Welcome to Inside the Suns, your weekly deep-down analysis of the current Phoenix Suns team. Each week, the Fantable — a round table of Bright Siders — gives their takes on the Suns’ latest issues and news.
Fantable Questions of the Week
Q1: If the Suns could trade their 2027 1st round pick (least favorable of Cleveland, Minnesota, and Utah) for a late 1st rounder in this year’s draft, would you do it?
Diamondhacks: Beyond 2026 being a “strong class”, my principal insight on drafts involves beer, so I’ll say “No” to a swap. Or to any transaction I have insufficient visibility into. I’d also recommend this hands-off approach to similarly challenged hoops fans. But if you’re addicted to this sort of thing, a recent prospect breakdown by Brynn-Tannehill might be a good place to start assessing the landscape.
Ashton: I think it is pretty safe to assume that Cleveland and Minnesota would be the least favorable picks that probably turn into a late first-rounder in 2027 anyways. By allowing a late first-round pick in the 2026 draft is the preferable option due to the strength of the draft. But I am not overly impressed with what the mocks are saying at the back-half of the draft. I am assuming this pick would fall somewhere between 26 and 30. If it is 20 and above, the better.
Also, I am writing this on Thursday, when the deadline to declare for the NBA draft closed Wednesday night. I now have a better idea of who is returning to college, and that resets the mock draft boards. The main takeaway is that there’s still good talent at those late round picks in the 2026 and 2027 drafts, looks a lot stronger with a boatload of 2026 second rounders opting back into college. The 2026 47th pick is not going to be worth Jack.
But like speculating on the draft, and it would be boring to just consider the 47th pick in June. So sign me up for more options in the heat of summer. Brynn Tannenhill can write an article about it.
But where does the money come from to sign a two-year guaranteed contract for a first-rounder for a team that is already toeing the repeater tax? Let’s say 3 million is added to payroll. By keeping the 2027 pick, the can is kicked down the road to reset the repeater tax clock and another incremental increase in salary cap. That gives MI a bit more flexibility in spending his hard-earned cash.
It is a tougher question than most would think.
Rod: If there’s someone there that they want this year and they can find a trade partner, even if they had to throw in the 47th 2nd rounder, I’d do it. I can’t see that 2027 pick ending up higher than maybe 24th/25th, and there’s no way of knowing if they might be able to get a better player next year if they wait. To me, that’s a relatively cheap deal and one I’d much rather make than trade away any of the few Suns’ 1st rounders that they still own. But, unless there’s someone there that they really want, there’s no valid reason to trade up to the 1st round.
Q2: Between the 1992-93 Suns and the 2004-05 Suns teams (both 62-20), which of the two do you think would perform best in today’s NBA?
Diamondhacks: Stylistically, D’Antoni’s squad more closely resembled a modern team, successfully pushing the volume three onto an unsuspecting league. But I suspect that advantage and breakneck pace wouldn’t flummox modern opponents quite the same. Because everyone defends (and shoots) the three better now, which might effectively ‘steal’ D’Antoni’s thunder.
Speaking of Thunder, Westphal’s team defended better and was probably a bit more balanced overall. They had more rebounds, blocks, a lot more steals and, perhaps most surprisingly, scored more points and dished more assists than the transformative MVP Steve iteration. So against modern competition, I’d lean towards 93.
Ashton: It must be summertime to consider this question. Look, I am probably the youngest poster on the Fantable (we all know it is not OldAz) and the 92-93 Suns have a special place in my heart. It is where I truly began to follow the Suns in earnest as a know-it-all 19-year-old and thus leading to my current sports watching addictions and streaming subscriptions.
What I wouldn’t give to see the 92-93 Suns in today’s NBA. But what this question should really ask is who is refereeing the game? And that is where NBA development has occurred. Flop fouls and foul baiting to get to the free-throw line. Barkley is not going to flop for anyone. Add that more three-point shooting and fewer post-ups would probably doom this team.
I think Steve Nash and his circus dribbling, passing, and shooting would win the league. Yes, that team had some fouling issues of their own, but in more of a more pace-and-space league, 7SOL would set the pace and not let the other teams defend in space.
Rod: I had a tough time making up my mind on this one. Both teams were great; my vote goes to the 1992-93 Suns. It was really close, though, as each had points that kept me going back and forth between them. Overall depth and defense were the final factors in my decision.
The 2004-05 team really didn’t have great bench depth and was 17th in defense while the 1992-93 team had a stronger bench and was 9th in D. Either of the starting lineups would probably play great in this era but, the faster pace of today’s game (and yes, today’s game is actually played at a faster pace than the 2004-05 7SOL team played at) just favors teams with deeper rosters.
Q3: If you could magically add either Charles Barkley or Amar’e Stoudemire in their primes to the current Suns roster, which would you choose?
Diamondhacks: By most standards, Barkley’s prime (way back in Philadelphia) was a little more robust, but also twenty years earlier than Amare’s, and the league evolved a great deal in that interim. That’s the first conundrum of any magical teleportation. Were Chuck’s stats better because he was definitively the better player, or because the average NBA player wasn’t quite as advanced back when he played? I think it’s clearly some of the latter and less clearly some of the former.
In any case, we’re talking about the most serious interior ass kickers in Suns history. Chuck’s passing and shot creation for teammates probably put him over the top for me. Even if he was only 90% superstar and 10% Dillon Brooks. Amare was 100% ballplayer.
Ashton: Another whimsical question, and it bleeds off of Q2.
And again, I would pay good money to see Barkley bang against the top centers and forwards in the league. Barkley vs. Wemby? Barkley vs. Jokic? Hell, pick your dream match-up. My wallet would be picked clean just to see those battles.
But it goes back to pace and space, and Amar’e fits the bill as the defending teams would be forced to sag off players to defend the rim (and earth) shaking shattering dunks. Sign me up for that too.
Okay, these hypothetical “what-ifs” will probably force me to watch YouTube highlights for the rest of the day. It will be interesting to see what the comments say, as I may change my mind.
Rod: As much as I loved Amar’e, I’m picking Sir Charles here. Barkley was better with great players around him, but he was great all by himself and was just a more versatile player than STAT, also more of a leader. I think that would make him more valuable in today’s game, which leans toward positionless basketball.
As always, many thanks to our Fantable members for all their extra effort this week!
Suns Trivia/History
On May 30, 1976, after getting down 0-2 against the Boston Celtics in the 1976 NBA Finals, rookie center Alvan Adams scored 33 points and grabbed 14 rebounds along with 2 steals and a block to lead the Suns to a 105-98 Game 3 victory in Phoenix. The Suns took control from the start, building a 52-38 lead at the half and held on for the win despite a late run by the Celtics in the 4th quarter. A total of six Suns players had 2 steals in this game for a total of 12 vs just 5 for the Celtics. Paul Westphal added 22 points and 6 assists.
On June 1, 1993, Dan Majerle set a then-playoffs record by sinking eight 3-pointers during the Suns’ 120-114 win over Seattle in Game 5 of the Western Conference finals. Majerle finished the game with 34 points and was 8 for 10 from three (80%) and made 70.6% of his FG attempts. The rest of the Suns team took only 2 shots from three and went 1 of 2. Sir Charles (Barkley) led the Suns in scoring with 43 points while adding 15 rebounds and 10 assists…without even attempting a three-point shot. Tom Chambers was the only other Sun to make a three in the game.
On June 3, 2021, the Suns defeated the LA Lakers 113-100 on LA’s home court in game 6 of their 1st round playoff series to progress to the 2nd round. Devin Booker led all scorers with 47 points while adding 11 rebounds for his first-ever playoff double-double.
On June 4, 1976, the Suns lost Game 5 of the NBA Finals to the Boston Celtics 126-128 in the first triple-overtime game in NBA Finals history. That game came to be called “the greatest game ever played,” and Gar Heard’s buzzer beater at the end of the second OT to tie the game and send it into a third OT was dubbed “The Shot Heard ‘Round the World”. Gar Heard set a then Finals record by playing 61 minutes that night. This record stood until Kevin Johnson broke it 17 years later when he played 62 minutes in the Suns’ triple OT win against the Chicago Bulls on June 13, 1993.
Important Future Dates
Mid-June (date TBD) – Teams can begin negotiating with their own free agents (following the Finals)
June 23 – NBA Draft First Round, 8 ET (ABC/ESPN)
June 24 – NBA Draft Second Round, 8 ET (ESPN)
June 30 – Teams can begin negotiations with all free agents
July 1 – Official start of the 2026-27 league year and moratorium period
July 6 – Moratorium ends, official free agent contract signings can begin
July 9-19 – NBA 2K Summer League 2026 in Las Vegas
Late September (dates TBD) – NBA Training Camps open