The Path, Part I: Projecting a summer of ‘small tweaks' for Celtics

The Path, Part I: Projecting a summer of ‘small tweaks' for Celtics originally appeared on NBC Sports Boston

If at any point between, let’s say, March 6 and April 26, you had asked us to forecast what the summer of 2026 might look like for the Boston Celtics, we might have suggested a rather quiet offseason could be looming. 

From the moment Jayson Tatum returned to parquet in early March until the night Boston took a 3-1 series lead over the Philadelphia 76ers, even the immediate future felt limitless. Drunk on Green Kool-Aid from an expectation-shattering regular season, we wondered out loud about Boston’s title chances this year, especially given Tatum’s absurd recovery, Jaylen Brown’s MVP-caliber season and the internal development of young talent thrust into bigger roles. 

Then the Sixers won three straight games. Boston got bounced in Round 1. If that alone didn’t kill our buzz, watching the Knicks rip off 11 straight wins while Victor Wembanyama and the Spurs arrived at the Finals waaaaaaay ahead of schedule sure did. 

Now, instead of that quiet summer, we’ve had basically a full month of pundits screaming about whether the Celtics should trade Brown for Giannis Antetokounmpo. That’s just the way things go in the NBA. 

The playoffs have a way of thrusting teams into a harsher spotlight. And in the span of just 10 bad quarters, it became fair to wonder if more drastic measures are needed to get Boston back on the level of the league’s elite.

While we believe all options should be on the table for the Celtics this offseason, is there still a case for a quieter summer? For Part 1 of our annual “The Path” series, we’re examining an offseason where the Celtics don’t overreact to an early playoff demise and how that might give the team the best long-term chance to get back to the title stage.

We tiptoed into these small-tweak waters in late May, outlining how some financial responsibility this offseason could position the Celtics to take some much bigger swings in the summer of 2027.

That doesn’t mean punting on the 2026-27 campaign. What it means is banking heavily on the idea that the experience the Celtics gained this past season — combined with some upgrades at key spots — might be enough to position Boston as an East favorite without having to shake up the core. A chance to be a bit more aggressive with roster upgrades would loom next summer. 

So what might a small-tweak summer look like? Let’s break it down:

Mission statement

Commit to bringing back the entire core of the 2025-26 team while hunting upgrades at key spots.

The Celtics could utilize exceptions to add talent, potentially scaling above the luxury tax line to start the season, but with an expectation that they would evaluate the roster in advance of February’s NBA trade deadline and dip back below the tax at that point in order to reset repeater penalties. 

The path

The small-tweak summer leaves the Celtics banking that … 

  1. A healthier Tatum, further removed from the Achilles injury that sidelined him for the first 62 games of the 2025-26 season, will reemerge as an MVP candidate, particularly given the strong numbers he posted throughout his return. 
  2. Brown, fresh off a Top-six finish in MVP voting, will rebuild his chemistry with Tatum, combining to provide maybe the best 1-2 punch in the NBA if both are willing to sacrifice in small ways for the betterment of the team as a whole.
  3. Soon-to-be 32-year-old Derrick White shakes off this season’s shooting woes and finds the offensive consistency to match his sustained defensive dominance.
  4. Neemias Queta, hindered by foul trouble throughout Boston’s first-round fumble, finds motivation to make yet another leap and continues to be an analytical darling as one of the top bigs on this team. 
  5. Payton Pritchard, before he puts pen to paper on a lucrative three-year contract extension, pledges again to embrace whatever role the Celtics need to be the best version of themselves.
  6. Boston identifies the young players it plans to lean heaviest into from the group of Hugo Gonzalez, Baylor Scheierman, Jordan Walsh, and Ron Harper Jr., and ensures consistent playing time to further accelerate their development. 

From there, the Celtics would make a series of moves. Our wish list would include: 

1. Sign center Robert Williams III utilizing the $15.1 million non-taxpayer midlevel exception.

Williams III played in 59 games last season, even as Portland delicately managed his minutes. He showed well in the postseason, even while jousting with Victor Wembanyama and the Spurs in the first round.

The combo of Queta and Williams III gives you a legitimate 1-2 punch at the center spot with Luka Garza there to eat up leftover minutes.

2. Trade up in the 2026 NBA Draft to select Santa Clara forward Allen Graves.

Utilize available assets to navigate the draft board with the goal of adding Allen Graves with a first-round pick and home-growing the next power forward on your roster.

We were already intrigued by the Draymond Green comps, then Graves said he’s been crushing tape of Naz Reid and Al Horford. Wow we’re sold this is the guy for Boston. 

3. Consider high-upside trades utilizing a portion of the Anfernee Simons traded player exception.

The Celtics likely would be hard-capped at the first apron if they use the non-taxpayer MLE and can’t spend too richly if that is utilized. But they should be ambitious hunting a big guard or an established power forward to beef up the roster.

We’re calling Orlando to check on Wendell Carter Jr. given the Magic’s bloated cap sheet (though that would likely mean sitting out a full midlevel splurge). Can you tempt Detroit with some shooting in a quest to trade for Isaiah Stewart? 

What it looks like

Instead of introducing elevated risk by moving on from championship-proven pieces, the Celtics give this core a chance to see what’s possible with a healthier Tatum and kick bolder decisions further down the road.

If it’s clear the Celtics remain a tier below the league’s elite, there are pathways to start a transition before February’s trade deadline. Regardless of how it plays out, the Celtics are well positioned in the aftermath to make some far bolder swings in the summer of 2027. 

In the lab: Astros infield Bases per out

As we go through some of these statistical series it becomes important to occasionally go back and explain the whys and what fors for these numbers. Simply put, the more numbers we can use to demonstrate the difference between players the better. Essentially, we are looking the mathematics of situational baseball. The good news is that the Astros are playing good enough baseball where it matters again. The bad news is they have dug themselves another hole where they cannot afford missteps.

Friday night was a misstep of epic proportions. For some it was even a fireable offense. In the 8th inning, Joe Espada subbed Brice Matthews in for Taylor Trammel ostensibly to get better defense in left field. Bryan Abreu immediately gives up the tying run and we are left needing that at bat later in the game. So, Matthews had to hit with the bases loaded and one out. Given his speed, a strikeout was the only real negative probability. Since he strikes out 32 percent of the time, he obviously struck out. That single decision was baseball malpractice.

Baseball is a game of probabilities. Every pitch and every situation sees the odds of success and failure change in the blink of an eye. A 1-0 count shifts to a 1-1 count. However, if ABS can shift that to a 2-0 count then the odds clearly change. Coaches and players must make split second decisions based on these odds. Even when the odds are in your favor you will often fail. Even if failure is predicted you sometimes succeed through happy happenstance.

A manager’s job is to put his team in a position where the odds of success are as high as possible. As much as we might love a manager like “Major League’s” Lou Brown, I would just as soon not have my manager rolling out phrases like, “I gotta hunch he’s due.” Coaches, gamblers, and even players don’t succeed without a healthy understanding of situations and what the highest percentage play is.

That brings us to bases per out. Obviously, this is just yet another number, but I believe it to be a pretty accurate one and descriptive one. No number explains everything. Nothing is ever that easy. However, it can explain a lot on both the pitching and hitting side of things. It is calculated by taking total bases, walks, stolen bases, and hit by pitches and divide it by the total number of outs. The league average is .663 and as we have seen in the outfield, very few Astros have met the average. Again, we will list the players from most outs to least outs.

TBBB/HBPSBOutsBPO
Christian Walker113250174.793
Isaac Paredes75270158.646
Jose Altuve62201133.624
Jeremy Pena386368.691
Braden Shewmake302060.533
Nick Allen174142.524

Let’s put these numbers in perspective. Yordan Alvarez might very well lead the league in BPO. His BPO is well over 1.000. There is a pretty significant drop off from there. You can clearly see there are only three really above average hitters on this team according to BPO. Taylor Trammel counts as one for the moment, but he is likely to see a regression really soon. The resurgence of Jeremy Pena has helped considerably over the last week, but this is still a pretty shallow lineup.

Mind you, Paredes is not far below average and one mini hot streak gets him above average. He has an OPS+ of 99 so he looks more or less average. Altuve obviously got off to the hot start, but faded in early May. Does he recalibrate himself and get back to what he was doing in the first couple of weeks of the season when he does come back? Anything is possible.

What this effectively means is that the Astros have several players that are interchangeable in terms of overall production. Shewmake and Allen are similar offensively if not in style, but results that matter. Mathews can also play on the infield and he is similar to them in results. These numbers are not predictive in nature, but they do help explain why managers sometimes make the decisions that they do. Unfortunately, it also highlights when they make the wrong ones.

When Altuve comes back, the decision of who to start will be simple. It is the decision of who to keep and who to drop that will become harder. As important as fielding is, this team does not have enough good bats to squander a spot to a fielding only player. However, looking at Matthews, Allen, and Shewmake right now is like looking at a group of siblings. They are not identical triplets. Each of them reach their BPO a little differently, but the results are all fairly similar.

So, it comes down to a decision. Do you want upside? Clearly, Matthews has more of that. Do you want positional flexibiity? Shewmake and Allen can play every infield position well. Matthews can play second well in addition to the outfield. He struggled in limited time at third and has not played short in the big leagues. Mathews also has options left and that is a pretty big deal. He has the look of a guy that needs everyday reps. Like Zach Cole before him, he just simply does not make enough contact yet to stick. Will he someday? Baseball history is littered with guys that take awhile to figure it out.

The simple fact is that the Astros have played well enough (and other teams in the AL West have sputtered) to where their games in June matter. Development can and should happen, but it cannot happen at the big league level under those circumstances. Joe Espada and Dana Brown have to maximize every single ounce of good baseball they can out of this 40 man roster. They will need to pick their bench and bullpen carefully. One or two missteps will cause losses like Friday night. Those are the kinds of losses this team can ill afford right now.

Is MarJon Beauchamp worth a longer look for the Sixers?

PHILADELPHIA, PA - MARCH 23: Marjon Beauchamp #16 of the Philadelphia 76ers arrives to the arena before the game against the Oklahoma City Thunder on March 23, 2026 at the Wells Fargo Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2026 NBAE (Photo by Jesse D. Garrabrant/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images

MarJon Beauchamp was the last player the Sixers acquired before the 2025-26 season began. After the final preseason game, the team waived Emoni Bates and signed Beauchamp to an Exhibit 10 contract. 

He spent the majority of the season in the G League playing for the Delaware Blue Coats. In 19 games for the Coats he averaged 25.2 points shooting 47% from the field and 35% from three-point range. 

The Sixers rewarded his strong play there, cutting undrafted free agent Hunter Sallis to give Beauchamp their final two-way roster spot. Beauchamp wouldn’t appear in a game for the Sixers until Feb. 9, helping fill in on a night the team was decimated by injuries, illnesses, suspensions and the trade deadline. 

His appearances continued to be sporadic, but he shot it well in the time he was given. In the first nine games Beauchamp appeared for the Sixers, he shot 49% from the field and 38% from three. 

That was good enough to earn a start, albeit in a game the Sixers were so injured they were basically punting it to the Oklahoma City Thunder. Beauchamp went 5-of-18 from the floor in his 31 minutes against the defending champs. He would only appear in garbage time the rest of the season as the Sixers’ wings got healthy to end the campaign. 

It’s a shame Beauchamp’s production came when the team was so depleted. Not that it would have led to any huge impact, but the random 3-of-4 three-point nights he had can swing a regular season game. It’s just the type of fun, random end-of-bench production the Sixers haven’t had since… Corey Brewer? 

Of course, there’s a reason those were the only times Beauchamp got the opportunity. His struggles to translate his success in the G League to meaningful minutes is catapulting him towards “4A player” territory. 

That type of 4A player, one that does have the ability to hit some shots on any given night, is a pretty good use of a two-way contract. Unfortunately for Beauchamp, he is running out of two-way eligibility; only players with four years of experience or less can be signed to them. If he’s able to find a team next season, it would be his fifth year in the league. 

Beauchamp’s fate looks destined to be lighting up the G-League or somewhere in Europe. As a wing-sized player who possesses at the very least, the idea of a jump shot, that could be enough for someone to take another flyer on him.

The NBA Couldn’t Have Asked for Better Finals Than Knicks-Spurs

NBA
The NBA Couldn’t Have Asked for Better Finals Than Knicks-Spurs
Wemby's coming-out party. New York's lightning-in-a-bottle opportunity. Spurs-Knicks is the NBA Finals the league needed, and why the Knicks have to win it.

The NBA couldn't have drawn this up better if it tried.

On one side, you have the New York Knicks, a franchise that hasn't won a championship since 1973, that spent the better part of two decades being the punchline of the league, and that is somehow, improbably, four wins away from ending one of the longest droughts in North American professional sports. On the other, you have the San Antonio Spurs, a team that won just 34 games last season and hasn't exceeded that mark since 2018, that wasn't supposed to be here for another two or three years, and that is being carried to the NBA Finals on the back of a 22-year-old alien from France who just won the Western Conference Finals MVP.

Spurs vs. Knicks. The NBA Finals tip off Wednesday night. And full stop: This is the best possible outcome for the league. And it's not even close.

Let's start with Victor Wembanyama, because, well, you have to. In seven games against the defending champion Oklahoma City Thunder, he averaged 27.3 points, 10.9 rebounds, 3.1 assists, 1.4 steals, and 2.7 blocks. He helped keep two-time MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander mostly in check throughout the series, and then went on the road for Game 7 and delivered 22 points and seven rebounds to close it out. When it was over, he was in tears. This is his coming-out party, not just for the casual fan, but for the world. The numbers have always been there. The moments are arriving right on schedule.

Here's the thing about Wembanyama that gets lost in the highlight reel. This isn't a flash in the pan. He's 22 years old, in just his third season, and he just led a franchise that missed the playoffs for six straight years all the way to the NBA Finals. The Spurs are going to be here again. And again after that. The dynasty machinery in San Antonio — the culture, the coaching, the front office discipline — doesn't go away just because Tim Duncan retired. It went dormant; Wembanyama just woke it back up. The rest of the league has a decade-long problem on its hands, and most of them are just starting to realize it.

Which is exactly why, if you're thinking about what's best for the NBA, the Knicks need to win this series.

That's not a popular opinion in many markets. But it's the right one. The Spurs will be back. Wembanyama will have his moment, probably multiple moments, a dynasty's worth of them. He doesn't need this particular trophy to cement what he already is. The window for what's happening in New York right now is a different conversation entirely.

The Knicks are seeking their first championship in 53 years. Madison Square Garden hasn't hosted a Finals game since 1999. Jalen Brunson took a $113 million pay cut to build this team. Karl-Anthony Towns was traded here and immediately bought in after coming home. OG Anunoby had every reason to test the market and chose to stay. Mikal Bridges absorbed every criticism thrown at him and is now playing some of the best basketball of his life when it matters most. This roster was assembled with intention, with sacrifice, and with a belief that this window was worth betting everything on.

And while the window is real, windows close. Brunson turns 30 next year and is due for an extension in 2028 after giving the Knicks a massive discount in 2024. KAT's contract also gets complicated with a $61 million-plus player option set for 2027-28. The picks are spent. The margins get tighter. This specific version of this specific team, riding this specific momentum, in this specific city that has been starving for this moment for half a century; this doesn't come back around on demand.

That's what makes this matchup so perfect and so urgent at the same time. The Spurs losing this series costs them nothing in the long run. They just knocked out the defending champions in seven games with a roster full of guys who are 22 years old. They have Wembanyama, Stephon Castle, Dylan Harper (who has looked like an absolute future star in this league in his first playoffs as a rookie), and Devin Vassell all locked in together for the foreseeable future. San Antonio is going to be a problem for a long time. One Finals loss doesn't change that math at all.

But for New York? This is lightning in a bottle. The kind of run that a city talks about forever -- win or lose -- but that means something entirely different if it ends with a parade down the Canyon of Heroes. You can feel it in the way the city has leaned into this. The Knicks haven't just won games in this playoff run; they've won back a fanbase that had genuinely given up. Brunson hit a game-winner against Detroit. They swept Cleveland. Brunson won the Eastern Conference Finals MVP. The narrative is writing itself. The only question is whether it gets the ending it deserves.

And just to illustrate the point further, imagine if the Thunder had won Game 7 instead. Oklahoma City is a great basketball city. Gilgeous-Alexander is a legitimate superstar. But the rest of the world has already made up its mind about the Thunder. They were the favorites all year. They won the championship last season. A repeat run was the expected outcome, not the compelling one. Nobody outside of Oklahoma wants to watch the predetermined winner collect another trophy, and that fatigue was real heading into Game 7. The Spurs saved the league from that storyline. Now it's on the Knicks to finish the job.

That's what New York brings to this that nobody else can. The MSG effect is real, and it is measurable. When the Knicks are relevant, the entire sports conversation shifts. Every national broadcast becomes an event. Every highlight gets three times the engagement. Every casual fan who grew up watching the league in the '90s -- when the Knicks were appointment television -- suddenly has a reason to tune back in.

And then there's the room itself. Spike Lee in his courtside seat. Timothée Chalamet losing his mind on every big shot. Ben Stiller on his feet in the fourth quarter. The Garden celebrity row during a playoff run is its own cultural moment, the kind of organic star power that no other arena in the country can replicate. The Knicks are seeking their first championship in over half a century, and that storyline alone is worth more to the NBA's bottom line than almost anything else the league could put on the floor.

The sport needs New York the way Broadway needs an audience. When the Garden is loud, everybody's watching.

The NBA has spent years searching for its next great story. It found two of them at the same time. A generational talent arriving on the biggest stage for the first time, and a city that has waited longer than most fanbases can even comprehend. One of them is going to win, and one of them is going to go home. The Spurs will get their moment. They have all the time in the world.

New York doesn't.

Read More:

Film & TVJune 1, 2026

HBO’s ‘Euphoria’ Ends in the Most Sam Levinson Way Imaginable

DrakeEntertainmentMay 29, 2026

What Drake’s Historic Week Tells Us About Music in 2026

Backrooms press imageEntertainmentMay 29, 2026

Can A24 Turn a Viral YouTube Series Into a Box Office Success?

Orion PicturesFilm & TVMay 28, 2026

How Orion Pictures Quietly Became Hollywood’s Most Interesting Studio Again

Execs & EntrepreneursMay 28, 2026

Project Healthy Minds: How to Save An Anxious America

SportsMay 26, 2026

Is Jalen Brunson Already the Most Valuable Knick of All Time?

Former Columbus Blue Jackets Forward Inducted Into IIHF Hall Of Fame

Former Columbus Blue Jackets forward Thomas Vanek was officially inducted into the IIHF Hall of Fame on Sunday. 

Vanek was traded to Columbus by Vancouver for Tyler Motte and Jussi Jokinen, February 26, 2018, to help Columbus with their playoff run that season. 

Vanek played in 19 games for the CBJ, scoring 7 goals and totaling 15 points, and having a plus-9 rating. He played 6 games in the first round of the playoffs and had two points. 

In the summer of 2018, he signed with the Detroit Red Wings, where he would play in 64 games, and then end his career in the NHL. 

Vanek also played for the Buffalo Sabres, New York Islanders, Montreal Canadiens, Minnesota Wild, Florida Panthers, Detroit Red Wings, and the Vancouver Canucks. 

The Austrian native played in various international tournaments for his home country. He played in the World Juniors, World Championships, Olympics, and other various tournaments for the Austrians. 

Congrats to Thomas Vanek on his induction into the IIHF Hall of Fame. 


Next Up For Columbus: The NHL Draft is on June 26 and 27 in Buffalo, where the CBJ will own pick #14.   

Stay updated with the most interesting Blue Jackets stories, analysis, breaking news, and more!

Tap the star to add us to your favorites on Google News and never miss a story.

Let us know what you think below.

For action-packed issues, access to the entire magazine archive and a free issue, subscribe to The Hockey News at THN.com/free. Get the latest news and trending stories by subscribing to our newsletter here. And share your thoughts by commenting below the article on THN.com or creating your own post in our community forum.

Sabres Goalie Named Among NHLers Who Could Use Fresh Start

In a recent article for ESPN, Rachel Krysak discussed multiple young players who could use a change of scenery. A Buffalo Sabres goaltender was among the players listed, as Devon Levi made the cut.

With Levi dropping to the fourth spot on the Sabres' goalie depth chart and not making an appearance at the NHL level this season, it is certainly fair to argue that he could use a fresh start. There is simply not a path for him to make the jump to the Sabres' roster right now, so it would make sense if the Sabres gave him another opportunity elsewhere. 

With Levi being a young goalie with good upside, it is possible that the Sabres could use him in a trade package to land a player who would help them immediately. The 24-year-old goalie was once considered Buffalo's top prospect, after all. Furthermore, with the free-agent market being weak this year when it comes to goalies, that could also lead to interest being high in Levi.

Levi appeared in 52 AHL games this season with the Rochester Americans, posting a 23-20-9 record, a .904 save percentage, a 2.83 goals-against average, and three shutouts. This is after he had a 25-13-4 record, a 2.20 goals-against average, a .919 save percentage, and seven shutouts in 2024-25 with Rochester. 

In 39 career NHL games with the Sabres, Levi has a 17-17-2 record, an .894 save percentage, and a 3.29 goals-against average. 

Cardinals 5, Cubs 1: Back to the drawing board for Jordan Wicks

The Cubs looked really good Saturday. Great pitching from Ben Brown, a huge day from Pete Crow-Armstrong, good relief, great defense…

As good as they looked Saturday, that’s how bad the team looked Sunday in a dispiriting 5-1 loss to the Cardinals.

You knew it probably wasn’t going to be the Cubs’ night after they got the first two hitters in the game on base and didn’t score. Nico Hoerner and Pete Crow-Armstrong singled to begin the night’s action and then… Alex Bregman struck out, Seiya Suzuki popped up and Ian Happ struck out. If you’re keeping track that’s already 0-for-3 with RISP. (0-for-8 with RISP for the entire game, not that such things are anything new for this team.)

Then Jordan Wicks had a second start just like his first, getting hit hard in the first inning. He allowed hits to the first three Cardinals and by the time the inning was over, two runs had scored. So, improvement? Just two runs given up in the first instead of five, as he did in Pittsburgh?

Yes, I’m being sarcastic. Everyone could have gone home after that inning because the Cubs offense was largely absent. They had only five more hits the rest of the way, just two for extra bases — a double by Michael Conforto in the seventh, by which time the game was basically over, and a solo homer by Alex Bregman in the fifth.

By the time Bregman left the yard, the Cubs were already down 5-0. Three of the runs were off Wicks, who completed just two innings plus one batter’s worth of the third, a leadoff single by JJ Westerholt, who eventually scored. Three runs off Wicks in two innings and his ERA went DOWN, from 16.62 to 15.63. Yikes. I feel badly for Wicks, who does have talent, but who doesn’t seem to know how to harness it at the MLB level. It seems likely that at least one more start in that rotation slot replacing Edward Cabrera will be needed, and my recommendation (not that the team listens to me) would be for Javier Assad to be recalled to make that start and Wicks be sent back to Triple-A Iowa.

Two more runs scored in the Cardinals third off Ethan Roberts, who had a rare bad outing. At 5-0 the game appeared out of reach, but Bregman did put them on the board with this home run [VIDEO].

It was Bregman’s first home run since May 12, a span of 82 plate appearances. All five of Bregman’s home runs so far this year have come with no one on base. That’s not a criticism, it’s just a coincidence. Did you know that Bregman is on a 10-game hitting streak? True story. He’s batting .304/.373/.413 (14-for-46) during the streak with two doubles, a home run and six runs scored. So that’s… pretty good, I guess. Hopefully he can build on it.

After Roberts left the game, Trent Thornton, Phil Maton and Ryan Rolison combined to throw five one-hit innings, though they also issued four walks. Maton actually retired all three hitters he faced — baby steps, maybe. Maton’s only strikeout came after this ABS challenge [VIDEO].

Honestly, that’s about all I’ve got from this one. With Cabrera and Matthew Boyd (who had a good rehab outing Sunday) on the shelf and Jameson Taillon and Shōta Imanaga giving up home runs every time you look up, Cubs starting pitching is in tatters, and it’s shown in the results over the last week. The Cubs went 3-4 on the road trip, which wouldn’t have been terrible if they hadn’t lost eight straight games right before it.

Here are Craig Counsell’s postgame comments [VIDEO].

It was fun to hear Anthony Rizzo as a field reporter for a Cubs game, and Jim Deshaies and Jason Benetti had an easy rapport. NBC’s Sunday Night Baseball production is, in my view, vastly superior to ESPN’s. NBC focuses much more on the action on the field, and that’s the game I want to watch.

Silly fun fact about this game:

After an excellent 17-9 April, the Cubs went 13-16 in May. Let’s hope that’s the worst month of 2026. They trail the Brewers by five games in the NL Central and dropped into a third-place tie with the Pirates after Sunday’s loss. With 102 games remaining, that is certainly not an insurmountable lead. Perhaps coming back to Wrigley Field and a turn of the calendar page will get the Cubs back on a winning track.

The Cubs are off Monday, an off day they surely need after 10 straight games during which they went 3-7. They’ll open a three-game series against the Athletics at Wrigley Field Tuesday evening. Jameson Taillon will start for the Cubs and Gage Jump will go for the A’s. Game time Tuesday is 7:05 p.m. CT and TV coverage will be via Marquee Sports Network.

Who is your choice for NL Pitcher of the Month?

SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA - MAY 27: Cristopher Sanchez #61 of the Philadelphia Phillies looks on during the fourth inning against the San Diego Padres at Petco Park on May 27, 2026 in San Diego, California. (Photo by Orlando Ramirez/Getty Images) | Getty Images

There isn’t a lot to go into this question. The National League just witnessed two of the best months from a starting pitcher in a long time.

These are two types of domination. For Sanchez, he literally did the exact job a pitcher is supposed to do: prevent the other team from scoring. No one scored on him in the month of May. For Misiorowski, he only allowed a single run, but struck out twelve more hitters than Sanchez did. They were both beyond excellent and entered a different stratosphere of pitcher while doing so.

So, which is the pitcher of the month? A minor award when thinking in terms of Cy Young stuff, but it is still something that any pitcher would be happy to claim.

Who was your Braves MVP for May?

CINCINNATI, OHIO - MAY 31: Mike Yastrzemski #18 of the Atlanta Braves hits a single in the 9th inning against the Cincinnati Reds at Great American Ball Park on May 31, 2026 in Cincinnati, Ohio. (Photo by Andy Lyons/Getty Images) | Getty Images

Well, that’s another month in the books. It was a pretty good month; while the Braves didn’t play at a league-best rate (hi Brewers), they weren’t far behind, either.

If you had to pick one Brave as the standout, however defined, who would you pick? Some food for thought…

While Mike Yastrzemski didn’t have the most bombastic batting line, he did far and away lead the team in WPA. His resurgence was perhaps also emblematic of the season the Braves are having as a whole: next man up production-wise, with different heroes stepping up to delivery victory after victory. It’s not that his context-neutral performance was anything to sneeze at, either, with a 170 wRC+ and 0.7 fWAR in just 66 PAs. But, in perhaps a fitting fashion for this season and not any other Braves season, he did it while massively outhitting his inputs: a .418 wOBA on a .338 xwOBA for the month.

Robert Suarez was almost entirely money, with a 6/1 shutdown/meltdown ratio in 12 appearances. Dylan Lee had a similar ratio and actually a much better pitching line (Suarez’ 17/85/94 is actually kinda meh; Lee was a hilariously dominant 34/42/54), but Suarez did stuff like have four consecutive outings (and five of six) with 0.10 WPA or more and only entered in low leverage three times for the month.

Meanwhile, Chris Sale was Chris Sale, with the most fWAR on the team for May (1.3). He made five starts, and though the Braves somehow lost two of them, he was dominant in every single one. Seriously, among his five starts, his worst ERA- was 88, his worst FIP- was 84, and his worst xFIP- was 70.

Though they weren’t around for the whole month, no one would blame you for going with Ronald Acuña Jr. or Drake Baldwin, either. Both had 0.9 fWAR. Acuña had a 192 wRC+ with a .451 wOBA and .462 xwOBA, because that’s what heroes do. Baldwin, well… .441 wOBA, .469 xwOBA, 185 wRC+. These guys were monsters. Get well soon, Drake Baldwin.

I think I’ve covered the likely picks here, but who ya got?

Monday Morning Texas Rangers Update

May 31, 2026; Arlington, Texas, USA; Texas Rangers pitcher Jacob Latz (67) and catcher Kyle Higashioka (11) celebrate their teams 6-3 win over the Kansas City Royals following the ninth inning at Globe Life Field. Mandatory Credit: Jim Cowsert-Imagn Images | Jim Cowsert-Imagn Images

Good morning.

Shawn McFarland writes about what we’ve learned about the Texas Rangers over the last week, a club that started a homestand by getting no-hit and ended it with a sweep.

Kennedi Landry writes about Jack Leiter following his Vandy bro Kumar Rocker for a stellar outing against Kansas City as the Rangers finished off a sweep of the Royals on Sunday.

McFarland writes that the Rangers secured the sweeping victory by scoring six runs with timely hits, getting good pitching from their starter, and playing sound defense.

Jeff Wilson writes about the Rangers bouncing back from a poor start to finish with a winning homestand by taking the win on Sunday.

The cavalry could soon arrive as McFarland notes that Corey Seager is expected to begin a rare rehab assignment with Wyatt Langford also nearing a return.

Landry writes that getting Seager back and healthy and hitting is the hope for Texas to heat up in June.

And, Evan Grant answers why it was Andrew McCutchen on the chopping block despite several other players also struggling.

Have a nice day!

The Orioles made a statement with successful home stretch

May 30, 2026; Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Baltimore Orioles infielder Pete Alonso (25) begins to celebrate after hitting a walk-off single in the ninth inning against the Toronto Blue Jays at Oriole Park at Camden Yards. Mandatory Credit: Jamie Sabau-Imagn Images | Jamie Sabau-Imagn Images

If the Orioles do end up fully turning this season around, this past home stand will have been where it started. Ten days ago, this club was spiraling, losers of five out of six and cratering to the bottom of the AL East. Now, after some home cooking and a series of exciting wins, the O’s feel like they are truly back in the mix.

Prior to this 10-game home stretch, the Orioles were 21-29, in fifth place in the division, 13 games out of first place and 3.5 games back of the final wild card spot. After going 7-3, which included a series win over the Tigers, a sweep of the Rays, and a four-game split with the Blue Jays, they are now 28-32. That brought them up to fourth in the East, within 10 games of first in the division, and just one game out of the final wild card spot.

Clearly, there’s work to be done, but the success of the home stand is unambiguous. The Orioles finally put together a stretch of games that made them look like the competitive team they were always supposed to be. Dreams of a playoff run are back on.

Offensive outburst

Over these 10 games, the Orioles scored 60 runs and hit 14 home runs. Contributions came from up and down the order, the previous black holes at second and third base seem to have disappeared, and one Oriole in particular has reasserted his everyday place in the lineup.

Nine different Orioles had a wRC+ of 105 or better. That is the sort of well-rounded offense Mike Elias had in mind when he built the roster. And that includes Pete Alonso (119 wRC+), Gunnar Henderson (111), and Adley Rutschman (105) being good not great. It was the rest of the team that really drove the run scoring.

Coby Mayo, despite dealing with an injury, had an impressive showing across five appearances. He slashed .333/.412/.600 with a home run. Could he be turning the corner? The Orioles really need him to take third base as his own.

Jackson Holliday’s return to the lineup has added a crucial dimension to the offense. He hit .276/.371/.483 with two home runs, and a 14.3% walk rate. While Jeremiah Jackson did a great job early in the season, his struggles have been evident for a while now. Holliday brings a much better approach to the plate.

But the MVP of the entire home stand is, without a doubt, Colton Cowser. The outfielder hit .375/.444/.792 with three home runs, eight runs scored, and nine RBI. He cut is strikeout rate in half, just 18.5% in this stretch, while still walking at a solid 11.1% rate. Cowser also came up clutch several times, including a pair of walk-off home runs. The Orioles don’t even need him to be that good at the plate. They just need him to be competent. He was certainly that these last few days.

Rotation rounding into form?

Expectations for the Orioles starting staff were not as high as they were for the lineup. The group simply needed to be serviceable with occasional pops of brilliance. Until recently, the underlying numbers for the starters were better than the actual outcomes. In these 10 games, their fortunes turned around a bit.

The Orioles 2.38 starter ERA since May 22 is the fifth-best in baseball. Their 4.27 xERA is 17th, their 4.21 FIP is 19th, and their 4.48 xFIP ranks 23rd. So were they actually good, or did they just get some good luck? The answer varies by the individual.

Shane Baz had a brilliant seven-inning outing, and both Brandon Young and Kyle Bradish have found some consistency recently that feels impossible to ignore. Chris Bassitt, on the other hand, allowed just one run in six innings despite barely missing any bats. Trey Gibson navigated a boatload of walks to give up just one run in 5.2 frames. Those two seem to be on the luckier side of things.

Trevor Rogers exists somewhere in between. Neither of his two starts on the home stand were “good,” and the Orioles lost both games. But they also felt like progress from where he has been. If he had been pulled after six innings in the game against the Blue Jays then maybe we would feel even better about this team, the pitching staff, and this stretch of 10 games.

Bullpen roles becoming clear

The relief corps had an opposite experience to their mates in the rotation. Some of their underlying stats from the home stand were actually better (3.16 FIP) than their top-line numbers (4.10 ERA). But overall outcomes in a bullpen feel less important than how some of the most important individuals are doing. In that regard, it was promising.

Rico Garcia went another 4.2 innings without allowing an earned run, though his strikeout (5.79 K/9) and walk (3.86 BB/9) numbers are not where you want them. Even still, it’s more brilliance from one of the team’s best surprises.

Andrew Kittredge seems to have found his footing after struggling after his IL stint. He didn’t allow a run in three appearances, which included coming into a bases loaded jam with no outs against the Rays. He struck out the three batters he was responsible for.

It was not a good week-and-a-half for Yennier Cano. He is the one that created the aforementioned bases loaded mess for Kittredge, and he exited with what seemed to be a hamstring injury. The good news is that he’s fine! No IL stint. and his underlying metrics are much better than the 16.20 ERA across 1.2 innings would suggest.

On top of that, Ryan Helsley is on the way back. He threw a 15-20-pitch bullpen on May 30, will do more bullpen work this week, and then is expected to go out on a rehab assignment sometime after June 8. He’s a reliever, so shouldn’t need an overly long stint down in the minors before he is ready to help the rest of the group out.

The return of Helsley should make the entire unit deeper. He will likely return to the closer’s role, even though Garcia has filled in admirably there. More importantly, it pushes everyone else further up in the game. So if a starter can get through five or six innings with the game in reach, you feel confident that a combination of Garcia, Kittrege, Cano, and Helsely can lock things down from there. It’s a much better situation in the late innings than many expected coming into the season.

Keep it going

Hoping for the Orioles to continue winning seven out of every 10 games is a way to get yourself disappointed. But they do need to maintain some level of momentum, and this road trip could give a chance to do just that.

They start with three games in Boston, who are back at the bottom of the AL East following the O’s winning ways. The BoSox have been awful at home this year, owning a 9-19 record at Fenway Park. Similarly, the Orioles have been terrible on the road (9-17) this year. Something’s gotta give.

Then the O’s get to see the Blue Jays again. The defending American League champs have righted the ship after early-season wobbles. But they are no juggernaut. There’s no better way to get back into playoff position than to beat a team that currently holds one of the last wild card spots.

This past home stand was so huge for the Orioles and the fan base. If it had gone wrong, it would have felt like a final blow to this underperforming team. Instead, they were fantastic. We saw the potential. Let’s keep it going, folks!

Have Golden Knights, Hurricanes given Bruins a blueprint to contending?

Have Golden Knights, Hurricanes given Bruins a blueprint to contending? originally appeared on NBC Sports Boston

Drafting and developing has often been the best and most cost effective way to build a true Stanley Cup contender, especially in the salary cap era (2005-06 to present).

The Chicago Blackhawks won three Stanley Cup titles after drafting franchise cornerstone players such as Jonathan Toews, Patrick Kane, Brent Seabrook and Duncan Keith. The Pittsburgh Penguins won three titles after drafting Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin, Marc-Andre Fleury and Kris Letang.

The Tampa Bay Lightning won two championships after drafting Steven Stamkos, Brayden Point, Nikita Kucherov, Ondrej Palat and Victor Hedman.

There are several other examples, too.

This season’s Stanley Cup finalists — the Vegas Golden Knights and Carolina Hurricanes — have taken the complete opposite approach to roster construction.

Let’s breakdown some crazy numbers and notes from both of their active rosters ahead of Tuesday night’s Game 1 in Carolina:

  • The Golden Knights’ Game 1 lineup likely won’t have a single player they drafted in the first round. The Hurricanes have two of their own first-round picks (Andre Svechnikov and Seth Jarvis) on their roster.
  • Andre Svechnikov (Carolina) is the only player drafted by one of these teams in the top five. Other players, such as Jack Eichel (Vegas), were top-five picks, but they were drafted by other teams.
  • Sixteen of Vegas’ players, including many of its best players (Jack Eichel, Mitch Marner, Mark Stone, Noah Hanifin, Tomas Hertl, Rasmus Andersson, etc.) were acquired via trade.
  • Seven Hurricanes players, including Taylor Hall, captain Jordan Staal, K’Andre Miller and Logan Stankoven, were acquired via trade.
  • Only two of the Golden Knights’ players — Pavel Dorofeyev and Kaedan Korczak — were drafted by Vegas. Just six of the Hurricanes’ players — Svechnikov, Jarvis, Jackson Blake, Sebastian Aho, Alexander Nikishin and Jaccob Slavin — were drafted by Carolina.
  • Both starting goalies — Carter Hart (Vegas) and Frederik Andersen (Carolina) — were free agent signings.

Veteran sportswriter Adam Gretz made a great graphic that highlights these two rosters:

The Florida Panthers’ 2025 Stanley Cup team was built heavily on trades, too. The Panthers acquired Matthew Tkachuk, Sam Bennett, Sam Reinhart, Brad Marchand and Seth Jones in separate trades.

It’s true, to some degree, that the Golden Knights are a bit of a unique case. They greatly benefited from the expansion draft process. They also operate in the state of Nevada, which has zero state income tax, and that’s helpful in terms of signing players to team-friendly contracts. But their overall approach of not overpaying in free agency and making super aggressive (but also smart) trades has been fascinating to watch over the last eight years.

Is there a lesson or a blueprint the Bruins can follow here?

Yes, actually.

Trades are an effective way to build a team. This method of roster construction does carry plenty of risk, especially if you’re trading away first- and second-round picks at a high rate. But if you have good pro scouts and can identify players who will fit your team and can be extended long term (if necessary), it’s possible to build a perennial contender through the trade market.

Jack Eichel and Mark Stone.Bob Frid-Imagn Images
The Golden Knights got Jack Eichel and Mark Stone via trades.

Bruins general manager Don Sweeney has generally done a good job in his role since taking over in 2015. Drafting and developing has been a challenge for the entire organization during his tenure, though. It’s gotten better in recent years, but overall, the Bruins have not done a good job building through the draft.

Trades are a different story. Sweeney is awesome at making deals. He has won nearly every trade he’s made as Bruins GM, and many of them were home runs. It doesn’t matter if he was a buyer or seller — he almost always knocks it out of the park.

If a team is looking to build a winning roster via trades, Sweeney is a great guy to have in charge. And if you look at the Bruins’ current situation, they absolutely should consider being super aggressive in the trade market this summer.

Why is that?

For starters, the free agent market is pretty weak. Alex Tuch is the only legit top-six forward available. Rasmus Andersson and Darryn Raddysh are the only legit top-four defensemen available, and giving an expensive long-term deal to either player would be a risk considering they’re both 29 years old.

The Bruins have the No. 23 pick in the first round of the 2026 NHL Draft. They did not get lucky in the draft lottery and won’t get a first-round pick from the Maple Leafs to complete the Brandon Carlo trade until 2027 or 2028.

That leaves the trade market. And for the first time in a long while, the Bruins are loaded with quality assets to dangle.

They have five first-round picks in the next three drafts. They own all their second-round picks, too. They have several super talented prospects such as James Hagens, Dean Letourneau and Will Zellers. NHLers such as Casey Mittelstadt and Mason Lohrei have value, too.

The Bruins desperately need more high-end talent. They have only one elite forward in David Pastrnak. Every true Cup contender has at least two or three of those players. The B’s have a legit No. 1 defenseman in Charlie McAvoy, but the depth and talent behind him (especially on the right side of the blue line) is not great. The B’s have a great goalie in Jeremy Swayman. That’s one position that doesn’t require substantial improvement.

Boston hasn’t been able to find a real No. 1 center, or even a legit top-six center, since Patrice Bergeon and David Krejci both retired in 2023. Elias Lindholm was supposed to be that kind of player when he signed a seven-year, $54.25 million deal in 2024 free agency, but he has played well below expectations so far. Maybe Hagens becomes a No. 1 center in the near future, but even if that scenario did play out, trading for another top-six center should still be a priority.

The bottom line is the trade market is by far the best way for the Bruins to add the premium talent they need.

Which players could they target? Last week, we looked at seven players the Bruins should consider pursuing, including top-six forwards Robert Thomas, Jason Robertson and Mason McTavish, as well as defensemen Owen Zellweger and Simon Nemec.

Robertson is a 45-goal scorer at left wing and only 26 years old. He would take significant pressure off of Pastrnak. Thomas is a legit No. 1 center and an elite playmaker. He might be a little unrealistic as a target given the crazy high asking price. McTavish might be a less expensive option if he became available.

Zellweger and Nemec are two highly talented young defensemen who could benefit greatly from a change of scenery and/or a larger role.

The Bruins have a good core. Pastrnak, McAvoy and Swayman are franchise pillars. Pavel Zacha was a 30-goal scorer. Morgan Geekie is a very good goal scorer, too. Hampus Lindholm, when healthy, is a solid second-pairing defenseman. Fraser Minten could be a strong two-way center for many years. Hagens has enormous potential.

  • James Hagens, C, 19 years old
  • Fraser Minten, C, 21
  • Morgan Geekie, LW, 27
  • Jeremy Swayman, G, 27
  • Charlie McAvoy, D, 28
  • Pavel Zacha, C/W, 29
  • David Pastrnak, RW, 29
  • Elias Lindholm, C, 31
  • Nikita Zadorov, D, 31
  • Hampus Lindholm, D, 32
  • Viktor Arvidsson, LW, 33 (UFA this summer)

There’s a lot to like about the Bruins’ roster. But the lack of elite talent was glaringly obvious during the playoffs, and until that issue gets addressed, the Bruins will likely be a first-round exit kind of team.

The best place for them to make immediate and massive roster additions is the trade market, which is why Sweeney needs to be aggressive this summer.

Knicks vs. Spurs: 3 keys for New York in Game 1 of NBA Finals

After 27 years, the Knicks are back in the NBA Finals, with a real shot to win a championship for the first time in 53 years.

Standing in New York’s way are the 62-20 San Antonio Spurs and 7-foot-4 superstar Victor Wembanyama. Both teams have some familiarity with each other, as the Knicks defeated the Spurs in the NBA Cup championship game in December. 

The Spurs are coming off a highly competitive seven-game series against the Oklahoma City Thunder. New York has cruised through much of the playoffs, entering the Finals with an 11-game winning streak. 

As we’ve seen in the NBA, these opportunities don’t happen often. Last year’s NBA finalists, the Indiana Pacers and Oklahoma City Thunder, did not repeat, continuing a recent trend of teams unable to get back to the finals. That adds more pressure for the Knicks and Spurs to make the most of the moment.

Let’s dive into three keys to the NBA Finals opener on Wednesday night in San Antonio...

Forcing turnovers

The Spurs are a young team, and from time to time, that youth shows up in the form of turnovers. One of San Antonio's weaknesses exposed during the Conference Finals was a tendency to cough up the rock. The Spurs had at least 15 turnovers in four of the seven games played against the Thunder. In the postseason, the Spurs have a turnover rate of 15.2 percent, which is ranked 11th out of 16 playoff teams. 

Specifically, Spurs guard Stephon Castle had some shaky moments, recording 11, nine, and six turnovers in three different games against the Thunder. 

Forcing miscues from San Antonio will also help New York’s offense, since the Knicks can create transition scoring opportunities. New York thrived in the Conference Finals, scoring on misses and makes against the Cleveland Cavaliers. In the postseason, New York is averaging 1.32 points per possession on transition opportunities, per NBA Stats, the No. 1 scoring rate among all playoff teams. That would put less pressure on having to consistently create great looks in the halfcourt.

Paint touches

There’s no better rim protector in the NBA than Wembanyama. He led the NBA in blocks per game during the regular season and is tops in the category during the postseason. 

But the most meaningful indicator of Wembanyama’s impact is how little teams attack the paint when facing the Spurs. In the first two playoff rounds, 41.4 percent of the Thunder’s points were scored in the paint, per NBA Stats. That number dipped to 34.9 percent against San Antonio, which would be last in the NBA during the regular season.

New York has relied heavily on attacking the paint in the playoffs, with 44.4 percent of its points coming near the basket, fourth among all playoff teams. 

Wembanyama and the Spurs will look to limit the interior scoring opportunities, with him defending Josh Hart for much of this series and lurking on the backline to disrupt any drives. Jalen Brunson's ability to pull up from three and midrange is valuable in a series like this.

Can the Knicks pull the 7-footer away from the basket? There’s some possible solutions, such as using Hart as a screener more often, or going to five-out lineups with Landry Shamet or Miles McBride in Hart’s place. 

Paint points in the halfcourt will be a challenge the Knicks have to figure out.

Going to Towns

With Wembanyama expected to be guarding Hart, San Antonio will have a smaller defender on Karl-Anthony Towns for a lot of this series. In New York’s most recent game against the Spurs in early March, Castle defended Towns at the start of the game, and other defenders like Harrison Barnes and Keldon Johnson checked the big man. 

Towns doesn’t have to score relentlessly like he has in the past. During this playoff run, he’s averaging a modest 16.9 points, the second-lowest scoring numbers of his career. Some of that can be attributed to the high number of blowouts where the Knicks have been able to rest their starters. But Towns has also become more of a distributor, averaging 5.9 assists in 14 playoff contests.

A second-year pro, Castle is a great defender, but he’s listed at 6-foot-6. Towns should be able to find windows to make plays both for himself and his teammates. His scoring, playmaking, and offensive rebounding will be important in this series. 

Cam Booser comes to Rays pen with some new pitch shapes

PORT CHARLOTTE, FLORIDA - MARCH 15, 2026: Cam Booser #62 of the Tampa Bay Rays throws a pitch during the seventh inning of a spring training game against the Pittsburgh Pirates at Charlotte Sports Park on March 15, 2026 in Port Charlotte, Florida. (Photo by Nick Cammett/Diamond Images via Getty Images) | Diamond Images/Getty Images

The Rays signed Cam Booser this past offseason as a non-roster invitee. He performed well enough during Spring Training to earn a spot on the Rays’ 40-man roster and remain in the organization’s plans despite opening the season in Durham.

Booser has the lowest walk rate of his career while still getting above average swing-and-miss on his stuff. The Rays have helped Booser accomplish this by getting him in the zone more with his cutter. Cutters are naturally platoon-neutral offerings, so optimizing his cutter shape has helped him handle both righties and lefties. Below are the differences in his cutter from 2025 in the majors to what he has shown in Durham this year:

20252026
Vertical movement0.8 inches3.8 inches
Horizontal movement3.3 inches3.4 inches
Zone rate46.4%56.8%
Strike rate61.6%68.5%

Prior to the adjustment to the shape, Booser’s only in-zone weapon was his four-seamer. It’s a good pitch with solid velocity and ride from his slot – especially from the left side – but major league hitters are talented. Hitters could reasonably narrow their decision-making process. If a pitch was going to finish in the zone, it was most likely Booser’s four-seamer.

Now that Booser has a second pitch he can reliably land in the zone, hitters can no longer assume every strike will come from the four-seamer. Stuff models will likely favor his old cutter shape because the additional depth gave it more bat-missing potential. The tradeoff is that Booser now throws the pitch for strikes far more often. To mitigate the risk of the flatter shape getting hit hard, the Rays have altered his usage.

Hitters are less likely to swing early in counts; the league swing rate this season is just 38.1% in the first two pitches of an at-bat compared to 55.3% after the first two pitches. The Rays have Booser throwing his new cutter nearly 60% of the time within the first two pitches of an at-bat. He was doing it at just 20% last season. Booser throwing his cutter more when hitters are less likely to swing helps hedge the risk of it getting hit while still accomplishing the same goal of keeping hitters from sitting four-seam.

Booser has adapted well to the Rays pitching philosophy of pounding the zone with less than two strikes and then looking to expand the zone. He now has two distinct shapes in two distinct velocity bands that he can attack the zone with before using his plus breaking ball to generate chases and whiffs outside of the zone. On paper, the shape change may look like a step backward because it sacrifices some movement. In practice, it appears to be making the entire arsenal play better by giving Booser a second pitch he can confidently attack the zone with. If the strike-throwing gains hold, this version of Booser looks much more capable of handling meaningful major league innings.

Yankees May Approval Poll: Brian Cashman

Hard to believe that we are already beyond Memorial Day and the one-third mark of the MLB season. The first two months have flown by, the Yankees looking well positioned with the second-best record in the AL. As the calendar flips over to June, it’s time to evaluate GM Brian Cashman and the performance of his team in May.

Cashman entered the month of May polling at a relatively robust 41 percent approval rating when in recent years his approval has tended to hover in the low-to-mid 30s at the end of April. It helped that his team was in first place, powered by the two-headed monster of Aaron Judge and Ben Rice as well as a historically good starting rotation. However, things took a turn for the inconsistent once we got into May.

They started the month well enough, with a sweep of the Orioles and a series win over the Rangers. But then they got swept by the Brewers and lost consecutive series to the Orioles and Mets culminating in the soul crushing walk-off loss in Queens. A series against the Blue Jays brought a hard-fought respite but a subsequent series split with the Rays laid bare the frailty of the offense. That being said, the month-ending road trip could not have come at a better time, the Yankees sweeping the Royals and taking two out of three in Sacramento after having dropped a series to the A’s in April.

I think we have enough evidence to say that this Yankees offense is prone to blowing hot or cold, reflected by the overall streakiness of the team — they have three winning streaks of at least five games but also a pair of losing streaks of at least four games. They have scored at least 23 runs in seven different series but also have a pair of streaks of over 20 innings each where they failed to score. There were worries that the yearly June Swoon had arrived early in May, but their play to wrap up the month did enough to assuage those fears.

They might have fared better in May had Judge not “slumped” to a 126 wRC+ in the month, but that is the time when you look to his teammates to carry the captain through a temporary downturn in form. Rice also cooled off from a 212 wRC+ to 156 in May. It shows how much that pair was propping up the offense through the first month, and will continue to be relied upon as the principal run producers of the team.

The main issue has been the pair of black holes at the bottom of the lineup. Austin Wells and J.C. Escarra have combined to produce the second-worst wRC+ (58) of any group of catchers in the AL ahead of only the Angels. Ryan McMahon is 24th out of 30 qualified third basemen with his 75 wRC+, but at least has shown the faintest stirrings of life in May as opposed to the pair of catchers while also being part of a platoon alongside the inspired re-signing of Amed Rosario and his 129 wRC+.

Fortunately, other contributors have stepped up in the lineup. Cody Bellinger is doing his best Kyle Tucker impression since re-upping over the winter with a 140 wRC+ and 2.2 fWAR. Paul Goldschmidt has been something of a savior after Giancarlo Stanton and Jasson Domínguez went down with injury, stabilizing the DH role with his six home runs and 140 wRC+ in 34 games. Anthony Volpe returned from offseason shoulder surgery with a newly disciplined approach that has allowed him to post a .375 OBP and 128 wRC+ in 13 games. Trent Grisham and Jazz Chisholm Jr. have turned around slow April starts to resemble the lineup stalwarts they were last season, Grisham posting a 131 wRC+ and Jazz a 126 wRC+ in May.

The rotation has remained exemplary despite losing Max Fried to an elbow injury. Cam Schlittler is the early favorite for AL Cy Young with his 1.50 ERA, 1.90 FIP, and AL-leading 2.9 fWAR. Gerrit Cole hasn’t missed a beat since making his long awaited return from Tommy John rehab and steps right back into his spot as staff ace. Carlos Rodón has posted back-to-back one-run outings after a pair of rocky starts in his return from offseason elbow surgery. Will Warren and Ryan Weathers remain sturdy back of the rotation options.

The bullpen remains the weakest link. We’re all still scarred from the three-run homer David Bednar gave up to Tyrone Taylor. Even Tim Hill and Brent Headrick have gotten touched up recently after strong starts to the season. The bright side is that reinforcements might be on the way. Yovanny Cruz opened eyes in his brief cameo and should be one of the first options back up if he can improve his strike throwing. One of Warren or Weathers will likely be pushed into the bullpen by Fried’s return. And perhaps most excitingly, Cashman floated the possibility that they could call up top pitching prospect Carlos Lagrange and his 103 mph fastball to reinforce the bullpen at some point.

That brings us to today’s task. Do you approve of the job Brian Cashman has done through the end of May? On one hand, the Yankees boast the best offense and pitching staff in the AL by several metrics. On the other hand, they sit a game-and-a-half behind the Rays in the division and often look just as liable to be shut out or suffer a bullpen meltdown as they are to turn in a dominant win. The polarizing GM certainly elicits stronger feelings than can be captured in a one-word response — you may feel a question such as the one being posed requires more nuance, greater elaboration, or a wider selection of options than just a “yes” or a “no,” however for the sake of this exercise, a binary question works best.