Magic and Bird helped save the NBA, but Doc and Moses did their part, too

Basketball: Philadelphia 76ers Moses Malone (L) and Julius Erving on the bench during game vs Denver Nuggets at The Spectrum. Philadelphia, PA 2/16/1983 CREDIT: John Iacono (Photo by John Iacono /Sports Illustrated via Getty Images) (Set Number: X28070 TK1 R6 F18 )

It is NBA gospel to believe that Larry Bird and Magic Johnson, shining stars as they were in the East (and West), enabled the league to rise into the firmament, to become the Goliath it has since become.

Upon their arrival in 1979, they polished pro basketball’s profile, burying its sordid, drug-addled past and paving the way for the Michael Jordans and the Kobe Bryants and the LeBron Jameses.

And verily, David Stern and Adam Silver have said, it is good.

Julius Erving, forever the epitome of decorum and decency, is an unlikely blasphemer. And yet, Dr. J said this entire idea is “bullshit” in the 2025 book “Magic in the Air,” by Inquirer columnist Mike Sielski.

Erving believes that the NBA’s ascension can be traced not to the Bird-Magic bump but rather the league’s merger with the ABA in 1976 – that the resulting infusion of talent and flair led to a quantum leap.

The Good Doctor acknowledged in Sielski’s book that Magic and Bird brought “a great rivalry” from college to Los Angeles and Boston, respectively, where it became white hot. It was, Erving said, “a good story.”

“But truth be told,” he told the author, “I think in terms of the popularity of the league, the league was never more popular than it was after the ABA joined the league. Eleven All-Stars in that first All-Star game were from the ABA. That’s what saved the league.”

Both things can be true, of course. Erving and the ABAers brought talent, style and panache to a league sorely in need of all three. But in migrating to the two most storied franchises, Bird and Magic gave the NBA sizzle beyond measure. And that obscured all else … at least until MJ came along in 1984.

Recent media offerings have brought the ABA’s role in the NBA’s resurrection to the fore, none better than Luke Epplin’s new book “Moses and the Doctor: Two Men, One Championship and the Birth of Modern Basketball.” With a painstaking eye for detail and a novelist’s knack for narrative, Epplin – who in fact once dreamed of becoming a novelist – underscores the impact not only of Dr. J but another ABA alum of note, Moses Malone. And it is artfully framed around the Sixers’ 1982-83 championship run.

“My biggest thing is character,” Epplin, 47, said before a book signing last Tuesday, the day “Moses and the Doctor” was released.

That’s befitting of a man who had trained to be a novelist at Washington University in St. Louis, and who continued to write fiction into his 30s. Then he came to a realization.

“I sucked,” he told those who gathered at the signing, at a bookstore near Rittenhouse Square.

But, he added, “I use the techniques I developed as a failed novelist to write these kinds of stories.”

He did that in his 2021 book “Our Team,” about the Cleveland Indians of the late 1940s, and he does it here. In the process he echoes, at least to a degree, not only Sielski’s book, but also one authored in 2025 by Paul Knepper entitled “Moses Malone: The Life of a Basketball Prophet,” as well as an Amazon Prime documentary released last week called “Soul Power: The Legend of the American Basketball Association.“

And really, what better characters are there than Doc and Moses? What better story is there than theirs? Erving was soaring and elegant, Moses down and dirty. They were perfect complements to one another, a veritable yin and yang.

While apart, their successes were considerable. Dr. J won two championships as a New York Net while keeping the ABA afloat, and Moses established himself as one of the greatest rebounders in history after becoming the first player to make the prep-to-pro jump. Epplin nonetheless argues that their tales were pockmarked with failure.

Malone broke in with the Utah Stars as a 19-year-old in October 1974, then bounced from team to team. Indeed, one of pro basketball’s great what-ifs is how things might have turned out if the Portland Trail Blazers, his first NBA landing spot, had held onto him, given the subsequent injuries suffered by Bill Walton. As it was, Malone never appeared in a regular-season game for the Blazers, who traded him to Buffalo, leading to another what-if: The Braves (now the Los Angeles Clippers) had Bob McAdoo! And Ernie DiGregorio! And Adrian Dantley! And the eternally underrated Randy Smith!

Moses played exactly two games in Buffalo before he was shipped out to Houston, where he blossomed. Even led the undermanned Rockets to the 1981 Finals, at which point he argued that he and four guys from his native Petersburg, Va., could take down Bird and the mighty Celtics. We’ll never know, but certainly the Rockets couldn’t; they lost in six games.

Meantime Erving, acquired by the Sixers from the cash-strapped Nets in the fall of ‘76, was experiencing his own frustrations. As part of a talented but dysfunctional ‘76-77 Philadelphia club, he lost in the Finals to Walton’s Blazers. Then Doc fell short against Magic’s Lakers in the ‘80 and ‘82 Finals as well.

By that point Dr. J was a beloved figure – the sport’s foremost ambassador, a high-profile pitchman and the perfect teammate. Bobby Jones, with whom Epplin spoke for his book, once told me for one of mine that unlike other superstars, Erving was “an encourager.”

“He wasn’t arrogant,” Bobby said. “He didn’t consider himself better than anybody. He worked as hard as anybody, if not harder. Didn’t put anybody down for the mistakes that they made. That’s easy to do at that level, when the game’s on the line or something’s on the line. He knows he can do it, but you’re in a position where you have to do it, and you don’t, it takes strength of character to say, ‘We’re in this together. We win together, we lose together.’ I think that was probably, to me, his greatest quality.”

That is as great a testimonial as any teammate could offer another, but that’s Bobby. And that was Julius. Which is why everyone – and I mean everyone – wanted to see him win an NBA championship.

It’s also why he was beginning to wonder if he ever would. He cried in the Los Angeles Forum’s visiting locker room after the Sixers were eliminated by the Lakers in six games in the ‘82 Finals.

To revisit the Biblical theme: Julius wept.

When Epplin learned of this, it immediately struck a chord. 

“I thought, there’s the break right there: Why is Julius Erving crying?” he told last week’s gathering.

The answer is simple: Dr. J would not be fulfilled without a title. His tale would be incomplete.

Then Moses came to Philly via trade, bringing with him the means of completion and redemption. No longer would the Sixers be bullied inside. No longer would they have to live with inconsistency at center, as had been the case with the eternally entertaining and eternally frustrating Darryl Dawkins. (Caldwell Jones had been around, too. But he was more a complementary piece than the dominating force Moses was, and was ultimately jettisoned in the Malone trade.)

The following spring, back in the Forum, the Sixers finished off a sweep of a Lakers team that by the end was without McAdoo, James Worthy and Norm Nixon due to injury – i.e., two Hall of Famers and a terrific guard.

No matter, though – the Sixers were the best team all year, storming to 65 victories and then nearly fulfilling Moses’ fo’, fo’, fo’ playoff prophecy. (And consider how Moses, famously averse to media interactions, uttered two of the greatest quotes in NBA history – this one, and the one about the dudes from Petersburg.)

It is a testimony to Malone (who died in 2015) and Erving that they were able to meld their talents, that they knew they needed each other at that point in their careers. And it is testimony to Epplin that he was able to deftly navigate this most fascinating period in the history of the Sixers, and the league. That he was able to retell a tale that needs to be retold, for the sake of context. It is inarguable that Bird and Magic brought a great deal to the table, but Moses and Dr. J are among those deserving of a seat, too. In this book, each is given one.

Steve Cohen declares Mets 'will never' appoint team captain under his ownership

Francisco Lindor is now widely considered the leader of the Mets as their longest-tenured hitter, but seniority doesn't guarantee captaincy.

In fact, there isn't any player on the roster who should expect that title and status under Steve Cohen's watch, as the Mets owner revealed Monday he'll never appoint a captain while in control of the franchise.

"As long as I'm owning the team, there will never be a team captain," Cohen said at the Mets' complex in Port St. Lucie. "That was my decision. My view is, the locker room is unique and let the locker room sort it out, year-in, year-out. There'll never be a captain. I've felt that way all along."

Following the exit of slugger Pete Alonso, who became the Mets' all-time home runs leader before signing with the Orioles in free agency this winter, all signs pointed toward Lindor -- their de facto captain -- eventually earning the rank officially.

Lindor was an obvious candidate, considering the leadership traits and responsibilities he's assumed since joining the Mets in 2021. Just last spring, when the Mets reportedly mulled the idea of naming him captain, the veteran shortstop expressed the possibility as "an honor and a privilege."

"The captain thing is not up for me to decide. If it does happen, it would be fantastic, an honor and a privilege," Lindor said a year ago. "Something I would never take for granted. Something that would put me next to the greats of this organization forever and It would be very humbling."

Mets manager Carlos Mendoza even admitted to having captain conversations. He told WFAN last February he shared feelings on Lindor to Mets president of baseball operations David Stearns, contending, "he doesn’t have the ‘C’ on [his uniform], but he’s doing a lot of the things that a captain will do."

Lindor also received an endorsement from Mets legend John Franco -- the third captain in franchise history -- who ran into the switch-hitter last spring training and told him he wants to see that 'C' on his uniform.

The only wrinkle was Mendoza never talked to Cohen on the matter then, which explains the change in tune now and why the Mets aren't inclined to name a fifth captain in franchise history and their first since David Wright.

"The way we see it is we have a bunch of guys there who are part of that leadership group," Mendoza said. "We lost a few guys who were part of that group, and then we gained some guys who have done that -- so I think when you're talking about a major league locker room, you need to have not only one guy, but a few guys."

The story of Cohen's reign can't be told without Lindor, however. He was acquired by the Mets in a blockbuster trade with the then-Indians five winters ago, and their commitment to a long-term relationship was cemented when Lindor signed a10-year contract extension prior to Opening Day.

Since then, Lindor has slashed .261/.338/.462 with 148 doubles, 141 home runs, and 445 RBI across 758 total games with the Mets. He nearly captured NL MVP honors in 2024, finishing second in the race, and earned Silver Slugger awards in 2023 and 2024.

There have only been four official captains in Mets history -- Keith Hernandez, Gary Carter,Franco, and Wright -- and the exclusive group isn't accepting new members, according to the boss.

Sabres Have 2 Jets Trade Targets To Consider

The Buffalo Sabres are expected to be buyers ahead of the 2026 NHL trade deadline as they look to end their 14-year playoff drought. 

The Winnipeg Jets, on the other hand, are likely to be sellers due to their struggles this campaign. 

With this, let's take a look at two Jets players whom the Sabres should consider targeting leading up to the 2026 NHL trade deadline. 

Luke Schenn 

It is no secret that the Sabres would be wise to add another right-shot defenseman by the deadline. It is clear that their right side could use a boost, and the Jets have an interesting option to consider in blueliner Luke Schenn. 

Schenn would give the Sabres another solid, hard-nosed defenseman to work with for their bottom pairing and penalty kill if acquired. The 18-year veteran and two-time Stanley Cup champion would also be a good mentor for the Sabres' younger players if brought in.

Logan Stanley 

The Jets have another interesting trade candidate defenseman in Logan Stanley. While Stanley is a left-shot defender, he would still have the potential to be a nice addition for a Sabres club that could use more depth on their blueline.

Like Schenn, Stanley is well-known for playing a heavy game, so he would give the Sabres' defensive group more bite. Furthermore, the 6-foot-7 defenseman is having an excellent year for Winnipeg, as he has set career highs with nine goals, nine assists, and 18 points in 55 games. 

Anthony Edwards caught in 4K saying he wants to play for Hawks at NBA All-Star Game

The 2026 NBA All-Star Weekend gave us a lot to chew on. There was Kevin Durant’s alleged burner scandal, an absolutely terrible dunk contest, and a pretty good All-Star Game featuring a Kawhi Leonard takeover and Victor Wembanyama raising the competitive stakes. No one talked about tanking for a few days, and that’s really all the league can ask for.

There’s always some viral moments when the best players in the world gather together for the weekend, especially with the way cameras and microphones are constantly rolling these days. After Sunday’s All-Star Game, Anthony Edwards covered his mouth to make an off-handed comment to Atlanta Hawks star Jalen Johnson. It sure sounded like Edwards, an Atlanta native said “I can’t wait to come home,” and added “y’all got so many wings, and (Jonathan) Kuminga nice, too” I remember interviewing Edwards from his Atlanta high school in 2019 when he could only dream about being America’s biggest NBA star. Now that it’s actually happened, maybe he’s dreaming about returning to his hometown.

Watch the clip here and judge for yourself.

The Hawks acquired Kuminga from the Golden State Warriors at the trade deadline. Atlanta entered the All-Star break at 26-30 in 10th place in the Eastern Conference after trading away Trae Young earlier this season.

Is it panic time for the Wolves? Not yet. Edwards is under contract through the 2028-2029 season. Minnesota has gone to back-to-back Western Conference Finals since drafting Edwards with the No. 1 overall pick in 2020, and they have four more playoff runs with him under contract before he can test free agency.

The NBA hasn’t had a superstar change teams in free agency since Kawhi Leonard did it in 2019. New York and Los Angeles are usually the markets elite players want to end up in, so it’s interesting to hear Edwards speculate about going home to Atlanta. Life is always easier in the Eastern Conference, so maybe that’s part of the appeal.

It’s possible that Edwards is just talking about going home to Minnesota after the All-Star Game here. Maybe he’s talking about chicken wings, not small forwards. If that’s the case, why did he cover his mouth?

Ultimately, Wolves fans have nothing to worry about for now, and Hawks fans can’t get too excited. Edwards is under contract, he plays for a really good team, and he won’t have the opportunity to test free agency for a long time. It’s just another viral moment from this All-Star Weekend.

Steve Cohen puts emphatic end to Mets captain debate

Mets owner Steve Cohen speaks to reporters at spring training in Port St. Lucie on Feb. 16, 2026.
Mets owner Steve Cohen speaks to reporters at spring training in Port St. Lucie on Feb. 16, 2026.

PORT ST. LUCIE — The debate over who the next Mets captain will be is over, at least for the foreseeable future.

It won’t be anybody.

Mets owner Steve Cohen said Monday that as long as he owns the team, the title “captain” won’t be bestowed on a player.

Mets owner Steve Cohen speaks to reporters at spring training in Port St. Lucie on Feb. 16, 2026. Corey Sipkin for the NY POST

“There will never be a captain,” Cohen said.

He added the decision is based on how he would like to see the clubhouse run.

“Every year a team is different,” Cohen said. “And let the team figure it out in the locker room rather than have a designation. Having a captain in baseball doesn’t happen often — it’s actually unusual. Whatever previous ownership did, that was their way of doing things. I look at things differently.”

In recent seasons, Francisco Lindor, Brandon Nimmo and Pete Alonso had emerged as potential captains. Nimmo and Alonso departed the organization after last season, which appeared to clear the way for Lindor to potentially land the title.

David Wright, who played his final game for the Mets in 2018, was the team’s last captain. Keith Hernandez, Gary Carter and John Franco have also worn the title for the Mets.

The Bucks have a separation-of-powers problem

MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN - JANUARY 21: Head coach Doc Rivers of the Milwaukee Bucks looks on during the first quarter against the Oklahoma City Thunder at Fiserv Forum on January 21, 2026 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Patrick McDermott/Getty Images) | Getty Images

Not four years ago, the Bucks had an elite on-court product, massively spurred by stability and synergy from ownership on down. Now, despite the recent good form, the team is overall in a much worse spot, and while some of the reasons for that have been beyond the Bucks’ control, many have been within their control. Over the last three or so years, this franchise has made avoidable error after avoidable error, largely culminating in the current product.

What I noticed while investigating these errors is that many share a common theme: a lack of synergy between the franchise’s different arms and, in some cases, power brokers. More specifically, there was either a lack of conviction by the arm with decision-making responsibility to go with its gut, or an arm without that responsibility overruled the arm with it, resulting in a bad decision. Therefore, I decided to dive deep into three examples of this phenomenon in the following areas: coaching hires, injury management, and possibly even the drafting process. Let’s begin with coaching hires.  

A heck of a mess: The post-Budenholzer hiring debacle

The Budenholzer-to-Griffin-to-Rivers fiasco was easily the most consequential example of how a lack of organisational synergy left the Bucks in a hot mess. Whatever you may think in hindsight, it was widely accepted in 2023 that coach Bud’s time had come, and a new voice was needed. The initial search was far-reaching, but in the end, the Bucks’ brain trust settled on three finalists: Nick Nurse, Kenny Atkinson, and Adrian Griffin.

Of course, they went with Adrian Griffin, who would go on to be about as incompetent as one can be in the top job, getting fired halfway through the first year of his three-year contract (yes, I know, 30-13 record; that was not because of anything he did, and I’ll stand on that forever). When you think about it, the only logical explanation as to why they didn’t just wait to fire Griff at the end of the year—when the replacement options would be plentiful—was that he was creating so much tension that it simply could not wait, which is bonkers.

So, who gets the blame for Griffin’s hiring? Marc Stein’s reporting states that Horst wanted Nurse, but Giannis wanted Griffin, and that won out. Now, you might think that’s your answer right there: Antetokounmpo is to blame. Sure, Giannis definitely deserves some blame; knowing his opinion carries such considerable weight, he probably should’ve done more homework. But overall, you’ll seldom hear me criticise a player for doing anything other than their play. My knee-jerk reaction is to blame Horst for not trusting himself, because his instincts about Nurse being the man for the job were probably right.

Then again, in the front office’s defence, the context of the 2023 offseason was clearly very relevant to Horst’s decision-making. The Bucks had just gotten bounced in the first round, and rumors were swirling about Antetokounmpo’s future (almost as much as they were in 2020) because he was extension-eligible. Therefore, it was understandable for the Bucks’ brain trust to both involve Giannis in the process and weigh his opinion so heavily that his preference overrode the GM’s.

Looking back, this leaves you in a pickle when evaluating if there was a “right move” or not. On the one hand, the Griffin era was an abject failure from a team standpoint, and it also led to utter chaos following his ouster. Injuries or not, the team was never going to be a contender under AG (or his replacement), which we sometimes forget is the entire goal behind all of this. On the other hand, assuming the initial coaching hire influenced Antetokounmpo’s decision to sign the extension (which, to be fair, we don’t actually know for certain), the Griffin hire was objectively a successful move!

But let’s move on from that and briefly discuss the Doc Rivers hire in more detail. There were a few options on the table. Nick Nurse had taken the head job in Philly, so he was out, but Kenny Atkinson was still available. Kevin O’Connor’s reporting states that Horst wanted Atkinson but was overruled by the ownership group, who wanted Doc Rivers. So once again, the lack of synergy reared its ugly head. The front office wanted one guy, whom they had already vetted extensively, but were overruled by the ownership group.

Which leads us to where we’re at now. The Rivers hire has gone about as expected. Had Giannis signed the extension under Nurse or Atkinson, the franchise at large would likely be in a much better position right now. However, the reality is that we don’t know if he would have signed under another coach, as crazy as that sounds in hindsight, making Horst’s decision to hire Griffin easily defensible. Who to blame for the Doc hire, though, seems pretty unambiguous. Giannis was not a factor, and Horst had a strong candidate ready to go; unfortunately, ownership decided they wanted to run point on that one, completely bungling it.

Playing with fire: Questions around the injury management of Giannis

I can apply this framework to the situation that has played out with Giannis’ continued calf injuries. In his recent interview with the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Antetokounmpo admitted he returned too early from his initial calf injury this season, which we can only assume led to his reinjury about a month ago (at least in part). My question is: knowing what we know about calf injuries, how was there any world in which he returned in anything other than tip-top condition the first time around?

Look, I’ll guess that the 65-game rule for award eligibility had something to do with it from Giannis’ end. Not that it matters, but my personal response to that is blunt: I don’t care. He needs to know that his health is more important than some award (p.s., this is why the 65-game rule is stupid, but I digress). But then there’s the more pressing questions surrounding the game in which he reinjured that calf, the main one being: why was he allowed to continue playing when it was clear he wasn’t right? The broadcast kept pointing it out; those watching could see it. Heck, Doc even admitted it himself!

“I thought he was favoring it for most of the second half. I asked our [medical staff] five different times. I didn’t like what my eyes were seeing, personally. Giannis was defiant about staying in. On that one play, seeing him try to run down the floor, to me, I’d had enough. I didn’t ask, I just took him out.“

And yet and still, Rivers didn’t take him out until right at the end when he couldn’t move? Oh, how noble of him. Doc referred to notifying the medical staff “five different times,” and they also didn’t demand he come out? Huh? Going back through some of Antetokounmpo’s postgame quotes from that night made me incredibly frustrated.

“I don’t like to quit. I couldn’t explode, jog, get on my toes, so I was jogging on my heels. I didn’t have the same explosiveness, but I still felt like I could help. But then at the end, when it popped, I had to get out.”

“I was feeling it [for] a majority of the game, but I did not want to stop playing. But at the end, I could not move, so I had to stop.”

It is baffling to me that he wasn’t taken out the second he felt discomfort (in a random game in a lost season, no less). The man fully admitted he wasn’t feeling right for a majority of the game, was changing his running biomechanics because of it, and people did nothing because they presumably didn’t want to be the “bad guy” and save him from himself. That is crazy to me. What makes Antetokounmpo so great is that he’ll do anything to win, including playing through pain—it’s the Bucks’ duty of care to stand in his way. And judging from these quotes, how could there be any other conclusion than that they failed in that duty of care?

Sliding doors moment: Was Milwaukee about to select Kyshawn George before Jon Horst stepped in?

Something in the media surfaced recently that made me question how the Bucks’ drafting process works and whether that department is another lacking trust and synergy. And I want to be clear upfront that I am putting on my tinfoil hat and 100% speculating here, which I don’t love to do, but honestly, I just had to put this in writing. My question is: how trusted are the scouts, who work exclusively on the draft, to make selections on draft night?

What prompted this thought for me? Well, I listen to the Old Man And The Three podcast. Recently, they recorded an episode with some of the Washington Wizards’ young core: Kyshawn George, Alex Sarr, and Bilal Coulibaly. On the podcast, each player discussed their pre-draft process and the teams they worked out with and/or had interest from. George (14:45–15:03) singled out just one team, Milwaukee, as the franchise he believed was likely to select him:

“To be honest, I had a couple teams that I had really, really, really good feedback [with], and it was kind of my floor, and they didn’t pick me”

“Which team?”

“The team was Milwaukee, actually. I had an individual workout with them; that went pretty well. Had pretty good feedback from them. And then after [they didn’t pick me], I was like, ‘oh, I guess we’re going to have to see.’”

Whether you, like many online, read that as a “promise” from the Bucks or not, it’s clear that, at minimum, there was significant interest. Of course, Milwaukee would select AJ Johnson instead, and Washington would snap up Kyshawn George with the very next pick. Now, hearing that reminded me that the Bucks themselves made an all-access video of their 2024 draft. I rewatched this video out of curiosity and found quite an interesting nugget (2:08–2:17) relating to their picking Johnson, and that was the wording Jon Horst used to announce it:

“With what we see on the board, we’re going to go for a big swing here. We’re going to change the board a little bit. We’re going to take AJ Johnson.”

Again, I have no way of confirming this, but it seems relatively clear that Horst made an executive decision to override the draft board and, by his own admission, “swing.” Recall that AJ Johnson was not seen as a first-round pick by the NBA at large, evidenced by his not receiving a green room invite (unlike Kyshawn George). Would he really have been rated as a first-round guy by the Bucks? Regardless, the pick missed by a country mile and, in hindsight, the Bucks were lucky to get off AJ when he still had “intrigue.”

Granted, teams miss in the 20s all the time, but this one hurt a little extra because we know from George’s own admission that he was nearly a Buck. Ironically, this situation is eerily similar to the 2022 draft, when, per the Zach Lowe Show (51:05–52:05), the Bucks worked out Andrew Nembhard twice and also loved him, only to use their pick on MarJon Beauchamp. To put it bluntly, Milwaukee identified two studs late in the first round who’d each go ~20 spots higher in a redraft, were reportedly at the 10-yard line with both, only to pass on them for two busts who’d go ~20 spots lower in a redraft. Sliding doors, man. Sliding doors.

And sure, this isn’t really the same as the other separation-of-powers arguments I’ve made, as Jon Horst does play a key role in scouting and drafting; these aren’t “separate arms” getting in each other’s way. It also could very well be a one-off situation. But it’s fair to say that scouts, unlike Horst, are singularly focused on the draft year-round, and thus their opinions should hold a lot of weight in this specific area. If Horst indeed overrode the draft board to take a consensus second-round prospect at 23, he’d better have been confident that the prospect would turn out good (or even average!), which they did not. Not even close.


Well, there you have it. I think it’s more than fair to say a lack of synergy and trust from top to bottom in the Bucks organisation has played a key role in their demise. It’s clear that as the franchise approaches another major inflection point in the offseason, that can no longer continue. At the same time, it’s not all bad. The Bucks have made a bunch of shrewd moves around the edges that help to make up for these mistakes. Unearthing Ryan Rollins and AJ Green has, in many ways, saved them. Ousmane Dieng’s first few games have been beyond exciting. Kevin Porter Jr. and Cam Thomas are both flawed but awfully talented. There’s a lot to be excited about, but no franchise runs well when different factions are on different wavelengths.

Source: Sixers bringing back Cameron Payne from overseas

Partizan player Cameron Payne plays during the EuroLeague game against Panathinaikos in Belgrade, Serbia, on February 5, 2026. (Photo by Maxim Konankov/NurPhoto via Getty Images) | NurPhoto via Getty Images

Guard reinforcements are on the way for the Sixers.

The team is bringing back Cameron Payne for the rest of the season, a source confirms to Liberty Ballers. TeleSport was the first to report the signing. Payne had been playing in Serbia for Partizan Belgrade, reportedly agreeing to a buyout to return to the NBA.

After the dust settles from all the post-trade deadline roster moves, the Sixers will have two standard roster spots open — both currently occupied by players on 10-day deals in Charles Bassey and Patrick Baldwin. It appears Payne will slide into one of those spots. There’s no clear indication if the other spot will be used to convert two-way player Jabari Walker to a standard deal or further explore the buyout market.

Payne came to the Sixers at the 2024 trade deadline (along with a second-round pick) in the deal that sent Patrick Beverley to the Milwaukee Bucks. In hindsight, that move was an absolute steal as Payne provided much-needed offensive juice while Beverley saw an unceremonious end to this NBA career.

The 31-year-old Payne spent last season with the New York Knicks. This past offseason, the Knicks sought to upgrade that role with veteran Jordan Clarkson and former Sixer Landry Shamet. Payne was in camp with the Indiana Pacers ahead of the 2025-26 season, but was waived and then took his talents overseas.

The Sixers traded Jared McCain to the Oklahoma City Thunder for draft capital and also moved veteran Eric Gordon to the Memphis Grizzlies in a salary dump. The team went from a glut of guards to lacking depth as we saw last week when Quentin Grimes missed a pair of games because of illness.

Payne won’t solve all the Sixers’ problems, but he’ll add shooting and can competently run an NBA offense. He’s likely a better guard option than most of the players who were recently bought out. With Tyrese Maxey leading the NBA in minutes and VJ Edgecombe leading rookies in minutes, the team needed a better option than soon-to-be 40-year-old Kyle Lowry. They appear to have one in Payne.

The many Dodgers contracts of Max Muncy

GLENDALE, ARIZONA - FEBRUARY 13: Max Muncy #13 of the Los Angeles Dodgers participates in a fielding drill during spring training workouts at Camelback Ranch on February 13, 2026 in Glendale, Arizona. (Photo by Brandon Sloter/Getty Images) | Getty Images

Since getting called up to the Dodgers in April 2018, Max Muncy has been a fixture in the Dodgers infield at three different positions, and has yet to reach free agency. The contract he signed Thursday — his fourth extension — keeps Muncy under contract through 2027 with another club option for 2028.

Muncy has expressed multiple times in recent years of his desire to stay in Los Angeles, and did so again on Saturday at Dodgers camp at Camelback Ranch.

From Jack Harris at The California Post:

“I know I’m leaving some money on the table,” Muncy said Saturday. “But I want to be here. I want to end my career here. I know who I am as a person, and I wouldn’t be happy trying to chase money somewhere else. I’ve never been comfortable trying to do that. And I wouldn’t be comfortable now.”

Also revealed on Saturday were some further details of Muncy’s latest contract, which added $10 million guaranteed for 2027 to his existing 2026 deal. Fabian Ardaya at The Athletic shared some of Muncy’s contract incentives, as did Robert Murray of FanSided, the latter shown here:

The 2026 incentives were included in the option that was picked up from the previous contract. It includes $15K in performance bonuses with each plate appearance from 401 to 550, with a maximum of $2.25 million.

From the extension: 2027 salary escalator based on 2026 plate appearances. $20K for each plate appearance from 401-500 and $35K for each plate appearance from 501-550, with a maximum of $3.75 million. The 2028 performance bonuses (if the option is exercised) includes $20K for each plate appearance from 401-500 and $35K for each plate appearance from 501-550, with a maximum of $3.75 million.

Let’s run through the history of Muncy’s contracts with the Dodgers, beginning when he was first eligible for salary arbitration after the 2019 season.

February 2020: three years, $26 million, plus club option

Covered all three arbitration seasons (2020-22), after Muncy and the Dodgers exchanged salaries for his first time through arbitration. Muncy was at $4.675 million and the Dodgers were at $4 million, with a midpoint of $4.3375 million. Muncy got a $4.5 million signing bonus and a $1 million salary in 2020, $7.5 million in 2021, and $11.5 million in 2022, with a $13 million club option and a $1.5 million buyout for 2023.

Muncy’s club option had salary escalators based on his placement in MVP voting, and his 10th-place finish in 2021 added $500,000 to his 2023 club option base salary.

August 2022: one year, $13.5 million, plus club option

The base salary for 2023 matched Muncy’s club option salary, with another club option for 2024 at $10 million and no buyout. The 2024 option salary had escalators based on 2023 playing time, and Muncy earned all $4 million with his 579 plate appearances, putting his club option at $14 million

November 2023: two years, $24 million, plus club option

This contract was signed on the first day of the offseason and four days before the club option decision was due. Instead of $14 million for one year, the Dodgers signed him for $12 million per year over two years, plus a 2026 club option. This time around, the Dodgers exercised Muncy’s option on November 6 without an extension. Yet.

February 2026: one year, $10 million, plus club option

Already signed for 2026, Muncy’s extension pays him $7 million for 2027, plus a club option worth $10 million for 2028 with a $3 million buyout.

The Dodgers have paid Muncy $37.5 million over the last three years, what would have been free agent seasons had he hit the open market. That’s a relatively modest sum for someone who has been an integral part of the Dodgers lineup who has been productive even while missing time with injuries the last two seasons.

Muncy in 2024 missed four months with a right oblique strain, and played only 73 games during the regular season. Last year he missed a month with a left knee bone bruise, then another three and a half weeks with an oblique strain, finishing the year with 100 games played and 388 plate appearances.

Muncy can earn up to $2.25 million in bonuses for 2026 and add to his 2027 option base salary based on playing time, but those bonuses don’t start until 401 plate appearances, something he hasn’t reached since 2023. He can max out those bonuses with 550 plate appearances, something he’s done four times in his career — 2019, plus 2021-23.

How to prepare for baseball before baseball season starts

It’s Friday morning as I write this, and for some reason, the boys are home, the first day of a four-day weekend. Such as it is, we had a movie night last night, and it was my turn* to pick out the film. As I’m impatiently awaiting the start of baseball, in any shape or form, I chose A League of Their Own, one of the best** baseball movies.

*We choose movies in order of birth, and my wife is the oldest of the group. She picked last time and chose The Mighty Ducks, which I hadn’t watched in years. It wasn’t bad! Except the part about Gordon Bombay landing a DWI in the first few scenes, and the opening scene where the coach belittles young Gordon for hitting the post. Stupid Gordon!

**My two favorite baseball movies are A League of Their Own and Major League. I also enjoy Field of Dreams and The Sandlot, but I have a hard time picking out a fifth favorite baseball movie. Probably the Albert Brooks and Brendan Fraser vehicle, The Scout, where Fraser’s character, at the end, strikes out the fearsome slugger…Ozzie Smith???

Watching a baseball movie is just one of the ways I’m gearing up for the baseball season, in particular, watching the Royals. I’m sure I’ll watch plenty of the World Baseball Classic, which begins in early March.

While the WBC isn’t that far away, it feels like it is. Closer is the start of college baseball. My beloved, woeful Missouri Tigers, who finished last season 16-39 (3-27 in conference play), begin their season the night I’m writing this piece as they take on Mount St. Mary’s in a neutral-site game down in Florida.

A couple of weeks ago, my wife and I took our sons to their first-ever Mizzou basketball game. During one of the first-half timeouts, the baseball team came out to throw t-shirts to the crowd. The next time out, head baseball coach Kerrick Jackson took the court to address the crowd. No one booed Jackson, but no one cheered him, either. I could tell that not a lot of the fans cared that much, or knew that much, about the baseball team.

Lady Behind Me: Is the baseball team any good?

Man Behind Me: [laughs]

Still, baseball is baseball. If you love it, you love it in all its shapes and sizes, from the SEC to the minors to the Majors to a film about the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League (AAPBL, thank you very much).

My sons really enjoyed A League of Their Own. The littler one asked if we could watch it again as soon as the credits rolled. My wife didn’t recognize Madonna. The older son and I engaged in a conversation that has surrounded the movie since it was released in 1992 – did Kit Hinson knock the ball out of Dottie’s hand, or did Dottie purposefully let it go?

It also warmed my heart when Tom Hanks first entered the picture—over thirty minutes in!—and the boys recognized him from the only other movie in which they’ve seen him (excluding the Toy Story movies, of course): The ‘Burbs.

The on-field action in League, if you will, is pretty good. Sure, there’s a scene or two where the batter clearly hits the ball to the right side of the field, and Rosie O’Donnell’s Doris, playing third, makes a play to her right. Whatever. The play has me gearing up to go.

With the Royals, there’s also the draft to consider. They moved up in the lottery and landed the #6 pick in the draft, which should enable them to land a premium player. Because of that draft position, I’m keeping an eye on the college baseball season as a whole (not just Mizzou, which is probably good for my sanity) as well as how certain prep players perform this spring.

Reading Baseball America is great for that coverage, and The Athletic seems to be upping its coverage of the college game, too. I’m sure there are other, possibly better (i.e., cheaper) sites for this sort of coverage, but these are the two on which I’m leaning.

Then we have the Royals’ own farm system, which is getting stronger. Keith Law at The Athletic is great for prospect coverage, as is Baseball America, but MLB Pipeline, which is the only free site of the group, also provides strong work. All of them are helpful for keeping an eye on Royals prospects climbing the ladder toward the Majors or determining who the front office might dangle* in a trade to upgrade the 40-man.

*I’ll have another column on this soon.

Lastly, I’m reading a bunch of baseball books, to which I’ll be devoting an entire column in the coming days. It seems that there are more books about baseball than any other sport, even football. When I’m roaming the stacks at the local library, it’s clear that baseball—at least, the history of baseball—is thriving.

All of this is to say, I can’t wait to watch some baseball. Starting with Mizzou tonight, I should be watching or listening to baseball games from now until the end of October. I’ll be at Opening Day at the K for the first time in my life. I have finally convinced my youngest join a baseball team, too.

There’s nothing better.

Happy Valentine’s Day, everyone: baseball has returned.

Yankees 2026 Season Preview: Camilo Doval

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - OCTOBER 08: (NEW YORK DAILIES OUT) Camilo Doval #75 of the New York Yankees in action against the Toronto Blue Jays in game four of the American League Division Series at Yankee Stadium on October 08, 2025 in New York City. The Blue Jays defeated the Yankees 5-2. (Photo by Jim McIsaac/Getty Images) | Getty Images

As the Yankees approached last season’s Trade Deadline, they’d squandered an early division lead and sat in need of reinforcements. The most logical area of the roster to augment was the bullpen. Devin Williams, acquired in a preseason blockbuster to serve as the team’s closer, had been a massive disappointment, closing out July with an ERA above 5.00, and few other Yankees relievers fared much better. GM Brian Cashman acted with heartening urgency, adding not one, not two, but three relievers to the mix. Alongside David Bednar and Jake Bird, he swung a trade with the Giants to acquire their off-and-on-again closer, Camilo Doval.

2025 Stats (with Giants and Yankees): 65.1 IP, 3.58 ERA, 3.47 FIP, 1.32 WHIP, 9.9 K/9, 4.8 BB/9, 0.6 HR/9, 0.6 fWAR

2026 ZiPS Projections: 64.3 IP, 3.64 ERA, 3.45 FIP, 1.26 WHIP, 10.5 K/9, 4.3 BB/9, 0.7 HR/9, 0.7 fWAR

Doval burst on the scene in 2021, posting an exemplary 37:9 strikeout-to-walk ratio in 27 innings for a surprising 107-win Giants club that dethroned the Dodgers as NL West champs for the only time since 2012. They fell back as a team the next year, but Doval secured San Francisco’s closer job, establishing himself as a ninth-inning stalwart before leading the NL with 39 saves in 2023. The Dominican Republic native appeared poised for a steady run as one of the game’s premier relief arms.

But, as has been proven time and again, the reliever is baseball’s most fickle creature. Doval regressed dramatically in 2024, recording a 4.88 ERA that called into question his long-term viability. While he fared better in the first half of 2025, his inconsistency—as well as the middling Giants’ inability to get back to October in an uber-competitive NL West—made him expendable at the deadline.

Doval’s Yankees debut came in a game that could not have been scripted better to shatter the hearts of the team’s fans everywhere. Riding high on the strength of their deadline additions, New York watched Bird allow four runs and Bednar allow another two to blow a comfortable lead against the lowly Marlins. New York’s third shiny new object, Doval, entered in the ninth with a two-run lead, promptly allowing three baserunners before, aided by an error from fellow newcomer José Caballero, Miami walked the game off on a dribbler.

Receiving an opportunity to enter the setup mix in a wide-open Yankees bullpen, Doval continued to flounder in his new uniform. Through his first 16 appearances with New York, the right-hander posted a 6.59 ERA. By the end of that run, he’d fallen largely into mop-up duty while an unfazed Bednar seized the closer spot and Williams settled in as setup man.

In this lower-leverage role, Doval started to turn things around. In late September, he allowed just one hit in six scoreless outings to end the season. Crucially, for a pitcher whose struggles with control had led him to give free passes in half of those first 16 appearances, Doval allowed walks in just one of those final six. He wasn’t used in the Wild Card Series but pitched reasonably well in three ALDS appearances. This included Game 2 in Toronto, where Doval entered with the Yankees down 2-0 in the fifth and tossed two perfect innings, making him one of a precious few hurlers able to keep the relentless Jays lineup at bay.

With Williams and Luke Weaver both departing in free agency, Doval would appear in line to get a crack at the setup job once again behind Bednar unless the Yankees add another top-end arm. The pressure is on, as Brian Cashman has on multiple occasions pointed to his Trade Deadline additions as a primary reason why the team didn’t add much to the bullpen this past offseason. The front office is optimistic about what they’ll get from a full season of Doval.

The big question is whether his inconsistency the past two seasons is an aberration or his early dominance has faded. ZiPS expects the latter, projecting a remarkably similar line to Doval’s last season, a performance that would land him more in the middle reliever category. Many of Doval’s peripherals remained strong last year — including a 53.6-percent ground-ball rate — but his 12.6 percent walk rate held him back from being reliably effective.

Entering 2026, expect control to be a focal point of Doval’s scouting report. If the former All-Star can keep traffic off the bases, Doval still has the stuff to be a back-end option. If not, the 28-year-old could once again cede his role and find himself in mop-up duty — and possible non-tender territory.


See more of the Yankees Previews series here.

Julian Fernández Could Be A Sneaky Bullpen Weapon For the Washington Nationals

If this article is your first time hearing of Julian Fernández, I can’t blame you. The 30-year-old right-handed reliever was acquired in August off waivers from the Dodgers, and in 12.2 innings pitched with the Rochester Red Wings, he posted a 7.82 ERA and 5.47 FIP. He made his Nationals debut at the end of September in 2025, posting a 3.00 ERA and 5.80 FIP in 3 outings.

On the surface, Fernández’s Triple-A and major league numbers don’t suggest he is due for a major breakout in 2026. And yet, Fangraphs projects Fernández not only to be better in 2026, but to be one of the better rookie relievers in all of baseball, with Steamer projecting him to post a 3.72 ERA and 16 K-BB% in 59 innings.

Some other projection metrics, such as ZiPS and THE BAT, aren’t quite as high on Fernández, projecting him for an ERA in the low 4s, but the sentiment remains: Julian Fernández will be better in 2026 than his past performance dictates.

So what exactly does Fernández do so well that has the projection systems so high on him? It starts with the swing and miss stuff, as he struck out over 11 batters per 9 innings in 54 innings at Triple A in 2025. Fernández has a very intriguing pitch arsenal, throwing only 2 pitches: a fastball about 60% of the time and a changeup about 40% of the time.

The fastball is loud, sitting 97 MPH with the pitch in 2025, but gets hit around quite a bit, with a 46% hard hit rate in Triple A. The changeup, on the other hand, is lethal, with a 43% whiff rate and .162 opponents’ expected batting average on the pitch in Triple A.

Fernández also does an excellent job of limiting free passes, with a 77th percentile walk rate in Triple-A in 2025. Not many pitchers are able to combine strikeout stuff with strike-throwing ability like Fernández, and that’s why he ranked 10th in K-BB% among all Triple-A pitchers with at least 50 innings pitched.

The key culprit to Fernández’s struggles in 2025 was his unbelievably high home run numbers. In his 54 Triple-A innings in 2025, Fernández had a home run to fly ball ratio of 14.5%, including an unreal 30.8% HR/FB ratio as a National.

For reference, the average HR/FB is generally around 10.5% league wide, far below where Fernández was last season. While some of that was his tendency to give up loud contact, with a 23rd percentile barrel rate in 2025, he’s bound to see some positive regression in the home run department in 2026, which will lead to better results overall.

If I were Simon Mathews, the Nationals’ new pitching coach for 2026, my main focus for developing Julian Fernández into a plus big league reliever would be to start throwing his nasty changeup much more often, as well as looking to add a third pitch to his arsenal to keep hitters guessing.

He’s shown that he can miss bats with his stuff at Triple-A, and the addition of a new pitch, such as a sinker (which he did tinker with at the end of 2025, throwing it just 0.3% of the time overall) to help induce more groundballs could help him take him from an “if” to a sure thing in a currently shaky Nationals bullpen.

Red Sox catcher Carlos Narváez wants to be here “forever.” What would an extension look like?

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - OCTOBER 02: Carlos Narváez #75 of the Boston Red Sox walks across the field prior to game three of the American League Wild Card Series against the New York Yankees at Yankee Stadium on October 02, 2025 in the Bronx borough of New York City. (Photo by Al Bello/Getty Images) | Getty Images

During this past week’s run of press comments from members of the Red Sox organization at Fenway South (including Sam Kennedy, I’m sure you know what I’m talking about), catcher Carlos Narváez got some glowing reviews.

Manager Alex Cora noted that Narv/Narvi/The Narv did a great job exceeding expectations in 2025, per Gabrielle Starr the Boston Herald, while being “banged up” the entire time. Red Sox Hall of Famer and current team staff member Jason Varitek commended him for his preparation and mindset in the clubhouse. Cora himself ordained him as the team’s starting backstop, a call that was all but official leading up to Spring Training.

These are all good things for a guy who was basically an afterthought when he was traded from the Yankees to Boston in December 2024. After all, he was acquired by the Sox on the same day that ace Garrett Crochet was. A little over a year later and Narváez is starting his 2026 season in the good graces of those around JetBlue Park.

That Herald article did have one other point that I feel warrants further discussion, though: the idea of a contract extension for the 27-year-old Narváez.

“The only thing I may say is I would love to be a Red Sox forever. I would like to retire with this team. We haven’t talked about it, hopefully that will come in the future.

That’s something that I’m not paying attention to right now. Of course, I would love it, but we’ve got different goals this year, and I think this year is going to be very important for us, for everybody.

We got our goal set. Like, individual things, personal things that will come in the future, and of course I’m more than happy and welcome if that happens, but as of now, our goal is to get a World Series ring this year.”

Perhaps that extension topic won’t rear its head for a few more seasons. Carlos has only played in 124 major league games (118 of which came in 2025), he’s coming off a cleanup knee surgery this winter (one that he reportedly, according to MassLive put off until the conclusion of the previous season), and he’s still under pre-arbitration control.

But maybe now’s the time to at least start thinking about it, even if it’s just a fun thought exercise. Hell, I’ve got nothing better to do on this holiday.

From a 30,000 foot view, Narváez was rated as the 12th-most valuable catcher in 2025 according to fWAR (2.7) out of backstops who had at least 400 plate appearances. Much of that value at the position league-wide was driven by offensive output, though, and Narv’s bang-on average OPS+ of 100 was never going to set himself apart in that department. We’ve seen some encouraging signs of power at times from Carlos from the right-hand side of the dish (something we very well might need to improve heading into the new year), but there can be some big time holes in his swing as demonstrated by his 27.7% whiff rate and 24.9% strikeout rate (both below the 30th percentile mark last season, according to Savant).

However, his Def rating on FanGraphs (which is just the combined total of his fielding runs above average and positional adjustment) of 14.2 put him as the sixth-most valuable defensive catcher in the sport. Savant’s metrics confirm those defensive skills, as his fielding run value of 12 was good for the 96th percentile across MLB in 2025. Blocks, arm talent to catch runners stealing, framing (which may not be as valuable of a skill going forward due to the introduction of the ABS challenge system, but something that will still be useful in some fashion nevertheless), pop time, you name it: Narv was in elite company.

WAR may not be able to always tell the full story of a player, but it at least gives us a good benchmark. For perspective, catchers that Narváez was within one fWAR of last season—one way or the other—include Milwaukee’s William Contreras (3.6), the Giants’ defensive wiz Patrick Bailey (3.4), rookie of the year Drake Baldwin of Atlanta (3.2), Austin Wells of the Yankees (3.0), the Cubs’ Carson Kelly (2.6), Philly’s J.T. Realmuto (2.1), and Ryan Jeffers of Minnesota (2.1).

With that in mind, we can pop over to Spotrac’s catcher contract breakdown. Three of those names I just mentioned—Contreras, Jeffers, Kelly—have average annual values between $9.4 million and $5.75 million. A fairly comparable player within Boston’s division is Alejandro Kirk of Toronto, who inked a five-year extension with the Blue Jays last year worth $58 million ($11.8 million AAV) through 2030. Kirk is excellent defender behind the plate with a career OPS just south of .750 and a career OPS+ of 108. Maybe he doesn’t get there on offense the same way Carlos would—Kirk’s 15 home runs last year was a career high after only eclipsing double-digit dongs one other time beforehand, while Narváez had 15 homers in his first full MLB season—but the similarities are there.

So if:

  1. Narváez is the equivalent of “We have Alejandro Kirk at home,”
  2. He’s still in his 20’s with pre-arbitration years still in play, and
  3. Catchers of similar caliber are making somewhere around the mid-to-high seven-figure range each season…

…what sort of deal might make sense for him?

Something around the lines of five years, $45 million feels about fair to me in a vacuum right now. Red Sox Payroll on Twitter—an excellent resource, by the way—said a deal starting in 2027 worth $50 million over six years with a club option, based on pre-arb extensions for catchers elsewhere, could be worth consideration. I think that’s a fair estimation too; tack on an extra year to lower the AAV, that’s sensible.

However, would either of those bids even make sense to offer at this point in time? The Red Sox front office certainly has to be considering the knee issue last season, right? Would an AAV of $8-9 million be worth eating into the arbitration years of a catcher? Do you let Narv play out 2026 and then come back to the table to negotiate a long-term deal? He’ll be closer to 30 years of age than 25 by the conclusion of this season; do you just let the arbitration years play out if he doesn’t take a step forward? If he does take a step forward on offense, are you gonna have to shell out even more money—Alejandro Kirk money, or even more given the nature of how the AAV line is always going to climb for talent—at this point next year if you want to keep him in the picture going forward?

Competitive balance taxes should never deter a franchise of this stature from making the moves they’ve got to make to stay competitive, and the contracts of Masataka Yoshida and Trevor Story will (probably) be coming off of the books over the next few years, but that’s another factor to consider when having this discussion.

At the end of the day, I guess I don’t expect an extension to be provided to Narváez in the near future. For clarity, let’s just call it the 2026 season; I don’t expect a long-term deal prior to the end of the World Series this upcoming fall. But Mr. Breslow does move in silence, so who am I to say for sure?

For now, I hope Narv is able to keep up that defensive presence while improving on offense. If he can do that, I’d be more than happy to entertain an eight-figure AAV extension for him—because that would mean he’d be a massive part of Boston’s success in 2026.

Mets 2026 Season Preview: Grae Kessinger looks to overcome a lost 2025

Apr 12, 2024; Houston, Texas, USA; Houston Astros third baseman Grae Kessinger (16) throws out a runner during the first inning against the Texas Rangers at Minute Maid Park. Mandatory Credit: Troy Taormina-Imagn Images

It is interesting, and potentially advantageous, that the Mets signed so many middle infielders during the offseason. As we all cross our fingers for a speedy recovery from hamate surgery for Francisco Lindor, we’ve been highlighting some of the potential players who may take some at-bats during spring training and (hopefully not) during the early days of the regular season.

Today’s spotlighted middle infielder is Grae Kessinger. A third-generation major leaguer, Kessinger was drafted in the second round by Houston in 2019. Much like Christian Arroyo, Kessinger was a top prospect who showed promise at times in the minor leagues, but he never had a slam dunk season on the farm, but his 2023 was solid, hitting .283 .397 .429 across AA and AAA. Later that season, he got his first shot in the big leagues. In 26 games for the Astros, he hit .200/.289/.325 with one home run while playing all four infield positions.

2024 saw Kessinger mostly playing in Triple-A, but he made 23 appearances for the Astros, but didn’t collect a single hit in 25 plate appearances. After the season, the Astros traded Kessinger to the Diamondbacks for minor league pitcher Matthew Linskey. However, after just 11 games for Triple-A Reno, Kessinger was designated for assignment.

While minor league releases happen all the time, it’s odd to see a relatively young (27) year old who made the majors in the prior season be released after less than a dozen games. Not that these are Babe Ruth numbers, but Kessinger collected 8 hits in 11 games, only to be released. MLB Trade Rumors was similarly surprised by the move:

It’s a bit surprising to see Kessinger released, as most DFA’d players are either traded or placed on outright waivers. An injured player can’t be placed on outright waivers, so a release is sometimes an indication that a player is hurt, though there’s been no reporting to suggest that’s the case with Kessinger. Another possibility is that he has been released to pursue an opportunity overseas, though that’s entirely speculative.

He was not signed by another club all season, either stateside or elsewhere. No official statement was ever released by either the club or Kessinger to explain his departure and lack of signing elsewhere.

Of all the potential middle infielders we’ve discussed so far, Kessinger’s story is the least conventional. While the money and minor league roster spot aren’t exactly a big deal to Steve Cohen’s budget, it’s rare to see a player who wasn’t playing organized ball of any kind for 90% of the season last year get signed at all.

But the same ‘former top prospect’ caveats that applied to Arroyo apply to Kessinger. He’s a versatile player with options remaining who isn’t terribly far removed from some moderate minor league success. As long as whatever led to his mysterious release in 2025 doesn’t pop up again, Kessinger seems likely to play a lot in Syracuse this season, maybe popping up to the majors for a cup of coffee.

Elephant Rumblings: Holman Claimed By Diamondbacks

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 8: Grant Holman #67 of the Athletics pitching in the top of the eighth inning against the Baltimore Orioles at Sutter Health Park on June 8, 2025 in Sacramento, California. (Photo by Justine Willard/Athletics/Getty Images) | Getty Images

Morning everyone and happy President’s Day!

Yesterday afternoon we got word that right-handed reliever Grant Holman was claimed off waivers by the Arizona Diamondbacks, ending his time in the A’s system and thinning out the bullpen:

That’s lame. The A’s were clearly trying to sneak him though waivers and hoping he would go unclaimed. That would have opened up a spot on the 40-man roster but instead the A’s trickery comes back to bite them in the butt.

Holman was one of the more intriguing relief prospects that the A’s had developed in recent years. The 25-year-old, a former 6th-round pick in 2021, began his pro career as a starter but shifted to a relief role after struggling in his first couple years in the system.

That change in role did wonders for Holman. After a year adjusting to his new role Holman had a lockdown 2024 season split between Double and Triple-A, allowing just 3 earned runs in 40 appearances. That earned him his first call up to the big league squad and though he wasn’t as unhittable as he was in the minors he still showed plenty of potential in his brief call up.

Holman entered 2025 with raised expectations but fell flat this past season. He struggled when he was on the mound before eventually getting demoted back to Triple-A. There things continued to go south as he suffered rotator cuff tendinitis that more or less ended his season before he could ever fix things on the field.

Though he was coming off a down season it wasn’t long ago he was a hot relief prospect coming up through the system. The homegrown arm was likely looking at beginning the year in Triple-A but would have surely been an option at some point this season. That won’t be the case as he’ll instead be an option for the Diamondbacks down in Arizona. It’s not a crippling loss but it won’t feel good if we see him take off with his new team while the A’s continue to face bullpen struggles. Relievers are super unpredictable so we’ll have to see if this was a smart move to move on from Holman, but my gut says that we’ll regret letting him go before giving him a real extended chance.

Have a great week guys!

A’s Coverage:

MLB News and Interest:

Best of X:

Pretty close to just about right but I’d still take Soddy over a couple guys higher than him:

Thoughts on that projected Opening Day lineup?

Recent roster moves, ICYMI:

Former fan favorite is joining division-rival Rangers:

Colorado Rockies prospects: No. 9, Zac Veen

Apr 20, 2025; Denver, Colorado, USA; Colorado Rockies right fielder Zac Veen (13) rounds the bases on a solo home run in the third inning against the Washington Nationals at Coors Field. Mandatory Credit: Isaiah J. Downing-Imagn Images | Isaiah J. Downing-Imagn Images

9. Zac Veen (388 points, 19 ballots)

A star ceiling was promised when Veen was made the ninth-overall pick in the 2020 draft and signed for a slightly above-slot value $5 million — but there are some ifs to be overcome. If the 24-year-old lefty-swinging, righty-throwing outfielder can stay healthy; if he can manage the swing-and-miss in his profile; if he can translate more of his raw power into game power; and if Veen can remain sober and clear-minded through it all… Then Veen could be a star at the big-league level.

Mid-season 2025 Rank: 7

High Ballot: 4

Mode Ballot: 9, 11

Future Value: 40+, platoon outfielder

Contract Status: 2020 First Round, Spruce Creek (FL) HS, 40 Man Roster, two options remaining

MLB ETA: Now

After three years in an injury-affected purgatory (primarily a left wrist issue, but also back and thumb injuries last year) at Double-A Hartford, Veen finally ascended to Triple-A Albuquerque in late 2024. Veen played in 21 games for Albuquerque down the stretch, hitting a slugging-heavy .220/.281/.476 with six homers and three doubles in 92 plate appearances.

That was good enough for Veen to be considered a strong candidate for the Opening Day roster in 2025. While that didn’t quite happen (despite a strong spring training), Veen was up with the Rockies on April 8th after a 5-for-5 game with Albuquerque that included a homer and two doubles. With the Rockies, Veen played consistently in a two week stint but just didn’t hit very well. In 37 plate appearances across 12 games with the Rockies, Veen had only four hits, though one of them was a homer, en route to a .118/.189/.235 line (4 wRC+, -0.3 rWAR) — a humbling experience in his first taste of the big leagues.

Veen returned to Albuquerque in late April for a month, until in late May it was revealed that Veen had been nursing a spring training ankle injury that had hampered his performance (he had hit for just a .481 OPS in May). That led to a three week absence and a stint on the ACL team to rehab the injury and refine his hitting mechanics to improve his ability to hit high fastballs. Upon his return from that assignment, Veen promptly had a 14-game hitting streak that included eight multi-hit and two four-hit games.

In total for 2025, including the ankle-impacted beginning of the season, Veen recovered to hit .289/.354/.468 with 11 homers, five triples, and 23 doubles with 15 steals for Albuquerque in 412 plate appearances — a slightly below average 94 wRC+. He cut his strikeouts five points to 20% of plate appearances while walking 9% of the time. For as long as he’s been in our prospect consciousness, it’s also important to remember that Veen only faced a younger pitcher than him in 8% of plate appearances (and a chunk of those were during his ACL rehab stint). On defense, Veen played all three outfield positions, with the plurality of playing time coming in left field. He made four errors and had three outfield assists in 80 Triple-A games.

In a recent article by Thomas Harding of MLB.com, Veen explained that his last few years had been affected by substance abuse issues and that he has recommitted himself to the game, packing on 40 pounds vs. last year. We’ll see how that new body serves Veen this spring against fastball velocity as he fights for an Opening Day roster spot.

Here are some of Veen’s 2024 highlights, which show off all-fields power:

Veen was slotted 16th in the system by Keith Law of the Athletic earlier this month:

Veen was Colorado’s first pick in the 2020 draft and was the last player I saw live before everything shut down. In that game, he hit a massive home run, aligning with reports I’d heard for months before about his plus power, but that has not been a part of his game at all in pro ball. He hit 15 homers in Low A in 2021, and that remains his career high. He’s the king of medium-quality contact, and that might work if he were a more disciplined player in the box or on the bases. He chases way too many pitches — nobody in Albuquerque should be swinging at 33 percent of pitches out of the zone — and he tends to swing too uphill, hitting for power he doesn’t have. I thought Veen would have a very different career than this when the Rockies took him, and maybe the new front office can try to get him to be more of a contact-first hitter and give up on the power, but for now, he’s maybe a backup corner outfielder.

Eric Longenhagen of FanGraphs ranked Veen as a 40+ FV player, 14th in the system (despite a 70 run grade and 60 future grades on fielding and raw power) last January:

Veen’s lefty swing is still vulnerable to inner-half velocity, and he remains in a liminal prospect space more than he is a slam dunk big league star.

This grade remains skeptical of Veen’s future ability to hit and access his raw power, but appreciates how impactful his speed will be in a part-time outfield role.

I’m excited by Veen for the same reasons anyone would be: He’s a ferocious rotator capable of hitting some epic home runs, and he’s built as if Maserati started making human beings. Veen has one of the more electric power/speed combos in the minors, but his levers and long, low-ball swing make it very difficult for him to be on time to the contact point, especially against fastballs, which has led to a good number of strikeouts and mediocre contact. Pitchers work him in on the hands, then get him to swing over the top of back-foot breaking balls once Veen starts to cheat on heaters in that spot. He’s best able to create power against bad breaking balls and pitches located down-and-away from him, when he can get his arms fully extended. When he does, it’s very beautiful and easy to see why so many folks (including your author) have been gaga for Veen at various points in his prospectdom. Still, as it’s currently constituted, he presents a below-average contact and game power look.

Veen brings other meaningful stuff to the table. He plays with an elite motor, moves from base to base with just a few gigantic strides, and commits to the next base with abandon in borderline situations. There are more opportunities for speed to impact the big league game now, which helps elevate Veen into a more impactful FV tier. On defense, his speed allows him to turn would-be doubles into singles by chasing them down before they can trickle into the gap or corner, but he doesn’t get good reads and looks uncomfortable at the catch point. Despite his wheels, the Rockies have basically never given Veen any kind of extended run in center field because his reads and routes aren’t good. It makes Veen feel like a turbo charged fifth outfielder on a good team rather than a true fourth or platoon guy.

Veen is ranked as a 45 Future Value player by MLB Pipeline, 11th in the system, including plus grades on his speed and arm with a 55 on fielding and a 50 on his hit tool:

The 23-year-old outfielder still offers plenty of projection in his 6-foot-3 frame and game, if he can stay on the field. His 2023 wrist injury definitely wreaked some havoc with his swing mechanics, but it was encouraging that he started to get to some of his power again in ’24, albeit sporadically. He’ll have to be cognizant of not trying to get to too much loft, something that has happened in the past, also the reason why his strikeout rate is north of 25 percent at the upper levels. Earlier in his career, he offered better bat-to-ball skills.

A solid runner who squeezes every ounce of his speed by being aggressive with good instincts on the basepaths, Veen probably fits best in an outfield corner if he were to settle in as a regular. He’ll see time in all three outfield spots to provide options for when the need arises, but more than anything, he has to show that he can answer the bell over the course of a full, healthy season.

John Trupin of Baseball Prospectus ranked Veen sixth in the system last January with a 55 OFP grade:

Veen plays hard—a double-edged sword—as his gazelle-like strides generate a gait at paces he cannot always easily alter. That can lead to electric defensive plays and swipes of third and home, as well as self-injurious plays that are unfortunately the purview of those who burn particularly bright. At the plate, Veen’s prominent uppercut swing generates loft, while his patience and power earn him respectful approaches from pitchers. It can get long through the zone, and doesn’t offer much room for adjustment when fooled. His struggles in Triple-A Albuquerque following his activation from the injured list are not yet of high concern, as his power and defense fit the bill, but a 28.3% whiff rate highlights the ceiling limiter for one of the best athletes in this system. Ahead of last year, we’d hoped to see Veen dominate and stay healthy. He came up a little short of both, but is nonetheless on the cusp of the big leagues.

When he makes contact, you can see a superstar’s framework in Veen’s powerful swings and strides. But not only has he struggled to maintain that performance, his body has not held up to the pace at which Veen plays. Injuries that continue to sap his athleticism would leave a thimble-wide passage for success, while lasting health will make him a Coors Field mainstay.

First of all, Veen needs to be more forthcoming about injuries that are impacting his ability to perform — this has now happened at least twice (with his wrist and now his ankle). Veen is a player that Purple Row has stayed higher on than the scouting consensus due to what he can be when he’s not playing through injuries or on the shelf. Maybe Veen won’t be able to adjust to some holes in his swing that big league pitching will exploit, but he’s shown the ability to adjust before.

Veen is an excellent base-runner, a good outfielder, he has raw power to tap into. He’s making better swing decisions and he’s come into camp this year in much better shape. That makes him a candidate for a big league role this season and a 40+ FV grade (13th on my list).


Please keep in mind our Purple Row Community Guidelines when you’re commenting. Thanks!