Category: Sports News

ATLANTA — After riding the bench in Golden State, Jonathan Kuminga finally got a chance to shine for the Atlanta Hawks.

He sure made the most of it.

In his Atlanta debut on Tuesday, Kuminga threw down thunderous dunks, knocked down 3-pointers and spent much of the night smiling in a 119-98 rout of the Washington Wizards.

Kuminga finished with a season-high 27 points — a far cry from the ending to his tenure in Golden State, where the high-flying forward fell out of favor with coach Steve Kerr.

“It was great,” said Kuminga, who also had seven rebounds, four assists and two steals. “I was excited to be out there with the guys.”

The Hawks acquired Kuminga and guard Buddy Hield in a deal that sent center Kristaps Porzingis to the Golden State Warriors at the trade deadline.

Kuminga checked in off the Atlanta bench near the midway point of the first quarter and made an immediate impact against the woeful Wizards.

He dunked off a fast break — breaking into a big grin as he headed back up the court — and gave a tantalizing glimpse of his wide-ranging talents with a 3-pointer, four assists, two rebounds and a steal during his initial stint on the court.

Kuminga wound up playing nearly 24 1/2 minutes, taking on a bigger-than-expected role after Atlanta’s All-Star forward, Jalen Johnson, went down in the first quarter with a hip flexor injury and didn’t return.

“He connected with his teammates and let the game come to him,” coach Quin Snyder said of his new addition.

Kuminga missed his first six games with the Hawks, sandwiched around the All-Star break, while recovering from a left knee bone bruise sustained in his closing weeks with the Warriors.

The No. 7 overall pick in the 2021 draft, Kuminga was dropped from the rotation in Golden State and asked to be traded when his playing time dwindled.

At first, the Warriors indicated there weren’t a lot of teams showing interest. But the Hawks stepped forward as a trading partner, parting ways with Porzingis after he played just 17 games during his only season in Atlanta because of injuries and illness.

Kerr discounted any off-the-court issues with Kuminga, even though the 23-year-old from the Democratic Republic of the Congo played in just seven of his last 38 games with Golden State.

He started the season as a starter, averaging 12.1 points, 5.9 rebounds and 2.5 assists per game during his limited time on the court.

Kuminga insisted that he wasn’t trying to send a message to the Warriors in his first appearance with the Hawks.

But he was clearly thrilled to be back on the court.

“Everybody has an opinion,” Kuminga said. “I really don’t play attention to what anyone else is saying. We’re trying to win as many games as we can here. That’s my main focus.”

Coming into Tuesday’s NBA slate, the Dallas Mavericks (21-36) sat seventh from the bottom of the league standings. Just the Utah Jazz (18-40), the Washington Wizards (16-40), the New Orleans Pelicans (16-42), the Brooklyn Nets (15-42), the Indiana Pacers (15-43) and the sad Sacramento Kings (13-46) entered play with worse records than the Mavericks.

With a loaded 2026 NBA Draft class looming, all eyes in those markets are now firmly affixed upon the Tankathon standings, with visions of Dybantsa and Boozer dancing in fanbases’ heads. The Mavs may not have what it takes to get all the way to one of the top 2026 prospects, but the player available at the seventh overall pick this year may be more impactful than the second overall pick next year. Getting the seventh pick in this year’s draft would be a win.

But can the Mavericks’ tank gain any precious ground on any of the six teams ahead of them in the race to the bottom? That’s why they play the final 26 of the 82-game NBA season.

Dallas’ strength of schedule the rest of the way is 11th in the league. That’s a point in their favor for piling up more losses over the next month and a half. The fact that they came into Tuesday’s slate of games 3.5 games up on the Jazz, who sit at sixth in the Tankathon standings, and a full five games up on the Wizards in fifth, doesn’t bode as well. In fact, the Mavs came into play Tuesday just one game behind the Memphis Grizzlies for the eighth-worst record in the NBA, inching a step closer toward moving from seventh to the eighth-best lottery odds with their 123-114 win at the Brooklyn Nets.

The tank is losing ground at the moment, in light of the Mavs’ back-to-back wins at Brooklyn and Indiana.

Snapshot: Race to the bottom

After a cursory glance at the remaining schedule, I’ve got the Mavericks going 7-18 in their final 25 games, for a painful 28-54 record when it’s all said and done. That’s based on six scheduled wins and a belief that Dallas, a true blind squirrel, will find one more nut somewhere along the way.

If that happens, the Jazz would have to go 10-14 in their final 24 to tie the Mavs in the standings and bring conference record into play to decide the lottery-odds tiebreaker, or 11-13 to pass Dallas. The Jazz have an easier path to wins the rest of the way with their remaining strength of schedule at 21st in the league, but hoping they go 11-13 down the stretch seems like a bit of a stretch at this point.

The Mavs and the Jazz have already played all four of their matchups this year, splitting the four games between them.

It’s the same story with the New Orleans Pelicans. They’ve got more scheduled wins left in their final 23 games than the Mavericks have in their last 24, but they’d have to go 11-12 to finish out the year to give the Mavs a legitimate shot to pass them in the Tankathon standings. It looks like it’s going to be more ground than Dallas can make up at this point. It would be even harder to catch Washington, and their tank is emboldened by the fourth-best remaining strength of schedule in the NBA the rest of the way.

It looks more likely that the Mavericks will stay at the seventh-best odds in the lottery. In fact, it’s more likely that they slide to eighth than move up to sixth.

There are a lot of variables in play here. The sheer will of each team’s tanking effort is one that’s hard to quantify here. The Mavs, for instance, have consistently played hard in the face of a losing season, forcing their way into clutch loss after clutch loss along the way. The Jazz, on the other hand, are more blatant with their tank in terms of roster management.

At this point, if the Mavs are going to gain any ground, it will likely come at Utah’s expense, but it’s hard to see that happening. If you squint hard, you could convince yourself that Utah has 10 wins left on the schedule, but bad teams find a way to lose. It’s what bad teams do. And the Jazz are very much a team that has decided to be bad.

Keep an eye on this space, though, Mavs fans, because if Dallas can rattle off losses to Sacramento and Memphis on Thursday and Friday, or even split those two games, they’ll still have a chance to sneak past Utah before the year is out. Those would be two very valuable losses.

The 2026 NBA Draft is so good that it’s causing a moral crisis. There are nine teams in the tank race at the moment, and most of them feel like they’re putting out losing lineups on purpose with about 25 games to play in the season. This lottery will have huge stakes, and not just because there’s three potential No. 1 caliber prospects in BYU’s AJ Dybantsa, Duke’s Cameron Boozer, and Kansas’ Darryn Peterson.

The Indiana Pacers could pull off the ideal gap year without Tyrese Haliburton by landing a premium young prospect … unless their pick lands outside the top-4, and then it goes to the Los Angeles Clippers in the Ivica Zubac trade. The Dallas Mavericks hit the lottery last year for Cooper Flagg, and now they need to land him a great teammate without control of their first-round pick from 2027-2030. The Utah Jazz better land in the top-8, otherwise their pick goes to the Oklahoma City Thunder.

The 2026 NBA Draft lottery will happen on Sunday, May 10, and until then the league’s worst teams are jockeying for position to maximize their ping pong balls. Here’s our latest mock draft, with more analysis on this class after the table.

Let’s dive into the biggest themes from this class over the last few weeks.

Ranking Boozer, Peterson, and Dybantsa in the top-3

There’s some movement on my personal board since I published a mid-season update at the start of the month. Here’s how I’d rank the ‘big three’ of the 2026 NBA Draft:

1. Cameron Boozer, F, Duke: The simple case for Boozer over Peterson and Dybantsa is that he’s the most productive and most versatile of the three while also being the youngest. It’s no coincidence that Boozer’s teams have won at the highest level in every setting: he positively impacts the game in so many ways without taking much off the table. At 6’9, 250 pounds, he can initiate a pick-and-roll like a guard, set a mean screen and make plays on the short roll as a big, pound the offensive glass, punish switches on the drive with his strength, or rip a catch-and-shoot three from deep. It’s understandable to question Boozer’s athletic fluidity, ability to finish over length, or high-level defensive impact, but he’s solid enough in those areas while shining basically everywhere else. If Boozer doesn’t pass your “eye test,” then your eye test probably sucks. I’ve always thought Boozer vs. Cooper Flagg is a better question than Boozer vs. Dybantsa or Peterson, and that continues to be true as he nears the stretch run of his one-and-done season.
2. A.J. Dybantsa, F, BYU: Dybantsa has been third on my board since the summer, but his strong Feb. combined with Peterson’s poor performance in conference play has elevated him to No. 2 for me for the first time. The BYU freshman is the prototypical big wing scorer NBA teams covet with a rare mix of length (7’1 wingspan), fluidity, and explosion. Dybantsa is a gifted driver with tight handles, impressive bend to turn the corner against defenders, and crazy stride length. His three-point volume has been underwhelming thus far, but otherwise he’s the total package as a scorer. I’m a bit skeptical of Dybantsa’s ability to impact the game in areas other than scoring. His playmaking has been surprisingly impressive thus far, but I wonder if some of that is due to BYU’s pristine system. His defense has been subpar, he’s only average as a rebounder, and he can have turnover problems. Ultimately, Dybantsa feels a clear step ahead of similar prospects like Brandon Miller and Ace Bailey in recent drafts because he’s more well-rounded as a scorer, but I wouldn’t put him in the Cooper Flagg/Jayson Tatum tier because he’s not as good at doing the dirty work.
3. Darryn Peterson, G, Kansas: Peterson washed Dybantsa at a high school level, and was so impressive as a senior that I briefly considered putting him over Boozer. The best version of Peterson would be a special guard prospect who can efficiently play a high-usage on-ball role while also being a knockdown shooter as an off-ball threat zooming around screens while also making a big impact defensively. The problem is that we haven’t seen Peterson’s best all year because of a bizarre set of injury issues that have limited his explosiveness at both ends. Peterson just isn’t getting into the paint off the bounce or jumping the passing lanes like he was expected to, but to his credit he’s still been a high-volume scorer on good efficiency. His shot-making has looked better than expected at Kansas, and if you believe his hamstring strain and cramping eventually resolve themselves, there’s still a case for him at No. 1. Peterson appeared to be the mainstream favorite to go No. 1 entering the year. Are we overreacting to a small sample by an injured player by dropping him to No. 3? It takes a leap of faith and heavy reliance on prior production to put Peterson over Boozer and Dybantsa, and I just don’t have the risk tolerance for that right now.

Mikel Brown Jr. makes it a strong top-6

Louisville freshman Mikel Brown Jr. has been considered a potential top-10 pick dating back to preseason. Two things slowed his momentum earlier in the season: a) a pesky back injury that kept him sidelined for an eight-game stretch, and b) an extended shooting slump. For his first 12 games this season, Brown was only shooting 27 percent from three, which was way below where he was expected to be. Over his last eight games, Brown has now made 32-of-83 (38.5 percent), which is more in line with his reputation.

Pull-up shooting is a big part of what makes Brown such an appealing potential offensive engine. The Louisville guard bombs away from deep with 14.5 three-point attempts per 100 possessions, which is just a fraction below Peterson for tops in the class among likely first-round picks. Of the 71 players in DI taking at least 14.5 threes per 100, no player has a higher free throw rate than Brown’s 46 percent. Add in a 30 percent assist rate, and the picture of Brown as a lead guard comes into focus: he pumps out a ton of threes, he consistently gets to the foul line with his attacking off the dribble, and he has good playmaking vision to kick out to teammates when the defense collapses on him.

It’s fair to wonder how else Brown can impact the game. He has only one offensive rebound in his first 20 games this season. His stock rate of 2.9 percent is underwhelming. His turnovers have been an issue all year, including six against Baylor and seven against SMU in back-to-back games earlier this month. Age can be a knock too, as Brown will turn 20 during Final Four weekend, and is six months older than Jeremiah Fears, the stud one-and-done point guard in last year’s draft.

I like the shooting/passing/foul-drawing package from Brown enough to solidify him as the No. 6 overall prospect in the class. If he really turns it on in the home stretch, he can challenge Houston’s Kingston Flemings for the top point guard in the class.

The late lottery feels like a hornets’ nest

Why is this considered such a strong NBA draft class? Mostly because it has three potential No. 1 overall picks at the top, and then really good prospects at 4-6. After that, I think it gets really dicey.

I wouldn’t want to be picking in the back-half of this lottery. Here’s how ESPN’s Jeremy Woo, probably the most sourced reporter covering the draft, ranked the 6-11 range: Keaton Wagler, Darius Acuff, Nate Ament, Mikel Brown Jr., Karim Lopez, Thomas Haugh. While I can see the vision with a lot of these players, I would feel serious hesitation using a top-11 pick on them outside of the aforementioned Brown.

To my knowledge, there’s never been a 6’6+ one-and-done lottery pick to finish a season with zero dunks, and Wagler is in line to do that so far. His athletic limitations also show up in his low steal rate, but it’s fair to point out that Illinois’ system suppresses steals as they rank dead-last in DI in takeaway percentage. Wagler has made up for it by being a nuclear off-the-dribble shooter who cooks especially hard against bigs on switches. Is that really a sustainable way to live in the NBA for a top-10 pick, though? Acuff has been remarkably productive for Arkansas, but I’m worried about his defense, rebounding, and mid-range heavy shot profile. Ament has been killing it lately as a tall and skinny wing, but his finishing, shooting, and defensive playmaking are so poor that he feels mostly like a theoretical player to me. Lopez is a skilled and strong ball handler at 6’9, but I’m worried about his outside shooting and defense. Haugh is a decent connective wing, but I don’t think his defense is special, and it feels like he would be the lowest usage player in most five-man NBA lineups.

Maybe I’m wrong and Wagler will be a cross between SGA and Haliburton, Acuff becomes Gen Z Stephon Marbury, Haugh turns into a star role player, and Ament refines his skills and becomes an ideal modern wing. It could all happen. I just don’t think the second-half of the lottery plays into the narrative that this is a super strong draft.

Give me 10 underrated prospects in the 2026 NBA Draft

Don’t twist my arm! Here’s some guys I’m higher on than consensus with some brief scouting reports.

• Dailyn Swain, F, Texas: Defensive wing stopper with vastly improved driving and finishing while showing signs of outside shooting development:

• Patrick Ngongba, C, Duke: Stout defensive paint protector with soft hands on interior finishes and great passing chops.
• Bennett Stirtz, G, Iowa: Pick-and-roll maestro and strong pull-up shooter who will probably struggle to guard the ball in the league.
• Morez Johnson Jr., F, Michigan: Monster defender and rebounder with interior scoring touch and possible outside shooting potential.
• Tyler Tanner, G, Vanderbilt: Tiny but super productive guard who plays physically on both ends and has developed into a really good shooter.

• Hannes Steinbach, F, Washington: Elite offensive rebounder who catches and finishes everything inside and shines in transition.
• Aday Mara, C, Michigan: Massive center (7’3 with 7’7 wingspan) who can defend the rim in drop coverage and also throws some absurdly great outlet passes.
• Meleek Thomas, G, Arkansas: Knockdown three-point shooter who limits mistakes as a passer and ball handler.
• Joshua Jefferson, F, Iowa State: Mack truck forward who rebounds, defends, and can make some awesome passes off the bounce.
• Flory Bidunga, C, Kansas: Athletic center who can protect the rim and finish lobs.

Which picks do you love and hate?

Conference tournaments are about to be in full swing, and then it’s time for the big dance. March Madness is the best, and it’s going to be even better this year with such a loaded draft class on display.

What picks did I totally blow it on? What picks did you love? Sound off in the comments.

UCLA men's basketball flat-out outplayed USC in Tuesday night's 81-62 win. The archrivals met for the first of their two Big Ten clashes on Feb. 24 in what was a crucial game for two teams on the bubble in USA TODAY Sports' latest Bracketology.

The two have been on opposite trajectories as of late, with the Bruins entering Tuesday fresh off Donovan Dent's overtime buzzer-beater to beat No. 11 Illinois and secure a much-needed quad 1 win. The Trojans, meanwhile, entered the night in the midst of a three-game losing streak capped off by a stunning 71-70 home loss to Oregon in which they led by six points with 59 seconds to go.

Those trends played continued as UCLA's physical defense and a 30-point gem from Donovan Dent derailed a Trojans team that couldn't find much offense from anyone not named Chad Baker-Mazara (25 points, eight rebounds, two assists).

"They're a very athletic team, obviously Baker-Mazara is a potent offensive player that can turn your lights out. Proud of the guys that got the job done," Bruins head coach Mick Cronin said postgame. "This late in the year, guys are just trying to win and stay healthy. ... Happy with the win, and nobody got injured. So, onward."

Here are the winners and losers from the first leg of the USC-UCLA rivalry:

Per a Spurs press release:

The NBA G League announced that Austin Spurs forward Harrison Ingram has been named NBA G League Player of the Week for games played Feb. 9-22. This marks the first Player of the Week honor of Ingram’s career and the first for an Austin player this season.

Ingram averaged 22.2 points, 13.4 rebounds and 7.4 assists over five games. He recorded four double-doubles and one triple-double as the Austin Spurs went 4-1.

Ingram also posted a season-high 30 points against the Iowa Wolves on February 10th.

In his second season with the Silver and Black, Ingram has appeared in 76 games (72 starts) and holds career averages of 13.7 points, 10.1 rebounds and 4.3 assists in 33.3 minutes. His 31 career double-doubles rank third in franchise history.

Welcome to the Thread. Join in the conversation, start your own discussion, and share your thoughts. This is the Spurs community, your Spurs community. Thanks for being here.

Our community guidelines apply which should remind everyone to be cool, avoid personal attacks, not to troll and to watch the language.

The game against the Boston Celtics on Tuesday night opened with signs that the Suns had steadied themselves after the loss to Portland, the narrow win over Orlando, and the beating they took against San Antonio. Injuries have weighed heavily on them, but for a half, Phoenix looked functional. They trailed 50-46 at the break, and the offense felt balanced, which was a welcome sight. Shots were falling, something that has been rare for this team throughout February. There was flow. There was purpose.

Then the third quarter arrived.

It turned into an avalanche of green inside the Mortgage Matchup Center, and at times it sounded like TD Garden had relocated to downtown Phoenix. The Suns opened the night 7-of-14 from three. They then missed their next 12 straight. The Suns also got overwhelmed on the offensive glass. They surrendered 22 offensive rebounds to Boston and finished with 25 defensive rebounds of their own. Boston only turned those extra chances into 15 second-chance points, but the issue remains. Phoenix continues to struggle with closing possessions and preventing second and third opportunities, and that lack of control keeps resurfacing at costly moments.

That pattern is becoming far too familiar. Long shooting droughts, extended inefficiency from deep, poor rebounding, and an inability to steady themselves when the offense freezes over. Injuries factor into it, but schematically, the counter never arrives. Whether that is personnel, competition, or system-related, the result is the same. Phoenix becomes a team that survives through the three, and lately, it has not survived at all. The third quarter broke the game open, with Boston outscoring the Suns 30-11. Against a team operating like a machine, that margin is fatal.

Phoenix pushed, because they always do, opening the fourth on a 9-0 run that trimmed the deficit to 14. It did not matter. The damage was already done. Shooting 18.2% in the third quarter sealed it long before the final horn.

Bright Side Baller Season Standings

The Portland game, with 77 total points, is one we’d like to forget. But it is one may never will. Why? Because it is the first game that Khaman Maluach earned Bright Side Baller honors. Here’s to many more, Khaman.

Bright Side Baller Nominees

Game 59 against the Celtics. Here are your nominees:

Collin Gillespie
15 points (6-of-11, 3-of-6 3PT), 3 rebounds, 3 assists, 1 steal, 1 turnover, -5 +/-

Grayson Allen
14 points (2-of-12, 1-of-9 3PT, 9-of-10 FT), 3 rebounds, 1 assist, 2 turnovers, -13 +/-

Jalen Green
13 points (5-of-18, 1-of-8 3PT, 2-of-2 FT), 4 rebounds, 1 assist, 1 turnover, -33 +/-

Ryan Dunn
10 points (4-of-6, 2-of-2 3PT), 6 rebounds, 2 assists, 0 turnovers, -3 +/-

Royce O’Neale
9 points (3-of-6, 3-of-4 3PT), 2 rebounds, 1 assist, 1 block, -19 +/-

Oso Ighodaro
5 points (2-of-5), 3 rebounds, 5 assists, 2 steals, 1 block, +4 +/-

Votin’ time…

Let’s talk about resilience, Dub Nation. The Warriors limp into FedExForum tonight missing Stephen Curry, Jimmy Butler, and Kristaps Porzingis, carrying their playoff hopes on the backs of Moses Moody, Brandin Podziemski and a collection of contributors who were largely afterthoughts two months ago. And somehow, the Warriors are still eighth in the Western Conference at 30-28, clinging to that play-in spot with both hands.

Next up in there way is the new look Memphis Grizzlies, who have let go of pretty much anybody who played in these two teams short lived rivalry besides Ja Morant. Oh by the way, he’s out with an elbow injury for another week and a half at least.

Golden State Warriors at Memphis Grizzlies

When: February 25, 2026 | Time 4:30pm

TV: NBC Sports Bay Area

Radio: 95.7 The Game

Last night in New Orleans was painful. Zion Williamson dropped 26, Dejounte Murray made his return from a torn Achilles like he never missed a beat, and the Warriors shot a brutal 24.4% from three on 45 attempts. You can survive a lot of things in this league. Making eleven threes on 45 attempts isn’t one of them. Melton’s season-high 28 and Moody’s 24 weren’t enough to close a four-point gap with under two minutes left, and Golden State fell 113-109 to a Pelicans team that seemed like an easier win on paper than real life.

Now it’s time to face Memphis one night later. The Grizzlies that once made this rivalry genuinely threatening, the Dillon Brooks-led outfit that tortured Golden State in the 2022 playoffs, barely exists anymore. Jaren Jackson Jr. is gone. The team just lost to the Sacramento Kings, who had dropped sixteen straight and hadn’t won since January 16th. They are decimated by injuries, missing eight players in the loss to Sacramento. Some relative unknowns are running this show now, and the Ja Morant trade rumors are so loud at this point that ESPN’s insiders are writing offseason previews about it in February.

Here’s what matters: Golden State has handled Memphis twice this season, 131-118 in October and 114-113 in a February nail-biter. Only nine Warriors saw action Tuesday. Tonight won’t look much different. But this is a winnable game against a rebuilding team that just got embarrassed by the league’s worst record. The play-in picture is close enough that every W matters.

Game tips off tonight at FedExForum. Come on, Dub Nation. This one’s there for the taking.

Next week, the month of March arrives.

But for college basketball fans, the angst and excitement of March Madness has already arrived. With conference tournaments around the corner, the excitement for the 2026 NCAA Tournament is building among many fan bases.

REQUIRED READING: March Madness bracketology prediction for NCAA Tournament has another shakeup

Fans have been treated to potential Final Four previews, with Duke-Michigan and Houston-Arizona facing off on Saturday, Feb. 21. Another big one ― No. 11 Illinois hosting No. 3 Michigan ― is on the docket for Friday, Feb. 27, which could help determine final seeding for the tournament.

However, while fans of programs are certainly excited, the bigger joy fans get is watching the teams currently on the bubble playing for their postseason lives. For all intents and purposes, their NCAA Tournament has already begun for these teams.

Here's a look at the latest NCAA Tournament preview, including bubble teams and locks to reach March Madness: