Mets Daily Prospect Report, 8/13/26: Binghamton is a wagon

PHILADELPHIA, PA - JULY 18: Eric Wagaman #39 of the New York Mets fields the ball prior to the game between the New York Mets and the Philadelphia Phillies at Citizens Bank Park on Saturday, July 18, 2026 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Trevor Hayes/MLB Photos via Getty Images) | MLB Photos via Getty Images

Triple-A: Syracuse Mets (38-37/19-21)

SYRACUSE 10, JACKSONVILLE 9 (BOX)

This game had EVERYTHING.

Jacksonville lead and controlled this game in the early portion of the proceedings, as the Jumbo Shrimp were up 3-0 after five innings. The Syracuse offense finally arrived in the sixth, with MJ Melendez starting the scoring with a two run home run. Zack Short followed it up with a three run home run, putting a five spot on the board for the Mets. Eric Wagaman continued the scoring in the seventh with a double, and Melendez singled him home, as the Mets ran out to a 7-3 lead.

The Jumbo Shrimp did not take this lightly, and scored five in the bottom of the eighth to take a 8-7 lead. The Mets, who simply would not be denied on the day, took the lead back in the top of the ninth with a Christopher Morel two run home run. Wagaman went back to back with Morel, making it 10-8. Jacksonville would hit a solo home run to get a run back in the ninth, but Zach Franklin closed the door for the save.

  • CF Nick Morabito: 0-4, BB, SB (36)
  • SS Ronny Mauricio: 1-5, R, 2B
  • RF Christopher Morel: 2-4, 2 R, HR (11), 2 RBI, BB, 2 E (3, 4)
  • 1B Eric Wagaman: 3-4, 3 R, 2 2B, HR (4), 2 RBI, BB
  • DH MJ Melendez: 2-5, R, HR (13), 3 RBI, K
  • 3B Nick Lorusso: 0-5, K
  • LF Jose Ramos: 2-3, R, 2B, 3B, BB, K, SB (1)
  • C Shawn Ross: 1-4, R, 3 K
  • 2B Zack Short: 1-3, R, HR, 3 RBI, BB, K
  • RHP Jack Wenninger: 5.0 IP, 2 H, 3 R, 2 ER, 4 BB, 8 K
  • REHAB ALERT: RHP Austin Warren: 1.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 2 K, H (3)
  • RHP Chris Devenski: 1.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 1 K
  • RHP Dylan Ross: 0.1 IP, 2 H, 3 R, 3 ER, 1 BB, 1 K
  • LHP Joe Jacques: 0.2 IP, 1 H, 2 R, 2 ER, 3 BB, 2 K, 1 HBP, W (4-0), BS (2)
  • RHP Zach Franklin: 1.0 IP, 2 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 1 BB, 2 K, S (6)

Double-A: Binghamton Rumble Ponies (27-42/19-22)

BINGHAMTON 13, PORTLAND 5 (BOX)

Binghamton, who have been doing their best 1927 Yankees impression since the trade deadline, are at it yet again, winning their ninth in a row in dominating fashion.

Jefferson Rojas started the scoring in the first, notching an RBI single, and they were off from there. They scored five in the second, one in the third and fourth, and five in the sixth. Everyone except John Bay got a hit in the game, and only Rojas, Chris Suero, and Billy Amick had one hit (though Amick’s was a three run home run, so he made it count). Mitch Voit notched two hits (and dropped his batting average to .533 in the process), and Émilien Pitre had three. It was a dominating performance.

On the pitching side, Gary Gill Hill got the start and was up and down, going six innings but surrendering all five of the runs (with four being earned). He only surrendered five hits and one walk, but was done in by two home runs. He struck out five. The bullpen coasted through the final three frames.

  • SS Mitch Voit: 2-5, 2 R, 2B, BB
  • 3B Émilien Pitre: 3-4, R, 2 RBI
  • LF JT Benson: 1-2, K
  • 2B-3B Jefferson Rojas: 1-3, 2 R, 3 RBI
  • DH Jacob Reimer: 2-4, R, 2B, RBI, K
  • C Chris Suero: 1-5, R, HR (15), RBI, 3 K
  • 1B Billy Amick: 1-3, 3 R, HR (6), 3 RBI, BB, K
  • CF John Bay: 0-4, R, BB, 2 K
  • LF-2B D’Andre Smith: 3-4, 2B, 2 RBI
  • RF Yohairo Cuevas: 2-5, 2 R, 2B, RBI, K, SB (1)
  • RHP Gary Gill Hill: 6.0 IP, 5 H, 5 R, 4 ER, 1 BB, 5 K, 1 WP. W (2-0)
  • RHP Carlos Guzman: 1.0 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 1 K
  • RHP Brendan Girton: 1.0 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 1 K
  • RHP Justin Armbruester: 1.0 IP, 2 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 2 K

High-A: Brooklyn Cyclones (25-40/22-21)

JERSEY SHORE 4, BROOKLYN 3 / 11 (BOX)

After four scoreless frames for both teams, the Cyclones finally got on the board in the fifth, when Daiverson Gutierrez singled home Ronald Hernandez. That 1-0 score held until the eighth, until Jersey score tied it at one and took a 2-1 lead in the ninth (on a Chase Meggers error). Yonatan Henriquez tied it in the bottom of the ninth with a sacrifice fly, pushing us to extras.

The teams traded runs in the tenth, with the Cyclones scoring on a Gutierrez double. Jersey Shore scored on a fielder’s choice in the tenth, and held off the Cyclones in the bottom of the frame.

  • SS Sammy Stafura: 0-5, 2 K
  • CF Aidan Smith: 1-4, R, BB, 2 K
  • RF John Spikerman: 1-4, BB, K
  • DH Ronald Hernandez: 1-5, R, 2B, 2 K
  • LF Yonatan Henriquez: 0-4, RBI, K
  • 3B Colin Houck: 1-3, R, 2B, BB, E (16)
  • C Daiverson Gutierrez: 3-4, 2B, 2 RBI
  • 2B Eddinson Paulino: 1-4, 3B, K, E (1)
  • 1B Chase Meggers: 0-4, K, E (3)
  • RHP Emilio Obispo: 5.0 IP, 4 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 2 BB, 3 K
  • RHP Elwis Mijares: 1.0 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 1 BB, 2 K, H (1)
  • RHP Ryan Dollar: 1.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 1 BB, 1 K, H (2)
  • RHP Josh Blum: 1.0 IP, 2 H, 1 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 1 K, BS (1)
  • RHP Juan Arnaud: 2.0 IP, 2 H, 2 R, 0 ER, 1 BB, 3 K
  • RHP Joe Scarborough: 1.0 IP, 0 H, 1 R, 0 ER, 2 BB, 1 K, L (0-2)

Single-A: St. Lucie Mets (33-33/16-27)

JUPITER 16, ST. LUCIE 8 (BOX)

For a game that ended in a such lopsided way, it was actually an interesting game for a while. Jupiter ran out to a 6-0 lead after two, and a 7-3 lead after five, before St. Lucie came roaring back in the sixth. A Bohan Adderley bases loaded walk made it 7-4, and singles by Dylan Carey and Aiden Robbins flipped the game on its head, giving the Cyclones a 8-7 lead.

The good times woukd end there, though.

Jupiter scored two in the bottom of the sixth and seven in the eighth, putting the game to bed.

  • SS Elian Peña: 1-4, R, RBI, BB, 2 K, SB (28)
  • DH Aiden Robbins: 2-5, 3 RBI, 2 K, SB (1)
  • 1B Julio Zayas: 0-5, 2 K
  • LF Kuhio Aloy: 0-4, R, BB, 2 K, E (1)
  • C Yovanny Rodriguez: 0-3, BB, 2 K
  • RF Wyatt Vincent: 1-4, R, K
  • 2B Vladi Gomez: 0-3, R, BB, K
  • CF Bohan Adderley: 1-3, 3 R, RBI, BB, K, 3 SB (4, 5, 6)
  • 3B Dylan Carey: 2-4, R, 2 RBI, K, 2 SB (1, 2), E (2)
  • RHP Owen Woodward: 1.0 IP, 4 H, 4 R, 4 ER, 1 BB, 0 K
  • RHP Jose Lopez: 4.2 IP, 4 H, 5 R, 2 ER, 2 BB, 3 K, 2 HBP, L (1-2)
  • RHP Ernesto Mercedes: 0.1 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 0 K
  • RHP Jose Guevara: 1.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 1 K
  • RHP Brett Banks: 0.1 IP, 5 H, 6 R, 6 ER, 1 BB, 0 K, 1 WP
  • RHP Caden Wooster: 0.2 IP, 2 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 1 BB, 1 K

Rookie: FCL Mets (24-33)

NO GAME (SEASON OVER)

STAR OF THE NIGHT

Eric Wagaman

GOAT OF THE NIGHT

Brett Banks

Shaikin: Some questions (and answers) about Mark Walter selling the Lakers

Dodgers majority owner Mark Walter stands at a podium and speaks to a crowd during a Dodgers Foundation gala
Dodgers owner Mark Walter in 2019 (Frazer Harrison / Getty Images)

In 2012, on the day after Mark Walter and his partners bought the Dodgers, I sat next to Walter in a conference room. To the sports fan, Walter was virtually anonymous: a super rich guy who had made his money running investment and insurance companies.

Walter’s purchase valued the Dodgers and its related assets at a then-record $2.15 billion. That value stunned the sports world. Mark Cuban had bowed out of the bidding, believing the Dodgers were not worth even $1 billion.

I asked Walter why he believed it made business sense to pay three times as much as any major league team had sold for.

“I think you have a few moments in life where you have the opportunity to own an asset and really be a custodian of something that should be multigenerational and iconic,” he said then. “I understand it’s a lot of money. But it’s not as if you can go buy another one tomorrow. … We hope we never, ever are going to sell it.”

Read more:Plaschke: Too many questions, not enough answers. Lakers sale doesn’t pass smell test

That was essentially the point someone who travels within the inner circles of pro sports made to me Wednesday morning, as news broke that Walter had sold the Lakers to Bob Iger, the former Disney chief, and Joshua Kushner.

The Steinbrenner family has owned the New York Yankees for 53 years. Jerry Jones has owned the Dallas Cowboys for 37 years. The Buss family owned the Lakers for 46 years.

These trophy assets are few and far between. Walter had sold the Lakers after less than one year of ownership ratified by the NBA board of governors — and not through a comprehensive bidding process, but to an inquiring caller during the weekend?

“This has more red flags than a May Day parade,” an industry insider said, speaking on condition of anonymity so as not to jeopardize his professional relationships.

The deal, which valued the Lakers at $12.5 billion, was motivated by the spiraling price for an NBA expansion team in Las Vegas, according to ESPN’s Ramona Shelburne. After all, if Iger and Kushner might have to pay $10 billion for a startup team, why not call and see if Walter might accept a bit more for one of the marquee franchises in American sports?

Was this a blind call or was Walter looking to sell?

“It was suggested to us that maybe Mark Walter would be interested in selling his stake in the Lakers,” Iger told the California Post.

What did Dodgers president Stan Kasten have to say about that?

“I never knew that. He never said that to me,” Kasten said. “I think he was surprised by it. That’s what he has expressed to me. Mark had no plan to do this. This just came up, and he thought about it and said yes.”

Why might Walter have been interested in selling?

Mark Walter, chairman and controlling owner of the Dodgers, acknowledges a fan before a game in Chicago on Aug. 4.
Mark Walter acknowledges a fan before a game against the Cubs in Chicago this month. (Melissa Tamez / Associated Press)

Only he can say for sure, but his companies are under federal investigation for failing to disclose and properly account for billions of dollars of loans among related entities. Bloomberg reported Wednesday that Walter’s holding company is trying to raise money that could help pay off or at least pay down those loans, and the Financial Times reported that company assets could be sold or restructured.

No charges have been filed, and investigations can conclude without charges. No allegations of wrongdoing have been made against Walter.

Is there a baseball angle to this?

Among the investment firms Walter’s holding company approached about “deals to raise cash,” according to Bloomberg: the asset management firm owned by New York Mets owner Steve Cohen.

Cohen’s firm passed, according to the Financial Times.

When Walter and his partners bought the Dodgers, the runners-up: the bid team of Cohen and Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong.

Read more:Swanson: Bob Iger could be the Imagineer to lead the Lakers back to glory

Does Kasten believe the Lakers sale is related to the federal investigation?

“No, that never came up. And Mark and I discussed it,” Kasten said. “So, no, we don’t have any reason to think that. I certainly have no reason to think that.”

What does Walter’s sale of the Lakers mean for the Dodgers?

“It means nothing for the Dodgers,” someone who speaks regularly with Walter said, speaking on condition of anonymity. “He owned them long before the Lakers and will own them long after.”

If Walter should later sell the Dodgers, what might have the greatest impact on the team?

Shohei Ohtani has an out clause in his contract if Mark Walter sells the team.
Shohei Ohtani has an out clause in his contract if Mark Walter sells the team. (Eric Thayer / Los Angeles Times)

Shohei Ohtani’s 10-year, $700-million contract with the Dodgers includes an unusual escape clause: If Walter is no longer the controlling owner, or if Andrew Friedman is no longer running the Dodgers’ baseball operations department, Ohtani can opt out of the contract.

Would he?

Way too soon to tell. If major league owners get their way in collective bargaining, the proposed salary cap would mean Ohtani at $70 million could eat up just about one-third of any team’s payroll. And, in his third year with the Dodgers, he has yet to complete a full season as a pitcher, and a left knee in which manager Dave Roberts says Ohtani suffers from “wear and tear” could make him less of a two-way player as the contract winds down.

On the other hand, playing salary might be less of an issue for him than for any other player in baseball. Ohtani is making more than his annual salary — an estimated $125 million this year — from sponsorships and endorsements, and he famously deferred $68 million of each year’s salary so the Dodgers could spend more freely on players that could help him and the team win. After six losing years with the Angels and two World Series championships in two years with the Dodgers, a losing team might not entice Ohtani, no matter how much room it might have under a proposed cap.

Iger used to run Disney. How did Disney’s experience owning the Angels and Mighty Ducks go?

Disney chairman Michael Eisner and NHL commissioner Gary Bettman blow duck calls announcing the name of the team in 1993.
Disney chairman Michael Eisner, left, NHL commissioner Gary Bettman, NHL chairman Bruce McNall and Mighty Ducks chairman Jack Lindquist blow duck calls announcing the name of the team in 1993. (Doug Pizac / Associated Press)

Disney dressed the Angels in uniforms derided by one player as “pinstripe pajamas,” put cheerleaders on the dugout roof, and installed a loud “countdown to first pitch.” This all seemed awful at the time but, given the plagues of in-game hosts and teams sporting jerseys in colors far beyond home white and road gray, perhaps Disney was just ahead of its time. And, for the first few years of the franchise, Mighty Ducks gear was some of the hottest merchandise in American sports.

Ultimately, Disney wanted the Angels and Mighty Ducks to launch an “ESPN West” regional sports channel. When that channel collapsed, Disney no longer needed the teams and eventually sold them. The Angels were such a minimal part of Disney’s portfolio that then-chief executive Michael Eisner showed up in the clubhouse and the players had no idea who he was.

Who owned the Angels when they won their one and only World Series championship?

Angels players waive to fans during the World Series title parade in Anaheim in 2002.
Angels players waive to fans during the World Series title parade in Anaheim in 2002. (Jean-Marc Bouju / Associated Press)

Disney. The company hired an investment banker to sell the team in the final month before the Angels won the 2002 World Series and agreed to sell to Arte Moreno in the first month of the following season.

One more try: Why did Walter really sell the Lakers?

“I think it was opportunistic and he found something that made sense to him,” Kasten said. “Mark’s a very sensible guy. But that’s really the only way I can explain it.

“You’ll have to talk to Mark about a more in-depth explanation and good luck.”

Times staff writer Maddie Lee contributed to this report.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter on all things Lakers.

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Throwback Thursday – Nick The Quick arrives in Dallas – February 21st 2002

SAN ANTONIO - MAY 19: Nick Van Exel #31 of the Dallas Mavericks watches Game one of the Western Conference Finals against the San Antonio Spurs during the 2003 NBA Playoffs at SBC Center on May 19, 2003 in San Antonio, Texas. The Mavericks won 113-110. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this Photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement (Photo by Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images) | Getty Images

February 21st, 2002 found the Dallas Mavericks swinging a trade deadline deal with the Denver Nuggets. In the move, the Mavericks shipped off Juwan Howard, Tim Hardaway (Sr.), Donnell Harvey, a first round draft pick in 2002 and cash. That netted Dallas Raef LaFrentz, Avery Johnson, Tariq Abdul-Wahad and Nick Van Exel. The centerpiece of the deal at the time was actually Raef LaFrentz, a 25-year-old 6’11” center who was the well-established starter for the Nuggets at the five.

To that point, Dallas had two true centers on their roster – Shawn Bradley and Evan Eschmeyer – neither of whom were three-point threats. Head coach Don Nelson loved unconventional lineups (that would look much more like the league norm years later) with a stretch big who was a legitimate deep threat. LaFrentz fit the bill and upon his arrival, he slotted in as the go-to starter (starting 25 of 27 games for the remainder of the regular season). The outbound Juwan Howard played some minutes at center for the Mavericks, but didn’t bring the size or shooting range they were after, so the deal was generally a win/win for both sides in that respect. Little did anyone know at the time, but the trade brought in future head coach Avery Johnson, and the player who would meaningfully change the identity of the Mavericks as he shifted to a sixth man role – Nick Van Exel.

Who was Van Exel before the trade?

As much as the trade was framed about LaFrentz, Van Exel was certainly no slouch. Spending his first five seasons with the Los Angeles Lakers where he earned a single All-Star selection, Van Exel was a staple in the starting lineup throughout his career to that point. Up until his final season in LA, he started every game he played except one, which came in his rookie season. He then started all but two games he played during his time with the Nuggets. The season he was traded to Dallas, he was averaging 21.4 points and 8.1 assists per game across 45 contests with Denver.

Of course, everyone knew the trade meant Van Exel would be shifting roles from a sure-fire starter, to a backup behind Steve Nash. That may have been part of why he wasn’t the featured name of the transaction, but coming off the bench proved to be a role he thrived in. So much so, in fact, that he averaged more points per game as sixth man than LaFrentz did as the starter!

Uncrowning the Kings

In Van Exel’s first Postseason with the Mavericks, he was part of the 3-0 first-round sweep of the Minnesota Timberwolves. That series has since become a talking point about the careers of Dirk Nowitzki and Kevin Garnett, with some deeming it to be the tie-breaker as to why Nowitzki is the better power forward of the two. In the next round, Dallas got walloped by the Sacramento Kings, 4-1.

That Kings team was relatively stacked with players such as Mike Bibby, Peja Stojakovic, Chris Webber, Vlade Divac and others. Dallas meanwhile had Steve Nash, Michael Finley, Dirk Nowitzki and LaFrentz leading the way as something of a well-matched mirror for the Kings. The similarities between the teams and the frequency of high intensity regular season games between them supercharged a rivalry that was only added to by the Kings’ young hotshot owners from the Maloof family, who were perfect rivals for Mavericks’ then-owner Mark Cuban.

The following season, the Mavericks met the Kings in the Playoffs in the second round once again. Following a game seven win over the Portland Trailblazers in the first round, Dallas dropped game one of the second round series against the Kings, at home. That loss prompted Van Exel to ask Nelson if he could speak to the team. With permission granted, Van Exel told Nash, Finley and Nowitzki that they needed to stop deferring to the Kings and stop believing them to be a better team. Van Exel backed up his words with stellar play of his own. In game two, the Mavericks ran the Kings out of the gym after dropping 83 first-half points on them. Van Exel scored 36 points in that one, then hung 40 points in game three’s double-overtime victory back in Sacramento. For the series, he connected on over 50% of his total field goals and just north of 45% from downtown.

Van Exel’s legacy with the Mavs

Van Exel’s stay in Dallas was relatively short, clocking in at a season-and-a-half overall. He was largely electric in his time with the Mavs, and certainly brought a much-needed grit and attitude to the team. His only full season in Dallas was the first time the franchise won 60 games. His motivational speech in the Playoffs against the Kings was the only series win Dallas had against Sacramento across three-straight seasons in which the two teams met in the postseason. Van Exel then returned to the fold as the head coach of the Mavericks G League team, the Legends, for the 2015-2016 season.

Van Exel’s unconventional free-throw shooting from about two feet behind the line, his post-up game (yes, the 6’1” point guard had a nice back-to-the-basket game) and his quirky spinning hook/push shot were all memorable. His unwillingness to back down and his ability to turn it on when needed should be unforgettable, despite a relatively short tenure in Dallas.

I invite you to follow me @_80MPH on X, and check back often at Mavs Moneyball for all the latest on the Dallas Mavericks.

Optionality, winning now, and the crossroads the Celtics and Red Sox faced this summer

BOSTON, MA - JUNE 24: Jayson Tatum #0 of the Boston Celtics holds the Larry O'Brien Championship trophy before a pre-game ceremony in recognition of the NBA Finals Championship before a game between the Boston Red Sox and Toronto Blue Jays on June 24, 2024 at Fenway Park in Boston, Massachusetts. (Photo by Billie Weiss/Boston Red Sox/Getty Images) | Getty Images

The Boston Celtics have had a puzzling offseason. By trading away Jaylen Brown, one of their franchise cornerstones, to a long-time conference and division rival in the Philadelphia 76ers, it appears they opened up a can of worms.

In a vacuum, Brad Stevens helped to steer the team in the right direction with the latest moves this summer. Signing veterans Mitchell Robinson and Mike Conley Jr., locking in extensions for Ron Harper Jr., Jordan Walsh, and Neemias Queta, and drafting Chris Cenac Jr. and Dillon Mitchell were all hits.

Though controversial, swapping JB for Paul George and picks could be seen as a small win too, finding a player who could be a slightly better fit next to Jayson Tatum, while also giving the team more flexibility for the future.

If we leave the vacuum and look to the rest of the league, Boston’s situation might not look as appealing. By sending Brown to the Sixers, it seems they turned Philly into the hottest destination of the offseason. Dean Wade, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, Anfernee Simons – oh, and LeBron James all decided to join JB, Tyrese Maxey, Joel Embiid, and VJ Edgecombe to help fill out the roster in pursuit of a ring.

PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA – AUGUST 6: Jaylen Brown #7 and President of Basketball Operations Mike Gansey of the Philadelphia 76ers pose for a picture at Francis J. Myers Recreation Center on August 6, 2026 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Mitchell Leff/Getty Images) | Getty Images

The Miami Heat took a swing of their own, beating out Boston in the race for Giannis Antetokounmpo that later prompted the Brown trade. They haven’t had much financial flexibility to improve the roster around him and Bam Adebayo, but they’re a team that constantly overachieves under the coaching of Erik Spoelstra, so they can’t be taken lightly.

The Charlotte Hornets sent out LaMelo Ball and Miles Bridges in favor of more veteran players as they look to make their first return to the post-season since Kemba Walker was on the team. The Toronto Raptors went all-in for Kawhi Leonard as well, though we’ll have to see how the league handles that one…

The Indiana Pacers made their push last season when they gave up a haul for Ivica Zubac, giving Tyrese Haliburton a solid starting center to work with and round out the team as he returns from rehabbing his torn Achilles. The New York Knicks, reigning champs, are bringing back nearly the same roster that won it all, the main change being the loss of Mitchell Robinson, who they now replaced with Andre Drummond.

Long story short, the Eastern Conference got a whole lot better, and a whole lot more competitive. Several teams made big moves to win now, so why didn’t Boston? Why favor “optionality” over a proven super star like Giannis?

It’s a fair question fans have been asking all offseason. Sorry to say, I’m not sure I have the answer, if there is one at all.

Only one team brings home the Larry O’Brien Trophy in the end. Is a high chance of winning the championship this season worth more than maybe having a potentially high chance of winning one or more championships in the future?

As we’ve learned in the past, even “super teams” aren’t guaranteed to win every year. If the Celtics traded Jaylen, Hugo Gonzalez, and Baylor Scheierman for Giannis, a package that Boston was rumored to have been unwilling to offer, instead of trading Brown for PG, would they be closer to winning a championship this year? I would bet on it. Would they be head-and-shoulders over the rest of the league, or even the rest of the East? Not to the point where a ring would be guaranteed, especially given Giannis’ injury history.

Keep in mind, Giannis is also on the final guaranteed year of his contract, with a player option in the following season. Boston would be faced with either extending him for another four years at around $275 million, or potentially seeing him walk in free agency. If he continues to have health issues, would extending him make sense?

It’s hard to say what the “right” answer is. So much of sports is left up to chance. If things go according to plan, it’s a no-brainer to always go all-in, but it’s incredibly rare for that to happen. Injuries can strike at any time, even after perfect preparation, as Celtics fans already saw with Jayson Tatum.

TORONTO, CANADA – AUGUST 11: Adley Rutschman #31 of the Boston Red Sox walks off the field during the first inning of a game against the Toronto Blue Jays on August 11, 2026 at Rogers Centre in Toronto, Ontario. (Photo by Maddie Malhotra/Boston Red Sox/Getty Images) | Getty Images

For my fellow Red Sox fans, we gave up a haul of top prospects at the trade deadline in a win-now move, acquiring Adley Rutschman from the Baltimore Orioles. Rutschman is a great player at a position of need coming from an in-division team, and was also being pursued by Boston’s rivals as well.

This comes in a season where the Red Sox were playing terribly to start and sitting well outside of the playoff picture for quite some time. Their climb back into a wildcard spot for the playoffs has felt magical at times, and the front office decided it was as good a time as any to make a real push for a ring.

Boston is dealing with some injuries to key players at the moment, and now with five straight losses, it feels like their improbable comeback is starting to lose steam. If they don’t win it all, was it a bad idea for them to make the trade? Could one or more of those prospects have brought Boston a ring somewhere down the line?

Again, there’s no right answer.

Jeff Passan, ESPN’s lead MLB insider, said on the Pardon My Take podcast that fans have been “conditioned to accept that now is not as important as the future,” going on to say that he hates that as a fan. He made that comment while saying that the Red Sox “comically overpaid” for Rutschman, though praising them for actually “going for it.” He wants “executives and owners to treat this year like it’s the last year that’s going to be played… We don’t know what the future is going to look like. We don’t know when our franchise player is going to suffer a catastrophic injury … So why wouldn’t we throw all of our resources at what we’ve got right now, and try to steal a championship.”

It’s a very fair assessment to make, and incredibly hard to argue with as a fan. In my heart, I share the same sentiment, though it is noteworthy that the MLB and NBA operate very differently in terms of salaries, roster spots, and the ability to have and develop prospects. The stakes are a bit higher on a player-to-player basis in the NBA when playoff rotation can shrink to as small as 6-7 players.

Maybe you trade DeMar DeRozan for Kawhi Leonard, and immediately win your first championship in franchise history. Maybe you trade Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and a boatload of picks for Paul George and end up with at least half a decade of mediocrity, if not more.

Regardless, I think everything Celtics fans have felt this offseason has been justified, and I say that knowing how hard it is to find two Celtics fans who agree on anything more than loving the team. The pain, the joy, the confusion, the anger – all of it is justified.

Unfortunately — or maybe fortunately — we aren’t in those executive offices making the tough decisions. We don’t get to dictate the makeup of the team. We just get to feel what we feel, and if so inclined, share it with the world as we all watch along.

No one knows the future. Maybe this current iteration of the team is still enough to get it done. The only way to find out is to wait and see how everything plays out. It may be frustrating at times, but I for one would like to sit back and enjoy the ride, wherever it may take us.

The trippy statistical comps for Bilal Coulibaly

Historical comps suggest Bilal Coulibaly could be an all-time great. Or a bust. Or something in between. | NBAE via Getty Images

This journey through the wonderful world of The Statistical Doppelgänger Machine starts with some warnings.

Remain seated throughout the duration of this article. Keep your hands, feet, legs, and arms securely accounted for. For the protection of others, avoid flailing about or throwing objects, including — but not limited to — smartphones, laptops or other electronic devices. Do not attempt to read or listen to this article while exercising, driving, or operating heavy machinery. Use of safety gear such as a seat belt or lap bar are recommended. Do not read or listen while under the influence of drugs, alcohol or other substances.

Maybe keep those substances handy for after reading.

This one is a trip.

For those wondering what the heck this is all about, welcome to my statistical doppelgänger series, in which I run Wizards players through an algorithm connected to a player database. The algorithm calculates which player seasons (as measured across 14 categories) through NBA history are “most similar” to the reference player.

In the first article of this year’s series, we learned that Alex Sarr just might be the second coming of Kristaps Porzingis. Right down to the broken foot.

Anyway, today we’re looking at Wizards wing Bilal Coulibaly.

Through three seasons, Coulibaly has been somewhat enigmatic — long and hyper-athletic. At times, he’s defended well and exhibited athletic arrogance. At others he’s seemed timid and too ready to defer. Also, he’s gotten hurt a lot — sitting out 27.8% of the team’s game since he entered the league.

<p>The range of possible outcomes for Bilal Coulibaly is massive.</p> | Getty Images

Entering his fourth season, Coulibaly is still just 22-years-old.

As I wrote in his production ekg article, what he can do remains more than a little unknown, even after three seasons. What he seems to do best (defend) seems to have had little impact on the team performance, which is a) ultimately what matters, and b) might be a function of less-than-committed teammates, a terrible defensive ecosystem, and a franchise that was trying to lose.

The offensive end is where he’s shown the least promise, though over his final 20 games played last season, he showed sustained aggression, reasonable efficiency, and an apparent ability to get by nearly anyone off the bounce nearly any time he wanted.

All that said, I was in no way prepared for what the doppelgänger machine says are Coulibaly’s closest comps (similar per possession production across 14 categories at a similar age).

To save you some typing in the comments:

  • Yes, I double-checked to make sure The Doppelgänger Machine was functioning correctly. Triple-checked, if I’m being nitpicky.
  • I warned you.

To the doppelgängers:

  1. James Harden | 2010-11 | Oklahoma City Thunder | Age: 21 — Yes, this is THE James Harden. The Beard. The 8x All-NBA selection, the NBA MVP, the 3x scoring champ, the 2x assists leader. This was Harden in his second season with OKC — he’d win 6th Man of the Year the following season. In this comp season, Harden shot better and notched higher efficiency than Coulibaly did. Amazingly, Coulibaly’s usage was slightly higher (19.5% to 18.9%) and their stats on a per possession basis were remarkably similar. If someone had asked me to list players Coulibaly was like, I probably would have named dozens (if not hundreds) before I got to Harden. But don’t worry, The Machine is going to get weirder.
  2. Aaron Gordon | 2016-17 | Orlando Magic | Age: 21 — I promised weird(er), but you’ll have to wait a little longer for that. Gordon is closer to what I would have expected. This was back when Orlando was trying to make him into a wing because they were one of those teams through the years that always seemed to think how great it would be to play a freak athlete power forward type on the perimeter. I can’t think of too many such attempts of this sort were successful. Gordon’s gone on to have a good career, which included helping Nikola Jokic and the Denver Nuggets win a championship.
  3. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander | 2018-19 | Los Angeles Clippers | Age: 20 — That’s 2x NBA MVP and NBA champion Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. I mean, I watched Coulibaly for three seasons and saw an enigmatic wing with offensive deficiencies. I fed The Machine numbers, and it sees a future all-time great. This was SGA’s rookie season. He then got dealt to OKC in the Kawhi Leonard/Paul George transaction. And then…he kinda languished in the good-to-maybe-very-good range for another three seasons before erupting into what we’ve seen the past four years. That three-year semi-wilderness stretch included missing games by the dozens as the Thunder tanked.
  4. Hedo Turkoglu | 2001-02 | Sacramento Kings | Age: 22 — Another comp I would not have come up with my eyeballs and memory. The multi-talented forward was probably not as impactful as my Stan Van Gundy-aided recollections would suggest, but he was a good player for a long time.
  5. Omri Casspi | 2009-10 | Sacramento Kings | Age 21 — Another international player, which is kinda interesting. Casspi played 10 seasons and never cracked average in my PPA metric. This was his rookie season, and like each of the player’s on this list (including Coulibaly), his offensive usage rate was in the 18-20% range (SGA was highest at 19.9%), and his statistical production in the other categories was in that “about the same” range.

One of the fascinating things about this annual exercise is the different directions young players can go from a similar start. Coulibaly’s comps range from guys who had similar production patterns early in their career and then went in wildly divergent directions. Which way will Coulibaly go?

Moving into the “honorable mention” section, the player types start feeling more like what I expected before I order The Machine to run:

  • Tim Thomas — age 23 with the Milwaukee Bucks — talented forward who never became as good as expected
  • P.J. Washington — age 21 with the Charlotte Hornets
  • Martell Webster — age 21
  • Peyton Watson (last season)
  • John Williams — yes, the Bullets’ John Williams (before the knee injury and weight gain)
  • Troy Brown Jr. — age 20 — the not bad season (PPA: 96)

Then seasons from other guys who make sense: Devin Vassell, Jerami Grant, Jaylen Brown (age 21), Jae Crowder, Will Barton, Jalen Suggs, Paul George (age 21).

The Doppelgänger Machine in this case largely reinforced what I wrote about Coulibaly back in May. But maybe the point is that with young players, it’s hard to tell what they’re going to become. The range of possibilities is vast.

If Coulibaly does the kind of psychotic work that Harden and SGA did on their bodies and games, he probably has the physical tools to reach elite status.

If he does “hard-working NBA player” work — which is to say borderline psychotic — maybe he’s a high-level role player like Gordon or Washington.

If he does “normal NBA player” work — which would provide work-life balance and probably $150 million in career earnings over a 10-12-year career — maybe he’s an 8th or 9th man type like Casspi.

Next through The Statistical Doppelgänger Machine: Kyshawn George. I promise it won’t be so weird.

Open Thread: Spurs announce new partnership with Heybike

Dec 13, 2018; San Antonio, TX, USA; A general view of the San Antonio Spurs logo on the court prior to a game between the Spurs and the LA Clippers at AT&T Center. Mandatory Credit: Soobum Im-USA TODAY Sports

Per a Spurs press release:

“The San Antonio Spurs today announced Heybike as the organization’s official e-bike partner, uniting the two brands through a shared vision for connection through sports and movement. This marks Heybike’s first agreement with an NBA team, as they seek to align with strong, internationally recognized sports brands like the Spurs.”

Heybike, a global e-bike brand, seeks to redefine eco-mobility with sleek design and user-centric innovation. Jason Fang, Heybike founder, stated,

“Partnering with the San Antonio Spurs is a historic milestone for Heybike. We believe an e-bike is more than just transportation—it is a bridge that brings generations together. Through this partnership, we are excited to integrate into the Spurs’ vibrant community and inspire fans of all ages to explore, connect, and let their joy out!”

To celebrate the launch, Official Spurs Fan Club can receive a 20% discount on their Heybike purchase from now until Sunday, September 30.

Brian Colbert, senior vice president of global partnerships for Spurs Sports & Entertainment added,

“We’re proud to welcome Heybike to the Spurs family. Whether we’re bringing people together through sport or helping fans explore their cities in new ways, we share a belief in the power of mobility to create connection and strengthen communities.”

If you are not a current member of the Spurs Fan Club, joining now makes you eligible for the discount on a Heybike purchase.


Welcome to the Thread. Join in the conversation, start your own discussion, and share your thoughts. This is the Spurs community, your Spurs community. Thanks for being here.

Our community guidelines apply which should remind everyone to be cool, avoid personal attacks, not to troll and to watch the language.

Phillies News: Luis Arraez, Bryce Harper, Derek Hill

Aug 12, 2026; St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Philadelphia Phillies left fielder Brandon Marsh (16) reacts as he is called out on strikes by umpire Dan Iassogna (58) during the fourth inning against the St. Louis Cardinals at Busch Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jeff Curry-Imagn Images | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

This week has been brutal for the Phillies, but at least you’ll be able to watch them ground into double plays with the majestic backdrop of a cornfield in Iowa tonight at the Field of Dreams game. Well, if you have Netflix. And if it doesn’t rain.

On to the links.

Phillies News:

MLB news:

What time is MLB Field of Dreams game? Where to watch Phillies vs Twins today

Major League Baseball returns to Dyersville, Iowa on Thursday, Aug. 13 with the Philadelphia Phillies and Minnesota Twins facing off at the "Field of Dreams" ballpark.

This will be third the Field of Dreams Game and first since 2022, held at a venue inspired by the beloved 1989 film starring Kevin Costner. But the site has undergone major renovations since hosting its last MLB game and those upgrades should be on full display during the broadcast.

The Phillies are wearing road gray uniforms inspired by the ones the club wore from 1939-41. Meanwhile, the Twins will don home whites that harken back to 1961, the franchise's first season in Minneapolis.

More than 25 Baseball Hall of Famers are set to walk through the outfield as part of a cinematic pregame ceremony, before the Twins' Taj Bradley takes the mound, opposed by Phillies right-hander Aaron Nola.

Where to watch MLB Field of Dreams game

Philadelphia and Minnesota will be playing a regular-season MLB game at the "Field of Dreams" ballpark. Here's everything you need to know to watch it.

  • Time: 7:30 p.m. ET (pregame coverage begins at 6:30)
  • Location: Dyersville, Iowa
  • Streaming: Netflix

What time is Phillies vs Twins at Field of Dreams?

First pitch is scheduled for 7:30 p.m. ET on Thursday, August 13.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: What time is MLB Field of Dreams game? Where to watch Phillies vs Twins today

The Lakers have been sold for a record $12.5 billion. What happens now?

The Los Angeles Lakers were sold for a record $12.5 billion. So now what?

Like every major sports league, the NBA has specific protocols in place to structure the sale of franchises. Those procedures are outlined in Article 5 of the league’s Constitution and By-laws. Yet, given how quickly the agreement came about, and given how much work goes into vetting prospective owners, this is a multi-step process that may take months to resolve, possibly dragging into 2027.

On Wednesday, Aug. 12, Mark Walter agreed to sell the Lakers to businessman Joshua Kushner and former Disney CEO Bob Iger in a deal that set the record for the highest amount paid for a North American sports franchise. Neither the NBA nor the Lakers publicly acknowledged the agreement Wednesday because the formal application requesting the transfer of ownership — what is tantamount to a private purchase agreement — hadn’t been filed to the NBA league office.

This is the first step in the process. That document must be filed to NBA commissioner Adam Silver, who then has the right to request any additional information from the parties. The NBA, however, has a nine-person advisory finance committee that will oversee the thorough vetting of Kushner and Iger, including potential background checks and a complete review of the finances of each.

This, though, is where the process might be expedited. If the NBA was vetting a prospective owner completely new to the league, there would be more steps to clear to fully understand the financial picture of those parties. But since Kushner and Iger were actively exploring the NBA’s expansion opportunity in Las Vegas, the NBA may have already done some legwork in vetting them in what could be considered a head start.

While this vetting is taking place, Silver and other league executives can receive updates about the process, as needed.

Then, once the vetting has been completed, the advisory finance committee will present a recommendation to the rest of the NBA’s ownership groups (Board of Governors) on whether transfer of ownership should be approved.

At this point, the issue will be put to a vote, with approval requiring 75% of the Board of Governors, or at least 23 of the 30 franchises.

The first date to watch is the Board of Governors meeting that is set to take place in New York in September. While that timeline would appear to be too soon for the matter to be put to a vote — just the process of drafting the detailed private sale agreement takes considerable time — it’s almost certain that an update on the Lakers sale will be an item on the agenda.

Furthermore, Silver will hold a press conference upon the conclusion of the Board of Governors meeting, where he can provide any updates to assembled media.

The following Board of Governors meeting will be in the Spring of 2027, but a vote to approve the Lakers sale does not need to take place in person. There can be a remote session to accommodate the closing date outlined by Walter and Kushner and Iger; Walter’s purchase of the Lakers, for example, was approved unanimously on Oct. 30, 2025 in a virtual session.

It’s tricky to gauge a timeline, as each sale has its own considerations. Using Walter’s purchase of the Lakers as an example, the agreement was reached in mid-June 2025, putting the timeline at four months until NBA ownership approved the sale in late October of that year.

Once approved, the NBA would then issue a statement announcing the decision, though the transaction would still need to close. That step is typically a formality and requires all documents to be signed and all money to be wired. Only then can ownership be fully transferred, and only then can the transaction become fully binding.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: The Lakers have been sold for a record $12.5 billion. What happens now?

Dodgers vs. Brewers: Who has the edge? Position-by-position breakdown

A sneak preview of the 2026 National League Championship Series might be set to unfold at Dodger Stadium starting Thursday night, Aug. 13.

The Los Angeles Dodgers and Milwaukee Brewers, both still vying for the best record in baseball, will begin a four-game series. It will feature Dodgers star Shohei Ohtani at the plate, Brewers phenom Jacob Misiorowski on the mound, and the requisite turnout of LA celebrities.

Last year, the Dodgers swept the Brewers in the NLCS on the way to their second straight World Series title. The Brewers are among the biggest obstacles preventing the Dodgers from a three-peat.

To assess who’s got the better team – at least before they play – it’s best to determine who has the edge at each position.

Dodgers vs. Brewers: Who has the edge?

Stats entering Wednesday's games.

First base (edge, Dodgers)

Jake Bauers, the Brewers’ primary first baseman, is having a career year with a team-high 21 homers and a team-best slugging percentage of .499. Dodgers stalwart Freddie Freeman has suffered a slight dip in HRs − and had a big scare Wednesday night − but leads the team with 135 hits and a batting average of .305 while remaining an asset on defense.

Second base (edge, Brewers)

Tommy Edman has been productive for the Dodgers since returning from a right ankle injury in mid-June. But Milwaukee’s Brice Turang has been instrumental for the Brewers, leading the team with 121 hits, including 16 home runs and 28 doubles, and a team-best 76 RBIs.

Shortstop (edge, Dodgers)

As bad as things have gone for Mookie Betts, he’s still slugged 14 homers and provides power the Brewers lack at this position. Cooper Pratt, a promising, 21-year-rookie for the Brewers, is out with a hamstring injury, forcing Milwaukee to plug in third baseman David Hamilton.

Third base (edge, Dodgers)

Max Muncy remains a power threat for the Dodgers. His 22 home runs this season are second best on the team, behind only Shohei Ohtani’s 26. Meanwhile, the Brewers’ lack of power at this position is almost as notable as what Muncy supplies.

Catcher (edge, Brewers)

Will Smith appears to be on his way back for the Dodgers from a neck injury. But until then, it’s duct tape, glue and staples holding together this position. The Brewers’ William Contreras is having a subpar year at the plate, but this season he still made the All-Star Game for the third time in five years.

Left field (edge, Brewers)

For the Dodgers, it’s become left field by committee because no one’s good enough to win the job. By contrast, Jackson Chourio, a rising star for the Brewers, is batting .275 with 17 homers and slugging at a .480 clip.

Center field (edge, Dodgers)

For the Dodgers, Andy Pages is batting .270 with 19 home runs and his WAR is a team-best 5.2. The Brewers have yet to find a player who merits the full-time job.

Right field (edge, Dodgers)

The Dodgers signed Kyle Tucker to a four-year, $240 million deal and still are waiting for the payoff. But Brewers’ speedster Garrett Mitchell is more underwhelming at the plate than Tucker and his potential upside.

Designated hitter (edge, Dodgers)

Shohei Ohtani is batting .290 with a team-best 26 home runs, .392 OBP and .929 OPS. Christian Yelich, a three-time All-Star, has struggled so much this year that he slipped in the batting order as low as No. 7.

Starting rotation (edge, Brewers)

The Brewers have the best pitcher in baseball in Jacob Misiorowski − his fastballs have been clocked as high as 105.5 mph − and ample talent around him. The Dodgers’ rotation should be world-class with the addition of Tarik Skubal, but it remains a work in progress.

Bullpen (edge, Brewers)

The trumpets are blaring again for Edwin Diaz, but elbow surgery did not solve his early-season struggles. Trevor Megill is an elite closer for the Brewers.

Manager (pick 'em)

The Brewers’ Pat Murphy is the back-to-back National League Manager of the Year. Dave Roberts has guided the Dodgers to back-to-back World Series titles.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Dodgers vs. Brewers: Who has the edge? Position-by-position breakdown

The Dodgers' biggest October threat just arrived in LA

Existentially, the biggest threat to the Los Angeles Dodgers is the Dodgers. Sometimes they look to be strolling when they should be sprinting after a third straight World Series title.

But with October baseball in mind, the Dodgers have another problem: the Milwaukee Brewers. And those Brewers are in Los Angeles for a four-game series at Dodger Stadium that starts Thursday, Aug. 13.

The Brewers manifested from small-market magic. The Dodgers consume almost endless resources in the second-largest media market.

The two teams met in the National League Championship Series last year, when the Dodgers swept the series 4-0. It would be no surprise if the Dodgers and Brewers met in the NLCS yet again.

So with the regular season about 75% complete and October looming, now might be the perfect time for the Dodgers to size up their most formidable foes.

Jacob Misiorowski vs. Dodger hitters

Last week, Dodgers manager Dave Roberts noted his team is struggling to hit fastballs. That could not be more troubling than with Brewers pitcher Jacob Misiorowski in town. He’s scheduled to start Saturday in Game 3 of the series, and at times the 6-foot-7 right-hander has been almost unhittable.

Start with the triple-digit fastball that has reached speeds of 105.5 mph. He’s also been sharper in his second year in the big leagues and leads all pitchers in ERA (1.76), strikeouts (204) and WHIP (0.74).

But Misiorowski isn’t unbeatable, as the Dodgers know firsthand. In Game 3 of the NLCS last year, for example, Misiorowski struck out nine batters in five innings and gave up just one earned run during his appearance. Yet the Dodgers still won, 3-1.

It's nothing to count on. The Dodgers faced Misiorowski once during the 2025 regular season. He struck out 12 batters in six innings and allowed just one earned run while the Brewers won, 3-1.

This will be an optimal chance for Dodgers hitters to prove they can hit the fastball.

Misiorowski and Brewers staff vs. Dodgers pitching conundrums

No one else on the planet sets off a radar gun like Jacob Misiorowski does. But the Brewers pitching staff goes beyond Miz -- far enough that the Dodgers hitters will have to be locked in.

Milwaukee has the fourth-best ERA (3.54) in the majors, and Kyle Harrison has been a strong No. 2 starter. But on Monday, Aug. 11 he gave up eight earned runs in 4 2/3 innings in an 11-2 loss to the Padres. The Brewers rotation is mortal, and World Series favorites led by Shohei Ohtani and Freddie Freeman would capitalize.

Lucky for the Dodgers, they'll just miss Harrison, who is scheduled to pitch next Tuesday vs. Seattle.

The loss of Ohtani from the Dodgers pitching staff because of knee inflammation clearly has impacted the team. He was 8-2 with a 1.79 ERA after his last start, July 3.  

Yoshinobu Yamamoto has looked strong as the Dodgers' No. 1 starter. But the team still is trying to figure out its rotation with Blake Snell back from elbow surgery and Tyler Glasnow expected to return soon from back spasms.

The Brewers will help test Roki Sasaki, the Dodger pitcher who's set to start Thursday and has made notable progress over the past month. The Dodgers' trade for Tarik Skubal hasn’t paid off immediate dividends, but he'll get another chance with a scheduled start Sunday.

Fire vs. Ice?

Brewers manager Pat Murphy has yet to put his signature stamp on the 2026 season. Which is to say he has not been ejected.

Murphy, when disappointed with the umpires, has a penchant for expressing himself forcefully. It resulted in two ejections in 2025 and five ejections in 2024, the year he took over as the Brewers manager. He also had five ejections in 2015, during the 96 games he spent as manager of the San Diego Padres.

The fiery nature is cited as part of Murphy's success, and the Brewers respond. During Murphy's three years in Milwaukee, the Brewers have won two NL Central division titles and last year finished with the best regular-season record in baseball. Murphy is now the reigning two-time National League Manager of the Year.

If Murphy is fire, Dodgers manager Dave Robert is ice. Well, maybe less scorching. He’s calm and cerebral, and his demeanor won’t ever be confused for Murphy’s.

Since taking over as manager of the Dodgers in 2016, he’s been ejected at least once each season -- with the exception of 2026. But the next time you see Roberts implode and humiliate an umpire will be the first.

At times, Dodger fans have yearned for more fire from the Dodgers manager. In fact, that might have been the case when the Dodgers recently lost eight of nine games. But Roberts seems especially adept at keeping his team from panicking – such as while guiding the team to back-to-back World Series titles and three World Series titles in the past six years.

Slumbering bats

Not all of the bats are slumbering, but some expensive ones are.

Christian Yelich, the Brewers’ highest-paid player, hardly resembles the three-time All-Star he is. He has a meager eight home runs and is batting .231. Also struggling is All-Star catcher William Contreras, who in his seventh big-league season is having one of his least productive years at the plate.

Breakout performances from either of them could help separate two well-matched teams.

Los Angeles has a similar situation. Mookie Betts, in the middle of a 12-year, $365,000 contract, has returned to action after missing 35 games due to an oblique strain. But what happened to his bat?

He’s hitting just .235, but he showed signs of life Tuesday, Aug. 11, when he went 3-for-4 with a home run and a double in the Dodgers’ 5-4 victory over the Royals in 10 innings.

It’s been a similar story for Kyle Tucker, who’s in his first year of a $240 million, four-year deal with the Dodgers, underdelivering while batting .241. But two homers in his past seven games offered a glimmer of hope – especially for a team trying to separate itself from the Brewers.

Suddenly the Dodgers are getting back on track, and the Brewers have lost three in a row. With about two months before the playoffs begin, two juggernauts head into a four-game homestand from which they could emerge with a better sense of who they are and how far they can go.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: The Dodgers' biggest October threat just arrived in LA

Over/unders for Blake Lizotte and the Penguins’ depth players in 2026-27

PITTSBURGH, PA - MARCH 08: Charlie McAvoy #73 of the Boston Bruins skates against Blake Lizotte #46 of the Pittsburgh Penguins at PPG PAINTS Arena on March 8, 2026 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Joe Sargent/NHLI via Getty Images) | NHLI via Getty Images

We continue our PensBurgh over/under series this week with a look at some of the Pittsburgh Penguins depth players and what they might be capable of this season.

Among the many surprises the Penguins had in 2025-26 was the emergence of their fourth line, specifically as it related to Blake Lizotte and Connor Dewar. Both players played well enough to earn long-term contract extensions with the team, that are not only reasonable salary cap numbers, but also appropriate term lengths that should not make them liabilities long-term.

Here is a quick look at the other over/unders we have looked at so far:

Let’s get into today’s players and potential numbers.

Blake Lizotte: Over/under 1.5 shorthanded goals

Lizotte has been one of the Penguins’ top penalty killers since arriving in Pittsburgh, and has also had a knack throughout his career of producing offense on the penalty kill. Entering the 2026-27 season he has seven shorthanded goals in 434 career games, and has scored at least one in five of his seven full seasons in the league. That includes each of the past three seasons where he has accounted for four of them despite playing in only 176 games.

Over that time period 132 forward have logged at least 250 minutes of shorthanded ice-time, with Lizotte’s 0.75 goals per 60 minutes ranking 24th among that group, while also producing 0.48 individual expected goals per 60 minutes in that time. He gets his chances, and he creates some opportunities.

Had he not missed so much time over those three years it is not a stretch to think that he could have potted at least one or two more.

With Noel Accairi now playing in Philadelphia, it seems logical to assume that Lizotte’s PK role will take on even more importance, and if he can manage to stay on the ice you have to figure he is going to get some opportunities.

Will it be enough, and will he be dangerous enough to score two shorthanded goals this season?

Connor Dewar: Over/under 12.5 goals

When the Penguins traded a fifth-round pick at the 2024-25 NHL Trade Deadline to the Toronto Maple Leafs for Dewar and defenseman Connor Timmins it did not really register much for me. It just seemed like a, “okay, that happened,” type of move, and perhaps something to just fill out a roster for the rest of the season and give them some options for the 2025-26 season.

It has turned out to be a sneaky win for Kyle Dubas.

Dewar has become an extremely effective fourth-liner.

They flipped Timmins and organizational depth piece Isaac Belliveau to Buffalo for defenseman Connor Clifton and, more importantly, a second-round pick in 2025 that turned out to be defenseman Peyton Kettles, who is now one of the organization’s top prospects. Pretty strong value for a fifth-round pick and AHL roster fodder.

Since arriving in Pittsburgh, Dewar has scored 18 goals in 95 regular season games, while also adding two goals in six playoff games. Those 20 goals in 101 total games round out to an 82-game average of 16.2 goals. That’s closer to third-line production than fourth-line production.

That jump in goals has come with a spike in shooting percentage, going up 13.1 percent with the Penguins after being just 8.0 percent during his time with the Maple Leafs and Minnesota Wild. Had he shot at 8 percent over those two seasons with the Penguins his 20 goals would have gone down to about 12 goals. That would average out to 10 goals per 82 games played, which is probably more in line with what you would expect from a fourth-line depth player whose focus is more on defense than goal-scoring.

Is he simply a better player now in Pittsburgh with more opportunity?

Will the two extra games in the regular season help him get a little more shot volume?

Will all of that add up into more than 12.5 goals for the season?

Justin Brazeau: Over/under 41.5 games played with the Penguins

In the first part of the 2025-26 season Brazeau was one of the Penguins’ biggest surprises. He scored 12 goals in his first 24 games through the end of December, and rapidly emerged as a steal of a free agent signing at just $1.5 million per season. He brought size, physical play, and a surprising scoring touch to the lineup, while also displaying some shockingly good hands for a player of his size. He has always been a late-bloomer at every level he played at, and it seemed to be happening again for the Penguins.

But he cooled off considerably in the second half of the season, scoring just five goals over his last 40 games of the regular season.

Injuries no doubt played a role in that, but you also had to expect some sort of a regression. It happened.

Here is the problem I see for him this season: Where, exactly, does he fit in the lineup on a regular basis? The Penguins have 16 or 17 NHL-caliber forwards right now at a minimum, including the proven top-six veterans (Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin, Bryan Rust, Rickard Rakell), the other depth players (Lizotte and Dewar), a lot of younger/new players that figure to be regulars in the lineup (Egor Chinakhov, Nicholas Robertson, Ben Kindel) and a lot of younger players that will be competing for games and playing time (Ville Koivunen, Rutger McGroarty, Elmer Soderblom, Hendrix Lapierre, Avery Hayes). Including Brazeau, that is 16 forwards. Only 12 forwards are going to dress. Is Brazeau one of the best 12 forwards? Is there another trade to be made to open up a roster spot? You figure some of those younger players are going to end up in Wilkes-Barre/Scranton at the start. Could Brazeau himself be a potential trade piece given the roster and the fact he is in the last year of his contract and an unrestricted free agent after this season?

I like Brazeau as a player. I like what he brings and potentially brings. There will also inevitably be injuries and some of the younger players starting in the American Hockey League, all of which will create some sort of a roster opening for Brazeau at times. But I am just having a hard time seeing where he fits at the moment.

Islanders News: Of Fishermen and the Whale

Sutter The Elder vs. Turgeon The Elder, in a different time. | Getty Images

Another good morning (Rick!), afternoon or evening from our quiet summer where the Islanders added Matias Maccelli and subtracted Anders Lee, leaving us to view the return from season-ending injuries of Alex Romanov and Kyle Palmieri as the proverbial “like a new signing.”

Islanders & Isles-Adjacent News

  • Reminder to expressly agree to share your personal data to vote in the Islanders’ 3rd-jersey poll. [Isles]
  • Here is a very brief medley of Islanders players reacting to jersey designs. Good to see Romanov proof of life. [Isles]
  • And former Newsday Fisherman-era beatwriter Alan Hahn of course has thoughts on the Fisherman being in the running. [Newsday]
  • Brock Nelson is back in Da Beauty League, reflects on a crazy season of Olympic gold while falling short of Cup dreams with Colorado. He turns 35 in October — when did our little Reverend become an ol’ man?!? — but probably will continue to improve or at least age like fine wine. [NHL]
  • The Islanders will face the Hurricanes in Whalers unis this season. (The picture at the top of this post is from a bygone era, that’s Duane Sutter battling Sylvain Turgeon.) [THN]

Elsewhere

  • Twelve under-the-radar acquisitions from this summer (including Jordan Kyrou and Mavrik [sic] Bourque, who weren’t exactly under the radar, but whatever). [Sportsnet]
  • A 32-in-32 look at the Kings, who are Peter Laviolette’s seventh team. Dude is one team away from coaching a quarter of the 32-franchise league. [NHL]
  • Carey Price reflects on life and the Canadiens as he prepares to enter the Hall of Fame as the Canadiens’ all-time leader in goalie games played and victories. [NHL]
  • Seth Jarvis brought the Stanley Cup to Winnipeg, which is something that…oh no need to fill in any cruel punch lines. [NHL]

Banner Years: 1966, one final victory cigar

NBA history spans 80 seasons, and as CelticsBlog readers well know, the Boston Celtics have won a league-high 18 championships. This month, we are recapping each of those title years.

He was a kid born and raised in Brooklyn, N.Y., whose parents ran a deli. He went to college in Washington, DC, and continued to live there for the rest of his life. He also wound up spending nearly six decades in Boston as the architect of the greatest basketball franchise of all time. He coached 20 seasons and won more than anyone in the NBA at the time he retired, holding records that still stand. He invented the victory cigar. The Coach of the Year trophy is now named after him. As a team executive, he pulled off legendary trades and led the franchise to endless achievements. Throughout his career he was an influencer on civil rights. And he was associated with winning 16 NBA championships.

Red Auerbach shown in a familiar pose, coaching the Boston Celtics, clutching a rolled up program and smoking a victory cigar on the bench during a game played at the Boston Garden. Copyright 1965 NBAE (Photo by Dick Raphael/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images

Yes, that was the real life that Arnold “Red” Auerbach lived during his 89 years. So, when he decided to step down from coaching and go to the front office full-time after the 1966 playoffs, that got people’s attention.

Auerbach announced his plans in preseason and literally told his opponents that they had “one last crack at me.”

Red Auerbach coached 20 NBA seasons, the last 16 in Boston. He won 938 regular season games and 99 playoff games. His overall record was 1,037-548, equaling a .654 winning percentage. His eight consecutive titles with the Celtics is an unbreakable record.

The regular season

For the first time in 10 years, Boston did not win the Eastern Division. Their record was 54-26, with uneven results throughout the schedule. Their longest win streak was during the last six games of the season, but the Philadelphia 76ers edged them by one win. Many of the original core were now retired or moved on. And the Sixers were improving.

The Celtics still had the league’s best defense, but the offensive rating ranked next to last. While they were motivated to win one for Red on his way out, that sort of pressure can wear you down too. On top of that, going for an eighth straight title was even more draining.

A new roster addition was Don Nelson, entering his fourth NBA season. Nelson was on the Lakers when they were run off the court at the end of the 1965 Finals. He was cut after the season. Boston signed him as a free agent. “Nellie” would go on to play more than 1,000 games, win five titles, then become a head coach with five teams spanning three decades. He ranks second all-time with 1,335 wins, as well as earning Coach of the Year three times. Don Nelson passed away this past Sunday at age 86. Rest in peace, champ.

K.C. clips

We haven’t mentioned K.C. Jones enough in this Banner Years series, so let’s pause and correct that with this short video.

Eastern playoffs

Because they finished second, the Celtics finally had to play a first-round, best-of-five series, versus the Cincinnati Royals. All the aforementioned motivation must’ve been forgotten because the Royals won Games 1 and 3 in Boston. Only a fourth-quarter comeback fueled by 42 points from Sam Jones in Game 2 saved the Cs from a catastrophic sweep.

Game 4 was in Cincinnati, but the Royals missed their chance to end the dynasty when Sam and Satch Sanders combined for 60 points. Oscar Robertson almost drove the Royals to victory in Game 5 with 37 points. However, Sam Jones once again nearly matched him with 34 points and Boston won, 112-103. It was the only game won by the home team.

The Sixers were next, and this time they had home court advantage – which the Celtics immediately stole by blowing out Game 1 there, 115-96, and Game 2 at home, 114-93. The latter contest featured an actual fistfight between Boston’s Larry Siegfried and Philly’s Billy Cunningham, which led to Russ and Wilt going nose-to-nose. No one backed down!

(no audio)

Chamberlain’s 31-point, 27-rebound effort saved face and saved Philly from doom in Game 3. Temporarily. The Celtics refused to allow the Sixers to close out Red’s career. Game 4 at home, 114-108, and Game 5 away, 120-112, and it was over. A gentleman’s sweep, almost like the regular season never happened. Chamberlain went for 46 and 34 in the closeout, but John Havlicek and Sam Jones combined for 62 points. Russell’s line was 18/31/6.

The matchup

Chamberlain’s various teams had now faced Russell’s Celtics in five playoff series. Wilt’s record: 0-5.

NBA Finals

Auerbach and the Celtics moved on to their 10th straight Finals appearance. Their opponent was another regular foe, the LA Lakers. But before the series began, the Celtics announced that Bill Russell had accepted the coaching job as Red’s successor beginning next season. Russell would serve as player-coach and would be the first black head coach of a major professional sports team in the United States.

The first black draft choice, black and white players rooming together on the road (at that time, teams customarily assigned two players per room), the first all-black starting five, and now the coach. Another milestone action by the franchise.

<p>Bill Russell was named as new coach of the Boston Celtics and became the first black coach in the NBA. Russell and Red Auerbach pose after the announcement. (Photo by Bettmann Archive/Getty Images)</p>

The push for integration and equal rights versus the segregationists who resisted had created a volatile situation in the U.S. Sports were not excluded. Russell had a big job ahead of him. But first, there was one more series to play.

And the way it unfolded was frustrating for the Celtics and their fans. If it happened like this today, Twitter would melt down.

Game 1 in Boston began with the Celtics running out to a 14-point advantage, but LA cut it to one by halftime. A tight second half led to overtime and the Lakers pulled it out for a 1-0 series lead. Russell, Sam Jones and John Havlicek combined for 72 points, but Elgin Baylor – healthy this year – and Jerry West compiled 77 points, plus rookie Gail Goodrich added 20. Most noticeable was the 39 of 55 free throws for LA, compared to Boston’s 27 of 34, especially since the final score was close, 133-129.

Series turning point, part 1

Game 2, West and Baylor combined to shoot just 12 for 34 and 34 points. No one on the Lakers scored more than 18 points. Final: 129-109, Boston, series tied and momentum beginning to build.

In Games 3 and 4 in Los Angeles, Boston appeared to settle matters by winning both, 120-106, and 122-117. In each game, the Celtics had a trio of players combine for nearly 80 points. Now up 3-1, it’s back to Boston Garden for Red’s anticipated celebration.

Series turning point, part 2

Not so fast. The Lakers delayed the party by winning Game 5, 121-117. Baylor and West got hot again with 72 combined points. Russell’s 32-point, 28-rebound effort wasn’t enough. Game 6 in LA also went to the Lakers, 123-115, thanks to a fourth quarter in which they pulled away down the stretch.

Two closeout games lost, LA forcing Game 7 in Boston – the motivation probably changed from “let’s win for Red” to something like “we cannot let this happen.”

The Celtics immediately made a statement, jumping out to a 10-0 lead. They stretched it to 16 after three quarters, but the Lakers rallied to within a few points. In response, Sam Jones banked one in from what was called 40 feet, and Russell’s drive and dunk made it 10 with 30 seconds left.

The Garden crowd was jubilant and Red lit his cigar, with Massachusetts Gov. John Volpe handling the lighter. The celebration had begun, but the game wasn’t over, and the chaos of fans getting in the way nearly caused a disaster in the last three minutes. The desperate Lakers patched together an 8-0 run, still with time on the clock. Auerbach had never lit his cigar too soon, but on this night, of all nights, he almost did. It’s all in this amazing video.

WHEW!

The heroes we needed

Russell was masterful with 25 points and 32 rebounds in Game 7. His dunk with 30 seconds left triggered the celebration that nearly backfired. Sam Jones added 22 points.

It wasn’t over until…

…Literally the last second of the final minute of the series. Boston had been right there to end it in five, then found themselves barely able to run out the clock to survive Game 7. LA simply ran out of time. The Celtics were great enough to win eight straight titles, but the perception that they strolled to those titles with no competition couldn’t be more wrong.

The matchup

This was the fifth time the Lakers had faced Russell and the Celtics in the Finals. The Lakers’ record: 0-5.

Notable facts and stats

  • Russell may not have been a scorer but he led Boston in the series with 23.6 points per game, while adding 24.3 boards, 3.7 assists and ridiculous numbers of blocks, which we know even though they weren’t counted.
  • Sam Jones and Havlicek each averaged 23 PPG.
  • Jerry West averaged 33.9/6.4/5.1.
  • With hindsight, we know the title streak ended here, but the new coach Russell wasn’t finished.

And finally…

Banner Years continues tomorrow with a review of the 1967-68 season and the road to winning Banner #10.

Dave Roberts sounds off on Dodgers hate, legacy and LA intensity | Exclusive

PHOENIX — Los Angeles Dodgers manager Dave Roberts, sitting in the visiting office with the door closed, leans back in his chair behind the desk, momentarily shuts his eyes, and listens to the quiet, before starting to talk.

It’s 3 ½ hours before game time and for the time being there is peace, before the turbulence sets in beginning Thursday with the Milwaukee Brewers and their league-best record coming into town – followed by the pennant race, the push for the top seed, the September clinching celebrations and then the sheer madness of October.

It’s become a rite of passage for Roberts, who has been in the postseason all 10 years of his managerial career, winning three World Series championships, five National League pennants and reaching 1,000 victories quicker than any manager in history.

There are times he still can’t believe it. A journeyman player who will be remembered for his stolen base with the Boston Red Sox in their historic comeback in the 2004 ALCS against the New York Yankees, Roberts is already acclaimed as one of the most successful managers in the history of the game.

“Never in my wildest dreams," Roberts says, “did I think this would happen. And now, to be talked about with some of the greats that led their organizations to championships, my goodness."

Aug 7, 2026; Phoenix, Arizona, USA; Los Angeles Dodgers manager Dave Roberts prior to the game against the Arizona Diamondbacks at Chase Field. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

Roberts breaks into a slow smile and exhales, wondering himself how he’s been able to survive this grind for a decade, and still have the same energy and enthusiasm as if he’s a teenager who got a free pass to Disneyland.

The grueling seasons, the relentless demands, motivating a team all year, staying in constant contact with the front office, answering questions from the largest media throng in baseball and managing 162 regular-season games – all before going under the postseason microscope – could chew up and spit out the best in the business.

If the Dodgers win the World Series as they have the past two years, Roberts simply has done his job.

If the Dodgers aren’t the last team standing, the season is a failure.

It’s hardly fair, but it comes with the job as manager of the richest and most powerful team in the sport, where the pressure can be relentless.

“The best part of my day," Roberts quietly says, “is the national anthem. All of the prep, the conversations, and everything else is over. But once I hear the national anthem, then it's just about a one-game competition: us versus them.”

There will be precious free time for Roberts these next two months, but for 45 minutes, he carved out time to bare his feelings in a wide-ranging interview with USA TODAY Sports.

He talks about a book that he’s writing, how long he plans to keep managing, his exasperation from those underestimating his managerial and tactical skills, his gripes with the Manager of the Year award, potentially coaching in the Olympics, the debate on whether the Dodgers are ruining baseball and the legacy he wants to leave behind.

Locked in on three-peat

Roberts, who signed a four-year, $32.4 million contract extension through 2029, originally intended to manage just through the contract, and walk away as one of the few to go out on his own terms. Now, he has changed his mind. He wants to keep going. For how long, he doesn’t really know, but he wants to make an indelible impact, not only with the Dodgers, not only in baseball, but in life.

It’s this desire that has Roberts writing a book that will be released next spring, “Relentlessly Positive."

“It’s not a memoir, Roberts says. “There’s no top-secret stuff. It’s just an opportunity for me to kind of have my voice in something positive, and something that people in all walks of life could pull from. There’s so much negativity in the world, but I want this to be something that touches executives, regular people, leaders, people that want to be leaders. Things that are not always tangible or you can quantify, but matter. It’s just my overarching thoughts on cultured leadership."

Thhe son of a Black father, a career United States Marine Corps master gunnery sergeant, and Japanese mother, Roberts has been relentlessly positive his entire life.

He was a 28th-round draft pick from UCLA who had a 10-year career. He overcame Stage II Hodgkin's lymphoma in 2010. He spent six years in the San Diego Padres front office and coaching staff before anyone would even interview him for a managerial job. The Dodgers called – but their first choice was Gabe Kapler. Roberts won the job for 2016.

While the Padres have since gone through six managers, Roberts is already the Dodgers’ fourth-longest tenured manager in franchise history.

“This is a tough job managing us with all of the personalities in here," Dodgers World Series hero Miguel Rojas tells USA TODAY Sports. “He deals with so much stuff, but he keeps things under control. This is the only clubhouse I’ve been a part of that everybody is happy with their job. You know how hard that is to have 26 guys on the same page, and guys who want to play every day. But he does a really good job of making everybody understand where they are. He always has a good touch on when and how to send a message."

Roberts called out his team Monday during their 1-8 stretch, imploring them to wake up if they want that first-round bye. He had a private meeting a week ago with their position players reminding them that what they’ve done winning the past two World Series doesn’t mean a damn thing this year.

“He told us that he’s happy and proud and really fortunate that he had the opportunity to manage back-to-back championship teams," Rojas said, “but he also said that he could care less about the last two years. He wants to win so bad. That’s the motivator he is. He’s still hungry to win this year, and wants everybody else to be hungry.

“He told us that we have the opportunity to do something historic, so let’s take advantage of it."

The Dodgers could become the first National League team to win three consecutive World Series championships, a feat accomplished only by the New York Yankees and Oakland Athletics in the American League.

Who knows, maybe a third consecutive title will get folks’ attention that perhaps Roberts will be mentioned in the same breath as Walter Alston and Tommy Lasorda before him. He has the greatest winning percentage (1,015-624, .619) of any manager in history, is the only National League manager to reach the postseason in each of his first 10 seasons, and has the third-most postseason victories (69), behind only Hall of Famers Joe Torre (84) and Tony La Russa (71).

“It’s interesting because when you’re a focus, when you’ve had success, there’s always going to be people that try to minimize things," Roberts says, “or downplay or hate on what you do. But I think for me, I think it’s more of just focusing internally on the things that are important."

Shohei Ohtani joined Roberts' Dodgers for the 2024 season.

No Manager of the Year love?

He tries not to let it bother him, but it’s frustrating knowing that unless the Dodgers suddenly go in the tank one year or dramatically slash their payroll, it’s virtually impossible for Roberts to win the NL Manager of the Year award ever again. He won it in 2016, and only once has finished higher than fourth place since 2017. He won the last two World Series, and finished seventh in the balloting in 2024 and didn’t receive a single vote last year.

“In all honesty, I felt Pat Murphy [of the Milwaukee Brewers] should have won the last two years," Roberts says. “He deserved to be the National League Manager of the Year. But the thing that drives me crazy is that I'm not even considered in the top five. I think that's absurd.

“It just speaks to what people feel that it's a turn-key operation."

It’s also infuriating that just because you’re considered a "players’ manager," you can’t also be a shrewd tactician or strategist.

The Dodgers were on the brink of elimination in 2024 in their NL Division Series against the San Diego Padres and had no available starters. They went with a bullpen game, used eight different relievers, won 8-0, and then won the World Series having only three healthy starters.

“He’s the best I’ve ever seen the way he runs a bullpen," Dodgers veteran reliever Evan Phillips said. “He knows when to deploy a guy, what role is suited for a guy that particular day, protecting guys, and challenging guys too. That’s why you see guys like Tanner Scott and Edwin Diaz who sign here wanting to be a part of this."

It was no different than with future Hall of Fame manager Dusty Baker, the only manager to lead five different teams to the postseason, while winning 2,183 games and a World Series championship.

“It was so frustrating," Roberts said, “to hear people always say, 'Dusty is a great players’ manager. He’s so fun. He’s so positive. He can relate so well to his players. What a great guy.'

“I don't know if it's the color of his skin or what, but no one ever talked about good of a tactician he was. That always bugged me."

'I'm a steward of this game'

Roberts, who along with Baker and Cito Gaston are the only Black managers to win a World Series, wants to be known not only as one the game’s finest managers – but also someone who left the game in a better place.

This is why he has changed his mind and wants to continue managing after his contract expires. He’s still young, and why leave when he can make a difference?

“From the studies I’ve seen, I think the male brain is continuing to excel and be sharp until you're in your early 60s," Roberts says. “So, for me, at 54, I still think I'm on an upward trajectory with my enthusiasm, my positivity, my brain, my sharpness. That’s why CEOs are in their 60s and they still have that ability.

“So I don’t want to close that door."

Besides, as long as Roberts enjoys the gig, and still has the passion, why leave?

“I love people and I love this game of baseball," Roberts says. “I love it more than my first day in Jamestown, N.Y., in 1994. I feel that I'm a steward of this game, and I want to see it grow. I want to move this game forward. When you hear me, I don't just speak specifically to the game, I try to speak beyond the game.

“That’s what I’m chasing."

And what better way to grow the game, Roberts believes, than having major-league players participate in the 2028 Olympics for the first time.

And he has the perfect guy for that Olympic managing job.

He sees him in his mirror every day.

The Olympic Games will be at Dodger Stadium where he has an office. He played in the Pan Am games in 1999 that qualified the USA Team for the 2000 Olympics with Tom Lasorda leading the minor-league players to the gold medal. And there’s not a more successful manager in the game.

“I know there are a lot of great candidates out there," Roberts said, “but that would mean so much to me. I would love to do that, wear U-S-A across my chest."

That Olympic dream, of course, is two years away.

In the meantime, he’s got another World Series or two to win.

“This is the golden era of Dodger baseball, and to win it again," Roberts said, “this core group of people will be talked about forever. You could put it up against the ‘27 Yankees, and that era, and debate it forever."

Is Dodgers hate good for baseball?

Just like now, fans all over the sports landscape can debate whether the Dodgers are good or bad for the game. Is it good to have a team that has a brilliant front office, a future Hall of Fame manager, and a payroll four times the size of some other teams?

Or is it good to have a villain, just like the Yankees during their dynasty, the New England Patriots in their Super Bowl run, or the Boston Celtics in their golden era?

“When I hear people debating that," Roberts said, “I think that’s a great thing for the game. It’s great for fans. At least they’re talking about baseball and not football. I’d rather them hate us than be talking about the Cowboys.

“I remember going in with a small winery (Red Stich Wine) in 2007, and we’re going over the blend, I asked my winemaker, 'Is there any competition. Is there another brand like ours that people may drink?’ He says, 'Dave, let me tell you something, in the wine business, if people are drinking wine, we all win.’

“So if you love baseball, you talk about baseball. You can philosophize on it. Theorize on it. Debate it. Sure, I would love for them to love the Dodgers, but man, even if you hate us, you're talking about baseball, and that’s a win for all of us."

Maybe one day, as the playoff berths and championships keep mounting, they’ll be talking about Roberts, too.

You don’t see him throwing temper tantrums on the bench, getting into the face of umpires, or putting on a show to make it about him.

He just quietly leads, and not only is beloved by everyone in the game, but respected by every player in his clubhouse. He doesn’t take the credit nor does he ever throw his players under the bus, he simply demands professionalism.

“I tell myself every day, 'Please, Lord, don’t make it about me,'" Roberts says. “Really, I fight that every single day because I don’t want my ego to bleed into decision-making. That was the great thing about Dusty, his humility. He just always made it about the players, but some people get some notoriety and success, and they want to make it about themselves.

“I’m very mindful of stuff like that. Be positive. Stay humble. Don’t change."

He never will.

Follow Nightengale on X: @Bnightengale

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Dave Roberts sounds off on Dodgers hate, legacy and LA intensity | Exclusive