How the NBA’s most dangerous backcourt is learning each other on the fly

CLEVELAND, OH - APRIL 20: Donovan Mitchell #45 and James Harden #1 of the Cleveland Cavaliers hugs after the game against the Toronto Raptors during round one Game two of the 2026 NBA Playoffs on April 20, 2026 at Rocket Arena in Cleveland, Ohio. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2026 NBAE (Photo by Jeff Haynes /NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images

You can’t fake chemistry.

It’s an intangible thing that’s so vital to playing winning basketball, you almost wonder why it isn’t mentioned more often. You can’t win a championship without rapport and trust. For the Cleveland Cavaliers, fast-tracking the process of building that connection between Donovan Mitchell and James Harden was their biggest challenge entering the playoffs.

So far, so good. The Cavs’ backcourt has combined for a whopping 112 points through their first two games of the playoffs. Their seemingly innate chemistry has helped Cleveland jump out to a 2-0 series lead over the Toronto Raptors. But manifesting a genuine connection between two players that’s strong enough to withstand the intensity of playoff basketball is easier said than done.

That type of chemistry can take years to form — and this backcourt doesn’t have time to spare. Harden is in the final chapter of his career, while Mitchell is in his prime. They have to learn on the fly while their championship window is still open.

“I know we are behind,” said Harden. “So I think what speeds that process up is communication and helping each other out… I don’t even know how many games we’ve played together, so our communication during games, on practice days, is very important because that can get us over the hump.”

Harden joined the team in early February. Roughly two months before the postseason began. That left little time for integration. Maximizing every opportunity to learn something from each other is the only way they can pull this together.

“A lot of times in timeouts, we’ll spend two-thirds of the timeout us communicating amongst each other,” said Mitchell. “Just trying to make these adjustments and pick apart what we see.”

We saw a great example of this during Game 2 versus Toronto.

Mitchell had just put on a one-man show, dancing in isolation before drilling a difficult three-pointer. It was a beautiful shot, but not the highest quality attempt this offense can generate. As such, Harden went out of his way to tell Mitchell what he saw on that play — and where they can find something more sustainable.

“We always communicate what we see,” said Mitchell. “Even though I scored on that possession, to his point, there was an easier read that I didn’t see, but he saw.”

“That’s Donovan Mitchell… what he’s doing is spectacular,” said Harden about Spida’s shot-making. “But we can’t put ourselves in those positions; that’s the first step.”

It’s not easy to tell an All-Star player that the shot he just made wasn’t in the team’s best interest. You can only do that if you’ve built a sense of mutual respect and trust amongst each other. Cleveland’s backcourt has done the work to accomplish this in less than half a season.

“They’re in constant conversations about what’s going on out there,” said Kenny Atkinson. “In the huddle, they are de facto leaders.”

This communication extends to the defensive end, where being on the same page is significantly more important. While Harden isn’t known for his defense, he has nonetheless established himself as one of Cleveland’s most vocal defenders.

“The biggest thing with him is, he’s obviously an all-world offensive talent, but the one thing that jumps out at you is his communication about defense,” said Mitchell. “I’m over here in huddles talking about ‘hey, we need to do this offensively,’ and he’s like, ‘man, we just need three stops in a row.’”

Harden, who had 5 steals in Game 2, once again showed us an example of why being vocal is important. It was his adjustment mid-play that helped Mitchell come up with a steal in the fourth quarter. That type of leadership is why the Cavs wanted him on the roster.

“That’s part of the reason we traded for him,” said Atkinson. “Teams aren’t really picking on him because he’s smart, he’s big, and he’s savvy… the IQ, the hands, he’ll get beat, but then he’ll strip a guy from behind… he’s got a lot of nuance to his defensive game.”

Beating the Narratives

There’s a broader point to be made of this duo.

Both Mitchell and Harden have suffered similar shortcomings in the playoffs. They’ve fallen victim to the same narratives. Two dynamic shot creators who can’t get over the hump. High usage stars who will burn themselves out before going the distance. I’m sure you’re all familiar with the criticisms surrounding both players.

But they no longer have to do it all on their own. Working together as a duo might be what it takes to finally get that chip off their shoulders.

“I think Harden balances it,” said Atkinson. “I still get a little crazy with Don, like ‘Don pass the ball’ and then he goes and makes an incredible shot — it’s just finding that Michael Jordan maturity and balance. Just knowing when to [score], but I do think James being beside him helps a lot. It balances it out a little because Don realizes he doesn’t have to do it all himself.”

Cavs fans have seen Mitchell play the hero. It can be amazing to watch him leave it all on the floor — like when he scored 48 points to elevate an injury-riddled Cavalier team against the Indiana Pacers in Game 2 of last year’s playoffs. But those points came at a high cost to his body. All of the bruises he earned while attacking the basket took a toll. And by the end of the game, his exhaustion contributed to Cleveland blowing their lead in the closing minutes.

Now, Mitchell has a sidekick. If a defense is making it too costly for Mitchell to score, he can lean on Harden to take the pressure off him.

“There are a couple of times where Don’s in isolation, and they start crashing, and so he just throws it to James,” said Atkinson.

The effect goes both ways. Mitchell can suck in multiple defenders and dish it to Harden. Or Harden can warp the floor with his own playmaking to open gaps for Mitchell to attack. The two guards work in tandem to pose an impossible challenge for even a top-ranked defense like Toronto.

“You have a guy who can create for himself and others, it just makes it tough,” said Mitchell. “You have to figure out how to guard it. If he runs the pick-and-roll with Ev, do you help off me? Do you stay? There’s a trust level between the two of us and among the group.”

Trust is key. Mitchell has scored 30+ points in each game to open his series versus the Raptors. Neither effort took more than 25 field goal attempts — a mark he reached in four of five games against the Pacers last season. Harden, meanwhile, has totalled 50 points on just 32 field goal attempts across his first two playoff games with the Cavaliers.

Maintaining that balance will be the difference between a deep playoff run and another early exit.

“They’re selfless with each other because they’re on the same page and they want to get to that next level, that next step,” said Atkinson.

Rockets vs Lakers Computer Picks: Our Best Player Prop Projections for Game 2

Want to get more Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account here.

Our NBA player prop projections are locked and loaded for tonight's Game 2 matchup between the Houston Rockets and Los Angeles Lakers, with the model flagging several high-value opportunities.

By breaking down the data and stacking it up against current market lines, we’ve identified where the strongest edges lie.

These Rockets vs. Lakers predictions aren’t based on feel — they’re backed by the numbers.

If you’re building out your card, here are the model’s top NBA picks for Tuesday, April 21.

Rockets vs Lakers computer picks for Game 2

Rockets RocketsLakers Lakers
Sengun u18.5 points 
-105
James u24.5 points 
-112
Thompson o4.5 assists
-155
Hachimura o1.5 threes
-145
Smith Jr. o6.5 rebounds 
+100
Ayton u8.5 rebounds 
-135

Cash your ML bets quicker with bet365's early win payout!

Take advantage of the early win payout at bet365, where any pre-game NBA moneyline bet gets paid out as a winner if your team goes up by 20+ points!

Learn more about this feature, and all of bet365's offerings, with our comprehensive bet365 review!

Sign Up Now atimg src="https://img.covers.com/betting/sportsbooks/2/bet365.svg" alt="bet365" width="100" height="28" style="vertical-align: middle;"

21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER

Rockets Game 2 computer picks

Alperen Şengün Under 18.5 points (-105)

Projection: 18.1 points

The Houston Rockets could see a dip in scoring opportunities tonight, as they face the Los Angeles Lakers, who have played at the third-slowest pace at home over their last five games.

That sluggish tempo could limit chances for Alperen Şengün to clear his points prop in Game 2.

span style="font-size: 14px;"🔥/span spanBet sengun Now at bet365!/span

Amen Thompson Over 4.5 assists (-155)

Projection: 5.1 assists

Amen Thompson has gone Over his 4.5 assist line in seven of his last 10 games, and despite the matchup, there’s a clear path for him to get there again against the Lakers.

Thompson’s playmaking is heavily driven by his ability to collapse defenses with size and athleticism. At his position, he presents matchup problems — especially when he attacks downhill — which often forces the Lakers into help situations.

span style="font-size: 14px;"🔥/span spanBet thompson Now at bet365!/span

Jabari Smith Jr. Over 6.5 rebounds (+100)

Projection: 6.8 rebounds

The Rockets lead the league with 15.1 offensive rebounds per game this season, and Jabari Smith Jr. is in a position to take advantage on the glass by having gone Over in four of his last 10 games on a 6.5 rebound line.

span style="font-size: 14px;"🔥/span spanBet smith jr. Now at bet365!/span


Lakers Game 2 computer picks

LeBron James Under 24.5 points (-112)

Projection: 23.6 points

This season, opposing starting power forwards have shot just 21.7% from three against the Rockets — the lowest mark in the league — creating a challenging environment for LeBron James to clear his points prop tonight.

On top of that, the Lakers could see fewer possessions overall, as Houston plays at the second-slowest pace in the league this season, which could limit scoring volume in this matchup.

span style="font-size: 14px;"🔥/span spanBet james Now at bet365!/span

Rui Hachimura Over 1.5 threes (-145)

Projection: 2.1 3-pointers

The Lakers have been the league’s most efficient three-point shooting team over their last five games, and that hot perimeter form sets up a favorable shooting environment in this matchup against the Rockets.

When Houston is on the road, opposing starting small forwards have averaged 2.4 made threes per game—the third-highest mark in the NBA this season—creating a strong spot for Rui Hachimura to stay active from beyond the arc and potentially clear his Over.

span style="font-size: 14px;"🔥/span spanBet Hachimura Now at bet365!/span

Deandre Ayton Under 8.5 rebounds (-135)

Projection: 7.4 rebounds

The Lakers have struggled on the offensive glass at home, ranking last in offensive rebounding over their previous 20 games, which has limited second-chance opportunities and, in turn, impacted Deandre Ayton’s production on the boards.

That trend aligns with his recent form as well, with Ayton finishing Under his 8.5 rebound line in seven of his last ten games.

span style="font-size: 14px;"🔥/span spanBet ayton Now at bet365!/span

How to watch Trail Blazers vs Spurs Game 2

LocationCrypto.com Arena, Los Angeles, CA
DateTuesday, April 21, 2026
Tip-off10:30 p.m. ET
TVNBC/Peacock

Not intended for use in MA.
Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.

This article originally appeared on Covers.com, read the full article here and view our best betting sites or check out our top sportsbook promos.

Why Stephen A. Smith missed ‘First Take’ after Knicks collapse

An image collage containing 2 images, Image 1 shows Stephen A. Smith speaking at the 2025 HOPE Global Forum, Image 2 shows Mike Brown and the Knicks collapsed on Monday night
Mike Brown and the Knicks collapsed on Monday night.

Watching the Knicks Monday night was like having your teeth pulled – and Stephen A. Smith apparently feels that pain literally.

The enigmatic Knicks fan and host of ESPN’s “First Take” was absent his usual post, where he would surely be laying into his favorite team after an embarrassing 107-106 collapse to the Atlanta Hawks.

“This is truly a sad day for me,” Smith posted on X on Tuesday morning after he was unable to make it to the show. “Bad enough I had to miss @FirstTake because of this damn dental procedure, but to miss the show when BOTH my boys — @KendrickPerkins AND @RealMikeWilbon — are IN-STUDIO…..on a day I was scheduled to be IN-STUDIO…..I almost cried! Love my boys. You, too, @shaepeppler. Damn this sucks. See y’all tomorrow! “

Stephen A. Smith wasn’t present for his usual spot on ESPN First Take. Getty Images

It seems that a toothache has become the latest source of pain for Smith, though the Knicks certainly contributed as well after leading by 12 points to start the fourth quarter before their offense went stale and they blew it at the Garden.

The loss evened the first-round series with the Hawks at 1-1, as blown leads have become the story for the team over the past two playoff runs despite changing coaches between seasons.

Smith, whenever he does return to the air, will surely be calling for head coach Mike Brown to figure out how to break the offense’s stagnation and knock down open looks.

He may also point out that Brown called a timeout with 2:43 left in the fourth quarter, which eventually left the team without a timeout on the game’s final possession.

Mike Brown and the Knicks collapsed on Monday night. Charles Wenzelberg / New York Post

The Knicks fired coach Tom Thibodeau last offseason, citing his inability to get this team over the hump to a title contender.

The Knicks and Hawks play next on Thursday in Atlanta, with Smith likely having figured out to key to victory well before tip-off.

The Timberwolves Rescued a Season on the Brink

DENVER , CO - APRIL 20: Anthony Edwards (5) of the Minnesota Timberwolves reacts to being called for a traveling violation during the second quarter against the Denver Nuggets at Ball Arena in Denver, Colorado on Monday, April 20, 2026. (Photo by AAron Ontiveroz/The Denver Post) | Denver Post via Getty Images

DENVER – On Monday night at Ball Arena, the Minnesota Timberwolves and Denver Nuggets added another thrilling chapter to one of the best rivalries in the NBA.

Game 2 started incredibly rough for the Timberwolves. Their defense got picked apart from beyond the arc, including an incredible four and-1 fouls on 3-pointers in just the first quarter. The offense was equally lifeless, with little to no purpose to their actions on the court.

“We came into the game trying to shoot dumb shots,” Timberwolves Head Coach Chris Finch explained. “They were a step ahead of us in everything. We were a little slow defensively, and things settled down. We just chipped into the lead slowly. I was particularly pleased with the way that we kind of just didn’t try to get it all back in one or two possessions. Sometimes we have a habit of doing that, but guys did a really good job.”

The Timberwolves fell down by as many as 19 points early in the second quarter. The series and the Timberwolves season seemed to be teetering on the brink of collapse as the weight of a long NBA schedule and a recent stretch of injuries to Anthony Edwards and Naz Reid, among others, appeared to be dragging them down.

The Wolves had a choice in that moment. They could have let go of the rope, played out the string the rest of the series, booked their flights to Cancun, and let go of a season that has largely been a disappointment.

A lesser group would have made that choice. Instead, the Wolves fought back.

“Just coming together, staying poised within those moments,” Edwards said. “I think they was up like, what, 15, 16 [points], just trying to make runs, get defensive stops. We was on one cord, I feel like on the defensive end tonight, especially once they went on those runs.”

The run started in the second quarter when Edwards, pushing through his nagging knee injury, scored 13 points in the frame, including a pair of 3-pointers and multiple drives to the rim for layups and free throws.

It was the first time in the series that the real Anthony Edwards showed up. With his right knee still hampering him, Edwards pushed through and led the Wolves on a 39-12 run that completely changed the tone of the game.

“Definitely uplifts me,” Julius Randle said with Edwards sitting next to him at the podium. “I feel like I can’t let him down. If he’s out there battling, then there’s no excuse why I can’t get my best and make the extra effort plays and just go out there and compete at the highest level. So it definitely energizes me. It makes me want to be on my best game.”

Randle himself, after an especially poor Game 1, gave the Wolves exactly what they needed in Game 2, giving Minnesota the proper mix of playmaking bully-ball game in the paint. He finished the game with 24 points, nine rebounds, six assists, and only a single turnover.

It wasn’t just Minnesota’s offense that rose to the occasion after a horrendous first quarter; it was the defense, too. Rudy Gobert was forced to sit much of the second and third quarters with foul trouble, but when he returned to the court in the fourth quarter, he dominated.

In the fourth quarter, Gobert held Nikola Jokić to just one make on seven shot attempts. Gobert took the one-on-one defensive assignment and shut down a three-time MVP.

The praise for Gobert poured in after the game, “He was phenomenal,” Finch said. “Surviving the foul trouble, just playing his defense before the catch, after the catch. Challenging everything. It’s hard as heck to guard those guys.”

Randle also spoke about Gobert’s impact on Game 2.

Gobert this week was not selected as a top-three finalist for Defensive Player of the Year, finishing in fourth place for the award. Gobert, with a smirk, referenced his DPOY when answering a question about shutting down Jokić; “I was lucky. A top-three defender cannot do that. So I was lucky.”

The dagger for the Timberwolves came from Donte DiVincenzo. With the Wolves up by one with just over a minute left, the Nuggets double-teamed Edwards, who found DiVincenzo just one pass away for the 3-pointer to put Minnesota up by four.

“I love Dante,” Edwards remarked. “I told him after the game he got gorilla nuts. He’s willing to take any kind of shot at any moment of the game, no matter how far it is.” DiVincenzo finished with 16 points, including four 3-pointers, while sporting a team high +20.

Donte explained what allowed him to be successful in his Game 2 minutes: “Kinda just focusing on the little things. Loose balls. Getting my hands on stuff. Disrupting their rhythm of plays. That half a second where you’re disrupting the play, Jaden gets back in front, Rudy gets back in front. And then they make or miss.”

Following a Jokić dunk and a split pair of free throws from Christian Braun, Randle knocked down a two free throws to put Minnesota up by three with 18 seconds left. Jamal Murray subsequently took a head-scratching long two that rimmed out, which led to a leak out dunk by DiVicenzo to salt the game away.

Jaden McDaniels, like Gobert with Jokić, did a fantastic job guarding Murray down the stretch of the game. Murray went 1-5 from the field in the fourth quarter. Combined, the usually deadly combo of Jokić and Murray shot 2-12 in the final frame.

The comments from McDaniels after the game were not focused on the Denver offense, but their defense, or the lack thereof.

Most NBA players would never say publicly what McDaniels did. They would care too much about what other people thought and not have the confidence to back it up when the opponent inevitably responds.

Not Jaden. He so clearly does not care what other people think of him or his team. He is willing to say when he thinks a defender is trash because he, in fact, believes it.

McDaniels scored 14 points in Game 2, all of which came in or around the paint. McDaniels clearly feels he has an advantage offensively near the rim and attacked that Monday night.

Game 2 was a perfect encapsulation of this era of Timberwolves basketball. Just when it feels like they are teetering on the edge of disaster, they play their best basketball. There could not have been many people who believed they could pull that game out, and just minutes later, they had taken the lead.

The unfortunate aspect of the Wolves is that the opposite is just as often true. Just when it feels like they are ready to get on a roll, they let go of the rope and go into a slump. Trying to predict when these ebbs and flows will take place has been impossible during this up-and-down but ultimately disappointing 49-win regular season.

The Wolves saved their season Monday night in Denver. There’s no doubt they are capable of that type of performance again, but now, it’s up to them to repeat that level of play at least three more times and potentially beyond.

We’ll see if they can do it Thursday night at Target Center for Game 3, where the crowd is sure to be rocking.

Knicks Game 2 players and coach grades

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - APRIL 20: Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks reacts after being knocked to the floor against the Atlanta Hawks during game two of the Eastern Conference first round NBA playoffs at Madison Square Garden on April 20, 2026 in New York City. (Photo by Al Bello/Getty Images) | Getty Images

Jalen Brunson: C-

The 29 points and seven assists will be what people see, and the box score-watchers will say he had a solid game. But anybody watching the game can tell you that he did not. Not only did he shoot just 10-26 from the field and 5-7 from the free-throw line, he took his matchup against Dyson Daniels and the back-and-forth against CJ McCollum too personally and sabotaged the offense by trying to play hero ball. That led to most of his 26 shot attempts being contested and forced, which in turn took his teammates out of rhythm. And when he wasn’t overly focused on trying to get up another shot attempt, he also committed two live-ball turnovers down the stretch.

That alone might not have cost the game, but it came close. And he compounded those mistakes by getting absolutely torched by CJ McCollum on the other end. The veteran guard was very intentional in seeking Brunson out, and the Knicks captain put up little to no resistance. The game was still a team loss at the end of the day, but Brunson deserves the most individual blame for blowing what should’ve been a relatively easy win.

Josh Hart: B+

Josh Hart shot 1-5 from three, and that’s less than ideal. If he makes even one of those, the feelings around this series might be completely different. That being said, Hart was everywhere in that dominant first quarter. He continues to do a very commendable job defending a bigger and more athletic Jalen Johnson while also going right at him in transition. He also led the team in rebounds for the second straight game with 13. Hart could’ve played better, but as the team leader in plus-minus, he was far from the reason they lost.

Mikal Bridges: B-

Mikal Bridges came out of the gates aggressive, which is usually a very good sign for him and the Knicks. But the problem remains his ability, or lack thereof, to remain aggressive and engaged. Part of that is on the coaching staff and Brunson, but part of it also falls on him. Bridges faded into obscurity on the offensive end as the game went on and had a very tough stretch, going 0-3 in the final period. He missed two open threes that would’ve swung the momentum of the game and missed the game-winner.

The only thing saving Bridges from a lower grade is the defense he has played thus far. For the second straight game, Bridges has shut down Nickeil Alexander-Walker, who is now averaging just 13 PPG and shooting just 9-29 from the field.

OG Anunoby: B+

This was a difficult one to grade. OG Anunoby started out the game playing very well. He was aggressive going to the basket when he needed to be, made two out of the four threes he took, and was great on the boards once again, all while playing his usual standout defense. But it’s hard not to penalize Anunoby’s grade for the free throws he missed in crunch time and for going four for eight on the night.

Karl-Anthony Towns: B+

18 points and eight rebounds doesn’t sound like an amazing game. And one can argue that he could’ve been more aggressive in demanding the ball in the fourth quarter. But I, as have others, have loved the way Karl-Anthony Towns is playing right now. He’s looked incredibly confident and comfortable when featured in the offense, doing a great job of being both decisive and patient. The three turnovers aren’t ideal, but him taking 14 fewer shots than Brunson is much more on the point guard and Mike Brown than it is on him.

On top of that, the big man is also playing some of the best defense we’ve seen him play. He followed up his three-block, one-steal Game One performance with another two blocks.

Mitchell Robinson: A-

Is there anything more we can say about Mitchell Robinson at this point? His plus-minus looks at a team-worst -10, but that is partly a product of him playing with some very questionable lineups. For most of the 18 minutes he was on the court, he looked great, grabbing seven rebounds and scoring 13 points on 6-6 from the field while also making one of his two free-throw attempts.

Deuce McBride: F

Not all of McBride’s F grade is on him. He seems to still be partially bothered by his sports hernia injury, and Brown did him no favors by inserting him as the point guard and the lone ball-handler and creator in some of the 13 minutes he played. But boy, did Deuce McBride look bad last night. It was maybe the worst he has looked since being a rotation mainstay. His shot, when he can even find one, looked off, and he did not handle the perimeter ball pressure well whatsoever. Regardless of the reason, he simply needs to be better if the Knicks want to get to the Finals, let alone beat this Hawks team.

Jordan Clarkson: B+

Jordan Clarkson continues his career-reinvention tour with another good game. I can’t say I remember any other bench microwave scorer turning himself into a player whose game is centered around hustle, ball pressure, and offensive rebounding. It’s safe to say Clarkson has gained the trust of Brown (rightfully so) and has also bought his career more time as well. Good on Clarkson. If the Knicks want to win this series, they’ll likely need him to continue being who he has become.

Landry Shamet: F

Landry Shamet may still be dealing with knee soreness, and Brown misused Shamet, like he did with McBride. But that doesn’t excuse Shamet either. Through two games, the veteran guard has looked like a shell of his regular season self. Maybe the veteran’s regular season performance tempered the fanbase’s expectations, but they can’t keep playing him this much if he can’t make, let alone find, shots out there. It’s hard to confidently say he should be benched without seeing him play with Brunson and/or Towns more, but I also can’t say his leash should be very long. The Knicks need at least one of him or McBride to show up. On Monday night, neither did.

Jose Alvarado: B

Jose Alvarado didn’t play in Game One, and nobody was questioning the decision. Such is the case when you win. Had they lost, that might’ve been a different scenario. But after the bench unit struggled with ball handling in the second quarter, the New York native got his first playoff minutes, and he did not disappoint. While his stats leave a lot to be desired, he was tied for the second-highest plus-minus with a plus five in just nine minutes. He provided the Knicks with some much-needed playmaking and energy. I’m still not certain just how much playing time he should get, but with Shamet and McBride struggling the way they have, there’s a case for him to play a little more.

Mike Brown: F

If grades could go below Fs, I think Mike Brown would deserve it. Players have a larger impact on the game than coaches do, and if they had made more shots, turned the ball over less, and defended better, they would’ve won the game. But some of those things aren’t always controllable. Do you know what is, though? Coaching decisions. Despite the starters coming into the game with the lead, Brown’s decision to go without his two best players for such a long stint was inexplicable. One, he hasn’t even used those lineups much, and two, they haven’t statistically been great. To experiment in what is the most important game up to this point in the season just makes no sense.

Brunson’s lackluster play, the missed free throws, and CJ McCollum’s heroics played a part in the loss, but Brown shot himself and the team in the foot and arguably coached his worst game of the season in the process.

Suns vs Thunder Prediction, Picks & Odds for NBA Playoffs Game 2

Want to get more Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account here.

The Oklahoma City Thunder are not worried about this first-round series. Nor should they be.

Frankly, the Phoenix Suns might not be worried, either. They can see the writing on the wall.

My Suns vs. Thunder predictions and NBA picks expect at least one piece of Phoenix’s rotation to go down swinging, hopefully more figuratively than literally, in Game 2 on Wednesday, April 22.

Suns vs Thunder prediction

Suns vs Thunder best bet: Dillon Brooks Over 17.5 points (-110)

Here comes desperation. Not from the Oklahoma City Thunder, of course, but from the Phoenix Suns.

Losing Game 1 by 35 should make the Suns’ plight rather clear. A similar beatdown in Game 2 would create an absolutely deflated atmosphere in Phoenix for Game 3 on Saturday.

No one will embody that desperation more openly than Dillon Brooks. He has never been known for concealing his emotions.

Brooks already chucked plenty in Game 1, partly out of necessity. Phoenix knows it is out-gunned. It needs its backcourt of Brooks, Devin Booker, and Jalen Green to get hot and stay out, and even then, the Suns may not have enough.

Thus, Brooks went 6-for-22 from the field for 18 points. As inefficient as that may be, it is simply what Phoenix needs.

Counting Game 1, Brooks has cleared this modest prop in three of his last five games, averaging 18.2 points. Perhaps more pertinently, he has taken 14.8 shots per game. That latter number should stay elevated in this series, for better or for worse, thus elevating Brooks’s scoring output.

Suns vs Thunder same-game parlay

Oklahoma City knows the only way it loses this series is if Booker goes thermo-nuclear for four games. Getting the ball out of his hands should always be the Thunder’s priority, creating logic to back Brooks while fading Booker.

And if Oklahoma City can dictate those terms, it will stifle Phoenix’s offense to such an extent that this game cannot come near its total.

Suns vs Thunder SGP

  • Dillon Brooks Over 17.5 points
  • Devin Booker Under 23.5 points
  • Under 215

Our "from downtown" SGP: SGA's Easy Living

Why should Shai Gilgeous-Alexander play extended minutes when Oklahoma City is likely to be up by two dozen points early in the third quarter? The Thunder led by 21 at halftime in Game 1 and by 31 after the third quarter, part of why the presumptive MVP played only 29 minutes and scored only 25 points.

Sure, his postseason free-throw shooting could push his points tallies higher. Gilgeous-Alexander took 18 field goals in Game 1 and 17 free throws. Judge that as you should. But even with that foul-baiting, SGA still came more than a bucket short of this prop, simply because he did not need to pour it on.

Suns vs Thunder SGP

  • Thunder First Half -10
  • Thunder -17
  • Under 215
  • Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Under 29.5 points

Suns vs Thunder odds for Game 2

  • Spread: Suns +17 (-110) | Thunder -17 (-110)
  • Moneyline: Suns +1100 | Thunder -2200
  • Over/Under: Over 215 (-110) | Under 215 (-110)

Suns vs Thunder betting trend to know

Oklahoma City has gone 4-1 against the spread at home in the first round across the last three postseasons. Find more NBA betting trends for Suns vs. Thunder.

How to watch Suns vs Thunder Game 2

LocationPaycom Center, Oklahoma City, OK
DateWednesday, April 22, 2026
Tip-off9:30 p.m. ET
TVESPN

Suns vs Thunder latest injuries

Not intended for use in MA.
Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.

This article originally appeared on Covers.com, read the full article here and view our best betting sites or check out our top sportsbook promos.

Thunder star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander wins NBA Clutch Player of the Year

Thunder star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander wins NBA Clutch Player of the Year originally appeared on NBC Sports Boston

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is officially clutch.

The Oklahoma City Thunder star was named the 2025-26 NBA Clutch Player of the Year on Tuesday, adding to his growing list of accolades.

The NBA defines clutch time as the final five minutes of the fourth quarter or overtime in close games, with the award starting in 2022-23. The 27-year-old Gilgeous-Alexander led the NBA with 175 total clutch points and 6.5 points per game in that period this season.

He also made an NBA-leading 16 go-ahead field goals in clutch time.

Denver Nuggets guard Jamal Murray and Minnesota Timberwolves star Anthony Edwards were the other two finalists for the honor.

Ninety-six first-place votes went Gilgeous-Alexander’s way, good for 484 total points. Murray finished second in the running, one total point above Edwards. Neither received a first-place vote, though.

New York Knicks star Jalen Brunson, who won the award last season, received two first-place votes.

Gilgeous-Alexander was at the heart of Oklahoma City’s 64-18 regular-season record, which landed the team the Western Conference’s No. 1 seed as it seeks a repeat championship.

The Toronto, Canada native won league MVP, Finals MVP and the scoring champion award last season. He’s also a four-time All-Star and three-time All-NBA First Team recipient.

Gilgeous-Alexander is back in the mix for league MVP again this season, along with Nuggets center Nikola Jokic and San Antonio Spurs star Victor Wembanyama, who unanimously won Defensive Player of the Year on Monday.

Thunder star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander wins NBA Clutch Player of the Year

Thunder star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander wins NBA Clutch Player of the Year originally appeared on NBC Sports Philadelphia

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is officially clutch.

The Oklahoma City Thunder star was named the 2025-26 NBA Clutch Player of the Year on Tuesday, adding to his growing list of accolades.

The NBA defines clutch time as the final five minutes of the fourth quarter or overtime in close games, with the award starting in 2022-23. The 27-year-old Gilgeous-Alexander led the NBA with 175 total clutch points and 6.5 points per game in that period this season.

He also made an NBA-leading 16 go-ahead field goals in clutch time.

Denver Nuggets guard Jamal Murray and Minnesota Timberwolves star Anthony Edwards were the other two finalists for the honor.

Ninety-six first-place votes went Gilgeous-Alexander’s way, good for 484 total points. Murray finished second in the running, one total point above Edwards. Neither received a first-place vote, though.

New York Knicks star Jalen Brunson, who won the award last season, received two first-place votes.

Gilgeous-Alexander was at the heart of Oklahoma City’s 64-18 regular-season record, which landed the team the Western Conference’s No. 1 seed as it seeks a repeat championship.

The Toronto, Canada native won league MVP, Finals MVP and the scoring champion award last season. He’s also a four-time All-Star and three-time All-NBA First Team recipient.

Gilgeous-Alexander is back in the mix for league MVP again this season, along with Nuggets center Nikola Jokic and San Antonio Spurs star Victor Wembanyama, who unanimously won Defensive Player of the Year on Monday.

Billy Donovan leaves Chicago Bulls: Could return to college basketball be on table?

CHICAGO, IL - APRIL 5: Head Coach Billy Donovan of the Chicago Bulls looks on during the game against the Phoenix Suns on April 5, 2026 at United Center in Chicago, Illinois. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2026 NBAE (Photo by Jeff Haynes/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images

On Tuesday, it was announced by Shams Charania of ESPN that Billy Donovan would be stepping down as head coach of the Chicago Bulls after six seasons. The decision was surprising, as Bulls management reportedly wanted Donovan to return.

Before his time in Chicago, Donovan became the head coach of the Oklahoma City Thunder after spending 19 years leading the Florida Gators. In his final college season (2014–15), Florida went 16–17 before Donovan made the jump to the NBA.

Since 2024, Donovan has been mentioned as a candidate to return to the college ranks. After John Calipari left to become the head coach at Arkansas, there were rumors that Donovan could leave the Bulls to take over at Kentucky.

That did not happen, as Kentucky wasn’t willing to wait and hired Mark Pope instead.

More recently, after Hubert Davis was let go by North Carolina, the Tar Heels made a run at Donovan before settling on Mike Malone.

Now, after a disappointing season, Kentucky is entering a pivotal stretch under Pope. If things do not improve, the program could consider a change after his third season. Should Donovan remain available, he could once again emerge as a potential candidate to finally take over in Lexington after previous opportunities did not materialize.

Fantasy Basketball: Anthony Davis, Giannis among preseason rankings 'misses'

A fun exercise in the aftermath of a fantasy basketball season is to look back on the preseason rankings and figure out which players lived up to the expectations and which ones did not. While some of the "misses" may not affect how a player is viewed for the next season, that isn't the case across the board. Below are some of our misses based on the preseason Top-200 rankings that we released in October.

NBA: Utah Jazz at Los Angeles Lakers
In addition to actual free agents, some player option situations will significantly affect fantasy basketball this summer.

F/C Anthony Davis, Washington Wizards

Preseason rank: 6

Even with Davis coming off a 2024-25 season in which he appeared in 51 games, the belief that he could flourish in Dallas led to him being placed within the top-10 of our preseason rankings. To say that things didn't go to plan would be a severe understatement. Injuries limited Davis to 20 games, all of which were played before the Mavericks traded him to the Wizards.

And it would not be until the final week of the regular season that Washington dropped the charade and announced that Davis would not play. Between the injury history and not knowing how he'll fit into a rotation that includes Trae Young, Alex Sarr and Kyshawn George, there's no way that Davis can be ranked this high in the 2026-27 preseason rankings.

F Giannis Antetokounmpo, Milwaukee Bucks

Preseason rank: 5

After appearing in 61 games or more in each of his first 12 seasons, Antetokounmpo played 36 for the Bucks this season. Thanks to two separate calf strains and a knee injury that was the source of much controversy late in the season, he was unable to make good on the first-round expectations. Also, when Giannis was on the floor, his production took a noticeable hit. While averages of 27.6 points, 9.8 rebounds, 5.4 assists, 0.9 steals and 0.7 blocks certainly aren't bad, Antetokounmpo's numbers decreased in four of those categories compared to the 2024-25 season.

Also, the trade rumors never subsided, and that will be one of the NBA's major offseason storylines. He and the Bucks can't agree to an extension until October 1; does Milwaukee look to move Giannis before then? Or do they hold out hope that something can be done? How the front office approaches this situation will undoubtedly affect how Antetokounmpo is valued in fantasy basketball.

F/C Pascal Siakam, Indiana Pacers

Preseason rank: 23

With no Tyrese Haliburton (Achilles), we expected Siakam's usage to see a significant boost, leading to increased production. Siakam's scoring average did increase by nearly four points per game, but his other averages remained about the same compared to his 2024-25 production. And that was with a career-high usage percentage of 30.1. Add in Siakam being limited to 62 games, and the result was the veteran forward finishing outside of the top-100. However, this may set up Spicy P to be undervalued in drafts for the 2026-27 season, especially with Haliburton expected to be back in the fold.

F Cameron Johnson, Denver Nuggets

Preseason rank: 69

Even though his usage was expected to decrease with the move from Brooklyn to Denver, there was an expectation that Johnson's category league value would remain fine due to the opportunity to play alongside better talent. Unfortunately, he struggled with his shot early on and saw significant declines in points (12.2 ppg, down from 18.8 in 2024-25) and three-point attempts (4.7 per game, down from 7.2 in 2024-25).

Johnson missing over a month with a hyperextended right knee didn't help either, even though he had some productive nights in the final month of the regular season. While the per-game value wasn't terrible, Johnson's points league value took a significant hit with the move to Denver, even though he was able to join a championship contender.

G Cam Thomas, Free Agent

Preseason rank: 80

With Thomas heading into a contract year, the feeling was that he would be able to put up big numbers for the rebuilding Nets. That didn't happen. Another hamstring injury sidelined him for over six weeks, and the Nets managed his minutes closely upon the guard's return. The fit was poor, ultimately leading to Thomas being waived right after the trade deadline.

Milwaukee decided to kick the proverbial tires, and while there were a few positive performances early on, the Bucks would eventually waive Thomas in late March. By this point, many fantasy managers had already moved on, but the top-100 preseason ranking not materializing stung. And at this point, it's unknown what kind of deal or role Thomas will be able to find in free agency this summer.

G/F Kon Knueppel, Charlotte Hornets

Preseason rank: 199

Regarding Knueppel's preseason ranking, we may have put too much in his Summer League performance. The rookie wing struggled some in Las Vegas, but had no such issues once the games truly counted. A finalist for Rookie of the Year, Knueppel averaged 18.5 points, 5.3 rebounds, 3.4 assists, 0.7 steals and 3.4 three-pointers per game, providing top-100 value in points and category leagues. Those who were able to wait until the later rounds to draft Knueppel wound up with an absolute steal, and he has the skill set to offer excellent fantasy value for years to come.

G Nickeil Alexander-Walker, Atlanta Hawks

Preseason rank: Not ranked

At the time of his signing with the Hawks, Alexander-Walker appeared poised to fill a bench role slightly bigger than the one he held in Minnesota. He would move into the starting lineup within the first week of the regular season, and Trae Young's knee injury before his move to Washington opened the door for Alexander-Walker to remain there. In 78 games, NAW averaged 20.8 points, 3.4 rebounds, 3.7 assists, 1.3 steals and 3.2 three-pointers while shooting 45.9 percent from the field and 90.2 percent from the foul line. Not ranking Alexander-Walker may have been the biggest "miss," especially considering his production.

G Ryan Rollins, Milwaukee Bucks

Preseason rank: Not ranked

Rollins was another player who did not make the cut for the preseason top-200, even with the Bucks needing perimeter production in the aftermath of Damian Lillard's exit. Appearing in 74 games, he recorded career-high averages in points, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks and three-pointers. Rollins made 67 starts and had the look of a player who can be valuable to fantasy managers in 2026-27, regardless of what happens with Antetokounmpo. He won't be unranked when the preseason rankings for next season drop, that's for sure.

Trail Blazers vs Spurs Computer Picks: Our Best Player Prop Projections for Game 2

Want to get more Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account here.

Our NBA player prop projections are locked in for tonight’s Game 2 showdown between the Portland Trail Blazers and San Antonio Spurs, with the model highlighting several high-value spots across the board.

By breaking down the data and comparing it to current market lines, we’ve pinpointed where the strongest edges appear.

These Trail Blazers vs. Spurs predictions aren’t based on narrative or intuition; they’re driven by the numbers.

If you’re building out your card, here are the model’s top NBA picks for Tuesday, April 21.

Trail Blazers vs Spurs computer picks for Game 2

Blazers Trail BlazersSpurs Spurs
Avdija u23.5 points 
-105
Wembanyama u28.5 points 
-105
Holiday o5.5 assists 
-140
Wembanyama o11.5 rebounds
-115
Henderson o1.5 3-pointers
+115
Fox o5.5 assists
-120

Cash your ML bets quicker with bet365's early win payout!

Take advantage of the early win payout at bet365, where any pre-game NBA moneyline bet gets paid out as a winner if your team goes up by 20+ points!

Learn more about this feature, and all of bet365's offerings, with our comprehensive bet365 review!

Sign Up Now atimg src="https://img.covers.com/betting/sportsbooks/2/bet365.svg" alt="bet365" width="100" height="28" style="vertical-align: middle;"

21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER

Trail Blazers Game 2 computer picks

Deni Avdija Under 23.5 points (-105)

Projection: 22.4 points

The Portland Trail Blazers have struggled offensively on the road, ranking as the fourth-lowest scoring team in the league over their last 25 away games.

Over their last five road contests, opposing starting power forwards have managed just 13.0 points per game against the San Antonio Spurs—the fourth-lowest mark in the NBA. That sets up as a difficult spot for Deni Avdija to replicate the offensive output he delivered in Game 1.

span style="font-size: 14px;"🔥/span spanBet avdija Now at bet365!/span

Jrue Holiday Over 5.5 assists (-140)

Projection: 6.4 assists

Jrue Holiday has cleared the 5.5 assist line in five of his last ten games, and the path to doing it again in Game 2 against the Spurs is firmly in place.

A key factor is lineup synergy. Playing alongside high-efficiency scorers and floor spacers means Holiday doesn’t need high volume to rack up assists, just clean looks created within the flow of the offense. If those shots are falling at a reasonable rate, 6+ assists becomes a very reachable threshold.

span style="font-size: 14px;"🔥/span spanBet holiday Now at bet365!/span

Scoot Henderson Over 1.5 3-pointers (+115)

Projection: 1.64 3-pointers

This season, opposing starting point guards have knocked down 40.4% of their 3-point attempts against the Spurs, the fifth-highest mark allowed in the league, setting up a favorable matchup for Scoot Henderson, who has cashed the Over in seven of his last 10 games on a 1.5 made threes line.

span style="font-size: 14px;"🔥/span spanBet henderson Now at bet365!/span


Spurs Game 2 computer picks

Victor Wembanyama Under 28.5 points (-120)

Projection: 28.4 points

The Spurs are likely to see fewer scoring opportunities tonight, as they match up with the Trail Blazers, who have played at the sixth-slowest pace in the league over their last five games. That slower tempo could make it tougher for Victor Wembanyama to clear his points prop in Game 2.

span style="font-size: 14px;"🔥/span spanBet wembanyama Now at bet365!/span

Victor Wembanyama Over 11.5 rebounds (-115)

Projection: 12.01 rebounds

The Spurs have been one of the stronger offensive rebounding teams in the league, ranking sixth over their last 15 games, and Wemby has been a major contributor on the glass, clearing the Over in seven of his last 10 games on an 11.5 rebound line.

span style="font-size: 14px;"🔥/span spanBet wembanyama Now at bet365!/span

De'Aaron Fox Over 5.5 assists (-120)

Projection: 6.4 assists

De'Aaron Fox has gone over the 5.5 assist mark in five of his last 10 games, and there’s a strong case for that trend continuing against the Trail Blazers.

Fox’s playmaking often scales with defensive attention, and Portland tends to collapse on dribble penetration, especially against high-speed guards. That’s where Fox thrives.

His ability to get downhill forces help defenders to rotate, creating clean passing lanes to shooters and bigs in favorable positions. Even if he’s aggressive as a scorer early, that pressure typically opens up assist opportunities as the game progresses.

span style="font-size: 14px;"🔥/span spanBet fox Now at bet365!/span

How to watch Trail Blazers vs Spurs Game 2

LocationFrost Bank Center, San Antonio, TX
DateTuesday, April 21, 2026
Tip-off8:00 p.m. ET
TVNBC/Peacock

Not intended for use in MA.
Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.

This article originally appeared on Covers.com, read the full article here and view our best betting sites or check out our top sportsbook promos.

How Lakers defense shut down the Rockets in Game 1

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - APRIL 18: Alperen Sengun #28 of the Houston Rockets chases a loose ball as Jarred Vanderbilt #2 of the Los Angeles Lakers looks on during the second half of Game One of the First Round of the NBA Western Conference Playoffs at Crypto.com Arena on April 18, 2026 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images) | Getty Images

Following the first matchup of any playoff series, both teams, win or lose, return to the drawing board and strategize what they can take forward in future contests.

For the Lakers, missing their star shot creators in Luka Dončić and Austin Reaves means the offense will be a journey every night. The regular season numbers and what created success are completely thrown out the window in their absence.  

What the team can lean on is its defense and it showed why its improvement in the second half of the season was no fluke in Game 1 against the Houston Rockets, even it came against a Rockets side missing a superstar of its own in Kevin Durant.

LA jumped from 23rd to 14th in defensive rating post All-Star break. They headed into the playoffs with real synergy and cohesion on that end while following specific game plans specifically tethered to different superstars.

​The purple and gold held their opponent under 100 points for just the eighth time this season on Saturday. Without Durant, LA’s defensive focus shifted and keyed in on first-time All-Star Alperen Şengün.

​As with other star bigs across the league, LA switched and fronted the post while maintaining a high level of physicality throughout the game.

​It started early in the first quarter. Watch below as Deandre Ayton begins on Şengün. A screen comes from Amen Thompson with the Lakers switching the action. LeBron fronts the post while Marcus Smart gives textbook backside help.

The ball swings out to the perimeter while the Lakers close out and run them off the 3-point line. The play ends with a Houston turnover due to an offensive three-second violation.

As with most offensive bigs, the only player the Lakers allowed Şengün to get single coverage against was Ayton. Finishing with 19 points, 11 rebounds and one block does not do justice to the defensive night LA’s starting big man had, clearly winning his head-to-head matchup.

He collected the Şengün body bumps, moving his feet without going for fakes and contesting high, as shown in the clip below

Sengun missed eight straight shots at one point, finishing just 6-19 from the floor with three turnovers.

“We did a good job of contesting those six-to-eight-foot shots without fouling using our length,” head coach J.J. Redick said postgame. “I thought [Ayton], Jaxson, Bron, Rui, Vando, all those guys, Jake, just getting a contest is super important.”

The other player LA knew they needed to slow down was Thompson. A supreme athlete that can get to the paint at will, the First Team All-Defense guard shot up the scouting report without Durant.

LA made sure to create a wall anytime he drove, contesting his shots at the basket on his straight-line drives, picking him up early in transition and attempting to bait him into jump shots.

Watch below as Thompson runs a screen with Tari Eason, this time switching LeBron on to him. He drives to the basket and is met by 41-year-old LeBron recovering to pin it off the backboard with Hachimura right there to offer extra help at the rim.

Thompson missed all three of his shots outside the paint and finished just 3-8 in the restricted area over LA’s rim protection. LA ended up holding Houston to just 37.6% overall, 33% from the 3-point line and just 43% in the restricted area, per NBA stats.

“I felt like the second efforts on the defensive end, it really got us moving a little bit,” Ayton said. “We are taking pride with this new team having our superstars out creating on the defensive end to start our offense and get us moving and just get us an offensive rhythm and get the crowd in it a little bit.”

While everything hinges on Durant’s availability on Tuesday, the Rockets and head coach Ime Udoka will make adjustments to what the Lakers offered on defense. They will look to continue on their massive offensive rebound advantage and leverage Sengun as more of a ball handler in different spots on the floor.

Game 1’s are feel-outs, but Game 2 is where the tension of a series begins. The Lakers look to take a commanding 2-0 series lead and will have to do so by leading the way with their defense.

You can follow Raj on X at @RajChipalu

Timberwolves' Jaden McDaniels takes jab at Nuggets saying they are 'bad defenders'

As if the rivalry between Denver and Minnesota needed anyone to throw gasoline on the fire, Jaden McDaniels stepped up and did just that after a come-from-behind win by his Timberwolves Monday night evened the series. He took aim at the Nuggets stars, Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray,

"Go after Jokic, Jamal, all the bad defenders," McDaniels said, via the Associated Press. "Tim Hardaway (Jr.), Cam Johnson, Aaron Gordon, the whole team, just go at them."

The whole team is bad defenders?

"Yeah, they're all bad defenders," McDaniels said, doubling down.

For the record, the Nuggets had the 21st-ranked defense in the NBA during the regular season, although that defense looked much better in Game 1 of the series, a Nuggets win.

In Game 2, McDaniels had 14 points on 7-of-15 shooting, on a night where Anthony Edwards had 30 points and 10 rebounds, and Julius Randle had 24 points, leading the way.
Minnesota had a 116.8 offensive rating in Game 2, which is right at the team's regular-season average. What won the Timberwolves the game was its defense, which wore down Jokic and Murray and kept the Nuggets to a 111 offensive rating, more than six points per 100 possessions below their season average.

McDaniels will be celebrated at home, with the series shifting back to Minnesota for games three and four. However, when the series shifts back to Denver for Game 5 next week, he can expect a very special welcome from the Nuggets faithful.

Mike Brown’s rotations need a major retooling ahead of Game 3

NEW YORK, NY - APRIL 20: Miles McBride #2 of the New York Knicks handles the ball during the game against the Atlanta Hawks during Round One Game Two of the 2026 NBA Playoffs on April 20, 2026 at Madison Square Garden in New York City, New York. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2026 NBAE (Photo by David L. Nemec/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images

There’s been a lot of emotion pouring out of the Knicks-verse after the startling fourth-quarter collapse in Game 2 that turned the series from a Knicks stranglehold to anyone’s series. While not quite as jaw-dropping as the collapse against Indiana last year, this one was more methodical. In a way, though, it’s worse because it gave the Knicks countless opportunities to lock in, and it never happened, while there was this drowning sensation in that infamous Game 1 last May.

There are loads of reasons the game went the way it did. The timeout fiasco (Mike Brown did NOT have a timeout at the end of the game, but puzzling usage put them in that spot), the 10 missed free throws, Jalen Brunson’s off-kilter performance disrupting the offense, and a puzzling disappearance by Karl-Anthony Towns.

A reason that a lot of people are blaming is the rotations, which I don’t necessarily agree with for two reasons. For one, the Jose Alvarado-led lineup played effectively even in a 4-5 minute stretch in the second half, and two, the starters had a nine-point lead and the ball multiple times, and the offense shut off. For a lineup that’s been exceptional in fourth quarters and a team that’s historically good in these situations, that’s more to blame for me.

But you can argue that the lack of an optimized rotation allowed the Hawks to hang around in two stretches when they were struggling and to come back. As this series shifts to Atlanta in a suddenly even series, you might not have the margin for error that you had last night.

According to PBP Stats, Karl-Anthony Towns and Jalen Brunson are a slight negative when on the court together, but I believe that’s skewed by the late-game charge in Game 1 and whatever the hell that was in Game 2. For six of the eight quarters, they’ve played well together. That’s because the Hawks are mostly using Onyeka Okongwu to guard Towns, but are switching to using Jonathan Kuminga on him in clutch time.

The reason behind that is pretty obvious: the Knicks go into an iso-centric offense around Brunson in these situations, and Towns is a non-factor, so you’re effectively able to take him out of the play and blitz Brunson while having his co-star two passes away. In fact, the only possession in the final five minutes where Okongwu guarded Towns last night was executed quite well, but resulted in a miss:

If Brunson makes this elbow jumper (or kicks to an open Anunoby in the corner), they probably win. Alas, that’s not what we’re here for.

The more startling number is that Mike Brown has now played lineups without Towns or Brunson for 20 minutes through two games, and those lineups are being crushed to the tune of a -13.5 net rating. Most of that is in the truly terrible stretch to start the second quarter, but it’s notable nonetheless.

The three lineups with both on the bench that we mostly saw last night were:

McBride-Shamet-Clarkson-Anunoby-Robinson
Alvarado-McBride-Shamet-Anunoby-Robinson
Alvarado-Clarkson-Bridges-Anunoby-Robinson

All of these lineups are a negative, albeit in a small sample. The first lineup, in particular, is the team’s second-most common lineup (11 minutes) in the series and is the worst-performing. That’s flat-out bad, especially when you’re playing a team that is as scrappy as the Hawks.

There are real issues with these lineups on offense. While the third lineup is theoretically playable with multiple shooters and ballhandlers, it lacks the alpha that is needed on the court in the playoffs.

There’s also a stylistic problem with how players are being used. Deuce McBride has been a non-factor so far and, for a guy with a reputation of being a plus-minus machine, is involved in all of these negative lineups.

Of the 35 minutes that McBride has played this series, 18 of them are coming without Brunson or Towns. In fact, 15 of them have come without a true point guard (which includes Alvarado). This forces the young guard to take on more on-ball responsibilities, which has never been his forte, especially against an aggressive defense.

In these possessions, you’re seeing either McBride sharing ball-handling duties with Landry Shamet or running in circles to try and create something to no avail. The 18 minutes that McBride has played without Brunson or Towns have a -18.4 net rating, while the brief stints he’s played with either Brunson or Towns have been much stronger.

You go back to the regular season, and these numbers are equally apparent.

McBride with Towns: +7.9 (323 min)
McBride with Brunson: +12.7 (273 min)
McBride with both: +11.8 (263 min)
McBride with neither: +3.5 (121 min)

Deuce thrives on his teammates’ gravity. When Brunson sucks in the defense on a drive, he has open shooters to spray to. When the defense collapses on Towns in the post, he has open shooters to kick it out to. The same can be said for Anunoby and even Mitchell Robinson off an offensive rebound, but these two are the keys. McBride has to play with one of them. He’s inarguably a top-seven player on your roster and needs to make an impact.

In the regular season, lineups without Brunson and Towns didn’t even play well, so choosing to go to them often in this postseason is baffling. It’s one thing when both have four fouls in the third; that’s understandable, but it isn’t in the second quarter. Mike Brown needs to stagger his stars better because complacency in the midst of trying things out is going to make this series a lot longer and more nerve-wracking than it should be.

The four biggest takeaways after NY’s Game Two loss against Atlanta

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - APRIL 20: Head Coach Mike Brown of the New York Knicks speaks to Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks during game two of the Eastern Conference first round NBA playoffs against the Atlanta Hawks at Madison Square Garden on April 20, 2026 in New York City. (Photo by Al Bello/Getty Images) | Getty Images

Game two’s loss on Monday night was a messy amalgamation of inexplicable coaching decisions, selfish play, bad and bad shot-making from both the three-point line and the free-throw line, and it led to one of the most frustrating losses of the season. So what are the biggest takeaways from a loss that I’m sure everybody will want to forget about? Hint, you’re going to see that a lot of guys just need to be better.

Jalen Brunson has to be better.

Jalen Brunson has meant more to this franchise than almost anyone who has ever been a Knick. He is the best player on the team, the steady captain of a team, and an organization that has longed for said steadiness. And without him, New York does not experience its first taste of sustained success in two decades. That being said, Brunson, like any other player to ever don a jersey, has his flaws. Among those flaws is his tendency to take matchups personally.

It can, at times, work in his and the Knicks’ favor. But when it doesn’t, it leads to a self-serving, heliocentric, stagnant offense, leaving teammates and fans watching and wondering what’s going on. Last night, and you can argue the last 7 quarters, have been a prime example of that. For a very large portion of this series, Brunson’s offensive process has been subpar, bordering on awful. There’s been a lot of isolation, forced shots, and open-court turnovers, and many of them have come at critical junctures of the game.

When his second option was a hobbled Julius Randle or Donte DiVincenzo, it was understandable for Brunson to play hero ball. But with an All-NBA player in Karl-Anthony Towns right beside him, it’s inexplicable. Towns has been feasting on the Hawks’ defense for much of the series, but only when he is given the ability to do so. Despite the big man toeing the line between patience and decisiveness incredibly well over the first two games, Brunson insisted on doing it by himself.

What Brunson has yet to understand is that not only does playing with Towns work very well, it also makes everyone’s life, including his very own, much easier. When Brunson either involves Towns in a pick-and-roll or plays off of Towns being the offensive hub, he can then conserve energy, while also often getting much better looks.

I expect Brunson to improve moving forward. During his almost two full seasons playing with Towns, he’s often backed up games like last night’s with very good playmaking games. But that doesn’t make up for last night’s loss, and it doesn’t make it any less frustrating. The two have been playing way too long for Brunson to still have games like this. And if he and the Knicks want to get as far as they’d like, Brunson will want to think real hard about whether personal matchups or winning matters more.

Deuce McBride and/or Landry Shamet have to be better.

I spoke very openly after game one about how much better the Knicks’ bench was compared to the Hawks’. Last night, the results were a bit different. New York’s bench has gotten a lot of flak in the last 12 hours, but I think it’s overstated a bit. Mitchell Robinson and Jordan Clarkson were still both effective and provided some great minutes. As did Jose Alvarado, who, despite only logging nine minutes, was tied for the second-highest plus-minus in the game.

What hasn’t been overstated is the ineffectiveness of Deuce McBride and Landry Shamet, two players who have been pivotal to the Knicks’ regular-season success, in Game 2. McBride made two key threes in Saturday night’s win, but went 0-3 from the field, just 0-1 from three, had two turnovers, and overall looked outmatched when met with perimeter pressure. Shamet attempted just one shot in 10 minutes, and missed it, making him just 1-7 from the field, and 1-6 from three this series.

Meanwhile, the Hawks’ bench was a big reason they won. Corey Kispert, thanks in large part to the Knicks ’ bench ineptitude, was a +10 in nine minutes, while Tony Bradley repeated some of his successes as a Pacer, giving them a very solid 12 minutes. And Jonathan Kuminga scored 19 crucial points off the bench as well.

With Robinson and Clarkson playing the way they have been, the Knicks don’t need a lot from McBride and Shamet. But with the Hawks now having homecourt advantage and the momentum, they can ill afford both of these players being as quiet as they have been.

Mike Brown has to be better.

While both players can and should be playing better, it is on the coach to put their best players in the best position to succeed, something Mike Brown failed to do last night. Brown, rightfully so, has caught a lot of flak for his lineup decisions last night. And while many have pointed out that the starters came back in with a nine-point lead, it’s still hard to justify Brown’s choices.

It is true that the starters had a chance to close out the game. It is true that Brunson can, should, and needs to be better. It is true that OG Anunoby cannot miss two free throws like he did last night. And it is true that if Mikal Bridges makes the final shot, the Knicks still escape with a victory.

But even the greatest players of all-time have missed shots and made bad decisions. One thing you can control is rotations and lineup choices. If Brown doesn’t go to a Brunson, and Towns-less lineup in the second and fourth quarters, chances are, the starters have more than a nine-point cushion. Instead of using lineups that he has gone to for the vast majority of the season, he went with lineups that either had very little success or no experience playing together, and that is just flat out not okay.

And it’s not just about having one of your two best players on the court at all times. It’s the fact that they make the jobs of the bench players easier. And, quite frankly, those bench players also make the stars’ jobs easier. For as long as McBride has been a rotational player, he has played extremely well with Brunson, and or Towns. It’s because McBride amplifies both of them with his shooting and perimeter defense, while they both make McBride’s job easier. The same, albeit to a lesser extent, can be said about Shamet.

Again, yes, those two can play better. But instead of putting his bench players in a position to succeed, he made their jobs more difficult, and that, regardless of how well the starters closed out the game, is a problem Brown needs to address going forward.

Offense against the bigs on Hart has to be better.

The more things change, the more they stay the same. As I touched on after game one, the Hawks went back to the Knicks’ biggest kryptonite-putting a big on Josh Hart-and it worked to perfection. As it so often has, the Knicks’ offense, which had already gotten stagnant, ran into even more problems when the Hawks went to this defensive alignment. And you can bet the Hawks are only going to rely on it more and more as the series goes on.

While the Knicks should still have the upper hand and should still out-talent the Hawks, this should, and likely will, be a key thing to keep an eye on the rest of the playoffs.