Category: Sports News

The NBA Draft is less than two weeks away, so it won’t be long until we learn where Cameron Boozer will play ball for the foreseeable future.

The smart people now think he may end up being taken by Utah with the second pick, but the smart people are frequently wrong. We’ll just have to wait and see.

The latest mock drafts (ESPN, CBS, NBADraft.net, and SBNation) see him going to Memphis with the #3 pick, while Yahoo has him going to the Jazz at #2.

Like a lot of Duke players, Boozer comes from a basketball family, with his father, Carlos, having played at Duke in Cameron before he gave that name to his son.

In this article, the author focuses on following a famous father. It can be difficult, but not for everyone. Kobe Bryant far exceeded his father Joe; in fact, his father is nearly forgotten. Steph Curry outshone his father Dell, and Klay Thompson has eclipsed his father, Mychal.

But a lot of guys don’t manage it. Michael Jordan’s sons were never going to surpass their dad, but they never even got close to the NBA. Scotty Pippen Jr., has a long ways to go to catch his dad. Hakeem Olajuwon’s son, Aziz is at Stanford, and this fall, he’ll start to understand how difficult that is.

Boozer has made his own reputation, but he had to deal with it on the way up. At this point in his career, he’s well ahead of his father. His fundamentals are impeccable, and he is, by far, a better passer and shooter than his dad ever was. And he’s just 19.

Watching his career unfold is going to be a lot of fun.

Go to the DBR Boards to find Blue Healer Auctions || Drop us a line

Carmelo Anthony compares potential OG Anunoby NBA Finals MVP to Andre Iguodala originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

Even two days after the New York Knicks’ record-breaking comeback to defeat the San Antonio Spurs in Game 4 of the 2026 NBA Finals, people are still buzzing over OG Anunoby’s game-winning tip-in layup.

Along with a crucial block on San Antonio’s De’Aaron Fox’s fastbreak layup with 11 seconds left in the game, Anunoby has given himself a case to win Finals MVP if New York finishes its mission to win its first NBA championship since 1973.

Former Knicks superstar Carmelo Anthony supports the idea of Anunoby winning Finals MVP, but without eliminating the fact that New York’s franchise player, Jalen Brunson, has led the team in scoring in three of its four games in the NBA Finals so far.

“OG has been the most steady, consistent guy in these Finals,” Anthony said on his “7PM in Brooklyn” show.

“Forget the tip-in. That stop on Fox was amazing. So now you put all of that together… that’s me playing devil’s advocate. But let’s just be honest about this, it’s [Brunson]. If OG wins it, it’s like Andre Iguodala in Golden State.”

During the 2015 NBA Finals, Warriors legend Iguodala won the Finals MVP award over the team’s best series performer, Steph Curry, who averaged 26.0 points, 5.2 rebounds, 6.3 assists and 1.8 steals per game and shot 38.5 percent from 3-point range.

Meanwhile, Iguodala only averaged 16.3 points, 5.8 rebounds, four assists and 1.3 steals per game. Despite being outproduced by Curry offensively during the series, Iguodala secured the award mainly for his defense against the Cleveland Cavaliers’ LeBron James.

Similarly, Brunson currently is outperforming Anunoby when it comes to stats, averaging 29.5 points, 4.5 rebounds, five assists and two steals per game in the 2026 NBA Finals.

Anunoby has lower averages of 23.8 points, four rebounds, 1.3 assists and one steal per game, but is shooting more efficiently at 58 percent from the field and 55.6 percent from beyond the arc.

The 6-foot-7, 240-pound forward certainly has a case for Finals MVP, especially with his heroic plays in Game 4 against the Spurs, but it likely would require another memorable performance in Game 5 for him to beat out Brunson for the prestigious award.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

Isaiah Evans has had a nice few years. First, he was North Carolina’s Gatorade Player of the Year in 2023 and 2024, and then spent two years at Duke. In his first season, the Blue Devils got to the Final Four, and this spring, his sophomore year, Duke just missed getting back. And in less than two weeks, he’ll find out his future when the NBA Draft is held.

Obviously, no one gets that far alone, and the biggest person who has helped Evans achieve all of that is his mother, Marieke Lemon.

This article talks about the sacrifices that she’s made to help Isaiah achieve his dreams. And now that he’s in a position to do something for her, he’s helped her to build her nail business.

There’s a lot of fun stuff in here that you may or may not have known. It’s a good read.

• Sixers draft profile: Isaiah Evans fires away from long range
• Scouting the 2026 NBA Draft | AJ Dybantsa, Henri Veesaar, Isaiah Evans, & More
• Every NBA team should be interested in Duke’s Isaiah Evans
• Drafting Isaiah Evans would save Lakers from a potential free agency overpay
• Mavericks predicted to reunite Cooper Flagg with the sharpshooter Dallas needs
• Duke’s Isaiah Evans Making Noise Ahead of NBA Draft

Go to the DBR Boards to find Blue Healer Auctions || Drop us a lined

When NBA fans think of the greatest NBA Finals performances ever, Michael Jordan, Shaquille O’Neal, Jerry West, Kevin Durant, Giannis Antetokounmpo, Dwyane Wade, Hakeem Olajuwon, Kareem-Abdul Jabbar, Tim Duncan, Larry Bird, LeBron James, and Larry Bird are the kinds of names that come to mind. All-time legends who either were, or are going to be, unanimous first ballot Hall of Famers. But if things keep going the way they have, could a certain Knick buck that trend, and force his name into conversations often reserved for the greatest players to ever play the sport?

After his second dominant two-way performance that was capped off with one of the most memorable plays in Finals history, Anunoby catapulted himself into serious Finals MVP conversations. Through four games, he is averaging 23.8PPG, 4RPG, 1.3APG, 1SPG, and 1.5BPG while shooting 58% from the field, 56% from three, and 92% from the free-throw line. Now, his counting stats don’t pop off the page. Were the Finals to end right now, he’d rank 41st out of the 57 Finals MVPs in scoring, while ranking third lowest in rebounds per game, lowest in assists per game, tied for 36th in steals per game, and tied for 16th in blocks per game. Not a great case to be made for Anunoby being an impressive MVP Finals winner, right?

If you were to take a look at his efficiency, though, that’s where he really stands out among the greats. Anunoby currently has the highest Finals true shooting percentage ever among players who’ve attempted at least field goals, and the highest true shooting percentage among all players who averaged 20+PPG over any four-game stretch in Finals history. Wednesday night, he also became the only player in NBA Finals history to score at least 30 points, make at least seven threes, and do so while shooting 60% or higher from the field. His Game 4 performance was also the third-most threes made in a Finals game ever. The All-Defensive Second Team member is also averaging the sixth most fourth-quarter points per game in the modern era, and joined a lot of the earlier names (West, Abdul-Jabbar, Olajuwon, and Jordan) as the only players in Finals history to score 30 points and score a go-ahead field goal in the final three seconds. He’s done all that on the offensive end while holding De’Aaron Fox, Devin Vassell, Victor Wembanyama, and Derrick Harper all to 46% or lower shooting on a combined 50 attempts as the primary defender.

As you can see, digging past just the surface-level stats shows just how incredibly efficient and valuable the forward has been. But going back to the original question, where does this rank him among the past Finals MVPs? Despite all of the history he’s made, he still ranks outside the top 30. As mentioned earlier, there are a lot of great players who have averaged more points, assists, and rebounds than him while also averaging more steals and or blocks. Even with the unrivaled efficiency and great defense, it doesn’t make up for some of the stats that he lacks. Now, that’s not completely fair because part of that is a lack of volume and his role.

But that is precisely one of the things that is also hurting him. Those two things, while holding him back from potentially averaging more points and assists, could be argued as one of the main reasons for his efficiency. That doesn’t do Anunoby justice, and it discredits his incredible play and all of the work he has put in. If you go back and look at the shots Anunoby has converted on, it’s not like he’s wide open on all of them. He isn’t just a spot-up shooter being spoon-fed easy looks. He’s still taking and making very difficult shots that are often heavily contested or off the dribble. But the truth is, he doesn’t face the kind of game planning or attention that guys like Jalen Brunson and Karl-Anthony Towns have faced. Those two are tasked with having to do more offensively in terms of self-creation and creation for others. That doesn’t fully take away from what Anunoby has done and the undeniably pivotal role in helping the Knicks go up 3-1.

When taking in all of that context into account, I do think it kind of comes down to subjectivity. To someone who prioritizes role, gravity, and attention, players with similar stats, even at the cost of efficiency, may win out. To others who may prioritize raw stats, Anunoby could easily win out. I think his Finals MVP, if it continues on a similar trajectory, would be better than those of Paul Pierce, Chauncey Billups, Jaylen Brown, Cedric Maxwell, Willis Reed (1973), Andre Iguodala, Wes Unseld, and a player he’s recently been compared to, Kawhi Leonard. Tony Parker, for me, is a great comparison, averaging 24.5PPG, 5.RPG, and 3.3APG in 2007, while shooting 56.8% from the field, and 57.1% from three. He wasn’t the defender Anunoby is, but he was also tasked with initiating way more than Anunoby is. And that should place him right around the 40th to 45th best, especially because stat and pace inflation should be taken into account as well. That may seem low, but for a player who was unranked by many high school recruiting sites and was drafted 23rd overall, that’s still quite an unexpected accomplishment.

Overall, though, it’s an interesting conversation, and one that also shines some light on the makeup of the Knicks and what makes them so good. Brunson is the obvious best player and engine of this team, but he isn’t burdened with as much responsibility as some of the other names mentioned above, and as much as I hate to say it, nor is he as good as those guys were. But what Brunson and the Knicks do have is an incredibly talented team with depth and multiple players who can give you 20 points on any given night. We’ve seen Brunson, Towns, Anunoby, Mikal Bridges, Josh Hart, and Deuce McBride do it, and we’ve seen Landry Shamet get close. It’s a team that can beat you in multiple ways and often does.

With how close the Finals MVP race looks right now, there’s a very real chance Brunson ends up with it, especially since he’s also the captain, the best player, the biggest name, and the main ball handler/creator. But it is coming down to the wire. If the Knicks, who currently are a -500 to win the Finals on FanDuel, close it out and Anunoby takes home the award, it will make for some very interesting conversations about how to evaluate secondary and tertiary creators when it comes to Finals MVP.

The Spurs melted down in the second half. What was the play that let you know the loss was coming?

Marilyn Dubinski: There were several plays within the downward spiral that had me losing hope, from Wemby missing three threes in one possession and two clutch free throws, but the moment for me was when Fox got the loose ball with them up one with very little time left, and he had the choice to race to the bucket and get the lead up to three or dribble around and eat some clock. Hindsight is always 20-20, and now it seems obvious he should have dribbled and gotten free throws, but I can’t entirely blame him for going for two guaranteed points to get the lead to three over two non-guaranteed ones. The problem is, of course, he missed, with seemingly a slight hesitation while deciding what to do allowing the defense to recover and the Knicks the chance to take the game-winner.  (I’ll also give him the benefit of the doubt and say he gets there and makes the shot without a bum ankle.)

Mark Barrington: I think it was when Wembanyama missed both free throws. At that point I knew he was spent and couldn’t save the team, and nobody else was going to step up. Of course, I was yelling at my TV when Fox took an unnecessary shot with a few seconds left, as no one wearing Silver and Black had anything resembling court awareness. That play, like Wemby’s pass off of Castle’s back in Game 2, was the final nail in the coffin, but they had been building that coffin for the entire second half.

Devon Birdsong: I *knew* it was over when Fox made one of the biggest mistakes in Spurs history, but my first real suspicion was the out-of-bounds call on Castle (which the NBA has now admitted was wrong). My hope momentarily lifted when Fox had an open mid-range jumper, but when he missed it (even though Castle redeemed himself on the rebound), my heart sank into my bowels. After Game 3, I wrote that most of this series has felt like a horror film, and I’m not sure if that was predictive or just bad timing, but I had no idea that it could get worse. Watching the 2nd half of that game was like watching characters do clearly stupid things in one of those movies (or the ‘Good Choices’ Geico commercial), and I could almost hear the faintest echo of Fred Herman Jones saying “Let’s split up gang!” in the distance. 

Jeje Gomez: I’d love to be less predictable here, but it was Fox’s mistake. Even though the collapse started much earlier, the Spurs were still in the driver’s seat for most of the last few minutes and it seemed like the Josh Hart miss was going to be the Knicks’ version of the Wemby to Castle botched pass, an error that would determine the winner. I was optimistic until the end, and when Fox tapped the rebound to himself, I could taste the win. Then, the second he took the shot, and it got blocked, I thought a New York win was almost inevitable.

True or false: The Spurs’ lack of experience is the biggest reason for their struggles in the Finals. 

Dubinski: It’s hard to say.  It seemingly wasn’t a problem against the defending champions last round, in which they didn’t even have homecourt advantage, so why is it a problem now? There is zero doubt the Finals are an exponentially bigger stage than the conference finals, and going against a historical and charged-up franchise like the Knicks adds yet another level, so maybe this is just too much for a young team with little to no playoff experience before this year.  Closing tight games has been an issue almost all season, and the Knicks are the polar opposite and the last team you want to falter against in the clutch against.  I guess I’ll go with true since they’re playing a team of hardened, grizzled veterans with more experience to learn and build off of. (Although I think the Spurs win this series against any other Eastern Conference opponent.) 

Barrington: True. De’Aaron Fox is supposed to be the playoff closer for the Spurs, but before this year, he had been in only 7 playoff games, and he had the most playoff experience of any starter. You could say that the 22 playoff games they’ve played this season would be a lot of playoff experience, but I don’t think players can absorb that quickly on the fly with only one or two days off between games. They’ll handle these kinds of situations better next season, if they make it this far, but nothing is guaranteed. They’ve had a lot of things go right for them in this year’s playoff run to get to the finals, but their luck ran out Wednesday night in the Garden. You have to give the Knicks credit for continuing to fight even when down by a ton of points, but you also have to be a little mad at the Spurs for losing their focus and falling apart under pressure. It’s a hard lesson, and thinking it would never happen to this team on a storied run from a 34-win season to the NBA Finals was a vain hope. 

Birdsong: Absolutely true. Lost in the hubbub about Fox is the very real failure as a team to recognize a need for a strategy change midway through the 3rd quarter. The Spurs should have been grinding out possessions instead of still trying to jump-shoot the Knicks out of the building. The inability to recognize that they no longer had the hot hand, as well as that they weren’t effectively draining the clock + failing to create, take, and make easier shots, is largely what let the Knicks back in. Some of that was pure hubris (I’ve written before about how these Spurs are sometimes not satisfied with just carrying a lead and prefer to embarrass the opposition), and some of it was execution. But both are symptoms of the same thing, inexperience. A Twitter/X account last night tweeted out that if Chris Paul had still been on the team (even hardly playing) he would never have let them keep that up for the entire 2nd half, and I think that’s right. Last night wasn’t just the players’ inexperience showing, but Mitch’s too. 

Gomez: True-ish. There’s no denying that some of the mistakes the Spurs have made are probably a reflection of not only their lack of experience in the biggest stages, but a lack of experience playing with one another. The Fox gaffe can be explained by the former, and the Wemby-to-Castle pass by the latter. Without those two massive blunders, the series could easily be 3-1 the other way. But there are other, arguably deeper problems. San Antonio doesn’t have a bench or reliable size at the forward spots. They don’t have an established half-court offense, which technically could be chalked up to Mitch Johnson’s lack of experience, but it seems more to do with the coach’s philosophy of giving his players freedom. Since the Spurs have so much talent, they have been able to hide those flaws at times and overcome them at others, but against a team that matches up so well against them, it’s been harder to do. Youth is to blame for some of the issues, but focusing solely on it can distract from other weaknesses in the roster and the offense that are being exposed.

How confident are you that the Spurs can get it to Game 7?  

Dubinski: Not at all, but maybe I should give them more than a 10% chance.  One thing they have done well in these playoffs is bounce back, and they likely know just as well as we do that they could just as easily be up 3-1 (or even have already won 4-0) if they weren’t shooting themselves in the foot in the final minute of games. They have what it takes, but they have to stop beating themselves and execute for three straight games. The question is, can they do it, considering consistency has not been their forte in these playoffs? (I will say, my only goal for them right now is to just get to Game 6, and not just for the obvious “one game at a time” reason, but also because the only thing we have never had to endure as a franchise is watch another team celebrate a championship on our home court, and I don’t want that to change now.)

Barrington: I’m not confident, but I’m hopeful. Game 5 is the key. This series isn’t over yet. If they play like goldfish and don’t internalize the failure of Game 4, they will be in good shape to take Game 6 in the Garden. If they do that, it’s a matchup for the ages, as the league can see one of the most exciting back-and-forth series in history. 

The reason why I think that won’t happen is that I remember the Spurs in the 2013 finals. After Ray Allen’s miracle shot stole Game 6, the Spurs were mentally and physically spent and didn’t put up that much of a fight in Game 7. I could see that happening again in Game 5 this year, but this team is younger and they could overcome the fatigue. The only good thing about remembering the 2013 Finals is that that wasn’t the end of the story. There was a redemption arc, and who knows, that could happen again. 

This team is going to be good for a long time, and the mental hardening from the lessons of this season should make them tougher to take down in the future. That, and some roster improvements, as the bench was really exposed by the Knicks in this year’s finals, and the lack of playable bigs led to an overdependence on Wembanyama, who can’t play over 40 minutes in every game.

Birdsong: I think it’s all about Game 6. Supposing the Spurs win Game 5 (and I expect they will, if not purely out of sheer anger with themselves), they have a very tall order going back to the Garden down 2-3. That being said, they’ve already pulled that off down 0-2. It’ll be a different kind of pressure, though. The Knicks will do everything they can to not go back to San Antonio for Game 7, but if the Spurs pull it off, I can still see them winning it all. Right now, they need to focus on a reset in familiar surroundings and take every positive thing they can out of an extremely embarrassing and public lesson. They’ve risen to the occasion before, so I think they can do it again. In fact, in spite of the loss, I’m more confident in their ability to beat the Knicks; it’s just going to come down to execution. The margin separating these two teams is razor-thin, and that bodes well for series extension. I give them 50/50 to get to Game 7, but if they do, I’m putting my money on them. At that point, they’ll know they can overcome anything, and that’s money in the bank(shot). 

Gomez: Can they bounce back and win Game 5? I’m not confident about it. The loss was too painful, and while the Spurs have been surprisingly resilient in the face of adversity, at some point, they will break. If we use the stonecutter’s credo to describe the situation, they might be the rock, and the OG Anunoby game-winner, the final blow. If they somehow manage to once again respond well to a tough loss, I think anything is possible. I expect the Knicks to be confident in Game 5, but if they lose, they might get anxious about trying to finish it all at home since they don’t exactly have much championship experience themselves. Is it likely we’ll get a Game 7? Not really, but I won’t call the series over until someone actually wins four.

One quick hand motion has some in San Antonio up in arms.

Some extra attention has been brought to Karl-Anthony Towns’ deflection on the final play of Wednesday’s miracle Knicks Game 4 Finals win after it appears he motioned to the fans sitting courtside to crowd Spurs rookie Dylan Harper for the critical inbounds pass.

With the Knicks leading 107-106 with 1.2 seconds remaining, Towns walked toward Harper — positioned on the left sidelines if looking straight at the basket from midcourt — and discretely motioned toward Harper with his left hand to a man in a suit and a man in an orange shirt.

As Harper took one step to his right, the two men also moved in that direction closer to the guard.

When Harper eventually received the ball to inbounds the ball for a potential game-winning shot, the two men could not have been more than two feet away with the fan in orange clapping.

X user @SpursReporter quote tweeted the clip with another frontward-showing angle that displayed the fan in orange getting rather close to Harper and pondered whether the referees did enough.

“Should the @nba and @OfficialNBARefs review this incident where Karl Anthony Towns asks Knicks fans to crowd Dylan Harper as he attempts to inbound the ball on the final play of Game 5? ,” the individual wrote.

“NBA rules explicitly state that fans are strictly prohibited from entering the playing area or intentionally interfering with players, whether the player is inbounds or out of bounds. Furthermore, rules state that fans must remain within the physical limits of their own seats.

“In an instance like this, Arena security staff is required to back the front row up, and offenders should be ejected. The second video in the tweet below also shows how egregious this violation was.”

The NBA rules on out-of-bounds and throw-in plays does not specifically state any stipulation about fans, although they are not allowed to interfere with play.

However, in these instances, there’s only so much the referees can do since the play happens right in front of those sitting courtside.

Whether the fans affected Harper or not, he and the Spurs missed a golden chance for a great look on their final play when Towns deflected his pass to Stephon Castle.

That tip led to Castle fumbling the ball, and he did not get a shot off in time as the Knicks rallied from a 29-point hole in the second half to grab a 3-1 series lead.