Japan beats South Korea 4-1 to set up Women’s Asian Cup final against Australia

SYDNEY (AP) — By the time Saki Kumagai scored to make it 3-0 on Wednesday, it was clear her Japan team was going to beat South Korea and feature in a final against Australia for the third time in four Women’s Asian Cup tournaments.

Riko Ueki opened the scoring in the 15th minute and Maika Hamano squeezed a right-foot strike between the near post and the goalkeeper in the 25th to give Japan a 2-0 halftime lead. Kumagai and Remina Chiba added second-half goals as Japan converted a glut of possession and field position into a lopsided 4-1 semifinal win at Sydney’s Stadium Australia over the 2022 runner-up.

South Korea edged the Australians on goal difference in the group stage but struggled from the outset against Japan, the top-ranked team in Asia.

Japan could have gone ahead 3-0 before halftime with Aoba Fujino finding the back of the net in the 43rd minute, but the goal was disallowed after a VAR review for a handball much earlier in the attacking movement.

Japan increased its tally to 27 goals in the continental championship when Kumagai headed in from Momoko Tanikawa's swinging corner kick in the 75th. It was just her fourth goal in a long international career.

The Nadeshiko finally conceded a goal in the tournament when Kang Chae-rim turned and fired in a right-foot shot from close range in the 78th.

But Chiba restored the three-goal buffer with a powerful strike to make it 4-1 in the 81st, giving Japan momentum ahead of Saturday's final in Sydney.

“Please don’t tell Australia, but we have played better than we did today — but we were good today and I was happy with them,” Japan coach Nils Nielsen said. "Because it is not easy, you sort of get into a rhythm, and it wasn’t that rhythm. We needed to find more, we needed to find a gear more, and we did.”

Japan beat Australia in back-to-back finals in 2014 and ’18 but neither team reached the championship decider in 2022, when China edged South Korea in the final.

Australia has reached the championship match four previous times since joining the Asian confederation but has only won the title once, in 2010. Japan lost four finals before finally clinching the title in 2014 for the first time.

Japan is the only Asian team to have won the Women’s World Cup — beating the U.S. on penalties in the 2011 final.

Advancing Australia

Sam Kerr scored the winner in the 58th minute to secure Australia’s 2-1 win in the first of the semifinals over defending champion China, two years after losing in the World Cup semifinals on home soil.

All four semifinalists here have qualified automatically for the 2027 Women’s World Cup.

In playoffs Thursday for two more spots in Brazil, Taiwan will take on North Korea and Philippines faces Uzbekistan at the Gold Coast.

___

AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccer

The Celtics are building an army of Derrick Whites

From the moment Derrick White joined the Celtics, there hasn’t been a more seamless fit alongside Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown. You could see it in his debut, when his first two plays created a layup and a dunk for the Jays. Right away, it was clear he’d fill the gaps and support Boston’s stars.

White does role player things at an All-Star level, all while playing on one of the league’s best value contracts. His ability to scale his role up or down depending on what the lineup needs has left much of the NBA searching for their own version of him.

Boston, however, may have already found the solution.

Rather than searching for the next Derrick White, the Celtics have quietly begun using him as the blueprint for developing more.

Over the years, White’s game has expanded as he’s taken on a larger role as a creator. He’ll always be a connective player, but his impact is now far more visible within Boston’s offense.

As White has more responsibility to create advantages, someone else has to extend them. Fortunately for the Celtics, their growing army of Derrick Whites is up to the task.

Boston’s newest wave of role players — Baylor Scheierman, Hugo Gonzalez, Jordan Walsh, and Ron Harper Jr. — aren’t being asked to manufacture offense on their own. That responsibility already belongs to Boston’s stars.

Instead, they’re asking them to do something far more specific: attack advantages and keep the ball moving. The guiding principle is simple. When the ball finds you, decide immediately. Shoot. Drive. Pass. Just don’t let it stick.

It’s the idea of “.5 offense”, which refers to making a decision within half a second of the catch. It has become a defining trait of Boston’s role players this season.

White brought that philosophy with him from San Antonio, and it’s a significant part of what’s made him so effective throughout his career. He always knows exactly how to kill a defense in rotation. 

Now Boston is asking its young role players to operate the same way. When teams are in scramble mode, instant decisions lead to breakdowns and open looks.

The amount of true one-to-one comparisons is small. It is not my goal to argue that any of these players are the same, or project to be as good as White. But they are pulling from the area of his skill set that makes him a perfect complement to any lineup.

The results often show up in smaller moments, but that fast processing is a large reason why the Celtics have maintained a top-two offense in what many expected to be a down year.

This possession starts with Payton Pritchard beating the closeout, getting a deep paint touch, and kicking out to Gonzalez. Hugo and Harper Jr. effectively have a 2-on-1 as Brandon Podziemski tries to cover both until a teammate rotates. Hugo’s quick pass sends Podziemski to the corner, but Harper Jr. doesn’t wait a beat before giving it right back. Kristaps Porzingis is the closest defender in rotation, but Gonzalez made up his mind right away that he’d attack while they’re on their heels.

The margins are thin in the NBA. If Harper Jr. or Hugo hold the ball a touch longer, the advantage falters. Being decisive is the key to a more dangerous offense. When you have Tatum, Brown, White and Pritchard leading the attack, the game doesn’t need more isolation.

This is a similar circumstance as the previous clip. Brown draws several defenders on the drive, and his kick out forces the defense to rotate. Like Podziemski, Keon Ellis attempts to cover two to buy his team time. He rotates, but keeps himself in the passing lane, ready to fly back toward Simons. Scheierman, identifying that immediately, holds Ellis in no-man’s land with a brief glance and ball fake before pulling the open shot.

When you have an edge this significant, hesitating is the only bad choice.

Here, it’s a situation in the clutch against the Knicks that features a comparable rotation by Miles McBride. Jordan Walsh may have had a brief window to shoot, but McBride commits fully to the closeout. As quickly as it arrives, the ball is out of Walsh’s hands and off to White. Walsh simply keeps the advantage alive, trusting the next decision in the chain.

The right play can be fluid in these cases, but it boils down to how fast you can identify and attack a defense under pressure. There’s rarely a bad time to shoot in Mazzulla’s offense, though if you’re passing up a shot it should be for an option that keeps things humming.

There is simplicity in good execution, and it can be destructive for defenses when it leads to repeated breakdowns.

Whenever a Celtics role player has a breakout moment, the reaction tends to be the same. How do they keep finding these guys? Where do they keep coming from?

For years, Derrick White has been the Celtics’ ultimate advantage extender. The player who understands exactly how to punish a defense that’s already rotating. Now that same philosophy is showing up across the roster.

Baylor Scheierman, Hugo Gonzalez, Jordan Walsh, and Ron Harper Jr. aren’t being asked to become Derrick White. But they are learning to play the part of the game that makes him so valuable. Fast, confident decisions will take them a long way.

According to Sports Info Solutions, the Celtics currently rank 1st in the NBA in Advantages Reduced per 100 possessions. Essentially, this measures how often a team’s edge stalls out through hesitation or poor decision-making. While their creators spark the initial scramble, the young role players help to ensure that an advantage is rarely wasted.

The Celtics may never find another Derrick White. By teaching his brand of basketball, they might not need to. The organization’s attention to detail has already helped develop several new connective pieces into real contributors.

Is Steph Curry playing today? How much longer will he be out?

Golden State Warriors guard Stephen Curry remains out for Wednesday's game against the Boston Celtics with a lingering right knee injury that has sidelined him for six weeks.

Curry has averaged 27.2 points, 3.5 rebounds and 4.8 assists on 46.8% field goal shooting this season, but missing the last 18 games for Golden State has been a huge blow for the Warriors. In that 18-game span, Golden State has gone 6-12 and has slipped to the No. 9 spot in the NBA Playoffs and Play-In Tournament race.

And the growing concern is whether Curry could miss more games as the remainder of the regular season winds down. No timetable for a return has been set. In a March 11 statement, the team said that Curry would be re-evaluated in 10 days.

The good news for the Warriors is that their star is coming along with his progress.

"Steph is back working out on the court and increasing his workload," the team told USA TODAY Sports. "Hopefully he'll be back (playing) in the near future."

His injury was described as "basically runner's knee" with "no structural damage," the team adding that the four-time NBA champion, who just turned 38, simply "just needed rest."

Another evaluation update should come March 21, or over the forthcoming days.

The Warriors are in the midst of a six-game road trip. It started March 15 with a 110-107 loss to the New York Knicks, but they rebounded the following day in a 125-117 win against the Washington Wizards.

Leading up to that anticipated date for another Curry evaluation, Golden State visits the Celtics Wednesday, then Detroit Pistons and Atlanta Hawks on March 20 and 21, respectively.

Curry has traveled with the team during their road trip as he awaits his reevaluation. He will get to watch his dad be recognized in Charlotte as the Hornets retire Dell Curry's No. 30 jersey on March 19 against the Orlando Magic.

The Warriors' road trip ends with the Dallas Mavericks on March 23 before returning to the Bay Area to host the Brooklyn Nets on March 25.

The regular season concludes April 12 against the Los Angeles Clippers.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Steph Curry injury update, Warriors vs Celtics status

Pro ready: Top NBA prospects among 2026 March Madness players

One of the greatest sports events of the calendar year is set to tip off this week with the men’s and women’s NCAA Tournaments.

It’s the chance for hoops fans to see the intense drama of March Madness, but it’s also the chance for them to catch the future stars of pro basketball before they reach the next level.

And, on the men’s side, the 2026 NBA Draft is projected to be a deep class loaded with elite talent at the top. From the very top names like Darryn Peterson and AJ Dybantsa to perhaps lesser known players like Bennett Stirtz.

Here are the top NBA prospects to watch in the men’s NCAA Tournament – ranked from most to least ready in each regional – and who their skills most compare to among current NBA players:

East Regional

G Darryn Peterson, Kansas

The most polished offensive player in the class, Peterson thrives best when the ball is in his hands so he can either create his own shot or distribute it in a play-making role. He’s a three-level scorer, though he may be most effective at the rim.

He has faced some lingering injury concerns with constant cramping and availability concerns, but Peterson is a plug-and-play threat, and the NCAA Tournament offers the chance to see him on the biggest stage.

NBA player comparison: Devin Booker

F Cameron Boozer, Duke

In terms of production, no player has been as dominant or consistent as Boozer, who is probably still undersized as an NBA center at 6-foot-9. Still, though he may lack explosive athleticism, Boozer does several things well on offense. He can bring the ball up the floor and handle it in the half-court. His footwork in the low block is tremendous, and he should be a massive threat in the NBA as a pick-and-roll.

And with Duke holding national title expectations, it will be fascinating to see how he responds to the added pressure.

NBA player comparison: Paolo Banchero

PG Mikel Brown, Jr., Louisville

It’s still unclear if Brown will actually play, as he has been dealing with a nagging back injury, but Cardinals coach Pat Kelsey said Monday, March 16 that Brown had “made great progress” leading up to this week. Back issues aside, Brown has solid size at 6-foot-5 for the position and has an excellent stroke from deep, though he could certainly emphasize efficiency in his scoring portfolio.

NBA player comparison: Tyrese Haliburton

SG Braylon Mullins, Connecticut

He missed some time early in the season with an ankle issue, but he has emerged as a solid perimeter guard for the Huskies with excellent size (6-foot-6) and catch-and-shoot ability. His 3-point shooting will be on display in the tournament, and it could help him rise up draft boards.

NBA player comparison: Tyler Herro

West Regional

F AJ Dybantsa, Brigham Young

Dybantsa may be the purest scorer in the class, and one who doesn’t necessarily need assistance to get buckets. He’s blessed with tremendous size and length and has natural athleticism that appears effortless. He’ll still need to refine his jumpshot and ball-handling ability, but these are factors that can be trained.

He leads the country in scoring (25.3 points per game) and will need to carry the Cougars, who continue to be without Richie Saunders (torn anterior cruciate ligament).

NBA player comparison: Jayson Tatum

PG Darius Acuff, Jr., Arkansas

An asset in the half-court, Acuff is a player who can immediately slide into an NBA team to run point. He thrives in a score-first mentality, but his ability to knock down floaters or hit shots in tight spaces also opens up his play-making ability. He has solid vision and operates offense with excellent pace and body control.

He sometimes settles for jumpers when he can’t get past opponents, and his defense is a concern.

NBA player comparison: Keyonte George

G Brayden Burries, Arizona

Although he’s a touch undersized at 6-foot-4, he’s solidly built with a good frame. As the season progressed, Burries’ scoring productivity improved, and he consistently showed plus effort on the defensive side. At times, he appeared to push his jump shot, and some improvement with his perimeter jumper would go a long way.

NBA player comparison: Quentin Grimes

F Koa Peat, Arizona

This is a case where a freshman may better serve his draft stock by returning for another season. Peat has had some inconsistent offensive performances, and much of that has been because of deference and a jumpshot that could use some improvement. Peat, though, is a high-energy athlete, one of the stronger prospects in the class, and he should only improve as he gets more experience.

NBA player comparison: Aaron Gordon

South Regional

*North Carolina forward Caleb Wilson is sidelined for the Tar Heels, after undergoing season-ending thumb surgery

PG Kingston Flemings, Houston

With his speed, improving scoring ability and effort on defense, Flemings might be the best natural point guard in the class. Though his shot may feature some unconventional mechanics, it’s hard to argue with the results. He thrives attacking downhill, but his lateral speed and length also help him deflect passes on defense.

NBA player comparison: De’Aaron Fox

G Keaton Wagler, Illinois

His range and perimeter shooting will get him instant playing time in the NBA. His size may make him a star. At 6-foot-6, Wagler has excellent length and is built for the modern game, and his 40.2% shooting from 3-point range should make him an instant asset, whether he plays point guard or shooting guard.

NBA player comparison: Cade Cunningham

F Thomas Haugh, Florida

A breakout player in his third season with the Gators, Haugh is a high-effort player who is better off the ball. He has a polished, versatile skill set, though the perimeter shot can be streaky, if not altogether average. He fits in at the NBA as a two-way forward who won’t be outworked on the floor. That should win over his eventual coaching staff.

NBA player comparison: Hebert Jones

PG Bennett Stirtz, Iowa

Though he’s not the most polished athlete, Stirtz possesses many of the operational qualities coaches want in a point guard. He can operate pick-and-rolls and sees the court extremely well. And he can also create his own shot, particularly along the perimeter. Defense, though, is a concern.

NBA player comparison: Fred VanVleet

Midwest Regional

*Kentucky forward Jayden Quaintance is expected to miss the NCAA Tournament, as he’s facing ongoing knee swelling following his return from a torn anterior cruciate ligament.

F Nate Ament, Tennessee

After suffering a right ankle sprain, Ament returned to action in the SEC Tournament and should be poised to build off of that in the NCAA Tournament. He has tremendous size (6-foot-10) and length, and he’s a fluid athlete, though he sometimes doesn’t capitalize on that length and settles for jumpers. Either way, he has the build that NBA front offices prioritize in wing players.

NBA player comparison: Mikal Bridges

PG Christian Anderson, Texas Tech

Another player with effortless range and accuracy from 3, Anderson can shine both on and off the ball. His vision and distribution has improved significantly, as he went from 2.2 assists per game as a freshman to 7.6 this season.

NBA player comparison: Jamal Murray

F Yaxel Lendeborg, Michigan

After withdrawing his name from consideration late in the draft process last season, Lendeborg has starred for Michigan, showing why he’s one of the more NBA-ready prospects in the country. Lendeborg has a well-rounded offensive skill set and used his strength and wingspan to defend a variety of players, including shiftier guards. He’s 23 years old, however, so that may lower his profile for some NBA teams, but the tournament provides a chance for him to back up Michigan’s title hopes.

NBA player comparison: Tari Eason

G Labaron Philon, Jr. Alabama

Dealing with some nagging injuries, Philon hasn’t been fully healthy, but he has played through discomfort. Coming back for his sophomore season was a wise choice; his field goal percentage jumped more than five points (50.9%, up from 45.2%) and his 3-point percentage really took off (40.2%, up from 31.5%). He’s a natural scorer and should find a steady role early in his NBA career, even if it’s off the bench.

NBA player comparison: Ayo Dosunmu

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: NCAA Tournament March Madness players who are top prospects in NBA

Plaschke: "Yeaaaaaah!" A child's cheer inspires surging Lakers

Lakers forward LeBron James dives for a loose ball in front of Nuggets Christian Braun and Jamal Murray.
Lakers forward LeBron James dives for a loose ball in front of Nuggets guards Christian Braun (0) and Jamal Murray (27) Saturday at Crypto.com Arena. James credited young Lakers fan Jackson Tuyay with inspiring the team's win. (Gina Ferazzi/Los Angeles Times)

Out of the mouths of babes …

When measuring the furiously growing buzz around the Lakers, one need only heed the hopeful cries of one of their most rabid fans.

A 6-year-old.

Wearing a Shaquille O’Neal jersey that nearly drapes to his knees.

Leading 20,000 fans in a Saturday night cheer that has swept through a city.

“Yeaaaaaah!,” Jackson Tuyay screamed, and now all of Lakerland screams with him.

It happened in the second half of the Lakers’ steal of a victory against the Denver Nuggets.

The videoboard at Crypto.com Arena announced the regular competition for Fan of the Game, and while searching the stands for the usual dancing fools, the cameras focused on a child who had been cheering the entire night.

Not just cheering, but screaming. Not just rooting, but flexing. Not just clapping, but pounding his fists against his chest.

It was Jackson Tuyay, and he was doing it all with one word in a tiny voice that spoke for a massive fan base.

Yeaaaah indeed. Tuyay was captured on the giant videoboard, he was awarded a $100 gift card for being Fan of the Game, and afterward none other than LeBron James credited him with the comeback win.

“That little kid on the Jumbotron was definitely … I looked up there … I think he’s, yeah, he’s the reason why we won tonight for sure,” James told reporters afterward, and everyone laughed, but there’s something to this.

On what many onlookers credited with being the loudest night of the season, a kindergartner perhaps epitomized what many of this city’s oldest and most die-hard fans are finally feeling.

Everybody is screaming about the Lakers. Everybody is flexing about the Lakers. Everybody is pounding their chest about the Lakers.

They have won nine of the last 10 games, cutting into winning records of the New York Knicks, Minnesota, Denver and Houston in the last 10 days, moving up to third in the West, sprinting toward the potential for greatness.

Did you see them in their fourth quarter comeback win in Houston on Monday night? The Rockets committed nine turnovers, made four baskets and Kevin Durant was held to one garbage-time layup in the entire second half. Once a gaping wound, the Lakers have the league’s sixth-ranked defense during these last 10 games. Combined with its deftly collaborative offense, one can only imagine the heights this team can reach.

Read more:Are the Lakers the hottest team in the NBA?

They’re playing unselfish basketball, witness James throwing himself through the air while chasing down a loose ball against Denver.

They’re playing tough basketball, witness everything growling Marcus Smart does down the stretch, from steals to treys.

They’re playing redemptive basketball, witness Deandre Ayton finally showing up and proving he is truly the X factor on this team.

And, of course, they’re playing Luka and A.R. basketball, the two best players on this team throwing down one dagger after another, even playing better with James on the court alongside them.

“I think they’re gonna win a lot of games,” predicted Jackson this week, and I think this child genius might be right.

The kid’s impact Saturday night might have been brief, but it’s real, as he received props not just from James, but from Doncic on Instagram.

Lakers center Deandre Ayton blocks a pass to Rockets center Clint Capela during their game Monday.
Lakers center Deandre Ayton blocks a pass to Rockets center Clint Capela during their game Monday. (David J. Phillip / Associated Press)

“I just wanted the Lakers to win because I thought it would be cool,” Jackson said.

Cooler still is that this was the first Lakers game of Jackson's young life, as his father, Byron, bought four tickets online for him; his mother, Katherine; and his younger sister, Emilia.

“I saw it on the schedule and just figured it would be a fun afternoon for the kids,” said Byron, a South Pasadena lawyer who grew up during the Shaq-Kobe era and is passing his Laker fandom on to his family.

Like any good Lakers fan, the couple bought souvenirs for the kids before the game, including purchasing a jersey and a foam finger for Jackson. The jersey was the smallest size possible, but appropriately celebrated the biggest man imaginable. Jackson swam in it, but was inspired by it.

“We had to get the Shaq jersey,” said Byron. “We’re old school.”

Once the game started Jackson lived up to a nickname given to him because he runs everywhere, including out of his house in the mornings and around the corner to his nearby school.

Read more:Lakers surge late and defeat Rockets for their sixth consecutive win

A friend’s parent calls him “Turbo,” and he was doing all kinds of turbo things when the cameras caught him in the act.

“He has this crazy aura and energy about him,” said Byron. “He was cheering like that all game.”

Once the fans at Crypto.com Arena saw his flexing and chest beating, they couldn’t get enough. He was not only named Fan of the Game, but he was shown on the videoboard several times during the rest of the game, igniting a huge ovation every time and establishing himself as the team’s new talisman.

After the game ended with the Lakers stunning overtime victory, fans lined up to give him high-fives and cheer for him as his family descended a stairway.

He might be hearing more cheers in the future. He’s already been invited to their next home game by somebody from Doncic’s camp, and future invitations are sure to follow.

C’mon Lakers, get this kid in the building for a playoff game. Show that the sophisticated following of the world’s most glamorous sports franchise is actually rooted in the heart of a child.

After all, Laker fans know a hero when they see one, and the postgame chants for Jackson Tuyay were unmistakable.

“M-V-P … M-V-P … M-V-P!”

Sign up for our weekly newsletter on all things Lakers.

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Knicks 136, Pacers 110: “Good win. Incredible game for Josh.”

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - MARCH 17: Guard Josh Hart #3 of the New York Knicks reacts with center Mitchell Robinson #23 and guard Tyler Kolek #13 during the second half against the Indiana Pacers at Madison Square Garden on March 17, 2026 in New York City. The Knicks won 136-110. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Sarah Stier/Getty Images) | Getty Images

The Pacers (15–54) limped into Madison Square Garden on a 13-game losing streak, but they always bring the fire against the Knicks (45*-25). After Indy shot brilliantly through the first half, they crashed back to Earth in the second. Behind Josh Hart’s 33 points, a Knicks career high, our heroes celebrated St. Patrick’s Day with a 136-110 win.

Starting the 35th game of his career, Jose Alvarado (16 PTS, 10 AST, 2 STL, 4-of-7 3PT) covered for the absent Jalen Brunson, nursing a sore neck. Alvarado had shot poorly since going off against Philly in February, but swished his first two attempts from yard. His energy powered the offense, and he logged three assists and a steal before yielding the floor to Tyler Kolek. Indiana countered with T.J. McConnell (10 PTS, 10 AST) in its starting five, filling in for Andrew Nembhard (who’s been filling in for Tyrese Haliburton all season).

Karl-Anthony Towns (22 PTS, 11 RBS, 2-of-7 3PT) scored early, but Josh Hart set the tone—back-to-back steals on Jarace Walker (16 PTS), a pull-up jumper, and a putback through contact ignited the Knicks. OG Anunoby (26 PTS, 8 RBS, 10-of-13 FG) carried the scoring load with a layup and two threes on his way to 15 points in the quarter. Mikal Bridges (10 PTS, 5 AST, 4-of-12 FG) quietly dished four assists, even if he took a while to score. He turned an ankle on a missed layup, and for a moment, his 626-game iron man streak seemed briefly in jeopardy.

The Pacers made their first four three-pointers, while the Knicks went 5-of-7 to go ahead 27-20 late in the first quarter. Thrice the Knicks pushed their lead to seven, and thrice the Pacers answered. OAKAAKUYOAK Obi Toppin (15 PTS) led Indiana with seven points off the bench. When the buzzer rang, the Knicks were ahead 38-34, having shot 5-of-9 from deep and allowing Indiana to shoot 5-of-8.

The quarter opened with Anunoby knocking down another three, but Indiana swung back. Walker hit from deep, Quenton Jackson attacked the paint, and McConnell kept the beat as the Pacers found a groove. Towns worked the glass and got to the line but missed a few easy looks, while Bridges still couldn’t get his burner lit. Indiana took advantage, with Keita Brown and Aaron Nesmith (14 PTS) hitting threes to claim a six-point lead midway through the frame.

Quoth Jaybugkit, “Incredible game for Josh.” Yessir! Hart swung the momentum late in the second quarter. He hit a three to stop the bleeding, then added another late, standing out as the Knicks’ most impactful player. Alvarado pushed the pace with a string of assists and a timely three off a steal, while Bridges finally connected, chipping in a late jumper. Indiana got buckets from Nesmith, Jackson, and Sheppard, but couldn’t string together stops. When intermission arrived, the hosts had gone ahead, 72-64.

Through the half, Indiana shot 63% from the field and 61% from three, while the Knicks had shot 56% and 55%. The home team had won the glass 21-18 and turned the ball over just three times. Hart led all scorers with 19 points at the half, and Alvarado had 13 points and seven assists. For the Pacers, Kobe Brown and Aaron Nesmith had 11 points each.

To start the second half, New York surrendered five easy points, and Mike Brown called a timeout after just a minute. From there, the Knicks straightened up, going on a 19-10 run and gradually extending their advantage to 17. Hart, having his best offensive game of the season, had made 12 of his first 13 shots, 5-of-5 from deep, and 4-of-5 from the free-throw line before sitting late in the third. His 33 points were the most he’d scored in his career as a Knick.

Indiana’s hot first-half shooting cooled, and an excess of turnovers cost them. Furthermore, most of the Knicks were enjoying the freedom of a half-hearted Hoosier defense. Anunoby chipped in a dunk and a transition finish, and both he and Towns eclipsed 20 points.

The middle stretch bogged down with misses and turnovers. Indiana’s bench briefly supplied some offense with a dunk from Jay Huff, a putback by Sheppard, and a triple from Toppin, but they couldn’t cut their deficit to single digits. With three quarters gone, New York sat on a comfortable 105-91 lead.

In the fourth quarter, Mitchell Robinson (8 PTS, 8 RBS) spanked the Pacers’ frontcourt. Indiana had their opportunities to climb back into the game (Toppin drilled a trey, Walker got to the line), but they packed it in early. For the Knicks, Towns and Anunoby added to their point totals, Jordan Clarkson made his way to 10 points, and Bridges swished two encouraging threes. The lead reached 27 points. Around the middle of the period, Coach Brown sent in Jordan Clarkson, Jeremy Sochan, Kolek, Pacome Dadiet, Mohamed Diawara, and Kevin McCullar, Jr. to finish it off.

Up Next

New York takes the subway to Brooklyn on Friday for a night with the Nets. Safe travels, Knickerbockers.

Box Score

* Should be one more, but NBA Cups have leaks.

‘Like old times': Tatum-Brown duo off to a dominant start for Celtics

‘Like old times': Tatum-Brown duo off to a dominant start for Celtics originally appeared on NBC Sports Boston

For all the over-caffeinated consternation about how Jayson Tatum might reintegrate with his Boston teammates, the Celtics have thrived in Tatum’s 146 minutes of floor time since he returned from a nine-month absence

The Celtics have outscored opponents by 14.8 points per 100 possessions in Tatum’s limited time, which would be the best mark on the team if maintained over a larger sample. Even as Tatum shakes rust and fights his 3-point shot (27.1 percent beyond the arc on 9.6 attempts per game), the Celtics have outscored opponents by 45 total points in Tatum’s floor time. 

After Euro-stepping his way to a layup off a feed from Jaylen Brown in the fourth quarter of Boston’s gritty win over the Phoenix Suns on Monday night, Tatum remarked how “felt like old times” operating with his All-Star running mate.

The Jays have now shared the court for 101 minutes through five games together. Boston is outscoring opponents by a robust 24 points per 100 possessions during that span.

For context, Boston’s best high-volume two-man pairing (at least 1,000 minutes together) is the Derrick White-Neemias Queta combo at +13.8 net rating. The best two-man pairing in the entire league with 500-plus minutes together is the Oklahoma City Thunder duo of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Ajay Mitchell at +20.5.

In other words, the Jays are trending toward some of the best numbers in the NBA, at least in early returns. Boston has outscored opponents by 53 points in 213 possessions with the Jays together on the floor. A five-man pairing featuring the Jays with White, Queta, and Payton Pritchard is +30 in 21 minutes, having outscored opponents 67-37 in that span.

The Celtics have played solid competition during that span, too. A good chunk of the Brown/Tatum minutes came against Cleveland and San Antonio, then against a Phoenix team nestled just outside the top six in the West.

The Celtics have outscored opponents by 7.8 points per 100 possessions in each of the past two seasons during Brown and Tatum’s shared floor time. A larger sample might pull their net rating back to earth a bit, but the success while Tatum is still reacclimatizing is rather remarkable. 

window.addEventListener(“message”,function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}});

Some wondered how the team would find shots for everybody upon Tatum’s return. But even as Brown operates as a bona fide MVP candidate, there have been plenty of looks to go around.

Tatum has averaged a team-high 18.6 shots per game in his five games back, while Brown is at 16.7 shots. What’s more, the combined averages for the Jays puts them in line with their output in recent seasons:

window.addEventListener(“message”,function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}});

Tatum averaged just 26 minutes per game in his first four games back before bumping up to 31 minutes in each of the last two games. He’s still well below his career average of 34.5 minutes per game and last season’s minutes average (36.4 per game). His output will increase as he shakes more rust and gets extended run on the court.

It was fair to expect some bumps in the road as Tatum worked his way back. But, for the most part, it’s been smooth sailing. In fact, what’s been most obvious is how Tatum’s presence has made things easier for Boston’s supporting cast. All the attention the Jays draw is creating opportunities for others.

Queta and White have each finished seven of Tatum’s 22 total assists since returning. Queta is figuring out pick-and-roll tendencies after limited reps with Tatum the previous two seasons, while White has routinely thrived off Tatum feeds. White is shooting 9-of-21 (42.9 percent) on all Tatum feeds, and Tatum’s presence should help White push his 3-point efficiency back up this season. 

The continued attention on Brown is helping Tatum, too: Tatum is shooting 55.6 percent on all Brown feeds. 

Boston’s biggest priority over these final 14 games is getting Tatum reps with the core that he’ll share much of his floor time with in the postseason. That the Celtics have enjoyed as much success as they have in the infancy of his return is a rather tantalizing indication of where this team could go by the time the playoffs arrive.

MMBets: The Atlanta Hawks visit the Dallas Mavericks

ATLANTA, GEORGIA - MARCH 16: Jalen Johnson #1 and Mouhamed Gueye #18 of the Atlanta Hawks celebrate a 124-112 victory over the Orlando Magic at State Farm Arena on March 16, 2026 in Atlanta, Georgia. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Todd Kirkland/Getty Images) | Getty Images

The Atlanta Hawks arrive at American Airlines Center on Wednesday riding a 10-game win streak, which is the sort of thing that makes a 23-win home team either lie down or get ornery. The Mavericks have been ornery lately. Cooper Flagg has scored 21 or more in three straight, PJ Washington has strung together back-to-back good nights, and this group…despite racking plenty of losses…refuses to develop the losing habits that a lesser-coached, lesser-charactered roster might by mid-March.

The Hawks are led by Nickeal Alexander-Walker, who just dropped 41 on the Magic, and Jalen Johnson, who has been a walking triple-double threat over Atlanta’s last three games. The same two guys who gave Dallas fits in the first meeting. Worth noting.

Let’s scan the lines in search of value.

🏀 Fixture: Atlanta Hawks (37-31) @ Dallas Mavericks (23-46) 📍 American Airlines Center — Dallas, TX 🕖 7:40 PM CST, Wednesday, March 18, 2026 📺 KFAA Channel 29 / MavsTV / NBA League Pass

📊 DraftKings Snapshot (as of 5:17 AM CST) Spread: ATL -8.5 (-102) | DAL +8.5 (-118) Total: 238.5 (O -105 / U -115) Moneyline: ATL -355 | DAL +280

📉 Game Side Lean: Dallas +8.5

Ten-game win streaks have a way of ending in the exact building where nobody expects them to. The Mavericks are home, they’re motivated, and this particular group has a habit of playing spoiler when the moment calls for it. Atlanta is good—genuinely good—but 8.5 points is asking a lot against a Dallas team that has been competitive far more often than its record suggests. Gafford and Caleb Martin are both questionable, and the Mavs’ frontcourt limitations could matter. But Flagg is locked in, Washington is finding himself again, and the number feels too generous. Dallas covers or wins outright. Either way, we like the plus side.

🔮 Total Lean: Over 238.5

Defense is a concept both these teams engage with selectively and without great enthusiasm. Atlanta has been scoring in bunches on their win streak, and Dallas—especially in home games where the crowd gives them something to play for—pushes pace and gets out in transition. Neither team has the personnel to grind this into a 105-103 affair. Expect points.

🎯 Player Props We Like

Cooper Flagg Over 21.5 Points (-107) Three straight games of 21 or more, and Atlanta’s defense hasn’t exactly been its calling card during this win streak. Flagg is in a groove, the usage is there, and this is a home game against a team with legitimate playoff ambitions—which means Flagg gets to play hero ball with real stakes attached. This number clears with a good third quarter.

Onyeka Okongwu Over 7.5 Rebounds (-127) Okongwu averages 7.8 rebounds on the season and Dallas’s frontcourt situation—Gafford questionable, Cisse limited—creates a landscape where interior boards are up for grabs. He should eat. The juice is a little steep but the matchup earns it.

💡 Summary: Dallas +8.5 for a team that doesn’t know how to quit. Over 238.5 because neither defense is going to save anyone. Flagg in a groove, Okongwu feasting on a thin Dallas frontcourt. Four picks. Go Mavs. Oh, and tonight’s ice cream of choice is Dark Cherry Truffle—get you some.

March Madness a stage for 3-way race for NBA draft's No. 1 pick

The debate over which player is taken first overall in this year’s NBA draft has to include Duke freshman Cameron Boozer, the clubhouse leader for national player of the year.

With his double-double consistency in leading the Blue Devils to the top of the USA TODAY Sports Men’s College Basketball Poll, Boozer has joined a pair of fellow freshmen who have paced the conversation since the summer in Kansas guard Darryn Peterson and Brigham Young forward AJ Dybantsa.

At various points this season, each of these three contenders has shown explosive bursts of production that paint him as the top player in a draft class that’s deep enough to have triggered tanking efforts among the worst teams in the league — and in turn made efforts to limit or prevent tanking a major theme for the NBA.

"It's an extremely strong draft class," said Ben Pfeifer, an independent draft analyst. "And it starts at the top with, I think, three MVP-level, No. 1-pick-caliber guys in Peterson, Dybantsa and Cameron Boozer. But then I think even as you go down there is a ton of quality depth. I think there are more guys that could reasonably go in the lottery than lottery spots available and more first-round-quality players than first-round spots."

In this month's NCAA tournament, front offices and talent evaluators will be keeping close tabs on Boozer, Dybantsa and Peterson as they attempt to answer one of the most intriguing questions of the 2025-26 season: Who goes No. 1?

Cameron Boozer’s consistency propels Duke

Cameron Boozer has led top-ranked Duke to ACC regular season and tournament titles and a No. 1 overall seed in the NCAA Tournament.

Following in the footsteps of former Duke star Cooper Flagg, who had a memorable one-year run under coach Jon Scheyer and is now putting together a transcendent rookie season for the Dallas Mavericks, Boozer is averaging 22.5 points, 10.2 rebounds and 4.2 assists per game for the top-ranked Blue Devils.

His consistency can’t be ignored: Boozer has scored in double figures in every game, has made at least half of his attempts in all but four games since early January and has played at least 31 minutes in every ACC game except for blowouts of Syracuse and Notre Dame.

“He’s been the most productive of all the freshmen and the most consistent at a high level,” said ESPN analyst Jay Bilas. “A lot of these guys are winners, but he’s got this winning gene that you don’t see very often.”

The son of former Duke forward and NBA All-Star Carlos Boozer, the freshman has excelled despite playing alongside a weaker supporting cast than the group that joined Flagg a season ago; two of Flagg’s teammates, Kon Knueppel and Khaman Maluach, were taken No. 4 and No. 10 overall in last June's draft, respectively.

In comparison, this year’s team has another pair of potential first-round selections in guard Isaiah Evans and center Patrick Ngongba II, though neither is currently predicted to be a lottery pick.

"I definitely don't think any of his teammates are as good as Kon Knueppel or Maluach were last year," Pfeifer said, adding Ngongba and Evans are both "mid-first round to potentially late-lottery-level players."

Still, whether Boozer is taken No. 1 depends in large part on which team is drafting first and that team’s personnel needs, and whether teams see a difference-making, franchise-shaping talent in the 6-9 forward. For example, the Indiana Pacers could choose Boozer should they land the first pick given next year’s expected return of guard Tyrese Haliburton.

“He’s a force,” Scheyer said of Boozer following Duke’s Feb. 28 win against Virginia. “No question about it. He sets a great tone for us with his rebounding and rim attacks.”

Darryn Peterson’s performance, availability spark acclaim, concern

Darryn Peterson has a tantalizing skill set and ability to score at all three levels.

There is no question Peterson can play at an absurdly high level.

The five-star recruit is averaging 19.8 points per game for No. 17 Kansas while making 44.2% of his shots from the field and 38.4% from 3-point range. He’s cracked the 20-point mark 11 times, led by a season-high 32 points in an overtime win against TCU in early January.

Along the way, his NBA-ready skill set and shot creation paints Peterson as a plug-and-play prospect with the potential to develop into an elite scorer and franchise cornerstone.

The question is whether Peterson will play — and that question has so far defined the Jayhawks’ season.

A herky-jerky year has seen Peterson miss games with a hamstring injury, an ankle injury and due to illness. He’s also left games with cramping issues, including during a win against Oklahoma State on Feb. 18 that saw Peterson check himself out of action three minutes into the second half.

By that point, Peterson had scored 23 points on 7-of-10 shooting in just 18 minutes of action.

“It's a concern," Kansas coach Bill Self said postgame. “I thought we were past it, but obviously we're not. It's certainly a concern."

Since that game, Peterson is averaging 31.6 minutes a game, so whatever message was sent was received.

Another issue has been Peterson’s lackluster play against the top opponents on the Jayhawks’ schedule. In four games against the best teams in the Big 12 — a loss to Arizona, a split with Houston and a loss to Iowa State — Peterson averaged 15.5 points while shooting 19-of-56 from the field and 9-of 26 from deep.

With Boozer, there may be a concern that his long-term NBA impact won’t match the expectations heaped on the No. 1 pick, especially in a draft class with this much star power. But Peterson’s candidacy for the top pick comes with a different sort of risk: Does he have the makeup to stand up to the hype and pressure that come with going No. 1 overall?

"I’m not concerned about it unless something is revealed that’s factual that gives me concern," said Bilas. "I know him to be a competitor in talking to everybody that’s dealt with him, so I’m not worried about it. The talent there is undeniable, and there’d have to be a red flag you can see from 50 miles away to keep you from a talent like that."

AJ Dybantsa does it all for BYU

AJ Dybantsa led the nation in scoring at a little over 25 points per game.

Meanwhile, Dybantsa has been a dynamic and consistent scorer for a BYU team that started the season 17-2, but has stumbled lately as the Cougars deal with injuries.

His commitment to BYU as a five-star prospect from Brockton, Massachusetts, was seen as emblematic of the NIL era. After reaching last year’s Sweet 16 before falling to Alabama, the Cougars were expected to take a step forward by adding Dybantsa into a mix that included holdovers such as guard Richie Saunders and fellow newcomer Robert Wright III, a Baylor transfer.

The question of whether the Cougars parlay this roster into a deeper postseason run will be answered soon. But Dybantsa has met and even exceeded expectations as the nation’s top scorer and one of the most well-rounded wings in the Power Five.

He’s scored at least 20 points in 13 games in a row, and averaged 31 points in the Cougars' three Big 12 tournament games. Dybantsa poured in a season-high 43 points in a 91-78 win against rival Utah on Jan. 24.

"He's a truly absurd scorer," Pfeifer said. Dybantsa has "some of the best footwork you're ever going to see from a player this age," he added.

"Truly absurd stuff that he can do with pivots and step-throughs and just creative moves that you very rarely see players like him pulling out on a basketball court."

Overall, he’s averaging 25.3 points per game, 6.7 rebounds and 3.8 assists per game while making 51.3% of his attempts. Dybantsa has already become just the 20th freshman since 2000 to score at least 700 points and is just the third freshman to lead the country in scoring since the NCAA began officially tracking statistics in the late 1940s.

"I don't think it's hype with AJ Dybantsa," Bilas said. "I think it's factual. Like, when you saw him in high school, you knew: This guy is the real deal. And he's done nothing but elevate judgment on that. So whatever expectation he had as a freshman, I think by all measure he's exceeded it. It's like he's made in a lab for the NBA. He's got size and crazy length and a skill set that is transferrable to the league right now."

NBA mock draft: Who goes No. 1?

In the latest mock draft from For The Win, AJ Dybantsa is projected to go No. 1 to the Indiana Pacers, followed by Darryn Peterson to the Washington Wizards at No. 2 and Cameron Boozer to the Sacramento Kings at No. 3.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: NBA draft No. 1 pick a 3-way race between Dybantsa, Boozer, Peterson

The Great Tank Race, Vol. IV: hypocrisy, betrayal, and Cody Williams

PORTLAND, OREGON - MARCH 13: Cody Williams #5 of the Utah Jazz dribbles against Scoot Henderson #00 of the Portland Trail Blazers during the first half at Moda Center on March 13, 2026 in Portland, Oregon. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Soobum Im/Getty Images) | Getty Images

A recently discovered letter, of unknown age and origin:

To Adam Silver and the basketball powers-that-be: Why so quiet?

From your mighty cloud on high, you struck Utah and Indiana for their heresy and crimes against the sanctity of the game. You sent doctors and insisted on micromanaging every personnel decision of these pitiful teams, lest your followers dwindle into disbelief through the mighty vice of tanking’s temptation. The underlings have paid the price, and your word was made law.

You did not hesitate to pass righteous judgment against the wicked in the past. Yet now, as Utah dives to the bottom of the pile, the gods have fallen silent?

Clear and obvious tanking measures continue to spread like a plague across the dregs of professional basketball, and the protectors are nowhere to be seen. Their influence is muted. Their hand is invisible. My faith has reached a point of crisis — a hinge point from which I feel destined to fall. I feel on the verge of collapse, as Sacramento, Washington, Brooklyn, Dallas, and yes, even my home of Utah, laugh in the face of judgment, smile in the crosshairs of your vengeance, and mock your authority with every subsequent contest.

Are you there? Can you hear my plea? All I can ask is for justice to be handed to the deserving. Were you simply hoping to make an example of the unpopular? Do you fear those beneath you so deeply?

NBA Olympus has fallen, and Silver is tarnished.

(Author Unknown)

Previous volumes of The Great Tank Race: I | II | III


1- (+3) Indiana Pacers (15-54)

Like waves upon a stormy sea, the Pacers rise and fall in the order of the tank race. Just a month ago, they had dropped all the way to fourth place.

But then they lost 14 straight and lurched right to the bottom again. Congratulations are in order because that is their second streak of 13+ losses this season, and they are just two away from tying Sacramento’s record of 16. The lords of the tank shook off the chains of mediocrity and have embraced bloated, unapologetic self-sabotage. I have never seen something quite so beautiful in my entire life. Indy has not won a basketball game since the last edition of this saga and has brought meaning to meaningless basketball.

The possibility of adding one of this year’s top prospects should have the Pacers’ front office in a frenzy, because I can imagine any of Dybantsa, Peterson, Boozer, or Wilson pairing effortlessly with Tyrese Haliburton. When all seemed lost, they reclaimed their throne and kingdom.

I bend the knee to you, O rightful King of the Great Tank race.

2- (+0) Washington Wizards (16-52) 1.5 GB

Yes, Trae Young is finally wearing basketball shorts again, but Washington is in no rush to push him into heavy minutes at this point in the season. Gradually bringing their injured stars along on minutes restrictions cost Utah $500,000. That service is free in the nation’s capital.

If you thought that Indiana’s 14-game losing streak is impressive, the Wiz are not far behind — currently shuffling through a 13-game slumber of their own. Two titans of the tank are doing battle at the top, and there’s very little the higher-ups of the league can do to stand in their way.

3- (+2) Brooklyn Nets (17-51) 2.5 GB

Yes, one-man shooting gallery Egor Demin is out for the year with plantar fasciitis, and yes, the Nets have done very well to position themselves in the bottom three (equal odds for the number one pick), but there’s trouble over the horizon. When it comes to strength of schedule, the Brooklyn Nets have 14 games and the fifth-easiest remaining slate of any team in the NBA — easier than any of their tank race adversaries.

Considering their paper-thin curtain of just a half-game separating Brooklyn from Sacramento, the comfort of the top-3 and an equal share of number-one pick odds exchange hands of the Tank Race contenders on nearly a game-by-game basis.

Brooklyn, a team that quintuple-dipped in the first round of last year’s draft, is hungry for more. They’ll have plenty of chances to claim losses at the expense of their tank race foes down the home stretch. Lose those games, however, and the crowded mass at the bottom of the standings could spit you out far from the top pick.

4- (-3) Sacramento Kings (18-51) 3.0 GB

Kings.

You guys can’t even tank right.

5- (+1) Utah Jazz (20-48) 5.5 GB

With the hope that Keyonte George receives a full recovery from his hamstring tear suffered against New York, Keyonte’s availability was only going to hurt his team’s chances in the Tank Race. Utah has become one of basketball’s most exciting teams, promising a starting lineup of George (who is playing at an All-Star level this season, and I will personally fight anyone who disagrees), Markkanen, JJJ, Kessler, and Ace Bailey/whoever Utah snags with their first-round pick. Heck, Cody Williams just had a 34-point, 7-assist, 7-rebound game against Portland. The atmosphere is crackling in the Salt Lake Valley.

Any of Dybantsa, Boozer, Peterson, or even Darius Acuff would be incredible additions to a Jazz squad that feels they are just one foundational player away from competing in the Western Conference — and they’re tanking like their lives depend on it.

Losers in 2 of their last 10, Utah is climbing the ladder — or sliding down the fireman’s pole, depending on which way you prefer to orient your standings page — and gaining ground on a Kings team that is 5-5 in their last 10, and actively competing on a nightly basis against the customs of the Tankers’ Guild.

You tell me which is detrimental to the integrity of the game.

t6- (+1) Dallas Mavericks (23-46) 8.0 GB

Cooper Flagg is Cooper Flagg-ing once again, and the Mavericks are winning basketball games. This is tremendous news for Utah, whose shirt collar has become damp with condensation after these months of the Mavericks breathing down their necks in the standings.

The Mavs lucked into the number one pick last season after one of the most sanity-defying trades in recent memory, and have only made the Luka exchange worse by turning around to sell low on an aging, and (surprise, surprise) injured Anthony Davis. Yes, Nico Harrison is no longer with the team, and the whole “win-now” motivation behind dealing Doncic was his idea, but Dallas is years removed from competitive basketball, even if Kyrie Irving decides to return from his cryogenic chamber to play NBA basketball again.

If Dallas gets the number-one pick, we revolt.

t6- (-3) New Orleans Pelicans (23-46) 8.0 GB

Bad news, Atlanta. The Pelicans learned how to win.

New Orleans’ first-round pick is owned by the Hawks, all because the Pelicans needed Derik Queen. Queen is excellent for a late-lottery pick, don’t get me wrong, but New Orleans has sabotaged their own future during a present that promised, well, many more lottery picks before they can set their gaze upon trophies.

The Hawks — as hawks often do — swooped at the opportunity to claim an easy kill. The Pelicans are no longer a bottom-three team, no, but this is a bleak organization, and has been for an agonizingly long time.


Calvin Barrett is a writer, editor, and prolific Mario Kart racer located in Tokyo, Japan. He has covered the NBA and College Sports since 2024.

Former reality TV star Jessie Holmes repeats as champion of the grueling Iditarod sled dog race

NOME, Alaska (AP) — Former reality TV star Jessie Holmes cruised to a repeat victory in the Iditarod, the roughly 1,000-mile (1,609-kilometer) sled dog race in Alaska.

Holmes guided his dog team across the finish line Tuesday night in the old Gold Rush town of Nome, a Bering Sea coastal community. He pumped both fists in the air as the crowd cheered for him and his team of 12 dogs.

After finishing, the dogs got steaks and Holmes answered some questions accompanied by his lead dogs, Polar and Zeus.

“Zeus led every single run except one. I just wanted to let someone else have some fun. And Polar deserves it more than anybody,” he said. “He leads by example.”

The race started March 8 in Willow, a day after the ceremonial start was held in Anchorage. The course took dog teams and their mushers over two mountain ranges, along the frozen Yukon River and across the unpredictable Bering Sea ice.

Holmes, a former cast member on the National Geographic reality show “Life Below Zero,” is the third competitor in the 54-year history of the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race to repeat the year after winning for the first time. The others were Susan Butcher in 1986-1987 and Lance Mackey in 2007-2008. Both went on to win four titles.

Holmes told The Associated Press before the Iditarod that this year’s race was the most important of his career. “That’s hard to put that on yourself because you got to live with that pressure every day,” Holmes said. “And if I do not make it, it is going to absolutely crush me.”

He will pocket about $80,000 for this year’s win, up from the $57,000-plus he took home last year. This year's purse was boosted by financial support from Norwegian billionaire Kjell Rokke, who participated in a newly created, noncompetitive amateur category. Rokke reached Nome on Monday, under rules that allowed him to have outside support from a former Iditarod champ, flexible rest periods and to swap out dogs.

Holmes' first Iditarod was in 2018. His seventh place finish earned him rookie of the year honors. He has now raced in the Iditarod nine times, earning seven top 10 finishes. He’s been in the top five the last five races.

He appeared for eight years on “Life Below Zero,” which chronicled the hardships of people living in rural Alaska.

Holmes used the money he earned from the show to buy better dogs and equipment, and also was able to purchase raw land near Denali National Park and Preserve. A carpenter by trade, he’s carved his homestead in the wilderness, where his closest neighbor is about 30 miles (48 kilometers) away.

Rokke, who now lives in Switzerland, provided $100,000 in additional prize money and $170,000 to Alaska Native villages that serve as checkpoints. Another musher in the noncompetitive “expedition” class, Canadian entrepreneur Steve Curtis, pledged $50,000 to help youth sports programs in the villages. Curtis did not finish the race.

The race’s biggest critic, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, has claimed that more than 150 dogs have died in the history of the Iditarod. It urged Rokke to spend his money to help dogs rather than put them through “hazards and misery.”

The Iditarod has never provided its count of dogs who have died on the race.

One dog has died in this year's race, a 4-year-old female named Charly on musher Mille Porsild's team, the Iditarod said in a statement Tuesday. A necropsy will be conducted.

Thirty-four competitive mushers started, matching the inaugural 1973 race for the second fewest in race history. The retirements of many longtime mushers and the high cost of supplies, such as dog food, have kept the fields small this decade.

8 unpredictable March Madness top seeds that may bust NCAA Tournament brackets

Since March Madness became part of the sports vernacular, the NCAA Tournament bracket pool has become a familiar exercise. Broadly speaking, participants come from two main categories. There are the more casual fans who only pay attention to men’s college hoops around tourney time. They’ll do a modicum of research but will for the most part rely on name recognition and seeding to fill out their brackets.

Then there are the diehards, those who follow the sport from November onward in hopes of accumulating more knowledge for when the bracket is finally unveiled.

This is for the latter group, the ones who have been watching certain teams all season and are all too aware just how wildly unpredictable they can be. These are the teams that will cause self-described bracket experts the most angst as they consider their picks. They’re the teams that have the talent necessary for a deep run, even perhaps capable of sending a No. 1 packing. But they are also inconsistent enough that they’re just as likely to flame out in the first weekend. As you consider what to do with these eight teams, all we can say is, good luck.

Kansas

The Jayhawks’ history with Bill Self at the helm suggests their Final Four potential shouldn’t be dismissed. Their Big 12 results this season were a mixed bag, however, with impressive wins against Arizona and Iowa State mingled with ugly losses to bottom-tier finishers West Virginia and Arizona State. KU’s inconsistency isn’t entirely attributable to Darryn Peterson’s inconsistent health status, though that is certainly part of the story. Flory Bidunga can be dominant at times and invisible at others, and Melvin Council Jr. can be sizzling hot or ice cold.

Kansas guard Darryn Peterson (22) dribbles the ball against Texas Tech guard Jazz Henderson (2) during their game at United Supermarkets Arena.

Purdue

The Boilermakers were voted No. 1 in the preseason poll. At the start of the campaign and again at the end they looked the part. In between, however, they presented as a middle-of-the-pack Big Ten squad, a curious situation for a team with several multi-year starters. When Purdue struggled, there were issues at both ends of the floor, at times disinterested on defense and making bad decisions with the ball. Did the Boilermakers figure things out at the Big Ten tournament, or will there be a relapse at an inopportune time?

REGION BREAKDOWNS, PREDICTIONS: East | South | Midwest | West

Arkansas

There are many reasons to back the Razorbacks in their region. Their SEC tournament title would seem to indicate they’re heating up at the right time, and coach John Calipari has taken his share of teams to the final weekend. But their path to the SEC championship was cleared for them a bit as they didn’t have to face Florida or Alabama, and as good as Darius Acuff Jr. has been over the last few weeks, only a few teams have gone the distance with a talented freshman lead guard.

Gonzaga

Putting the Bulldogs in your Sweet 16 is usually a safe choice, but how far to take this group beyond that is tough to predict, especially since they’ll be matched up with equally volatile Purdue if the seeds hold. Gonzaga always plays a challenging non-conference schedule by necessity, and the results this season were mixed. The team defense is usually sound, but the Zags might not have enough perimeter scoring options to compensate when Graham Ike inevitably has to contend with bigger post players.

Connecticut

A few weeks ago, a complete domination of St. John’s had the Huskies on course for a top seed and well positioned for a shot at a third national title in four years. Since then, there was a loss to Marquette and a payback defeat to the Red Storm in the Big East final, not to mention numerous other uneven outings and more Danny Hurley meltdowns. It’s quite the conundrum when contemplating just how far to trust the Huskies in their extremely loaded regional. When Solo Ball is on UConn can beat anyone, but when he isn’t the rest of his game suffers.

Alabama

The Crimson Tide were going to be on this wildcard list even before the news of Aden Holloway’s legal troubles came out. Regardless, Alabama’s feast-or-famine approach at the 3-point arc can lead all the way to the Final Four as it did a couple years ago. This year’s version lacks rim protection, so the team has to rely on ball pressure to generate takeaways, a high-energy approach that might not be sustainable in the quick turnaround setting of the tournament. And missing one of their best players on the eve of the event may be too tough to manage.

Illinois

At the start of February, the Fighting Illini were riding a 12-game winning streak with a path to a No. 1 seed in sight with veteran guard Kylan Boswell returning from injury. But then Illinois went 4-5 down the stretch, with four of the five losses coming in overtime. All the defeats were against other tournament teams, but their troubling inability to make winning plays in close games has to be on everyone’s mind as the Big Dance tips off.

Virginia

While seeing the Cavaliers on the bracket is not new, this year’s version is constructed quite differently than the Tony Bennett teams of recent vintage. First and foremost, fans will see the team play at a much faster tempo under first-year coach Ryan Odom. But the real mystery with UVa is just how they’ll stack up against teams from other power leagues. The Cavs handled most of their competition in the watered-down ACC, but aside from a win against Texas there wasn’t much of note on their non-conference resume entering the postseason.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: March Madness bracket busters: Eight top seeds to avoid picking

Big Ten hasn't won NCAA Tournament since 2000. Will March Madness drought end this year?

The Big Ten is one of the two wealthiest and most powerful entities in college sports, an 18-school, coast-to-coast colossus that features many of the biggest universities and most recognizable brands in American higher education.

For all its money and influence, though, there’s something quite notable that the conference is missing: a men’s college basketball national championship in the past 25 years.

As the 2026 NCAA Tournament begins this week, the Big Ten will look to rectify a lingering and unsavory bit of history by having one of its teams cut down the nets in Indianapolis on April 6 after the national title game, something that hasn’t happened since Michigan State did it all the way back in 2000.

REGION BREAKDOWNS, PREDICTIONS: East | South | Midwest | West

Just how long has this drought been?

When the Spartans enjoyed their one shining moment, Bill Clinton was still the U.S. president. Later that April, the rock band Metallica sued digital file sharing application Napster. Jason Richardson, a freshman guard on that Michigan State team, now has a son who’s in his rookie season in the NBA. Richardson’s fellow freshman that season, Mat Ishbia, now has a net worth of $8.5 billion and owns the NBA’s Phoenix Suns. Tom Izzo, who now looks like this, looked like this.

To quote a popular song from around the time of the Spartans’ triumph, it’s been a while.

What’s made the drought so confounding is Big Ten teams haven gotten close to winning a championship. It’s not as if this is the Patriot League or the WAC, where it has a single representative in the tournament that’s fortunate to win a game. Big Ten teams regularly reach the biggest and brightest stages in college basketball; they just haven’t been able to close the deal.

Since Michigan State’s title in 2000, 15 teams from the conference have made it to the Final Four. Eight of those squads advanced to the national championship game, but in each instance, they lost. A couple of them came agonizingly close, with Illinois losing to North Carolina, 75-70, in 2005 and Wisconsin coming up short against Duke, 68-63, in 2015.

It’s not like its teams haven’t been in advantageous spots entering the tournament in recent years, either. Since the NCAA Tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1985, 35 of the 40 national champions (87.5%) have been a No. 1, No. 2 or No. 3 seed. Since 2018, Big Ten teams have accounted for 17 of those 84 spots on the bracket (20.2%).

Even if current Big Ten compatriot Maryland, which won the national championship in 2002 while a member of the ACC, was included as one of the Big Ten’s championships, the conference has still gone nearly a quarter-century without a title.

During that same stretch, other power conferences have repeatedly had its teams hoist a trophy at the end of the Final Four.

Since 2000, the Big East and ACC have each had eight teams win championships. During that same stretch, the SEC has had four champions and the Big 12 three. Even the American, which has disintegrated in recent years into a one- or two-bid league, had a title-winner on its resume, thanks to UConn in 2014.

Why has the Big Ten gone so long without winning March Madness?

There are a number of factors that have contributed to the Big Ten’s tournament woes.

For one, it’s a single-elimination format that can create some extreme variance and unexpected results. Without absolving some of its missteps, it’s quite possible the Big Ten’s just had some rotten luck.

Beyond that, many of the Big Ten teams that made and ultimately lost the national championship game had the misfortune of running up against some of the best teams in modern college basketball history. The North Carolina team Illinois lost to in 2005 was 33-4 and had four of the top 14 picks in that year’s NBA draft. Two years later, a Greg Oden and Mike Conley-led Ohio State team lost to a Florida team that brought back the entire starting five from its national championship team the year before. In 2009, Michigan State was blown out by a North Carolina team that was 34-4. Wisconsin came up short against a 2015 Duke team that won 35 games and had two top-10 NBA draft picks. Michigan was handled by a 2018 Villanova squad that won 36 games and had Jalen Brunson, Mikal Bridges and Donte DiVincenzo on its roster. Two years ago, Zach Edey and Purdue weren’t able to hang with a buzzsaw of a UConn team that had won 27 of its previous 28 games, including five NCAA Tournament games that were decided by an average of 25 points.

The wait for a champion has been even longer on the women’s side, where Purdue in 1999 is the league’s last national title winner. At least some of that can be explained away by a small handful of teams that own a disproportionate number of championships during that drought – namely UConn, with its 11 titles since 2000.

Can the Big Ten win a national championship this year?

The Big Ten enters the 2026 NCAA Tournament about as well-positioned as any conference in men’s college basketball to take home the sport’s ultimate prize.

Four of the top 10 and five of the top 13 teams on the NCAA selection committee’s seed list for the tournament are from the Big Ten. Of the 20 teams that have a top-four seed in the tournament, five are from the Big Ten, the most of any conference.

Its best bet for a champion this year appears to be Michigan, which went 31-3 in the regular season and has one of the country’s best players in All-America forward Yaxel Lendeborg.

Big Ten March Madness championship losses

Here’s a look at Big Ten teams that have lost in the national championship game in the years since Michigan State’s NCAA title in 2000:

  • 2002: Maryland 64, Indiana 52
  • 2005: North Carolina 75, Illinois 70
  • 2007: Florida 84, Ohio State 75
  • 2009: North Carolina 89, Michigan State 72
  • 2013: Louisville 82, Michigan 76
  • 2015: Duke 68, Wisconsin 63
  • 2018: Villanova 79, Michigan 62
  • 2024: Connecticut 75, Purdue 60

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Big Ten March Madness title drought could end in 2026 NCAA Tournament

Arizona 'built for' March Madness, says one expert. Call it proof of Big 12 surge

Fran Franschilla’s job calling Big 12 games gives him a front-row seat to the best action in college basketball, but that’s where he stops you. Don’t label broadcasting Big 12 hoops work.

“They pay me to travel, not to work,” Fraschilla, ESPN's veteran color commentator and a former coach, says affably. “I’ve been blessed, because I’ve watched the league grow up over 20 years.”

Along the way, Fraschilla became ESPN’s voice of the Big 12 and an unofficial conference advocate. It’s easy to advocate for the Big 12 in a season when the conference supplied peak entertainment and premier performance.

The SEC led all conferences with 10 NCAA Tournament bids, a show of its depth, but ball-knowers recognize the best batch of hoops lived inside the Big 12.

Now, to back that up on the final exam that is the NCAA Tournament.

The Big 12 earned eight bids. Fraschilla counts three with Final Four potential: No. 1 seed Arizona and No. 2 seeds Houston and Iowa State.

That list would be bigger, he says, if not for injuries to Texas Tech’s JT Toppin and Brigham Young’s Richie Saunders, a pair of big-time ballers who went down in February.

As for national championship potential? Start with Arizona.

“I give Arizona as good of chance as anybody in the field to cut down the nets in Indianapolis,” Fraschilla, who coached Manhattan to a mammoth NCAA Tournament upset of Oklahoma in 1995, told me.

Why Arizona is a top March Madness championship contender

Two of Arizona’s key bench players started on last year’s team that reached the Sweet 16. That speaks to the quality of a starting lineup in which every player averages in double digits scoring.

“They are as complete a team as there is in college basketball," Fraschilla said. "First of all, they are an old-school, bludgeon-you-inside team with three terrific post players. They have as good of a leader at point guard, (Jaden Bradley), as any team in the country.”

Oh, we’ve yet to mention dynamite freshman guard Brayden Burries, the team’s leading scorer.

Try to go devil’s advocate and point out Arizona’s history of March Madness shortcomings the past 25 years, and Fraschilla uncorks the ultimate comeback.

“I can say the same thing about an entire league: the Big Ten,” he says.

Fair point.

Anyway, why should these Wildcats fret about what happened to the 2023 team, which lost to 15th-seeded Princeton in the first round? Or, the 2018 team that got blasted by 13th-seeded Buffalo in the first round? The past three times Arizona earned a No. 1 seed in the past quarter-century, it got bounced before the Final Four. That’s for you to consider as you fill out your bracket, but whispers of the past are not for these Wildcats to fuss over.

“They play like they’re in a cocoon,” Fraschilla said, “so I’m not sure how much of the noise they hear.”

If you need more than one man’s opinion, there’s also Ken Pomeroy's rankings. Basketball nerds cite KenPom as if it’s college basketball’s holy literature. His metrics rank Arizona, Houston and Iowa State among the six best teams, making the Big 12 the only conference with more than one team tucked inside the top six.

The Big 12's “Big Monday” games, with Jon Sciambi and Fraschilla on the call, showcased premier teams in elite environments with future NBA stars.

“Big Monday has become must-watch TV,” Fraschilla said.

Truth.

The Big 12’s TV audience on “Big Monday” doubled this season, according to commissioner Brett Yormark, to average 1.7 million viewers.

Consider it evidence of how the Big 12 survived conference realignment.

Big 12 basketball emerged strong on this side of realignment

Realignment is bloodsport, and the Big 12 hit an inflection point in 2021 after Oklahoma and Texas set out for the SEC’s richer pastures. The impending exodus of the Big 12’s two richest brands cast the future of the conference into peril.

Would it be raided for parts? Merge with the Pac-12?

Neither.

Option 3: Fortify.

The conference steadied by adding BYU, Central Florida, Cincinnati and Houston under outbound commissioner Bob Bowlsby. Then, Bowlsby’s successor Yormark secured a media rights extension with ESPN and Fox before looting the Pac-12 for Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado and Utah.

While the Pac-12 collapsed into a shell of its former self, the Big 12 went from endangered species to basketball behemoth.

“The league came out much stronger on the basketball side than anybody would have realized,” Fraschilla said.

Yormark describes his conference as “the second-best basketball league in America behind the NBA,” and he promised to cash in when the conference hits the media rights marketplace again in 2030.

In the meantime, the Big 12 is on national championship watch, with Arizona forming the tip of the spear.

“They have a countenance about them,” Fraschilla said of coach Tommy Lloyd’s Wildcats, “that is built for the tournament.”

Blake Toppmeyer is a columnist for the USA TODAY Network. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: March Madness will test if Arizona, Big 12 are 'built for' NCAA bracket

Mild West: Why NCAA Tournament has a West Coast problem

SAN DIEGO – Two of the greatest men’s basketball coaches of all time had to solve a basic geography test this week.

Where is San Diego, California?

“It’s not Alaska,” quipped St. John’s coach Rick Pitino, who is from New York.

Where is Portland, Oregon?

“Are we in the United States?” Arkansas coach John Calipari asked on ESPN. “I thought they put us in another country.”

Pitino’s team from New York plays Northern Iowa in a first-round NCAA Tournament game more than 2,400 miles away in San Diego on Friday, March 20. Calipari’s team plays Hawaii in a first-round game more than 1,600 miles away in Portland on Thursday.

But this is what happens when the NCAA still tries to keep a geographical balance for postseason game sites even though the sport itself has become even more entrenched in the Eastern and Central time zones. Only 10 of the 68 tournament teams (14.7%) come from west of the Kansas border this year, tied for the second-fewest number of western teams in the 21st century, according to data provided to USA TODAY Sports by Stats Perform.

There are several reasons for this, one of which is baked into the cake: Only 63 of 361 teams (17.5%) in Division I are located west of the Central time zone, according to Stats Perform.

At the same time, other money-driven developments raise even bigger questions about the future of the game out west after the implosion of the old Pac-12 Conference in 2024 — a seismic shift that left zero power conferences headquartered west of metro Dallas.

Blame it on realignment, too

Only two teams from the former Pac-12 (UCLA and Arizona) earned NCAA Tournament bids this year, which is tied for the lowest in the modern era for legacy Pac-12 teams, all located in the Pacific and Mountain time zones.

Just 10 years ago, this former “conference of champions” earned seven bids to the tournament. Just two years ago, a record 16 teams west of Kansas earned NCAA bids, including four from the Pac-12.

But then UCLA and USC left the Pac-12 to earn more money in the Big Ten, based in Chicago.

Oregon and Washington followed them there, while Colorado, Utah, Arizona and Arizona State left for the Big 12, based in Texas.

The result is more crowded competition in the Big Ten (now with 18 teams) and Big 12 (now with 16 teams). UCLA earned one of nine NCAA bids for the Big Ten but now plays a first-round game in Philadelphia this week after playing in the Big Ten tournament last weekend in Chicago.

“We’re not concerned with travel,” UCLA coach Mick Cronin said this week. “We’re experienced at it.”

New York and Philadelphia teams to invade San Diego

The NCAA still tries to make this easier. It says so right in its guidelines for geographic placement of teams in the tournament.

“Teams should remain as close to their home region as possible, based on mileage,” the guidelines state.

In theory, this would ease the travel burden on teams and help maximize attendance at games.

But tournament game sites are set years in advance. And there’s only so much the selection committee can do if only four teams earned bids from California. As a result, three of the eight teams playing first-round games in San Diego this week are from New York or Philadelphia but only one is from California (No. 13-seed Cal Baptist from Riverside).

This isn't ideal from a business standpoint if the goal is to sell tickets and cultivate the next generation of fans in California, a state that not only has the most people but also a rich hoops history, at least until recently. In men's and women's basketball, the state has the most combined NCAA Tournament winners, Final Four Most Outstanding Players and NCAA Tournament-winning coaches since 1939 with 37, according to a recent study by BetMGM.

John Calipari says 'We only have to fly six hours'

Of the four regions in the bracket this year, one is still called the “West Region,” whose championship will be decided this month in San Jose, California. The problem is there might not be many local fans to watch it there. Only five of the 16 first-round slots in the West Region are from teams west of Kansas. Only two of those five are among the five highest seeds in the region — No. 1 Arizona and No. 3 Gonzaga.

“We’ll have maybe a few hundred people,” Pitino said of the trip to San Diego. “That’s about it… It’s not ideal traveling to the West Coast, but you deal with it and you just make the best of it.”

Calipari’s team was scheduled to depart for Portland early on Tuesday, March 17.

“We only have to fly six hours to get there,” Calipari said on Sirius XM. “So you know, it’s not all that bad.”

His comments dripped with sarcasm, but if he wins his next two games in Oregon, his team will be rewarded. Arkansas would play the following week in San Jose, which is further south on the West Coast and at least a little bit closer to home.

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Why NCAA Tournament teams have to travel so far for March Madness