It’s hard to understand how Game 7 became necessary. The Celtics split the first two games of the series, but then went on the road and took both Games 3 and 4 – one close and one comfortably – in front of hostile crowds. They returned home for Game 5 feeling good and expecting to wrap up the series.
But in Game 5, the Celtics went cold from the floor and couldn’t seal the deal. Then they inexplicably let Game 6 get away, too. And suddenly they were facing a Game 7 against a team with two superstars that seemed to have figured out how to win the series.
How could Boston have collapsed? Where was the killer instinct? Where was the clutch shooting? The defense? Weren’t they motivated to win one last title for their coach before he retired?
“Hold on,” you say, “what is that about? Joe Mazzulla isn’t having the best series, but he’s not retiring.”
Correct, but that story wasn’t about the current Celtics. It’s what occurred during the 1966 Finals between Boston and the Los Angeles Lakers. That was during the Bill Russell-Red Auerbach era dynasty, in the year they were going for their eighth straight title. Auerbach had announced he would retire from coaching at the end of the season, and during the Finals he revealed that Russell would succeed him in the role of player-coach.
If you’re accustomed to winning it all every single year, and the coach that led you there had taunted the entire league that they had one more shot at having the last laugh, you would probably be hell-bent on protecting your mentor. And no doubt those Celtics had that attitude. Still, they were taken to Game 7.
The Celtics did win that game, 95-93, against a Lakers team led by all-time greats Jerry West and Elgin Baylor. Boston built a 10-point lead with 30 seconds left, but in a flash West cut the lead to six. Only 16 seconds remained, so Auerbach lit up his trademark victory cigar, which he did whenever a game was safely in hand. When play resumed, the Lakers pressed, forced some turnovers, and got within two points with four seconds on the clock. K.C. Jones shook free for the inbounds pass and escaped a trap long enough for the buzzer to sound. The Garden crowd celebrated. Auerbach retired where he’d always been, on top.
The Celtics many times have been in series that started out 3-1 and wound up 4-3. A major difference: They’ve always been the team chasing the miracle comeback. Now they’re the team trying to hang on.
Back to today, Celtics Nation and probably the team members themselves are in shock about having to face survival in Game 7. No one imagined this after being up 3-1. There’s plenty of criticism and “how could they let this happen?” takes aimed at them now, and it’s not unwarranted.
But the reality is, if it could happen to a dynasty, it could certainly happen to the 2026 squad.
That’s the thing about the NBA. Anything is, indeed, possible. Just as almost everyone thought this would be a gap year, after 56 wins those same people thought the Celtics were favorites to capture the East. That notion is now in serious jeopardy. (How anyone bets on the NBA is a mystery to some of us; it’s absurdly unpredictable.)
The Celtics many times have been in series that started out 3-1 and wound up 4-3. A major difference: They’ve always been the team chasing the miracle comeback. Now they’re the team trying to hang on. That is admittedly a scary position, but it’s also worth remembering that competition is never over till it’s over.
Looking back, Boston has won some of those Game 7s and lost some.
In 1973, the Celtics fell behind New York 3-1 when captain John Havlicek was injured, and fought back only to lose Game 7 on the Boston Garden parquet (for the first time ever). Then in 2023, as we sadly remember, Miami went up 3-0 before the Celtics valiantly took the next three games (Derrick White at the buzzer!). They couldn’t close it out, however, in part because Jayson Tatum sprained his ankle on the game’s first possession.
Now, a 3-1 lead has again turned into a win-or-go-home showdown, the fourth time this scenario has occurred in the Boston vs. Philly rivalry. The previous three were epic.
1968
The Sixers, led by Wilt Chamberlain, were the defending NBA champs, having broken the Celtics’ eight-year string of rings in 1967. They met again in the Eastern Division Final, equivalent to today’s conference final. Boston won the opener in Philadelphia, but lost the next three, and it didn’t look good with Games 5 and 7 scheduled back in Philly. But Russell’s Celtics recovered to win Game 5 by 18 and Game 6 by six.
In a close, tense Game 7, Chamberlain – who once averaged 50 points per game for an entire season – oddly attempted just two shots in the second half. Russell made a couple of free throws in the final seconds to clinch the game, 100-96. It was the first time an NBA team had overcome a 3-1 deficit. Boston went on to defeat the Lakers for Banner 10.
1981
Boston and Philadelphia were loaded – they finished the regular season tied with 62 wins and just 20 losses. When they met in the Eastern Conference Finals, the Celtics had home court advantage thanks to a tie-breaker. That proved crucial since five games in the series ended up decided by one or two points. The Sixers, led by Julius “Dr. J” Erving, won the opener in Boston, 105-104, on a late jump shot by lethal rookie scorer Andrew Toney. The Celtics responded in Game 2 by double digits. Game 3 went to the Sixers by 10 points, followed by a two-point win for the 3-1 lead.
Back home, the Celtics trailed by six points with under two minutes left in Game 5, but rallied for a two-point win that stunned the Sixers. In an eventful Game 6 on the road, Cedric Maxwell got into a fight with a fan sitting behind one of the baskets (not ejected!), and Kevin McHale blocked a late Toney jumper to preserve a two-point win.
Game 7 in Boston was the most physical battle imaginable. Survival of the fittest for 48 minutes. The Celtics won it, 91-90, on a last-minute bank shot by Larry Bird, one of the moments that helped him become known as Larry Legend. The Celtics went on to the Finals, beating Houston to raise Banner 14.
1982
Boston went 63-19 this season and again had homecourt advantage for the ECF. In Game 1, they obliterated Philly by 40 points. The embarrassed Sixers regrouped and won the next three games, only one of them close. Boston point guard Tiny Archibald injured his shoulder in Game 3 and was ruled out for the series.
The Celtics won a blowout Game 5 at home to keep hope alive. In Game 6 in Philly, they smothered the 76ers offense, winning 88-75, to force Game 7 in Boston yet again. Fans and media mocked Dr. J’s team as “the 75ers” and the consensus was they were headed for another crushing loss. Instead, they went on a mission to atone for the previous year. Toney and the Doctor combined for 63 points, Philly controlled pretty much the entire 48 minutes, and the Celtics were eliminated, 120-106.
That Sixers victory came 44 years ago, and they haven’t beaten the Celtics in a playoff series again. They’ve met six times since in the postseason, and Boston has won them all, including three during the Brown-Tatum era. Surely, today’s Sixers have heard all about that history. This Embiid-Maxey group has all the momentum now and will be motivated to avoid losing a seventh straight series in the rivalry. Beating the Sixers in Game 7 will take everything the Celtics have.
Understandably, many Boston fans are worried. The Celtics appear disjointed and their chances seem bleak. All of this has happened so quickly, going from a secure position to a potential worst-case scenario. Some fans are upset, some are stunned, and probably everyone is feeling the pressure.
Fortunately, the team remains confident. They have their own motivation to keep their streak going, to prove they can turn the series around, and to win and advance. What they’re looking for is to replicate the 1982 result, in reverse. Skeptics will point out these Celtics don’t have a Russell or a Bird; believers will counter that the Sixers don’t have Wilt or Dr. J.
The bottom line is that Celtics Nation still has hope. Buckle up for Saturday night and stay ready, because anything actually is possible.