Butler, Kerr share how injured Steph helped Warriors in Game 2 loss

Butler, Kerr share how injured Steph helped Warriors in Game 2 loss originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

Steph Curry’s absence on the floor clearly was felt during the Warriors’ 117-93 Game 2 loss at the Minnesota Timberwolves on Thursday night.

But that doesn’t mean Curry was a complete non-factor at Target Center following the hamstring strain he sustained during Game 1.

After the game, coach Steve Kerr and forward Jimmy Butler detailed how the Golden State star still managed to boost his team from the bench.

“He was great. He sat a couple of seats down,” Kerr told reporters about Curry’s sideline presence. “We talked a couple of times during the game, and he was talking to all of the players. I don’t know exactly what he was saying to the guys, but it’s very comforting having him on that bench for our guys.”

Butler offered some more specific insight into Curry’s coach-like leadership.

“Talking the game, what he sees, what we should be doing on both sides of the ball,” Butler revealed about Curry’s role Thursday night. “Even though he’s not out there, he still expects us and wants us to win. So, as often as he’s telling us — this guy needs to be here and, on defense, this is what everybody needs to be doing — we’ve got to listen, because he’s seeing firsthand a lot of stuff that everybody else can’t see.

“So he’s definitely still out there on the bench with us.”

Like Curry, Butler undertook a similar responsibility when he missed Game 3 of the Warriors’ first-round series against the Houston Rockets with a pelvic contusion.

After that contest, guard Buddy Hield explained how Butler gave him a pep talk — mixed with some light teasing — following an unflattering turnover.

Golden State grabbed an important victory minus Butler; now, the Warriors must figure out a way to win without Curry’s impact on the court.

Nevertheless, Curry clearly will do anything necessary to benefit his team while he is limited to the bench for multiple games.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

Butler feels no burden to uphold ‘Playoff Jimmy' rep with Steph out

Butler feels no burden to uphold ‘Playoff Jimmy' rep with Steph out originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

The pressure is on after the Warriors dropped Game 2 against the Minnesota Timberwolves on Thursday at Target Center, heading back to the Bay with the Western Conference semifinals tied at one game apiece.

But Jimmy Butler, who has earned the nickname “Playoff Jimmy” thanks to his postseason prowess, isn’t hitting the panic button — even with superstar and leading scorer Steph Curry sidelined by a hamstring injury.

“I don’t have a burden or expectation,” Butler told reporters postgame of the scoring onus falling on him now. “I don’t. I play basketball the right way. I will continue to play basketball the right way. If that time comes where your people that are saying whatever, [I’m] supposed to score 40 or 43, whatever the case may be, I’m capable of it.

“I can do it, but I love making sure that my guys are comfortable, passing the ball to them, taking the right shots at the right time. But we’ll talk about it, if that may be needed. Who knows.”

Through 127 NBA playoff games, including eight with the Warriors (though he missed most of Game 2 before sitting out all of Game 3 against the Houston Rockets with a pelvic injury), Butler is averaging 21.1 points, 6.2 rebounds and 4.7 assists.

But he reached legendary status with the Heat during the 2022 and 2023 NBA playoffs. Butler averaged 27.4 points per game across 17 contests before the Boston Celtics eliminated Miami in the 2022 Eastern Conference semifinals. Butler had four 40-plus point games that postseason and scored at least 30 points eight times.

And in 2023, Butler’s epic 56-point game in the first round highlighted the Heat’s incredible run to the NBA Finals, where they lost to the Denver Nuggets in five games. Butler averaged 26.9 points per game that postseason, scoring 30 or more points in five separate contests.

Those certainly are Curry numbers, but Butler has yet to score more than 27 points during the Warriors’ current playoff run. He’s their second-leading scorer behind Curry (22.6) with 18.6 points per game, and the closest behind him is Buddy Hield at 12.5.

With Curry out at least a week, Golden State certainly would love “Playoff Jimmy” to make an appearance as the team returns to Chase Center for Game 3 on Saturday. But Butler makes an impact through other means as well and isn’t going to force it — he’s going to keep playing basketball the way he knows how, and the points will come.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

Draymond Green accuses NBA referees of ‘agenda' after Game 2 technical foul

Draymond Green accuses NBA referees of ‘agenda' after Game 2 technical foul originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

Draymond Green is among America’s most polarizing professional athletes, feeling targeted by NBA officials and surely is high on the list of players crudely heckled by fans.

Both factors likely contributed to his brief, pointed postgame statements Thursday night at Target Center in Minneapolis, where the Warriors took a 117-93 loss to the Timberwolves in Game 2 of the Western Conference semifinals.

After being assessed with a technical foul in the second quarter and getting harassed by fans in the arena, Green demonstratively expressed his feelings to reporters in the locker room.

“I’m not an angry Black man,” he said. “I’m a very successful, educated Black man, with a great family. And I’m great at basketball. Great at what I do. The agenda to try to keep making me look like an angry Black man is crazy. I’m sick of it. It’s ridiculous.”

This is the outburst of a man who feels persecuted by officials – and for years has been disparaged by fans when the Warriors are on the road. Who will ever forget the wretched treatment he received in Boston during the 2022 NBA Finals?

Yet there is an undercurrent of belief around the league that Green’s history of fines and suspensions has resulted in different and less lenient rules for him than his fellow players. Some believe it – Draymond obviously does – but others do not.

After officials’ crew chief Tony Brothers assessed, upon review, a technical foul on Green for a flailing left arm that landed on the face of Minnesota’s Naz Reid with 8:46 left in the second quarter, Green’s furious reaction prompted Stephen Curry, Jimmy Butler and coach Steve Kerr to take turns interceding.

Kerr ultimately opted to put Green on the bench for the next six minutes in hopes he would cool off. There were no more flare-ups for the remainder of the game, but Draymond’s postgame statement is proof that he still was simmering.

This was Green’s fifth technical foul in nine postseason games. A one-game suspension hits after a player reaches seven. He also has two flagrant fouls on his ledger, and four of those also warrant suspension.

It’s apparent that Green was upset by something that occurred during the game. Maybe some things.

How many NBA teams have come back from a 3-0 deficit in the playoffs?

How many NBA teams have come back from a 3-0 deficit in the playoffs? originally appeared on NBC Sports Philadelphia

It’s must-win time for both the Cleveland Cavaliers and Boston Celtics.

The East’s top two teams each lost the first two games of their respective second-round series on their home courts, and they will now look to avoid facing a 3-0 deficit that no NBA team has managed to overcome.

The Cavs — the top-seeded team in the East after going 64-18, including 34-7 at home – dropped consecutive games to the Indiana Pacers, the latter on a buzzer-beating heartbreaker.

The Celtics – the East’s No. 2 seed and defending NBA champions – surrendered 20-point third-quarter leads in consecutive losses to the New York Knicks.

Many NBA teams have come back from a 2-0 series deficit – 34 to be exact — but all that managed to do so were victorious in Game 3.

As for the teams that lost Game 3 to go down 3-0, here’s a look at how they fared and why history shows it’s a must-win game for the Cavs and Celtics.

How many NBA teams have come back from being down 3-0 in the playoffs?

An NBA team has never come back from a 3-0 deficit to win the series in the playoffs. Teams that opened a 3-0 series lead in an NBA postseason series have gone 159-0.

The Celtics nearly became the first NBA team to pull off the historic comeback just two seasons ago. After losing the first three games of the Eastern Conference Finals to the No. 8 Miami Heat, No. 2-seeded Boston won the next three games before losing Game 7 at home.

As for other professional sports, the only Major League Baseball team to win a series after trailing 3-0 was the 2004 Boston Red Sox. Four National Hockey League teams have managed to do so: the 1942 Toronto Maple Leafs, 1975 New York Islanders, 2010 Philadelphia Flyers and the 2014 Los Angeles Kings.

How many teams have forced Game 6 after being down 3-0 in the NBA playoffs?

Of the 159 teams to face a 3-0 series deficit in the NBA playoffs, only 15 managed to force a Game 6:

  • 1947 BAA Semifinals: Washington Capitols trailed Chicago Stags 3-0, lost in six
  • 1949 BAA Finals: Washington Capitols trailed Minneapolis 3-0, lost in six
  • 1951 NBA Finals: New York trailed Rochester Royals 3-0, lost in seven
  • 1962 Western Division finals: Detroit trailed L.A. Lakers 3-0, lost in six
  • 1994 Western Conference semifinals: Denver trailed Utah 3-0, lost in seven
  • 1996 NBA Finals: Seattle trailed Chicago 3-0, lost in six
  • 2000 Eastern Conference semifinals: Philadelphia trailed Indiana 3-0, lost in six
  • 2003 Western Conference first round: Portland trailed Dallas 3-0, lost in seven
  • 2007 Eastern Conference semifinals: Chicago trailed Detroit 3-0, lost in six
  • 2010 Eastern Conference finals: Orlando trailed Boston 3-0, lost in six
  • 2013 Eastern Conference first round: Boston trailed New York 3-0, lost in six
  • 2013 Western Conference first round: Houston trailed Oklahoma City 3-0, lost in six
  • 2015 Eastern Conference first round: Milwaukee trailed Chicago 3-0, lost in six
  • 2022 Eastern Conference first round: Toronto trailed Philadelphia 3-0, lost in six
  • 2023 Eastern Conference Finals: Boston trailed Miami 3-0, lost in seven

How many teams have forced Game 7 after being down 3-0 in the NBA playoffs?

Only four teams that went down 3-0 in an NBA playoff series forced a decisive Game 7:

  • 1951 New York Knicks: lost to the Rochester Royals in Game 7 of the NBA Finals
  • 1994 Denver Nuggets: lost to the Utah Jazz in Game 7 of the second round
  • 2003 Portland Trail Blazers: lost to the Dallas Mavericks in Game 7 of the first round
  • 2023 Boston Celtics: lost to the Miami Heat in Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Finals

How many NBA teams have come back from being down 3-1 in the playoffs?

Only 13 teams in NBA playoff history have managed to come back from a 3-1 deficit to win the series. The most recent team to do so was the Denver Nuggets, who overcame 3-1 deficits in consecutive series during the 2020 playoffs, defeating the Utah Jazz in the first round and Los Angeles Clippers in the second round.    

The only team to come back from a 3-1 series deficit in the NBA Finals to win the championship was the 2016 Cavaliers, who won three straight games to stun the Golden State Warriors.

How many NBA teams have come back from a 3-0 deficit in the playoffs?

How many NBA teams have come back from a 3-0 deficit in the playoffs? originally appeared on NBC Sports Boston

It’s must-win time for both the Cleveland Cavaliers and Boston Celtics.

The East’s top two teams each lost the first two games of their respective second-round series on their home courts, and they will now look to avoid facing a 3-0 deficit that no NBA team has managed to overcome.

The Cavs — the top-seeded team in the East after going 64-18, including 34-7 at home – dropped consecutive games to the Indiana Pacers, the latter on a buzzer-beating heartbreaker.

The Celtics – the East’s No. 2 seed and defending NBA champions – surrendered 20-point third-quarter leads in consecutive losses to the New York Knicks.

Many NBA teams have come back from a 2-0 series deficit – 34 to be exact — but all that managed to do so were victorious in Game 3.

As for the teams that lost Game 3 to go down 3-0, here’s a look at how they fared and why history shows it’s a must-win game for the Cavs and Celtics.

How many NBA teams have come back from being down 3-0 in the playoffs?

An NBA team has never come back from a 3-0 deficit to win the series in the playoffs. Teams that opened a 3-0 series lead in an NBA postseason series have gone 159-0.

The Celtics nearly became the first NBA team to pull off the historic comeback just two seasons ago. After losing the first three games of the Eastern Conference Finals to the No. 8 Miami Heat, No. 2-seeded Boston won the next three games before losing Game 7 at home.

As for other professional sports, the only Major League Baseball team to win a series after trailing 3-0 was the 2004 Boston Red Sox. Four National Hockey League teams have managed to do so: the 1942 Toronto Maple Leafs, 1975 New York Islanders, 2010 Philadelphia Flyers and the 2014 Los Angeles Kings.

How many teams have forced Game 6 after being down 3-0 in the NBA playoffs?

Of the 159 teams to face a 3-0 series deficit in the NBA playoffs, only 15 managed to force a Game 6:

  • 1947 BAA Semifinals: Washington Capitols trailed Chicago Stags 3-0, lost in six
  • 1949 BAA Finals: Washington Capitols trailed Minneapolis 3-0, lost in six
  • 1951 NBA Finals: New York trailed Rochester Royals 3-0, lost in seven
  • 1962 Western Division finals: Detroit trailed L.A. Lakers 3-0, lost in six
  • 1994 Western Conference semifinals: Denver trailed Utah 3-0, lost in seven
  • 1996 NBA Finals: Seattle trailed Chicago 3-0, lost in six
  • 2000 Eastern Conference semifinals: Philadelphia trailed Indiana 3-0, lost in six
  • 2003 Western Conference first round: Portland trailed Dallas 3-0, lost in seven
  • 2007 Eastern Conference semifinals: Chicago trailed Detroit 3-0, lost in six
  • 2010 Eastern Conference finals: Orlando trailed Boston 3-0, lost in six
  • 2013 Eastern Conference first round: Boston trailed New York 3-0, lost in six
  • 2013 Western Conference first round: Houston trailed Oklahoma City 3-0, lost in six
  • 2015 Eastern Conference first round: Milwaukee trailed Chicago 3-0, lost in six
  • 2022 Eastern Conference first round: Toronto trailed Philadelphia 3-0, lost in six
  • 2023 Eastern Conference Finals: Boston trailed Miami 3-0, lost in seven

How many teams have forced Game 7 after being down 3-0 in the NBA playoffs?

Only four teams that went down 3-0 in an NBA playoff series forced a decisive Game 7:

  • 1951 New York Knicks: lost to the Rochester Royals in Game 7 of the NBA Finals
  • 1994 Denver Nuggets: lost to the Utah Jazz in Game 7 of the second round
  • 2003 Portland Trail Blazers: lost to the Dallas Mavericks in Game 7 of the first round
  • 2023 Boston Celtics: lost to the Miami Heat in Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Finals

How many NBA teams have come back from being down 3-1 in the playoffs?

Only 13 teams in NBA playoff history have managed to come back from a 3-1 deficit to win the series. The most recent team to do so was the Denver Nuggets, who overcame 3-1 deficits in consecutive series during the 2020 playoffs, defeating the Utah Jazz in the first round and Los Angeles Clippers in the second round.    

The only team to come back from a 3-1 series deficit in the NBA Finals to win the championship was the 2016 Cavaliers, who won three straight games to stun the Golden State Warriors.

Stephen Curry has no return target date, 'I'll do everything in my power to get back as soon as possible'

Golden State's offense survived without Stephen Curry in Game 1 — the Warriors were +1 after Curry left the game with a hamstring strain, thanks to a hot shooting night from Buddy Hield and Draymond Green knocking down four 3-pointers. That, however, is not sustainable — the Warriors' offense is 20 points per 100 possessions worse when he is off the floor in the playoffs.

Curry is officially out for Thursday night's Game 2 and will be re-evaluated in a week, meaning he will miss at least three games this series. Speaking to the media at shootaround Thursday, Curry said there is no target date for his return, he has never had a hamstring injury before so he doesn't know how long it will take to recover.

While Curry will be re-evaluated in a week, the average time missed for a Grade 1 hamstring strain is around 10 days, according to Jeff Stotts of In Street Clothes. That timeline would also have Curry missing Game 5 and returning for Game 6.

"This is new and from all that I'm learning about how quickly you can get back, there has to be a healing process," Curry said, via NBC Sports Bay Area. "It's just the way the body works. You can't accelerate more than what it's telling you."

Having stolen a game on the road, if Golden State can get this series to 2-2 when Curry might be able to return, that's a win. Golden State is going to have to do that with defense and some timely offense. The challenge is Anthony Edwards isn't going to start another game 0-of-10 and the Timberwolves are not going to score just 88 points again.

All Curry can do is watch this unfold and hope to return and put his Warriors over the top and back into the Western Conference Finals.

What we learned as Warriors miss Steph Curry in Game 2 loss to Timberwolves

What we learned as Warriors miss Steph Curry in Game 2 loss to Timberwolves originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

BOX SCORE

MINNEAPOLIS – The Warriors’ first playoff game without Steph Curry since the 2018 Western Conference semifinals was too big of an obstacle to overcome, losing 117-93 to the Minnesota Timberwolves on Thursday night at the Target Center in Game 2 of Round 2. 

There was no way the Timberwolves were going to brick as many threes as they did to open the series. They missed their first 16 threes in the Warriors’ Game 1 win, and then made threes on their first two possessions of Game 2. The Warriors were outscored by 21 points from deep, going 9 of 32 overall compared to the Timberwolves going 16 of 37.

Timberwolves star Anthony Edwards looked like he had a horrible injury when he had to be helped off the court in the second quarter and couldn’t put any weight on his left leg. But Edwards somehow returned to begin the third quarter and was a plus-21, scoring 20 points and adding nine rebounds, five assists and three steals. 

Jimmy Butler, without Curry, put up 17 points, seven rebounds, four assists and was a minus-4. Draymond Green picked up another technical foul and was a minus-3 with nine points on 3-of-10 shooting and 1 of 6 on threes, four rebounds and five assists. It was two bench players who provided a punch for Golden State.

Jonathan Kuminga tied his playoff career high of 18 points in 26 minutes off the bench. Trayce Jackson-Davis got up for multiple dunks, making all six of his shots for 15 points.

Here are three takeaways from the Warriors’ tough Game 2 loss:

Slow Start For First Five

Through nine playoff games, the Warriors now have used five different starting lineups. Kerr decided to give the nod to rookie center Quinten Post, adding size and 3-point shooting to begin the game. A minute and a half later, Kerr was forced to call a timeout after an easy 8-0 run from the Timberwolves to begin the game.

The Warriors trailed 12-0 when Kerr made his first substitution, bringing Gary Payton II and Moses Moody in for Post and Buddy Hield. A Julius Randle free throw pushed the lead to 13-0. Finally, after missing their first eight shots, a Butler three snapped the Warriors’ scoring drought more than seven minutes into the game, making it 13-3.

After the first quarter, the Warriors trailed 29-15. They made six shots and had five turnovers that resulted in seven points for the Timberwolves, with the deficit being as much as 18 at one point. 

Post started Game 3 of the Warriors’ win last round and was a plus-7 in 27-plus minutes with just two points but 12 rebounds. He didn’t start the second half, and only played the first three minutes of the game. The starting five’s lone stint together was the first three-plus minutes of the night when they were outscored 13-0. 

This unit had only played five minutes together in the playoffs prior to Game 2, and had a lot of success in such a small sample. In 11 regular-season games, 42 minutes, they had a 34.2 net rating with a 124.4 offensive rating and 90.2 defensive rating.

Playing It Smart

Searching for any kind of help, Kerr used 11 players in the first quarter, giving minutes to Kuminga, Pat Spencer and Gui Santos. Within the first two minutes of the second quarter, that number grew to 13 as Kevin Knox came in and then Jackson-Davis. The Warriors were down 31-17 at the 10:18 mark of the second quarter when Jackson-Davis entered the game.

Every active, healthy Warriors player saw action in the first half when Braxton Key played the final 5.7 seconds. 

Part of the decision to use so many players certainly had to do with how much changes from Curry’s injury. The bigger picture was preserving Green and Butler. The two 35-year-olds barely had a break between Sunday’s Game 7 in Houston and Tuesday’s Game 1 in Minnesota. Butler, between those two games, played 86 minutes, and Green played nearly 75.

Butler was at 17 minutes going into halftime, and Green was at 15. The former finished at 34 minutes, and the latter played 29.

Calling On Kuminga 

Between badly needing points from someone and essentially having to give him a longer leash, this was a game meant for Kuminga. His first stint wasn’t pretty. Kuminga was out-hustled by Donte DiVincenzo for an offensive rebound, missed two free throws and had a bad pass that was a turnover from an unnecessary jump. 

The next time Kerr called his number, Kuminga was much better and was the Warriors’ leading scorer through the first half with 10 points on a perfect 5-of-5 shooting. Kerr rewarded him by starting Kuminga over Post to begin the second half, and he exploded for two big dunks in the first few minutes.

Kuminga made his first three shots of the second half, bringing him to 17 points on 8-of-8 shooting, before missing a turnaround jumper in the final two minutes of the third quarter. His perfect 8 of 8 start was followed by three misses to end his otherwise strong night. 

On a night that didn’t have a ton of positives, Kuminga’s play was at the top of the list for the Warriors. He was under control most of the time and used his athleticism to his advantage. With Curry out, the Warriors will need Kuminga’s ability to score.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

Edwards returns after injury scare in Warriors-Timberwolves Game 2

Edwards returns after injury scare in Warriors-Timberwolves Game 2 originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

The Warriors’ Western Conference semifinal series with the Minnesota Timberwolves took another wild turn late in the second quarter of Game 2.

And for a moment, it appeared as if the Timberwolves were going to experience a major blow. 

With less than five minutes remaining in the second quarter on Thursday at Target Center, star Anthony Edwards went to the locker room after apparently suffering a left ankle injury. The 23-year-old was in pain, holding his ankle before leaving the court.  

During the halftime break, Edwards, who initially was listed as questionable to return, ran drills in preparation to return to action.

Before the injury, Edwards was struggling from the floor, having made just 2 of 7 field-goal attempts for seven points.

The Warriors, without star guard Steph Curry due to a Grade 1 hamstring strain, are looking to take a surprising 2-0 lead on the Timberwolves. 

With Edwards back on the floor, the odds certainly don’t favor Golden State, however.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

Injured Steph Curry calms down upset Draymond Green after Game 2 technical foul

Injured Steph Curry calms down upset Draymond Green after Game 2 technical foul originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

Steph Curry isn’t playing Thursday night at Target Center, but he still found a way to help the Warriors.

Early in the second quarter of the Western Conference semifinal Game 2 between the Warriors and the Timberwolves, Draymond Green picked up a dead-ball technical foul for hitting Naz Reid after a foul was called on the Minnesota big man.

Green was incredulous over the technical foul and was close to picking up another when Curry stepped in to calm down his longtime teammate.

Green now has five technical fouls during these playoffs, putting him two away from an automatic one-game suspension.

Per the Associated Press’ Josh Dubow, Green has far and away the most NBA playoff technical fouls since 2013.

With Curry out for at least two more games, the Warriors need Green to lead by example, and a big part of that is keeping his composure.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

How many NBA teams have come back from a 3-0 deficit in the playoffs?

How many NBA teams have come back from a 3-0 deficit in the playoffs? originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

It’s must-win time for both the Cleveland Cavaliers and Boston Celtics.

The East’s top two teams each lost the first two games of their respective second-round series on their home courts, and they will now look to avoid facing a 3-0 deficit that no NBA team has managed to overcome.

The Cavs — the top-seeded team in the East after going 64-18, including 34-7 at home – dropped consecutive games to the Indiana Pacers, the latter on a buzzer-beating heartbreaker.

The Celtics – the East’s No. 2 seed and defending NBA champions – surrendered 20-point third-quarter leads in consecutive losses to the New York Knicks.

Many NBA teams have come back from a 2-0 series deficit – 34 to be exact — but all that managed to do so were victorious in Game 3.

As for the teams that lost Game 3 to go down 3-0, here’s a look at how they fared and why history shows it’s a must-win game for the Cavs and Celtics.

How many NBA teams have come back from being down 3-0 in the playoffs?

An NBA team has never come back from a 3-0 deficit to win the series in the playoffs. Teams that opened a 3-0 series lead in an NBA postseason series have gone 159-0.

The Celtics nearly became the first NBA team to pull off the historic comeback just two seasons ago. After losing the first three games of the Eastern Conference Finals to the No. 8 Miami Heat, No. 2-seeded Boston won the next three games before losing Game 7 at home.

As for other professional sports, the only Major League Baseball team to win a series after trailing 3-0 was the 2004 Boston Red Sox. Four National Hockey League teams have managed to do so: the 1942 Toronto Maple Leafs, 1975 New York Islanders, 2010 Philadelphia Flyers and the 2014 Los Angeles Kings.

How many teams have forced Game 6 after being down 3-0 in the NBA playoffs?

Of the 159 teams to face a 3-0 series deficit in the NBA playoffs, only 15 managed to force a Game 6:

  • 1947 BAA Semifinals: Washington Capitols trailed Chicago Stags 3-0, lost in six
  • 1949 BAA Finals: Washington Capitols trailed Minneapolis 3-0, lost in six
  • 1951 NBA Finals: New York trailed Rochester Royals 3-0, lost in seven
  • 1962 Western Division finals: Detroit trailed L.A. Lakers 3-0, lost in six
  • 1994 Western Conference semifinals: Denver trailed Utah 3-0, lost in seven
  • 1996 NBA Finals: Seattle trailed Chicago 3-0, lost in six
  • 2000 Eastern Conference semifinals: Philadelphia trailed Indiana 3-0, lost in six
  • 2003 Western Conference first round: Portland trailed Dallas 3-0, lost in seven
  • 2007 Eastern Conference semifinals: Chicago trailed Detroit 3-0, lost in six
  • 2010 Eastern Conference finals: Orlando trailed Boston 3-0, lost in six
  • 2013 Eastern Conference first round: Boston trailed New York 3-0, lost in six
  • 2013 Western Conference first round: Houston trailed Oklahoma City 3-0, lost in six
  • 2015 Eastern Conference first round: Milwaukee trailed Chicago 3-0, lost in six
  • 2022 Eastern Conference first round: Toronto trailed Philadelphia 3-0, lost in six
  • 2023 Eastern Conference Finals: Boston trailed Miami 3-0, lost in seven

How many teams have forced Game 7 after being down 3-0 in the NBA playoffs?

Only four teams that went down 3-0 in an NBA playoff series forced a decisive Game 7:

  • 1951 New York Knicks: lost to the Rochester Royals in Game 7 of the NBA Finals
  • 1994 Denver Nuggets: lost to the Utah Jazz in Game 7 of the second round
  • 2003 Portland Trail Blazers: lost to the Dallas Mavericks in Game 7 of the first round
  • 2023 Boston Celtics: lost to the Miami Heat in Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Finals

How many NBA teams have come back from being down 3-1 in the playoffs?

Only 13 teams in NBA playoff history have managed to come back from a 3-1 deficit to win the series. The most recent team to do so was the Denver Nuggets, who overcame 3-1 deficits in consecutive series during the 2020 playoffs, defeating the Utah Jazz in the first round and Los Angeles Clippers in the second round.    

The only team to come back from a 3-1 series deficit in the NBA Finals to win the championship was the 2016 Cavaliers, who won three straight games to stun the Golden State Warriors.

Knicks vs. Celtics notes: Mitchel Robinson most impactful Knick, Porzingis puts positive spin on losses

Two games, two 20-point Boston third quarter leads, two times the Celtics shot less than 25% after getting those leads, twice Boston turned the ball over an lot in the clutch, two games where in the clutch the Celtics played predictable — meaning: defendable — offense, and twice the Knicks showed resilience, twice New York got to the free throw line when it mattered, twice Mikal Bridges made a clutch defensive play, and twice the Knicks completed the comeback inside TD Garden.

With the Knicks up 2-0 as the series heads to Madison Square Garden, here are a couple of notes out of the Knicks vs. Celtics

Mitchell Robinson most impactful Knick

Through two games, Mitchel Robinson is a series-best +32. For comparison, Jalen Brunson is +1 through two games, while Mikal Bridges is -3.

When Robinson is on the court in the playoffs, the Knicks' defense is 17.6 points per 100 possessions better, giving up less than a point per possession — this is the vision the Knicks had for him and Karl-Anthony Towns when they traded for KAT right before the season. Recovery from Robinson's offseason ankle surgery put that vision on hold, but it has hit the Celtics full force.

Which led to Celtics coach Joe Mazzulla to call for a hack-a-Mitch plan late in Game 2 (as he had done at other points in the series), intentionally fouling the career 52.2% free throw shooter, trying to force New York to take him off the floor.

"He was a +19, all their starters were in the negative," Mazzulla said.

That strategy backfired in Game 2. Knicks coach Tom Thibodeau left Mitchell on the court until his team was in the bonus the rest of the way, which came with 2:41 left in the game. At that point, Thibodeau swapped out Mitchell for OG Anunoby and let his offensive players foul hunt the rest of the way. Jalen Brunson won the game from the free-throw line (on a shooting foul).

"Actually, that makes me feel like a threat," Robinson said of the intentional fouling. "You want me out the game?... I'm just saying, you trying to get me out the game? Why y'all want me out the game?"

The other thing that has thrown the Celtics off is something Thibodeau envisioned since the KAT trade — a double-big lineup with the defensive-focused Robinson next to the offensive-focused Towns. It's similar to how Towns thrived last season in Minnesota, playing next to Rudy Gobert. The Knicks have a +17.8 net rating in the playoffs when both their bigs are on the court together. Mazzulla and the Celtics need to figure out how to handle this quickly. If they go down 0-3 in this series on Saturday, their season is all but over.

Porzingis says pressure of Celtics

Kristaps Porzingis has played just 27 minutes through two games in this series, slowed by a non-COVID upper respiratory issue that has been with him for a few months. His lack of presence on the court means Boston is not exploiting Towns' defense like they hoped, and one of their best scoring options is not impacting the game.

But it was Porzingis with the positive spin on Boston being down 0-2 in this series.

"In a way, it kinda takes all the pressure off of us," Porzingis said. "If you check the odds, maybe the Knicks are the favorites now to win. We were expected to win, so for us to be in this hole right now, with our backs against the wall, we have nothing to lose. We've got to go out there and leave it all out on the floor. It's still a lot of basketball left to play, and let's see where it goes."

Even with the Knicks up 2-0, our partner BetMGM has the series even — both teams are -110 to win the series — and the Celtics are -5.5 point favorites to take Game 3 in Madison Square Garden.

Also, is the pressure off Boston? If they lose this series — then head into an offseason where many around the league expect the Celtics to trade away a key rotation player or two because of the NBA second luxury tax apron and its team building restrictions — hard questions will be asked. Championship teams only get so many bites at the apple, the pressure is on Boston to take advantage of theirs, not assume they will be back in this position next year.

Parsons calls out Draymond for ‘little harsh' criticism of Brooks

Parsons calls out Draymond for ‘little harsh' criticism of Brooks originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

In the NBA world, there’s plenty of criticism to go around. 

Retired forward Chandler Parsons believes Warriors star Draymond Green is wrong for his criticism of Houston Rockets forward Dillon Brooks, who refused to shake Golden State’s hands after Game 7 on Sunday at Toyota Center. 

Parsons, Brooks’ teammate for two seasons with the Memphis Grizzlies, pointed out an irony in Green’s message.

“The message is fine. It’s just the messenger is a little interesting here, coming from Draymond Green, who has probably been suspended and fined more than anybody,” Parsons said to host Michelle Beadle and former NBA player Lou Williams on FanDuel TV’s “Run It Back” on Thursday morning.

“It’s OK not to like someone; just say that you don’t like him.” 

As his former teammate, Parsons pushed back on Green’s idea that the league’s players unanimously don’t respect Brooks.

“’No one respects him’ is a little aggressive, a little harsh,” Parsons added. “There’s people that respect him. I had him in Memphis. He’s actually an awesome dude. 

“He’s just gone a little sideways, but that’s who he is. That’s how he’s found his calling in the NBA.”

Friction between Green and Brooks dates back three-plus years, when the two faced off against one another in a heated series between the Warriors and the Grizzlies in the 2022 Western Conference semifinals.

As Williams indicated, the impression players give on the floor isn’t always reflected behind the scenes. The retired guard, who has experienced it himself, knows Brooks has a distinct demeanor off the court. 

“I like Dillon as well. He’s been nothing but respectful towards me the times that I’ve competed against him, even with some of the antics,” Williams said. 

“He would do some of those things, and behind the scenes, he would tell you, ‘Bro, I love your game. I respect you. I grew up watching you’. That’s why it’s important to have that optic in that situation.” 

Considering the beef between Green and Brooks, however, mutual respect between the two is just a pipe dream at this point.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

Jimmer Fredette talks new USA Basketball role, retirement, Olympic 3×3 change he'd like to see

Jimmer Fredette announced both his retirement from basketball and his new role in the sport — USA Basketball men’s 3x3 national team managing director — last month.

Fredette recently discussed both moves as he ventures into the administrative side of the sport.

This interview has been lightly edited for length and clarity:

OlympicTalk: When did you know you were ready to retire?

Fredette: My original plan was play the Paris Olympics, hopefully medal, and then be able to ride off into the sunset, right? Of course, what happened — getting injured right in the beginning of the Olympics and not being able to compete the full time — was definitely difficult. I had a long rehab ahead of me. I knew it was going to be an eight-, nine-month rehab. As I was going through it, I wasn't playing basketball, but I was just kind of preparing to kind of get back into shape.

As I thought about it, I was like, man, I kind of don't love the grind anymore. I don't love being out there and trying to work out and be in the gym every single day like I had been. For me, that was a big sign, because I loved that throughout my career. That was my favorite part was the grind of it, was the practicing, was the getting better. That's what made me the player that I was. So when I had that type of feeling, I was like, I don't want to force it, it's probably a good sign. Then decided to make it official. It just felt like the right time. Now being home with the three kids, and being the dad and doing all those things has been really rewarding.

OlympicTalk: If you could change one thing about Olympic 3x3 basketball, what would it be?

Fredette: I would have, in our case of what happened in Paris, if someone does get injured, that you would be able to sub a guy in so that they could still have four players. That's one of the biggest things that we've talked about, just because it's such a difficult and unfair advantage to have four versus three players when you're going through the Olympic process.

I get it completely (why they don't have it). There's costs involved. There's stuff that goes on, but a general FIBA 3x3 event is only two days, and you only play five games if you win it. You can play with three guys and get away with it.

Whereas the Olympics, you're playing seven days and 10 games (if you get to the final). It's just a way longer period. It's a way different time frame than we normally do, so if someone does go down with a rolled ankle or whatever happens, I feel like you should be able to have at least one person that's an alternate that can sub in, and then that's it, just one time, and then it's over with.

OlympicTalk: Would you like to see a U.S. Olympic Trials type event for 3x3?

Fredette: It's fun to watch trials, right? People like to get familiar with the players before the Olympics. I think we can do some type of form of that, but it's a little interesting. With 3x3, you're not just going through and being like, all right, I'm going to pick this guy, this guy, this guy, and they're just going to come together, and then I pick the team, and then it's over.

These guys are going to be playing a lot for the next three to four years. It'd be fun to have, maybe, a tournament or a trials or something like that, where you could see the collection of players together that we would be able to at least showcase — this is who is in the pool. These are the guys that have been playing for the last two to three years that care about the sport, that have gotten better. They're playing professionally, and now you get to see them and know who they are. It wouldn't be like the final pick or anything like that for me, because it would be a whole long process, right?

From that perspective, you can have a bad tournament, but still be on the team, because you have had a whole body of work. But I think it would be fun to be able to do that in a capacity where the USA would be able to see it.

OlympicTalk: For the first two Olympics in 3x3, eligibility rules made it difficult for NBA players to participate — they needed to have competed in 3x3 events outside of the Olympics. Would you like to see those rules relaxed to make it more accommodating for NBA players?

Fredette: I think it would be great for the sport somewhat. But I also do love the fact that it's (currently) kind of like a true Olympic story, where these guys are going through for years, and some of them have had other jobs, or do other things or play in other leagues, and then they play 3x3 as well professionally.

It's fun to see guys that have been homegrown, that have been doing 3x3 for so long, to be able to get rewarded and play in the Olympics at the end.

I think it would be good from a marketing standpoint. Obviously, if you had some of the top NBA players that aren't on the 5x5 team, maybe come and play 3x3. From a branding perspective, obviously, people would watch and be aware of that. But I do like the idea of guys that are kind of homegrown and playing professionally being able to get their shine as well.

OlympicTalk: The 3x3 World Cup is next month. Are you selecting that team so early in your USA Basketball tenure, and if so, how is that looking?

Fredette: For sure, I'll still pick that team, but our USA Basketball player pool is pretty small right now. That was intentional, because we had myself and all of my team were kind of playing through the Olympics, and that's who they kind of put their money into, and all that stuff.

There were other guys playing, obviously, but not necessarily through USA Basketball. So coming into 2025 we knew we were going to have a little bit of a smaller pool, but we still have a really good team that's out there playing in Team Miami on the FIBA World Tour, which is the team I played for. One of the guys, Dylan Travis, was on the Olympic team. He's still playing on that team. Then some other guys that were alternates and have been playing professionally for a while. So we have some really good guys to play at the World Cup and to build.

My opportunity is to now try to find more guys as we move forward for the next several years. These guys that are playing now will continue to be in that mix, obviously, and be able to help us as we push forward and then integrating some new players and some new talent. So by the 2026 World Cup, and all the things that we have coming up, we'll be able to have more players in our pool.

NBL HoopsFest Press Conference With Carmelo Anthony And Kenny Smith
The newly-minted Hall of Fame inductee will be one of the voices welcoming the NBA back to NBC in October 2025.

Paul Pierce makes good on Celtics promise, walks 15 miles to FOX studios

Paul Pierce makes good on Celtics promise, walks 15 miles to FOX studios originally appeared on NBC Sports Boston

Paul Pierce is a man of his word.

The Boston Celtics legend was so confident his former team would win Game 2 of its Eastern Conference semifinals series against the New York Knicks on Wednesday night that he vowed to walk to the FOX Sports 1 studios in Los Angeles from his house if the C’s lost. It would be a 15-mile walk.

Unfortunately for Pierce, the Celtics blew another 20-point lead and lost 91-90 to the Knicks, putting the defending champs in an 0-2 series hole.

Pierce reacted after the game by posting a picture of his route to work on X. And then he got up early Thursday morning to begin the long journey to the FOX studios.

Plenty of fans, and even his former Celtics teammate Kevin Garnett, stopped to interact with Pierce during his walk.

Pierce eventually arrived at FOX, making good on his promise. It took him around seven hours to complete the trip.

Plenty of people make wild promises/bets involving sports teams and don’t make good on them. Pierce deserves credit for actually following through. A 15-mile walk is not easy for anyone.

Lots of Knicks fans, including movie star Ben Stiller, appreciated what Pierce did. “Paul pierce good to his word 🙌,” Stiller wrote on X.

The Celtics will be back in action Saturday afternoon at 3:30 p.m. ET when they face the Knicks in Game 3 at Madison Square Garden. It remains to be seen whether Pierce will make another promise ahead of this weekend’s matchup.