It’s a new week here at BCB After Dark: the coolest spot for night owls, early risers, new parents and Cubs fans abroad. We’re so glad to start the week with you. It’s always nice to see a friendly face. Come on in out of the heat. There’s no cover charge. We still have a few tables available. The hostess will seat you now. Bring your own beverage.
BCB After Dark is the place for you to talk baseball, music, movies, or anything else you need to get off your chest, as long as it is within the rules of the site. The late-nighters are encouraged to get the party started, but everyone else is invited to join in as you wake up the next morning and into the afternoon.
Last week, I asked you whether you would rather the Cubs acquire Twins right-hander Joe Ryan or Tigers left-hander Tarik Skubal. With the caveat that the Cubs are unlikely to acquire either one, 58 percent of you would rather get Ryan and that extra year of control over just two months of Skubal.
Still, if you ask me which one I’d rather have starting a Game 7, it’s Skubal every time. Although Ryan would be good too.
Here’s the part with the music and the movies. You’re free to skip ahead if you want. Or you can just read that stuff and skip the baseball stuff. Your call.
Tonight we’re honored to have trumpeter Jeremy Pelt and his Quartet playing the Miles Davis tune “If I Were a Bell” in Amsterdam on the Fourth of July, just a few weeks ago.
Joining Pelt are Orrin Evans on piano, Buster Williams on double bass and Lenny White on drums.
Saturday Fiction, the 2019 Chinese film directed by Lou Ye, has a great premise for a film. It’s beautifully shot in black-and-white and it stars a first-rate actress in Gong Li. This should have been a great movie. Unfortunately, a confusing plot and weak characterizations turn Saturday Fiction into a disappointing mess.
Saturday Fiction stars Gong Li as Jean Yu, a huge Chinese film star who leaves the relative safety of Hong Kong for the French Concession of Shanghai in the first week of December of 1941. The French Concession was the area of Shanghai where day-to-day control had been handed over to the French Government almost 100 years earlier. When the Japanese invaded China in 1937, they left the French Concession mostly alone, not wanting to cause an international incident with a European power. After the Fall of France in 1940, the French Concession was nominally under the control of the Vichy Government. It had always been a prosperous neighborhood crawling with foreigners, but by 1941 it was also a refuge from the war for those who could get in. It was also, naturally enough, overrun with spies. Jean Yu is one of them.
So if the setup of Saturday Fiction sounds familiar, it should. It’s basically Casablanca. It’s a Vichy French territory crawling with intrigue. The area’s independence can be stripped away by an Axis power at a moment’s notice. Jean Yu isn’t Rick, but like Bogart’s classic character, where her loyalties will take her are unclear until late in the film.
Jean Yu goes to Shanghai ostensibly to star in a play entitled “Saturday Fiction” (hence the title), co-starring and directed by her boyfriend Tan Na (Taiwanese-Canadian actor Mark Chao). But everyone suspects that she’s actually there to contact her ex-husband who is being held by the Japanese for reasons that are unclear. He seems to have been collaborating with the Japanese, so did he betray them or something? I don’t know and I’ve seen the film.
But her real reason for coming to Shanghai wasn’t to star in the play or meet with her ex-husband (although she does both), but as part of an espionage plot. Her spy cell needs to learn a Japanese code and discover what the recent Japanese communications are about and report back to the British and/or American authorities. Or maybe the Free French. We find out who Jean Yu is working for and why, but we never do find out whom he is working for.
Since this is the first week of December of 1941, the contents of the secret Japanese communications that her spy ring is trying to decode is obvious. It’s also obvious that by the time they decode it, it’s too late.
One admirable thing Is how Saturday Fiction portrays the international flavor of Shanghai by having the dialogue in Mandarin, English, French and Japanese.
Saturday Fiction also takes a confusing wartime espionage plot and then tosses in that completely irrelevant play. Several times a scene will start with either Jean Yu and her boyfriend speaking to each other in conspiratorial tones. We think this is important information about her mission but . . .nope! It’s just a rehearsal scene from the play. The play is giving way too much screen time for something that is completely irrelevant to everything else. It’s not even a good MacGuffin. Director Lou just keeps going back again and again to these pointless scenes from this play. Yes, there is some intrigue surrounding the rehearsals with a young Jean Yu fangirl (Huang Xiangli) who is actually working for the Japanese (but is also really a Jean Yu fangirl), but they didn’t need to act out the scenes again and again for that intrigue to work. It just makes an already confusing plot even more confusing.
Let’s not even get into how someone who is constantly besieged by adoring fans could be an effective spy. At least it does explain why only she could extract the information.
Gong Li does a great job with what she’s given. Jean Yu’s motivations are kept hidden until the very end. The rest of the cast are mostly fine and Pascal Greggory in particular turns in a strong performance as her mysterious French contact. But none of that overcomes a sloppy plot with weak characterizations.
There are some things about Saturday Fiction that lift the film from below-average to watchable. For one, in the final half-hour or so of the 126 minute film, Saturday Fiction transforms from a languid espionage film to a pretty solid, fast-paced shoot-em-up. If the rest of the film had the pace and excitement of the final half-hour, we might not care about the confusing plot.
The other strong part of the film is the terrific black-and-white cinematography. I’m a sucker for black-and-white, as you probably know, but Saturday Fiction is a real break from the shadowy noir look that gets overused. In fact, the sets are mostly well-lit and many shots use hand-held cameras, which gives the film more of a newsreel look than noir. But despite the 1940s costumes, sets and the black-and-white cinematography, the film looks new and fresh.
If you’re interested in the Sino-Japanese War, great black-and-white cinematography or are just a fan of Gong Li, then Saturday Fiction could be worth a watch. It’s why I watched. The movie is not terrible. It’s not even bad. It’s just that for someone like me who is interested in the War in the Pacific, black-and-white films and is a fan of Gong Li, the whole thing is just disappointing.
Here’s the trailer for Saturday Fiction. The trailer smartly emphasizes the action of the final half hour. I mean, who wouldn’t want to watch a film with that shot of Gong Li?
Welcome back to everyone who skips the music and movies.
We all know the Trade Deadline is two weeks away and pretty much all the off-the-field discussions are going to be about who is going where. For the Cubs, that obviously means pitching. It’s frankly incredible what this team has done despite a huge rash of injuries to their pitching staff. It’s not crazy to think that with some better pitching, the Cubs could make some noise in the postseason.
The question then becomes who can the Cubs give up to acquire that pitching? The obvious answer is “infielders,” since the Cubs have Alex Bregman, Dansby Swanson, Nico Hoerner and Michael Busch all under team control through at least the 2029 season. Bregman and Hoerner even longer.
So that means that the Cubs’ two young infielders, Matt Shaw and Pedro Ramírez, are luxuries. Yes, it’s important to have backups in case of injuries, but two good young infielders? On top of that, there are solid infield prospects down in the minors like Jefferson Rojas, James Triantos and Ty Southisene who may be able to step into one of those reserve infield positions over the next couple of years.
So if a team is willing to trade pitching the Cubs need and they want a major-league ready infielder back in return, it makes sense to deal either Shaw or Ramírez. Not only does it make sense for the Cubs, it makes sense for those two young players to go to a team where they will get more regular playing time at one position.
I’ve been looking at these two players and I’ve concluded that it’s a personal preference as two which one is better. Shaw certainly has the better pedigree. He was the Cubs’ first-round draft pick in 2023 and was the Cubs’ top prospect coming into last season. He spent all of last season as the Cubs’ starting third baseman and for a 23-year-old rookie, he was fine. Good, even. His batting line was a below-average .226/.295/.394 with 13 home runs and 17 steals, but that’s the kind of line that a lot of everyday veteran starting infielders post in their rookie seasons. He was also playing out-of-position at third base and he was actually good there defensively. He even was a Gold Glove finalist at third base.
This year, Shaw lost his starting third base job to Bregman, but he moved into a utility role without complaint and with ease. He started playing the outfield for the first time and he’s surprisingly not bad out there for someone with so little experience. He’s played every position on the field but shortstop, pitcher and catcher. That kind of versatility is valuable.
On top of that, despite erratic playing time, Shaw has made the kind of improvements at the plate that we all expected he would make after his rookie season. Over 56 games, Shaw is hitting .246/.322/.415 with four home runs and four steals. Most teams would gladly take that out of a young infielder with a sold glove. If the Cubs didn’t have four better options, they would too. It’s also not unrealistic to believe that Shaw is going to continue to improve upon that as he ages.
Yes, Shaw is currently on the Injured List with a hand injury. But I assume that any team that is trading away pitching this year is out of the playoff hunt and would want Shaw for next season and beyond. As far as I know, the injury isn’t expected to have any lasting impact and Shaw is expected to be back on the field before the end of the season. So I don’t think Shaw’s injury will have much or any effect on his trade value.
On the other hand, the Cubs have Pedro Ramírez, who has filled in admirably in Shaw’s absence. Ramírez doesn’t have quite the same pedigree as Shaw does. He was always considered a prospect, but he was only ranked as the eighth-best Cubs prospect coming into this season. Ramírez got off to a strong start this year and started to get some Top 100 prospect considerations, but not Top 40 like Shaw was before he lost his prospect eligibility.
As noted before, Ramírez got off to a great start to the season in Triple-A Iowa this year. In the International League, Ramírez hit .312/.395/.547 with a career-high nine home runs in just 43 games. He also stole 19 bases.
There were reasons to be wary of those numbers from Ramírez in Iowa because offense is way up for everyone for some unknown reason in the minor leagues this year. But since his major-league call-up, Ramírez has hit a very good .281/.329/.438 with five doubles, one triple and one home run in just 71 plate appearances. Obviously that’s a small sample size, but Ramírez looks like a major league hitter out there.
I think which player has a higher trade value has a lot to do with what the team the Cubs are dealing with values the most. Shaw has a better track record and is likely to hit for more power. He’s also more versatile defensively and is probably the better glove all-around. Shaw walks a bit more than Ramírez, but he’s also likely to strike out more.
With Ramírez, you have a switch-hitter that makes more slightly more contact at the price of a little less power. He’s also two years younger than Shaw, so maybe there’s a bit more projection in Ramírez. But whereas Shaw has proven he can play all over the diamond, Ramírez is more limited to second and third base. Their speed is pretty similar. Both will steal double-digit bases in the majors and run the bases well.
I though about asking you which player had a higher trade value, but as I mentioned, the more I think about it, the more I think it’s a matter of individual preference. So instead, I’m going to ask you which one you would rather keep? Meaning, if a team offered the Cubs a pitcher for either one, which one do you keep and which one do you trade?
Thanks for stopping by tonight. We’re off to a good start to the week with your presence. Please get home safely. Recycle any cans and bottles. Tip your waitstaff. And join us again tomorrow night for more BCB After Dark.