The amount of talent in this 2026 draft has been compared to some of the best draft classes the NBA has ever seen, drawing comparisons to the 1996 and 2003 drafts. The 1996 draft showcased names like Kobe Bryant, Steve Nash, Allen Iverson, and Ray Allen. Widely regarded as the most talented class ever, the 2003 draft featured names like LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, Chris Bosh, and Carmelo Anthony. With so many comparisons being drawn with this draft, it’s worth taking a deeper look at the peak of this draft, and one of those names is Cameron Boozer.
The basics
Cam Boozer, the 6’9 freshman out of Duke, has widely been deemed a top four pick in this year’s draft, and for good reason. Boozer has been around basketball since birth, being the son of NBA veteran Carlos Boozer. He was born in Salt Lake City, Utah, on July 18, 2007, while his father was playing for the Utah Jazz. He was touted as an elite prospect in high school as a freshman. He didn’t fall short of expectations, leading Christopher Columbus High School in Westchester, Florida, to four 7A state championships. Boozer won Gatorade National Player of the Year as a sophomore and senior and was also named Florida Mr. Basketball and Mr. Basketball USA. In his senior year, he averaged 22.1 points, 11.8 rebounds, 3.2 assists, and 3.4 stocks (blocks + steals) per game.
His elite talent and winning ways made him a consensus five-star recruit and one of the top players in a loaded 2025-2026 NCAA class. Ultimately, he committed to Duke and continued his dominance at the collegiate level. Even in such a talented draft, Boozer stood out in his own unique ways, showing he’s capable of dominating at any level. He averaged 22.5 points, 10.2 rebounds, and 4.1 assists per game. Boozer led the Blue Devils to a 31-3 record, securing a one seed in the 2026 NCAA tournament. They were eliminated on the infamous turnover at halfcourt that led to a UConn Braylon Mullins three, ending the Duke March Madness run at the Elite Eight. In the 73-72 loss, Boozer had 27 points, 8 rebounds, 4 assists, and 2 blocks.
The good
Boozer is an elite offensive player. He stands at 6’9, 250 pounds, with a 7-foot wingspan – and plays like it. His game starts on the inside and moves out. He’s about as close to a mix of old-age and new-age big man as you can get. Boozer shot 55.6% from the floor his senior year, 39.1% from three, and 78.9% from the free throw line.
As far as his shot diet goes, 60% of his shots came in the paint, about 13% came from mid-range, and 26% came from three. Boozer was never perceived as an outside threat in high school but expanded his game at Duke. Most notable was his ability to shoot the three. He shot 42 percent on unguarded catch-and-shoot threes, 39 percent on guarded catch-and-shoot threes, 49 percent on spot-up threes, and 44 percent on pick-and-pops. For not being dubbed a natural “shooter,” these numbers are impressive.
Although the three is in his hip pocket, the meat and potatoes of Boozer’s game is inside of 15 feet. He often operates out of the post and uses a flurry of moves to find a way to put the ball in the basket. He isn’t quite as savvy as a guy like AJ Dybantsa in terms of getting to his spot, but he has good fundamentals and footwork that allow him to get easy buckets inside.
The room to grow
The concerns surrounding Boozer mostly stem from his lack of general athleticism.
For the most part, he plays below the rim, and scouts worry his reliance on brute strength likely won’t be an advantage in the bigger, faster, stronger NBA. Boozer is a good athlete but does not possess top-tier explosiveness like an AJ Dybantsa or Darryn Peterson. This may affect his ability to finish strong at the rim and could limit his effectiveness in transition or when attacking the basket against more athletic defenders. As the NBA moves away from standard big men and more towards shooting and spacing at every position, there is concern Boozer’s skillset may not translate to the NBA.
Another area for improvement is at the defensive end of the floor. Although he’s a smart defensive player, Boozer may not be as dominant a rim protector at the next level. His shot-blocking numbers dropped notably from high school to college, which suggests he might struggle against substantially more athletic big men in the NBA. Boozer averaged just 0.6 blocks per game with Duke, just 2.0% of total shots taken by opponents. All the more reason for scouts to be concerned about his ability to guard length and athleticism. Additionally, his general lack of speed and lateral quickness puts him in vulnerable positions, especially when guarding on the perimeter. He’s not Daniel Gafford bad, but at best, he looks uncomfortable in space.
The good news for Boozer is that the concern teams and scouts have about him can be minimized by continuing to stretch his game outside of 15 feet and add some positional quickness. He’ll never be considered athletic, but his reliance on his size and fundamentals keep him in the top four prospects.
Fit with the Grizzlies (third selection)
As the Memphis Grizzlies continue to build around a young core that includes Cedric Coward, Jaylen Wells, and Zach Edey, selecting Boozer would add a key go-to offensive threat along with creating one of the more dynamic frontcourts in the league. Although the Grizzlies already have solid options at power forward, including Taylor Hendricks and GG Jackson Jr., Boozer’s talent is a huge tier above those guys. He would be the ideal power forward to add to this dynamic core. The Grizzlies were 25th in the NBA this season in offensive rating at 112.9 points per 100 possessions. Adding Boozer would be an incredible shot to the arm offensively. Memphis would still need a year or two to build into a playoff team, but man this team looks a lot more fun with Boozer.
Fit with the Bulls (fourth selection)
The other destination Boozer could find himself landing in, is Chicago. The Bulls have been a mess for the past decade, and this draft is their chance to significantly right the ship. If the Grizzlies were to take Caleb Wilson with the third pick, leaving Boozer on the board for the Bulls, Chicago should salivate at the idea of adding him to a young core of Matas Buzelis and Tre Jones. Jones showcased his ability to be a solid point guard this past season and Buzelis is an athletic, high-flyer, who can be a threat on both sides of the floor. Chicago was 23rd in the NBA in offensive rating this season at 113.0 points per 100 possessions. Cam Boozer would be the ideal offensive fit for a much-needed revival of Chicago basketball.
NBA comparison
Boozer is frequently compared to Paolo Banchero of the Orlando Magic for his combination of strength and the ability to finish inside the paint. His ceiling could be a combination of Banchero with a touch of Tim Duncan’s fundamentals and offensive prowess inside of 15 feet. If Boozer doesn’t reach that level, a slightly smaller Kevin Love is also in the cards. At his peak, Love was an offensive juggernaut who sucked up rebounds like a vacuum cleaner. Either way, Boozer will probably have a very solid NBA career.