Knicks Bulletin: ‘He’s exhausted. Come on, that was egregious’

Victor Wembanyama R of San Antonio Spurs defends New York Knicks forward Og Anunoby during the final game 2 between New York Knicks and San Antonio Spurs at the 2025-2026 NBA basketball game in San Antonio, the United States, June 5, 2026. (Photo by Sun Yuxuan/Xinhua via Getty Images)

Why do we have to wait one more day to enjoy another Knicks game?

Who would have thought, but turns out ballers also rest on weekends.

We don’t, so here’s another Bulletin presented by your very own.

Mike Brown

On not looking too far amid the NBA Finals:

“One of the things that we preach is being present. In order to be present, you can’t think about the past, you can’t think about the future. For all of us as humans, that’s hard as heck to do.”

On reminding himself to stay present:

“I constantly — boom — flick myself in the head. Tell myself: be present, be present, be present. I obviously mention it to the group, too. With those guys being who they are, they’ve really embraced it, and they’re really trying to live it every single moment during this run.”

On the Knicks’ supporting cast stepping up in Game 2:

“Somebody is always there. Mitch defensively at the end of the ballgame. Mikal during a stretch of the ballgame was huge for us on both ends of the floor. You’re not stopping a guy like De’Aaron Fox. You’ve just got to try to make him work. We put Mikal on Fox in the second half a little bit and made him work. But what he did for us offensively when we were struggling and then when we took Jalen out was huge. He made big play after big play after big play. Landry hit a couple of big shots. Deuce (McBride) came off the bench late and hit a big 3 for us. OG was huge on his drives. Again, a lot of contributions from a lot of guys, and that’s why you like having a team because it could be anybody’s night on any given night. Our guys don’t care. They sacrifice for one another and we found a way to get a win.”

On Mikal Bridges’ two-way impact in Game 2:

“[Bridges] was huge for us on both ends of the floor. You’re not stopping a guy like De’Aaron Fox. You’ve just got to try to make him work. We put Mikal on Fox in the second half a little bit and made him work. But what he did for us offensively when we were struggling and then when we took Jalen out was huge. He made big play after big play after big play.”

On Landry Shamet’s opportunity:

“I’m talking about his whole career because he’s been a journeyman, but he probably deserved more of an opportunity because what he does out on the floor on both ends is very hard to find in this league, especially at his size, with is mental and physical toughness. We gave him an opportunity and showed him we loved him. He embraced it and he ran with it.”

On recruiting Shamet to New York:

“When I first got the job, I called Landry. I said, ‘hey, I want you here.’ I’m sorry about the way the circumstances are contractually. I have nothing to do with that, but I believe you can help us.”

Jalen Brunson

On keeping a 0-0 mindset heading into Game 3:

“I think our mindset was 0-0, not being up 1-0. Even with the series it is now, next game, mindset has to be 0-0 again. It’s just how it has to be. You can’t be comfortable. You can’t be satisfied with anything. Just continue to push forward.”

On trusting his teammates and working in the shadows:

“That’s just who they are. That’s who my teammates are. Night in and night out, they come and bring it. There’s always going to be things said, regardless of the situation, but I have the utmost trust and faith in them just because of the work ethic and the things that we’re able to do every day. When there’s no cameras and when we’re in the practice gym, when we’re in film, when we’re trying to be the best team that we can be, that’s when, in those moments, that’s when we grow.”

Karl-Anthony Towns

On New York’s energy through Game 2:

“New York City showed up. The fans showed up. The energy showed up.”

On shutting down the narrative about Brunson’s struggles in the Finals:

“I’ll leave that question to you and everyone else. I’m just worried about the team result, which is winning. And for JB, you call it rough shooting nights. I see him hitting the free throw to give us the game, get Mitch a chance to get the stop for us to win the game. The last game, he hit some of the craziest shots I’ve seen to give us the game. So I don’t know if you say a rough shooting night. I see Captain Clutch doing what he’s always been doing since I got here . . . You know, he’s a huge part when it comes down to the actual, the game, to winning the game. Number 11 can’t be messed with.”

On the Knicks’ unity as the foundation of its success:

“This team leans on each other. I think that’s why we’ve gotten here. That’s why we had the success we had during the regular season even when things weren’t going great, because at the end of the day, when things do get tough and the trials and tribulations do present themselves, this team doesn’t disband. They don’t go away from each other. We lean into each other even more. We trust each other even more to get out of the rut. That’s what special teams do. Jalen knows. He has a national championship, and you’ve seen the camaraderie and unity they have.”

On the importance of enjoying the grind of the game:

“I didn’t get (a college championship), but I know the success I did have in my career has always come down to one thing: It’s been the unity of the team. How well does that team truly enjoy being in each other’s presence? Because the NBA season is a grind, and you’re going to be with each other more than you’re going to be with your families, your kids, and if you guys don’t truly enjoy the grind and the work that needs to be put in together, I don’t think success is possible. So it’s a testament to these guys, that’s where resiliency comes from, that we don’t want to let each other down. We do look at each other as family, as brothers, and we don’t ever want to see each other not succeed.”

Josh Hart

On the 2-0 lead meaning nothing:

“It’s still 0-0 as far as we’re concerned. Being up 2-0 means really nothing. The Spurs are going to come out on Monday [in Game 3] with an unbelievable amount of energy and desperation, and we’ve got to be better.”

De’Aaron Fox

On trying to avoid making the wrong kind of history:

“We just got to try to make history not repeat itself.”

Stephon Castle

On the Spurs feeling good heading into Game 3 with a 2-0 deficit:

“It was going to take everything to win the series anyway. Putting ourselves in this type of predicament is going to be tough, but I don’t think it’s anything we can’t handle.”

Walt Frazier

On Victor Wembanyama’s missed game-winning jumper:

“I saw [the last jumper was off]. I could look at his face. He wasn’t shooting with confidence. He’s fatigued. He doesn’t know how to pace himself. That turnover? He was exhausted. Come on, that was egregious. [And then the] foul? Come on, man, you just lost the ball. Why are you fouling? You see, when you get tired mentally, you’re losing … a little calamity. And it cost them the game.”

On whether the series will return to San Antonio for Game 5:

“I don’t think so. I think it’s our destiny now, the way things have unfolded for the Knicks. Every game — the grit, the resiliency, the resourcefulness. I don’t see it ending, because we’ve got 10 guys that are thriving. So, like tonight, Jalen was mediocre, and somebody steps up. And it’s been that way.”

Jeremy Lin

On the Spurs’ inexperience showing up late in Game 2:

“The Spurs have so much heart. 14-0 run to come back into the game, but the last 30 seconds, just so much inexperience. Whether you want to call it youth, whether you want to call it fatigue, it just wasn’t it.”

On the Spurs’ awful late-game decision-making:

“The first play: another isolation for Wemby with 30 seconds, tough shot over Mitchell Robinson. Then you have a turnover, then you have a foul. I mean, they had the game where you have the ball with 12 seconds left, it’s a tie game, there’s no way you should be able to ever lose that game.”

On the contrast to the Knicks’ late-game approach:

“If the roles were reversed, the Knicks get the ball, what do they do? They will immediately find Brunson and he will immediately find the mismatch that he wants. But the Spurs, when they get the ball, they’re not really sure. So Wemby’s dribbling up, Castle’s not even looking for it, they don’t know who’s going to take charge, is there a timeout to be called or not. It just seemed, as Wemby said, very blurry.”

On wanting a private conversation with Carmelo Anthony going public on his podcast:

“I know our teams are in contact. My desire is still the same. I’d like to have a private conversation before having a public recorded conversation. That’s my goal right now — to be able to have that private conversation. Would love, of course, to go on the podcast and talk about those things. And talk about things publicly afterward.

“I do think a private conversation would go a long way in terms of being able to work through, talk through, go back and hash things out about how things ended. I think that would be super healthy, so I think that would be amazing. You can sense and tell that there’s not that hostility or ill will. Or not rooting for the other person. It’s just something that we can go back and have that discussion about.”

On not wanting to guess about issues Melo has hinted at:

“I can guess [what the issues are], but I don’t think it would do Melo justice for me to guess what I think he might mean.”

On returning to Madison Square Garden for Games 3 and 4:

“I will be going back as a spectator for the first time ever. After leaving the Knicks, I did play against the Knicks multiple times, but I have never been back to The Garden as a spectator. This will be my first time in 14 years back at The Garden, not as an opposing player. I can’t wait. I really genuinely can’t wait for Game 3 and 4.”

On the Knicks inviting him back to the Garden:

“A big shoutout to the Knicks. They have been really adamant and consistent about trying to get me to go back to a game. I’ve always had the desire. It’s not that I didn’t want to, I was just always still playing. I won’t be courtside, but I will be in the first two rows.”

Stephon Marbury

On how Becky Hammon must be feeling these days:

“She’s going to be on her knees praying for us to lose. I love this feeling. Up 2-0 with this comment hanging over the heads of all New Yorkers. This is what sports is about.”

Charles Oakley

On Adam Silver’s recent comments about his mediation efforts to bring him to MSG:

“I want to talk about the series. I want to talk about the commissioner lying again. When the commissioner is talking about with him and Michael Jordan, he’s throwing Michael Jordan under the bus. That’s what he’s really doing. He’s trying to have a conversation like they just talked yesterday. He’s coming back out with something from 2017 when we met with that guy from New York, Michael, and himself. And he’s trying to act like they tried to solve a problem. And he went to the public in 2017 said we met and we came to an agreement that this is over with. And now you look in the paper he’s making another statement about that, but you didn’t solve the problem in 2017 cuz it’s nine years later and it’s still going on.”

On whether there was a new meeting with James Dolan and others:

“No. He’s lying again. It’s two times in this case he has lied about. He lied about putting the statement out that what happened. And he’s lying now like they talked two days ago. No, he didn’t. I haven’t talked to James, I’ve been to court with James. And we tried to settle and he said no. So, this has been a whole thing of they ain’t blackballing me from the NBA.”

Fat Joe

On his message to Shaquille O’Neal before Game 2:

“You don’t believe, Shaq.”

On his message after the Knicks went up 2-0:

“This, this is our year. New York City, this is our year.”

On Knicks fans invading San Antonio:

“We here, we here. We are not playing. Shoutout to San Antonio, great guys, great basketball program. Tim Duncan—my favorite power forward of all time.”

Marv Albert

On how the Knicks have captivated New York:

“They have captivated the city. The crowd, now, aside from the crowd at the Garden, which is off the charts in terms of the sounds of rooting and all that, but [also] with the crazy party that went on at the Garden, which they stopped because they had some problems and then they resumed. Then you have huge turnouts at Radio City Music Hall or watch parties at the Garden, and you didn’t have them in those days [in the ’70s]. I don’t know if you’d get the same number of people. People are really excited about this team. The Mets and the Yankees and the Jets and Giants, if they win, would have a very good reaction. I don’t know if it would be the same as this. This is really unusual. I’ve never seen anything like it. It’s extraordinary.”

On New York as a hoops city:

“It’s always been different than other teams in the league. Because New York City and its suburbs are such a basketball-geared area. All you need is the basket, the backboard and the ball and you go down to the schoolyard, that’s what we used to do. That’s what kids still do. It’s crazy about basketball — krazy with a K.”

Kevin Garnett

On the Knicks overwhelming the Spurs and Victor Wembanyama:

“He’s not seen this. He’s gon turn around and see this sea of Blue and Orange, and no one’s seen this. It’s gon look like lava. Have you ever seen the streets of New York like this? This is like all the parades put in one.

“Knicks finna smash ’em. Aight, n—a, can the boy play in the pressure cooker? Huh? Can he come in Madison Square Garden and play? And ain’t no going to play no chess and going to Carbone, and think you going to be in the streets of New York. Nah n—a, you gonna be in that hotel room. Ain’t no going out, n—a. You don’t want to be out in this storm. You don’t want to be out in this Knicks storm, n—a. That’s crazy, f–k this n—a talkin’ bout? Knicks gonna bone these n—-s. You ready?”

Kendrick Perkins

On the Knicks’ togetherness and trust being key for their postseason run:

“They got what you call ‘togetherness.’ For Towns to start the game on Wemby, that’s what you call trust. For Mike Brown to continue to lean on Landry Shamet, he played 32 minutes; that’s what you call trust. You could see and feel the energy through the television screen. It’s led by big-body Brunson, but every guy’s been a star in their role. Every guy is being unlocked in a different fashion that they never been unlocked in their career.”

Brian Windhorst

On Towns outplaying Wembanyama in the Finals:

“They’re winning because Karl-Anthony Towns totally outplayed Victor Wembanyama in the first half of this game in a way that we never expected to see.”

Stephen A. Smith

On urging Donald Trump to skip Game 3:

“He’s coming to Game 3 of the Finals, and I don’t want him there. He’s coming to Game 4 of the Finals, and I don’t want him there. And it has nothing to do with politics, policy, or anything like that. It has everything to do with him disrupting and contributing at the same time to the chaos that’s going to be existing at Madison Square Garden.

“If it were Barack Obama coming to the Garden, I would say, ‘Stay home.’ Stay at the White House. I have been covering sports for over 30 years. And I’m telling you right now, come Monday, for Game 3 of the NBA Finals at Madison Square Garden, I expect to see an environment I have never seen in my entire career covering sports.”

No. 47

On attending Game 3 and praising the Knicks’ Jim Dolan:

“[The Knicks] find a way to do it. They’re really great, a great team. I’m happy for Jim because Jim has really been fighting hard to produce such a team.”

On the record-breaking MSG Game 3 ticket prices:

“You can watch it on television. It’s sort of semi-free to watch it on television. That’s the way life goes. Now, if the team wasn’t a big success, you can go very easily. You can do that too. But that’s the way life is.”

Knicks vs. Spurs: 3 keys for New York in Game 3 of NBA Finals

The Knicks have found pretty much every way to win a game. During their 13-game playoff win streak, they’ve blown out teams by as much as 51 points. They’ve also had some nail-biters.

Added to the win streak was another close affair on Friday night. The Knicks won Game 2 of the NBA Finals 105-104 in dramatic fashion. New York blew a 14-point fourth quarter lead, came up with a steal after a surprising Victor Wembanyama gaffe, took a one point lead after Jalen Brunson made a free-throw and narrowly avoided a loss after Wembanyama missed a mid-range jumper in the closing moments. 

New York is now up 2-0 after taking both games on the road. The Game 2 win continued a mesmerizing postseason run. As the Knicks look to push to a 3-0 series lead on Monday night in Madison Square Garden, let’s touch on three keys to the third game.

Top performer

Through two games, Karl-Anthony Towns has been the best player on the floor. His numbers of 19.5 points, 12.5 rebounds, and 4.0 assists through the first two games seem modest. But his impact has been loud in this series. He’s picked apart the Spurs defense in a variety of ways. He’s knocked down three-pointers, attacked closeouts with drives to the rim, and he’s ducked in for post-ups against smaller defenders. Towns has done all of that with efficiency. On defense, he has held up containing Wembanyama in the pick-and-roll. 

In Towns’ 68 minutes during the Finals, New York has a net rating of plus-14.9 according to NBA Stats. When he’s off the floor, the Knicks have been outscored by 16.2 points per 100 possessions. It’s a small sample size, but it shows how important having Towns on the floor has been to New York during the finals.

Towns is playing the most well-rounded basketball of his career, and it’s been a driving force in New York’s 2-0 series lead.

Defensive disruption

The Knicks are winning this series mainly on the strength of their defense. Through two games, the Knicks have held the Spurs to 100.5 points per 100 possessions per NBA Stats. It’s a far cry from the 115.4 points per 100 possessions the Spurs averaged during the first three rounds of the postseason.

New York’s defense has made offense a chore for Wembanyama. The seven-footer is averaging 27.5 points in the series, but he’s shooting just 40.5 percent from the field. New York centers Towns and Mitchell Robinson have been effective in one-on-one situations against Wembanyama. 

The Knicks have also overloaded the paint with help defenders who have consistently slowed down Wembanyama’s forays to the rim as the roll man in the pick-and-roll. The Spurs haven’t been able to take advantage of New York’s extra help in the paint, shooting just 30.6 percent from three in Games 1 and 2.

Wembanyama played better in the second half, putting up 22 points. He made a few three-pointers, and relied more on his faceup game. The turnaround could give him some momentum going into Game Three.

Corner pocket

One adjustment the Spurs made in Game 2 was applying more pressure to Brunson. San Antonio’s perimeter players checked Brunson full court and there were more double teams and traps on the Knicks’ All-Star guard. With that aggressive defense comes more opportunities for Brunson’s teammates. 

As San Antonio doubled, it left the Knicks many opportunities to attack from the corner. New York is 15-for-28 (54 percent) on corner threes in the first two games. The Knicks have thrived from the corners over the past few years. New York was sixth in corner three-point percentage during the regular season (41.6 percent) and the club is third in the category (43.8 percent) in the postseason.

Mikal Bridges, OG Anunoby, and Landry Shamet are three players who do most of their damage from three in those two areas. Bridges and Anunoby were number one and two respectively in total corner three attempts during the regular season.

Will the Spurs dial back the pressure going forward? Brunson has struggled from the field during the first two games. But he still is playing a part in generating good looks for other Knicks. If the Knicks continue to accumulate corner threes, they should be in good shape for the rest of the series.

Sixers promoting Nelson to executive VP of basketball operations under Gansey

Sixers promoting Nelson to executive VP of basketball operations under Gansey originally appeared on NBC Sports Philadelphia

Along with hiring Mike Gansey as their new president of basketball operations, the Sixers are making other significant front office changes.

ESPN’s Shams Charania reported Sunday that the team is promoting Jameer Nelson to executive vice president of basketball operations, the No. 2 spot in their front office hierarchy. NBC Sports Philadelphia’s John Clark confirmed that news.

Charania also reported vice president of player personnel Prosper Karangwa has signed a multi-year extension and Elton Brand “will not return as 76ers GM and is currently working through a new role with the franchise and its parent company, Harris Blitzer Sports & Entertainment.”

According to a report from Marc Stein, Karangwa had “drawn interest in recent weeks” from the Mavs and Lakers. Brand took the Sixers’ general manager job in 2018, which at the time was the top spot in the Sixers’ collaborative front office structure. He’d served under former president of basketball operations Daryl Morey since 2020. ESPN reported Brand “elected not to interview for the president role” after Morey’s exit.

Nelson’s risen steadily up the Sixers’ front office ranks. The former Saint Joseph’s star and NBA point guard accepted Brand’s offer of a role as Sixers scout and Delaware Blue Coats assistant GM in 2020. He was later promoted to Delaware’s GM and then stepped up to Sixers assistant general manager in May of 2025. 

“Initially, I didn’t know what I wanted to do, whether it was front office, coach, media, whatever,” Nelson told NBC Sports Philadelphia in a 2024 phone interview. “I just knew I wanted to stay around the game. Elton and I had been talking for a couple of years … just back and forth about what I wanted to do. And he was willing to help me step foot in the right direction. … Over the years, we’ve been seeing what I like, my value, and all that stuff to help the group. He’s played a huge role in my growth and my front office experience.”

The Sixers are set to hold an introductory press conference for Gansey on Monday at 10 a.m. ET. 

NYPD says Knicks NBA finals watch party outside MSG cancelled due to Trump’s attendance

The Knicks’ run to the NBA finals has created a feverish atmosphere in New York.Photograph: Timothy A Clary/AFP/Getty Images

The New York Knicks are warning fans to bring as little as possible to Monday night’s Game 3 of the NBA finals at Madison Square Garden, which Donald Trump plans to attend.

The Knicks are encouraging fans to arrive at least two hours before tipoff as part of enhanced security measures due to the president’s attendance. The New York Police Department also announced it will cancel a watch party outside Madison Square Garden as part of the measures. The decision was made after discussion between the Secret Service and the NYPD. There was trouble at the watch party outside the venue on Friday when more than 20 people were arrested as people celebrated the team’s win in Game 2 of the finals.

Related: NBA finals: Knicks within two wins of elusive title after holding off Spurs in Game 2

The Knicks said on Saturday that a strict no-bag policy will be in place and that there will be airport-style “screening procedures” for fans when they enter Madison Square Garden for the game, which is scheduled to start at 8.40pm local time.

Trump confirmed last week that he will attend the game between the Knicks and San Antonio Spurs, the first NBA finals game in New York City since 1999. He has already attended a number of major sporting events in his second term, including the 2025 Super Bowl, Daytona 500 and Ryder Cup.

Trump is not expected to be the only prominent political figure at the Garden. New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani has also said he plans to attend Monday’s game, though he suggested there is little chance he will cross paths with Trump.

“I will be in a very different section,” Mamdani said last week.

The mayor’s office said Mamdani would be paying his own way for a ticket. Trump, meanwhile, said he would be attending as Knicks owner Jim Dolan’s guest, setting up a finals scene that could feature two of New York’s most prominent political figures under one roof.

The game will take place amid a fevered atmosphere in New York as the Knicks attempt to win their first NBA title since 1973. They lead the Spurs 2-0 in the best-of-seven series and are on a 13-game winning streak.

What The No. 1 Pick Means For Washington’s Long-Term Cap Sheet

LAWRENCE, KANSAS - JANUARY 31: Darryn Peterson #22 of the Kansas Jayhawks and forward AJ Dybantsa #3 of the BYU Cougars chase down a loose ball in the first half at Allen Fieldhouse on January 31, 2026 in Lawrence, Kansas. (Photo by Ed Zurga/Getty Images) | Getty Images

The Washington Wizards entered 2026 with a projected $80 million in cap space for the 2026-27 season.

But after acquiring four players before the February deadline — including Trae Young and Anthony Davis — and winning the No. 1 pick in the 2026 NBA draft, the Wizards sit just $11 million below the luxury tax.

The current odds to be the No. 1 pick, according to Fandual Sportsbook, are as follows:

AJ Dybantsa: -450

Darryn Peterson: +380

Cameron Boozer: +1700

Here’s a breakdown of what the No. 1 pick means for Washington’s long-term cap sheet.

2026-27 Active Roster Cap


The maximum rookie-scale contract for the No. 1 pick is a four-year, $69,003,336 deal.

The contract represents 120% of the rookie scale, which is the most a first-round pick can sign for. The lowest a first-round pick can sign for is 80% of the rookie scale.

For reference, the Wizards signed Tre Johnson — last year’s No. 6 pick — to a four-year, $37,439,131 contract, which was 120% of the rookie scale. They did the same with Alex Sarr, Bub Carrington and Kyshawn George in 2024.

So, based on previous transactions, expect the Wizards to do the same with this year’s top pick and pay 120% of the rookie scale ($15,208,260) to the No. 1 selection.

Should Washington pay the No. 1 at 120% of the rookie scale, that contract looks as follows:

A familiar piece of Finals history surfaced again

CHICAGO - JUNE 18: Michael Jordan #23 of the Chicago Bulls talks to Charles Barkley #34 of the Phoenix Suns during Game Five of the 1993 NBA Championship Finals at Chicago Stadium on June 18, 1993 in Chicago, Illinois. The Suns won 108-98, sending them home to Phoenix with 2 games to 3. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this Photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 1993 NBAE (Photo by Andrew D. Bernstein/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images

One of the unfortunate realities of being a Phoenix Suns fan is that whenever history enters the conversation, especially anything tied to championships or monumental moments, the Suns always seem to find themselves on the wrong side of it. As much as we try to outrun the past, we are constantly reminded that the Suns are a franchise that has accumulated 2,510 wins, owns the fifth-best winning percentage in NBA history at .535, and still has never won a championship.

On Friday night, we received another reminder. A reminder of a history that has never included the Suns winning the final game of an NBA season.

As the New York Knicks and San Antonio Spurs battle in the 2026 NBA Finals, the Spurs have become only the third team in league history to fall behind 0-2 in the Finals after winning Game 1 on the road. And the first team to ever find itself in that position? You guessed it. The Phoenix Suns.

The Phoenix Suns made their second NBA Finals appearance in 1993 behind an MVP season from Charles Barkley, posting a league-best 62-20 record, the same mark the San Antonio Spurs finished with this season. After surviving a seven-game battle with the Seattle SuperSonics in the Western Conference Finals, much like San Antonio recently did against the Oklahoma City Thunder, Phoenix earned home-court advantage and hosted the first two games of the NBA Finals.

The difference? The Suns ran into Michael Jordan. While the New York Knicks don’t have their own version of Jordan standing across from them, the Suns had to deal with the real thing, along with a Chicago Bulls team chasing its third consecutive championship. 

And things started poorly. Phoenix dropped both games at home at America West Arena, immediately falling into a 0-2 hole. Game 1 saw the Suns lose 100-92 despite 21 points and 11 rebounds from Charles Barkley and 20 and 12 from Richard Dumas. Barkley scored 42 points in Game 2, but so did Jordan, as Chicago won 111-108.

To their credit, the Suns fought back. They won a thrilling triple-overtime Game 3 and eventually pushed the series to Game 6, earning one more opportunity on their home floor to extend the Finals. It wasn’t enough. They lost Game 6 at home, and with it their championship hopes.

What Phoenix ultimately ran into was arguably the greatest Finals performance of Jordan’s career. Across the six-game series, he averaged 41.0 points, 8.5 rebounds, 6.3 assists, and 1.7 steals per game. As great as that Suns team was, and as magical as that season felt, the greatest player in the world simply wasn’t going to be denied.

One of the reasons I look forward to summer is that there are fewer lines of demarcation reminding Suns fans where the franchise stands historically. Of course, then there’s the draft. The Phoenix Suns have had only one No. 1 overall pick in franchise history. We all know how that turned out.

There’s something unique about being a Suns fan. It takes a certain mentality to survive all of the near misses, heartbreaks, and historical reminders that seem to pop up every time the NBA decides to celebrate something significant.

We’ll see if the San Antonio Spurs can avoid the fate that befell Phoenix, who were later joined by the Orlando Magic in 1995 as the only teams to lose the first two games of an NBA Finals at home. Maybe San Antonio can reverse the trend. I’d be lying if I said I was rooting for that outcome.

As a Suns fan, I’m clearly pulling for the New York Knicks. Part of that is historical grudges that will never dissipate. Part of that is because I’d like to see Mikal Bridges finally get one. He’s been up 2-0 in a series before, just like he is now, and watched it slip away. I’d like to see this one end differently. And sure, it wouldn’t hurt to see Landry Shamet get a ring too.

We’ll see what the Spurs can do on Monday, as the NBA Finals continue at 5:30pm on ABC, this time from Madison Square Garden.

Dallas Is Committed To Cooper Flagg. What Does That Mean For Kyrie Irving?

BOSTON, MA - MARCH 6: Kyrie Irving #11 of the Dallas Mavericks looks on during the game against the Boston Celtics on March 6, 2026 at TD Garden in Boston, Massachusetts. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2026 NBAE (Photo by Jesse D. Garrabrant/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images

As the NBA Draft draws closer, the Dallas Mavericks have made it clear that Cooper Flagg is now their cornerstone, their primary building block.

That makes perfect sense. He’s coming off a spectacular rookie season, he is just 19 and will be 20 for most of next season, and he’s shown every sign of being able to carry the leadership burden.

Which puts teammate and fellow former Blue Devil Kyrie Irving in an interesting situation.

Now 34, and coming off of an ACL injury, his future is uncertain, and a lot of people are suggesting that Dallas should trade him as part of an overhaul.

Among other things, he’s due to be paid $39,491,282 this coming season.

We have no idea what Dallas is thinking, obviously, but if they moved Irving, they could free up a lot of money to pursue, say, Giannis Antetokounmpo. He’s going to make a good bit more than Irving – about $58.5 million – and pairing him with Flagg would be incredible.

Or they could move Irving and spread that money around. They could sign, say, Luke Kennard for not that much, possibly Rui Hachimura, or Quentin Grimes.

The Mavericks also have two first-round draft picks to work with. They could sweeten the pot for an Irving trade and go for someone completely unexpected. Just imagine if they pulled off a trade for Bam Adebayo, Domantas Sabonis, or, say, Darius Garland?

A lot goes into an NBA trade, and we have no idea what Dallas would have to do to make it worthwhile. First, you have to deal with the salary cap, and then you have to make sure the pieces fit together.

Here’s another thought that could be fun, if difficult: Ja Morant and Memphis are clearly at the end, and while he’s damaged goods at this point, given all his various issues with the Grizzlies, he’s still an extraordinary talent. It’s fun to imagine him with Flagg, and it would be nearly impossible to guard both.

The good news is that Memphis won’t be able to get very much for him. The bad news?

He’s still Ja Morant, and he’s clearly a risk. But if it works…wow.

Go to the DBR Boards to find Blue Healer Auctions || Drop us a line

Historical Comparisons For This Year’s NBA Finals Matchup

CLEVELAND, OH - JUNE 16: The Golden State Warriors hoist the Larry O'Brien Trophy after a victory over the Cleveland Cavaliers in Game Six to win the 2015 NBA Finals at The Quicken Loans Arena on June 16, 2015 in Cleveland, Ohio. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2015 NBAE (Photo by Andrew D. Bernstein/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images

The New York Knicks are just two wins from earning their first championship since they last hoisted the Larry O’Brien trophy all the way back in 1973. They might as well have won it already.

After Friday’s 105-104 win over the San Antonio Spurs in Game 2 of the NBA Finals, New York is standing in one of the rarest spots in history—certified rarefied air—as one of just three teams ever to win the first two games of the title series on the road.

The other two: the 1993 Chicago Bulls (57-25 in the regular season, 11-2 in the playoffs) and the 1995 Houston Rockets (47-35, 15-7).

The outcome of those Bulls and Rockets finals runs? Jobs finished and happy endings.

The 1993 Bulls opened the Finals with two wins against the Suns, beating them in Phoenix twice and in six games overall before Michael Jordan announced his first retirement.

Two years later, the 1995 Rockets took Games 1 and 2 in Orlando against the Magic, went back to Houston, and swept Shaquille O’Neal, Penny Hardaway, and a supremely inexperienced Magic squad that resembles a certain contemporary squad we’ve gotten familiar with this week.

That is the regal company the Knicks joined as Friday leaked into Saturday.

New York surely sweated getting there, but to the disbelief of many—both on the haters’ ship and within the Garden faithful—the Knicks are mammoth favorites to win the chip on FanDuel, boasting -520 odds to the Spurs’ +400.

The Knickerbockers trailed by 14 in Game 1 but ended up winning 105-95. They once again trailed by 12 in the first half of Game 2, led by 14 in the fourth, then watched San Antonio rip off a 14-0 run before Jalen Brunson bailed them out late.

Brunson was kinda awful, let’s admit it, shooting just 7-for-25 in Game 2 but putting on his Captain Clutch cape at the perfect time to tie the game with a midrange jumper, grab a gift from Victor Wembanyama, and hit the go-ahead free throw with 9.5 seconds left.

Karl-Anthony Towns kept building his NBA Finals resume by leading New York with 21 points and 13 rebounds. A desperate-as-you’ve-never-seen-him Mikal Bridges added 20 points, six rebounds and six assists. Brunson finished 20 points, six assists, five rebounds and five steals. Josh Hart decided it was a nice evening to improve his cardio. Mitch and Shamet were off-the-pine saviors again. Jeremy Sochan didn’t play.

Now, looking at it from a Spurs point of view—if you’re into that or are one of the two San Antonio fans still not mad enough to read this blog—I’m sorry to inform you that here comes another ominous warning.

Five teams have come back from 0-2 to win the NBA Finals: the 1969 Celtics, 1977 Trail Blazers, 2006 Heat, 2016 Cavaliers and 2021 Bucks (yay!)… but those comebacks all came after the trailing team lost the first two games on the road, not in their supposedly strong feud. Ugh, sorry to disappoint you, Coyote.

The Spurs have lost the first two at their own Alamo Frost AT&T Arenadome or whatever the name of that thing is these days. No Finals team has ever recovered from that specific start to win the championship.

So, yeah. The Knicks still need two more wins. The Spurs have five chances to win four games. The math works for both heading into Game 3, but facts are facts, not Kenny Atkinson’s analytics.

The Bulls got there and won. The Rockets got there and won. New York is halfway there, and why not Knicks in four?

Open Thread: Tony Parker on inspiring Victor Wembanyama

PARIS, FRANCE - JANUARY 23: Victor Wembanyama #1 of the San Antonio Spurs greets Tony Parker before the game against the Indiana Pacers on January 23, 2025 at The Accor Arena in Paris, France. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2025 NBAE (Photo by Garrett Ellwood/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images

Spurs legend Tony Parker spoke regarding the time he discovered Victor Wembanyama had worn his #9 Spurs jersey and what it meant to him.

“Victor was with me in ASVEL, my team, the French team that I own. And the whole time you know he was with us I had a great time and we had great talks and we won a championship. When the Spurs drafted him number one, he put a picture on his social media with my jersey when he was ten-years-old. He had a picture of my jersey. And I saw that picture and I was like ‘wow,’ he never showed it to me when he was with me in ASVEL. And he waited that moment where when he got drafted to show that picture to the world. And I saw him with my jersey. I was like ‘oh, wow.’ So the way that Michael [Jordan] inspired me, I felt very proud that I inspire some one like that.”

It stands to reason. Parker was one of the players from France to make it into the NBA. He met unprecedented success with the Spurs earning a Finals MVP in 2007, one of his four NBA titles. He’s inspired so many players over the years. But for one of his proteges and members of his team to become the biggest player on the planet, that must be quite an honor.

N ow Victor is in the NBA Finals on the same team which Parker spent a majority of his career.

Victor and the Spurs landed in New York on Saturday. They meet with media on Sunday. Game 3 is Monday night. The Spurs are facing the Knicks in Madison Square Garden. With an 0-2 hole, they have their work cut out for them.


Welcome to the Thread. Join in the conversation, start your own discussion, and share your thoughts. This is the Spurs community, your Spurs community. Thanks for being here.

Our community guidelines apply which should remind everyone to be cool, avoid personal attacks, not to troll and to watch the language.

How Gregg Popovich helped Knicks’ Mike Brown arrive at this moment: ‘A special human being’

Even though Knicks coach Mike Brown earned some of his coaching chops as a Spurs assistant under Gregg Popovich from 2000–2003, he didn’t dare to reach out to him ahead of the NBA Finals.

The fear? Sabotage.

Knicks coach Mike Brown is two wins from an NBA championship. Daniel Dunn-Imagn Images

“He’s savvy,” Brown said before Game 1 against the Spurs. “He’s very competitive. If I reached out to him and asked him for some advice, he’d give me some BS that worked against us.”

Brown’s joke had Popovich’s fingerprints all over it.

See, when you’re raised in Popovich’s coaching tree, certain values are emphasized above all others, namely humor.

During Popovich’s 29 seasons at the helm of the Spurs, he wanted people around him who could laugh at themselves. He turned to humor to cut through the weighty pressure of 82-game marathon seasons.

Though he was fiercely competitive, he emphasized that basketball is just a silly game. He has been known to cut people from his staff who couldn’t dish or take a joke.

Perhaps that’s why the partnership between Popovich and Brown worked.

Brown is deeply likable. He’s quick to laugh. He doesn’t hesitate to poke fun at himself.

And now, after leading the Knicks to a 105-104 win over the Spurs in Game 2 on Friday, Brown is two wins from his first NBA championship as a head coach.

It has been a long road for Brown, who has spent the last 29 years as either an assistant or head coach for eight NBA franchises, including getting fired four times as the leading man.

Brown has coached some of the league’s biggest stars, including LeBron James and Kobe Bryant. He coached under some of the most venerated coaches, including Popovich and Steve Kerr. But now, for the first time in his career, the Larry O’Brien Trophy is within his grasp as the head of a locker room.

Brown points to his time under Popovich as one of the biggest reasons he has arrived at this moment.

“It was huge,” Brown said. “Pop — I talk about MSG being iconic, New York City being iconic — Pop is iconic, especially here in San Antonio. When you talk about the game of basketball, he’s iconic to everybody that enjoys the game of basketball.”

During Brown’s three seasons under Popovich, he watched firsthand how the winningest coach in NBA history operated. They won a championship together in 2003, the second of Popovich’s five rings amid his historic 22 straight years in the postseason.

Brown said his biggest takeaway from Popovich actually has very little to do with basketball.

“The neat part about him is it’s not just about the X’s and O’s that you learn,” Brown said. “You know you can never be him, but you learn people skills. You learn how to connect, not just the 15 or 18 players, you learn how to connect an entire city, maybe even an entire state.”

That insight has proven instrumental for Brown, who’s in his first season at the helm of the Knicks after being fired by the Kings in December 2024. In just a short period of time, Brown has won over Jalen Brunson, Karl-Anthony Towns and the biggest-market city in the NBA.

Gregg Popovich (right) has had a major impact on Mike Brown’s life. Getty Images

But Popovich’s impact on Brown goes deeper than that.

When Brown separated from his wife in 2002, Popovich famously threatened to fire him if he traveled with the team instead of spending a little extra time with his two young sons, who were crying as he took them to the airport to say goodbye.

Popovich also famously offered Brown a lifeline after he was fired by the Cavaliers in 2014. He joined the Spurs as a volunteer consultant, which helped put him back on the map ahead of getting hired as an assistant with the Warriors in 2016.

“He’s second to none [in] how he treats people off the floor in their personal lives,” Brown said. “I grew a lot personally. Everybody goes through good times and bad times off the floor in their personal life. When I was here, I went through good times and bad times. He helped me tremendously with those.”

The 77-year-old Popovich is now watching the Spurs from the stands, having retired after suffering a stroke in November 2024.

After games, he regularly texts Spurs phenom Victor Wembanyama, trying to help the future face of the league reach his full potential. But down the sideline, in enemy territory, sits another one of his protégés.

Brown is immensely grateful to Popovich for not only helping him reach the apex of his career but for being his friend.

“He’s a special human being,” Brown said.


Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters

California Post News: Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, YouTube, WhatsApp, LinkedIn
California Post SportsFacebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X
California Post Opinion
California Post Newsletters: Sign up here!
California Post App: Download here!
Home delivery: Sign up here!Page Six Hollywood: Sign up here!


ANALYSIS: How should Brooklyn Nets fans feel about Nate Ament?

Michael Reaves/Getty Images

I will always appreciate writing for NetsDaily. There are nearly 600 comments on Friday’s article, where I reported the league-wide consensus that the Brooklyn Nets have interest in Tennessee’s Nate Ament, whether at the #6 spot or in a trade-down. Thank you all for the engagement and consistent readership; I don’t even remember the Nets playing in the NBA Finals, and yet, my fandom-turned-coverage of the team has, somehow, been as rewarding as it has been tormenting, thanks to the people who visit this site regularly.

So let’s just clarify a couple things about that report. I am not reporting that it is “likely” that the Nets take Ament, but rather, that is what people around the league believe. Brian Lewis of the New York Post, ever a trustworthy reporter, says that Ament hasn’t even been in for a workout…

I personally doubt it’s “likely” the Nets take anybody at this juncture, over a fortnight before the NBA Draft, though their interest in Ament certainly seems legit. The noise, though, is undeniable. No prospect is linked to Brooklyn more often — it’s not even close.

And again, part of that comes from Brooklyn’s recent draft history. But just because it seems like the Nets would take Ament at No. 6 — after Egor Dëmin, everybody now knows this front office isn’t afraid to “reach” in the lottery — doesn’t actually make it more likely.

Perhaps the Nets are preying on their rivals’ preconceived notions to create some smoke, maybe they’re doing their best to facilitate a trade-down, who knows? For what it’s worth, major sportsbooks still don’t think Ament is “likely” to go at #6, though the odds are climbing. On Kalshi (sorry), Ament’s odds of being drafted at No. 6 overall have jumped from 4% to 17% in the past week, but that’s still lower than Mikel Brown Jr. and Darius Acuff.

In any case, there’s enough smoke to strongly consider Ament’s strengths and weaknesses, even if Brooklyn doesn’t trade down, which would have seemed unthinkable a couple weeks ago. He was not good at Tennessee in his freshman year, and to discuss his talents further, I held a brief Q&A with NBA Draft analyst Ben Pfeifer.

Benny Pfeif is a friend of mine and a tremendous tape-eater; no analyst has a crystal ball, but he’s demonstrated the value of his opinion many times over…

His social media is, obviously, linked in that post above, and I’ll link his YouTube channel here. So, without further ado, let’s get started.


Q: Nate Ament was the #4 high school prospect in the country upon graduation. What to that point made him such an exciting prospect. What, for lack of better wording, was the high-end sell?

A: Nate Ament looked to join the long line of tall wings oozing shotmaking talent and theoretical upside that the NBA typically covets. Ament coupled his 6’10” frame with dynamic on and off-ball shooting from beyond and inside the arc, some basic ball skills and impressive defensive versatility, especially on the ball. His prospect profile sat clearly below the level of Darryn Peterson, Cameron Boozer and AJ Dybantsa but the promise of a 3-and-D plus wing with latent on-ball creation enticed evaluators (myself included).

Q: Let’s break his NCAA season down into parts — how good of an outside shooter is he, really? 33.3% from deep, 37.3% on long twos, 79% from the line isn’t terrible, but that’s not the profile of a sniper. I know it’s just one season of college data, but what level of shooter do you think we’re really talking about here?

A: While Ament’s shooting profile is indeed solid, his 3-point volume, efficiency and free-throw numbers all dipped from his final AAU season (and his most recent reliable pre-NCAA dataset). He traded some of those outside shots for mid-range jumpers, which contributed to some volume deflation from 3-point range, but <8 threes per 100 possession is undeniably disappointing for a prospect with shooting as a primary sell. Plenty of prospects with similar shooting profiles have developed into effective NBA shooters, but they rarely become truly elite outside of fringe cases like Kawhi Leonard. Ament’s mid-range off-the-dribble shotmaking and flashes of movement shooting are enticing, but I view Ament as a good-to-great outside shooter rather than a game-changing one.

Q: Let’s get to the main reason most draft nerds don’t have Ament in the lottery. He shot 43% from two this season, and under 40% from two against top 100 teams. What the hell is going on there? Can we blame Tennessee’s offensive environment, does he just not have wiggle/explosiveness? How does that happen?

A: Since 2008, 11 drafted college players 6’7” or taller logged a career 2-point percentage under 45%, according to Bart Torvik. The best of these players is Jaden McDaniels, who still isn’t a scoring ace after tons of offensive development. Jabari Smith (an apt comparison for Ament, IMO) is there too, but the rest of the list consists of the Cam Reddishes, Ziaire Williamses, and Brandon Bostons of the world. It’s an undeniably concerning indicator and speaks to Ament’s lack of burst, ball-handling chops and standout contested touch.

He’s a far better foul-drawer and strength creator than in high school, but notable strength gains zapped much of the mobility he previously relied on to outmaneuver defenders with the ball. Tennessee’s spacing and supporting cast weren’t pristine by any means and and Ament occasionally flashed effective driving and finishing off two feet with a runway. Maybe he leans into the strength creation, adds a ton of muscle and takes the bully route, but it will be a tight needle to thread regardless on the path to efficient NBA scoring, especially with any on-ball creation involved.

Q: Penultimate question: What are his most enticing secondary skills? Plus-rebounder? Rim protector/switchy? Secret passing guru despite a 1.0 assist:turnover? In other words, when the ball ain’t going in, what are you most confident he’ll contribute to an NBA team?

A: Based on my pre-college expectations, Ament’s defense significantly disappointed this past season. The aforementioned muscle gain and lessened mobility really hurt his defense, especially moving in space and making plays as a helper. At his best, Ament should develop into a fine defender, but he lacks high-end traits and feel on that end (and on offense). His off-ball lapses and technical worries aren’t as concerning as his frequently poor instincts, awareness and change of direction on closeouts and long rotations.

He’ll occasionally flash as a help-side shot blocker, but those moments were few and far between. Ament is one of the class’s least threatening playmakers, often struggling to convert easy reads in favor of tough off-dribble jumpers. He’ll high point some rebounds and his cleanest path to ancillary value comes from being extremely large and (hopefully) positioning himself well, but it’s unfortunately bleak projecting any non-scoring facets of his game to impact winning at a playoff level.

Q: Well, this has been kinda depressing, but let’s ask the big question(s) now. Assuming their interest is real, what do you think Brooklyn sees in him, like what’s the high-end scenario? Lastly, let’s say they take him at #6. Is that fine? Crazy?

A: Viewing Ament’s projection through the rosiest lens possible could lead one to value him near the top of a loaded draft class, especially if said person really values physical traits and shotmaking. Maybe the Tennessee context cloaked his true offensive self, and NBA spacing/movement unlock his game. Even for players without standout feel, ball handling or defensive chops, there’s value in sheer size and scoring, especially in certain postseason matchups. If Ament fleshes out his strength creation and becomes a high-level contested shotmaker, it’s possible he’d fit in as a stabilizing force with the size to add value on the defensive end.

However, that outcome sits at the tail end of Ament’s range and even if a player of the Tobias Harris/Jabari Smith progeny isn’t a terrible result for a top-6 pick, it’s a bleak one in a draft as loaded as 2026. In 2025, Brooklyn drafted a smattering of future complementary pieces, and that’s what Ament projects as. Maybe the Nets view themselves as such a marquee free agent/trade destination that they’ll intentionally eschew high-end star swings like Mikel Brown Jr., Aday Mara, or Kingston Flemings for better roster/size fits. But if Ament is Brooklyn’s sixth pick, it would be an undeniably disappointing selection with potentially damaging long-term ramifications. For your sake (Lucas and his lovely readers), let’s hope this is just typical draft season smoke and mirrors.


Again, another thanks to Mr. Pfeifer for his time and words. He also made this comprehensive video on Ament a couple days ago…

Again, the NBA Draft beings on June 23rd at 8:00 p.m. ET. Until then, get ready way more rumors, analysis, and everything in between.

New York takes 2-0 lead into game 3 against San Antonio

San Antonio Spurs (62-20, second in the Western Conference) vs. New York Knicks (53-29, third in the Eastern Conference)

New York; Monday, 8:30 p.m. EDT

LINE: Knicks -2.5; over/under is 215.5

NBA FINALS: Knicks lead series 2-0

BOTTOM LINE: The New York Knicks host the San Antonio Spurs in the NBA Finals with a 2-0 lead in the series. The Knicks won the last meeting 105-104 on Saturday, led by 21 points from Karl-Anthony Towns. Victor Wembanyama led the Spurs with 29.

The Knicks are 30-10 in home games. New York ranks fifth in the NBA allowing just 110.1 points per game while holding opponents to 46.0% shooting.

The Spurs are 30-12 in road games. San Antonio averages 119.8 points and has outscored opponents by 8.3 points per game.

The 116.5 points per game the Knicks average are 5.0 more points than the Spurs allow (111.5). The Spurs average 13.6 made 3-pointers per game this season, 0.3 fewer makes per game than the Knicks give up.

TOP PERFORMERS: Jalen Brunson is averaging 26 points and 6.8 assists for the Knicks. Mikal Bridges is averaging 17.3 points over the last 10 games.

Wembanyama is averaging 25 points, 11.5 rebounds, 3.1 assists and 3.1 blocks for the Spurs. Julian Champagnie is averaging 2.9 made 3-pointers over the last 10 games.

LAST 10 GAMES: Knicks: 10-0, averaging 118.2 points, 44.9 rebounds, 27.8 assists, 9.2 steals and 3.9 blocks per game while shooting 50.3% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 100.5 points per game.

Spurs: 5-5, averaging 112.7 points, 48.4 rebounds, 24.6 assists, 7.8 steals and 6.5 blocks per game while shooting 44.3% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 108.2 points.

INJURIES: Knicks: None listed.

Spurs: David Jones Garcia: out for season (ankle).

___

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.

Jalen Brunson hasn’t hit his best level for Knicks in NBA Finals — yet

Jalen Brunson struggled to get his shot going in NBA Finals Game 2.
Jalen Brunson struggled to get his shot going in NBA Finals Game 2.

What’s scary is that there is another level the Knicks can reach. 

Jalen Brunson in particular. 

He has been far from his best across the first two games of the Finals — he has shot just 19-for-56 from the field (33.9 percent) and 4-for-17 from 3-point range (23.5 percent).

He’s committed a combined eight turnovers. 

In Friday’s 105-104 Game 2 win over the Spurs at Frost Bank Center, he missed three straight shots as the Spurs went on a 14-0 run to tie the game late in the fourth quarter.

Jalen Brunson struggled to get his shot going in NBA Finals Game 2. Jason Szenes for The New York Post

The last one was a wide-open 3-pointer that he was unable to hit. 

He did, though, make a jumper to tie the game and hit a free throw — after stealing Victor Wembanyama’s pass — to give the Knicks their final lead. 

“We’re just trying to make it difficult on him,” De’Aaron Fox said. “I think we’ve done a good job both games. He’s made big shots at the end of games. He’s a hell of a player.” 

“Even when you make it difficult on good players, they’re talented so they’re going to end up making shots. He’s done that, especially at the end of the games.” 

The Spurs clearly made it a point to not let Brunson beat them Friday.

They blitzed him every time someone set a screen for him.

They collapsed in the paint every time he got into the lane. 

San Antonio Spurs guard De’Aaron Fox fouls New York Knicks guard Jalen Brunson during the second half at Frost Bank Center of Game 2. Jason Szenes for The New York Post

And they were extremely physical — picking him up full court, bumping him off the ball and trying to get under his skin.

Much of it was allowed by the referees. 

At one point in the fourth quarter, De’Aaron Fox basically shoved him, then tried to exchange a few words with Brunson, who simply stared him down.

Brunson’s father, assistant coach Rick, shouted a few words toward Fox. 

Brunson expects even more of that approach in Game 3 on Monday. 

“Knowing them, there’s going to be another level,” Brunson said. “We have to be prepared and be ready to match it and play for 48 minutes. No matter what goes on in the game, we have to have each other’s back, what’s going on, who is on a run, what’s not, who is up, who is down. Making sure we are playing together for 48 minutes is really important.” 

And, as Fox said, Brunson has still found a way to execute late in both Games 1 and 2 despite his struggles up to that point. 

He became the first player since at least 1971 to score the final go-ahead points in the last two minutes of back-to-back Finals games, according to ESPN. 

“I see Captain Clutch doing what he’s always been doing since I got here,” Karl-Anthony Towns said. “He’s a huge part when it comes down to the actual — the game, to winning the game, No. 11 can’t be messed with.” 

If this is what the Knicks look like without Brunson at his best, just imagine what they’ll be when he finally breaks out.

The Knicks sixth man in the Finals is time

SAN ANTONIO, TX - JUNE 5: Victor Wembanyama #1 of the San Antonio Spurs looks on during the game against the New York Knicks during Game Two of the 2026 NBA Finals on June 5, 2026 at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, Texas. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2026 NBAE(Photo by Jesse D. Garrabrant/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images

“And David put his hand in his bag,” wrote the anonymous or eponymous author of the book of Samuel, “and took thence a stone, and slang it, and smote the Philistine in his forehead, that the stone sunk into his forehead; and he fell upon his face to the earth. So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and with a stone.”

David made due with what he had and it was enough. The NBA version of David would be the 2004 Pistons, who upset the Shaq/Kobe Lakers and their seemingly destined fate to four-peat. Los Angeles was a mess, what with Shaq hating Kobe, Kobe hating Shaq, both players hating Phil Jackson, the child rapist sexually harassing the accused rapist’s wife with a “joke” about little girls, etcetera. They were their for the taking, and the Pistons made sure they got took.

The Lakers lost Game 1 at home, then trailed by six with 36 seconds left before rallying to force overtime and win Game 2. But the next three games were in Michigan, one of the busiest hubs on the railroad that runs where dreams go to die, and whatever lingering fantasies they flew in with were laid to rest after three straight Ls. It’s not a perfect fit. It’ll do.

The San Antonio Spurs lost Game 1 of this year’s Finals at home, then very nearly staged an incredible comeback to win Game 2. To my knowledge Victor Wembanyama and De’Aaron Fox get along well enough. Mitch Johnson seems inoffensive, if not likable. And I’ve never heard a single salacious thing about Stephon Castle. So I’m not saying the Knicks and Spurs are David vs. Goliath II. I’m saying what New York’s has done/is doing is more impressive. A slingshot blast to the dome? That’s like porn, or Stalinism — effective, but only so far as you either ignore or adore the brutality.

The Knicks are doing unto others what’s been done to them the past two postseasons. When they played Indiana in 2024, Tyrese Haliburton led Pacers in minutes (235). Jalen Brunson, Josh Hart and Donte DiVincenzo all eclipsed that mark, with Isaiah Hartenstein nearly joining them. Nine Pacers averaged a dozen or more minutes over the seven games; only seven Knicks did. Multiply that over a couple of weeks and . . . well, you know what it looks like.

In these Finals the Knicks are the bigger, stronger, deeper team. They entered the series far more rested than the Spurs, a gap likely to continue expanding: the Knicks have no reason to fix what ain’t broke, whereas teams down 0-2 are historically more likely to change or shrink their rotation than expand it. Sean Elliott, Tony Parker and Kawhi Leonard aren’t walking through that door, and probably neither are Kelly Olynyk, Lindy Waters III or Bismack Biyombo.

These are the minutes played after two games:

Aren’t those pretty?

What’s clear in those graphs is that the team that’s down and clearly and understandably worn out is more top-heavy, minutes-wise, than their fresher opponent. But there’s something not immediately apparent that emerges with a little bit of a closer look.

The man from the government would tell you Wembanyama and Brunson have played nearly identical minutes (78 to 75). They haven’t. That’s one reason the Knick star has had enough in the tank to close both games out when the younger stud Spur hasn’t. And it’s one reason the Spurs are up against a more daunting uphill than merely coming back after dropping the opening two at home.

Brunson has played roughly 20,000 minutes in the NBA, regular-season and playoffs. Two games into the Finals, he’s played 6% more minutes than he did a year ago. Wembanyama just passed the 6,000 minute mark this spring. Last year, deep vein thrombosis ended his season before the All-Star break, so his workload from 2025 to 2026 is up 64%. Even if you go back to his prior career high in 2024, his total minutes are up 20%. I don’t know how to calculate the added intensity of playoff minutes, but however you frame it the picture’s the same: the biggest man in a league of big men is working more than ever.

And as the season’s advanced, he’s playing way more minutes way more often. There’s no real difference between Brunson playing 37-plus minutes in 50% of his playoff games and Wembanyama doing so in 47%. But Brunson played that many minutes 42% of the time in the regular season. He’s done it eight times in the playoffs. Wembanyama did so five times in the entire regular season, 8% of his games.

Hack-a-Mitch is the free throw story getting the most press in the series, but Wembanyama’s attempts are noteworthy. He had nine in the first two games against Portland (he left the second game early due to a head injury), five against Minnesota and 15 versus OKC. The Knicks sent him to the line 21 times. Those add up over time. Long as those fouls aren’t coming from KAT or Mitch, they’re fine continuing to send him there.

When the legs are gone, the fight usually is, too. The Knicks being the Knicks — in particular Towns being as unique a 7-footer as Wembanyama — is forcing the young giant to answer questions that weren’t in the reading, to push past limits he’s never tested before, limits no human that big maybe ever has. If the Knicks are partying in the Canyon of Heroes this June, their silent sixth man will be a big reason why.

Goliath’s Achilles heel was his head. Shaq was awful at the line. The Knicks are relying on talent and grit in this series. They’re also relying on time wearing on Wembanyama. Head shots are automatic flagrants these days, and he’s making nearly 90% of his free throws in the playoffs. A rock to the noggin won’t work against this particular strain of mutant. Time itself is grinding on him. The Knicks are skilled and gifted on both ends. They’re two wins from a title because they’re stronger and tougher, too.

Knicks in prime NBA Finals position thanks to their impressive bench

An image collage containing 2 images, Image 1 shows New York Knicks guard Landry Shamet #44 reacts after scoring during the fourth quarter, Image 2 shows Mitchell Robinson dunks over Victor Wembanyama in Game 2
Knicks

SAN ANTONIO — The unborn will know their names. 

With another two wins, the Knicks will end the NBA’s most painful drought and capture their first championship in 53 years.

With two more wins, the names of Jalen Brunson, Karl-Anthony Towns, OG Anunoby, Josh Hart and Mikal Bridges will be passed down to future generations, just as Walt Frazier, Willis Reed, Dave DeBusschere, Bill Bradley and Earl Monroe became famous to every Knicks fan too young to experience when the Garden was Eden. 

Every title team eventually gets whittled down to a small fraction of its contributors.

Even perhaps the greatest team of all time, the 1927 Yankees, has been filtered to little more than Ruth and Gehrig. 

New York Knicks guard Landry Shamet reacts after scoring during the fourth quarter of Game 2 of the NBA Finals. Charles Wenzelberg / New York Post

But you know better. 

You know the Knicks wouldn’t hold a 2-0 lead in the NBA Finals without the strength of their second unit — without names that will never reach the rafters (Mitchell Robinson, Landry Shamet, Jose Alvarado, Miles McBride). 

“A lot of contributions from a lot of guys, and that’s why you like having a team because it could be anybody’s night on any given night,” Knicks coach Mike Brown said following the 105-104 Game 2 win. “Our guys don’t care. They sacrifice for one another and we found a way to get a win.” 

The Knicks bench was instrumental in the Game 1 win in San Antonio, producing 28 points, along with four assists from McBride, and a combined 10 rebounds from Alvarado and Robinson.

In Game 2, Brown needed even more, as Brunson shot 7-for-25, Hart was held scoreless and Towns was limited to four second-half points. 

For a stretch of more than five crucial minutes — from the 3:19 mark of the third quarter through the 10:15 mark of the fourth quarter — Brown sat Brunson and Towns, opting for a lineup of Shamet, Robinson, Alvarado, McBride and Bridges. 

Mitchell Robinson dunks over Victor Wembanyama in Game 2. Charles Wenzelberg / New York Post

During that span, the Knicks lead grew from four to 12, eventually settling at 87-78 when Brunson and Towns reentered. 

Shamet, who is shooting 67.6 percent on 3-pointers in the postseason, finished with 13 points for the second straight game.

Robinson had seven points, three rebounds, one block and one steal in 14 minutes, in addition to helping prevent Victor Wembanyama from evening the series on the potential game-winner.

Alvarado and McBride — who have two of the Knicks’ top five on-court ratings in the NBA Finals — combined for seven points, four assists and four offensive rebounds. 

In last year’s playoffs, Tom Thibodeau used each of his starters for more than 35 minutes per game, giving just two reserves (Robinson, McBride) double-digit minutes per game. 

This year, Brunson is the only starter averaging more than 34 minutes in the playoffs, as Brown uses a nine-man rotation during the season’s most critical moments, placing trust in names many will never know. 

“It’s important,” Shamet said of the bench play. “We need everybody.”