Category: NBA

NBA News

Posted on

Celtics draft fits: Adou Thiero's physicality should intrigue Boston

Celtics draft fits: Adou Thiero's physicality should intrigue Boston originally appeared on NBC Sports Boston

A busy offseason lies ahead for the Boston Celtics.

While navigating their complicated financial situation, the Celtics may have to find replacements for veteran big men Al Horford and Luke Kornet, who are set to become unrestricted free agents. There will be some intriguing frontcourt options in the 2025 NBA Draft, but what if president of basketball operations Brad Stevens has other ideas?

A historic 3-point shooting team, the Celtics could use an infusion of explosive and physical play. Enter Adou Thiero, a forward out of Arkansas who thrives in both categories and wreaks havoc on the defensive end.

More Celtics best draft fits:

Thiero could fall to the Celtics when they pick at No. 28 or No. 32 overall in this month’s draft. Learn more about him and his potential fit with the C’s below:

Adou Thiero’s bio

  • Position: Forward
  • Height: 6-foot-6
  • Weight: 200 pounds
  • Birthdate: May 8, 2004 (age 21)
  • Birthplace: Utah
  • College: Arkansas

Adou Thero’s collegiate stats

  • 2022-23: 2.3 points per game, 1.9 rebounds per game, 0.4 assists per game, 34.5 field goal percentage (20 games)
  • 2023-24: 7.2 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 1.1 apg, 49.2 field goal percentage (25 games)
  • 2024-25: 15.1 ppg, 5.8 rpg, 1.9 bpg, 54.5 field goal percentage (27 games)
  • Career: 8.8 ppg, 4.4 rpg, 1.2 apg, 51.4 field goal percentage (72 games)

Adou Thiero’s highlights

Why Adou Thiero fits with Celtics

Thiero isn’t what anyone would call a sharpshooter. He needs time to develop his offensve game, so why would he fit in with the 3-point-happy Celtics?

The former Razorback is a versatile defender who plays with high energy each time he takes the floor. He averaged 1.6 steals and 0.7 blocks per game as a junior.

Boston doesn’t need another 3-point shooter, but it may need someone with a Jrue Holiday-like skill set to replace the veteran guard, who could be traded as a result of the team’s goal to get under the second apron.

NBC Sports Boston’s Celtics insider Chris Forsberg explained why Thiero is a solid fit for the C’s.

“Could Adou Thiero add an injection of physical play for the Celtics? A menace on the defensive end, a willing cutter to the hoop on offense, and a nose for attacking the offensive glass, Thiero’s game plays at an NBA level based on those traits,” Forsberg said.

“What will make him even more valuable is if he can develop a 3-point shot. He made just 26 percent of his threes as a junior.”

Posted on

Draymond details his mom's brutal trash talk during Warriors games

Draymond details his mom's brutal trash talk during Warriors games originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

You thought Draymond Green’s trash talking was good?

The 35-year-old says the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

Green joined “Jimmy Kimmel Live” and shared how his mom has never gotten into a player’s face the way Tyrese Haliburton’s dad did when the Pacers faced the Milwaukee Bucks in first-round Western Conference playoff series.

That said, the four-time NBA champion did add that his mom has a habit of trash-talking his own teammates.

“My mom, since I was a child, has been the mom who, like, from the stands, she yells, ‘You suck!’ But the thing about my mom is she talks bad about all the players on my team,” Green told Kimmel on Thursday.

Kimmel was surprised when Green said that his mom, Mary Babers, insults his own teammates, which led to the four-time NBA All-Star elaborating.

“She kills them, but she absolutely annihilates me,” Green added. “I’ve always heard like the stories from it where in the beginning a parent would almost want to get snappy at her and as they continue to watch, they realize how badly she talks about me. They’re just like, “Oh, that’s not a problem what she’s saying about my kid.'”

Green acknowledged his mom’s trash talk has been going on for as long as he can remember.

“When I was younger I could always hear it because the gyms were smaller, and I used to sometimes turn around and be like, ‘Ma, stop!,’ Green concluded. “She wouldn’t talk to me for days after I did that. She’d be mad at me as if I did something wrong.”

Green, notorious for his trash talking since entering the NBA in 2012, is recognized by many players as the league’s player with the best verbal jabs.

It sounds like his mom may have him beat, though.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

Posted on

‘We have been here before.’ Thunder players try to look ahead in aftermath of painful Game 1 loss

OKLAHOMA CITY — "It sucks, but we have been here before."

Jalen Williams' summation of Oklahoma City's gut-punch Game 1 loss — where the Thunder led until Tyrese Haliburton's shot with 0.3 on the clock — summed up the postgame mood of the Thunder.

Disappointed? Absolutely. However, the Thunder dropped Game 1 at home to Nikola Jokić and the Nuggets in the second round and came back to win that series in seven games. After Haliburton's shot, OKC players drew on that experience and how they had turned things around.

"We played good enough to win that game, controlled it for the most part. Was up double-digits most of that game, as well," Alex Caruso said of the Game 1 loss to Denver. "Then they made some big shots. We made a couple mistakes down the stretch to give them free throws. There's some similar stuff from that. I think moving forward, the mentality of this team is good."

The Thunder's postgame vibes flowed from their leaders.

"The biggest experience we've had is understanding that every game's a new game," Thunder coach Mark Daigneault said. "The most important game of the series is always the next one, regardless of the outcome… Would've liked to get the game, but need to be a better game in Game 2."

"The series isn't first to one, it's first to four," Gilgeous-Alexander said. "We have four more games to get, they have three. That's just where we are. We got to understand that and we got to get to four before they get to three, if we want to win the NBA championship. It's that simple. It's not rocket science. We lost Game 1. We have to be better."

The other postgame theme from the Thunder's perspective was that they lost the game more than the Pacers took it from them.

"It sounds weird — it wasn't like they won the game, but I feel like we lost the game," Isaiah Hartenstein said, speaking for a lot of Thunder players. "There was a lot of things where it was closeouts, executing and slowing down the pace a little too much at the end."

"We lost the game. I thought we played good enough to win. We just didn't finish the game," Caruso said. "Credit to them, that's how they've played for the whole post-season. They kind of strayed true to themselves, their brand of basketball. They threw in a couple big shots down the stretch."

The team's mantra seemed to be "it's just one game."

"It counts the same as when we lost by 40 in Minnesota in the last series. Counts the same as when we lost by two or three at Denver Game 3 that series. It's all worth one," Caruso said.

Game 2 is Sunday in Oklahoma City. Drop that one and the postgame mood from the Thunder may be very different.

Posted on

How to watch Oklahoma City Thunder vs Indiana Pacers Game 2: TV/stream info, date, time

The 2025 NBA Finals continue this Sunday, June 8, at 8:00 PM ET as Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and the Oklahoma City Thunder go head-to-head with Tyrese Haliburton and the Indiana Pacers in Game 2 at Paycom Center.

RELATED:Another dramatic come-from-behind win. How do the Pacers keep doing this?

Comeback victories have been the Pacers' calling card this postseason, and Game 1 of this Thunder vs Pacers series was no different.

Indiana was down by 15 in the fourth quarter on Thursday night but rallied to take the win. Tyrese Haliburton hit another clutch shot with just 0.3 seconds remaining, giving the Pacers the 111-110 dub. It was Indiana's only lead of the game.

The All-star guard has now made five game-tying or go-ahead shots in the final 30 seconds of the playoffs.

“When it gets to 15, you can panic, or you can talk about, ‘How do we get it to 10? How do we get it to five from there?" Haliburton said after the game. "So, you know, I think all [playoffs], that’s what we preached as a group, is when we get down big, let’s just find a way to incrementally get it down."

Gilgeous-Alexander led the Thunder with 38 points on Thursday night. While the outcome was not what was expected, the 2025 league MVP remains unfazed.

"As much as we can, we just got to treat it like every other game, every other situation we've been in," Gilgeous-Alexander said. "Yes, we haven't been in this situation, but that doesn't mean our character has to change, or what we did last time.

"It's still basketball, the game of basketball we grew up playing. The rules don't change because we're in the Finals.

mathuringilgeousalexander.jpg
Indiana Pacers vs Oklahoma City Thunder Preview: 2025 NBA Finals prediction, schedule, who to watch
The Thunder come in as heavy favorites, but we also have some best bets to consider this series.

How to watch Oklahoma City Thunder vs Indiana Pacers Game 2:

  • Date: Sunday, June 8
  • Time: 8:00 PM ET
  • Where: Paycom Center in Oklahoma City, OK
  • TV Channel: ABC

When is Game 2 of the NBA Finals?

Sunday, June 8 at 8:00 PM ET.

What channel is the Thunder vs Pacers game on?

The Thunder vs Pacers series will take place on ABC.

Thunder vs Pacers Series Scores and Schedule:

*All times listed are ET  (* = if necessary)

  • Game 1: Pacers 111, Thunder 110
  • Game 2: Pacers at Thunder - Sun. June 8, 8 PM on ABC
  • Game 3: Thunder at Pacers - Wed. June 11, 8:30 PM on ABC
  • Game 4: Thunder at Pacers - Fri. June 13, 8:30 PM on ABC
  • Game 5: Pacers at Thunder - Mon. June 16, 8:30 PM on ABC *
  • Game 6: Thunder at Pacers - Thu. June 19, 8:30 PM on ABC*
  • Game 7: Pacers at Thunder - Sun, June 22, 8 PM on ABC*

Oklahoma City Thunder’s Path to the NBA Finals:

The Thunder are seeking their first NBA title since relocating to Oklahoma City in 2008. The last time the franchise reached the Finals was in 2012, dropping their series against LeBron James' Miami Heat in 5. Here is how they advanced to the NBA Finals:

Oklahoma City swept the No. 8 Memphis Grizzlies in the First Round, eliminated the No. 4 Denver Nuggets in 7 in the Conference Semifinals, and defeated the No. 6 Minnesota Timberwolves in 5 in the Western Conference Finals.

RELATED:Times, they are a changin’ - Thunder vs. Pacers Finals highlights generational change sweeping NBA

Indiana Pacers’ Path to the NBA Finals:

The Indiana Pacers are seeking their first NBA title. The team's last Finals appearance was in 2000, when they lost to the Lakers in 6. Here is the team's path to the Finals:

Indiana eliminated the No. 5 Milwaukee Bucks and the No. 1 Cleveland Cavaliers in 5 games, before knocking out the No. 6 New York Knicks in 6 to advance to the Finals.

RELATED:Caitlin Clark, Tyrese Maxey, the basketball and sports worlds react to Tyrese Haliburton’s game-winner

Want even more NBA best bets and predictions from our expert staff & tools? Check out the Expert NBA Predictions page from NBC Sports for money line, spread and over/under picks for each game of the Thunder vs Pacers series

Was Pacers’ Game 1 victory over Thunder a fluke?

Take Siakam to record over 6.5 rebounds in Game 2:

Head to nbcsports.com/nba for the latest news, updates, and storylines!

Posted on

Player input was a factor in Knicks’ decision to fire Tom Thibodeau

The Knicks shocked the basketball world earlier this week, firing head coach Tom Thibodeau. 

Thibodeau helped turn the organization around -- leading them to the playoffs four times during his five seasons at the helm, including this year when they were eliminated in the Eastern Conference Finals. 

Still, ownership and the front office decided it was time to move in a different direction. 

According to SNY NBA Insider Ian Begley, player input during their end of season meetings with owner James Dolan in attendance was a factor in the ultimate decision to move on from Thibodeau. 

Players were respectful of the veteran coach, who they have a great deal of respect and admiration for, but they also pointed out in those meetings that there were things Thibodeau did that could be improved.

They'll look for those things to change under their next head coach -- who will be the 32nd in franchise history.

Who that will be remains to be seen, but numerous candidates have been mentioned over the past few days.

According to Begley, Houston’s Ime Udoka, Minnesota’s Chris Finch, and Dallas’ Jason Kidd are among the coaches currently under contract who the Knicks have degrees of interest in.

Posted on

Report: New York to ask Dallas for permission to talk to Jason Kidd about becoming head coach

The New York Knicks — searching for a new coach after the firing of Tom Thibodeau, who led them to the Eastern Conference Finals — are expected to ask permission of the Dallas Mavericks to talk to Jason Kidd about coming to Manhattan, reports Marc Stein of The Stein Line in his latest Substack missive.

"The New York Knicks are expected to formally request permission to speak to the Dallas Mavericks' Jason Kidd about their coaching vacancy in coming days, league sources say... A precise hierarchy of potential Knicks targets to replace Thibodeau has yet to emerge, but some in league coaching circles believe that Kidd... is at the top of New York's wish list."

Kidd coached Brunson for a year in Dallas, and the two had a good relationship (Brunson's issues in Dallas were about his next contract and feeling lowballed and disrespected, not the coaching).

Two big questions emerge here. First, would Dallas give permission for New York to talk to Kidd? Mavs ownership/management can say no, which is reportedly what Houston would do if New York called about Ime Udoka (Stein wrote that the Knicks would like Udoka, but knows they would be turned down if they asked). As a standard practice, if the coach is open to it, teams will let their coach have those conversations with another team, but if things get serious and the coach wants to move on then draft compensation has to come back to the coach's current team (and the Knicks are not flush with draft picks to send to Dallas). Kidd signed an extension with Dallas that runs through 2027 and by all accounts is happy there, Stein reports.

Second, would Kidd want the job? ESPN's Tim MacMahon said on the outlet’s “Hoop Collective” podcast that Kidd's "ears would perk up" at the idea, adding that the Knicks need to bring in a "relationship guy" and Kidd fits that bill.

"Listen, one of the names that's been thrown out there is a man who's under contract with another team, but definitely a guy who has relationships not just with Jalen Brunson but with a lot of people in that organization, and that's Jason Kidd. And what I will say about that is I would not dismiss that possibility."

Kidd was hired to be the Mavericks' coach by former owner Mark Cuban. In the wake of the ownership change and the Luka Doncic trade, would he want out? Dallas still has talent on the roster, including Kyrie Irving (out for most or all of next season with a torn ACL), Anthony Davis, and incoming No. 1 pick Cooper Flagg, as well as solid players such as P.J. Washington, Naji Marshall, and others.

If the Knicks can't get Kidd or Udoka, where do they turn next? They reportedly want an experienced head coach, which would rule out former assistant Johnnie Bryant (who is now in Cleveland and was a finalist for the Suns job). Michael Malone is out there, but he is seen as similar to Thibodeau in leaning too heavily into his starters and being set in his ways. Former Cavaliers, Lakers and most recently Kings coach Mike Brown is available, he is a defense-first guy, but is he an upgrade over Thibodeau that takes them to the next level?

The Knicks moved on from Thibodeau without a replacement lined up, which could make this search messy.

Posted on

Video: South Korean broadcasters lose minds over Tyrese Haliburton's game-winning shot

Tyrese Haliburton is surrounded by teammates and camera operators as he leaves the court after winning Game 1.
Indiana guard Tyrese Haliburton leaves the court after providing another game-winning shot for the Pacers in Game 1 of the NBA Finals against the Thunder on Thursday, in Oklahoma City. (Julio Cortez / Associated Press)

Anyone who is a fan of the Indiana Pacers or just a basketball enthusiast in general (minus those with a rooting interest in the Oklahoma City Thunder) has probably already watched Tyrese Haliburton's latest miracle shot from Thursday's Game 1 of the NBA Finals many, many times.

Get ready to watch it many, many more times.

The NBA has posted video to social media of Haliburton's game-winning jumper from South Korea's broadcast of the game on SPOTV, and the announcers' call of the magical moment is insane.

Read more:Pat McAfee identifies himself as the 'somebody' who 'embarrassed' John Mellencamp at Pacers-Knicks game

Simply put, they lose their minds.

Check it out. Don't worry if you don't speak the language — the unbridled enthusiasm coming from what sounds like a two-man broadcast booth requires no translation.

Seriously, the only other person who has ever screamed in such a manner was the Who's Roger Daltry in the epic climax to the 1971 classic "Won't Get Fooled Again."

The NBA also posted a clip of the clutch shot from ABC/ESPN's coverage of the game. Play-by-play announcer Mike Breen captured the excitement of the moment as well, although with a slightly less epic delivery than his South Korean counterparts.

Read more:'Stupid idea'? Charles Barkley says 'Inside the NBA' hosts may have another show on TNT

The Pacers hadn't led the entire game and trailed the heavily favored Thunder by nine points after Oklahoma City star and league MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander hit a pair of free throws with 2:52 remaining in the fourth quarter. But Indiana clawed back behind five points by Andrew Nembhard down the stretch to set up Haliburton's shot that lifted his team to a 111-110 win.

It was the fourth time during these playoffs that Haliburton hit a shot in the final two seconds of regulation to either win the game or send it into overtime.

“This group never gives up," Haliburton said after Game 1. “We never believe that the game is over until it hits zero, and that’s just the God’s honest truth. That’s just the confidence that we have as a group, and I think that’s a big reason why this is going on.”

Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report.

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Posted on

Draymond has blunt reaction to Knicks firing Thibs after playoff exit

Draymond has blunt reaction to Knicks firing Thibs after playoff exit originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

Warriors icon Draymond Green disapproves of how the Knicks fired coach Tom Thibodeau after New York was eliminated by the Indiana Pacers in the Eastern Conference finals.

In Thursday’s edition of the “Draymond Green Show” podcast, the four-time NBA champion explained his distaste for the Knicks’ questionable decision.

“I think what just happened to Thibs is this – and you see it quite a bit in the NBA these days – due in part to the success that we had on that run with Cleveland and the dominance that was going on in the NBA at that time, all the conversations nowadays are just ‘Championship. Championship. Championship.’ And in turn, people try to ignore the process of getting to a championship,” Green said.

“That sh–t is hard, and it takes time, and time is different for many people. If you’re firing Thibs because you ultimately think, ‘He ain’t the guy to get us there,’ that’s one thing, but if you’re blaming him for not winning a championship with this team, that’s not the right thing to do – because that’s not a championship roster.”

New York gave Thibodeau the boot after five seasons and the franchise’s first Eastern Conference finals appearance since 2000 — a 4-2 series loss to Tyrese Haliburton and the Pacers. Indiana is now three games away from winning their first Larry O’Brien Championship Trophy in franchise history.

Green is confident that Thibodeau, who finished his Knicks tenure with a 226-174 record, is being blamed by the front office for the roster simply not being good enough.

The Golden State forward understands organizations want to win now, but he believes Thibodeau steadily was climbing throughout his run in the Big Apple and that the Knicks’ decision was premature. 

“I don’t believe the New York Knicks, as currently constructed, can win a championship,” Green said. “I don’t give a damn how many players Thibs played all year, I don’t think that team can win a championship. I think what Tom Thibodeau did in getting that team to their first conference finals in 25 years, that’s steps in the right direction … that says, ‘Hey, front office, we may be, to get past this point, a guy or two away, in really making this thing go and really getting over that hump.’ 

“Me personally, I don’t think the ‘guy or two’ is some small guy, though. I think they need one of them ones.”

The Knicks probably are a key player or two away from taking the next step toward the franchise’s first NBA Finals win since 1973. However, that assumption does not lead Green to believe that Thibodeau is at fault or that he deserved to be dismissed from his position.

“I don’t agree that Thibs should’ve been fired based off this team not winning a championship, as if they were championship-or-bust and underachieved their payroll,” Green said. “But the eye test, coming from somebody (Green) who I believe knows what that looks like, nah.”

New York finished the 2024-25 NBA regular season with a 51-31 record, earning the third seed in the Eastern Conference. They finished just two wins shy of reaching the league’s biggest stage.

So, did Thibodeau deserve to be fired, or was he holding the Knicks back from achieving greater success?

Green certainly believes that the coach, who has been in the league since 1989-90, got the short end of the stick.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

Posted on

The best and worst No. 3 picks in NBA draft history

The best and worst No. 3 picks in NBA draft history originally appeared on NBC Sports Philadelphia

If the Sixers keep the No. 3 pick in the NBA draft, they’ll hope to add to a long list of hits.

Ahead of the June 25 draft, we reviewed the history of the third pick and rounded up the many highlights and a few lowlights (no exact science).

In chronological order, here are the 16 best and four worst No. 3 selections in NBA history: 

Best 

He only played 26 NBA games, but we’ll give an honorable mention here to the multi-sport Dick Groat — eight-time All-Star shortstop, two-time World Series champion, 1960 National League MVP. 

Outside of ultra-clear cases, our list leans against current players. That’s the main reason Jaylen Brown, Bradley Beal and Evan Mobley aren’t on it. 

1954: Gene Shue 

Drafted by the Philadelphia Warriors, Shue became a five-time All-Star guard during his prime years with the Pistons. He went on to coach two Eastern Conference championship teams (the 1970-71 Bullets and 1976-77 Sixers) and won two Coach of the Year awards. 

1963: Nate Thurmond 

Thurmond averaged 18.6 points, 17.6 rebounds, 2.9 assists and 2.9 blocks from the 1964-65 through ’73-74 seasons. The Hall of Fame big man recorded the first quadruple-double in NBA history on Oct. 18, 1974 — 22 points, 14 rebounds, 13 assists and 12 blocks. 

1977: Pete Maravich 

After a legendary career at LSU, “Pistol Pete” brought his trademark flair to the NBA. He led the league in scoring with the New Orleans Jazz in the 1976-77 season, posting 31.1 points per game. 

1980: Kevin McHale 

McHale never left the team that drafted him and put together a Hall of Fame Celtics career — two Sixth Man of the Year awards, seven All-Star selections, three championships. 

1981: Buck Williams 

Williams remains the Nets’ all-time leader in games played, win shares and rebounds. The ultra-durable power forward averaged a double-double (12.8 points and 10.0 rebounds per game) over his 17-year career. 

1982: Dominique Wilkins 

The Jazz drafted Wilkins but traded him to the Hawks months laterin exchange for John Drew, Freeman Williams and cash. Atlanta was quite pleased with the deal’s results; “The Human Highlight Film” turned into a nine-time All-Star and two-time dunk contest champion. 

1984: Michael Jordan 

The 1984 draft had three Hall of Famers in the first five picks — Hakeem Olajuwon (No. 1), Jordan and Charles Barkley (No. 5). The Sixers’ second pick of that draft, Leon Wood at No. 10, is a longtime NBA referee. 

1993: Penny Hardaway 

In Hardaway’s three Magic seasons with Shaquille O’Neal, Orlando went 167-79 and reached the franchise’s first NBA Finals. 

1994: Grant Hill 

Hill had a brilliant start to his career before facing a series of injury troubles. After being named co-Rookie of the Year with Jason Kidd, he was an All-NBA player for each of the next five seasons. 

1997: Chauncey Billups 

Billups didn’t make an All-Star Game until he was 29 years old and on his fifth team, but “Mr. Big Shot” became a Hall of Famer. 

2001: Paul Gasol 

Gasol transitioned very smoothly from Barcelona to the Grizzlies, earning the Rookie of the Year award. He won much more after being dealt to the Lakers, including back-to-back titles in 2009 and 2010. 

2003: Carmelo Anthony 

The incredible top of the 2003 draft featured three Hall of Famers (Anthony, Chris Bosh, Dwyane Wade) and one obvious future Hall of Famer (LeBron James) within the first five selections. The class had five other players who made an All-Star Game in Chris Kaman (No. 6), David West (No. 18), Josh Howard (No. 29), Mo Williams (No. 47) and Kyle Korver (No. 51). 

2009: James Harden 

Harden won Sixth Man of the Year in his third and final season with the Thunder. As a Rocket, he transformed into the ultimate offensive hub and the 2017-18 MVP. 

2014: Joel Embiid 

Injuries have always been a significant part of the picture with Embiid, but his on-court credentials are awfully impressive — seven All-Star nods, two scoring titles, one well-deserved MVP. 

2017: Jayson Tatum 

Tatum’s one of six All-Star players from the 2017 class. Of course, No. 1 pick Markelle Fultz is not among them. 

2018: Luka Doncic 

Doncic has more than lived up to the pre-draft hype. At 26 years old, he’s got career averages of 28.6 points, 8.6 rebounds and 8.2 assists. 

Worst 

1986: Chris Washburn 

Washburn made a mere 72 appearances in the NBA. Following a third failed drug test, the former NC State big man was suspended by the league for life.

1987: Dennis Hopson 

Hopson was a big-time scorer at Ohio State — 29 points per game his senior year — but could not carry anything resembling that production to the NBA. He averaged 10.9 points in 334 career games. Notable 1987 lottery picks below Hopson include Scottie Pippen, Kenny Smith, Kevin Johnson, Horace Grant, Reggie Miller and Muggsy Bogues. 

2006: Adam Morrison 

Morrison was a college sensation at Gonzaga. He tore his ACL during his second NBA preseason and wound up playing just 83 more games in the league. 

2015: Jahlil Okafor 

The former Process Sixer played in one game for the Pacers this season, which was his first NBA appearance in nearly four years.

Posted on

Why Draymond jokingly is grateful for Warriors' playoff exit

Why Draymond jokingly is grateful for Warriors' playoff exit originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

Draymond Green wanted nothing more than to be competing deep into the NBA playoffs, but he disclosed one upside about the Warriors’ second-round exit.

While joining “Jimmy Kimmel Live,” Green was asked about his notorious technical foul history and shared his growth — or attempted growth — in that department.

“I actually try not to [get a technical] now, which I’m embarrassed to say,” Green told Kimmel. “I went into the playoffs like, ‘I’m not getting any techs. I’m locked in.’ I had five in three games. You only get seven for the playoffs. Thank God we lost.”

The Warriors’ hard-fought battle against the Houston Rockets in the opening round, followed by a Western Conference semifinals meeting with the Minnesota Timberwolves, resulted in five technical fouls for Green.

Per NBA postseason rules, two more technicals would have resulted in an automatic one-game suspension.

And had the Warriors kept the series against Minnesota alive and advanced to a best-of-seven conference finals matchup with the Oklahoma City Thunder, Green isn’t confident with his chances that he wouldn’t reach that one-game suspension.

That doesn’t even include a would-be best-of-seven NBA Finals appearance.

But, again, baby steps, right?

Before the start of the 2024-25 regular season, Green predicted he would get fewer than 10 techs. He didn’t quite meet that goal, but he has reason for optimism.

“I had 13,” he said. “That’s a lot less than 17. Going the right way.”

Green was assessed 17 technical fouls during the 2023-24 season.

Growth.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

Posted on

Draymond, Livingston note how 2024-25 Thunder compare to 2014-15 Warriors

Draymond, Livingston note how 2024-25 Thunder compare to 2014-15 Warriors originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

Draymond Green and Shaun Livingston noted similarities and differences between the current Oklahoma City Thunder team and the 2014-2015 Warriors – Golden State’s first title winner of the dynastic era – on Thursday night’s edition of the “Draymond Green Show” podcast.

Here’s what Green had to say in the podcast, which aired soon after Tyrese Haliburton’s game-winner gave the Indiana Pacers a 1-0 series lead over Oklahoma City in the 2025 NBA Finals.

“Where I think they’re similar is the age; young guys with a few vets, like [Isaiah] Hartenstein, but not Chet [Holmgren]; Shaun [Livingston], [Andre Iguodala], they weren’t our age, so we kind of had that balance – and [Andrew] Bogut, [David] Lee, they were (also) the older guys. 

“[Alex] Caruso has been there before, right? I think they’ve got a few vets like we had that kind of settles things down for them. And they got young guys, Shai [Gilgeous-Alexander], [Jalen Williams] just kind of out there running wild doing their thing, relying on their talent, obviously thinking the game, but not to the level of the vets – because they’ve just seen more.”

The Thunder remind Green of the old Warriors because of their dynamics being based around seasoned veterans in their 30s and stars in their 20s.

Steph Curry, Klay Thompson and Green formed Golden State’s headlining trio during its 2015 NBA Finals victory over the Cleveland Cavaliers, with the support of valuable role players such as Livingston, Iguodala, Bogut and Lee, to name a few.

Oklahoma City has a similar situation around Gilgeous-Alexander, Williams and Holmgren, for example, with a strong supportive cast of players like Caruso and Hartenstein, who have been in the league for a while, each with high floors suitable for the playoffs.

“The vets see more, they help you more; they’re seeing these things develop,” Green added. “I think [the Thunder] are [similar] in that aspect. I’ve seen the playoff record, very similar. Offensive rating, I think we were number one, they’re like three. Defensive rating, we’re both number one. I saw those things … The end-of-season record, they [won] 68, we [won] 67. 

“I see all of that stuff, and I see a young team that’s gone through their lumps, and seems poised to take that final step. I can see those similarities, but the style of play couldn’t be further from the same.”

Livingston had a similar stance to Green. However, his perspective is from that of a player who was a Warriors veteran in 2014-15, unlike Green, who was an up-and-coming two-way star.

“It’s definitely similar. [Green] nailed all the points,” Livingston said about similarities between the Warriors and Thunder. “Listen, they were the best team by far this season – by far. And honestly, watching them too, they did not take games off; if they were supposed to beat a team they were a lot better than, they would beat the dog sh-t out of that team. The habits they were building, that’s what I watched.”

Livingston noticed how today’s Thunder and those past Warriors didn’t take games off. But he also pointed out how both teams, despite being a force every game, encountered uncharted territory as one of the last two teams standing.

“When I came to [the Warriors], I had come from playing with Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce, Joe Johnson, Deron Williams; these guys were kind of already cemented in their careers – former champions, veterans,” Livingston said about his Brooklyn Nets tenure. “They had a mindset about winning, where they expected to win. 

“When I came to Golden State, they had already tasted winning, and I felt like they wanted to win … but none of us had been to the finals, similar to OKC.”

Those Warriors won in their Finals debut; it’s still to be determined if the Thunder will do the same.

Green and Livingston, though, agreed that Oklahoma City is gaining great experience right now, regardless of the series outcome. 

The Thunder undoubtedly were the best team during the 2024-25 NBA season. But they had no way of preparing for the chaos the Pacers seem to embrace, despite entering the series with a variety of top-notch statistics and 18 more regular-season wins.

Oklahoma City needs to win four of its next six games to truly rival the old Golden State squad. Then, if things go well, three more trophies to match the Warriors’ dynasty.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

Posted on

Draymond recalls hilarious KD-to-Warriors mix-up after Luka trade

Draymond recalls hilarious KD-to-Warriors mix-up after Luka trade originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

The blockbuster trade that sent Luka Dončić to the Los Angeles Lakers stunned the entire NBA and sports world, but perhaps no one was as confused as Draymond Green.

However, Green’s bewilderment stemmed from a reason beyond the actual trade and more from a hypothetical one.

The Warriors star forward joined “Jimmy Kimmel Live” and hilariously recalled how his confusion unraveled thanks to a little premature information from Golden State majority owner Joe Lacob.

“When it first happened, we were at a Warriors charity poker tournament,” Green remembered. “I had just saw Joe Lacob 10 minutes before this happened. Joe gets excited. Joe goes, ‘Draymond, I think we’re going to get Kevin Durant. It’s right there at the finish line. It’s happening. We’re getting Kevin Durant back.’ I’m like, ‘Oh, man. Here we go. Let’s go.’ And we talk about it. He asks if I think it’ll work. I said absolutely. He leaves, he comes running back two minutes later like, ‘Draymond! Draymond! I wasn’t supposed to say anything. Don’t say nothing to nobody.’ I’m like, ‘Joe, I got you. I won’t say anything to anyone.’

“So we’re at this tournament and I go sit down and about 15 minutes later, Steph yells, ‘Draymond, you see the trade?’ And I go, ‘It happened?’ Steph goes, ‘Wait, who?’ I said, ‘Oh, never mind, nobody. What happened?’ And he’s like, ‘Luka got traded.’ “

Whew.

You can only imagine the emotional rollercoaster Green endured over those 20 minutes or so.

First, he had to fathom the thought that Durant was returning to the Bay, where he helped bring two championships, to then — like so many others — try and wrap his head around Dončić and LeBron James teaming up, to finally realizing that Durant was, in fact, not on his way to San Francisco.

What a whirlwind.

“I couldn’t believe it, I thought Shams was hacked,” Green said of the Dallas Mavericks trading Dončić. “There’s videos out at the charity event of us reacting. I couldn’t believe it. Superstars at 25 don’t get traded. Luka’s a megastar.

“Then I thought, ‘I have to be next if Luka’s getting traded. It’s coming for me soon.’ “

To be fair to Lacob, several reports indicated that Durant’s return to the Warriors was a possibility before the 15-time NBA All-Star turned down a reunion.

Maybe next time, Lacob will wait for the trade to be official before spilling any premature beans.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

Posted on

Adam Silver expects NBA to take next steps toward expansion this summer

OKLAHOMA CITY — NBA expansion has felt like a pot of water sitting on the NBA's stovetop for a long time, with the heat kept on low. Everyone knows that eventually the heat will be cranked up, the water will boil, and there will be cooking, but so far, everything is just being kept warm.

This July, expect the NBA to turn up the heat.

That was the takeaway from NBA Commissioner Adam Silver, speaking to the media before Game 1 of the NBA Finals. He was asked about the owners' temperature on expansion.

"I'd say the current sense is we should be exploring it," Silver said. "I don't think it's automatic because it depends on your perspective on the future of the league. As I've said before, expansion, in a way, is selling equity in the league. If you believe in the league, you don't necessarily want to add partners. On the other hand, we recognize there are underserved markets in the United States and elsewhere…

"We have an owners' meeting in July in Las Vegas. It will be on the agenda to take the temperature of the room. We have committees that are already talking about it. But my sense is at that meeting, they're going to give direction to me and my colleagues at the league office that we should continue to explore it."

That exploration will be a more formal process, although Silver, always cautious in his public statements, wouldn't go beyond that.

"What I expect is if a decision is made that there should be further exploration by the league office and presumably a committee of team owners, it would be more of a formal process," Silver said.

What that likely means is the league starts meeting with potential ownership groups.

"There's been no lack of interest. Certainly I've gotten a lot of unsolicited calls," Silver said. "I essentially have said to people from several different cities, We're just not engaging in that process right now. I want to be fair to everyone. So I don't want to have meeting with some and not others.

"So if we were to say yes, we're now going to move into a more formal exploratory phase, we would take those meetings and in addition likely we would engage with outside advisors who would look at markets, look at economic opportunities and media opportunities, et cetera."

The expectation in league circles is that the NBA will ultimately move forward with expansion, with two teams: Seattle and, most likely, Las Vegas. Silver and the league office had wanted to wait for a new CBA to be in place (ensuring stability) as well as the new television deal finalized before moving forward. Those are now done.

The NBA also waited for the sale of the Boston Celtics — with the franchise value in that sale set at $6 billion — before moving forward, so the league could have an idea what it could ask for in expansion fees. The sale of the Portland Trail Blazers, a process that has just begun, will also be factored into that expansion price tag.

Expect the heat to be turned up on the expansion process this summer when the owners get together in Las Vegas. Maybe then everything will move toward a boil.

Posted on

Celtics draft fits: How Thomas Sorber could boost Boston's frontcourt

Celtics draft fits: How Thomas Sorber could boost Boston's frontcourt originally appeared on NBC Sports Boston

The Boston Celtics have begun a pivotal offseason for the franchise.

One position group that could see significant change is the frontcourt. Kristaps Porzingis is entering the final year of his contract. If the Celtics try to get under the second apron of the luxury tax, the star center could be a player who is moved to shed salary.

Veteran centers Al Horford and Luke Kornet have expiring contracts and will become unrestricted free agents in July. Both of them have been key players off the Celtics bench the last couple seasons.

If any of these players depart Boston in the offseason, how will the Celtics add some much-needed talent and depth in the frontcourt? Well, the 2025 NBA Draft could be the best place to find it.

The Celtics own the No. 28 overall pick in the first round and the second pick (No. 32 overall) in the second round.

One player who fits what the Celtics are looking for and could fall to them in the late first round is Georgetown center Thomas Sorber.

Learn more about Sorber and his fit with the C’s below:

Thomas Sorber’s bio

  • Position: Forward/Center
  • Height: 6-foot-10
  • Weight: 255 pounds
  • Birthdate: Dec. 25, 2005
  • Birthplace: Trenton, New Jersey
  • College: Georgetown

Thomas Sorber’s collegiate stats

  • 2024-25: 14.5 points, 8.5 rebounds, 2.4 assists, 2.0 blocks per game, 53.2 field goal percentage (24 games)

Thomas Sorber’s collegiate accolades

  • All-Big East Third Team
  • Big East All-Freshman team

Thomas Sorber’s highlights

Why Thomas Sorber fits with Celtics

Sorber averaged 14.5 points per game last season. He has good touch around the rim and is effective on lobs off the pick-and-roll. He’s also able to beat slower players off the dribble and finish at the rim. Sorber isn’t much of a 3-point shooter, though. He shot 16.2 percent on 1.5 3-point attempts per game.

Sorber doesn’t have to shoot lights out from 3-point range to be a quality NBA player. But as NBC Sports Boston’s Celtics insider Chris Forsberg explains, it would definitely improve Sorber’s potential at the next level if he could become an average (or better) outside shooter.

“The Hoyas big man is coming off of foot surgery, but he was named to the Big East All-Freshman team,” Forsberg said. “His offensive game was close to the rim. The question is: Can he fully develop a 3-point shot? If he does, he has the potential to become more than just a defensive rotational player.”

Two areas where Sorber could help the Celtics immediately is rebounding and defense. He crashes the glass at both ends of the floor and is a real shot-blocking presence at the basket.

Sorber’s versatile skill set would make him worthy of the No. 28 pick.

Posted on

Another dramatic come-from-behind win. How do the Pacers keep doing this?

OKLAHOMA CITY — The statistics are mind-boggling:

• Indiana has five 15+-point comebacks in these playoffs.
• Indiana is 5-3 when trailing by 15 or more in these playoffs.
• Tyrese Haliburton has four game-winning or game-tying buckets in the final 5 seconds these playoffs (Game 5 vs. Milwaukee, Game 2 vs. Cleveland, Game 1 vs. New York, and now Game 1 vs. Oklahoma City).

How do the Pacers keep doing this?

Turning disrespect into fuel.

"That's been our thing the whole year, even at the beginning of the playoffs. Everybody got the other team winning every single game," Obi Toppin said. "We just go out there and always do what we do."

That fuel wasn't just everyone picking against Indiana in these playoffs, it dates back to last season and the Pacers' run to the Eastern Conference Finals, Haliburton said.

"After you have a run like last year, and you get swept in the Eastern Conference Finals, and all the conversation is about is how you don't belong there and how you lucked out to get there, and that it was a fluke. Guys are going to be pissed off," Haliburton said. "We're going to spend the summer pissed off. And then you come into the year with all the talk around how was a fluke, you have an unsuccessful first couple months, and now that's easy for everybody to clown you, talk about you in a negative way.

"I think as a group, we take everything personal, like as a group, it's not just me, it's everybody. I feel like that's the DNA of this group."

“Ultimate Confidence”

The other thing the Pacers discussed was their unshakable confidence in themselves.

When did Indiana start to believe it could win this game?

"When I got off the bus, I put on my shoes, there was never a disbelief as a group," Haliburton said.

Haliburton embodies that.

"Ultimate, ultimate confidence in himself..." Myles Turner said of his team's star. "When it comes to the moments, he wants the ball. He wants to be the one to hit that shot. He doesn't shy away from the moment and very important this time of the year to have a go-to guy. He just keeps finding a way and we keep putting the ball in the right positions and the rest is history."

That confidence means the Pacers don't panic when trailing, they just focus on small victories that add up to big ones.

"I thought we did a great job of just walking them down," Haliburton said. "When it gets to 15, you can panic, or you can talk about, 'How do we get it to 10? How do we get it to five from there?' So, you know, I think all [playoffs], that's what we preached as a group, is when we get down big, let's just find a way to incrementally get it down."

"We stay connected. We’re going to play until the whistle blows," said Andrew Nembhard, who was critical in the Game 1 comeback by scoring or assisting on 16 fourth-quarter points and playing strong defense on Shai Gilgeous-Alexander in the fourth.

That leads to dramatic endings, even if it isn't always pretty getting there. Not that the Pacers care.

"Come May and June, it doesn't matter how you get them, just get them," Haliburton said. "So we'll take it."
And they'll take a 1-0 lead in the NBA Finals.