With the annual MLB GM Meetings taking place in Las Vegas this week, Mets president of baseball operations David Stearns will be speaking to reporters for the first time since New York's end-of-season news conference.
Back then, Stearns was blunt about how the Mets handled their in-season pitching woes (he said they should've done more) and repeatedly stressed the need for the club to improve its run prevention.
Stearns obviously won't lay out an exact blueprint regarding what the team plans to do this offseason, but his availabilities are generally candid and forthcoming, which makes his upcoming comments at the GM Meetings something to keep an eye on.
Here are five questions Stearns should be asked as things start to percolate...
Has there been contact with Pete Alonso and Edwin Diaz?
Alonso and Diaz opted out of their contracts last week. And with free agency now open, they can sign with any team. In the case of Diaz, the Mets extended a qualifying offer that he will almost certainly reject.
The negotiation with Alonso last offseason was drawn out and didn't end until early February, when he agreed to a two-year deal worth $54 million that contained an opt-out after the first year of the deal.
It can be argued that Alonso is the best fit for New York's opening at first base and that the Mets are the best fit for Alonso. But with one report saying his early asking price could be seven years, it's fair to wonder how long the Mets might let this play out before going in a different direction.
First base options on the free agent market include Cody Bellinger, Josh Naylor, and Japanese stars Munetaka Murakami and Kazuma Okamoto.
When it comes to Diaz, who opted out of the final two years and roughly $40 million on his deal, it's possible he can be brought back by in effect tacking two years onto that contract at a similar average annual value.
With the Mets not having an in-house closer option, bringing Diaz back makes all the sense in the world.
What is the team's appetite for trading top prospects?
In Stearns' first year at the helm, which began during the 2023-24 offseason, he made it clear that the Mets trading any of their most prized prospects at that point was unlikely.
Last offseason, Stearns' public comments regarding his comfortability with dealing top prospects softened -- which made sense since the team was coming off a trip to the NLCS and had World Series expectations.
As this offseason unfolds, with New York possibly engaging teams on potential trades for a top-of-the-rotation starting pitcher, the question surrounding the future of top prospects such as Brandon Sproat, Jett Williams, and Jonah Tong could grow louder.
In a scenario where the Tigers seriously explore dealing Tarik Skubal, the Mets would have to give up a package of prospects it hurts badly to part with. Are they prepared to do it?
Is the third base job open?
After struggling while getting sporadic playing time over his first two full seasons in the majors, Brett Baty got a long look at third base this past season. And he excelled.
In 432 plate appearances over 130 games, Baty slashed .254/.313/.435 with 18 home runs, 13 doubles, and two triples.
Meanwhile, his defense was smooth and above average, with him in the 69th percentile in OAA.
If Mark Vientos remains with the Mets for 2026, it's safe to believe he would be viewed as mainly a designated hitter option. That would seemingly leave Baty as the starter at the hot corner. But are the Mets prepared to hand him the job?
Stearns spoke a bit during his end-of-season news conference about the possibility that the offensive core could be shaken up. If Alonso leaves, perhaps that shakeup comes at first base. If Alonso stays, the easiest way to jolt the offensive core could be by making a big addition at either second base (Bo Bichette?) or third base.
When it comes to third, free agent Alex Bregman could be a nice fit, with him able to bring a plus bat, plus defense, and leadership.
What's the plan in center field?
The Mets had serious issues in center last season.
Jose Siri suffered an early injury that kept him out for most of the year (and was DFA'd shortly after returning), Tyrone Taylor was strong defensively but had the worst offensive year of his career (70 OPS+), and trade deadline acquisition Cedric Mullins hit .182 with an OPS+ of 62.
Taylor is arbitration-eligible in 2026 and slated to make roughly $3.6 million, so it's safe to think he'll be back. But he's better suited as a backup.
If the Mets view Carson Benge or Williams -- who both ended the 2025 season with Triple-A Syracuse -- as the future in center, it's possible that future will arrive at some point during the first half of the 2026 season.
If the Mets decide to go the free agent route for a short-term answer, options they could explore include Harrison Bader.
Will the Mets consider free agents who have qualifying offers attached?
As a team that exceeded the luxury tax in 2025, the Mets' penalty for signing a player attached to the QO would be relatively severe, with them losing their second- and fifth-highest picks in the 2026 MLB Draft as well as $1 million from their international bonus pool.
Bichette, Dylan Cease, Kyle Schwarber, Kyle Tucker, Framber Valdez, and Ranger Suarez were all tagged with -- and will reject -- the QO.
Of those players, the ones who make the most sense for the Mets are arguably Cease, Bichette, and Schwarber.
And it's hard to make a case against the Mets chasing any of those players, even with the associated penalties.