Author: NBA Basketball News, Scores, Standings, Rumors, Fantasy Games

Philadelphia is undeniably a huge sports town and certain fans preen about their “4 for 4” status. Still, there exists a hierarchy, and who sits atop it is a certain combination of what part of the season we’re in, current competitiveness of each club, overall likeability of the team.

The last time the Sixers unquestionably sat atop the hierarchy was all the way back in 2001 for the Allen Iverson-led NBA Finals run. Between AI, still one of the city’s most popular athletes ever, an underdog status that you know Philadelphia loves, and a lunchpail defensive attitude that further endeared the squad to fans, it was a perfect combination for what became a magical playoff run. Could this be the year the Sixers ascend back up the Philadelphia sports mountain? Let’s examine.

First and foremost, Philadelphia is an NFL city. The Eagles dominate coverage and conversation across the greater Delaware Valley. For anyone to pass the Eagles in the current hierarchy, it has to be a combination of another team being really good and the Birds greatly disappointing. This could be a tough hurdle for the Sixers to overcome, because the Eagles should be pretty good, currently sitting with the seventh-best Super Bowl odds, per Fanduel.

Still, the narrative is easy to construct. Despite winning a Super Bowl MVP, Jalen Hurts is a somewhat divisive quarterback that a section of the fanbase would be happy to move on from. Last year left a bitter taste in fans’ mouths with a bunch of ugly wins that overshadowed the huge flaws in the offensive scheme. Sean Mannion is in as offensive coordinator this season, but the opening win over Washington was uneven, and the offensive line looks like it could be an ongoing issue. There’s every chance some tweaks are made and the Eagles go on to have a very successful season, but you can envision a scenario where things go off the rails and fans demand a major shakeup.

Next, we have the Phillies, and I have a much easier case to make than I would have needed a couple weeks ago. After a recent rough patch, a couple wins have settled things a bit, but there’s still plenty of concern with the postseason approaching. Jesus Luzardo was just placed on the injured list, bringing into question the one surefire advantage the team had in a playoff series, which was the starting rotation. The bullpen is a mess and all the same questions exist about the lineup that have caused them previous postseason swoons, namely there aren’t enough patient hitters and they’re easy to gameplan around in a playoff setting. Vibes are very low at the moment. Fans were already getting antsy with this current core after the recent postseason defeats, and an early exit this fall could spell full-on emotional removal from the Phils with the emotional hierarchy.

The Flyers have some exciting young players, highlighted by Porter Martone. The front office certainly looks to have things on the right track, and beating the Penguins in the first round of the playoffs last season was enjoyed by one and all east of Harrisburg. Still, the sweep to Carolina showed this group still has some growth steps ahead of them. The Flyers are in the fun come up stage of a franchise rebuild cycle, but it’s hard to say they’re a threat to being atop the city hierarchy.

So, let’s make the case for the Sixers?

Before this offseason, I would have said there was no chance. With his injury history and huge contract, half the fan base wants Joel Embiid gone, and the other half is always internally wincing for the next injury report to drop. Tyrese Maxey is and always has been terrific, but he’s not enough to overcome all the scars of the playoff heartbreaks, tough injuries, and bizarre off-court situations that have plagued this franchise in recent years. No, we needed something big to reset the table and Mike Gansey arrived to provide it. The trade for Jaylen Brown immediately put the Sixers put into the short list of true contenders. Fans took notice. Then, LeBron James chose to come to Philadelphia on a minimum contract. Money was not a factor, and the greatest player of at least his generation…chose…the…Sixers. Sure, he’s 41 years old with a bad back, but LeBron is still playing at an All-Star level and he’s here on a minimum deal.

Things still need to break right. There’s injury luck involved and pieces needing to gel and all the rest of it. But the Sixers are now tied with the defending champion Knicks for the third-best NBA title odds, per Fanduel. They’re objectively the most fascinating team in the league, as evidenced by their having the maximum number of nationally televised games this season. It’s the potential for the perfect storm of competitiveness and intriguing storylines that could catapult the Sixers back atop the Philadelphia sports hierarchy for the first time in decades.

One of the bright young stars of the NBA — and perhaps a player you’ve never even heard of — just locked in a massive extension that affirms his status as an essential piece on an ascending team.

The Utah Jazz and Keyonte George have agreed to a five-year, $157.5 million rookie-scale contract extension, a person with direct knowledge of the matter confirmed to USA TODAY Sports.

The person spoke under the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the deal because it had not been formally announced.

As with all contract extensions, the instant question becomes: is it worth it?

George flies under the radar because of the market he plays in, but he’s a fourth-year player who has seen his numbers and efficiency metrics tick up every season, he's 22 and he has the potential to be part of what could be an elite backcourt pairing in Utah, alongside No. 2 overall selection Darryn Peterson.

There had been some speculation that Peterson, who like George can play both point guard and shooting guard, would make George redundant. This deal confirms that the two will be simultaneous features.

That grants Utah immense flexibility with its offense, as the Jazz are poised to become a breakout team in 2026-27 and beyond.

Utah has missed the playoffs the last four seasons and has won just 107 of a possible 328 games in that span, including only 39 of 164 across the last two seasons. The Jazz tanked their way to the No. 2 selection and now have an intriguing, young roster that could make some noise, even in the crowded Western Conference and even as soon as this season.

George averaged career highs in points (23.6 per game), assists (6.1), field goal percentage (45.6%), 3-point percentage (37.1%), win shares (3.3), player efficiency rating (18.5), steals (1.1) and other metrics last season.

He became one of only nine players in the league last season who surpassed the 23-point, 6-assist threshold on a per-game basis. The others: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Brunson, Luka Dončić, Tyrese Maxey, Cade Cunningham, Devin Booker, Jamal Murray and James Harden. Those eight players, for reference, have 34 combined All-Star appearances.

George has become a three-tier scorer who is as comfortable slashing past defenders and finishing in the paint as he is lacing stepback 3s. His midrange game is fluid and he can operate off the ball. He’s a plus defender.

This deal is a reward for George's past performance, but it's also an investment in the future. At an average of $31.5 million per season, it could become a relative bargain. By comparison, that average annual salary puts him just below Magic guard Jalen Suggs, who averaged 13.8 points and 5.5 assists per game, and Nuggets forward Aaron Gordon.

For a young Jazz team that should suddenly compete, that's good business.

“Keyonte has changed all of our expectations for him, and I think that's a good thing,” Jazz coach Will Hardy said Dec. 15, 2025, after George dropped 37 points in an overtime victory against the Mavericks. “I think that does make us feel differently about him in terms of our roster and what that could mean moving forward.

“You know, he has become a real centerpiece of our organization, and it’s because of the work he has put in as a player and the work he has put in on himself as a young man.”

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Keyonte George gets huge extension from Utah Jazz. Was it worth it?

Of all the signings the Lakers made this offseason, Sandro Mamukelashvili was perhaps the most unexpected.

A reserve for the Raptors last season, the purple and gold not only moved swiftly to sign him, but gave him quite the contract as well. It was part of the team’s move toward being younger, more athletic and offensive-focused.

But given his role in Toronto and likely few Lakers fans having watched him last season, we reached out to our friends over at Raptors HQ and asked their site manager, Julian Apolinario, for a scouting report on Mamu.

---

What are his strengths?

Mamu is a versatile offensive player who can be trusted to get a bucket, while often punching above his weight class — both from a height standpoint and a roster position one. He has experience playing both power forward and center, and is a great locker room guy.

With him, it’s just as much about the intangibles as it is about the stuff you see on the court. Of late he’s developed into a solid shooter with an outside shot that does really need to be respected.

What are his weaknesses?

For someone who is often slotted into the five, Mamu is a bit small at only 6’9″. In a traditional world, he’s really more of a power forward. While he’s not a cone on defense, it’s not what I’d say stands out about his game.

From an outsider’s perspective, how do you see him fitting with the Lakers?

I think his tandem with both Luka Doncic and Walker Kessler will be worth looking out for. Mamu can space the floor while maintaining interior presence in a way that could benefit Kessler if he’s slotted in next to him.

Playing off-ball with Luka facilitating for both interior looks and 3-point shots will be able to keep him as a smoothly running part of the offensive engine.

Anything else to know about him?

The fans tend to love Mamu a lot wherever he goes.

You can follow Jacob on Twitter at @JacobRude or on Bluesky at @jacobrude.bsky.social.

The Houston Rockets have turned the page on their 2025-26 campaign after an up-and-down season. The Rockets made the biggest move of the 2025 offseason when they traded for future Hall of Famer Kevin Durant, hoping he would be the missing piece in their championship hopes.

Unfortunately for the Rockets, those plans were derailed before they even started, as Fred VanVleet, the Rockets’ on- and off-court leader, had his season ended before it started when he suffered a season-ending injury during an offseason workout. The Rockets spent the entire season trying to make up for the absence as they struggled at times to build any consistency throughout the season.

Despite those struggles, the Rockets won 52 games, the same mark as the season before. Like the season before, the Rockets saw their season end in the first round—this time at the hands of LeBron James and the Los Angeles Lakers.

The Rockets now head into season two of the Kevin Durant era and hope to do it with a fully healthy team. VanVleet wasn’t the only Rocket who missed significant time last season, as the Rockets’ best rebounder and screen setter, Steven Adams, suffered a season-ending injury in January.

That made an already short-handed Rockets bench even thinner and played a huge part in the Rockets’ early playoff exit. The Rockets didn’t make any big offseason splashes this time around, but they are banking on a healthy VanVleet, and Adams will be exactly what they need to get over the hump this season finally. That said, what three things must happen for the Rockets to have a successful season?

Three things the Rockets must do this season to take that next step

The Rockets performed well in some areas last season. They were again the NBA’s best rebounding team, as they have been for the last few seasons. They were also a top-10 defense all season. Despite those stats, the Rockets still did not finish in the top four in the Western Conference. The Rockets must improve in several areas this upcoming season. Here are the three areas the Rockets must change or improve.

Limit Kevin Durant’s Minutes

Last season, with VanVleet out, the Rockets leaned heavily on the remaining starters, especially Durant. The Rockets, of course, plan on leaning on Durant, considering that even at the age of 36 at the time, Durant is still one of the best players in the league. However, without a traditional point guard, the Rockets had to rely on Alperen Sengun and Durant to not only be their leading scorer but also their point guard at times.

That led to Durant playing not only the second most minutes on the Rockets but in the entire NBA. It was the most total minutes Durant had played since the 2013-14 season. Ime Udoka spoke for most of the season about hoping to limit the former MVP’s minutes but was not able to for obvious reasons. Now the Rockets must limit Durant’s minutes, as they need him as healthy as possible going into the playoffs, unlike last season.

More production from their bench

As mentioned earlier, the Rockets are hoping for a much improved bench this upcoming season. With VanVleet out and eventually Adams gone, players like Reed Sheppard and, at times, Tari Eason had to enter the starting lineup. That severely limited bench production, which led the Rockets to rank last in points per game by a wide margin. The Rockets averaged only 27.6 points per game from their reserves.

The Rockets hope the return of Adams and VanVleet, along with the additions of Marcus Smart and Bogdan Bogdanović, means they will not have to rely so heavily on their starters again this season.

Cut down their turnovers

One of the main reasons the Rockets brought in VanVleet was how much they struggled with turnovers. VanVleet’s first season saw the Rockets have one of their best seasons taking care of the basketball in franchise history. That wasn’t the case last season, as the Rockets ranked near the bottom of the league in turnovers.

The Rockets’ lack of ball security hurt them most late in close games, when teams pressured them full court and forced errors that cost them several games. The most egregious of those turnovers happened at the worst time in a must-win playoff game at home vs. the Lakers.

With the Rockets holding a late lead, LeBron James pressured Reed Sheppard, forcing the turnover that helped the Lakers force an improbable overtime, which the Rockets would go on to lose. That play was a microcosm of the Rockets’ ball security issues all season. To get past the first round, the Rockets must take care of the basketball, and VanVleet’s return should go a long way toward reducing turnovers.

The Rockets kick off training camp starting on the 23rd of this month and hope to lay the groundwork for a successful 2026-27 season, but they must improve in these three areas for that to happen.

We’re in the home stretch, folks.

September brings a bunch of things. School for many young people (it was personally August for me up in State College), the start of all forms of football, the stretch run of the MLB season, and the end of a hot summer.

For us here at P&T, all it means is that a new basketball season is right around the corner. Before you know it, training camp will commence in a matter of days, and the Knicks will take the floor for the first time as defending champs in the preseason on October 5.

It’s been an offseason of celebration, but also one of reflection. A reflection on the long journey to get here.

53 years is an extremely long time. As we count down the final weeks to the season opener on October 20, we begin a five-part series chronicling some of the dumbest games, moments, and decisions of the past 53 years that slowly made us all think this day would never come… until it did.

Part I will focus on the downfall of the 1970s dynasty that served as the organization’s standard-bearer, while poor front office decisions and injuries derailed any chance at a soft landing through the late 1980s. We’ll then gradually go through the 1990s in Part II, the dreadful 2000s in Part III, the turbulent 2010s in Part IV, and cap it off with the Leon Rose era in Part V.

With that, let’s begin.

The Downfall of the Golden Era Knicks (1974-80)

Every single championship-caliber operation has to disassemble. It’s a fact of life. Championship windows do not last forever, and teams will have to eventually say goodbye to players who shaped an entire generation.

Time and time again, teams are presented with the reality of either retaining these aging pieces into their sunsets and risking a prolonged stint at the bottom or making the difficult decisions to trade them as they exit their primes at the risk of angering everyone. This is going to happen to the very Knicks we love so much; it’s inevitable.

The reverberations of the highly successful early 1970s Knicks began not too long after that second championship.

Willis Reed, the captain and two-time Finals MVP, played just 19 games after the 1973 NBA Finals. He was only 31 years old, but a body that had slowly deteriorated over the last several years finally gave out. He played 15 of the first 22 games in 1973-74 before missing the next 56 games. The big man returned for the final four regular-season games and the postseason, but was a shell of himself due to a debilitating knee injury.

He’d refuse to undergo another procedure that June, calling it quits on his career. He’s one of many guys whose bodies failed him, and you often wonder what would’ve happened if he’d played in an era when athletes are healthier than ever because of advances in sports science.

Also retiring that offseason were Dave DeBusschere and Jerry Lucas. The former was still an All-Star and All-Defense recipient, but he hung them up ahead of his 34th birthday. Lucas was already diminished after his brilliant 1972 season and slowly fizzled out of the franchise’s plans by the end of the 1973-74 season.

Without Reed, DeBusschere, and Lucas, the Knicks finished 40-42 in 1974-75 and were swept in the first round by the Houston Rockets. They fell even further in the following seasons, failing to make the playoffs in consecutive seasons until the great Red Holzman was next out the door, stepping down in 1977.

Reed would replace him as head coach and lead the Knicks back to the playoffs in 1978, but soon into the following season, we learned why it’s never a good idea to hire franchise legends into leadership posts. The Captain was fired 14 games into the 1978-79 season and replaced with Holzman again, who’d serve another few seasons as the rest of the guard fizzled out.

A week before that 1977-78 season, Clyde Frazier was shipped to Cleveland for Jim Cleamons. A franchise icon was shipped out as his career faded for a journeyman, a move that still irks Clyde to this day. The final remnant of the Golden Era faded away in 1980, when Earl “The Pearl” Monroe retired at age 36 due to persistent knee injuries. One era of Knicks basketball was dead, but maybe it didn’t have to end that way.

Declining An Opportunity To Purchase Julius Erving’s Contract (1976)

You may recall this already being mentioned in my piece on the worst trades in Knicks history. This, of course, wasn’t a trade, but should’ve been. It’s hands-down the worst decision in franchise history.

When the Nets were among the teams chosen to join the NBA after the ABA merger in 1976, the Knicks demanded that they pay a fee of $4.8 million over 10 years for encroaching on their territorial rights, a request that was sustained by the NBA alongside their $3.2 million fee for joining the league. In total, the Nets had to come up with $8 million just to exist. That’s over $46 million combined in 2026 dollars.

That’s a lot of money for an NBA team in the 1970s, when franchises were commonly worth just seven figures, so the Nets were looking for any reason to not pay some of that cash, prompting them to make an extremely tough decision.

Dr. J made $350,000 during this time, but wanted a renegotiation. As such, the Nets were willing to offload his salary and offered him to the Knicks, then owned by the Graham Paige Corporation and ran by Eddie Donovan in the front office.

The Knicks said no. They chose a few million over a future Hall of Famer.

Philadelphia purchased Erving for $3 million, and the rest is history. The Knicks let a rival get the best incoming ABA talent available and watched him lead the Sixers to a championship in 1983 while spending over a decade as a top-five player in the game. That playoff appearance in 1978? Ended by Erving’s Sixers. As was the one in 1983.

If the Knicks make this move and look past the dollar signs, they’d suddenly pair the aging Frazier and Monroe with one of the greatest small forwards to ever play the game. They were gifted the soft landing that no aging dynasty gets, and just declined it for money.

Trading Maurice Lucas for Truck Robinson (1982)

Another one from the worst trades article, the Knicks traded the prime years of a pretty damn good player for an aging, regressing player at the same position in a one-for-one deal.

The New Jersey Nets sent them a 28-year-old Maurice Lucas as a form of compensation for signing Ray Williams in free agency in 1981. In his one year in New York, Lucas averaged 15.8 points and 11.3 rebounds while shooting 50.3% from the field. It was his best overall season since he was in Portland, but the Knicks never saw him as a long-term option, shipping him to Phoenix for Robinson one year later.

The deal made sense at the time, as he was even more productive than Lucas the season prior, but he hit a hard regression in his age-31 season in 1982-83 and only lasted two seasons in New York, flaming out by age 33. He would hear it from the fans, being nicknamed “Dump Truck” for his startling fall-off.

Meanwhile, Lucas made his fifth All-Star team in his first year in Phoenix as part of a second prime that slowly dissipated a few years later. While Lucas would only have 2-3 years of All-Star-level talent post-trade, it was a helluva lot better than Robinson.

Trading Away The Right To Pick Mark Price (1984)

This was actually something I had no idea about before researching this article, and it might be a bit nitpicky, but the Knicks missed out on a perfect point guard companion for Ewing to sign a role player in 1984.

The NBA was still in the free agent compensation era, so the Knicks had to pony up assets to sign Pat Cummings on June 27, 1984. Ultimately, it wasn’t much: just a 1985 third-round pick and a 1986 second-round pick. The way we view picks nowadays, it’s no biggie.

Except… they could’ve used one of those picks. The Knicks were bad in both of these seasons, but especially so in 1986, which handed the Mavericks the No. 25 pick in the 1986 NBA Draft, the top pick of the second round. They used that pick to select future four-time All-Star point guard Mark Price.

Price would ultimately be flipped for a 1989 2nd, which allowed him to spend the next decade as a big-time foe in the Eastern Conference with the Cavs. He had four top-10 MVP finishes, was an early 3-point innovator, and consistently dished out eight assists a game for his entire prime. Imagine if the Knicks had him at point guard alongside prime Ewing.

Cummings was no slouch for the Knicks, having his best season in New York with a young Ewing underneath him in 1984-85, but injuries cost him 80 total games over the next two seasons as he dwindled into a backup behind the franchise’s next star. Woof.

The Rise and Fall of Bernard King (1985)

Who’s the best Knick ever? I still lean toward Clyde Frazier for the two championships and the personality that he still radiates to this day, but there’s a case to be made for a few people. Patrick Ewing, Jalen Brunson, Willis Reed, etc. One name that’s mentioned as a great Knick, but never in GOAT convos, is Bernard King. What he does have a case for, however, is having the greatest peak in Knicks history.

Acquired for a damn good player in his own right (Micheal Ray Richardson), King got down-ballot MVP votes in 1983 while leading the Knicks to the playoffs in the first year under Hubie Brown. He leveled up his game in 1983-84, finishing runner-up in MVP voting to Larry Bird while single-handedly dragging the Knicks to Game 7 against the powerhouse Celtics in the second round. In 12 postseason games that year, he averaged 34.8 points per game.

He was, pound for pound, the best player in the world the following season. He’d have a few multi-week absences with minor injuries, but he entered late March 1985 averaging over 32 points a night, a mark that would lead the NBA and all of Knicks history. He was well on his way to competing for the first MVP award in franchise history, but it all came to a screeching halt when he blew out his knee against the Kansas City Kings on March 23.

Torn ACL. Torn meniscus. Thigh bone fracture. It was a gruesome injury, one that few (if any) players had ever come back from. Doctors thought his career was over, despite being in his athletic prime.

It was a gut punch for the Knicks, who were already in a horrible season with a 24-47 record when King got injured. It would result in the team drafting Ewing, the next great franchise star, but there was absolutely a world where Ewing would get to play with King, as the even lottery system likely sealed the Knicks’ fate the moment they missed the playoffs.

Bernard King was poised to be the Tommy John of ACL surgeries; however. He eventually returned two seasons later, but he didn’t look the same in six games to finish the 1986-87 season, prompting the Knicks to release him after the season. That was probably shortsighted, as he put together four really great years for the Washington Bullets immediately after.

What could’ve been…

The 1987 NBA Draft Fiasco (1986-87)

When I called Mark Price a big-time foe, it was at least partially facetious. He played on a good Cavs team for a long time, but the Knicks lagged behind the Cavs with their Ewing revival, and the two teams only squared off in the playoffs once: a Knicks sweep in 1995, as Price’s career wound down.

Scottie Pippen is an all-time Knicks foe. He might not be on the Mount Rushmore with Michael Jordan, Reggie Miller, and whatever other flavor of Knick killer you like (my picks are Haliburton and Alonzo Mourning), but he’s a Hall of Famer who routinely beat the Knicks’ butt. His lone playoff series as the lead option went New York’s way in 1994, but he served as the perfect wingman to MJ’s dominance across the 90s.

He could’ve been a Knick, you know.

On November 12, 1986, the Knicks swapped their first-round picks in 1987 with the Seattle SuperSonics to get Gerald Henderson, a former Celtic and father of the best player on the worst team in NBA history. A rebuilding Knicks team appreciated his consistency over 60 games through the rest of the season, but he was waived six games into the following season, exactly 367 days later.

That pick swap was pretty ill-advised considering the team had been among the NBA’s worst for a few years now, but they believed in their young star to help make tangible progress in 1987 along with a smattering of veterans, which included Jawann Oldham, who was acquired for a 1987 Denver first-round pick just two weeks earlier.

As you might’ve guessed, the Knicks sucked again in 1987, losing 58 games and receiving the No. 5 pick in the still-young lottery format. The Denver pick they traded? No. 8. They traded two top-10 picks for Gerald Henderson and Jawann Oldham, who combined to play six games for the team after that season. Great stuff from Gordon Stirling.

Pippen was selected by the SuperSonics at No. 5 overall, but was traded on draft night to the Bulls… for the 8th pick, a 1988 2nd, and a 1989 pick swap. In a cruel fate of irony, the two teams that got their top-10 picks from the Knicks in lopsided deals for crummy veterans engineered an all-time draft night swap, even if one side feels quite resentful about only getting Olden Polynice out of it. If the Knicks had just simply passed on Oldham, they could’ve been the Bulls in this situation.

If they had kept both picks? Maybe instead of Polynice, they drafted Horace Grant (No. 10) or even… Reggie Miller (No. 11). Imagine that. You either could’ve taken the legs out of a future dynasty by taking Grant and Pippen from the Bulls or rewritten the 90s in a different way by taking Reggie.

Silver lining, they at least made a good pick with Mark Jackson at No. 18, but he was out the door by 1992.

Johnny Newman Can’t Force Game 7 (1989 Second Round)

A heartbreaking end to a game against the Bulls in the playoffs? If I had a nickel…

The Knicks won fewer than 30 games in three consecutive seasons from 1985-87, but broke through by sneaking into the postseason at 39-43 in 1988, even if it meant losing in four games to Larry Bird and the Celtics. The following year, the team leveled up even more as Ewing ascended to become one of the best players in basketball, finishing fourth in MVP voting. The Knicks won 52 games and rolled past the Charles Barkley Sixers in the first round to get their first crack at the new look Bulls.

A team they’d be very familiar with over the next decade, Chicago was still a few years off from the otherworldly dominance that made them all-time legends, but their success against the Knicks really began here. Jordan scored 34 in Game 1 to steal it at MSG, and while a big game from Ewing evened it at one game a piece, the Bulls took both at home to push the Knicks to the brink. After winning Game 5, one objective remained. Steal Game 6 in Chicago and get a chance to close it out at the Mecca.

It was dead even in the first half, but Chicago had opened up a seven-point lead after three quarters. Into the final minute, it seemed firmly in their grasp. Leading by four with nine seconds left, the Bulls just needed to play smart on defense, make free throws, and they’d win it. That didn’t go to plan, as the Knicks got a gift from the heavens when Trent Tucker buried a three with six seconds left and was fouled, tying the game on a four-point play.

On the other end, Jordan drew a foul on a mid-range jumper with four seconds left, sinking both free throws and ending his day with 40 points. On the ensuing inbound, some atrocious full-court defense from the Bulls gave Johnny Newman, a 33.8% shooter from distance (a solid mark at the time), a wide-open three in transition to win the game and force Game 7.

He missed it. Bulls win. The season is over.

As many of us know, this would only be the start of the heartbreak that the GOAT and his Bulls would inflict on the orange and blue.

Rick Pitino’s Resignation (1989)

A decade that began with the final light fading from the Golden Age of Knicks basketball ended with a light at the end of the tunnel. Ewing, Jackson, and Charles Oakley were at the forefront of the next era of basketball in New York.

And they had done it with a 37-year-old born-and-bred New Yorker at the helm. Rick Pitino made the NCAA Tournament with Boston University in the early-80s, spent two years under Hubie Brown on the Knicks’ coaching staff, and led an upstart Providence bunch to the Final Four in 1987 before landing his dream job: head coach of the New York Knicks.

His first two years represented progress and the burgeoning of a new force in the Eastern Conference. He was young, the team was young, what could go wrong?

What went wrong is that Pitino handed in his letter of resignation on May 30, 1989, just 11 days after the season ended in Chicago, to return to the college game and coach Kentucky.

A season of optimism to end a turbulent decade ended with a big question: why would Coach Pitino leave? Especially for a college team in Kentucky’s situation. Once a collegiate powerhouse, the program was in utter shambles after receiving NCAA sanctions impermissable payment to recruits and entrance exam fraud. They weren’t even postseason eligible for the next two seasons! Any rebuild would take way longer; who would sign up for this with a great NBA job?

As has unfortunately been the case all too often in franchise history, it was a case of dysfunction.

Pitino and Knicks general manager Al Bianchi hated each other. When Pitino flirted with the Kentucky job that May, something that would admittedly irk any executive, Bianchi showed no intent to keep him. Pitino would later say that the relationship had reached a boiling point, and that he would end up taking the Kentucky job because he couldn’t coexist with Bianchi.

In a twist of fate, Bianchi would be canned just two years later by Hollywood producer and new president of Paramount (who oversaw the Knicks), Stanley Jaffe, who allegedly tried to talk Pitino out of visiting Kentucky in 1989 on behalf of ownership (then Gulf and Western) by telling him, “You need to trust me”. Pitino would later say that, had he known Jaffe would be taking over the franchise shortly, he wouldn’t have taken the Kentucky job.

The delay in said move caused the disastrous tenure of Stu Jackson over the next two seasons that saw the franchise move backwards. When the house was cleaned in 1991, the Knicks ultimately came out on top by getting Pat Riley to elevate them to the next level.

But, as we’ve come to know over these past 53 years, stupid moments like having your head coach on a 52-win team go back to college for a program that got sanctioned to hell is just the tip of the iceberg.

Final Score: Sixers 125 Knicks 114

Series Score after result: New York lead 2-1

Embiid’s stat line: 50 points, 8 rebounds, 4 assists, 13-of-19 FGs, 5-of-7 3PTs, 1 block, +16 rating

It was a game the Sixers had to have. After a couple of hard-fought losses in New York to open the first-round series against the Knicks, including a controversial Game 2 loss, Philadelphia returned home with its backs against the wall. 

For the most part, the first two games of the series followed a similar script. The two teams appeared to be evenly matched, but New York was winning on the margins enough to pull through in tight games. The Knicks appeared to be the hungrier team at Madison Square Garden, getting to more loose balls than the Sixers and doing a better job of creating second chances on offense. The first two quarters of Game 3 were similar in that regard. New York led by two points after the first 12 minutes and by three points at halftime. Embiid appeared to be on his way to another strong stat line, with 17 points at intermission.

But Philly’s star player had 34 points in Game 2 and 29 points in Game 1 and the Sixers fell short in both games. Sensing the gravity of the moment, Embiid raised his level in the third quarter when Game 3 resumed. In just the third quarter alone, he more than doubled his 17 points in the first half, playing all 12 minutes of the period and scoring 18 points on 7-of-8 shooting in the quarter and a stellar 4-of-4 from the three-point line. Suddenly a three-point halftime deficit turned into a 13-point lead at the end of the third.

Embiid was sending a message that the Sixers were not going down without a fight against one of their bitter rivals. One of his many strengths is his free-throw shooting ability which is better than most seven footers. Embiid went 12-of-13 from the free-throw line in the fourth quarter and the Sixers coasted to an 11-point win and trimmed New York’s lead to 2-1 in the best-of-seven opening round series.

The Knicks would go on to win two of the next three and close the series out in six games. But this was very much a back-and-forth series that could have gone either way. Ultimately, the narrative that New York was a little hungrier than the Sixers and willing to go the extra mile and make more hustle plays did win out. But Philly was competitive in every game of this six-game series loss and the Game 3 win for the Sixers was the only game of the six in the series that was decided by double digits.

It’s interesting to look back on this series from 2024 now that we have the additional knowledge of the Sixers getting swept in this past postseason by the Knicks. Perhaps Embiid’s stronger play in 2024 compared to 2026 against New York can simply be attributed to the fact that the 2024 series came one round earlier. Much has been made about Embiid’s body being unable to hold up into the spring for the Sixers to make a deep playoff run with him in the starting lineup. 

These two series against the Knicks are a good reason as to why. Don’t forget that Embiid had been out for a good chunk of the second half of the regular season leading up to the 2024 postseason with a knee injury that he sustained in January in San Francisco in a game against the Warriors on Jan. 30. Embiid returned to game action on April 2 and appeared in five regular season games before the postseason began.

I’m not suggesting that the knee injury was a good thing for Embiid. It played a big role in a lost 2024-25 season for the big man. However, recovering from the knee injury and ramping back up for the first half of April before the postseason started, probably allowed him to be more productive against the Knicks than had he been playing 35-40 minutes a night on a regular basis in February and March.

Admittedly, in February and March of this past season, Embiid’s playing time was a bit scattered anyway, but it was clear by the time the Sixers got to the second round of the playoffs that he was running out of gas and the team still needed 12 more victories to win the NBA championship. Stamina and endurance are always going to be questions with Embiid come the spring, but it’s worth reminding you that we’re still less than three years removed from his playoff career high.

Welcome to our Lakers Season Preview Series! For the next several weeks, we’ll be writing columns every weekday breaking down the biggest questions we have about every player the Lakers added this offseason. Today, we look at Sandro Mamukelashvili.

Sandro Mamukelashvili wasn’t on Lakers fans’ radar. That’s why when the Georgian big man joined the purple and gold, it was considered the team’s most out-of-the-box signing of the summer.

With Mamu in the mix, the Lakers now have a different type of offensive weapon than they’ve had in the past. Not only did they acquire a big man that truly fits with Luka Dončić and Austin Reaves, but one who can also space the floor and allow LA to play a two-big lineup. The 27-year-old lefty adds more firepower to an already potent offense.

The 6’9” big is also coming off his best season yet in his career, where he received votes for Sixth Man of the Year. Mamu averaged 11.2 points and 4.9 rebounds per game and shot 38.9% from 3-point range for the Raptors. He played in 80 games and started in 13 of those. It was a season that the incoming six-year forward can build on.

Given that Mamu signed a four-year, $52 million contract, the expectation for him to deliver will be considerably higher. The Lakers’ relatively thin frontcourt also puts added importance on his role.

What is his best-case scenario?

The best case for Mamu is that he becomes a dependable, key rotation player throughout the season, like LaMar Odom during the Lakers’ title runs. Obviously, Mamu is a significantly different player compared to Odom but it would be great if he can have a similar impact off the bench.

Mamu has to thrive in spacing out the Lakers’ offense, which means his shooting numbers have to remain consistent. If he can maintain his shooting percentage from last year, then that will do wonders for a team that runs a heavy pick-and-roll offense. Additionally, him continuing to finish 71% of his shots in the restricted area will be the icing on the cake.

Those numbers matter because that’s the type of production the Lakers need. He has to shoot well for the two-big lineups to be effective. Fortunately, there’s enough data to prove that Mamu can make it work, as he did last season alongside Jakob Poelt, with whom he had a +6.6 net rating in the 112 minutes.

Besides scoring, it would be ideal to see Mamu further improve his already decent ability to read defenses and make quick passes. There’s a reason why the former Raptor is highly regarded for his high basketball IQ. He can take advantage of the defenses with his playmaking through kick-out passes and backdoor bounces.

The best-case scenario for Mamu is to give the Lakers’ offense another dimension while adding a level of versatility and unpredictability that they haven’t had.

What is his worst-case scenario?

The worst-case scenario for Mamu is if he doesn’t perform as well as he did last season. That would be a tough blow for the Lakers, especially after investing in him without much insurance in the frontcourt.

It would be hard to watch Mamu constantly be a liability on defense. There have been scenarios of him being targeted on switches and he’s not exactly the best rim protector out there. The worst-case scenario would be Mamu becoming unplayable in certain situations, particularly when the Lakers need his production.

What is his most likely role on the team?

Mamu will most likely come off the bench. Besides playing alongside Kessler, Mamu will also be tasked with stepping in for him when he takes a breather. The two big men, along with Kevon Looeny, will shoulder the load in the frontcourt.

What sets Mamu apart from his frontcourt teammates is his unique skill set. How he puts it to use will ultimately determine his success in his first season as a Laker.

You can follow Nicole on Twitter at @nicoleganglani.

A high school teammate and childhood friend of LeBron James is now an NBA general manager.

Brandon Weems has been promoted to general manager of the Cleveland Cavaliers after rising through the organization's front office over the past decade, according to multiplereports on Friday, Sept. 18. He'd been an assistant general manager for the franchise since 2022.

Weems played basketball with James at St. Vincent-St. Mary High School in Akron, Ohio. James' agent, Rich Paul, described Weems as "basically like LeBron's brother" during a podcast appearance as James was deciding on a new team this offseason. His presence in Cleveland was seen as a positive recruiting tool for the Cavaliers.

In an odd twist, Weems is replacing one of the men who helped persuade James to sign with the Philadelphia 76ers in July over the Cavaliers, Miami Heat, Golden State Warriors and others. Weems is filling the vacancy left by Mike Gansey, who is now the 76ers' president of basketball operations.

Weems, 40, played college basketball at Walsh University in Ohio and then had jobs for the men's basketball programs at Oakland University, Drexel and Kentucky, where he worked under John Calipari. Weems began working for the Cavaliers as a scout in 2015, according to the Akron Beacon-Journal, part of the USA TODAY Network.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: LeBron James' childhood friend, HS teammate promoted to Cavaliers GM

Steph Curry reveals Li-Ning sneaker release date, his future with Warriors originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area

Steph Curry announced he has a new signature shoe on the way. He also used the occasion to make his intentions with the Warriors unmistakably clear.

Curry told CNBC on Thursday that his signature shoe with Li-Ning, the Chinese footwear company he signed a reported 10-year, $400 million contract with after 13 years with Under Armour, will debut early next year. He called the split with Under Armour “mutual” and said he holds no regrets about how it played out, adding that Li-Ning ultimately won him over because “the product reigned supreme.”

Until his own shoe releases, Curry said he will wear Li-Ning models designed by Warriors teammate Jimmy Butler and Hall of Fame guard Dwyane Wade, both of whom also represent the brand.

The bigger news for the Warriors’ audience came when the conversation turned to his own future. Entering his 18th NBA season with his contract set to expire in 2027, Curry made it clear he has no interest in testing free agency or walking away from the franchise that drafted him.

“I want to be a lifer with Golden State,” Curry said.

He also confirmed something Warriors fans had assumed for months without ever hearing him say it outright: he actively tried to recruit LeBron James to join Golden State this summer, before James ultimately signed with the Philadelphia 76ers. Curry didn’t shy away from admitting it.

“If anybody didn’t try, I think they’d be a fool,” Curry said, adding that seeing a player of James’ stature get to choose his own next chapter was good for the league as a whole.

The comments cap a summer that saw the Warriors strike out on every major star target, including James, while Draymond Green opted out of his own contract in part to help create the flexibility for exactly this kind of pursuit.

Curry’s own extension talks remain pending, but Thursday’s comments leave little ambiguity about which side of the negotiation he is approaching from — one that wants to finish his career and build whatever comes next in the Bay Area.

Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast

The Bounce Newsletter  | This is The Athletic’s daily NBA newsletter. Sign up here to receive The Bounce directly in your inbox.

Good morning! It’s been a busier week around the NBA than I expected. I accidentally started a basketball book club on X (formerly Twitter). Let’s get to it

T-Mac’s Take

McGrady would rather have an MVP than a title

No really!

In a recent episode of his “Cousins” podcast alongside NBA legend Vince Carter, Hall of Famer Tracy McGrady said he would rather have an MVP than a championship. (He does not have either. No shade. I don’t either!) In his explanation, McGrady said the championship is for the collective, the MVP award is for the individual and nobody remembers the 10th or 11th man on a winning team.

In the days since the clip hit social media, former NBA champions like Iman Shumpert have taken issue with T-Mac’s comments.

It’s so easy to say what we would do in someone else’s shoes. But we have no clue what it took for real. I’m of the belief that a person’s view of winning is often impacted by how they view their own legacy, and T-Mac sometimes feels like a legend without a true legacy.These convos never go well for him.

The discussion of whether winning a championship matters versus winning MVP is an interesting one, because I don’t think they’re the same thing. I agree with Shump.

Ring chasing is the point. I refuse to believe there is a player who doesn’t care about their chances of winning, especially not when they’re in the prime of their careers. Shumpert’s reaction to McGrady’s comment brings to mind something Zach (yep, the Zach who usually writes this newsletter) has mentioned to me in the past: Have we reached a point where winning it all is actually underrated?

Though not a one-to-one comparison, as recently as 2025, Hall of Famer Allen Iverson has said he doesn’t regret not winning. Iverson looks at his own impact on the game and the way he changed his life through basketball as more important than a chip.

So while the rest of us might easily say winning changes everything, these guys have the benefit, the delusion maybe, of looking back on their younger selves a bit kinder and reducing the value of winning. (You also need that delusion to even reach the levels they did. The challenge is in the margins of just playing the game.)

In another viral clip, McGrady said that if you replaced Kobe Bryant with him on the three-peat Lakers, he would’ve had a similar impact. T-Mac averaged 29.4 points in the playoffs from 2000 to 2003; the Lakers three-peated in 2000, 2001 and 2002.

McGrady’s postseason scoring average during those years was tied with Shaquille O’Neal for second, behind only Iverson (30.9). Kobe ranked fourth (26.5).

These convos do make me empathize with T-Mac, though. His body betrayed him, he didn’t have talented teams in Orlando and his coach was Doc Rivers, who routinely gets clowned for choking in big moments aside from the 2008 ring many say he lucked into.

(There’s another world where we can acknowledge there are just too many podcasts and too many takes, thus creating a need to ignore facts, stretch opinions and be unnecessarily harsh.)

The last 24

🏀 Numbers game. Which current NBA players deserve to have their jersey numbers retired? Jason Jones has the list.

🏀 Into the vacuum. Ownership turnover in the NBA has only increased the power of the commissioner, Jason Lloyd writes.

🏀 Mental matters. DeMar DeRozan is nearing the end of his playing career, but he has big plans to continue his advocacy for mental health.

🏀 Eastern promises. The Knicks are the defending champs, but the Eastern Conference has a deep bench of contenders this season.

BOG thoughts

Three takeaways from NBA meeting

In case you missed it, the NBA held its Board of Governors meetings earlier this week. An editor asked my opinion about it all, and I didn’t realize I had thoughts until I did.

Here are my takeaways now that the dust has settled a little:

On the Portland Trail Blazers’ arena dispute: I found it interesting that NBA commissioner Adam Silver said he “would see it as a failure” if the Trail Blazers left Portland. Silver also said he hoped both sides could “lower the temperature” in the negotiations. But it feels like the NBA and other professional sports teams across the country are ignoring the general public’s lack of appetite for financing a sports team’s new state-of-the-art arena.

Silver admitted to wanting to be more “NFL-like” with every fan believing their team can win it. I guess that’s fine. People either love or hate parity. But something I think the NBA should also look at is how the NFL is so popular. The NFL knows its audience and leans into its established culture. The NBA can be having a good day, and the NFL will bust in like the Kool-Aid Man. Gotta figure out how to fight back.

Everybody’s ready to move on from the Clippers investigation and subsequent punishments. Silver addressed Clippers owner Steve Ballmer’s statement accepting the punishment doled out by the league and said he’d spoken to Kawhi Leonard, who is officially with Toronto again. They’re all ready to move on. Understandably so. But people are definitely going to be talking about this for a good while longer. This was huge! It will be interesting to see fan reaction in L.A. at the start of the season.

WNBA future

Part 2 of our Q&A with Annie Costabile

After an extended break for the FIBA Women’s World Cup, the final stretch of the WNBA season is underway, with the regular season ending later next week.

I discussed awards races and more with The Athletic’s women’s basketball writer Annie Costabile earlier this week, but our conversation was so good (and so long!) that I didn’t want to leave anything on the cutting room floor.

So here’s Part II (and check out the rest of Annie’s recent work):

With a new CBA in place for a full season, can fans expect teams to fully upgrade their standards/resources by next season?

Annie: Teams have until 2028 to meet the facility standards requirement, and some will push it until then. The Liberty, for example, are in the building phase, but structural framing doesn’t appear to have been started based on a walk-by of the Greenpoint site.

The teams with the biggest resource issues, like the Chicago Sky, Los Angeles Sparks and Dallas Wings are all set to have facilities open by the 2027 season. The Liberty have some flexibility because, even though their Greenpoint location looks like it may not be ready by the start of next season, they still have been leaders in the league in terms of overall resources/operational standards.

What WNBA teams need a drastic overhaul for next season? And in what ways?

Annie: The Sparks, the Sky, the Phoenix Mercury and the Connecticut Sun. I think for the Sparks and the Sky, they have to answer the question of whether or not the vision they had is the vision they want to keep. We’ve seen in L.A. they’ve already fired and hired a new general manager before the season even ended. They could look to continue that overhaul and fire coach Lynne Roberts. The Sky have to confront similar questions of whether or not GM Jeff Pagliocca and coach Tyler Marsh are capable of getting them back to playoff contention. I think what’s slightly different there is the degree of injury the Sky dealt with and what they looked like prior to Rickea Jackson’s ACL injury.

The Sun are obviously relocating to Houston, so that comes with natural change. Then we have the Mercury, and their overhaul, I think, really comes down to the roster. Is Alyssa Thomas still the franchise player? They should not have fallen from championship contention to outside of the playoffs because of one player (they lost Satou Sabally in free agency.) I don’t see a coaching change happening there.

With the women’s college hoops season approaching, I’d like to shift our attention to next season’s highly anticipated 2027 draft class that includes players like JuJu Watkins, Madison Booker and MiLaysia Fulwiley. Who’s a sleeper to watch who could boost their draft stock?

Annie: My mind immediately went to South Carolina forward/center Ashlyn Watkins. I still remember watching her win the McDonald’s All-American dunk contest in 2022 and being in awe of her length and athleticism. She rejoined Dawn Staley’s Gamecocks in June after taking a year off from basketball. If she comes back with an improved shot coupled with her defensive prowess, specifically when it comes to defending at the rim, I think she could end up going in the top half of the first round.

This article originally appeared in The Athletic.

NBA, WNBA, NBA Highlights, The Bounce

2026 The Athletic Media Company

With less than two weeks to go until training camp begins, the vibes around the Sixers are still largely immaculate for the time being. However, Thursday’s news that Adem Bona suffered a foot sprain was a reminder of what might prove to be their Achilles’ heel.

Liberty Ballers’ Paul Hudrick reported that Bona suffered the injury during the FIBA World Cup qualifiers and that he’s expected to return to on-court workouts within the first two weeks of training camp. For now, it doesn’t appear to be any major cause for alarm. But if Bona does miss the start of the season for whatever reason, it’ll put the Sixers’ frontcourt depth to the test early on.

Joel Embiid has not exactly been the textbook definition of health throughout his decade-long NBA career. Although he said in the spring that he was feeling better about his oft-injured knee moving forward, he isn’t going to suddenly start playing 82 games. If nothing else, he figures to continue missing at least one game in back-to-back sets and buying strategic rest at other points throughout the regular season.

As a result, backup center tends to be more important for the Sixers than most other teams. And even with a healthy Bona, that looked like the weakest spot of their roster heading into the season.

Bona is the spiritual successor to Paul Reed: a low-minutes chaos agent who can’t stay out of foul trouble. His athleticism and motor have endeared him to Sixers fans, but his 4.7 fouls per 36 minutes over his first two seasons? Not so much. Bona did undeniably outplay Andre Drummond for significant portions of the 2025-26 season and figured to enter this year with the inside track for the backup center job.

Ariel Hukporti, whom the Sixers signed with a portion of their bi-annual exception this offseason, is Bona’s main competition for that role. He’s far more of an unknown, as he served as the New York Knicks’ third-string center for his first two NBA seasons. The 7’0″, 246-pound Hukporti has solid size for a center, but could he hold down the fort as the primary backup if Bona misses time? The jury remains very much out on that for now.

The Sixers might not have much of a choice in the matter, though. After signing LeBron James and Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, they’re only about $1.8 million below their first-apron hard cap. They won’t have enough financial wiggle room to sign anyone other than an undrafted rookie free agent until early December at the earliest. (Sorry, Kevin Love.)

Instead, Bona’s injury could force head coach Nick Nurse to tap into his mad-scientist side early on.

Nurse already tinkered with small-ball lineups featuring Dominick Barlow at the 5 last year, so he figures to revisit those. Granted, lineups featuring Barlow without any of Embiid, Bona or Andre Drummond had a net rating of minus-3.3 last season, so those might not be a panacea, either.

Dean Wade is also listed at 6’9″, so he could be another small-ball 5 option. However, he didn’t fare much better in lineups without Jarrett Allen or Evan Mobley last season in Cleveland (minus-2.1 net rating). And while LeBron-at-the-5 lineups are a fun idea in theory, that isn’t the best use of him on either end of the floor. Those lineups would also leave the Sixers woefully short on rim protection.

The Sixers do still have one open two-way spot, so they could (should?) look to fill that with another big man as additional insurance. Granted, players can only sign two-way contracts if they have fewer than four years of NBA experience, so the Sixers couldn’t sign an established veteran such as Love or Kelly Olynyk to such a deal. Their options may be fairly limited in that regard, although none of us should ever doubt president of basketball operations Mike Gansey again after what he pulled off this offseason.

If the Sixers are fully healthy, they should be in the inner circle of title contenders this year. But Bona’s foot sprain was an unwelcome reminder of their lack of depth behind the oft-injured Embiid.

Could that be their undoing, at least early in the year before they’re able to fill their 15th roster spot with a prorated minimum contract? It might largely fall on Hukporti to prove otherwise.

Unless otherwise noted, all stats via NBA.com, PBPStats, Cleaning the Glass or Basketball Reference. All salary information via Spotrac and salary-cap information via RealGM.

Follow Bryan on Bluesky.