Category: NBA

Heading into a highly anticipated Finals matchup between a hot Knicks team and a young and upcoming Spurs team, Mitchell Robinson was consistently brought up as someone who could have a big impact even in limited minutes. In the past, he’s dominated games, even series, with his elite offensive rebounding and game-changing defense. And he’s also had success slowing down Victor Wembanyama. Through three games, though, he’s been anything but a game changer.

In game one, the reserve big man had some solid minutes, scoring two points and grabbing six rebounds in 13 minutes. But since then, he’s not only been neutralized, but his presence has seemingly been detrimental to the team. He has yet to have a single game where he’s had a positive plus-minus, he’s grabbed just six offensive rebounds, has just one steal, and one block, and he’s done all that despite spending some of his minutes playing against Spurs backup, Luke Kornet, someone who many believed Robinson could, and would dominate.

Unfortunately for the Knicks, though, it’s only gotten worse as the series has gone on. His game two, despite being bad, wasn’t disastrous. He was a -10 in 14 minutes, but made three of his six free throws, scored two baskets, and was more active defensively. Last night, though, Robinson looked very bad.

It’s hard to tell if it’s the hand, the overwhelming crowd, the moment, or just a lack of concentration, but it was clear from the beginning that Robinson just wasn’t where he needed to be. With about two minutes left in the first quarter, when the aforementioned Kornet sets a screen for De’Aaron Fox, he is caught flat-footed with his arms down, allowing Fox to take a very easy two-dribble pull-up jump shot. Making this play confusing is the fact that Kornet isn’t even rolling or popping. After setting a screen, he stands there for a good second or two, making Robinson’s decision to continue dropping questionable if not downright bad.

Just seconds later, Kornet gets the ball at the top of the key, which initiates a Dylan Harper cut off of him. Robinson, instead of reading this and dropping back, watches Landry Shamet get blown up the Kornet screen, which leads to a highlight dunk for the Spurs rookie. Why is Robinson playing up on Kornet like he is Karl-Anthony Towns? Nobody knows.

But it doesn’t stop there. He had a play later on in the game where he just accepts being screened by Keldon Johnson on a delayed transition play in the third quarter. This leads to an open Wembanyama, who then drops off a pass to Johnson for a layup. There’s another play on a failed lob play where Wembanyama can’t finish the alley-oop, but comes down with it. Robinson is right there, but does little to impact the attempt. For much of the series, Robinson has failed to do the things he’s known for. He hasn’t matched the physicality, the energy, or attention to detail that the Spurs, and the stage that is the Finals calls for. And that’s a big problem for him and the Knicks.

Even in short spurts and limited minutes, Robinson’s ability to be an elite backup center and be a disruptor was supposed to be one of the key strengths for the Knicks. His doing so would give the Knicks 48 uninterrupted minutes of elite center play against one of the best bigs in the league. Instead, they’ve gotten a confusingly uninspired performance that is inexplicable for the biggest games of his life.

The Knicks are still the favorites with -180 odds to win it all on FanDuel, but last night’s loss closed the gap substantially. If New York wants to get back to their winning ways and keep the Spurs from making those odds uncomfortably close, matching San Antonio’s physicality, activity, and energy will be pivotal, and Robinson getting his head in the game would go a long way in helping them do so.

Victor Wembanyama made his presence known in Game 3 of the NBA Finals

It wasn’t just the Spurs star’s stats that increased in San Antonio’s 115-111 win, but his physicality also rose sharply.

But in seeing that physical play, ex-NBAer Lou Williams went as far as to say on FanDuel TV’s “Run It Back” on Tuesday that Wembanyama was “dirty.”

“Give credit where it’s due. Wemby’s starting to do a lot of dirty s–t,” Williams, the three-time Sixth Man of the Year, said.

Chandler Parsons said Wembanyama, who scored 32 points in Game 3 but made headlines for his shove of Knicks star Jalen Brunson, needs to find the right balance in his game. 

“I’d rather him do this than flopping and foul baiting.” Parsons said. “He’s got to be careful, though. This type of stuff will get you tossed from a game, and then your team has zero chance.”

"Give credit where it's due. Wemby's starting to do a lot of dirty sh*t." – Lou Williams

"Y'all called him skinny and weak for 2.5 years." – Michelle Beadle

"I'd rather him do this than flopping and foul baiting." – Chandler Parsons

"Get 'em out the way." – Boogie Cousins

… pic.twitter.com/hiYSVNzrhk

— Run It Back (@RunItBackFDTV) June 9, 2026

Many have pointed to the one play in particular when Wembanyama was guarding Brunson late in the first quarter and the San Antonio big man threw Brunson to the floor. 

The referees did not call a foul live and did not review the play. During the postgame interviews, Brunson remained coy about what happened. 

“Whatever you saw is what you saw,” Brunson said. 

Wembanyama heard it from the Knicks fans in the form of a “F–k you, Wemby” chant, but he said he understands where his villain status is.

“I’m nowhere near Trae Young level, though,” he said of the former Hawks star who tormented the Knicks during the 2021 playoffs.

The Spurs dictated the physicality of Game 3 as a whole. The perimeter guards in Stephon Castle and De’Aaron Fox made it hard for Brunson and the Knicks to have freedom on the outside.

The Spurs were also able to shut down Karl-Anthony Towns (11 points on 4-for-10 shooting) for the first time in the series. 

But still, even with the 7-foot-4 Defensive Player of the Year, the Spurs were out-rebounded (46 to 37) and conceded more points in the paint (46 to 44). But that did not hurt them in Game 3 because the guards played so well. 

If the Spurs want to knot the series at two games apiece on Wednesday night, that could be an area of improvement. But for the Knicks, consistent play will be key. 

The now all-important Game 4 tips off at 8:30 p.m. ET.

We’re exactly two weeks away from Day 1 of the 2026 NBA Draft which, yes, is now a two-day event. A lot can change between now and then, including the Golden State Warriors attaching their first-round pick to a few other assets to land a big fish before free agency begins. But the most likely scenario is that when Adam Silver calls out the No. 11 pick on draft night, it still has the Warriors’ name attached to it, and is a player that Mike Dunleavy Jr. and Steve Kerr are excited about adding to the rotation.

One of my favorite things to do during draft season is look back on prior picks, so I can calibrate my own expectations. Of course, it’s hard to compare picks year over year — sometimes teams opt for a raw project that they hope can develop down the road, while other times they choose a player they anticipate contributing right away (such as Yaxel Lendeborg, who our Ricky O’Donnell has the Dubs selecting in his latest mock draft).

So here, to help you get a feel for what the Warriors can strive for, are the last 20 No. 11 picks in the draft.

2025: Cedric Coward (Grizzlies)

It’s also hard to compare draft picks because team situations vary so much. The Grizzlies, who swung a draft day trade for Coward, were hit by an absurd amount of injuries this year, and it opened up the door for their first-round pick to play a lot. Coward took advantage, averaging 13.6 points and 5.9 rebounds per game, and making the All-Rookie first team. Only time will tell if he’s a quality starter going forward, or if it’s an Eric Paschall situation.

2024: Matas Buzelis (Bulls)

Safe to say the Warriors would be thrilled to get a Buzelis. In his rookie season he made the All-Rookie team and earned Rookie of the Year votes, while playing well enough to help a team with playoff aspirations. And he followed it up with a sophomore leap that makes him look like he could be a player Chicago builds around for the future.

2023: Jett Howard (Magic)

Suffice to say, you can’t expect to hit a home run with every pick outside of the top 10 (or inside it, for that matter). So far, that’s been the case for the Magic with Howard. He hasn’t been a bust, but only plays a modest bench role — in his third season this year, he averaged career highs in minutes (12.6) and points (5.5).

2022: Ousmane Dieng (Thunder)

Some of the draft serve as a reminder as to how good of a player is drafted at No. 11. And some serve as a reminder as to how good of a player is available at No. 11. Dieng was unable to become a key part of OKC’s rotation during his time with the team, though he played well after a midseason trade to the Bucks this year. But most notably, the two players drafted immediately after Dieng were Jalen Williams and Jalen Duren, All-Stars who are core players on two of the best teams in the NBA.

2021: James Bouknight (Hornets)

The 2021 draft wasn’t great for the Warriors … they took Jonathan Kuminga No. 7 (one spot ahead of Franz Wagner), and Moses Moody No. 14 (two spots ahead of Alperen Şengün, and three spots ahead of Trey Murphy III). But suffice to say, it went a bit worse for the Hornets, who used their lottery pick on Bouknight. He played in just 79 games over three years (while also having legal issues) before being cut, and didn’t catch on anywhere but the G League. He now plays in Mexico.

2020: Devin Vassell (Spurs)

If the 2021 draft wasn’t great for the Warriors, the 2020 one was even worse. The infamous Covid draft saw the Dubs take James Wiseman with the second overall pick, right before LaMelo Ball. A lot of strong players fell to lower draft positions, including Vassell, who is currently a starter on a Spurs team that’s in the NBA Finals. Vassell was a quality role player as a rookie, and a player to build around by his third year.

2019: Cameron Johnson (Suns)

Johnson isn’t a spectacular player, but he’s a high-quality role player, and that’s a nice (but realistic) get at No. 11. He averaged 8.8 points as a rookie, and has averaged 12.8 for his career, peaking at 18.8 during the 2024-25 season. He’s a career 39.6% shooter from deep, and it’s safe to say Golden State would love to find that in the draft. To me, Johnson feels like the prototypical No. 11 pick. There are plenty of players drafted in this slot that are worse, but you’d still be pretty disappointed to get one of them. You aim for this level of production, and hope that you strike gold with a star. Speaking of which…

2018: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (Clippers)

I probably don’t need to inform you all as to who SGA is. His rookie version would help the Dubs tremendously — he averaged 10.8 points, 3.3 assists, and 1.2 steals, while making the All-Rookie team — but what he blossomed into is the real story. I’ve long maintained that the Warriors quest for two timelines is absurd and unrealistic, but that could all change if the Dubs draft a player who will go on to win back-to-back MVPs, average 30+ points in four consecutive seasons, and lead a young team to a championship. They should do that. That’s my official stance.

Side note: SGA was part of a draft day trade that saw the Hornets trade him to the Clippers for the No. 12 pick (Miles Bridges) and two second-rounders. After his rookie year, the Clippers traded him to the Thunder, along with Danilo Gallinari, two first-round pick swaps, and five first-round draft picks, for Paul George. I can only imagine what the Charlotte and LA fanbases (and ownerships) feel every time they play the Thunder.

2017: Malik Monk (Hornets)

Monk is another player who feels very much like a No. 11 pick. You hope you get something better, you’re disappointed if you get something worse, and you expect to get something in his galaxy. He’s a high-quality role player who can help any team, and that was true from his rookie season.

2016: Domantas Sabonis (Thunder)

Yet another No. 11 pick with ties to Paul George (who sadly was drafted 10th, not 11th). Before the Thunder traded George for a No. 11 pick entering his second season, they traded a No. 11 pick entering his second season for George. Needless to say, the Dubs would be thrilled if they landed Sabonis at No. 11 this year. He was a contributor from Day 1, starting in 66 games as a rookie, and averaging double figures as a sophomore. By year four he was an All-Star who averaged a double-double. Now he’s a three-time All-Star and a three-time rebounding champ.

2015: Myles Turner (Pacers)

Turner is far from the best player on this list, but he’s still someone the Warriors would be very excited to land at No. 11. He averaged 10.3 points and 5.5 rebounds as a rookie, while starting 30 games, playing strong defense, and making the All-Rookie team. He’s averaged double figures every year of his career, is a decent shooter from distance, and has led the league in blocks twice, while drawing All-Defense and All-Star consideration a few times. If the Dubs end up with a player of Turner’s caliber, they’ll get someone who can help them win games immediately, while being a core part of the next era of Golden State hoops.

2014: Doug McDermott (Bulls)

McDermott should be proud of the career he’s put together, but he’s still an example of a player Golden State will really want to avoid, especially since they’ll likely be shopping for players on the older side. McDermott was a four-year college player and the reigning college Player of the Year when he entered the draft, but his lack of athleticism never allowed him to thrive in the NBA. He averaged just 3.0 points as a rookie, and has spent his career mostly playing sporadic minutes for bad teams. Again, it’s a career he should be proud of: despite many draft pundits saying he wouldn’t be able to survive in the NBA, he’s put together a 12-year career, made a lot of money, and scored more than 6,000 career points. Those are things to be proud of, but things the Warriors will be hoping to avoid.

2013: Michael Carter-Williams (76ers)

This is a fun hypothetical: how would you feel if the Dubs drafted Carter-Williams? As a rookie, MCW averaged 16.7 points, 6.2 rebounds, 6.3 assists, and 1.9 steals, while winning Rookie of the Year. That sure would help Golden State this season! It was also far and away the best year of his career, and by his fourth year he was down to 6.6 points, and would never average double digits again. It was a weird career, and a reminder that the Warriors could end up with a player who helps them in the short term but not the long term … or vice versa.

2012: Meyers Leonard (Blazers)

Leonard is a player who put together a pretty solid career, but would still be a disappointment if the Warriors drafted his 2026 equivalent. He contributed a little bit as a rookie, but only averaged 17.5 minutes on a bad Blazers team, and barely played as a sophomore. Eventually he became a decent contributor, but never anything special. He’s not a bust, but you hope to do better.

2011: Klay Thompson (Warriors)

Do we need to say anything about Klay? It goes without saying that the Dubs would be ecstatic at the opportunity to draft their future Hall of Famer again. Klay contributed right away for Golden State, averaging 12.5 points as a rookie, while shooting 41.4% from three-point range and making the All-Rookie team. In his fourth year he was an All-Star, and All-NBA selection, and a champion. It’s fairly obvious that if the Warriors draft one of the best players in franchise history this year, they’ll be happy.

2010: Cole Aldrich (Thunder)

Aldrich is the type of player the Warriors will be hoping to avoid in the draft. He was drafted onto a contending team and couldn’t crack the rotation, as he appeared in just 18 games as a rookie, and scored a mere 18 points. It wasn’t until his fifth year where he started to become a rotation player, and even then it was in a limited capacity. This won’t help Golden State with their short term or long term goals.

2009: Terrence Williams (Nets)

Four picks after the Dubs selected Steph Curry, the Nets grabbed Williams, who only played four seasons in the Association. Williams was decent as a rookie, which Golden State is certainly on the hunt for, but he never developed after his first year.

2008: Jerryd Bayless (Blazers)

Another player who had a lengthy career, but still is a player the Warriors will be hoping to do better than. Bayless played 11 seasons in the NBA, though he started just 99 games and often filled out the bench for mediocre teams. He’s a valuable player to have, but someone you’d rather sign to the mid-level exception, rather than draft with a lottery pick.

2007: Acie Law (Hawks)

Ahh, Law, who had two stints on the Warriors and catches a stray from Curry once a year due to Don Nelson’s propensity for playing him over the future MVP. He only had a four-year career, and probably would not have helped this version of the Warriors as a rookie, or at any point in his career.

2006: JJ Redick (Magic)

I try not to admit this in public, but once upon a time I was a huge Duke fan, and an even huger Redick fan. Those things haven’t aged incredibly well, but my desire for the Warriors to use the No. 9 pick on Redick instead of Patrick O’Bryant looks pretty smart in hindsight. It took Redick a little bit of time to really find his groove in the pros — he averaged double figures 10 straight seasons — but even as a youngster with moderate stats, he was a contributor for a good Magic team. Like many on this list, Redick is the type of player that the Warriors are probably expecting to get, but hoping to do better than.

So there’s 20 years worth of No. 11 picks. The conclusion, as always? Just draft Shai Gilgeous-Alexander or Klay Thompson, obviously.

It’s becoming more apparent by the week — by the day? — that Giannis Antetokounmpo will be on the move this offseason.

Months of speculation about Antetokounmpo’s future in Milwaukee have led to this point, with Antetokounmpo set to enter the second-to-last year of his contract. And if Antetokounmpo is indeed preferring to play elsewhere, the Bucks may opt to move him if they sense he has no interest in signing a long-term extension with the franchise.

Bucks co-owner Jimmy Haslam said recently that he expects resolution in the matter prior to the NBA draft, which is scheduled for June 23.

Here’s a ranking of the five best landing spots for Giannis Antetokounmpo, based on fit:

5. Cleveland Cavaliers

Is this a case where Cleveland would be willing to part with Evan Mobley? It seems that would be required for this deal to work, and the Cavaliers have given every indication that they want to run this group back after reaching the Eastern Conference finals.

On paper, this would present an interesting — if not forced? — pairing of stars at different points in their careers. Antetokounmpo, Donovan Mitchell and James Harden are each talented scorers. All do best when the ball is in their hands, and adding Antetokounmpo would require each to sacrifice parts of their games to make it work.

That said, it’s clear the Cavs need to tweak parts of their roster, as the Knicks blew past them in the conference finals, and Antetokounmpo certainly is a dangerous player. It might take some time, however, for it to all jell.

4. Portland Trail Blazers

This was a bit of a surprise addition to the list of suitors, given that Antetokounmpo reportedly wants to play out East. The Trail Blazers were a surprise this season under interim coach Tiago Splitter, who embraced his team’s youth and athleticism.

While turnovers were an issue, Portland looked to play quickly, and Deni Avdija blossomed into a first-time All-Star. The big question here is whether Antetokounmpo would really sign a long-term extension with the franchise. If the Trail Blazers get any indication that he’s not interested in that, it doesn’t make sense for Portland — which would still be significantly behind contenders in the West like the Spurs, Thunder, Nuggets, Timberwolves, Lakers and Rockets — to take a two-year flier on Antetokounmpo.

There’s also the matter of new owner Tom Dundon, whose first few months at the helm have been marked by cost-cutting measures.

Interestingly, assuming both would remain in Portland with any trade, this deal would reunite Antetokounmpo with Damian Lillard and Jrue Holiday, a pair of guards he called teammates with the Bucks for multiple seasons.

3. Boston Celtics

For years under Joe Mazzulla, the Celtics have opted to roll out an offense in which all five starters can space and shoot the ball. That changed this season when Boston traded away Kristaps Porziņģis and let Al Horford walk in free agency. And while Neemias Queta provided value as a rim-running big who could protect the rim, Antetokounmpo is not an accurate perimeter shooter.

Another area where this is something of an awkward fit is pace. Antetokounmpo is the premier fast break player in the NBA. With his size, strength and agility, no one in the league is better at scooping up boards and then going coast-to-coast. The Celtics, however, are far more deliberate in the half-court. Boston ranked dead last in pace this season, generating just 95.58 possessions per 48 minutes.

And while Antetokounmpo can create offense in the half-court, it’s his ability to run the floor that makes him special. The positive is that, with shooters all over the floor around him, Antetokounmpo would likely see his assists numbers climb.

2. Orlando Magic

This is one based on familiarity. The Magic named Spurs assistant Sean Sweeney as their next head coach after firing Jamahl Mosley. And Sweeney is intimately familiar with Antetokounmpo, after Sweeney spent four seasons in Milwaukee (from 2014-18) as an assistant coach, most of that under then-coach Jason Kidd.

Sweeney was credited with helping elevate Antetokounmpo as an offensive force and a perennial All-Star; Sweeney’s first season in Milwaukee was Antetokounmpo’s second in the NBA, and Antetokounmpo’s first two All-Star selections came in Sweeney’s final two seasons with the Bucks.

The Magic struggled at times to incorporate a cohesive offense with both Paolo Banchero and Franz Wagner, given that both often required to be on the ball to shine. By swapping one of them with Antetokounmpo, that should allow the remaining player to play a little more freely, given that Antetokounmpo has a very different skill set from both.

The big concern here, however, is shooting. Orlando struggled significantly from the perimeter, and Antetokounmpo only deepens that issue. Either way, if it is indeed the Magic, Sweeney will know exactly what to do with Antetokounmpo.

1. Miami Heat

This is a pair that would seemingly satisfy all parties, assuming Milwaukee does have an interest in Miami’s assets. For one, this is reportedly Antetokounmpo’s preferred destination. For another, Antetokounmpo’s agent, Alex Saratsis, is also Heat captain Bam Adebayo’s agent. Presumably, the two would be in lockstep for their vision about what the pairing could look like on the floor.

The Heat also embraced pace this season, leading the league in the stat, at 104.22 possessions per 48 minutes. Antetokounmpo would give Miami the premier downhill threat in the NBA to work with.

Heat coach Erik Spoelstra, one of the league’s top basketball minds, would suddenly be coaching his best player since he had LeBron James and Dwyane Wade in their primes. Miami, much like Orlando, would be suited to add a perimeter shooter or two to fill out the roster.

And Antetokounmpo, who reportedly wants to be on the East Coast (given its proximity to Greece) and in a city with a vibrant community, would seemingly have no issue signing an extension with the Heat.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Ranking Giannis Antetokounmpo landing spots amid trade rumors

In today’s Dub Hub:

• Michigan prospects Yaxel Lendeborg and Aday Mara headline latest Warriors mock draft roundup.
• NBC Sports Bay Area’s Dalton Johnson makes the Warriors to trade down for more picks in this year’s NBA Draft.
• Victor Wembanyama scores 32 points as Spurs beat the Knicks in Game 3 of the NBA Finals, 115-111.

The 2026 NBA Draft is just two weeks away, and the Golden State Warriors continue to explore their options with the No. 11 overall pick. As draft boards begin to crystallize, several prospects have emerged as popular selections for Golden State in recent mock drafts.

Here’s a roundup of who various draft experts believe the Warriors will take:

• The Athletic’s Sam Vecenie: Yaxel Lendeborg, Michigan, Forward
• SB Nation’s Ricky O’Donnell: Yaxel Lendeborg, Michigan, Forward
• The Associated Press’ Aaron Beard and Brian Mahoney: Yaxel Lendeborg, Michigan, Forward
• CBS Sports’ Adam Finkelstein: Aday Mara, Michigan, Center
• Yahoo Sports’ Kevin O Connor: Aday Mara, Michigan, Center
• ClutchPoints’ Brett Siegel: Cameron Carr, Baylor, Wing
• Bleacher Report’s Jonathan Wasserman: Karim Lopez, New Zealand, Forward
• Tankathon: Nate Ament, Tennessee, Forward

The most common names linked to the Warriors come from NCAA national champion Michigan, with both small forward Yaxel Lendeborg and center Aday Mara appearing in multiple mock drafts. Given the Warriors’ longstanding need for positional size and frontcourt depth, it’s not difficult to understand the appeal.

Lendeborg may be one of the older prospects in this draft class at 23 years old, but he could also be among the most NBA-ready. The 6-foot-9 versatile forward averaged 15.1 points, 6.8 rebounds, and 3.2 assists while helping lead Michigan to a national championship. With a reported 7-foot-3 wingspan, Lendeborg offers the size, athleticism, and defensive upside that could allow him to contribute immediately for the Warriors.

Meanwhile, Mara has emerged as one of the fastest-rising prospects in this year’s class. The 7-foot-3 center measured with a 9-foot-9 standing reach at the NBA Draft Combine, providing the type of size the Warriors have lacked for years now. Mara averaged 12.1 points, 6.8 rebounds, 2.6 blocks per game while shooting 66.8 percent from the field last season. While his length and rim protection already make him an intriguing option, one of Mara’s most underrated strengths is his passing ability. Mara averaged 2.4 assists per game with the Wolverines last season, showcasing a willingness to facilitate which should bode well for his potential fit within head coach Steve Kerr’s offense.

Regardless of who ultimately hears their name called by the Warriors on draft night, this postseason has only reinforced Golden State’s need for an injection of youth, size, and athleticism. Several prospects in this range could help address those concerns, but Lendeborg may be the one to watch most closely given his experience and ability to contribute from Day 1.

For more on this and other news around the NBA, here is our latest news round-up for Tuesday, June 9th:

Warriors News:

2026 NBA Mock Draft 3.0: Latest intel and updates for all 60 picks with 2 weeks until draft | ClutchPoints

Along with Carr and Mara, Burries, Hannes Steinbach, and Yaxel Lendeborg are other names commonly brought up as targets for the Warriors around the league. Ament and Flemings are among the two players Golden State would give serious consideration to if they fell out of the top 10. Speaking of Lendeborg, he has a scheduled upcoming workout for the Warriors, a source said. How he performs during this workout will greatly impact whether he is truly in play for the Dubs, as he has been a hard read as of late.

How Warriors can create their perfect path in first round of 2026 NBA Draft | NBC Sports Bay Area

It’s also why the Warriors should get greedy. The best path forward for the Warriors isn’t somehow moving up in the draft. The real best outcome would be leaving the first night of the draft with multiple first-round picks. 

So, what’s the easiest way for that idea to come true? There are two teams that have two first-round picks this year: The Oklahoma City Thunder and Charlotte Hornets. Let’s start with OKC.

Warriors players give advice to their younger selves

Dear future Draft pick … ✍️@cartainc || #DubsDraftpic.twitter.com/Wmtp2cE974

— Golden State Warriors (@warriors) June 9, 2026

NBA News:

Finals Film Study: Victor Wembanyama finds way to rim in Game 3 | NBA

In Game 3, Wembanyama set 35 ball-screens, the third-highest total in his 19 playoff games. Of the 35, 16 of them had two players on the weak side.

But late in the second quarter, right after the Knicks took their first lead of the game, the Spurs found something with two players on the strong side. Julian Champagnie was in the left corner, and Harper was in the left “dunker” spot (on the baseline, just outside the paint). That left Devin Vassell (deep in the right corner) as the lone Spurs player on the weak side as Wembanyama set a ball screen for De’Aaron Fox.

With Vassell so far away, the Knicks had nobody to tag Wembanyama as he rolled into the paint. Both Jordan Clarkson (Vassell) and Josh Hart (Harper) collapsed into the paint after Wembanyama caught the ball, but now the Knicks were a little scrambled.

Thunder GM Sam Presti fires back on free-throw narrative around Shai Gilgeous-Alexander

Sam Presti’s full 7 minute answer on the SGA free throw narrative. ⬇️

Must watch for OKC fans. Maybe even moreso for non-OKC fans. https://t.co/bzZTVjMu58pic.twitter.com/N8Bhwdz1et

— Brandon Rahbar (@BrandonRahbar) June 8, 2026

In case you missed it at Golden State of Mind:

How long can the Warriors reign as the most recent repeat champions last?

They lost the crown the next year against the Toronto Raptors. A year later, James returned to the finals and this time emerged victorious, now a member of the Los Angeles Lakers. Giannis Antetokounmpo, years before discontent with the Milwaukee Bucks would brew, hoisted the trophy in 2021, and then the Warriors snuck back in for a surprise revival in 2022. In 2023 it was the Denver Nuggets, and in 2024 the Boston Celtics.

Follow @unstoppablebaby on X for all the latest news on the Golden State Warriors.

The 2026 NBA Finals have reached a critical juncture based on past champions.

The San Antonio Spurs struck back and took Game 3 over the New York Knicks at Madison Square Garden after the Knicks won the first two games of the series in San Antonio. A pivotal Game 4 awaits in New York on Wednesday, June 10, with history suggesting the winner could have a big advantage in the pursuit of a title.

This is the 64th time in league history that the NBA Finals has featured one team winning two of the first three games, and there's been an inordinate amount of volatility in these situations in recent years. But there's still just one team ever to overcome a 3-1 series deficit in the NBA Finals.

With that in mind, USA TODAY Sports combed through the NBA record books to examine all the NBA Finals since they began in 1950 to determine any trends and patterns that have emerged when a team leads the series 2-1. Here's a look at five storylines that emerged:

NBA FINALS: League admits missed foul call on Wembanyama shoving Brunson in Game 3

1) Home teams have an advantage, but not as much lately

Home teams are 29-32 in Game 4 of the NBA Finals when the series sits at 2-1, while road teams have won eight of the last nine Game 4s of an NBA Finals where one team won two of the first three games.

Though the team that's leading the best-of-seven series 2-1 after Game 3 has gone on to win the NBA Finals 49 of 63 times, the team trailing 2-1 after three games has won the NBA Finals three of the past four times it has occurred (2025, 2022, 2021).

2) The Knicks have been here before

The New York Knicks are more than 50 years removed from their last NBA championship, but that title in 1973 came under similar circumstances. The Knicks had a 2-1 series lead heading into Game 4 of the NBA Finals at Madison Square Garden and won, then captured their second NBA championship in four years in Game 5.

The Knicks also had a 2-1 series lead in 1970 when they beat the Los Angeles Lakers for the NBA title, though New York lost Game 4 on the road in that series. The Knicks trailed 2-1 in the series when they lost in the NBA Finals in 1994 and 1999.

3) Only 7 teams have pulled off what Spurs must to win NBA Finals

There are seven teams to successfully pull off what the San Antonio Spurs must do in the NBA Finals — overcome a 2-1 series deficit facing Game 4 on the road in the NBA Finals. Steph Curry and the Golden State Warriors did it twice during their recent championship run (2015 and 2022). Before that, LeBron James and the Miami Heat won the 2013 NBA championship over the Spurs in that fashion.

The 1984 Boston Celtics with Larry Bird, the 1978 Washington Bullets and Bill Russell's 1957 and 1962 Celtics' teams also won championships facing the scenario the Spurs are now dealing with entering Game 4 of the 2026 NBA Finals.

None of those teams, however, lost the first two games of the NBA Finals at home like San Antonio this year.

4) Could Wemby emulate Bill Russell's early NBA Finals loss?

Russell faced a 2-1 series deficit in his first two NBA Finals appearances and four times overall during his remarkable run with the Boston Celtics in which he won the NBA championship 11 times in 13 years.

He had a 3-1 record in those respective Game 4s, with the lone loss coming in 1958 when the Celtics lost the NBA Finals to the St. Louis Hawks. During Russell's rookie season the year before, he and the Celtics overcame a 2-1 NBA Finals deficit by winning Game 4 on the road against the Hawks.

5) LeBron James and 2016 Cleveland Cavaliers stand apart

A team that's leading the NBA Finals by a 2-1 series advantage and and then wins Game 4 has only failed to win a championship once. In 2016, Lebron James and the Cleveland Cavaliers became the first (and only) team to overcome a 3-1 series deficit in the NBA Finals when they defeated the Golden State Warriors for the title. The Warriors won Game 4 on the road that year.

Michael Jordan and the Chicago Bulls had a 2-1 series lead in five of their six NBA Finals appearances and went 3-2 in Game 4 in those situations. They, of course, never lost an NBA Finals series.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Knicks should be wary of 2-1 NBA Finals lead given recent history

The Knicks wouldn’t be here without Jalen Brunson.

But they just might be better with him off the court in this NBA Finals.

The Knicks have been outscored by 13 points in 110 minutes with Brunson on the floor through three games against the Spurs, a jarring development for a team built around its star point guard’s playmaking.

Brunson is still putting up plenty of volume, but he’s struggled against a tough San Antonio defense with a stable of athletic guards and wings to throw at him. 

Heading into Game 4, Brunson is shooting just 37 percent overall and 31.8 percent from 3-point land. 

Turnovers have been an issue as well, with Brunson giving the ball up at least four times in all three games. 

Outside of his 27.3 points per game, Brunson’s impact on the offensive end has been limited, having dished out just 13 total assists thus far in the Finals. 

Brunson’s defense, which has never been a strength of his game, has been a problem as well. 

His 110.8 defense rating is the third-worst among players with at least 15 minutes per game played in this series. 

The Knicks’ thrilling Game 2 win overshadowed what was a rough performance from Brunson, who was a minus-10 while shooting just 7-for-25 from the field with 20 points. 

He was a Knicks starter worst minus-9 in Monday’s Game 3 loss with 32 points on 11-of-25 shooting. 

Brunson admitted after the game that the Knicks’ offense could be better, especially down the stretch. 

“I liked some of the looks, but I also think we were pretty stagnant. There’s definitely things that we can learn from,” Brunson said of the fourth quarter.

“Especially with our approach when we start the game and with the way we start the half, I don’t think we did well and I don’t think I did well either.”

After a third straight physical game to begin the NBA Finals, Knicks guard Jose Alvarado has issued a warning after Spurs star Victor Wembanyama got away with a bit of nastiness on Jalen Brunson early in Game 3.

In the first quarter, San Antonio’s center gave a shove to the back of Brunson’s head as the guard jockeyed for position at the high post, sending him to the ground.

Brunson took exception to the uncalled one-armed shove and addressed it with Wembanyama, jabbing his finger at the Frenchman during the possession.

On Tuesday, Alvarado issued a warning to the Spurs.

“I think that’s not basketball,” Alvarado said Tuesday, via The New York Post. “That’s something that they gotta look at. But he got away with one. 

“That’ll be the last one.”

After the Spurs grabbed a 115-111 win that saw Knicks head coach Mike Brown decry a free-throw discrepancy, Brunson said San Antonio’s level of physicality on the night didn’t bother him, and on the play in question, said, “Whatever you saw is what you saw.”

Monty McCutchen, the NBA’s Senior Vice President and Head of Development and Training for Referee Operations, said Tuesday the play should have been whistled for a foul.

"Well, most certainly I think we can all agree that a foul was missed on that play," McCutchen said on ESPN's "NBA Today." "A big part of our job is on-ball, off-ball exchanges between referees. We did a poor job of that here, where we've got two people on ball, and we don't see the screening action… And if we break down in our fundamentals in even the smallest amounts, we have the opportunity to miss a clear foul as we missed here."

The NBA has yet to announce whether Wembanyama will receive a retroactive flagrant foul for the action on Brunson. If the league does upgrade the foul, Wembanyama would be one flagrant foul away from an automatic one-game suspension, after he was issued a Flagrant-2 foul and ejected for elbowing Minnesota’s Naz Reid earlier in the postseason.

Spurs guard De'Aaron Fox said everybody knows playoff basketball will be physical, and nobody expects to “not have bumps and bruises” in his defense of his teammate.

“If you get hit, you hit back. That's life,” Fox said Tuesday. “If life hits you, you need to figure out a way to get on your feet and hit it back.

Every time he rolls, he gets tagged, he gets hit. If he's trying to go set a screen, box out, whatever it may be, he's getting grabbed, he's getting held. It would be crazy for him to think he's going to get open by not hitting somebody.”

Fox added: “You know that team's going to be physical with you, so you go out there and you try to hit first.”

Stacey King’s family has broken its silence after the NBA champion and beloved broadcaster’s unexpected death.

King’s sons, Erick, Garrett and Brandon, issued an emotional statement through the Bulls on Tuesday, thanking fans for the outpouring of support and remembering their father as more than the larger-than-life personality Chicago came to know.

King died Sunday at age 59.

A cause of death has not been disclosed.

ESPN Chicago’s David Kaplan said King died after a fall at his home. Medical examiners said King was found at his River Forest, Ill., home and that a head autopsy was needed to confirm the cause of death, ABC7 Chicago reported.

King’s sons said many knew him as a champion, broadcaster and “larger-than-life personality,” but they knew him as an “even greater father, friend, and man.”

The family also shared one of its favorite memories of King’s ability to connect with people.

When fans would ask if he was a professional athlete, King would smile and say, “No, I’m just a tall black guy.”

His sons said that his sense of humor and warmth never left him.

The family said the messages, phone calls, prayers and stories they have received since King’s death have brought comfort.

The Bulls selected King with the No. 6 pick in the 1989 NBA Draft out of Oklahoma, and he became part of Chicago’s first three-peat alongside Michael Jordan from 1991-93. He played eight NBA seasons before retiring in 1997.

After his playing career, King became one of the most recognizable voices around the Bulls as a longtime television analyst, known for his energy, humor and signature calls.

Jordan said Monday that he was “deeply saddened” by King’s death, remembering their years together as teammates and King’s role in defining an era of Bulls basketball.

The Bulls also paid tribute to King after his death, with owner Jerry Reinsdorf remembering him as one of the unique personalities and “unmistakable voice” in the organization’s history.

King’s family thanked the Bulls organization and Bulls Nation for embracing him throughout his playing and broadcasting career, saying his connection with the city and fans meant the world to him.

“We love you, Dad,” the family added. “Your legacy will live on.”

I’ve never been much for horror films.

Sure, I’ve always been fascinated by the destabilizing and open-ended duality of The Shining (Stephen King owes Kubrick a debt for improving on the book, the ungrateful wretch), or the bizarro excesses of a young Peter Jackson’s Dead Alive, and though I have enjoyed the return of more psychological horror over the past decade, by-and-large it’s a genre I don’t engage with much.

Most perplexing to me is the popularity of horror films that rely on the jump scare. The jump scare is a time-honored convention at this point in the genre, but there’s a very fine line between using it as an intelligently startling punctuation, and having it function as the only real draw/form of stimulation.

Personally, I adjust to over-stimulation far too quickly for these kinds of films to be very effective. As a younger man, drinking began to lose the appeal once I needed to imbibe larger and larger quantities of alcohol, even as the effect lessened.

Now, in the relative sobriety of middle-age, I find that one or two drinks can really do the trick. The same feels true for the jump scare. Too many, and I begin to lose interest. I find an extended section of growing unease to be far more effective.

Why is probably why I spent most of my weekend dreading the thought of having to write about Game 3.

Unlike the previous series against the Thunder, there haven’t been any blowouts. Losing feels bad, but in a blowout at least it goes quickly. You lose your attachment to the game pretty quickly when you’re down 20+ in the fourth quarter. It almost seems like it hurts less, or at the very least, allows you to pull the chute earlier.

Each Finals game has felt like base-jumping into the Overlook Hotel. The endless seesawing of the score starts to play tricks on your mind. How many times have the Spurs had the lead? Have they actually ever really had the lead? I could have sworn they were up by 8. Or 10. Or 6. Wait…they’re tied??

The margin starts to feel as inflationary as our national currency (or gas prices), and everything seem relative. What even is a lead? Five points ahead is basically a tie at this point. It’s all a fugazi. It’s fairy dust. Even worse, the games were starting to give me a feeling that the only slasher franchise I’ve ever regularly engaged with gives me.

Anytime something important needed to happen, the Knicks seemed to hit any and every shot in spite of the odds.

A long-distance prayer at the end of the shot clock?

They’re going to make it.

The perfect pass out of a near-perfect defensive rotation?

They’re gonna find it.

A critical rebound that mutiple Spurs are in position for, and have hands on?

They’re gonna come down with it.

It was starting to feel like the Spurs, no matter how vigilant, how disciplined, how aware, were being thwarted by fate itself. Like they were driving behind a log truck that was about randomly lose its load and annihilate everything behind it, and I was constantly in a state of having a premonition about it, only for something just as bad (or worse) to happen instead.

And in the second quarter of Game 3, the Final Destination vibes started to kick in again.

The Spurs were amazing for the first ten-or-so minutes of the 1st quarter, before the Knicks caught back up with the highest-scoring quarter of the series for either team.

New York hit 6 of their 13 threes in that quarter. They went 13/16 from the field as a whole. Everything was going in. Perfectly contested shots. Leaning shots off one leg. Shots majestically arcing over Wemby’s Lovecraftian reach. (Brunson in particular seems to have mastered this) Shots with seemingly no arc at all.

They went 8 for 8 from the free-throw line, and they didn’t even seem to need it.

The Spurs had been up by 12 at the start of the 2nd. Now they were down by 7 going into the half. Intellectually I knew that 7 points wasn’t much, but I was starting to feel like the Spurs were up against something supernatural.

Had James Dolan finally given in and sold his soul to dark forces? Was Adam Silver the demiurge? Were the current Knicks being possessed by the ghosts of Willis Reed, and Dick Barnett, and Dave DeBusschere?

Were the Spurs strapped to an out-of-control roller-coaster, or was it all in my head?

And so it continued. The Spurs would claw out a lead. The Knicks would then make impossible plays and shots and/or the Spurs would slip up in unusual ways. And even though they only ended up with eight turnovers, it felt like every pass from San Antonio was either reckless or hazarded by their opponents, to the point that I thought it might be giving me heart palpitations or angina.

If this had been a bog-standard slasher film, I’d have adjusted to it by then, but as in the case of Final Destination, it was the sheer improbability and unpredictability (or false certainty) that was keeping my blood pumping.

I was either standing or pacing for most of the fourth quarter, my daughter tucked in on the couch, a serene and innocently slumbering opposite. I couldn’t carry her to her room in the middle of that madness! Who knows what might have happened?!

I had honored my contractual agreement for pre-bedtime cuddles. What my daughter had failed to grasp was the nature of the contract I had signed in watching this potentially paranormal snuff film of my favorite team’s hopes and dreams on the apparently haunted hardwood of Madison Square Garden!!

(Who says dramatic monologuing isn’t the spice of life?)

And the Spurs clawed out one final lead. They were about to be up double digits.

And then the Knicks successfully challenged the foul, with Keldon Johnson found to be the real culprit like some awful Scooby Doo reveal, which wiped out Wemby’s make and the free-throw.

And the Brunson hit a shot. And then Anunoby. And the valiant De’Aaron Fox answered, but Brunson continued to close the gap.

An alley-oop to Victor, but it didn’t seem to matter. The fix was in, and it felt malevolently Calvinistic. The Knicks were the Elect. Everything was predetermined. We’d seen this movie before. At least twice. And I was definitely not crashing out in a pseudo-theological way at all.

And then Castle hit a three.

And it wasn’t just a three. It was an end-of-the-shot-clock plea for intercession. A life exchange momentarily shifting someone else’s name onto Basketball Death’s list in place of your own. The resuscitation of an NBA team that was flat-lining. A tiny miracle of the sort that had been evading the Spurs all series.

And you could tell the invigoration was real, because no one hung their head or checked out when OG Anunoby ended up at the free-throw line. Or when Jalen Brunson benefited from one last gasp of ludicrous magic by hitting a step-back three to cut the lead to three points.

And then Fox, the 2023 NBA Clutch Player of the Year, who’s had to pick his spots for most of the series, picked the last perfect spot of the night, with a mid-range jumper right over the formidably-defending Anunoby, and the light at the end of the tunnel was there. The edge of the maze. The weirdly rampant zombie-killing lawn mower.

And a pair of free-throws from Castle iced the game, like it was Jack Torrance out of doors in a Rocky Mountain snowstorm.

And I was relieved, which feels like the wrong word, because I wasn’t sure what to write. But also the right word, because I really had to pee.

The ending of the film version of the shining is ambiguous. We don’t actually know what happened to Jack, or who/what he even is. The Final Destination films are heading into their seventh installment, with no more hint of clarity or cessation than in the films before.

The Spurs still have to play Game 4. They’ll still be at The Garden. There’s no way of knowing if this was a respite, or a turning point. Anticipation is its own kind of psychological horror.

But for one night, the Spurs disrupted the conspiratorial delusions of at least one Spurs fan.

I don’t know what tomorrow will bring. I don’t know if they’ve broken the cycle. But I know that I can’t stop watching.

I can’t help it. It’s the best show around.

Takeways

• For most of the postseason, the Spurs have actually shot a little above (79.5%) their season average (78.7%) at the free throw line, but they shot 75% during the first two games, and it cost them. Shooting closer to their average last night (78%) was almost certainly a deciding factor when the margin is so thing, so let’s hope they continue to trend upwards in the respect. People always talk about championships being won in the margins to the point of eliciting the occasional eye roll, but that’s how much a 3% difference can matter. Maybe Mitch Johnson should set up a practice where players shoot free-throws while Sean Sweeney stands next to them doing his best Chucky Doll impression? I’ve got all kinds of ideas, if only they’d ask me.
• The Spurs also managed to finally knock down their threes to the tune of something close to their season average (35%). Variance is a beast that both teams are falling victim to in that arena, but the Spurs shot 30% from three over those first two games, and the law of averages has somewhat avenged them. Thankfully, the Knicks are finally sinking back down to just below their regular season average (with some Spursy assistance, of course) after going on a very extended hot streak over multiple rounds, but the Spurs aren’t going to win the day in MSG again if they get a repeat of those first two performances, so light your payer candles before the game, because I get the feeling they’re going to have to weather a fierce response.
• Keldon Johnson looked a little bit better after a pair of games that had me questioning how he could be effectively used in this series. But by limiting his usage, and picking his spots more like De’Aaron Fox, he ended the game with the team-high plus minus and has pulled himself out of the depths of a negative net rating. However, as much as I like the more discerning approach, I get the feeling that the Spurs are going to need *at least* one big game out of Keldon in order to bring home the trophy, so he still needs to keep his eye out for opportunities while biding his time more efficiently. Both of the previous series have featured at least one game with Keldon on a heater. Does he have one more in him against a team that has clearly prepared for thwarting him? I guess we’ll see.
• Carter Bryant hit a three! It’s his first of the series, and we like to celebrate the little victories as well here at PTR. Naturally we all expect him to instantly morph into Steph Curry and change the complexion of the series. That seems fair. Maybe I can go out and buy one of those wishing willows from Obsession. I’m sure that won’t backfire at all. It’s not like it’s a Monkey’s Paw.

Playing You Out – The Theme Song of the Evening:

The Killing Moon by Echo and the Bunnyman

President Donald Trump was booed, loudly and at length, when he appeared on the Jumbotron during the national anthem before Game 3 of the NBA Finals at Madison Square Garden Monday night.

The arena had been chanting “U-S-A! U-S-A!” as Avery Wilson began to sing The Star Spangled Banner. The Trump’s face appeared on the screen for the first time since he had entered the arena, saluting the flag and the arena erupted in boos.

While the booing was clear on the ABC broadcast, people inside the arena also posted videos capturing the booing.

The Athletic's Esfandiar Baraheni recorded the moment it turned.

Trump booed very loudly here at MSG pic.twitter.com/IeQwwqGtop

— Esfandiar Baraheni (@JustEsBaraheni) June 9, 2026

The White House press pool put it plainly: “loud and long.” The crowd didn’t let up until the camera moved and found Knicks star Jalen Brunson.

New York Post editor Mark Hale caught the booing from a side angle.

President Trump booed during National Anthem of NBA Finals Game 3 pic.twitter.com/bimQuNGgIX

— New York Post (@nypost) June 9, 2026

WFAN host Evan Roberts also caught the reaction to the president from his seats.

pic.twitter.com/YYKb63OGhm

— Evan Roberts (@EvanRobertsWFAN) June 9, 2026

Fans caught the booing as well.

Trump booed in NYC pic.twitter.com/vQFnDJhIWk

— SNEAKO (@sneako) June 9, 2026

One reporter said the booing for Trump was worse than the boos for the San Antonio Spurs.

They showed Trump on the Jumbotron during the anthem. He got more boos than the Spurs. pic.twitter.com/nYq69hGPiS

— Albert Samaha (@AlbertSamaha) June 9, 2026

Even outside the arena, Trump was booed. The watch party at Bryant Park was loud too.

Crowd at Bryant Park watch party also booed President Trump. pic.twitter.com/aV3bTxqbRa

— New York Post Sports (@nypostsports) June 9, 2026

Trump wasn’t rattled, at least not publicly. Boarding Air Force One after the game, the president told reporters, “I think it was mostly cheers. It was loud. And it was enthusiastic.”

He attended as the guest of Knicks owner James Dolan and became the first sitting president to attend an NBA Finals game. The Knicks lost 115-111. They lead the series 2-1. Game 4 is on Wednesday at MSG, ESPN reported that Trump will not attend.

Joining Trump in the suite were White House Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino, EP Administrator Lee Zeldin, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and Trump's granddaughter, Kai Trump. Also in the suite was Envoy Steve Witkoff, Director of White House Oval Office operations Walt Nauta, longtime Trump adviser Boris Epshteyn, and executive assistant to the president Natalie Harp.

CNN reported that his son-in-law Jared Kuschner was also in the suite.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Donald Trump booed at NBA Finals in Game 3 at Madison Square Garden

Madison Square Garden waited 26 years to host an NBA Finals game, but the home fans saw a loss on Monday night when the San Antonio Spurs beat the Knicks in Game 3 to trim New York’s series lead to 2-1. After the game, there were multiple reports of Knicks fans physically attacking Spurs fans on the streets. The viral videos of the assaults are so ugly that Victor Wembanyama, Karl-Anthony Towns, and others players pleaded with fans to stop the violence.

In separate incidents, Knicks fans jumped men wearing Spurs jerseys around the city after the loss. The videos are horrifying. This is totally unaccepted behavior from some stupid, young members of the fanbase. No should should be assaulted just because they are wearing another team’s jersey.

The videos elicited a response from star players on both teams. Here’s Wembanyama’s comments on the incidents, via ESPN:

“My thoughts of course [are] that we can’t forget it’s a game,” Wembanyama said. “We’re just playing a game out there. I am all for passion, but [with] the respect of each other. It’s unacceptable.”

Spurs teammate Julian Champagnie added: “I feel like, for the fans, it should never be that serious where you have to jump people, beat people up, follow people home. Whether we win, they win, it doesn’t really matter. Everybody should be able to come and enjoy the game, no matter who they’re rooting for.”

Towns encouraged fans to “Leave the physicality to everyone on the court.”

Warning: The video below contains violence that readers may find disturbing.

New angle: Knicks fans claim wearing a Spurs jersey in NYC is considered disrespectful 👀😳💥 https://t.co/ix0vhGAkpupic.twitter.com/91GzvxZPw8

— Rain Drops Media (@Raindropsmedia1) June 9, 2026

🚨INSANITY🚨

SPURS FAN gets ASSAULTED by a rabid mob of New York Nicks fans

Police is nowhere to be found… pic.twitter.com/p57KAD8vln

— PartiKing (@parti_king) June 9, 2026

View from a balcony pic.twitter.com/5yz3MfrqP1

— King_Mach (@KingMach) June 9, 2026

Spurs fans standing behind the police in New York to stay away from the angry Knicks fans. 😳

(via @Raindropsmedia1)

pic.twitter.com/BdCJQsjOco

— Hoop Central (@TheHoopCentral) June 9, 2026

Obviously this is not all Knicks fans, but a few bad apples are the giving the fanbase a bad reputation. This type of behavior is never acceptable.

Game 4 is Wednesday. Let’s hope this doesn’t happen again.

GlobePayton Pritchard says people took Jaylen Brown’s ‘favorite year’ comments the wrong way

NBA Insider hasn’t heard ‘one iota’ about Jaylen Brown being available for trade

The Spurs figured out some things in Game 3, and showed that the NBA Finals are far from over

Victor Wembanyama carries Spurs to win that cuts Knicks’ NBA Finals lead to 2-1

At the NBA Finals, potential top pick AJ Dybantsa sees a chance to have quick success like the Spurs

CelticsBlogHow would you feel about the Celtics mostly running it back? (Topic Tuesday)

Windhorst: ‘I have not heard that Boston is on Giannis’ list’

Report: Nikola Vucevic not expected to return to the Celtics

CLNS MediaSam Amick Gives Update on Jaylen Brown and Giannis Antetokounmpo Trade Talks

NESN Celtics Star Defends Jaylen Brown’s Controversial ‘Favorite Year’ Comments

Mass LiveNBA insider adds new wrinkle to Giannis Antetokounmpo to Celtics trade rumors

Future of Celtics trade addition becoming clear as free agency nears

Celtics WireJoe Mazzulla makes next stop on Celtics world tour in Portugal

What is the latest on the Jaylen Brown – Giannis trade rumors?

Boston Celtics 2026 NBA Draft interviewee Jaron Pierre Jr. 2025-26 NCAA highlights

Maria Harper on her sons Ron Jr., Dylan fitting into NBA

Celtics 2026 NBA Draft interviewee Kashie Natt 2025-26 NCAA highlights

Ron Harper Jr. college coach on potential with Celtics, in NBA

Celtics history: Robert Parish, Kevin McHale trade; Bird, Ainge drafts

Do the Celtics need to make a big move on the 2026 NBA offseason?

Payton Pritchard says Jaylen Brown comments on Twitch taken wrong way

Should the Celtics want to be in the Giannis trade business?

Dylan Harper on his, his brother Ron Jr. rise with Spurs, Celtics

Celtics short-timer big man Stacey King passes

Hardwood HoudiniCeltics shouldn’t overreact to the Victor Wembanyama hype train

The NBA Finals are showing that the Celtics don’t have a talent problem

Al Horford makes too much sense as Celtics’ Nikola Vucevic replacement

Nikola Vucevic’s time with Celtics was as brief as it was hapless

Celtics have officially lost the Nikola Vucevic trade ahead of free agency

Major roadblock standing in the way of Kristaps Porzingis reunion in Boston

Chowder and Champions Celtics’ latest draft workout could help fix their backcourt problems

CLNS Media/YouTubeSpurs vs Knicks Game 3 Reaction: Celtics Not That Far Off? | Garden Report on CLNS

Can the Celtics CONTEND with this roster?🏆 #celtics #nba

Sam Amick Gives UPDATE on Jaylen Brown and Giannis Antetokounmpo Trade Talks

Charlie Villanueva on Mentoring Jordan Walsh Through Celtics Rise | Exclusive Interview

Luke Kornet Calls Out Derrick White for ‘Hostile Act’ in Celtics vs Spurs | NBA Finals

Locked on Celtics Is Home Court Advantage DEAD? | Jaylen Brown Rumors SHOT DOWN

Basketball Network“Today, the sports have changed completely” – Jerry West on why Bill Russell’s GOAT case got overlooked

“We were like Uncle Toms” – Cedric Maxwell on the hardships of being a Black player on the Boston Celtics in the 80s

FansidedNBA Rumors: Blazers willing to risk it all for Giannis and the Jaylen Brown fantasy

Behind the Buck PassCeltics’ massive edge in Giannis trade talks comes from Brad Stevens

The LeadThe Celtics’ Championship Window Isn’t Closing Anytime Soon

The Sporting News Jaylen Brown jokes about $400 million reason to leave Celtics

Robb ReportJaylen Brown’s Boston Home in Photos

Duke Basketball ReportJayson Tatum Gets A Dubious Honor

WEEI/YouTubeBrian Scalabrine joins the show | Rich & Ken with Ted Johnson

HeavyLakers Reportedly Interested In Free Agent Center Nikola Vucevic

Celtics’ Payton Pritchard Comes to Jaylen Brown’s Defense After Livestream Backlash

Celtics Blockbuster Trade Idea Lands 12-Time All-Star for Jaylen Brown

Clutch PointsCeltics’ Jaylen Brown grabs attention with cryptic Chinese post

All U Can HeatJaylen Brown could suddenly ruin everything for the Heat

Piston PoweredCeltics could be gift wrapping the Pistons an upgrade they can’t ignore

For the WinWhy a Jaylen Brown trade rumor for Giannis Antetokounmpo has NBA insiders completely divided

SI .com Nikola Vucevic Could Leave Celtics, Join Raptors

NBA Insider Shuts Down Jaylen Brown, Giannis Antetokounmpo Trade Rumors

Audacy What do you believe the Celtics need, roster wise, to get back to the Finals? Did people ‘overlook’ the Knicks chemistry/talent?

Fan Recap Blazers Offer Could Force Celtics To Move Jaylen Brown

Celtics RoundtableHow Far Are Boston Celtics From Being True Contender?

Why Are Some People So Down on Boston Celtics?

Hoops Rumors Atlantic Rumors: Vucevic, Shamet, Nets, Murray-Boyles

The San Antonio Spurs have officially made the 2026 NBA Finals a series after taking Game 3 on the road in Madison Square Garden. However, their victory may have come at a heavy cost. After reviewing a first quarter shove of New York's Jalen Brunson by Victor Wembanyama, the league's head of officiating, Monty McCutchen, has admitted they missed a foul call on the play. Even worse for San Antonio is that it could turn into a retroactive flagrant.

NBA head of officiating Monty McCutchen, appearing now on ESPN, acknowledges that a foul was missed on Victor Wembanyama's first-quarter shove of Jalen Brunson and says the league's review is still ongoing regarding whether the play will be deemed a retroactive flagrant foul. https://t.co/W4wAe20h0F

— Marc Stein (@TheSteinLine) June 9, 2026

While there is no trouble just yet, Wembanyama has put himself in danger with this foul. Should the league upgrade it to a flagrant 1, Wembanyama would be subject to suspension if he were to commit another similar foul.

Wembanyama's absence from the Spurs would almost certainly mean defeat in the NBA Finals. Wembanyama cannot afford to play so recklessly for the remainder of the series.

Here's what to know about the foul and what it could mean for the Spurs.

What happened between Wembanyama and Brunson?

The play in question came in the first quarter of the Spurs' Game 3 win over New York. Brunson and Wembanyama got tangled up during a possession and video shows Wembanyama tossing Brunson to the ground during the play.

Brunson on Wemby shoving him in Game 3:

"Whatever you saw is what you saw." pic.twitter.com/BA8b1tTk5u

— ESPN (@espn) June 9, 2026

Will Wembanyama be suspended?

Not yet. In the NBA playoffs, players are allowed three penalty points before a suspension is enacted. Wembanyama has already obtained two penalty points for his Flagrant 2 foul against Naz Reid in Game 4 of the Western Conference semifinals.

Should the NBA determine that Wembanyama's shove warrants a Flagrant 1 distinction, Wembanyama would have three penalty points for the postseason, meaning one more flagrant foul (1 or 2) would lead to immediate suspension.

What determines a Flagrant 1 or 2 in the NBA?

Per NBA Rule 12, a Flagrant 2 is called when contact with an opposing player is determined to be "unecessary and excessive." A Flagrant 1 is called when the contact is only unecessary.

A Flagrant 2 is also grounds for an immediate ejection from the game and comes with a minimum $2,000 fine.

Seeing a lot of confusion right now about whether Victor Wembanyama will be suspended for Game 5, so here’s what NBA rules say might happen:

Wembanyama was ejected under NBA Rule 12 for a Flagrant Foul Penalty 2, which officials determined involved “unnecessary and excessive”… https://t.co/KVkHqAvDNWpic.twitter.com/0gPPAxWIOG

— SpursRΞPORTΞR (@SpursReporter) May 11, 2026

When is Game 4?

Game 4 of the 2026 NBA Finals is scheduled for Wednesday, June 10 at 8:30 p.m. ET from Madison Square Garden.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY Sports: NBA admits they missed a foul call on Victor Wembanyama in Game 3