Knicks 136, Pacers 110: “Good win. Incredible game for Josh.”

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - MARCH 17: Guard Josh Hart #3 of the New York Knicks reacts with center Mitchell Robinson #23 and guard Tyler Kolek #13 during the second half against the Indiana Pacers at Madison Square Garden on March 17, 2026 in New York City. The Knicks won 136-110. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Sarah Stier/Getty Images) | Getty Images

The Pacers (15–54) limped into Madison Square Garden on a 13-game losing streak, but they always bring the fire against the Knicks (45*-25). After Indy shot brilliantly through the first half, they crashed back to Earth in the second. Behind Josh Hart’s 33 points, a Knicks career high, our heroes celebrated St. Patrick’s Day with a 136-110 win.

Starting the 35th game of his career, Jose Alvarado (16 PTS, 10 AST, 2 STL, 4-of-7 3PT) covered for the absent Jalen Brunson, nursing a sore neck. Alvarado had shot poorly since going off against Philly in February, but swished his first two attempts from yard. His energy powered the offense, and he logged three assists and a steal before yielding the floor to Tyler Kolek. Indiana countered with T.J. McConnell (10 PTS, 10 AST) in its starting five, filling in for Andrew Nembhard (who’s been filling in for Tyrese Haliburton all season).

Karl-Anthony Towns (22 PTS, 11 RBS, 2-of-7 3PT) scored early, but Josh Hart set the tone—back-to-back steals on Jarace Walker (16 PTS), a pull-up jumper, and a putback through contact ignited the Knicks. OG Anunoby (26 PTS, 8 RBS, 10-of-13 FG) carried the scoring load with a layup and two threes on his way to 15 points in the quarter. Mikal Bridges (10 PTS, 5 AST, 4-of-12 FG) quietly dished four assists, even if he took a while to score. He turned an ankle on a missed layup, and for a moment, his 626-game iron man streak seemed briefly in jeopardy.

The Pacers made their first four three-pointers, while the Knicks went 5-of-7 to go ahead 27-20 late in the first quarter. Thrice the Knicks pushed their lead to seven, and thrice the Pacers answered. OAKAAKUYOAK Obi Toppin (15 PTS) led Indiana with seven points off the bench. When the buzzer rang, the Knicks were ahead 38-34, having shot 5-of-9 from deep and allowing Indiana to shoot 5-of-8.

The quarter opened with Anunoby knocking down another three, but Indiana swung back. Walker hit from deep, Quenton Jackson attacked the paint, and McConnell kept the beat as the Pacers found a groove. Towns worked the glass and got to the line but missed a few easy looks, while Bridges still couldn’t get his burner lit. Indiana took advantage, with Keita Brown and Aaron Nesmith (14 PTS) hitting threes to claim a six-point lead midway through the frame.

Quoth Jaybugkit, “Incredible game for Josh.” Yessir! Hart swung the momentum late in the second quarter. He hit a three to stop the bleeding, then added another late, standing out as the Knicks’ most impactful player. Alvarado pushed the pace with a string of assists and a timely three off a steal, while Bridges finally connected, chipping in a late jumper. Indiana got buckets from Nesmith, Jackson, and Sheppard, but couldn’t string together stops. When intermission arrived, the hosts had gone ahead, 72-64.

Through the half, Indiana shot 63% from the field and 61% from three, while the Knicks had shot 56% and 55%. The home team had won the glass 21-18 and turned the ball over just three times. Hart led all scorers with 19 points at the half, and Alvarado had 13 points and seven assists. For the Pacers, Kobe Brown and Aaron Nesmith had 11 points each.

To start the second half, New York surrendered five easy points, and Mike Brown called a timeout after just a minute. From there, the Knicks straightened up, going on a 19-10 run and gradually extending their advantage to 17. Hart, having his best offensive game of the season, had made 12 of his first 13 shots, 5-of-5 from deep, and 4-of-5 from the free-throw line before sitting late in the third. His 33 points were the most he’d scored in his career as a Knick.

Indiana’s hot first-half shooting cooled, and an excess of turnovers cost them. Furthermore, most of the Knicks were enjoying the freedom of a half-hearted Hoosier defense. Anunoby chipped in a dunk and a transition finish, and both he and Towns eclipsed 20 points.

The middle stretch bogged down with misses and turnovers. Indiana’s bench briefly supplied some offense with a dunk from Jay Huff, a putback by Sheppard, and a triple from Toppin, but they couldn’t cut their deficit to single digits. With three quarters gone, New York sat on a comfortable 105-91 lead.

In the fourth quarter, Mitchell Robinson (8 PTS, 8 RBS) spanked the Pacers’ frontcourt. Indiana had their opportunities to climb back into the game (Toppin drilled a trey, Walker got to the line), but they packed it in early. For the Knicks, Towns and Anunoby added to their point totals, Jordan Clarkson made his way to 10 points, and Bridges swished two encouraging threes. The lead reached 27 points. Around the middle of the period, Coach Brown sent in Jordan Clarkson, Jeremy Sochan, Kolek, Pacome Dadiet, Mohamed Diawara, and Kevin McCullar, Jr. to finish it off.

Up Next

New York takes the subway to Brooklyn on Friday for a night with the Nets. Safe travels, Knickerbockers.

Box Score

* Should be one more, but NBA Cups have leaks.

‘Like old times': Tatum-Brown duo off to a dominant start for Celtics

‘Like old times': Tatum-Brown duo off to a dominant start for Celtics originally appeared on NBC Sports Boston

For all the over-caffeinated consternation about how Jayson Tatum might reintegrate with his Boston teammates, the Celtics have thrived in Tatum’s 146 minutes of floor time since he returned from a nine-month absence

The Celtics have outscored opponents by 14.8 points per 100 possessions in Tatum’s limited time, which would be the best mark on the team if maintained over a larger sample. Even as Tatum shakes rust and fights his 3-point shot (27.1 percent beyond the arc on 9.6 attempts per game), the Celtics have outscored opponents by 45 total points in Tatum’s floor time. 

After Euro-stepping his way to a layup off a feed from Jaylen Brown in the fourth quarter of Boston’s gritty win over the Phoenix Suns on Monday night, Tatum remarked how “felt like old times” operating with his All-Star running mate.

The Jays have now shared the court for 101 minutes through five games together. Boston is outscoring opponents by a robust 24 points per 100 possessions during that span.

For context, Boston’s best high-volume two-man pairing (at least 1,000 minutes together) is the Derrick White-Neemias Queta combo at +13.8 net rating. The best two-man pairing in the entire league with 500-plus minutes together is the Oklahoma City Thunder duo of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Ajay Mitchell at +20.5.

In other words, the Jays are trending toward some of the best numbers in the NBA, at least in early returns. Boston has outscored opponents by 53 points in 213 possessions with the Jays together on the floor. A five-man pairing featuring the Jays with White, Queta, and Payton Pritchard is +30 in 21 minutes, having outscored opponents 67-37 in that span.

The Celtics have played solid competition during that span, too. A good chunk of the Brown/Tatum minutes came against Cleveland and San Antonio, then against a Phoenix team nestled just outside the top six in the West.

The Celtics have outscored opponents by 7.8 points per 100 possessions in each of the past two seasons during Brown and Tatum’s shared floor time. A larger sample might pull their net rating back to earth a bit, but the success while Tatum is still reacclimatizing is rather remarkable. 

window.addEventListener(“message”,function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}});

Some wondered how the team would find shots for everybody upon Tatum’s return. But even as Brown operates as a bona fide MVP candidate, there have been plenty of looks to go around.

Tatum has averaged a team-high 18.6 shots per game in his five games back, while Brown is at 16.7 shots. What’s more, the combined averages for the Jays puts them in line with their output in recent seasons:

window.addEventListener(“message”,function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}});

Tatum averaged just 26 minutes per game in his first four games back before bumping up to 31 minutes in each of the last two games. He’s still well below his career average of 34.5 minutes per game and last season’s minutes average (36.4 per game). His output will increase as he shakes more rust and gets extended run on the court.

It was fair to expect some bumps in the road as Tatum worked his way back. But, for the most part, it’s been smooth sailing. In fact, what’s been most obvious is how Tatum’s presence has made things easier for Boston’s supporting cast. All the attention the Jays draw is creating opportunities for others.

Queta and White have each finished seven of Tatum’s 22 total assists since returning. Queta is figuring out pick-and-roll tendencies after limited reps with Tatum the previous two seasons, while White has routinely thrived off Tatum feeds. White is shooting 9-of-21 (42.9 percent) on all Tatum feeds, and Tatum’s presence should help White push his 3-point efficiency back up this season. 

The continued attention on Brown is helping Tatum, too: Tatum is shooting 55.6 percent on all Brown feeds. 

Boston’s biggest priority over these final 14 games is getting Tatum reps with the core that he’ll share much of his floor time with in the postseason. That the Celtics have enjoyed as much success as they have in the infancy of his return is a rather tantalizing indication of where this team could go by the time the playoffs arrive.

MMBets: The Atlanta Hawks visit the Dallas Mavericks

ATLANTA, GEORGIA - MARCH 16: Jalen Johnson #1 and Mouhamed Gueye #18 of the Atlanta Hawks celebrate a 124-112 victory over the Orlando Magic at State Farm Arena on March 16, 2026 in Atlanta, Georgia. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Todd Kirkland/Getty Images) | Getty Images

The Atlanta Hawks arrive at American Airlines Center on Wednesday riding a 10-game win streak, which is the sort of thing that makes a 23-win home team either lie down or get ornery. The Mavericks have been ornery lately. Cooper Flagg has scored 21 or more in three straight, PJ Washington has strung together back-to-back good nights, and this group…despite racking plenty of losses…refuses to develop the losing habits that a lesser-coached, lesser-charactered roster might by mid-March.

The Hawks are led by Nickeal Alexander-Walker, who just dropped 41 on the Magic, and Jalen Johnson, who has been a walking triple-double threat over Atlanta’s last three games. The same two guys who gave Dallas fits in the first meeting. Worth noting.

Let’s scan the lines in search of value.

🏀 Fixture: Atlanta Hawks (37-31) @ Dallas Mavericks (23-46) 📍 American Airlines Center — Dallas, TX 🕖 7:40 PM CST, Wednesday, March 18, 2026 📺 KFAA Channel 29 / MavsTV / NBA League Pass

📊 DraftKings Snapshot (as of 5:17 AM CST) Spread: ATL -8.5 (-102) | DAL +8.5 (-118) Total: 238.5 (O -105 / U -115) Moneyline: ATL -355 | DAL +280

📉 Game Side Lean: Dallas +8.5

Ten-game win streaks have a way of ending in the exact building where nobody expects them to. The Mavericks are home, they’re motivated, and this particular group has a habit of playing spoiler when the moment calls for it. Atlanta is good—genuinely good—but 8.5 points is asking a lot against a Dallas team that has been competitive far more often than its record suggests. Gafford and Caleb Martin are both questionable, and the Mavs’ frontcourt limitations could matter. But Flagg is locked in, Washington is finding himself again, and the number feels too generous. Dallas covers or wins outright. Either way, we like the plus side.

🔮 Total Lean: Over 238.5

Defense is a concept both these teams engage with selectively and without great enthusiasm. Atlanta has been scoring in bunches on their win streak, and Dallas—especially in home games where the crowd gives them something to play for—pushes pace and gets out in transition. Neither team has the personnel to grind this into a 105-103 affair. Expect points.

🎯 Player Props We Like

Cooper Flagg Over 21.5 Points (-107) Three straight games of 21 or more, and Atlanta’s defense hasn’t exactly been its calling card during this win streak. Flagg is in a groove, the usage is there, and this is a home game against a team with legitimate playoff ambitions—which means Flagg gets to play hero ball with real stakes attached. This number clears with a good third quarter.

Onyeka Okongwu Over 7.5 Rebounds (-127) Okongwu averages 7.8 rebounds on the season and Dallas’s frontcourt situation—Gafford questionable, Cisse limited—creates a landscape where interior boards are up for grabs. He should eat. The juice is a little steep but the matchup earns it.

💡 Summary: Dallas +8.5 for a team that doesn’t know how to quit. Over 238.5 because neither defense is going to save anyone. Flagg in a groove, Okongwu feasting on a thin Dallas frontcourt. Four picks. Go Mavs. Oh, and tonight’s ice cream of choice is Dark Cherry Truffle—get you some.

March Madness a stage for 3-way race for NBA draft's No. 1 pick

The debate over which player is taken first overall in this year’s NBA draft has to include Duke freshman Cameron Boozer, the clubhouse leader for national player of the year.

With his double-double consistency in leading the Blue Devils to the top of the USA TODAY Sports Men’s College Basketball Poll, Boozer has joined a pair of fellow freshmen who have paced the conversation since the summer in Kansas guard Darryn Peterson and Brigham Young forward AJ Dybantsa.

At various points this season, each of these three contenders has shown explosive bursts of production that paint him as the top player in a draft class that’s deep enough to have triggered tanking efforts among the worst teams in the league — and in turn made efforts to limit or prevent tanking a major theme for the NBA.

"It's an extremely strong draft class," said Ben Pfeifer, an independent draft analyst. "And it starts at the top with, I think, three MVP-level, No. 1-pick-caliber guys in Peterson, Dybantsa and Cameron Boozer. But then I think even as you go down there is a ton of quality depth. I think there are more guys that could reasonably go in the lottery than lottery spots available and more first-round-quality players than first-round spots."

In this month's NCAA tournament, front offices and talent evaluators will be keeping close tabs on Boozer, Dybantsa and Peterson as they attempt to answer one of the most intriguing questions of the 2025-26 season: Who goes No. 1?

Cameron Boozer’s consistency propels Duke

Cameron Boozer has led top-ranked Duke to ACC regular season and tournament titles and a No. 1 overall seed in the NCAA Tournament.

Following in the footsteps of former Duke star Cooper Flagg, who had a memorable one-year run under coach Jon Scheyer and is now putting together a transcendent rookie season for the Dallas Mavericks, Boozer is averaging 22.5 points, 10.2 rebounds and 4.2 assists per game for the top-ranked Blue Devils.

His consistency can’t be ignored: Boozer has scored in double figures in every game, has made at least half of his attempts in all but four games since early January and has played at least 31 minutes in every ACC game except for blowouts of Syracuse and Notre Dame.

“He’s been the most productive of all the freshmen and the most consistent at a high level,” said ESPN analyst Jay Bilas. “A lot of these guys are winners, but he’s got this winning gene that you don’t see very often.”

The son of former Duke forward and NBA All-Star Carlos Boozer, the freshman has excelled despite playing alongside a weaker supporting cast than the group that joined Flagg a season ago; two of Flagg’s teammates, Kon Knueppel and Khaman Maluach, were taken No. 4 and No. 10 overall in last June's draft, respectively.

In comparison, this year’s team has another pair of potential first-round selections in guard Isaiah Evans and center Patrick Ngongba II, though neither is currently predicted to be a lottery pick.

"I definitely don't think any of his teammates are as good as Kon Knueppel or Maluach were last year," Pfeifer said, adding Ngongba and Evans are both "mid-first round to potentially late-lottery-level players."

Still, whether Boozer is taken No. 1 depends in large part on which team is drafting first and that team’s personnel needs, and whether teams see a difference-making, franchise-shaping talent in the 6-9 forward. For example, the Indiana Pacers could choose Boozer should they land the first pick given next year’s expected return of guard Tyrese Haliburton.

“He’s a force,” Scheyer said of Boozer following Duke’s Feb. 28 win against Virginia. “No question about it. He sets a great tone for us with his rebounding and rim attacks.”

Darryn Peterson’s performance, availability spark acclaim, concern

Darryn Peterson has a tantalizing skill set and ability to score at all three levels.

There is no question Peterson can play at an absurdly high level.

The five-star recruit is averaging 19.8 points per game for No. 17 Kansas while making 44.2% of his shots from the field and 38.4% from 3-point range. He’s cracked the 20-point mark 11 times, led by a season-high 32 points in an overtime win against TCU in early January.

Along the way, his NBA-ready skill set and shot creation paints Peterson as a plug-and-play prospect with the potential to develop into an elite scorer and franchise cornerstone.

The question is whether Peterson will play — and that question has so far defined the Jayhawks’ season.

A herky-jerky year has seen Peterson miss games with a hamstring injury, an ankle injury and due to illness. He’s also left games with cramping issues, including during a win against Oklahoma State on Feb. 18 that saw Peterson check himself out of action three minutes into the second half.

By that point, Peterson had scored 23 points on 7-of-10 shooting in just 18 minutes of action.

“It's a concern," Kansas coach Bill Self said postgame. “I thought we were past it, but obviously we're not. It's certainly a concern."

Since that game, Peterson is averaging 31.6 minutes a game, so whatever message was sent was received.

Another issue has been Peterson’s lackluster play against the top opponents on the Jayhawks’ schedule. In four games against the best teams in the Big 12 — a loss to Arizona, a split with Houston and a loss to Iowa State — Peterson averaged 15.5 points while shooting 19-of-56 from the field and 9-of 26 from deep.

With Boozer, there may be a concern that his long-term NBA impact won’t match the expectations heaped on the No. 1 pick, especially in a draft class with this much star power. But Peterson’s candidacy for the top pick comes with a different sort of risk: Does he have the makeup to stand up to the hype and pressure that come with going No. 1 overall?

"I’m not concerned about it unless something is revealed that’s factual that gives me concern," said Bilas. "I know him to be a competitor in talking to everybody that’s dealt with him, so I’m not worried about it. The talent there is undeniable, and there’d have to be a red flag you can see from 50 miles away to keep you from a talent like that."

AJ Dybantsa does it all for BYU

AJ Dybantsa led the nation in scoring at a little over 25 points per game.

Meanwhile, Dybantsa has been a dynamic and consistent scorer for a BYU team that started the season 17-2, but has stumbled lately as the Cougars deal with injuries.

His commitment to BYU as a five-star prospect from Brockton, Massachusetts, was seen as emblematic of the NIL era. After reaching last year’s Sweet 16 before falling to Alabama, the Cougars were expected to take a step forward by adding Dybantsa into a mix that included holdovers such as guard Richie Saunders and fellow newcomer Robert Wright III, a Baylor transfer.

The question of whether the Cougars parlay this roster into a deeper postseason run will be answered soon. But Dybantsa has met and even exceeded expectations as the nation’s top scorer and one of the most well-rounded wings in the Power Five.

He’s scored at least 20 points in 13 games in a row, and averaged 31 points in the Cougars' three Big 12 tournament games. Dybantsa poured in a season-high 43 points in a 91-78 win against rival Utah on Jan. 24.

"He's a truly absurd scorer," Pfeifer said. Dybantsa has "some of the best footwork you're ever going to see from a player this age," he added.

"Truly absurd stuff that he can do with pivots and step-throughs and just creative moves that you very rarely see players like him pulling out on a basketball court."

Overall, he’s averaging 25.3 points per game, 6.7 rebounds and 3.8 assists per game while making 51.3% of his attempts. Dybantsa has already become just the 20th freshman since 2000 to score at least 700 points and is just the third freshman to lead the country in scoring since the NCAA began officially tracking statistics in the late 1940s.

"I don't think it's hype with AJ Dybantsa," Bilas said. "I think it's factual. Like, when you saw him in high school, you knew: This guy is the real deal. And he's done nothing but elevate judgment on that. So whatever expectation he had as a freshman, I think by all measure he's exceeded it. It's like he's made in a lab for the NBA. He's got size and crazy length and a skill set that is transferrable to the league right now."

NBA mock draft: Who goes No. 1?

In the latest mock draft from For The Win, AJ Dybantsa is projected to go No. 1 to the Indiana Pacers, followed by Darryn Peterson to the Washington Wizards at No. 2 and Cameron Boozer to the Sacramento Kings at No. 3.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: NBA draft No. 1 pick a 3-way race between Dybantsa, Boozer, Peterson

The Great Tank Race, Vol. IV: hypocrisy, betrayal, and Cody Williams

PORTLAND, OREGON - MARCH 13: Cody Williams #5 of the Utah Jazz dribbles against Scoot Henderson #00 of the Portland Trail Blazers during the first half at Moda Center on March 13, 2026 in Portland, Oregon. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Soobum Im/Getty Images) | Getty Images

A recently discovered letter, of unknown age and origin:

To Adam Silver and the basketball powers-that-be: Why so quiet?

From your mighty cloud on high, you struck Utah and Indiana for their heresy and crimes against the sanctity of the game. You sent doctors and insisted on micromanaging every personnel decision of these pitiful teams, lest your followers dwindle into disbelief through the mighty vice of tanking’s temptation. The underlings have paid the price, and your word was made law.

You did not hesitate to pass righteous judgment against the wicked in the past. Yet now, as Utah dives to the bottom of the pile, the gods have fallen silent?

Clear and obvious tanking measures continue to spread like a plague across the dregs of professional basketball, and the protectors are nowhere to be seen. Their influence is muted. Their hand is invisible. My faith has reached a point of crisis — a hinge point from which I feel destined to fall. I feel on the verge of collapse, as Sacramento, Washington, Brooklyn, Dallas, and yes, even my home of Utah, laugh in the face of judgment, smile in the crosshairs of your vengeance, and mock your authority with every subsequent contest.

Are you there? Can you hear my plea? All I can ask is for justice to be handed to the deserving. Were you simply hoping to make an example of the unpopular? Do you fear those beneath you so deeply?

NBA Olympus has fallen, and Silver is tarnished.

(Author Unknown)

Previous volumes of The Great Tank Race: I | II | III


1- (+3) Indiana Pacers (15-54)

Like waves upon a stormy sea, the Pacers rise and fall in the order of the tank race. Just a month ago, they had dropped all the way to fourth place.

But then they lost 14 straight and lurched right to the bottom again. Congratulations are in order because that is their second streak of 13+ losses this season, and they are just two away from tying Sacramento’s record of 16. The lords of the tank shook off the chains of mediocrity and have embraced bloated, unapologetic self-sabotage. I have never seen something quite so beautiful in my entire life. Indy has not won a basketball game since the last edition of this saga and has brought meaning to meaningless basketball.

The possibility of adding one of this year’s top prospects should have the Pacers’ front office in a frenzy, because I can imagine any of Dybantsa, Peterson, Boozer, or Wilson pairing effortlessly with Tyrese Haliburton. When all seemed lost, they reclaimed their throne and kingdom.

I bend the knee to you, O rightful King of the Great Tank race.

2- (+0) Washington Wizards (16-52) 1.5 GB

Yes, Trae Young is finally wearing basketball shorts again, but Washington is in no rush to push him into heavy minutes at this point in the season. Gradually bringing their injured stars along on minutes restrictions cost Utah $500,000. That service is free in the nation’s capital.

If you thought that Indiana’s 14-game losing streak is impressive, the Wiz are not far behind — currently shuffling through a 13-game slumber of their own. Two titans of the tank are doing battle at the top, and there’s very little the higher-ups of the league can do to stand in their way.

3- (+2) Brooklyn Nets (17-51) 2.5 GB

Yes, one-man shooting gallery Egor Demin is out for the year with plantar fasciitis, and yes, the Nets have done very well to position themselves in the bottom three (equal odds for the number one pick), but there’s trouble over the horizon. When it comes to strength of schedule, the Brooklyn Nets have 14 games and the fifth-easiest remaining slate of any team in the NBA — easier than any of their tank race adversaries.

Considering their paper-thin curtain of just a half-game separating Brooklyn from Sacramento, the comfort of the top-3 and an equal share of number-one pick odds exchange hands of the Tank Race contenders on nearly a game-by-game basis.

Brooklyn, a team that quintuple-dipped in the first round of last year’s draft, is hungry for more. They’ll have plenty of chances to claim losses at the expense of their tank race foes down the home stretch. Lose those games, however, and the crowded mass at the bottom of the standings could spit you out far from the top pick.

4- (-3) Sacramento Kings (18-51) 3.0 GB

Kings.

You guys can’t even tank right.

5- (+1) Utah Jazz (20-48) 5.5 GB

With the hope that Keyonte George receives a full recovery from his hamstring tear suffered against New York, Keyonte’s availability was only going to hurt his team’s chances in the Tank Race. Utah has become one of basketball’s most exciting teams, promising a starting lineup of George (who is playing at an All-Star level this season, and I will personally fight anyone who disagrees), Markkanen, JJJ, Kessler, and Ace Bailey/whoever Utah snags with their first-round pick. Heck, Cody Williams just had a 34-point, 7-assist, 7-rebound game against Portland. The atmosphere is crackling in the Salt Lake Valley.

Any of Dybantsa, Boozer, Peterson, or even Darius Acuff would be incredible additions to a Jazz squad that feels they are just one foundational player away from competing in the Western Conference — and they’re tanking like their lives depend on it.

Losers in 2 of their last 10, Utah is climbing the ladder — or sliding down the fireman’s pole, depending on which way you prefer to orient your standings page — and gaining ground on a Kings team that is 5-5 in their last 10, and actively competing on a nightly basis against the customs of the Tankers’ Guild.

You tell me which is detrimental to the integrity of the game.

t6- (+1) Dallas Mavericks (23-46) 8.0 GB

Cooper Flagg is Cooper Flagg-ing once again, and the Mavericks are winning basketball games. This is tremendous news for Utah, whose shirt collar has become damp with condensation after these months of the Mavericks breathing down their necks in the standings.

The Mavs lucked into the number one pick last season after one of the most sanity-defying trades in recent memory, and have only made the Luka exchange worse by turning around to sell low on an aging, and (surprise, surprise) injured Anthony Davis. Yes, Nico Harrison is no longer with the team, and the whole “win-now” motivation behind dealing Doncic was his idea, but Dallas is years removed from competitive basketball, even if Kyrie Irving decides to return from his cryogenic chamber to play NBA basketball again.

If Dallas gets the number-one pick, we revolt.

t6- (-3) New Orleans Pelicans (23-46) 8.0 GB

Bad news, Atlanta. The Pelicans learned how to win.

New Orleans’ first-round pick is owned by the Hawks, all because the Pelicans needed Derik Queen. Queen is excellent for a late-lottery pick, don’t get me wrong, but New Orleans has sabotaged their own future during a present that promised, well, many more lottery picks before they can set their gaze upon trophies.

The Hawks — as hawks often do — swooped at the opportunity to claim an easy kill. The Pelicans are no longer a bottom-three team, no, but this is a bleak organization, and has been for an agonizingly long time.


Calvin Barrett is a writer, editor, and prolific Mario Kart racer located in Tokyo, Japan. He has covered the NBA and College Sports since 2024.

Former reality TV star Jessie Holmes repeats as champion of the grueling Iditarod sled dog race

NOME, Alaska (AP) — Former reality TV star Jessie Holmes cruised to a repeat victory in the Iditarod, the roughly 1,000-mile (1,609-kilometer) sled dog race in Alaska.

Holmes guided his dog team across the finish line Tuesday night in the old Gold Rush town of Nome, a Bering Sea coastal community. He pumped both fists in the air as the crowd cheered for him and his team of 12 dogs.

After finishing, the dogs got steaks and Holmes answered some questions accompanied by his lead dogs, Polar and Zeus.

“Zeus led every single run except one. I just wanted to let someone else have some fun. And Polar deserves it more than anybody,” he said. “He leads by example.”

The race started March 8 in Willow, a day after the ceremonial start was held in Anchorage. The course took dog teams and their mushers over two mountain ranges, along the frozen Yukon River and across the unpredictable Bering Sea ice.

Holmes, a former cast member on the National Geographic reality show “Life Below Zero,” is the third competitor in the 54-year history of the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race to repeat the year after winning for the first time. The others were Susan Butcher in 1986-1987 and Lance Mackey in 2007-2008. Both went on to win four titles.

Holmes told The Associated Press before the Iditarod that this year’s race was the most important of his career. “That’s hard to put that on yourself because you got to live with that pressure every day,” Holmes said. “And if I do not make it, it is going to absolutely crush me.”

He will pocket about $80,000 for this year’s win, up from the $57,000-plus he took home last year. This year's purse was boosted by financial support from Norwegian billionaire Kjell Rokke, who participated in a newly created, noncompetitive amateur category. Rokke reached Nome on Monday, under rules that allowed him to have outside support from a former Iditarod champ, flexible rest periods and to swap out dogs.

Holmes' first Iditarod was in 2018. His seventh place finish earned him rookie of the year honors. He has now raced in the Iditarod nine times, earning seven top 10 finishes. He’s been in the top five the last five races.

He appeared for eight years on “Life Below Zero,” which chronicled the hardships of people living in rural Alaska.

Holmes used the money he earned from the show to buy better dogs and equipment, and also was able to purchase raw land near Denali National Park and Preserve. A carpenter by trade, he’s carved his homestead in the wilderness, where his closest neighbor is about 30 miles (48 kilometers) away.

Rokke, who now lives in Switzerland, provided $100,000 in additional prize money and $170,000 to Alaska Native villages that serve as checkpoints. Another musher in the noncompetitive “expedition” class, Canadian entrepreneur Steve Curtis, pledged $50,000 to help youth sports programs in the villages. Curtis did not finish the race.

The race’s biggest critic, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, has claimed that more than 150 dogs have died in the history of the Iditarod. It urged Rokke to spend his money to help dogs rather than put them through “hazards and misery.”

The Iditarod has never provided its count of dogs who have died on the race.

One dog has died in this year's race, a 4-year-old female named Charly on musher Mille Porsild's team, the Iditarod said in a statement Tuesday. A necropsy will be conducted.

Thirty-four competitive mushers started, matching the inaugural 1973 race for the second fewest in race history. The retirements of many longtime mushers and the high cost of supplies, such as dog food, have kept the fields small this decade.

8 unpredictable March Madness top seeds that may bust NCAA Tournament brackets

Since March Madness became part of the sports vernacular, the NCAA Tournament bracket pool has become a familiar exercise. Broadly speaking, participants come from two main categories. There are the more casual fans who only pay attention to men’s college hoops around tourney time. They’ll do a modicum of research but will for the most part rely on name recognition and seeding to fill out their brackets.

Then there are the diehards, those who follow the sport from November onward in hopes of accumulating more knowledge for when the bracket is finally unveiled.

This is for the latter group, the ones who have been watching certain teams all season and are all too aware just how wildly unpredictable they can be. These are the teams that will cause self-described bracket experts the most angst as they consider their picks. They’re the teams that have the talent necessary for a deep run, even perhaps capable of sending a No. 1 packing. But they are also inconsistent enough that they’re just as likely to flame out in the first weekend. As you consider what to do with these eight teams, all we can say is, good luck.

Kansas

The Jayhawks’ history with Bill Self at the helm suggests their Final Four potential shouldn’t be dismissed. Their Big 12 results this season were a mixed bag, however, with impressive wins against Arizona and Iowa State mingled with ugly losses to bottom-tier finishers West Virginia and Arizona State. KU’s inconsistency isn’t entirely attributable to Darryn Peterson’s inconsistent health status, though that is certainly part of the story. Flory Bidunga can be dominant at times and invisible at others, and Melvin Council Jr. can be sizzling hot or ice cold.

Kansas guard Darryn Peterson (22) dribbles the ball against Texas Tech guard Jazz Henderson (2) during their game at United Supermarkets Arena.

Purdue

The Boilermakers were voted No. 1 in the preseason poll. At the start of the campaign and again at the end they looked the part. In between, however, they presented as a middle-of-the-pack Big Ten squad, a curious situation for a team with several multi-year starters. When Purdue struggled, there were issues at both ends of the floor, at times disinterested on defense and making bad decisions with the ball. Did the Boilermakers figure things out at the Big Ten tournament, or will there be a relapse at an inopportune time?

REGION BREAKDOWNS, PREDICTIONS: East | South | Midwest | West

Arkansas

There are many reasons to back the Razorbacks in their region. Their SEC tournament title would seem to indicate they’re heating up at the right time, and coach John Calipari has taken his share of teams to the final weekend. But their path to the SEC championship was cleared for them a bit as they didn’t have to face Florida or Alabama, and as good as Darius Acuff Jr. has been over the last few weeks, only a few teams have gone the distance with a talented freshman lead guard.

Gonzaga

Putting the Bulldogs in your Sweet 16 is usually a safe choice, but how far to take this group beyond that is tough to predict, especially since they’ll be matched up with equally volatile Purdue if the seeds hold. Gonzaga always plays a challenging non-conference schedule by necessity, and the results this season were mixed. The team defense is usually sound, but the Zags might not have enough perimeter scoring options to compensate when Graham Ike inevitably has to contend with bigger post players.

Connecticut

A few weeks ago, a complete domination of St. John’s had the Huskies on course for a top seed and well positioned for a shot at a third national title in four years. Since then, there was a loss to Marquette and a payback defeat to the Red Storm in the Big East final, not to mention numerous other uneven outings and more Danny Hurley meltdowns. It’s quite the conundrum when contemplating just how far to trust the Huskies in their extremely loaded regional. When Solo Ball is on UConn can beat anyone, but when he isn’t the rest of his game suffers.

Alabama

The Crimson Tide were going to be on this wildcard list even before the news of Aden Holloway’s legal troubles came out. Regardless, Alabama’s feast-or-famine approach at the 3-point arc can lead all the way to the Final Four as it did a couple years ago. This year’s version lacks rim protection, so the team has to rely on ball pressure to generate takeaways, a high-energy approach that might not be sustainable in the quick turnaround setting of the tournament. And missing one of their best players on the eve of the event may be too tough to manage.

Illinois

At the start of February, the Fighting Illini were riding a 12-game winning streak with a path to a No. 1 seed in sight with veteran guard Kylan Boswell returning from injury. But then Illinois went 4-5 down the stretch, with four of the five losses coming in overtime. All the defeats were against other tournament teams, but their troubling inability to make winning plays in close games has to be on everyone’s mind as the Big Dance tips off.

Virginia

While seeing the Cavaliers on the bracket is not new, this year’s version is constructed quite differently than the Tony Bennett teams of recent vintage. First and foremost, fans will see the team play at a much faster tempo under first-year coach Ryan Odom. But the real mystery with UVa is just how they’ll stack up against teams from other power leagues. The Cavs handled most of their competition in the watered-down ACC, but aside from a win against Texas there wasn’t much of note on their non-conference resume entering the postseason.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: March Madness bracket busters: Eight top seeds to avoid picking

Big Ten hasn't won NCAA Tournament since 2000. Will March Madness drought end this year?

The Big Ten is one of the two wealthiest and most powerful entities in college sports, an 18-school, coast-to-coast colossus that features many of the biggest universities and most recognizable brands in American higher education.

For all its money and influence, though, there’s something quite notable that the conference is missing: a men’s college basketball national championship in the past 25 years.

As the 2026 NCAA Tournament begins this week, the Big Ten will look to rectify a lingering and unsavory bit of history by having one of its teams cut down the nets in Indianapolis on April 6 after the national title game, something that hasn’t happened since Michigan State did it all the way back in 2000.

REGION BREAKDOWNS, PREDICTIONS: East | South | Midwest | West

Just how long has this drought been?

When the Spartans enjoyed their one shining moment, Bill Clinton was still the U.S. president. Later that April, the rock band Metallica sued digital file sharing application Napster. Jason Richardson, a freshman guard on that Michigan State team, now has a son who’s in his rookie season in the NBA. Richardson’s fellow freshman that season, Mat Ishbia, now has a net worth of $8.5 billion and owns the NBA’s Phoenix Suns. Tom Izzo, who now looks like this, looked like this.

To quote a popular song from around the time of the Spartans’ triumph, it’s been a while.

What’s made the drought so confounding is Big Ten teams haven gotten close to winning a championship. It’s not as if this is the Patriot League or the WAC, where it has a single representative in the tournament that’s fortunate to win a game. Big Ten teams regularly reach the biggest and brightest stages in college basketball; they just haven’t been able to close the deal.

Since Michigan State’s title in 2000, 15 teams from the conference have made it to the Final Four. Eight of those squads advanced to the national championship game, but in each instance, they lost. A couple of them came agonizingly close, with Illinois losing to North Carolina, 75-70, in 2005 and Wisconsin coming up short against Duke, 68-63, in 2015.

It’s not like its teams haven’t been in advantageous spots entering the tournament in recent years, either. Since the NCAA Tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1985, 35 of the 40 national champions (87.5%) have been a No. 1, No. 2 or No. 3 seed. Since 2018, Big Ten teams have accounted for 17 of those 84 spots on the bracket (20.2%).

Even if current Big Ten compatriot Maryland, which won the national championship in 2002 while a member of the ACC, was included as one of the Big Ten’s championships, the conference has still gone nearly a quarter-century without a title.

During that same stretch, other power conferences have repeatedly had its teams hoist a trophy at the end of the Final Four.

Since 2000, the Big East and ACC have each had eight teams win championships. During that same stretch, the SEC has had four champions and the Big 12 three. Even the American, which has disintegrated in recent years into a one- or two-bid league, had a title-winner on its resume, thanks to UConn in 2014.

Why has the Big Ten gone so long without winning March Madness?

There are a number of factors that have contributed to the Big Ten’s tournament woes.

For one, it’s a single-elimination format that can create some extreme variance and unexpected results. Without absolving some of its missteps, it’s quite possible the Big Ten’s just had some rotten luck.

Beyond that, many of the Big Ten teams that made and ultimately lost the national championship game had the misfortune of running up against some of the best teams in modern college basketball history. The North Carolina team Illinois lost to in 2005 was 33-4 and had four of the top 14 picks in that year’s NBA draft. Two years later, a Greg Oden and Mike Conley-led Ohio State team lost to a Florida team that brought back the entire starting five from its national championship team the year before. In 2009, Michigan State was blown out by a North Carolina team that was 34-4. Wisconsin came up short against a 2015 Duke team that won 35 games and had two top-10 NBA draft picks. Michigan was handled by a 2018 Villanova squad that won 36 games and had Jalen Brunson, Mikal Bridges and Donte DiVincenzo on its roster. Two years ago, Zach Edey and Purdue weren’t able to hang with a buzzsaw of a UConn team that had won 27 of its previous 28 games, including five NCAA Tournament games that were decided by an average of 25 points.

The wait for a champion has been even longer on the women’s side, where Purdue in 1999 is the league’s last national title winner. At least some of that can be explained away by a small handful of teams that own a disproportionate number of championships during that drought – namely UConn, with its 11 titles since 2000.

Can the Big Ten win a national championship this year?

The Big Ten enters the 2026 NCAA Tournament about as well-positioned as any conference in men’s college basketball to take home the sport’s ultimate prize.

Four of the top 10 and five of the top 13 teams on the NCAA selection committee’s seed list for the tournament are from the Big Ten. Of the 20 teams that have a top-four seed in the tournament, five are from the Big Ten, the most of any conference.

Its best bet for a champion this year appears to be Michigan, which went 31-3 in the regular season and has one of the country’s best players in All-America forward Yaxel Lendeborg.

Big Ten March Madness championship losses

Here’s a look at Big Ten teams that have lost in the national championship game in the years since Michigan State’s NCAA title in 2000:

  • 2002: Maryland 64, Indiana 52
  • 2005: North Carolina 75, Illinois 70
  • 2007: Florida 84, Ohio State 75
  • 2009: North Carolina 89, Michigan State 72
  • 2013: Louisville 82, Michigan 76
  • 2015: Duke 68, Wisconsin 63
  • 2018: Villanova 79, Michigan 62
  • 2024: Connecticut 75, Purdue 60

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Big Ten March Madness title drought could end in 2026 NCAA Tournament

Arizona 'built for' March Madness, says one expert. Call it proof of Big 12 surge

Fran Franschilla’s job calling Big 12 games gives him a front-row seat to the best action in college basketball, but that’s where he stops you. Don’t label broadcasting Big 12 hoops work.

“They pay me to travel, not to work,” Fraschilla, ESPN's veteran color commentator and a former coach, says affably. “I’ve been blessed, because I’ve watched the league grow up over 20 years.”

Along the way, Fraschilla became ESPN’s voice of the Big 12 and an unofficial conference advocate. It’s easy to advocate for the Big 12 in a season when the conference supplied peak entertainment and premier performance.

The SEC led all conferences with 10 NCAA Tournament bids, a show of its depth, but ball-knowers recognize the best batch of hoops lived inside the Big 12.

Now, to back that up on the final exam that is the NCAA Tournament.

The Big 12 earned eight bids. Fraschilla counts three with Final Four potential: No. 1 seed Arizona and No. 2 seeds Houston and Iowa State.

That list would be bigger, he says, if not for injuries to Texas Tech’s JT Toppin and Brigham Young’s Richie Saunders, a pair of big-time ballers who went down in February.

As for national championship potential? Start with Arizona.

“I give Arizona as good of chance as anybody in the field to cut down the nets in Indianapolis,” Fraschilla, who coached Manhattan to a mammoth NCAA Tournament upset of Oklahoma in 1995, told me.

Why Arizona is a top March Madness championship contender

Two of Arizona’s key bench players started on last year’s team that reached the Sweet 16. That speaks to the quality of a starting lineup in which every player averages in double digits scoring.

“They are as complete a team as there is in college basketball," Fraschilla said. "First of all, they are an old-school, bludgeon-you-inside team with three terrific post players. They have as good of a leader at point guard, (Jaden Bradley), as any team in the country.”

Oh, we’ve yet to mention dynamite freshman guard Brayden Burries, the team’s leading scorer.

Try to go devil’s advocate and point out Arizona’s history of March Madness shortcomings the past 25 years, and Fraschilla uncorks the ultimate comeback.

“I can say the same thing about an entire league: the Big Ten,” he says.

Fair point.

Anyway, why should these Wildcats fret about what happened to the 2023 team, which lost to 15th-seeded Princeton in the first round? Or, the 2018 team that got blasted by 13th-seeded Buffalo in the first round? The past three times Arizona earned a No. 1 seed in the past quarter-century, it got bounced before the Final Four. That’s for you to consider as you fill out your bracket, but whispers of the past are not for these Wildcats to fuss over.

“They play like they’re in a cocoon,” Fraschilla said, “so I’m not sure how much of the noise they hear.”

If you need more than one man’s opinion, there’s also Ken Pomeroy's rankings. Basketball nerds cite KenPom as if it’s college basketball’s holy literature. His metrics rank Arizona, Houston and Iowa State among the six best teams, making the Big 12 the only conference with more than one team tucked inside the top six.

The Big 12's “Big Monday” games, with Jon Sciambi and Fraschilla on the call, showcased premier teams in elite environments with future NBA stars.

“Big Monday has become must-watch TV,” Fraschilla said.

Truth.

The Big 12’s TV audience on “Big Monday” doubled this season, according to commissioner Brett Yormark, to average 1.7 million viewers.

Consider it evidence of how the Big 12 survived conference realignment.

Big 12 basketball emerged strong on this side of realignment

Realignment is bloodsport, and the Big 12 hit an inflection point in 2021 after Oklahoma and Texas set out for the SEC’s richer pastures. The impending exodus of the Big 12’s two richest brands cast the future of the conference into peril.

Would it be raided for parts? Merge with the Pac-12?

Neither.

Option 3: Fortify.

The conference steadied by adding BYU, Central Florida, Cincinnati and Houston under outbound commissioner Bob Bowlsby. Then, Bowlsby’s successor Yormark secured a media rights extension with ESPN and Fox before looting the Pac-12 for Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado and Utah.

While the Pac-12 collapsed into a shell of its former self, the Big 12 went from endangered species to basketball behemoth.

“The league came out much stronger on the basketball side than anybody would have realized,” Fraschilla said.

Yormark describes his conference as “the second-best basketball league in America behind the NBA,” and he promised to cash in when the conference hits the media rights marketplace again in 2030.

In the meantime, the Big 12 is on national championship watch, with Arizona forming the tip of the spear.

“They have a countenance about them,” Fraschilla said of coach Tommy Lloyd’s Wildcats, “that is built for the tournament.”

Blake Toppmeyer is a columnist for the USA TODAY Network. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: March Madness will test if Arizona, Big 12 are 'built for' NCAA bracket

Mild West: Why NCAA Tournament has a West Coast problem

SAN DIEGO – Two of the greatest men’s basketball coaches of all time had to solve a basic geography test this week.

Where is San Diego, California?

“It’s not Alaska,” quipped St. John’s coach Rick Pitino, who is from New York.

Where is Portland, Oregon?

“Are we in the United States?” Arkansas coach John Calipari asked on ESPN. “I thought they put us in another country.”

Pitino’s team from New York plays Northern Iowa in a first-round NCAA Tournament game more than 2,400 miles away in San Diego on Friday, March 20. Calipari’s team plays Hawaii in a first-round game more than 1,600 miles away in Portland on Thursday.

But this is what happens when the NCAA still tries to keep a geographical balance for postseason game sites even though the sport itself has become even more entrenched in the Eastern and Central time zones. Only 10 of the 68 tournament teams (14.7%) come from west of the Kansas border this year, tied for the second-fewest number of western teams in the 21st century, according to data provided to USA TODAY Sports by Stats Perform.

There are several reasons for this, one of which is baked into the cake: Only 63 of 361 teams (17.5%) in Division I are located west of the Central time zone, according to Stats Perform.

At the same time, other money-driven developments raise even bigger questions about the future of the game out west after the implosion of the old Pac-12 Conference in 2024 — a seismic shift that left zero power conferences headquartered west of metro Dallas.

Blame it on realignment, too

Only two teams from the former Pac-12 (UCLA and Arizona) earned NCAA Tournament bids this year, which is tied for the lowest in the modern era for legacy Pac-12 teams, all located in the Pacific and Mountain time zones.

Just 10 years ago, this former “conference of champions” earned seven bids to the tournament. Just two years ago, a record 16 teams west of Kansas earned NCAA bids, including four from the Pac-12.

But then UCLA and USC left the Pac-12 to earn more money in the Big Ten, based in Chicago.

Oregon and Washington followed them there, while Colorado, Utah, Arizona and Arizona State left for the Big 12, based in Texas.

The result is more crowded competition in the Big Ten (now with 18 teams) and Big 12 (now with 16 teams). UCLA earned one of nine NCAA bids for the Big Ten but now plays a first-round game in Philadelphia this week after playing in the Big Ten tournament last weekend in Chicago.

“We’re not concerned with travel,” UCLA coach Mick Cronin said this week. “We’re experienced at it.”

New York and Philadelphia teams to invade San Diego

The NCAA still tries to make this easier. It says so right in its guidelines for geographic placement of teams in the tournament.

“Teams should remain as close to their home region as possible, based on mileage,” the guidelines state.

In theory, this would ease the travel burden on teams and help maximize attendance at games.

But tournament game sites are set years in advance. And there’s only so much the selection committee can do if only four teams earned bids from California. As a result, three of the eight teams playing first-round games in San Diego this week are from New York or Philadelphia but only one is from California (No. 13-seed Cal Baptist from Riverside).

This isn't ideal from a business standpoint if the goal is to sell tickets and cultivate the next generation of fans in California, a state that not only has the most people but also a rich hoops history, at least until recently. In men's and women's basketball, the state has the most combined NCAA Tournament winners, Final Four Most Outstanding Players and NCAA Tournament-winning coaches since 1939 with 37, according to a recent study by BetMGM.

John Calipari says 'We only have to fly six hours'

Of the four regions in the bracket this year, one is still called the “West Region,” whose championship will be decided this month in San Jose, California. The problem is there might not be many local fans to watch it there. Only five of the 16 first-round slots in the West Region are from teams west of Kansas. Only two of those five are among the five highest seeds in the region — No. 1 Arizona and No. 3 Gonzaga.

“We’ll have maybe a few hundred people,” Pitino said of the trip to San Diego. “That’s about it… It’s not ideal traveling to the West Coast, but you deal with it and you just make the best of it.”

Calipari’s team was scheduled to depart for Portland early on Tuesday, March 17.

“We only have to fly six hours to get there,” Calipari said on Sirius XM. “So you know, it’s not all that bad.”

His comments dripped with sarcasm, but if he wins his next two games in Oregon, his team will be rewarded. Arkansas would play the following week in San Jose, which is further south on the West Coast and at least a little bit closer to home.

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Why NCAA Tournament teams have to travel so far for March Madness

Knicks’ latest update on injured Miles McBride: ‘progressing well’

An image collage containing 1 images, Image 1 shows A smiling Miles McBride (center), who underwent a sports hernia surgery and has been out since late January, reacts from the bench during the Knicks' 136-110 blowout win over the Pacers on March 17, 2026 at the Garden

The Knicks announced encouraging news Tuesday about the recovery of Miles McBride, who is taking contact on the court and “progressing well,” the team said.

McBride has been out since late January and underwent sports hernia surgery, saying last month he hopes to return before the playoffs.

The sixth man has missed 24 straight games, including Tuesday’s 136-110 win over the Pacers.

A smiling Miles McBride (center), who underwent a sports hernia surgery and has been out since late January, reacts from the bench during the Knicks’ 136-110 blowout win over the Pacers on March 17, 2026 at the Garden. Getty Images

“Anytime we can get healthy, yeah [I’m encouraged],” coach Mike Brown said before tipoff. “I try not to hear [the updates] though, because does that mean he’ll be back in two weeks, three weeks, a week, 10 days? I don’t know.

“Deuce was playing well for us when this happened. It’s part of the season, so keep fingers crossed, allow our medical crew who has done a fantastic job, and when he comes back we’ll all be excited.”

Before his injury — which was uncovered as the guard underwent tests on a sore ankle — McBride was the top bench scorer, averaging 12.9 points while shooting a career-best 42 percent from beyond the arc.

Armed with the knowledge McBride would miss an extended period, the Knicks successfully pushed to acquire point guard Jose Alvarado in a trade.

Alvarado, Landry Shamet and Jordan Clarkson have taken up the most minutes at backup guard.


Brown believes Jalen Brunson will play in the next game Friday at Brooklyn.

Brunson missed Tuesday’s win with a neck strain. It was his first DNP since mid-January, a stretch of 27 consecutive appearances. The Knicks are now 2-4 this season without him.

“I imagine [he’ll play in Brooklyn]. … There’s two days off before the next game,” Brown said. “There’s plenty of time to get himself right.”

Brunson needs just one more game to qualify for postseason awards. He’s projected to earn another All-NBA selection, his third straight.


Clarkson, who played 20 minutes Tuesday with 10 points, supplanted Mohamed Diawara (six minutes, zero points) in the rotation.

“Jordan went stretches without playing this season and kept himself ready. Offensively, he’s been good for us. So I decided to throw him out there before Mo,” Brown said. “We’ll see what happens going forward. … [Diawara] just has to keep himself ready like Jordan did.”


A slumping Mikal Bridges was left on the court in garbage time so he might regain confidence.

“He hit a couple shots down the stretch and to try to get anybody that hasn’t shot well from the 3-point line, to try to get him more looks, especially in a game like this, was a good thing,” Brown said. “To try to get him an extra look or two down the stretch is something we wanted to do.”

Thunder first NBA side to clinch play-off place

Oklahoma City Thunder's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander in action against Orlando Magic in the NBA
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is averaging 31.7 points per game this season [Reuters]

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander enjoyed another 40-point night as the Oklahoma City Thunder beat the Orlando Magic 113-108 to become the first NBA team to secure a play-off berth.

The 27-year-old Canadian went 14 from 27 from the field as he extended his record of most 20-point games in a row to 129.

Chet Holmgren added 20 points and 12 rebounds as the Western Conference leaders claimed a ninth straight win to improve to 54-15 for the season.

"We got off to a good start but then the car kind of came off the road for a little bit," reigning NBA Most Valuable Player Gilgeous-Alexander said.

"But that's what great teams do - they figure out a way to get the car back on the road, they figure out a way to go into a building and win a game when the chips are stacked against you, and we did that tonight."

San Antonio Spurs remain second in the West after a comfortable 132-104 win over the Sacramento Kings, while the Minnesota Timberwolves beat the Phoenix Suns 116-104.

In the Eastern Conference, the Detroit Pistons handed the Washington Wizards a 13th straight loss to strengthen their position at the top.

But the 130-117 triumph was marred by an injury to star point guard Cade Cunningham, who had to leave the game in the first quarter with a back issue.

The New York Knicks stay third in the East after a thumping 136-110 win over the Indiana Pacers, a 14th consecutive loss leaving last year's NBA Finals runners-up 15-54 this term.

Spurs blow out Kings to cap off mini road trip

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA - MARCH 17: Victor Wembanyama #1 of the San Antonio Spurs dunks on Maxime Raynaud #42 and DeMar DeRozan #10 of the Sacramento Kings during the first half at Golden 1 Center on March 17, 2026 in Sacramento, California. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Ezra Shaw/Getty Images) | Getty Images

Following a rollercoaster win in LA on Monday, the Spurs extended their win streak against the lowly Kings on the second night of a back-to-back. 

The start of this game was the opposite of what happened in LA. San Antonio caught fire from deep and made six triples in the first quarter alone, jumping out to a double-digit lead just minutes into the contest. Luke Kornet’s return allowed the good guys to have 48 minutes of reliable rim protection, letting Wemby sit without bleeding points. Sacramento shot an abysmal 7-17 from two in the opening frame, as the Spurs closed out the first up 39-22. 

The dominance continued in the second. Wemby took over by scoring three consecutive buckets, including back-to-back dunks. San Antonio also set a new season high for threes in a half with 14, and the ball movement was pristine: the Spurs racked up 27 assists on 30 made field goals. At the other end, the Kings looked out of sorts, unable to generate any offense while losing assignments on defense. As a result, the Spurs went into halftime leading 78-47. 

The entire second half was essentially garbage time. The closest Sacramento got was 25, and San Antonio began chucking up threes, ending with a franchise record 25 in a single game. All the starters were subbed out by the end of the third, and you know a game is out of hand when Big Biz sees minutes. The Spurs ran away with a 132-104 shellacking, and the quest for 60 is officially on.

Game Notes

  • Wemby didn’t look any worse for wear after tweaking his ankle Monday against the Clippers. He played 22:00 and put up 18 points, 8 rebounds and 3 assists. It’s always nice to give him some extra rest, especially since the Spurs will play their third game in four nights when they face Phoenix at home on Thursday.
  • Dylan Harper returned from a brief two-game absence and picked up right where he left off. The rookie finished with 15 points, 4 rebounds and 5 assists on nice 6-9 shooting and 3-5 from deep.
  • The quest for 8 (10-point scorers) lives on! Barnes (16 points) and Champagnie (17 points) combined to shoot 9-12 from deep, giving them some more cushion to maintain their 10+ point averages. Our very own Marilyn Dubinski floated a conspiracy theory about the Spurs holding out Barnes on purpose so that he stays at 10 points, but with the way he’s shooting now, he might be the next to drop 83!
  • Fox was actually cheered during the pre-game intros, which is an extremely rare sight for a player who asked for a trade. I guess Sacramento fans realize how poorly their team is run and knows that none of the blame can be put on the players. When you’re having a bad day, just remember that you cheer for the Spurs and not the Kangz. 

Play of the game

Another day, another Wemby highlight.

Next game: vs Phoenix on Thursday

The Spurs will return home for a date against Phoenix Thursday night, as they try and extend the win streak to four.

Utah faces Minnesota on 3-game losing streak

Utah Jazz (20-48, 14th in the Western Conference) vs. Minnesota Timberwolves (42-27, sixth in the Western Conference)

Minneapolis; Wednesday, 8 p.m. EDT

BETMGM SPORTSBOOK LINE: Timberwolves -11.5; over/under is 233.5

BOTTOM LINE: Utah is looking to end its three-game losing streak with a victory against Minnesota.

The Timberwolves are 8-6 against division opponents. Minnesota is fifth in the Western Conference with 33.3 defensive rebounds per game led by Rudy Gobert averaging 7.5.

The Jazz are 1-11 against Northwest Division opponents. Utah ranks seventh in the Western Conference with 31.9 defensive rebounds per game led by Jusuf Nurkic averaging 7.8.

The Timberwolves average 13.8 made 3-pointers per game this season, 1.6 fewer makes per game than the Jazz give up (15.4). The Jazz average 12.9 made 3-pointers per game this season, 0.4 more makes per game than the Timberwolves give up.

The teams meet for the fourth time this season. The Jazz won 127-122 in the last matchup on Jan. 21.

TOP PERFORMERS: Naz Reid is scoring 13.7 points per game and averaging 6.2 rebounds for the Timberwolves. Julius Randle is averaging 17.1 points and 7.1 rebounds over the last 10 games.

Keyonte George is averaging 23.6 points and 6.1 assists for the Jazz. Brice Sensabaugh is averaging 2.9 made 3-pointers over the last 10 games.

LAST 10 GAMES: Timberwolves: 6-4, averaging 111.5 points, 42.3 rebounds, 24.1 assists, 7.5 steals and 4.9 blocks per game while shooting 49.2% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 114.2 points per game.

Jazz: 2-8, averaging 113.2 points, 41.4 rebounds, 26.1 assists, 10.4 steals and 4.3 blocks per game while shooting 45.1% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 119.3 points.

INJURIES: Timberwolves: Anthony Edwards: out (knee).

Jazz: Lauri Markkanen: out (ankle), Ace Bailey: day to day (concussion), Kyle Filipowski: day to day (rest), Keyonte George: day to day (leg), Isaiah Collier: day to day (knee), Walker Kessler: out for season (shoulder), Jusuf Nurkic: out for season (nose), Jaren Jackson Jr.: out for season (knee), John Konchar: day to day (calf).

___

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.

Phoenix visits San Antonio, aims to stop road losing streak

Phoenix Suns (39-30, seventh in the Western Conference) vs. San Antonio Spurs (51-18, second in the Western Conference)

San Antonio; Thursday, 8 p.m. EDT

BOTTOM LINE: Phoenix visits San Antonio looking to end its three-game road slide.

The Spurs are 30-14 in Western Conference games. San Antonio is 7-4 in games decided by 3 points or fewer.

The Suns are 25-19 in Western Conference play. Phoenix is third in the Western Conference allowing only 111.4 points while holding opponents to 47.0% shooting.

The Spurs are shooting 48.0% from the field this season, 1.0 percentage point higher than the 47.0% the Suns allow to opponents. The Suns average 112.4 points per game, 0.7 more than the 111.7 the Spurs allow.

The teams square off for the fourth time this season. The Spurs won the last matchup 121-94 on Feb. 20, with Stephon Castle scoring 20 points in the win.

TOP PERFORMERS: Castle is scoring 16.4 points per game and averaging 5.0 rebounds for the Spurs. Victor Wembanyama is averaging 23.9 points and 9.9 rebounds over the last 10 games.

Royce O'Neale is scoring 9.9 points per game and averaging 4.8 rebounds for the Suns. Devin Booker is averaging 28.1 points and 4.1 rebounds over the last 10 games.

LAST 10 GAMES: Spurs: 8-2, averaging 122.4 points, 47.6 rebounds, 30.8 assists, 6.0 steals and 6.3 blocks per game while shooting 49.5% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 111.6 points per game.

Suns: 6-4, averaging 114.2 points, 41.1 rebounds, 25.3 assists, 8.4 steals and 4.3 blocks per game while shooting 45.6% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 111.3 points.

INJURIES: Spurs: Devin Vassell: day to day (ankle), David Jones Garcia: out for season (ankle).

Suns: Grayson Allen: day to day (knee), Dillon Brooks: out (hand), Mark Williams: out (foot).

___

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.