Did Henri Veesaar make the right decision to stay in the NBA draft?

CHICAGO, IL - MAY 11: Henri Veesaar shoots the ball during the 2026 NBA Draft Combine on May 11, 2026 at Wintrust Arena in Chicago, Illinois. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2026 NBAE (Photo by Melissa Tamez/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images

Only Henri knows the answer to that for sure. When a kid from Estonia grows up dreaming of being in the NBA, that decision goes well beyond simple salary math. Veesaar recently married, and after three years of college life, a desire for a change in lifestyle would be completely understandable. The NBA draft values potential more than anything else, and a player’s age plays a role in those calculations. Henri turned 22 in March, and a 23 year old Veesaar is slightly less valuable than a 22 year old Veesaar, all other things being equal. Veesaar had these and other reasons to go, all totally valid. Godspeed, Henri. Knock ’em dead.

UNC has three players on next season’s roster in the conversation for next year’s first round: Nikolas Avdalas, Seyon Keita, and Matt Able. Given that, Henri’s decision seems worthy of discussion. UNC fans will likely be crossing this bridge with one or more players at the end of every season, who will be faced with the same sorts of risks, opportunities, and options. What did Henri leave behind?

Start with this: the decision in the short term likely cost Veesaar a significant amount of money. If it seems odd to contemplate a player taking a pay cut to move to the NBA, welcome to college basketball in 2026. UNC was reported to have offered Veesaar something around $5 million to return to UNC for one more season. With the change in eligibility rules announced this week, Veesaar actually had two more years of college eligibility remaining. Let’s pretend Veesaar opts for two more years of college ball rather than the NBA, and let’s assume he remains healthy. Those two years would net Veesaar — or someone like him — at least $10 million.

Compare that to the players selected at the top of the second round in 2025.

  • Rasheer Fleming, pick #31 in 2025: $8.7m for four years ($5.9m guaranteed)
  • Noah Fleming, pick #32 in 2025: $8.6m for four years ($2.4m guaranteed)
  • Sion James, pick #33 in 2025: $10m for four years ($4.7m guaranteed)

So, where do the Bucks go from here?

MILWAUKEE, WI -MAY 06: Jon Horst, Jimmy Haslam and Taylor Jenkins poses for a photo after being announced as the new head coach on May 06, 2026 at the Milwaukee Art Museum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this Photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. Mandatory Copyright Notice: Copyright 2026 NBAE (Photo by Gary Dineen/NBAE via Getty Images) | NBAE via Getty Images

There will be plenty of content from the Brew Hoop team memorialising Giannis and his impact in Milwaukee over the coming weeks, but for this article, I wanted to delve deep into the minutiae of how the Bucks move forward from here, now that the draft is over. Are the obstacles in front of them really as debilitating as outsiders make them seem? Clearly, the goal will not be to win a title in the immediate future, so what should they aim to do? When might fans truly get to see the “light at the end of the tunnel”? My take on it all:

Rebuilding without your own picks

With Giannis now shipped off to South Beach, the Bucks have entered a phase they haven’t been in for a very long time: the rebuilding phase. The model rebuilding teams have generally followed in the past is to tank for 2-4 years, acquire picks at the top of the draft, and hope they can emerge with the requisite talent to compete once again. Now, the NBA has (foolishly, in my view) all but outlawed tanking anyway, but even if they hadn’t, that wouldn’t have been an option for Milwaukee because they don’t own their picks outright until 2031.

So, how do the Bucks rebuild without going to the draft (or having access to the top of it)? Well, the way I’ve been looking at it is they did go to the draft… they just packed what would have been a multiyear process into one offseason. Think about it: as opposed to building their young core over the course of 2-4 years, the Giannis trade gave them a unique opportunity to, in a way, do it in one fell swoop.

They acquired young, promising pieces in Kel’el Ware, Jaime Jaquez Jr., and Kasparas Jakucionis (we’ll see what they do with Tyler Herro)… to pair with their multiple 2026 lottery picks in Brayden Burries and Nate Ament… to pair with their own proven/promising/interesting young guys in Ryan Rollins, AJ Green, Jericho Sims, Ousmane Dieng, and Bogoljub Markovic. The average age of this entire group is 22.81 years old. If you remove Herro (as they appear to prefer trading him before the season), along with Sims and Green (who might be “on the outer” to varying degrees), the average age reduces to just 21.50.

Of course, we wait to see what happens with some of the remaining veterans on this team—such as Myles Turner and Kyle Kuzma—but it’s very plausible that they, too, could be flipped for draft picks and/or young players. I mean, credit where credit’s due: I really think Jon Horst and his team cooked here. That doesn’t mean it will all be sunshine and rainbows in the years to come, but from a process standpoint, you really can’t fault their approach to this “flash rebuild.”

How the Bucks can still generate future draft picks

I want to add that although the Bucks will not have their own picks during this time, they can acquire other teams’ picks by 1. trading their veterans, as I just mentioned, and 2. taking on bad contracts in exchange for draft capital. There is some well-founded debate about the extent to which the front office should be trying to win and make this group as formidable as possible, since they don’t own their picks (within reason; I am absolutely not implying that they should make another all-in trade).

More specifically, I am referring to the debate over the extent to which they should absorb other teams’ bad contracts for picks, even though doing so might make them marginally worse in the short term, possibly improving their pick for the team that owns it. For what it’s worth, I would dismiss this notion out of hand. Milwaukee owns a grand total of two picks over the next four years; Horst should be uber-opportunistic in acquiring as much draft capital as possible, and live with the results.

Additionally, as I outline in the next segment, the next two drafts (at least) are projected to be… below average, shall we say. The players that the Bucks give up via their own picks may not even be that good. Moreover, Milwaukee will generate a $25.5m trade exception in the Giannis trade. For those who don’t know, a trade exception allows Team A to absorb a contract (or contracts) without having to send out matching salary to Team B, which helps Team B save money and makes Team A an attractive trade partner. The Bucks should try to put that trade exception to good use.

Of course, another element of the push-and-pull between winning now and fortifying the future is which players the org wants to prioritise. I don’t feel like it’s a controversial take to say that I don’t want Nate Ament’s minutes being taken all season by Taurean Prince, for example. Sure, make the kids earn it, but they are the future—play ’em.

The hardest part of any rebuild

Ultimately, I think the most pressing task the Bucks will have over the coming years is simple: finding The Guy. I do believe this roster now has the bones to develop into a deep, entertaining squad that is a fringe playoff chance down the road, but I’m not sure their ceiling is much higher than that. It’s all well and good to have a team of solid players, but history tells us that you need stars to compete. Whether said star (or stars) is/are already on the roster is another question, but that’s the next step for this franchise.

It should be mentioned that nobody thought Shai Gilgeous-Alexander would become this when he was included in that blockbuster transaction with LA. Nobody thought Jalen Brunson would become the player he became when he arrived in New York. These success stories happen—the Bucks will need to find their own.

Will not having picks actually hurt Milwaukee?

People often denigrate Milwaukee’s outlook by referring to the org having traded their picks away, but if you look under the hood, the situation is not as dire as you might think. There are two reasons for this: 1. not having access to a draft only hurts if that draft itself is strong, and 2. the team that owns the Bucks’ picks and swaps plays a factor as well.

Analysing the upcoming draft classes

Let’s start with the 2027 draft. Look, if you had to choose a draft to not have a pick, this would undoubtedly be it. Jonathan Givony, founder of the well-known Draft Express, reported in July last year that league executives “are already ringing alarm bells in their front offices for the 2027 NBA draft, which appears to be an especially weak group of rising high school seniors and international players.”

The 2028 draft—when the Bucks will have the lesser swap rights between like three different teams (it’s really confusing)—appears to be slightly stronger than 2027, but it still looks to be much closer to the ‘27 draft than this year’s. So, let’s just stop here for a second: we’ve now accounted for two of the next four drafts in which not having your pick (or unfettered rights to it) might not actually be that significant.

Moving to the 2029 draft, it becomes increasingly hard to project right at this moment because you’re betting on kids three years away, but I have heard that this draft is a step above the previous two—the Bucks do not own any pick for this one, so that’s certainly not ideal. Maybe they can target getting that pick back down the line.

As for the 2030 crop, well, ESPN doesn’t even have rankings for this class yet, so your guess is as good as mine regarding its strength. But as far as the Bucks are concerned, they will receive the second-most favourable pick between their own, the Blazers’, and the Heat’s; this was another shrewd move by Horst, extracting a 2030 pick swap in the Giannis trade.

From there, the Bucks finally own unfettered access to their own firsts moving forward. Additionally, they now own Miami’s firsts in 2031 and 2033, when Giannis will be 36 and 38 years old. We shall see how that plays out down the line…

Why Portland owning Milwaukee’s picks matters

I’ve already written about why the changes to draft odds—in place until 2029, when they will be reevaluated—benefit the Bucks, but there’s another underdiscussed factor regarding Portland owning Milwaukee’s draft from 2028-2030: the strength of the Blazers themselves during this period.

Think about this: the only reason the Bucks were able to quasi-tank their way to the 10th pick this year is because the team that could have swapped picks with them (the Pelicans) was worse than them. Thus, Milwaukee was able to sink lower and lower while still being likely to retain their own pick (or, at the very least, a swap would have yielded a good pick for Milwaukee anyway).

Now, I’m not necessarily saying that the Bucks will be better than Portland during this period, but you tell me: what are the odds that Portland will be a playoff team in the west from 2028-2030? Most of those West playoff teams aren’t going anywhere, and teams like the Utah Jazz will be trying to win and look quite promising.

Look, I think there’s a good chance Portland is right there with Milwaukee in the lottery during those years; therefore, even if the Blazers swap picks with the Bucks and move up, Milwaukee would still get a lottery pick as a consolation prize. And with the flattened odds, who knows if the Blazers will even end up swapping picks in the first place, even if the Bucks have a worse record. Touch wood, but I doubt this will be like the infamous Thunder-Clippers deal, where LA often got their pick swapped to the end of the first round because OKC was so good.


All in all, watching the Bucks will now be a different type of experience than the one we are all used to, but honestly, I’m excited for it. Sure, watching your team try to compete year after year brings a certain exhilaration that probably won’t be replicated in the Cream City for a while. At the same time, that era, to me, had reached a dead end and was only going to get more toxic (and don’t take my word for it, take the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s: How the Giannis Antetokounmpo era in Milwaukee came to a bitter end). Frankly, watching a group of hungry young fellas come together to build something from the ground up sounds like a nice switch-up.

Let’s do this.

Has your opinion on Justin Crawford changed since the season began?

Jun 15, 2026; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Philadelphia Phillies outfielder Justin Crawford (2) reacts after hitting an RBI single against the Miami Marlins in the third inning at Citizens Bank Park. Mandatory Credit: Kyle Ross-Imagn Images | Kyle Ross-Imagn Images

The Phillies came into the 2026 season with an almost unprecedented number of players returning to the team yet again for another year. However, one player that was new was Justin Crawford, as it was all but guaranteed that the top prospect would be the Phillies starting center fielder to begin 2026. And that’s exactly what happened, as Crawford made his MLB debut on Opening Day and is still with the Phillies as we creep closer to the All-Star break.

Crawford was and is a polarizing player. The merits of his skill set and approach have been hotly debated as he progressed through the Phillies minor league system. Some believed that his groundball heavy hitter’s profile and low walk rates coupled with moderately high strikeout rates would make it difficult for Crawford to be a productive major leaguer. Others believed that his speed and ability to make contact coupled with good exit velocities would make him into a regular for a contending team.

Well, we are now 73 games into Justin Crawford’s MLB career as of yesterday. He’s slashing .243/.301/.339 with two home runs and nine stolen bases. Crawford started the year off well enough, hitting .267 with a .700 OPS through his first month in the big leagues. But he cratered in May, hitting just .195 with a .565 OPS as the Phillies began to platoon him to keep him away from left-handed pitching, against which he’s hitting .143 with a .374 OPS and a strikeout rate of 23.1%. He’s had a better June, hitting .275 with a .648 OPS through 18 games played as of June 24th. When things have gone well, Crawford’s contact ability and speed have been a welcome addition to the bottom of the Phillies lineup. When things have gone poorly, Crawford has been an automatic out and a black hole of offensive production with uncompetitive strikeouts.

Defensively, Crawford has been uneven at best, as he still looks like an unfinished product in center. Defensive metrics have their own biases and limitations, especially at this point in a season, but Crawford currently grades out as one of the worst defenders in baseball by defensive runs saved (-6) while being below average in outs above average (-2) and fielding run value (-2). By the eye test, Crawford has made some spectacular plays in center but has also struggled with routes at times and missed balls that should have been caught, especially by someone who possesses his speed.

The book is far from written on Justin Crawford’s rookie season, let alone his MLB career. But we have now read the first few chapters and should have a better idea of the type of player he is and possibly could be. So, has your opinion of Justin Crawford changed since the season began?

Cubs 10, Mets 5: Dansby Swanson leads the team to a doubleheader sweep

I’ve always been a fan of Dansby Swanson. He plays elite defense and, up to this year, his bat always played well enough.

This season, Swanson got off to a very slow start. He had a decent run for a few weeks in April, then went into an extended slump that had him batting .175/.281/.306 after last Tuesday’s loss to the Rockies at Wrigley Field.

I’m not sure what’s gotten into Swanson over the last six games but let’s hope this hot streak sticks around. After driving in seven runs in the doubleheader opener Tuesday afternoon with a three-run homer and grand slam, Swanson went 3-for-5 with four RBI in the nightcap, helping lead the Cubs to a 10-5 win over the Mets and a doubleheader sweep.

Also, the Mets are a really, really bad defensive team. They made six errors in this game, making half the Cubs’ 10 runs unearned. It was the first time any team had made six errors in a game against the Cubs since the Pirates made seven errors Sept. 7, 2012, a game the Cubs won 12-2. In fact, this is so rare in modern baseball that it hadn’t happened in seven years. Before this game, the last time any team had made six errors in a game was… the Cubs, on April 1, 2019, in Atlanta.

Before I get to the facts of this game, you need to read this. A team record was set by Swanson in the doubleheader — details from BCB’s JohnW53:

Dansby Swanson’s 11 RBI on Wednesday are the most since 1901 by a Cub in a doubleheader.

Billy Williams had nine (two, then seven) on Wednesday, Aug. 21, 1968, at home vs. the Braves.
In the first game, he singled home one run each in the third and seventh. After the second one, Ernie Banks homered to give the Cubs a 5-4 lead, and that is how the game ended.

Williams hit a two-run homer in the third inning of the second game, added a sacrifice fly in the fifth to tie the score at 5, broke the tie with a two-run single in the sixth and doubled home two runs in the eighth to make the score 9-5. The Cubs won, 11-5.

That record stood for less than two years, until Monday, July 6, 1970, when Ron Santo drove in 10 (two, then eight) at home vs. the Expos. He smacked a two-run, fourth-inning homer as the Cubs won the opener, 3-2.

Then he knocked in eight in the rematch, with a grand slam in the first, a bases-loaded walk in the fourth and a three-run homer in the sixth. He came up in the seventh with runners on first and second, and one out, and grounded into a double play. The Cubs won, 14-2.

No Cub had more than seven after Santo until Swanson on Wednesday. Williams had seven on Aug. 8, 1971, and Ryne Sandberg had seven on June 13, 1990.

Now, let’s begin at the beginning.

The Cubs took a 1-0 lead in the second on a pair of doubles. Nico Hoerner was first, then Carson Kelly drove in Nico [VIDEO].

The Mets came back with a three-run second off Shōta Imanaga. Unfortunately, all three of the runs scored on homers, which has been an issue for Imanaga all year. Francisco Alvarez hit a solo shot and after a single, A.J. Ewing hit a three-run blast.

The Cubs didn’t wait too long to take the lead back. In the top of the fourth, Hoerner doubled for the second time in the game. Kelly reached on the Mets’ second error of the game, with Hoerner taking third.

A single by Pedro Ramirez scored Nico [VIDEO].

A wild pitch advanced the runners to second and third. Swanson then singled in Kelly to tie the game 3-3 [VIDEO].

Ramirez took third on that hit and scored on this excuse-me bunt by Pete Crow-Armstrong [VIDEO].

As you will hear in comments from Swanson below, PCA was actually trying to do that — he’s been practicing it, according to Dansby.

The Mets tied the game in the bottom of the fourth with another home run off Imanaga, this one a solo shot by Mark Vientos. About all the homers given up by Imanaga, from John:

This was the 10th game in his three-season career as a Cub in which Shota Imanaga has surrendered at least three home runs.

That ties him with Steve Trachsel (1994-99) and Kyle Hendricks (2015-23) for the third most by any Cub since 1901.

Ferguson Jenkins did it 11 times in 1966-73 (never in his return in 1982-83) and Warre Hacker did it 12 times in 1950-56.
Hacker made 140 starts; Jenkins, 347; Trachsel, 190; and Hendricks, 270. This was just Imanaga’s 70th.

The Cubs took the lead back in the top of the sixth. Ramirez led off with a double and Swanson, again, came through, this time with a triple [VIDEO].

After PCA walked — that gives him eight walks in his last six games — Matt Shaw hit into a force play, scoring Swanson [VIDEO].

Imanaga was left in to face Francisco Lindor to lead off the bottom of the sixth. Shōta retired Lindor and then gave way to Gavin Hollowell to face Bo Bichette.

Didn’t matter. Bichette homered anyway, off Hollowell, to make it 6-5. Hollowell finished off the rest of the sixth without incident, and Hoby Milner threw a scoreless seventh.

The Cubs increased their lead to 7-5 in the eighth thanks to two Mets errors. Ramirez reached on the first one, by Bichette, then stole second. One out later, this happened [VIDEO].

The Mets defense was just awful. Just you wait, there’s more of that to come.

Trent Thornton threw a scoreless eighth and then the Cubs put the game away in the ninth. And all of it happened after the first two Cubs were routine outs.

Hoerner doubled, his third two-base hit of the game. This is, we hope, a good sign for Nico, who has been in a terrible slump for two months. His 21 doubles are now tied for third in MLB.

Kelly followed, reaching on an error by Vientos, with Hoerner taking third.

Another single by Ramirez scored Nico [VIDEO].

That wasn’t an error on Marcus Semien, but it could have been — that’s just poor defense. Kelly took third, and Ramirez moved up to second on his second steal of the game.

Swanson drove in both runners with this hit [VIDEO].

Jacob Webb threw the ninth. He issued a pair of two-out walks, then, appropriately, Swanson caught the ball for the final out [VIDEO].

Here are a couple of amazing run-scoring facts from John. First, on scoring six or more runs in consecutive games:

The Cubs have scored at least six runs in six consecutive games. They had not had a streak that long in more than 26 years, since they had six in a row April 22-28, 2000. That was the last of 10 previous streaks that ended at six.

Their last of more than six was eight, April 16-26, 1970. They had had eight three times before, in 1920, 1925 and 1930.

The team record since 1901 is nine, done twice: Aug. 31-Sept. 8, 1929, and June 29-July 5, 1937

And, on scoring in double digits in both games of the doubleheader:

The Cubs had not scored at least 10 runs in both games of a doubleheader in more than 82 years, since May 21, 1944, when they beat the Braves at Wrigley Field by 15-1 and 14-5. The second game was called after eight innings.

They had done it in only five earlier doubleheaders:
Aug. 21, 1935: lost, 13-12, and won, 19-5, at Philadelphia
Aug. 6, 1932: won, 10-9 and 10-8 in 11 innings, at Philadelphia
Sept. 2, 1929: won, 11-7 and 12-10, at home vs. Cardinals
Sept. 26, 1912: won, 11-10 and 10-0, at home vs. Reds (second game six innings)
May 30, 1908: won, 10-2 and 11-2, at St. Louis

So, Wednesday was the seventh time, fourth on the road and first sweep on the road in nine-inning games in 118 years and 27 days.

Wednesday’s doubleheader was the Cubs’ 858th since their last with two double-digit games and their 421st on the road.

Also, check this out. Seven hits with RISP is excellent for one game, but having 25 at-bats with RISP in one game is just an insanely large number.

Here’s Swanson on his big day and series [VIDEO].

And here are Craig Counsell’s postgame comments [VIDEO].

I have written here before on how much defense matters. The Cubs have elite defense at almost every position. The Mets are, to be blunt, terrible. It showed in this game. Errors aren’t the only measure, either. You can read almost every defensive metric available and it will show how far superior the Cubs are to the Mets. Further, this elite defense might help David Peterson, who the Cubs just acquired from the Mets in trade. We’ll likely find out more about that this weekend in Milwaukee, because I suspect Peterson will start one of the games against the Brewers.

In the meantime, the Cubs can go for an unlikely sweep of the Mets Thursday evening at Citi Field. Matthew Boyd will be activated from the injured list to start this game for the Cubs. The Mets will counter with Freddy Peralta. Game time is again 6:10 p.m. CT and TV coverage will be via Marquee Sports Network.

The Future: Walker Jenkins

After missing over a month with a shoulder sprain, Walker Jenkins is back in Triple-A and just one step away from the big leagues. He played four rehab games between Single-A and High-A, going 9-for-16 with a pair of homers. A couple days later, he faced off against reds rehabber Hunter Greene in his first at bat since returning to Triple-A and blasted a 99 mph fastball to the center field wall for a 108.7 mph triple. The Twins’ prized outfield prospect is looking MLB-ready and could be just weeks away from his major league debut.

His sweet lefty swing generates an impressive blend of contact and power. At just 21 years old, his 112.3 mph max EV and 90th percentile in the 107 range are well above average and give him a chance to develop plus power as he continues to mature. His plus hit tool has translated seamlessly throughout the minors, and it is only getting better. With strong contact rates and high line drive rates, he could push close to the .300 batting average mark in the majors, although that may drop if he leans into more of a power-focused approach. With strong discipline and good spin recognition, Jenkins has more walks than strikeouts in Triple-A this season. He is a complete hitter with no considerable weaknesses and is remarkably polished for his age.

It’s not just the bat, though. The Twins are getting an asset in every aspect of the game. Jenkins probably won’t be an aggressive base-stealer, but he is a good runner and can provide value on the bases. Defensively, he is a capable centerfielder, but with Buxton in the way, he will slot nicely into right field, where his plus arm and good range are expected to be reminiscent of what Max Kepler did out there for so many years.

The Twins are trotting out Austin Martin, Trevor Larnach, Kody Clemens, and Kyler Fedko in the corner outfield right now, all of whom have controllability beyond this season. At the same time, they have Emmanuel Rodriguez, Alan Roden, Matt Wallner, and Hendry Mendez waiting across the river along with Jenkins. This overcrowding issue in the outfield has been on the horizon for a couple years and the Twins have reached a position where they now have to deal with it. Something has to give. The consensus opinion is likely that Larnach or Clemens should be traded, but those two have been two of the Twins most consistently productive bats. Would the team be willing to trade one or two of the prospects for a big league pitcher?

There are countless potential outcomes, but if there is one certainty in this crossroads, its that Walker Jenkins is a franchise cornerstone, and a spot will undeniably be there for him when the team decides that its time for his major league career to begin.

Will a visit San Francisco be disastrous this year, too?

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 08: Matt Chapman #26 of the San Francisco Giants gets picked off at first base tagged out by Matt Olson #28 of the Atlanta Braves in the bottom of the eighth inning of a major league baseball game at Oracle Park on June 08, 2025 in San Francisco, California. (Photo by Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images) | Getty Images

I know that no one really wants to remember last year, but the trip to San Francisco was a bit of a fulcrum point. Or, maybe, not a fulcrum point, but the part where the Braves were flipped off the deep end by a lever atop a diabolically-positioned fulcrum. Or something.

Specifically, the 2025 Braves ended May at 27-30. Not good, but playoff odds were still at about 50 percent, given the roster, the expanded playoffs, yadda yadda yadda. When 85 wins can give you a playoff spot, winning seven more games than you lose over four months isn’t really that hard of a sell. They then lost four straight at home, including two one-run losses to the Diamondbacks — the latter of which involved giving up a seven-run ninth to turn an easy win into another disaster. Just like that, playoff odds went from 1-in-2 to 1-in-3, because, well, 27-34 is a lot harder to overcome than 27-30.

Then they got to San Francisco, and the bottom more or less dropped out. The Braves were swept, first with two consecutive walkoff losses, and then another one-run loss. Playoff odds were now down to 1-in-4. It was their fifth straight one-run loss; they wouldn’t have another one-run loss until the last game of June. Part of the kicker, too, was that after this visit to San Francisco, they went 11-8 for the rest of June — exactly the kind of improvement they’d have needed before the meaty part of the skid. But since that meaty part existed, it wasn’t near enough.

The Braves right now are… it’s not similar, but the vibes (which were near-immaculate for two months) are similarly doomer-ish. The Braves have lost 10 of 13, they’ve lost four in a row for the first time all season, they’ve been officially swept for the first time all season, and it goes on. The lineup is both injured enough to look like those random 2025 lineups with a bunch of warm bodies, but instead of the stories being about exciting resurgences from scrapheap pickups like Dominic Smith and Jorge Mateo, the only thing to really talk about is how nearly the entire team, including, say, Matt Olson, has gone from jumping all over hittable pitches to a revolting combination of staring at strikes, swinging at balls, and weak contact without any super-noticeable reduction in swing speed. Probably the biggest killer was rushing Drake Baldwin back because the Braves decided they couldn’t live with worse-than-a-pitcher offensive production from their fill-in catchers, only to have Baldwin hit like those catchers upon his return. Nothing has killed the team more than going from a best-in-class to a worst-in-class spot, and then keeping the worst-in-class stuff going even without Sandy Leon. Without the elite-ish hitting, the run prevention (or lack thereof) is more exposed, as the Braves have had to make tougher pitching management decisions while also taking the foot off the proverbial pedal in terms of actually orienting those decisions towards winning today’s game. Combine that with stuff like, “now is the perfect time to give Chris Sale more rest” and, yeah, it’s a mess.

But, this is about San Francisco and the Giants, who won two games (and had a third rained out) in Atlanta not long ago. The Giants aren’t good, and they followed their time in Atlanta by getting swept in Miami, though they have won their first two against the Athletics in a couple of very low-scoring games. If the Braves can’t recover here, it might just be that same early-June slide from 2025, just… much, much longer given how good April and May were.

On a related note, I’m of two minds about the press discussion (or lack thereof) regarding the team. Early on, before we knew what was going to happen, a lot of staffers and players were giving sound bites about how Walt Weiss differed from Brian Snitker because he was more vocal, animated, and willing to put himself in opposition to players to get a specific reaction. In other words, they were suggesting that he’d get steamed when things weren’t going his way. Of course, that was basically irrelevant for two months when everything was going his way… but we’ve heard nothing about any sort of steaming or internal boot-to-butt antics.

On the flip side, though, it may be disingenuous to expect any management impetus when the players could (but probably wouldn’t? probably?) point to management decisions as a contributing factor to the disharmony. I don’t think any players would come out and say it, but they’re as aware of the load management and the pushing Sale back as anyone. So, who knows — maybe we aren’t hearing anything about Weiss metaphorically spear-tackling his guys because really everyone needs a spear-tackle. But that’s really a side note.

Anyway, hope the things get better soon, but given that the Braves don’t seem very committed to making them better, we’ll see whether San Francisco is more of the same or a turnaround that is best described as fortuitous rather than some other adjective, because I’m not sure there’s much of a middle ground.

Rangers vs. Blue Jays prediction: Odds, recent stats, trends, and best bets for June 25

The Texas Rangers (38–42) open a four‑game set against the Blue Jays (39–41) tonight at Rogers Centre north of the border.

 

Last night, the Rangers dropped their second in a row in Miami, losing 4-2 to the Marlins. Jacob deGrom allowed just two runs over six innings but it was enough to send him to his fifth loss in 11 decisions this season. Wyatt Langford collected a couple of hits in the loss including his seventh home run of the season. Texas is now 4-6 in their last ten games to fall to 2.5 games behind the Mariners in the AL West. Toronto also lost last night. The Jays fell 3-1 to the Astros and in the process dropped the series to Houston. Nathan Lukes went yard in the first inning but that was the extent of the Jays’ offense. Trey Yesavage was elite allowing just two hits and one earned run over 5.2 innings…but it was not enough as Toronto lost for the third time in their last four games. The Blue Jays now trail the Yankees by 9.5 games in the AL East.

Tonight’s pitching matchup features MacKenzie Gore for Texas and Kevin Gausman for Toronto. Gore enters at 4–6 with a 4.07 ERA, having thrown 84.0 innings with 92 strikeouts. Control has been an issue of late for him, though, as he is allowing one walk every two innings over the past four starts (10BB over 22.2 IP). Gausman counters with a 4–5 record and 4.04 ERA, supported by 89 strikeouts in 89.0 innings and a strong 1.13 WHIP. His last start, however, was a disaster. Gausman allowed seven runs in just two innings against the Cubs last Friday.

 

At the plate, Texas has leaned on Josh Jung, who leads the team with a .296 average, and Jake Burger, who has produced 13 home runs and 46 RBI. Toronto’s hottest bats include Ernie Clement, hitting .292, and Kazuma Okamoto, who leads the club with 17 home runs and 49 RBI.

 

Lets dive into tonight’s matchup and find a sweat or two.

 

We’ve got all the info and analysis you need to know ahead of the game, including the latest info on the how to catch first pitch, odds, recent team performance, player stats, and of course, our predictions, picks & best bets for the game from our modeling tools and staff of experts.

 

Follow Rotoworld Player News for the latest fantasy and betting player news and analysis all season long.

Game Details and How to Watch: Rangers vs. Blue Jays

  • Date: Thursday, June 25, 2026
  • Time: 7:07PM EST
  • Site: Rogers Centre
  • City: Toronto, ON
  • Network/Streaming: MLB.TV, Rangers Sports Network, Sportsnet

 

Never miss a second of the action and stay up-to-date with all the latest team stats and player news. Check out our day-by-day MLB schedule page, along with detailed matchup pages that update live in-game with every out.

 

The Latest Odds: Rangers vs. Blue Jays

The latest odds as of Thursday courtesy of DraftKings:

  • Moneyline: Texas Rangers (-122), Toronto Blue Jays (+101)
  • Spread: Rangers +1.5 (-171), Blue Jays -1.5 (+141)
  • Total: 8.0 runs

 

Probable Starting Pitchers – Rangers vs. Blue Jays for June 25

  • Rangers: MacKenzie Gore
    Season Totals: 84.0 IP, 4-6, 4.07 ERA, 1.30 WHIP, 92K, 37 BB
  • Blue Jays: Kevin Gausman
    Season Totals: 89.0 IP, 4-5, 4.04 ERA, 1.13 WHIP, 89K, 20 BB

 

Who’s Hot? Who’s Not! Rangers vs. Blue Jays

  • Kazuma Okamoto had his modest 3-game hitting streak (6-10) snapped yesterday (0-4)
  • George Springer was 3-13 with 2 runs scored in the series against Houston
  • Andres Gimenez has hit safely in 8 of his last 10 games (10-32)
  • Josh Jung went hitless (0-13) in the series against the Marlins  
  • Brandon Nimmo went 0-4 last night to snap his 7-game hitting streak (13-30)
  • Joc Pederson has homered in 2 straight games and hit safely in 3 straight (6-13)

 

Rotoworld still has you covered with all the latest MLB player news for all 30 teams. Check out the feed page right here on NBC Sports for headlines, injuries and transactions where you can filter by league, team, positions and news type!

 

Top Betting Trends & Insights: Rangers vs. Blue Jays

  • The Rangers are 39-41 on the Run Line this season
  • The Blue Jays are 38-42 on the Run Line this season
  • The OVER has cashed 39 times in Toronto’s 80 games this season (39-37-4)
  • The OVER has cashed 34 times in Texas’ 80 games this season (34-40-6)

 

Expert picks & predictions: Rangers vs. Blue Jays

Rotoworld Bet Best Bet

 

Please bet responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline at 1-800-522-4700.

 

Our model calculates projections around each moneyline, spread and over/under bet for every game on the MLB calendar based on data points like past performance, player matchups, ballpark information and weather forecasts.

 

Once the model is finished running, we put its projection next to the latest betting lines for the game to arrive at a relative confidence level for each wager.

 

Here are the best bets our model is projecting for tonight’s game between the Rangers and the Blue Jays:

 

  • Moneyline: Rotoworld Bet is recommending a play on the Jays on the Moneyline.
  • Spread: Rotoworld Bet is staying away from a play on the Run Line.
  • Total: Rotoworld Bet is leaning towards a play on the Game Total OVER 8.0

 

Follow our experts on socials to keep up with all the latest content from the staff:

  • Jay Croucher (@croucherJD)
  • Drew Dinsick (@whale_capper)
  • Vaughn Dalzell (@VmoneySports)
  • Trysta Krick (@Trysta_Krick)

The curious case for letting Craig Breslow run the Red Sox through the trade deadline

Fort Myers, FL - February 16: Boston Red Sox Chief Baseball Officer Craig Breslow. The Red Sox held Day 7 of Spring Training at JetBlue Park on February 16, 2026. (Photo by Barry Chin/The Boston Globe via Getty Images) | Boston Globe via Getty Images

Amid the flaming trainwreck that is the 2026 Red Sox season, there’s this very odd side note to consider. Specially, the Red Sox actually had a pretty solid offseason.

Now, “pretty solid offseason” is intentionally vague and highly subjective, but work with me here. As we approach the season’s halfway point, it’s worth exploring the moves the club did make last winter, and how much more maddening they makes everything that’s manifesting now.

Below is a list of the eight transactions I deem to be the most significant of the past offseason. For this exercise, I’m not interested in things like the Vaughn Grissom trade or signing Danny Coulombe and Tommy Kahnle for peanuts in the bullpen. I’m trying to stick to the headliners that have moderate to major impacts on the big picture. If you disagree with the list, feel free to let me know in the comments and we can hash it out there.

So without further ado, here we go in chronological order:

1)November 25, 2025: Traded Brandon Clarke and Richard Fitts to the St. Louis Cardinals for Sonny Gray and cash.

Right out of the gate, this one looks like a win. Going into the winter, one of the biggest items on the Red Sox shopping list was a No. 2 starter after they had to go with Brayan Bello in Game 2 of the Wild Card series last year against the Yankees. Amazingly, it looks like they got one before Thanksgiving.

Gray is sitting at 9-1 and nearly a third of all Red Sox victories this year have come in his starts. The money gets complicated, and will continue to get more complicated if he is moved in the next six weeks, but I don’t think there are any Sox fans who would take back this trade.

2) December 4, 2025: Traded Jesus Travieso and Jhostynxon Garcia to the Pittsburgh Pirates for Adonys GuzmanJohan Oviedo and Tyler Samaniego.

This looks like a mostly nothing deal right now and you could even argue it doesn’t belong on the list. Jhostynxon Garcia hasn’t found success in Pittsburgh and Johan Oviedo has spent almost the entire year on the IL. For now it’s a neutral, nothing deal, but I’d have to imagine we’re going to see a decent amount of Oviedo in the second half, so I thought it deserves mention as a deal that could become relevant in the coming months.

3) December 15, 2025: Traded Luis Perales to the Washington Nationals for Jake Bennett.

Another deal for the nerds but, so far, this one is going quite well for Breslow and the Red Sox. Jake Bennett fits the big lefty, long extension mold they covet, and he’s starting to settle into the back of the rotation after also posting a 1.60 ERA in nine starts with Worcester.

Perales still has a high ceiling, but has shown no signs of getting closer to reaching it yet in 2026. Long way to go here, but so far this is looking like another positive move.

4) December 22, 2025: Traded Blake AitaYhoiker Fajardo and Hunter Dobbins to the St. Louis Cardinals for Willson Contreras.

The craziest thing about the Willson Contreras acquisition is how much he’s exactly what the Red Sox needed on paper, and yet it hasn’t made a lick of difference in their record. He’s right handed, he mashes, he’s having the best season of his career slugging wise, he’s filled the hole at first base, he plays above average defense, he brings a veteran presence in the clubhouse, and he takes a good at bat in high leverage spots. How has this not mattered more?

In any case, the Red Sox desperately needed a big right handed bat, and Craig Breslow managed to get one at an extremely affordable price. Contreras has an .896 OPS, which is just 30 points off the highest OPS of any right handed bat in baseball thanks to the top seven guys all being left handed and some pretty interesting evidence starting to pile up that ABS is helping the lefties (each of the top seven OPS figures in the sport right now bat left handed).

Bottom line: This was a fantastic trade!

5) January 9, 2026: Signed Tyron Guerrero as a free agent.

A total reclamation project that’s blossoming before our eyes. The goods news is he’s throwing triple digit gas for the strikes. The bad news is he’s 35 and the prudent thing to do is likely move him for future value before the deadline. Still, this looks like another win for Breslow.

6) Mid January, 2026: Lost out on the bidding war for Alex Bregman to the Cubs and immediately pivoted to sign Ranger Suarez to a five-year, $130 million deal.

Here’s the key moment of the entire offseason. Through some combination of misreading the market, not locking Alex Bregman up earlier, and just genuinely poor communication skills, the Red Sox didn’t land their man. This led to a pivot to spend the money that was going to go to Bregman on Ranger Suarez because at that point in the offseason, there wasn’t much else left on the shelves.

On one hand, Suarez has been another excellent addition, and there’s a good chance we’re going to look back on this move extremely favorably by the time his five year contract is over. However, this also left the Red Sox with a surplus of starting pitchers and a gigantic hole at third base, which leads us to this:

7) February 9, 2026: Traded Shane DrohanDavid Hamilton and Kyle Harrison to the Milwaukee Brewers for Caleb DurbinAndruw Monasterio, and Anthony Seigler.

Undoubtedly, this is the most bitter transaction of the winter. Craig Breslow moved on from a young, cost controlled left handed starter who has been outstanding for the Brewers for a third baseman who just started hitting this month. Losing Harrison hasn’t hurt the 2026 Red Sox all that much as their issue isn’t in the starting rotation, and you can kind of see how Durbin was supposed to fit into the puzzle with his defense, but there’s no way to classify this other than a huge loss at this stage.

They better hope Durbin keeps hitting!

8) February 10, 2026: Signed Isiah Kiner-Falefa as a free agent to a one year, $6 million deal.

It’s certainly not a move I would have made (they needed to shoot higher), but at that price and with this team’s holes, he’s been fine as a utility man. If he comes off the IL quickly, the front office will probably be able to get a lottery ticket return for him at the deadline.

Adding all that up, again I say, “pretty solid offseason.” The biggest issues here are the moves he didn’t make. Breslow didn’t move Jarren Duran for 80 cents on the dollar to clear the outfield logjam. He didn’t move on from Brayan Bello when the had the surplus of pitching following the Ranger Suarez signing, and he didn’t go aggressively enough after another right handed bat. (Although to be fair, the right handed bats available have proved incredibly underwhelming. Even if you wanted Pete Alonso at first base, that means no Willson Contreras.)

Still, despite those warts, it’s feels borderline impossible the Red Sox are having the season they’re having in 2026 with that offseason coming off 89 wins in 2025. Then again, if you watch them play every night, you know the real issue here is they just don’t know how to play baseball as a collective unit. They don’t come back in games, they don’t pick each other up, they don’t take good situational at bats, they’re downright dreadful in clutch situations, and despite being well above average overall defensively, they manage to make their errors at the most inopportune times and almost never make a highlight reel play to save a game.

Long-term, this characteristic is a complete disaster and enormous changes are needed throughout the organization since being able to play baseball as a cohesive unit is kind of the whole point of the sport. However, when it comes to just the 2026 trade deadline, that doesn’t really matter. Unlike in the offseason where piling up value on a roster where the pieces don’t fit will absolutely come back to bite you in the caboose, it’s pretty much the name of the game if you’re a seller at the trade deadline.

You can be picky, you can drive the price up, and you can wait out for offers that will make your counterpart squirm because you have all the leverage. This is exactly the type of negotiation Craig Breslow is made for. So instead of swapping everything else out in the next few weeks and letting somebody new handle this on the fly, isn’t it better to let Breslow have the deadline and then radically alter the organizational philosophy after August 3rd?

Again, take a look at the offseason he had. Breslow is good at collecting value. Despite the unmitigated disaster this club has been on the field in 2026, he’s probably still the best man for this job for at least six more weeks.

Beyond that though, it’s going to take a much bigger reclamation project to fix the issues that permeate deep inside the organization. While sellers at the deadline play a game on paper, the rest of the league, as this front office has learned the hard way, does not.

2026 NBA Draft: Second Round Review

San Antonio went smaller for its two second round picks - with one of them being Ja’Kobi Gillespie from Tennessee

San Antonio continued its recent trend of selecting talent from established teams in powerhouse conferences – nabbing getting Ja’Kobi Gillespie from Tennessee and Maliq Brown from Duke. Meanwhile, there were eyeball-popping amounts of trade activity again around the Spurs’ draft picks.

  • 42nd selection: Ja’Kobi Gillespie (Tennessee) – 6’0″ 182 lb.
  • 44th selection: Maliq Brown (Duke) – 6’8″ 217 lb.

Below is a review of the entire second round, but first, a few quick observations:

  • The pre-drafting show segment tonight went longer than last night’s lead-up into the first pick. This could have been for the longer explanations about the importance of these second round picks (featuring 2-way contracts) in the new ‘3-2-1’ drafting world.
  • It was really pleasant to hear the applause across the board for Mark Tatum as he walked up to announce each pick.
  • The names repeated as second round found gold ranged from Jalen Brunson to Nikola Jokic to our own Manu Ginobili (forever knighted as “E-man-yoo-el Gee-noh-bee-lee“) (other luminaries: Dennis Rodman and Draymond Green)
  • Way more cooler names in the second round, including: Baba Miller, Trevon Brazile (who went from San Antonio to Denver), Otega Oweh, Vsevolod Ishchenko, and Narcisse Ngoy.
  • Denver scuttled Isaiah Stewart to memphis for only three future second round picks. He would have been an upgrade for the Spurs’ bench.

And now onto the picks!

31. Houston Rockets (via New York)

PLAYER: Bruce Thornton (Ohio State)

OBSERVATION: When I first heard his voice from the other browser tab, I immediately thought ‘Dennis Rodman!

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Chauncey Billups / Spurs: Thicc DeMar DeRozan


32. Memphis Grizzlies

PLAYER: Richie Saunders (BYU)
OBSERVATION:
An heir to the tater tot kingdom is a winner in my eyes.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: what Warriors fans want Brandin Podziemski to be / Spurs: 2002-2003 Stephen Jackson


33. Minnesota Timberwolves (via Brooklyn)

PLAYER: Isaiah Evans (Duke)

OBSERVATION:  The nickname “Showtime Slim” is quite exemplary.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Aaron Wiggins / Spurs: early 90s Dale Ellis


34. Cleveland Cavaliers (via Sacramento)

PLAYER: Meleek Thomas (Arkansas)

OBSERVATION: He looks deceptively quick.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: poor man’s Bradley Beal / Spurs: Gary Neal in a pinch


35. Denver Nuggets (from San Antonio)

PLAYER: Trevon Brazile (Arkansas)

OBSERVATION: He looks like a no-nonsense big that has a nice motor.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Willey Cauley-Stein / Spurs: 2007 Francisco Elson


36. Los Angeles Clippers

PLAYER: Baba Miller (Cincinnati)

OBSERVATION: He had a very blingy ‘B’ necklace to complete his draft day fit. Loved it.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Amare Stoudemire (squinting heavily) / Spurs: would’ve chewed up and spit out Zach Collins in practice


37. Miami Heat (from Oklahoma City)

PLAYER: Ryan Conwell (Louisville)

OBSERVATION: This pick immediately went to Miami – who just need to fill out their roster at this point.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Devin Booker / Spurs: a more compact Danny Green


38. Indiana Pacers (from Chicago)

PLAYER: Braden Smith (Purdue)

OBSERVATION: Heady point guard going to Indiana? Of course.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP:  Non-Spurs: TJ McConnell with pizzazz / Spurs: Speedy Claxton if we could have kept him beyond 2003


39.  New York Knicks (from Houston)

PLAYER: Jack Kayil (Germany)

OBSERVATION:  Maybe an understudy for Jalen Brunson. This seems like the type of draft-and-stash San Antonio used to make.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Deron Williams / Spurs: A fully-formed Blake Wesley


40. Boston Celtics

PLAYER: Dillon Mitchell (St. John’s)

OBSERVATION: Didn’t hear too much about him with most of the analysts’ attention on Zuby Ejiofor.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Aaron Nesmith / Spurs: (way back machine) Monty Williams


41. Oklahoma City Thunder (from Miami)

PLAYER: Otega Oweh (Kentucky)

OBSERVATION: Looks like a defensive lineman masquerading as a basketball wingman.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: less-dirty Lu Dort / Spurs: 2nd year Carter Bryant


42. San Antonio Spurs

PLAYER: Ja’Kobi Gillespie (Tennessee)

OBSERVATION: The highlight plays seemed to come easy for him.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Jose Alvarado / Spurs: Gary Neal with handles


43. Brooklyn Nets

PLAYER: Tyler Bilodeau (UCLA)

OBSERVATION: The shooting stroke looks smooth, but he’ll need to contribute on the defensive end.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Adam Morrison / Spurs: 2002 Steve Smith


44. San Antonio Spurs

PLAYER: Maliq Brown (Duke)

OBSERVATION: He looks like a potential upgrade for Julian Champagnie or a platoon partner – particularly while leading his teams with deflections and steals.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Jalen Williams / Spurs: Champagnie


45. Sacramento Kings (from New York)

PLAYER:  Emanuel Sharp (Houston)

OBSERVATION: Their salary cap seems harder to manager than a grad school economics course.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Jae’Sean Tate / Spurs: Lonnie Walker IV


46. Orlando Magic

PLAYER: Felix Okpara (Tennessee)

OBSERVATION: This pick was soon after traded to Washington. If he had stayed with Orlando, that would’ve been a crowded frontcourt.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Grant Williams / Spurs: A taller more filled out Sidy Cissoko


47. Phoenix Suns

PLAYER:  Tyler Nickel (Vanderbilt)

OBSERVATION: This pick was sent to New York. He would be a broadcaster’s dream if he learned to pass well – “What a dime by Nickel!

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Alex Caruso / Spurs: Jeremy Sochan before the confidence was sucked out of him


48. Dallas Mavericks

PLAYER:  Tobi Lawal (Virginia Tech)

OBSERVATION:  He looks like he’ll be a rotation big for a decade-plus.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Jonathan Isaac / Spurs: Chimezi Metu – with more playing time


49. Denver Nuggets

PLAYER:  Bryce Hopkins (St. John’s)

OBSERVATION: Denver’s picks seems like eventual Aaron Gordon buddy material or his replacements.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Aaron Gordon / Spurs: 2021 LaMarcus Aldridge (sad face)


50. Toronto Raptors

PLAYER: Jaden Bradley (Arizona)

OBSERVATION: His college heroics would seem to portend to success in the league.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Marcus Smart / Spurs: Malaki Branham in a non-Wemby universe


51. Orlando Magic (from Washington)

PLAYER:  Izaiyah Nelson (USF)

OBSERVATION: He looks like the type of tweener who will excel on his second team.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Miles Bridges / Spurs: what Jaron Blossomgame could have been


52.  Atlanta Hawks (from Los Angeles Clippers)

PLAYER:  Henri Veesaar (North Carolina)

OBSERVATION: Just as I was about to type “Ivica Zubac’s replacement,’ the trade was announced.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Brook Lopez / Spurs: however, this feels like a Luka Samanic situation


53. Houston Rockets

PLAYER:  Ugonna Oyenso (Virginia)

OBSERVATION: Surprise! This was traded to Detroit. But he had one of the top five inspirational reactions upon getting drafted.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Theo Ratliff / Spurs: Mason Plumlee


54. Golden State Warriors

PLAYER:  Lajae Jones (Florida State)

OBSERVATION: He moved pretty smoothly in all of his highlights.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: more athletic Gui Santos / Spurs: moves somewhat like Quinndary Weatherspoon


55.  New York Knicks

PLAYER:  Nick Martinelli (Northwestern)

OBSERVATION: He should have been a Warriors pick given that the Martinelli’s beverage company is heardquartered here in the Bay Area.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: 2010s Gordon Hayward / Spurs: fully actualized Boris Diaw


56. Chicago Bulls

PLAYER:  Vsevelod Ishchenko (Russia)

OBSERVATION: Yet another trade after the fact – this one went to the Mavericks.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Andrei Kiriklenko (in high school) / Spurs: the way Nikola Milutinov made so many of our mouths salivate in 2015 and the years after


57. Atlanta Hawks

PLAYER:  Narcisse Ngoy (France)

OBSERVATION: This one was also traded to the Clippers. #GINOBILI!

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Guerschon Yabusele is envious of Narcisse’s dimensions / Spurs: I could see Nazr Mohammed


58.  New Orleans Pelicans

PLAYER:  Jaron Pierre, Jr. (SMU)

OBSERVATION:  Is this their first pick of this draft? This particular pick has traveled more than I have on the basketball court.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Ryan Dunn (at least the way he’s played against San Antonio) / Spurs: David Garcia-Jones


59.  Minnesota Timberwolves

PLAYER:  Trey Kaufman-Renn (Purdue)

OBSERVATION:  This looks like a depth move should Naz Reid move into the starting lineup.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: Sacramento version of Trey Lyles / Spurs: Trey Lyles alert!


60. Washington Wizards

PLAYER:  Malique Lewis (Trinidad and Tobago)

OBSERVATION:  It’s really cool that the Wizards got the first and last picks of the 2026 draft! However, this pick was sadly traded to Milwaukee.

UNOFFICIAL PLAYER COMP: Non-Spurs: oddly enough, 2013 Giannis Antetokounmpo (before the growth spurt and the muscles) / Spurs: If any of you remember him, James Anderson!

Good news, Pounders! It’s only about 1.5 weeks til the California Classic in Northern California and 2 weeks until the NBA Summer League! Hallelujah for basketball!

Minor league update for 6/24/26

BERLIN, GERMANY - JUNE 23: A view of Alexanderplatz with the TV Tower on June 23, 2026 in Berlin, Germany. (Photo by Thomas Koehler/Photothek via Getty Images) | Photothek via Getty Images

For Hickory, Michael Trausch struck out one in a scoreless inning. Louis Marinaro struck out both batters he faced.

Marcos Torres was 3 for 4 with a homer and two stolen bases. Yolfran Castillo was 1 for 3 with a walk and a stolen base. Marco Argudin doubled and walked. Paulino Santana had a hit. Angel Arredondo had a hit and a walk.

Hickory box score

Hub City starter J’Briell Easley allowed four runs in 1.1 IP, striking out two and walking two. Owen Proksch struck out three in 2.2 scoreless innings. Brock Porter struck out five and walked three in 2.1 IP, allowing one run. Case Matter struck out two and walked three in an inning, allowing two runs.

Hector Osorio had a hit and a walk. Maxton Martin went 2 for 4. Gleider Figuereo, Chandler Pollard and Eduardo Mejia each had a hit.

Hub City box score

For Frisco, Bryan Magdaleno struck out four in two shutout innings.

Malcolm Moore was 2 for 4 with a homer. Keith Jones II was 2 for 3 with a double, two walks and a stolen base. Rafe Perich drew a pair of walks.

Frisco box score

Spencer Adams started for Round Rock. He was a second round pick of the Chicago White Sox in 2014 who, it appears, last pitched in affiliated ball in 2019. He didn’t pitch at all after 2019 until 2025, when he spent the season with Gary in the independent American Association. He was pitching for Gastonia in the Atlanta League before the Rangers apparently signed him so he could provide a body for Round Rock’s pitching staff.

Adams allowed six runs in 5.2 IP, including three homers, walking one and striking out two. Michel Otanez allowed five runs in 0.2 IP, striking out one and walking three. Ryan Lobus faced two batters, giving up a hit and retiring the other guy.

Cam Cauley homered. Aaron Zavala had a hit.

Round Rock box score

Mets vs. Cubs: How to watch on SNY on June 25, 2026

The Mets conclude the four-game series with the Chicago Cubs with a nightcap on Thursday at Citi Field at 7:10 p.m. on SNY.


Mets Notes

  • Francisco Alvarez, who homered in both games of Wednesday's doubleheader, is 7-for-22 (.318) in his last six games with a 1.075 OPS
  • Bo Bichette, who homered in Game 2, has been swinging a hot bat: 21-for-58 (.362) with nine extra-base hits, 13 RBI, and a 1.067 OPS in his last 14 games
  • Freddy Peralta looks to bounce back from a rough outing in Philadelphia, when he allowed 10 runs on 10 hits in 2.2 innings
  • Chicago is sending out left-hander Matthew Boyd, who carries a 6.00 ERA over his first 24 innings of the campaign, but the veteran is coming off his best outing: two runs on four hits over six innings against Arizona

Today's Lineups

CUBS
METS
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----

What channel is SNY?

Check your TV or streaming provider's website or channel finder to find your local listings.

How can I stream the game?

The way to stream SNY games is via the MLB App or MLB.tv.

In order to stream games in SNY’s regional territory, you will need to have SNY as part of your TV package (cable or streaming), or you can now purchase an in-market SNY subscription package via MLB or Amazon. Both ways will allow fans to watch the Mets on their computer, tablet or mobile phone.

How can I watch the game on my computer via MLB?

To get started on your computer, click here and then follow these steps:

  • Log in using your provider credentials. If you are unsure of your provider credentials, please contact your provider.
  • Link your provider credentials with a new or existing MLB.com account.
  • Log in using your MLB.com credentials to watch Mets games on SNY.

How can I watch the game on the MLB App?

MLB App access is included for FREE with SNY. To access SNY on your favorite supported Apple or Android mobile device, please follow the steps below.

  • Open “MLB” and tap on “Subscriber Login” for Apple Devices or “Sign in with MLB.com” for Android Devices.
  • Type in your MLB.com credentials and tap “Log In.” 
  • To access live or on-demand content, tap on the "Watch" tab from the bottom navigation bar. Select the "Games" sub-tab to see a listing of available games. You can scroll to previous dates using the left and right arrows. Tap on a game to select from the game feeds available. 

For more information on how to stream Mets games on SNY, please click here.

New York Yankees vs. Boston Red Sox: Series Preview

BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS - JUNE 12: Starting pitcher Sonny Gray #54 of the Boston Red Sox throws in the first inning against the Texas Rangers at Fenway Park on June 12, 2026 in Boston, Massachusetts. (Photo by Jaiden Tripi/Getty Images) | Getty Images

Last year, the Yankees and Red Sox met in an AL Wild Card Series that seemed like it could easily go either way. Of course, it went to a decisive Game 3, where Cam Schlittler delivered a monster outing, and the teams have gone in opposite directions since.

This year, the Yankees — while you can have your qualms about their play and the roster construction — are again a contender and enter this weekend with the best record in the American League. Meanwhile, the Red Sox have fallen way off the pace and are last in both the division and the AL as a whole, recently crashing past the Angels. Interim skipper Chad Tracy’s club is still missing big-name players like Garrett Crochet and Roman Anthony, and their offense has been appallingly anemic. Entering play yesterday, only the underachieving Padres had a worse hitting corps by wRC+ (86 to Boston’s 89), and the Red Sox were also second-worst by total homers (65 in 77 games).

However, the two teams are now set to meet this weekend at Fenway Park. While the “throw out the record books when rivals meet” is too much of a cliché, we’ve seen the Yankees put in some iffy performances of late and the Red Sox still do have talent. With four games coming over the next couple days, let’s take a look at the probable pitching matchups for this series.

Thursday: Cam Schlittler vs. Connelly Early (7:10 pm ET)

The opening game of the series will be a rematch of Game 3 of the Wild Card Series last year. Schlittler began June with his first genuinely not-great start of the season, and has since responded by looking like his normal dominant self. He’s allowed just two earned runs combined over his last three outing, and struck out 13 batters during his last time out against the Reds. That’s a career best for him, besting even the aforementioned Wild Card Series Game 3.

Early was somewhat famously the man opposite Schlittler last year, as he was also notably a rookie getting a start in that massive game. His overall numbers in 2026 grade out as either side of average, depending on what stat you’re looking at. He has been hit by the home run bug a bit this year, having given up 14 in 15 starts, so that’ll be something the Yankees will hope they can take advantage of.

Friday: Will Warren vs. Payton Tolle (7:10 pm ET)

Warren’s numbers for the season are absolutely ones that you’ll take from a back-end starter; however, he often looks like he has the raw stuff to be even better than that. However, he just has too many starts like the last two, where he’s given up a total of 16 hits, even if he’s only been dinged for four earned runs in that time.

The Yankees have only gotten one previous look at the second-year Tolle, and it didn’t go well. Back in April, he struck out 11 batters while holding the Yankees to just one run on three hits. That being said, after a very good start — even beyond that outing — to his sophomore campaign, Tolle has struggled a bit recently. His ERA is 5.29 over his last three games, with his overall season mark going up nearly an entire run in the process.

Saturday: Gerrit Cole vs. Jake Bennett (1:10 pm ET)

Following a brilliant initial return from Tommy John surgery, Cole has looked a bit pedestrian of late. Returning from an injury that knocks you out for a full year is always going to produce some up-and-down results, but you’d like to see Cole fare better than the 5.95 ERA he’s produced over his last four appearances.

The Red Sox will be going with yet another youngster on Saturday, and this will be the Yankees’ first ever meeting with the rookie Bennett. He’s been decent so far in his career, and his coming off his best-ever major-league performance. Earlier this week against the Rockies, he shut out Colorado over six innings, allowing four hits, while striking out nine.

Sunday: Carlos Rodón vs. Sonny Gray (7:20 pm ET)

A 114 ERA+ with a FIP that suggests he could be a bit better is absolutely something worth taking from Rodón, especially considering that he’s probably the Yankees No. 4 when everyone is healthy. However, especially with his walks, he can often be a chore to watch. The Red Sox are one of the teams that walk the least in all of MLB, so theoretically, this is a chance to put in a good effort on that front.

The veteran and former Yankee Gray has been a bright spot for the Red Sox this year, with a 2.95 ERA over his 14 starts so far (and might already be on the trade block due to Boston’s spiral). One of those came against the Yankees back at the start of the month, where he and the Red Sox got the win. That wasn’t his best effort of the season, but he did manage to frustrate the Yankees enough for them to get just three runs despite eight hits.

Mets Morning News: Cubs and Vikings raid Citi Field

Jun 24, 2026; New York City, New York, USA; Norway national soccer team fans show support accompanied by Mr. and Mrs. Met during the MLB game between the New York Mets and the Chicago Cubs at Citi Field. Mandatory Credit: Vincent Carchietta-Imagn Images | Vincent Carchietta-Imagn Images

Meet the Mets

Well it was unsurpringly ugly yet again at Citi Field. The Mets gave up 20 runs in the doubleheader while scoring eight to get swept in the two games by the Cubs. The pitching was awful, the defense was atrocious, and the offense left a bit to be desired, but hey at least the Norwegians had fun.

Choose your recap Game 1: Amazin’ Avenue, MLB.com, Newsday, NY Post

Game 2:Amazin’ Avenue, Athletic, Daily News, MLB.com, NY Post

In what could be the start of a fire sale, the Mets traded David Peterson to the Cubs in exchange for prospect Cole Mathis.

About the only people having fun in the stadium, besides the Cubs, were the Norwegian World Cup fans who took in a baseball game while they are in town.

Nolan McLean looked like he actually might help the team win a ballgame but instead it all fell apart quickly, and it turned it yet another ugly loss in game one.

Keith Hernandez lamented the Pete Crow-Armstrong trade after watching him score against the Mets.

Before game two of the doubleheader, the team activated Francisco Lindor from the IL and designated Zack Short for assignment.

With his latest struggles, Carlos Mendoza announced that Kodai Senga will be moving to the bullpen for the foreseeable future.

Tyrone Taylor continued his rehab assignment in Triple-A as he works his way back from a hip flexor strain.

Around the National League East

The Braves were swept by the Padres with a 5-2 loss in the series finale.

Reynaldo López is returning to the Atlanta rotation after finding some success in the bullpen.

Eury Pérez outdueled Jacob deGrom in the Marlins’ 4-2 win over the Rangers.

The Phillies topped the Nationals by a score of 5-4.

Before their game against Philadelphia, Washington claimed reliever Justin Lawrence off waivers from the Twins.

Around Major League Baseball

The Cardinals promoted Bill DeWitt III to chief executive officer after serving as the team’s president since 2008.

The Giants’ Pride Night cap controversy is forcing MLB to decide whether they truly want to be inclusive to everyone.

The Red Sox will likely be sellers at the deadline and they have a few players who could be on the move as the trade deadline approaches.

Left-handed hitting is on the rise around the league and it might stem from the new ABS challenge system.

Mookie Betts slugged his 300th career home run against the Twins.

This Date in Mets History

Happy Birthday Carlos Delgado!

Astros vs. Tigers prediction: Odds, recent stats, trends, and best bets for June 25

The Houston Astros (39–43) visit the Detroit Tigers (34–46) at Comerica Park tonight with both clubs needing to string wins together if they are to threaten for a playoff position.

 

Last night, Houston wrapped up its series in Toronto with a 3–1 win, taking two of three against the Jays. Mike Burrows was special allowing one run and two hits over six innings to earn just his third win of the season. Jeremy Pena and Isaac Paredes each drove in a run for the Astros. The Tigers dropped two of three against the Yankees earlier this week including a 4-2 setback last night. Tarik Skubal was roughed up a bit allowing four runs over six innings.

 

Detroit continues to be consistently inconsistent. They sandwiched a couple of series losses to the Astros and the Yankees around a sweep of the White Sox. As a result, the Tigers sit in fourth in the AL Central 7.5 games in back of the aforementioned ChiSox. The Astros have been marginally better. They are 6-4 over their last ten and have climbed into a tie for second in the AL West, 2.5 games behind the Mariners.

Tonight’s pitching matchup features Tatsuya Imai for Houston and Troy Melton for Detroit. Imai enters with a record of 4–3 with a 6.15 ERA and 1.44 WHIP. He has struck out 48 opposing hitters but as his ERA suggests has struggled preventing baserunners from crossing home plate. Melton, by contrast, has been one of Detroit’s most effective arms, carrying a 4–0 record, 2.56 ERA, and 0.95 WHIP. With Skubal having just returned from a few weeks on the injured list, Melton has been the anchor of this rotation.

 

Diamond Notes: Houston takes the field with a 19–22 road record, while Detroit has been OK at home sitting at 22–18. The Tigers have excelled when scoring five or more runs, going 24–6 in such games. Houston’s offense and specifically their power at the plate has been consistent this season. They rank fifth in baseball with 107 home runs.

 

Lets dive into tonight’s matchup and find a sweat or two.

 

We’ve got all the info and analysis you need to know ahead of the game, including the latest info on the how to catch first pitch, odds, recent team performance, player stats, and of course, our predictions, picks & best bets for the game from our modeling tools and staff of experts.

 

Follow Rotoworld Player News for the latest fantasy and betting player news and analysis all season long.

 

Game Details and How to Watch: Astros vs. Tigers

 

  • Date: Thursday, June 25, 2026
  • Time: 6:40PM EST
  • Site: Comerica Park
  • City: Detroit, MI
  • Network/Streaming: MLB.TV, SCHN, Tigers.TV

 

Never miss a second of the action and stay up-to-date with all the latest team stats and player news. Check out our day-by-day MLB schedule page, along with detailed matchup pages that update live in-game with every out. 

The Latest Odds: Astros vs. Tigers

The latest odds as of Thursday courtesy of DraftKings:

  • Moneyline: Houston Astros (-105), Detroit Tigers (-114)
  • Spread: Astros -1.5 (+157), Tigers +1.5 (-191)
  • Total: 9.0 runs

 

Probable Starting Pitchers and their Stats: Astros vs. Tigers for June 25

  • Astros: Tatsuya Imai
    Season Totals: 41.0 IP, 4-3, 6.15 ERA, 1.44 WHIP, 48K, 24 BB
  • Tigers: Troy Melton
    Season Totals: 31.2 IP, 4-0, 2.56 ERA, 0.95 WHIP, 19K, 9 BB

Who’s Hot? Who’s Not! Astros vs. Tigers

  • Jose Altuve was 4-13 in the series against Toronto (.308)
  • Yordan Alvarez was 0-3 last night snapping his modest 3-game hitting streak
  • Isaac Paredes was 13-38 with 1 HR and 7 RBI over his last 10 games
  • Colt Keith is 7-28 with 4 HRs and 10 RBI over his last 10 games
  • Kevin McGonigle has hit safely in 9 of his last 10 games (12-39)
  • Sam Torkelson was 3-10 against the Yankees this week

Rotoworld still has you covered with all the latest MLB player news for all 30 teams. Check out the feed page right here on NBC Sports for headlines, injuries and transactions where you can filter by league, team, positions and news type!

Top Betting Trends & Insights: Astros vs. Tigers

  • The Tigers are 39-41 on the Run Line this season
  • The Astros are 39-43 on the Run Line this season
  • The OVER has cashed 43 times in Houston’s 82 games this season (43-36-3)
  • The OVER has cashed 34 times in the Tigers’ 80 games this season (34-42-4)

 

Expert picks & predictions: Astros vs. Tigers

Rotoworld Bet Best Bet

Please bet responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline at 1-800-522-4700.

 

Our model calculates projections around each moneyline, spread and over/under bet for every game on the MLB calendar based on data points like past performance, player matchups, ballpark information and weather forecasts.

 

Once the model is finished running, we put its projection next to the latest betting lines for the game to arrive at a relative confidence level for each wager.

 

Here are the best bets our model is projecting for today’s game between the Astros and the Tigers:

  • Moneyline: Rotoworld Bet is leaning towards a play on the Tigers on the Moneyline.
  • Spread: Rotoworld Bet is staying away from a play on the Run Line.
  • Total: Rotoworld Bet is recommending a play on the Game Total OVER 9.0.

 

Follow our experts on socials to keep up with all the latest content from the staff:

  • Jay Croucher (@croucherJD)
  • Drew Dinsick (@whale_capper)
  • Vaughn Dalzell (@VmoneySports)
  • Trysta Krick (@Trysta_Krick)

David Peterson trade not start of a Mets summer sell-off, surrender

Late Wednesday night, after a six-error game capped the most demoralizing day of a remarkably demoralizing season, the Mets… well, finally did something.

They traded struggling left-handed starter David Peterson to the Chicago Cubs, who spent the day beating up on them despite a rotation held together by a thread, in exchange for infield prospect Cole Mathis. Mathis, 22, has a .981 OPS across two Single-A levels this year.

Trading Peterson should not be read as a sign of surrender, nor an indication that the Mets are now in full sell-off mode, according to a person with direct knowledge of their thinking. They needed to try something different in their rotation, though exactly what that will look like remains unclear. And they liked Mathis, the 13th ranked prospect in the Cubs’ system, according to MLB Pipeline, one Chicago was willing to give up after a stunning series of injuries decimated their rotation in recent weeks. 

In other words, the Mets saw a chance to get value out of an asset they were struggling to revive. So they did it.

But if not a sign of surrender, the move does represent the first drastic, permanent change David Stearns and the Mets have made to their roster since the start of this season. Prior to Wednesday, their most substantial shake-up came when they called up outfielder A.J. Ewing in mid-May and decided to play him every day. Other than that, Stearns and his front office have been almost unfathomably patient with their major league roster -- particularly Peterson and his fellow struggling colleagues KodaiSenga and Sean Manaea.

Manaea looked like he had figured something out until he struggled again Wednesday. Senga will move to the bullpen in a last-ditch effort to extract value from a once-promising arm, a generous outcome for a veteran whom the Mets have given chance after chance out of necessity and lack of options.

Peterson’s last outing was yet another maddening combination of ground balls that did not help him, too many walks, and back-breaking home runs. The Cubs have the best defense in baseball, which might help him. Maybe all he needs is a fresh start. The lefty was the Mets’ longest-tenured player after Stearns purged veterans this winter. For whatever reason, Peterson simply could not recover his All-Star form with them this year.

His departure, combined with Senga’s move to the bullpen, leaves two holes in the Mets' rotation. Righty Christian Scott is expected to fill one of them when he returns from the injured list this weekend, joining Manaea, FreddyPeralta, and Nolan McLean in the starting corps.

Potential minor league reinforcements could include Jonah Tong, who is struggling to add to his pitch mix in Triple-A, Zach Thornton, who allowed five runs in four innings in his last outing, and Jack Wenninger, whose walk rates have deterred the Mets from calling him up sooner, even as his ERA and strikeout numbers look promising this year. Tobias Myers has returned to his bulk role in the big leagues, but he has been inconsistent recently, too. 

Perhaps the Mets will look outside the organization for reinforcement, though, as Stearns said when he addressed the media Tuesday, it is not always easy to find players via trade this time of year.

Even so, the Cubs found a much-needed starter late Wednesday night. Maybe the Mets can find one, too.