Author: NBA Basketball News, Scores, Standings, Rumors, Fantasy Games

Last week, NBA media submitted their ballots for regular-season awards, with the late-breaking stipulation that Cade Cunningham and Luka Doncic were indeed eligible despite playing fewer than 65 games. What a stupid rule. As we hope that one goes the way of the dodo bird in short order, and as hardware starts to come out with Victor Wembanyama winning Defensive Player of the Year last night, here are our picks. Not that we have ballots!

Most Valuable Player

Van: Looks like I’m going against the grain here! Truthfully, Gilgeous-Alexander is the league’s best player right now, and all arguments for him are worthy. And the Thunder are world-beaters with him on the floor. But here’s the thing—they’re still damn good when he rests, which is not his fault; they’re an amazing team! But the Spurs were quite meh in the 2,081 minutes that Wemby sat, and when he played, they were just as good as the Thunder. That, plus the larger defensive impact (see next section), gives the big Frenchman my vote over the Canadian. I’ll explain Brown once we get to All-NBA.

Zac: An otherworldly offensive player who also contributes to one of the best defences of all time and led his team to the best record in the league (again)? Yeah, this one was pretty easy. SGA is just on another plane right now. You know what he’s going to do, but he does it anyway. Oh, and when the game is on the line, he’s the one you want, averaging the most points per game in clutch time (6.5)—nearly a full point per game more than second-place Anthony Edwards (5.6)—to go along with the best plus/minus (+3.4). How could it be anyone else?

Jack: SGA is an excellent two-way player who was, quite clearly, the deserving MVP when you account for individual and team success. Wemby will get his soon enough, but it wasn’t his time just yet.

Finn: SGA was the best player in the world during the 2025-26 season. His consistency was unmatched, and his floor impact was as high as anybody’s. He shot 55.3% from the field as a guard while averaging 30+ points for the fourth straight year. Wemby is gonna win at least three MVPs in the next five years (assuming health), but we’re still in the Shai “era” for now.

Deolu: The evidence is pretty overwhelming for Shai over Wembanyama. Not only is he the main offensive factor, a notable defensive presence, and all-around the best player on the best team, but he’s also been scoring at historic rates. Not only is he totaling around 127 games straight with 20 points scored as a slender guard, but he leads the league in win shares and VORP (value over replacement player). His efficiency and pure scoring prowess make his season definitively MVP-caliber.

Defensive Player of the Year

Van: Is there any doubt who this should be? Voters agreed, as he was the unanimous selection last night. San Antonio was equivalent to the league’s best statistical defense when he played, and equivalent to the Dallas Mavericks when he didn’t. That’s an impact he didn’t have as a rookie, or even last year, when he was ineligible for this award. Second and third were more interesting selections that I’ll go into when we hit the All-Defensive teams.

Zac: If MVP was easy, then DPOY was a no-brainer. The only thing that could have stopped Wembanyama from winning this award was the right-intentions-wrong-result 65-game rule. Of course, he checked that box, dropping a casual 40, 13, five, one, and two in a blowout win against the Dallas Mavericks. You can pencil Wemby in for the foreseeable future—he’s that good of a defender.

Jack: Agree with everything Zac said. It truly feels like Wemby could dominate this award going forward, and the only factors that might stop him from winning it every season would be health and voter fatigue. Ridiculous defensive player whose bona fides are backed up by the eye test even more than the box score.

Finn: One stat sums this up: every single team in the NBA this year had an effective field goal percentage of at least 52%. When Victor Wembanyama was on the floor, though, Spurs opponents posted a sub-50% eFG%.

Deolu: You-know-who led the league in blocks for the third straight year and posted a steal per game. Interestingly enough, here is Ausar Thompson’s widespread inclusion on four of five ballots as the only guard; he has almost single-handedly made Detroit’s defense elite and has helped define their Bad Boys 2.0 playstyle.

Most Improved Player

Van: Every year, my choice comes down to who had the most consequential—and therefore biggest—leap. For that reason, I’m deviating from Bucks partisanship by leaving Rollins out, and I think the real voters made the correct call doing so too. To be clear, he made a giant leap this season, from fringe rotation player (on a two-way deal for most of last year, even) to quality starter, if on a bad team. To me, that’s not anywhere near the leap the other guys made. Duren was a quality starter on a playoff team and had some big-time statistical gains when you average them out per-36. NAW equaled Rollins’ scoring jump and surpassed it on that same per-36 basis, so I thought real hard about giving this to him. But ultimately, Avdija went from—once again—quality starter (on a non-playoff team) to All-NBA candidate and leading scorer on a playoff team, maintaining his efficiency in a bigger role. His statistical gains this year compared to last year surpassed those of last year to two years ago, so 2025–26 was more of an Avdija breakout. His is the biggest and most consequential leap any NBA player made this season. Rollins could follow this arc and go from quality starter to All-Star next year, and if he does, he’ll have my MIP vote.

Zac: Call me a homer, but I can’t go past our very own Ryan Rollins. He went from being a “can he play some meaningful minutes?” guy to “this dude might make an All-Star team!” in half a season. He played 47% of his career games this season; 71% of his career minutes. That leap is just absurd. Now he’s just as likely to get 30+ (three times) as he is to have nine or fewer points (four times). And he plays both ends. And he shoots 41% from three. Nickeil Alexander-Walker and Deni Avdija are worthy recipients too, but for Rollins to not even be a finalist is criminal (sorry, Jalen).

Jack: The MIP award is always somewhat tough to predict because of the different interpretations people can have. For me, Ryan Rollins embodies everything this award should be about, going from a two-way contract to potentially a long-time starter in this league (and possibly an All-Star too). These other guys were somewhat known commodities (not to say we expected this out of NAW). To me, Deni “broke out” last season.

Finn: Our guy Ryan jumped from a decent-at-best rotation player to a good starter with star potential. He posted career-highs in all five major categories while maintaining strong efficiency (52.3% from two, 40.6% from three) despite taking more shots and facing more defensive pressure than ever before. Homer pick? Sorta kinda. Deserving pick? Absolutely. Shoutout Nickeil Alexander-Walker, who will likely be the real winner and made an ascension with the Hawks that nobody expected.

Deolu: I’ll be the odd man out and pick Alexander-Walker here. Alexander-Walker went from a backup wing on a fringe contender in Minnesota to arguably The Man for one of the league’s hottest teams. The 11.4-point jump, along with career highs in rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks, plus notable boosts in efficiency, show genuine growth outside of usage. Also, shoutout to C’s center Neemias Queta. Queta was a fringe starter, barely managing 14 minutes a game last year. Now he is the centerpiece of Boston’s imposing defense and has posted career highs in virtually everything worth counting.

Rookie of the Year

Van: Milwaukee’s own Knueppel was the better player from start to finish this year. It wasn’t Flagg’s fault that he was miscast for a time thanks to Jason Kidd running the offense through him, which affected his production a bit, and it’s not as though he had a significantly worse season than his former Duke teammate. The huge efficiency gap, plus the fact that Knueppel was putting those numbers up on a play-in team as opposed to a 26-win squad, makes this an easy call.

Zac: Cooper Flagg will likely end up being the better player down the road, but this year you can’t go past Kon Knueppel. In addition to leading the league in three-pointers made, he was part of some of the best five-man lineups in the league, leading the Hornets to postseason (if not playoff) action. In some ways, this reminds me of the LeBron James vs. Carmelo Anthony ROY debate. The NBA got that wrong—it should have at least been a tie—but now they have a shot at redemption.

Jack: Really tough one. As Finn says, we are not meant to consider Kon’s play-in performance. I just think Kon impacted winning and was a key part of one of the best stories in the NBA this season. Flagg struggled somewhat early, then really hit his stride in the final third of the season, but the Mavs were not playing competitive basketball during that stretch, so I rewarded winning. I still think Flagg has a better career.

Finn: This was the toughest pick to make, and honestly, after Knueppel’s showing in the play-in, I don’t feel good about my decision. But it’s a regular-season award, and the young Hornet did things we’ve never seen before from a rookie, including leading the entire NBA in three-pointers made. No matter which way you shake it, he and Flagg both had special freshman campaigns.

Deolu: Knueppel’s season ended with a whimper in the play-in, but it shouldn’t erase the legendary rookie season he had. Knueppel’s worth extends farther than his league-leading three-point shooting: his all-around scoring (18.6 PPG) on 64% true shooting has pushed the Hornets from the bottom of the barrel to a spooky team. The race is closer than our ballots make it seem, but Kon narrowly gets the edge in my mock ballot.

Clutch Player of the Year

Van: Like I said last year, I still really don’t know how to determine who wins this one. And like last year, I just looked up who had the best scoring and shooting numbers in clutch situations. Murray’s were better in some ways than Ant’s and SGA’s, but he was sharing the clutch responsibilities with Jokic, unlike the other two, who were their team’s “guys.” Also, note to the NBA: keep track of game-winning field goals! Especially buzzer beaters!

Zac: I’ll reiterate what I said in my MVP paragraph: SGA is the one you want with the game on the line, averaging the most points per game in clutch time (6.5)—nearly a full point per game more than second-place Anthony Edwards (5.6)—to go along with the best plus/minus (+3.4). But it goes beyond this. As a guard, the ball is going to be in his hands, and if he doesn’t stick a dagger in your eye from the field, he’ll make it a slow, painful death from the free-throw line (where he’s the only player to average over two made free throws per game in the clutch).

Jack: As others have noted, this award feels gimmicky, but I guess I’ll go with SGA. He hit a tonne of clutch shots this season. He’s just got that quality where he never seems flustered; always in complete control under any circumstance. I thought Cade and Ant also deserve praise for what they did late in games this year.

Finn: For whatever reason, I can’t bring myself to seriously care about this award, so I didn’t put too much thought into it. Shai had the most memorable clutch moments, in my opinion, and the stats back up the selection. Ant hit that unbelievable turnaround OT-forcing triple on Christmas. McCollum had his fair share of late-game heroics for both the Wizards and the Hawks, including a game-winner against the Bucks.

Deolu: This rivalry game-winner says enough about Shai for CPOY. Kawhi Leonard sneaks his way onto my ballot for his three-game winners, including one in the NBA Cup against the Pels. His leadership as the star player and lead vet to steer the Clips from 6-21 to the play-in is also pretty clutch.

Sixth Man of the Year

Van: Seems like there was no clear-cut favorite for this award this year, but I like what Johnson did the most: a more well-rounded scorer than Hardaway, and more helpful than jack-of-all-trades, master-of-none Jaquez. Plus, the edge in team success. It was tempting to reward THJ for his career-best season from the field, though.

Zac: This debate seemingly comes down to preference: Jaime Jaquez Jr. vs. Keldon Johnson. Both are deserving candidates, but it’s Jaquez’s leap as a playmaker that gives him the edge for me. I also can’t ignore the fact that Johnson put up nearly identicalnumbers to last season (albeit slightly more efficiently), when he didn’t receive a single 6MOY vote. Shout-out to Bobby Portis too, who had another strong year despite the Bucks’ chaos—and should already have at least one of these awards.

Jack: Keldon was a major key to the Spurs’ success this year. He was truly all-in on winning and improved the areas of his game that needed work to play that role. I also thought Naz Reid had a strong year off the bench.

Finn: Big Body Keldon Johnson was the heart and soul of the Spurs this year as they established their dominance. He sacrificed usage in favor of impact and changed game after game for San Antonio with his energy off the pine.

Deolu: Jaquez averaged 15 points, five rebounds, and 4.7 assists off the bench on 57% true shooting. His offensive firepower helped Miami’s bench score 43.8 PPG (fourth in the league), and he leads Johnson in points, assists, and stocks. Without Jaquez on the bench, the Heat would be a shell of themselves. I’m not sure if I can say the same for Johnson.

Coach of the Year

Van: Usually, I base this vote on year-to-year improvement by incumbents, which is why Johnson (28 additional wins) and Lee (25) are on my ballot. Apologies to Darko Rajakovic (16) and Jordan Ott (nine), who mainly benefited from a healthier roster in the former’s case and a revamped roster in the latter’s. Bickerstaff got my vote last year because going from historically bad to playoff team (2024 to 2025) is crazy and more unprecedented than six-seed to 60 wins (2025 to 2026). But I can’t deny the gigantic smashing of expectations Mazzulla did with “gap year” Boston.

Zac: Look, Joe Mazzulla will probably win this award, and I have absolutely no issue with that—what he’s done with the Celtics sans Jayson Tatum et al. has been phenomenal and something no one saw coming. But I can’t ignore J.B. Bickerstaff’s efforts either. To go from lottery team to playoff team is one thing. To go from playoff team to 60 wins and the number one seed is another, especially when you lead your team to a 13-5 record without its best player.

Jack: This one was pretty easy for me. Mazzulla has done an unbelievable job turning a team that many thought was heading for a Pacers-esque gap year into a legit title contender. The way this dude has turned other teams’ trash into the Celtics’ treasure is truly astounding. Special shoutouts to Lee and Ott for how they transformed their teams from the previous season’s results.

Finn: Mazzulla is a basketball sicko and genius. The system he’s built in Boston is the reason why they were so good this year. Every single guy on the roster knows their role. The team plays the same way regardless of who’s in the lineup, and it always works. Joe, in my mind, is the real MVP candidate for Boston, not Jaylen Brown.

Deolu: It turns out they weren’t 2-26 bad. Bickerstaff’s has seen the Pistons jump 16 wins to a first seed and their first 60-win season in two decades, a whiplash-inducing turnaround. Additionally, Bickerstaff’s aggressive personality and coaching style have seen Detroit become arguably the best defensive unit in the league, with two potential All-NBA players (Cade Cunningham, Jalen Duren) leading the charge.

Executive of the Year

Van: My rationale here often follows what I employ for Coach of the Year, but in this case, I have to go with Gregory despite leaving Ott off above. The first-year Suns GM completely revamped a flawed roster without a big cupboard of assets (sounds like something the Bucks could do). Peterson didn’t make any huge moves free agency or trade-wise, he just drafted well and benefited from better health—the Hornets weren’t too different. Same with Saleh’s Hawks, though he too made some savvy moves.

Zac: Deolu beat me to the point (see below). Peterson seemed to hit on every decision he made, but drafting three guys—including two second-round picks—who are a core part of a winning rotation stands out.

Jack: Peterson utilised the draft, trades, and free agency to completely transform a team that was a bottom-feeder just one year ago. Brilliant work. The Coby White trade, in particular, was a master stroke. Onsi Saleh gets in there solely off his trade with the Pels to get their first-rounder this year, LOL.

Finn: If you ask Mazzulla how the Celtics have achieved the role definition and connectivity I just gushed about (as I did when Boston visited Milwaukee on April 3rd), he’ll first credit the players, but then he’ll credit the front office. Brad Stevens sniffed out the players that fit the Boston ethos, allowing them to remain one of basketball’s best teams despite being forced to trade Jrue Holiday and Kristaps Porzingis over the summer.

Deolu: The Hornets had the best turnaround this season. Through Jeff Peterson’s savvy draft picks (Kneuppel, Ryan Kalkbrenner, Sion James), trades (Coby White for Collin Sexton), and hiring (second-year head coach Lee), the Hornets went from a sub-20 win team to a ninth seed in the East with aspirations of further growth.

All-NBA Teams

Van: Here’s where I talk about Jaylen Brown. All of us had him on our first team before the Doncic and Cunningham announcement. I had to put the NBA’s leading scorer (Luka) among the top five, but quite simply, Brown had a better year than Cunningham. A slight edge in efficiency and a larger one defensively outweighs Cunningham’s superiority as a passer, and Brown was certainly the more prolific scorer. The Celtics had only four fewer victories too. Shout out to Murray for a ridiculously good year that would have put him second team had it not been for the 65-game rule shenanigans, to Holmgren for the best two-way year outside of Wemby, and Wisconsin native Johnson for all-around offensive prowess.

Zac: The Luka Doncic and Cade Cunningham “extraordinary circumstances” rulings changed my picks—initially, I had Jaylen Brown and Jaylen Brunson in my first team—but that’s another discussion in and of itself. I also continue to dislike the “positionless” nature of these teams, which leads them to be a list of the season’s 15 best players rather than realistic teams. All this said, I was higher on Avdija than most, who put up similar (if not better) stats than Kawhi Leonard and Kevin Durant, leading the Blazers to a better-than-expected record, while the Clippers and Rockets underwhelmed relative to expectations.

Jack: The first team drama re: Luka and Cade was addressed by others. If I were to single one guy out who really had an underrated year, it’d be LaMelo Ball. No longer is he this bit player that people make fun of; he is now a legit point guard who drives winning at a high level. The season that Kawhi put together was otherworldly, and I wanted to put him on the second team because of that.

Finn: Once Luka and Cade were approved, they were no-brainer first-team additions. Before that, I had Kawhi on my first team, who just had the best individual regular season of his Hall of Fame career. I made no real zag picks here— I thought LaMelo would be one, but Jack and Deolu made me look smarter, haha.

Deolu: The first five players are pretty much set in stone, but Jaylen Brown is pretty unlucky to miss out on a first-team nod. His career highs of 28.7 PPG, almost seven RPG, and just over five APG helped Boston avoid the injury slump. His stats aren’t quite good enough to hang with the likes of Shai, Wemby, Luka, and Jokic, but Jaylen Brown’s 60-or-so games as the number-one option on the C’s put him in a very real conversation with Cunningham for the final slot.

All-Defensive Teams

Van: This is all about impact for me, like the other awards. I just mentioned Holmgren, though he didn’t make my DPOY ballot for similar reasons to Shai: the Thunder were an elite defense when he played and merely really good when he didn’t. The Wolves were frankly terrible without Gobert and top-five equivalent with him, as were the Celtics depending on where you’d find White. Thompson is an outstanding individual defender for a top-ten unit, but didn’t have the on-off numbers to back it up, and I was just too impressed by White’s and Gobert’s. Three of my second team guys were also the best defenders on great defenses and merited spots (honorable mention to Dunn, whose Clippers weren’t quite good enough to get him on). Wallace is similarly great in his own right but affected by the same Holmgren dilemma. Then we have Queta, whom Delou discussed above. His on/off numbers elevated Boston from what would be the 20th-ranked D to the second.

Zac: I toyed with the idea of having three centres in my First Team, but decided Rudy Gobert would suffer from voter fatigue. Instead, I went with his teammate, Jaden McDaniels. He’s not as flashy as some of the other wing defenders out there—especially in terms of highlight plays and traditional defensive stats like blocks, steals, and rebounds. In many ways, he reminds me of another slender 6’9” wing defender who, despite making four All-Defensive Second Teams, never really got the praise he deserved: Tayshaun Prince. Plus, there’s a reason they call him “Seatbelt.”

Jack: I thought Camara started slow, but got back to his defensive best by about a third of the way through the year. Kris Dunn was a really underrated part of why the Clippers had the season they did after the rough start; he was nails all year on defence, and I thought he deserved his plauidts.

Finn: I had my first team penned in since probably December. All five guys up there would be fully deserving DPOYs, although Wemby has made it an uncontested race, of course.

Deolu: Derrick White is probably the most exciting person I chose on this list. It will genuinely be interesting if he can earn a First Team nod after being snubbed last year. White somehow averages more blocks (1.3) than steals (1.1) per game, and his role as the point-of-action defender is invaluable for the league’s second-best defense (behind the Thunder).

All-Rookie Teams

Van: Beyond the top two rooks, pretty clear that Edgecombe and Harper deserved plaudits for solid debuts on playoff teams. Bailey was good enough for a crap team. Fears and Queen were pleasant surprises, though not as much as Coward, Kalkbrenner (crazy value in the second round), and Raynaud. I admit I didn’t know who that Parisian was until late in the year. This rookie class is a touch underwhelming to me overall.

Zac: These seemed relatively straightforward for me. I suppose Cedric Coward could have taken Derik Queen’s spot, but Queen played 19 more games, which should mean something—and likely still suffers from the backlash of the trade that got him to New Orleans in the first place. I also really wanted to reward Sion James, whose defence will make him a valuable player for years to come, but couldn’t justify him above any of the other guys.

Jack: Jeremiah Fears had a really good year, and one that really surprised me as someone who thought he would be awful as a rookie. Maxime Raynaud looks like a gem for the Kings, as does Will Riley for the Wizards. I’m still undecided on Queen being a winning player, but he at least makes that trade more palatable.

Finn: Cooper Flagg is still the best long-term prospect in this class, but Dylan Harper isn’t far behind him. The bench role he was forced into (but thrived in) masked just how much of a stud he already is and is going to become. Ace Bailey, one of the most-discussed guys pre-draft, had a quiet year in terms of fanfare, but he looked like a real weapon in Will Hardy’s system and is still a strong bet to return top-five value.

Deolu: I’m surprised I’m the only one here with Kings guard Nique Clifford anywhere. Outside of disappointing shooting, Clifford has been a Swiss Army knife for a struggling, tanking squad. He averaged a respectable 8.6 points, 3.8 rebounds, and 0.9 steals in 75 appearances. Clifford overperformed as Tank Commander after Zach LaVine and DeMar DeRozan checked out for the season; in his last seven games, he averaged 17.6 points, 5.4 rebounds, and 4.1 assists on .500/.355/.842 shooting. He’ll be the sleeper to watch out from this rookie class in the future.

There you have it: our fake ballots. Why don’t you submit one too? Hit the comments, and also tell us if our picks are off base.

Billy Donovan is out as head coach of the Chicago Bulls after six seasons, the team announced Tuesday, April 21.

Donovan had an option year on his contract to coach the Bulls next season, but decided to leave the position. Chicago is still in the process of looking for a person to head up its basketball operations after the team fired executive vice president of basketball operations Arturas Karnisovas and general manager Marc Eversley.

"Through honest conversations, we all agreed that giving our new Head of Basketball Operations the right to build out his staff was the most important thing for the future of this franchise. That is the kind of person Billy is – he put the Bulls first. We are deeply grateful for everything he has given to this organization," Bulls chairman Jerry Reinsdorf partially said in a statement.

Billy Donovan is stepping away as head coach. pic.twitter.com/Up6S6dd5tL

— Chicago Bulls (@chicagobulls) April 21, 2026

The 60-year-old Donovan went 226-256 in his tenure in Chicago, and the Bulls missed the postseason in each of the last four years.

"After a series of thoughtful and extensive discussions with ownership regarding the future of the organization, I have decided to step away as the head coach of the Chicago Bulls, to allow the search process to unfold," Donovan said in a statement. "I believe it is in the best interest of the Bulls, to allow the new leader to build out the staff as they see fit. My gratitude for this community and this organization is permanent."

Before coaching the Bulls, Donovan spent five seasons with the Oklahoma City Thunder, where he compiled a 243-157 record, with the team making the playoffs in each season.

Want to get more Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account here.

After treating their fans to a 111–98 victory in Game 1, the San Antonio Spurs will look to keep home-court advantage intact with another win against the Portland Trail Blazers tonight.

We break down Kalshi’s win probability markets and deliver some Trail Blazers vs. Spurs predictions to help guide your NBA picks for Tuesday, April 21.

Who will win Trail Blazers vs Spurs Game 2?

Trail Blazers win probability:16% (+525)
Spurs win probability:86% (-614)

Trading at 79¢ before the series opener, San Antonio is an even heavier favorite heading into Game 2, currently listed at 86¢.

Our prediction:Spurs to win

Victor Wembanyama has officially arrived. Not to overreact to an easy Game 1 win, but this version of the San Antonio Spurs should be feared by everyone in the NBA.

The Trail Blazers had a delightfully surprising season, but it would be an act of mercy by the NBA to shorten this series to best-of-five, if not best-of-three.

Read more in Douglas Farmer's full Trail Blazers vs. Spurs predictions.

More Trail Blazers vs Spurs prediction markets

You're certainly not limited to the main game outcome for Trail Blazers vs. Spurs at Kalshi; you also have options to trade on the spread, total, and more, among other NBA odds markets.

You can buy either side of a market — for example, "Yes" on the Spurs -10.5 spread means the Spurs will cover, while "No" means the Trail Blazers will cover — with each side priced based on the implied probability (which can be converted to American, Decimal, or Fraction odds using the Covers odds converter).

Trail Blazers vs Spurs spread and total at prediction markets

Our predictions:Over 219.5 points — No

The one thing the Trail Blazers should carry over from Game 1 is slowing down the pace. Fewer possessions give San Antonio fewer chances to enjoy its talent advantage.

Six of Portland's final eight regular-season games also cashed the Under.

Other Trail Blazers vs Spurs prediction markets available

• Victor Wembanyama 25+ points (Yes: 69¢)
• De'Aaron Fox 6+ assists (Yes: 53¢)
• Donovan Clingan 10+ rebounds (Yes: 46¢)

What is Kalshi and how does it work?

Kalshi is a federally regulated U.S. exchange where you trade directly on the outcome of real-world future events. Instead of traditional bets, you trade "Event Contracts," which are simple Yes/No questions like "Will the Spurs win tonight?" These events are priced between $0.01 and $0.99, and the prices reflect the market’s estimated probability of that event occurring. For instance, $0.55 equals a 55% chance. If your prediction is correct, the contract pays out exactly $1.00; if not, it settles at $0. Kalshi is essentially a stock market for reality.

How does Kalshi differ from sportsbooks?

In a sportsbook, you bet against the bookmaker, who sets fixed odds and takes a "vig," which is a kind of commission. On Kalshi, you trade against other users. This peer-to-peer model means prices are driven by supply and demand, often resulting in fairer odds. Additionally, because these are financial derivatives, you can exit your position early. If your team takes a 14-point lead, the contract price will rise, allowing you to sell your "Yes" shares for a profit before the final whistle even blows.

Why should I wager on Trail Blazers vs Spurs at Kalshi?

Kalshi offers four unique advantages over traditional sportsbooks:

1. Flexibility: Unlike a "locked-in" bet, you can sell your contract at any time.
   
   
2. Transparency: You trade against other users, which can allow you to find better value.
   
   
3. Federal regulation: As a CFTC-regulated exchange, your funds are held in a secure, transparent environment.
   
   
4. Availability: Kalshi is available in 49 states (excluding Nevada) and D.C., including many regions where traditional sportsbooks aren't yet legal.

This article originally appeared on Covers.com, read the full article here and view our best betting sites or check out our top sportsbook promos.

Bradford Bulls centre Esan Marsters will miss the rest of the season with an Achilles injury, boss Kurt Haggerty has said.

The 29-year-old sustained the injury during the Bulls' heavy defeat by Wakefield Trinity at the weekend.

Marsters has made 10 appearances for the Bulls this season since joining from Salford for 2026.

"Esan is pretty down. We've got a really good support system around him but he's pretty disappointed," Haggerty said.

"It hurts us as a playing group but ultimately we'll support Esan and his family more than anything."

Hindsight is 20/20. Foresight is not.

So, arguing with the benefit of hindsight will annoy people. Still, if it’s contrary to a view that you’d expressed with (deeply flawed) foresight, it’s responsible.

All of which is to say, I thought Fred VanVleet over James Harden was the right call. Now, I think it was a mistake.

So, here we are.

Rockets had their reasons to pick VanVleet

It was the summer of 2023. It was a simpler time. The Rockets did not know “what they had”, so the prevailing assumption among fans was that Alperen Sengun, Jalen Green, and Amen Thompson would be populating All-NBA teams for time immemorial.

The front office was presumably not operating under the assumption. Still, figuring out what they had was an imperative. So, bringing in a high usage guard could be counterproductive. If Harden was carrying the group to wins, how could we learn about the group?

Fred VanVleet was coming off a season with the Toronto Raptors in which he had a 23.2% Usage Rate. That’s not egregiously high, and it was easy to imagine him scaling down. Harden’s 2022-23 Usage Rate with the Philadelphia 76ers was just 24.9%. That’s barely higher, but the year before, he was at 28.3% with the Brooklyn Nets.

Perhaps Harden would have treated Sengun with the same relative deference with which he treated Joel Embiid. Perhaps. Yet, even 24.9% was too high. In VanVleet’s first season with the Rockets, his usage dipped to 19.7%. Harden hasn’t dipped below 20% since his 2010-11 rookie season. For context, his Usage Rate this year is 28.6%.

Moreover, what’s Harden’s value if you scale down his usage? VanVleet is a more active off-ball player. He’s also a far better defender.

This wasn’t strictly about basketball, either. The Rockets wanted a culture-setter. VanVleet brought everyone a copy of “Chop Wood Carry Water: How to Fall in Love with the Process of Becoming Great” by Joshua Medcalf. The forever aloof Harden was more likely to bring Gucci bags full of honeybuns.

It seemed clear that Ime Udoka wanted VanVleet, and the Rockets wanted to shape the team in Udoka’s image. They wanted defensive intensity. So, there were plenty of good reasons to pick VanVleet over Harden:

As it turns out, none of them were good enough to justify taking the lesser player.

Rockets picked the wrong guard

VanVleet missed this season, so let’s look at 2024-25. Harden averaged 22.8 points and 8.7 assists per game with a 4.3 Box Plus/Minus (BPM). VanVleet averaged 14.1 points and 5.6 assists per game with a 0.9 BPM.

Yes, there’s context. Again, there’s defense. Harden also turns the ball over far more often. That’s all true, but here’s the grander, more substantive truth:

Harden is much better than VanVleet.

It’s easy to say now. We now (basically, depending on your level of optimism and/or delusion) know that the Rockets have a platoon of talented young players who are not franchise-altering. Perhaps we don’t learn that with Harden in the fold.

Alternatively, the goal was to build a winning team. Perhaps it was wiser to bring in the best players possible and let the chips fall. Moreover, usage isn’t so strictly delineated that Harden would erase everyone. There’s a world where, yes, Sengun finishes pick-and-roll alongside Harden very often, but Harden’s Philly usage stagnates, allowing Sengun an Embiid-sized piece of the pie.

It’s particularly easy to say when VanVleet is injured. Yet, as easy as it is to say, I felt compelled to say it. I thought VanVleet was the right move, and now, I see that it would have been better to go with Harden:

See how easy that is?

CHICAGO (AP) — Chicago Bulls say coach Billy Donovan is stepping down after six seasons.

Want to get more Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account here.

Gary Payton is best known for his legendary Seattle Supersonics career, and he sees the return of the Sonics as a necessity for the Emerald City.

The Hall of Fame point guard established his legacy in the NBA as a member of the Supersonics (1990-2003), leading them to the NBA Finals in 1996 and becoming the first point guard in league history to win the Defensive Player of the Year award. Payton also went to the All-Star game nine times and led the league in assists and steals.

With the NBA approving possible expansion into Seattle and Las Vegas for the 2028-29 season, the city of Seattle could see the return of the Supersonics for the first time in two decades. Their franchise left Seattle in 2008 to become the Oklahoma City Thunder.

"Our community needs it"

"Our community needs it," Payton told Covers in an exclusive interview. "I think that we should be able to get our Sonics back, because if you look at it, we just won the Super Bowl. Baseball is doing very, very well. The Storm is doing very well; they've won a lot of championships. They gave Sue Bird a statue in front of the place. We're doing things like that in Washington.

"The Huskies, the Sounders, everybody is coming. The Kraken, our new NHL team. We're pretty good. The only thing we're missing is basketball. When that comes back, it's going to be a great thing for me to be a part of it, be up there every day and get it back going. Get our tradition back."

Payton said that he will absolutely be a part of the Supersonics franchise if it does come back. He said he's close to the ownership group looking to lead the franchise, One Roof Sports & Entertainment, back to Seattle.

"I can't do anything else," Payton said. "This is the franchise that started me. That's the franchise that started 'The Glove', the franchise that got me to become a Hall of Famer, a top-75 player. So yes, I'm going to be a part of that and get that built to where it needs to be built back up, when we were winning in the 90s and every game was sold out. When we were winning 50 or more games every year for about six, seven years straight. So yes, that's going to be a big thing for me to go in here and try to help our city get back to where it was."

Payton: Sonics tickets will sell out in "about an hour"

Payton plays up how big of a sports city Seattle is, saying that the arena will sell out in "about an hour" if the franchise moves back to the city.

"You’ve got to see our city to understand what it is," Payton lights up when given a chance to speak about the city he made his name in. He continued, 'It's not just a city of rain, it's a city of love. Our team and our people there know that, and that's why we're so big and adamant about getting the Sonics back. Now we have this opportunity. Watch what's going to happen, as soon as they say, 'Yo, it's time to come and let's go.' We're probably going to sell out in about an hour.”

Payton has high expectations if, or when basketball returns to Seattle, "Everybody's going to be coming in and rolling there. It's going to be almost like Los Angeles. I think a lot of people will come in there and be a part of our thing. A lot of superstars, a lot of celebrities. I think they're going to be up there, especially if I'm involved. I'm trying to get them up there every time, every chance we can, so we can have a good time up there."

Payton: Michael Jordan would average "40 a game easily" in today’s NBA

Payton is known as widely regard as the greatest perimeter defender of all-time.

The 57-year-old Oakland, CA native was a nine-time NBA All-Defensive First Team selection for nine consecutive seasons from 1994 until 2002. Nicknamed ‘The Glove’, he famously helped the Supersonics win two NBA Finals games against the 1995-96 Chicago Bulls squad that won a then-record 72 games.

The wins came after Payton was switched onto Michael Jordan and with Seattle trailing 3-0 in the series. Payton held Jordan to just 23 points in Game 4 on 6-of-19 shooting. He held Jordan to 26 points in Game 4.

Jordan had averaged 31.0 points per game in the first three games on 46.0% from the field.

When asked what Jordan would average today, Payton said the five-time MVP would average 40 points per game "easily" if he played in the current era.

"Forty, easily," Payton said. "Nobody could guard him, not right now. There's only a couple of teams that play defense. You saw last year, the two teams who made it. Why did Indiana make it? Because they played defense. They brought their team, played defense. I think Oklahoma City plays a lot of great defense."

The Hall of Fame point guard makes it clear that while you can slow down a great scorer, there's no stopping one like Jordan.

"Y'all got to understand, nobody can stop that kind of scorer," Payton said. "All you can do is slow him down and try to make it close and make yourself have a chance of winning games. But with him, I think he would average 40. He would average 40 a game easily in this league."

Payton: Gary Payton II, Jrue Holiday best on-ball defenders in NBA

On the topic of who is the best on-ball defender in the game today, Payton goes with his son, Gary Payton II - who plays for the Golden State Warriors - and veteran Jrue Holiday, who recently helped lead the Portland Trail Blazers to a surprise playoff appearance.

Holiday is a six-time All-Defensive Team selection.

"That's very hard," Payton said initially. "I'm always gonna say my son can be the best one-on-one defender along with Jrue Holiday. I think they're two of the best basketball players that can change a game guarding anybody. I think on the ball, those two guards are the best that's on the scene right now in the NBA."

Payton: Jontay Porter “a good kid” and NBA should consider reinstatement

Payton currently serves as a consultant for the USBL's Seattle Super Hawks, which is coached by former NBA guard Robert Pack. The USBL returned to play this season after being defunct since its last season in 2008.

The most intriguing storyline for the league and the team right now is Jontay Porter, who currently plays for the Super Hawks after he was banned for life by the NBA after violating its gambling policies as a member of the Toronto Raptors.

"Unfortunately, he got in trouble, but he's a good kid," Payton explained. "He's a quiet kid, a family kid. He's around his people, his family all the time, and we just have to let people understand what was happening. He made a mistake, and that's what was going on. But as a basketball player, he has a hell of an IQ. The IQ of what I think that a big man should have, as you see with Jokic in Denver.”

Payton speaks glowingly of Porter as a person and gives major praise to the 6-foot-10 big man for his passing abilities, saying he can pass it like Denver Nuggets star Nikola Jokic. As of this writing, the Super Hawks have the best record in the USBL at 12-0. Porter leads the league with 20.0 rebounds per game and ranks second with 7.8 assists per game.

"This kid can pass a basketball, he can score the basketball, he has a good feel for the game. He can dribble the basketball. For a big man, I think his passing ability is off the charts. I think that he didn't come in here in shape, but now he's getting in shape, and now he's starting to have double-doubles and do the things when he wants to. I want the NBA to see that, but we have to first get him out of trouble first. Then we'll see what the NBA wants to do after that."

Payton: Porter must earn back his credibility

Payton - who will take over his hometown Oakland USBL franchise when it begins play in 2027 - said the best advice he has given Porter is to stay humble.

"The best advice I gave to him is that you have to listen and you have to be humble," Payton continued. "The humble thing is you got to understand that you got to get your credibility back. You got to get people to trust you again. A lot of people always say, 'Oh, these kids do this, they do that.' But you gotta earn respect and earn trust, and you gotta show people that you can do this and don't just talk about it.

Payton remains optimistic for Jontay Porter’s future, "I think he's staying out of trouble. He's doing things in the community that would help people understand that, 'Yeah, I made a mistake, and I don't want other people to make mistakes. So now I'm gonna talk about it.' I think when people get in trouble, they have to understand that, and they have to be real with it. They gotta talk about it."

Gary Payton spoke exclusively with DJ Siddiqi on behalf of Covers.com. All quotes in this article are taken from an exclusive interview conducted by Covers.com. Journalists and media outlets are welcome to use these quotes, provided they are attributed to Covers.com. Please ensure links back to the original article to provide full context for readers.

This article originally appeared on Covers.com, read the full article here and view our best betting sites or check out our top sportsbook promos.

Want to get more Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account here.

Will he or won’t he?

That’s the big question surrounding Kevin Durant and his status for Game 2 between the Houston Rockets and Los Angeles Lakers.

While KD is a game-time call with a knee injury, my same-game parlay for Houston at L.A. is confident the visitors can rally from a poor performance in the opener with some help from a young superstar. Given game script, LeBron James will be forced to jack up more shots from beyond the arc.

Check out my Rockets vs. Lakers predictions and NBA picks below.

Our best Rockets vs Lakers SGP for Game 2

Without Kevin Durant, this Houston Rockets offense was stagnant, but with two days to rest and ready a Plan B, Houston will look much better in Game 2 while the Los Angeles Lakers’ hot shooting cools. If KD comes back, L.A. doesn’t have a defensive solution for the 6-foot-11 shooter.

Amen Thompson was the only member of the Rockets to show up in Game 1, scoring 17 points. His projections for Game 2 are as high as 19 points, and he’s put up 17, 19, and 26 in his last three head-to-head meetings with the Lakers.

If Durant does return, the game script has Los Angeles playing from behind. LeBron James wasn’t needed from distance in Game 1, but with L.A.'s shooting ripe to regress, LeBron will feel the need to take and make more shots from 3-point land to close the gap.

This article originally appeared on Covers.com, read the full article here and view our best betting sites or check out our top sportsbook promos.

Want to get more Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account here.

Life is funny. The one thing that made the Los Angeles Lakers underdogs is kind of the reason they won the series opener with the Houston Rockets.

Kevin Durant’s absence sapped more star power from this Round 1 matchup — already down Luka Doncic and Austin Reaves — but unlike L.A.’s injured studs, Durant has a good shot of playing in Game 2 tonight.

My Rockets vs. Lakers predictions and NBA picks bank on a better showing from Houston tonight, with or without KD on April 21.

Rockets vs Lakers prediction

Who will win Rockets vs Lakers Game 2?

Rockets: I bet the Lakers’ moneyline in Game 1, even before the news of Kevin Durant’s knee injury. If there was going to be a game in which L.A. came out swinging, it would be the opener. And boy did it. But balance is restored in Game 2 as Houston’s role players get on track and the Lakers’ support staff plummets back to earth.

Rockets vs Lakers best bet: Rockets -4.5 (-110)

With the way the Los Angeles Lakers shot the ball in Game 1, it may not have mattered if Kevin Durant was healthy or not.

Los Angeles finished a blistering 61% from the floor, including 10-for-19 from beyond the arc. A well-rested LeBron James conducted a crisp L.A. attack that recorded an assist on more than 72% of its total buckets.

The Houston Rockets' offense, on the other hand, was lost and untethered without the gravity of Durant. The Rockets were a chilly 38% from the floor, with an 11-for-33 mark from beyond the arc.
 
Los Angeles was able to be more aggressive when it came to double-teaming Houston’s secondary stars, and the Rockets missed KD’s ability to create when things broke down. Couple that with playoff nerves on the road for some younger standouts, and you can see how things fell apart.

I expect it all to come closer to the middle in Game 2 as a potential letdown for the Lakers, who got a Luka-like effort from reserve-turned-starter Luke Kennard on Saturday.

Los Angeles won’t connect at the same clip, and Houston will tighten the bolts on offense, with or without Durant. Head coach Ime Udoka is emphasizing spacing and more screen action — both on- and off-ball — after iso-heavy sets stagnated the Rockets in Game 1.

I’m holding out hope Durant returns for the sake of this bet, but I’m confident Houston will still perform better than Game 1 if he doesn’t.

Rockets vs Lakers same-game parlay

Amen Thompson scored 17 points in Game 1 as one of Houston’s lone bright spots. He dropped 26 and 19 points in the previous two matchups with Los Angeles, and if Durant returns, he’ll enjoy a lot more space in Game 2. Thompson is projected for as many as 19 points.

LBJ did it all for L.A. in the opener but didn’t need to take or make triples, with the Lakers playing with the lead. Game script has Los Angeles trailing tonight, and with some of the Lakers’ role players coming back to earth, James will jack up his share of long-range looks to close that gap. 

Rockets vs Lakers SGP

• Rockets -4.5
• Amen Thompson Over 16.5 points
• LeBron James Over 1.5 threes

Our "from downtown" SGP: The King and I (V2.0)

Let’s try this one more time. I had a fun all-GOAT same-game parlay pegged for Game 1 leaning into LeBron vs. KD. Then Durant went and spoiled it all by banging up his knee in practice. He’s trending toward playing in Game 2, so I’m calling for these two HoFers to pace their team in points and knock down shots from downtown.

Rockets vs Lakers SGP

• Rockets -4.5
• Kevin Durant Over 23.5 points
• Kevin Durant Over 2.5 threes
• LeBron James Over 24.5 points
• LeBron James Over 1.5 threes

Rockets vs Lakers odds for Game 2

• Spread: Rockets -4.5 | Lakers +4.5
• Moneyline: Rockets -205 | Lakers +170
• Over/Under: Over 207 | Under 207

Rockets vs Lakers betting trend to know

Houston is 22-8 SU off a loss this season, with those bounce-back spots producing a 12-17-1 Over/Under count. Find more NBA betting trends for Rockets vs. Lakers.

How to watch Rockets vs Lakers Game 2

Rockets vs Lakers latest injuries

This article originally appeared on Covers.com, read the full article here and view our best betting sites or check out our top sportsbook promos.

The Celtics host the 76ers on Tuesday night for Game 2, two days after a 32-point Game 1 demolition. And, they’ll mostly be at full strength: only Ron Harper Jr. is on the injury report. He’s listed as probable with a right ankle sprain that he suffered earlier this month.

Jayson Tatum, who made his return from an Achilles injury on March 6th, continues to be fully uninhibited. He tallied 25 points, 11 rebounds, 7 assists, and 2 steals in 32 minutes on Sunday, and even said after the game that he feels stronger than he’s felt in years past.

For the 76ers, everyone is available except for Joel Embiid

Joel Embiid has been ruled out of Game 2 after undergoing a successful emergency appendectomy surgery on April 9th. However, on Monday, the 76ers announced he had begun his strength and conditioning program.

Whether Embiid returns in the first round of the playoffs vs Boston remains to be seen.

NBA injury analyst Joel Stotts reported that the average time lost for in-season surgery is 23 days, while the median time lost is 18 days (meaning that half of the NBA players who have undergone appendectomy surgery have missed more than 18 days, while the other half have missed less than 18 days).

Say Embiid falls right in line with that 18-day mark; he’d return on April 27th. Game 3 is scheduled for Friday, April 24th, and Game 4 is scheduled for Sunday, April 26th.

The 76ers undoubtedly hope Embiid can make his return sooner rather than later, as Embiid has been crucial to Philadelphia this season. He’s averaged 26.9 points and 7.7 rebounds, while shooting 48.9% from the field. The 76ers were a much better team with him available — they were 24-14 with him (63.2% win rate) and 21-23 without him (a 47.7% win rate).

But for now, Philadelphia will continue to rely on Adem Bona and Andre Drummond to hold down the fort in the post.

The Atlanta Hawks overcame a double-digit deficit in the fourth quarter to even their best-of-seven series against the New York Knicks at Madison Square Garden on Monday night, taking a 107-106 victory. CJ McCollum led all scorers with 32 points while Jonathan Kuminga added 19 points off the bench. For the Knicks, Jalen Brunson scored 29 points with Karl-Anthony Towns adding 18 points.

The Hawks began this game with a change in approach, using Dyson Daniels to guard Karl-Anthony Towns, who similarly began the game guarding Daniels. In a physical affair in the first quarter, it was the Knicks who just exploited the Hawks’ lack of size and attacked on the offensive glass, scoring seven second chance points in the first quarter alone. The hosts established a double-digit lead in the first quarter but a strong start to the second quarter — with Towns and Brunson on the bench —saw the Hawks take a brief lead. Three-point shooting and capitalizing on New York turnovers contributed to this quick turnaround, but it did not last.

The Knicks re-took the lead and took a five-point lead into the second half, where a quick burst led by Josh Hart and Towns saw the Knicks re-establish their double-digit lead, running as high as 14 points. While the lead, at times, hovered in and around double-digits for much of the second half. Even as the fourth quarter arrived, the Knicks still held a double-digit lead having successfully kept the Hawks at arm’s length for the third quarter. Then, the tide began to shift.

The Hawks began to find success getting to the rim, in fact, converting all 11 of their attempts around the rim in the fourth quarter:

The Knicks had success earlier in the game lobbing to Mitchell Robinson, but when they try to run it again in the fourth it’s broken up by Kuminga and falls to Nickeil Alexander-Walker, who gets the ball to Corey Kispert, who finishes at the rim:

Working at the three-point line waiting for a hand-off, Onyeka Okongwu receives a great contribution from Gabe Vincent, who not only manages to push Mikal Bridges out of the way and sets the screen on Robinson which allows Okongwu to go from waiting for a hand-off option to being able to spot the opportunity and drive the ball himself to the rim for the dunk, leading to a quick New York timeout:

Vincent is involved again, this time in the pick-and-roll with Kuminga, who receives the ball and darts down the lane, rising effortlessly for the slam dunk:

The help defender for the Knicks here is OG Anunoby, who is quick to rotate but Kuminga quicker getting in the lane and with his athleticism, Anunoby quickly makes the executive decision to not contest this dunk.

The Knicks suffer another lapse at the rim, this time it’s Robinson who allows Okongwu to wander behind him, and Kuminga finds Okongwu for the easy lob:

Kuminga’s first half wasn’t brilliant, but he was excellent in the second half, and his strong played continued as he attacks Jordan Clarkson, getting into the lane, drawing the contact and hitting the hook shot, plus the foul:

Again faced with a mismatch in Jalen Brunson, Kuminga attacks him off of the dribble and gets to rim for the basket:

A good job of recognizing and attacking the mismatch, but a bad mistake for the Knicks to make to allow it to happen and lack of organization sorting their matchups out heading down the floor. It also marks one of many possessions where Brunson gets torched defensively.

For now, another basket on a mismatch, this time courtesy of Jalen Johnson, who takes it to the chest of Hart, and finishes off glass to reduce the Knicks lead further:

Now with the Hawks down by one point, the CJ McCollum show begins.

Having already had a strong game up to this point (particularly in the first quarter), McCollum got his run started as he puts Brunson on skates with the dribble move, and drives to the rim for the basket, lifting his layup high off of the glass to avoid Towns’ block attempt to give the Hawks their first lead since the second quarter:

In isolation this time beyond the three-point line, McCollum drives by Brunson with ease — who makes a poor attempt to stay in front of McCollum and then reach from behind — and rises into his runner to extend the Atlanta lead:

A three from Brunson ties the game at 103 apiece, and McCollum takes charge again. This time, he’s guarded by Anunoby, who does a much better job defending McCollum, following him towards the baseline after the screen from Okongwu. Despite Anunoby’s efforts, McCollum connects on the fadeaway jumper to return the lead to the Hawks:

While all of these baskets were important, arguably the most important one comes here, as Brunson is stripped by Alexander-Walker as he rises into the shot, and the turnover is created. Alexander-Walker finds Johnson, who streaks ahead and dunks at the rim, giving the Hawks a four point lead with 10 seconds remaining:

From trailing all of the way in the second half, the Hawks have rallied to take a two-possession lead with 10 seconds remaining and on course to steal Game 2. However, a quick three out of the timeout by Brunson and two missed free throws from McCollum put the game in doubt.

The Knicks elect not to take a timeout and push up the floor. They get the ball to Bridges, who rises near the corner amidst the contest of Johnson, and the ball hits the front of the rim. The game is over, and the Atlanta Hawks steal Game 2 on the road to even the series:

The Hawks shot 72% in the final quarter to outscore the Knicks 28-15, while the Knicks shot just 22% — 5-of-22 and 3-of-11 from three. An utter collapse on both ends of the floor for the Knicks, who couldn’t stop the Hawks at the rim, nor could find success through Brunson.

Postgame, the word ‘resilience’ was put forward to Hawks head coach Quin Snyder when describing the comeback, a sentiment he felt summarized their efforts in this game.

“I think that’s a great word to describe the night for us,” said Snyder postgame. “New York was dialed in and knocked us back at the beginning of the game. We were competing, we just needed to continue to raise our level and the guys did that. I just thought the way they fought and competed throughout the whole game, and then obviously, we’re able to make some plays late.”

Despite the Knicks clearly establishing themselves as the superior team for three quarters with the counting stats pointing in their favor (shooting 52% from the field, holding the Hawks to under 30% from three, scoring 22 second chance points through three quarters), the Hawks were, mostly, getting the shots they wanted up to that point.

“…I missed four wide-open threes, I missed a corner three, I missed a left wing three, I missed a left slot three, I missed a one-legged three at the end of the quarter, which is whatever,” McCollum listed. “Mo missed a left corner three, ‘JK’ missed a left-corner three, Nickeil missed a trail three, and he made a right corner three. We had possessions where guys that we wanted to shoot were shooting. We had a swing-swing to JJ, he pumped faked and shot a three at the end of the shot clock. Those are great possessions where we did what we said we wanted to do going into the game, and we just missed, and it’s a make-or-miss league.”

Despite the deficit, McCollum rallied the Hawks and encouraged them that they were never far away in this game.

“It’s a long game,” said McCollum. “I think with the experience and just watching so much basketball and playing in so many big moments, you know don’t get caught up in the possessions, don’t get caught up in misses, turnovers, fouls, good or bad. It’s a long game; you’ve got to play it to zero. The way the game is played now is so fast, there’s so many threes, there’s so many possessions. You always have a chance. So, I just told them we’ve just got to stay within one, two possessions, stay a punch away, and then we’ll throw the last punch.”

The Hawks produced multiple defensive stops in the fourth quarter which allowed them to build their run, founded upon their success at the rim.

“I think we just kept competing,” said Snyder of the fourth quarter defense. “Over the course of a game, if you don’t let up and you don’t give in to that, you have an opportunity to have more success late if you just hang in there. We know they’re such a good team and they’re so hard to guard offensively that I think our guys understand that when they do score, you just can’t get discouraged. You just need to keep trying to raise your level. We had a hard time on the defensive glass. Those plays can really be deflating but I thought we responded to those as well. We never quite figured it out, but we dug in in other aspects of the game.”

Let’s talk CJ McCollum now.

Hands up: I wrote before the series that I was concerned with the potential reliance on McCollum in the stretch versus Brunson and said there was a gap between the two players. I said it, and I still think it’s not an outrageous assessment, or concern, to hold, especially in a game where the Hawks’ top two options in Jalen Johnson and Nickeil Alexander-Walker struggled to make their usual impact.

However, I was wrong to be concerned about McCollum’s clutch play, because it’s just won the Hawks a playoff game that they probably fall short in otherwise. McCollum was brilliant down the stretch (free throws aside, which, had the Bridges shot gone in, we’d be having a very different conversation — it didn’t, so we aren’t) and took offensive responsibility when the Hawks needed it, with Alexander-Walker scoring nine points, and Johnson scoring 17 points after finding a better rhythm in the second half.

“I make the hard shots and miss the easy ones,” said McCollum of missing his free throws late. “I’m going to have to get in the gym and work on my wide-open free throws. Credit to JJ for getting back on defense and us doing enough to win but got to make those (free throws).”

McCollum scored 32 points on 12-of-22 shooting from the field, but it was his leadership which impressed Quin Snyder even more so.

“The things I really liked, I really liked CJ’s leadership as much as the shot making,” said Snyder. “I thought Nickeil and JJ, their recognition of how we were playing the game offensively and their selflessness in those situations. When they needed to make plays, they made plays too. But as I said, CJ’s leadership was really good with the ball in his hands and hopefully we can shoot better. But to win a game when you don’t shoot well sometimes is more gratifying than the other.”

The media narrative after the game focused on a new guard for the Knicks to center their ire on in the absence now of Trae Young; these were the first questions that were asked of McCollum after the game. I can’t say I’m a fan that this is the narrative chosen when there are other angles to take instead which also praise McCollum’s impact and clutch performance in the face of those who picked the Knicks to comfortably win this series (again, I’m guilty of this, for the sake of transparency), but it is something that has to be highlighted. This was McCollum’s response when asked in the opening question how he felt about being a villain and another guard who has drawn the ire of the Knicks crowd.

“I am no villain, I’m a nice guy with two kids and a wife,” McCollum replied postgame. “I think it’s admiration. Great, passionate fans in a really hostile environment. It’s fun, it’s basketball, it’s the playoffs. If anything, I think it’s a sign of respect.”

McCollum was asked further about playing to the animosity of the Knicks crowd, but didn’t play into it the narrative too much, outlining the respect he has for the Knicks and their fans, as well as playing in the Garden in the postseason.

“I love it, I love it,” added McCollum when asked about feeding off the animosity of the crowd. “It’s why we play the game. It’s fun being in opposing arenas and when the buzzer sounds, and it’s quiet and you walk off the court. I think there’s a level of mutual respect. It was a tough game against a good team on their home floor and they’re supposed to be passionate, and I think they do a great job of showing up consistently throughout the year. I’ve been to games in the Garden as a fan and watched, I’ve seen playoff games here. It’s a pleasure to be able to play here and it’s a pleasure to be able to walk off the court with a win.”

“CJ, that got him going, I think he enjoyed it,” added Jonathan Kuminga. “The crowd shouldn’t really do that or say that. I think that really got him going, I think it got all of us going, just the energy.”

McCollum’s efforts in the fourth quarter down the stretch will rightly be praised, but his shot-making in the first half I thought was equally important as it kept the Hawks in the game at a time where the Knicks could have begun to stretch away. In future games, the Hawks hope that Alexander-Walker and Johnson will have more offensive impact scoring the ball, but how comforting it must be for the Hawks to know that they can still win a playoff game on the road with neither Johnson or Alexander-Walker having great games, the Hawks shooting 30% from three, and the Knicks scoring 24 second chance points. The belief will have grown massively off of the back of this win, and McCollum has a very large role in that as the series now shifts to Atlanta.

Another reason the Hawks were able to pull off this victory was due to the play of Jonathan Kuminga off the bench. Kuminga scored 19 points on 7-of-12 shooting from the field, including seven in the fourth quarter as we looked at — a quarter where he played the entire 12 minutes.

Snyder acknowledged the contributions Kuminga made on offense, but praised his defensive contributions, too.

“He made some plays offensively that were great,” said Snyder of Kuminga. “I think you could just feel the way he competed on the defensive end. It was a huge lift for us, just his physicality, the way he defended the ball, the way he got to the glass, guarded Towns at times. On the offensive end he got us a few big buckets, too.”

Kuminga sensed that the Hawks’ energy was perhaps lower in the first half, and his objective was to play physically in order to change the tempo in the game.

“I think just setting the tone, mostly on defense,” said Kuminga of bringing the energy off the bench. “Being physical as much as I can, because I feel like our energy was a little bit lower because we wasn’t hitting shots that we usually make. There was something else that needed to be done, and I think it’s just the mindset coming out there, trying to engage all the guys and trying to be as physical as much as I can.”

Kuminga had some high energy defensive plays and leapt for loose balls that were heading out of bounds. His effort did not go unnoticed out on the floor. Offensively, he provided a big spark in the fourth taking it to the rim and exploiting the mismatches in front of him. Heading into the series, the Hawks needed strong performances like this from Kuminga to have a chance in swinging the bench battle and to have any chance winning this series they need these types of games from Kuminga. His efforts helped the Hawks win the bench battle 28-20.

Snyder was pleased not just with Kuminga’s contribution, but there were mentions for the other members of the bench.

“…We got some big plays from other guys,” added Quin Snyder. “I think everybody from Tony Bradley, when Mo went down, I thought Corey and Gabe, both off the bench, sparked runs. Two guys that are just really competitive and good basketball players. It was a team win.”

Quick-Hitters

This section is more dedicated to the other talking points of this game/series that we’ll discuss quickly.

Jalen Johnson had a difficult start to this game, scoring four points in the first half on 0-of-4 shooting before finishing with 17 points on 6-of-12 shooting. The ball went through Johnson more in the second half, and he was able to get to the rim and finish more in the second half. Overall, however, this was a pretty quiet Johnson game. This is his first postseason appearance as a leading star of the team, and first experience with all the nuances the postseason provides, and Quin Snyder described this particular process and how Johnson proceeds in this scenario where he has to give the ball up in certain situations as a matchup develops.

“I think him just keeping an even keel,” said Snyder of Johnson of the next step in the series. “As the game progressed, he found more of a rhythm. That’s hard to do than maybe coming out and having everything go your way. His ability to kind of grind through those situations, and when that happens and then the ball goes to CJ, or Nickeil’s in an action, that’s a big thing for Jalen to understand how important he is and how much we need his offense. But then for him to also be able to recognize there are certain times in the game where he’s playing more of a secondary role. That doesn’t happen as much, obviously, but that’s the playoffs.”

Speaking of the Hawks’ other leading scorer, Nickeil Alexander-Walker is having a much more difficult time of things offensively in the postseason compared to the regular season matchup with the Knicks. As we saw with McCollum in the fourth, this is what happens when you’re guarded by Brunson and not Mikal Bridges. McCollum was easily able to get by Brunson, and Alexander-Walker has had a much difficult time offensively with Bridges guarding him instead of Brunson — averaging 15 points per game on 30% shooting from the field, shooting 3-of-12 in Game 2. Bridges spent over seven minutes of game time guarding Alexander-Walker, holding him to 1-of-4 shooting in their Game 2 matchup.

Interestingly, OG Anunoby spent the majority of his defensive time on Okongwu, while Josh Hart took the Jalen Johnson assignment (guarding him for over nine minutes with Johnson shooting 5-of-8 when guarded by Hart), leaving Towns on Daniels. It was an interesting adjustment for the Knicks, and I imagine there may be another adjustment to take Brunson off of McCollum, who shot 83% when guarded by Brunson, all per NBA.com’s matchup stats. The next step, I have to imagine, involves Brunson guarding Daniels, and while this would require a reshuffling — potentially placing Anunoby back on Johnson, and Hart onto McCollum — I think it’s a logical place for New York to look next.

Elsewhere, the Hawks have a Dyson Daniels problem in this series. His playing time was limited last night due to foul trouble — and some questionable fouls at that — but offensively he hasn’t been able to get to his drive and spin moves where he can either score himself or create for others in the manner he’s used to — only two assists in Game 2. Daniels is already left alone to shoot threes, and at the beginning of the game Towns was guarding him and just can stands off him until Daniels gets to the paint, leaving Towns free to roam defensively and help elsewhere.

If Daniels isn’t even able to get inside himself or get to his spin/floater/kick-out, all he’s doing at the moment offensively is setting screens for others. While there’s definitely value in that — and it was seen to have success in the regular season matchup with the Knicks — it’s not enough offensively and creates a problem for the Hawks. These ball screens haven’t been able to free up Alexander-Walker as they did in the regular season to get downhill. Fortunately, Alexander-Walker was able to pick up the defensive responsibilities on Brunson (and did a fantastic job at the end of the game, and held Brunson to 4-of-9 from the field per NBA.com’s matchup tracking), and Kuminga was able to get to the rim and score, and make a couple of plays such as the Okongwu lob.

Game 3 is a big one going forward for Daniels in this series, and I suspect his playing time may decrease slightly going forward from an offensive perspective. Defensively, he’s still very important for what the Hawks want to do and for guarding Brunson, but offensively I wonder if the Hawks can find another way for Daniels to be involved. Right now, it’s a lob of probing and then hand-off/screen, and that’s mostly it. Speaking of defense very quickly, I thought this was a much better showing from Johnson, highlighted by his effort at the end of the game on the Bridges contest to seal the game.

The second chance scoring is still a massive problem for the Hawks, with Snyder even admitting afterwards the Hawks still have no answer for this and didn’t figure it out in Game 2. On a different night, this is the defining feature of a New York Knicks victory — 22 second chance points through three quarters is monumental in a playoff game, and the Hawks are very fortunate it didn’t cost them victory.

All in all though, a great road victory for the Hawks, and a collapse from the Knicks at home, who really ought to have wrapped this game up after their strong three quarters. There were some shots you look back in that, had they gone in, change the course of this game — two consecutive three-point attempts from Bridges in the fourth that looked like they were in spring to mind.

But I think for the Knicks, those really difficult shots that Jalen Brunson hit in the regular season with such consistency finally fell out, and he shot just 10-of-26 from the field. McCollum and Kuminga were excellent, and they led the way for the Hawks to take a famous playoff victory in New York and swing home court advantage in their favor.

Game 3 takes place on Thursday night at State Farm Arena, and it’s set to be an enthralling affair.

Until next time!

In a pregame press conference in Atlanta in late March, Joe Mazzulla said he never wanted to be asked about the Coach of the Year award again. 

“I don’t need it,” Mazzulla said. “I think it’s a stupid award. They shouldn’t have it. And it’s more about the players. It’s more about the work that the staff puts in. It’s just that simple. I really don’t ever want to be asked or talk about it again. It’s just that dumb. The players play. It’s about them. Staff work their ass off. I’m grateful to have them.”

I remember turning back to the national reporter who asked the question and chuckling. He hadn’t interfaced with Mazzulla as much as we on the Celtics beat had, and he had just experienced a classic Joe Mazzulla press conference moment that he likely knew was coming.

That Monday evening was far from the first time that Mazzulla had minimized the significance of that kind of honor – he’d downplayed several Coach of the Month awards throughout his four-year tenure as Celtics head coach – but it was the first time that it appeared almost certain that Mazzulla would be named Coach of the Year at the season’s end, after leading a “Gap Year” Celtics team to a 56-26 record.

Three weeks later, hours after Mazzulla was, in fact, named a finalist, Derrick White spoke about the award in definitive terms. 

“He doesn’t like the attention on him and making it about himself,” White said. “But, obviously, he has done an amazing job this year – and when he wins it, it’ll be well deserved.”

What does it actually mean to win an award in the NBA?

Awards dominate discourse in the NBA, particularly in April. But their significance is often diminished depending on when they’re announced and what happens in the postseason.

I always think back to Dirk Nowitzki winning the MVP in 2007, just days after his top-seeded Dallas Mavericks lost to the 8th-seeded Golden State Warriors in the first round of the playoffs. 

“It just feels so empty right now,” Nowitzki said a few days before collecting his hardware. In a league defined by championships, the highest regular season of all suddenly felt futile.

Coach of the Year is a particularly interesting award because, in recent years, it’s almost been cursed. 

Take a look at just the last few years. 

In 2023, Sacramento Kings head coach Mike Brown won the award.
In 2022, it was Phoenix Suns head coach Monty Williams.
In 2021, it was New York Knicks head coach Tom Thibodeau.
In 2020, it was Toronto Raptors head coach Nick Nurse.
In 2019, it was Milwaukee Bucks head coach Mike Budenholzer.
In 2018, it was Toronto Raptors head coach Dwane Casey. 

Every single one of those coaches was fired within four years. The most extreme example, Casey, was actually fired before he even collected the hardware. 

And Mazzulla is fully aware of that reality, of the fleeing nature of success, about how the next day, or next season, isn’t promised. He talks about it all the time.

“This could all change 24 hours from now, to where we’re having different conversations,” Mazzulla said Monday, with the Celtics holding a 1-0 series lead over the Philadelphia 76ers. “So it’s part of just the perspective of being rooted in something, regardless of the environment around you on a 24-hour cycle.”

Much of Mazzulla’s desire to deflect praise and recognition is rooted in his faith. He lights up at the podium as he discusses it.

“There are a bunch of better leaders that have gone through a lot before me – David, Solomon, those guys were much better than I was,” he said. “But they went through a lot of good and bad. I like studying those two the most. I flocked to David and Solomon. Good dudes struggled, had success. Guess we’re still talking about them though. But that won’t be me 2,000 years from now.”

Mazzulla has also acknowledged he hasn’t always been this way, calling back to his tenure at West Virginia University as a star basketball player.

“Being a Division I basketball player, you grow up with this sense of entitlement, as if the whole world revolves around you,” he said. “I had to, inherently, if I wanted to be a better husband, a better father, a better coach, I had to get rid of that type of entitlement.” 

That end result is what we see today.

Still, whether he likes it or not in this very moment, Mazzulla is on top of the world 

“Praise is just as dangerous as criticism,” he said. “You just have to remind yourself that neither one lasts too long. And really, at the end of the day, they’re gonna forget about you eventually. This is all just a short-term thing that’s gonna last a few years, and then 10-15 years from now, no one is gonna talk about it.”

I asked Mazzulla if he tries to impose that belief on his players – especially the young ones who are experiencing widespread praise for the very first time. Several, like Baylor Scheierman, Neemias Queta, and Jordan Walsh, have been inundated with praise as their public profile has risen this season.

It’s something Walsh spoke to last week as he reflected on the highs and lows of his own individual season.

“It’s so hard; one day, you have your name going crazy and everywhere, everybody’s talking about it and how good you’re doing, and the next day, it’d be silent and [you] have nothing, and you’re just kind of on the bench,” he said.

So, is the praise something Mazzulla hopes his players fight?

“Everybody’s different,” he said. “You just try to treat people the way that they need to be treated. Everyone has a different anchor, has a different approach, handles things differently. I don’t try to make guys believe or do things that they don’t want to do. It’s not who they are.”

What he will preach is the idea that it’s all about the team, all about a storied franchise that has won 18 banners, about the greats that came before this particular group.

“The whole idea of this thing is that everything’s bigger than us,” Mazzulla said. “We’re part of this organization. We have a responsibility and ownership to move it forward for however long we’re here. And we can’t – I can’t be good if I don’t have people around me that are good. And, we need each other. So it’s really just having an understanding of that. We need to have great people around you. It’s as simple as that. And, we’re very fortunate enough to have that. We’ll see where it takes us.”

It’s not often that Mazzulla goes this long on a topic, but this topic is one of the things he’s been most consistent about this season: it’s not about him, it’s not about any individuals, really. It’s about the organization. 

“I can’t be good if I don’t have people around me that are good.” 

You’ll hear lots of people around the Celtics organization saying that in various forms. The assistant coaches don’t want to take the credit. The front office doesn’t want to take the credit. I asked Mazzulla if the award would resonate a little bit more if it were more about the collective.

He nodded. 

“I would like for it to be changed to Staff or Organization of the year,” Mazzulla said. “If it were Staff of the Year, it’s different, if it were Organization of the Year – but at the end of the day, I haven’t made one basket all year. Our staff hasn’t made a basket. We haven’t gotten a block. We haven’t ran back on defense. We didn’t play in a back-to-back. We didn’t have to play hurt. We haven’t really done shit. So, if you don’t have the guys to be able to put you in position, it doesn’t really matter. I’m just grateful – the greatest gift I have is I get to coach a bunch of guys that care about winning and being a part of the culture that we have.”

On his way out of the press conference, one reporter jokingly reminded him that they did, in fact, get buckets – referencing the infamous preseason Coaches vs Media game, in which the Celtics coaches defeated us media members 57-4 in a 12-minute beatdown. 

That drew some laughs.

But, more seriously, Mazzulla has a valid point. The Celtics coaching staff consists of more than a dozen people. There’s also an athletic training staff, a nutrition team, and countless other people who are responsible for players’ success and development.

He’s the one who talks to the press before and after every game, but he represents a collective that keeps the wheels turning.

Payton Pritchard still believes the tone is set at the top.

“Joe just does an excellent job of holding everybody to a high standard and work ethic and showing up every day and just putting that time in,” Pritchard said. “It doesn’t matter if it’s training staff, weight room. Everybody knows their job, and they come in on a high level, and they produce every day. Even the player development staff, they’re on-court probably more than us, working their butt off. It definitely starts with Joe and the expectations he has and the standard that he holds people to.”

Here we go again!

The Philadelphia 76ers will take the floor at TD Garden once again on Tuesday in hopes of turning things around in this first-round playoff series against the Boston Celtics — or at least make it a little more competitive. The hosting Celtics come into Game 2 with a 1-0 series lead after absolutely demolishing the Sixers on Sunday afternoon without really having to break a sweat.

It was truly a disaster on Sunday afternoon, a perfect display of two teams and organizations that are simply on two different levels in basically every possible way — Boston came in with strategy and depth, while Philadelphia looked completely desperate and without a plan.

Pretty much everything that could go wrong or poorly for Philadelphia on Sunday did. The team shot just 38.9% from the floor and 4-for-23 from long range in the loss. Paul George had a truly rough-to-watch game in terms of effort and efficiency. Kelly Oubre Jr. was 0-for-5 from long range. The Sixers still don’t have a truly suitable backup center for Joel Embiid, with both Andre Drummond and Adem Bona floundering in an attempt to keep up with the Celtics.

But Tuesday is another day. Whether it changes the result remains to be seen, but one can only hope the Sixers are able to put up a little more of a fight. Even just a spoonful of fight. It can’t get worse than Sunday, can it? (That question is rhetorical, Sixers… please do not take it as a challenge.)

The Sixers are still without Embiid as he continues to recover from an urgent appendectomy surgery performed just under two weeks ago. On Monday, the team announced that the center had begun a strength and conditioning program as his healing continues. What this means in the short term is still relatively unknown. Embiid probably wouldn’t return to training so quickly post-surgery unless there was a chance he could return these playoffs, but the likelihood of him even having a chance to play again this season might be cut down if the Sixers were to go down 2-0 on Tuesday night. It now becomes a bit of a “will he, won’t he” matter for Embiid. Familiar territory, indeed.

Meanwhile, the Celtics are a healthy, full-strength squad looking to just continue what they were able to do on Sunday. The Sixers didn’t exactly give them any reason to change strategy. Boston never trailed for a single moment of Game 1. Jaylen Brown (26 points) and Jayson Tatum (25) led the squad per usual, but this was a widespread effort for the C’s with everyone able to get involved. They had six players score in double-digits, with 10 of the 13 players they utilized throughout the game scoring five or more points.

It’s very tough to write about, honestly. It’s truly not meant to be overly negative or “doomer.” It is simply that the Celtics are an organization playing a completely different, much more successful game than the Sixers. The evidence was clear as day on Sunday. That being said, fans can always hope that Philadelphia are able to steal a game away. It would very likely require much better shooting from the Sixers on top of a plethora of other factors: more contributions from Paul George and even Quentin Grimes, better performances from the backup fives, providing more help/screens to get Tyrese Maxey space with the ball, actual ball movement instead of forcing ISO ball repeatedly… I could go on, but I think we all get the picture.

At the time of writing, the Sixers are roughly a 14-point underdog. Do with that what you will. It’s going to take a lot to overcome. But, if all the right stars align, it’s always possible.

The Sixers and Celtics tip off for Game 2 at 7 p.m. ET.

Game Details

When: Monday, April 21, 7 p.m. ET
Where: TD Garden, Boston, MA
Watch: Peacock
Radio: 97.5 The Fanatic
Follow: @LibertyBallers

After the San Antonio Spurs handled the Portland Trail Blazers in the first playoff game of the Victor Wembanyama era, the two teams return for Game 2 tonight at 8 p.m ET. 

If you didn’t watch Game 1 or are just trying to refresh your mind ahead of some Game 2 wagering, you are in the perfect place!

Game 1 Recap

As many of us expected, the Trail Blazers did not merely rollover and die. Deni Avdija did a great job in his playoff debut – scoring 30 points on 63.5% true shooting while also tallying ten rebounds and five assists. But he and everyone else on the floor was on a completely different level than Wembanyama. 

The prodigious big man set a franchise record with 35 points in his postseason debut. That is a big deal considering this is the same organization that fostered the likes of Tim Duncan, David Robinson, Manu Ginobili, and Tony Parker.

More than scoring, Wembanyama’s presence in the paint made it nearly impossible for Portland to operate. In his minutes, Portland was held to a 102.9 offensive rating, which is over ten points lower (113.1) than their regular season offensive rating – that was already viewed as unimpressive (21st in NBA).

Game 2 Outlook

The current spread for this game is set at 11.5, meaning that you can bet on whether you think the Spurs will win by more than 11 points or less than 12 points and vice versa with the Blazers. 

As we said, the Spurs looked like the clearly superior team in Game 1. But the Blazers kept it close throughout, and San Antonio shot nearly 20% better from three than the Blazers on similar volume in Game 1. In the season, the two teams are separated by just 1.6% in that category. If that evens out a little (which you expect given the unusually large gap in this department), the game will be a lot more closely contested. 

The over/under for this contest is set at 220.5. Game 1’s total finished at 209, so oddsmakers think there will be more scoring tonight. 

According to the moneyline probabilities, FanDuel sees San Antonio as a heavy-favorite in Game 2. Their moneyline is listed at -700, giving them an 87.5% implied probability of victory. 

How to watch Spurs vs. Trail Blazers Game 2 of the 2026 NBA Playoffs

Date: April 21, 2026

Time: 7 p.m. ET

TV/Streaming: NBC/Peacock

Location: San Antonio, Texas