Category: NBA

This week, I became friends with J.R. Wilco of Pounding the Rock. It’s a strange relationship. We enjoy each other’s banter, and he’s a thoroughly likable dude, yet at the same time, I want the thing I love to destroy the thing he loves—and vice versa. There’s probably a Marvel movie logline in there somewhere.

With Game One of the NBA Finals between our New York Knicks and Wilco’s San Antonio Spurs about to tip off, we two SB Nation site editors put our heads together for your entertainment. (Mostly our own, really, but if you dig it too, cool.)

J.R.

I don’t know about you, but I’m feeling strong 20th century vibes right now. As if I want to party like it’s 1999, or at least watch basketball like it. Twenty-seven years have passed since the Knicks and Spurs met in the Finals and here we are in the year that the NBA Finals validate the in-season NBA Cup Tournament. 

Ever since San Antonio eliminated Minnesota, I’ve been saying that New York scared me more than OKC. But during games 1, 2 & 7 against the Thunder, I was more tense than I’ve been for any game in over twenty years, so I don’t know that stack ranking teams by induced fear will accomplish much. Before the OKC series, people were saying how much both teams had developed since they last played, but the Knicks have undergone the same kind of improvement since SA and NY have met. Which makes me wonder, with all of these changes on both sides, how long a series do you expect?

R.R.

Pleased to meet you finally, J.R. I have three tickets to see Wilco this month, so when a message arrived from Wilco, I assumed Jeff Tweedy was checking on my choices for the setlist.

Funny story: My reason for picking the Knicks to win in five games is not rooted in basketball logic. A few months ago, my wife and sister-in-law asked about attending a Wilco show at Beak and Skiff (an excellent venue). With a date of June 16, a potential Knicks conflict didn’t register. Why? Because it’s been decades since the Knicks last played in June, and they weren’t exactly living up to expectations this season. I bought tickets. Child care was arranged. Now, I’m in a pickle: either the Knicks wrap this up in five, or I’ll need to fake an injury so I can watch Game Six. What’s the marital equivalent of an SGA flop?

But if you pinned me down, I’d predict: Impossible Four, Unlikely Five . . . Knicks in Six.

Your memories of the 1999 Finals must be fonder than mine. For one, I was inebriated throughout the series, watching from a Belmar barstool while my soon-to-be (and eventually ex-) wife drowned me in whiskey. Suffice it to say, my recollection is blurry. For two, look at those box scores. Yikes! The Knicks scored 77 in Game One and 67 in Game Two. It’s crazy to remember that they averaged 86 points per game that season. Sure, that was nearly the lowest in the league, but the NBA was still a far cry from the point-paloozas of today. In 25 years, teams will average 150 and play exhibition games on Mars.

The current Spurs team has no trouble running up the scoreboard. And in the playoffs, they’ve looked more cohesive than the iteration New York beat in the NBA Cup. Even then, they were no pushovers; the Knicks had to rally in the fourth, winning the quarter 35–19. When the Thunder were favored in the WCF, I was skeptical. San Antonio proved me right. They’re truly the best in the West, and, truth be told, they’re a helluva lotta fun to watch.

I can’t wait for these two teams to lock horns. I’m here for all of your questions, although brilliant answers are not guaranteed (many brain cells died before this blogger sobered up). I’m curious to know what you think is different between the Spurs of this moment versus the team that NY beat in the Emirates Cup game. I have assumptions (a young team coming to understand each other’s rhythms and style after playing more games together, for instance) but you’ve watched them more than I.

J.R.

The changes the Spurs have undergone since the Knicks beat them on December 16 is a fun topic because some started soon after, and some have just been completed in overcoming Oklahoma City. 

The first transition was in the team’s approach on offense. Early in the season, the offense ran through Victor, and opponents were selling out to stop him at all costs. Sometimes this would work  (the early-season games against Phoenix are great examples) and San Antonio’s offense simply cratered. Even in the games they won, the Spurs would go through extremely long offensive droughts. This continued until the all star break after which Wemby suddenly showed that he’d learned that he didn’t have to be the center of the offense for the team to win. 

Suddenly, instead of calling for the ball while 20 feet from the basket, going on-on-one, and driving into loads of help defense and turning the ball over (which he’d done a lot of last season), he would set screens and roll while the defense stretched to keep him from the rim, which opened up all kinds of opportunities for the Spurs shooters and drivers to exploit. That’s the environment in which Wemby would then attack, and defenses have a hard time defending so many threats and that explains the run they went on from February through the end of the season. 

Then the postseason came, which taught the coaching staff and the team to deal with situational threats that are rarely seen during the regular season. The OKC series was an advanced education in developing new offensive strategies on the fly, and if they hadn’t passed that test we wouldn’t be talking right now. 

So that’s what’s changed since we met. There was the final meeting of the year in that stretch, which New York won, and it’s apparent that the Knicks are a different beast from any of the previous Spurs opponents because of how they handled SA during the 20+ game stretch in which their only loss was to the Knickerbockers. Then as if that weren’t enough, they unlocked KAT’s point center module and started tearing through teams. San Antonio made it past the defending champs largely through size and physicality, but New York has shooting AND length. They have size at the wing that can dwarf the Spurs, and they’re on a win streak longer than the Thunder’s 8-0 run to start the playoffs. 

All that to say, I haven’t seen enough of the Knicks’ recent games to have anything close to a good foundation to make an educated guess from. So I have some questions that would help me get ready for the series; some about basketball, some about the fanbase, and some about you: Has point KAT been that big a deal? In other words, was placing the ball in his hands the move that facilitated the 9-0 win streak? How much point KAT have they been using?

R.R.

Indeed, like the Spurs, New York has improved since December—and not just by dumping Guerschon Yabusele. It took a while to get cooking, though.

Wemby suddenly showed that he’d learned he didn’t have to be the center of the offense for the team to win.

You could say the same about Jalen Brunson.

Throughout the season, many complained that Mike Brown should play Brunson off the ball more often, for multiple reasons. It saves his legs, and it diversifies the offense. But the Knicks kept drilling the same formula repeatedly.

Through two seasons, the Towns-Brunson pairing was never as successful as it could have been. Countless games started stale and didn’t improve until the reserves came in to mix up the lineup. Usually, KAT would flourish while Jalen rested in the second quarter, and he’d get some buckets in the third, letting Jalen take center stage in the fourth.

Here’s another gripe: For whatever reason (either by his choice or the coach’s) KAT doesn’t post up. It didn’t happen under Thibs, either, so you can draw your own conclusions. We came to accept it, but it drove some of the fanbase nuts.

Anyway, the first three games of the playoffs followed the same script they tried all season. And after falling behind 1-2 to the clearly less-talented Hawks (losing each game by one point), many fans wondered if our hopes had been too high.

Then, a change. Point-KAT was unleashed; the team started playing faster, exploiting more fast-break opportunities; the scoring load was shared across all five starters (plus one sharpshooting Shamet); and their defense has bordered on criminally abusive. They unlocked an unprecedented level of beautiful basketball during their 11-game winning streak—and their historic numbers back it up.

Some specific changes we’ve seen is Mikal Bridges bringing the ball up the court more often, and Hart taking off on a sprint if he’s hauled in a rebound. That means a good defender has to chase Jalen around away from the ball, while the other four starters go to work—and each can shoot or attack the rim.

Karl is an exceptional passer. As the hub, he can thread a pass to a cutter, zip it out to a corner (and from there it swings until an open shooter is found), rise up for a high-percentage shot, or put his shoulder down and drive to the cup.

So the Knicks unlocked basketball nirvana by relying less on Brunson as the primary ball handler, rocketing defensive rebounds down the court for fast-paced buckets, and letting KAT operate as a hub. Just as the Spurs learned to rely less on Wemby, the Knicks did the same with Jalen. And, lo and behold, both players became even more valuable to their teams.

A few Q’s for you. Where do you think the Spurs will most surprise the Knicks? What vulnerabilities worry you the most? (You mentioned size, but most of your key guys are 6’5” and up—and Wemby is a friggin’ tree.)

J.R.

When the NBA Cup final was over, who could have expected that both teams would be in the Finals because their centers started initiating their offense as 7-foot point guards? Well it’s happened. I know that KAT has spent far more time in that role, but Point Wemby made a significant contribution at the beginning of Game 7 in OKC and it helped the Spurs build their first lead. So I’m wondering how much of that we’ll see in the Finals, and I’m enjoying with anticipation the media losing their minds over a series in which centers are leading their teams in assists. With how much of a copycat league this is, it would be interesting to see how far the idea can go. 

As to how the Spurs will surprise the Knicks, I think it has to be with Dylan Harper. The rookie has played well all year, but there’s nothing about his play in the playoffs that looks the slightest bit like it’s his first season in the league. Of all the changes the Spurs have made since they’ve played NY, Harper’s emergence has to be the one that I think will have the biggest effect on the Finals because he’s like no one else at his age in ages, literally. When his numbers aren’t matching Magic Johnson’s rookie playoff stats, they’re setting rookie postseason records. If he hadn’t gotten an adductor injury during the WCF, there’s no way he’d be able to surprise anyone because I believe that it would have been a shorter series, and he’d have been one of the major Spurs stories heading into the Finals. Even with the 3-4 subpar games from Dylan as he recovered his health, you can make a strong case that San Antonio doesn’t eliminate OKC without him. 

On the vulnerabilities front, it’s all about New York’s size for me. You’re right that the Spurs have big guards, but their forwards are undersized against most teams in the league. Against Anunoby and Robinson, they’re almost tiny. Also, San Antonio likes to guard opposing centers with a guard or a wing, so that Wemby can roam the paint and play Gandalf (You shall not pass!) If they do that in the Finals then that’s another matchup the Spurs are small in, which could create rebounding problems and a bevy of other issues, crossmatching, etc. 

Ok, my questions for you: Who did you want to advance between the Thunder and the Spurs and why? And are you concerned about one of the consistent issues over the past few postseasons: rest-induced rust for the team that ended its series early?

R.R.

Cooper Flagg deserves his flowers, but Harper deserved more votes for Rookie of the Year. His skills and poise in the biggest moments have impressed us at P&T. Wemby, Castle, and Harper: three excellent drafts for you, my friend!

Upon examining the strengths and weaknesses of both Western Conference finalists, I argued that the Knicks should want to face the Spurs. Not the greatest take, in hindsight. I assumed that San Antonio’s youth and mounting fatigue after a grueling three rounds would make them less formidable than the defending champion Thunder. Furthermore, many of these young Spurs had never played so many games without a break, counting both the regular season and the postseason. After watching them lay out OKC on the road in a closeout game, I should probably surrender my sportswriting license.

Now I’m a little worried that the Knicks have had too much time off. It wouldn’t astonish me if New York loses Game One. They’ve played just eight games in the past month, and while that absolutely keeps them fresh, allows for injury recovery, etc., I wonder how they can maintain their game conditioning. Playing 40+ minutes of NBA basketball is different from 40 minutes on a stationary bike. You’ll recall that they were pretty rusty early in Game One against Cleveland after nine days’ rest. They fell behind by 22 points before their amazing, miraculous, one-for-the-ages comeback to win in overtime.

Excuse me while watch that fourth quarter and overtime again.

Phew, I’m back. Needed a shower after that. . . . Yeah, so, this break between Game Seven and the Finals might actually be the perfect length for San Antonio—long enough to get healthy and prepare for its opponent, short enough not to lose momentum—while eight days off might not be ideal for New York.

Question for you: Has there been any word on De’Aaron Fox’s high-ankle sprain? He seemed really limited in the Thunder series, but I’d imagine he’s getting better all the time (forgive the obligatory Beatles reference). How do you feel when Castle plays lead guard? I recall he had an 11-assist, 11-turnover double-double in Game One of the WCF.

J.R.

Your request for an Official Sportswriting License from the Guild of Legitimate Sportswriters was approved? Lucky! I guess I shouldn’t wonder; you live in New York state after all. Must be nice to cover the largest media market in the hemisphere. Meanwhile, we small market folk have to make do with the sportswriting licenses we find at the bottoms of a cereal boxes. But that didn’t stop me from getting mine laminated and displaying it proudly in my home office workstation right next to my typewriter, my dogeared copy of the AP Stylebook, and my horn-rimmed glasses with the old prescription that I only use to focus the sun to burn ants after the Spurs lose. 

As for the Knicks’ Game 1 comeback win, there is no shame in re-re-watching those recaps, particularly when you have so much time to wait before your team can generate new highlight reels. I’m only a couple days removed from Game 7, and I found myself going down the rabbit hole of one video after another and had to tear myself away when you messaged me to say it was my turn to write. That said, isn’t it interesting that both the Knicks and the Spurs had to endure overtime in the first game of their conference final series? Makes me wonder what other kinds of similarities there are to be uncovered over the next two and a half weeks.

In order to answer your question about any news concerning the condition of Fox’s ankle, I need to introduce you to the Spurs media landscape. This isn’t like the Big Apple where the media is strong enough to get a coach fired if they don’t get complete enough answers to their questions. In San Antonio, the tenure of the head coach doesn’t rely on anything except the good will of the owner, and that good will has essentially been granted to Gregg Popovich for life. (In case you don’t know, Popovich is still the president of basketball operations which means that he is the one in charge of hiring the general manager. In other words, Pop named his successor.) In this environment, we find out about the news concerning injuries at the same time that everyone else does: an hour and 15 minutes before tip off. So, no, there’s no additional word outside of our own speculation surrounding what kind of advanced treatment he’s receiving. (No need to apologize for Beatles references. I love the Fab Four.)

My feelings about Castle are not particularly complicated. Rookies aren’t known for being able to avoid turnovers, and Stephon is no exception. His exceptional qualities are so many and varied that I happily classify the turnovers as the price for entry. I remember hearing Steve Kerr, at the beginning of the Golden State dynasty, discuss the Warriors’ turnovers in terms that I’d never heard a coach use before. He said something to the effect that the team was at its best when the ball moved, and he would prefer that his players made mistakes while passing for advantage, as opposed to mistakes of passing omission. It sounded revolutionary at the time because Pop always considered turnovers an existential threat. Castle turns it over less frequently when Fox is out there to calm things down. The problem at the beginning of the Thunder series was Fox‘s absence which hopefully won’t happen again. 

For my next queries, I have to go back to the All-Star game for the set up. Wemby and KAT played together and Victor got quite upset about more than one of Towns’ … defensive choices. Much seemed to be made about Wemby’s body language with people interpreting it as him blaming KAT for the loss. This also seemed to play into a reputation for a certain lack of focus on defense in high leverage moments. 

So my questions are: is this reputation earned, what forms do his miscues take, and are you concerned about how he’ll handle the kind of complex and fluid defensive schemes that success in the Finals requires?

R.R.

Ah, yes, I heard tales of sportswriters sharing malteds with Gregg Popovich on a bench outside the Alamodome while watching tumbleweeds roll by. Meanwhile, in the metropolis, writers interviewed players in the Champagne Room at Scores (allegedly). Alas, everyone’s too brand-conscious for such extracurricular hijinks these days, or at least they don’t invite me along for the fun.

True confession: I loved Pop as a coach. He was a gruff, fundamentals-focused skipper like Thibs, who deserves credit for laying the foundation that made this Finals appearance possible. Pop always seemed both perfectly suited to San Antonio and an odd fit. He got far more rope than he would have in New York thanks to the small market and his winning record, yet he was also outspoken, unconcerned about offending the season-ticket-holder base. We saw one aspect of the man in front of the camera. The fact that former players like Tim Duncan are helping him recover from his stroke speaks volumes about his character (and theirs).

On the subject of injuries, the Knicks are notoriously tight-lipped as well. We may never know how Mitchell Robinson broke his finger. If Leon Rose & Co. hadn’t done such a tremendous job building the roster, they’d be pilloried for their silence. I believe Leon has sat for one interview in six years as president of basketball operations. Try getting away with that in any other city, or any other profession.

In my Game Two preview of the Eastern Conference Finals, I wrote something like, “Lord Silver must be smiling.” Early on, both conference finals looked destined to be epic when each began with an overtime thriller. Then the Cavs folded like laundry. While we were ecstatic that New York steamrolled the next three games, there wasn’t much drama to it.

The Finals should be a helluva show. I wouldn’t be surprised if both teams rip off a 15-point run every game, but a blowout either way feels unlikely–if the teams take turns, winning one, losing one, etc. My family and I live about three hours from the city, though my son in Brooklyn insists we’d be safer farther away during the Finals—maybe bunkered in an Airbnb in Buffalo. If the Knicks win, the fans might steal the Statue of Liberty. If they lose, City Hall could burn to the ground.

Regarding Castle’s turnovers: I’m too lazy to look it up, but Mike Brown recently explained why some turnovers are better than others. His logic shared the spirit of your Steve Kerr reference. Still, 11 giveaways is an Ooof. I hope Stephon will be as generous to the Knicks. You’re right, though; with Fox back, Castle will have fewer opportunities to cough up the rock.

Here’s the thing about Towns. Knicks fans have pulled out copious amounts of hair over two types of fouls: Karl’s occasional brain-fart foul and, worse, his hook-on-the-drive foul. His teammates didn’t care for them, either. You could see the blood drain from their faces when he hooked his way into another offensive infraction and then argued that he was the victim.

During this 11-game winning streak, however, Karl has played with discipline. We pray it continues. If he gets into foul trouble early against the Spurs, New York will be in trouble. Why? Mitch hasn’t exactly wowed us this postseason and has claimed to be dealing with mental health issues. Add a broken finger and he’s a real wildcard. Ariel Hukporti is the team’s third-string center. If you haven’t heard of him, there’s a reason for that.

Cleveland’s size neutralized Point-KAT early on in the conference finals. New York still won the battle in the paint, however, and pushed the pace to great effect. This series will be different, of course. We expect that Mitch Johnson will strategize to limit KAT, points in the paint will be hard won, and the Spurs will have springier legs than the Cavs, but we’re also sure that Mike Brown knows all this and will plan accordingly. The Knicks have so many offensive weapons, a stifled KAT just means that one of the other guys gets to eat.

I’m curious what similarities, and differences, you’ve seen between Johnson and Pop. And finally, what’s your pick for the series? Who wins, and in how many games?

J.R. 

The best description I have of Mitch Johnson is that he’s an updated version of Pop. There are so many similarities between them that it’s easier to describe the differences. Pop was famously against ever giving another team points. He lost a number of games over the years because he wouldn’t foul when up three, which allows the opponent to tie with a three and win in overtime. Johnson has ended my agony by handling end game strategy more to my liking. Also, San Antonio’s defense is far more modern than it was toward the end of Pop’s tenure. 

Before I make a prediction, I have to address the Jose Alvarado situation: SA’s coaches better have the guys trained up on his gambits so he can’t create extra possessions with his wonderful sneakiness. Also, there’s the fact that we haven’t yet discussed the player who’s guaranteed the championship ring this year, Jeremy Sochan. Just putting this here for the moment, so we remember to chop it up before the series is over. 

Now to the series: I like the Spurs in 6, but I could see them winning in 7 or 5 depending how things break. First, they have the rust/rest early advantage. Second, I don’t think the Knicks have had to face the same quality of opponents that the Spurs have had to overcome and the adjustment to the level of play might be worth something in a series. Third, if San Antonio can keep Wemby off KAT and near the basket, then his ability to lock down the paint throws a major wrench into New York’s offense. 

So there you have it; I hate making predictions and you got one out of me. Anyway, here’s to an entertaining series opener, and I’ll see you on the other side!

R.R.

May the best team win, and may The Extender remember that he has a grand riding on the Knicks!

Knicks guard Josh Hart’s wife, Shannon, wasn’t sure what was happening during a ride share while in San Antonio for the 2026 NBA Finals.

Taking to her Instagram Story Tuesday night, Shannon shared a video of a driver singing karaoke and said he wouldn’t operate the vehicle until he was done with the song.

“San Antonio is really about to piss me off because wtf is going on here ???” Shannon wrote. “And he won’t drive until he finishes the song.”

Shannon did not elaborate further on the bizarre situation.

Earlier that day, she showed some behind the scenes of her arrival in San Antonio, as the Spurs host the Knicks for Game 1 of the finals Wednesday night.

She shared a snapshot of a plane and another image riding in a bus with a police escort.

The Harts, who were high school sweethearts, tied the knot in August 2021. They share 3-year-old twin sons Hendrix Aaron and Haze Dana

The Knicks’ return to the NBA Finals has been quite the journey.

They have won 11 straight games — completing series sweeps of the Sixers and Cavaliers, respectively — en route to the Finals for the first time since 1999, when they lost in five games to the Spurs.

New York had eight days off, while San Antonio had three before the start of the NBA Finals.

The Spurs beat the defending-champion Oklahoma City Thunder 111-103 in Game 7 of the Western Conference finals on Saturday.

Stephan A. Smith says he deserves credit for the Knicks’ 11-game playoff win streak.

On ESPN’s “First Take” on Wednesday, Smith said he should get recognition for fueling the Knicks’ first appearance in the NBA Finals since 1999 by calling the team out during the playoffs.

“I deserve some credit, so I’m going to take it,” Smith said. “You know, when I called the Knicks out, I almost had a stroke on national television. They didn’t lose since. They’ve been 11-0.”

Smith called out the Knicks after a 109-108 loss to the Atlanta Hawks in Game 3 of the first round of the NBA playoffs.

“Let me tell y’all something right now. Change is coming to New York City. There’s going to be another head coach in New York City if they lose this series.” Smith said on “First Take” at the time. “Several players are going to be gone from New York City if y’all lose this game.”

Mikal Bridges did not score in the Game 3 loss, Josh Hart had only two points and the bench provided just 30 points.

The Knicks shot 40-of-93 (43%) from the field and 10-of-35 (29%) from behind the arc in the game.

“Bunch of sorry asses right now. I’m so sick of what I’m seeing right now. I’m losing my damn mind,” Smith said while continuing his rant for nearly five more minutes.

Since then, though, the Knicks have won 11 straight, including the sixth-largest playoff victory in NBA history in a 41-point Game 6 win over the Hawks.

Bridges has improved since Game 3 as well, averaging 14.6 points per game, 3.1 rebounds, and 2.5 assists in the playoffs.

Smith said Wednesday that the Knicks aren’t winning the Finals without him.

Despite more optimism from recent performances, Smith added a warning to the Knicks on Wednesday that the job is far from over.

“There’s a level of urgency that’s not just because it’s the NBA finals. The Spurs can kick your ass,” Smith said Wednesday. “You got to show up.”

Stephen A. Smith says he deserves credit for the Knicks’ NBA Finals run

“I deserve some credit, so I’m gonna take it. You know, when I called the Knicks out…They haven’t lost since.”

(h/t @TheNBABase ) pic.twitter.com/I5cZgok8cu

— NBACentral (@TheDunkCentral) June 3, 2026

The Knicks went 2-1 vs. San Antonio across three meetings during the regular season and the NBA Cup.

The Spurs are -185 favorites to win the NBA Finals, per DraftKings Sportsbook, and are 4.5-point favorites in Game 1.

We live in an era of sports fandom where championships are among the most important pieces of the puzzle that is a player’s legacy. Regardless of the sport, players have been torn down or elevated above others, sometimes unreasonably or unfairly, because of a championship. In individual sports such as tennis, track and field, gymnastics, or swimming, there’s an argument to be made that it should be that way. Even in team sports, championships do matter. But depending on the individual, the weight of a championship can differ greatly.

If winning is the only thing that matters, then ranking all-time greats becomes as simple as looking up the list of athletes with the most championships in their respective sports. Bill Russell would be the best NBA player of all time, while Yogi Berra would hold that honor in MLB. Tom Brady, given his record of seven Super Bowl victories, is the only case where that argument actually holds. Russell is an all-time great, as is the beloved former Yankee Berra, but neither has a legitimate argument for being the greatest player in his sport. Greatest career? Sure. But you get the point. Championships in team sports are a very important factor when evaluating an athlete’s legacy and should be weighed heavily. Given two players with similar stats and accomplishments, the athlete with more championships should get the nod. As always, context matters, though.

Is Aaron Judge’s legacy worse than Johnny Damon’s or Jim Edmonds’s because the latter two have a combined three championships? No. Do Chris Paul, James Harden, or Charles Barkley have worse legacies than Ray Allen because he won two championships? Obviously not. Yet the ring conversation will remain prevalent for as long as we’re around.

For a lot of Knicks players, a championship would do a lot for their legacies. They’d finally capture that elusive feeling of nirvana while bringing home the Larry O’Brien Trophy to a championship-starved fan base for the first time in 53 years, and it would very likely lead to more endorsements and a nice bump in the aforementioned conversation about legacy. For stars, though, a ring can boost the way a career is viewed much more than it would for role players or even just really good players. Karl-Anthony Towns, for example, would likely get a lot more of the respect he deserves if he were to win a ring after the incredible playoff run he’s had. The same can be said for OG Anunoby and Mikal Bridges, albeit to a slightly lesser degree. For one Knicks player, though, it would mean significantly more.

Were Jalen Brunson to win a championship, not only would his legacy receive a boost, but he would also enter some very intriguing conversations. He may not have the total counting stats that some other all-time greats accumulated because he became a franchise player relatively late in his career. But given the myriad accolades and historic statistics he has amassed during his short but highly successful stint as a Knick, he could easily make a case as the greatest Knick of all time. He’d still be one championship shy of legends Willis Reed and Walt “Clyde” Frazier, but it would be very difficult to keep him off the top of that list when considering both the historic numbers and the sentimental aspect of being the savior of the franchise.

Being 6’2″ and defeating the 7’5″ Victor Wembanyama would also instantly silence many of the nonsensical critics who have harped on players of his height being unable to lead a team to the promised land. Lastly, being the best player and captain on a championship team in New York, along with a few more years of producing at the level he has reached, could even propel him toward a Hall of Fame case—something that neither he nor the fans probably considered just a couple of years ago.

Now, if he does not win, many of those things could end up not happening. His place among the Knicks legends may be secured, but questions about his height would remain, the Hall of Fame would become a long shot again, and conversations about whether it was worth it for the Knicks to sign his friends would persist. Some of that is unfair. What if he plays out of his mind but still can’t pull it off? The Spurs are currently favored on FanDuel, with favorable odds at -188. Does losing as an underdog make him any lesser as a player, or make his legacy any less impressive? Maybe, maybe not. Will fans and pundits care when it’s time to settle his place among his peers? Unlikely.

In a team sport where so much can happen, it’s unfortunate that so much of a legacy can be tied to the outcome of what is now a best-of-seven series. But that’s just how it is. With so much to lose, but also so much to gain, Brunson, given his age and all the conversations surrounding him, has the most pressure to win it all. Can he pull it off? Knicks fans believe he can.

Who Draymond Green picks to win 2026 NBA Finals between Spurs and Knicks originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

The San Antonio Spurs and New York Knicks begin their highly anticipated 2026 NBA Finals matchup with Game 1 on Wednesday at Frost Bank Center, and Warriors star Draymond Green has made his pick.

The four-time NBA champion predicted who will take home the Larry O’Brien Trophy on the latest episode of “The Draymond Green Show,” and his answer might surprise some — though his reasoning is pretty sound.

“I’m also going to go with the New York Knicks to win this series,” Green declared. “This is a series that can go either way. I think this series can go either way. I think, ultimately, the New York Knicks are more primed and
ready right now than the Spurs. Spurs still ain’t been through nothing.”

The Spurs, of course, are just over a decade removed from their most recent NBA title, while the Knicks have experienced plenty of heartbreak over their 53-year championship drought. It’s this hardened mindset that Green believes finally will push Jalen Brunson and Co. over the hill.

But even if that’s the case, he knows the experience gained by an already-lethal Spurs team will keep the young squad in contention for years to come.

“Now granted … these series, they age you fast, right?” Green continued. “So [the Spurs] aren’t your typical young team anymore because these series, you go through s–t in these series, and they age you fast. However, the Knicks, they got to be feeling it. They got to feel good about it and they got to go steal Game 1. And like I said, I also think they win this series.”

We’ll see if Green’s prediction proves true in this best-of-seven series.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

For a couple of New York Knicks, Game 1 of the NBA Finals in San Antonio isn’t just a work trip – it’s a homecoming. 

Jordan Clarkson and Kevin McCullar Jr. both attended Wagner High School in San Antonio, just a ten-minute drive from where they’ll be tipping off against their hometown team tonight. 

It comes with a lot of memories – and Clarkson, who attended Wagner from 2006-2010 and grew up during a dominant, four-title era for the Spurs, remembers it well. 

Knicks vs. Spurs: Where did NBA Finals stars play high school basketball?

“The energy is always amazing,” Clarkson told reporters about growing up during that era during a media availability on Tuesday. “My stepmom worked at the Westin so I would see the parades through the hotel balconies and stuff. I would sneak around there and…take pictures and run up on players for autographs. I was definitely that kid.”

That hasn’t slowed him down, however, when playing against his hometown team: he’s averaged 20 points per game when playing the Spurs across his career. 

He’s been a strong presence off the bench for New York this season, averaging 8.6 points per game during this regular season and 15.3 points per game across his 12-year NBA career. Back at Wagner, he led the Thunderbirds to back-to-back state semifinal appearances and was named the San Antonio high school player of the year his senior season. 

McCullar Jr. made his own mark on the Wagner Thunderbirds years after Clarkson left, leading them to the 6A state title game as a sophomore in 2017. He’s been earning some more playing time for the Knicks this season, moving up the depth chart after a strong stint while Josh Hart was out with an injury. He’s averaged 2.2 points for the Knicks since being drafted in 2024. 

Clarkson, McCullar Jr. and the Knicks will open the NBA Finals against the San Antonio Spurs in San Antonio tonight, tipping off at 8:30 eastern. 

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: These Wagner High alumni return home for NBA Finals — as New York Knicks

With 6:32 remaining in the 4th quarter of last Saturday’s Game Seven matchup between the Oklahoma City Thunder and the San Antonio Spurs, San Antonio backup center Luke Kornet chased down the Thunder’s Isiah Hartenstein and blocked what looked to be an easy dunk which would have cut the Spurs’ lead to 4 at 97-93. It was reminiscent of LeBron James’ block against Andre Iguodala in Game 7 of the 2016 NBA Finals.

Kornet’s block potentially saved the game for the Spurs and will go down as one of the NBA Playoffs’ more iconic defensive plays, particularly if the Spurs go on to win their sixth championship against the New York Knicks.

But there was another defensive play only a few minutes later that I can’t quite wrap my head around. I’m not sure anyone can.

With 4:53 left and the Spurs up 102-93, Spurs rookie Dylan Harper drove into the lane, lost his footing, and lost the ball. OKC’s Cason Wallace and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander dove on top of Harper, as did the Spurs’ Victor Wembanyama. OKC’s Jared McCain saw the scrum, correctly anticipated the pending OKC possession, and ran toward the opposite corner. Gilgeous-Alexander secured the ball while Wembanyama was on one knee just outside the restricted area of the Spurs’ basket. And here’s where it gets crazy.

Wembanyama got to his feet and sprinted alongside Gilgeous-Alexander towards half court. For the handful of you that have never watched Wembanyama play, he runs with his fists high and close to his chest and bobs his head back and forth. It’s reminiscent of a little kid trying to show his parents how fast he can run with new shoes on. It’s 100% effort with complete disregard for picking up women or getting a cool Ray-Ban endorsement. And it’s part of what makes him so unique.

Wembanyama is officially listed as 7’4”, which is only true in a world where Kevin Durant is actually 6’9”. With shoes on, which is typically required to participate in an NBA game, Wembanyama is probably closer to 7’7”, so running stride for stride with the two-time league MVP is a feat in and of itself. But now let’s get even crazier.

Both players reached half court at the same time, where Gilgeous Alexander spotted McCain wide open on the left wing at the three-point line and fired a pass to him. McCain took a big sidestep to position himself almost along the baseline in the corner and launched his shot. And this is where things get stupid crazy.

Wembanyama covered 28 feet in just over a second and a half, taking only five steps from half court after Gilgeous-Alexander passed the ball to McCain. Just inside the free throw line extended, he launched off his left foot and fully extended his right arm. He jumped almost 14 feet through the air and came within an untrimmed fingernail of blocking McCain’s shot. The shot rimmed out, Julian Champagnie secured the rebound and Wembanyama walked back toward halfcourt with his left arm and clinched fist high in the air, triumphantly. The Spurs went on to win the game and the series.

During these playoffs, Wembanyama has wowed NBA fans with jaw-dropping play after jaw-dropping play. Logo threes, backward dunks, insane blocks, he’s done it all. But it’s plays that will never be memorialized in a stat book that has to be scariest for the rest of the league. His block attempt went largely unnoticed, particularly considering the things he’s done that have made a bigger splash this spring. Reggie Miller applauded Wembanyama’s “nice job to get that Kornet contest,” but there wasn’t much after that. And that’s why this is all so crazy, so early, so far ahead of someone else’s schedule.

Victor Wembanyama is an alien, not of this world. He’s a monster in the woods. He’s Tiger at Augusta in ‘97. He’s Tyson in Brooklyn in ’86. He’s Kurt Cobain in Seattle in ‘91. He’s all those things wrapped and stretched like the rubber band man into one inconceivable presence of wise beyond his years philosophical thought and never before seen athletic brilliance.

In 2018, Kurt Cobain’s mom, Wendy O’Conner talked about the first time Kurt played Smells Like Teen Spirit for her.

“I sat on the edge of it, and I could remember that like it happened just a few minutes ago. The hair on my arms stood up, and I got this heaviness in my chest. I said, ‘Oh my god Kurt, how are you going to handle this?’ He said, ‘What?’ I said, ‘This is going to change everything.”

Wembanyama is doing the same thing — he’s changing everything we knew about the game of basketball. Everything is different now since Wembanyama got here. And we’re all so lucky that we get to watch.

Mixing metaphors when writing a story is often frowned upon, it’s too confusing. But how else can you even begin to try and describe what we’re witnessing right now? There are the viral dunks and blocks and elbows but there are also the plays that are never recorded as a stat happening several times in a game, plays that when you rewind and watch again, you can’t believe what you are seeing.

Wembanyama is the alien that has arrived. He’s the monster in the woods preparing to destroy your city. He exudes “Hello, world and Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth”, with every tear he sheds when a goal is met; every time a long-held grudge is avenged.

And now the Finals are about to start for Wembanyama and the Spurs. Here we are now. Entertain us.

For the eighth straight season, a new NBA champion will be crowned this June. The New York Knicks have won eleven straight games after falling to 2-1 against the Hawks in Round 1 while the San Antonio Spurs have won two hard fought series vs. the Timberwolves and the defending champs.

Who raises the Larry O’Brien and looking ahead, what do the Celtics have to do to take down the champs next June?

Rich Jensen: I have the Spurs in six messy games.

The C’s best path to beat the Spurs is continued growth and perhaps the addition of one or two veteran players. I don’t think it’s sensible, as fans, to put the Spurs up on a pedestal. The C’s are nothing to sneeze at, and will hit the next season with the league’s best one-two punch.

Grant Burfeind: Spurs in 7, partly because Adam Silver didn’t script Wemby in the Finals just to leave all that Game 6 MSG ticket money on the table. Have you SEEN what those seats cost? The league may send this series to seven out of fiscal responsibility alone.

Now, for the actual basketball reason: San Antonio has the best player in the series, and he happens to be the hardest player in the league to solve. The Knicks are deeper, older, more physical and built to make this series feel like a nightly dental procedure. Brunson has the ability to steal games, no doubt. KAT pulling Wembanyama away from the rim could swing stretches. OG and Hart will make every possession for the Spurs feel like trying to move a couch through a narrow hallway. But Wemby changes the math on both ends. Scratch that, Wemby is a new form of math altogether. He can erase the paint, rush shooters who think they’re open and still be the offensive hub San Antonio needs late. Add in Fox’s burst, Harper’s poise and Castle’s defense, and I think the Spurs survive just enough rock fights to win the series.

For the Celtics, beating either team next year starts with accepting what this Finals is showing them: the margins around stars have to be sturdier. Since the West is so loaded that it’s hard to predict who comes out next year, New York is probably the cleaner measuring stick. To beat the Knicks, Boston needs size, rebounding and enough functional strength to survive without bleeding extra possessions. If San Antonio is the matchup, they need multiple frontcourt bodies to bother Wemby, enough shooting to punish his help instincts and more consistent rim pressure so the offense doesn’t turn into five guys politely waiting behind the arc. The Celtics don’t need to adopt an entirely new identity, but they do need to get healthier, bigger and a little less dependent on shot variance if they want to be the last team standing in June.

Ian Inangelo: I think the Spurs are winning the Finals in 6 games over the Knicks.

I think the key to the Celtics beating them next year is doing something similar to what they did this season. Let Victor Wembanyama beat you from three-point range and slow down everyone else. Boston would need a big who can play defense on the perimeter and I think a Robert Williams reunion would be the key. He played pretty solid defense on Wemby during Portland’s first round series this year and I think he could be a solid option for this team.

Bill Sy: Spurs in 5 because TL;DR, but ultimately, I trust Castle and Wemby controlling Brunson and KAT.  And if the path to Banner 19 goes through New York and San Antonio next season, the biggest question mark right now is obviously at center, but I’m not totally convinced that’s an area of need for Stevens to address this offseason.  Conventional wisdom says that you have to upgrade Neemias Queta after he got wrecked by a hobbled Joel Embiid.  However, I just don’t see a major swing the front office can make at the 5.  Instead, they’ll put a premium at point guard — preferably someone that can also stay in front of Fox and Brunson — and again lean in on their depth, particularly on the perimeter with their wings.

Nirav Barman: I have the Spurs winning in 6 games. I think they’re deep and talented enough to really push this Knicks team despite not having as much experience. As long as they’re not too tired, they should be able to handle things.

San Antonio’s defense is excellent, even beyond the 7’4″ freak of nature on their roster. The Spurs were able to minimize the reigning 2x MVP, and contain the rest of the reigning champs’s offense too. If they can limit their turnovers, they have a good chance of snuffing out the Knicks as well. KAT’s ability to stretch the floor may be a more effective way to get Wemby out of the paint than Chet and Jaylin Williams, but it’s likely that Mitch Johnson will plan for that, and have a switch heavy defense that keeps Wemby close to the paint.

The Knicks might have more reliable offensive threats, but they also have less of them, and have had a looong break between games. Maybe that means they’ll just be more rested, but I would imagine a 7+ day period without a game could take a team out of rhythm. I think Brunson has proven his ability to show up in big games, as has OG Anunoby who should hopefully be fully healthy now. If the rest of the roster keeps up their level of play that helped them take care of the Sixers and Cavs in quick fashion, then I think this will be a very interesting series, but I don’t see New York’s defense being effective enough to win the overall matchup.

If the Celtics end up having to go through the Knicks next year, they’re going to have to become much better at containing Brunson at the point of attack, and defending pick-and-rolls when Brunson is forced to defer. Additionally, they’ll need to find a way to consistently open up the paint for themselves to get better looks at the rim, likely by upgrading their big men.

If the Celtics are going up against the Spurs, they’ll need some prayers on their side. Having a large, switchable team would go a long way, so the Jays are a great start. Hugo and Jordan becoming offensive threats would become critical, as would having a mobile two-way big (which doesn’t come around all that often.) On top of that, they’ll need their role players to capitalize on any and all open looks. The Jays need consistent, reliable support when the defense is focusing on them. I think you have to say that the Spurs are the better team, and considering how much younger and cheaper their roster is, that’s a scary thought. I do think that the Celtics can keep every game competitive, though – I just don’t see them winning a 7-game series without some significant improvements.

Jake Issenberg: It pains me to say it: Knicks in 7. The way to beat the Spurs is by bombing away from outside the paint. The Knicks have been scorching hot from three all playoffs and employ big, quick trigger shooters across the roster. Something that Chet Holmgren, and the rest of the OKC Thunder shooters are not. Towns is a skeleton key on offense in this specific matchup. KAT’s ability to either pull Wemby out of the paint or punish the Spurs on the offensive glass if Wemby is roaming off Josh Hart is going to be what tips the series in favour of the Knicks. The Thunder are not an elite rebounding team and were able to punish the spurs on the offensive glass at times. Between KAT, Mitchell Robinson, and Josh Hart, the Knicks have the personnel to mash the Spurs on that specific margin. On the other end, I think OG Anunoby is one of the only perimeter players in the league capable of giving Wemby trouble. I’m picking the Knicks in 7, so I wouldn’t be surprised if the Spurs win the NBA Championship, however, I think the matchup favours the Knicks.

How do the Celtics reach the mountain top if it’s the Knicks and Spurs who stand in their way? Priority number one is upgrading the front court. Whether that’s Giannis, Robert Williams, or Jock Landale, the group needs to get more talented and more versatile. Next, Joe Mazzulla, the reigning coach of the year, needs to level up as a playoff coach, starting with updating the team’s offensive approach. The team has become too rigid. Dominating the margins is important and clearly drives winning, but there’s something missing when the Celtics get out of the 82 game season and into the paradigm of a 7 game series.

Jeff Clark: I’ll go with Spurs in 6. These things typically boil down to who has the most transcendent player with the perfect pieces around him. The Knicks have Brunson and KAT and some great defensive wings, but that strikes me as a very-good team, not a great one. The Spurs, on the other hand, have Wemby and a young, but very talented supporting cast around him. One might assume that it is a year early for them, but I don’t get the sense that the lights will shine too bright for them. After all, the biggest test was the Thunder and they were able to defeat them. I think the Spurs win their first title of the Wemby era, and frankly I’m a little concerned about what that means for every other team going forward, including the Celtics.

Robby Fletcher: I have the Spurs in 6, specifically coming back from 2-1 to win the series.

The Knicks are getting a third straight opponent coming off a 7-game series which is an obvious advantage, but the Spurs have the end-all No. 1 player in this matchup, and plenty of defenders on the perimeter to make life difficult for Brunson and company.

How does Boston win that matchup? With improved paint defense and better perimeter shotmaking, although if we’re being honest, is there really an answer to stopping Wemby? Probably not, but if you’re killing them from deep, that at least opens the door for dragging Wemby a little farther away from the paint.

Bobby Manning: I’m going Spurs in 7 despite going back-and-forth in my head. If Victor Wembanyama is playing like himself, the Knicks, and maybe nobody at this point, have an answer for his defensive impact. Never mind what he’s producing the other way. Between that, Mitchell Robinson’s injury and defensive questions for NY, I give San Antonio a slight, but not definitive edge. The Spurs also have to handle Brunson and Towns’ offensive attack, OG Anunoby’s defensive versatility and the Knicks’ more consistent bench. What I know for sure is that this could be the series for the ages, and despite how agonizing of a decision it’ll become, one of many reasons why I believe the Celtics need Giannis Antetokounmpo.

Ryan Paice: I think the Spurs win in 6 or 7, and while I expect a hard fought series, I think Wemby’s defense is generational and the Spurs have the perimeter depth to slow Brunson down. While KAT is a tough matchup for Wemby, I don’t think it’ll be enough for the Knicks to win. New York has yet to face a real challenger this postseason, and I think running into the roadblock that is the Spurs will trip them up pretty badly. Meanwhile, the Spurs are battle-tested and young enough to recover from a seven game series against the reigning champs.

For the Celtics to beat the Spurs next year, I think we’ll need an upgrade at the center position that can stretch Wemby out to the perimeter and bang for buckets down low. Obviously, that’s a tall order. Unicorns don’t grow on trees. But having a center like Queta will only allow Wemby to play off of him and patrol the paint, which is exactly the opposite of how to beat San Antonio. Without a center upgrade, I don’t see the C’s beating the Spurs at all. But that alone might not be enough. Boston also needs to add a couple steady hands, like Al Horford and Jrue Holiday were for the team in 2024. Their impact in the championship run was huge and the Jays need steady hands around them to keep the gears turning when they start to grind. So, for the Celtics to beat the Spurs next year, we’ll need a near-impossible center upgrade and to add a couple vets who complement the Jays stylistically and mentally. Realistically, it could be another year or two of roster building before something like that happens. But if anyone can make it happen, it’d be Brad Stevens, so I remain hopeful.

For the past few days, Knicks and Spurs fans have had to dream up hypotheticals and play out the most important series of the season in their heads. But tonight, we finally get to see the teams take the court and throw all of that out the window. But before they do, with the NBA Finals just hours away, let’s take a final look at who the experts are picking to win the title.

On ESPN.com, 10 of the 13 writers picked the Spurs to win. Bobby Marks picked them to win in five games, and everybody else who had the Spurs winning picked them to do so in six or seven games. Ramona Shelburne, Justin Tinsley, and Ohm Youngmisuk were the three who picked the Knicks to come out on top, predicting the Knicks to win in seven games, six games, and seven games, respectively.

Over on Sports Illustrated, three of their five writers picked the Spurs. Chris Mannix picked the Spurs to win in six games, “maybe five,” citing the Spurs’ backcourt defense and Victor Wembanyama’s dominance. Meanwhile, Blake Silverman and Dan Lyons picked the Western Conference representatives in six games due to Mitchell Robinson’s injury concern and their belief that Wembanyama will ultimately be the best player in the series.

The Athletic bucked some of the aforementioned trend, though, with the most popular outcome being Knicks in six. Of their 26 votes, said result got 10 votes, with Spurs in seven and Spurs in six getting five votes each, and Knicks in seven getting three votes.

Lorenzo Reyes of USA Today Sports picked the Knicks in seven games largely due to the Knicks’ experience and additional rest advantage, while Prince J. Grimes picked the Spurs in seven games, raising questions surrounding whether the Knicks really are a dominant team, or whether the strength of their Eastern Conference opponents — or lack thereof — played a role in their road to the Finals.

As you can see, while the experts are slightly leaning towards the Spurs, there really isn’t a foregone conclusion. If anything, the only consensus is that the series should be close and could easily go the full seven games. The books, on the other hand, seem to disagree. The Spurs came out as pretty heavy favorites after they advanced to the Finals and currently sit at -188 odds over on FanDuel, while the Knicks sit at +158, which equates to about a 38.76% chance.

While Knicks fans may feel like their team is getting slighted, it may play to the Knicks’ advantage. Every time the Knicks have been eliminated in the postseason during the Jalen Brunson era, it has been to a lower seed. Not that the team needs any extra motivation, but seeing and/or hearing about them being counted out may further feed into their focus on playing with a level of desperation.

Recently, AJ Dybantsa was on the “Gilbert Arenas Show,” a podcast with the former Wizards star. Contrary to previous rumblings that he preferred to stay in Utah because he went to Brigham Young, Dybantsa answered questions about him as a potential Wizards player, including which number he would want to wear.

If they draft me, I do need 3, Trae [Young]. If they draft me. We’re going to see in like five weeks.

AJ Dybantsa says Trae Young will have to give up No. 3 if he’s drafted by the Wizards 😅

“If they draft me, I do need 3, Trae. If they draft me. We’re gonna see in like 5 weeks”

(h/t @NBA__Courtside ) pic.twitter.com/iD0DGrombi

— NBACentral (@TheDunkCentral) June 2, 2026

Young wears No. 3 for the Wizards, though he previously wore No. 11 for most of his career. The No. 11 is retired by the Wizards in honor of Elvin Hayes, so this appears to be a taller task for Dybantsa. After all, if Young gets traded to the Wizards and doesn’t demand No. 11, then Dybantsa probably should be more coy about that.

All of that said, jersey numbers are a very small part on why a player should or shouldn’t be acquired. Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

The San Antonio Spurs have once again emerged as a force to be reckoned with, reaching the 2026 NBA Finals after six years without a playoff berth and nine years without a series win. A storied franchise that had previously never missed the playoffs in back-to-back years has come out of their worst stretch in team history with one of the youngest rosters to ever reach the Finals.

While their Finals opposition, the New York Knicks, have successfully relied on major trades and the absolute bargain that was the free-agent signing of Jalen Brunson, the Spurs are nearly the polar opposite. Aside from last season’s De’Aaron Fox trade, their core pieces have come through the draft.

The NBA Draft lottery has repeatedly broken the Spurs’ way

It’s hard for the rest of the league not to be envious looking at San Antonio’s last three first-round picks:

• 2023: Victor Wembanyama, No. 1 overall
• 2024: Stephon Castle, No. 4 overall
• 2025: Dylan Harper, No. 2 overall

Wemby by himself is franchise changing, and he’s on his way to being one of the greats. Castle and Harper already look like ideal guards to pair him with for years to come.

Famously (and, for conspiratorial-minded NBA fans, suspiciously), moving up in the lottery has been a rite of passage for the Spurs. Every time the Spurs have had top eight odds, they’ve moved up, including for Tim Duncan and David Robinson at No. 1 overall. The Spurs rose two spots to win the Wemby sweepstakes, improved their position by one for Castle, and vaulted six places to the No. 2 pick off a 34-48 season to get Harper. Not a bad consolation for narrowly losing out on Cooper Flagg.

File this stretch away in the history books, because this trio may be the last of its kind.

NBA Draft lottery reform makes it impossible to replicate the Spurs

In a supposed effort to curb tanking/reduce the number of G-League players getting significant minutes in March and April, the NBA sought major reform to its draft lottery. Last week, they approved something so convoluted that it makes the salary cap rules seem easy to comprehend.

Among the many changes set for the 2027 through 2029 drafts, no team is allowed to have the number one overall pick in back-to-back years, nor can it pick in the top five in three consecutive years. Had this been implemented sooner, Harper would’ve never been a Spur.

There’s another aspect to this rule that is already impacting a recent trade:

These restrictions will apply only to each team’s own pick without regard to whether that pick has been retained by the team or traded to (and thus held by) another team.

The Memphis Grizzlies, who themselves are picking third overall in this month’s draft, hold the most favorable of the 2027 first-round pick from the Utah Jazz, Minnesota Timberwolves, or Cleveland Cavaliers, as part of the Jaren Jackson Jr trade. Utah picks second this year and picked fifth last year, so if the Jazz end up in the lottery again next season, the pick is ineligible to be higher than sixth. Memphis, of course, was the lone team to vote against the reform.

In effect, the NBA could end up punishing teams, whether they’re “tanking” or not, who’ve acquired potentially high-value draft picks through trades.

It’s not just high lottery picks that have made the Spurs a powerhouse again

Sixth Man of the Year winner Keldon Johnson, rookie Carter Bryant, and starting forward Devin Vassell were also first-rounders, but those three were respectively picked 29th, 14th, and 11th overall. Johnson and Vassell endured the back-to-back 60-loss seasons, as did other starting forward Julian Champagnie, who was claimed off waivers when the Philadelphia 76ers desperately needed to open up a roster space so that Mac McClung could be in the dunk contest. Champagnie is one of their top three-point shooters and hasn’t missed a game in over two years.

Backup center Luke Kornet was San Antonio’s major free agent signing at just over $10 million/year, and while he may not be having a particularly strong postseason, his block on Isaiah Hartenstein in Game 7 of the Western Conference Finals symbolically slammed Oklahoma City’s championship repeat shut. De’Aaron Fox has not been at his best in the playoffs and has otherwise been dealing with an ankle sprain, but the former Kings star has proven to be a stabilizing force at point guard. Stephon Castle’s early turnover issues against the Thunder as the primary ball-handler (20 TOs in Games 1-2) significantly subsided after Fox returned in Game 3, after which he had just 12 TOs combined.

The Spurs are well coached, seemingly unflappable, and the roster is poised to get better with more experience and veterans like Kelly Olynyk and Harrison Barnes eventually off the books. It also helps a hell of a lot when the ping pong balls bounce your way and you can land franchise cornerstones at three positions. Starting next year, the new rules will see to it that no team can even have a shot at the same good fortune as San Antonio.

Why Steph Curry's Li-Ning sneaker deal is ‘absolutely insane' to Draymond Green originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

After four NBA titles, two MVP awards, the all-time 3-pointers made record and 12 All-Star appearances, it might seem like Steph Curry doesn’t have many more accolades to attain.

However, with his new reported 10-year, $400 million partnership with Li-Ning, Curry is proving he isn’t ready to slow down a bit.

Draymond Green is plenty excited for his long-time Warriors teammate, and recently explained what went into Curry’s decision to sign with the shoe company.

“Well, number one, Li-Ning is one of the fastest growing shoe brands in the world,” Green said on “The Draymond Green Show”. “Number two, the opportunity for him to grow Curry brand globally, the market in China, life after basketball for him. This deal checks all of those boxes and I’m happy as hell for him. I think this is groundbreaking.”

In November 2025, Curry and Under Armour ended their partnership that had been ongoing since 2013 – before the future Hall of Fame shooter had achieved any of the honors listed above.

“To sign a $400 million plus sneaker deal, allegedly, at 38 years old is unheard of,” Green said. “Which just lets you know the weight that the name Steph Curry carries, which lets you know that the presence that Steph Curry has, who he is, what he is, what he stands for, that they’re willing to sign this a 10-year deal.”

The partnership of a lifetime. pic.twitter.com/PtnTakEf4a

— Stephen Curry (@StephenCurry30) June 1, 2026

Green also mentioned the fact that the 17-year veteran likely has “two or three more years” left in the NBA, something that stands out given the length of the contract.

“Amazing, absolutely insane,” Green added. “So, shout out to 30. Incredible. Another one. Incredible to see, man. Congratulations, brother. Job well done.”

The deal will also give Curry the freedom to sign male and female athletes, will feature a golf line and also will introduce “Curry Brand” retail stores in the United States and China.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

Knicks center Mitchell Robinson is expected to be available for Wednesday’s Game 1 of the 2026 NBA Finals against the Spurs after having hand surgery for a broken right hand, according to ESPN.

The 7-foot Robinson — who sustained a fracture of the fifth metacarpal, as first reported by The Post’s Stefan Bondy — was a full participant in practice Tuesday.

Robinson wore a sleeve on his right hand and appeared to be moving well while shooting.

Although it is unclear exactly how Mitchell was injured, ESPN reported that it occurred at his home during New York’s off week following a four-game sweep of the Cavaliers in the Eastern Conference finals.

The Knicks had nine days off before Game 1 of the NBA Finals Wednesday night in San Antonio.

The 28-year-old big man has been a reliable backup for starter Karl-Anthony Towns.

Robinson shared that he was “fighting to get back on track” with his mental health and taking a break from social media amid the Knicks’ playoff run.

The first NBA Finals game in New York in 27 years is set to have a presidential guest.

President Trump is planning to attend Game 3 of the Knicks-Spurs series on June 8 at Madison Square Garden, sources told The Post, although there’s always the chance plans change.

MSG performed security walkthroughs in preparation for his potential visit, according to the sources.

New York City mayor and diehard Knicks fan Zohran Mamdani also plans to attend Game 3, although he is not expected to sit alongside the president, according to sources.

The White House did not immediately respond to comment.

Trump previously said he planned to attend one of the NBA Finals games in New York, with Game 3 set for June 8, Game 4 on June 10 and a potential Game 6 on June 16.

The New York native also planned to attend Game 5 of the Eastern Conference finals, but the Knicks secured their first Finals berth since 1999 by sweeping the Cavaliers in four games.

“I was invited to. I was going to go on Wednesday [Game 5 of the Eastern Conference Finals], but they closed it out very quickly. They’re great, and Jim Dolan’s a great guy — he’s, as you know, owns and in charge of Madison Square Garden. He’s having a good year,” Trump told The Post’s Emily Goodin on May 27.

“Boy, what a team! They win all their games. They really have some great players. I think I’ll be going to one of the games, yeah. I was invited by numerous people, and Jim, and I think it’s great. Great to see it. The Knicks have really, they’ve really suffered for years and they’re doing right now very well.”

President Trump has attended various high-profile sporting events throughout his two terms, including the Eagles’ 2025 Super Bowl win over the Chiefs in New Orleans and the 2025 men’s US Open finals in Queens.