New York Knicks fans have been waiting 53 years for a championship, and now they are only one win away after watching their team pull off the biggest comeback in NBA Finals history in Game 4. The Knicks somehow erased a 29-point second half deficit to win the game just before the buzzer on OG Anunoby’s tip-in to take a commanding 3-1 series lead ahead of Game 5 in San Antonio on Saturday.
It’s understandable that New Yorkers are excited, but the behavior from certain segments of the fanbase in this series has been disappointing and totally inappropriate. Knicks fans beat up Spurs fans in the streets after their Game 3 loss, and following the Game 4 win, Knicks fans were throwing objects at Victor Wembanyama as he went back to the team hotel.
Knicks fans were waiting to jeer the Spurs as they arrived at their hotel after Game 4, which is weird behavior by itself. Wembanyama appeared to be hit by an egg as he walked off the bus.
Booing the opponent’s star player is fair game, but throwing things at him on his way to bed is just completely out of line. Knicks fans should be embarrassed. It’s a terrible look for the city and the fanbase. Wembanyama deserves a lot more respect than that, not just as a player but as a human.
Knicks fans are disgracing themselves in this series as their team puts itself on the brink of achieving an impossible dream. I’m not going to tell Knicks fans to act like they’ve been there before, because almost 70 percent of New York City residents weren’t born when the team won its last title in 1973. Still, let’s try to have a little respect for the opponent. This behavior is gross, and it needs to stop immediately.
De’Aaron Fox’s 28-year-old legs ain’t what they used to be.
The guard’s confidence burned the Spurs and potentially sealed their Finals fate when his — as labeled by Charles Barkley — “dumbass” decision to attempt a layup in the final 11 seconds resulted in a block and paved the way for OG Anunoby’s game-winning and series-changing tip-in in the Knicks’ win.
“I just thought I’d be able to outrun him,” Fox said.
"I just thought I'd be able to outrun [OG Anunoby]."
De'Aaron Fox explains his late game shot that was blocked by OG Anunoby.
Fox’s decision from the 107-106 loss now has a spot alongside Ray Allen’s 2013 3-pointer in the pantheon of brutal Spurs Finals moments and it may be hard for fans to forgive him for this one.
The veteran guard’s questionable decision perhaps will be what swings this series.
With the Spurs leading 106-105 and roughly 18 seconds remaining, Jalen Brunson missed a shot and the fight for the rebound led to the ball being tipped past half court.
Fox had a clean path to the ball and gained possession near the paint with approximately 13 seconds remaining with Anunoby on his tail and then made a decision that could be rued in San Antonio for decades.
Rather than pull up and make the Knicks foul him, which would give the Spurs the chance to grab a two-point lead and potentially three, he opted to go for the contested layup.
Anunoby, one of the sport’s premier defenders, blocked Fox, which led to the Knicks gaining possession and he became a Knicks legend with his tip-in with 1.2 seconds remaining resulting in a 3-1 series lead.
The situation facing Fox when he attempted to score. @ESPN/X
“Haven’t scored,” Fox said of his decision. “Try to get a layup get up three, force them to need a 3. OG made a good block.”
Fox has earned universal criticism for his decision, especially since the easy option to force the Knicks into a foul seemed like the most logical decision.
Charles Barkley shredded Fox on ESPN during his tirade against a Spurs team he labeled as “the dumbest basketball team in the history of civilization.”
Anunoby moments before his block. Getty Images
He described Fox’s decision as “bonehead.”
“That was a dumbass play,” Barkley said. “He did not have to shoot that ball.”
To make matters worse for Fox, his sloppy play in the second half helped fuel the Knicks’ comeback.
He turned the ball over four times in the second half, including one in the fourth quarter — although one could argue his decision in the final minute may as well have been a turnover.
The veteran is the elder statesman in a young Spurs lineup that primarily lacked playoff experience before this run to the Finals, yet all that experience failed him when he needed it most.
“We’ve got to try to put it behind us,” Fox said, per The Athletic. “Get back to the things that we’ve done well in these games. … We have to figure out a way to hold the lead. We’ve been able to build double-digit leads in all four of these games, and we’ve got to figure out a way to sustain that.
“It obviously looks like a steep hill, but this is something that’s happened before. … We feel like we have a team that is able to come back from this, but we have to take this one game at a time.”
Video of the final play of the Knicks’ thrilling Game 4 win over the Spurs show Karl-Anthony Towns deflected the inbounds pass from Dylan Harper, potentially disrupting what would have been a game-winning basket.
A fan’s breakdown of the play on X showed that Stephon Castle had back cut to the basket and was wide open for an alley-oop. It would have taken a pinpoint pass from Harper to execute the play, but any chance of that was destroyed once Towns disrupted it.
Castle fumbled the catch before gathering the ball, but that allowed the defenders to catch up and the star guard had his back to the basket and he ultimately did not get up a shot up with just 1.2 seconds left.
It did not appear that Towns’ play was initially caught by the ESPN broadcast in the chaotic celebration that followed at Madison Square Garden after the Knicks had rallied from 29 points down against the Spurs to take a 3-1 lead in the NBA Finals.
“For us, when we got in there at halftime, we understood we were disappointed with the performance we had in the first half. That’s, of course, the result of walking in,” Towns’ said of the Knicks being down 76-49 at the break and looking for sure headed to a second straight loss at MSG.
“But I’ve always talked about the unity and the connectivity of this team. Went in there, people spoke up. Jose (Alvarado), just saying, regardless how the result of the game comes out, we can’t at least not work on our standards and be who we are.”
Warning: Graphic Language
Karl-Anthony Towns saved the whole comeback. I can only respect it and shake his hand pic.twitter.com/ieLNqtSO0M
Anunoby inbounded the ball to Jalen Brunson, who launched a deep 3-pointer that came up short. However, Anunoby was streaking in and tipped the ball in with just over a second left.
Karl-Anthony Towns celebrates the Knicks win over the Spurs in Game 4 of the NBA Finals on June 10, 2026. NBAE via Getty Images
“That’s why every time we’re in the game with OG, third quarter, second quarter, he may not be feeling like he’s playing his best,” Towns said. “Every time I talk to him, I say, I already know what OG Anunoby is going to do in the fourth quarter, and he did exactly what I thought he would do. He gave us a chance to win, and that’s all you could ask for from the best two-way player in the NBA.”
Towns finished with 13 points and 10 rebounds after he received his second foul just a minute into the game on a controversial overrule that forced him to the bench.
PHILADELPHIA, PA - MARCH 25: Justin Edwards #11 of the Philadelphia 76ers dunks the ball during the game against the Chicago Bulls on March 25, 2026 at the Wells Fargo Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2026 NBAE (Photo by Jesse D. Garrabrant/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images
Throughout this season, Philadelphia 76ers’ young forward Justin Edwards struggled to maintain a meaningful spot in the team’s rotation.
Edwards, in his sophomore season, featured in 64 contests for the Sixers, starting in 12, for 15.3 minutes per night — with those minutes varying wildly from night to night. Some games, Nick Nurse went to him early and often, racking up some serious minutes off the bench for Edwards. When the team struggled with injuries, he even started some contests. But other times, Edwards seemingly disappeared, playing little or no time at all. He ended up averaging 6.0 points, 1.5 rebounds and 1.3 assists throughout 2025-26.
These numbers represent some slight statistical regressions compared to his rookie year, but context surrounding those numbers is important, as Edwards’ opportunities this season were much different than those of last season.
Let’s look back. Edwards was originally brought to Philly in the summer preceding the 2024-25 season as an undrafted free agent. A few months later, the Philadelphia-native was thrust into basically a regular starting role for a Sixers squad absolutely desperate for bodies to simply play out the rest of the campaign. After playing in just two of the first 30 games of that season (and for nine minutes total), Edwards then played in 42 of the last 52, starting in 26 of those, for 27.2 minutes per night. His rookie season ended with him averaging 10.1 points, 3.4 rebounds, 1.6 assists and 1.0 steals per game.
In February of that year, Edwards was converted from his original two-way contract to a standard NBA deal. From undrafted to some guaranteed millions of dollars. Talk about a jump-start.
This season, things were different. Though the Sixers still dealt with a number of availability issues, the desperation level was never quite as high as 2024-25. This meant a much smaller role for Edwards as a sophomore, with the vast majority of his time coming off the bench and totaling 178 less minutes played than his rookie campaign throughout the course of the season.
Nevertheless, Edwards found ways to really shine in spots. His best game of the season came on March 19, when Edwards posted a career-high 32 points on 11-for-18 field goal and 7-for-11 long-range shooting in 33 minutes. The Sixers defeated the Sacramento Kings 139-118.
That game was part of a stretch in mid-March within which Edwards started seven straight contests for the Sixers, who were without four of their usual starters at the time (Joel Embiid, Tyrese Maxey, Paul George and Kelly Oubre Jr.). In those seven contests, Edwards fared relatively well overall, averaging 15.9 points, 3.0 rebounds, 2.7 assists and 2.0 steals in 27.6 minutes per game. He shot 40.5% from long range on 5.3 attempts during that time.
That impact, and where it was made, reflects something Edwards needs to hone in on to become a fully viable rotation player: three-point shooting. It has been one of the most promising things about his game, with Edwards hitting 37.2% from long range in his sophomore season, a slight improvement over the 36.3% he posted his rookie year. He always seems confident about it, with zero hesitation when the opportunity presents itself for him to pull up from long range. It wasn’t always perfect by any means, but it’s noteworthy that Edwards was much better from beyond the arc with more volume shooting. In the 12 games this season he attempted at least five three-pointers, he shot 50.6% from behind the arc (40-for-79). In the 52 games he shot 4 or less attempts, he sank just 26.7% (27-for-101).
He already has a decent feel or awareness in the game and is a solid defender, but he’s not the best rebounder for his size nor does he have much of an aggressive dribble-drive game. Sincerely honing in on becoming a consistent, accurate volume three-point shooter is what could make it possible to somewhat overlook some of those weaknesses enough to get him in the regular rotation. The Sixers desperately need perimeter threats that opposing defenses can’t just leave wide open inconsequentially, leaving a role prime for the taking for Edwards if he can take that step forward.
And at just 22 years old, there’s still time to develop. If there is one coach that will let Edwards develop with meaningful NBA minutes, it’s Nick Nurse, who clearly has confidence in the young forward as evidenced by his willingness to keep calling upon him off the bench. But, as he enters his third NBA season, one can imagine the expectations for Edwards will be higher than ever, and patience for rough performances could be much lower.
And it’s not like he won’t have motivation. Edwards will be playing to earn the next step of his NBA career, as he is entering season two of his three-year deal with the Sixers, but with the 2027-28 season being a team option. So, in 2026-27, Edwards needs to play at a level that either convinces Philadelphia to pick up that option, or convinces another team to take a chance on him should the Sixers decline.
A lot on the line for the young forward in the coming season.
Jan 9, 2026; Phoenix, Arizona, USA; Phoenix Suns guard Devin Booker (1) shoots the ball against New York Knicks guard Jalen Brunson (11) in the second half at Mortgage Matchup Center. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images | Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images
There’s a debate brewing online and in the Reddit threads as the NBA Finals roll along, and it’s one that forces fans to decide whether they want to approach it logically or emotionally. Because once emotion enters the conversation, things tend to get flustered, frustrated, and disappointing in a hurry.
The debate? Who is better, Jalen Brunson or Devin Booker?
This is meant to be a fun debate, and since I saw it on Reddit, it got the juices flowing a bit. It’s the offseason, we’re bored, so why not spice up our lives a little bit with some comparative Suns-based convo? I will say that once I took the Reddit argument to Twitter, the internet reminded me that barstool-esque topics, especially when it involves Devin Booker, get into people’s feelings. And quick. They begin projecting intent and assuming that if you are critical of a player in any capacity, you must hate them.
So I’m stating that on the front in. Don’t hate Devin Booker. Love ‘em. Love having him on this team in this city. My intent is to have a basketball conversation. All right, with the Booker Stan Clause addressed, let’s talk about it.
I understand this is an inherently speculative and subjective argument, although you can certainly point to objective statistical analysis to support your side. But there’s no real reason for the debate to exist outside of the fact that Jalen Brunson is currently playing in the NBA Finals. And because Brunson is only 60 days older than Devin Booker, the comparison becomes unavoidable.
You start looking at the players on the Suns and measuring them against the players still competing at the highest level, in the biggest games, at the end of the season. This isn’t supposed to be some grand architectural discussion about whether you would trade Devin Booker for Jalen Brunson. We know neither the Phoenix Suns nor the New York Knicks would entertain that idea. And when you consider the $19.3 million gap in what they’re paid, it doesn’t make much sense anyway.
These are offseason barroom conversations. They’re not designed to tear down one player or elevate another. They’re conversations about skill sets, styles of play, financial implications, strengths, weaknesses, and how different players impact winning. These are the debates we used to have sitting at the bar before smartphones could provide an answer in five seconds. We couldn’t instantly pull up statistics. We had to talk about what we saw. That being said, feel free to pull up this article at a bar to make your case, one way or the other.
What I see when I watch these two players is something completely different. On one side, you have Devin Booker. He’s smooth. He’s methodical. He’s a jump shooter with what is arguably the best jumper in the NBA. He’s a bigger player who, when he’s at his best, is a shooting guard.
The problem is that traditional point guards have largely disappeared from the league. And the few true facilitators who still exist aren’t exactly available. As a result, Point Book has become a permanent part of the Devin Booker experience. Had he played 20 years ago, there’s a strong argument he would have been the best shooting guard in basketball. Instead, he exists in an era dominated by combo guards, where primary ball-handling responsibilities are often shared. In that sense, Booker is a product of the times.
On the other side is Jalen Brunson. He’s one of those smaller combo guards, but he’s a true three-level scorer. He can get to the rim, operate in the midrange, and knock down the three-point shot. And when the game gets tight, I believe he’s the better clutch player.
That’s what my eyes tell me. And when I started digging into the numbers, they backed up what I was seeing.
Devin Booker vs. Jalen Brunson Career Clutch Statistics
Based on career clutch statistics, Jalen Brunson comes out ahead of Devin Booker in just about every metric that matters. And that’s where this conversation becomes uncomfortable for Suns fans. That’s where the debate takes a turn.
Because if you’re carrying the flag for Devin Booker in this argument, there isn’t a lot of statistical ground to stand on. You can point to the double teams Booker faces. You can argue that there are plenty of possessions where he makes the correct pass, only to have a teammate miss the shot, costing him a potential assist. That’s fair. But Brunson sees those same coverages. He sees doubles. He sees traps. He sees defenses loading up to stop him. He’s simply quicker at navigating them.
When you compare assist-to-turnover ratios, Brunson comes out ahead there as well.
You can also point to the talent around each player and argue that Brunson has had better teammates throughout his career. There’s probably some truth to that. But the statistics we’re discussing encompass the entirety of their careers, the good years and the bad years alike. And when viewed through that lens, Booker has spent significant portions of his career playing alongside players like Kevin Durant, Bradley Beal, and Chris Paul. Those are All-Star-caliber teammates who should, and did, make life easier.
That’s where the challenge lies. If the argument becomes that Booker needs elite talent around him to maximize his effectiveness, what does that ultimately say about Booker?
Meanwhile, Brunson spent his early years playing next to Luka Doncic. Once he arrived in New York, the only All-Star teammates he’s shared the court with have been Julius Randle and Karl Anthony Towns. Yet his impact late in games remains undeniable. The numbers support it. The eye test supports it. And that’s what makes this debate more difficult than many Suns fans would probably like to admit.
I’ll pause here and say this: I want my answer to be Devin Booker. As a Phoenix Suns fan and a Devin Booker fan, I want him to be the better player in this comparison. But sometimes reality points you in a different direction. Sometimes the eye test tells you one thing, and the statistics back it up. That’s where this conversation becomes frustrating for the fan base. Because Booker makes $19.3 million more than Jalen Brunson.
When you’re making $57.1 million a season, the expectation is that when the moments are brightest and the games get tightest, you’re the guy who comes through. That doesn’t always mean scoring. It can mean making the right pass, creating for teammates, controlling the pace, or making winning plays. But when you look at a career assist-to-turnover ratio of 1.7, a career 25.4% shooting mark from three in clutch situations, and overall negative clutch metrics, those numbers become difficult to ignore. And unfortunately, that’s the fuel for the fire for those who believe moving on from Devin Booker is the right decision.
This is where I reset the conversation.
This is where I step away from the barstool debate and remind everyone that even if he isn’t Jalen Brunson, he’s still Devin Booker. Even if he isn’t a superstar, he’s still a star. That matters, especially when you consider the position the Phoenix Suns currently occupy.
The Suns are in a transitional era. They’re in what I like to call their Dead Cap Era, one we’ll look back at someday and share memories much akin to The Timeline Era. They’re trying to run a race with an anvil tied to their ankle. That anvil is $23.2 million in dead money, and there are limits to what you can accomplish when you’re carrying that kind of weight.
What else is weighing them down? The fact that they don’t control their own first-round draft picks until 2032. That’s six summers away.
So while the cap limits their ceiling and the lack of draft capital limits their floor, the smartest path forward is to remain competitive, continue building the culture, establish an identity, and focus on continuity and internal development as the primary means of improvement.
Because while Booker may not be as effective in clutch moments as Brunson, he’s still a top 20 player in the NBA. He’s still someone capable of helping you win basketball games during this stretch of organizational uncertainty.
And if you decide to trade him? You’re trading him to a team that immediately becomes better because of his presence. That, in turn, lowers the value of the draft capital you’re receiving back. And since the Suns don’t control their own picks, there’s very little benefit to the losing that would almost certainly follow.
That’s why, even if the Brunson comparison doesn’t land in Booker’s favor, it doesn’t automatically mean moving on from him is the right answer.
Perhaps that’s the real takeaway from all of this. The Brunson versus Booker debate doesn’t have to end with a winner and a loser. It’s a reminder that not every star carries a franchise the same way, and not every path to winning looks identical. Brunson may have the edge in the moments that matter most, but Booker remains the player Phoenix has, the player Phoenix needs, and the player who gives this organization its best chance to navigate an uncertain future without losing its direction along the way.
Now pass me another Four Peaks Kilt Lifter. And where are my wings?
Jerry Seinfeld shut down an anti-Israel influencer by telling him Palestine “doesn’t exist” after he was rushed while leaving the Garden Wednesday night following the Knicks’ historic NBA Finals comeback.
The legendary comedian, 72, was walking among the throngs of people after Game 4 when he was ambushed by a popular streamer armed with a mic and camera.
“What up, Seinfeld? What up? Can we get a ‘Free Palestine’?” said the streamer, FinesseFave, sticking a mic in the face of the Jewish actor and writer.
Jerry Seinfeld and wife Jessica on celebrity row during the second quarter of the Knicks’ game. Charles Wenzelberg / New York Post
The famously quick-on-his-feet standup responded with a laugh before shutting down the incendiary question in three words.
“It doesn’t exist,” he said, before walking away.
FinesseFave later shared the video with his 180,000 TikTok followers, along with the caption, “Clown hasn’t been relevant in decades anyway.”
Jerry Seinfeld told a prominent Kick streamer that Palestine does not exist. TikTok / @finessefaveThe comedian was rushed after the historic game. TikTok / @finessefave
Two weeks later, he was interrupted on stage by an anti-Israel protester who jumped up and yelled, “Free Gaza” during a standup show in Norfolk, Virginia, TMZ reported.
The audience responded by booing the heckler and chanting, “Jerry! Jerry!” as another bystander got the protester in a headlock before security ushered the man out.
Here’s the latest on the Knicks’ historic 2026 NBA Finals run
“This is exciting. I like this. I like a little Jew hate to spice up the show,” Seinfeld joked darkly from the stage as the heckler was evicted.
The show continued, but protesters interrupted Seinfeld a further eight times throughout the 90-minute set.
Seinfeld has also faced abuse on the streets of his native New York, with two high-profile incidents in 2025.
Jerry Seinfeld performs onstage at the Colossal Stage during Colossal Clusterfest at Civic Center Plaza and The Bill Graham Civic Auditorium on June 4, 2017 in San Francisco, California. FilmMagic
In February 2025, an influencer asked Seinfeld for a selfie outside Radio City Music Hall, before instead recording himself saying “Free Palestine” while filming the comedian.
Seinfeld responded by saying, “I don’t care about Palestine,” before walking away.
And while leaving the Garden after a Knicks game in May 2025, a vile protester filmed themselves telling Seinfeld he supports the genocide of babies in Gaza.
The comedian watches the second half of Game 4. AP Photo/Ross D. FranklinJerry Seinfeld cheers on the Knicks from court side. NBAE via Getty Images
“Only you,” Seinfeld quipped, as he got into his car.
His standup shows have faced continual picketing this year, with protesters branding him a “genocide apologist” ahead of his appearance in Aurora, Illinois, in January, as the Jamia Times reported at the time.
Seinfeld, star of the eponymous iconic ’90s sitcom, was sitting on celebrity row at Madison Square Garden as the Knicks completed a record 29-point comeback against the San Antonio Spurs to take a 3-1 lead in the series.
The Knicks are on the brink of their first NBA Championship since 1973 if they beat the Spurs in Texas on Saturday, with tipoff at 8:30 p.m.
NEW YORK — In the service area here at Madison Square Garden, after it was all over, the world’s biggest pop icon was being whisked toward the tinted Chevy Suburban that would wheel her out into the thick night.
By this point, thousands of fans had already spilled back into the streets for a rave in orange and royal blue.
As Taylor Swift approached the truck, the expression on her face was caught between wonder and exuberance. Shaking her head in disbelief, she mouthed, seemingly to no one: What just happened?
About 200 feet away, San Antonio Spurs coach Mitch Johnson was trying to explain how his team had wasted a 29-point lead to become an inglorious footnote in NBA Finals history. And on the other end of that were the New York Knicks, who authored the largest comeback in Finals history to go up 3-1 in the series, on the cusp of the franchise’s first championship in 53 seasons.
This was, when considering the stakes, undeniably the greatest game in the storied history of the Knicks.
Johnson was in a makeshift press room. Makeshift because it wasn’t a room at all, but rather a wedge of hallway carved out of black cloth room dividers. There was no door to speak of, and the exultant cries still coming from Knicks fans were so loud that his microphone picked them up.
Seventy-five feet from there, underneath the tunnel that feeds to the court, Knicks superfan and actor Ben Stiller was trying to make his way toward the New York interview room. Stiller is reportedlyshooting footage for an HBO documentary about the Knicks and has been a staple at the team’s postgame press conferences.
Stiller could not get very far; members of the Knicks hype squad started shouting "We love Ben" over and over until Stiller joined the mob in an impromptu mosh pit.
In the upper and lower bowls, thousands of fans had chosen to bask in the revelry a little longer. Fittingly, Journey’s "Don’t Stop Believin’ " was pumping through the speaker system. Those who stayed were dancing and belting the chorus, snapping selfies and FaceTiming jealous loved ones. It was unrestrained jubilance in the collective, a catharsis for a fan base deprived of an NBA title for 53 seasons.
Somehow, it felt spiritual; this was their mecca, and they were gathered in worship.
Down the corridor back toward Tower C, Knicks coach Mike Brown was holding his press conference, where he called the game-winning tip-in from OG Anunoby "the most iconic shot in the history of New York basketball."
He reflected but acknowledged the need to close the series out. He humbly praised the grit and resilience of his players. Yet, as much as he tried to restrain his emotions, he, too, got caught up in the
"Fat Joe is just sitting there with all his chains on, and every time he jumped up, the freaking lights with those chains, they blinded me, so it was a little hard (to see)," Brown said. "Fat Joe, keep wearing the chains, because you look smooth.
"But you can’t replace this crowd, man. The building’s already electric, but during a run like that, to see, you know, people like Fat Joe and all the others just enjoying themselves at a basketball game – you know, just being human, jumping up and down, high-fiving, screaming, the vibe is just – it’s hard to describe, and the energy in the crowd had a lot to do with our comeback, too. It was fantastic. Unbelievable."
As Brown left the press room and worked his way back toward the Knicks locker room, a procession of people congratulated him. From long-time beat reporters to a Madison Square Garden staffer ("great adjustments, Mike") to former Knick Iman Shumpert ("great [expletive] win"), Brown brought hope back to this fan base.
Shumpert, who wore his own Knicks jersey though he last played for the team in 2014, then said, to no one in particular, that he was "going to turn up on 7th Ave." He was a man of his word.
A pair of former Knicks paraded toward the exit, and the communal celebration of fans continued to steadily thrum throughout the building.
"One more," Marcus Camby said to Latrell Sprewell, referring to the final game the Knicks need to win.
Back in the Knicks press room, the current players had that very thought in mind.
"I’m not going to sugarcoat this: I was about to cry, not because – obviously there is one more – but I’m at Madison Square Garden, end of the fourth quarter, playing with these guys, and we’re playing for something special," Knicks guard Jose Alvarado.
"I was just – I was just excited. It’s really something I couldn’t put into words. And like I said, we could get excited and enjoy this, but we got one more to do."
The Knicks are one win from the third championship in their 80-year history and first since 1973.Photograph: Al Bello/Getty Images
What does a team of destiny look like? You know it when you see it. The evidence has been mounting for weeks – months, even – that this year, despite decades of precedent to the contrary, that team is the New York Knicks.
On Wednesday night, the proof overflowed in the hallowed halls of the Mecca. One of the most improbable comebacks in NBA history – and the largest ever in an NBA finals game – saw New York erase a 29-point deficit to beat the San Antonio Spurs in Game 4, leaving Taylor Swift and members of Haim leaping for joy courtside and the 58-year-old building shaking like a bounce house.
The irony, of course, is that these same Knicks have so often found themselves on the wrong end of heartbreak in those very halls. As recently as last year, the Indiana Pacers reminded them of the sport’s cruelest lesson: no game is over until the clock hits zero. In some ways, those Pacers were the last team to carry the sense of inevitability that seems to surround this Knicks squad. Their run, however, ended in crushing fashion with a Game 7 defeat. The Knicks appear mindful of that history. “It’s still 0-0” and “still a long way to go” were common refrains throughout their post-game press conferences on Wednesday night. Some, including head coach Mike Brown and players Jose Alvarado and Karl-Anthony Towns, showed visible emotion.
“I’m not going to sugarcoat this,” Alvarado said. “I was about to cry. I’m at Madison Square Garden, end of the fourth quarter, playing with these guys, and we’re playing for something special.”
Others, such as team captain Jalen Brunson and game-winning playmaker OG Anunoby, were more stoic. But the message was unanimous: as extraordinary as this victory was, there is still one more game left to win.
The Knicks have become something of comeback specialists in recent years. There have been multiple double-digit rallies during this 2026 playoff run alone, after a handful of stunning recoveries against the favored Boston Celtics last postseason. So they certainly have some experience in the art of the improbable. But perhaps the real preparation for nights like this comes from the heartbreak. Being on the receiving end of an unlikely comeback teaches you, in unforgettable fashion, that no lead is safe and no game is ever truly over. The scar tissue of past playoff disappointments, the callouses left by victories snatched away at the last moment – those can be life’s greatest teachers.
And beyond the wins and losses (and Knicks fans will be the first to tell you there have been plenty of losses), this is, in many ways, a team of castoffs. The Dallas Mavericks let Jalen Brunson walk, and that was after he was passed over in the first round of the NBA draft as a two-time national champion at Villanova. Karl-Anthony Towns was abruptly moved by the Minnesota Timberwolves after years as the face of the franchise. Josh Hart bounced around the league. Alvarado went undrafted. Even Brown was dismissed as coach of the Sacramento Kings not long after helping them “light the beam”.
Perhaps that’s why this group never seems to believe they are beaten. Too many of these players have spent their careers being told what they couldn’t do to accept that a game is over before the final buzzer sounds.
“I think everybody, to a certain degree, at some point in life is overlooked,” Brown said late Wednesday night. “Just to have the ability to stay with it, stay with it, stay with it, stay with it, especially when you get knocked down, to me, that defines who you are. Even if you don’t have the quote-unquote ‘ultimate success’ that you think you deserve, if you get knocked down in life and you’re able to get back up and keep fighting, that’s a freaking win.”
The idea of a team of destiny raises an interesting question: how much control do we really have over our own fate? Is destiny a path laid out before us, something inevitable and immutable? Or is it something we create ourselves? Maybe it’s a bit of both. The Knicks found themselves pondering those questions after their historic victory.
“You’ve got to have a little luck in sports,” Brown said. “But you can also make your luck, too.”
Towns echoed the sentiment.
“Sometimes you get lucky. Sometimes you make your luck,” he said. “We made our luck today.”
For most of Wednesday night, it seemed as though New York’s luck had finally run dry. Team owner James Dolan had spent the previous few days making himself the center of attention on a decidedly ill-advised media tour, while some fans half-jokingly wondered whether the bad vibes lingering from the Commander in Chief’s controversial – and sleepy – appearance at Game 3 had cursed the Knicks’ title hopes. The Spurs certainly played as if they believed it. Victor Wembanyama even went so far as to proclaim “I’m in your head” to the Knicks during the first half, and he may not have been wrong. Until he was.
Because that’s the thing about a resilient group like this one. That’s the thing about a team of destiny: however unconventional the path, however theatrical the punctuations along the way, it somehow arrives where it’s meant to. And for the 2026 New York Knicks, that journey is now just one win away from an NBA championship.
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - JUNE 10: Karl-Anthony Towns #32 of the New York Knicks celebrates after his team's 107-106 victory against the San Antonio Spurs in Game Four of the 2026 NBA Finals at Madison Square Garden on June 10, 2026 in New York City. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Al Bello/Getty Images) | Getty Images
San Antonio set a record nobody would want, giving up a 29-point lead, including a 20-point lead in the fourth quarter, and losing to New York, 107-106.
Charles Barkley, who has had a few things to say about the city of San Antonio over the years, called the Spurs “the dumbest basketball team in the history of civilization.”
He’s not entirely wrong, but there is some context: first, the Spurs are by far the youngest team to make it to the Finals. If a couple of plays had gone differently, they’d be up 3-1 instead of down by that margin.
And secondly, while this team has some great pieces, it’s not where it could be. Julian Champagnie and Devin Vassell might be better coming off the bench. And while De’Aaron Fox had a major error, so did Josh Hart.
Imagine the Spurs with a couple of other pieces. For argument’s sake, let’s say they had Jared McCain, a confident shooter and acceptable defender. Imagine if they had, say, De’Andre Hunter or Marcus Smart.
Or having just one veteran could stabilize that team when things get dicey and could put them over the top.
Right now, Dylan Harper (20), Stephon Castle (21), and Victor Wembanyama (22) are the heart of that team. Wembanyama is wildly gifted, but he’s cracked under the pressure of the Finals. Harper is very promising, but he’s a rookie. Castle, just in his second year, seems like the rock of the team.
We’d love to see Mason Plumlee playing a bigger role, but he’s 36 and his career is winding down. He got another DNP in Game 5.
We said the other night that San Antonio had a narrow margin of error in the Finals, and that was the case in Game 4. Their best three players are under 22, and they’ll learn from this failure. This is a humiliating loss and a brutal lesson, but this is still the team of the future.
Just as the Spurs are too young to pull this off, New York is a team with a lot of veterans who made amazingly gutsy plays down the stretch. The guy we’re happiest for is Jose Alvarado. When he was at Georgia Tech, we said he’d be a four-year player who would not play in the NBA. Well, we were really wrong there. Alvarado hit a dagger of a three late in the fourth. The Knicks probably wouldn’t have won without him.
Assuming they get one more win, which seems highly likely, Alvarado is going to be an absolute prince in his hometown. New York hasn’t won a title since 1973, and when they do, he may never have to pay for another meal in town again.
Mar 22, 2015; Phoenix, AZ, USA; Dallas Mavericks guard Rajon Rondo (left) talks with head coach Rick Carlisle in the fourth quarter against the Phoenix Suns at US Airways Center. The Suns defeated the Mavericks 98-92. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images
Your favorite Trade Machine has approved thousands of deals and never once flagged one for personality incompatibility. It checks the salaries, blesses the math, and leaves the human beings to sort themselves out. Three months ago, Secret Base’s Beef History series revisited the most instructive case of humans failing to sort themselves out in Mavericks history: the brief, loud cohabitation of Rajon Rondo and Rick Carlisle.
On paper, the December 2014 trade was exactly right. Dallas was a contender missing a point guard. Rondo was a championship point guard, a basketball savant who saw the floor like a chessboard. Carlisle was an offensive mastermind with a ring of his own. Two geniuses, one goal. The video lays out how seductive the logic was, and the logic came with a precedent: Jason Kidd. Kidd and Carlisle butted heads over pace early in their partnership, Carlisle loosened his grip, and the compromise ended with a parade in 2011. Mark Cuban openly compared Rondo to Kidd. Dallas believed it had a road map.
The problem, as Secret Base details, is that the warning labels were public record. Carlisle had worn out welcomes in Detroit and Indiana with a my-way-or-the-highway approach and a compulsion to call plays on nearly every possession. Jamaal Tinsley had already lived the experience of being a point guard ordered to slow down for him. Rondo, meanwhile, spent years clashing with Doc Rivers in Boston while quarterbacking a roster full of Hall of Famers. Two men with documented allergies to surrendering control were now expected to share a steering wheel. League whispers, per the video, suggested Carlisle was never sold on the deal in the first place.
It unraveled on schedule. Seventeen games in, Carlisle benched Rondo for the final five minutes against Chicago and called it a coach’s decision. After an ugly loss in Oklahoma City, Rondo told reporters that Carlisle calls the plays and he just follows orders, which is the point guard equivalent of “per my last email.” Then came February in Toronto: Rondo walking the ball up the floor while Carlisle erupted at half court, an exchange that carried into the locker room and ended in a one-game suspension over play-calling responsibilities. The whole fight, beginning to end, was about who decides what happens next.
Then the playoffs arrived, and so did the part I will never need a documentary to remember. Game 2 against Houston: Rondo played 34 seconds after halftime and spent the rest of the night looking like a man waiting on a delayed flight. He ducked the media. The next day, Dallas issued a press release about a back injury, and reporters called cap in unison. Rondo has since offered the revisionist version, telling Chandler Parsons in 2023 that he never quit, that he was told Carlisle didn’t want to coach him, and that the injury was a mutually agreed cover story. Revisionist history is the chief occupation of the retired athlete. I watched those games. A championship veteran gave a playoff series 34 seconds of second-half effort. Call it whatever you want. I know what I saw.
Carlisle’s own autopsy, recounted in the video, is the sharpest part. Kidd and Rondo looked similar and were fundamentally different. Kidd had developed into a legitimate three-point threat by the time he reached Dallas; defenses happily ignored Rondo. Above all, pace: Kidd taught Carlisle to let go and play fast, while Rondo wanted to walk it up. Asking Rondo to change his tempo in the middle of a season was, by Carlisle’s own admission, impossible. The Kidd precedent that justified the trade was the exact thing that doomed it. Dallas pattern-matched the résumé and missed the person.
The mercy is that it was a fireball. Rondo was a Maverick for barely half a season, and fireballs burn out fast. It’s the slow corrosion that reshapes a franchise. But the lesson travels. The new brain trust is about to run the two highest-stakes chemistry experiments in basketball: hiring a head coach and remaking a roster around a 19-year-old franchise player. Every candidate and every trade target will look right on paper. Paper is undefeated that way. The Rondo half season is a reminder that fit is also temperament, ego allocation, pace preference, and the unglamorous question of who decides what happens next. The résumé tells you whether a man can do the job. It cannot tell you whether two men can do it together.
The Trade Machine will keep saying yes all summer. Someone in the room needs to ask the other question.
Mar 7, 2026; Waco, Texas, USA; Baylor Bears guard Cameron Carr (43) scores a layup as Utah Utes guard Terrence Brown (2) defends during the first half at Paul and Alejandra Foster Pavilion. Mandatory Credit: Chris Jones-Imagn Images | Chris Jones-Imagn Images
Cameron Carr may have been one of the more talked-about players coming out of the NBA combine after dropping 30 points in the scrimmage. It felt reminiscent of his year with Baylor, as he took the program by storm, averaging a school record 18.9 points per game. The 6’5 wing showed a little bit of everything, and he could be an exciting player coming out of the draft.
The first thing that may pop out when watching Carr is his athleticism, and he uses that to get to the rim to get easy points. He has a quick first step, and once he gets to his spot, he’ll leave it up to you to find out if it’ll be a crafty layup or a dunk. He might be one of the best dunkers in the class, and he had a lot of opportunities to show off his vertical at Baylor.
With that athleticism, Carr also has the ability to rebound better than most players at his position, in which he averaged 5.6 per game. On top of that, he was a solid shot blocker, averaging 1.3 per game. It’s obvious that he has the intangibles that can change a game on either side of the ball, and that goes a long way for teams looking for a winner.
Outside of the athleticism, Carr’s other strength is his shooting, specifically from the 3-point line. He shot 37% from the perimeter, and he’s probably never taken a shot he doesn’t like. His mechanics are smooth, and he can raise up for a shot that can be hard to defend. What makes it even better is that he can go beyond the 3-point line, and that’s a plus in a league that is all about spacing.
Not only has Carr shown the catch-and-shoot ability, but he has flashes of being able to shoot off the ball and as a pick-and-roll handler.
In all, his 3-point shooting is probably what teams will enjoy about him the most, and if he can continue to show consistency in that area, he’ll be a player who can see a lot of time on the court.
Just as much as Carr’s shooting can be a plus, it can also turn into a negative depending on his shot selection. This was Carr’s first time as a true No. 1 option, and he probably felt like he had to do everything in order for the team to succeed. He won’t have the problem early into his NBA career, but teams will definitely want him to be smart about the types of shots he takes.
Defensively, Carr has the tools to be serviceable at the next level, and his length allows him to get in the passing lanes. He still has to get stronger and smarter on that side of the ball, which is where teams have taken advantage of him when he’s on the ball. Again, his frame and athleticism show promise for him to improve, so it shouldn’t be much of a problem.
Carr is a player who could be drafted in the lottery range to the early 20s, and that could be a spot where, if the Hawks like him, they can take him. He offers 3-point shooting that would be an instant plus on the team, and his defense is solid enough that he can make an impact. It’s hard to know if the Hawks would want to add another guard, especially when they have needs at guard and center, but Onsi Saleh is all about drafting the best player available.
That said, I ended Wednesday night completed deflated. Did the Spurs play the first half as if they were sending Knicks fans home in disbelief? Yes. Did they blow the biggest Finals lead in NBA history and go down 3-1? Absolutely. Should they have won this game? Most definitely. Are Spurs fans now the ones in disbelief?
Well, are you?
I recently posted an article regarding Wembanyama’s demeanor after losing Game 1. He sat upright with no hint of regret, clearly stated there were adjustments to come. He admitted he had to figure some things out. He did not get sullen or too introspective in front of the cameras. He owned the moment, showed leadership, and gave hope to his teammates and fans.
Last night, Wemby was stoic. His answers were short, filled with uncertainty. He was being asked his take on plays that he had not yet reviewed or seen film of. His involvement in the moments limited his ability to speak about them confidently. That said, he showcased the disappointment he was internalizing in real time.
For 46 minutes and 38 seconds it looked as if the Spurs were going to even the series. In fact, for the entire first half, it looked to be a foregone conclusion. But no lead is safe in basketball. And twice now in the postseason, the Knicks have come back from over 20 point deficits to win. They took back Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals from the Cleveland Cavaliers and then swept the series. Last night they took back home court advantage just in time to send the Spurs home with their backs against the wall.
I reiterate what I said at the start. I still believe.
I believe that all four of these games could have gone either way. One missed shot. One foul call. One tipped ball goes the other way. One pass lands in possession of the intended receiver.
All four of these games were winnable by both teams. Well, the first three for sure could have gone either way. Last night’s game shouldn’t have, but the Knicks proved that any game — ANY GAME — is in play as long as you keep fighting.
The Spurs have shown the same sort of resilience throughout the season. Fighting back from 25 down against the Clippers. Wemby’s buzzer-beater against the Suns. Game 7 of the Western Conference Finals.
This series isn’t over. We all need to relax. Trust the process. Trust the team. Trust the Spurs Way.
60 hours in New York. I am not leaving empty handed, and neither are the Spurs. They won one with the relentlessness that carried them through the season. They need to regroup and pull off another complete wire-to-wire game. Remind themselves what got them here and why they deserve another game.
Welcome to the Thread. Join in the conversation, start your own discussion, and share your thoughts. This is the Spurs community, your Spurs community. Thanks for being here.
Our community guidelines apply which should remind everyone to be cool, avoid personal attacks, not to troll and to watch the language.
02/27/1971--Connie Hawkins (42), Phoenix Suns, scores against Philadelphia. Seen in this photograph in the air, ball leaving his hand on a lay up.
Connie Hawkins was an immense talent who missed some of his best years professionally after being falsely implicated in the notorious 1961 point shaving scandal. He signed with Iowa, but was kicked out of school in his freshman year. The NBA warned teams not to draft him, so he played for a year with the old ABL before it folded, then with the Harlem Globetrotters, and then the ABA, before the NBA, under public and legal pressure, finally allowed him to play in 1969.
Few fans got to see him in those pre-NBA years, but he played a lot of ball and had a lot of stories.
This story involves Rucker Park, the Mecca of New York / Harlem basketball, Wilt Chamberlain, and a freakishly athletic street player named Jackie Jackson.
Just 6-4, Jackson blocked a Chamberlain shot, which kind of set Wilt off. Keep in mind that Chamberlain reportedly had a 50” vertical. It’s a great story.
Apr 6, 2026; Memphis, Tennessee, USA; Cleveland Cavaliers guard Tyrese Proctor (24) drives to the basket as Memphis Grizzlies forward Cedric Coward (23) defends during the third quarter at FedExForum. Mandatory Credit: Petre Thomas-Imagn Images | Petre Thomas-Imagn Images
Being selected 49th overall, Tyrese Proctor faced an uphill battle for relevance in his rookie season. Even though his playing time was uneven, he showed that there’s a pathway to battle for the Cleveland Cavaliers’ backup point guard spot as early as next season.
All grades are based on our usual expectations for each player.
Regular Season Stats
5.4 points
1.3 rebounds
1.5 assists
41.3% FG
35% 3PT FG
88.9% FT
It’s tough to break into the rotation on a playoff team as a rookie, never mind a second-round pick on a team with a dearth of guards. Proctor was always going to have to flash in his limited meaningful minutes with the Cavaliers this past season. For the most part, he showed that he could be up to the task with more development.
Proctor’s bread and butter is his jumper. In college, Proctor shot the three-ball around 40%. While that number dipped down to around 35% in the NBA, it could climb back up with more stable minutes in the future.
The majority of the opportunities Proctor was presented with came either in garbage time or in short bursts. The Cavaliers have done this before, most recently with Jaylon Tyson, sprinkling in some quality runs to get the young guy familiar with the system in meaningful moments.
Proctor has a lot physically going for him, he is 6’5” and has a good frame for showing combo guard potential. The Duke product isn’t a defensive hound by any means, but the instincts shown this past season give hope that there is potential for two-way play. The size gives him a huge advantage, while the athleticism is enough to create havoc in passing lanes and make smaller guards’ lives harder.
Where Proctor really struggled with was playmaking for others. It felt like sometimes the game was a little too fast. Proctor was forcing passes to make the perfect read, which while showing that he can see the floor, he didn’t necessarily have the ability yet to convert on those reads.
Proctor had 40 turnovers compared to 74 assists. A 1.85 assist-to-turnover ratio is not great, however, it is fair to note that going forward it is likely that this primary facilitator role will be held by either Donovan Mitchell or James Harden. It will be imperative that Proctor can alleviate either for possessions at a time rather than for entire games. Proctor will rarely, if ever, be the point guard of the Cavaliers’ offensive ecosystem.
Proctor’s road map is definitely there for next season. The Cavaliers have Dennis Schroeder and Craig Porter Jr. on the books vying for that backup point guard spot. Neither really offers much upside, so it’ll be a perfect opportunity for Proctor to flash his offensive skills and make use of his frame on defense.
The rookie laid a decent foundation for his role with the Cavaliers. With increased reps, Proctor could rise to become a valuable contributor sooner rather than later.
NEW YORK, NY - JUNE 10: OG Anunoby #8 of the New York Knicks shoots the game winning shot during the game against the San Antonio Spurs during Game Four of the 2026 NBA Finals on June 10, 2026 at Madison Square Garden in New York, New York. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2026 NBAE(Photo by Joe Murphy/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images
“I knew there was a lot of time left. I knew we’ve got to get a little lucky, but let’s do what we have to do to make some of that luck happen.”
On Jalen Brunson’s performance:
“Jalen, he’s an MVP candidate. I say the same thing about Jalen every game: He does what an MVP is supposed to, and he did it again tonight.”
On OG Anunoby’s Game 4 tip-in:
“How he had to control it and tip it in, that has to be the most iconic shot in the history of New York basketball. It’s unbelievable. Just how he had to control it and tip it in.”
On challenging Anunoby before Game 4:
“I challenged a lot of our guys today, and OG was one of the guys I challenged. I told OG, as big, as strong, as athletic as he is, he’s got to be a monster on the offensive glass tonight. I don’t know if there was a play bigger than any other play in the history in Knicks basketball. That was a huge offensive rebound. Huge offensive rebound. He took on the challenge, and he went and won the game for us doing exactly what I called him out for during shootaround today.”
On not changing much schematically before the second half rally:
“Really, we didn’t change much. We basically kept the same game plan. But defensively, we just did it [better] for longer stretches, and we were really in tune to what we were supposed to be doing. Our level of physicality increased without sending them to the free-throw line as well, which is huge.”
On Jose Alvarado’s Game 4 impact:
“Jose was unbelievable tonight. He changed the game. His speed, his ability to touch the paint… if you don’t close out to Jose, as hard as he works on his shot, he’s gonna make you pay. If you close out to him, he’s quick enough to go by you and he made some great basketball plays offensively tonight. And then he was great defensively.”
On the league not upgrading Victor Wembanyama’s foul to a flagrant before Game 4:
“The league is gonna do what they’re gonna do. You gotta live with it. They ain’t gonna listen to me, they ain’t gonna listen to nobody else. You just hope at the end of the day, everything is consistent on both ends throughout the whole game, that’s it. It is what it is. Stuff like that can cause a fight. Obviously, they didn’t see it. If it happens in the future, fingers crossed the officials see it and call it, but again, it’s out of my control. The officials are human; they’re gonna miss stuff. You hope that they miss stuff for both teams, but they’re gonna miss stuff.”
On the Knicks’ chemistry, continuity and keeping a group together:
“The longer you can keep a group together, I think that’s better. And it’s kind of always been that to a certain degree. You know, way, way back, the Lakers, they had Karl Malone, I think Gary Payton and a couple other superstars that they threw together one year, and it was hard. Not to say that it can’t be done. I’m sure it’s been done. But the longer the group can stay together, I feel the better chance they have.”
“That’s called Knicks basketball. Stay together, be together. And look at this f—— energy man. This is who we do it for.”
On the Knicks’ mindset at halftime in Game 4:
“Regardless of the outcome, these next 24 minutes, we better bring it and show them how we really play basketball.”
On proving the first half was an anomaly:
“We needed to show them that first half was a fluke.”
On playing in the fourth quarter of an NBA Finals game:
“Playing in the fourth quarter, that’s something, when you play this game, that’s when you want to play at. Shout out to our bench… we all stepped up when our number was called and I’m glad we got the job done today.”
On being part of the Knicks’ journey:
“Just to be part of the journey is amazing. I appreciate coach [Brown] and everybody giving me my flowers, but this is what I worked hard for, to be in moments like this and it’s showing. I’m glad we got a win today and I’ll definitely remember this for the rest of my life.”
On Brown’s message to the team while trailing:
“Stay together, and chop the lead down. More importantly, stay together and stay confident.”
On nearly crying after the Game 4 win:
“I was about to cry, not because — obviously there is one more, but … I’m at Madison Square Garden, end of the fourth quarter, playing with these guys, and we’re playing for something special. It’s really something. I couldn’t put it in words.”
"Right hand of God!"✋
Karl-Anthony Towns and Jose Alvarado talk about OG Anunoby's game-winning tip-in.
KAT: "He gave us a chance to win and that's all you can ask for from the best two-way player in the NBA." pic.twitter.com/CoAlOxZ4J7
“He gave us a chance to win, and that’s all you can ask for from the best two-way player in the NBA.”
On Jose Alvarado’s Game 4 performance:
“He’s a special player. His tenacity, his defensive ability and his offensive ability that I got to see first-hand… He has so much to his basketball game that people don’t give credit to and I’m glad at this stage and like this he was able to show the world what he can do when he’s given a chance. Jose Alvarado literally told everybody in the world tonight he’s a big time player.”
On an emotional Madison Square Garden after the comeback:
“I felt for all of y’all who were at the game, obviously, you could feel the abundance of joy at one time from everyone at one time, the collective joy that came out of everybody for that one moment, to hear the buzzer going off and not to see the ball go in the basket, I think we all felt something, like that emotion that was special. It’s something that MSG hasn’t had that kind of moment in a long time, so shoutout to our fans for real. I’ve seen people leave before the game was over at MSG, watching on MSG Network before. … You could see my reaction, the emotion, it kind of spilled out of that moment. It was tears of joy … All you can do is ask for a chance. And for me personally, I just wanted one break in life. And I got one.”
“We’re a team, a brotherhood, you know, we just have each other’s backs. That’s just how it goes sometimes. We would all do the same for each other.”
On his message in the locker room at halftime:
“I’ll just say stuff like, ‘We’re fine. Stay with it, we’re fine.’ “We know it’s a game of runs. We’re a resilient group. We’ve been through a lot. We’ve come back plenty of times when we’re behind. Just staying with it, weathering the storm, not being too down or angry or frustrated. Cut it down to 18, cut it down to 12, cut it down to six. Pushing through. It’s a 48-minute game. Just play to the end.”
On how Mike Brown challenged him at shootaround:
“Make an impact on the offensive glass. And it happened at the end.”
On crashing the glass after Brunson’s miss:
“I inbounded the ball to Jalen. He got a pretty good look and I just went and crashed. Tried to get a tip-dunk or something. The ball went over my head, so I couldn’t really dunk it. So, I tried to tip it in softly and it went in.”
“I was free. There was no one boxing me out. So I just went in there for a tip-dunk and then ended up just tipping it in. Brunson got a pretty good look. And I just went and crashed.”
On the defensive turnaround in the second half:
“Our contests were better, just 1 percent better. Getting out faster and then finishing possessions with rebounds.”
On pulling off another monster comeback:
“When you do it once. You know you can do it again.”
On the MSG faithful belief in these Knicks:
“They believed the whole way.”
On the team’s resilience:
“We stayed with it. It’s a game of runs. We’ve come back before, we’re battle-tested, we’re tough, we’re a resilient group.”
On staying focused on the task at hand:
“We’re enjoying it right now. But we’re just focused on the next game now.”
On the Knicks’ chemistry playing a big role in their postseason run:
“For sure, having another year together builds chemistry, builds just every day learning how to play off each other. Yeah, that means a lot. It’s a big time for us. Just going through the experience last year — we played a lot of games, 82-plus — and losing in the Eastern Conference finals and learning a lot of things about each other definitely helps.”
"I got a special shout-out for OG because he saved me … a lifetime of regret.
On OG Anunoby saving him after the missed layup and rebound:
“I’ve got a special shout-out for OG, man, because he saved me, at least for this game, a lifetime of regret. So I’m sitting there just hoping my guys make a play. And OG, he’s been amazing since he’s got here. This whole playoff run, he’s been amazing on both ends of the ball. He’s a winning player and he made a winning play.”
On Anunoby’s season and game-winner:
“This whole playoff run he’s been amazing, and he’s a winning player, and he went and made a winning play.”
On the fourth-quarter defensive effort:
“That’s unreal, and doing that especially in the fourth quarter. We were able to get stops without fouling, and that fueled our offense.”
On where he ranks the Game 4 win among his career highs:
“I won a national championship in 2016. [Jalen Brunson] and [Mikal Bridges] will probably remind you that I only have one and they have two. So that night is No. 1. This one is definitely No. 2.”
On the trust and familiarity within the Knicks:
“I think you just get a familiarity and a certain comfort level with those guys. All of them can go out there and make plays, especially end of shot clock. … I think it’s more so the trust that’s built, and you know where everyone likes the ball and plays for them to execute.”
“Really wasn’t that much to be said at that point. It was really just, we need to chip away. We need to hit singles, get on base and make plays from there.”
On focusing on what’s next instead of getting distracted:
“The most important thing for me over the next 48 hours is focusing on what we have to do to win Game 5. There’s nothing to celebrate. It’s not over yet, not even close.”
On OG Anunoby’s Game 4 performance:
“OG is someone who brings it, every night. Does what’s asked of him, plus more, every single night.”
“I don’t think any of us have ever seen anything like that. It’s a lot to process.
“On the bench when we’re slowly walking them down and you feel it shift a little bit and there’s a little bit of hope there that creeps in, it’s hard to explain, but if you were in the building, everybody felt it. This isn’t just talking about staying in the game, let’s cut the lead. It was like, ‘No, we’re here, let’s make something happen.’”
On Alvarado’s spark:
“He checked into the game and changed the game. That’s when things really started to shift. He’s a spark. The energy he brings for us … he was ready to go and stepped in and made some huge plays for us.”
“To put as much good work into that first half as we did and get the lead that we had and not finish the job, it’s disappointing to say the least. We felt the momentum [shift]. Too much to overcome? I didn’t feel that way until the clock hit zero…. We got away from playing the brand of basketball that got us the lead. And then you saw at times, the aggressiveness and conviction that we played with early on dissipated and they made some shots. We needed a couple of more tough-minded plays to finish the job.”
Victor Wembanyama:
End of Game 1: 👽Dribbles off foot
End of Game 2: 👽Butt pass 👽Fouls Jalen Brunson 👽Misses good look at buzzer
End of Game 4: 👽Misses both FTs 👽Doesn't crash boards on losing putback 👽Ball not in hands last shot
“It began before that. I can’t really explain it right now. Stopped moving the ball. Stopped executing.”
“I can’t really explain it right now, I don’t know. I think it’s just execution, greediness of some sort. We clearly weren’t the most hungry in the second half.”
“It’s gonna go one of two ways. A bad one and a good one. The bad one would be giving up; the good one would be getting stronger from this, getting more together, and this is what we’re gonna do.”
“It was painful, of course. It feels like we’re working too hard to give up our leads. It just hurts.”
On what’s next for San Antonio after suffering the worst loss in NBA history:
“Holding each other accountable, communicating, not pointing fingers. After that, we either got it or we don’t. But we’ve proven we can surpass these difficulties, and even though we haven’t been there before, I’m convinced we’re built this way and we’re gonna get better from this.”
On focusing on his weaknesses during his early development:
“As a kid, whether you’re 10, 13, 16 years old, you’re working for the future. You’re trying to develop your range of skills. I would say, long story short, play on your weaknesses, not only your strengths.”
On the Spurs’ identity:
“What we’ve built with this team is we have an identity that makes everybody dangerous. Sometimes it will pay off over a season, [sometimes] over a playoff series.”
On the MSG crowd and playing on the road:
“I like lively crowds, active crowds. … At home, it’s an extra motivation because you want to give the people who support you a good show. On the road, you want to do the opposite.”
“We’re all definitely hurt. I mean, we kind of gave the game up. Was up, what, 30? Hurt, I mean, angry. But I mean, I feel like this is all fuel to the fire for us. I think that we’re just going to go out next game with a sense of fire, and we’re just going to focus on game five. I mean, can’t do anything about it now.”
“A whole new fire, I feel like, is ignited in me, in a sense that we gave that game away. And if we’re going to lose, we’re not going out like that. We’re going to put up a fight. We’re going to keep swinging.”
On the Spurs’ chemistry despite their youth:
“I feel like those kind of events and things like that make up for the years that we weren’t together or the years that we haven’t had. So, the biggest thing, I feel like, is chemistry when you get in a building like this, when you get in an environment like this. I feel like we have the most chemistry and camaraderie, and togetherness as anyone else.”
On OG Anunoby’s tip-in:
“It bounced off the rim the right way. He tipped it in the right way. It went in. I could play, ‘Wish I could have did this, wish I could have did that.’ But at the end of the day, he tipped the ball, and it went in the rim. I definitely thought I had a hand on it. I definitely think I helped put the ball in the rim. But just got to box out.”
The Knicks led for just 53.8 seconds in Game 4 🤯
That's the 2nd-lowest amount of time leading in a Finals win since the 1976-77 merger 😲 pic.twitter.com/QBOqZGc6Sq
“Coach Mitch said it best, we’ve pretty much dictated the winner and loser of all these games. I think that just finishing games and just trying to maintain our lead has been tough for us.”
Keldon Johnson
On the Spurs’ belief after going down 3-1:
“The main thing is that belief is there. We believe. Our belief is as high as ever. You don’t get here without belief, without faith in each other, and that’s not going to change now. If it was easy, everybody would do it.”
"I just thought I'd be able to outrun [OG Anunoby]."
De'Aaron Fox explains his late game shot that was blocked by OG Anunoby.
On going for a layup late instead of just running the clock:
“I just thought I’d be able to outrun (OG). That’s it. I tried to get the layup to get up three, force them to need a three, and OG made a good block.”
On what makes the Knicks different:
“Yeah, I mean, I think just all four of our playoff series this year. I mean, Portland, physical team. Minnesota, physical team. OKC, physical team. New York, physical team. I think all these teams have something in common.”
“I think on the offensive end is where these teams are really different. Neither of those other three teams shoot the ball like [New York] does. Neither of those other three teams play as fast as [New York] does. Knowing there’s something similar that we come out but knowing there’s going to be differences in some of the nuances of schematics or personnel. I think those three series did help us prepare for the physicality we were going to see.”
“We saw the dumbest basketball team in the history of civilization. … The San Antonio Spurs helped the New York Knicks win this game.”
Charles Barkley after the Spurs allowed the largest comeback in NBA Finals history 👀 pic.twitter.com/Y7t4UZsVhU
“We saw the dumbest basketball team in the history of civilization. We saw they had a 25-point lead, took eight straight threes. Like they thought… that was some of the most mismanaged and stupid basketball.”
“Hey, when you blow a 29-point lead, the other team has to help you. The San Antonio Spurs helped the New York Knicks win this game by doing some of the stupid a– stuff I’ve ever seen on the basketball court. When they shot when they had a 25-point lead, they shot eight threes in a row.”
“Never even came close to using any time on the clock. And you’re like, ‘This game ain’t over yet.’ Then the Spurs and DeAndre Fox, whatever his name is. Calling him a– DeAndre tonight.”
“That was a dumba– play. He did not have to shoot that ball. They could have just gotten fouled. There was no reason for him to shoot that ball. They had a 29-point lead, and they shot eight threes in a row and never came close to losing any time on the clock, and you’re like ‘This game ain’t over yet.’ The Knicks got a Christmas gift in June tonight.”
On the Knicks’ historic comeback and Fox’s decision:
“We just watched the Knicks make the greatest comeback in NBA Finals history! The first and second halves were two completely different stories – the Spurs dominated in the first half and the Knicks stormed back in the second. Jalen Brunson put the team on his back with his 36-point performance, but OG Anunoby was the true hero tonight, finishing with 33 points AND the game-winning tip-in!”
“De’Aaron Fox made a huge mistake when he got the ball with seconds left in the fourth and decided to go for a layup instead of dribbling the ball out to be fouled. I think the Spurs have another win in them, and the Series will stretch out to 6 or 7 games, but I still see the Knicks winning it all.”
"I just tried to make a play."🔥
OG Anunoby after making the game-winning shot in the Knicks' Game 4 comeback 😤 pic.twitter.com/uYx9SwGfOw
“Fox, come on, fam! Finish that or dribble it out.”
Latrell Sprewell
On the Garden atmosphere during Game 4:
“I’ve heard it loud in here before. I remember how loud it was when [Larry Johnson] hit that four-point play against the Pacers in ’99. I’ve never heard it like this.”
“That game was physical as shit. There was times where [Karl-Anthony Towns] was holding on to [Victor Wembenyama], grabbing him, and it was no calls. There was times where [Jalen Brunson] was getting bumped. It was no calls.”
“I think that the physicality of this series is it’s whoever’s the most physical team, but the smart physical team, because now, after a game like that, game three back in New York, all eyes are on it, the energy that’s surrounding it, they’re going to pay close attention to all the little shit in the game. So don’t be surprised if game four they come out and the game is super tight.”
On the Knicks’ lack of response to Wembanyama’s shove of Brunson:
“Somebody should have put Wemby right there. You put me on the ground and you laughed at me? Nah. Next play, boom. He got to feel something.”
On the need for standing up for teammates on the court:
“It’s like football. If you hit the quarterback late, them offensive linemen come see you.”
On the criticism of Brunson’s shot volume:
“The reality of that is he has to do that. If he don’t do that, Knicks don’t stand a chance.”
On Towns’ small fourth-quarter involvement heading into Game 4:
“KAT just can’t have one shot in a half, fourth quarter. You can’t be doing that in the Finals. You got to set the tone for Game 4 in the post. That’s what KAT got to do. And that will help JB.”
“I don’t think I know enough about the history of the older teams to fully know. But forget the Knicks, this is one of the most dominant runs we’ve seen in NBA history.”
“One word that captures that all is just believe.”
Jalen Brunson joins Inside the NBA to react to the Knicks’ historic comeback win in Game 4 🙌 pic.twitter.com/lj0GKIGYaO
“They’re going to win it. I think this is going to be the time. I knew I wanted to see it in my lifetime, and it feels like Jalen Brunson is the best player in the playoffs right now even though [San Antonio’s Victor] Wembanyama is really good. But right now, Jalen Brunson is the best player in the playoffs.”
On wanting to play and lead the Knicks in his prime:
“I wanted to be the one to bring the Knicks back and be a real core piece in my prime. Being the Defensive Player of the Year in the Garden, I just felt like that would’ve been a helluva — if you would’ve come to the Garden with me on the other side in my prime, good luck to you. I’m always going to go back to me, personally. But for the Knicks to win the championship now, you can’t take it away from nobody. You can’t take it away from anybody from New York. You can’t take it away from the players. You can’t take it away from the coaches. You can’t take it away from the owners. You can’t take it away from the fans. We want to see that because we’re from New York.”
(@NIKNBAYT) 
