Category: Sports News

SOLDEU, Andorra (AP) — Sofia Goggia won her second super-G of the season Sunday and regained a commanding lead in the race to the World Cup discipline title.

The Olympic downhill bronze medallist extended her advantage in the super-G standings to 84 points over Alice Robinson of New Zealand and 116 over Emma Aicher of Germany in third, with two events left.

A race win is worth 100 points.

“I'm still not thinking about it,” said Goggia, who bounced back in impressive style, a day after the Italian had her lead reduced to just 20 points following a sixth-place finish in another super-G.

“I’m really thinking day by day, race by race. It was a solid run today, I got back the points I lost yesterday," she added.

With a trademark gutsy run, Goggia beat Saturday’s winner Aicher by 0.24 seconds and third-placed Kajsa Vickhoff Lie of Norway by 0.31.

Robinson finished 0.94 seconds behind in seventh.

“It was a really similar race to yesterday. But we decided to adopt a different strategy to get into the central pitch, and it paid off,” Goggia said.

Goggia and Robinson set up their duel for the super-G title early in the season when they won the first two races, but neither added another win until the Italian's victory Sunday.

Goggia now has nine career wins in super-G but is chasing her first season title in the discipline, having won the crystal globe in downhill four times, most recently in 2023.

“I still haven’t won in downhill yet (this season), and this is maybe a bit strange for everyone, because I have been doing so many podiums in downhill in my career,” said Goggia, who was the 2018 Olympic downhill champion.

“I have a really solid feeling with the super-G, so I’m happy with it. Now it’s important to stay really focused for the next ones in which we play for everything.”

Olympic super-G champion Federica Brignone came nearly a second behind her Italian teammate in eighth, improving from her 15th-place finish in Saturday’s race when she was more than two seconds off the pace.

Brignone returned from a broken left leg just before the Milan Cortina Games and then won gold in super-G and giant slalom.

Mary Bocock earned her career-best result leading the U.S. ski team in 11th, one position ahead of her teammate Keely Cashman.

Olympic downhill champion Breezy Johnson was nearly three seconds off the pace in 30th.

Aicher’s seventh podium result of the season saw the German close in on second-ranked Camille Rast in the overall standings. The Swiss skier has 963 points while Aicher is on 914.

Mikaela Shiffrin leads with 1,133 points as the American aims for her sixth overall title. She hasn’t competed in speed races this season except for one super-G start last December.

Shiffrin is expected back in action for a GS and slalom in Sweden on March 14-15.

The World Cup continues with two downhills and a super-G in Italy next weekend.

___

AP skiing: https://apnews.com/hub/alpine-skiing

The Wizards keep doing the improbable this season. Last night, for example, they shot 47.1% from three, were +15 on the scoreboard from deep (16 made threes to Toronto’s 9), and lost by nine. Once again, it wasn’t that close.

Bright side: the Wizards need to keep on losing, and at least they made the Raptors work for the victory.

The Wizards were committed to securing the important loss. Kyshawn George and Bilal Coulibaly — both of whom played pretty well — sat for the entire fourth quarter. No one played particularly badly. The least productive was Tre Johnson, though I thought he was okay. If he’d played his usual full set of minutes, I suspect he’d have picked up a few assists, and the impact of the turnovers would have moderated.

This is not to say the Wizards played well. Their defense was a joke (and not a funny one, except perhaps to the Raptors), and their offensive production seemed more a case of Toronto “not respecting the game plan,” as an assistant coach told the Toronto sideline reporter at halftime.

Here are the current standings in The 2026 NBA Race to the Bottom:

1. Sacramento Kings | 14-47 | .230
2. Indiana Pacers | 15-45 | .250
3. Brooklyn Nets | 15-44 | .254
4. Washington Wizards | 16-43 | .271
5. New Orleans Pelicans | 18-42 | .300
6. Utah Jazz | 18-41 | .305

It’s going to be a tight race.

Thoughts & Observations

• The Wizards were awful defensively, but Tristan Vukcevic had one defensive possession in the first quarter I thought was excellent. Brandon Ingram drove from the wing, and Vukcevic made a great rotation, got there early and forced a kickout pass. Naturally, the Raptors scored on the play anyway, but hey…that rotation!
• Another nice defensive moment: Toronto secured the ball off a Wizards miss and made a good outlet pass that seemed to set up a transition opportunity. Sharife Cooper picked up the ball handler and forced him to turn, shutting down the fast break and turning it into a halfcourt possession. Naturally, the Raptors scored on the possession.
• #SoWizards moment on Washington’s first offensive possession: Coulibaly spotted Bub Carrington come open on a baseline cut and made an excellent pass. The problem? Carrington was just clearing the side and wasn’t looking. The pass sailed out of bounds.
• #SoWizards defensive moment: Washington had four players involved in defending a two-man pick-and-roll. Somehow, the play ended in an easy layup AND an and-one for roll man Sandro Mamukelashvili.
• Tidbit from the Toronto broadcast: Washington’s loss to Atlanta was their ninth of the season by 30 or more points. That’s the most in the NBA this season, and the most in Washington’s franchise history.
• For some reason, the Wizards started the second half once again by running a postup for Carrington. Once again, it failed. I guess maybe they think this is some kind of player development thing. Maybe? I don’t really see the point — Carrington plays small, doesn’t play with the toughness and physicality to be successful on this sort of play.
• If you want to see a well-run fastbreak, check out the Toronto possession that ended at 5:36 of the third quarter. Immanuel Quickley pushed to the middle, forced defenders to commit, and hit a trailer for a dunk. Excellent bsasketball.
• Toronto burned a few possessions late that (barely) got their offensive rating below 140 for the game. Their 139 offensive rating is the best against the Wizards this season — topping the 133 posted by…the Toronto Raptors the day after Christmas.

Four Factors

Below are the four factors that decide wins and losses in basketball — shooting (efg), rebounding (offensive rebounds), ball handling (turnovers), fouling (free throws made).

The four factors are measured by:

• eFG% (effective field goal percentage, which accounts for the three-point shot)
• OREB% (offensive rebound percentage)
• TOV% (turnover percentage — turnovers divided by possessions)
• FTM/FGA (free throws made divided by field goal attempts)

FOUR FACTORS	RAPTORS	WIZARDS	LGAVG
eFG%	65.3%	62.5%	54.3%
OREB%	25.8%	30.8%	26.1%
TOV%	9.3%	13.5%	12.8%
FTM/FGA	0.271	0.170	0.207
PACE	96		99.5
ORTG	139	130	115.4

Stats & Metrics

PPA is my overall production metric, which credits players for things they do that help a team win (scoring, rebounding, playmaking, defending) and dings them for things that hurt (missed shots, turnovers, bad defense, fouls).

PPA is a per possession metric designed for larger data sets. In small sample sizes, the numbers can get weird. In PPA, 100 is average, higher is better and replacement level is 45. For a single game, replacement level isn’t much use, and I reiterate the caution about small samples sometimes producing weird results.

POSS is the number of possessions each player was on the floor in this game.

ORTG = offensive rating, which is points produced per individual possessions x 100. League average so far this season is listed in the Four Factors table above. Points produced is not the same as points scored. It includes the value of assists and offensive rebounds, as well as sharing credit when receiving an assist.

USG = offensive usage rate. Average is 20%. Median so far this season is 17.7%.

ORTG and USG are versions of stats created by former Wizards assistant coach Dean Oliver and modified by me. ORTG is an efficiency measure that accounts for the value of shooting, offensive rebounds, assists and turnovers. USG includes shooting from the floor and free throw line, offensive rebounds, assists and turnovers.

+PTS = “Plus Points” is a measure of the points gained or lost by each player based on their efficiency in this game compared to league average efficiency on the same number of possessions. A player with an offensive rating (points produced per possession x 100) of 100 who uses 20 possessions would produce 20 points. If the league average efficiency is 115, the league — on average — would produced 23.0 points in the same 20 possessions. So, the player in this hypothetical would have a +PTS score of -3.0.

Players are sorted by total production in the game.

WIZARDS	MIN	POSS	ORTG	USG	+PTS	PPA	+/-
Kyshawn George	15	30	160	24.5%	3.3	243	2
Bilal Coulibaly	23	46	124	26.1%	1.0	150	-4
Justin Champagnie	22	43	135	22.7%	1.9	149	-13
Tristan Vukcevic	19	37	179	20.0%	4.8	165	3
Bub Carrington	21	42	133	23.9%	1.7	136	-4
Jamir Watkins	21	43	186	9.9%	3.0	125	0
Will Riley	35	69	128	20.9%	1.8	74	-16
Sharife Cooper	18	36	121	13.0%	0.2	79	4
Jaden Hardy	20	40	123	18.2%	0.6	46	-5
Anthony Gill	28	57	93	19.1%	-2.4	8	-5
Tre Johnson	19	39	93	19.9%	-1.7	-12	-7

RAPTORS	MIN	POSS	ORTG	USG	+PTS	PPA	+/-
Immanuel Quickley	37	75	166	23.4%	8.9	223	7
Jakob Poeltl	26	53	185	19.2%	7.0	234	18
Brandon Ingram	34	68	138	24.6%	3.7	154	11
Scottie Barnes	29	59	131	24.1%	2.3	130	3
RJ Barrett	33	66	122	24.6%	1.1	101	12
Jamison Battle	17	34	160	9.8%	1.5	89	-11
Ja’Kobe Walter	24	48	137	9.0%	0.9	58	0
Sandro Mamukdlashvili	16	31	113	17.6%	-0.1	66	3
Jamal Shead	22	44	89	18.3%	-2.1	20	9
Trayce Jackson-Davis	3	5		0.0%	0.0	0	-7

After the Boston Celtics’ recent loss to the Denver Nuggets, this year’s Celtics team no longer qualifies for Phil Jackson’s benchmark for true championship contenders. According to Jackson, hitting the magical mark of securing 40 wins before 20 losses ensures you are among the league’s elite. The 2025-2026 Celtics are 39-20 after their win against the Brooklyn Nets, so the question becomes: does missing Jackson’s mythical contender benchmark signal the end of the Celtics’ championship hopes?

The 40/20 rule has held up remarkably well over the years. Since the NBA added the three-point line in the 1979-80 season, only four teams have won an NBA championship without meeting this benchmark. We will examine if there was anything special or unique about those teams a bit later.

I’m not afraid to admit that I don’t believe there is anything magical or especially insightful about the rule Jackson came up with. Having a record of 40/19 or better means that a team is on pace for at least 56 wins. NBA teams that win at least 55 games are incredibly good. It’s essentially another way of saying that unless a team is a top-3 seed, they are incredibly unlikely to win a championship. A top-3 seed has won 77 of the last 79 NBA championships. That’s not because the top-3 seeds are given special powers; it’s because the best teams are almost always top-3 seeds. The same goes for winning 40 games before 19 losses. 

Next, it’s time to address the ridiculous flaw in thinking that winning 40 games before 20 losses is any different from winning 40 games before 21 losses. Logically there is no difference between winning 39 games before 19 losses, or winning 41 games before 22 losses. A one or two game difference in a 60-game sample does not, or at least should not, spell the end of a team’s season. That’s the logical, rational argument when discussing the 40/20 rule. On the other hand, there are those who believe in the Basketball Gods, and reaching 40/20 is a rock-solid prerequisite for winning the title. 

I like to think of myself as Basketball God agnostic. I believe in a higher power; for example, Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown needed to experience Steph Curry levitating to a higher plane in the 2022 NBA Finals to unlock more powerful versions of themselves. But I can’t believe something as small as a single win or loss in February determines who wins the NBA championship.

There have been plenty of teams that have missed the 40/20 mark and made it to the NBA Finals. In fact, all four past NBA Finals losers have failed to reach 40 wins before 20 losses. The ’25 Indiana Pacers, the ’24 Dallas Mavericks, the ’23 Miami Heat, and the ’22 Boston Celtics. There are countless more examples over the past 45 years. Drilling down to these recent examples, did these teams lose because of a mystical 40/20 rule, or because they simply weren’t good enough? The ’25 Indiana Pacers made it to Game 7 of the NBA Finals and were tied with the Oklahoma City Thunder 16-16 when Tyrese Haliburton ruptured his Achilles tendon. The Pacers, in my opinion, could have easily won that game if Haliburton had not gone down. The ’24 Dallas Mavericks never stood a chance and were a good example of a team going on a late run, and not quite being a bulletproof title contender. The ’23 Miami Heat are a good example of the Basketball Gods not being real. If they were, they would never have allowed Caleb Martin to shoot 50% from three for an entire Eastern Conference series against the Boston Celtics. That Miami Heat team is another example that supports the 40/20 rule. The ’22 Boston Celtics provide another interesting case. Another team that got hot late in the season and missed 40/20 because it didn’t build its championship profile from the start of the season. However, that Celtics team was up 2-1 in the NBA Finals, with a lead in the 4th quarter of Game 4. I firmly believe that if Robert Williams hadn’t torn his meniscus in March of that season, the Celtics would have won the title. The team was never the same after Rob’s injury. Did the Celtics lose because they didn’t hit 40/20? Or because Robert Williams’ knees couldn’t hold up? The answer is in the eye of the beholder. 

History says the best the 2025-2026 Boston Celtics can do this season is win the Eastern Conference. This feels like a good moment to take a second to appreciate the season the 2025-2026 Celtics have given their fans. Many analysts (myself included) expected the Celtics to be a sub-.500 team. Fast forward to 59 games through the regular season, and the Celtics are the second seed in the Eastern Conference, are on pace for 54 wins, and currently hold the third best point differential in the entire league. Even the most optimistic predictions did not anticipate this season. 

There have been four teams that have been exceptions to the 40/20 rule since 1980. The 95’ Houston Rockets, the 04’ Detroit Pistons, the 06’ Miami Heat, the 21’ Milwaukee Bucks. Taking a closer look at these four teams, a common thread emerges that could also apply to this year’s Celtics. The 95’ Rockets traded for Clyde Drexler at the trade deadline. The 04’ Pistons traded for Rasheed Wallace at the trade deadline. The 06’ Heat traded for Derek Anderson at the trade deadline. If you just asked yourself who Derek Anderson is, that makes sense, as he didn’t play a second in the 2006 NBA Finals. The 21’ Bucks traded for PJ Tucker at the trade deadline, who played 29.6 minutes per game for the Bucks in the playoffs on the way to the championship. Three of the four teams made significant acquisitions halfway through the season to bolster their title chances. Two of the teams traded for All-Star-level talents. If the 2025-2026 Boston Celtics get Jayson Tatum back, they will be getting back an All-Star-level talent. 

As currently constructed, I don’t believe the Boston Celtics can win a championship this season. It has nothing to do with the 40/20 rule and more to do with them not having a gear necessary to take down several high level opponents in the playoffs. While this year’s Celtics team has been objectively awesome, they have struggled against the league’s elite. The Celtics are currently 5-10 against the top 10 teams in point differential. If Jayson Tatum can return, even in a diminished form, to the player we saw in the 2025 NBA Playoffs, then winning the championship is very much on the table for this year’s Celtics team. They have already proven they are in the fringe contender range. Adding a player who can elevate every aspect of their team’s profile would thrust them into true contender status. 

Lastly — and most importantly — if Red Auerbach heard someone say the 2025–26 Celtics can’t win the title because of something Phil Jackson came up with more than a decade ago, we all know exactly what Red would say to that.

DELHI, India (AP) — George Linde put in an all-round show as South Africa beat Zimbabwe by five wickets in their final Super 8 clash at the 2026 T20 World Cup.

All-rounder Linde – brought in for today’s game to rest Keshav Maharaj – picked up 1-22 in three overs and then scored a crucial 30 not out off 21 balls batting at No. 7 as South Africa topped Group 1 and continued its unbeaten run to the semifinals.

Dewald Brevis hit 42 off 18 balls with four sixes, while Tristan Stubbs anchored the innings home with 21 not out off 24 balls, as South Africa finished with 154-5 in 17.5 overs.

Earlier, Zimbabwe opted to bat and put up 153-7 (20 overs) thanks to skipper Sikandar Raza scoring 73 off 43 balls.

The Proteas, the 2024 runners-up, have now reached the semis after winning all three Super 8 games. They beat India, West Indies and now Zimbabwe, after finishing unbeaten in the so-called group of death — Group D — in round one, also featuring New Zealand and Afghanistan.

Zimbabwe has been eliminated with three losses after making its first appearance in round two at the T20 World Cups.

England and New Zealand qualified for the semis from Group 2, with Pakistan and co-hosts Sri Lanka eliminated.

South Africa unbeaten as Zimbabwe impresses in final game

Raza rescued his side after the top-order stumbled to leave Zimbabwe down to 28-2 in 4.3 overs. He put on 38 off 23 balls with Dion Myers, even as the Proteas struck back in the middle overs.

Linde got the breakthrough, with Myers caught for 11. Raza, though, scored 50 off 29 balls, hitting five fours and three sixes.

Lungi Ngidi and Corbin Bosch (2-40) hit the middle order to reduce Zimbabwe to 87-5 but Raza found an able partner in Clive Madande. They put on 39 off 29 balls, before Kwena Maphaka finally accounted for Raza.

Madande’s 26 not out helped Zimbabwe cross 150.

South Africa too started poorly as Raza struck twice with his off-spin bowling counterpart Aiden Markram out for four, while Quinton de Kock was out caught for a two-ball duck.

Ryan Burl held a terrific catch in the deep to dismiss Ryan Rickelton (31) who put on 29 off 18 balls with Brevis.

The crucial partnership was 50 off 25 balls for the fourth wicket – Brevis and David Miller (22) did the job again for the Proteas.

But Zimbabwe just wouldn’t relent as Raza struck a third time to remove Brevis, while Blessing Muzarabani sent back Miller as South Africa was down to 101-5 in 10.4 overs.

Stubbs-Linde resisted with an unbeaten 53 off 43 balls to see their side home with 13 balls to spare.

India wins toss, fields vs West Indies

Co-host and defending champion India takes on West Indies in Kolkata on Sunday evening to decide the other semifinalist from this group – a virtual quarterfinal in the final Super 8 game of the tournament.

India opted to field after winning the toss at the Eden Gardens.

___

AP cricket: https://apnews.com/hub/cricket

Before the Madness begins, we need to crown conference champions and NCAA Tournament automatic bids are up for grabs.

Here's a list of the men's basketball conference tournament schedules:

Bracketology: NCAA Tournament last four in, first four out

March Madness predictions: 13 teams who can win NCAA tournament

Men's college basketball conference tournament dates, schedule

Listed by start date.

• Horizon: March 2-10 (Indianapolis)
• Sun Belt: March 3-9 (Pensacola, Fla.)
• Patriot: March 3-11 (on campus)
• OVC: March 4-7 (Evansville, Ind.)
• ASUN: March 4-8 (Jacksonville, Fla.)
• Big South: March 4-8 (Johnson City, Tenn.)
• Summit: March 4-8 (Sioux Falls, SD)
• NEC: March 4-10 (on campus)
• MVC: March 5-8 (St. Louis)
• MAAC: March 5-10 (Atlantic City, NJ)
• WCC: March 5-10 (Las Vegas)
• SoCon: March 6-9 (Asheville, NC)
• CAA: March 6-10 (Washington DC)
• Big Sky: March 7-11 (Boise)
• America East: March 7-14 (on campus)
• Mountain West: March 7-14 (Las Vegas)
• Southland: March 8-12 (Lake Charles, La.)
• SWAC: March 9-14 (Atlanta)
• ACC: March 10-14 (Charlotte)
• Big 12: March 10-14 (Kansas City)
• Conference USA: March 10-14 (Huntsville, Ala.)
• Big Ten: March 10-15 (Chicago)
• Big East: March 11-14 (New York City)
• Big West: March 11-14 (Henderson, NV)
• MAC: March 11-14 (Cleveland)
• MEAC: March 11-14 (Norfolk, Va.)
• WAC: March 11-14 (Las Vegas)
• American: March 11-15 (Birmingham)
• Atlantic 10: March 11-15 (Pittsburgh)
• SEC: March 11-15 (Nashville)
• Ivy: March 14-15 (Ithaca, NY)

When is Selection Sunday 2026?

The 68-team bracket for the 2026 NCAA men’s basketball tournament will be unveiled on 6 p.m. ET, Sunday, March 15.

When does March Madness start? 

The first men’s game of the 2026 NCAA tournament will be on March 17 with the start of the First Four in Dayton, Ohio.

March Madness 2026 schedule 

The 2026 NCAA men’s basketball tournament will transpire over the next three weeks, which will end with the Final Four and the national championship game in Indianapolis.

Here’s a rundown of the schedule for the 2026 NCAA Tournament:

• First Four: March 17-18
• First round: March 19-20
• Second round: March 21-22
• Sweet 16: March 26-27
• Elite Eight: March 28-29
• Final Four: April 4 at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis
• National championship game: April 6 at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: NCAA men's basketball conference tournament schedule, dates, locations

As basketball fans, when our team loses, we suffer. Imagine being the head coach.

Former NBA head coach David Fizdale — the creator of “Take That For Data” meme — recently visited with Michelle Beadle, Chandler Parsons, and Lou Williams on Fan Duel TV’s Run It Back. Anyone aware of Fizdale knows he does not shy away from controversial statements. This visit was no exception.

Fiz revisited the “Take That For Data” and “Not Gonna Rook Us” comments he made as head coach of the Memphis Grizzlies after a playoff loss to the Spurs. He added to his conspiracy that the Spurs were favored by the refs adding “I’m not calling out the refs officially, but I did a podcast with a guy and he said two of the refs went to San Diego State. I know a guy on that team that shot 19 free throws that went to San Diego State” referring to Kawhi Leonard.

He doubled down on his contempt for the Spurs as he reminisced about the air condition going out during Game 1 of the 2014 NBA Finals, believing the air condition going out was done on purpose. He also revealed that at some point when the Heat played in San Antonio, a snake was discovered in the visitor’s locker room.

See the entire interview here, Spurs related topics begin just after the two-minute point.

Fizdale started his coaching career as an assistant for his alma mater, the University of San Diego. Between 2003-2016 he serves as an NBA assistant for Warriors, Hawks, and Heat, the latter being where he picked up two rings.

In his first year as head coach, he and the Memphis Grizzlies met the Spurs in the playoffs where he unleashed his now infamous rant.

Fizdale went to the Knicks for a year before returning to assisting for the Lakers and eventually the Suns.

This season he did not sign on with anyone and currently resides in Southern California, which you might be able to tell from the video chat.

---

Welcome to the Thread. Join in the conversation, start your own discussion, and share your thoughts. This is the Spurs community, your Spurs community. Thanks for being here.

Our community guidelines apply which should remind everyone to be cool, avoid personal attacks, not to troll and to watch the language.

SYDNEY (AP) — The United States showed its mastery of light conditions by winning the Sydney leg of the SailGP series Sunday, beating Britain and Spain in a three boat final.

Racing took place in winds of between 8 and 15 knots (9 to 17 mph) and the United States looked in its element, clearly beating Britain for its first win of the season.

Driver Taylor Canfield positioned the United States at the top end of the starting line in the final and, while Britain crossed slightly ahead, the USA was faster and had a better angle. Britain was just ahead at the first mark but the United States again had better speed and took a lead which it didn't concede for the rest of the race.

Britain split away on the second leg, looking for better wind. But the tactic didn't work and the United States positioned itself well to cement its advantage.

First win in two seasons

While the United States achieved a best speed of the day of around 41 knots, it only managed to stay on its foils for 22 percent of the finals. The win was its first in two seasons, since Cadiz in season four.

SailGP features 13 identical 50 foot catamarans which rise out of the water on foils and can attain high speeds. In the previous event of the series in Auckland, New Zealand strong winds saw boats achieve speeds of around 100kmh (60mph).

Only 11 boats were able to contest the Sydney event. France and New Zealand are still undergoing repairs after colliding in Auckland in a crash which sent a crewperson from both teams to hospital. New Zealand sailor Louis Sinclair suffered compund fractures to both legs and French strategist Manon Audinet suffered chest injuries.

Britain won the first of three fleet races Sunday. The United States won the second race and Denmark won the third.

The British team won the first event of the sixth SailGP season in Perth, Australia and Australia's Flying Roos won the Auckland event.

After three events, Britain leads the overall standings with 29 points from Australia with 25 and the USA with 20.

___

AP sports: https://apnews.com/sports