation for a Cy Young” down the road.

While looking to the future, it’s crucial to think about the money an aging Valdez or Gallen would make in their mid 30s. Baltimore paid for the best years of Alonso while taking on some risk for the later years. Can they afford to do the same with a starting pitcher?

Veterans like Justin Verlander and Max Scherzer wouldn’t require multi-year deals, but it’s fair to wonder if they actually represent an improvement over the five guys in the rotation at this point in their career

The case against the bullpen

It’s not uncommon for competitive teams to piece together an unheralded bullpen. Relievers are volatile from year to year, and it’s never a guarantee that a free agent signing will meet expectations. Helsley, Kittredge and Akin should blend nicely with the raw talent from guys like Strowd and Nunez, and a bounceback from Cano is still in the cards.

While guys like Valdez and Gallen remain available, there are very few relievers still on the open market. A reunion with Danny Coulombe would play, and reclamation projects like Liam Hendriks are still a possibility.

Any significant addition would likely come via trade. Baltimore was linked to Jojo Romero last month, and the Rockies have multiple relievers that could be available for the right price. But if a trade is required, the Orioles might prefer to wait and see who is hot at the trade deadline.

What’s Your Personal Truck Day?

The Phillies have announced Truck Day— and as sure as Punxsutawney Phil not seeing his shadow, that means spring is coming. For those who don’t know, Truck Day involves the Philadelphia Phaithful seeing off the equipment trucks, laden with bat, ball, and glove, as they begin their long, happy journey to Clearwater. There’s photo opportunities and the chance to chat with your fellow fans. This year, Truck Day is February 3rd.

Just as the Phillies mark the first portent of spring with Truck Day, each baseball fan marks their own path to warmer weather with a tradition. Perhaps it’s giving that favorite jersey a wash, or giving that favorite game a watch. Maybe it’s playing out a simulated season in a video game, or sending a few good natured jabs to that Braves fan in the family. Maybe your personal Truck Day is, well, going to Truck Day. It’s for the fans, after all.

Today’s question is: What’s your personal Truck Day?

In The Lab: Jose Altuve and the HOF Index

It often is hard to separate analysis and fandom. If you ask most Astros fan to name the best player in franchise history, most of them will name Jose Altuve. It makes perfect sense. He has an MVP award like Jeff Bagwell. Unlike Bagwell, he has two rings and perhaps one of the best postseason resumes in baseball history. He certainly has a better postseason resume than anyone in Astros history.

He isn’t there yet, but he seems to be on pace to eclipse many of Craig Biggio’s records for career numbers. Assuming an uninterrupted schedule (we will get to more on that later), he has a decent chance of getting to 3000 hits. Naturally, he will see a bump in all of the other relevant numbers as well. Nostalgia and positive vibes don’t go well with cold, hard analysis. We have to find a way to separate our own personal feelings about a player with the numbers.

The Hall of Fame Index aims to do that. It was never meant to rank order players. It is not necessarily a precise instrument. The idea is to put players into groups of players they are similar to. When a player is similar to Hall of Famers then he is likely a Hall of Famer. If he similar to guys that aren’t quite there then he is also likely not quite there. The index includes career value and peak value. Peak value is the total of the top ten WAR seasons for the player.

The Hall of Fame Index

BWARFWARBWAR10FWAR10Index
Joe Gordon55.660.454.158.4228.5
Willie Randolph65.962.148.546.7223.2
Jose Altuve52.356.847.851.7208.6
Bobby Doerr58.453.045.946.7204.0
Billy Herman57.255.144.246.1202.6

The good news for Altuve is that three of these four players are Hall of Famers. The other irony is that all of those Hall of Famers missed seasons serving their country in World War II. Obviously, it had a greater impact on some of them than others. Altuve likely will have more to do with them then simple numbers. 2020 was a wash due to Covid. He also had the worst numbers of his career. It was hardly a coincidence. If you gave him a full complement of at bats then it is much more likely that he would be on his way to 3000 hits.

It hasn’t happened yet, but all indications are that there will be a major work stoppage in 2027. Obviously, it is just guess work as to how much time he will miss. The index does a lot of things, but it does not allow for situations like this or the color barrier for African American players. This is just one of many reasons why we move onto our other tests. Based on career norms and recent trends, Altuve is not likely to change his place in the second base pecking order this season, but the other numbers will change.

Offensive Numbers

OPS+ROVOW%BPO
Joe Gordon120.302.593.796
Willie Randolph104.265.537.695
Jose Altuve129.289.635.804
Bobby Doerr115.287.606.765
Billy Herman112.251.589.684

We’ve talked about these numbers in previous articles, but there is some added context that needs to be added. OPS+ and offensive winning percentage are tied to the league norms. The other two metrics are not. In case anyone is coming in for the first time, real offensive value (ROV) is the midpoint between batting average and secondary average. Secondary average is calculated by adding total bases, walks, stolen bases, and hit by pitches and subtracting hits. That sum is divided by at bats.

Offensive winning percentage assumes that a team has nine hitters like that hitter and an average pitching staff. From there, the numbers speak for themselves. If a 100 win baseball team is a championship level team then a .600 offensive winning percentage is pretty darn good. Finally, we get bases per out. The league average tends to range between .650 and .700 depending on the era.

What we should note is that three of these players played during the Live Ball Era of the 1930s and 1940s. That obviously was a more robust offensive era than Randolph or Altuve played in. That can explain the differences between offensive winning percentage, OPS+, and the other two metrics. Unfortunately, Altuve is at the part of his career where he is likely to detract from these numbers and not add to them. That is part of the push and pull factors all players get to late in their careers.

Fielding Numbers

RfieldDWARFG2B
Joe Gordon15022.414.1150
Willie Randolph11416.820.2115
Jose Altuve-690.0-1.6-86
Bobby Doerr4813.517.143
Billy Herman5512.415.458

This is the biggest reason why I use a second source for WAR and why the index is superior to JAWS. Different sources look at fielding value differently. FWAR does not use defensive runs saved. DRS is the current basis behind Rfield. FWAR uses other metrics (notably Statcast’s Outs Above Average) as a part of its formula. OAA is much more kind to Altuve than DRS.

If we are to believe Rfield then Altuve will likely go down as the least valuable fielding second baseman in the Hall of Fame. He will surpass fellow former Astro Craig Biggio with those numbers. This is yet another push and pull factor that happens when players continue to play. Pound for pound, Gordon might be the best fielding second baseman in history. He did not reach the numbers that Bill Mazeroski did, but he only had 11 seasons. If you give him those two seasons he lost serving his country and another here or there it could have turned out differently.

Total Runs

RCRfieldRbaserRposTR
Joe Gordon9361504661156
Willie Randolph113811441731366
Jose Altuve1208-6915451199
Bobby Doerr116948-2821297
Billy Herman1137558681268

Thus. we get to major push factor on continuing to play. With each passing season, Altuve will continue to build on these numbers. Runs created, Rfield, and Rbaser are simple enough. Rpos is a positional adjustment based on the fielding and hitting difficulty relative to the rest of the positions. Altuve’s numbers are obviously lower because they include some time in left field. That might or might not continue to be the case moving forward.

If a typical regular has between 70 and 90 total runs a season, then we can foresee Altuve surpassing all of these players with three more seasons. Obviously, those numbers will be included with the requisite counting numbers everyone is familiar with. That would include perhaps getting to 300 home runs, 1200 runs and RBI, and well over 2500 hits. As it stands, he already has created more runs than all of these players.

Our last test looks at factors related to peak value. How the players accumulated their value matters. Fans are more captivated by greatness even if it is short-lived. In the books I looked at the MVP test. This is a variation of it. We are looking at 5 WAR, 4 WAR, and 3 WAR seasons. Players with five or more WAR tend to be among the best three or four at their position in baseball. Four WAR players are likely borderline all-star performers. Three WAR seasons are solid above average performers. Additionally, we will note if a player led the league in WAR.

Dominance

5 WAR4 WAR3 WARTop
Joe Gordon7020
Willie Randolph4610
Jose Altuve5221
Bobby Doerr6020
Billy Herman3470

Based on these numbers, Herman and Randolph end up looking pretty similar. Altuve’s 2017 season will end up being a feather in his cap. He won the MVP that season and based on the BWAR score, that honor was deserved. This isn’t to say that a player has to be an MVP winner to get into the Hall of Fame, but it certainly does help when everything else was equal.

The numbers also explain why Gordon deserved the love he got from the Veterans Committee. I hate to assume facts not in evidence, but if he had not taken off two seasons serving his country he likely would have been considerably higher up the index food chain. He had come off of two six win seasons and another ten BWAR and FWAR would have boosted both his career and peak value.

Obviously, Altuve can still add to his overall career value, but he is unlikely to get to three WAR again if recent seasons are any indication. Sure, he could have a rebound season or two, but most players in his situation start to see the numbers taper off. Still, if we consider Joe Gordon, Billy Herman, and Bobby Doerr to be credible Hall of Famers then Altuve likely qualifies as one already. That doesn’t even include his ample postseason production.

Race for No. 1 seeds in March Madness: Who is in the hunt?

College basketball this season is top heavy, with the top 10 of the USA TODAY Sports Coaches Poll having a combined 14 losses and no one with more than three defeats. That makes for a fun race to grab the precious No. 1 seed.

We all saw last season how valuable the No. 1 seed is when all four top teams in the bracket made it to the Final Four, the second time it's happened since seeding began in 1979. With how strong the top teams in the country look, that very much could happen again, making it paramount to get the top spots in the bracket and get the inside track to Indianapolis.

Selection Sunday is six weeks away, but we are getting a good sense of who is in the running to be a No. 1 seed in the 2026 NCAA tournament.

Arizona

Record: 21-0 (8-0). Quad 1 record: 9-0. NET Ranking: 1.

Why Arizona is here: The Wildcats put themselves in the top spot, one of two undefeated teams left in the country. The nine Quad 1 wins are tied for the most in the country, and most of them came in what was a challenging nonconference schedule that included Florida, UConn and Alabama. Arizona had a relatively easy start to Big 12 play that showcased its dominance, and it continued playing a top brand of basketball in a road win against BYU that ended a little too close for comfort.

What's next: The schedule only gets tougher. Arizona plays six ranked teams in 10-game stretch, which includes Iowa State, Houston and Kansas twice. Arizona will certainly be tested, but it is very safe right now in being a No. 1 seed.

Michigan

Record: 19-1 (9-1). Quad 1 record: 6-0. NET Ranking: 3.

Why Michigan is here: Remember when everyone was ready to declare Michigan national champion in November? Arguably no one had a better start than the Wolverines, who blew out teams for much of the first two months of the season, including a 40-point romp of Gonzaga. They aren't blowing teams out as much since then, but they keep winning — the only defeat a three-point loss to a hot-shooting Wisconsin team. The Wolverines got a big resume boost by ending Nebraska's undefeated season Tuesday, Jan. 27.

What's next: A trip to in-state rival Michigan State is the first major road game for Michigan, and February will only get more challenging with games away from home against Purdue, Duke and Illinois in a 10-day span.

UConn

Record: 20-1 (10-0). Quad 1 record: 5-1. NET Ranking: 8.

Why UConn is here: Dan Hurley is back in the title conversation. What's impressive about UConn's resume is the five Quad 1 wins all came away from home, including neutral games against BYU and Illinois, as well as a road victory at Kansas. The lone blemish is a home loss to Arizona, a game the Huskies could have won. The Big East has presented some challenges, but they have emerged victorious in every conference game so far.

What's next: The rest of Big East isn't near UConn, with the biggest challenges two February games against St. John's and at Villanova. This team has the easiest path to a No. 1 seed and it's theirs to lose, even without a top five NET ranking.

Duke

Record: 19-1 (8-0). Quad 1 record: 9-1. NET Ranking: 2.

Why Duke is here: Of course, Duke found a way to be even better after Cooper Flagg left. The Blue Devils had challenging nonconference slate and made statements with wins over Kansas, Florida and Michigan State. They are a one-point loss vs. Texas Tech away from being undefeated. The nine Quad 1 wins are tied with Arizona for the most in the country, picking up more in dominating fashion in the ACC. It has won every conference game by an average margin of 15.7 points, including two routs of Louisville.

What's next: An improved ACC will continue to challenge Duke outside of the two meetings with rival North Carolina. Clemson and Virginia visit Cameron Indoor Stadium in February, and then there's the game against Michigan that could give it the best nonconference resume in the country.

Just on the outside

Nebraska

Record: 20-1 (9-1). Quad 1 record: 6-1. NET Ranking: 5.

Why Nebraska is here:Nebrasketball is alive and well in a historic season for the Cornhuskers. The perfect start came with some caution as they weren't tested much to start the season, but all was validated with wins over Illinois and Michigan State. Even though its undefeated season ended against Michigan, the narrow loss proved the Cornhuskers are in the same tier of title contenders.

What's next: The Cornhuskers are in the midst of one of their toughest stretches with Illinois up next and Purdue visiting Lincoln in a few weeks. However, the end of the regular season isn't too treacherous. There's a chance Nebraska gets a top-two seed for the first time, and finally captures that elusive first NCAA tournament win.

Gonzaga

Record: 21-1 (9-0). Quad 1 record: 3-1. NET Ranking: 4.

Why Gonzaga is here: Another year, another run of dominance for Gonzaga. The blowout loss to Michigan has overshadowed what's been another outstanding start for Mark Few, with wins against Alabama and Kentucky away from the Northwest. It did enough to start the resume strong before West Coast Conference play began, which has been another relatively easy going run for Gonzaga in its last year in the conference.

What's next: As usual, Gonzaga faces an easy rest of the regular season, with the major challenge being the two annual games against Saint Mary's. Prime opportunity to boost the low Quad 1 resume, and the Bulldogs can hope teams above them start to slip so they can climb up the seed line.

Houston

Record: 17-2 (5-1). Quad 1 record: 4-2. NET Ranking: 11.

Why Houston is here: Last season's national runner-up has quietly put itself back in a spot to be a No. 1 seed for the fourth-straight season. The early season loss to Tennessee doesn't look as good with the Volunteers' inconsistency since then, but it was able to split the season series with Texas Tech. The Cougars are still one of the best defensive teams in the country and have become even better offensively.

What's next: The Big 12 gauntlet gives Houston more opportunities to rise, with games against BYU, Iowa State, Arizona and Kansas in the middle of February. That stretch will determine whether the Cougars can be a top seed.

Iowa State

Record: 18-2 (5-2). Quad 1 record: 5-1. NET Ranking: 7.

Why Iowa State is here: The high-powered Iowa State offense blitzed several teams to start the season, headlined by the big road victory over Purdue. It hasn't nabbed any notable wins since then, and the two uninspiring losses have pushed the Cyclones away from a No. 1 spot, mostly thanks to suffering a Quad 2 loss at the hands of Cincinnati.

What's next: There are plenty of key win opportunities coming up for the Cyclones. It ends the season with six Quad 1 games in the last eight, which features Houston, BYU, Texas Tech and Arizona, needing to win at least three of them to feel good about getting the first No. 1 seed in program history.

Also contenders

Illinois, Texas Tech and Michigan State,

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Who can be No. 1 seed in NCAA tournament? Breaking down contenders