Jeff McNeilhas been a constant for the Mets since bursting onto the scene as a 26-year-old rookie in 2018 and hitting .329 with an .852 OPS -- giving New York a cog who has been a lineup mainstay ever since.
Since 2019, McNeil has played at least 120 games in every full season (he appeared in 52 of 60 during the COVID-shortened campaign in 2020).
Along the way, he's won a batting title and made two All-Star teams.
McNeil, who signed a four-year, $50 million extension before the 2023 season, has also been versatile.
A natural second baseman, he has gotten a solid amount of time at both corner outfield spots and third base. This past season, McNeil even played 34 games in center field -- including 28 starts. And he performed admirably in center.
There have been ebbs and flow for McNeil along the way, which included down campaigns in 2023 and 2024.
But as he prepares to enter his age-34 season in what is the final guaranteed year of his contract (the Mets hold a club option for 2027), McNeil is coming off a campaign where he was an above average offensive performer while continuing to provide the aforementioned versatility.
Should McNeil be in the Mets' plans for 2026, or is it time for them to move on?
WHY IT COULD MAKE SENSE TO TRADE MCNEIL
While McNeil's 2025 season was above average when compared to the rest of the league -- he slashed .243/.355/.411 with an OPS+ of 111 -- it's now been three full seasons since he was a high-average, high-on-base percentage player.
Over his first five seasons in the majors, McNeil slashed .307/.370/.458.
Over his last three seasons, McNeil has hit .253/.326/.389.
Meanwhile, McNeil has never really hit for power -- excluding 2019, when he smacked a career-high 23 homers. He also doesn't walk a lot, though he did draw a career-high 49 walks this past season.
Beyond McNeil's recent shortcomings at the plate is the fact that the Mets have a glut of infielders on the 40-man roster and more coming. Additionally, they're set at both corner outfield positions (Juan Sotoin right, Brandon Nimmo in left) and will almost certainly go defense-first in center field to start the 2026 season.
When it comes to the infield situation, second base and third base are technically open, but Brett Baty is coming off a season where he started to produce at the plate -- posting a .748 OPS while smacking 18 homers in 130 games. Baty was a solid defender, too, and showed that he can handle second base in addition to the hot corner.
There's also the presence of Ronny Mauricio. The 24-year-old still has way too much chase at the plate, but he has tantalizing power and the ability to be Francisco Lindor's backup at shortstop along with being an option at second and third.
Then there's Jett Williams, who had an .828 OPS in 130 games last season across Double-A Binghamton and Triple-A Syracuse. The 21-year-old is the Mets' top prospect and is expected to debut this coming season -- possibly at some point in the first half. And it's likely that his position once in the bigs will be second base or center field.
WHY IT COULD MAKE SENSE TO KEEP MCNEIL
Even though the Mets have numerous options for second base and third base, they're all unproven.
And while it's also possible to envision a scenario where the Mets find a third baseman externally if Pete Alonsoleaves via free agency (which would create a domino effect that gives them four possible second base options), that hasn't happened yet.
There's also the fact that none of the other options on the Mets' 40-man roster offer the kind of versatility that McNeil does.
Baty has played a grand total of 1.0 inning in the outfield during his big league career, and that came in 2023.
Mauricio played 26 games in left field in the minors in 2023, but hasn't left the infield dirt since suffering the knee injury that cost him the entire 2024 season.
Even in a world where McNeil isn't being viewed as someone who will start the majority of the time, it's easy to make an argument that he would be valuable in a super utility role where he gets time at four or five different spots in the field.
The main question for the Mets in that scenario would be whether they think it makes sense to have a $15.75 million bench player who -- while able to play all over the field -- isn't a true plus defender at any position and doesn't hit for power.
VERDICT
The day after the season ended, Mets president of baseball operations David Stearns stressed the need to improve the team's defense.
Stearns also did not reject that idea that the offensive core of the team could be shaken up.
And if Alonsore-signs, the easiest way to shake up the core while improving the defense could be to move on from McNeil (and Starling Marte, a free agent who is no longer able to play the outfield much).
In the case of McNeil, it's possible the Mets would have to eat a bit of his salary in order to help facilitate a deal.
But he could be an intriguing option for infield-needy teams in need of a versatile player who won't require a commitment beyond 2026.