PORT CHARLOTTE, FL - MARCH 18: Nate George (11) of the Baltimore Orioles runs in from the field during a minor league spring training game against the Tampa Bay Rays on March 18, 2026 at Charlotte Sports Park in Port Charlotte, Florida. (Photo by Joe Robbins/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images) | Icon Sportswire via Getty Images
On the surface, it might feel like Nate George and Enddy Azocar are an unlikely pairing for our prospect review series. And it’s true, their 2026 seasons had very different trajectories. But they are both talented outfielders who weren’t heralded signings when they joined pro ball in 2024. They are both above-average defenders, which is always exciting after watching the Orioles’ current defense. And they both played for the High-A Frederick Keys, though not at the same time.
These two had almost opposite arcs over the course of the season. George’s year was highly anticipated after he shot up the prospect lists with his 2025 performance. Azocar, however, struggled in 2025 and was looking to get into the top prospect discussion (spoiler: he did). Now the two sit back-to-back on the Orioles prospect list at MLB Pipeline; Azocar is #6 and George is #7.
Nate George
At the end of 2025, Nate George was a star on the rise. The Orioles drafted him in the 16th round of the 2024 draft. By the end of the next season, everyone was taking notice. He was awarded the team’s Minor League Prospect of the Year in 2025, was named a top 100 prospect by Baseball America, and was at the top of Orioles’ prospect lists.
He did so by spending his 19th year laying waste to the Florida Coast League and Low-A, then finishing off the season with a .380 OBP in 21 games with the high-A Aberdeen IronBirds. His full 2025 numbers: .336/.413/.483 with 50 stolen bases. He is also an above-average fielder with a ton of speed, making him perhaps even more enticing than Enrique Bradfield, Jr., who has the defense but struggles offensively.
When the 2026 minor league rosters were announced, the High-A Frederick Keys had an enviable lineup. George joined fellow prospects Ike Irish and Wehiwa Aloy to make a formidable threesome. But it didn’t last long.
George was off to a pretty good start when, after 20 games, he was put on the injured list with a non-baseball-related medical condition. George was hitting .293/.372/.366 with 15 SB when he left the team. He did not play for the rest of the year.
There have been no real updates on George since he was removed from the active roster at the beginning of May. It hurts for a prospect to lose so much development time, but more than that, I think we can agree that we just hope he’s doing ok as a person. I expect we’ll get news of some sort as we approach spring training.
Enddy Azocar
The same year that Nate George was drafted #489 overall, the Boston Red Sox signed Enddy Azocar out of Venezuela for just $40,000. Azocar made his professional debut that year in the Dominican Summer League, then started strong in 2025 in the Florida Coast League. After just 14 games, the Red Sox promoted him to low-A Salem.
Unlike George, Azocar struggled in low-A. Over 71 games he failed to get on base (.273 OBP) and failed to hit for power (.315 SLG). He was young for the league, about 2.5 years younger than the average player. It was a struggle he apparently learned from, because 2026 was much different.
Azocar began 2026 with the same team he finished 2025 with, the low-A Salem Red Sox. Same team, but he appeared to be a different player. He started strong at the plate, OPS’ing .868 in May and .907 in April. His power jumped up, too. By the end of May, Azocar had seven home runs. He hit only six in all of 2025.
His improved numbers earned him a promotion to high-A, and he stumbled against the higher competition. June was his worst month of the season, but he adjusted. In July, he hit eight home runs and OPS’d 1.046 in 19 games.
On August 3rd, Azocar was traded to the Orioles in the package that sent Adley Rutschman to the Red Sox. He debuted with the Frederick Keys the next day and made a very good first impression. Azocar had three hits in his organizational debut and 10 hits over his first five games. He finished out the year with the Keys and hit .327/.372/.529 in 25 games.
At just 19, Azocar was still young for the league he played in. But this time around, he thrived. Between the two orgs, he played well at High-A for 71 games. I expect he’ll start 2027 with the Double-A Chesapeake Baysox.
Azocar has played multiple outfield positions, but on all three teams in 2026 he spent the majority of his time in center field. Per MLB Pipeline, he has good instincts and average range in center, but is much better suited to a corner outfield position. Luckily for him, the Orioles need defensive help at all positions.
George and Azocar are both young, talented outfielders in the Orioles’ system. They had different paths in 2026, but we hope to see them both continue to succeed in 2027.
Oct 15, 2026; Los Angeles, California, USA; Milwaukee Brewers outfielder Sal Frelick (10) celebrates in the clubhouse after defeating the Los Angeles Dodgers in game four of the NLCS for the 2026 MLB Playoffs at Uniqlo Field at Dodger Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jayne Kamin-Oncea-Imagn Images | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect
Good morning.
The Rays beat the Guardians yesterday to take a three-games-to-two lead in the American League Championship Series. Here are some takeaways from Game 5.
Assuming Díaz is correct, the Rays will take on the National League Champions Milwaukee Brewers. Eric Longenhagen has a review of the NL Championship Series.
Jayson Stark writes that with the Brewers win, the “gamers” beat the Hall of Famers. (The Athletic sub. req.) Stark also tries to put the Brewers win in historic context and has the kinds of obscure facts that we’ve come to expect out of Stark.
PHILADELPHIA, PA - SEPTEMBER 22: Luis Arraez #4 of the Philadelphia Phillies warms up during batting practice prior to the game between the Milwaukee Brewers and the Philadelphia Phillies at Citizens Bank Park on Tuesday, September 22, 2026 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Denis Kennedy/MLB Photos via Getty Images) | MLB Photos via Getty Images
If the Cardinals want to compete next season, it would be wise to shore up their positions of weakness. The bullpen is a clear weakness, but it’s also the part of the team I would probably focus on last personally. An argument for the best closer in baseball is Bryan Baker of the Tampa Bay Rays, a 31-year-old with 3 career saves entering this season. Baker was drafted by the Rockies, traded as the player to be named later in a package for a year and a month of Seung Hwan Oh, selected off waivers by the Orioles a few years later, and finally traded for a draft pick last deadline. Meanwhile, Edwin Diaz got paid $17 million to allow nearly a run per inning in his 21 appearances for the Dodgers. Neither of these are unusual stories for relievers.
So most of my offseason talk will be focused on finding someone for either third base, center field, or starting pitcher. There is a very big, unfortunate issue with this however: the free agent market at those positions kind of suck. It’s why my very first free agent profile was focused on someone who has barely played 3B (JP Crawford). Any true 3B upgrade will either have to come via trade or someone at a different position. Which brings me to today’s post.
In theory, anybody who plays second base can play third base. And while that is literally true, the two positions require different strengths so they are likely not going provide the same quality of defense. But the truth of the matter is that the 2B market is significantly stronger than the 3B market. At the very least entertaining the better second basemen on the market is worth exploring to improve 3B. You could also move JJ Wetherholt to 3B, but I am opposed to that, so I would make it clear to these free agents that they would have to play 3B. It’d be an easier argument because Wetherholt is indeed better defensively than every other 2B. So if for no other reason than to eliminate them as real targets, let’s look at the 2B who might make sense at 3B.
The Tampa Bay Rays are one win away from the World Series. They also, at least as of now, made an extremely bad trade involving Brandon Lowe. They traded one season of Lowe, getting paid $11.5 million, 5 seasons of Mason Montgomery (2.2 fWAR out of the bullpen), and Jake Magnum (who isn’t very good) for 25-year-old Jacob Melton (who missed most of 2026 to injury and never saw the majors) and Anderson Brito, a mediocre prospect who only pitched in 8 games in 2026 at a level he had already pitched before (and he was worse at that level in 2026).
With all that said, Brandon Lowe has more warning signs than a radiation plant. He will most likely receive a qualified offer, and that is not a good start. In his previous four seasons prior to 2026, he averaged under 2 WAR per season. He was randomly great at defense after a career of not being very good defensively. The first year of his deal will be at 32-years-old. And he has never played an inning of 3B at pro ball. Also his arm is 11th percentile according to Statcast, though 2B hold back more than 3B as we will soon see.
The arm is the big one because frankly, a career of being not great defensively is actually a very good argument for someone to move to 3B. But I wanted to take a one-year game on Crawford defensively, and you would likely be taking a 3-4 year gamble on Lowe (his QO could very much hurt his market to an extreme degree though). On the positive side, his power wouldn’t be that terribly affected by Busch. He hit 35 homers for the Pirates. It would have been 32 at Busch.
But unfortunately, I have even more warning signs. For as good of a season as he had, there are so many reasons to not sign this guy. My last warning sign is that his offense looked to be on the luckier side. He had his highest K% since 2019 and he had his highest BABIP also since 2019. That’s not a great combo. His xwOBA was .331, which was his lowest since 2022 in his injury-shortened season. His actual wOBA was .354.
I’m going to be completely honest. I think I would avoid Lowe even if the Cardinals had a hole at 2B. A 32-year-old who probably didn’t actually get better last season but saw a career year saddled with a QO? And we have to move him to 3B, a position he hasn’t played professionally, and he has a weak arm?
Expected Contract: I don’t think I can even guess, I have no idea
The great big mystery of Arraez is how does the league value Arraez? Coming off a 0.9 fWAR season, Arraez signed for $1 year, $12 million. That is honestly more than most 0.9 WAR players will get, maybe all of them, so I’m not necessarily taking it as a given that the league doesn’t value Arraez like anti-stats people like to say. He will be 30-years-old and will likely get a multi-year deal.
With that said, his offense did not really get that much better, he was a significantly better player because he was suddenly great at defense. I have not looked into why, but unlike Lowe who was generally below average before 2026, Arraez was straight up awful defensively. Even with genuine improvements, it’s very hard to buy into his 2026 level of defense. You just don’t really see that kind of jump defensively, ever, and if it was hitting that did it, everyone would be similarly skeptical. When a sudden jump happens, you don’t assume the same level, you go somewhere in between where he used to be and his career year.
Arraez has played 3B, although very little, and like 2B and like 1B, he was awful defensively. I don’t think his arm is an issue. It’s 25th percentile, but I think he has more in the tank. When he last played significant innings at 3B, he threw it four miles per hour harder at 3B than when he played at 2B. And his arm at 2B this past season was very similar to how hard he threw at 2B in the year he also played 3B. He was actually dead average the year he played 400 innings at 3B, for some reason he was -7 OAA in 40 innings the very next season and nobody’s tried him at 3B since.
His bat is more reliable, although not near as good as the batting average people think. He doesn’t walk and he has no power, so he’s an above average hitter, but definitely not elite. He also hits into a lot of double plays. He hit into 15 double plays last season and has averaged just about that in the last four seasons. He somehow hit into 18 double plays when he batted .354.
As I said in the beginning, I don’t really know how the league values him. My interest in him is entirely dependent on his next contract. Is he valued like an All-Star, because I’d definitely avoid that contract. Like the 1 WAR player he was in 2024 and 2025? That means short-term and that’s more interesting.
Chisholm is kind of the opposite of our first two choices. His 2026 season stats are him coming off a down season and he’s very likely good on defense, despite his blunders. His numbers at 3B are a bit of a mixed bag – he was very good in 2024 and not good in 2025, and then the Yankees stopped playing him at 3B. He’s similar to Arraez in that he threw it harder at 3B than he does at 2B and most of his 9th percentile arm is related to that fact. He threw it 85.6 mph at 3B last year, 78.5 mph at 2B. So he must be really having his fair share of lobbing it over at 2B. It’s not really possible to lob it over at 3B (despite it looking like that’s what Matt Carpenter did).
We also saw in the 2026 playoffs that he likes to play hero ball and will likely continue to do so given his postgame comments, and I can see how that could potentially affect you more at 3B than 2B when you simply have more opportunities to make errors from trying to land on a top ten list. Couple that with the high standard he sets at 2B and the 3B version of Chisholm is probably a worse player than the 2B version.
On top of that, he had a down year with the bat. His xwOBA was a career low .294 and his 98 wRC+ was only a little bit better than his career low his rookie season. His power took a huge dip despite the bandbox he got to play in. Like his offensive stats are concerning.
Of course he’ll be 29 and the reporting is indicating he will not receive a qualified offer. They didn’t actually want Trent Grisham and he accepted, and I don’t think they want to repeat that risk. And Chisholm is firmly in his prime years so a bounceback offensively wouldn’t be the craziest thing. Chisholm would be a bit of a swing and it doesn’t seem like he’d be a fan favorite, but at least by value…. I mean he makes sense.
Conclusion: If you can get him for a good deal, frankly, I might take that swing
Torres is an interesting case, because he has not played 3B since 2018 and he has a grand total of less than 200 innings there in his entire pro career. But he’s also a former SS who has spent his fair share of time on the left side of the infield. Of course, he was bad defensively there and had to move to 2B. He has also been bad there. It’s clear range is not his thing which means there’s some theoretical upside to him defensively at 3B. Like he sets a low enough standard at 2B that I’m not real sure his defense would actually be worse at 3B. And like the others, once he moved from SS to 2B, his arm strength magically got weak. So I feel like his arm wouldn’t be an issue.
He also will 100 percent not have the qualified offer saddled on him. He already accepted it for the 2026 season and can’t get it again. He’ll be 30. He is fairly consistent as an above average hitter. And his batting profile is walk-heavy, not a ton of strikeouts, not reliant on power at all, so a move to Busch shouldn’t really hurt him. I’d actually be very curious on what kind of deal he would get, coming off a down year.
Conclusion: I’d be very tempted if less than my proposed contract
I could talk myself into Jazz Chisholm or Gleybar Torres. I assume the Cardinals have a much better way of figuring out how each player’s defense would translate at 3B. It’s entirely possible them at 3B is just a nonstarter. Kind of an important part of this whole process. So the estimates would have to work out, the contract would have to work out, they’d have to be willing to play 3B, I wouldn’t say any of these are likely.
CLEVELAND, OHIO - OCTOBER 18: PitcherDrew Rasmussen #57 of the Tampa Bay Rays celebrates at the end of the first inning against the Cleveland Guardians in game five of the American League Championship Series at Progressive Field on October 18, 2026 in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo by Jason Miller/Getty Images) | Getty Images
Happy Monday, everyone! We could know as soon as tonight who will be heading to the World Series against the Brewers, or whether we’ll get a nail-biter Game 7 in the ALCS. Today we’ll check in on how the Rays have managed to turn things around when they needed it the most, and how pitcher Drew Rasmussen came in clutch precisely when his team needed him. We round things up with some postseason chatter as well as some offseason and free agency overview. Plus, the Tigers have added a new member to their coaching staff, and it’s a reunion of sorts for A.J. Hinch from his Astros days.
Let’s get right into it.
Detroit Tigers News
Happy Willie Horton Day!
One of the greatest to ever wear the Olde English D and #RepDetroit
Join us in celebrating Willie Horton’s 84th birthday and Willie Horton Day in the state of Michigan! 👏 pic.twitter.com/JWyh5IXClE
Longtime MLB catcher Martín Maldonado is in agreement to join the Detroit Tigers coaching staff, sources tell @CodyStavenhagen and me – https://t.co/QLAEbAkoCv
LAS VEGAS, NV - JULY 15: Blake Wesley #14, Jeremy Sochan #10 and Malaki Branham #22 of the San Antonio Spurs pose for a portrait during 2022 NBA Rookie Photo Shoot on July 15, 2022 at UNLV Campus in Las Vegas, Nevada. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2022 NBAE (Photo by Michael J. LeBrecht II/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images
Back in 2022, the San Antonio Spurs drafted three players in the first round — Jeremy Sochan (9th), Malaki Branham (20th), and Blake Wesley (25th). The pick that brought Branham was acquired from the Toronto Raptors and the Wesley pick from the Boston Celtics.
All three joined the Silver & Black and began developing. Sochan in particular was shuffled through various roles as the team developed, but never locked into a position. As the Spurs continued to grow, Branham and Wesley found themselves with diminishing roles as the team built around Victor Wembanyama. The emergence of Stephon Castle and a monster trade for De’Aaron Fox left the 2022 drafted duo in the dark.
On July 9, 2025, Branham and Blake Wesley were traded to the Washington Wizards in exchange for Kelly Olynyk. Last February, the Spurs waived Sochan. He went to the Knicks and picked up an NBA championship.
The NBA season starts Tuesday. On October 17, all three of the Spurs 2022 draft picks were waived by their respective teams.
Jeremy Sochan, Malaki Branham oraz Blake Wesley.
Panów łączą dwie kwestie. Każdy został wydraftowany przez Spurs w 2022 oraz zwolniony z NBA w przeciągu ostatnich 24H.
After picking up his championship ring, Sochan signed with the Portland Trail Blazers but was waived after four preseason games. Branham, who’d been with the Washington Wizards since being traded in 2025, he signed with the Orlando Magic in September. Wesley, who landed in Portland after initially being traded to the Wizards, signed with the Los Angeles Clippers on a one-year contract.
All three were waived within 24-hours of one another on Saturday.
Welcome to the Thread. Join in the conversation, start your own discussion, and share your thoughts. This is the Spurs community, your Spurs community. Thanks for being here.
Our community guidelines apply which should remind everyone to be cool, avoid personal attacks, not to troll and to watch the language.
Ilya Solovyov is back in Pittsburgh, hoping his latest call-up leads to something more than a short stay in the NHL.
The Penguins recalled the 26-year-old defenseman from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton on Sunday, Oct. 18, after sending Ryan Johnson to the AHL earlier in the day. Solovyov started the season on Pittsburgh's roster but didn't play in any of its first five games. He cleared waivers and was sent down on Oct. 10, picking up one assist in three games with the AHL club.
Now he's back, although it's still unclear when he'll get his next chance to play.
Solovyov speaks with The Hockey News shortly after being claimed off waivers by Colorado last season.
Solovyov should be a familiar name to Colorado Avalanche fans. The team claimed him off waivers from Calgary on Oct. 3, 2025, and he made a brief stop in Denver before being traded to Pittsburgh in January.
One of his highlights with Colorado came on Jan. 10, when he scored his first NHL goal in a 4-0 win over the Columbus Blue Jackets. It was a memorable moment for a defenseman still trying to establish himself in the league.
The Avalanche traded Solovyov to Pittsburgh just 10 days later, receiving forward Valtteri Puustinen and a seventh-round pick in the 2026 NHL Draft. Colorado eventually used that pick to select Shawn Carrier.
Solovyov found some opportunities with the Penguins after the trade, recording five assists in 14 regular-season games. He also appeared in three playoff games before Pittsburgh was eliminated by the Philadelphia Flyers.
He finished last season with one goal and seven assists in 30 NHL games between Calgary, Colorado and Pittsburgh.
The production isn't eye-catching, but Solovyov has shown he can contribute when given the chance. Getting that chance consistently has been the bigger problem.
For now, he's back with Pittsburgh. Whether he can earn a regular spot remains to be seen, but he'll have another opportunity to make his case when the Penguins need him on the blue line.
DYERSVILLE, IOWA - AUGUST 13: A detailed view of a Netflix camera prior to a game between the Philadelphia Phillies and the Minnesota Twins at Field of Dreams on August 13, 2026 in Dyersville, Iowa. (Photo by Tyler Clouse/Getty Images) | Getty Images
I didn’t watch a single game of MLB’s Wild Card Series. I listened to it on the radio.
Is that weird? I think so.
I’m not part of the analog movement; I’m not out to prioritize tactile experiences over digital ones. You could even argue that I was lucky to be spared the images of our Sox falling at the hands of the Yankees. That’s a valid argument as far as it goes but I would have far preferred to watch the games anyway.
I listened to the ALWCS on the radio as though it’s 1955 because I didn’t have access to NBC.
What’s a Cable Cutter Supposed to Do?
I am a longtime streamer; I cut the cable on my TV subscription almost ten years ago. It was supposed to be a savvy move, saving money and riding the wave of the streaming technologies that are now completely baked into our daily lives.
So how did I fall so far behind that in the 2026 postseason, I followed my team the same way my grandfather did?
Being an out-of-market baseball fan like me is supposed to be easy in the digital era. There are a number of apps and plentiful clips all over the internet to watch live games, condensed games, recaps, highlights, and more. However, my location in Seattle makes me ineligible for the Red Sox own NESN 360, even though I’m part of Red Sox Nation, because I don’t live in New England. (And those New Englanders who are Sox fans but happen to live in Fairfield County, CT are out of luck too, the poor bastards.) But I have my MLB.TV subscription, and you would think that would be enough to watch baseball all season long. Isn’t that kind of promised in the name?
Not really, because today’s baseball fan actually finds it tough to catch all their games without:
Attending in person (clearly, this amounts to a small fortune and is impractical on many levels)
Obtaining multiple subscriptions (still a small fortune)
Navigating an elaborate calendar based on which outlet is offering the broadcast
Listening on the radio
Watching Gameday’s slightly time-delayed simulation of each at-bat
Resorting to illegal means
Missing out entirely
None of that sounds appealing, or makes any sense, or fits with MLB’s stated intentions of growing the fanbase, does it?
In 2025, When announcing MLB’s new broadcast deal with ESPN, NBC, and Netflix, Rob Manfred said it was “a great opportunity to expand our reach to fans.” MLB executive vice president and chief marketing officer Karin Timpone has also said, “The number one thing we’re trying to do is invite everybody to be a fan.”
And yet, when I’ve fired up the MLB app on a Friday night, I’ve been told the Red Sox (or other interesting games) are locked behind an exclusive Apple TV+ paywall. On other days of the week, at different times in the season, I find that a different national media deal has shut me out. I’m not paying less for my MLB.TV subscription, either, even though it now offers fewer games. I’m being asked by MLB to pay more, for an ever-growing list of streaming options: Apple TV+, Netflix, FOX, NBC, TBS, ESPN. And if I don’t pay up, I have to tune out.
Some of these broadcasters are very familiar, from the olden days of watching sports on cable. Could I watch more baseball if I simply gave in and rekindled my relationship with a cable TV provider? My MLB app locks me out of some games because I don’t have one of those. How does this make sense?
I’ve tried subscriptions to Fubo, YouTube TV, and Peacock. They offer introductory rates but those expire, and none of them provide complete coverage anyway.
And that’s just the regular season! When October arrives, MLB dials up the frustration to an entirely new level.
Once the postseason begins, the MLB.TV app goes dark (unless you already have a cable provider, and reside in the US). To watch a single pitch of the most meaningful games of the year, fans are forced into a multi-tiered corporate gauntlet. Want the Wild Card? Open Peacock. Want the ALDS? That’s HBO Max (I got lucky, since I happen to have that one already!). Need the World Series? You’ll have to get a live TV bundle like YouTube TV, Fubo, or Sling. There’s no one-size-fits-all solution, though. For just one example, Fubo doesn’t carry the ALCS. By the time you string together the necessary subscriptions, you’ve essentially recreated that pricy monthly cable bill, just to watch four weeks of sports.
And the headache! How long have I spent mapping all this out? First to find out what I can squeeze into my budget, and then the day-to-day planning of which provider is broadcasting which game. It’s exhausting, and frankly, ridiculous.
I’m not the first person to log this complaint. Outlets as varied as NJ.com, Consumer Reports, Awful Announcing, and many more have all covered this before me. And I feel like when Consumer Reports is weighing in on baseball, a line has clearly been crossed, right? At the beginning of the 2026 season, Kiplinger (known for their personal finance and related advice) looked into the costs a modern baseball fan could expect to incur by watching a season’s worth of games on TV. In their analysis, this model of decentralized streaming has pushed the annual cost of following baseball to roughly $500–$600. For a league trying to grow, this is an incredibly steep barrier to entry. That doesn’t even include a trip to the ballpark, or buying a jersey, or any of the “extras” that following a team might inspire.
Even Congress has gotten involved. Rep. Tammy Baldwin introduced legislation this year called the For The Fans Act. The bill seeks to improve the fan experience by ending regional blackouts within league-owned subscription services like MLB.TV, and requiring pro sports leagues to offer free access to broadcasts of local games.
The Baseball Toll (not Tolle)
I’m a longtime, dedicated fan. I write about baseball. I’m a nerd. For all these reasons, I pay the toll. That is, I navigate the apps, I hunt down clips, I use Gameday, and I do what my grandfather did: I tune into the radio. But as I listen to an audio feed or watch a Gameday at-bat in this era of high-definition broadcasting, a glaring question emerges: How on earth does MLB expect to win over new fans like this?
The league is currently trapped in a massive paradox. They talk extensively about “growing the sport” by expanding globally and capturing new demographics (among them: women, international fans, and potential fans who are Gen Z aged or younger). Yet, their distribution model does the exact opposite.
I lived with a Gen Z teen until just three weeks ago when he became a college freshman, and the truth is, if he can’t watch something, it may as well not have happened. He’ll watch a highlight on TikTok (he doesn’t watch baseball as far as I know; I’m speaking more generally) but I don’t believe that’s how baseball will find its way into more hearts, or grow from a highlight into an abiding interest, even a passion. By making it difficult to get invested—to even find the games—MLB is preventing casual fans from becoming more than casual.
In the last two years alone, MLB has made serious attempts to expand into Japan, Mexico, South Korea, and the UK. Even now, Red Sox Nation is full of global citizens; it’s not just a New England thing. You could argue that about any team. But if a potential fan in Tokyo, Mexico City, Seoul, or London can’t click a single app on their phone to watch a game, they simply won’t watch it. As an out-of-market fan myself, I understand what it takes to get that game, and MLB isn’t making it easy.
A Hydra With Many Heads
To understand why it is so difficult to follow baseball, you have to look at the sheer number of corporate entities slicing up the broadcast rights. There is no longer anything like a “baseball package;” instead there is a completely decentralized, sprawling entity that is not only difficult to navigate, but it seems to keep growing. Every time another deal is signed, there’s another head on this monster that needs to be fed—by fans’ subscriptions, of course.
Consider what it takes just to follow the regular season:
Apple TV+ regularly streams Friday Night Baseball.
Netflix has moved into the space and owns exclusive rights to high-profile events like Opening Night, the Home Run Derby, and the iconic Field of Dreams game.
Traditional broadcasters like Warner Bros. Discovery (via TBS and truTV) and Fox Corporation still command massive chunks of the schedule.
NBCUniversal expanded its MLB footprint by buying rights to Sunday Night Baseball, as well as the entire MLB Wild Card round. I’ve heard quite a bit of lip service as to how NBC’s “storied” legacy with baseball (one that seemingly ended when Bob Costas signed off in 2000) will continue and grow. Honestly, as a fan, it felt like bad news because it put up another hurdle to navigate.
Fragmentation Fatigue
The result is a sports media landscape where the fan can never keep up. According to recent data from the Sports Business Journal, “fragmentation fatigue” (which is not limited to sports) is widespread: nearly 28% of active sports streamers juggle three or more separate, paid apps just to follow their teams.
When the postseason arrives, the financial absurdity truly sets in. The league’s flagship app, MLB.TV, explicitly requires “Pay TV provider authentication” to stream postseason games live in the United States. If you cut the cable to save money, October forces you to buy your way back in. And that’s only in the US! When I was in France three years ago, my MLB.TV app didn’t work (without a VPN) so what will happen to all the international fans that MLB is trying to cultivate?
If a fan wants to watch every single playoff game, legally, without cable, they essentially have two choices:
Subscribe to an all-in-one provider like YouTube TV, Hulu+Live TV, or DirecTV Stream to get FOX, FS1, and TBS, plus a separate subscription to Peacock (or Fubo) for the Wild Card series. It’s especially wild to me that fans can’t watch either the Division Series or Championship Series on a single provider; the National League was covered this year by FOX, with TBS handling the American League. This is also why there are so many “How to Watch” articles because it’s that damn complicated! The cost for this nonsense? Upwards of $100 for one month.
Create a patchwork quilt of apps. There are a number of ways to do this, depending on what streamers you already have. This gentleman on Instagram who researched the options promised that it could be done for just under $52. But note the fine print: “Heads up: Peacock Select and the HBO Max plan with ads do NOT include live sports. Pick the wrong tier and the game stays locked at first pitch.”
I have a friend—let’s call her “Laura”—who is a baseball fan and sportswriter. She watches games but wants to watch more, as in, all the Red Sox and postseason MLB games. Friends and colleagues have suggested other ways to stream these games, ways that may exist somewhere on the spectrum from “certainly shady” to “for sure illegal.”
VPNs that might fool an app into unlocking blackouts also require a paid subscription. Laura says she might have tried even less legal means; however, even though she’s pretty tech-savvy, she couldn’t get them to work due to never-ending popups that didn’t allow her to reach the actual game. Besides, I hear that there was too much porn to wade through, which added yet another layer of unpleasantness to this whole dilemma.
In the spring, she learned about a “Media Hub” box, which has since been pulled from legit American retailers due to legal rulings regarding copyright. Depending on where you look, it costs somewhere between $300-$600 and can only be purchased from overseas retailers. Laura is a pretty law-abiding citizen and certainly supportive of the right of copyright holders to protect their creative work (MLB broadcasts are copyrighted). That she has even considered this probably says a lot, right?
So even if fans wanted to go another route, it’s costly and difficult, and steeped in moral quagmires.
Follow the Money
The owners and league executives aren’t blind to this frustration, but they are following the money. Contracts provide exclusive broadcast rights. That allows media companies to use baseball as leverage to gain streaming subscribers. Platforms are willing to pay astronomical fees because having two million people download an app and enter a credit card number is a huge business victory—even if it means drawing fewer total eyeballs for baseball overall. Those same contracts slice up the postseason (separating American and National Leagues within the same series, for example, or allowing only one series to be broadcast per streamer before moving on to the next streamer). If the media company gets their subscriber, they don’t care what happens with the other league, or the rest of the postseason; their work is done.
That’s a win for the streamers, but not for MLB.
The windfall of all that money, earned by allowing those streamers to bid against each other for the joy of broadcasting fragmented parts of the MLB season, creates an existential threat for MLB and baseball itself. When games are partitioned off behind a maze of different paywalls, casual channel-surfers (along with the rest who can’t or won’t pay) are completely shut out. No one can be accidentally drawn into an exciting game. We’ve seen how much work has to generally be done to catch a postseason game at all; this time of year should theoretically offer the most intense and exciting games of the whole season. If that theory holds up, it’s also when new fans might become most invested. Awful Announcing has written about the number of viewers in 2026 and compared those numbers to past postseasons, and while there’s a lot of slicing and dicing to this analysis, non-Dodgers games drew fewer viewers and overall, there was a drop of 3% in total viewership for the 2026 Division Series. How much of this might be because fans simply can’t get the game in front of them?
MLB is betting that short-term television revenue is worth ignoring the next generation of fans—and right now, the fans are the ones losing.
Radio Days
The financial reality is clear: Major League Baseball is making billions by letting corporate giants use our fandom as a customer acquisition tool for their own companies, not for the greater good of baseball or fans. And the cultural cost is crazy. When MLB makes it this expensive and this exhausting to watch a pennant race, it isn’t just squeezing the wallets of diehard baseball nerds like me. It is actively turning away the next wave of fans who will never experience the magic of October baseball—and not even realize what they’re missing—because they can’t find the game.
So, as this postseason rolls on, I will likely find myself continuing to do what I’ve been doing. Maybe others are forced to do it too. More and more, I will turn off the TV entirely and somewhat reluctantly listen to the game on the radio.
There is a beautiful, poetic nostalgia to listening to baseball but relying on a technology developed in the late 19th to early 20th century in order to bypass 2026 corporate paywalls isn’t a romantic tradition. It’s a systemic failure. MLB might be winning the battle for short-term broadcast revenue, and it seems fine with that. But if it keeps allowing the most exciting part of the season to be locked away behind those paywalls, it is going to be broadcasting to an increasingly quiet, and shrinking, fanbase.
The rebuilt Lakers will feature (from left) Austin Reaves, Luka Doncic and Walker Kessler as starters for coach JJ Redick. The other two starters are still to be determined. (Photo illustration by Tate Rudisill / Los Angeles Times; photos by Chris Carlson / AP Photo, Lynne Sladky / AP Photo, Mark J. Terrill / AP Photo, Nick Wass / AP Photo)
He is unwavering in his belief that the newly constructed Lakers can compete for an NBA championship this season and that is the conviction coach JJ Redick has instilled into his group.
It is why the Lakers play the game, Redick mused, and it is the standard this organization has set.
The Lakers have won 17 NBA championships — the second most in the league — with the last coming in 2020.
So, as the Lakers prepared to open the regular season Wednesday night against the Golden State Warriors at Crypto.com Arena, Redick explained why he believes these Lakers are championship contenders.
“Well, I think that every season,” he said. “Unless somebody blatantly tells me that we’re not trying to win, I think that every year. That’s why I say I’m confident. I said the same thing last year and for all of January and February that we were going to figure it out at some point and we did. And then we had some injuries. So, being a championship-level team or being a — I don’t like the word ‘contender’ — but being a team that can make a run and can play in the playoffs and can play different ways in the playoffs, those things take time and it doesn’t mean you’re going to be in the NBA Finals.
“It’s just not the way this works, particularly with the way the playoffs work in terms of just matchups and what you can exploit and what you can’t exploit versus certain teams. But I think because of our talent, because of our fit, because of our depth, I really like our team.”
Luka Doncic said his first glimpse of what the Lakers could become was when he invited his teammates to his home country of Slovenia for a bonding experience.
As the unquestioned leader of the Lakers now that LeBron James has departed to Philadelphia, Doncic organized the trip. It was basketball, golfing and rowing. It was dinners and get-to-know-you conversations.
It was over these four or five days in August that Doncic also saw a Lakers team with championship potential.
“Since the first day. That simple,” Doncic said. “Since the first day everybody came together in Slovenia, I believed that we can win a championship.”
Yet this is a team with nine new players and Redick is trying to incorporate them on a Lakers team that is playing in the uber-tough Western Conference that most experts believe the San Antonio Spurs and Oklahoma City Thunder are the creme de la creme of the NBA.
The Lakers acquired Walker Kessler, a 7-foot-2 center they received from Utah in a sign-and-trade deal in which he was paid $130 million over four years and in which L.A. sent two unprotected first-round picks and two first-round swaps to the Jazz.
Lakers center Walker Kessler tries to block a shot by Warriors center Yaxel Lendeborg during a preseason game last week. (Ethan Miller / Getty Images)
The Lakers added depth in Quentin Grimes, Collin Sexton, Matisse Thybulle, Ziaire Williams, Sandro Mamukelashvili and Kevon Looney.
They join Doncic, Austin Reaves, Jake LaRavia, Adou Thiero and others to form the 2026-27 Lakers.
“I think in terms of integrating all the new guys that have been available, which I think is everybody except for Collin in live play, it’s been pretty seamless,” Redick said. “It’s a smart group. … We’ve been able to probably install more, particularly on the defensive end, than we have in the last couple years.
“Last year we had six total practices in the preseason because of the amount of games and the back-to-backs and the travel and all that. And we played opening night, so that’s another day that we didn’t get to practice. So I think we end up with 12 [practices] this year. We get double the amount of practice time, so I think that’s a blessing when you have new guys.”
The starting five is still unclear.
Doncic, Reaves and Kessler are the sure things, but the other two spots are not certain. Those three started alongside Williams and Thybulle in the final preseason game against the Denver Nuggets on Friday night. Grimes started the first four preseason games.
Lakers guard Luka Doncic, left, bring the ball upcourt under pressure from Nuggets guard Christian Braun their final preseason game on Friday. (Ben Liebenberg / Associated Press)
“I think we have a lot of guys that could start,” Reaves said. “Unfortunately there’s five guys that are gonna start. Like JJ said a while back, he’s pretty sure of three of them. The other two, regardless of who we roll out there, we have high confidence in.”
Reaves is the longest-tenured Laker entering his sixth season and he knows the high expectations that come with playing for the iconic franchise.
Last season, he had James to lean on, Marcus Smart was steady and Rui Hachimura was part of the fabric.
But they are all gone and now Reaves, who signed a four-year, $180-million contract extension, is one of the leaders.
“Yeah, I don’t know anything else,” Reaves said. “This is what I came to, but obviously it’s the Lakers, and it’s one of the most covered sports organizations in the world. So they’re gonna praise you when you’re doing good and not when you’re not.
“So you just gotta [know] whatever that goes on outside these walls doesn’t really matter. It’s just what goes on inside these walls. And if anybody has any questions, I’ll give them the best knowledge I have. But like I said, they’re high character guys that care about the right things. So, I think that’ll take care of itself.”
Lakers guard Austin Reaves gets past the Warriors defense for a left-handed layup during a preseason game last week. (David Becker / Associated Press)
The Lakers were 53-29 last season, finishing fourth in the West and getting knocked out in the second round by the Thunder.
They have two more days of practice before the journey begins.
“I think you’re always trying to get better,” Redick said. “And even later in the season, you tweak plays, you tweak the offense and you tweak coverages. It’s just constantly evolving. There’s no like, ‘Oh, we’re done. Now we’re going to go play.’
England take on Pakistan and Sri Lanka in ODI series
Harry Brook is embracing leadership and responsibility as he nears the one-year anniversary of his Wellington altercation, insisting he wants to be “the man England fans and the team rely on”.
Brook has in the past admitted he could have been sacked as white-ball captain after being punched by a nightclub bouncer, hours before leading England in an ODI against New Zealand on Halloween last year.
Boston, MA - September 28: Boston Celtics forward Paul George speaks at a press conference during media day on September 28, 2026. (Photo by Meleck Eldahshoury/The Boston Globe via Getty Images) | Boston Globe via Getty Images
We’re 24 hours out. A day away from tangible, real, meaningful Boston Celtics basketball gracing the court and our screens for the first time in 170 days. With that, there’s only one thing to do.
I invited Feed followers to exorcise all of their excitement and angst by sharing their “Hot Takes” about the upcoming Celtics season. Let’s analyze the spiciest of those takes, judge how likely they are to come true, and get ourselves riled up one last time before we embark on that long journey to Banner 19.
The Team Takes
“The Celtics finish top five offensively and top three defensively.” Celtics_fan_in_va
Starting us off, we need to address the elephant in the room. It can be difficult to come up with a truly spicy take when your subject is Joe Mazzulla’s Boston Celtics. Read through 90% of team sites, forums and local media, and a top-five finish on both ends would be suitably hot. UV protection required.
Dig into the data from Joe’s previous iterations of the Celtics and the take starts to feel a little frosty. Check out Boston’s finishes in offensive and defensive rating from 2022–23 through 2025–26, Joe’s full tenure as head coach.
Season
Offensive Rating
NBA Rank
Defensive Rating
NBA Rank
2022–23
117.3
2nd
110.6
2nd
2023–24
122.2
1st
110.6
2nd
2024–25
119.5
2nd
110.1
4th
2025–26
120.0
2nd
111.7
4th
In each of Mazzulla’s four seasons at the helm, Boston has finished comfortably inside the top five offensively, while ranking no lower than fourth defensively. In fact, according to NBA.com, Boston became the first team since turnovers were tracked in 1977 to finish in the top five on both ends in four consecutive seasons.
Nothing is a certainty in the modern NBA, particularly with injuries, but with no true emerging giant joining the ranks of Oklahoma City and San Antonio, I think it’s completely reasonable to expect Boston to rank in the top three defensively and top five offensively in 2026–27.
“Boston go 40-1 at home.” Eaglemike
Now that’s a take! Across four seasons, Boston is 127–37 (.774) at home. During the championship season in 2023–24, the C’s went 37–4 at TD Garden, one of the best home records in NBA history and the best of any team in the 2020s.
Eaglemike predicts that Boston not only surpasses that mark, but that a Jayson Tatum-led Celtics team joins perhaps the greatest team in franchise history, the ’86 Celtics, atop the mountain of all-time regular-season home records at 40–1.
The argument for it would be the degree to which this Celtics roster is optimised to maul teams night after night. There are options on the bench, depth throughout the roster, the added three-point volume of Paul George and Mitchell Robinson attacking the glass on both ends. If you view Tatum as essentially a swap for Brown from last year, I think it’s clear that the team Joe has access to for the majority of this season is far superior to last year’s roster.
This group is also far better equipped to survive cold shooting nights, thanks to its ability to rebound and generate turnovers. That speaks to Boston being a juggernaut both home and away, but I struggle to buy a Celtics team with ammunition still left in the chamber, and a number-one option returning from a serious injury, equalling one of the NBA’s most sacred records.
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS – OCTOBER 14: Neemias Queta #88 of the Boston Celtics reacts after scoring a basket against the Charlotte Hornets during the second half of the preseason game at the TD Garden on October 14, 2026 in Boston, Massachusetts. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Brian Fluharty/Getty Images) | Getty Images
The Big Fella University Takes
“Queta wins 6th man of the year.” PDCeltics
Here’s a cleaned-up version that keeps your tone and structure while smoothing the flow and fixing spelling:
This is the season where Neemias Queta seeks to earn tenure at Big Fella University. Questions around Queta’s quality and consistency from last offseason feel as though they were voiced a long time ago. According to DataBallr, Boston was 6.3 points per 100 possessions better defensively last year when Queta took the court, and he played his part offensively too, scoring an efficient 10 points a night while doing all the big-man basics that helped facilitate higher-usage offensive players. Neemy was pivotal to Boston on both sides of the floor last year.
Rewarded with a $56 million extension, Queta is here to stay, but preseason outings against Charlotte and Philadelphia have suggested that he will take up a new role on this year’s C’s. No coach has employed the “Hack-a-Mitch” ploy more frequently than Mazzulla over the past couple of seasons. To avoid endless trips to the charity stripe in the final two minutes of quarters, it seems Robinson will be the nominal starter for the Celtics this year, opening up an opportunity for Queta to compete for a major accolade.
As it stands, the Portuguese big man can’t be found on either the short or long lists of Sixth Man of the Year candidates. Payton Pritchard has short odds at +400, so in fairness to PDCeltics, this is a hot take.
The case for Queta competing for the award would be an analytically driven one. I’d have to expect him to post magnificent on/off or EPM numbers, while also coming up with huge plays in pivotal moments, to truly vie for honors. Queta’s game doesn’t resemble those of the other bench big men who have walked away with the Sixth Man trophy. Naz Reid and Montrezl Harrell were spark plugs of sorts, with a unique proclivity for juicing an offense. Queta didn’t drag Boston’s offensive rating down when he was on the floor last year, but he didn’t accentuate it either.
The last true-blue big man to win the award for doing big-man things was Roy Tarpley in 1987–88. Queta winning would represent a landmark shift in how the award is judged. For that reason, while I think Queta could be one of the very best bench players in the league this year, his chances of winning 6MOY are rightly astronomical.
“The platoon of Queta and Robinson gives the Celtics the best 48-minute center combination outside of Denver and San Antonio.” Geno-Time
Geno-Time would make a great analyst. This is a brilliant level of hot take. It’s sufficiently spicy but I believe it bares real scrutiny. The Celtics are looking to imitate the success of their former Finals opponents, the 2024 Dallas Mavericks, with their big-man tandem of Robinson and Queta. Neither Robinson nor Queta possesses the skill set to vie for an All-Star berth, but together they provide an insanely high floor at the five for Boston. I’ll list a few other tandems and rotations below that I think are worthy of consideration once you take Denver and San Antonio out of the equation:
Alperen Sengun and Steven Adams
Donovan Clingan and Rob Williams III
Naz Reid, Moussa Diabate and Ryan Kalkbrenner
Rudy Gobert and Joan Beringer
Isaiah Hartenstein, Chet Holmgren and Aday Mara
In my view, all of the above rotations possess more raw talent than Boston’s frontcourt. Injury concerns surrounding Steven Adams and Rob Williams, however, raise real questions about their ability to outplay Neemy and Mitch over the course of a season. The likes of Beringer and Aday Mara are also unproven at the NBA level, so there’s certainly an argument that Boston will have a true top-tier rotation at center this season.
The key to Robinson and Queta providing more value than the bigs above lies with Boston’s stars. Luka Doncic and Kyrie Irving unlocked Daniel Gafford and Dereck Lively II, two non-All-Star bigs, to great effect, helping them outperform their individual talent level and making the Dallas frontcourt imperious throughout the 2024 season.
I don’t think Queta and Robinson will be the third-best big-man rotation in the league this year, but if they are, expect either the best season of Jayson Tatum’s career or a major leap from the subject of our next take to be the key to their success.
CLEVELAND, OHIO – OCTOBER 08: Jayson Tatum #0 and Payton Pritchard #11 of the Boston Celtics sit on the bench during the first quarter of a preseason game against the Cleveland Cavaliers at Rocket Arena on October 08, 2026 in Cleveland, Ohio. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Jason Miller/Getty Images) | Getty Images
The Payton Pritchard Takes
“Payton Pritchard is named to the All-Star team as a coach selection or injury replacement.” Larksnado
PPayton winning Sixth Man of the Year isn’t a hot enough take to qualify for this list, so we have to skip a few steps and get into real Sean Evans, make-your-head-explode territory. Larksnado’s claim that Pritch makes his first All-Star team this year is one I’ve considered and investigated in seasons prior.
Fans and analysts alike have suggested for years that Pritchard, a game-breaking college guard who has improved in each of his six NBA seasons, could possess the requisite skills to make the jump from high-impact player to perimeter star in the same way Jalen Brunson has since taking up residence in NYC.
To figure out Pritchard’s chances of making an All-Star team, we can look at a few different things. Firstly, let’s consider his competition for places in the East ahead of the upcoming season. Here’s a list of Payton’s stiffest competition:
Jalen Brunson
Tyrese Haliburton
Cade Cunningham
James Harden
Donovan Mitchell
Tyrese Maxey
Desmond Bane
Derrick White
Tyler Herro
Coby White
Nickeil Alexander-Walker
If healthy, Brunson, Cunningham, Mitchell and Maxey are close to guarantees for places on the All-Star roster. I haven’t included Haliburton in that group because we can’t be 100% certain that he returns to his pre-injury level, but his name can at least be pencilled in.
That leaves Harden and Herro, both former All-Stars who will be in contention, followed by Derrick White, Coby White, Bane and Alexander-Walker, all of whom occupy a similar position to Pritchard, on the outside looking in. Typically, there are a maximum of six guards selected per conference, but with injury replacements we could argue that number might rise to seven next season. Crucially, I believe every player listed above is more likely to start for their respective team. Starting leads to usage, usage leads to points, and points lead to All-Star recognition.
The scenario in which Pritchard makes the All-Star team looks something like this: it becomes clear within the opening ten games that Boston needs Pritch as Tatum’s legitimate second option when the two share the floor, as well as the primary option for bench units. That leads to a spike in usage into genuine All-Star territory.
Of the last 14 guards to make their first All-Star appearance, only Fred VanVleet (23.7%) and Tyrese Haliburton (23.8%) posted a usage rate below 27.1%. Pritchard’s career-high usage came last year, when he posted a rate of 21.6%, so we would need to see Payton empowered to a degree that he hasn’t yet come close to before.
Whilst that makes Pritchard’s All-Star case seem a little far fetched his lineup data with JB on the court last year is proof that he can play at an All-Star level:
Stat (per 75 possessions)
With Jaylen 1,665 mins
Without Jaylen 861 mins
USG%
18.5%
27.2%
PTS
16.8
26.7
AST
5.3
7.6
REB
4.4
5.3
TOV
1.3
2.4
TS%
56.6%
60.6%
3P%
36.1%
39.9%
+/-
4.2
9.6
Payton Pritchard’s 2025–26 numbers with and without Jaylen Brown on the floor. Source: DataBallr.
If Pritchard keeps up that form in non-Jayson lineups this year and assumes an Austin Reaves like role alongside Tatum there’s a chance that Larksnado is looking awfully smart come February this season.
The Paul George Takes
“Paul George will play more games than LeBron James” Jeff Clark (That’s right, the Jeff Clark!)
Jeff was too kind commenting this on the Feed. This could be an article unto itself, and I’m sure it’s something we’re all rooting for heading into the season.
The numbers don’t look good. Over the last five years, LeBron has played 73 more regular-season games than George, with PG13 missing half the season or more in each of his last two seasons.
I believe Jeff’s take is rooted in the idea of role difficulty and need. George is entering his seventeenth season, and I believe the last time he had this little on-ball responsibility was his sophomore NBA season, fifteen years ago. George has already done some interesting stuff as a point forward for Boston in the preseason, but first and foremost I expect him to be a plus role player this year.
Hit the role-player shots, switch on defence, occasionally create off the bounce. Games played aren’t all the same. George shouldn’t be required to take on the most physical assignment on any given night this year. He’ll have the widest driving lanes to the rim that he’s experienced since the bubble, minimising the contact that can lead to awkward landings or contact injuries. George can be nursed through the season with a view to contributing each night and building towards playoff impact.
LeBron James, on the other hand, is still, even at 42 years old, LeBron James. Contact at the rim is inevitable. On-ball responsibility, touches and physicality are all givens when your talents, even in year twenty-four, still command the ball. I believe Jeff has read James’ sciatica quotes, empathised, factored in his usage and come to the conclusion that an injury could be on the horizon for James this year, whereas George might simply avoid that same level of wear and tear.
The theory that James will sit more often because of Philadelphia’s star power is also worth considering. With stars in their prime around him, LeBron can afford to skip back-to-backs and manage his schedule, just as his co-star Joel Embiid will. We know Boston will seek to strangle the regular season, and we know Philadelphia will seek to survive it.
“Paul George will be NBA Finals MVP” C’s the day (Great username)
Paul George calling “Ball Game” in the biggest game of his career would perhaps be the highlight of my NBA watching life and a worth while ending to my favoutite Basketball GIF of all time. Lets pray for this one.
The man has an eight year old son. Streaming with Speed feels like a before kids activity.
“Jaylen Brown gets married this year.” Celtics_fan_in_va
Could this be the end of the stream as we know it?
“KP and Horford retire at the end of the season” Celtics_fan_in_va
I thought KP retired in 2024?
“Hugo Gonzales marries Steve Jobs’ widow and buys the Celtics.” Saint Stephen
Lauren Powell Jobs has three kids and hasn’t remarried since Jobs’ death in 2011. Powell would also have to sell her 20% stake in the Washington Wizards to make this happen but let’s be honest… Who wouldn’t for Hugo?
See all the takes in the feed above. Apologies if you didn’t make the cut!
MEMPHIS, TN - OCTOBER 16: Kon Knueppel #7 of the Charlotte Hornets & Cameron Boozer #27 of the Memphis Grizzlies shake hands after the game during a preseason game on October 16, 2026 at FedExForum in Memphis, Tennessee. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2026 NBAE (Photo by Joe Murphy/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images
It’s still preseason in the NBA – the regular season doesn’t start until Tuesday – but former Blue Devil Cameron Boozer has made an impression on many people, not least of all, former All-Star and NBA Champion Kevin Garnett.
Obviously, Garnett knows what he’s talking about, and he has nice things to say about Boozer. Check it out:
“I like him, I like him.
“He is really polished. And he plays defense too…
“He is going to be in (Rookie of the Year talks). He got the most give, he got the most – I can get away with anything any night – he can mess up and still (produce).
“He gonna be 20/10.
“He got a little Jokic in his game. He is a little more athletic, he will dunk you. The high-post where he can make decisions.
“He nice, I like him. He got a high IQ too. Shout out to Boozer.”
For people who were sure that Boozer wasn’t athletic enough, there’s a pretty good indication that you might be wrong.
MACAO, CHINA - OCTOBER 8: Head Coach Dusty May of the Dallas Mavericks smiles during practice and media availability as part of 2026 NBA China Games on October 8, 2026 in Macao, China at Venetian Arena. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2026 NBAE (Photo by Ryan Stetz/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images
Dusty May might be the most fascinating person in the Mavericks organization this season.
Dallas hired him straight out of Michigan after he won the 2026 national championship, and the hire immediately became one of the offseason’s biggest swings. May had already built a reputation as one of college basketball’s brightest coaches after taking Florida Atlantic to a Final Four, then turning Michigan from an 8-24 team into a 37-3 national champion in two years. He also became the first college coach to jump directly to an NBA head coaching job since John Beilein left Michigan for Cleveland in 2019.
That history matters because this transition usually goes poorly.
Brad Stevens worked. Billy Donovan worked. A lot of others did not. John Calipari lasted just over two seasons in New Jersey, Rick Pitino struggled in Boston, and Beilein’s Cleveland experiment ended after only 54 games. The NBA asks coaches to manage adults, egos, travel, and a schedule with significantly less practice time than college basketball allows. May knows all of that.
He also believes the modern college game has prepared him better than some of those coaches. At his introductory press conference, May pointed to NIL and the transfer portal as experiences that forced college coaches to deal with agents, paid players, roster churn, and many of the same relationship-management issues NBA coaches face.
Now he has to prove that theory in Dallas.
Biggest question
Does Dusty May’s system actually translate to this Mavericks roster?
In theory, I love a lot of what he wants to do. May’s offenses have been built around pace, spacing, ball movement, and shot quality. He wants rim attempts, free throws, and catch-and-shoot threes. He does not want an offense that settles for bad midrange shots or spends 15 seconds watching one player dribble. His Michigan team had one of the most efficient offenses in college basketball last season, and his overall approach is much closer to the modern NBA than most college coaches run.
That sounds great until you look at the Mavericks. Kyrie Irving is basically the only proven high-level ball-handler on the roster, and he’s also one of the best midrange scorers ever. Cooper Flagg can create, but Dallas should not want him initiating every possession. Zaccharie Risacher is still figuring out what he is. The rest of the roster has plenty of wings, forwards, and bigs who attack better than they create.
May’s teams also tend to play with a lot of freedom, and that can lead to turnovers. That is what I worry about with this group right now. Dallas does not have a bunch of elite decision-makers who can constantly make live reads without mistakes.
Best case scenario
May becomes one of the rare college coaches whose style actually looks even better in the NBA. That is the dream. Dallas plays fast. Flagg becomes a monster in transition. Kyrie still gets freedom to use the midrange when it is there, while the rest of the team becomes much more disciplined about generating threes, layups, and free throws. Risacher finds an actual role. Morez Johnson Jr. develops quickly because he already understands what May wants.
May has also always been a relationship coach. Michigan’s culture was built heavily around unselfishness, development, and player buy-in, and that matters as much as any X’s and O’s. If he can get NBA veterans to buy in the same way his college players did, Dallas could establish an identity much faster than most young teams.
The defensive side is interesting too. May has shown he is willing to adapt to his personnel rather than forcing one system. At Michigan, he leaned into size and versatility and built the nation’s top-ranked defense instead of simply copying what worked at FAU. That adaptability is probably why I rate him so highly.
Worst-case scenario
The history wins.
The NBA isn’t college basketball, and May will find out quickly that a good system isn’t the same as having players who can run it.
The turnovers pile up. Dallas struggles to create offense whenever Kyrie sits. May wants to use versatile centers as passing and decision-making hubs, but Dereck Lively II is already dealing with injuries, and the rest of the center rotation may not be built for that kind of responsibility. The offense becomes too theoretical and not practical enough for the roster he actually has.
Then there is the relationship side.
May’s calm demeanor and collaborative approach should help. However, professional players still respond differently than college players. Beilein’s failure in Cleveland is a pretty obvious reminder that even an elite college coach can lose an NBA locker room quickly.
If May cannot adjust quickly, Dallas could spend the season trying to run a system designed for players it doesn’t have.
Season goal
Establish an identity. I do not think this season should be judged entirely by wins and losses. Dallas needs to know what a Dusty May basketball team looks like by April. Does Flagg look more comfortable? Does the offense create easier shots? Do players understand their roles? Can May develop young players while still holding veterans accountable? Can Dallas play with the pace and movement he wants without turning the ball over constantly? That matters more than whether the Mavericks win 39 or 44 games.
Overall
I am high on Dusty May. Part of that is probably because he came from Indiana (Go Hoosiers) and I loved what he did at Michigan, but there are real basketball reasons to believe in him too. His style is modern. His offenses make sense mathematically. He has shown he can adapt to different personnel. Players seem to buy into him, and his college teams already looked more like NBA teams than most.
But this is still a massive gamble. The history of college coaches jumping directly to the NBA is ugly, and Dallas’ roster isn’t built perfectly for what May wants to do. He could be the next Brad Stevens. He could also find out very quickly why almost nobody makes this jump successfully.
The Toronto Maple Leafs are set to take on the San Jose Sharks on Monday for the first meeting between the two teams this season. It'll also be the first time that Gavin McKenna and Ivar Stenberg will face each other in the NHL since they were drafted first and second overall in the 2026 draft, respectively.
With the two teams seeing each other at Scotiabank Arena on Monday night, the discussion of that 2026 draft is only natural, and Stenberg was asked about what his meetings were like with the Maple Leafs and the process of potentially being selected first overall instead of McKenna.
McKenna was the projected first overall pick of the 2026 draft, and that remained true through the official selection by the Leafs. But regardless, Stenberg felt that he didn't have a chance at being taken by Toronto back in June.
"I had met with (the Maple Leafs) during the year, but I don’t know," Stenberg said. "They wanted another guy, and I accept that. But I’m super happy I’m with the Sharks.
"You kind of feel when a team wants you or not, or how interested they are," Stenberg said. "You get a feeling, and I think that feeling was pretty (accurate)," the Sharks rookie added.
So far in Stenberg's rookie season, the 19-year-old has scored two goals and six points in eight games and averaged 15:51 of ice time per game. He's coming off a two-point performance against the Detroit Red Wings on Saturday, which saw him score his second goal of the year.
In comparison, McKenna has two goals and five points in the first nine games of his young NHL career, logging 14:23 of ice time per game. In the last two games, the 18-year-old hasn't gotten on the scoresheet, but had just come off a four-game point streak prior to that.
Playing in different conferences and on opposite sides of the continent, McKenna and Stenberg won't get to see each other often with their current teams. But San Jose's rookie recalls meeting Toronto's rookie multiple times before the season.
"I met him at the combine and at the draft," Stenberg said of McKenna. "He’s a good guy, really good on the ice, too."
See more of The Hockey News on Google — Save us as Preferred Source
For action-packed issues, access to the entire magazine archive and a free issue, subscribe to The Hockey News at THN.com/free. Get the latest news and trending stories by subscribing to our newsletter here. And share your thoughts by commenting below the article on THN.com or creating your own post in our community forum.
There’s
something about Cole Caufield and Saturday nights. Once again, in the Montreal
Canadiens’ 4-3 win over the Buffalo Sabres, the sniper scored two goals,
including the overtime winner. The game didn’t start well for the trigger-happy
forward, though; in the first frame, he went in alone on Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen
and, instead of showing off his smooth hands, wound up taking a slapshot in
motion that missed the net entirely. Seeing a Canadiens player miss an
opportunity on a breakaway isn't rare, but seeing the Mosinee, Wisconsin,
native do it is quite out of the ordinary.
The
diminutive winger didn’t wait long to make up for the mishap; 14 minutes in, he
got a close-range chance when linemate Juraj Slafkovsky poked the puck away
from Olen Zellweger and straight onto Caufield’s stick. The puck was buried instantly,
giving the Habs a 2-1 lead. That was his 65th Saturday night goal, and before
the night ended, he added a 66th, the overtime game-winner. It stood as his
first game-winner of the season and, of course, his first overtime goal of the
new campaign. Last year, he led the league with 12 game-winning goals and five
overtime goals.
While some
do not like the pressure of playing in a market like Montreal, Caufield revels
in it:
“Saturdays
are great here. I think the other crowd, the building, the city, you can just
feel it,” Caufield said. “I like being in those moments. I think those are the
ones that you want the puck on your stick, and you want to make a difference
and be that guy, so I get excited for those.”
The
Canadiens have a couple of players like that, guys who live for those moments,
Lane Hutson and Ivan Demidov, for instance, but with the young Russian on IR at
the start of the season, Caufield’s contribution becomes even more important. Coach
Martin St-Louis thought all hope was lost when he saw the Sabres get a
three-on-one in overtime:
“You look
at that sequence, they’re going on a three-on-one, and I’m like, no way,’” he said, laughing. “They miss the net; it’s a
breakaway. You talk about the emotions of a game. I mean, I was happy it was on
his stick.”
With the
game on the line and coming in hot in front of Luukkonen, Caufield made no
mistake; he picked his spot and sent a quick wrist shot right by the masked man
to the back of the net, sending an already buzzing Bell Centre into a frenzy. He
was understandably named the first star of the match, and as he came on the ice
for an interview, the 21,000 Habs faithful assembled for Saturday mass chanted
his name in unison.
When the
media got to speak to the man of the hour in the dressing room, he was
understandably all smiles and bore an uncanny resemblance to the smiley face
embroidered on the socks he wears post-game. He got the socks in a golf shop, and they are a bit longer than the others he has, so they're more comfortable, which is why he wears them; the smiley faces are just a lucky coincidence, but he wears them well.
38 of his
66 Saturday night goals came since the start of the 2024-2025 season, and in that
season and the following one, he set near-career marks for game-winning goals,
with 8 in 2024-25 and 12 last season. How many will he add this year? It
remains to be seen. But it's fascinating that 36 of his 174 career goals are
game-winners, and that 14 came in overtime. That, right there, is being a
gamer, a player that delivers when it’s most needed. The Canadiens can thank
their luck star: at the 2019 draft, the Florida Panthers chose Spencer Knight
and the Philadelphia Flyers chose Cam York, leaving them with an incredibly
talented winger who was thought to be too small for the league at number 15,
but has delivered big performances ever since.
(Photo illustration by Tate Rudisill / Los Angeles Times; photos by Elizabeth Ruiz Ruiz / Getty Images, Mark J. Terrill / AP Photo, Jae C. Hong / AP Photo, Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times)
The Clippers will have their hands full when the season opens trying to contend in the always tough Western Conference after being slapped with the harshest penalties in league history for violating salary cap circumvention rules.
With Kawhi Leonard, James Harden and Ivica Zubac gone from last season’s team, they’ll focus on developing a new core of stars, including rookie Keaton Wagler, when they open play Wednesday by hosing the Sacramento Kings at Intuit Dome.
Another positive for the team: Tyronn Lue is a proven asset as coach and he’ll be tasked with developing and blending in the younger players. Wagler spent the summer building up his body and has potential to be a strong defender.
The league’s year-long investigation is over and the Clippers have a clear path, albeit rocky, to move on and again become competitive in the West. They finished ninth in the conference last season and were eliminated by the Warriors in a play-in game.
Now fully recovered from a foot injury, two-time All-Star guard Darius Garland will be counted on to provide floor leadership. Also returning are former All-Star guard Bradley Beal, guard Kris Dunn, forward Derrick Jones Jr. and center Brook Lopez.
“I think we can surprise a lot of people,” Garland said.
Garland is fully recovered from toe and foot ligament injuries. In 19 games last season, he averaged 19.9 points with 6.4 assists. With a full offseason and training camp, Garland is expected to be one of the team’s top players.
Other young players to watch are guard Kobe Sanders, who had a productive rookie season when averaging 7.3 points and nearly 20 minutes a game as part of the rotation, and center Yanic Konan Niederhauser, who had his rookie season end early because of a foot injury but he showed promise over 41 games.
Forward Brandon Ingram, driving against Clippers forward Derrick Jones Jr. last season, is now a teammate after the Kawhi Leonard trade was completed following the salary cap circumvention investigation. (Ronald Martinez / Getty Images)
Additions include All-Star forward Brandon Ingram and guard Gradey Dick, who were part of the Leonard trade to Toronto, wing Max Strus, guard Jalen Pickett, forward Baba Miller, forward Isaiah Jackson and forward Nick Martinelli.
“I know [there are] little to no expectations for us this year,” said Ingram, who will miss the start of the season while recovering from May surgery for a partially torn Achilles. “We have enough in the building to compete. This is what we love to do. So, we’ll go out and compete every single night, learn, go on to the next game and get better and better.”
Strus also will be out for a while after injuring his right foot during training camp.
Departed from the team are forward John Collins, guard Bogdan Bogdanovic, forward Nicolas Batum and wing Bennedict Mathurin.
Also noteworthy: owner Steve Ballmer won’t be sitting courtside after being banned by the NBA for a year as part of the team’s steep punishment for circumventing salary-cap rules. Top basketball executive Lawrence Frank has been banned for six months. The penalties included the loss of five first-round draft picks.
“I give our players a lot of credit … the leadership is great [and] the morale is great, even in these tough situations,” Lue said at the start of training camp. “That’s good to see, when you have your players coming in every day, giving everything they have; a lot of teams don’t have that.”
